<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_1524216</id>
	<title>NASA Satellite Looks For Response From Dead Mars Craft</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263314520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>coondoggie writes <i>"NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter will next week make a number of passes over the <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/11/10/2257217/Phoenix-Mars-Lander-Declared-Dead">presumed dead</a> Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/011210-layer8-nasa-mars-satellite.html">possible, though improbable, radio transmissions</a>. Odyssey will pass over the Phoenix landing site about 10 times this month and two longer listening tries in February and March trying to determine if the craft survived Martian winter and <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission\_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix20100111.html">try to lock onto a signal</a> and gain information about the lander&rsquo;s status."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>coondoggie writes " NASA 's Mars Odyssey orbiter will next week make a number of passes over the presumed dead Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called possible , though improbable , radio transmissions .
Odyssey will pass over the Phoenix landing site about 10 times this month and two longer listening tries in February and March trying to determine if the craft survived Martian winter and try to lock onto a signal and gain information about the lander    s status .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coondoggie writes "NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter will next week make a number of passes over the presumed dead Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called possible, though improbable, radio transmissions.
Odyssey will pass over the Phoenix landing site about 10 times this month and two longer listening tries in February and March trying to determine if the craft survived Martian winter and try to lock onto a signal and gain information about the lander’s status.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096</id>
	<title>And so it goes</title>
	<author>jimbobborg</author>
	<datestamp>1263318960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from the craft that was splattered across the Martian Landscape, is this the shortest lived mission to Mars so far?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from the craft that was splattered across the Martian Landscape , is this the shortest lived mission to Mars so far ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from the craft that was splattered across the Martian Landscape, is this the shortest lived mission to Mars so far?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30743196</id>
	<title>Weight of ice breaks solar panels</title>
	<author>hh4m</author>
	<datestamp>1263293160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read somewhere that the solar panels wont be able to handle the mass of the ice that forms on them over winter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read somewhere that the solar panels wont be able to handle the mass of the ice that forms on them over winter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read somewhere that the solar panels wont be able to handle the mass of the ice that forms on them over winter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739800</id>
	<title>That headline...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263321480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>NASA Satellite Looks For Response From Dead Mars Craft</p></div><p>If they knew it was dead, they wouldn&rsquo;t be looking for a response from it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA Satellite Looks For Response From Dead Mars CraftIf they knew it was dead , they wouldn    t be looking for a response from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA Satellite Looks For Response From Dead Mars CraftIf they knew it was dead, they wouldn’t be looking for a response from it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740876</id>
	<title>travelling</title>
	<author>skeffstone</author>
	<datestamp>1263325560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet it initially smashed through a porous structure and entered an underground river which spans a martian continent. Now it's popping up closer to the surface and can penetrate the thin ice it is trapped under!

I could also suggest it is being carried by aliens, but that's boring if you're a scientist.
Wait.. I'm not a scientist. But I'd like to be one, so there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet it initially smashed through a porous structure and entered an underground river which spans a martian continent .
Now it 's popping up closer to the surface and can penetrate the thin ice it is trapped under !
I could also suggest it is being carried by aliens , but that 's boring if you 're a scientist .
Wait.. I 'm not a scientist .
But I 'd like to be one , so there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet it initially smashed through a porous structure and entered an underground river which spans a martian continent.
Now it's popping up closer to the surface and can penetrate the thin ice it is trapped under!
I could also suggest it is being carried by aliens, but that's boring if you're a scientist.
Wait.. I'm not a scientist.
But I'd like to be one, so there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739562</id>
	<title>It has come to this.</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1263320580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great. Now we're flying over alien planets looking for signs of artificial terrestrial life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
Now we 're flying over alien planets looking for signs of artificial terrestrial life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
Now we're flying over alien planets looking for signs of artificial terrestrial life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740430</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1263323880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.</p></div><p>It wont. The Great Noodly Appendage will be displeased with our offerings of wealth and will send our ships to their Jovian demise.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.It wont .
The Great Noodly Appendage will be displeased with our offerings of wealth and will send our ships to their Jovian demise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.It wont.
The Great Noodly Appendage will be displeased with our offerings of wealth and will send our ships to their Jovian demise.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739552</id>
	<title>Re:And so it goes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slated for 3 months, lasted for 5, so it was substantially longer than intended.  Either way, when the sun sets on a solar powered craft, the mission is over - regardless of how good the hardware is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slated for 3 months , lasted for 5 , so it was substantially longer than intended .
Either way , when the sun sets on a solar powered craft , the mission is over - regardless of how good the hardware is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slated for 3 months, lasted for 5, so it was substantially longer than intended.
Either way, when the sun sets on a solar powered craft, the mission is over - regardless of how good the hardware is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741652</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>emilper</author>
	<datestamp>1263328620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You already got to Jupiter 30 years ago<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the point is to get there and have something to do besides gawking at the beautiful colors.</p><p>AFAIK, all the interesting (like those that produces more than pretty pictures in fake colors of distant gas bags) US space projects were done, or funded, by the US military; looking at what kind of projects they finance, my bet is the next big vehicle will come either from private companies, or from the US Air Force or Navy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You already got to Jupiter 30 years ago ... the point is to get there and have something to do besides gawking at the beautiful colors.AFAIK , all the interesting ( like those that produces more than pretty pictures in fake colors of distant gas bags ) US space projects were done , or funded , by the US military ; looking at what kind of projects they finance , my bet is the next big vehicle will come either from private companies , or from the US Air Force or Navy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You already got to Jupiter 30 years ago ... the point is to get there and have something to do besides gawking at the beautiful colors.AFAIK, all the interesting (like those that produces more than pretty pictures in fake colors of distant gas bags) US space projects were done, or funded, by the US military; looking at what kind of projects they finance, my bet is the next big vehicle will come either from private companies, or from the US Air Force or Navy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739100</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263318960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.  We would be at Jupiter right now.</p></div><p>TERRORIST!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish we took 50 \ % of the money given to the military and put it into space .
We would be at Jupiter right now.TERRORIST !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.
We would be at Jupiter right now.TERRORIST!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741750</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like you have a severe case of Enlightenment. The only thing for that is to slap you until your ears ring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you have a severe case of Enlightenment .
The only thing for that is to slap you until your ears ring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you have a severe case of Enlightenment.
The only thing for that is to slap you until your ears ring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740478</id>
	<title>Re:should have send Balto!</title>
	<author>Proteus Child</author>
	<datestamp>1263324060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Moon Hamster approves of this message.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Moon Hamster approves of this message .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moon Hamster approves of this message.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739226</id>
	<title>Re:And so it goes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263319380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mission wasn't THAT short lived.  The lander transmitted for 125 days before it died.  Compared to Spirit and Opportunity yeah, that's a brief little period, but the mission wasn't a total failure.</p><p>The first lander that the Russians sent died within 1 minute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mission was n't THAT short lived .
The lander transmitted for 125 days before it died .
Compared to Spirit and Opportunity yeah , that 's a brief little period , but the mission was n't a total failure.The first lander that the Russians sent died within 1 minute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mission wasn't THAT short lived.
The lander transmitted for 125 days before it died.
Compared to Spirit and Opportunity yeah, that's a brief little period, but the mission wasn't a total failure.The first lander that the Russians sent died within 1 minute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740718</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263324960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's dead Jim!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's dead Jim !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's dead Jim!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739392</id>
	<title>Pun!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263319980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>over the presumed dead Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called possible, though improbable, radio transmissions.</p> </div><p>In other words, since its presumed dead, they're listening for the PULSE Beacon!</p><p>Haha, Aren't I clever?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>over the presumed dead Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called possible , though improbable , radio transmissions .
In other words , since its presumed dead , they 're listening for the PULSE Beacon ! Haha , Are n't I clever ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over the presumed dead Phoenix Mars Lander on the surface of the planet and listen for what the space agency called possible, though improbable, radio transmissions.
In other words, since its presumed dead, they're listening for the PULSE Beacon!Haha, Aren't I clever?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741650</id>
	<title>Re:What is the point in studying Mars?</title>
	<author>Fallen Seraph</author>
	<datestamp>1263328620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Las Vegas was in an arid desert too, what's your point?
<br> <br>
Mars is so interesting because of all the rocks out there, Mars would be shit-easy to terraform in comparison. Basically we'd pump out a whole bunch of CO2 (something we're already doing on earth, albeit as a byproduct) until the atmosphere gets a bit thicker. A thicker atmosphere traps heat better. Then we introduce vegetation to convert said CO2 into Oxygen (lots and lots and lots of algae really, that way when they die and decompose, it can be used as soil). Boom, habitable. It will take a while, but the sooner we start the sooner it'll be ready for long term colonization and exploration.
<br> <br>
Yeah, may sound a little dumb now, but realize that the Earth's current population is estimated at around 6.8 BILLION people. Currently, many areas are already suffering from over population, in the conservative projection is that we'll reach 9 Billion people around 2040 (though this assumes no major shift in the trend for deaths, such as world changing medical breakthroughs, etc).
<br> <br>
So one way or another, if we hope to continue to survive, we're not left much choice other than to expand to other planets/moons. And since Mars is relatively close, has similar gravity, and environmentally isn't much different from Earth (on the grand scale of things in the universe), terraforming it is a very real possibility.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Las Vegas was in an arid desert too , what 's your point ?
Mars is so interesting because of all the rocks out there , Mars would be shit-easy to terraform in comparison .
Basically we 'd pump out a whole bunch of CO2 ( something we 're already doing on earth , albeit as a byproduct ) until the atmosphere gets a bit thicker .
A thicker atmosphere traps heat better .
Then we introduce vegetation to convert said CO2 into Oxygen ( lots and lots and lots of algae really , that way when they die and decompose , it can be used as soil ) .
Boom , habitable .
It will take a while , but the sooner we start the sooner it 'll be ready for long term colonization and exploration .
Yeah , may sound a little dumb now , but realize that the Earth 's current population is estimated at around 6.8 BILLION people .
Currently , many areas are already suffering from over population , in the conservative projection is that we 'll reach 9 Billion people around 2040 ( though this assumes no major shift in the trend for deaths , such as world changing medical breakthroughs , etc ) .
So one way or another , if we hope to continue to survive , we 're not left much choice other than to expand to other planets/moons .
And since Mars is relatively close , has similar gravity , and environmentally is n't much different from Earth ( on the grand scale of things in the universe ) , terraforming it is a very real possibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Las Vegas was in an arid desert too, what's your point?
Mars is so interesting because of all the rocks out there, Mars would be shit-easy to terraform in comparison.
Basically we'd pump out a whole bunch of CO2 (something we're already doing on earth, albeit as a byproduct) until the atmosphere gets a bit thicker.
A thicker atmosphere traps heat better.
Then we introduce vegetation to convert said CO2 into Oxygen (lots and lots and lots of algae really, that way when they die and decompose, it can be used as soil).
Boom, habitable.
It will take a while, but the sooner we start the sooner it'll be ready for long term colonization and exploration.
Yeah, may sound a little dumb now, but realize that the Earth's current population is estimated at around 6.8 BILLION people.
Currently, many areas are already suffering from over population, in the conservative projection is that we'll reach 9 Billion people around 2040 (though this assumes no major shift in the trend for deaths, such as world changing medical breakthroughs, etc).
So one way or another, if we hope to continue to survive, we're not left much choice other than to expand to other planets/moons.
And since Mars is relatively close, has similar gravity, and environmentally isn't much different from Earth (on the grand scale of things in the universe), terraforming it is a very real possibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739770</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>flablader</author>
	<datestamp>1263321420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're already on our way (or will be in 2011, I hope).  See <a href="http://juno.wisc.edu/" title="wisc.edu" rel="nofollow">http://juno.wisc.edu/</a> [wisc.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're already on our way ( or will be in 2011 , I hope ) .
See http : //juno.wisc.edu/ [ wisc.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're already on our way (or will be in 2011, I hope).
See http://juno.wisc.edu/ [wisc.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739270</id>
	<title>Have they tried...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263319560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...poking it with a really long stick?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...poking it with a really long stick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...poking it with a really long stick?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739900</id>
	<title>Re:And so it goes</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263321900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Catastrophic failures during descent didn't really reach Mars...</p><p>The shortest lived mission that touched down was the very first lander - Soviet Mars 3 probe. Stopped transmitting after around 20 seconds (but the data that were sent and external observation suggest it had the misfortune of landing in extreme dust storm)</p><p>Phoenix Mars Lander is no failure. It was known it will cease operations quickly (might even have been under CO2 icecap during winter)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Catastrophic failures during descent did n't really reach Mars...The shortest lived mission that touched down was the very first lander - Soviet Mars 3 probe .
Stopped transmitting after around 20 seconds ( but the data that were sent and external observation suggest it had the misfortune of landing in extreme dust storm ) Phoenix Mars Lander is no failure .
It was known it will cease operations quickly ( might even have been under CO2 icecap during winter )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Catastrophic failures during descent didn't really reach Mars...The shortest lived mission that touched down was the very first lander - Soviet Mars 3 probe.
Stopped transmitting after around 20 seconds (but the data that were sent and external observation suggest it had the misfortune of landing in extreme dust storm)Phoenix Mars Lander is no failure.
It was known it will cease operations quickly (might even have been under CO2 icecap during winter)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739406</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>lopgok</author>
	<datestamp>1263320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, if we would have funded Project Orion, we would have gone to Saturn in the early 1960's. See <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/george\_dyson\_on\_project\_orion.html" title="ted.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/george\_dyson\_on\_project\_orion.html</a> [ted.com] among other references.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , if we would have funded Project Orion , we would have gone to Saturn in the early 1960 's .
See http : //www.ted.com/talks/george \ _dyson \ _on \ _project \ _orion.html [ ted.com ] among other references .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, if we would have funded Project Orion, we would have gone to Saturn in the early 1960's.
See http://www.ted.com/talks/george\_dyson\_on\_project\_orion.html [ted.com] among other references.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739612</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no, we'd be in China</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no , we 'd be in China</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, we'd be in China</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741378</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>172pilot</author>
	<datestamp>1263327540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love the space program too, but if we did that, we'd be a territory of China right now, and all living a communist life with no space program..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the space program too , but if we did that , we 'd be a territory of China right now , and all living a communist life with no space program. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the space program too, but if we did that, we'd be a territory of China right now, and all living a communist life with no space program..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739134</id>
	<title>should have send Balto!</title>
	<author>Thud457</author>
	<datestamp>1263319140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>godspeed, brave little robot!</htmltext>
<tokenext>godspeed , brave little robot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>godspeed, brave little robot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30742076</id>
	<title>B2itch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263287520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>may disturb o7her UNDER THE GPL. Sujre that by the</htmltext>
<tokenext>may disturb o7her UNDER THE GPL .
Sujre that by the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>may disturb o7her UNDER THE GPL.
Sujre that by the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30747724</id>
	<title>Re:That headline...</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1263324360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every word in every sentence doesn't have to be 100\% grammatically correct you joyless waste of empty space...  Everyone, everywhere, perfectly understood what the headline meant (if they know ANY background about the situation at all, that is).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every word in every sentence does n't have to be 100 \ % grammatically correct you joyless waste of empty space... Everyone , everywhere , perfectly understood what the headline meant ( if they know ANY background about the situation at all , that is ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every word in every sentence doesn't have to be 100\% grammatically correct you joyless waste of empty space...  Everyone, everywhere, perfectly understood what the headline meant (if they know ANY background about the situation at all, that is).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739058</id>
	<title>And speaking German, Russian, or Chinese...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263318840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And speaking German, Russian, or Chinese...perhaps a better source of money for it would be the nanny state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And speaking German , Russian , or Chinese...perhaps a better source of money for it would be the nanny state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And speaking German, Russian, or Chinese...perhaps a better source of money for it would be the nanny state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741008</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1263326040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.</p></div></blockquote><p>It will still be more effective than spending it on millimeter wave scanners, banks, and U.S. car companies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.It will still be more effective than spending it on millimeter wave scanners , banks , and U.S. car companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.It will still be more effective than spending it on millimeter wave scanners, banks, and U.S. car companies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739580</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish we took 50\% of that money and used it to feed the other half of the world which is providing us with our wealth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish we took 50 \ % of that money and used it to feed the other half of the world which is providing us with our wealth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish we took 50\% of that money and used it to feed the other half of the world which is providing us with our wealth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</id>
	<title>Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263318720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.  We would be at Jupiter right now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish we took 50 \ % of the money given to the military and put it into space .
We would be at Jupiter right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.
We would be at Jupiter right now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739692</id>
	<title>Marvin the Martian</title>
	<author>rehtonAesoohC</author>
	<datestamp>1263321120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The message NASA will receive probably won't be sent from the dead Mars lander... most likely it will be something like:<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...going to blow up Earth. It obstructs my view of Venus!</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The message NASA will receive probably wo n't be sent from the dead Mars lander... most likely it will be something like : ...going to blow up Earth .
It obstructs my view of Venus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The message NASA will receive probably won't be sent from the dead Mars lander... most likely it will be something like: ...going to blow up Earth.
It obstructs my view of Venus!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741254</id>
	<title>Send a rover to chop it's head off.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the only way to be sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739814</id>
	<title>What is the point in studying Mars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263321600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a planet that cannot provide the support for our current life forms, so why invest time and money in it?  I don't see the point in it.  Is a gigantic "desert" seriously that interesting?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a planet that can not provide the support for our current life forms , so why invest time and money in it ?
I do n't see the point in it .
Is a gigantic " desert " seriously that interesting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a planet that cannot provide the support for our current life forms, so why invest time and money in it?
I don't see the point in it.
Is a gigantic "desert" seriously that interesting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739324</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>codewarren</author>
	<datestamp>1263319740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yikes, money in space is dangerous... especially coins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yikes , money in space is dangerous... especially coins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yikes, money in space is dangerous... especially coins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744752</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1263300780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe the plan to make NASA part of the military will make that happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the plan to make NASA part of the military will make that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the plan to make NASA part of the military will make that happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739426</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and speaking German, Japanese, Chinese or otherwise hailing our new foreign overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and speaking German , Japanese , Chinese or otherwise hailing our new foreign overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and speaking German, Japanese, Chinese or otherwise hailing our new foreign overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30769786</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>AC0101</author>
	<datestamp>1263460020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The civilian space program would benefit from more money. But the military industrial complex has a secret space program. There are many former and official insiders who testify to advanced research projects involving incredible space flight capabilities. You may start at with a hacker known as Gary McKinnon who faces extradition. Than to the Disclosure Project and finally Project Camelot. As for advanced research projects, I'm referring to a division in Lockheed Martin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The civilian space program would benefit from more money .
But the military industrial complex has a secret space program .
There are many former and official insiders who testify to advanced research projects involving incredible space flight capabilities .
You may start at with a hacker known as Gary McKinnon who faces extradition .
Than to the Disclosure Project and finally Project Camelot .
As for advanced research projects , I 'm referring to a division in Lockheed Martin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The civilian space program would benefit from more money.
But the military industrial complex has a secret space program.
There are many former and official insiders who testify to advanced research projects involving incredible space flight capabilities.
You may start at with a hacker known as Gary McKinnon who faces extradition.
Than to the Disclosure Project and finally Project Camelot.
As for advanced research projects, I'm referring to a division in Lockheed Martin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744378</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1263298740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You are making a very silly assumption. You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole.</i></p><p>And you seem to be assuming that "reduce military spending by 50\%" is the same as "disband the military and leave the nation unguarded".</p><p><i>Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system?</i></p><p>Yes, I can definitely see that.  I can see them aggressively pursuing manned missions as well.  Probably with the benefit of lots of knowledge of things like the effects of radiation exposure or vacuum on human bodies, discovered via experiments on unwilling subjects.</p><p>The Nazis sucked, but they weren't "barbarians".  Germans had a thirst for knowledge; part of why it was such a treasure trove of scientists for the U.S. after the war.  Just while under Nazi rule, they were rather inhumane in their methods of acquiring knowledge.  Oh and they didn't care how smart you were if you were a Jew or homosexual or other undesirable.</p><p><i>We are free to argue about these things and do basic science, safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness.</i></p><p>I get your general point that military is necessary for the security of a democratic nation where science is valued... But seriously, what hordes?  Al Qaeda's attack was nasty and worthy of retribution, but it didn't threaten the existence of our nation at all.  Iraq wasn't a threat to us at all.  So what exactly are we being protected from?  Mexico?  There's basically nobody even "walking the wall" there, and all that's happened as a result is a lot of people have come here to work shitty jobs for shitty pay.  It's a problem, but its hardly a case of "barbarian hordes" threatening our existence.</p><p>The GP suggested taking 50\% of the military's funding and doing something else with it.  I would suggest that our military could easily do the job of keeping our country safe with that budget.  We didn't even have a large standing army before WWII, and Eisenhower warned against keeping it.  Military budgets continued to expand during the Cold War in the biggest military bluff operation ever...  But now that is over.  So why do we need such a huge budget anymore?  Where are these hordes that require <b>this</b> amount of spending?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are making a very silly assumption .
You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole.And you seem to be assuming that " reduce military spending by 50 \ % " is the same as " disband the military and leave the nation unguarded " .Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system ? Yes , I can definitely see that .
I can see them aggressively pursuing manned missions as well .
Probably with the benefit of lots of knowledge of things like the effects of radiation exposure or vacuum on human bodies , discovered via experiments on unwilling subjects.The Nazis sucked , but they were n't " barbarians " .
Germans had a thirst for knowledge ; part of why it was such a treasure trove of scientists for the U.S. after the war .
Just while under Nazi rule , they were rather inhumane in their methods of acquiring knowledge .
Oh and they did n't care how smart you were if you were a Jew or homosexual or other undesirable.We are free to argue about these things and do basic science , safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness.I get your general point that military is necessary for the security of a democratic nation where science is valued... But seriously , what hordes ?
Al Qaeda 's attack was nasty and worthy of retribution , but it did n't threaten the existence of our nation at all .
Iraq was n't a threat to us at all .
So what exactly are we being protected from ?
Mexico ? There 's basically nobody even " walking the wall " there , and all that 's happened as a result is a lot of people have come here to work shitty jobs for shitty pay .
It 's a problem , but its hardly a case of " barbarian hordes " threatening our existence.The GP suggested taking 50 \ % of the military 's funding and doing something else with it .
I would suggest that our military could easily do the job of keeping our country safe with that budget .
We did n't even have a large standing army before WWII , and Eisenhower warned against keeping it .
Military budgets continued to expand during the Cold War in the biggest military bluff operation ever... But now that is over .
So why do we need such a huge budget anymore ?
Where are these hordes that require this amount of spending ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are making a very silly assumption.
You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole.And you seem to be assuming that "reduce military spending by 50\%" is the same as "disband the military and leave the nation unguarded".Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system?Yes, I can definitely see that.
I can see them aggressively pursuing manned missions as well.
Probably with the benefit of lots of knowledge of things like the effects of radiation exposure or vacuum on human bodies, discovered via experiments on unwilling subjects.The Nazis sucked, but they weren't "barbarians".
Germans had a thirst for knowledge; part of why it was such a treasure trove of scientists for the U.S. after the war.
Just while under Nazi rule, they were rather inhumane in their methods of acquiring knowledge.
Oh and they didn't care how smart you were if you were a Jew or homosexual or other undesirable.We are free to argue about these things and do basic science, safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness.I get your general point that military is necessary for the security of a democratic nation where science is valued... But seriously, what hordes?
Al Qaeda's attack was nasty and worthy of retribution, but it didn't threaten the existence of our nation at all.
Iraq wasn't a threat to us at all.
So what exactly are we being protected from?
Mexico?  There's basically nobody even "walking the wall" there, and all that's happened as a result is a lot of people have come here to work shitty jobs for shitty pay.
It's a problem, but its hardly a case of "barbarian hordes" threatening our existence.The GP suggested taking 50\% of the military's funding and doing something else with it.
I would suggest that our military could easily do the job of keeping our country safe with that budget.
We didn't even have a large standing army before WWII, and Eisenhower warned against keeping it.
Military budgets continued to expand during the Cold War in the biggest military bluff operation ever...  But now that is over.
So why do we need such a huge budget anymore?
Where are these hordes that require this amount of spending?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741670</id>
	<title>Most likely Message</title>
	<author>arthurpaliden</author>
	<datestamp>1263328680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Batteries cold, can't start, has anybody out there got cables, I need a boost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Batteries cold , ca n't start , has anybody out there got cables , I need a boost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Batteries cold, can't start, has anybody out there got cables, I need a boost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739646</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish everyone would get along in the world so we didn't have to put any money into the military.</p><p>Reality sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish everyone would get along in the world so we did n't have to put any money into the military.Reality sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish everyone would get along in the world so we didn't have to put any money into the military.Reality sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740736</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>cynvision</author>
	<datestamp>1263325020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What strikes me is maybe how many more sick and injured (or dead) astronauts we'd have had. Science learned a lot about the effects of microgravity and radiation on human health puttering in orbit here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What strikes me is maybe how many more sick and injured ( or dead ) astronauts we 'd have had .
Science learned a lot about the effects of microgravity and radiation on human health puttering in orbit here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What strikes me is maybe how many more sick and injured (or dead) astronauts we'd have had.
Science learned a lot about the effects of microgravity and radiation on human health puttering in orbit here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744882</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263301560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.  We would be at Jupiter right now.</p></div><p>Taking money from our admittedly bloated defense budget would get us to Jupiter faster, although America's official language might be Chinese by then if we let our defensive superiority slip.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish we took 50 \ % of the money given to the military and put it into space .
We would be at Jupiter right now.Taking money from our admittedly bloated defense budget would get us to Jupiter faster , although America 's official language might be Chinese by then if we let our defensive superiority slip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.
We would be at Jupiter right now.Taking money from our admittedly bloated defense budget would get us to Jupiter faster, although America's official language might be Chinese by then if we let our defensive superiority slip.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744330</id>
	<title>We'd be too busy</title>
	<author>amightywind</author>
	<datestamp>1263298500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, we'd be too busy going to the mosque 5x a day. Islamists hate the space program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , we 'd be too busy going to the mosque 5x a day .
Islamists hate the space program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, we'd be too busy going to the mosque 5x a day.
Islamists hate the space program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740206</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Eponymous Bastard</author>
	<datestamp>1263322980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you seen how much aliens are charging for a ride nowadays???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you seen how much aliens are charging for a ride nowadays ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you seen how much aliens are charging for a ride nowadays??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740318</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1263323460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy.  Declare finders keepers.  First person to retrieve the half trillion from Jupiter gets to keep it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy .
Declare finders keepers .
First person to retrieve the half trillion from Jupiter gets to keep it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy.
Declare finders keepers.
First person to retrieve the half trillion from Jupiter gets to keep it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741916</id>
	<title>Re:And so it goes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263329880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mission wasn't a failure at all.  It didn't "die" from hardware failure: it shut down because it couldn't survive the high-latitude Martian winter, which is what was expected.  That's why it only had a mission life of three months.  It landed in May and completed all mission objectives at the end of August.  We lost contact with it in early November, when its batteries froze.  That was the intended outcome all along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mission was n't a failure at all .
It did n't " die " from hardware failure : it shut down because it could n't survive the high-latitude Martian winter , which is what was expected .
That 's why it only had a mission life of three months .
It landed in May and completed all mission objectives at the end of August .
We lost contact with it in early November , when its batteries froze .
That was the intended outcome all along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mission wasn't a failure at all.
It didn't "die" from hardware failure: it shut down because it couldn't survive the high-latitude Martian winter, which is what was expected.
That's why it only had a mission life of three months.
It landed in May and completed all mission objectives at the end of August.
We lost contact with it in early November, when its batteries froze.
That was the intended outcome all along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741412</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>jmorris42</author>
	<datestamp>1263327660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.</p><p>You are making a very silly assumption.  You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole.  It doesn't.  We get two benefits from that money.  First is tech, probably more tech than NASA has delivered and NASA has done some good stuff.  But look how much tech came out of two World Wars and the Cold War (WWIII in everything but body count) and compare it to NASA.  But by far the bigger benefit is that Western Civilization didn't fall to the barbarian hordes.  Hint: Barbarians don't send out space probes in a peaceful quest for pure knowledge.  Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system?  How about the Soviet Union in a world where they defeated the West and didn't need to 'waste' resources in a PR war?  Remember, with some of the more productive farmland in the world their system couldn't feed their population, if the whole world fell to their level of productivity there wouldn't be much surplus wealth to blow on exploration.  How 'bout the sixth century rejects wanting to re-establish the Caliphate?  Think they would be interested in the Final Frontier?  We are free to argue about these things and do basic science, safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I wish we took 50 \ % of the money given to the military and put it into space.You are making a very silly assumption .
You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole .
It does n't .
We get two benefits from that money .
First is tech , probably more tech than NASA has delivered and NASA has done some good stuff .
But look how much tech came out of two World Wars and the Cold War ( WWIII in everything but body count ) and compare it to NASA .
But by far the bigger benefit is that Western Civilization did n't fall to the barbarian hordes .
Hint : Barbarians do n't send out space probes in a peaceful quest for pure knowledge .
Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system ?
How about the Soviet Union in a world where they defeated the West and did n't need to 'waste ' resources in a PR war ?
Remember , with some of the more productive farmland in the world their system could n't feed their population , if the whole world fell to their level of productivity there would n't be much surplus wealth to blow on exploration .
How 'bout the sixth century rejects wanting to re-establish the Caliphate ?
Think they would be interested in the Final Frontier ?
We are free to argue about these things and do basic science , safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I wish we took 50\% of the money given to the military and put it into space.You are making a very silly assumption.
You assume the military budget just goes down a black hole.
It doesn't.
We get two benefits from that money.
First is tech, probably more tech than NASA has delivered and NASA has done some good stuff.
But look how much tech came out of two World Wars and the Cold War (WWIII in everything but body count) and compare it to NASA.
But by far the bigger benefit is that Western Civilization didn't fall to the barbarian hordes.
Hint: Barbarians don't send out space probes in a peaceful quest for pure knowledge.
Can you see the Thousand Year Reich sending unmanned probes to the outer solar system?
How about the Soviet Union in a world where they defeated the West and didn't need to 'waste' resources in a PR war?
Remember, with some of the more productive farmland in the world their system couldn't feed their population, if the whole world fell to their level of productivity there wouldn't be much surplus wealth to blow on exploration.
How 'bout the sixth century rejects wanting to re-establish the Caliphate?
Think they would be interested in the Final Frontier?
We are free to argue about these things and do basic science, safe under the protection of hard men walking the wall and beating back the unreasoning barbarian hordes who are always out there waiting for weakness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739588</id>
	<title>Only one thing left to do...</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1263320700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go get it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739840</id>
	<title>di34</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263321660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know it sux0rs, since we made the 4 5ad world. At</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it sux0rs , since we made the 4 5ad world .
At</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it sux0rs, since we made the 4 5ad world.
At</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739528</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1263320460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, in the US at least, Congress would have taken the majority of the money and thrown it towards welfare programs. Which is what they did that cut Apollo and limited the Manned Orbital Laboratory and limited the Shuttle, and cut all sorts of other NASA plans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , in the US at least , Congress would have taken the majority of the money and thrown it towards welfare programs .
Which is what they did that cut Apollo and limited the Manned Orbital Laboratory and limited the Shuttle , and cut all sorts of other NASA plans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, in the US at least, Congress would have taken the majority of the money and thrown it towards welfare programs.
Which is what they did that cut Apollo and limited the Manned Orbital Laboratory and limited the Shuttle, and cut all sorts of other NASA plans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1263319800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how a rocket with a payload of nothing but dollar bills is going to get us any closer to Jupiter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739676</id>
	<title>but we wouldn't</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1263321060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and that is the problem.  I always cringe when I see people toss out IRAQ IRAQ IRAQ as if that explains the current state of NASA's budget.</p><p>Face it, NASA does not generate votes.  The only science that generates votes is that which well funded special interest groups support.  The US could spend ZERO on its military and the space budget would be still be shit.</p><p>If anything the real science people want is how to get something for nothing, if not that how to get more from someone else</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and that is the problem .
I always cringe when I see people toss out IRAQ IRAQ IRAQ as if that explains the current state of NASA 's budget.Face it , NASA does not generate votes .
The only science that generates votes is that which well funded special interest groups support .
The US could spend ZERO on its military and the space budget would be still be shit.If anything the real science people want is how to get something for nothing , if not that how to get more from someone else</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that is the problem.
I always cringe when I see people toss out IRAQ IRAQ IRAQ as if that explains the current state of NASA's budget.Face it, NASA does not generate votes.
The only science that generates votes is that which well funded special interest groups support.
The US could spend ZERO on its military and the space budget would be still be shit.If anything the real science people want is how to get something for nothing, if not that how to get more from someone else</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739030</id>
	<title>Nigger area code</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263318780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hairy balls</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hairy balls</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hairy balls</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739748</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263321360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the Constitution Of The United States tells them to spend on a space program right...???<br>Learn your history and laws or we will be a nation of Men and not Laws....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the Constitution Of The United States tells them to spend on a space program right... ? ?
? Learn your history and laws or we will be a nation of Men and not Laws... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the Constitution Of The United States tells them to spend on a space program right...??
?Learn your history and laws or we will be a nation of Men and not Laws....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739820</id>
	<title>Re:Love the space program</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1263321600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jupiter isn&rsquo;t solid, and wouldn&rsquo;t be very hospitable to anything we sent into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jupiter isn    t solid , and wouldn    t be very hospitable to anything we sent into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jupiter isn’t solid, and wouldn’t be very hospitable to anything we sent into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739372</id>
	<title>Once they discover the spice worms</title>
	<author>MRe\_nl</author>
	<datestamp>1263319920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frank Herbert's prophecies will be seen for what they truly are, and L. Ron shall be proven false, and the Fremen formerly known as Al Qaida will start broadcasting improbable messages from Mars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frank Herbert 's prophecies will be seen for what they truly are , and L. Ron shall be proven false , and the Fremen formerly known as Al Qaida will start broadcasting improbable messages from Mars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frank Herbert's prophecies will be seen for what they truly are, and L. Ron shall be proven false, and the Fremen formerly known as Al Qaida will start broadcasting improbable messages from Mars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30747724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30769786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1524216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739226
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30743196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30747724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30769786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30740736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30741378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30744882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1524216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1524216.30739372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
