<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_11_1956259</id>
	<title>Rudolph the Cadmium-Nosed Reindeer</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263222060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"Barred from using lead in children's jewelry because of its toxicity, some Chinese manufacturers have been <a href="http://www.sphere.com/nation/article/some-childrens-jewelry-made-in-china-contains-high-levels-of-toxic-metal-cadmium/19311067">substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium</a> in sparkling charm bracelets and shiny pendants being sold throughout the US, an AP investigation shows. Charms from 'Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer' bracelets were measured at between 82 and 91 percent cadmium, and leached so much cadmium that they would have to be specially handled and disposed of under US environmental law if they were waste from manufacturing. Cadmium, a known carcinogen, can hinder brain development in the very young. 'There's nothing positive that you can say about this metal. It's a poison,' said the CDC's Bruce Fowler. On the CDC's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No. 7. Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years. Hey, at least it doesn't <a href="//slashdot.org/story/07/11/08/1440208/US-Aussie-Officials-Yank-GHB-Producing-Toys">metabolize into GHB</a> when the little tykes ingest it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Barred from using lead in children 's jewelry because of its toxicity , some Chinese manufacturers have been substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium in sparkling charm bracelets and shiny pendants being sold throughout the US , an AP investigation shows .
Charms from 'Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer ' bracelets were measured at between 82 and 91 percent cadmium , and leached so much cadmium that they would have to be specially handled and disposed of under US environmental law if they were waste from manufacturing .
Cadmium , a known carcinogen , can hinder brain development in the very young .
'There 's nothing positive that you can say about this metal .
It 's a poison, ' said the CDC 's Bruce Fowler .
On the CDC 's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment , cadmium ranks No .
7. Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years .
Hey , at least it does n't metabolize into GHB when the little tykes ingest it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Barred from using lead in children's jewelry because of its toxicity, some Chinese manufacturers have been substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium in sparkling charm bracelets and shiny pendants being sold throughout the US, an AP investigation shows.
Charms from 'Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer' bracelets were measured at between 82 and 91 percent cadmium, and leached so much cadmium that they would have to be specially handled and disposed of under US environmental law if they were waste from manufacturing.
Cadmium, a known carcinogen, can hinder brain development in the very young.
'There's nothing positive that you can say about this metal.
It's a poison,' said the CDC's Bruce Fowler.
On the CDC's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No.
7. Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years.
Hey, at least it doesn't metabolize into GHB when the little tykes ingest it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30747648</id>
	<title>Re:Itai-Itai</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263323040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but *EVERYBODY* in Japan commits suicide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but * EVERYBODY * in Japan commits suicide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but *EVERYBODY* in Japan commits suicide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732878</id>
	<title>YouE FAIL It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263227160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>minutes now while Playing so it's</htmltext>
<tokenext>minutes now while Playing so it 's</tokentext>
<sentencetext>minutes now while Playing so it's</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732840</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263226920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot believe US of A export this waste/crap cheaply to China and they, in-turn, export it back to us as 'goods' or trinket, which has way far superior value. Talk about innovation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not believe US of A export this waste/crap cheaply to China and they , in-turn , export it back to us as 'goods ' or trinket , which has way far superior value .
Talk about innovation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot believe US of A export this waste/crap cheaply to China and they, in-turn, export it back to us as 'goods' or trinket, which has way far superior value.
Talk about innovation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737892</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1263314940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We need regulation. We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.</i></p><p>And yet despite nearly a century of this kind of thought, Wal*Mart is selling bracelets with cadmium.</p><p>Just how much more evidence do you need that government regulation doesn't work?  Just one more law or ruling will finally get it right?  No, that's been the prevailing attitude among socialists for the past half century, and their arrogance is killing our children.</p><p>Only independent validation and consumer regulation can work, precisely because it leverages economies of scale governments can never bring to bear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need regulation .
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP , but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.And yet despite nearly a century of this kind of thought , Wal * Mart is selling bracelets with cadmium.Just how much more evidence do you need that government regulation does n't work ?
Just one more law or ruling will finally get it right ?
No , that 's been the prevailing attitude among socialists for the past half century , and their arrogance is killing our children.Only independent validation and consumer regulation can work , precisely because it leverages economies of scale governments can never bring to bear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need regulation.
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.And yet despite nearly a century of this kind of thought, Wal*Mart is selling bracelets with cadmium.Just how much more evidence do you need that government regulation doesn't work?
Just one more law or ruling will finally get it right?
No, that's been the prevailing attitude among socialists for the past half century, and their arrogance is killing our children.Only independent validation and consumer regulation can work, precisely because it leverages economies of scale governments can never bring to bear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733362</id>
	<title>Re:Scaremongering</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1263231300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ingestion is a serious danger with cadmium. There was a case of mass Cd poisonings in Japan in the first half of the 20th century, caused by contaminated rice irrigated with water downstream from mines.  Any application where Cd comes into contact with the hands -- especially children's hands -- is suspect.</p><p>With respect to Cd plated tools  -- I don't remember them.     I do remember fasteners with Cd plating.  I suppose if you don't disturb the plating it's not likely to leach. However that says nothing about the items in the article which *did* leach.  You can't compare plating to something like paint, which is an entirely different thing. If it weren't, you'd never have to plate anything, you'd get by with paint.</p><p>In any case I don't buy the whole "we used to use such and so and it ain't harmed me none" argument.  When I was young people still carbon tetrachloride to clean circuit boards.  Let me tell you it was da bomb. It was cheap, worked like a charm, left no residue, and you could put out fires with it. I knew lots of people who used it and never saw any adverse reactions.  That doesn't mean it didn't hurt some people. For one thing I haven't followed those people for thirty years and don't know how many ended up with liver damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ingestion is a serious danger with cadmium .
There was a case of mass Cd poisonings in Japan in the first half of the 20th century , caused by contaminated rice irrigated with water downstream from mines .
Any application where Cd comes into contact with the hands -- especially children 's hands -- is suspect.With respect to Cd plated tools -- I do n't remember them .
I do remember fasteners with Cd plating .
I suppose if you do n't disturb the plating it 's not likely to leach .
However that says nothing about the items in the article which * did * leach .
You ca n't compare plating to something like paint , which is an entirely different thing .
If it were n't , you 'd never have to plate anything , you 'd get by with paint.In any case I do n't buy the whole " we used to use such and so and it ai n't harmed me none " argument .
When I was young people still carbon tetrachloride to clean circuit boards .
Let me tell you it was da bomb .
It was cheap , worked like a charm , left no residue , and you could put out fires with it .
I knew lots of people who used it and never saw any adverse reactions .
That does n't mean it did n't hurt some people .
For one thing I have n't followed those people for thirty years and do n't know how many ended up with liver damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ingestion is a serious danger with cadmium.
There was a case of mass Cd poisonings in Japan in the first half of the 20th century, caused by contaminated rice irrigated with water downstream from mines.
Any application where Cd comes into contact with the hands -- especially children's hands -- is suspect.With respect to Cd plated tools  -- I don't remember them.
I do remember fasteners with Cd plating.
I suppose if you don't disturb the plating it's not likely to leach.
However that says nothing about the items in the article which *did* leach.
You can't compare plating to something like paint, which is an entirely different thing.
If it weren't, you'd never have to plate anything, you'd get by with paint.In any case I don't buy the whole "we used to use such and so and it ain't harmed me none" argument.
When I was young people still carbon tetrachloride to clean circuit boards.
Let me tell you it was da bomb.
It was cheap, worked like a charm, left no residue, and you could put out fires with it.
I knew lots of people who used it and never saw any adverse reactions.
That doesn't mean it didn't hurt some people.
For one thing I haven't followed those people for thirty years and don't know how many ended up with liver damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733722</id>
	<title>What can you do?</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1263235020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I were a parent and I had read this article, it would probably scare me shitless. What would you do to protect your children from these kinds of threats -- the ones you don't even know enough about to keep an eye out for? Even if you did know about this threat, how would you make sure that jewelry didn't contain cadmium? It's not like there's a "nutrition facts" sticker for jewelry and toys.
<br>
<br>
As one poster said, you could try to refrain from buying items made in China, since that's where the majority of the problems come from, but what else can you do? So much stuff is made in China nowadays that it seems pretty hard to not get those things for your kids, or have them get them from other people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I were a parent and I had read this article , it would probably scare me shitless .
What would you do to protect your children from these kinds of threats -- the ones you do n't even know enough about to keep an eye out for ?
Even if you did know about this threat , how would you make sure that jewelry did n't contain cadmium ?
It 's not like there 's a " nutrition facts " sticker for jewelry and toys .
As one poster said , you could try to refrain from buying items made in China , since that 's where the majority of the problems come from , but what else can you do ?
So much stuff is made in China nowadays that it seems pretty hard to not get those things for your kids , or have them get them from other people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I were a parent and I had read this article, it would probably scare me shitless.
What would you do to protect your children from these kinds of threats -- the ones you don't even know enough about to keep an eye out for?
Even if you did know about this threat, how would you make sure that jewelry didn't contain cadmium?
It's not like there's a "nutrition facts" sticker for jewelry and toys.
As one poster said, you could try to refrain from buying items made in China, since that's where the majority of the problems come from, but what else can you do?
So much stuff is made in China nowadays that it seems pretty hard to not get those things for your kids, or have them get them from other people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733034</id>
	<title>Well that's *very* comforting</title>
	<author>toby</author>
	<datestamp>1263228600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years.</p></div></blockquote><p>And we know the Chinese don't give a damn about <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/hong-kong-air-pollution-at-lifethreatening-levels-1857827.html" title="independent.co.uk">poisoning</a> [independent.co.uk] <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/hong-kong-air-pollution-at-lifethreatening-levels-1857827.html" title="independent.co.uk">their</a> [independent.co.uk] <a href="http://www.genetologisch-onderzoek.nl/index.php/782/anthropology/archaeologie/" title="genetologi...derzoek.nl">backyard</a> [genetologi...derzoek.nl] or <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/hong-kong-air-pollution-at-lifethreatening-levels-1857827.html" title="independent.co.uk">themselves.</a> [independent.co.uk]</p><p> We'll all pay for this unforgivable, mindless destruction eventually.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years.And we know the Chinese do n't give a damn about poisoning [ independent.co.uk ] their [ independent.co.uk ] backyard [ genetologi...derzoek.nl ] or themselves .
[ independent.co.uk ] We 'll all pay for this unforgivable , mindless destruction eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jewelry industry veterans in China say cadmium has been used in domestic products there for years.And we know the Chinese don't give a damn about poisoning [independent.co.uk] their [independent.co.uk] backyard [genetologi...derzoek.nl] or themselves.
[independent.co.uk] We'll all pay for this unforgivable, mindless destruction eventually.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732868</id>
	<title>Rudolph...</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1263227040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium</p> </div><p>Everybody knows a proper Rudolph is made from tritium, not cadmium. Damn imitation radioactive children's toys... buy american: We use 100\% Tritium in our glow in the dark toys!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium Everybody knows a proper Rudolph is made from tritium , not cadmium .
Damn imitation radioactive children 's toys... buy american : We use 100 \ % Tritium in our glow in the dark toys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium Everybody knows a proper Rudolph is made from tritium, not cadmium.
Damn imitation radioactive children's toys... buy american: We use 100\% Tritium in our glow in the dark toys!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733544</id>
	<title>End Result?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing happens. They'll be confiscated when they enter customs, or get recalled, hopefully, if they reach the shelves.</p><p>Outside of that, nothing. No reprimand to China, cause they have the U.S. by the balls and they know it. We might here some Congressmen bark about it on CSPAN and hold a hearing, but add this to the list of toxic crap coming to the U.S. from China.</p><p>This is how U.S. business operates from now on. Get used to it. I'd like to think that if enough people complain 'something' would actually be done, but sadly I've grown to cynical. Hopefully some of you haven't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing happens .
They 'll be confiscated when they enter customs , or get recalled , hopefully , if they reach the shelves.Outside of that , nothing .
No reprimand to China , cause they have the U.S. by the balls and they know it .
We might here some Congressmen bark about it on CSPAN and hold a hearing , but add this to the list of toxic crap coming to the U.S. from China.This is how U.S. business operates from now on .
Get used to it .
I 'd like to think that if enough people complain 'something ' would actually be done , but sadly I 've grown to cynical .
Hopefully some of you have n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing happens.
They'll be confiscated when they enter customs, or get recalled, hopefully, if they reach the shelves.Outside of that, nothing.
No reprimand to China, cause they have the U.S. by the balls and they know it.
We might here some Congressmen bark about it on CSPAN and hold a hearing, but add this to the list of toxic crap coming to the U.S. from China.This is how U.S. business operates from now on.
Get used to it.
I'd like to think that if enough people complain 'something' would actually be done, but sadly I've grown to cynical.
Hopefully some of you haven't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733484</id>
	<title>Re:Makes nice paints</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1263232560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's very effective corrosion resistance plating as well. Even better when you put on a chromate conversion coating after (also toxic).<br> It's not used much in consumer goods though, mostly military stuff (chrome conversion can conveniently turn it olive-drab, too.)<br> <br>I believe the main problem with Cd is - it's very similar to Zn. And due to this similarity, your body absorbs it, as zinc, but you are unable to excrete it, and get something like a horrible zinc deficiency? I'm not entirely certain, but I seem to recall something like that.<br> <br>Coincidentally, Cd and hex-chrome as both banned in the EU, under RoHS, - Well It would be if these were electronics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very effective corrosion resistance plating as well .
Even better when you put on a chromate conversion coating after ( also toxic ) .
It 's not used much in consumer goods though , mostly military stuff ( chrome conversion can conveniently turn it olive-drab , too .
) I believe the main problem with Cd is - it 's very similar to Zn .
And due to this similarity , your body absorbs it , as zinc , but you are unable to excrete it , and get something like a horrible zinc deficiency ?
I 'm not entirely certain , but I seem to recall something like that .
Coincidentally , Cd and hex-chrome as both banned in the EU , under RoHS , - Well It would be if these were electronics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very effective corrosion resistance plating as well.
Even better when you put on a chromate conversion coating after (also toxic).
It's not used much in consumer goods though, mostly military stuff (chrome conversion can conveniently turn it olive-drab, too.
) I believe the main problem with Cd is - it's very similar to Zn.
And due to this similarity, your body absorbs it, as zinc, but you are unable to excrete it, and get something like a horrible zinc deficiency?
I'm not entirely certain, but I seem to recall something like that.
Coincidentally, Cd and hex-chrome as both banned in the EU, under RoHS, - Well It would be if these were electronics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734224</id>
	<title>Re:Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>M4DP4RROT</author>
	<datestamp>1263328800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It doesn't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight....The thing that surprised me about this story: cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds. ($75/tube vs $20/tube) why the hell aren't they using one of the much cheaper, safer reds?</p></div><p>You've answered your own question-
From the article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Much of the increase found by the Michigan-based HealthyStuff.org came in toys with polyvinyl chloride plastic, according to Jeff Gearhart, the group's research director. Both lead and cadmium can be used to fortify PVC against the sun's rays.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight....The thing that surprised me about this story : cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds .
( $ 75/tube vs $ 20/tube ) why the hell are n't they using one of the much cheaper , safer reds ? You 've answered your own question- From the article : Much of the increase found by the Michigan-based HealthyStuff.org came in toys with polyvinyl chloride plastic , according to Jeff Gearhart , the group 's research director .
Both lead and cadmium can be used to fortify PVC against the sun 's rays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight....The thing that surprised me about this story: cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds.
($75/tube vs $20/tube) why the hell aren't they using one of the much cheaper, safer reds?You've answered your own question-
From the article:Much of the increase found by the Michigan-based HealthyStuff.org came in toys with polyvinyl chloride plastic, according to Jeff Gearhart, the group's research director.
Both lead and cadmium can be used to fortify PVC against the sun's rays.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734188</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263328260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We need regulation. We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.</p></div><p>The problem with regulation is when it's being created, it gets watered down by multiply parties whining how it will have terrible consequences on them.  Then it effectively becomes useless.</p><p>Of course the US has very little leverage against China these days, as long as the debt levels keep growing the government needs them to buy the debt. Change we can believe in right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We need regulation .
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP , but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.The problem with regulation is when it 's being created , it gets watered down by multiply parties whining how it will have terrible consequences on them .
Then it effectively becomes useless.Of course the US has very little leverage against China these days , as long as the debt levels keep growing the government needs them to buy the debt .
Change we can believe in right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need regulation.
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.The problem with regulation is when it's being created, it gets watered down by multiply parties whining how it will have terrible consequences on them.
Then it effectively becomes useless.Of course the US has very little leverage against China these days, as long as the debt levels keep growing the government needs them to buy the debt.
Change we can believe in right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733864</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1263236700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements. We enforce IP laws to no end, but other issues? Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.</p></div><p>Yes... the developed world thinks they got rid of slavery centuries ago, but really we just outsourced it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements .
We enforce IP laws to no end , but other issues ?
Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.Yes... the developed world thinks they got rid of slavery centuries ago , but really we just outsourced it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements.
We enforce IP laws to no end, but other issues?
Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.Yes... the developed world thinks they got rid of slavery centuries ago, but really we just outsourced it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733106</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1263229140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's always been people that want to import substandard and dangerous goods to make a profit.  In the past it was difficult for them to do so.  Now it is very easy.  That is what has changed.<br>It really has nothing to do with the quality and safety of Chinese goods because in general both have improved dramaticly and the really bad quality stuff doesn't get exported.  We're just letting things in we wouldn't allow to be sold if they were made domesticly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's always been people that want to import substandard and dangerous goods to make a profit .
In the past it was difficult for them to do so .
Now it is very easy .
That is what has changed.It really has nothing to do with the quality and safety of Chinese goods because in general both have improved dramaticly and the really bad quality stuff does n't get exported .
We 're just letting things in we would n't allow to be sold if they were made domesticly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's always been people that want to import substandard and dangerous goods to make a profit.
In the past it was difficult for them to do so.
Now it is very easy.
That is what has changed.It really has nothing to do with the quality and safety of Chinese goods because in general both have improved dramaticly and the really bad quality stuff doesn't get exported.
We're just letting things in we wouldn't allow to be sold if they were made domesticly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734726</id>
	<title>Number 7 out of how many?</title>
	<author>JakartaDean</author>
	<datestamp>1263292500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>On the CDC's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No. 7.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I see.  So, where does it rank on their list of the 500 most hazardous substances in the environment?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the CDC 's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment , cadmium ranks No .
7 . I see .
So , where does it rank on their list of the 500 most hazardous substances in the environment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the CDC's priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No.
7.
I see.
So, where does it rank on their list of the 500 most hazardous substances in the environment?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736518</id>
	<title>Re:How come...</title>
	<author>Pigeon451</author>
	<datestamp>1263309300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cadmium was never an issue in toys before, now it is. So there was no need for regulation. If lawmakers were to propose regulations on "all" potentially harmful materials, the public would go nuts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cadmium was never an issue in toys before , now it is .
So there was no need for regulation .
If lawmakers were to propose regulations on " all " potentially harmful materials , the public would go nuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cadmium was never an issue in toys before, now it is.
So there was no need for regulation.
If lawmakers were to propose regulations on "all" potentially harmful materials, the public would go nuts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733204</id>
	<title>silver lining</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>30 years from now when China is the top superpower, their population will be battle hardened by natural selection for the biochemical attacks that the terrorists will spring on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>30 years from now when China is the top superpower , their population will be battle hardened by natural selection for the biochemical attacks that the terrorists will spring on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>30 years from now when China is the top superpower, their population will be battle hardened by natural selection for the biochemical attacks that the terrorists will spring on them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734004</id>
	<title>Re:I can think of something positive...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263238980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that is how Rudolph lights his nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that is how Rudolph lights his nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that is how Rudolph lights his nose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733254</id>
	<title>OMG Ponies!!!</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1263230340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Notice Slashdot reports on kids jewelry from China, not say, tech parts from China. How are they doing on that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Notice Slashdot reports on kids jewelry from China , not say , tech parts from China .
How are they doing on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notice Slashdot reports on kids jewelry from China, not say, tech parts from China.
How are they doing on that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733394</id>
	<title>Re:When life gives you lemons</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1263231600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which is pretty weird considering the lemons themselves can be used as a battery.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon\_battery" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon\_battery</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://hetlab.kro.nl/hightech/citroenbatterij.aspx" title="hetlab.kro.nl">http://hetlab.kro.nl/hightech/citroenbatterij.aspx</a> [hetlab.kro.nl] (includes a nice video)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is pretty weird considering the lemons themselves can be used as a battery .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon \ _battery [ wikipedia.org ] and http : //hetlab.kro.nl/hightech/citroenbatterij.aspx [ hetlab.kro.nl ] ( includes a nice video )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is pretty weird considering the lemons themselves can be used as a battery.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon\_battery [wikipedia.org] and http://hetlab.kro.nl/hightech/citroenbatterij.aspx [hetlab.kro.nl] (includes a nice video)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739318</id>
	<title>Re:Fair and balanced.</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1263319740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on them</i></p><p>I don't have a problem with that. After all, that's their role in society.</p><p><i>to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous.</i></p><p>Most stereotypes are based on truths, although things change and what once may have been true isn't necessarily true any more. If you're Jewish and don't like the stereotype of "jewing someone down" then don't do it. If you're Irish and don't like the stereotype of being a drunken brawler, don't drink and avoid fights. If China wants to overcome the truthful stereotype of producing poisonous toys and food, they should simply stop doing it and in a coupld of generations those stereotypes will go away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on themI do n't have a problem with that .
After all , that 's their role in society.to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous.Most stereotypes are based on truths , although things change and what once may have been true is n't necessarily true any more .
If you 're Jewish and do n't like the stereotype of " jewing someone down " then do n't do it .
If you 're Irish and do n't like the stereotype of being a drunken brawler , do n't drink and avoid fights .
If China wants to overcome the truthful stereotype of producing poisonous toys and food , they should simply stop doing it and in a coupld of generations those stereotypes will go away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on themI don't have a problem with that.
After all, that's their role in society.to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous.Most stereotypes are based on truths, although things change and what once may have been true isn't necessarily true any more.
If you're Jewish and don't like the stereotype of "jewing someone down" then don't do it.
If you're Irish and don't like the stereotype of being a drunken brawler, don't drink and avoid fights.
If China wants to overcome the truthful stereotype of producing poisonous toys and food, they should simply stop doing it and in a coupld of generations those stereotypes will go away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138</id>
	<title>Re:Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>theheadlessrabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1263229320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>There's nothing positive that you can say about this metal</i></p><p>It's sulfide makes for a good <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoresistor" title="wikipedia.org">photoresistor.  Combined with nickel, cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery.  It's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems.  In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p> </div><p>It also makes a very, very nice red pigment.</p><p>As an artist, I use tons of cadmium red because it has properties that no other red pigment can match.  it's got great intensity, great opacity, and unlike 90\% of the other reds used in paint, cadmium is actually permanent.  It doesn't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight.  Unlike every other red pigment out there, when you mix cadmium red with white, you don't get pink, you get light red.  When mixed with other colours, it gives you very natural tones.<br>Classical portraiture and landscapes would be impossible without it.  Ever noticed how when high school kids paint portraits, it often looks like the men are wearing pink lipstick? it's cause the kids aren't using cadmium.  The synthetic pigments just don't mix right.</p><p>The thing that surprised me about this story: cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds. ($75/tube vs $20/tube) why the hell aren't they using one of the much cheaper, safer reds?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing positive that you can say about this metalIt 's sulfide makes for a good photoresistor .
Combined with nickel , cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery .
It 's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems .
In short , cadmium has probably saved more lives than it 's taken .
[ wikipedia.org ] It also makes a very , very nice red pigment.As an artist , I use tons of cadmium red because it has properties that no other red pigment can match .
it 's got great intensity , great opacity , and unlike 90 \ % of the other reds used in paint , cadmium is actually permanent .
It does n't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight .
Unlike every other red pigment out there , when you mix cadmium red with white , you do n't get pink , you get light red .
When mixed with other colours , it gives you very natural tones.Classical portraiture and landscapes would be impossible without it .
Ever noticed how when high school kids paint portraits , it often looks like the men are wearing pink lipstick ?
it 's cause the kids are n't using cadmium .
The synthetic pigments just do n't mix right.The thing that surprised me about this story : cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds .
( $ 75/tube vs $ 20/tube ) why the hell are n't they using one of the much cheaper , safer reds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> There's nothing positive that you can say about this metalIt's sulfide makes for a good photoresistor.
Combined with nickel, cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery.
It's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems.
In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken.
[wikipedia.org] It also makes a very, very nice red pigment.As an artist, I use tons of cadmium red because it has properties that no other red pigment can match.
it's got great intensity, great opacity, and unlike 90\% of the other reds used in paint, cadmium is actually permanent.
It doesn't fade after a few months exposure to sunlight.
Unlike every other red pigment out there, when you mix cadmium red with white, you don't get pink, you get light red.
When mixed with other colours, it gives you very natural tones.Classical portraiture and landscapes would be impossible without it.
Ever noticed how when high school kids paint portraits, it often looks like the men are wearing pink lipstick?
it's cause the kids aren't using cadmium.
The synthetic pigments just don't mix right.The thing that surprised me about this story: cadmium pigment is bloody expensive compared to all the other reds.
($75/tube vs $20/tube) why the hell aren't they using one of the much cheaper, safer reds?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735478</id>
	<title>Re:Itai-Itai</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263301080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They call the results itai-itai disease, which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch. Few victims actually die from the disease, they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes.</p><p>Isn't that like saying that when you shoot someone, you didn't kill them, the bullet did?</p><p>If someone kills themselves as a result of an illness, and ONLY as a result of that illness, with no other factors in the equation, then I'd say that the illness damn well kill them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They call the results itai-itai disease , which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch .
Few victims actually die from the disease , they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes.Is n't that like saying that when you shoot someone , you did n't kill them , the bullet did ? If someone kills themselves as a result of an illness , and ONLY as a result of that illness , with no other factors in the equation , then I 'd say that the illness damn well kill them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They call the results itai-itai disease, which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch.
Few victims actually die from the disease, they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes.Isn't that like saying that when you shoot someone, you didn't kill them, the bullet did?If someone kills themselves as a result of an illness, and ONLY as a result of that illness, with no other factors in the equation, then I'd say that the illness damn well kill them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30760832</id>
	<title>not surprising</title>
	<author>alt154</author>
	<datestamp>1263403860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>remember this is also the same country that has practically everything pass for food.</htmltext>
<tokenext>remember this is also the same country that has practically everything pass for food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>remember this is also the same country that has practically everything pass for food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733196</id>
	<title>Re:Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1263229740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken...</p></div><p>...mainly because it wasn't used in childrens' toys.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In short , cadmium has probably saved more lives than it 's taken......mainly because it was n't used in childrens ' toys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken......mainly because it wasn't used in childrens' toys.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733128</id>
	<title>Re:Scaremongering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please read post below <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1506464&amp;cid=30732992" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1506464&amp;cid=30732992</a> [slashdot.org] and generally about  heavy metal poisoning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please read post below http : //news.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1506464&amp;cid = 30732992 [ slashdot.org ] and generally about heavy metal poisoning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please read post below http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1506464&amp;cid=30732992 [slashdot.org] and generally about  heavy metal poisoning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768</id>
	<title>When life gives you lemons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lemons are an interesting fruit. They are incredibly sour to the point of being inedible as-is, this makes it evolutionarily disadvantaged since more tasty fruits would seemingly have an advantage. However, here we are with literally millions of lemon trees. What can we do with these sour fruits? Lemonade!</p><p>So when life hands you cadmium, make Ni-Cad batteries!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lemons are an interesting fruit .
They are incredibly sour to the point of being inedible as-is , this makes it evolutionarily disadvantaged since more tasty fruits would seemingly have an advantage .
However , here we are with literally millions of lemon trees .
What can we do with these sour fruits ?
Lemonade ! So when life hands you cadmium , make Ni-Cad batteries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lemons are an interesting fruit.
They are incredibly sour to the point of being inedible as-is, this makes it evolutionarily disadvantaged since more tasty fruits would seemingly have an advantage.
However, here we are with literally millions of lemon trees.
What can we do with these sour fruits?
Lemonade!So when life hands you cadmium, make Ni-Cad batteries!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734984</id>
	<title>More dangerous?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the list (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html), cadmium is #7, but lead is #2... So what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the list ( http : //www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html ) , cadmium is # 7 , but lead is # 2... So what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the list (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html), cadmium is #7, but lead is #2... So what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733852</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's *very* comforting</title>
	<author>robogun</author>
	<datestamp>1263236460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US did the same thing through its industrial phase. There are still disasters like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love\_Canal" title="wikipedia.org">Love Canal</a> [wikipedia.org] all over the country scheduled for Superfund cleanup. Take a look at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Superfund\_sites.svg" title="wikipedia.org">map</a> [wikipedia.org] for one near you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US did the same thing through its industrial phase .
There are still disasters like the Love Canal [ wikipedia.org ] all over the country scheduled for Superfund cleanup .
Take a look at the map [ wikipedia.org ] for one near you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US did the same thing through its industrial phase.
There are still disasters like the Love Canal [wikipedia.org] all over the country scheduled for Superfund cleanup.
Take a look at the map [wikipedia.org] for one near you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732758</id>
	<title>I can think of something positive...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...combine it with nickel and you've got yourself a battery.  Now that's positive... and negative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...combine it with nickel and you 've got yourself a battery .
Now that 's positive... and negative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...combine it with nickel and you've got yourself a battery.
Now that's positive... and negative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735350</id>
	<title>Interesting report on Cadmium in Beer Crates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the EU DG Environment:<br><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/packaging/pdf/report\_29092008.pdf" title="europa.eu" rel="nofollow">STUDY TO ANALYSE THE DEROGATION  REQUEST ON THE USE OF HEAVY METALS IN PLASTIC CRATES AND PLASTIC PALLETS</a> [europa.eu]</p><p>Apparently, it takes AGES to get rid of the Cadmium from beer crates, but on the other hand it doesn't leech out easily, either. In 150 years we should all have crates that are below the norm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the EU DG Environment : STUDY TO ANALYSE THE DEROGATION REQUEST ON THE USE OF HEAVY METALS IN PLASTIC CRATES AND PLASTIC PALLETS [ europa.eu ] Apparently , it takes AGES to get rid of the Cadmium from beer crates , but on the other hand it does n't leech out easily , either .
In 150 years we should all have crates that are below the norm : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the EU DG Environment:STUDY TO ANALYSE THE DEROGATION  REQUEST ON THE USE OF HEAVY METALS IN PLASTIC CRATES AND PLASTIC PALLETS [europa.eu]Apparently, it takes AGES to get rid of the Cadmium from beer crates, but on the other hand it doesn't leech out easily, either.
In 150 years we should all have crates that are below the norm :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733612</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm gonna guess that you are not a parent.  If you are and your kids are not babies (in this case meaning they have their own independent toy desires) I challenge you to look at some of their toys.  I bet 8 out of 10 were made in china.  Saying you won't get them chinese made toys is functionally equivalent to saying, I'm not gonna let them own any of the cool toys they want.  No star wars action figures, no dr. who action figures, no power rangers, no mutant turtles, no transformers, etc (I have a boy if you hadn't guessed.)  Sorry the only toys you can have are legos.</p><p>Of course I would have to say that anyone with enough knowledge to design kids jewelry with cadmium instead of lead is 99\% likely to know that it is even more dangerous.  That person should be hung from his or her short hairs.  That was not an ignorant mistake that was deliberate endangerment for profit.  Dirtbags.  Go free trade!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm gon na guess that you are not a parent .
If you are and your kids are not babies ( in this case meaning they have their own independent toy desires ) I challenge you to look at some of their toys .
I bet 8 out of 10 were made in china .
Saying you wo n't get them chinese made toys is functionally equivalent to saying , I 'm not gon na let them own any of the cool toys they want .
No star wars action figures , no dr. who action figures , no power rangers , no mutant turtles , no transformers , etc ( I have a boy if you had n't guessed .
) Sorry the only toys you can have are legos.Of course I would have to say that anyone with enough knowledge to design kids jewelry with cadmium instead of lead is 99 \ % likely to know that it is even more dangerous .
That person should be hung from his or her short hairs .
That was not an ignorant mistake that was deliberate endangerment for profit .
Dirtbags. Go free trade !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm gonna guess that you are not a parent.
If you are and your kids are not babies (in this case meaning they have their own independent toy desires) I challenge you to look at some of their toys.
I bet 8 out of 10 were made in china.
Saying you won't get them chinese made toys is functionally equivalent to saying, I'm not gonna let them own any of the cool toys they want.
No star wars action figures, no dr. who action figures, no power rangers, no mutant turtles, no transformers, etc (I have a boy if you hadn't guessed.
)  Sorry the only toys you can have are legos.Of course I would have to say that anyone with enough knowledge to design kids jewelry with cadmium instead of lead is 99\% likely to know that it is even more dangerous.
That person should be hung from his or her short hairs.
That was not an ignorant mistake that was deliberate endangerment for profit.
Dirtbags.  Go free trade!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774</id>
	<title>Domestic use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263226380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad they are using it domestically.  I hope they continue to poison their own population for decades to come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad they are using it domestically .
I hope they continue to poison their own population for decades to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad they are using it domestically.
I hope they continue to poison their own population for decades to come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733040</id>
	<title>Why using cadmium?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263228660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main thing I wonder is why do they use cadmium in the first place? What's so good about it? TFA says "nothing positive about cadmium" - but I'm sure that depends on your pov. There must be something very attractive about using cadmium (it can't be just the low price, iron is also pretty cheap) that makes them use cadmium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main thing I wonder is why do they use cadmium in the first place ?
What 's so good about it ?
TFA says " nothing positive about cadmium " - but I 'm sure that depends on your pov .
There must be something very attractive about using cadmium ( it ca n't be just the low price , iron is also pretty cheap ) that makes them use cadmium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main thing I wonder is why do they use cadmium in the first place?
What's so good about it?
TFA says "nothing positive about cadmium" - but I'm sure that depends on your pov.
There must be something very attractive about using cadmium (it can't be just the low price, iron is also pretty cheap) that makes them use cadmium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190</id>
	<title>Fair and balanced.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you consider the astronomical amount of products we import from China, cases like this are the rare exception<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... not the norm. Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on them to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous. Try to replace China with any country/countries and watch the prices/danger levels shoot up and quality fall. The only positive side of these stories is the public is informed of which specific products should be avoided. Problem is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. they do this only for Chinese products (and no it's not because only Chinese products have issues).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you consider the astronomical amount of products we import from China , cases like this are the rare exception ... not the norm .
Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on them to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous .
Try to replace China with any country/countries and watch the prices/danger levels shoot up and quality fall .
The only positive side of these stories is the public is informed of which specific products should be avoided .
Problem is .. they do this only for Chinese products ( and no it 's not because only Chinese products have issues ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you consider the astronomical amount of products we import from China, cases like this are the rare exception ... not the norm.
Problem is the media keeps digging these cases up and shining flood lights on them to reinforce the stereotype that products from China are poor quality and dangerous.
Try to replace China with any country/countries and watch the prices/danger levels shoot up and quality fall.
The only positive side of these stories is the public is informed of which specific products should be avoided.
Problem is .. they do this only for Chinese products (and no it's not because only Chinese products have issues).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737248</id>
	<title>Re:Fair and balanced.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263312240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok. Give us some sources. Name some more countries and their dangerous products that we buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok. Give us some sources .
Name some more countries and their dangerous products that we buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok. Give us some sources.
Name some more countries and their dangerous products that we buy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733054</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1263228720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I would like to know is which Chinese manufacturers are doing this.  If an American manufacturer put hazardous materials in children's products, you'd bet that we would all know which manufacturers were doing this.  By making the names of the companies that are doing this well known, it would give the other ones a chance to stand apart from the "OMG Chinese manufacturer..." stereotype you are painting them all with.</p><p>Just so you know, China is a big place with a lot of people.  I'm pretty sure that to lump them all into the same category is unfair to at least some of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I would like to know is which Chinese manufacturers are doing this .
If an American manufacturer put hazardous materials in children 's products , you 'd bet that we would all know which manufacturers were doing this .
By making the names of the companies that are doing this well known , it would give the other ones a chance to stand apart from the " OMG Chinese manufacturer... " stereotype you are painting them all with.Just so you know , China is a big place with a lot of people .
I 'm pretty sure that to lump them all into the same category is unfair to at least some of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I would like to know is which Chinese manufacturers are doing this.
If an American manufacturer put hazardous materials in children's products, you'd bet that we would all know which manufacturers were doing this.
By making the names of the companies that are doing this well known, it would give the other ones a chance to stand apart from the "OMG Chinese manufacturer..." stereotype you are painting them all with.Just so you know, China is a big place with a lot of people.
I'm pretty sure that to lump them all into the same category is unfair to at least some of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818</id>
	<title>Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1263226740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>There's nothing positive that you can say about this metal</i> <br> <br>
It's sulfide makes for a good <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoresistor" title="wikipedia.org">photoresistor.  Combined with nickel, cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery.  It's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems.  In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken.</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing positive that you can say about this metal It 's sulfide makes for a good photoresistor .
Combined with nickel , cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery .
It 's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems .
In short , cadmium has probably saved more lives than it 's taken .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing positive that you can say about this metal  
It's sulfide makes for a good photoresistor.
Combined with nickel, cadmium makes for a good rechargeable battery.
It's also used in the heat sensitive trigger in fire suppresion sprinkler systems.
In short, cadmium has probably saved more lives than it's taken.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733112</id>
	<title>Buy second hand toys.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buy second hand toys. All the dangerous bits would have been sucked or broken off. Just rinse after purchase to remove the previous child's saliva or blood. OK so some projective parts may be missing but hey nothing a bit of welding rod, nails or acrylic rod can't fix.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy second hand toys .
All the dangerous bits would have been sucked or broken off .
Just rinse after purchase to remove the previous child 's saliva or blood .
OK so some projective parts may be missing but hey nothing a bit of welding rod , nails or acrylic rod ca n't fix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy second hand toys.
All the dangerous bits would have been sucked or broken off.
Just rinse after purchase to remove the previous child's saliva or blood.
OK so some projective parts may be missing but hey nothing a bit of welding rod, nails or acrylic rod can't fix.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732676</id>
	<title>REGULATORS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263225660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's put these things together.... from TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Cadmium is a known carcinogen. Like lead, it can hinder brain development in the very young, according to recent research.</p></div><p>and...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Some of the most troubling test results were for bracelet charms sold at Walmart, at the jewelry chain Claire's and at a dollar store.</p></div><p>So we've got a substance dangerous to kids in just the kind of jewelry they can afford on their allowance.</p><p>This stuff is absolutely something that needs regulation to control it. Sometimes "letting the market decide" just rolls off the bowling lane and into the gutter. No, knocking down pins in somebody else's lane doesn't count. That's why they put the gutter in.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's put these things together.... from TFA : Cadmium is a known carcinogen .
Like lead , it can hinder brain development in the very young , according to recent research.and...Some of the most troubling test results were for bracelet charms sold at Walmart , at the jewelry chain Claire 's and at a dollar store.So we 've got a substance dangerous to kids in just the kind of jewelry they can afford on their allowance.This stuff is absolutely something that needs regulation to control it .
Sometimes " letting the market decide " just rolls off the bowling lane and into the gutter .
No , knocking down pins in somebody else 's lane does n't count .
That 's why they put the gutter in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's put these things together.... from TFA:Cadmium is a known carcinogen.
Like lead, it can hinder brain development in the very young, according to recent research.and...Some of the most troubling test results were for bracelet charms sold at Walmart, at the jewelry chain Claire's and at a dollar store.So we've got a substance dangerous to kids in just the kind of jewelry they can afford on their allowance.This stuff is absolutely something that needs regulation to control it.
Sometimes "letting the market decide" just rolls off the bowling lane and into the gutter.
No, knocking down pins in somebody else's lane doesn't count.
That's why they put the gutter in.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743514</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1263294480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... never, ever, buy Chinese food products.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZWy\_fASSiQ" title="youtube.com">Nor</a> [youtube.com] <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHZqcKj7jNM" title="youtube.com">cars</a> [youtube.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... never , ever , buy Chinese food products .
Nor [ youtube.com ] cars [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... never, ever, buy Chinese food products.
Nor [youtube.com] cars [youtube.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263228600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements. We enforce IP laws to no end, but other issues? Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.</p><p>The Libertarian view does not work here. Sure, we can sue Walmart for importing these toys. We can sue the maker, somehow. The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys, it's too late. We need regulation. We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.</p><p>The same applies to any company operating in the US. Self regulation only goes so far. We had the Sego mine disaster in 2006. Who was the head of US mine safety? A mine owner. So in Europe when the same thing happened, the workers had a bunker with food, water and air to retreat too. To save money, the US did not have any regulations requiring bunkers. The workers here died.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements .
We enforce IP laws to no end , but other issues ?
Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.The Libertarian view does not work here .
Sure , we can sue Walmart for importing these toys .
We can sue the maker , somehow .
The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys , it 's too late .
We need regulation .
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP , but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.The same applies to any company operating in the US .
Self regulation only goes so far .
We had the Sego mine disaster in 2006 .
Who was the head of US mine safety ?
A mine owner .
So in Europe when the same thing happened , the workers had a bunker with food , water and air to retreat too .
To save money , the US did not have any regulations requiring bunkers .
The workers here died .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the problem with our Trade Agreements.
We enforce IP laws to no end, but other issues?
Workers rights and safety issues never seem to come up.The Libertarian view does not work here.
Sure, we can sue Walmart for importing these toys.
We can sue the maker, somehow.
The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys, it's too late.
We need regulation.
We need trade agreements that not only enforce IP, but make sure that the companies are not using methods or materials banned in the US.The same applies to any company operating in the US.
Self regulation only goes so far.
We had the Sego mine disaster in 2006.
Who was the head of US mine safety?
A mine owner.
So in Europe when the same thing happened, the workers had a bunker with food, water and air to retreat too.
To save money, the US did not have any regulations requiring bunkers.
The workers here died.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940</id>
	<title>Scaremongering</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1263227760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a little annoying when people trot out these scary stories without completely understanding the true threats involved. Cadmium is only considered to be carcinogenic when inhaled as a vapor. You can safely touch it without any adverse effects. While not commonplace today, there was a time when tools were frequently cadmium plated. These are safe to use provided you don't do anything to remove the plating or try to polish it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a little annoying when people trot out these scary stories without completely understanding the true threats involved .
Cadmium is only considered to be carcinogenic when inhaled as a vapor .
You can safely touch it without any adverse effects .
While not commonplace today , there was a time when tools were frequently cadmium plated .
These are safe to use provided you do n't do anything to remove the plating or try to polish it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a little annoying when people trot out these scary stories without completely understanding the true threats involved.
Cadmium is only considered to be carcinogenic when inhaled as a vapor.
You can safely touch it without any adverse effects.
While not commonplace today, there was a time when tools were frequently cadmium plated.
These are safe to use provided you don't do anything to remove the plating or try to polish it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736788</id>
	<title>Treat them as what they are - bio weapons...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263310560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Made from materials which are toxic to a body's health, any product made from these materials should at minimum be labeled as a bio-hazard, at worst the companies making them should be treated as bio-terrorists...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Made from materials which are toxic to a body 's health , any product made from these materials should at minimum be labeled as a bio-hazard , at worst the companies making them should be treated as bio-terrorists.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Made from materials which are toxic to a body's health, any product made from these materials should at minimum be labeled as a bio-hazard, at worst the companies making them should be treated as bio-terrorists...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732908</id>
	<title>Re:Domestic use</title>
	<author>NemoinSpace</author>
	<datestamp>1263227340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More likely, They are charging us to ship us our hazardous cadmium waste under the guise of "cheap disposal" and then using it as raw material to sell product back to us by the boatload. <div><p> Much to my chagrin, in my travels, I have met a disproportionate number of criminally stupid Americans compared to criminally stupid Chinese.  (Or maybe I've become hopelessly disenfranchised).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely , They are charging us to ship us our hazardous cadmium waste under the guise of " cheap disposal " and then using it as raw material to sell product back to us by the boatload .
Much to my chagrin , in my travels , I have met a disproportionate number of criminally stupid Americans compared to criminally stupid Chinese .
( Or maybe I 've become hopelessly disenfranchised ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely, They are charging us to ship us our hazardous cadmium waste under the guise of "cheap disposal" and then using it as raw material to sell product back to us by the boatload.
Much to my chagrin, in my travels, I have met a disproportionate number of criminally stupid Americans compared to criminally stupid Chinese.
(Or maybe I've become hopelessly disenfranchised).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734010</id>
	<title>Solar Cells</title>
	<author>EndoplasmicRidiculus</author>
	<datestamp>1263239160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most thin film solar cells are based on cadmium telluride. Cadmium is one of the rarer metals so making children's bracelets out of it seems like a waste as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most thin film solar cells are based on cadmium telluride .
Cadmium is one of the rarer metals so making children 's bracelets out of it seems like a waste as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most thin film solar cells are based on cadmium telluride.
Cadmium is one of the rarer metals so making children's bracelets out of it seems like a waste as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734982</id>
	<title>Re:How come...</title>
	<author>will\_die</author>
	<datestamp>1263295920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are banned from using both for products that will be sold in the US.<br>
Part of the problem is that China allows cadmium to be used in local jewerly and it is a common matieral for China manufactures to use it local jewerly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are banned from using both for products that will be sold in the US .
Part of the problem is that China allows cadmium to be used in local jewerly and it is a common matieral for China manufactures to use it local jewerly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are banned from using both for products that will be sold in the US.
Part of the problem is that China allows cadmium to be used in local jewerly and it is a common matieral for China manufactures to use it local jewerly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732966</id>
	<title>Re:Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>the\_other\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1263228000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That doesn't mean we should put it in toys outside the battery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't mean we should put it in toys outside the battery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't mean we should put it in toys outside the battery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733792</id>
	<title>Surprised?</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1263235860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all the adulterated, poisonous food, even baby formulas, manufactured by chinese companies - after dozens were poisoned and died, you're still surprised? They will sell you anything they can get away with.</p><p>Keep buying "Made in China", fuck off and die. At this point, that's really all one can say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all the adulterated , poisonous food , even baby formulas , manufactured by chinese companies - after dozens were poisoned and died , you 're still surprised ?
They will sell you anything they can get away with.Keep buying " Made in China " , fuck off and die .
At this point , that 's really all one can say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all the adulterated, poisonous food, even baby formulas, manufactured by chinese companies - after dozens were poisoned and died, you're still surprised?
They will sell you anything they can get away with.Keep buying "Made in China", fuck off and die.
At this point, that's really all one can say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737786</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263314580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, why make clothes in the US by adults, when you can have kids do it in other countries. Why have an 8 hour work day and allow for sick leave, when you can work people 12 to 14 hours a day and fire them for being pregnant? Why make products with safe, but more expensive chemicals, when you can get away with anything in other locations, and ship it back in to the US? I am not saying that we need to convert the rest of the world in to the US, but having some basic human rights in our trade agreements would go along way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , why make clothes in the US by adults , when you can have kids do it in other countries .
Why have an 8 hour work day and allow for sick leave , when you can work people 12 to 14 hours a day and fire them for being pregnant ?
Why make products with safe , but more expensive chemicals , when you can get away with anything in other locations , and ship it back in to the US ?
I am not saying that we need to convert the rest of the world in to the US , but having some basic human rights in our trade agreements would go along way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, why make clothes in the US by adults, when you can have kids do it in other countries.
Why have an 8 hour work day and allow for sick leave, when you can work people 12 to 14 hours a day and fire them for being pregnant?
Why make products with safe, but more expensive chemicals, when you can get away with anything in other locations, and ship it back in to the US?
I am not saying that we need to convert the rest of the world in to the US, but having some basic human rights in our trade agreements would go along way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733004</id>
	<title>Re:How come...</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1263228360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kids haven't been exposed to Cadmium much, and there's far too many things to test. Laws are written to blacklist things that are troublesome. We'd be much better off with a whitelist of safe things to use, but that's not how the world works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids have n't been exposed to Cadmium much , and there 's far too many things to test .
Laws are written to blacklist things that are troublesome .
We 'd be much better off with a whitelist of safe things to use , but that 's not how the world works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids haven't been exposed to Cadmium much, and there's far too many things to test.
Laws are written to blacklist things that are troublesome.
We'd be much better off with a whitelist of safe things to use, but that's not how the world works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736544</id>
	<title>Re:When life gives you lemons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263309420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lemons are inedible by themselves? Try telling that to my six year old son who loves them so much he asks us to buy lemons at the grocery store for him to eat.</p><p>In fact, since the latest trend in candy making is sour candies, I keep wondering why lemons can't become the fruit of choice for young folks.  Why get a pale imitation when you can eat something truly sour!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lemons are inedible by themselves ?
Try telling that to my six year old son who loves them so much he asks us to buy lemons at the grocery store for him to eat.In fact , since the latest trend in candy making is sour candies , I keep wondering why lemons ca n't become the fruit of choice for young folks .
Why get a pale imitation when you can eat something truly sour !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lemons are inedible by themselves?
Try telling that to my six year old son who loves them so much he asks us to buy lemons at the grocery store for him to eat.In fact, since the latest trend in candy making is sour candies, I keep wondering why lemons can't become the fruit of choice for young folks.
Why get a pale imitation when you can eat something truly sour!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733208</id>
	<title>Re:Why using cadmium?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263229920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cadmium melts at about 600 F. Iron melts at about 2,800 F.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cadmium melts at about 600 F. Iron melts at about 2,800 F .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cadmium melts at about 600 F. Iron melts at about 2,800 F.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737120</id>
	<title>Isn't the idea of children's jewelry an oxymoron?</title>
	<author>EWAdams</author>
	<datestamp>1263311820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Children are not supposed to be seducing anyone or looking hot. They are supposed to be playing outside. Jewelry would get snagged on tree branches and so forth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Children are not supposed to be seducing anyone or looking hot .
They are supposed to be playing outside .
Jewelry would get snagged on tree branches and so forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Children are not supposed to be seducing anyone or looking hot.
They are supposed to be playing outside.
Jewelry would get snagged on tree branches and so forth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772</id>
	<title>Could outsource less</title>
	<author>Alcoholist</author>
	<datestamp>1263226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733618</id>
	<title>Get Even, Recycle Your Electronics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263233760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to think that the people of China deserved democracy, happiness and a better life.  I used to feel bad when I read about the Rape of Nanking and the Japanese treatment of the Chinese during WWII.  But with such cynical bastards blatantly exporting toxic crap to American children, I can only bemoan the fact that Truman and Eisenhower didn't have the good sense to nuke China back to the freaking stone age in 1952 like Gen. Douglas MacArthur wanted to.  It's not too late, though, I bet Russia would love to go halvsies on China with us.  After a nuclear renovation, we could use it as a landfill for all the crap they've sent us.  Oh, but wait!  We already do that... next time I have an old computer to get rid of, I'll be sure to give it to some unscrupulous recycler who'll send it to Guiyu for children to burn and inhale the fumes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to think that the people of China deserved democracy , happiness and a better life .
I used to feel bad when I read about the Rape of Nanking and the Japanese treatment of the Chinese during WWII .
But with such cynical bastards blatantly exporting toxic crap to American children , I can only bemoan the fact that Truman and Eisenhower did n't have the good sense to nuke China back to the freaking stone age in 1952 like Gen. Douglas MacArthur wanted to .
It 's not too late , though , I bet Russia would love to go halvsies on China with us .
After a nuclear renovation , we could use it as a landfill for all the crap they 've sent us .
Oh , but wait !
We already do that... next time I have an old computer to get rid of , I 'll be sure to give it to some unscrupulous recycler who 'll send it to Guiyu for children to burn and inhale the fumes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to think that the people of China deserved democracy, happiness and a better life.
I used to feel bad when I read about the Rape of Nanking and the Japanese treatment of the Chinese during WWII.
But with such cynical bastards blatantly exporting toxic crap to American children, I can only bemoan the fact that Truman and Eisenhower didn't have the good sense to nuke China back to the freaking stone age in 1952 like Gen. Douglas MacArthur wanted to.
It's not too late, though, I bet Russia would love to go halvsies on China with us.
After a nuclear renovation, we could use it as a landfill for all the crap they've sent us.
Oh, but wait!
We already do that... next time I have an old computer to get rid of, I'll be sure to give it to some unscrupulous recycler who'll send it to Guiyu for children to burn and inhale the fumes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732894</id>
	<title>Re:When life gives you lemons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263227280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kids don't get enough nickels in their allowance to make Ni-Cads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids do n't get enough nickels in their allowance to make Ni-Cads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids don't get enough nickels in their allowance to make Ni-Cads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735378</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1263300240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worker's rights?  Bullshit.  Nobody is forced into a factory at the barrel of a gun, they go to work there to improve their economic independence.  Yes, it is dirty and dangerous, but they have the right to choose for themselves whether they take that risk or not.  You would rather make a Chinese factory worthless, letting potential workers carry on scrabbling through rubbish heaps for a living.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worker 's rights ?
Bullshit. Nobody is forced into a factory at the barrel of a gun , they go to work there to improve their economic independence .
Yes , it is dirty and dangerous , but they have the right to choose for themselves whether they take that risk or not .
You would rather make a Chinese factory worthless , letting potential workers carry on scrabbling through rubbish heaps for a living .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worker's rights?
Bullshit.  Nobody is forced into a factory at the barrel of a gun, they go to work there to improve their economic independence.
Yes, it is dirty and dangerous, but they have the right to choose for themselves whether they take that risk or not.
You would rather make a Chinese factory worthless, letting potential workers carry on scrabbling through rubbish heaps for a living.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736960</id>
	<title>FUCK CHINA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263311280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and fuck chinks.. that is all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and fuck chinks.. that is all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and fuck chinks.. that is all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736482</id>
	<title>Give me back my bullets</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263309120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better off with LEAD toy soldiers.</p><p>jr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better off with LEAD toy soldiers.jr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better off with LEAD toy soldiers.jr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733146</id>
	<title>My theory -- It's a conpiracy</title>
	<author>moogoogaipan</author>
	<datestamp>1263229380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you make everyone dumber, you'll be the smartest. EOM</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you make everyone dumber , you 'll be the smartest .
EOM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you make everyone dumber, you'll be the smartest.
EOM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737938</id>
	<title>Re:Could outsource less</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263315060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great way to go out of business unless your competition does the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great way to go out of business unless your competition does the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great way to go out of business unless your competition does the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734098</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1263326640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys, it's too late.</p></div><p>I note the Republicans (well, and I guess the Democrats now) saying the same thing about terrorism.
<br> <br>
We cannot protect everyone from everything.  Well, we could, but I'm not sure that would be a world anyone would want to live in.
<br> <br>
But here's the question... has cadmium actually made anyone sick yet?  Isn't the alarm being raised before that happened already?  Do you expect our politicians to somehow spot have spotted this ahead of everyone else?
<br> <br>
I would be perfectly happy to see cadmium regulated, but it's not as if people are dying in the streets right now because of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys , it 's too late.I note the Republicans ( well , and I guess the Democrats now ) saying the same thing about terrorism .
We can not protect everyone from everything .
Well , we could , but I 'm not sure that would be a world anyone would want to live in .
But here 's the question... has cadmium actually made anyone sick yet ?
Is n't the alarm being raised before that happened already ?
Do you expect our politicians to somehow spot have spotted this ahead of everyone else ?
I would be perfectly happy to see cadmium regulated , but it 's not as if people are dying in the streets right now because of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that if one kid dies or becomes permanently sick because of these toys, it's too late.I note the Republicans (well, and I guess the Democrats now) saying the same thing about terrorism.
We cannot protect everyone from everything.
Well, we could, but I'm not sure that would be a world anyone would want to live in.
But here's the question... has cadmium actually made anyone sick yet?
Isn't the alarm being raised before that happened already?
Do you expect our politicians to somehow spot have spotted this ahead of everyone else?
I would be perfectly happy to see cadmium regulated, but it's not as if people are dying in the streets right now because of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732918</id>
	<title>Rudolph the Cadmium-Nosed Reindeer</title>
	<author>omar.sahal</author>
	<datestamp>1263227460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With stories like this, and also how a whole city had been built (so some city official can say his cities economy grew at 8 percent this year) despite almost no one having moved in, questions have to be asked of trade with china. <br>
If their government is so slack to allow the above (not to mention the melamine in milk to whiten it) and not be able to put a stop to it with out it affecting their International trade, all children goods, consumables and any other goods possibly effecting public health should be banned from China.<br>
This probably would never happen, one of our sins is putting money before people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With stories like this , and also how a whole city had been built ( so some city official can say his cities economy grew at 8 percent this year ) despite almost no one having moved in , questions have to be asked of trade with china .
If their government is so slack to allow the above ( not to mention the melamine in milk to whiten it ) and not be able to put a stop to it with out it affecting their International trade , all children goods , consumables and any other goods possibly effecting public health should be banned from China .
This probably would never happen , one of our sins is putting money before people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With stories like this, and also how a whole city had been built (so some city official can say his cities economy grew at 8 percent this year) despite almost no one having moved in, questions have to be asked of trade with china.
If their government is so slack to allow the above (not to mention the melamine in milk to whiten it) and not be able to put a stop to it with out it affecting their International trade, all children goods, consumables and any other goods possibly effecting public health should be banned from China.
This probably would never happen, one of our sins is putting money before people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739158</id>
	<title>Re:Makes nice paints</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1263319200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders.<br></i><br>Perhaps, but without his mental disorders would we have his paintings today? I once met a very old woman (decades ago) who actually met Van Gogh when she was about thirteen. She said he was the biggest asshole she ever met.</p><p>No wonder he only sold one painting in his entire life. Social skills matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders.Perhaps , but without his mental disorders would we have his paintings today ?
I once met a very old woman ( decades ago ) who actually met Van Gogh when she was about thirteen .
She said he was the biggest asshole she ever met.No wonder he only sold one painting in his entire life .
Social skills matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders.Perhaps, but without his mental disorders would we have his paintings today?
I once met a very old woman (decades ago) who actually met Van Gogh when she was about thirteen.
She said he was the biggest asshole she ever met.No wonder he only sold one painting in his entire life.
Social skills matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735446</id>
	<title>Re:Could outsource less</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1263300840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the USA, the would leaders in Chinese hatemongering, could take some responsibility. I'm getting really fed up with the way the USA wants everything cheap and cheerful without a thought for anyone else. The hate is borderline racism - call them Chinks and sprinkle some sugar on the top.<br><br>I work for a German company, in the UK. Our partners are mainly Swiss and French. When we commission the Chinese to work for us, we help them. We fly our people over, we explain why we wont let them machine our metal in an asbestos covered factory, we perform QA on every 200th part, we show them COSHH sheets, we help. The Chinese are more than happy to follow our safety procedures. They honestly like the help we give them. And they obviously love the work and the money and we like the quality produce they produce for us.<br><br>Sloppy work is all your fault. Just saying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the USA , the would leaders in Chinese hatemongering , could take some responsibility .
I 'm getting really fed up with the way the USA wants everything cheap and cheerful without a thought for anyone else .
The hate is borderline racism - call them Chinks and sprinkle some sugar on the top.I work for a German company , in the UK .
Our partners are mainly Swiss and French .
When we commission the Chinese to work for us , we help them .
We fly our people over , we explain why we wont let them machine our metal in an asbestos covered factory , we perform QA on every 200th part , we show them COSHH sheets , we help .
The Chinese are more than happy to follow our safety procedures .
They honestly like the help we give them .
And they obviously love the work and the money and we like the quality produce they produce for us.Sloppy work is all your fault .
Just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the USA, the would leaders in Chinese hatemongering, could take some responsibility.
I'm getting really fed up with the way the USA wants everything cheap and cheerful without a thought for anyone else.
The hate is borderline racism - call them Chinks and sprinkle some sugar on the top.I work for a German company, in the UK.
Our partners are mainly Swiss and French.
When we commission the Chinese to work for us, we help them.
We fly our people over, we explain why we wont let them machine our metal in an asbestos covered factory, we perform QA on every 200th part, we show them COSHH sheets, we help.
The Chinese are more than happy to follow our safety procedures.
They honestly like the help we give them.
And they obviously love the work and the money and we like the quality produce they produce for us.Sloppy work is all your fault.
Just saying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</id>
	<title>And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263226740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sort of shit is why you don't want to buy Chinese products if you can help, and never, ever, buy Chinese food products.</p><p>When buying gifts for very young children (preschool age and down) I do my best to buy toys made in Europe or the US.</p><p>I've accepted that I can't avoid Chinese merchandise in general, but I try to be selective - not for people who don't know not to eat their stuff, and not for things I plan to eat.</p><p>I read somewhere that Chinese industry is currently at a safety level - both for their workers and their products - roughly comparable to Victorian England or America. That isn't a world I want to live in if I can avoid it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sort of shit is why you do n't want to buy Chinese products if you can help , and never , ever , buy Chinese food products.When buying gifts for very young children ( preschool age and down ) I do my best to buy toys made in Europe or the US.I 've accepted that I ca n't avoid Chinese merchandise in general , but I try to be selective - not for people who do n't know not to eat their stuff , and not for things I plan to eat.I read somewhere that Chinese industry is currently at a safety level - both for their workers and their products - roughly comparable to Victorian England or America .
That is n't a world I want to live in if I can avoid it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sort of shit is why you don't want to buy Chinese products if you can help, and never, ever, buy Chinese food products.When buying gifts for very young children (preschool age and down) I do my best to buy toys made in Europe or the US.I've accepted that I can't avoid Chinese merchandise in general, but I try to be selective - not for people who don't know not to eat their stuff, and not for things I plan to eat.I read somewhere that Chinese industry is currently at a safety level - both for their workers and their products - roughly comparable to Victorian England or America.
That isn't a world I want to live in if I can avoid it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736508</id>
	<title>Re:Could outsource less</title>
	<author>Pigeon451</author>
	<datestamp>1263309240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then pay more for our products<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then pay more for our products .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then pay more for our products ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732960</id>
	<title>The real question is:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263227880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you buy it anyway?<br>Because I don&rsquo;t see it not being sold everywhere, anytime soon.</p><p>You don&rsquo;t have to buy it from China, you know?<br>But it&rsquo;s so <em>cheap</em>, right?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>When did cheap become equal too good?<br>I guess by the time that simple became equal to efficient...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you buy it anyway ? Because I don    t see it not being sold everywhere , anytime soon.You don    t have to buy it from China , you know ? But it    s so cheap , right ?
; ) When did cheap become equal too good ? I guess by the time that simple became equal to efficient.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you buy it anyway?Because I don’t see it not being sold everywhere, anytime soon.You don’t have to buy it from China, you know?But it’s so cheap, right?
;)When did cheap become equal too good?I guess by the time that simple became equal to efficient...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30744050</id>
	<title>WALMART STILL SELLING THE CADMIUM-LACED CHARM?</title>
	<author>uslurper</author>
	<datestamp>1263297120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is this the same charm that was found to have high cadmium content?</p><p>it's on sale now on walmarts website</p><p>http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product\_id=13057362</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is this the same charm that was found to have high cadmium content ? it 's on sale now on walmarts websitehttp : //www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do ? product \ _id = 13057362</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this the same charm that was found to have high cadmium content?it's on sale now on walmarts websitehttp://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product\_id=13057362</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733316</id>
	<title>To Stop This</title>
	<author>randallman</author>
	<datestamp>1263230760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever company outsources the labor or imports/markets the dangerous merchandise should be held accountable.  So if Barbie comes back with lead paint, Mattel should pay the price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever company outsources the labor or imports/markets the dangerous merchandise should be held accountable .
So if Barbie comes back with lead paint , Mattel should pay the price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever company outsources the labor or imports/markets the dangerous merchandise should be held accountable.
So if Barbie comes back with lead paint, Mattel should pay the price.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732974</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why not to buy Chinese....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263228000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good luck with at least 80\% of the worlds toys made in Shantou, China alone! Unless you make your own toys there is not much choice left...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck with at least 80 \ % of the worlds toys made in Shantou , China alone !
Unless you make your own toys there is not much choice left.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck with at least 80\% of the worlds toys made in Shantou, China alone!
Unless you make your own toys there is not much choice left...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30741030</id>
	<title>Mmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263326100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, now I can't wait for Easter to come around so I can get some of those delicious Cadmium Eggs....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/drool</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , now I ca n't wait for Easter to come around so I can get some of those delicious Cadmium Eggs.... /drool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, now I can't wait for Easter to come around so I can get some of those delicious Cadmium Eggs.... /drool</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732926</id>
	<title>Re:Domestic use</title>
	<author>ddxexex</author>
	<datestamp>1263227580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Chinese children are completely innocent, if there was justice in the world, it'd be the pathetic people, who care about making a few bucks at the cost of someone elses life, who should be getting posoined.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese children are completely innocent , if there was justice in the world , it 'd be the pathetic people , who care about making a few bucks at the cost of someone elses life , who should be getting posoined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese children are completely innocent, if there was justice in the world, it'd be the pathetic people, who care about making a few bucks at the cost of someone elses life, who should be getting posoined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733374</id>
	<title>Re:Domestic use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263231420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are all overjoyed that the US uses trans fat, corn syrup and big pharma.</p><p>There you go...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are all overjoyed that the US uses trans fat , corn syrup and big pharma.There you go.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are all overjoyed that the US uses trans fat, corn syrup and big pharma.There you go...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732976</id>
	<title>Re:When life gives you lemons</title>
	<author>guppysap13</author>
	<datestamp>1263228060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love eating lemons, you insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love eating lemons , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love eating lemons, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046</id>
	<title>Makes nice paints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263228660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually there is another nice thing you can say about cadmium.  It makes lovely yellow and orange pigments.  Sort of like lead white.  Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there is another nice thing you can say about cadmium .
It makes lovely yellow and orange pigments .
Sort of like lead white .
Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually there is another nice thing you can say about cadmium.
It makes lovely yellow and orange pigments.
Sort of like lead white.
Van Gogh may have absorbed or ingested enough to cause or exacerbate his mental disorders.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734100</id>
	<title>Good old capitalism</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1263326760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can't use substance A, use substance B which is cheaper to use than substance Q.</p><p>Substance Q may be completely harmless and substance B might make your eyes rot if you look at it for more than ten seconds, but if B is legal, doesn't the company have a legal obligation to their shareholders to use B instead of Q, when Q is 10 times as expensive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't use substance A , use substance B which is cheaper to use than substance Q.Substance Q may be completely harmless and substance B might make your eyes rot if you look at it for more than ten seconds , but if B is legal , does n't the company have a legal obligation to their shareholders to use B instead of Q , when Q is 10 times as expensive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't use substance A, use substance B which is cheaper to use than substance Q.Substance Q may be completely harmless and substance B might make your eyes rot if you look at it for more than ten seconds, but if B is legal, doesn't the company have a legal obligation to their shareholders to use B instead of Q, when Q is 10 times as expensive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992</id>
	<title>Itai-Itai</title>
	<author>the eric conspiracy</author>
	<datestamp>1263228240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Japanese have experience with environmental pollution from cadmium mining.</p><p>They call the results itai-itai disease, which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch. Few victims actually die from the disease, they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Japanese have experience with environmental pollution from cadmium mining.They call the results itai-itai disease , which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch .
Few victims actually die from the disease , they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Japanese have experience with environmental pollution from cadmium mining.They call the results itai-itai disease, which is roughly translated into ouch-ouch.
Few victims actually die from the disease, they typically commit suicide to get relief from the pain it causes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812</id>
	<title>How come...</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1263226680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em> <b>Barred from using lead</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <b>Chinese manufacturers have been substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium</b> </em> </p><p>
They're not barred from using Cadmium?
But they're barred from using Lead?
</p><p>
Wouldn't it make more sense to regulate the safety of products using the more harmful material first?
</p><p>
We shouldn't need a 'law' for each material...  we should get one law about safety requirements for harmful materials, warning labels,  and access by children.
</p><p>
For example,  products for use by children must not contain  amounts of cadmium or lead that are not protected by a safety measure.
</p><p>
Of course their toy's batteries might contain cadmium or lead,  so it shouldn't be banned,  but safety requirements at least as strict  (such as shielding/containing harmful materials) should be applied to Cadmium as to lead, etc, etc.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barred from using lead ... Chinese manufacturers have been substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium They 're not barred from using Cadmium ?
But they 're barred from using Lead ?
Would n't it make more sense to regulate the safety of products using the more harmful material first ?
We should n't need a 'law ' for each material... we should get one law about safety requirements for harmful materials , warning labels , and access by children .
For example , products for use by children must not contain amounts of cadmium or lead that are not protected by a safety measure .
Of course their toy 's batteries might contain cadmium or lead , so it should n't be banned , but safety requirements at least as strict ( such as shielding/containing harmful materials ) should be applied to Cadmium as to lead , etc , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Barred from using lead ... Chinese manufacturers have been substituting the more dangerous heavy metal cadmium  
They're not barred from using Cadmium?
But they're barred from using Lead?
Wouldn't it make more sense to regulate the safety of products using the more harmful material first?
We shouldn't need a 'law' for each material...  we should get one law about safety requirements for harmful materials, warning labels,  and access by children.
For example,  products for use by children must not contain  amounts of cadmium or lead that are not protected by a safety measure.
Of course their toy's batteries might contain cadmium or lead,  so it shouldn't be banned,  but safety requirements at least as strict  (such as shielding/containing harmful materials) should be applied to Cadmium as to lead, etc, etc.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737256</id>
	<title>Buy now pay later</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1263312300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of cigarettes. Cheap &amp; available but watch out later in life. The delayed costs out weight the present benefit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of cigarettes .
Cheap &amp; available but watch out later in life .
The delayed costs out weight the present benefit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of cigarettes.
Cheap &amp; available but watch out later in life.
The delayed costs out weight the present benefit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743884</id>
	<title>Re:Cadmium Positives</title>
	<author>uslurper</author>
	<datestamp>1263296460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>random comments regarding red paint:</p><p>-artists usually dont stuff paint in their mouth like kids do.</p><p>-high quality artists paints are often made in england, germany, USA, and Japan. Things like decent wages, healthcare, environmental protection, etc make artist colors more expensive. Heres some info about cadmium red: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium\_pigments</p><p>"The synthetic pigments just don't mix right."<br>-Some colors just cant be produced by mixing other colors. Thats why artist sets have a variety of colors. My local artist shop has a neat exhibit about artist colors, and how the good stuff is made with certain mineral ores, crushed beetles, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>random comments regarding red paint : -artists usually dont stuff paint in their mouth like kids do.-high quality artists paints are often made in england , germany , USA , and Japan .
Things like decent wages , healthcare , environmental protection , etc make artist colors more expensive .
Heres some info about cadmium red : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium \ _pigments " The synthetic pigments just do n't mix right .
" -Some colors just cant be produced by mixing other colors .
Thats why artist sets have a variety of colors .
My local artist shop has a neat exhibit about artist colors , and how the good stuff is made with certain mineral ores , crushed beetles , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>random comments regarding red paint:-artists usually dont stuff paint in their mouth like kids do.-high quality artists paints are often made in england, germany, USA, and Japan.
Things like decent wages, healthcare, environmental protection, etc make artist colors more expensive.
Heres some info about cadmium red: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium\_pigments"The synthetic pigments just don't mix right.
"-Some colors just cant be produced by mixing other colors.
Thats why artist sets have a variety of colors.
My local artist shop has a neat exhibit about artist colors, and how the good stuff is made with certain mineral ores, crushed beetles, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30747648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_11_1956259_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735378
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30743884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30747648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30735446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30736508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30734004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30737248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30739318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733618
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_11_1956259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30732940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_11_1956259.30733128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
