<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_1656212</id>
	<title>Smartphones Receive Holy Blessing</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263322200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>jeffmeden writes <i>"Plow Monday is normally for blessing laborers and their tools; as the name suggests it is aimed at those who work the land.  A church service in London, England Monday decided to go after a more modern audience: office workers and their modern communication gadgets.  From the Times article: 'The congregation at St Lawrence Jewry in the City of London raised their mobiles and iPods above their heads and Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation. "<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6984258.ece">May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible</a>," he said.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jeffmeden writes " Plow Monday is normally for blessing laborers and their tools ; as the name suggests it is aimed at those who work the land .
A church service in London , England Monday decided to go after a more modern audience : office workers and their modern communication gadgets .
From the Times article : 'The congregation at St Lawrence Jewry in the City of London raised their mobiles and iPods above their heads and Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation .
" May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible , " he said .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jeffmeden writes "Plow Monday is normally for blessing laborers and their tools; as the name suggests it is aimed at those who work the land.
A church service in London, England Monday decided to go after a more modern audience: office workers and their modern communication gadgets.
From the Times article: 'The congregation at St Lawrence Jewry in the City of London raised their mobiles and iPods above their heads and Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation.
"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742986</id>
	<title>Re:ebay?</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1263292200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends. Is it a +3 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS, or just a +1 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends .
Is it a + 3 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS , or just a + 1 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends.
Is it a +3 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS, or just a +1 blessed jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741714</id>
	<title>Ooookaaaayyy...</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1263328920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible...</i> </p><p>And the congregation responds: And may porn flow freely without fear of spam and malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible... And the congregation responds : And may porn flow freely without fear of spam and malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible... And the congregation responds: And may porn flow freely without fear of spam and malware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743268</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>eliphalet</author>
	<datestamp>1263293460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a slight risk of being struck by lightning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a slight risk of being struck by lightning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a slight risk of being struck by lightning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745544</id>
	<title>Blessing them is one thing ...</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1263305160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... now I want to see someone volunteer theirs to be thrown into the water for everyone to dive in and be the first to grab it. I hear that the winner is blessed with good luck for the rest of the year. Except if it was your phone thrown into the water, in which case it's probably off to a bad start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... now I want to see someone volunteer theirs to be thrown into the water for everyone to dive in and be the first to grab it .
I hear that the winner is blessed with good luck for the rest of the year .
Except if it was your phone thrown into the water , in which case it 's probably off to a bad start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... now I want to see someone volunteer theirs to be thrown into the water for everyone to dive in and be the first to grab it.
I hear that the winner is blessed with good luck for the rest of the year.
Except if it was your phone thrown into the water, in which case it's probably off to a bad start.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>AthanasiusKircher</author>
	<datestamp>1263290280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This church is called "St Lawrence Jewry"? What a confusing and possibly offensive (to Jews) name for a church. Unless there's something I'm missing about British English.</p></div><p>It's not something you're missing about "British English."  It's something you're missing about <i>history</i>.
<br> <br>
With just one search, you could have clarified the historical reasons for this.  The name dates back to a time when Jews were <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_the\_Jews\_in\_England\_(1066\%E2\%80\%931200)" title="wikipedia.org">welcomed into England</a> [wikipedia.org] (even as they were being persecuted elsewhere) after William the Conqueror arrived.  The old Jewish quarter in London includes prominent streets like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old\_Jewry" title="wikipedia.org">Old Jewry</a> [wikipedia.org] and nearby old landmarks like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St\_Lawrence\_Jewry" title="wikipedia.org">St Lawrence Jewry</a> [wikipedia.org].
<br> <br>
"Confusing"?  Potentially.  But it's a reference to an address whose name is almost a millennium old.  "Offensive"?  Only if you don't know anything about history.  It sort of reminds me of the idiots who want to remove the term "Providence Plantations" from the name of the state Rhode Island (whose official name is <a href=":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode\_Island" title="slashdot.org">"The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations"</a> [slashdot.org]), because they somehow think that "plantation" only refers to places where there were slaves.  That's not what it meant in the 17th century, when the colony was founded.
<br> <br>
Historical ignorance offends <i>me</i>.  In the name of reason, try to educate yourself before assuming that a term or name from centuries ago must be intended to offend people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This church is called " St Lawrence Jewry " ?
What a confusing and possibly offensive ( to Jews ) name for a church .
Unless there 's something I 'm missing about British English.It 's not something you 're missing about " British English .
" It 's something you 're missing about history .
With just one search , you could have clarified the historical reasons for this .
The name dates back to a time when Jews were welcomed into England [ wikipedia.org ] ( even as they were being persecuted elsewhere ) after William the Conqueror arrived .
The old Jewish quarter in London includes prominent streets like Old Jewry [ wikipedia.org ] and nearby old landmarks like St Lawrence Jewry [ wikipedia.org ] .
" Confusing " ? Potentially .
But it 's a reference to an address whose name is almost a millennium old .
" Offensive " ? Only if you do n't know anything about history .
It sort of reminds me of the idiots who want to remove the term " Providence Plantations " from the name of the state Rhode Island ( whose official name is " The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations " [ slashdot.org ] ) , because they somehow think that " plantation " only refers to places where there were slaves .
That 's not what it meant in the 17th century , when the colony was founded .
Historical ignorance offends me .
In the name of reason , try to educate yourself before assuming that a term or name from centuries ago must be intended to offend people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This church is called "St Lawrence Jewry"?
What a confusing and possibly offensive (to Jews) name for a church.
Unless there's something I'm missing about British English.It's not something you're missing about "British English.
"  It's something you're missing about history.
With just one search, you could have clarified the historical reasons for this.
The name dates back to a time when Jews were welcomed into England [wikipedia.org] (even as they were being persecuted elsewhere) after William the Conqueror arrived.
The old Jewish quarter in London includes prominent streets like Old Jewry [wikipedia.org] and nearby old landmarks like St Lawrence Jewry [wikipedia.org].
"Confusing"?  Potentially.
But it's a reference to an address whose name is almost a millennium old.
"Offensive"?  Only if you don't know anything about history.
It sort of reminds me of the idiots who want to remove the term "Providence Plantations" from the name of the state Rhode Island (whose official name is "The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations" [slashdot.org]), because they somehow think that "plantation" only refers to places where there were slaves.
That's not what it meant in the 17th century, when the colony was founded.
Historical ignorance offends me.
In the name of reason, try to educate yourself before assuming that a term or name from centuries ago must be intended to offend people.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741060</id>
	<title>Act of God</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1263326220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>""May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said." Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" " May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible , " he said .
" Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said.
" Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742180</id>
	<title>ebay?</title>
	<author>stokessd</author>
	<datestamp>1263288000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how much more does a BLESSED jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS sell for on ebay?</p><p>Sheldon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how much more does a BLESSED jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS sell for on ebay ? Sheldon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how much more does a BLESSED jailbroken unlocked iPhone 3GS sell for on ebay?Sheldon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263287340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not assistance they ask for, it is that the tool doesn't break/crash or become otherwise inoperable and IMHO that approach is less absurd and hints at the users humility.</p><p>How much did a plow cost back in the day? If it broke? Without it you and the rest of the family would have a hard time to live.</p><p>Now the absurd is that iPod's and the like should not be included. A persons main computer or server farm that pays the families bill... hell yes.</p><p>But then again most modern people may be Atheists and could care less.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not assistance they ask for , it is that the tool does n't break/crash or become otherwise inoperable and IMHO that approach is less absurd and hints at the users humility.How much did a plow cost back in the day ?
If it broke ?
Without it you and the rest of the family would have a hard time to live.Now the absurd is that iPod 's and the like should not be included .
A persons main computer or server farm that pays the families bill... hell yes.But then again most modern people may be Atheists and could care less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not assistance they ask for, it is that the tool doesn't break/crash or become otherwise inoperable and IMHO that approach is less absurd and hints at the users humility.How much did a plow cost back in the day?
If it broke?
Without it you and the rest of the family would have a hard time to live.Now the absurd is that iPod's and the like should not be included.
A persons main computer or server farm that pays the families bill... hell yes.But then again most modern people may be Atheists and could care less.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746442</id>
	<title>Only 38k to go....</title>
	<author>ihaveamo</author>
	<datestamp>1263311760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before 40k!  Sure, its just a simple blessing now, but I see the beginnings of the <a href="http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Machine\_Spirit" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">Adeptus Mechanicus </a> [wikia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before 40k !
Sure , its just a simple blessing now , but I see the beginnings of the Adeptus Mechanicus [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before 40k!
Sure, its just a simple blessing now, but I see the beginnings of the Adeptus Mechanicus  [wikia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742148</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Jonathunder</author>
	<datestamp>1263287820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The name is a reference to its location.</p><p>From its <a href="http://www.slj.btik.com/p\_About\_Us.ikml" title="btik.com">website</a> [btik.com]:</p><p>"St. Lawrence was first built in 1136 in the east end of London in the old Jewish quarter..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The name is a reference to its location.From its website [ btik.com ] : " St. Lawrence was first built in 1136 in the east end of London in the old Jewish quarter... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The name is a reference to its location.From its website [btik.com]:"St. Lawrence was first built in 1136 in the east end of London in the old Jewish quarter..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742020</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263287220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They didn't <i>just</i> call it that, you know.  Buildings in Europe can be centuries old, back when attitudes or conventions were different.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St\_Lawrence\_Jewry" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Enlighten thyself.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't just call it that , you know .
Buildings in Europe can be centuries old , back when attitudes or conventions were different .
Enlighten thyself .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't just call it that, you know.
Buildings in Europe can be centuries old, back when attitudes or conventions were different.
Enlighten thyself.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050</id>
	<title>How is this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this not Idle material? Or better yet trash can material. Who cares what some inane irrelevant church is doing in whatever part of the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this not Idle material ?
Or better yet trash can material .
Who cares what some inane irrelevant church is doing in whatever part of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this not Idle material?
Or better yet trash can material.
Who cares what some inane irrelevant church is doing in whatever part of the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742730</id>
	<title>Glad to see he respected the Book of Armaments</title>
	<author>serutan</author>
	<datestamp>1263290940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible."</i></p><p>"Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible .
" " Three shall be the number thou shalt count , and the number of the counting shall be three .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible.
""Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741858</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The church in in the financial district of London. The people with the phones are the moneychangers of the day. Irony abounds. Most of their colleagues probably are believers of the religion known as the Free Market and bathe at the Temple of the Greenback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The church in in the financial district of London .
The people with the phones are the moneychangers of the day .
Irony abounds .
Most of their colleagues probably are believers of the religion known as the Free Market and bathe at the Temple of the Greenback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The church in in the financial district of London.
The people with the phones are the moneychangers of the day.
Irony abounds.
Most of their colleagues probably are believers of the religion known as the Free Market and bathe at the Temple of the Greenback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741980</id>
	<title>The missing verse of Genesis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263287040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yae, and on the 8th day did God twit pics of his Son's birthday party</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yae , and on the 8th day did God twit pics of his Son 's birthday party</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yae, and on the 8th day did God twit pics of his Son's birthday party</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741234</id>
	<title>Read as:</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1263327000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone is trying to hard to be 'relevant'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone is trying to hard to be 'relevant' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone is trying to hard to be 'relevant'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741600</id>
	<title>Which one???</title>
	<author>Ipeunipig</author>
	<datestamp>1263328440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which one of the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse is this going to call into action?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which one of the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse is this going to call into action ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which one of the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse is this going to call into action?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742286</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263288420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's where they make jews.  Duh.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's where they make jews .
Duh.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's where they make jews.
Duh.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741892</id>
	<title>Fp CUM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">on ba3y...don't H0w is the GNAA</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>on ba3y...do n't H0w is the GNAA [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on ba3y...don't H0w is the GNAA [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743762</id>
	<title>Re:random thoughts...</title>
	<author>Cruciform</author>
	<datestamp>1263295920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>READY<br>ATDT 1888RINGGOD<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>CONNECTED<br>LOGIN: Are you there God, it's me M--$Y\%#NO CARRIER</p><p>READY<br>AT<br>ATDT 1888RINGGOD<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>CONNECTED</p><p>Welcome to the 4Chan BBS.<br>What? You thought you were going to talk to Sky God Crankypants? LOLZ.<br>Commandments:<br>1. Do as thou wilt.<br>2. For the lulz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>READYATDT 1888RINGGOD ...CONNECTEDLOGIN : Are you there God , it 's me M-- $ Y \ % # NO CARRIERREADYATATDT 1888RINGGOD ...CONNECTEDWelcome to the 4Chan BBS.What ?
You thought you were going to talk to Sky God Crankypants ?
LOLZ.Commandments : 1. Do as thou wilt.2 .
For the lulz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>READYATDT 1888RINGGOD ...CONNECTEDLOGIN: Are you there God, it's me M--$Y\%#NO CARRIERREADYATATDT 1888RINGGOD ...CONNECTEDWelcome to the 4Chan BBS.What?
You thought you were going to talk to Sky God Crankypants?
LOLZ.Commandments:1. Do as thou wilt.2.
For the lulz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741292</id>
	<title>Not to be left out...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something similar was tried recently at a Synagogue - the laptops got paraded around on chairs, the iPods were wrapped in a handkerchief and stepped on and the cell phones got the end of their antennas cut off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something similar was tried recently at a Synagogue - the laptops got paraded around on chairs , the iPods were wrapped in a handkerchief and stepped on and the cell phones got the end of their antennas cut off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something similar was tried recently at a Synagogue - the laptops got paraded around on chairs, the iPods were wrapped in a handkerchief and stepped on and the cell phones got the end of their antennas cut off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741350</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Dogbertius</author>
	<datestamp>1263327480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Because then I couldn't listen to the commentary..."
-Dilbert episode on Dogbert Day</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Because then I could n't listen to the commentary... " -Dilbert episode on Dogbert Day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Because then I couldn't listen to the commentary..."
-Dilbert episode on Dogbert Day</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741014</id>
	<title>Once again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another example of why organized religion is bullshit.</p><p>On another note: 10\% of the world controls 90\% of the rest. Have a good day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another example of why organized religion is bullshit.On another note : 10 \ % of the world controls 90 \ % of the rest .
Have a good day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another example of why organized religion is bullshit.On another note: 10\% of the world controls 90\% of the rest.
Have a good day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741130</id>
	<title>Parrot Parrott</title>
	<author>Max(10)</author>
	<datestamp>1263326520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation. "May our tongues <b>be</b> gentle, our e-mails <b>be</b> simple and our websites <b>be</b> accessible," he said.</p></div><p>I hope I don't go to hell for this, but Canon Parrott sounds a bit like a parrot.<br>May redundancy be gone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation .
" May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible , " he said.I hope I do n't go to hell for this , but Canon Parrott sounds a bit like a parrot.May redundancy be gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation.
"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said.I hope I don't go to hell for this, but Canon Parrott sounds a bit like a parrot.May redundancy be gone.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741208</id>
	<title>Spo86e</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the future of the I 3on't bore you</htmltext>
<tokenext>the future of the I 3o n't bore you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the future of the I 3on't bore you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740984</id>
	<title>hardcampa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263325980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RESPEKT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RESPEKT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RESPEKT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744600</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1263299880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd love to reject bug report or complaint if they returned it for repairs - "User Error - didn't pray hard enough"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to reject bug report or complaint if they returned it for repairs - " User Error - did n't pray hard enough " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to reject bug report or complaint if they returned it for repairs - "User Error - didn't pray hard enough"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742892</id>
	<title>Re:Which one???</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1263291720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All four, of course:</p><p>Conquest: viruses and worms<br>War: rootkits and trojans<br>Famine: DoS attacks<br>Death: Blue Screen (or Kernel Panic for Linux users)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All four , of course : Conquest : viruses and wormsWar : rootkits and trojansFamine : DoS attacksDeath : Blue Screen ( or Kernel Panic for Linux users )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All four, of course:Conquest: viruses and wormsWar: rootkits and trojansFamine: DoS attacksDeath: Blue Screen (or Kernel Panic for Linux users)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744060</id>
	<title>Redundant</title>
	<author>mosb1000</author>
	<datestamp>1263297180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The content of your post is implied in all Slashdot stories, since there inevitably is someone who will find anything irrelevant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The content of your post is implied in all Slashdot stories , since there inevitably is someone who will find anything irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The content of your post is implied in all Slashdot stories, since there inevitably is someone who will find anything irrelevant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745550</id>
	<title>seeking darkened enlightenment</title>
	<author>ewertz</author>
	<datestamp>1263305220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Must... bury... head... deeper...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Must... bury... head... deeper.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must... bury... head... deeper...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741094</id>
	<title>Slashdotting</title>
	<author>0racle</author>
	<datestamp>1263326340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that make Slashdotting a site a Satanic ritual now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that make Slashdotting a site a Satanic ritual now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that make Slashdotting a site a Satanic ritual now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742478</id>
	<title>Might as well add to it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May our blue screens be few,<br>our mice glide smooth and true,<br>and our online play be free of lag.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...And may that fucking paper clip burn in hell for all eternity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May our blue screens be few,our mice glide smooth and true,and our online play be free of lag .
...And may that fucking paper clip burn in hell for all eternity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May our blue screens be few,our mice glide smooth and true,and our online play be free of lag.
...And may that fucking paper clip burn in hell for all eternity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30750208</id>
	<title>Re:Turn in your nerd card.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263396900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.</p></div><p>Nope. Here's a tip for you: there's all kinds of people being nerds. Some are Christian, some are Muslims, some are Jews, some are Hindu, some are Buddhist, some are Satanist, some are Paganist, some are Taoist, some are Hedonist, Some are Deist, some are Theist, some are Gnostic, some are Agnostic, some are Atheist and so on...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and like you've already shown; some are Idiots<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>So you see not everyone is like yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.Nope .
Here 's a tip for you : there 's all kinds of people being nerds .
Some are Christian , some are Muslims , some are Jews , some are Hindu , some are Buddhist , some are Satanist , some are Paganist , some are Taoist , some are Hedonist , Some are Deist , some are Theist , some are Gnostic , some are Agnostic , some are Atheist and so on... ...and like you 've already shown ; some are Idiots : DSo you see not everyone is like yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.Nope.
Here's a tip for you: there's all kinds of people being nerds.
Some are Christian, some are Muslims, some are Jews, some are Hindu, some are Buddhist, some are Satanist, some are Paganist, some are Taoist, some are Hedonist, Some are Deist, some are Theist, some are Gnostic, some are Agnostic, some are Atheist and so on... ...and like you've already shown; some are Idiots :DSo you see not everyone is like yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</id>
	<title>Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This church is called "St Lawrence Jewry"? What a confusing and possibly offensive (to Jews) name for a church. Unless there's something I'm missing about British English.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This church is called " St Lawrence Jewry " ?
What a confusing and possibly offensive ( to Jews ) name for a church .
Unless there 's something I 'm missing about British English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This church is called "St Lawrence Jewry"?
What a confusing and possibly offensive (to Jews) name for a church.
Unless there's something I'm missing about British English.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745190</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Rufty</author>
	<datestamp>1263303120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And another old name that should not be forgot: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gropecunt\_Lane" title="wikipedia.org">here</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>And another old name that should not be forgot : here [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And another old name that should not be forgot: here [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741438</id>
	<title>random thoughts...</title>
	<author>Theodore</author>
	<datestamp>1263327780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, would the sound of a 300 baud modem connecting be equivalent to Gregorian chant now?<br>Is renewing DHCP equivalent to confession and absolution?<br>Is SMTP prayer?  What does God do when you spam him?<br>Does your firewall have an angel with a flaming sword?  Ours does.<br>And should they really be using wireless if Lucifer is the Lord of the Air?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , would the sound of a 300 baud modem connecting be equivalent to Gregorian chant now ? Is renewing DHCP equivalent to confession and absolution ? Is SMTP prayer ?
What does God do when you spam him ? Does your firewall have an angel with a flaming sword ?
Ours does.And should they really be using wireless if Lucifer is the Lord of the Air ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, would the sound of a 300 baud modem connecting be equivalent to Gregorian chant now?Is renewing DHCP equivalent to confession and absolution?Is SMTP prayer?
What does God do when you spam him?Does your firewall have an angel with a flaming sword?
Ours does.And should they really be using wireless if Lucifer is the Lord of the Air?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741700</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1263328860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends. Apple users will first pray to Jobs, and only then resort to an alternative deity. The reason for this is of course that Jobs introduced the iPhone by raising it above his head. So at the very least, the reason for waving the object in the air may vary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends .
Apple users will first pray to Jobs , and only then resort to an alternative deity .
The reason for this is of course that Jobs introduced the iPhone by raising it above his head .
So at the very least , the reason for waving the object in the air may vary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends.
Apple users will first pray to Jobs, and only then resort to an alternative deity.
The reason for this is of course that Jobs introduced the iPhone by raising it above his head.
So at the very least, the reason for waving the object in the air may vary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946</id>
	<title>Has anyone noticed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263325860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741264</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1263327120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its worth points so long as you show up or something.  I can understand faith but religion is strange sometimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its worth points so long as you show up or something .
I can understand faith but religion is strange sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its worth points so long as you show up or something.
I can understand faith but religion is strange sometimes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742862</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?!?!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263291600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is that not an assistance? They try to control their chosen deity to perform tricks for them, after all (there's no humility in that BTW)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is that not an assistance ?
They try to control their chosen deity to perform tricks for them , after all ( there 's no humility in that BTW )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is that not an assistance?
They try to control their chosen deity to perform tricks for them, after all (there's no humility in that BTW)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741142</id>
	<title>Re:Act of God</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1263326580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, forgot the line breaks.  Work needs to stop mandating IE6 so I can see my previews<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;p<br>
<br>
Edited Post:<br>
""May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said."<br>
Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , forgot the line breaks .
Work needs to stop mandating IE6 so I can see my previews ; p Edited Post : " " May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible , " he said .
" Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, forgot the line breaks.
Work needs to stop mandating IE6 so I can see my previews ;p

Edited Post:
""May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said.
"
Not sure all that will happen without an Act of God...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743792</id>
	<title>May the websites be accessible?</title>
	<author>mangu</author>
	<datestamp>1263296040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew it! Slashdotting is the work of the Evil One!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it !
Slashdotting is the work of the Evil One !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it!
Slashdotting is the work of the Evil One!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742792</id>
	<title>Erh, praying?</title>
	<author>Silas is back</author>
	<datestamp>1263291180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"May [...] our websites be accessible"</p></div><p> <b>URL:</b> <a href="http://www.london-city-churches.org.uk/Churches/St\%20Lawrence\%20Jewry.htm" title="london-cit...hes.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.london-city-churches.org.uk/Churches/St\%20Lawrence\%20Jewry.htm</a> [london-cit...hes.org.uk] <br>
<b>meta name="GENERATOR":</b> Microsoft FrontPage 12.0</p><p>I'm pretty sure that praying is absolutely useless, especially in this case...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" May [ ... ] our websites be accessible " URL : http : //www.london-city-churches.org.uk/Churches/St \ % 20Lawrence \ % 20Jewry.htm [ london-cit...hes.org.uk ] meta name = " GENERATOR " : Microsoft FrontPage 12.0I 'm pretty sure that praying is absolutely useless , especially in this case.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May [...] our websites be accessible" URL: http://www.london-city-churches.org.uk/Churches/St\%20Lawrence\%20Jewry.htm [london-cit...hes.org.uk] 
meta name="GENERATOR": Microsoft FrontPage 12.0I'm pretty sure that praying is absolutely useless, especially in this case...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742414</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone noticed...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263289260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has anyone ever seen sampenzus and Katz in the same place at the same time? Could they actually be... one and the same?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone ever seen sampenzus and Katz in the same place at the same time ?
Could they actually be... one and the same ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone ever seen sampenzus and Katz in the same place at the same time?
Could they actually be... one and the same?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741656</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone noticed...</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1263328680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be?</p></div><p>No, but Samzenpus articles are ones I tend to automatically skip.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be ? No , but Samzenpus articles are ones I tend to automatically skip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be?No, but Samzenpus articles are ones I tend to automatically skip.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042</id>
	<title>TFA</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1263326160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible"</p><p>Maybe they could start with TFA..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible " Maybe they could start with TFA. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible"Maybe they could start with TFA..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742522</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1263289740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would the word jewry be offensive?</p><p>As for confusing, well, the relationships between religions are confusing.  The various Christian sects and their relationship to Judaism particularly so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would the word jewry be offensive ? As for confusing , well , the relationships between religions are confusing .
The various Christian sects and their relationship to Judaism particularly so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would the word jewry be offensive?As for confusing, well, the relationships between religions are confusing.
The various Christian sects and their relationship to Judaism particularly so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741772</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>PGOER</author>
	<datestamp>1263329280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's got to be a Monty Python joke in here somewhere.  Personally I think Holy hand grenades are much more entertaining.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's got to be a Monty Python joke in here somewhere .
Personally I think Holy hand grenades are much more entertaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's got to be a Monty Python joke in here somewhere.
Personally I think Holy hand grenades are much more entertaining.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741306</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>musichead</author>
	<datestamp>1263327300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not terribly odd - the church has been in the practice of blessing man's vices for some time.  The church has a hostory of blessing pipes, why not tech gadgets?  <a href="http://theophiliacs.com/2009/01/24/theology-and-pipe-smoking-part-ii/" title="theophiliacs.com" rel="nofollow">http://theophiliacs.com/2009/01/24/theology-and-pipe-smoking-part-ii/</a> [theophiliacs.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not terribly odd - the church has been in the practice of blessing man 's vices for some time .
The church has a hostory of blessing pipes , why not tech gadgets ?
http : //theophiliacs.com/2009/01/24/theology-and-pipe-smoking-part-ii/ [ theophiliacs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not terribly odd - the church has been in the practice of blessing man's vices for some time.
The church has a hostory of blessing pipes, why not tech gadgets?
http://theophiliacs.com/2009/01/24/theology-and-pipe-smoking-part-ii/ [theophiliacs.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742208</id>
	<title>Voices from the Hellmouth</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1263288120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/99/04/25/1438249.shtml" title="slashdot.org">I don't think you remember how bad it was.</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>Until what's-his-nuts cashes is in like a prime time cable news anchor (or even worse, Nancy Grace) on the suffering of others by retreading the same old bullshit ideas, then he won't hold a candle to the inferno of dumb <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/17/204207" title="slashdot.org">that was</a> [slashdot.org], and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Soul-Dog-Reflections-Spirits-Animals/dp/1400066298" title="amazon.com">sadly is</a> [amazon.com], Jon Katz.</p><p>Thankfully he had the sense to <a href="http://www.bedlamfarm.com/blog/" title="bedlamfarm.com">put himself out to pasture.</a> [bedlamfarm.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you remember how bad it was .
[ slashdot.org ] Until what 's-his-nuts cashes is in like a prime time cable news anchor ( or even worse , Nancy Grace ) on the suffering of others by retreading the same old bullshit ideas , then he wo n't hold a candle to the inferno of dumb that was [ slashdot.org ] , and sadly is [ amazon.com ] , Jon Katz.Thankfully he had the sense to put himself out to pasture .
[ bedlamfarm.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you remember how bad it was.
[slashdot.org]Until what's-his-nuts cashes is in like a prime time cable news anchor (or even worse, Nancy Grace) on the suffering of others by retreading the same old bullshit ideas, then he won't hold a candle to the inferno of dumb that was [slashdot.org], and sadly is [amazon.com], Jon Katz.Thankfully he had the sense to put himself out to pasture.
[bedlamfarm.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741522</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1263328080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as you're paying enough attention to drop the money into the collection plate when it comes along, you can do whatever you want.  Folding money only, cheapskate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as you 're paying enough attention to drop the money into the collection plate when it comes along , you can do whatever you want .
Folding money only , cheapskate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as you're paying enough attention to drop the money into the collection plate when it comes along, you can do whatever you want.
Folding money only, cheapskate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748120</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263374040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine?</p></div></blockquote><p>

After tech support couldn't figure out their problem this was their next best idea.<br> <br>

Personally I prefer GOOG to God, as GOOG usually answers me when I ask it a question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine ?
After tech support could n't figure out their problem this was their next best idea .
Personally I prefer GOOG to God , as GOOG usually answers me when I ask it a question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine?
After tech support couldn't figure out their problem this was their next best idea.
Personally I prefer GOOG to God, as GOOG usually answers me when I ask it a question.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743438</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>blurryrunner</author>
	<datestamp>1263294180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are actually some good scripture apps out there so you don't have carry the analog versions around...

br/</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are actually some good scripture apps out there so you do n't have carry the analog versions around.. . br/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are actually some good scripture apps out there so you don't have carry the analog versions around...

br/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743920</id>
	<title>Blessed cell phone = holy texting</title>
	<author>da cog</author>
	<datestamp>1263296580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, talk about progress!  It used to be that if you wanted to see whether someone was a vampire you would have force them into holding a Bible to see if it burns their hands, but now all that you have to do is to bless your cell phone and then use it to send them a holy text!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , talk about progress !
It used to be that if you wanted to see whether someone was a vampire you would have force them into holding a Bible to see if it burns their hands , but now all that you have to do is to bless your cell phone and then use it to send them a holy text !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, talk about progress!
It used to be that if you wanted to see whether someone was a vampire you would have force them into holding a Bible to see if it burns their hands, but now all that you have to do is to bless your cell phone and then use it to send them a holy text!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</id>
	<title>The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...raised their mobiles and <b>iPods</b> above their heads</i></p><p>Taking your iPod to church? Why? So you can play games and listen to music instead of the sermon?</p><p>Religion sure is a weird business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...raised their mobiles and iPods above their headsTaking your iPod to church ?
Why ? So you can play games and listen to music instead of the sermon ? Religion sure is a weird business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...raised their mobiles and iPods above their headsTaking your iPod to church?
Why? So you can play games and listen to music instead of the sermon?Religion sure is a weird business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745154</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1263302940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, the rest of us are using iPod as a generic term so that Apple will lose its trademark protection and we can watch the Apple fanboys squirm at Sony iPods.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the rest of us are using iPod as a generic term so that Apple will lose its trademark protection and we can watch the Apple fanboys squirm at Sony iPods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the rest of us are using iPod as a generic term so that Apple will lose its trademark protection and we can watch the Apple fanboys squirm at Sony iPods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741392</id>
	<title>Technical support</title>
	<author>ilsaloving</author>
	<datestamp>1263327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After examining many badly managed and virus ridden machines, I've often declared that nothing short of a reformat and an exorcism is going to get it working again.</p><p>It's nice to know that *someone* is finally following through with my recommendations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After examining many badly managed and virus ridden machines , I 've often declared that nothing short of a reformat and an exorcism is going to get it working again.It 's nice to know that * someone * is finally following through with my recommendations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After examining many badly managed and virus ridden machines, I've often declared that nothing short of a reformat and an exorcism is going to get it working again.It's nice to know that *someone* is finally following through with my recommendations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you can clearly see that he is a total Apple fanboi. Else he would have said &ldquo;MP3 players&ldquo;, and not iPods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you can clearly see that he is a total Apple fanboi .
Else he would have said    MP3 players    , and not iPods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you can clearly see that he is a total Apple fanboi.
Else he would have said “MP3 players“, and not iPods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741328</id>
	<title>4You fail 1t.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the public eye: Of businesS and was then disappeared</htmltext>
<tokenext>the public eye : Of businesS and was then disappeared</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the public eye: Of businesS and was then disappeared</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</id>
	<title>Absurd?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741744</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1263329100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you can say a short prayer, something like this:<br>"Hail Steve, full of grace, the turtleneck is with thee. Blessed art thou among fanboys, and blessed is the fruit of thy twisted mind, for thou hast borne the savior of our social lives."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you can say a short prayer , something like this : " Hail Steve , full of grace , the turtleneck is with thee .
Blessed art thou among fanboys , and blessed is the fruit of thy twisted mind , for thou hast borne the savior of our social lives .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can say a short prayer, something like this:"Hail Steve, full of grace, the turtleneck is with thee.
Blessed art thou among fanboys, and blessed is the fruit of thy twisted mind, for thou hast borne the savior of our social lives.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742328</id>
	<title>We shouldn't call on Him 4 such modern commodities</title>
	<author>Christmas</author>
	<datestamp>1263288660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Lord, Himself, has not created these modern commodities that we use today. How can one even *think* of calling upon our God with prayers about "emails" or "the Internet" and other man-made things. We shall pray for the well-being of ourselves and others, for forgiveness of sins, etc. In fact, the new testament tells us *how* we should pray..</p><p>"Our Father, who art in heaven. Hallowed by Thy name. Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil..... For the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory are yours now and forever! Amen"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Lord , Himself , has not created these modern commodities that we use today .
How can one even * think * of calling upon our God with prayers about " emails " or " the Internet " and other man-made things .
We shall pray for the well-being of ourselves and others , for forgiveness of sins , etc .
In fact , the new testament tells us * how * we should pray.. " Our Father , who art in heaven .
Hallowed by Thy name .
Thy Kingdom come , Thy will be done , on Earth as it is in heaven .
Give us this day our daily bread , and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us .
And lead us not into temptation , but deliver us from evil..... For the Kingdom , the Power , and the Glory are yours now and forever !
Amen "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Lord, Himself, has not created these modern commodities that we use today.
How can one even *think* of calling upon our God with prayers about "emails" or "the Internet" and other man-made things.
We shall pray for the well-being of ourselves and others, for forgiveness of sins, etc.
In fact, the new testament tells us *how* we should pray.."Our Father, who art in heaven.
Hallowed by Thy name.
Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil..... For the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory are yours now and forever!
Amen"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743638</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>Obyron</author>
	<datestamp>1263295200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention that referring to the whole state as Rhode Island would make about as much sense as referring to the the whole of New York state as "Manhattan Island," or renaming Virginia to "Chincoteague Island." The state literally is Providence Plantation on land, as well as Rhode Island. For a similar concept see "Newfoundland and Labrador." These people don't just fail history, they fail geography.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that referring to the whole state as Rhode Island would make about as much sense as referring to the the whole of New York state as " Manhattan Island , " or renaming Virginia to " Chincoteague Island .
" The state literally is Providence Plantation on land , as well as Rhode Island .
For a similar concept see " Newfoundland and Labrador .
" These people do n't just fail history , they fail geography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that referring to the whole state as Rhode Island would make about as much sense as referring to the the whole of New York state as "Manhattan Island," or renaming Virginia to "Chincoteague Island.
" The state literally is Providence Plantation on land, as well as Rhode Island.
For a similar concept see "Newfoundland and Labrador.
" These people don't just fail history, they fail geography.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742474</id>
	<title>Proper English</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>British English? I think you mean English, the proper and correct form of the language.</p><p>It's not like one of those bastard dialects like American English or Australian English.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>British English ?
I think you mean English , the proper and correct form of the language.It 's not like one of those bastard dialects like American English or Australian English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>British English?
I think you mean English, the proper and correct form of the language.It's not like one of those bastard dialects like American English or Australian English.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743856</id>
	<title>Re:Are they serious?</title>
	<author>malp</author>
	<datestamp>1263296280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously! Like when the band Anthrax renamed themselves after the poisoned letters scare. Pretty much everyone's forgotten about the scare, and no one knows the band's new name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
Like when the band Anthrax renamed themselves after the poisoned letters scare .
Pretty much everyone 's forgotten about the scare , and no one knows the band 's new name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
Like when the band Anthrax renamed themselves after the poisoned letters scare.
Pretty much everyone's forgotten about the scare, and no one knows the band's new name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745386</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>akpoff</author>
	<datestamp>1263304260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It really started with Saint Attila:<blockquote><div><p>And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits, in Thy mercy."</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy\_Hand\_Grenade\_of\_Antioch" title="wikipedia.org">Book of Armaments, Chapter 2, verses 9-21</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It really started with Saint Attila : And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high , saying , " O Lord , bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits , in Thy mercy .
" Book of Armaments , Chapter 2 , verses 9-21 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really started with Saint Attila:And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits, in Thy mercy.
" Book of Armaments, Chapter 2, verses 9-21 [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741102</id>
	<title>Re:How is this</title>
	<author>Lunix Nutcase</author>
	<datestamp>1263326400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's idle material for sure.  The problem is that sampenzus has a bad habit of posting his crap outside of idle because he knows that 99.9\% of slashdotters blocks that section.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's idle material for sure .
The problem is that sampenzus has a bad habit of posting his crap outside of idle because he knows that 99.9 \ % of slashdotters blocks that section .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's idle material for sure.
The problem is that sampenzus has a bad habit of posting his crap outside of idle because he knows that 99.9\% of slashdotters blocks that section.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741338</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Malc</author>
	<datestamp>1263327420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you make an assumption and assertion like that?  Most people use their iPods to create their own little bubble on the Tube (e.g. going to the Church) and elsewhere in this crowded city and island.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you make an assumption and assertion like that ?
Most people use their iPods to create their own little bubble on the Tube ( e.g .
going to the Church ) and elsewhere in this crowded city and island .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you make an assumption and assertion like that?
Most people use their iPods to create their own little bubble on the Tube (e.g.
going to the Church) and elsewhere in this crowded city and island.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742130</id>
	<title>Exorcism for Windows viruses</title>
	<author>Jon\_Hanson</author>
	<datestamp>1263287760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They need an exorcism ritual for Windows viruses as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They need an exorcism ritual for Windows viruses as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need an exorcism ritual for Windows viruses as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742266</id>
	<title>Re:Turn in your nerd card.</title>
	<author>Chicken\_Kickers</author>
	<datestamp>1263288360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the hell are you talking about? People with religious beliefs are one of the original nerds. For example, there are many Muslims who have memorised the entire Quran, word for word and could recite to you any verse on command, the same way some nerds can memorise the entire script of Star Wars Episode IV. Medieval Christian monks can spend years on end, nerdily copying and decorating manuscripts by hand. The word "canon" came from the Catholic faith and has been adopted by geeky Wookiepedia, Memory Alpha writers  and basically any long-running TV show fans. Most of those said TV shows, especially sci-fi ones, have elements of Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman, Egyptian, Hindu etc. myths. Don't conflate nerdism and technophilia exclusively with atheism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell are you talking about ?
People with religious beliefs are one of the original nerds .
For example , there are many Muslims who have memorised the entire Quran , word for word and could recite to you any verse on command , the same way some nerds can memorise the entire script of Star Wars Episode IV .
Medieval Christian monks can spend years on end , nerdily copying and decorating manuscripts by hand .
The word " canon " came from the Catholic faith and has been adopted by geeky Wookiepedia , Memory Alpha writers and basically any long-running TV show fans .
Most of those said TV shows , especially sci-fi ones , have elements of Judeo-Christian , Greco-Roman , Egyptian , Hindu etc .
myths. Do n't conflate nerdism and technophilia exclusively with atheism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell are you talking about?
People with religious beliefs are one of the original nerds.
For example, there are many Muslims who have memorised the entire Quran, word for word and could recite to you any verse on command, the same way some nerds can memorise the entire script of Star Wars Episode IV.
Medieval Christian monks can spend years on end, nerdily copying and decorating manuscripts by hand.
The word "canon" came from the Catholic faith and has been adopted by geeky Wookiepedia, Memory Alpha writers  and basically any long-running TV show fans.
Most of those said TV shows, especially sci-fi ones, have elements of Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman, Egyptian, Hindu etc.
myths. Don't conflate nerdism and technophilia exclusively with atheism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747990</id>
	<title>Re:Read as:</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1263415620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. Don't we all?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
Do n't we all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
Don't we all?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745582</id>
	<title>Re:Exorcism for Windows viruses</title>
	<author>Anci3nt of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1263305400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Format c:/</p><p>Solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Format c : /Solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Format c:/Solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747980</id>
	<title>Re:How is this</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1263415500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thou shalt not worship false idles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thou shalt not worship false idles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thou shalt not worship false idles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742654</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone noticed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263290520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, because samzenpus is fantastic compared to kdawson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because samzenpus is fantastic compared to kdawson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because samzenpus is fantastic compared to kdawson.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746060</id>
	<title>Re:How is this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263308460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever you think of Christianity, its a bit daft to call it irrelevant since one third of the world's population is Christian and therefore a huge influence on world events. Even if you don't like it Christianity has a lot of influence on many aspects of your life that you do not have control over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever you think of Christianity , its a bit daft to call it irrelevant since one third of the world 's population is Christian and therefore a huge influence on world events .
Even if you do n't like it Christianity has a lot of influence on many aspects of your life that you do not have control over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever you think of Christianity, its a bit daft to call it irrelevant since one third of the world's population is Christian and therefore a huge influence on world events.
Even if you don't like it Christianity has a lot of influence on many aspects of your life that you do not have control over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746006</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>quadelirus</author>
	<datestamp>1263308100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually blessing of inanimate objects are prayers asking God that the objects will aid us in His service, not that they won't break.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually blessing of inanimate objects are prayers asking God that the objects will aid us in His service , not that they wo n't break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually blessing of inanimate objects are prayers asking God that the objects will aid us in His service, not that they won't break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744176</id>
	<title>Re:Once again!</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1263297720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Another example of why organized religion is bullshit."</i>
<br> <br>
No, this is an example of why <i>some</i> organized religion is bullshit.
<br> <br>
It's the Church of England for god's sake, what did you expect?  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English\_Reformation" title="wikipedia.org">It was created so a king could get a divorce</a> [wikipedia.org] and it's been a joke ever since.
<br> <br>
What if Obama created Church of America, would anyone care?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Another example of why organized religion is bullshit .
" No , this is an example of why some organized religion is bullshit .
It 's the Church of England for god 's sake , what did you expect ?
It was created so a king could get a divorce [ wikipedia.org ] and it 's been a joke ever since .
What if Obama created Church of America , would anyone care ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Another example of why organized religion is bullshit.
"
 
No, this is an example of why some organized religion is bullshit.
It's the Church of England for god's sake, what did you expect?
It was created so a king could get a divorce [wikipedia.org] and it's been a joke ever since.
What if Obama created Church of America, would anyone care?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741454</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Believe it or not, we church goers don't teleport from home to church &amp; back again. We might walk there, or possibly drive, and then maybe be crazy and go somewhere else after wards. What are we supposed to do, leave the things at the door?</p><p>They do have off buttons you know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe it or not , we church goers do n't teleport from home to church &amp; back again .
We might walk there , or possibly drive , and then maybe be crazy and go somewhere else after wards .
What are we supposed to do , leave the things at the door ? They do have off buttons you know : o )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe it or not, we church goers don't teleport from home to church &amp; back again.
We might walk there, or possibly drive, and then maybe be crazy and go somewhere else after wards.
What are we supposed to do, leave the things at the door?They do have off buttons you know :o)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741626</id>
	<title>Re:Absurd?</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1263328560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I regularly wave my tool in the air and pray for divine assistance. Alas, I'm still wielding it on my own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I regularly wave my tool in the air and pray for divine assistance .
Alas , I 'm still wielding it on my own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I regularly wave my tool in the air and pray for divine assistance.
Alas, I'm still wielding it on my own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748130</id>
	<title>Re:TFA</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263374160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible"</p></div></blockquote><p>

By the father, the son and the holy notebook,<br>
Amen</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" May our tongues be gentle , our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible " By the father , the son and the holy notebook , Amen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible"

By the father, the son and the holy notebook,
Amen
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741982</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263287040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, maybe they brought it because:</p><p>
&nbsp; - They're on call and that's how they receive notifications?<br>
&nbsp; - They have a Bible/Concordance app?<br>
&nbsp; - They are recording the sermon?<br>
&nbsp; - They knew that it would drive some poor sap on Slashdot into self-righteous indignation and find irony delicious?</p><p>It's hard to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , maybe they brought it because :   - They 're on call and that 's how they receive notifications ?
  - They have a Bible/Concordance app ?
  - They are recording the sermon ?
  - They knew that it would drive some poor sap on Slashdot into self-righteous indignation and find irony delicious ? It 's hard to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, maybe they brought it because:
  - They're on call and that's how they receive notifications?
  - They have a Bible/Concordance app?
  - They are recording the sermon?
  - They knew that it would drive some poor sap on Slashdot into self-righteous indignation and find irony delicious?It's hard to say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762</id>
	<title>Turn in your nerd card.</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1263329220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741738</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally I have my scriptures, hymn book, and lesson manuals on my iPhone. It's a lot more convenient than carrying around the physical books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I have my scriptures , hymn book , and lesson manuals on my iPhone .
It 's a lot more convenient than carrying around the physical books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I have my scriptures, hymn book, and lesson manuals on my iPhone.
It's a lot more convenient than carrying around the physical books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744710</id>
	<title>Re:The funny bit...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1263300540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Be glad he didn't say Iphones too (I have seen people use phrases like "Iphone-like device" to refer to a phone).</p><p>Still, I'll be amused when Apple lose their trademarks due to them becoming generic terms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Be glad he did n't say Iphones too ( I have seen people use phrases like " Iphone-like device " to refer to a phone ) .Still , I 'll be amused when Apple lose their trademarks due to them becoming generic terms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be glad he didn't say Iphones too (I have seen people use phrases like "Iphone-like device" to refer to a phone).Still, I'll be amused when Apple lose their trademarks due to them becoming generic terms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30750208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1656212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741762
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742266
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30750208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30746060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30744176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30748130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30747990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30740946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743856
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30745190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30742522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1656212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30741438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1656212.30743762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
