<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_09_1829241</id>
	<title>Google Seeking Patent On Ads For Street View</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263024420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"CNET reports that <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684\_3-10429372-265.html">Google is 'musing' about placing ads in Street View</a>. The search giant reportedly floated the idea in a presentation to marketing and ad agency types in Europe a few months back. So will virtual billboards be popping up in Google Street View? A Google rep said the company had no current plans to put ads in Street View, but you might want to take that with a grain of salt. On Thursday, the USPTO revealed that Google is seeking patent protection for <a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220100004995\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20100004995&amp;RS=DN/20100004995">Claiming Real Estate in Panoramic or 3D Mapping Environments for Advertising</a>. From the patent application: 'The street view display server can <a href="http://gorumors.com/google-working-on-introducing-map-view-advertisements/275148">locate an ad image within the image database</a> and overlay the region of interest with the associated ad image.' Connect the dots, and <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-mulling-several-ways-to-integrate-ads-on-maps-33127">it sure sounds like a plan</a>, doesn't it? <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/27/nyregion/thecity/27brid.html">Selling the Brooklyn Bridge</a> is a pretty good scam &mdash; selling a view of it is even better!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " CNET reports that Google is 'musing ' about placing ads in Street View .
The search giant reportedly floated the idea in a presentation to marketing and ad agency types in Europe a few months back .
So will virtual billboards be popping up in Google Street View ?
A Google rep said the company had no current plans to put ads in Street View , but you might want to take that with a grain of salt .
On Thursday , the USPTO revealed that Google is seeking patent protection for Claiming Real Estate in Panoramic or 3D Mapping Environments for Advertising .
From the patent application : 'The street view display server can locate an ad image within the image database and overlay the region of interest with the associated ad image .
' Connect the dots , and it sure sounds like a plan , does n't it ?
Selling the Brooklyn Bridge is a pretty good scam    selling a view of it is even better !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "CNET reports that Google is 'musing' about placing ads in Street View.
The search giant reportedly floated the idea in a presentation to marketing and ad agency types in Europe a few months back.
So will virtual billboards be popping up in Google Street View?
A Google rep said the company had no current plans to put ads in Street View, but you might want to take that with a grain of salt.
On Thursday, the USPTO revealed that Google is seeking patent protection for Claiming Real Estate in Panoramic or 3D Mapping Environments for Advertising.
From the patent application: 'The street view display server can locate an ad image within the image database and overlay the region of interest with the associated ad image.
' Connect the dots, and it sure sounds like a plan, doesn't it?
Selling the Brooklyn Bridge is a pretty good scam — selling a view of it is even better!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712064</id>
	<title>Re:Then I want compensation</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1263052380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, you sound like those folks who try to insist that their names are copyrighted in order to prevent people from talking about them.  Has it occurred to you that photos taken of your house do NOT belong to you, but to the photographer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you sound like those folks who try to insist that their names are copyrighted in order to prevent people from talking about them .
Has it occurred to you that photos taken of your house do NOT belong to you , but to the photographer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you sound like those folks who try to insist that their names are copyrighted in order to prevent people from talking about them.
Has it occurred to you that photos taken of your house do NOT belong to you, but to the photographer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709338</id>
	<title>Your number plate blurred out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263028380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://windows7.com/" title="windows7.com" rel="nofollow">And replaced with 904TSE</a> [windows7.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And replaced with 904TSE [ windows7.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And replaced with 904TSE [windows7.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709538</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>However, you have to realize that if Google messes this up, many more companies will pop up to deliver the same service.</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , you have to realize that if Google messes this up , many more companies will pop up to deliver the same service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, you have to realize that if Google messes this up, many more companies will pop up to deliver the same service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709846</id>
	<title>Google is well within its rights to do so.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1263033300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The places may be public but the pictures belong to Google and it wants to mash it up with ads it is well within its rights to do so. And it is well within our rights to stop using Google maps too. And other big players are there with their own street views Microsoft and Apple. Let there be competition and let the marketplace decide.<p>
Bur just yesterday we saw Mexico claiming copyright on <b>ALL</b> images of their heritage monuments built by the people it killed and eradicated. Google is most likely will cravenly let such governments walk all over it and assert its rights only against fairer governments like that of USA. Sad but that is life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The places may be public but the pictures belong to Google and it wants to mash it up with ads it is well within its rights to do so .
And it is well within our rights to stop using Google maps too .
And other big players are there with their own street views Microsoft and Apple .
Let there be competition and let the marketplace decide .
Bur just yesterday we saw Mexico claiming copyright on ALL images of their heritage monuments built by the people it killed and eradicated .
Google is most likely will cravenly let such governments walk all over it and assert its rights only against fairer governments like that of USA .
Sad but that is life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The places may be public but the pictures belong to Google and it wants to mash it up with ads it is well within its rights to do so.
And it is well within our rights to stop using Google maps too.
And other big players are there with their own street views Microsoft and Apple.
Let there be competition and let the marketplace decide.
Bur just yesterday we saw Mexico claiming copyright on ALL images of their heritage monuments built by the people it killed and eradicated.
Google is most likely will cravenly let such governments walk all over it and assert its rights only against fairer governments like that of USA.
Sad but that is life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709990</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263034980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Thus far, Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste.</p></div></blockquote><p>Have you looked at YouTube lately?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thus far , Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste.Have you looked at YouTube lately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thus far, Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste.Have you looked at YouTube lately?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709514</id>
	<title>Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the AP:</p><p>"WASHINGTON &ndash; The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama's race during the 2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book about the campaign.</p><p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as "light skinned" and "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.""</p><p>So which of Reid's comments are we to believe reflect his true heart - his initial comments or his politically-timed apology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the AP : " WASHINGTON    The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama 's race during the 2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book about the campaign.Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as " light skinned " and " with no Negro dialect , unless he wanted to have one .
" " So which of Reid 's comments are we to believe reflect his true heart - his initial comments or his politically-timed apology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the AP:"WASHINGTON – The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama's race during the 2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book about the campaign.Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as "light skinned" and "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.
""So which of Reid's comments are we to believe reflect his true heart - his initial comments or his politically-timed apology?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709758</id>
	<title>Re:This is one of those areas where patents are go</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1263032520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is one of those areas where patents are good. They prevent everybody else from doing this shit.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-</i> </p><p>They prevent everybody else from using <b> <i>Google's</i></b>  way of doing this shit.</p><p> Without a license.</p><p>The patent protects only their implementation of the idea.</p><p>It does not protect the idea itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of those areas where patents are good .
They prevent everybody else from doing this shit .
: - They prevent everybody else from using Google 's way of doing this shit .
Without a license.The patent protects only their implementation of the idea.It does not protect the idea itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of those areas where patents are good.
They prevent everybody else from doing this shit.
:- They prevent everybody else from using  Google's  way of doing this shit.
Without a license.The patent protects only their implementation of the idea.It does not protect the idea itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709528</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263030120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they will charge a fee for fidelity.</p><p>Off-putting, but a great way to segment the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they will charge a fee for fidelity.Off-putting , but a great way to segment the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they will charge a fee for fidelity.Off-putting, but a great way to segment the market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709658</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263031500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As usual, you should read the claims before blathering on about things that sort of sound like what the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. summary is talking about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As usual , you should read the claims before blathering on about things that sort of sound like what the / .
summary is talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As usual, you should read the claims before blathering on about things that sort of sound like what the /.
summary is talking about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709540</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Streetview is useful? what would be more useful is a service that notifies me when they are coming around, so I can place my own temporary billboards for the occasion or just put up a generic "Google sucks" or "Cloud computing sucks" banner outside the door</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Streetview is useful ?
what would be more useful is a service that notifies me when they are coming around , so I can place my own temporary billboards for the occasion or just put up a generic " Google sucks " or " Cloud computing sucks " banner outside the door</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Streetview is useful?
what would be more useful is a service that notifies me when they are coming around, so I can place my own temporary billboards for the occasion or just put up a generic "Google sucks" or "Cloud computing sucks" banner outside the door</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710020</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1263035220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No problem.</p><p>The Bing "birds eye" view is already better than close up aerial Google views.</p><p>Bing should move to a better and higher-res Street View equivalent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No problem.The Bing " birds eye " view is already better than close up aerial Google views.Bing should move to a better and higher-res Street View equivalent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problem.The Bing "birds eye" view is already better than close up aerial Google views.Bing should move to a better and higher-res Street View equivalent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711106</id>
	<title>patents block others, that's what they're for</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263044820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Patents <i>prevent other people</i> doing something.  This means google can block any competing "standalone" streetview type web applications whose only revenue stream planned might have been in-streetview advertising.  You may bitch about patents being anticompetitive, since that's what they're for (<i>not</i> for "compensating inventors", that's always been a lie-to-children).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Patents prevent other people doing something .
This means google can block any competing " standalone " streetview type web applications whose only revenue stream planned might have been in-streetview advertising .
You may bitch about patents being anticompetitive , since that 's what they 're for ( not for " compensating inventors " , that 's always been a lie-to-children ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Patents prevent other people doing something.
This means google can block any competing "standalone" streetview type web applications whose only revenue stream planned might have been in-streetview advertising.
You may bitch about patents being anticompetitive, since that's what they're for (not for "compensating inventors", that's always been a lie-to-children).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30714916</id>
	<title>I think I speak for Slashdot on this one...</title>
	<author>Yfrwlf</author>
	<datestamp>1263143760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...when I say FUCK YOU SOFTWARE PATENTS.<br> <br>

Well, OK, some readers may not have used all caps, but that's because they aren't as awesome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...when I say FUCK YOU SOFTWARE PATENTS .
Well , OK , some readers may not have used all caps , but that 's because they are n't as awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...when I say FUCK YOU SOFTWARE PATENTS.
Well, OK, some readers may not have used all caps, but that's because they aren't as awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709840</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263033240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years, and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views.</p></div><p>They have? I haven't seen a TV broadcaster that has a "online property management system". Have you? Nor have I seen a TV broadcaster that provides a user-selectable link associated with the region of interest in a geographic view. In fact, there's a whole bunch of things in the claims that I've never seen a TV broadcaster do. You know about claims, right? They set the boundaries of the invention, not the title, or the abstract, or some naive slashdot summary.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Google - for all your patent troll needs.</p></div><p>You don't actually know what a patent troll is, do you? Here's a hint - Google, a company who <i>puts out a lot of products</i> is, by definition, not a patent troll. A patent troll isn't just "some company who patents something I don't like" or even a company who patents something that already existed in the prior art. It's a company whose <i>sole</i> business model is patent litigation.</p><p>
How you got an interesting moderation, I'll never know.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years , and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views.They have ?
I have n't seen a TV broadcaster that has a " online property management system " .
Have you ?
Nor have I seen a TV broadcaster that provides a user-selectable link associated with the region of interest in a geographic view .
In fact , there 's a whole bunch of things in the claims that I 've never seen a TV broadcaster do .
You know about claims , right ?
They set the boundaries of the invention , not the title , or the abstract , or some naive slashdot summary.Google - for all your patent troll needs.You do n't actually know what a patent troll is , do you ?
Here 's a hint - Google , a company who puts out a lot of products is , by definition , not a patent troll .
A patent troll is n't just " some company who patents something I do n't like " or even a company who patents something that already existed in the prior art .
It 's a company whose sole business model is patent litigation .
How you got an interesting moderation , I 'll never know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years, and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views.They have?
I haven't seen a TV broadcaster that has a "online property management system".
Have you?
Nor have I seen a TV broadcaster that provides a user-selectable link associated with the region of interest in a geographic view.
In fact, there's a whole bunch of things in the claims that I've never seen a TV broadcaster do.
You know about claims, right?
They set the boundaries of the invention, not the title, or the abstract, or some naive slashdot summary.Google - for all your patent troll needs.You don't actually know what a patent troll is, do you?
Here's a hint - Google, a company who puts out a lot of products is, by definition, not a patent troll.
A patent troll isn't just "some company who patents something I don't like" or even a company who patents something that already existed in the prior art.
It's a company whose sole business model is patent litigation.
How you got an interesting moderation, I'll never know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711808</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1263050340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How you got an interesting moderation, I'll never know.</p></div><p>Allow me to be the first person to welcome you to Slashdot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How you got an interesting moderation , I 'll never know.Allow me to be the first person to welcome you to Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How you got an interesting moderation, I'll never know.Allow me to be the first person to welcome you to Slashdot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709414</id>
	<title>Redaction through advertisements!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263029040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, there could be great uses for this:</p><p>I don't want my license plate there, put an ad over it, or all license plates.</p><p>Maybe it wasn't the best day for that picture of your house/business, request that it be redacted, and Google gets ad dollars for . . . respecting your privacy!</p><p>With a little sanity, this could help.  Personally I wouldn't care if they made some money off of SOMEONE ELSE for respecting privacy requests, but here's hoping that they'd actually respect your request.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , there could be great uses for this : I do n't want my license plate there , put an ad over it , or all license plates.Maybe it was n't the best day for that picture of your house/business , request that it be redacted , and Google gets ad dollars for .
. .
respecting your privacy ! With a little sanity , this could help .
Personally I would n't care if they made some money off of SOMEONE ELSE for respecting privacy requests , but here 's hoping that they 'd actually respect your request .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, there could be great uses for this:I don't want my license plate there, put an ad over it, or all license plates.Maybe it wasn't the best day for that picture of your house/business, request that it be redacted, and Google gets ad dollars for .
. .
respecting your privacy!With a little sanity, this could help.
Personally I wouldn't care if they made some money off of SOMEONE ELSE for respecting privacy requests, but here's hoping that they'd actually respect your request.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710362</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a great way...</title>
	<author>cortesoft</author>
	<datestamp>1263038520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't argue whether ads will make using it more of a bother than it is worth, but StreetView is useful in a non-novelty way in many situations.</p><p>Maybe you don't live in a city where this is an issue, but I often use it whenever I am traveling somewhere new (like a store or a persons home or apartment).  This allows me to see a number of things that help me when I arrive: what does the store or building look like, so I can know when I see it?  What is the parking situation like?  Does it look like I ill be able to park in front, or is there a parking lot of some sort nearby?</p><p>In a city like San Francisco where I live, there is always a lot of traffic and not much parking, so you don't really have a chance to just drive slowly and try to figure it out when you get there.  It is much easier to have an idea of what you will encounter before heading out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't argue whether ads will make using it more of a bother than it is worth , but StreetView is useful in a non-novelty way in many situations.Maybe you do n't live in a city where this is an issue , but I often use it whenever I am traveling somewhere new ( like a store or a persons home or apartment ) .
This allows me to see a number of things that help me when I arrive : what does the store or building look like , so I can know when I see it ?
What is the parking situation like ?
Does it look like I ill be able to park in front , or is there a parking lot of some sort nearby ? In a city like San Francisco where I live , there is always a lot of traffic and not much parking , so you do n't really have a chance to just drive slowly and try to figure it out when you get there .
It is much easier to have an idea of what you will encounter before heading out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't argue whether ads will make using it more of a bother than it is worth, but StreetView is useful in a non-novelty way in many situations.Maybe you don't live in a city where this is an issue, but I often use it whenever I am traveling somewhere new (like a store or a persons home or apartment).
This allows me to see a number of things that help me when I arrive: what does the store or building look like, so I can know when I see it?
What is the parking situation like?
Does it look like I ill be able to park in front, or is there a parking lot of some sort nearby?In a city like San Francisco where I live, there is always a lot of traffic and not much parking, so you don't really have a chance to just drive slowly and try to figure it out when you get there.
It is much easier to have an idea of what you will encounter before heading out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712674</id>
	<title>Use this instead of blurring</title>
	<author>Eadwacer</author>
	<datestamp>1263060660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't blur faces. Don't blur the top of NSA HQ, just stick an ad up there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't blur faces .
Do n't blur the top of NSA HQ , just stick an ad up there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't blur faces.
Don't blur the top of NSA HQ, just stick an ad up there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709732</id>
	<title>So, I'm looking for ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263032280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... the Fine Arts Gallery. I look it up on Google maps, but when I arrive at the location, all I can find is this building of classical architecture. There's no McDonalds logo (as shown in street view, clown and all) anywhere in sight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the Fine Arts Gallery .
I look it up on Google maps , but when I arrive at the location , all I can find is this building of classical architecture .
There 's no McDonalds logo ( as shown in street view , clown and all ) anywhere in sight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the Fine Arts Gallery.
I look it up on Google maps, but when I arrive at the location, all I can find is this building of classical architecture.
There's no McDonalds logo (as shown in street view, clown and all) anywhere in sight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709502</id>
	<title>Video Games</title>
	<author>brainboyz</author>
	<datestamp>1263029760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have been doing this for years in video games, prior art anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have been doing this for years in video games , prior art anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have been doing this for years in video games, prior art anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</id>
	<title>How is this new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263028200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years, and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views.
</p><p>
Google - for all your patent troll needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years , and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views .
Google - for all your patent troll needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
TV broadcasters have been doing this with football games and the billboard in Times Square for years, and game publishers have also been doing it with their virtual street views.
Google - for all your patent troll needs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709580</id>
	<title>Prior art exists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google never heard of "Where's Waldo?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google never heard of " Where 's Waldo ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google never heard of "Where's Waldo?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709702</id>
	<title>Ad Overlay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263031860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds to me like they intend on finding actual, physical billboards and replacing them with their own virtual ads. No where does it imply that they will be adding additional ads that weren't there in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds to me like they intend on finding actual , physical billboards and replacing them with their own virtual ads .
No where does it imply that they will be adding additional ads that were n't there in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds to me like they intend on finding actual, physical billboards and replacing them with their own virtual ads.
No where does it imply that they will be adding additional ads that weren't there in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710224</id>
	<title>VRML</title>
	<author>future assassin</author>
	<datestamp>1263037380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would creating a 3d bilboard sign in a VRML world count as previous art?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would creating a 3d bilboard sign in a VRML world count as previous art ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would creating a 3d bilboard sign in a VRML world count as previous art?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709524</id>
	<title>Sounds like a great way...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds like a genius way to get me to stop using StreetView.  Not like it was of much use beyond novelty, anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like a genius way to get me to stop using StreetView .
Not like it was of much use beyond novelty , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like a genius way to get me to stop using StreetView.
Not like it was of much use beyond novelty, anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709560</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Armakuni</author>
	<datestamp>1263030420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...doesn't an invention have to be non-obvious to be patentable? Placing ads on a map on the web seems pretty obvious to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...does n't an invention have to be non-obvious to be patentable ?
Placing ads on a map on the web seems pretty obvious to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...doesn't an invention have to be non-obvious to be patentable?
Placing ads on a map on the web seems pretty obvious to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654</id>
	<title>Then I want compensation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263031440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going to use a picture of my house to place advertisements, then I want to be compensated for the use of my house. Either that or take the photo down. And I'm sure businesses are not going to want a competitor's ad placed in or around a photo of their building!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to use a picture of my house to place advertisements , then I want to be compensated for the use of my house .
Either that or take the photo down .
And I 'm sure businesses are not going to want a competitor 's ad placed in or around a photo of their building !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to use a picture of my house to place advertisements, then I want to be compensated for the use of my house.
Either that or take the photo down.
And I'm sure businesses are not going to want a competitor's ad placed in or around a photo of their building!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712024</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>sbbshoe092</author>
	<datestamp>1263052020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
<a href="http://www.sbbshoe.com/" title="sbbshoe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sbbshoe.com/</a> [sbbshoe.com]

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
UGG BOOT $50
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

FREE sHIPPING <a href="http://www.sbbshoe.com/" title="sbbshoe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sbbshoe.com/</a> [sbbshoe.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.sbbshoe.com/ [ sbbshoe.com ] Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 UGG BOOT $ 50 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 Jean ( True Religion,ed hardy,coogi ) $ 30 Sunglasses ( Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini ) $ 16 New era cap $ 15 Bikini ( Ed hardy,polo ) $ 25 FREE sHIPPING http : //www.sbbshoe.com/ [ sbbshoe.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
http://www.sbbshoe.com/ [sbbshoe.com]

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
UGG BOOT $50
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

FREE sHIPPING http://www.sbbshoe.com/ [sbbshoe.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713544</id>
	<title>Could be neat.</title>
	<author>Xeno man</author>
	<datestamp>1263119700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be neat if they could overlay existing billboards and bench ads with their own ads and clicking them brings up a larger view so that they are not obtrusive at all. Ads on existing billboards would make them expected and relevant to some degree. Or if your looking at a store front from street view there already is a link for that stores website (if existes). There is a right way to do advertising and a wrong way of shoving it in every corner you can.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be neat if they could overlay existing billboards and bench ads with their own ads and clicking them brings up a larger view so that they are not obtrusive at all .
Ads on existing billboards would make them expected and relevant to some degree .
Or if your looking at a store front from street view there already is a link for that stores website ( if existes ) .
There is a right way to do advertising and a wrong way of shoving it in every corner you can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be neat if they could overlay existing billboards and bench ads with their own ads and clicking them brings up a larger view so that they are not obtrusive at all.
Ads on existing billboards would make them expected and relevant to some degree.
Or if your looking at a store front from street view there already is a link for that stores website (if existes).
There is a right way to do advertising and a wrong way of shoving it in every corner you can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713520</id>
	<title>For You, Half Price</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263119460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot shouldn't be linking to sites which require registration, such as the NY Times. To see the article, try this <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=\%22for+you+half+price\%22+site:nytimes.com&amp;filter=0" title="google.com">google search</a> [google.com]. The first link is page one, and the third link is page two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot should n't be linking to sites which require registration , such as the NY Times .
To see the article , try this google search [ google.com ] .
The first link is page one , and the third link is page two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot shouldn't be linking to sites which require registration, such as the NY Times.
To see the article, try this google search [google.com].
The first link is page one, and the third link is page two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709546</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure you're not going to get completely confused if they put an ad in, say, the sky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure you 're not going to get completely confused if they put an ad in , say , the sky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure you're not going to get completely confused if they put an ad in, say, the sky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522</id>
	<title>Re:Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263030060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thus far, Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste.  We'll see though.  What I'm guessing is that it will be the form of a little transparent pop-up window with text ads relevant to whatever your looking at, e.g. if you're looking at a Border's, it will give you ads for a B&amp;N or something.  The kind of metadata to make these types of context specific ads has been creeping into google maps for some time.  E.g., just look at this <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=atlanta&amp;sll=33.733869,-84.395106&amp;sspn=0.009815,0.021973&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Atlanta,+Fulton,+Georgia&amp;ll=33.749277,-84.388186&amp;spn=0.004906,0.010986&amp;z=17" title="google.com">link</a> [google.com].  You can clearly see the name of each business and an icon about just what kind of business it is there (hotels get a little stick person in a bed, restaurants get a knife and fork, etc.).  Hopefully they would put them in a transparent window and somewhere unobtrusive, like on the street or in the sky.  <br> <br>Though, it does kind of give new meaning to the Futurama quote, "Behold.... the Internet." "My God!  It's full of ads!"</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thus far , Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste .
We 'll see though .
What I 'm guessing is that it will be the form of a little transparent pop-up window with text ads relevant to whatever your looking at , e.g .
if you 're looking at a Border 's , it will give you ads for a B&amp;N or something .
The kind of metadata to make these types of context specific ads has been creeping into google maps for some time .
E.g. , just look at this link [ google.com ] .
You can clearly see the name of each business and an icon about just what kind of business it is there ( hotels get a little stick person in a bed , restaurants get a knife and fork , etc. ) .
Hopefully they would put them in a transparent window and somewhere unobtrusive , like on the street or in the sky .
Though , it does kind of give new meaning to the Futurama quote , " Behold.... the Internet .
" " My God !
It 's full of ads !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thus far, Google has not displayed this sort of lack of taste.
We'll see though.
What I'm guessing is that it will be the form of a little transparent pop-up window with text ads relevant to whatever your looking at, e.g.
if you're looking at a Border's, it will give you ads for a B&amp;N or something.
The kind of metadata to make these types of context specific ads has been creeping into google maps for some time.
E.g., just look at this link [google.com].
You can clearly see the name of each business and an icon about just what kind of business it is there (hotels get a little stick person in a bed, restaurants get a knife and fork, etc.).
Hopefully they would put them in a transparent window and somewhere unobtrusive, like on the street or in the sky.
Though, it does kind of give new meaning to the Futurama quote, "Behold.... the Internet.
" "My God!
It's full of ads!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709598</id>
	<title>Re:Redaction through advertisements!</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1263030840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Problem is the Google ad model is an auction model. How do you know you win? Your arch enemy might put your license plate/face etc in all the wrong places simply by outbidding you...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem is the Google ad model is an auction model .
How do you know you win ?
Your arch enemy might put your license plate/face etc in all the wrong places simply by outbidding you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem is the Google ad model is an auction model.
How do you know you win?
Your arch enemy might put your license plate/face etc in all the wrong places simply by outbidding you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709676</id>
	<title>Laughing Man logo (Ghost in the Shell)</title>
	<author>starbugs</author>
	<datestamp>1263031620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be more interesting to see a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing\_Man\_(Ghost\_in\_the\_Shell)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Laughing Man</a> [wikipedia.org] logo superimposed over peoples faces.<br>These ads would be just as annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be more interesting to see a Laughing Man [ wikipedia.org ] logo superimposed over peoples faces.These ads would be just as annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be more interesting to see a Laughing Man [wikipedia.org] logo superimposed over peoples faces.These ads would be just as annoying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713076</id>
	<title>This is so cool</title>
	<author>vtstarin</author>
	<datestamp>1263066900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if customer browse in our street they can see what's we offer...

This is so cool..</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if customer browse in our street they can see what 's we offer.. . This is so cool. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if customer browse in our street they can see what's we offer...

This is so cool..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709554</id>
	<title>This is one of those areas where patents are good</title>
	<author>melted</author>
	<datestamp>1263030360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one of those areas where patents are good. They prevent everybody else from doing this shit.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of those areas where patents are good .
They prevent everybody else from doing this shit .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of those areas where patents are good.
They prevent everybody else from doing this shit.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709368</id>
	<title>Protection Patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263028680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are many ways to use a patent.</p><p>One of them is to patent something so that others cannot use the feature to add value to their offereings that compete with yours. The add money that they can stop from flowing to another competitor can keep their service faster, cheaper and better than those that would use the patented feature.</p><p>Just an observation, a hope, that google would do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are many ways to use a patent.One of them is to patent something so that others can not use the feature to add value to their offereings that compete with yours .
The add money that they can stop from flowing to another competitor can keep their service faster , cheaper and better than those that would use the patented feature.Just an observation , a hope , that google would do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are many ways to use a patent.One of them is to patent something so that others cannot use the feature to add value to their offereings that compete with yours.
The add money that they can stop from flowing to another competitor can keep their service faster, cheaper and better than those that would use the patented feature.Just an observation, a hope, that google would do this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711330</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>KIRBY1986</author>
	<datestamp>1263046620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult <a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ] Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular , most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts , jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3 ) $ 35HANDBGAS ( COACH,L V , DG , ED HARDY ) $ 35TSHIRTS ( POLO ,ED HARDY , LACOSTE ) $ 16 thanks... For details , please consult http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO ,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712278</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a great way...</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1263055200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hate to post twice, but I was heading out to pick up a DLP projector tonight and the one I wanted at the price I wanted was at Best Buy (surprised? me too) in Culver City, but at one I'd never been to.  I thought, hey, I'll see if I can use Street View to help me, like that guy from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. said.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  I put in the address, and while a slightly nearby street had been mapped, it was done a couple years ago while the entire area was being redeveloped - and thus is now totally useless.  It's just a bunch of photos of constructions sites.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to post twice , but I was heading out to pick up a DLP projector tonight and the one I wanted at the price I wanted was at Best Buy ( surprised ?
me too ) in Culver City , but at one I 'd never been to .
I thought , hey , I 'll see if I can use Street View to help me , like that guy from / .
said. : ) I put in the address , and while a slightly nearby street had been mapped , it was done a couple years ago while the entire area was being redeveloped - and thus is now totally useless .
It 's just a bunch of photos of constructions sites .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to post twice, but I was heading out to pick up a DLP projector tonight and the one I wanted at the price I wanted was at Best Buy (surprised?
me too) in Culver City, but at one I'd never been to.
I thought, hey, I'll see if I can use Street View to help me, like that guy from /.
said. :)  I put in the address, and while a slightly nearby street had been mapped, it was done a couple years ago while the entire area was being redeveloped - and thus is now totally useless.
It's just a bunch of photos of constructions sites.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710434</id>
	<title>Viagra Ads on Washington Monument</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263039420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nuf sed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nuf sed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuf sed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711536</id>
	<title>Billboards</title>
	<author>Mantrid42</author>
	<datestamp>1263048180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assumed they would be overlaying ads onto existing advertising space; i.e., billboards.

After all, the companies who wanted to advertise on the billboard did so with the expectation that their only audience would be people driving by. By leaving these images as they are, those companies get free advertising, which is not something Google is required to give them. Similarly, if the content of a billboard has changed since the image was taken, it's unfair for the earlier company to receive free advertising while the newer one does not.

If they want to superimpose new, relevant ads over old, useless ads, that's fine by me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assumed they would be overlaying ads onto existing advertising space ; i.e. , billboards .
After all , the companies who wanted to advertise on the billboard did so with the expectation that their only audience would be people driving by .
By leaving these images as they are , those companies get free advertising , which is not something Google is required to give them .
Similarly , if the content of a billboard has changed since the image was taken , it 's unfair for the earlier company to receive free advertising while the newer one does not .
If they want to superimpose new , relevant ads over old , useless ads , that 's fine by me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assumed they would be overlaying ads onto existing advertising space; i.e., billboards.
After all, the companies who wanted to advertise on the billboard did so with the expectation that their only audience would be people driving by.
By leaving these images as they are, those companies get free advertising, which is not something Google is required to give them.
Similarly, if the content of a billboard has changed since the image was taken, it's unfair for the earlier company to receive free advertising while the newer one does not.
If they want to superimpose new, relevant ads over old, useless ads, that's fine by me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710222</id>
	<title>Real-estate?</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1263037380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a <a href="http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/" title="milliondol...mepage.com">beta release</a> [milliondol...mepage.com] of the new Google Streetmap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a beta release [ milliondol...mepage.com ] of the new Google Streetmap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a beta release [milliondol...mepage.com] of the new Google Streetmap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709740</id>
	<title>linux sucks teh dick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263032340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>faggots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>faggots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>faggots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709474</id>
	<title>errr</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263029520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't the Brooklyn bridge be able to sell its advertising space to Google?  I live near a very scenic park, my house overlooks it and is in a bunch of post cards and such, if Google try's to use images of my house for advertising, I'm sooo suing.  To be honest Google is getting a bit too big for its britches and has definitely fallen into Microsoft, Intel territory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't the Brooklyn bridge be able to sell its advertising space to Google ?
I live near a very scenic park , my house overlooks it and is in a bunch of post cards and such , if Google try 's to use images of my house for advertising , I 'm sooo suing .
To be honest Google is getting a bit too big for its britches and has definitely fallen into Microsoft , Intel territory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't the Brooklyn bridge be able to sell its advertising space to Google?
I live near a very scenic park, my house overlooks it and is in a bunch of post cards and such, if Google try's to use images of my house for advertising, I'm sooo suing.
To be honest Google is getting a bit too big for its britches and has definitely fallen into Microsoft, Intel territory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710014</id>
	<title>Prepare the lawyers...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263035220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because if anyone sees an ad next to his house, that does not fly with him, he&rsquo;s gonna sue. Which means basically everyone who gets that this could mean money. Which in this artificially bad economy means everyone.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if anyone sees an ad next to his house , that does not fly with him , he    s gon na sue .
Which means basically everyone who gets that this could mean money .
Which in this artificially bad economy means everyone .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if anyone sees an ad next to his house, that does not fly with him, he’s gonna sue.
Which means basically everyone who gets that this could mean money.
Which in this artificially bad economy means everyone.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713298</id>
	<title>Re:Then I want compensation</title>
	<author>advocate\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1263114600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if you're clueless enough to have adverts on your house then that will happen, but if you read the summary, then you would know that it only applies to adverts found in the image, not ordinary buildings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if you 're clueless enough to have adverts on your house then that will happen , but if you read the summary , then you would know that it only applies to adverts found in the image , not ordinary buildings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you're clueless enough to have adverts on your house then that will happen, but if you read the summary, then you would know that it only applies to adverts found in the image, not ordinary buildings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709880</id>
	<title>How about Stella's iphone app as prior art?</title>
	<author>jonpublic</author>
	<datestamp>1263033660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/12/stella-artois-le-bar-guide-3d-augmented-reality-app.html" title="ismashphone.com">http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/12/stella-artois-le-bar-guide-3d-augmented-reality-app.html</a> [ismashphone.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.ismashphone.com/2009/12/stella-artois-le-bar-guide-3d-augmented-reality-app.html [ ismashphone.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/12/stella-artois-le-bar-guide-3d-augmented-reality-app.html [ismashphone.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709848</id>
	<title>That's still useful</title>
	<author>Theaetetus</author>
	<datestamp>1263033360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Congratulations, Google! You've figured out how to change a useful feature (seeing what the street really looks like) into a useless one (overlaying the street view with things that aren't actually there)! Brilliant!</p></div><p>It's useful to advertisers. Just because it's not useful to <i>you</i> doesn't mean that it's not useful to anyone. See Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , Google !
You 've figured out how to change a useful feature ( seeing what the street really looks like ) into a useless one ( overlaying the street view with things that are n't actually there ) !
Brilliant ! It 's useful to advertisers .
Just because it 's not useful to you does n't mean that it 's not useful to anyone .
See Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, Google!
You've figured out how to change a useful feature (seeing what the street really looks like) into a useless one (overlaying the street view with things that aren't actually there)!
Brilliant!It's useful to advertisers.
Just because it's not useful to you doesn't mean that it's not useful to anyone.
See Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710598</id>
	<title>Re:Then I want compensation</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1263040800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's your legal or moral justification for this? I could understand if someone browsed Street View, saw your house with some, say, MPAA ads beside it and assumed that you supported the MPAA. But otherwise, they're not using your house, they're using a picture of your house. If someone takes a picture of your house, you don't have any rights to that picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's your legal or moral justification for this ?
I could understand if someone browsed Street View , saw your house with some , say , MPAA ads beside it and assumed that you supported the MPAA .
But otherwise , they 're not using your house , they 're using a picture of your house .
If someone takes a picture of your house , you do n't have any rights to that picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's your legal or moral justification for this?
I could understand if someone browsed Street View, saw your house with some, say, MPAA ads beside it and assumed that you supported the MPAA.
But otherwise, they're not using your house, they're using a picture of your house.
If someone takes a picture of your house, you don't have any rights to that picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342</id>
	<title>Way to completely destroy utility</title>
	<author>word munger</author>
	<datestamp>1263028440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations, Google! You've figured out how to change a useful feature (seeing what the street really looks like) into a useless one (overlaying the street view with things that aren't actually there)! Brilliant!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , Google !
You 've figured out how to change a useful feature ( seeing what the street really looks like ) into a useless one ( overlaying the street view with things that are n't actually there ) !
Brilliant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, Google!
You've figured out how to change a useful feature (seeing what the street really looks like) into a useless one (overlaying the street view with things that aren't actually there)!
Brilliant!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713810</id>
	<title>Uh oh - NO WAY</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1263126120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no f*cking way I will allow Google to plaster my house with ads, especially those I cannot control.  If I don't allow people to deface the sides of my house, why should I allow this virtual graffiti?</p><p>Search term "abortion clinic" in your browser?  All the ads may lead to pro life supporters (or imaging a abortion clinic ad plastered on a church).  Tiger Woods' house?  Ads for relationship agencies (as a matter of fact, I have already seen that with Google ads surrounding Tiger Woods reporting).  Looking at Neverland?  Hey, cool place to stick child protection ads..</p><p>Someone who doesn't support Google?  I wonder what that house will get for ads..</p><p>It would be the equivalent of putting up all those ad boards, but without having to seek permission from the locals.</p><p>No way, not ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no f * cking way I will allow Google to plaster my house with ads , especially those I can not control .
If I do n't allow people to deface the sides of my house , why should I allow this virtual graffiti ? Search term " abortion clinic " in your browser ?
All the ads may lead to pro life supporters ( or imaging a abortion clinic ad plastered on a church ) .
Tiger Woods ' house ?
Ads for relationship agencies ( as a matter of fact , I have already seen that with Google ads surrounding Tiger Woods reporting ) .
Looking at Neverland ?
Hey , cool place to stick child protection ads..Someone who does n't support Google ?
I wonder what that house will get for ads..It would be the equivalent of putting up all those ad boards , but without having to seek permission from the locals.No way , not ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no f*cking way I will allow Google to plaster my house with ads, especially those I cannot control.
If I don't allow people to deface the sides of my house, why should I allow this virtual graffiti?Search term "abortion clinic" in your browser?
All the ads may lead to pro life supporters (or imaging a abortion clinic ad plastered on a church).
Tiger Woods' house?
Ads for relationship agencies (as a matter of fact, I have already seen that with Google ads surrounding Tiger Woods reporting).
Looking at Neverland?
Hey, cool place to stick child protection ads..Someone who doesn't support Google?
I wonder what that house will get for ads..It would be the equivalent of putting up all those ad boards, but without having to seek permission from the locals.No way, not ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709716</id>
	<title>Re:How is this new?</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1263032100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I was thinking.  CBS and New Year's Eve a few years ago, IIRC.

Does prior art still count in killing a patent application?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I was thinking .
CBS and New Year 's Eve a few years ago , IIRC .
Does prior art still count in killing a patent application ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I was thinking.
CBS and New Year's Eve a few years ago, IIRC.
Does prior art still count in killing a patent application?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1829241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30710598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30713298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30712024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30711330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1829241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1829241.30709740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
