<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_10_1649202</id>
	<title>$199 Freescale Tablet Design Runs Chromium OS</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263147840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Charbax writes <i>"This is an extensive video interview with Freescale's manager of software development about <a href="http://armdevices.net/2010/01/09/199-chrome-os-tablet-reference-design-based-on-freescale-i-mx515-processor/">their integration of the Chromium OS</a> onto their ARM Cortex A8 i.MX51-based $199 Tablet reference design. It seems to run smoothly and fast with multiple tabs. There's no touch screen support yet, so input is done through a USB keyboard and mouse for now, but the WiFi drivers are fine. Freescale is also demonstrating Android and Ubuntu versions. Those have a 3G SIM card reader built-in, an HDMI output and 720p video playback. The question is: will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?"</i>
The demonstration of the Chromium tablet begins at about 11:20 into the video. The Android and Ubuntu versions are displayed earlier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Charbax writes " This is an extensive video interview with Freescale 's manager of software development about their integration of the Chromium OS onto their ARM Cortex A8 i.MX51-based $ 199 Tablet reference design .
It seems to run smoothly and fast with multiple tabs .
There 's no touch screen support yet , so input is done through a USB keyboard and mouse for now , but the WiFi drivers are fine .
Freescale is also demonstrating Android and Ubuntu versions .
Those have a 3G SIM card reader built-in , an HDMI output and 720p video playback .
The question is : will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs ?
" The demonstration of the Chromium tablet begins at about 11 : 20 into the video .
The Android and Ubuntu versions are displayed earlier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charbax writes "This is an extensive video interview with Freescale's manager of software development about their integration of the Chromium OS onto their ARM Cortex A8 i.MX51-based $199 Tablet reference design.
It seems to run smoothly and fast with multiple tabs.
There's no touch screen support yet, so input is done through a USB keyboard and mouse for now, but the WiFi drivers are fine.
Freescale is also demonstrating Android and Ubuntu versions.
Those have a 3G SIM card reader built-in, an HDMI output and 720p video playback.
The question is: will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?
"
The demonstration of the Chromium tablet begins at about 11:20 into the video.
The Android and Ubuntu versions are displayed earlier.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716104</id>
	<title>Re:Flash + ARM?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1263154380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adobe now supports Flash on a variety of ARM chips.  The i.MX515 in TFA was launched with a version of Flash, supported by Adobe, and provided to OEMs right from the start.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adobe now supports Flash on a variety of ARM chips .
The i.MX515 in TFA was launched with a version of Flash , supported by Adobe , and provided to OEMs right from the start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adobe now supports Flash on a variety of ARM chips.
The i.MX515 in TFA was launched with a version of Flash, supported by Adobe, and provided to OEMs right from the start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716976</id>
	<title>Re:IDEA!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263117840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perfect, like a laptop/tablet is going to change thousands of years of culture. A pacemaker can help a heart live, but only Jesus can change a heart to live free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perfect , like a laptop/tablet is going to change thousands of years of culture .
A pacemaker can help a heart live , but only Jesus can change a heart to live free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perfect, like a laptop/tablet is going to change thousands of years of culture.
A pacemaker can help a heart live, but only Jesus can change a heart to live free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716290</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>pj81381</author>
	<datestamp>1263156240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, this thing is (supposedly) $199 and has a touch screen!
<br> <br>
At least the exact same tablets running Android and Ubuntu do. At about 11:34, Mr. Subramanian says "Chromium today does not support touch screen...". So it's not the tablet hardware which doesn't include a touch screen, but the build of Chromium they're using.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , this thing is ( supposedly ) $ 199 and has a touch screen !
At least the exact same tablets running Android and Ubuntu do .
At about 11 : 34 , Mr. Subramanian says " Chromium today does not support touch screen... " .
So it 's not the tablet hardware which does n't include a touch screen , but the build of Chromium they 're using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, this thing is (supposedly) $199 and has a touch screen!
At least the exact same tablets running Android and Ubuntu do.
At about 11:34, Mr. Subramanian says "Chromium today does not support touch screen...".
So it's not the tablet hardware which doesn't include a touch screen, but the build of Chromium they're using.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716010</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1263153540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has a touchscreen, so what is your point?</p><p>It's got great potential and a ton of functionality for a $200 unit. This is a stab at netbooks (cost/size), cellphones (3g/bluetooth), intel(arm) and microsoft(chrome).</p><p>Now google does their own questionable things sometimes, but a hit at those first 4 is a pretty good sign of some real competition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has a touchscreen , so what is your point ? It 's got great potential and a ton of functionality for a $ 200 unit .
This is a stab at netbooks ( cost/size ) , cellphones ( 3g/bluetooth ) , intel ( arm ) and microsoft ( chrome ) .Now google does their own questionable things sometimes , but a hit at those first 4 is a pretty good sign of some real competition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has a touchscreen, so what is your point?It's got great potential and a ton of functionality for a $200 unit.
This is a stab at netbooks (cost/size), cellphones (3g/bluetooth), intel(arm) and microsoft(chrome).Now google does their own questionable things sometimes, but a hit at those first 4 is a pretty good sign of some real competition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716280</id>
	<title>Re:Flash</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1263156180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash.</p></div></blockquote><p> My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with FreeBSD 8.0 plays flash just fine via the linux-f10-flashplugin10 port -- we don't even get a native libflashplayer.so. Sounds like you have an Ubuntu problem, not a flash problem...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer , but ca n't play 480p acceptably in flash .
My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with FreeBSD 8.0 plays flash just fine via the linux-f10-flashplugin10 port -- we do n't even get a native libflashplayer.so .
Sounds like you have an Ubuntu problem , not a flash problem.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash.
My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with FreeBSD 8.0 plays flash just fine via the linux-f10-flashplugin10 port -- we don't even get a native libflashplayer.so.
Sounds like you have an Ubuntu problem, not a flash problem...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716306</id>
	<title>It's a format definition ("phone" "laptop" etc)</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1263156360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Can you even consider it a tablet if it doesn't have a touchscreen or stylus? "</i><br>Slim square or rectangular hand held computers I think will generally be called "tablets" because that's what the pundits and sellers have decided to call them. When you have more influence than Steve Jobs, the New York Times, or other influential voice in the world of computing, you can call them something different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Can you even consider it a tablet if it does n't have a touchscreen or stylus ?
" Slim square or rectangular hand held computers I think will generally be called " tablets " because that 's what the pundits and sellers have decided to call them .
When you have more influence than Steve Jobs , the New York Times , or other influential voice in the world of computing , you can call them something different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Can you even consider it a tablet if it doesn't have a touchscreen or stylus?
"Slim square or rectangular hand held computers I think will generally be called "tablets" because that's what the pundits and sellers have decided to call them.
When you have more influence than Steve Jobs, the New York Times, or other influential voice in the world of computing, you can call them something different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719470</id>
	<title>Re:That's missing the point</title>
	<author>vcompiler</author>
	<datestamp>1263139920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Choose any Linux distro that can run Chrome Browser would be a better solution than choose Chrome OS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Choose any Linux distro that can run Chrome Browser would be a better solution than choose Chrome OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Choose any Linux distro that can run Chrome Browser would be a better solution than choose Chrome OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716320</id>
	<title>Work around Flash</title>
	<author>loudmax</author>
	<datestamp>1263156420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best solution to working around Flash video that I've worked out it to use the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3006" title="mozilla.org">Video download helper</a> [mozilla.org] Firefox plugin, then play the videos in Mplayer.  It has pretty good support for Youtube and its many imitators.  Unfortunately, it doesn't handle copy-protected stuff so it won't work with the full length movies on Youtube or anything on Hulu.  It is an extra step to download the video before playing it, but the add-on makes it pretty easy, so I find it worth the hassle if I'm going to watch anything more than a few minutes long.</p><p>I haven't seen anything approximate ported to Chrome yet.  Hopefully it'll get one soon... or better yet the &lt;Video&gt; tag becomes universally supported even sooner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best solution to working around Flash video that I 've worked out it to use the Video download helper [ mozilla.org ] Firefox plugin , then play the videos in Mplayer .
It has pretty good support for Youtube and its many imitators .
Unfortunately , it does n't handle copy-protected stuff so it wo n't work with the full length movies on Youtube or anything on Hulu .
It is an extra step to download the video before playing it , but the add-on makes it pretty easy , so I find it worth the hassle if I 'm going to watch anything more than a few minutes long.I have n't seen anything approximate ported to Chrome yet .
Hopefully it 'll get one soon... or better yet the tag becomes universally supported even sooner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best solution to working around Flash video that I've worked out it to use the Video download helper [mozilla.org] Firefox plugin, then play the videos in Mplayer.
It has pretty good support for Youtube and its many imitators.
Unfortunately, it doesn't handle copy-protected stuff so it won't work with the full length movies on Youtube or anything on Hulu.
It is an extra step to download the video before playing it, but the add-on makes it pretty easy, so I find it worth the hassle if I'm going to watch anything more than a few minutes long.I haven't seen anything approximate ported to Chrome yet.
Hopefully it'll get one soon... or better yet the  tag becomes universally supported even sooner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715910</id>
	<title>Re:Content is the problem.</title>
	<author>The End Of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1263152820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for conflating Chromium and Chrome above.  I still think the jury is out though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for conflating Chromium and Chrome above .
I still think the jury is out though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for conflating Chromium and Chrome above.
I still think the jury is out though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715882</id>
	<title>Re:Content is the problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263152520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the "compelling suite of apps" is already there, on the web: facebook, email, IM, twitter, browsing. Throw in google maps, an ebook reader, remote terminal... I don't think apps are that critical anymore, because they are already there.</p><p>As far as a keyboard is concerned, I'd rather have a tablet + separate keyboard/mouse for when I need them, rather than lug them around all the time. A pure tablet is better when not inputting much info, which is 50-75\% of my time on a netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the " compelling suite of apps " is already there , on the web : facebook , email , IM , twitter , browsing .
Throw in google maps , an ebook reader , remote terminal... I do n't think apps are that critical anymore , because they are already there.As far as a keyboard is concerned , I 'd rather have a tablet + separate keyboard/mouse for when I need them , rather than lug them around all the time .
A pure tablet is better when not inputting much info , which is 50-75 \ % of my time on a netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the "compelling suite of apps" is already there, on the web: facebook, email, IM, twitter, browsing.
Throw in google maps, an ebook reader, remote terminal... I don't think apps are that critical anymore, because they are already there.As far as a keyboard is concerned, I'd rather have a tablet + separate keyboard/mouse for when I need them, rather than lug them around all the time.
A pure tablet is better when not inputting much info, which is 50-75\% of my time on a netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719256</id>
	<title>support js and flash...</title>
	<author>Odinlake</author>
	<datestamp>1263137160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?</p></div><p>Dude, my (rather powerfull) desktop comp. doesn't do that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs ? Dude , my ( rather powerfull ) desktop comp .
does n't do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?Dude, my (rather powerfull) desktop comp.
doesn't do that.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716180</id>
	<title>Re:Flash + ARM?</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1263155460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites".</p></div><p>They can test the JS performance by visiting Slashdot.  It has way more JS than any other site I visit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites " .They can test the JS performance by visiting Slashdot .
It has way more JS than any other site I visit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites".They can test the JS performance by visiting Slashdot.
It has way more JS than any other site I visit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720236</id>
	<title>I'll take 5! Right now!</title>
	<author>corychristison</author>
	<datestamp>1263149460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, especially if it's not locked down to disallow other operating systems.</p><p>I'm not interested in Ubuntu or Chromium OS, I'd like to install whatever flavour or Linux/BSD/${OtherOS} I feel (obviously that means something that will run on ARM, anyway).</p><p>I bought an iPod for my wife for that price (8GB model) and it is very restricted and physically smaller than what she actually uses it for (eBook reader via BookShelf and light web browsing).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , especially if it 's not locked down to disallow other operating systems.I 'm not interested in Ubuntu or Chromium OS , I 'd like to install whatever flavour or Linux/BSD/ $ { OtherOS } I feel ( obviously that means something that will run on ARM , anyway ) .I bought an iPod for my wife for that price ( 8GB model ) and it is very restricted and physically smaller than what she actually uses it for ( eBook reader via BookShelf and light web browsing ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, especially if it's not locked down to disallow other operating systems.I'm not interested in Ubuntu or Chromium OS, I'd like to install whatever flavour or Linux/BSD/${OtherOS} I feel (obviously that means something that will run on ARM, anyway).I bought an iPod for my wife for that price (8GB model) and it is very restricted and physically smaller than what she actually uses it for (eBook reader via BookShelf and light web browsing).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30749384</id>
	<title>Off topic Quesiton about Freescale</title>
	<author>Murdoch5</author>
	<datestamp>1263391860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey guys this is off topic but it concerns freescale and Linux so this is the best place to ask.  I'm looking for Codewarrior for the HCS12 that runs on Linux.  I've looked on there site but all I find are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.exe versions.   I need the software for a univserity course and of course because I'm on Linux my profs don't try to help lol.
<br>
<br>
ya so don't mod this off topic because i know it is but this is a freescale Linux / Chromium question so where better to ask.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey guys this is off topic but it concerns freescale and Linux so this is the best place to ask .
I 'm looking for Codewarrior for the HCS12 that runs on Linux .
I 've looked on there site but all I find are .exe versions .
I need the software for a univserity course and of course because I 'm on Linux my profs do n't try to help lol .
ya so do n't mod this off topic because i know it is but this is a freescale Linux / Chromium question so where better to ask .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey guys this is off topic but it concerns freescale and Linux so this is the best place to ask.
I'm looking for Codewarrior for the HCS12 that runs on Linux.
I've looked on there site but all I find are .exe versions.
I need the software for a univserity course and of course because I'm on Linux my profs don't try to help lol.
ya so don't mod this off topic because i know it is but this is a freescale Linux / Chromium question so where better to ask.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263151680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you even consider it a tablet if it doesn't have a touchscreen or stylus?  Otherwise it's just a funky pc that nobody wants.  Come back to me when this thing is $199 and has a touch screen...otherwise it's not much of a story, IMHO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you even consider it a tablet if it does n't have a touchscreen or stylus ?
Otherwise it 's just a funky pc that nobody wants .
Come back to me when this thing is $ 199 and has a touch screen...otherwise it 's not much of a story , IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you even consider it a tablet if it doesn't have a touchscreen or stylus?
Otherwise it's just a funky pc that nobody wants.
Come back to me when this thing is $199 and has a touch screen...otherwise it's not much of a story, IMHO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717968</id>
	<title>Re:Flash</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1263124620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Youtube doesn't play smoothly on my Athlon II X2 3.5ghz. I'm amazed you got it to play acceptably on Windows, because I couldn't.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>PS: This seems relevent. Don't DDOS them.</p><p><a href="http://camendesign.com/code/video\_for\_everybody" title="camendesign.com">http://camendesign.com/code/video\_for\_everybody</a> [camendesign.com]</p><p>It's a non-javascript solution for embedding video that plays on a wide variety of devices and platforms. (iPhone, OSX, Linux, Windows, Firefox, IEx, Opera, etc.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube does n't play smoothly on my Athlon II X2 3.5ghz .
I 'm amazed you got it to play acceptably on Windows , because I could n't .
; ) PS : This seems relevent .
Do n't DDOS them.http : //camendesign.com/code/video \ _for \ _everybody [ camendesign.com ] It 's a non-javascript solution for embedding video that plays on a wide variety of devices and platforms .
( iPhone , OSX , Linux , Windows , Firefox , IEx , Opera , etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube doesn't play smoothly on my Athlon II X2 3.5ghz.
I'm amazed you got it to play acceptably on Windows, because I couldn't.
;)PS: This seems relevent.
Don't DDOS them.http://camendesign.com/code/video\_for\_everybody [camendesign.com]It's a non-javascript solution for embedding video that plays on a wide variety of devices and platforms.
(iPhone, OSX, Linux, Windows, Firefox, IEx, Opera, etc.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715932</id>
	<title>Intel and Microsoft's Greatest Fear</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263153060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is what Intel and Microsoft most fear - a perfectly usable ecosystem of increasingly powerful web connected devices that don't need them. At all.

At last!

M

(Note they didn't bother to do a Windows Mobile version - kinda a dead os there)</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what Intel and Microsoft most fear - a perfectly usable ecosystem of increasingly powerful web connected devices that do n't need them .
At all .
At last !
M ( Note they did n't bother to do a Windows Mobile version - kinda a dead os there )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what Intel and Microsoft most fear - a perfectly usable ecosystem of increasingly powerful web connected devices that don't need them.
At all.
At last!
M

(Note they didn't bother to do a Windows Mobile version - kinda a dead os there)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719684</id>
	<title>What fucking idiots!!</title>
	<author>randyleepublic</author>
	<datestamp>1263142440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their tablet gets slashdotted, I go to their website to buy one, and what?  It's not even listed as a product!!!  In fact there is not even a category of "tablets" listed amongst their offerings.  The damn thing is not for sale anywhere.  Oh, sure, they'll go far with that one.  BTW, anybody want a big bag of Palm Pilots and accesories?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their tablet gets slashdotted , I go to their website to buy one , and what ?
It 's not even listed as a product ! ! !
In fact there is not even a category of " tablets " listed amongst their offerings .
The damn thing is not for sale anywhere .
Oh , sure , they 'll go far with that one .
BTW , anybody want a big bag of Palm Pilots and accesories ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their tablet gets slashdotted, I go to their website to buy one, and what?
It's not even listed as a product!!!
In fact there is not even a category of "tablets" listed amongst their offerings.
The damn thing is not for sale anywhere.
Oh, sure, they'll go far with that one.
BTW, anybody want a big bag of Palm Pilots and accesories?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824</id>
	<title>Content is the problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263151920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't need a tablet PC unless it offers access to a compelling suite of applications. As it stands, this thing is basically an extremely underpowered netbook with a discrete keyboard and pointing device. Even with a touchscreen, it can't compete with a bottom end netbook for generic computing tasks (for example, typing just isn't efficient - I can't manage 45 wpm on a touchscreen). Apple gets this. The iPhone/touch is successful because of its integration with the app store, which offers *device-specific* apps. If apple releases a giant iPod Touch/eReader in the next couple of months, it will succeed only if there's a strong suite of apps written specifically for it. Other manufacturers will be left scrambling, because Chromium OS, Ubuntu NBE and Windows 7 just don't translate well to the tablet environment - you're left using a desktop OS on something that very definitely isn't a desktop. So Freescale's initiative will fail, as will dozens of goofy "tablets" that are little more than touchscreen-equipped PCs with user-hostile ergonomics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't need a tablet PC unless it offers access to a compelling suite of applications .
As it stands , this thing is basically an extremely underpowered netbook with a discrete keyboard and pointing device .
Even with a touchscreen , it ca n't compete with a bottom end netbook for generic computing tasks ( for example , typing just is n't efficient - I ca n't manage 45 wpm on a touchscreen ) .
Apple gets this .
The iPhone/touch is successful because of its integration with the app store , which offers * device-specific * apps .
If apple releases a giant iPod Touch/eReader in the next couple of months , it will succeed only if there 's a strong suite of apps written specifically for it .
Other manufacturers will be left scrambling , because Chromium OS , Ubuntu NBE and Windows 7 just do n't translate well to the tablet environment - you 're left using a desktop OS on something that very definitely is n't a desktop .
So Freescale 's initiative will fail , as will dozens of goofy " tablets " that are little more than touchscreen-equipped PCs with user-hostile ergonomics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't need a tablet PC unless it offers access to a compelling suite of applications.
As it stands, this thing is basically an extremely underpowered netbook with a discrete keyboard and pointing device.
Even with a touchscreen, it can't compete with a bottom end netbook for generic computing tasks (for example, typing just isn't efficient - I can't manage 45 wpm on a touchscreen).
Apple gets this.
The iPhone/touch is successful because of its integration with the app store, which offers *device-specific* apps.
If apple releases a giant iPod Touch/eReader in the next couple of months, it will succeed only if there's a strong suite of apps written specifically for it.
Other manufacturers will be left scrambling, because Chromium OS, Ubuntu NBE and Windows 7 just don't translate well to the tablet environment - you're left using a desktop OS on something that very definitely isn't a desktop.
So Freescale's initiative will fail, as will dozens of goofy "tablets" that are little more than touchscreen-equipped PCs with user-hostile ergonomics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716122</id>
	<title>Re:Content is the problem.</title>
	<author>peragrin</author>
	<datestamp>1263154620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>odd I want exactly  chromeOS.  all I want is a decent web browser.  Mobile safari is nice, but the iphone screen is to small and it doesn't have flash(good on the iphone bad on larger screened devices)  Applications aren't nearly as important as the UI.  if it isn't fully multi touch enabled it will fail.  It is why windows tablet editions fail.  as they cram a standard desktop GUI on a none desktop device.</p><p>software available doesn't matter if you can't use them well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>odd I want exactly chromeOS .
all I want is a decent web browser .
Mobile safari is nice , but the iphone screen is to small and it does n't have flash ( good on the iphone bad on larger screened devices ) Applications are n't nearly as important as the UI .
if it is n't fully multi touch enabled it will fail .
It is why windows tablet editions fail .
as they cram a standard desktop GUI on a none desktop device.software available does n't matter if you ca n't use them well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>odd I want exactly  chromeOS.
all I want is a decent web browser.
Mobile safari is nice, but the iphone screen is to small and it doesn't have flash(good on the iphone bad on larger screened devices)  Applications aren't nearly as important as the UI.
if it isn't fully multi touch enabled it will fail.
It is why windows tablet editions fail.
as they cram a standard desktop GUI on a none desktop device.software available doesn't matter if you can't use them well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30739420</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>tbuskey</author>
	<datestamp>1263320100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we'll see $200 ARM tablets Real Soon Now.</p><p>I have a SmartQ7.  ARM MID.  7" 800x600 color touch screen with 128 MB RAM.  Runs a custom Ubuntu that can apt-get from the standard repos.  I paid $240ish including shipping from Hong Kong.  WinCE is available.</p><p>I'm using it to read eBooks and Google Reader.  The RAM limits the browser (Midori) and the number of tabs.  I don't have flash on it.  I don't watch vids or listen to MP3s.</p><p>For what I do, it's great.</p><p>Maybe in a year I'll be able to buy a 10" 1024x600 (x768 or more please??) 1GB RAM Linux based tablet that can do youtube &amp; other flash apps.  I wouldn't bet on it, but I'm not convinced it won't happen.</p><p>The price point depends on the sales volume.  If this generation of tablets flops, it'll be awhile until the next churn.  If it does what Palm did for PDAs (now migrated to phones) that'll be a good thing.  The Kindle &amp; other niche tablets could make it happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we 'll see $ 200 ARM tablets Real Soon Now.I have a SmartQ7 .
ARM MID .
7 " 800x600 color touch screen with 128 MB RAM .
Runs a custom Ubuntu that can apt-get from the standard repos .
I paid $ 240ish including shipping from Hong Kong .
WinCE is available.I 'm using it to read eBooks and Google Reader .
The RAM limits the browser ( Midori ) and the number of tabs .
I do n't have flash on it .
I do n't watch vids or listen to MP3s.For what I do , it 's great.Maybe in a year I 'll be able to buy a 10 " 1024x600 ( x768 or more please ? ?
) 1GB RAM Linux based tablet that can do youtube &amp; other flash apps .
I would n't bet on it , but I 'm not convinced it wo n't happen.The price point depends on the sales volume .
If this generation of tablets flops , it 'll be awhile until the next churn .
If it does what Palm did for PDAs ( now migrated to phones ) that 'll be a good thing .
The Kindle &amp; other niche tablets could make it happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we'll see $200 ARM tablets Real Soon Now.I have a SmartQ7.
ARM MID.
7" 800x600 color touch screen with 128 MB RAM.
Runs a custom Ubuntu that can apt-get from the standard repos.
I paid $240ish including shipping from Hong Kong.
WinCE is available.I'm using it to read eBooks and Google Reader.
The RAM limits the browser (Midori) and the number of tabs.
I don't have flash on it.
I don't watch vids or listen to MP3s.For what I do, it's great.Maybe in a year I'll be able to buy a 10" 1024x600 (x768 or more please??
) 1GB RAM Linux based tablet that can do youtube &amp; other flash apps.
I wouldn't bet on it, but I'm not convinced it won't happen.The price point depends on the sales volume.
If this generation of tablets flops, it'll be awhile until the next churn.
If it does what Palm did for PDAs (now migrated to phones) that'll be a good thing.
The Kindle &amp; other niche tablets could make it happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30783142</id>
	<title>which stores</title>
	<author>t3chn0n3rd</author>
	<datestamp>1263546840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will these be available at wal-mart , or best buy or will you buy them online?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will these be available at wal-mart , or best buy or will you buy them online ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will these be available at wal-mart , or best buy or will you buy them online?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30718904</id>
	<title>feel sorry for Sridharan Subramanian...</title>
	<author>johnjones</author>
	<datestamp>1263132600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really do feel sorry for him the interview really is terrible</p><p>why cant people do interviews...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do feel sorry for him the interview really is terriblewhy cant people do interviews.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really do feel sorry for him the interview really is terriblewhy cant people do interviews...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716120</id>
	<title>Re:Flash</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1263154560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, it's a bit of both.  Freescale worked with Adobe before the launch of the i.MX515 to get Flash running on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's a bit of both .
Freescale worked with Adobe before the launch of the i.MX515 to get Flash running on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's a bit of both.
Freescale worked with Adobe before the launch of the i.MX515 to get Flash running on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</id>
	<title>Yeah right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263151620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $199.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $ 199 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $199.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720970</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>the person standing</author>
	<datestamp>1263204480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wake me up when there is a tablet which smoothly renders Slashdot...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when there is a tablet which smoothly renders Slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when there is a tablet which smoothly renders Slashdot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717364</id>
	<title>Re:Flash</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1263120480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will play flash the day one of the companies that need it seriously fund Gnash or any other open-source group trying to make a decent open source implementation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will play flash the day one of the companies that need it seriously fund Gnash or any other open-source group trying to make a decent open source implementation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will play flash the day one of the companies that need it seriously fund Gnash or any other open-source group trying to make a decent open source implementation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716186</id>
	<title>IDEA!</title>
	<author>clinko</author>
	<datestamp>1263155460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an awesome idea!</p><p>Instead of $199 for people that will buy it, lets make it:<br>- For Children in (um, africa? india? as long as it's not Gadget Geeks...)<br>- Bright green (or uglier if possible! Think Big!)<br>- Delayed by 4 years<br>- Cost Twice as much!</p><p>THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an awesome idea ! Instead of $ 199 for people that will buy it , lets make it : - For Children in ( um , africa ?
india ? as long as it 's not Gadget Geeks... ) - Bright green ( or uglier if possible !
Think Big !
) - Delayed by 4 years- Cost Twice as much ! THINK OF THE CHILDREN ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an awesome idea!Instead of $199 for people that will buy it, lets make it:- For Children in (um, africa?
india? as long as it's not Gadget Geeks...)- Bright green (or uglier if possible!
Think Big!
)- Delayed by 4 years- Cost Twice as much!THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720462</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>Yfrwlf</author>
	<datestamp>1263152940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aah Capitalism, not giving consumers what they want since (pick one of various historical reference dates).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aah Capitalism , not giving consumers what they want since ( pick one of various historical reference dates ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aah Capitalism, not giving consumers what they want since (pick one of various historical reference dates).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719900</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>hairyfeet</author>
	<datestamp>1263144900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well considering that we have been hearing about $200 and under ARM netbooks that are supposed to come out "any day now" for a couple of years now I'm afraid you're probably right. I just wonder how much of it is other companies interference VS being new players and simply not having their shit together?</p><p> Starting new products in a field where margins are usually razor thin to start with is hard enough, then add in the fact that you can't show VC investors your new device running the dominant OS, because Windows don't run on ARM, add in having to cut corners all over the place and the sometimes dodgy vendors one deals with when going bottom of the barrel, and I can see why so many devices end up as nothing more than vaporware.</p><p>Personally if they come out with sub $150 ARM netbooks (preferably $99) and $200 tablets I'll be happy to snap some up to sell in my shop, but I'm not holding my breath. There is a niche for these non Windows devices, how big a niche I don't know, but with a college nearby I'm sure I wouldn't have any problems moving a "browser in a box" that let them take notes in class and had 6 hour plus battery life. For college and HS kids these things would be perfect! Hell i would even snatch up a couple for myself just so when I had to go to the doctors office or some other "hurry up and wait" establishment I could kick back and surf and read.</p><p>

 But considering the money Intel is already losing by having Atom eat into notebook sales, plus now AMD entering the market with really nice sub $500 netbooks with Radeon GPUs and real Athlon CPUs, I really don't see Intel sitting back quietly on this. so while I'm sure a lot will go tits up thanks to simply not having all their ducks in a row, after Intel shelling out 1.25 Billion to AMD for not playing fair i wouldn't be surprised if any of these do manage to get their shit together that old Chipzilla wouldn't be willing to grease a few palms to make them go away. with the kind of money Intel has in the bank if it looks like one is close to market Intel can always "buy 'em and bury 'em". So while I would love to have this and a few of those cheapo ARM netbooks sitting in my shop, I won't be betting the farm on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well considering that we have been hearing about $ 200 and under ARM netbooks that are supposed to come out " any day now " for a couple of years now I 'm afraid you 're probably right .
I just wonder how much of it is other companies interference VS being new players and simply not having their shit together ?
Starting new products in a field where margins are usually razor thin to start with is hard enough , then add in the fact that you ca n't show VC investors your new device running the dominant OS , because Windows do n't run on ARM , add in having to cut corners all over the place and the sometimes dodgy vendors one deals with when going bottom of the barrel , and I can see why so many devices end up as nothing more than vaporware.Personally if they come out with sub $ 150 ARM netbooks ( preferably $ 99 ) and $ 200 tablets I 'll be happy to snap some up to sell in my shop , but I 'm not holding my breath .
There is a niche for these non Windows devices , how big a niche I do n't know , but with a college nearby I 'm sure I would n't have any problems moving a " browser in a box " that let them take notes in class and had 6 hour plus battery life .
For college and HS kids these things would be perfect !
Hell i would even snatch up a couple for myself just so when I had to go to the doctors office or some other " hurry up and wait " establishment I could kick back and surf and read .
But considering the money Intel is already losing by having Atom eat into notebook sales , plus now AMD entering the market with really nice sub $ 500 netbooks with Radeon GPUs and real Athlon CPUs , I really do n't see Intel sitting back quietly on this .
so while I 'm sure a lot will go tits up thanks to simply not having all their ducks in a row , after Intel shelling out 1.25 Billion to AMD for not playing fair i would n't be surprised if any of these do manage to get their shit together that old Chipzilla would n't be willing to grease a few palms to make them go away .
with the kind of money Intel has in the bank if it looks like one is close to market Intel can always " buy 'em and bury 'em " .
So while I would love to have this and a few of those cheapo ARM netbooks sitting in my shop , I wo n't be betting the farm on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well considering that we have been hearing about $200 and under ARM netbooks that are supposed to come out "any day now" for a couple of years now I'm afraid you're probably right.
I just wonder how much of it is other companies interference VS being new players and simply not having their shit together?
Starting new products in a field where margins are usually razor thin to start with is hard enough, then add in the fact that you can't show VC investors your new device running the dominant OS, because Windows don't run on ARM, add in having to cut corners all over the place and the sometimes dodgy vendors one deals with when going bottom of the barrel, and I can see why so many devices end up as nothing more than vaporware.Personally if they come out with sub $150 ARM netbooks (preferably $99) and $200 tablets I'll be happy to snap some up to sell in my shop, but I'm not holding my breath.
There is a niche for these non Windows devices, how big a niche I don't know, but with a college nearby I'm sure I wouldn't have any problems moving a "browser in a box" that let them take notes in class and had 6 hour plus battery life.
For college and HS kids these things would be perfect!
Hell i would even snatch up a couple for myself just so when I had to go to the doctors office or some other "hurry up and wait" establishment I could kick back and surf and read.
But considering the money Intel is already losing by having Atom eat into notebook sales, plus now AMD entering the market with really nice sub $500 netbooks with Radeon GPUs and real Athlon CPUs, I really don't see Intel sitting back quietly on this.
so while I'm sure a lot will go tits up thanks to simply not having all their ducks in a row, after Intel shelling out 1.25 Billion to AMD for not playing fair i wouldn't be surprised if any of these do manage to get their shit together that old Chipzilla wouldn't be willing to grease a few palms to make them go away.
with the kind of money Intel has in the bank if it looks like one is close to market Intel can always "buy 'em and bury 'em".
So while I would love to have this and a few of those cheapo ARM netbooks sitting in my shop, I won't be betting the farm on them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1263115680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $199.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's actually very insightful.  There are a lot of big players who are going to have to make sure a $200 Freescale Tablet never sees the light of day to keep their shareholders happy.</p><p>If it ever hit the market, they'd sell a ton of them.  Even the most ardent Mac supporter would have to think twice before spending more than $800 on an "iSlate" that will require another $600 in upgrades before it can be used instead of running out and spending $200 on a basic tablet that works.</p><p>I'd take three of them right now, today, if they were on the market.</p><p>Before they come out, I predict there will be "problems with the supply chain" and more "driver issues" and then several rounds of "intellectual property disputes" that will make sure a Freescale Tablet stays off the market at least until the big players can hit the markets with their more expensive offerings so the early adopters (aka "chumps") spend their money on 0-day.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $ 199.That 's actually very insightful .
There are a lot of big players who are going to have to make sure a $ 200 Freescale Tablet never sees the light of day to keep their shareholders happy.If it ever hit the market , they 'd sell a ton of them .
Even the most ardent Mac supporter would have to think twice before spending more than $ 800 on an " iSlate " that will require another $ 600 in upgrades before it can be used instead of running out and spending $ 200 on a basic tablet that works.I 'd take three of them right now , today , if they were on the market.Before they come out , I predict there will be " problems with the supply chain " and more " driver issues " and then several rounds of " intellectual property disputes " that will make sure a Freescale Tablet stays off the market at least until the big players can hit the markets with their more expensive offerings so the early adopters ( aka " chumps " ) spend their money on 0-day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $199.That's actually very insightful.
There are a lot of big players who are going to have to make sure a $200 Freescale Tablet never sees the light of day to keep their shareholders happy.If it ever hit the market, they'd sell a ton of them.
Even the most ardent Mac supporter would have to think twice before spending more than $800 on an "iSlate" that will require another $600 in upgrades before it can be used instead of running out and spending $200 on a basic tablet that works.I'd take three of them right now, today, if they were on the market.Before they come out, I predict there will be "problems with the supply chain" and more "driver issues" and then several rounds of "intellectual property disputes" that will make sure a Freescale Tablet stays off the market at least until the big players can hit the markets with their more expensive offerings so the early adopters (aka "chumps") spend their money on 0-day.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30722232</id>
	<title>Re:Content is the problem.</title>
	<author>coofercat</author>
	<datestamp>1263221040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see where you're going on this, but I think you're missing a proportion of possible uses for such a gadget.</p><p>I'm personally looking for one or two (touchscreen) tablet machines - definitely one in the kitchen, and maybe one in the bathroom or else just on the coffee table. I'm not looking to do all that much with it, except (in the kitchen) to be a place to play music, maybe watch something like BBC iPlayer for a cookery show, or just display a recipe on a web page (or fiddle with the home automation or what not). I'm not saying this specific device is going to be perfect for that (even when it gets touchscreen), but having hands covered in butter isn't going to be useful on any sort of keyboard or mouse. At least I can wipe the touchscreen clean, and I don't have to give up any horizontal space to use it.</p><p>Am I going to throw away my laptop for this? No way, but if it's a matter of "honey, just check if the trains are running on time", then a super-slimmed down tablet on the coffee table or stuck to the side of the fridge is definitely easier than any machine I've seen (other than some smart phones, maybe).</p><p>The problem the tablet producers will have include convincing the masses that they need a coffee table computer, and proving to people such as yourself that $200 for a bit of a toy is actually worth it.</p><p>(Just another thought: I once bought a Phillips Pronto touch screen universal remote control for more than $200 - so obviously there are some of us saps out there ready to spend money on an apparently over-engineered solution to a problem<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see where you 're going on this , but I think you 're missing a proportion of possible uses for such a gadget.I 'm personally looking for one or two ( touchscreen ) tablet machines - definitely one in the kitchen , and maybe one in the bathroom or else just on the coffee table .
I 'm not looking to do all that much with it , except ( in the kitchen ) to be a place to play music , maybe watch something like BBC iPlayer for a cookery show , or just display a recipe on a web page ( or fiddle with the home automation or what not ) .
I 'm not saying this specific device is going to be perfect for that ( even when it gets touchscreen ) , but having hands covered in butter is n't going to be useful on any sort of keyboard or mouse .
At least I can wipe the touchscreen clean , and I do n't have to give up any horizontal space to use it.Am I going to throw away my laptop for this ?
No way , but if it 's a matter of " honey , just check if the trains are running on time " , then a super-slimmed down tablet on the coffee table or stuck to the side of the fridge is definitely easier than any machine I 've seen ( other than some smart phones , maybe ) .The problem the tablet producers will have include convincing the masses that they need a coffee table computer , and proving to people such as yourself that $ 200 for a bit of a toy is actually worth it .
( Just another thought : I once bought a Phillips Pronto touch screen universal remote control for more than $ 200 - so obviously there are some of us saps out there ready to spend money on an apparently over-engineered solution to a problem ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see where you're going on this, but I think you're missing a proportion of possible uses for such a gadget.I'm personally looking for one or two (touchscreen) tablet machines - definitely one in the kitchen, and maybe one in the bathroom or else just on the coffee table.
I'm not looking to do all that much with it, except (in the kitchen) to be a place to play music, maybe watch something like BBC iPlayer for a cookery show, or just display a recipe on a web page (or fiddle with the home automation or what not).
I'm not saying this specific device is going to be perfect for that (even when it gets touchscreen), but having hands covered in butter isn't going to be useful on any sort of keyboard or mouse.
At least I can wipe the touchscreen clean, and I don't have to give up any horizontal space to use it.Am I going to throw away my laptop for this?
No way, but if it's a matter of "honey, just check if the trains are running on time", then a super-slimmed down tablet on the coffee table or stuck to the side of the fridge is definitely easier than any machine I've seen (other than some smart phones, maybe).The problem the tablet producers will have include convincing the masses that they need a coffee table computer, and proving to people such as yourself that $200 for a bit of a toy is actually worth it.
(Just another thought: I once bought a Phillips Pronto touch screen universal remote control for more than $200 - so obviously there are some of us saps out there ready to spend money on an apparently over-engineered solution to a problem ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30718986</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>JWW</author>
	<datestamp>1263133560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake ME up when the touchscreen on the "tablet" actually works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake ME up when the touchscreen on the " tablet " actually works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake ME up when the touchscreen on the "tablet" actually works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886</id>
	<title>Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263152580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In response to all of the questions of the form "can it play flash".  It's up to Adobe, not so much the hardware manufacturer.  A manufacturer can included chips to offload video processing, etc., but if Adobe doesn't take advantage of the hardware capabilities, Flash won't play well.</p><p>Flash is terrible on everything but Windows.  My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash. The problem is Adobe's exclusive control over the flash player.  We need a real standard, hence the debate over html5 video codec inclusion.</p><p>So please realize more times than not that the shortcoming is with flash and Adobe, not with the hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In response to all of the questions of the form " can it play flash " .
It 's up to Adobe , not so much the hardware manufacturer .
A manufacturer can included chips to offload video processing , etc. , but if Adobe does n't take advantage of the hardware capabilities , Flash wo n't play well.Flash is terrible on everything but Windows .
My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer , but ca n't play 480p acceptably in flash .
The problem is Adobe 's exclusive control over the flash player .
We need a real standard , hence the debate over html5 video codec inclusion.So please realize more times than not that the shortcoming is with flash and Adobe , not with the hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In response to all of the questions of the form "can it play flash".
It's up to Adobe, not so much the hardware manufacturer.
A manufacturer can included chips to offload video processing, etc., but if Adobe doesn't take advantage of the hardware capabilities, Flash won't play well.Flash is terrible on everything but Windows.
My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash.
The problem is Adobe's exclusive control over the flash player.
We need a real standard, hence the debate over html5 video codec inclusion.So please realize more times than not that the shortcoming is with flash and Adobe, not with the hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715908</id>
	<title>That's missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263152820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that the main news (whether it was news worthy or not is entirely different thing...) was that $199 (138 &euro;) machine has enough power to run the OS decently. Which is kinda neat. IE: news about the OS, not hardware... The OS is still unfinished and doesn't yet have support for touch screen but that is pretty irrelevant as long as we can make two assumptions: They will get it working eventually and it will not hog large amounts of processing power. I think we can trust on those two.</p><p>It's neat to see that Chromium OS is going to be light. (Yeah, Linux is also. As is mobile version of Windows. But more options is still nice.) That said, I'm not sure if this was news worthy: I thought that was given already. That we knew about this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that the main news ( whether it was news worthy or not is entirely different thing... ) was that $ 199 ( 138    ) machine has enough power to run the OS decently .
Which is kinda neat .
IE : news about the OS , not hardware... The OS is still unfinished and does n't yet have support for touch screen but that is pretty irrelevant as long as we can make two assumptions : They will get it working eventually and it will not hog large amounts of processing power .
I think we can trust on those two.It 's neat to see that Chromium OS is going to be light .
( Yeah , Linux is also .
As is mobile version of Windows .
But more options is still nice .
) That said , I 'm not sure if this was news worthy : I thought that was given already .
That we knew about this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that the main news (whether it was news worthy or not is entirely different thing...) was that $199 (138 €) machine has enough power to run the OS decently.
Which is kinda neat.
IE: news about the OS, not hardware... The OS is still unfinished and doesn't yet have support for touch screen but that is pretty irrelevant as long as we can make two assumptions: They will get it working eventually and it will not hog large amounts of processing power.
I think we can trust on those two.It's neat to see that Chromium OS is going to be light.
(Yeah, Linux is also.
As is mobile version of Windows.
But more options is still nice.
) That said, I'm not sure if this was news worthy: I thought that was given already.
That we knew about this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852</id>
	<title>Flash + ARM?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263152280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It says "will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites"; I didn't think you could run the flash player at all on ARM chips.   Gnash is probably out of the question too.  It's coming along nicely but at present it only seems to function 25\% of the time and it's very slow for video playback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It says " will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites " ; I did n't think you could run the flash player at all on ARM chips .
Gnash is probably out of the question too .
It 's coming along nicely but at present it only seems to function 25 \ % of the time and it 's very slow for video playback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It says "will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites"; I didn't think you could run the flash player at all on ARM chips.
Gnash is probably out of the question too.
It's coming along nicely but at present it only seems to function 25\% of the time and it's very slow for video playback.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30721740</id>
	<title>why so small?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263217020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ok, seriously, i know tablets and "netbooks" are great for people with gigantic pockets but really i need a keyboard that you can type on.  why cant i just get a full sized laptop with an ARM processor (not co-processor!) that will have a really long battery life?!  my ARM based cellphone still lasts a week with it's tiny battery, so why cant i have a laptop that lasts a week?!</p><p>the industry seems to be more interested in the latest buzzword bullshit instead of actually making shit people want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ok , seriously , i know tablets and " netbooks " are great for people with gigantic pockets but really i need a keyboard that you can type on .
why cant i just get a full sized laptop with an ARM processor ( not co-processor !
) that will have a really long battery life ? !
my ARM based cellphone still lasts a week with it 's tiny battery , so why cant i have a laptop that lasts a week ?
! the industry seems to be more interested in the latest buzzword bullshit instead of actually making shit people want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok, seriously, i know tablets and "netbooks" are great for people with gigantic pockets but really i need a keyboard that you can type on.
why cant i just get a full sized laptop with an ARM processor (not co-processor!
) that will have a really long battery life?!
my ARM based cellphone still lasts a week with it's tiny battery, so why cant i have a laptop that lasts a week?
!the industry seems to be more interested in the latest buzzword bullshit instead of actually making shit people want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30718986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30783142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30739420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30722232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_1649202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30722232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30717364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_1649202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30715780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30718986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30783142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30716652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30719900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30720462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_1649202.30739420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
