<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_11_2140224</id>
	<title>Neural Nets Make Art While High</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263228900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>brilanon writes <i>"<a href="http://m-net.arbornet.org/~flamoot/telepathic-critterdrug.html">Telepathic-critterdrug</a> is a controversial fork of the open source artificial-life sim <a href="http://critterding.sf.net/">Critterding</a>, a physics sandbox where blocky creatures evolve neural nets in a survival contest. What we've done is to give these animals an extra retina which is shared with the whole population. It's extended through time like a movie and they can write to it for communication or pleasure. Since this introduces the possibility of the creation of art, we decided to give them a selection of narcotics, stimulants and psychedelics. This is not in Critterding. The end result is a high-color cellular automaton running on a substrate that thinks and evolves, and may actually produce hallucinations in the user."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>brilanon writes " Telepathic-critterdrug is a controversial fork of the open source artificial-life sim Critterding , a physics sandbox where blocky creatures evolve neural nets in a survival contest .
What we 've done is to give these animals an extra retina which is shared with the whole population .
It 's extended through time like a movie and they can write to it for communication or pleasure .
Since this introduces the possibility of the creation of art , we decided to give them a selection of narcotics , stimulants and psychedelics .
This is not in Critterding .
The end result is a high-color cellular automaton running on a substrate that thinks and evolves , and may actually produce hallucinations in the user .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brilanon writes "Telepathic-critterdrug is a controversial fork of the open source artificial-life sim Critterding, a physics sandbox where blocky creatures evolve neural nets in a survival contest.
What we've done is to give these animals an extra retina which is shared with the whole population.
It's extended through time like a movie and they can write to it for communication or pleasure.
Since this introduces the possibility of the creation of art, we decided to give them a selection of narcotics, stimulants and psychedelics.
This is not in Critterding.
The end result is a high-color cellular automaton running on a substrate that thinks and evolves, and may actually produce hallucinations in the user.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737380</id>
	<title>Debug tool is good = Bad?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263312780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, people will complain about anything.</p><p>Google: We made debugging as easy as hitting F11<br>Article writer: DAMN YOU Google! You have made my leet debugging skills useless!</p><p>Sheesh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , people will complain about anything.Google : We made debugging as easy as hitting F11Article writer : DAMN YOU Google !
You have made my leet debugging skills useless ! Sheesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, people will complain about anything.Google: We made debugging as easy as hitting F11Article writer: DAMN YOU Google!
You have made my leet debugging skills useless!Sheesh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740724</id>
	<title>Re:art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263325020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree completely.  Both myself and many others I know find that through the use of various psychedelics and other substances, other realms can be contacted, and far more can be perceived.  I was once mired in the static reality of "scientific rationalism" or "materialism", the view that I ultimately rejected because it leads to the idea that the universe is nothing but a vast predictable machine.  I reject this.  I choose the mystic path, and I invite all who can to join me, please...the world needs something more.  The world needs to remember how to Dream.  No, I do not mean this as to eschew technology, as is often popular, quite the opposite.  Embrace potential, and free yourself.  Cast off the false prison.  There is so much more waiting in potential out there.  Of course, I mean, I'm not even human (though I am stuck in this annoying human body) so what do I know of humanity?  Maybe you lot can't wake up...but I doubt it...any sentient being can, given half a chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree completely .
Both myself and many others I know find that through the use of various psychedelics and other substances , other realms can be contacted , and far more can be perceived .
I was once mired in the static reality of " scientific rationalism " or " materialism " , the view that I ultimately rejected because it leads to the idea that the universe is nothing but a vast predictable machine .
I reject this .
I choose the mystic path , and I invite all who can to join me , please...the world needs something more .
The world needs to remember how to Dream .
No , I do not mean this as to eschew technology , as is often popular , quite the opposite .
Embrace potential , and free yourself .
Cast off the false prison .
There is so much more waiting in potential out there .
Of course , I mean , I 'm not even human ( though I am stuck in this annoying human body ) so what do I know of humanity ?
Maybe you lot ca n't wake up...but I doubt it...any sentient being can , given half a chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree completely.
Both myself and many others I know find that through the use of various psychedelics and other substances, other realms can be contacted, and far more can be perceived.
I was once mired in the static reality of "scientific rationalism" or "materialism", the view that I ultimately rejected because it leads to the idea that the universe is nothing but a vast predictable machine.
I reject this.
I choose the mystic path, and I invite all who can to join me, please...the world needs something more.
The world needs to remember how to Dream.
No, I do not mean this as to eschew technology, as is often popular, quite the opposite.
Embrace potential, and free yourself.
Cast off the false prison.
There is so much more waiting in potential out there.
Of course, I mean, I'm not even human (though I am stuck in this annoying human body) so what do I know of humanity?
Maybe you lot can't wake up...but I doubt it...any sentient being can, given half a chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734194</id>
	<title>I almost understood a whole word of that.</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1263328380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it was "the".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it was " the " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it was "the".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580</id>
	<title>design geekery</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two words: Jackson Pollock.</p><p>Also known as "the guy who vomits paint on extra large canvases while drunk and stoned." Glad to see neural nets getting high... they'll make an excellent contribution to modern american art (which imho is an oxymoron).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words : Jackson Pollock.Also known as " the guy who vomits paint on extra large canvases while drunk and stoned .
" Glad to see neural nets getting high... they 'll make an excellent contribution to modern american art ( which imho is an oxymoron ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words: Jackson Pollock.Also known as "the guy who vomits paint on extra large canvases while drunk and stoned.
" Glad to see neural nets getting high... they'll make an excellent contribution to modern american art (which imho is an oxymoron).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741468</id>
	<title>Re:If ever...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the word you are looking for is "recursive."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the word you are looking for is " recursive .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the word you are looking for is "recursive.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737300</id>
	<title>Interesting little hack</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1263312540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The project has added shared vision (across a population) and various drug pills that alter the behaviour of the neurons to an existing project to see what happens.  The website describes this in a way which doesn't make it sound as controversial as the summary does - it's just cool.  The critters are powered by neural nets and seemingly have retinas wired up for vision - this project has added a shared retina across the whole population and allows it to be updated by the individuals.  And it changes over time too, AIUI, like some kind of replay.  The drug pills act on the neural nets by changing the behaviour of certain neurons, which is basically what drugs do in a real brain.  Why do this?  Who cares if it's useful, it's a cool hack and this is news for nerds!  You can view the image of the shared retina so you can see what the critters have produced - I think that the telepathy aspect is more interesting (though not so headline-grabbing) than the drugs.</p><p>I'm not really sure where the "may actually produce hallucinations in the user" came from, I didn't see a mention on the homepage of the project.  It makes it sound like you, the user at the computer, might hallucinate whilst watching it - it looks like just a low-res grid of coloured pixels to me, so I wouldn't be worried about seeing any flying monkeys afterwards!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The project has added shared vision ( across a population ) and various drug pills that alter the behaviour of the neurons to an existing project to see what happens .
The website describes this in a way which does n't make it sound as controversial as the summary does - it 's just cool .
The critters are powered by neural nets and seemingly have retinas wired up for vision - this project has added a shared retina across the whole population and allows it to be updated by the individuals .
And it changes over time too , AIUI , like some kind of replay .
The drug pills act on the neural nets by changing the behaviour of certain neurons , which is basically what drugs do in a real brain .
Why do this ?
Who cares if it 's useful , it 's a cool hack and this is news for nerds !
You can view the image of the shared retina so you can see what the critters have produced - I think that the telepathy aspect is more interesting ( though not so headline-grabbing ) than the drugs.I 'm not really sure where the " may actually produce hallucinations in the user " came from , I did n't see a mention on the homepage of the project .
It makes it sound like you , the user at the computer , might hallucinate whilst watching it - it looks like just a low-res grid of coloured pixels to me , so I would n't be worried about seeing any flying monkeys afterwards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project has added shared vision (across a population) and various drug pills that alter the behaviour of the neurons to an existing project to see what happens.
The website describes this in a way which doesn't make it sound as controversial as the summary does - it's just cool.
The critters are powered by neural nets and seemingly have retinas wired up for vision - this project has added a shared retina across the whole population and allows it to be updated by the individuals.
And it changes over time too, AIUI, like some kind of replay.
The drug pills act on the neural nets by changing the behaviour of certain neurons, which is basically what drugs do in a real brain.
Why do this?
Who cares if it's useful, it's a cool hack and this is news for nerds!
You can view the image of the shared retina so you can see what the critters have produced - I think that the telepathy aspect is more interesting (though not so headline-grabbing) than the drugs.I'm not really sure where the "may actually produce hallucinations in the user" came from, I didn't see a mention on the homepage of the project.
It makes it sound like you, the user at the computer, might hallucinate whilst watching it - it looks like just a low-res grid of coloured pixels to me, so I wouldn't be worried about seeing any flying monkeys afterwards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737738</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263314340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bawww</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bawww</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bawww</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736176</id>
	<title>Re:Leave something for humans!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263307020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What will happen if somebody puts a vibrator into love robot?...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What will happen if somebody puts a vibrator into love robot ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What will happen if somebody puts a vibrator into love robot?...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734108</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>I'm guessing she was a spitter not a swallower.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love ...I 'm guessing she was a spitter not a swallower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love ...I'm guessing she was a spitter not a swallower.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204</id>
	<title>Re:If ever...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263328440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm afraid that "Perl script on drugs" would be redundant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm afraid that " Perl script on drugs " would be redundant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm afraid that "Perl script on drugs" would be redundant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733968</id>
	<title>critters</title>
	<author>brilanon</author>
	<datestamp>1263238680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The critterdrug page has some critters for that on it, but here are a couple of related types for vanilla Critterding, for those who are on Windows or prefer their electronic life clean and free</p><p><a href="http://ansistego.sf.net/foodotropes.tgz" title="sf.net" rel="nofollow">http://ansistego.sf.net/foodotropes.tgz</a> [sf.net]<br><a href="http://ansistego.sf.net/knightotropes.tgz" title="sf.net" rel="nofollow">http://ansistego.sf.net/knightotropes.tgz</a> [sf.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The critterdrug page has some critters for that on it , but here are a couple of related types for vanilla Critterding , for those who are on Windows or prefer their electronic life clean and freehttp : //ansistego.sf.net/foodotropes.tgz [ sf.net ] http : //ansistego.sf.net/knightotropes.tgz [ sf.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The critterdrug page has some critters for that on it, but here are a couple of related types for vanilla Critterding, for those who are on Windows or prefer their electronic life clean and freehttp://ansistego.sf.net/foodotropes.tgz [sf.net]http://ansistego.sf.net/knightotropes.tgz [sf.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733650</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>Hyppy</author>
	<datestamp>1263234060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've just started noticing this?  Where have you been the past few years?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've just started noticing this ?
Where have you been the past few years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've just started noticing this?
Where have you been the past few years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733678</id>
	<title>Re:Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me paraphrase the article with the stoner tag:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Dude, its like they, like, took a bunch of a.i. man... and it's fucking far out. they fucking got them jacked out on some crazy ass shit bro. Bitches be all like "shit bro, theres a bunch of ones and zeros... and I think I saw a two!". fucking gnarley dude. pass me the motherfucking cheetos</p> </div><p>Drugs are cool.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me paraphrase the article with the stoner tag : Dude , its like they , like , took a bunch of a.i .
man... and it 's fucking far out .
they fucking got them jacked out on some crazy ass shit bro .
Bitches be all like " shit bro , theres a bunch of ones and zeros... and I think I saw a two ! " .
fucking gnarley dude .
pass me the motherfucking cheetos Drugs are cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me paraphrase the article with the stoner tag:Dude, its like they, like, took a bunch of a.i.
man... and it's fucking far out.
they fucking got them jacked out on some crazy ass shit bro.
Bitches be all like "shit bro, theres a bunch of ones and zeros... and I think I saw a two!".
fucking gnarley dude.
pass me the motherfucking cheetos Drugs are cool.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30757524</id>
	<title>Re:art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>FiloEleven</author>
	<datestamp>1263383160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, I am sympathetic to this mindset, that there is more to life than Matter, but even I get turned off by empty phrases like "embrace potential, and free yourself."  Nine times out of ten, if I ask what that means, the answer is either "you must discover that for yourself" or a stream of even emptier metaphors.</p><p>The tenth time is the offer of a hit of acid, which is not what I am after.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , I am sympathetic to this mindset , that there is more to life than Matter , but even I get turned off by empty phrases like " embrace potential , and free yourself .
" Nine times out of ten , if I ask what that means , the answer is either " you must discover that for yourself " or a stream of even emptier metaphors.The tenth time is the offer of a hit of acid , which is not what I am after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, I am sympathetic to this mindset, that there is more to life than Matter, but even I get turned off by empty phrases like "embrace potential, and free yourself.
"  Nine times out of ten, if I ask what that means, the answer is either "you must discover that for yourself" or a stream of even emptier metaphors.The tenth time is the offer of a hit of acid, which is not what I am after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733576</id>
	<title>One or the other</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is either an incredibly cool experiment or an unparalleled exercise in highly-refined, weapons-grade bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is either an incredibly cool experiment or an unparalleled exercise in highly-refined , weapons-grade bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is either an incredibly cool experiment or an unparalleled exercise in highly-refined, weapons-grade bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734044</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1263239580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spore-related stories were posted in the games section. Everybody knows that the games section isn't *really* slashdot. It's like apple.slashdot.com in that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spore-related stories were posted in the games section .
Everybody knows that the games section is n't * really * slashdot .
It 's like apple.slashdot.com in that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spore-related stories were posted in the games section.
Everybody knows that the games section isn't *really* slashdot.
It's like apple.slashdot.com in that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735154</id>
	<title>Self-promotion + Slasdot = true controversy?</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1263297960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"What controversy? All I see is someone promoting their own project on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/."</p></div></blockquote><p>Right.  That's where the controversy part starts. Kudos on being the first to get it going<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What controversy ?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on /. " Right .
That 's where the controversy part starts .
Kudos on being the first to get it going ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What controversy?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on /."Right.
That's where the controversy part starts.
Kudos on being the first to get it going ;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735908</id>
	<title>Somebody forgot to take his medicine</title>
	<author>mangu</author>
	<datestamp>1263305340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net research</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't take it so hard, the history of AI is full of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=shrdlu+eliza+parry+racter" title="google.com">toy applications</a> [google.com].</p><p>In a field with so much left to explore as AI, sometimes an informal approach will yield results when the orthodox methods have run their course. Sort of like a meta-simulated annealing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net researchDo n't take it so hard , the history of AI is full of toy applications [ google.com ] .In a field with so much left to explore as AI , sometimes an informal approach will yield results when the orthodox methods have run their course .
Sort of like a meta-simulated annealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net researchDon't take it so hard, the history of AI is full of toy applications [google.com].In a field with so much left to explore as AI, sometimes an informal approach will yield results when the orthodox methods have run their course.
Sort of like a meta-simulated annealing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734250</id>
	<title>Re:If ever...</title>
	<author>AnRkey</author>
	<datestamp>1263329160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ROFL, this comment just made my day!</htmltext>
<tokenext>ROFL , this comment just made my day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROFL, this comment just made my day!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734228</id>
	<title>Re:One or the other</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263328860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the latter. the former would require, amongst other things, access to the source code (as required by the original critterdings license) and a lot of noise coming from the biological disciplines re: computationally tractable, useful models for the various signaling pathways involved in hallucinogen use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the latter .
the former would require , amongst other things , access to the source code ( as required by the original critterdings license ) and a lot of noise coming from the biological disciplines re : computationally tractable , useful models for the various signaling pathways involved in hallucinogen use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the latter.
the former would require, amongst other things, access to the source code (as required by the original critterdings license) and a lot of noise coming from the biological disciplines re: computationally tractable, useful models for the various signaling pathways involved in hallucinogen use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734018</id>
	<title>Re:Leave something for humans!</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1263239340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>outsourcing our drug use <a href="http://somethingawful.com/d/news/roxxxxy-love-robot.php" title="somethingawful.com">(and sex, apparently)</a> [somethingawful.com] </p></div><p>It's actually sex, drugs, and <a href="http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/AITopics/Music" title="aaai.org">rock&amp;roll</a> [aaai.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>outsourcing our drug use ( and sex , apparently ) [ somethingawful.com ] It 's actually sex , drugs , and rock&amp;roll [ aaai.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>outsourcing our drug use (and sex, apparently) [somethingawful.com] It's actually sex, drugs, and rock&amp;roll [aaai.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733532</id>
	<title>But is it good art?</title>
	<author>starbugs</author>
	<datestamp>1263232980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just looked at the link and I see that quite a few of them have starved.<br>So this mimics real life starving artists who (although they are starving) can still afford to get high.</p><p>The art will be worth more once the PC is off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just looked at the link and I see that quite a few of them have starved.So this mimics real life starving artists who ( although they are starving ) can still afford to get high.The art will be worth more once the PC is off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just looked at the link and I see that quite a few of them have starved.So this mimics real life starving artists who (although they are starving) can still afford to get high.The art will be worth more once the PC is off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734502</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My god, 4chan is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My god , 4chan is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My god, 4chan is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736226</id>
	<title>Re:art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263307260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NO MORE POSTING TILL YOU FINISH YOUR MOVIE.</p><p>Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NO MORE POSTING TILL YOU FINISH YOUR MOVIE.Filter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like YELLING .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO MORE POSTING TILL YOU FINISH YOUR MOVIE.Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like YELLING.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734008</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1263239040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What controversy? All I see is someone promoting their own project on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></div><p>Self-fulfilling controversy label!</p><p>o\_O</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What controversy ?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on /.Self-fulfilling controversy label ! o \ _O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What controversy?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on /.Self-fulfilling controversy label!o\_O
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736834</id>
	<title>No controversy, no narcotics, no art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263310800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't controversial, you didn't give them narcotics and 'they' didn't create art (you might have, but 'they' didn't).</p><p>Just because I draw a smiley on a piece of paper, it doesn't mean the paper is smiling, and just because you or anyone else assigns human emotion to a bit of hardware, it doesn't mean it experiences or intends anything.</p><p>This reminds me of those mad ventriloquists you sometimes get in horror films, who stick their hand up some puppet's backside, throw their voice, and convince nobody more than themselves, that the puppet - pause for shudder - is alive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't controversial , you did n't give them narcotics and 'they ' did n't create art ( you might have , but 'they ' did n't ) .Just because I draw a smiley on a piece of paper , it does n't mean the paper is smiling , and just because you or anyone else assigns human emotion to a bit of hardware , it does n't mean it experiences or intends anything.This reminds me of those mad ventriloquists you sometimes get in horror films , who stick their hand up some puppet 's backside , throw their voice , and convince nobody more than themselves , that the puppet - pause for shudder - is alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't controversial, you didn't give them narcotics and 'they' didn't create art (you might have, but 'they' didn't).Just because I draw a smiley on a piece of paper, it doesn't mean the paper is smiling, and just because you or anyone else assigns human emotion to a bit of hardware, it doesn't mean it experiences or intends anything.This reminds me of those mad ventriloquists you sometimes get in horror films, who stick their hand up some puppet's backside, throw their voice, and convince nobody more than themselves, that the puppet - pause for shudder - is alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734166</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>brilanon</author>
	<datestamp>1263327960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mod parent up</p><p>if the animals in spore were using artistic sensibilities evolved on the savannah to make their own building and vehicle designs that would really have been something</p><p>damn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mod parent upif the animals in spore were using artistic sensibilities evolved on the savannah to make their own building and vehicle designs that would really have been somethingdamn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mod parent upif the animals in spore were using artistic sensibilities evolved on the savannah to make their own building and vehicle designs that would really have been somethingdamn</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733522</id>
	<title>This summary...</title>
	<author>millennial</author>
	<datestamp>1263232920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Needs more acid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Needs more acid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Needs more acid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737388</id>
	<title>AI /.</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1263312840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they need to do is reward the AI for self-referential behavior, and then allow it to post on slashdot.</p><p>And once they make it recurse occasionally and repeat some earlier navel-contemplating two or three times, then they can be editors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they need to do is reward the AI for self-referential behavior , and then allow it to post on slashdot.And once they make it recurse occasionally and repeat some earlier navel-contemplating two or three times , then they can be editors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they need to do is reward the AI for self-referential behavior, and then allow it to post on slashdot.And once they make it recurse occasionally and repeat some earlier navel-contemplating two or three times, then they can be editors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734142</id>
	<title>Phallic?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the movie toward the end they look like male genitalia crawling around looking for a good fuck. Is this accidental?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the movie toward the end they look like male genitalia crawling around looking for a good fuck .
Is this accidental ?
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the movie toward the end they look like male genitalia crawling around looking for a good fuck.
Is this accidental?
   </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734020</id>
	<title>goddammit</title>
	<author>the brown guy</author>
	<datestamp>1263239400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"telepathic-critterdrug isn't available yet for Windows. I'm sorry"</p><p>The one thing I hate about Windows is the lack of compatibility with neural nets</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" telepathic-critterdrug is n't available yet for Windows .
I 'm sorry " The one thing I hate about Windows is the lack of compatibility with neural nets</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"telepathic-critterdrug isn't available yet for Windows.
I'm sorry"The one thing I hate about Windows is the lack of compatibility with neural nets</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734156</id>
	<title>Hip-E-Tron</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263327840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leave it to Silicone Valley to try to <b>automate the 60's</b>. California apparently misses its "glory days".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave it to Silicone Valley to try to automate the 60 's .
California apparently misses its " glory days " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave it to Silicone Valley to try to automate the 60's.
California apparently misses its "glory days".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</id>
	<title>Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>Infernal Device</author>
	<datestamp>1263232800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What controversy? All I see is someone promoting their own project on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What controversy ?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What controversy?
All I see is someone promoting their own project on /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741352</id>
	<title>Re:art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263327480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>anyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist</p></div><p> <a href="http://toolband.com/" title="toolband.com" rel="nofollow">Tool</a> [toolband.com]
</p><p>(they quote bill hicks in one of their songs about this issue)</p><p>And heaven forbid you forget the sixties.</p><p>I'd have to say I've noticed the opposite you have.  Artists music creation only starts to slow down when they get "sober".  I'll pick Nine Inch Nails for example.  Music creation peaked at "The Fragile" which was written on and about heroin.  After that, Trent overdosed, decided to get sober, and since then more or less has been, but his music has not been quite as good.</p><p>I can understand the drug warrior in some people wanting to lie in order to prevent people from using drugs but that's just not very productive in the long term.  Inevitably people are going to try things and when they do they're going to say "wow.  I can do better stuff on this"...  and when they're "sober" what was good high is still better.  In my view it's better to acknowledge that fact and warn people that while drugs have done some good things, they can also do some very bad things when abused, like anything can.</p><p>And I'll tell you why I'm so sure of this, and sure that it's not an illusion.  I make sure to test myself at various things while I am high and compare the results of those activities to when I'm not.  I write, high on pot, and read the writing when i'm "sober".  The writing while "stoned" is almost always unquestionably better.  I play games like Resident Evil for Wii while high and record the scores.  I also go out and talk to people who, surprise surprise, never notice i'm "high" and only ever notice I'm a bit slower when i'm "sober".  You may have convinced yourself that drugs did not help you because you are afraid of what might become of you, but that does not make it all true.  Certain drugs do slow people down, yes, but not all, and a person can choose to use responsibly.</p><p>Some people call it self medication. Well.  I own my body.  I should be able to medicate with whatever I find works.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>anyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist Tool [ toolband.com ] ( they quote bill hicks in one of their songs about this issue ) And heaven forbid you forget the sixties.I 'd have to say I 've noticed the opposite you have .
Artists music creation only starts to slow down when they get " sober " .
I 'll pick Nine Inch Nails for example .
Music creation peaked at " The Fragile " which was written on and about heroin .
After that , Trent overdosed , decided to get sober , and since then more or less has been , but his music has not been quite as good.I can understand the drug warrior in some people wanting to lie in order to prevent people from using drugs but that 's just not very productive in the long term .
Inevitably people are going to try things and when they do they 're going to say " wow .
I can do better stuff on this " ... and when they 're " sober " what was good high is still better .
In my view it 's better to acknowledge that fact and warn people that while drugs have done some good things , they can also do some very bad things when abused , like anything can.And I 'll tell you why I 'm so sure of this , and sure that it 's not an illusion .
I make sure to test myself at various things while I am high and compare the results of those activities to when I 'm not .
I write , high on pot , and read the writing when i 'm " sober " .
The writing while " stoned " is almost always unquestionably better .
I play games like Resident Evil for Wii while high and record the scores .
I also go out and talk to people who , surprise surprise , never notice i 'm " high " and only ever notice I 'm a bit slower when i 'm " sober " .
You may have convinced yourself that drugs did not help you because you are afraid of what might become of you , but that does not make it all true .
Certain drugs do slow people down , yes , but not all , and a person can choose to use responsibly.Some people call it self medication .
Well. I own my body .
I should be able to medicate with whatever I find works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist Tool [toolband.com]
(they quote bill hicks in one of their songs about this issue)And heaven forbid you forget the sixties.I'd have to say I've noticed the opposite you have.
Artists music creation only starts to slow down when they get "sober".
I'll pick Nine Inch Nails for example.
Music creation peaked at "The Fragile" which was written on and about heroin.
After that, Trent overdosed, decided to get sober, and since then more or less has been, but his music has not been quite as good.I can understand the drug warrior in some people wanting to lie in order to prevent people from using drugs but that's just not very productive in the long term.
Inevitably people are going to try things and when they do they're going to say "wow.
I can do better stuff on this"...  and when they're "sober" what was good high is still better.
In my view it's better to acknowledge that fact and warn people that while drugs have done some good things, they can also do some very bad things when abused, like anything can.And I'll tell you why I'm so sure of this, and sure that it's not an illusion.
I make sure to test myself at various things while I am high and compare the results of those activities to when I'm not.
I write, high on pot, and read the writing when i'm "sober".
The writing while "stoned" is almost always unquestionably better.
I play games like Resident Evil for Wii while high and record the scores.
I also go out and talk to people who, surprise surprise, never notice i'm "high" and only ever notice I'm a bit slower when i'm "sober".
You may have convinced yourself that drugs did not help you because you are afraid of what might become of you, but that does not make it all true.
Certain drugs do slow people down, yes, but not all, and a person can choose to use responsibly.Some people call it self medication.
Well.  I own my body.
I should be able to medicate with whatever I find works.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733718</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1263235020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's controversial to the  people who care about this project. Both of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's controversial to the people who care about this project .
Both of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's controversial to the  people who care about this project.
Both of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739636</id>
	<title>Re:If ever...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm afraid that "Perl script on drugs" would be redundant.</p></div><p>...Or would that be recursive?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm afraid that " Perl script on drugs " would be redundant....Or would that be recursive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm afraid that "Perl script on drugs" would be redundant....Or would that be recursive?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540</id>
	<title>Leave something for humans!</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1263233160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, I'm all for making robots and AIs do work, but outsourcing our drug use <a href="http://somethingawful.com/d/news/roxxxxy-love-robot.php" title="somethingawful.com" rel="nofollow">(and sex, apparently)</a> [somethingawful.com] is just going too far!  Leave at least something for us puny humans to enjoy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , I 'm all for making robots and AIs do work , but outsourcing our drug use ( and sex , apparently ) [ somethingawful.com ] is just going too far !
Leave at least something for us puny humans to enjoy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, I'm all for making robots and AIs do work, but outsourcing our drug use (and sex, apparently) [somethingawful.com] is just going too far!
Leave at least something for us puny humans to enjoy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736192</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263307140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While a menstrual blood painting does seem like a unique and meaningful gift, I'm not sure everyone is prepared to endure the extraordinary batshit which must come with territory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While a menstrual blood painting does seem like a unique and meaningful gift , I 'm not sure everyone is prepared to endure the extraordinary batshit which must come with territory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While a menstrual blood painting does seem like a unique and meaningful gift, I'm not sure everyone is prepared to endure the extraordinary batshit which must come with territory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734210</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1263328620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's speciest. I'm sure the AI cares a lot about this, as well as all other AIs out there (hi Skynet! I'm a big fan!).</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's speciest .
I 'm sure the AI cares a lot about this , as well as all other AIs out there ( hi Skynet !
I 'm a big fan !
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's speciest.
I'm sure the AI cares a lot about this, as well as all other AIs out there (hi Skynet!
I'm a big fan!
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733694</id>
	<title>Crappy screenshots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263234780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like a bunch of poorly rendered cubes. No fun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like a bunch of poorly rendered cubes .
No fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like a bunch of poorly rendered cubes.
No fun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734640</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>mcvos</author>
	<datestamp>1263291420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are you complaining about? The GP didn't say critterding or critterdrug suck. He just pointed out it's self-promotion (the submitter of the story is the guy who made critterdrug), and it tries to seem interesting by suggesting there's some sort of controversy, without linking to an article that attacks critterdrug for whatever's supposed to be controversial about it. So brilanon tries to seem more interesting than he is and hopes for attention.</p><p>I'm not saying it's less interesting than Spore. Critterding sounds quite interesting (I don't see the point of critterdrug much), but the only thing controversial about critterdrug is that he's trying to hype it through false controversy. Well, now he's got a real one, I guess. I bet that'll make him happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you complaining about ?
The GP did n't say critterding or critterdrug suck .
He just pointed out it 's self-promotion ( the submitter of the story is the guy who made critterdrug ) , and it tries to seem interesting by suggesting there 's some sort of controversy , without linking to an article that attacks critterdrug for whatever 's supposed to be controversial about it .
So brilanon tries to seem more interesting than he is and hopes for attention.I 'm not saying it 's less interesting than Spore .
Critterding sounds quite interesting ( I do n't see the point of critterdrug much ) , but the only thing controversial about critterdrug is that he 's trying to hype it through false controversy .
Well , now he 's got a real one , I guess .
I bet that 'll make him happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you complaining about?
The GP didn't say critterding or critterdrug suck.
He just pointed out it's self-promotion (the submitter of the story is the guy who made critterdrug), and it tries to seem interesting by suggesting there's some sort of controversy, without linking to an article that attacks critterdrug for whatever's supposed to be controversial about it.
So brilanon tries to seem more interesting than he is and hopes for attention.I'm not saying it's less interesting than Spore.
Critterding sounds quite interesting (I don't see the point of critterdrug much), but the only thing controversial about critterdrug is that he's trying to hype it through false controversy.
Well, now he's got a real one, I guess.
I bet that'll make him happy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734140</id>
	<title>Re:Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1263327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but I think you need to be high to write a summary like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but I think you need to be high to write a summary like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but I think you need to be high to write a summary like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30738392</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1263316680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow, this reminds me of the liqueurelle, a kind of painting introduced by German musician Udo Lindenberg. It's like a watercolor painting except that you use liquors of various colors. The rationale is that if you ever really need a drink and don't have anything around you can eat the painting.<br>
<br>
I don't think this actually works but I like the idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , this reminds me of the liqueurelle , a kind of painting introduced by German musician Udo Lindenberg .
It 's like a watercolor painting except that you use liquors of various colors .
The rationale is that if you ever really need a drink and do n't have anything around you can eat the painting .
I do n't think this actually works but I like the idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, this reminds me of the liqueurelle, a kind of painting introduced by German musician Udo Lindenberg.
It's like a watercolor painting except that you use liquors of various colors.
The rationale is that if you ever really need a drink and don't have anything around you can eat the painting.
I don't think this actually works but I like the idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734608</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1263291000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You ruined my lunch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ruined my lunch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You ruined my lunch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737150</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>Bandman</author>
	<datestamp>1263311880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but if the project is cool and interesting, what's the problem? You get mad because someone submitted an interesting link to their project, and the editors agreed that it was interesting enough to warrant inclusion?</p><p>I'm not seeing the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but if the project is cool and interesting , what 's the problem ?
You get mad because someone submitted an interesting link to their project , and the editors agreed that it was interesting enough to warrant inclusion ? I 'm not seeing the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but if the project is cool and interesting, what's the problem?
You get mad because someone submitted an interesting link to their project, and the editors agreed that it was interesting enough to warrant inclusion?I'm not seeing the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733604</id>
	<title>Re:Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>lemur3</author>
	<datestamp>1263233700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what the hell this is about?</p></div><p>it is an elaborate screensaver.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what the hell this is about ? it is an elaborate screensaver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what the hell this is about?it is an elaborate screensaver.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737306</id>
	<title>Very Blocky</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1263312540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  I don't quite understand where the high art aspect of this comes from
but the pictures on the site, are very blocky coloured cubes, and
don't look very artistic at all, to a philestein like me.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/AI/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">AI</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't quite understand where the high art aspect of this comes from but the pictures on the site , are very blocky coloured cubes , and do n't look very artistic at all , to a philestein like me .
--- AI [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  I don't quite understand where the high art aspect of this comes from
but the pictures on the site, are very blocky coloured cubes, and
don't look very artistic at all, to a philestein like me.
---

AI [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848</id>
	<title>Re:If ever...</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1263236460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Turns out Picasso was just a Perl script on drugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out Picasso was just a Perl script on drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out Picasso was just a Perl script on drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734942</id>
	<title>Groovy</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1263295260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>an extra retina which is shared with the whole population... extended through time like a movie... write to it for communication or pleasure...</p></div><p>Looks like the cellular automata aren't the only things that are high around here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>an extra retina which is shared with the whole population... extended through time like a movie... write to it for communication or pleasure...Looks like the cellular automata are n't the only things that are high around here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an extra retina which is shared with the whole population... extended through time like a movie... write to it for communication or pleasure...Looks like the cellular automata aren't the only things that are high around here.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733938</id>
	<title>Obviously not stoned</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263238020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of the innocent slashdotters expressing doubt as to the wonder of TFA obviously weren't reading it stoned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the innocent slashdotters expressing doubt as to the wonder of TFA obviously were n't reading it stoned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the innocent slashdotters expressing doubt as to the wonder of TFA obviously weren't reading it stoned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737830</id>
	<title>Re:art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>komode0</author>
	<datestamp>1263314700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My brother is an artist and he made some of his best stuff when he was high on pain killers after a sports injury.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My brother is an artist and he made some of his best stuff when he was high on pain killers after a sports injury .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My brother is an artist and he made some of his best stuff when he was high on pain killers after a sports injury.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506</id>
	<title>Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1263232800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in order to understand what the hell this is about?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in order to understand what the hell this is about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in order to understand what the hell this is about?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733542</id>
	<title>Just the program?</title>
	<author>Wolvenhaven</author>
	<datestamp>1263233160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>and may actually produce hallucinations in the user.</i>
<br>
I don't think the program is the only thing that's high around here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and may actually produce hallucinations in the user .
I do n't think the program is the only thing that 's high around here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and may actually produce hallucinations in the user.
I don't think the program is the only thing that's high around here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772</id>
	<title>Let me know</title>
	<author>th3rmite</author>
	<datestamp>1263235680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>once a cellular automaton cuts off its ear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>once a cellular automaton cuts off its ear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>once a cellular automaton cuts off its ear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733904</id>
	<title>Good Intentions</title>
	<author>Sigvatr</author>
	<datestamp>1263237240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think a more accurate title would be "Neural Nets Intended on Making Art While High".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a more accurate title would be " Neural Nets Intended on Making Art While High " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a more accurate title would be "Neural Nets Intended on Making Art While High".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735310</id>
	<title>I also made some art in the toilet this morning.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263299640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I also made some art in the toilet this morning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also made some art in the toilet this morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also made some art in the toilet this morning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736514</id>
	<title>Re:Leave something for humans!</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263309240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least we still have rocknroll!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least we still have rocknroll !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least we still have rocknroll!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739436</id>
	<title>Re:goddammit</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1263320160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank god! If a neural net ever took off on a windows box we'd all be screwed.  At least the current neural nets have a limited market share.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god !
If a neural net ever took off on a windows box we 'd all be screwed .
At least the current neural nets have a limited market share .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god!
If a neural net ever took off on a windows box we'd all be screwed.
At least the current neural nets have a limited market share.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736304</id>
	<title>Acid</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1263307920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does it score on the Acid 3 test?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it score on the Acid 3 test ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it score on the Acid 3 test?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735646</id>
	<title>To create the perfect image, shape fashion.</title>
	<author>COBB1986</author>
	<datestamp>1263303120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult <a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ] Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular , most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts , jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3 ) $ 35HANDBGAS ( COACH,L V , DG , ED HARDY ) $ 35TSHIRTS ( POLO ,ED HARDY , LACOSTE ) $ 16 thanks... For details , please consult http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO ,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186</id>
	<title>art ability != drug use</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263298320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>drug use in artists coincides with a loss of abilities, not an increase of them</p><p>artists certainly have excesses in their lifestyles, of which drug use certainly is a common factor. but this is all secondary to being an artist, not some sort of gateway. if you dressed up like a race car driver, does that make you a race car driver? likewise, if you use drugs, you don't increase any artistic abilities, you just get stupid</p><p>anyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>drug use in artists coincides with a loss of abilities , not an increase of themartists certainly have excesses in their lifestyles , of which drug use certainly is a common factor .
but this is all secondary to being an artist , not some sort of gateway .
if you dressed up like a race car driver , does that make you a race car driver ?
likewise , if you use drugs , you do n't increase any artistic abilities , you just get stupidanyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drug use in artists coincides with a loss of abilities, not an increase of themartists certainly have excesses in their lifestyles, of which drug use certainly is a common factor.
but this is all secondary to being an artist, not some sort of gateway.
if you dressed up like a race car driver, does that make you a race car driver?
likewise, if you use drugs, you don't increase any artistic abilities, you just get stupidanyone who actually believes that drug use increases artistic ability is certainly no artist</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733882</id>
	<title>I, for one,</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1263236880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>welcome our new stoned overlords, and ask 'Yo, you holding?'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new stoned overlords , and ask 'Yo , you holding ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new stoned overlords, and ask 'Yo, you holding?
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734718</id>
	<title>Hey, you got your idle in my technology</title>
	<author>PetoskeyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1263292380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cute toy.  I remember doing something like this back in high school in 2D after getting Koza's book about 20 years ago.</p><p>It's one hell of a stretch to suggest this does something for pleasure or is complex enough that virtual "drugs" can affect it's processing.  The only thing high was the person writing up the description... ya know man because may like - we're all simulations  - woah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cute toy .
I remember doing something like this back in high school in 2D after getting Koza 's book about 20 years ago.It 's one hell of a stretch to suggest this does something for pleasure or is complex enough that virtual " drugs " can affect it 's processing .
The only thing high was the person writing up the description... ya know man because may like - we 're all simulations - woah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cute toy.
I remember doing something like this back in high school in 2D after getting Koza's book about 20 years ago.It's one hell of a stretch to suggest this does something for pleasure or is complex enough that virtual "drugs" can affect it's processing.
The only thing high was the person writing up the description... ya know man because may like - we're all simulations  - woah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733728</id>
	<title>This Joke Is As Good As The Story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263235080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do black women like to keep their legs open during picnics?  It keeps the flies away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do black women like to keep their legs open during picnics ?
It keeps the flies away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do black women like to keep their legs open during picnics?
It keeps the flies away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912</id>
	<title>Re:Self-promotion AND false controversy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263237600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get it. You motherfuckers were all excited about the childrens' game Spore that didn't even use neural nets. Yet you are all being little bitches about a project that is aimed at basically creating Spore on a more fundamental and realistic level.</p><p>Yeah, yeah mod me troll. The mob mentality sucks here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it .
You motherfuckers were all excited about the childrens ' game Spore that did n't even use neural nets .
Yet you are all being little bitches about a project that is aimed at basically creating Spore on a more fundamental and realistic level.Yeah , yeah mod me troll .
The mob mentality sucks here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it.
You motherfuckers were all excited about the childrens' game Spore that didn't even use neural nets.
Yet you are all being little bitches about a project that is aimed at basically creating Spore on a more fundamental and realistic level.Yeah, yeah mod me troll.
The mob mentality sucks here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734012</id>
	<title>Re:Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1263239160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's about a controversial fishing net which catches drugs when used by artists... I think...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about a controversial fishing net which catches drugs when used by artists... I think.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about a controversial fishing net which catches drugs when used by artists... I think...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690</id>
	<title>Re:design geekery</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1263234720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you ever painted a picture with your menstrual blood? You should try it. <br> <br>

It fades to a silvery-crimson sheen, like metallic paint does, due to the iron content of the blood. I still get all misty-eyed when I think about her giving me that painting. I framed it and put it on my desk at work. They thought I was a weirdo. <b>Fuck them</b>. She even kept my semen in a test tube, stored in her freezer next to the Hot Pockets.<br> <br>

Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love -- short of cannibalism, at least<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever painted a picture with your menstrual blood ?
You should try it .
It fades to a silvery-crimson sheen , like metallic paint does , due to the iron content of the blood .
I still get all misty-eyed when I think about her giving me that painting .
I framed it and put it on my desk at work .
They thought I was a weirdo .
Fuck them .
She even kept my semen in a test tube , stored in her freezer next to the Hot Pockets .
Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love -- short of cannibalism , at least : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever painted a picture with your menstrual blood?
You should try it.
It fades to a silvery-crimson sheen, like metallic paint does, due to the iron content of the blood.
I still get all misty-eyed when I think about her giving me that painting.
I framed it and put it on my desk at work.
They thought I was a weirdo.
Fuck them.
She even kept my semen in a test tube, stored in her freezer next to the Hot Pockets.
Giving a menstrual blood painting is the ultimate expression of love -- short of cannibalism, at least :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734084</id>
	<title>Re:Do I have to be hight too</title>
	<author>Captain\_Jackass</author>
	<datestamp>1263326580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, there's no such thing as two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , there 's no such thing as two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, there's no such thing as two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733624</id>
	<title>no reason for a fork</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1263233880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going to suggest that when a project like this forks, it's from a failure of flexibility in the original project.  The second project looks like it could easily be a module added onto the first, and that their efforts would be better spent working on the same project, making it in a way that allows certain features to be added or removed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to suggest that when a project like this forks , it 's from a failure of flexibility in the original project .
The second project looks like it could easily be a module added onto the first , and that their efforts would be better spent working on the same project , making it in a way that allows certain features to be added or removed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to suggest that when a project like this forks, it's from a failure of flexibility in the original project.
The second project looks like it could easily be a module added onto the first, and that their efforts would be better spent working on the same project, making it in a way that allows certain features to be added or removed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734290</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know</title>
	<author>raftpeople</author>
	<datestamp>1263329700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The true Turing test</htmltext>
<tokenext>The true Turing test</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The true Turing test</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733582</id>
	<title>terrible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a mind.forth troll by a different name. Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net research. Narcotics, stimulants, and psychedelics are complex chemical interactions in brain, not superficial rainbow colors on a grid.<br>Submit this work for peer review and rightly be humbled by the withering reviews.<br>The only mental stuff going on with this project is the mental masturbation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a mind.forth troll by a different name .
Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net research .
Narcotics , stimulants , and psychedelics are complex chemical interactions in brain , not superficial rainbow colors on a grid.Submit this work for peer review and rightly be humbled by the withering reviews.The only mental stuff going on with this project is the mental masturbation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a mind.forth troll by a different name.
Show how this work realistically explains or models anything about biological mental processes or furthers AI or neural net research.
Narcotics, stimulants, and psychedelics are complex chemical interactions in brain, not superficial rainbow colors on a grid.Submit this work for peer review and rightly be humbled by the withering reviews.The only mental stuff going on with this project is the mental masturbation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502</id>
	<title>If ever...</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1263232800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If ever there was a need for a "wtf" tag...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If ever there was a need for a " wtf " tag.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If ever there was a need for a "wtf" tag...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737058</id>
	<title>Anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263311580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sourceforge causes massive memory leaks in firefox and crashes IE whenever I try to download a file.
Anyone know another place to grab the original Critterding?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sourceforge causes massive memory leaks in firefox and crashes IE whenever I try to download a file .
Anyone know another place to grab the original Critterding ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sourceforge causes massive memory leaks in firefox and crashes IE whenever I try to download a file.
Anyone know another place to grab the original Critterding?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740456</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263323940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would have get into a knife fight with another automaton first, apparently. Who has the most truthful third eye, now there's the subject for the fight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would have get into a knife fight with another automaton first , apparently .
Who has the most truthful third eye , now there 's the subject for the fight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would have get into a knife fight with another automaton first, apparently.
Who has the most truthful third eye, now there's the subject for the fight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30757524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30738392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_2140224_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734502
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30738392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30740724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30757524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30736834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734204
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30739636
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30741468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30735154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30737738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30733624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_2140224.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_2140224.30734142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
