<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_10_0210249</id>
	<title>A Peek Into Netflix Queues</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263146760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>margaret writes <i>"The New York Times has an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/01/10/nyregion/20100110-netflix-map.html?hp">interactive Web app</a> where you can map the popularity of various Netflix titles by neighborhood, in a dozen different cities. Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun?  Either way, it's pretty interesting."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>margaret writes " The New York Times has an interactive Web app where you can map the popularity of various Netflix titles by neighborhood , in a dozen different cities .
Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun ?
Either way , it 's pretty interesting .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>margaret writes "The New York Times has an interactive Web app where you can map the popularity of various Netflix titles by neighborhood, in a dozen different cities.
Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun?
Either way, it's pretty interesting.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715604</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263150360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stop being an idiot just because you're not creative enough to see how this info could be valuable. I'm planning on moving to NYC, for instance, and I'd rather live in an area where I "fit in" best. And this applet shows one possible factor in such a decision: The Bronx for instance has far fewer people with my movie tastes than Manhattan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop being an idiot just because you 're not creative enough to see how this info could be valuable .
I 'm planning on moving to NYC , for instance , and I 'd rather live in an area where I " fit in " best .
And this applet shows one possible factor in such a decision : The Bronx for instance has far fewer people with my movie tastes than Manhattan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop being an idiot just because you're not creative enough to see how this info could be valuable.
I'm planning on moving to NYC, for instance, and I'd rather live in an area where I "fit in" best.
And this applet shows one possible factor in such a decision: The Bronx for instance has far fewer people with my movie tastes than Manhattan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714996</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263144720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>02126 is the back bay, where all the rich people live. I used to live there, and once or twice we received mail from the RNC or Bush addressed to neighbors. It looked handwritten...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>02126 is the back bay , where all the rich people live .
I used to live there , and once or twice we received mail from the RNC or Bush addressed to neighbors .
It looked handwritten.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>02126 is the back bay, where all the rich people live.
I used to live there, and once or twice we received mail from the RNC or Bush addressed to neighbors.
It looked handwritten...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717608</id>
	<title>80225 is one person's most rented list</title>
	<author>mounthood</author>
	<datestamp>1263121980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Checkout 80225 in Denver - small grey square east of down town above the "L" for Lakewood. It looks like just one persons queue; titles from the same series, common sense of humour, etc... Plus, according to <a href="http://www.bestplaces.net/zip-code/Denver-Colorado-80225.aspx" title="bestplaces.net">this random page</a> [bestplaces.net] there's only one person living in that zip code. I think we have winner for this round of "thoughtless privacy invasion".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Checkout 80225 in Denver - small grey square east of down town above the " L " for Lakewood .
It looks like just one persons queue ; titles from the same series , common sense of humour , etc... Plus , according to this random page [ bestplaces.net ] there 's only one person living in that zip code .
I think we have winner for this round of " thoughtless privacy invasion " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Checkout 80225 in Denver - small grey square east of down town above the "L" for Lakewood.
It looks like just one persons queue; titles from the same series, common sense of humour, etc... Plus, according to this random page [bestplaces.net] there's only one person living in that zip code.
I think we have winner for this round of "thoughtless privacy invasion".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716892</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>zoloto</author>
	<datestamp>1263117360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You think Milk was popular / pseudo intellectual? Boy do I have some news for you...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You think Milk was popular / pseudo intellectual ?
Boy do I have some news for you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think Milk was popular / pseudo intellectual?
Boy do I have some news for you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713988</id>
	<title>Other cities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263130500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you get other areas of the country (since this is on Google maps, etc) or did Netflix only give out certain areas/did the New York Times only map these cities?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you get other areas of the country ( since this is on Google maps , etc ) or did Netflix only give out certain areas/did the New York Times only map these cities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you get other areas of the country (since this is on Google maps, etc) or did Netflix only give out certain areas/did the New York Times only map these cities?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713254</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1263156660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if we're already speculating you may also speculate if you are seeing a biased sample of the student population. At least many of the technically minded students I knew would see no need for a Netflix subscription...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if we 're already speculating you may also speculate if you are seeing a biased sample of the student population .
At least many of the technically minded students I knew would see no need for a Netflix subscription.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if we're already speculating you may also speculate if you are seeing a biased sample of the student population.
At least many of the technically minded students I knew would see no need for a Netflix subscription...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778</id>
	<title>Racial profiling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263125220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an extremely dangerous tool. If you are looking to live in an area, you can use this tool to see the proportion of (say) blacks and hispanics (through the choice of movies), and then decide to move/not move there, thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettos.</p><p>Studies have proved time and again that multi-cultural communities are more stable (socially and economically) than mono-culture communities.</p><p>If this was an interactive map that showed where ethnic minorities lived, there would be an uproar. It's just too subtle for people to notice this way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an extremely dangerous tool .
If you are looking to live in an area , you can use this tool to see the proportion of ( say ) blacks and hispanics ( through the choice of movies ) , and then decide to move/not move there , thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettos.Studies have proved time and again that multi-cultural communities are more stable ( socially and economically ) than mono-culture communities.If this was an interactive map that showed where ethnic minorities lived , there would be an uproar .
It 's just too subtle for people to notice this way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an extremely dangerous tool.
If you are looking to live in an area, you can use this tool to see the proportion of (say) blacks and hispanics (through the choice of movies), and then decide to move/not move there, thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettos.Studies have proved time and again that multi-cultural communities are more stable (socially and economically) than mono-culture communities.If this was an interactive map that showed where ethnic minorities lived, there would be an uproar.
It's just too subtle for people to notice this way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713426</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263117540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Some people like demographics."</p><p>Apparently, some people like masturbation as well.  That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Some people like demographics .
" Apparently , some people like masturbation as well .
That does n't mean they should n't get a life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Some people like demographics.
"Apparently, some people like masturbation as well.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713186</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1263155220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Marketing people care.  You'd better believe they care!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Marketing people care .
You 'd better believe they care !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Marketing people care.
You'd better believe they care!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716382</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1263156780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is the Potomac river boundary.  Capitol hill is just north of the river, and the south-east section of the river is almost all filled with african americans. The capitol region has a higher education rate (about half the people living there graduated from college).   As would be expected from the graduation rates, that area has higher income levels as well.  <a href="http://www.movoto.com/neighborhood/dc/washington/20003.htm" title="movoto.com">Here is a demographic breakdown of the area around capitol hill</a> [movoto.com] and <a href="http://www.movoto.com/neighborhood/dc/washington/20019.htm" title="movoto.com">here is one for a typical zip code south of the river</a> [movoto.com].  I'm going to guess that the biggest distinguishing factor is race, since opinions on homosexuality are already known to be divided on race.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is the Potomac river boundary .
Capitol hill is just north of the river , and the south-east section of the river is almost all filled with african americans .
The capitol region has a higher education rate ( about half the people living there graduated from college ) .
As would be expected from the graduation rates , that area has higher income levels as well .
Here is a demographic breakdown of the area around capitol hill [ movoto.com ] and here is one for a typical zip code south of the river [ movoto.com ] .
I 'm going to guess that the biggest distinguishing factor is race , since opinions on homosexuality are already known to be divided on race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is the Potomac river boundary.
Capitol hill is just north of the river, and the south-east section of the river is almost all filled with african americans.
The capitol region has a higher education rate (about half the people living there graduated from college).
As would be expected from the graduation rates, that area has higher income levels as well.
Here is a demographic breakdown of the area around capitol hill [movoto.com] and here is one for a typical zip code south of the river [movoto.com].
I'm going to guess that the biggest distinguishing factor is race, since opinions on homosexuality are already known to be divided on race.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716582</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>TheoMurpse</author>
	<datestamp>1263115020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126. Don't know what happened there.</p></div></blockquote><p>That is the ZIP code for Mattapan, MA. It is 77\% African American.</p><p>I have no idea what the personal preferences are of those residents, but I recall that there is little debate that homosexuality garners less acceptance in many visible black communities. Think of the "no homo" thing and the phenomenon of a "down low brotha" ("DLB") and the demographics of Prop 8 voting. My recollection is that the black populace voted much more against gay marriage in 2008 than did other races (except maybe Asians or Vietnamese or something?).</p><p>But that's just an anecdotal attempt to explain your noted variance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded , except in area code 02126 .
Do n't know what happened there.That is the ZIP code for Mattapan , MA .
It is 77 \ % African American.I have no idea what the personal preferences are of those residents , but I recall that there is little debate that homosexuality garners less acceptance in many visible black communities .
Think of the " no homo " thing and the phenomenon of a " down low brotha " ( " DLB " ) and the demographics of Prop 8 voting .
My recollection is that the black populace voted much more against gay marriage in 2008 than did other races ( except maybe Asians or Vietnamese or something ?
) .But that 's just an anecdotal attempt to explain your noted variance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126.
Don't know what happened there.That is the ZIP code for Mattapan, MA.
It is 77\% African American.I have no idea what the personal preferences are of those residents, but I recall that there is little debate that homosexuality garners less acceptance in many visible black communities.
Think of the "no homo" thing and the phenomenon of a "down low brotha" ("DLB") and the demographics of Prop 8 voting.
My recollection is that the black populace voted much more against gay marriage in 2008 than did other races (except maybe Asians or Vietnamese or something?
).But that's just an anecdotal attempt to explain your noted variance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30720360</id>
	<title>how is it an invasion of privacy?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263151380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its information in aggregate. privacy implies PERSONALLY identifying information</p><p>if i say "wilbur cross of madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men'" then that's an invasion of privacy</p><p>if i say "323 people in madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men'" then there is no invasion of privacy</p><p>its ok to get upset about invasion of privacy. getting upset about it when none actually occurs is some sort of spastic hysteria, a triumph of emotion over logic. save your ammo for real battles</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its information in aggregate .
privacy implies PERSONALLY identifying informationif i say " wilbur cross of madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men ' " then that 's an invasion of privacyif i say " 323 people in madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men ' " then there is no invasion of privacyits ok to get upset about invasion of privacy .
getting upset about it when none actually occurs is some sort of spastic hysteria , a triumph of emotion over logic .
save your ammo for real battles</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its information in aggregate.
privacy implies PERSONALLY identifying informationif i say "wilbur cross of madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men'" then that's an invasion of privacyif i say "323 people in madison wisconsin rented 'no country for old men'" then there is no invasion of privacyits ok to get upset about invasion of privacy.
getting upset about it when none actually occurs is some sort of spastic hysteria, a triumph of emotion over logic.
save your ammo for real battles</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714096</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1263132540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More intelligent poor folk aren't so poor that they can't afford netflix. And if you're a pirate of any note, you've got an internet connection; most internet connections are sufficient for streaming (unlike mine) so you can then parlay the cheapest netflix membership into something great, or at least entertaining.</p><p>Nothing makes Ramen taste inoffensive like distraction. TRUST ME</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More intelligent poor folk are n't so poor that they ca n't afford netflix .
And if you 're a pirate of any note , you 've got an internet connection ; most internet connections are sufficient for streaming ( unlike mine ) so you can then parlay the cheapest netflix membership into something great , or at least entertaining.Nothing makes Ramen taste inoffensive like distraction .
TRUST ME</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More intelligent poor folk aren't so poor that they can't afford netflix.
And if you're a pirate of any note, you've got an internet connection; most internet connections are sufficient for streaming (unlike mine) so you can then parlay the cheapest netflix membership into something great, or at least entertaining.Nothing makes Ramen taste inoffensive like distraction.
TRUST ME</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714174</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263133980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Zip code 02126 in Boston is Mattapan; predominantly black, with a lot of immigrants from the Caribbean. Perhaps you should try listening to some Jamaican dancehall music, and pay attention to the lyrics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Zip code 02126 in Boston is Mattapan ; predominantly black , with a lot of immigrants from the Caribbean .
Perhaps you should try listening to some Jamaican dancehall music , and pay attention to the lyrics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zip code 02126 in Boston is Mattapan; predominantly black, with a lot of immigrants from the Caribbean.
Perhaps you should try listening to some Jamaican dancehall music, and pay attention to the lyrics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712900</id>
	<title>porn?</title>
	<author>iamagloworm</author>
	<datestamp>1263064200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>porn, now that's where it'd get interesting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>porn , now that 's where it 'd get interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>porn, now that's where it'd get interesting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30728872</id>
	<title>Re:Racial profiling</title>
	<author>harlows\_monkeys</author>
	<datestamp>1263205020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> This is an extremely dangerous tool. If you are looking to live in an area, you can use this tool to see the proportion of (say) blacks and hispanics (through the choice of movies), and then decide to move/not move there, thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettos</p></div><p>Or you could just look at census data and not have to try to infer racial data from movie choice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an extremely dangerous tool .
If you are looking to live in an area , you can use this tool to see the proportion of ( say ) blacks and hispanics ( through the choice of movies ) , and then decide to move/not move there , thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettosOr you could just look at census data and not have to try to infer racial data from movie choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This is an extremely dangerous tool.
If you are looking to live in an area, you can use this tool to see the proportion of (say) blacks and hispanics (through the choice of movies), and then decide to move/not move there, thus encouraging the creation of racial ghettosOr you could just look at census data and not have to try to infer racial data from movie choice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714608</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1263140460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they like those movies more, so they go to the movie theater to see those, and the others aren't worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they like those movies more , so they go to the movie theater to see those , and the others are n't worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they like those movies more, so they go to the movie theater to see those, and the others aren't worth it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713032</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263066300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly, we should all stop reading slashdot.org and move on to more important things. Like getting out of the basement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , we should all stop reading slashdot.org and move on to more important things .
Like getting out of the basement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, we should all stop reading slashdot.org and move on to more important things.
Like getting out of the basement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714702</id>
	<title>Best thing I've seen in the New York Times but...</title>
	<author>Thagg</author>
	<datestamp>1263141480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am in despair over the newspaper industry.  The country and the world has needed news researchers, and over the last half-century that has been the province of big newspapers like the Times, the LA Times, the Wall Street Journal, and others.</p><p>Lately, though, newspapers subscription rates have fallen dramatically, their income has fallen even faster, and they're all cut back on their research budgets.</p><p>Here, though, we see a truly interesting tool, one that gives more insight the more one plays with it (as the long articles in newspapers used to do the same as you read through them.)  The credit list on this webapp is long, the quality of the presentation is absolutely top-notch, and the bandwidth behind it apparently infinite.  That the New York Times would do this is commendable.</p><p>Would CNN.com do this?  Could Google News do this?  Drudgereport?  No, those sites are merely aggragators.  They are only interested in what happened in the last 24 hours, at best.</p><p>But, unfortunately for the Times, this remarkable tool is inaccessible in their dead-tree edition.  I suppose it is a loss-leader for them, and a worthwhile one, but it does reinforce all the thousand other indicators that traditional newspapers are dying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am in despair over the newspaper industry .
The country and the world has needed news researchers , and over the last half-century that has been the province of big newspapers like the Times , the LA Times , the Wall Street Journal , and others.Lately , though , newspapers subscription rates have fallen dramatically , their income has fallen even faster , and they 're all cut back on their research budgets.Here , though , we see a truly interesting tool , one that gives more insight the more one plays with it ( as the long articles in newspapers used to do the same as you read through them .
) The credit list on this webapp is long , the quality of the presentation is absolutely top-notch , and the bandwidth behind it apparently infinite .
That the New York Times would do this is commendable.Would CNN.com do this ?
Could Google News do this ?
Drudgereport ? No , those sites are merely aggragators .
They are only interested in what happened in the last 24 hours , at best.But , unfortunately for the Times , this remarkable tool is inaccessible in their dead-tree edition .
I suppose it is a loss-leader for them , and a worthwhile one , but it does reinforce all the thousand other indicators that traditional newspapers are dying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am in despair over the newspaper industry.
The country and the world has needed news researchers, and over the last half-century that has been the province of big newspapers like the Times, the LA Times, the Wall Street Journal, and others.Lately, though, newspapers subscription rates have fallen dramatically, their income has fallen even faster, and they're all cut back on their research budgets.Here, though, we see a truly interesting tool, one that gives more insight the more one plays with it (as the long articles in newspapers used to do the same as you read through them.
)  The credit list on this webapp is long, the quality of the presentation is absolutely top-notch, and the bandwidth behind it apparently infinite.
That the New York Times would do this is commendable.Would CNN.com do this?
Could Google News do this?
Drudgereport?  No, those sites are merely aggragators.
They are only interested in what happened in the last 24 hours, at best.But, unfortunately for the Times, this remarkable tool is inaccessible in their dead-tree edition.
I suppose it is a loss-leader for them, and a worthwhile one, but it does reinforce all the thousand other indicators that traditional newspapers are dying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30726956</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1263241980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You only get your official intellectual card when you get to the grad school level. As an undergrad, My friends and I mostly watched mindless comedies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You only get your official intellectual card when you get to the grad school level .
As an undergrad , My friends and I mostly watched mindless comedies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You only get your official intellectual card when you get to the grad school level.
As an undergrad, My friends and I mostly watched mindless comedies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713090</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Eric in SF</author>
	<datestamp>1263067080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone in the neighborhood saw it in the theatre and so didn't need to rent it from Netflix.</p><p>We saw it at the Castro theatre about halfway through its total run and it was a full upper balcony sellout. It really was an important film to see as together as a community and I was glad to have taken part in what I felt was a community viewing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone in the neighborhood saw it in the theatre and so did n't need to rent it from Netflix.We saw it at the Castro theatre about halfway through its total run and it was a full upper balcony sellout .
It really was an important film to see as together as a community and I was glad to have taken part in what I felt was a community viewing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone in the neighborhood saw it in the theatre and so didn't need to rent it from Netflix.We saw it at the Castro theatre about halfway through its total run and it was a full upper balcony sellout.
It really was an important film to see as together as a community and I was glad to have taken part in what I felt was a community viewing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714724</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1263141900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would probably think twice about moving into any neighborhood where its residents have the movie "Gigli" in the top ten,...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would probably think twice about moving into any neighborhood where its residents have the movie " Gigli " in the top ten,.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would probably think twice about moving into any neighborhood where its residents have the movie "Gigli" in the top ten,...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713116</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>JackieBrown</author>
	<datestamp>1263154080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  Renting Milk shows open mindedness?</p><p>I never saw a movie preview for this movie.  I could see the arguement that this demographic is more aware of non-mainstream movies more.</p><p>Also, those demographics may just have more homosexuals.  I am straight and watch predominantly straight love movies with my wife.  I would imagine someone gay would probably prefer more gay love movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Renting Milk shows open mindedness ? I never saw a movie preview for this movie .
I could see the arguement that this demographic is more aware of non-mainstream movies more.Also , those demographics may just have more homosexuals .
I am straight and watch predominantly straight love movies with my wife .
I would imagine someone gay would probably prefer more gay love movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Renting Milk shows open mindedness?I never saw a movie preview for this movie.
I could see the arguement that this demographic is more aware of non-mainstream movies more.Also, those demographics may just have more homosexuals.
I am straight and watch predominantly straight love movies with my wife.
I would imagine someone gay would probably prefer more gay love movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714310</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263136200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, yeah, duh!  Kids like dumbass kid movies, so around a university filled with kids the most popular movies will be kid movies.  Actual adults watch movies that are for actual adults, sure, but college students aren't adults in any realistic sense of the word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , yeah , duh !
Kids like dumbass kid movies , so around a university filled with kids the most popular movies will be kid movies .
Actual adults watch movies that are for actual adults , sure , but college students are n't adults in any realistic sense of the word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, yeah, duh!
Kids like dumbass kid movies, so around a university filled with kids the most popular movies will be kid movies.
Actual adults watch movies that are for actual adults, sure, but college students aren't adults in any realistic sense of the word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714122</id>
	<title>note: ranking is biased by instant viewing</title>
	<author>ren-n-stimpy</author>
	<datestamp>1263133140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>note: this ranking is biased by instant viewing.</p><p>"instant view" titles are those you watch on your computer (or roku or xbox or whatever).  they are "second tier" movies only.  but, because they are convenient, they got a TON more views than movies you have to actually get the CD mailed to you for.</p><p>so, what you're seeing here is a hybrid list, with "top tier" movies vote counts watered down by over-counts of instant-play-ables.</p><p>fwiw.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>note : this ranking is biased by instant viewing .
" instant view " titles are those you watch on your computer ( or roku or xbox or whatever ) .
they are " second tier " movies only .
but , because they are convenient , they got a TON more views than movies you have to actually get the CD mailed to you for.so , what you 're seeing here is a hybrid list , with " top tier " movies vote counts watered down by over-counts of instant-play-ables.fwiw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>note: this ranking is biased by instant viewing.
"instant view" titles are those you watch on your computer (or roku or xbox or whatever).
they are "second tier" movies only.
but, because they are convenient, they got a TON more views than movies you have to actually get the CD mailed to you for.so, what you're seeing here is a hybrid list, with "top tier" movies vote counts watered down by over-counts of instant-play-ables.fwiw.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716544</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>CSHARP123</author>
	<datestamp>1263114720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Apparently, some people like masturbation as well. That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a life</i>
<br>
Apparently, some people like masturbation as well. That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a <b>WIFE</b>
<br>
There you go I fixed it for you. I know this is a geek site. But atleast you need to try getting a wife instead of just masturbating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , some people like masturbation as well .
That does n't mean they should n't get a life Apparently , some people like masturbation as well .
That does n't mean they should n't get a WIFE There you go I fixed it for you .
I know this is a geek site .
But atleast you need to try getting a wife instead of just masturbating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, some people like masturbation as well.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a life

Apparently, some people like masturbation as well.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't get a WIFE

There you go I fixed it for you.
I know this is a geek site.
But atleast you need to try getting a wife instead of just masturbating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717384</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>laron</author>
	<datestamp>1263120600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those statistics could come handy in "community standards" related lawsuits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those statistics could come handy in " community standards " related lawsuits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those statistics could come handy in "community standards" related lawsuits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1263066960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>Milk is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro. Try explaining that one if you can.<br></i><br>Maybe most people in Castro already saw it in the theater, or rented it months ago?  The DVD came out in March of last year, so it's not exactly new.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Milk is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro .
Try explaining that one if you can.Maybe most people in Castro already saw it in the theater , or rented it months ago ?
The DVD came out in March of last year , so it 's not exactly new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Milk is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro.
Try explaining that one if you can.Maybe most people in Castro already saw it in the theater, or rented it months ago?
The DVD came out in March of last year, so it's not exactly new.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713284</id>
	<title>You're kidding, right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263114240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun?</i> </p><p>What invasion of privacy?  They're not showing what any particular person rented, just what the aggregate in a given area liked.  If this is invasion of privacy, then so is any demographic statistic saying, for instance, that New Yorkers like hot dogs from a stand on the street or the baseball stadium over that cooked at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun ?
What invasion of privacy ?
They 're not showing what any particular person rented , just what the aggregate in a given area liked .
If this is invasion of privacy , then so is any demographic statistic saying , for instance , that New Yorkers like hot dogs from a stand on the street or the baseball stadium over that cooked at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Invasion of privacy or harmless voyeuristic fun?
What invasion of privacy?
They're not showing what any particular person rented, just what the aggregate in a given area liked.
If this is invasion of privacy, then so is any demographic statistic saying, for instance, that New Yorkers like hot dogs from a stand on the street or the baseball stadium over that cooked at home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717286</id>
	<title>55450 is watching Battlestar Galactica S3</title>
	<author>mounthood</author>
	<datestamp>1263120060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most watched for 55450 is Battlestar Galactica season 3 and nothing else. It's the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport; on the map it's the empty grey area south of the cities. Maybe this is TSA homework?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most watched for 55450 is Battlestar Galactica season 3 and nothing else .
It 's the Minneapolis/St .
Paul airport ; on the map it 's the empty grey area south of the cities .
Maybe this is TSA homework ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most watched for 55450 is Battlestar Galactica season 3 and nothing else.
It's the Minneapolis/St.
Paul airport; on the map it's the empty grey area south of the cities.
Maybe this is TSA homework?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713324</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>HouseOfMisterE</author>
	<datestamp>1263115020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure about Milk or Frost/Nixon, but there was a DVD screener for Benjamin Button available for download months before the retail DVD was released.  That may have measurably impacted rentals in a college ZIP code area.  Or not, who knows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure about Milk or Frost/Nixon , but there was a DVD screener for Benjamin Button available for download months before the retail DVD was released .
That may have measurably impacted rentals in a college ZIP code area .
Or not , who knows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure about Milk or Frost/Nixon, but there was a DVD screener for Benjamin Button available for download months before the retail DVD was released.
That may have measurably impacted rentals in a college ZIP code area.
Or not, who knows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713160</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>kannibal\_klown</author>
	<datestamp>1263154740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me.  The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else.  What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual' movies that you would think would be more popular, <i>Milk, Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon</i>, are relatively low in this area of learning, while mindless movies, <i>Role Models, House Bunny</i>, where the most popular.</p></div><p>I don't find it odd.</p><p>It's just anecdotal, but after a stressful day/week of courses and exams I found myself wanting to unwind and relax with a fun and mindless flick instead of a high quality film.</p><p>Don't get me wrong, I would still enjoy cerebral movies back then but not as frequently as a silly comedy or mindless action flick.</p><p>A mindless entertainment was a good way to unwind, plus you could watch it and laugh together with friends.</p><p>---------------</p><p>I guess it's somewhat like my reading habits.  I enjoy reading and do it fairly often now, likewise I read a fair amount back in high school.</p><p>However in college I was already reading  every day for multiple hours for my various courses, so the last thing I after I put down my textbook was pick up yet another book.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me .
The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else .
What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual ' movies that you would think would be more popular , Milk , Benjamin Button , Frost/Nixon , are relatively low in this area of learning , while mindless movies , Role Models , House Bunny , where the most popular.I do n't find it odd.It 's just anecdotal , but after a stressful day/week of courses and exams I found myself wanting to unwind and relax with a fun and mindless flick instead of a high quality film.Do n't get me wrong , I would still enjoy cerebral movies back then but not as frequently as a silly comedy or mindless action flick.A mindless entertainment was a good way to unwind , plus you could watch it and laugh together with friends.---------------I guess it 's somewhat like my reading habits .
I enjoy reading and do it fairly often now , likewise I read a fair amount back in high school.However in college I was already reading every day for multiple hours for my various courses , so the last thing I after I put down my textbook was pick up yet another book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me.
The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else.
What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual' movies that you would think would be more popular, Milk, Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, are relatively low in this area of learning, while mindless movies, Role Models, House Bunny, where the most popular.I don't find it odd.It's just anecdotal, but after a stressful day/week of courses and exams I found myself wanting to unwind and relax with a fun and mindless flick instead of a high quality film.Don't get me wrong, I would still enjoy cerebral movies back then but not as frequently as a silly comedy or mindless action flick.A mindless entertainment was a good way to unwind, plus you could watch it and laugh together with friends.---------------I guess it's somewhat like my reading habits.
I enjoy reading and do it fairly often now, likewise I read a fair amount back in high school.However in college I was already reading  every day for multiple hours for my various courses, so the last thing I after I put down my textbook was pick up yet another book.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713114</id>
	<title>Map Technology?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263154020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone know how they created that map?  I know it's Flash, but how did they make it?  Is there a library in Flash which can make these maps?  Is this built with an open source libary?  Just currious...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know how they created that map ?
I know it 's Flash , but how did they make it ?
Is there a library in Flash which can make these maps ?
Is this built with an open source libary ?
Just currious.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know how they created that map?
I know it's Flash, but how did they make it?
Is there a library in Flash which can make these maps?
Is this built with an open source libary?
Just currious...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714180</id>
	<title>Apparently in Minneapolis</title>
	<author>Sebilrazen</author>
	<datestamp>1263134100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We love us some gay and lesbian movies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We love us some gay and lesbian movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We love us some gay and lesbian movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30727060</id>
	<title>Re:Racial profiling</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1263242340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't need Netflix for that. One quick drive through the neighborhood will tell you way more about the demographics than any movie rental patterns will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need Netflix for that .
One quick drive through the neighborhood will tell you way more about the demographics than any movie rental patterns will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need Netflix for that.
One quick drive through the neighborhood will tell you way more about the demographics than any movie rental patterns will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712920</id>
	<title>Interesting relationship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263064620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else notice that Knowing's rank seems inversely proportional to Rachel Getting Married's rank?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else notice that Knowing 's rank seems inversely proportional to Rachel Getting Married 's rank ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else notice that Knowing's rank seems inversely proportional to Rachel Getting Married's rank?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713904</id>
	<title>Welcome to Murderpan; now go to the morgue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263128760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126."</p></div></blockquote><p>That is Mattapan; sometimes affectionately referred to as Murderpan.  There is a very large criminal element there, and as the name implies, a very high murder rate.  That alone cannot explain it though, unless you see significant dips in Dorchester and other high crime areas.  I don't really care enough to look, since I don't really think you can make reasonable conclusions even when having local/inside information about a region based on this kind of data.  About all you can do is theorize, which is all well and good, as long as you realize that you cannot take it any further than that, or test the veracity of your theory.  Since I see no benefit to formulating an untestable theory I don't think it makes much sense to advance one, except for the pure entertainment value, if that happens to be something you find entertaining.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded , except in area code 02126 .
" That is Mattapan ; sometimes affectionately referred to as Murderpan .
There is a very large criminal element there , and as the name implies , a very high murder rate .
That alone can not explain it though , unless you see significant dips in Dorchester and other high crime areas .
I do n't really care enough to look , since I do n't really think you can make reasonable conclusions even when having local/inside information about a region based on this kind of data .
About all you can do is theorize , which is all well and good , as long as you realize that you can not take it any further than that , or test the veracity of your theory .
Since I see no benefit to formulating an untestable theory I do n't think it makes much sense to advance one , except for the pure entertainment value , if that happens to be something you find entertaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126.
"That is Mattapan; sometimes affectionately referred to as Murderpan.
There is a very large criminal element there, and as the name implies, a very high murder rate.
That alone cannot explain it though, unless you see significant dips in Dorchester and other high crime areas.
I don't really care enough to look, since I don't really think you can make reasonable conclusions even when having local/inside information about a region based on this kind of data.
About all you can do is theorize, which is all well and good, as long as you realize that you cannot take it any further than that, or test the veracity of your theory.
Since I see no benefit to formulating an untestable theory I don't think it makes much sense to advance one, except for the pure entertainment value, if that happens to be something you find entertaining.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714560</id>
	<title>Re:Apparently in Minneapolis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263139980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I may be skewing the results as we downloaded every movie in the top 10 for my zip code months ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I may be skewing the results as we downloaded every movie in the top 10 for my zip code months ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I may be skewing the results as we downloaded every movie in the top 10 for my zip code months ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714282</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>bwalling</author>
	<datestamp>1263135840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose you could try to draw that inference, but it may just be that homosexual love stories don't appeal as much to heterosexuals.  I don't have much interest in watching two men fall in love.  I think this has to do with the fact that when watching a romantic movie, my interest in the love story is often based on my own attraction to the female character.  If she's a bitch or an idiot or I don't find her attractive, I'm not that interested.  So, if the romance involves two men, it's unlikely that I'll be attracted to either of them, and so I won't be interested.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose you could try to draw that inference , but it may just be that homosexual love stories do n't appeal as much to heterosexuals .
I do n't have much interest in watching two men fall in love .
I think this has to do with the fact that when watching a romantic movie , my interest in the love story is often based on my own attraction to the female character .
If she 's a bitch or an idiot or I do n't find her attractive , I 'm not that interested .
So , if the romance involves two men , it 's unlikely that I 'll be attracted to either of them , and so I wo n't be interested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose you could try to draw that inference, but it may just be that homosexual love stories don't appeal as much to heterosexuals.
I don't have much interest in watching two men fall in love.
I think this has to do with the fact that when watching a romantic movie, my interest in the love story is often based on my own attraction to the female character.
If she's a bitch or an idiot or I don't find her attractive, I'm not that interested.
So, if the romance involves two men, it's unlikely that I'll be attracted to either of them, and so I won't be interested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714744</id>
	<title>Lies... and statistics</title>
	<author>anvilmark</author>
	<datestamp>1263142260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure what you can reliably take away from these statistics.  Since it is only rentals it excludes the following conditions:</p><p>Did they go see it in the theater and now own the DVD? (will probably never rent)<br>Did they go see it in theaters and didn't care for it? (will probably never rent)</p><p>This means that the stats only capture those who<br>1) Didn't see it in theaters - i.e. it wasn't a big deal to see it / they didn't consider it worth the ticket price<br>2) Are curious enough about it to rent it later</p><p>After renting once, did they buy it for their personal library, or say 'meh' and never watch it again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what you can reliably take away from these statistics .
Since it is only rentals it excludes the following conditions : Did they go see it in the theater and now own the DVD ?
( will probably never rent ) Did they go see it in theaters and did n't care for it ?
( will probably never rent ) This means that the stats only capture those who1 ) Did n't see it in theaters - i.e .
it was n't a big deal to see it / they did n't consider it worth the ticket price2 ) Are curious enough about it to rent it laterAfter renting once , did they buy it for their personal library , or say 'meh ' and never watch it again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what you can reliably take away from these statistics.
Since it is only rentals it excludes the following conditions:Did they go see it in the theater and now own the DVD?
(will probably never rent)Did they go see it in theaters and didn't care for it?
(will probably never rent)This means that the stats only capture those who1) Didn't see it in theaters - i.e.
it wasn't a big deal to see it / they didn't consider it worth the ticket price2) Are curious enough about it to rent it laterAfter renting once, did they buy it for their personal library, or say 'meh' and never watch it again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713178</id>
	<title>Well...not now...</title>
	<author>dcigary</author>
	<datestamp>1263155040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they *had* an interactive application that did this.  Now it's a smouldering hunk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they * had * an interactive application that did this .
Now it 's a smouldering hunk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they *had* an interactive application that did this.
Now it's a smouldering hunk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</id>
	<title>cultural information</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1263066540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can use it as an indication of how different regions feel about homosexuality by looking at the rental patterns for <i>Milk</i> (no link, sorry, you'll have to click through the movies until you find it).  It was a lot more popular on the west side of the bay than the east side, which also matched voting patterns for proposition 8 (the west side was a lot more strongly opposed to it).  In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126. Don't know what happened there.<br> <br>
Strangely enough, <i>Milk</i> is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro.  Try explaining <i>that</i> one if you can.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can use it as an indication of how different regions feel about homosexuality by looking at the rental patterns for Milk ( no link , sorry , you 'll have to click through the movies until you find it ) .
It was a lot more popular on the west side of the bay than the east side , which also matched voting patterns for proposition 8 ( the west side was a lot more strongly opposed to it ) .
In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded , except in area code 02126 .
Do n't know what happened there .
Strangely enough , Milk is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro .
Try explaining that one if you can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can use it as an indication of how different regions feel about homosexuality by looking at the rental patterns for Milk (no link, sorry, you'll have to click through the movies until you find it).
It was a lot more popular on the west side of the bay than the east side, which also matched voting patterns for proposition 8 (the west side was a lot more strongly opposed to it).
In Boston it seems like they are a lot more open minded, except in area code 02126.
Don't know what happened there.
Strangely enough, Milk is in the top 3 movies in San Francisco in every area except the Castro.
Try explaining that one if you can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713226</id>
	<title>you insensiti#ve clod!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263156000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>THINKING ABOUT IT. GNAA and sup4ort brain. It is the So that their the project what provides the</htmltext>
<tokenext>THINKING ABOUT IT .
GNAA and sup4ort brain .
It is the So that their the project what provides the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THINKING ABOUT IT.
GNAA and sup4ort brain.
It is the So that their the project what provides the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713516</id>
	<title>Re:You're kidding, right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263119280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool map....</p><p>Not that there was evidence of it given:<br>The shocking part would be that Netflix keeps track of an individuals rentals (possibly) and then creates thse maps based on those individuals histories.  Again no proof but it concerns some.</p><p>On a similar note<br>In Canada the zip equivilant is the postal code.....postal codes often refer to only a handful of houses....so posting rentals based on postal codes + an individual knowning person x uses netflix = invasion of privacy.</p><p>cc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool map....Not that there was evidence of it given : The shocking part would be that Netflix keeps track of an individuals rentals ( possibly ) and then creates thse maps based on those individuals histories .
Again no proof but it concerns some.On a similar noteIn Canada the zip equivilant is the postal code.....postal codes often refer to only a handful of houses....so posting rentals based on postal codes + an individual knowning person x uses netflix = invasion of privacy.cc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool map....Not that there was evidence of it given:The shocking part would be that Netflix keeps track of an individuals rentals (possibly) and then creates thse maps based on those individuals histories.
Again no proof but it concerns some.On a similar noteIn Canada the zip equivilant is the postal code.....postal codes often refer to only a handful of houses....so posting rentals based on postal codes + an individual knowning person x uses netflix = invasion of privacy.cc</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715854</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>westyvw</author>
	<datestamp>1263152280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>During the Netflix contest to get more accurate predictions of movie rentals, the thought did occur to me that geospatial data might be useful to add the algorithm. More information, such as gender, income, and age, and past favorites may have a spatial component and add to the success of future predictions. This is at least a glimpse of this kind of analysis, so yes, I find it interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the Netflix contest to get more accurate predictions of movie rentals , the thought did occur to me that geospatial data might be useful to add the algorithm .
More information , such as gender , income , and age , and past favorites may have a spatial component and add to the success of future predictions .
This is at least a glimpse of this kind of analysis , so yes , I find it interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the Netflix contest to get more accurate predictions of movie rentals, the thought did occur to me that geospatial data might be useful to add the algorithm.
More information, such as gender, income, and age, and past favorites may have a spatial component and add to the success of future predictions.
This is at least a glimpse of this kind of analysis, so yes, I find it interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714708</id>
	<title>DC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263141600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll bet there is a correlation between crime rate and frequency of rentals of Tyler Perry movies in SE DC and PG county.</p><p>Also, military bases rent a lot of kids movies and yuppie pricks in MoCo rent Milk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bet there is a correlation between crime rate and frequency of rentals of Tyler Perry movies in SE DC and PG county.Also , military bases rent a lot of kids movies and yuppie pricks in MoCo rent Milk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bet there is a correlation between crime rate and frequency of rentals of Tyler Perry movies in SE DC and PG county.Also, military bases rent a lot of kids movies and yuppie pricks in MoCo rent Milk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713346</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>binarylarry</author>
	<datestamp>1263115380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatchu talkin' 'bout, adolf?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatchu talkin ' 'bout , adolf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatchu talkin' 'bout, adolf?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</id>
	<title>Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>piltdownman84</author>
	<datestamp>1263066180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me.  The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else.  What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual' movies that you would think would be more popular, <i>Milk, Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon</i>, are relatively low in this area of learning, while mindless movies, <i>Role Models, House Bunny</i>, where the most popular.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me .
The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else .
What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual ' movies that you would think would be more popular , Milk , Benjamin Button , Frost/Nixon , are relatively low in this area of learning , while mindless movies , Role Models , House Bunny , where the most popular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the Seattle map one interesting thing stands out for me.
The rentals in the zip code of Seattle University seems completely different then everywhere else.
What is interesting that ' pseudo intellectual' movies that you would think would be more popular, Milk, Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, are relatively low in this area of learning, while mindless movies, Role Models, House Bunny, where the most popular.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713462</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1263118020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, it could be, everyone in Castro STARRED in the damned thing, and they can't bear to watch it again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , it could be , everyone in Castro STARRED in the damned thing , and they ca n't bear to watch it again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, it could be, everyone in Castro STARRED in the damned thing, and they can't bear to watch it again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713220</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>BradMajors</author>
	<datestamp>1263155940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they know the true story rather than the Hollywood fictional version?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they know the true story rather than the Hollywood fictional version ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they know the true story rather than the Hollywood fictional version?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713168</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>zsimic</author>
	<datestamp>1263154920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And then, you can take it to the next level: stats on which zip code examined which other zip code stats... The possibilities are endless:
- which zip code is the most "self absorbed", (ie looked at its own stats)
- which zip code is the most popular (stats looked up by other zip codes)
- which zip code has the most self-confidence problems (looked at other zip codes' stats more than their own..)
- which zip code is the most popular homophobic (stats most looked up by other zip codes, while the renting trend of homo movies is high)
- and so on</htmltext>
<tokenext>And then , you can take it to the next level : stats on which zip code examined which other zip code stats... The possibilities are endless : - which zip code is the most " self absorbed " , ( ie looked at its own stats ) - which zip code is the most popular ( stats looked up by other zip codes ) - which zip code has the most self-confidence problems ( looked at other zip codes ' stats more than their own.. ) - which zip code is the most popular homophobic ( stats most looked up by other zip codes , while the renting trend of homo movies is high ) - and so on</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then, you can take it to the next level: stats on which zip code examined which other zip code stats... The possibilities are endless:
- which zip code is the most "self absorbed", (ie looked at its own stats)
- which zip code is the most popular (stats looked up by other zip codes)
- which zip code has the most self-confidence problems (looked at other zip codes' stats more than their own..)
- which zip code is the most popular homophobic (stats most looked up by other zip codes, while the renting trend of homo movies is high)
- and so on</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713320</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1263114960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say you have kids. Those concentrations can give you a very good idea about where there are other people who have kids, so you can look at those neighborhoods. Especially if you're moving to a new city or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Say you have kids .
Those concentrations can give you a very good idea about where there are other people who have kids , so you can look at those neighborhoods .
Especially if you 're moving to a new city or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say you have kids.
Those concentrations can give you a very good idea about where there are other people who have kids, so you can look at those neighborhoods.
Especially if you're moving to a new city or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713734</id>
	<title>Gee, be careful</title>
	<author>kramulous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, I think this stuff is kinda interesting, but you need to be very careful with information visualisation of geographical regions.  And some of this information is a little misleading.</p><p>Some neighbourhoods are smaller in size (area) than others.  If a neighbourhood is larger in area than another, a dominant colour (such as red!) will be highly dominant - not just because the movie is more popular - but because there is more red and the area is larger.  This is a psychological thing; eyes are drawn to larger objects (yeah baby!) and we see fewer shades of red to blue (a physics thing).</p><p>Are the number of people in a neighbourhood more than another neighbourhood?  How the borders are defined really needs to be stated.  Using point sources of density would have been more appropriate (eg <a href="http://www.time.com/time/covers/20061030/where\_we\_live/" title="time.com">http://www.time.com/time/covers/20061030/where\_we\_live/</a> [time.com]</p><p>I could be full of shit as I've had a few white wines and we had a lovely 30 degree day out in the sun after a few weeks of cloudy rain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , I think this stuff is kinda interesting , but you need to be very careful with information visualisation of geographical regions .
And some of this information is a little misleading.Some neighbourhoods are smaller in size ( area ) than others .
If a neighbourhood is larger in area than another , a dominant colour ( such as red !
) will be highly dominant - not just because the movie is more popular - but because there is more red and the area is larger .
This is a psychological thing ; eyes are drawn to larger objects ( yeah baby !
) and we see fewer shades of red to blue ( a physics thing ) .Are the number of people in a neighbourhood more than another neighbourhood ?
How the borders are defined really needs to be stated .
Using point sources of density would have been more appropriate ( eg http : //www.time.com/time/covers/20061030/where \ _we \ _live/ [ time.com ] I could be full of shit as I 've had a few white wines and we had a lovely 30 degree day out in the sun after a few weeks of cloudy rain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, I think this stuff is kinda interesting, but you need to be very careful with information visualisation of geographical regions.
And some of this information is a little misleading.Some neighbourhoods are smaller in size (area) than others.
If a neighbourhood is larger in area than another, a dominant colour (such as red!
) will be highly dominant - not just because the movie is more popular - but because there is more red and the area is larger.
This is a psychological thing; eyes are drawn to larger objects (yeah baby!
) and we see fewer shades of red to blue (a physics thing).Are the number of people in a neighbourhood more than another neighbourhood?
How the borders are defined really needs to be stated.
Using point sources of density would have been more appropriate (eg http://www.time.com/time/covers/20061030/where\_we\_live/ [time.com]I could be full of shit as I've had a few white wines and we had a lovely 30 degree day out in the sun after a few weeks of cloudy rain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714846</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>JoeMerchant</author>
	<datestamp>1263143280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By the Miami map, Milk isn't pseudo-intellectual, it's a clear marker of high gay population in the zip code.  Interestingly, it seems that even the straights in the gay neighborhoods were renting it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By the Miami map , Milk is n't pseudo-intellectual , it 's a clear marker of high gay population in the zip code .
Interestingly , it seems that even the straights in the gay neighborhoods were renting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the Miami map, Milk isn't pseudo-intellectual, it's a clear marker of high gay population in the zip code.
Interestingly, it seems that even the straights in the gay neighborhoods were renting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714488</id>
	<title>Re:cultural information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263139020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not from the USA, so what's going on in Washington? There seems to be a big difference between those areas in the top left versus bottom right quadrants. It almost as if there is some kind of boundary along the line from the bottom left corner of the map to the top right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not from the USA , so what 's going on in Washington ?
There seems to be a big difference between those areas in the top left versus bottom right quadrants .
It almost as if there is some kind of boundary along the line from the bottom left corner of the map to the top right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not from the USA, so what's going on in Washington?
There seems to be a big difference between those areas in the top left versus bottom right quadrants.
It almost as if there is some kind of boundary along the line from the bottom left corner of the map to the top right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713562</id>
	<title>Re:Intesting how College area is way off</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263120060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>More intelligent poor folk are pirates.  Who has money for Netflix when you are living off Ramen and Peanut Butter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>More intelligent poor folk are pirates .
Who has money for Netflix when you are living off Ramen and Peanut Butter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More intelligent poor folk are pirates.
Who has money for Netflix when you are living off Ramen and Peanut Butter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713316</id>
	<title>Interesting data for So Cal</title>
	<author>Mr. Lwanga</author>
	<datestamp>1263114840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could draw many fun, but useless conclusions from this data. This is probably the kind of info that sales pukes, marketing drones and security theater types drool over.<br><i>Mad Men</i> was only rented by those Hollywood types in Glendale and West LA<br>Tyler Perry's chitlin flicks  do well in South Central, Inglewood and Long Beach - why?<br><i>Religulous'</i> demographics proves that rich people really are godless.<br>White people really liked <i>Australia</i>, but <i>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</i> is better than the US Census for racial profiling.<br>Crooked cop movies,  <i>Pride and Glory</i>, do well in "concentrated urban areas" - interesting.<br><i>Pinapple Express</i> proves that some things are universal - legalize it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could draw many fun , but useless conclusions from this data .
This is probably the kind of info that sales pukes , marketing drones and security theater types drool over.Mad Men was only rented by those Hollywood types in Glendale and West LATyler Perry 's chitlin flicks do well in South Central , Inglewood and Long Beach - why ? Religulous ' demographics proves that rich people really are godless.White people really liked Australia , but Vicky Cristina Barcelona is better than the US Census for racial profiling.Crooked cop movies , Pride and Glory , do well in " concentrated urban areas " - interesting.Pinapple Express proves that some things are universal - legalize it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could draw many fun, but useless conclusions from this data.
This is probably the kind of info that sales pukes, marketing drones and security theater types drool over.Mad Men was only rented by those Hollywood types in Glendale and West LATyler Perry's chitlin flicks  do well in South Central, Inglewood and Long Beach - why?Religulous' demographics proves that rich people really are godless.White people really liked Australia, but Vicky Cristina Barcelona is better than the US Census for racial profiling.Crooked cop movies,  Pride and Glory, do well in "concentrated urban areas" - interesting.Pinapple Express proves that some things are universal - legalize it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717904</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263124200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also quite handy if you don't have kids and want to avoid them. Although I already knew my neighborhood, Capitol Hill in Denver (80203, 80218), does not have a whole lot of families with kids. I imagine a lot of near downtown areas are similar. It can also tell you a little about the people in the area. Milk is the number one most rented movie in my area and you can probably guess why (hint: rainbow flags).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also quite handy if you do n't have kids and want to avoid them .
Although I already knew my neighborhood , Capitol Hill in Denver ( 80203 , 80218 ) , does not have a whole lot of families with kids .
I imagine a lot of near downtown areas are similar .
It can also tell you a little about the people in the area .
Milk is the number one most rented movie in my area and you can probably guess why ( hint : rainbow flags ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also quite handy if you don't have kids and want to avoid them.
Although I already knew my neighborhood, Capitol Hill in Denver (80203, 80218), does not have a whole lot of families with kids.
I imagine a lot of near downtown areas are similar.
It can also tell you a little about the people in the area.
Milk is the number one most rented movie in my area and you can probably guess why (hint: rainbow flags).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713440</id>
	<title>Large differences in some areas...</title>
	<author>drZool</author>
	<datestamp>1263117720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could perhaps be explained by europeans using VPN accounts in these areas to access netflix.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could perhaps be explained by europeans using VPN accounts in these areas to access netflix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could perhaps be explained by europeans using VPN accounts in these areas to access netflix.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712998</id>
	<title>NYC and Oscar nominations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263065760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting to notice Oscar winners and nominees rank high in NYC rentals. Hype much and people will come? No wonder Apple is so popular in NYC!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting to notice Oscar winners and nominees rank high in NYC rentals .
Hype much and people will come ?
No wonder Apple is so popular in NYC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting to notice Oscar winners and nominees rank high in NYC rentals.
Hype much and people will come?
No wonder Apple is so popular in NYC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020</id>
	<title>Re:This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263066060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nor, does it mean that we should not "get it".</p><p>Different strokes, for different folks.  Some people <i>like</i> demographics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nor , does it mean that we should not " get it " .Different strokes , for different folks .
Some people like demographics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nor, does it mean that we should not "get it".Different strokes, for different folks.
Some people like demographics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960</id>
	<title>This just proves...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263065220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that people have no lives and don't have enough business of their own. I mean seriously. I can think of so many better things to be doing with my time than looking at what people are renting based on their ZIP code. WHO CARES!?</p><p>Just because we have the ABILITY to get this information doesn't mean we SHOULD get it.</p><p>Get a life people and MOVE ON!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that people have no lives and do n't have enough business of their own .
I mean seriously .
I can think of so many better things to be doing with my time than looking at what people are renting based on their ZIP code .
WHO CARES !
? Just because we have the ABILITY to get this information does n't mean we SHOULD get it.Get a life people and MOVE ON !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that people have no lives and don't have enough business of their own.
I mean seriously.
I can think of so many better things to be doing with my time than looking at what people are renting based on their ZIP code.
WHO CARES!
?Just because we have the ABILITY to get this information doesn't mean we SHOULD get it.Get a life people and MOVE ON!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713488</id>
	<title>Paul Blart?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263118740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, seems the worse the neighborhood the higher the ranking for Paul Blart Mall Cop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , seems the worse the neighborhood the higher the ranking for Paul Blart Mall Cop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, seems the worse the neighborhood the higher the ranking for Paul Blart Mall Cop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30727060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30728872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_10_0210249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30726956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713426
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716544
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30715604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713562
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30726956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30728872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30727060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30717286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30712900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30716382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30714282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_10_0210249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_10_0210249.30713114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
