<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_09_1715222</id>
	<title>Samsung Develops a Transparent OLED Laptop Screen</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263063480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Dyne09 writes <i>"The Design blog has posted an entry on Samsung's <a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/samsung-presents-worlds-first-and-largest-transparent-oled-laptop-at-ces/">new laptop with a transparent OLED screen</a>.  The photos show a dark-tinted and dimly-lit screen that is fully see-through.  While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dyne09 writes " The Design blog has posted an entry on Samsung 's new laptop with a transparent OLED screen .
The photos show a dark-tinted and dimly-lit screen that is fully see-through .
While the utility of a see-through laptop probably is n't that high for the average user , several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dyne09 writes "The Design blog has posted an entry on Samsung's new laptop with a transparent OLED screen.
The photos show a dark-tinted and dimly-lit screen that is fully see-through.
While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709166</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1263070080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>Glasses. It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed. Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.</em> </p><p>The problem is that the glasses are so close to your eye that you wouldn't be able to focus on anything displayed on them, and even if you could, the rest of the world would be out of focus as you shifted your focal length so close to your eyes.</p><p>VR headsets, if you remember those, put the screens several inches from the eye, otherwise it would be anatomically impossible to focus on them. Now, if you were projecting light into the eye, you could theoretically manipulate it to make its focal length equal to the focal length of the eye, but that requires somehow measuring the eye's focal length. And even if you could do THAT, an LCD screen doesn't have the ability to do the kind of focusing needed. What would really work is a system of lasers that directly illuminates the retinas, like old vector output displays. But can you imagine putting something like that in a headset?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glasses .
It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses , most of the time they 'd be clear like normal , but info could pop up throughout the day as needed .
Or I could sit back and watch a video , and just turn it off if I needed to see something .
The problem is that the glasses are so close to your eye that you would n't be able to focus on anything displayed on them , and even if you could , the rest of the world would be out of focus as you shifted your focal length so close to your eyes.VR headsets , if you remember those , put the screens several inches from the eye , otherwise it would be anatomically impossible to focus on them .
Now , if you were projecting light into the eye , you could theoretically manipulate it to make its focal length equal to the focal length of the eye , but that requires somehow measuring the eye 's focal length .
And even if you could do THAT , an LCD screen does n't have the ability to do the kind of focusing needed .
What would really work is a system of lasers that directly illuminates the retinas , like old vector output displays .
But can you imagine putting something like that in a headset ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Glasses.
It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed.
Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.
The problem is that the glasses are so close to your eye that you wouldn't be able to focus on anything displayed on them, and even if you could, the rest of the world would be out of focus as you shifted your focal length so close to your eyes.VR headsets, if you remember those, put the screens several inches from the eye, otherwise it would be anatomically impossible to focus on them.
Now, if you were projecting light into the eye, you could theoretically manipulate it to make its focal length equal to the focal length of the eye, but that requires somehow measuring the eye's focal length.
And even if you could do THAT, an LCD screen doesn't have the ability to do the kind of focusing needed.
What would really work is a system of lasers that directly illuminates the retinas, like old vector output displays.
But can you imagine putting something like that in a headset?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709310</id>
	<title>1995 calling...</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1263028200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>IBM ThinkPad 755CV had a transparent LCD display (VGA resolution) around 1995. It could be detached from the laptop, and placed on an overhead projector, for making PowerlessPointless-style presentations. This was in the days before projectors were common.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM ThinkPad 755CV had a transparent LCD display ( VGA resolution ) around 1995 .
It could be detached from the laptop , and placed on an overhead projector , for making PowerlessPointless-style presentations .
This was in the days before projectors were common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM ThinkPad 755CV had a transparent LCD display (VGA resolution) around 1995.
It could be detached from the laptop, and placed on an overhead projector, for making PowerlessPointless-style presentations.
This was in the days before projectors were common.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708878</id>
	<title>Cool for display pieces</title>
	<author>yakumo.unr</author>
	<datestamp>1263067920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like meseums, trade shows etc etc, it would really pull people arround them despite only being able to read properly from the one side.

Countless movies and TV shows have transparent screens in high tech work places, it's all good as long as it's not too bad on the eyes if it's to be worked with a lot, or if any private data ever needs to be shown it's useless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like meseums , trade shows etc etc , it would really pull people arround them despite only being able to read properly from the one side .
Countless movies and TV shows have transparent screens in high tech work places , it 's all good as long as it 's not too bad on the eyes if it 's to be worked with a lot , or if any private data ever needs to be shown it 's useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like meseums, trade shows etc etc, it would really pull people arround them despite only being able to read properly from the one side.
Countless movies and TV shows have transparent screens in high tech work places, it's all good as long as it's not too bad on the eyes if it's to be worked with a lot, or if any private data ever needs to be shown it's useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709246</id>
	<title>Re:Car Windshield possibilities</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1263027600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might not like it so much when it started to get dark and you effectively couldn't take off your sunglasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might not like it so much when it started to get dark and you effectively could n't take off your sunglasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might not like it so much when it started to get dark and you effectively couldn't take off your sunglasses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708958</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1263068520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't good for glasses. First problem is the focus issue as another person mentioned, but also the fact that everyone else would be able to see what is being displayed. Do you really want your girlfriend to know you only knew it was her birthday because of the reminder that flashed on your glasses?</p><p>Displays that project onto semi-reflective glasses are better on both counts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't good for glasses .
First problem is the focus issue as another person mentioned , but also the fact that everyone else would be able to see what is being displayed .
Do you really want your girlfriend to know you only knew it was her birthday because of the reminder that flashed on your glasses ? Displays that project onto semi-reflective glasses are better on both counts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't good for glasses.
First problem is the focus issue as another person mentioned, but also the fact that everyone else would be able to see what is being displayed.
Do you really want your girlfriend to know you only knew it was her birthday because of the reminder that flashed on your glasses?Displays that project onto semi-reflective glasses are better on both counts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708994</id>
	<title>mod vdowmn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Culture of tabuse perspeCtive, the</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Culture of tabuse perspeCtive , the [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Culture of tabuse perspeCtive, the [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709034</id>
	<title>How about black?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263069060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>None of the pictures or videos showed the screen displaying anything that was black.  Guess we give that up and replace it with "40\% transparent gray"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>None of the pictures or videos showed the screen displaying anything that was black .
Guess we give that up and replace it with " 40 \ % transparent gray "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>None of the pictures or videos showed the screen displaying anything that was black.
Guess we give that up and replace it with "40\% transparent gray"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709610</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>robvangelder</author>
	<datestamp>1263031020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A police car could see the status of cars as they drive past (speeding / stolen).</p><p>or a radar like in Grand Theft Auto?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A police car could see the status of cars as they drive past ( speeding / stolen ) .or a radar like in Grand Theft Auto ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A police car could see the status of cars as they drive past (speeding / stolen).or a radar like in Grand Theft Auto?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708888</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>- 3D Displays.  If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses.  It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.</p></div><p>That's the first thing that came to my mind, and I rushed to post this idea only to find your post already here.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>One can stack up a lot of such screen one after the other and display a sliced up picture one slice per screen. The picture will be a scan rather than a normal 2D shot and will be sliced up in Z-direction. The Z resolution will depend on number of slices and also on number of stacked up screens.</p><p>I hope the tech evolves so that we can have true 3D pixels (voxels?) in a transparent cubic monolithic screen. That would display a real 3D picture instead of just an illusion of 3D which present techs do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- 3D Displays .
If one would take many layers of this together , it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses .
It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available , but even a small amount could be revolutionary.That 's the first thing that came to my mind , and I rushed to post this idea only to find your post already here .
: ) One can stack up a lot of such screen one after the other and display a sliced up picture one slice per screen .
The picture will be a scan rather than a normal 2D shot and will be sliced up in Z-direction .
The Z resolution will depend on number of slices and also on number of stacked up screens.I hope the tech evolves so that we can have true 3D pixels ( voxels ?
) in a transparent cubic monolithic screen .
That would display a real 3D picture instead of just an illusion of 3D which present techs do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- 3D Displays.
If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses.
It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.That's the first thing that came to my mind, and I rushed to post this idea only to find your post already here.
:)One can stack up a lot of such screen one after the other and display a sliced up picture one slice per screen.
The picture will be a scan rather than a normal 2D shot and will be sliced up in Z-direction.
The Z resolution will depend on number of slices and also on number of stacked up screens.I hope the tech evolves so that we can have true 3D pixels (voxels?
) in a transparent cubic monolithic screen.
That would display a real 3D picture instead of just an illusion of 3D which present techs do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710022</id>
	<title>Ideas, a wonderful thing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263035280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a great example of information wanting to be free, you guys have all these great ideas about the applications of the technology and have no qualms spreading them. Now, someone just has to take your idea, copyright it, and then patent it, and then it's no longer free. Beautiful world we live in, eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a great example of information wanting to be free , you guys have all these great ideas about the applications of the technology and have no qualms spreading them .
Now , someone just has to take your idea , copyright it , and then patent it , and then it 's no longer free .
Beautiful world we live in , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a great example of information wanting to be free, you guys have all these great ideas about the applications of the technology and have no qualms spreading them.
Now, someone just has to take your idea, copyright it, and then patent it, and then it's no longer free.
Beautiful world we live in, eh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709106</id>
	<title>No Bezel-free Screens - Conspiracy theory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263069600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This supports my theory that LCD screen manufacturers are conspiring not to produce one without a bezel on (at least) one side, which would dramatically reduce the price they can get for larger screens.</p><p>Dont buy another LCD until they produce a bezel-free one !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This supports my theory that LCD screen manufacturers are conspiring not to produce one without a bezel on ( at least ) one side , which would dramatically reduce the price they can get for larger screens.Dont buy another LCD until they produce a bezel-free one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This supports my theory that LCD screen manufacturers are conspiring not to produce one without a bezel on (at least) one side, which would dramatically reduce the price they can get for larger screens.Dont buy another LCD until they produce a bezel-free one !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709060</id>
	<title>Re:Cool tech, all they need to do...</title>
	<author>kybred</author>
	<datestamp>1263069180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.</p></div><p>I don't that would work very well. Current <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up\_display#Factors" title="wikipedia.org">HUDs</a> [wikipedia.org] use an optical system to allow the generate imagery to be focused at infinity, that way the pilot/driver doesn't have to refocus between the outside world and the generated image.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a few others suggested ; Stick it in a high end luxuary car 's windscreen , no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.I do n't that would work very well .
Current HUDs [ wikipedia.org ] use an optical system to allow the generate imagery to be focused at infinity , that way the pilot/driver does n't have to refocus between the outside world and the generated image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.I don't that would work very well.
Current HUDs [wikipedia.org] use an optical system to allow the generate imagery to be focused at infinity, that way the pilot/driver doesn't have to refocus between the outside world and the generated image.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709436</id>
	<title>Re:Nook2</title>
	<author>forand</author>
	<datestamp>1263029220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would cause glare since the OLED will need to have something to protect it thus negating the benefits of the e-ink.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would cause glare since the OLED will need to have something to protect it thus negating the benefits of the e-ink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would cause glare since the OLED will need to have something to protect it thus negating the benefits of the e-ink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709704</id>
	<title>It is transparent!</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1263031860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1 a (1) : having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 a ( 1 ) : having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 a (1) : having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709164</id>
	<title>yo dawg...</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1263070020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard you like windows so I made a window that you can display windows with while running windows, so you can have windows in your window.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard you like windows so I made a window that you can display windows with while running windows , so you can have windows in your window .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard you like windows so I made a window that you can display windows with while running windows, so you can have windows in your window.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708890</id>
	<title>Focus and line of sight</title>
	<author>nsrbrake</author>
	<datestamp>1263068040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't see much use for an overlay unless there is a fixed viewpoint or the display is only used for information that does not need to be synced with what is behind it.  Move your head a few centimeters and it'd throw it all askew.</p><p>The other problem I see with this, as someone mentioned glasses is the focal distance.  The heads up displays and wearable computers, etc, that I've seen used mirrors and optics to achieve a further distance than trying to focus on the lens of your glasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see much use for an overlay unless there is a fixed viewpoint or the display is only used for information that does not need to be synced with what is behind it .
Move your head a few centimeters and it 'd throw it all askew.The other problem I see with this , as someone mentioned glasses is the focal distance .
The heads up displays and wearable computers , etc , that I 've seen used mirrors and optics to achieve a further distance than trying to focus on the lens of your glasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see much use for an overlay unless there is a fixed viewpoint or the display is only used for information that does not need to be synced with what is behind it.
Move your head a few centimeters and it'd throw it all askew.The other problem I see with this, as someone mentioned glasses is the focal distance.
The heads up displays and wearable computers, etc, that I've seen used mirrors and optics to achieve a further distance than trying to focus on the lens of your glasses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709268</id>
	<title>Missing a feature</title>
	<author>VinylPusher</author>
	<datestamp>1263027840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There doesn't seem to be a great deal of control over the actual transparency. It seems that fully white pixels are as opaque as can be whilst fully black are transparent.</p><p>I can't really see a point in the transparency, but maybe that's just a result of my underactive imagination. Still, if I were designing something to utilise a transparent display, I'd want to hardware and software to support varying transparency using an alpha channel. RGBA really just makes sense to me as something you'd use on a transparent display.</p><p>There's no OS support for such a thing, of course, but apps and drivers could be written to take advantage until OS support were available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There does n't seem to be a great deal of control over the actual transparency .
It seems that fully white pixels are as opaque as can be whilst fully black are transparent.I ca n't really see a point in the transparency , but maybe that 's just a result of my underactive imagination .
Still , if I were designing something to utilise a transparent display , I 'd want to hardware and software to support varying transparency using an alpha channel .
RGBA really just makes sense to me as something you 'd use on a transparent display.There 's no OS support for such a thing , of course , but apps and drivers could be written to take advantage until OS support were available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There doesn't seem to be a great deal of control over the actual transparency.
It seems that fully white pixels are as opaque as can be whilst fully black are transparent.I can't really see a point in the transparency, but maybe that's just a result of my underactive imagination.
Still, if I were designing something to utilise a transparent display, I'd want to hardware and software to support varying transparency using an alpha channel.
RGBA really just makes sense to me as something you'd use on a transparent display.There's no OS support for such a thing, of course, but apps and drivers could be written to take advantage until OS support were available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802</id>
	<title>Transparent OLED isn't new</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1263067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>However, sticking it on a laptop is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , sticking it on a laptop is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, sticking it on a laptop is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924</id>
	<title>It's not transparent!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's translucent.  It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's translucent .
It if were transparent then it would be clear , instead it 's like a dark tinted piece of glass which is n't that easy to see through if you ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's translucent.
It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711374</id>
	<title>Re:1995 calling...</title>
	<author>Nirvelli</author>
	<datestamp>1263046980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But the OLED has its own built-in light source, so no backlight is needed for direct-viewing in the dark.
Isn't that the big deal here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But the OLED has its own built-in light source , so no backlight is needed for direct-viewing in the dark .
Is n't that the big deal here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the OLED has its own built-in light source, so no backlight is needed for direct-viewing in the dark.
Isn't that the big deal here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708900</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263068100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>screen watches you<br><tt><br>-1 Cliche<br></tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>screen watches you-1 Cliche</tokentext>
<sentencetext>screen watches you-1 Cliche</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709046</id>
	<title>Re:How about a tablet/laptop</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1263069120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that's fine if you like looking at the keyboard behind your screen, and whatever is behind you when in laptop mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that 's fine if you like looking at the keyboard behind your screen , and whatever is behind you when in laptop mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that's fine if you like looking at the keyboard behind your screen, and whatever is behind you when in laptop mode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886</id>
	<title>How about a tablet/laptop</title>
	<author>Sepodati</author>
	<datestamp>1263068040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about using this on a hybrid laptop/tablet? Instead of having an mechanical swivel for the screen that can break, just have a transparent screen like this. Open it up and it's a laptop. Shut the laptop and the screen mirrors so it's a tablet now. This is assuming you could get the outside (or back of) the screen to have touch capabilities.</p><p>-John</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about using this on a hybrid laptop/tablet ?
Instead of having an mechanical swivel for the screen that can break , just have a transparent screen like this .
Open it up and it 's a laptop .
Shut the laptop and the screen mirrors so it 's a tablet now .
This is assuming you could get the outside ( or back of ) the screen to have touch capabilities.-John</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about using this on a hybrid laptop/tablet?
Instead of having an mechanical swivel for the screen that can break, just have a transparent screen like this.
Open it up and it's a laptop.
Shut the laptop and the screen mirrors so it's a tablet now.
This is assuming you could get the outside (or back of) the screen to have touch capabilities.-John</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712670</id>
	<title>Re:Automatic window tinting</title>
	<author>uuddlrlrab</author>
	<datestamp>1263060600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile. Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO. Wrong tool for the job.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>How would that work? OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Hrmmm... New idea! If these can be put on a flexible transparent screen, programmable t-shirts! Create and upload your own graphics! Even animations! Next step, programmable, &amp; <b>touch-interactive</b> clothing...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile .
Using OLED 's for that effect would be pointless IMO .
Wrong tool for the job.How would that work ?
OLEDs emit light , they do n't block light .
Hrmmm... New idea !
If these can be put on a flexible transparent screen , programmable t-shirts !
Create and upload your own graphics !
Even animations !
Next step , programmable , &amp; touch-interactive clothing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile.
Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO.
Wrong tool for the job.How would that work?
OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.
Hrmmm... New idea!
If these can be put on a flexible transparent screen, programmable t-shirts!
Create and upload your own graphics!
Even animations!
Next step, programmable, &amp; touch-interactive clothing...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709104</id>
	<title>First and Largest?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263069600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:
<br>
"Samsung presents world's first and largest transparent OLED laptop at CES"
<br> <br>
If it's the world's first, it's just as much the world's largest as the world's smallest transparent OLED laptop, as well as the brightest and most-dim, the sharpest and most-blurry, etc...</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " Samsung presents world 's first and largest transparent OLED laptop at CES " If it 's the world 's first , it 's just as much the world 's largest as the world 's smallest transparent OLED laptop , as well as the brightest and most-dim , the sharpest and most-blurry , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:

"Samsung presents world's first and largest transparent OLED laptop at CES"
 
If it's the world's first, it's just as much the world's largest as the world's smallest transparent OLED laptop, as well as the brightest and most-dim, the sharpest and most-blurry, etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709644</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1263031320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If not lap tops, maybe tank tops?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If not lap tops , maybe tank tops ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If not lap tops, maybe tank tops?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709348</id>
	<title>Re:It's not transparent!</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1263028500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is 40\% transparent not translucent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is 40 \ % transparent not translucent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is 40\% transparent not translucent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710510</id>
	<title>Advertising</title>
	<author>zogger</author>
	<datestamp>1263040080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll wind up using this for advertising.  Instead of regular "dumb" windows in stores they will all be "smart windows" with changeable ads, visible from both sides of the glass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll wind up using this for advertising .
Instead of regular " dumb " windows in stores they will all be " smart windows " with changeable ads , visible from both sides of the glass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll wind up using this for advertising.
Instead of regular "dumb" windows in stores they will all be "smart windows" with changeable ads, visible from both sides of the glass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709398</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>Fjandr</author>
	<datestamp>1263028860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that it's a brand-new product, the fact that it's already been successfully produced with 40\% transparency means it's likely going to be improved significantly through further development. I fully expect the technology, or one very like it, to eventually see use in car windshields.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that it 's a brand-new product , the fact that it 's already been successfully produced with 40 \ % transparency means it 's likely going to be improved significantly through further development .
I fully expect the technology , or one very like it , to eventually see use in car windshields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that it's a brand-new product, the fact that it's already been successfully produced with 40\% transparency means it's likely going to be improved significantly through further development.
I fully expect the technology, or one very like it, to eventually see use in car windshields.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711814</id>
	<title>Re:How about a tablet/laptop</title>
	<author>digitalchinky</author>
	<datestamp>1263050400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want my whole fridge door to be made out of one, with touch screen. I don't really know why though, maybe I could kick my fridge over on its side and watch wide screen movies...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want my whole fridge door to be made out of one , with touch screen .
I do n't really know why though , maybe I could kick my fridge over on its side and watch wide screen movies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want my whole fridge door to be made out of one, with touch screen.
I don't really know why though, maybe I could kick my fridge over on its side and watch wide screen movies...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709242</id>
	<title>Re:Transparent OLED isn't new</title>
	<author>eric31415927</author>
	<datestamp>1263027600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ian McKellen (Number 2) had a laptop with a see-through screen in AMC's version of The Prisoner.<br>I only remember it from one scene; I am unsure in which of the six episodes (no pun intended) it appeared.<br>It looked cool, and I've wanted one ever since.</p><p>Apparently, I can now get one.<br>However, I am sure that it won't be a slick as Number 2's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ian McKellen ( Number 2 ) had a laptop with a see-through screen in AMC 's version of The Prisoner.I only remember it from one scene ; I am unsure in which of the six episodes ( no pun intended ) it appeared.It looked cool , and I 've wanted one ever since.Apparently , I can now get one.However , I am sure that it wo n't be a slick as Number 2 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ian McKellen (Number 2) had a laptop with a see-through screen in AMC's version of The Prisoner.I only remember it from one scene; I am unsure in which of the six episodes (no pun intended) it appeared.It looked cool, and I've wanted one ever since.Apparently, I can now get one.However, I am sure that it won't be a slick as Number 2's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709078</id>
	<title>Car Windshield possibilities</title>
	<author>grilled-cheese</author>
	<datestamp>1263069360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't mind having my vehicle gauges and GPS moved onto my windshield.  Additionally, it would be nice to play movies on it too (in park of course) since my car has a reasonable surround sound system and soundproofing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't mind having my vehicle gauges and GPS moved onto my windshield .
Additionally , it would be nice to play movies on it too ( in park of course ) since my car has a reasonable surround sound system and soundproofing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't mind having my vehicle gauges and GPS moved onto my windshield.
Additionally, it would be nice to play movies on it too (in park of course) since my car has a reasonable surround sound system and soundproofing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709850</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263033360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder, though. Head-up displays have been around forever and they're still pretty rare in cars despite the big advantage of not having to look down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , though .
Head-up displays have been around forever and they 're still pretty rare in cars despite the big advantage of not having to look down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, though.
Head-up displays have been around forever and they're still pretty rare in cars despite the big advantage of not having to look down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30732600</id>
	<title>ki detection</title>
	<author>Tyrannicsupremacy</author>
	<datestamp>1263224880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>VEGETA! What does the laptop say about his power level??</htmltext>
<tokenext>VEGETA !
What does the laptop say about his power level ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VEGETA!
What does the laptop say about his power level?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709068</id>
	<title>Re:How about a tablet/laptop</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1263069240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>good idea. I don' know if a screen can be transparent and touch-enabled at the same time though ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>good idea .
I don ' know if a screen can be transparent and touch-enabled at the same time though ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good idea.
I don' know if a screen can be transparent and touch-enabled at the same time though ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980</id>
	<title>Nook2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of having LED below the e-ink, put it on top of the e-ink. With no current applied to either, you see the e-ink. When you need to use the faster more colorful tech, make the e-ink whitish and turn on the OLED.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of having LED below the e-ink , put it on top of the e-ink .
With no current applied to either , you see the e-ink .
When you need to use the faster more colorful tech , make the e-ink whitish and turn on the OLED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of having LED below the e-ink, put it on top of the e-ink.
With no current applied to either, you see the e-ink.
When you need to use the faster more colorful tech, make the e-ink whitish and turn on the OLED.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708898</id>
	<title>A bit late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would've been useful back when overhead slide projectors were ubiqutous and video projectors expensive and rare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would 've been useful back when overhead slide projectors were ubiqutous and video projectors expensive and rare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would've been useful back when overhead slide projectors were ubiqutous and video projectors expensive and rare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709970</id>
	<title>Tablet technology?</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1263034800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe a laptop with this screen could operate as a tablet when the lid is closed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe a laptop with this screen could operate as a tablet when the lid is closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe a laptop with this screen could operate as a tablet when the lid is closed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709240</id>
	<title>We all know the first profitable use will be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263027600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709470</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1263029520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didnt catch it it mentioned if the 40\% is a technological limit or something they chose to make the screen more visible. A way to adjust the transparancy on the fly would be awesome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I didnt catch it it mentioned if the 40 \ % is a technological limit or something they chose to make the screen more visible .
A way to adjust the transparancy on the fly would be awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didnt catch it it mentioned if the 40\% is a technological limit or something they chose to make the screen more visible.
A way to adjust the transparancy on the fly would be awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710360</id>
	<title>Re:It's not transparent!</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1263038460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's translucent.  It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.</p></div><p>It was <i>supposed</i> to be transparent, but if you look at the demo you'll see they're running Windows - Internet Explorer doesn't correctly handle opacity.</p><p>Yes, it's a CSS joke about a CES product...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's translucent .
It if were transparent then it would be clear , instead it 's like a dark tinted piece of glass which is n't that easy to see through if you ask me.It was supposed to be transparent , but if you look at the demo you 'll see they 're running Windows - Internet Explorer does n't correctly handle opacity.Yes , it 's a CSS joke about a CES product.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's translucent.
It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.It was supposed to be transparent, but if you look at the demo you'll see they're running Windows - Internet Explorer doesn't correctly handle opacity.Yes, it's a CSS joke about a CES product...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709008</id>
	<title>How about as an overlayed screen on e-reader?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would actually like to see something like this overlaying the e-ink screen on an e-reader. The LCD would make taking notes, browsing the web, and possibly even watching videos possible for short periods, and when not in use, the e-ink screen would still save on battery life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would actually like to see something like this overlaying the e-ink screen on an e-reader .
The LCD would make taking notes , browsing the web , and possibly even watching videos possible for short periods , and when not in use , the e-ink screen would still save on battery life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would actually like to see something like this overlaying the e-ink screen on an e-reader.
The LCD would make taking notes, browsing the web, and possibly even watching videos possible for short periods, and when not in use, the e-ink screen would still save on battery life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710050</id>
	<title>Re:This does have everyday applications!</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1263035580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to work in the given context. Also it sets up a physical audit trail, and makes it hard to over-distribute sensitive information. Sometimes design is about making it unobtrusively hard to do certain things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to work in the given context .
Also it sets up a physical audit trail , and makes it hard to over-distribute sensitive information .
Sometimes design is about making it unobtrusively hard to do certain things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to work in the given context.
Also it sets up a physical audit trail, and makes it hard to over-distribute sensitive information.
Sometimes design is about making it unobtrusively hard to do certain things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712460</id>
	<title>Video Conferencing</title>
	<author>Orphaze</author>
	<datestamp>1263057240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One good use that could result from a technology like this would be screen-embedded cameras for video conferencing.</p><p>Anyone who has ever VC-ed with someone before knows that the experience is severely lacking for one important reason: eye contact. Even with a modern built-in camera just a half inch above the screen, it is obvious that the person you are talking to you is looking at their screen and not you. In my opinion, this is show stopper, and it really makes the experience no better than a phone conversation, if not worse.</p><p>A camera that was embedded in the center of a screen, with the other person's video stream centered on top of it, would fix this problem once and for all. No bulky teleprompter-like screen attachment necessary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One good use that could result from a technology like this would be screen-embedded cameras for video conferencing.Anyone who has ever VC-ed with someone before knows that the experience is severely lacking for one important reason : eye contact .
Even with a modern built-in camera just a half inch above the screen , it is obvious that the person you are talking to you is looking at their screen and not you .
In my opinion , this is show stopper , and it really makes the experience no better than a phone conversation , if not worse.A camera that was embedded in the center of a screen , with the other person 's video stream centered on top of it , would fix this problem once and for all .
No bulky teleprompter-like screen attachment necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One good use that could result from a technology like this would be screen-embedded cameras for video conferencing.Anyone who has ever VC-ed with someone before knows that the experience is severely lacking for one important reason: eye contact.
Even with a modern built-in camera just a half inch above the screen, it is obvious that the person you are talking to you is looking at their screen and not you.
In my opinion, this is show stopper, and it really makes the experience no better than a phone conversation, if not worse.A camera that was embedded in the center of a screen, with the other person's video stream centered on top of it, would fix this problem once and for all.
No bulky teleprompter-like screen attachment necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709148</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1263069960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Combine both into 3d glasses, you give the 3d showing slightly different screen for each eye, Add augmented reality to the mix and you'll have an explosive cocktail. And you can add exrta features like vision enhancement (ok, for that dont need to be transparent, just project camera vision as background) to be able to use them if you are shortsighted</htmltext>
<tokenext>Combine both into 3d glasses , you give the 3d showing slightly different screen for each eye , Add augmented reality to the mix and you 'll have an explosive cocktail .
And you can add exrta features like vision enhancement ( ok , for that dont need to be transparent , just project camera vision as background ) to be able to use them if you are shortsighted</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combine both into 3d glasses, you give the 3d showing slightly different screen for each eye, Add augmented reality to the mix and you'll have an explosive cocktail.
And you can add exrta features like vision enhancement (ok, for that dont need to be transparent, just project camera vision as background) to be able to use them if you are shortsighted</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708966</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could be used as a big HUD to make all kinds of cheap security, surveillance and gaming devices, just imagine it mounted on a taser, laser, gun...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be used as a big HUD to make all kinds of cheap security , surveillance and gaming devices , just imagine it mounted on a taser , laser , gun.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be used as a big HUD to make all kinds of cheap security, surveillance and gaming devices, just imagine it mounted on a taser, laser, gun...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710162</id>
	<title>Re:Automatic window tinting</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1263036840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would that work? OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would that work ?
OLEDs emit light , they do n't block light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would that work?
OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711296</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>blhack</author>
	<datestamp>1263046380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Substitute sunglasses with motorcycle helmet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Substitute sunglasses with motorcycle helmet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Substitute sunglasses with motorcycle helmet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1263028320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering that it is only 40\% transparent, it won't be possible to use it in car windshields.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that it is only 40 \ % transparent , it wo n't be possible to use it in car windshields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that it is only 40\% transparent, it won't be possible to use it in car windshields.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709464</id>
	<title>Re:Nook2</title>
	<author>eggnoglatte</author>
	<datestamp>1263029400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is too dim to have a purely reflective technology at the back. The OLED is only 40\% transparent, any light bouncing off the e-ink has to pass through the OLED twice (once from the light source to the e-ink, and once form the e-ink to the viewer). At the end you only have 16\% of the light being reflected, minus whatever the e-ink absorbs. The reflections of the top of the OLED will be brighter than the displayed information from the e-ink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is too dim to have a purely reflective technology at the back .
The OLED is only 40 \ % transparent , any light bouncing off the e-ink has to pass through the OLED twice ( once from the light source to the e-ink , and once form the e-ink to the viewer ) .
At the end you only have 16 \ % of the light being reflected , minus whatever the e-ink absorbs .
The reflections of the top of the OLED will be brighter than the displayed information from the e-ink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is too dim to have a purely reflective technology at the back.
The OLED is only 40\% transparent, any light bouncing off the e-ink has to pass through the OLED twice (once from the light source to the e-ink, and once form the e-ink to the viewer).
At the end you only have 16\% of the light being reflected, minus whatever the e-ink absorbs.
The reflections of the top of the OLED will be brighter than the displayed information from the e-ink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709100</id>
	<title>Minority Report?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263069540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you combine this with Wii-type motion control, I think you have the photo/video system from Minority Report.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you combine this with Wii-type motion control , I think you have the photo/video system from Minority Report .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you combine this with Wii-type motion control, I think you have the photo/video system from Minority Report.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709928</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263034200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Try reading something an inch away from your eyes -- you can't, because our eyes can only accommodate to focusing at a minimum distance of 20cm or so.</p><p>You can't just stick these displays in glasses.  A complex lens arrangement will be needed before the human eye can focus on whatever is being displayed.<br>Unfortunately, this means it will probably not be transparent unless a clever workaround is devised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try reading something an inch away from your eyes -- you ca n't , because our eyes can only accommodate to focusing at a minimum distance of 20cm or so.You ca n't just stick these displays in glasses .
A complex lens arrangement will be needed before the human eye can focus on whatever is being displayed.Unfortunately , this means it will probably not be transparent unless a clever workaround is devised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Try reading something an inch away from your eyes -- you can't, because our eyes can only accommodate to focusing at a minimum distance of 20cm or so.You can't just stick these displays in glasses.
A complex lens arrangement will be needed before the human eye can focus on whatever is being displayed.Unfortunately, this means it will probably not be transparent unless a clever workaround is devised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709328</id>
	<title>Transparent screens are old news...</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1263028320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back when overhead projectors were the dominant method of displaying information before a large audience (y'know the ones you put clear sheets of plastic on and wrote with a marker), before powerpoint and before projectors that connected to your VGA port.  IBM came out with the <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi\_m0EIN/is\_1995\_May\_9/ai\_16932632/" title="findarticles.com">Thinkpad 755CV</a> [findarticles.com] in which you could remove the backcover of the screen and then place the screen over the light on your overhead projector.</p><blockquote><div><p>A snap-off screen panel gives the new ThinkPad 755CV the ability to "piggyback" atop many types of standard overhead projectors. Remove the rear panel and the images on the computer's screen become a see-through "slide show" projected on a wall or screen by the overhead's lamp. The contents of any software program or presentation can easily be shared with a group of people.</p></div></blockquote><p>Back in 1995...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back when overhead projectors were the dominant method of displaying information before a large audience ( y'know the ones you put clear sheets of plastic on and wrote with a marker ) , before powerpoint and before projectors that connected to your VGA port .
IBM came out with the Thinkpad 755CV [ findarticles.com ] in which you could remove the backcover of the screen and then place the screen over the light on your overhead projector.A snap-off screen panel gives the new ThinkPad 755CV the ability to " piggyback " atop many types of standard overhead projectors .
Remove the rear panel and the images on the computer 's screen become a see-through " slide show " projected on a wall or screen by the overhead 's lamp .
The contents of any software program or presentation can easily be shared with a group of people.Back in 1995.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back when overhead projectors were the dominant method of displaying information before a large audience (y'know the ones you put clear sheets of plastic on and wrote with a marker), before powerpoint and before projectors that connected to your VGA port.
IBM came out with the Thinkpad 755CV [findarticles.com] in which you could remove the backcover of the screen and then place the screen over the light on your overhead projector.A snap-off screen panel gives the new ThinkPad 755CV the ability to "piggyback" atop many types of standard overhead projectors.
Remove the rear panel and the images on the computer's screen become a see-through "slide show" projected on a wall or screen by the overhead's lamp.
The contents of any software program or presentation can easily be shared with a group of people.Back in 1995...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709640</id>
	<title>Re:Automatic window tinting</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1263031320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile.  Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO.  Wrong tool for the job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile .
Using OLED 's for that effect would be pointless IMO .
Wrong tool for the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile.
Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO.
Wrong tool for the job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709272</id>
	<title>What we really need this for:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263027900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Augmented reality glasses!</p><p>Mark my words!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Augmented reality glasses ! Mark my words !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Augmented reality glasses!Mark my words!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708820</id>
	<title>cool, absolutely. but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263067320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there certainly is some geek coolness in having a transparent display on a laptop, although I question the usefulness of it; particularly when one is playing back pr0n on said laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there certainly is some geek coolness in having a transparent display on a laptop , although I question the usefulness of it ; particularly when one is playing back pr0n on said laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there certainly is some geek coolness in having a transparent display on a laptop, although I question the usefulness of it; particularly when one is playing back pr0n on said laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708834</id>
	<title>This does have everyday applications!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263067500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time."</i></p><p>How about a heads-up-display for cars-- you know so I'm not distracted while driving and playing Grand Theft Auto?</p><p>Plus this technology is essential if you want to have Minority Report-like hand-waving technology/aerobics, so people can watch you through the screen as you, as in the movie, copy files onto a disk-like thing and carry 10 feet across the room to another computer.  How futuristic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the utility of a see-through laptop probably is n't that high for the average user , several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time .
" How about a heads-up-display for cars-- you know so I 'm not distracted while driving and playing Grand Theft Auto ? Plus this technology is essential if you want to have Minority Report-like hand-waving technology/aerobics , so people can watch you through the screen as you , as in the movie , copy files onto a disk-like thing and carry 10 feet across the room to another computer .
How futuristic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time.
"How about a heads-up-display for cars-- you know so I'm not distracted while driving and playing Grand Theft Auto?Plus this technology is essential if you want to have Minority Report-like hand-waving technology/aerobics, so people can watch you through the screen as you, as in the movie, copy files onto a disk-like thing and carry 10 feet across the room to another computer.
How futuristic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709006</id>
	<title>Re:It's not transparent!</title>
	<author>CecilPL</author>
	<datestamp>1263068880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It if were transparent then it would be clear</p></div><p>Transparent means the objects behind the glass are in focus, which they are in this case.</p><p>The amount of light the glass lets through is a separate consideration from the transparency/translucency distinction.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It if were transparent then it would be clearTransparent means the objects behind the glass are in focus , which they are in this case.The amount of light the glass lets through is a separate consideration from the transparency/translucency distinction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It if were transparent then it would be clearTransparent means the objects behind the glass are in focus, which they are in this case.The amount of light the glass lets through is a separate consideration from the transparency/translucency distinction.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712580</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>Vu1turEMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1263058980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only realistic use that I can think of is finally building a working version of Ed's computer from Cowboy Bebop. <a href="http://imgur.com/5SpiR" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/5SpiR</a> [imgur.com]</p><p>And trust me, I've had the SketchUp diagrams for 3 years, waiting for this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only realistic use that I can think of is finally building a working version of Ed 's computer from Cowboy Bebop .
http : //imgur.com/5SpiR [ imgur.com ] And trust me , I 've had the SketchUp diagrams for 3 years , waiting for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only realistic use that I can think of is finally building a working version of Ed's computer from Cowboy Bebop.
http://imgur.com/5SpiR [imgur.com]And trust me, I've had the SketchUp diagrams for 3 years, waiting for this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708988</id>
	<title>Great!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Greasy smudges on *both* sides of the screen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Greasy smudges on * both * sides of the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greasy smudges on *both* sides of the screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709768</id>
	<title>Old news, been out for years</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1263032580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These things have been out for years. Check out all the pictures people have taken of their <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=transparent\%20laptop" title="google.com">laptops with transparent displays</a> [google.com]! Most are 100\% transparency as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These things have been out for years .
Check out all the pictures people have taken of their laptops with transparent displays [ google.com ] !
Most are 100 \ % transparency as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These things have been out for years.
Check out all the pictures people have taken of their laptops with transparent displays [google.com]!
Most are 100\% transparency as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180</id>
	<title>Automatic window tinting</title>
	<author>uuddlrlrab</author>
	<datestamp>1263070200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this is low power enough, you could theoretically use this for the tinting in vehicle windows/windshields or even homes; make it a graduated but adjustable auto-tint that works on how much and/or what wavelengths of light sensors detect entering the cabin or room. The best part is, when you leave your car in the sun, instead of having to struggle with a clumsy sun screen that only protects one window, one button press blocks all the windows, keeping the cabin relatively cool by the time you return.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is low power enough , you could theoretically use this for the tinting in vehicle windows/windshields or even homes ; make it a graduated but adjustable auto-tint that works on how much and/or what wavelengths of light sensors detect entering the cabin or room .
The best part is , when you leave your car in the sun , instead of having to struggle with a clumsy sun screen that only protects one window , one button press blocks all the windows , keeping the cabin relatively cool by the time you return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is low power enough, you could theoretically use this for the tinting in vehicle windows/windshields or even homes; make it a graduated but adjustable auto-tint that works on how much and/or what wavelengths of light sensors detect entering the cabin or room.
The best part is, when you leave your car in the sun, instead of having to struggle with a clumsy sun screen that only protects one window, one button press blocks all the windows, keeping the cabin relatively cool by the time you return.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</id>
	<title>Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263067200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had two ideas come to mind on ways to use this technology (laptop screens don't really seem like a killer feature).</p><p>
- Glasses.  It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed.  Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.
</p><p>
- 3D Displays.  If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses.  It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had two ideas come to mind on ways to use this technology ( laptop screens do n't really seem like a killer feature ) .
- Glasses .
It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses , most of the time they 'd be clear like normal , but info could pop up throughout the day as needed .
Or I could sit back and watch a video , and just turn it off if I needed to see something .
- 3D Displays .
If one would take many layers of this together , it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses .
It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available , but even a small amount could be revolutionary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had two ideas come to mind on ways to use this technology (laptop screens don't really seem like a killer feature).
- Glasses.
It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed.
Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.
- 3D Displays.
If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses.
It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711238</id>
	<title>Re:Nook2</title>
	<author>Jezza</author>
	<datestamp>1263046020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's only 40\% transparent - the effect would be to render the e-ink unreadable (or near unreadable). While I think it's fantastically cool, I can't think of a single good use for the technology. I can think of a couple of bad ones:</p><p>Make it a touch screen, and put it on the door of your microwave oven - now you don't need the panel to the side... still need to put that volume somewhere (that's where the "guts of the microwave are").</p><p>Did I say a couple? I meant one - really weak idea. But yeah it's cool.</p><p>For a laptop? Total nonstarter... do I really want everyone to see what I've got on my screen?! (No, not all the time)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only 40 \ % transparent - the effect would be to render the e-ink unreadable ( or near unreadable ) .
While I think it 's fantastically cool , I ca n't think of a single good use for the technology .
I can think of a couple of bad ones : Make it a touch screen , and put it on the door of your microwave oven - now you do n't need the panel to the side... still need to put that volume somewhere ( that 's where the " guts of the microwave are " ) .Did I say a couple ?
I meant one - really weak idea .
But yeah it 's cool.For a laptop ?
Total nonstarter... do I really want everyone to see what I 've got on my screen ? !
( No , not all the time )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only 40\% transparent - the effect would be to render the e-ink unreadable (or near unreadable).
While I think it's fantastically cool, I can't think of a single good use for the technology.
I can think of a couple of bad ones:Make it a touch screen, and put it on the door of your microwave oven - now you don't need the panel to the side... still need to put that volume somewhere (that's where the "guts of the microwave are").Did I say a couple?
I meant one - really weak idea.
But yeah it's cool.For a laptop?
Total nonstarter... do I really want everyone to see what I've got on my screen?!
(No, not all the time)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708914</id>
	<title>Cool tech, all they need to do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263068220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>... Is make it a touch screen and shrink the components to a "hand size" grip along the side.<br><br>Or<br><br>Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.<br>(Obligitory M$ joke follows!) Just don't let the car windscreen run windows or the phrase "Blue screen of death" might take on a more perminent meaning.... ^\_^</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>... Is make it a touch screen and shrink the components to a " hand size " grip along the side.OrLike a few others suggested ; Stick it in a high end luxuary car 's windscreen , no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts .
( Obligitory M $ joke follows !
) Just do n't let the car windscreen run windows or the phrase " Blue screen of death " might take on a more perminent meaning.... ^ \ _ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Is make it a touch screen and shrink the components to a "hand size" grip along the side.OrLike a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.
(Obligitory M$ joke follows!
) Just don't let the car windscreen run windows or the phrase "Blue screen of death" might take on a more perminent meaning.... ^\_^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709392</id>
	<title>Re:also</title>
	<author>serutan</author>
	<datestamp>1263028860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a great idea. Adding an information display to something that needs to be transparent, like a car windshield, seems like a much better application than making something transparent that shouldn't be, like a laptop screen. I'm surprised Samsung didn't learn anything from the public's reaction to transparent GUI windows. They're kind of cool as a novelty for about 5 minutes, but nobody really wants to use them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a great idea .
Adding an information display to something that needs to be transparent , like a car windshield , seems like a much better application than making something transparent that should n't be , like a laptop screen .
I 'm surprised Samsung did n't learn anything from the public 's reaction to transparent GUI windows .
They 're kind of cool as a novelty for about 5 minutes , but nobody really wants to use them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a great idea.
Adding an information display to something that needs to be transparent, like a car windshield, seems like a much better application than making something transparent that shouldn't be, like a laptop screen.
I'm surprised Samsung didn't learn anything from the public's reaction to transparent GUI windows.
They're kind of cool as a novelty for about 5 minutes, but nobody really wants to use them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709224</id>
	<title>MRI/CAT scanners</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1263070620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A great application would be for medical ultra-sound visualisation. The latest scanners can generate 3D surfaces which can be viewed on a monitor. There was some experimentation with combining LCD screens with mirrors so that a cross-section view from the sensor could be superimposed on top of the location of the actual sensor.</p><p>Imagine if a doctor could slide this screen around a patient and motion sensors could pick up the location of the screen and transform the data from a MRI/CAT scan into a matching projection, all in real-time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A great application would be for medical ultra-sound visualisation .
The latest scanners can generate 3D surfaces which can be viewed on a monitor .
There was some experimentation with combining LCD screens with mirrors so that a cross-section view from the sensor could be superimposed on top of the location of the actual sensor.Imagine if a doctor could slide this screen around a patient and motion sensors could pick up the location of the screen and transform the data from a MRI/CAT scan into a matching projection , all in real-time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A great application would be for medical ultra-sound visualisation.
The latest scanners can generate 3D surfaces which can be viewed on a monitor.
There was some experimentation with combining LCD screens with mirrors so that a cross-section view from the sensor could be superimposed on top of the location of the actual sensor.Imagine if a doctor could slide this screen around a patient and motion sensors could pick up the location of the screen and transform the data from a MRI/CAT scan into a matching projection, all in real-time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709316</id>
	<title>Safety plus fun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263028200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just combine it with a naked scanner. No more invasive body checks, just walk by that smiling security officer behind a computer screen. Oh wait. It'd better be one-way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just combine it with a naked scanner .
No more invasive body checks , just walk by that smiling security officer behind a computer screen .
Oh wait .
It 'd better be one-way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just combine it with a naked scanner.
No more invasive body checks, just walk by that smiling security officer behind a computer screen.
Oh wait.
It'd better be one-way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710590</id>
	<title>Beware of using with compiz.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263040740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried a beta version of this display with compiz and my windows set to transparent, and I almost blew my mind.  Almost.<br><br>Sean</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried a beta version of this display with compiz and my windows set to transparent , and I almost blew my mind .
Almost.Sean</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried a beta version of this display with compiz and my windows set to transparent, and I almost blew my mind.
Almost.Sean</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712622</id>
	<title>Augmented Reality</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1263059700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be awesome for augmented reality in a hand held device. If you could make it so you could look through it to your surroundings, and overlay useful information. The tricky part would be tracking where the user's eyes were relative to the device so you could properly position the overlay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be awesome for augmented reality in a hand held device .
If you could make it so you could look through it to your surroundings , and overlay useful information .
The tricky part would be tracking where the user 's eyes were relative to the device so you could properly position the overlay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be awesome for augmented reality in a hand held device.
If you could make it so you could look through it to your surroundings, and overlay useful information.
The tricky part would be tracking where the user's eyes were relative to the device so you could properly position the overlay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708928</id>
	<title>Avatar</title>
	<author>chrysalis</author>
	<datestamp>1263068220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like screens in Avatar!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like screens in Avatar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like screens in Avatar!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709028</id>
	<title>"Pay attention to me!"</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1263069000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Samsung's new laptop with a transparent OLED screen</p></div><p>And there was much feline rejoicing.</p><p>However, on the issue of privacy, can people on the other side of the screen also see what you have displayed?</p><p>Then again, could it be also be used as a tablet without having to flip the screen?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Samsung 's new laptop with a transparent OLED screenAnd there was much feline rejoicing.However , on the issue of privacy , can people on the other side of the screen also see what you have displayed ? Then again , could it be also be used as a tablet without having to flip the screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Samsung's new laptop with a transparent OLED screenAnd there was much feline rejoicing.However, on the issue of privacy, can people on the other side of the screen also see what you have displayed?Then again, could it be also be used as a tablet without having to flip the screen?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709036</id>
	<title>Two thoughts. . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263069060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could change the game for small tablets; you could hold the tablet on either side and use your fingers behind the screen to manipulate images without obstructing your view of them.</p><p>I've seen variations of such a solution which artificially create a 'finger' effect through graphics with the touch pad on the back of the device, but this would be the real thing.</p><p>Interesting.</p><p>Also. . .</p><p>People are obviously worried about the privacy factor of see-through computer screens, but I could see this being considered a huge plus in the evil corporate work environment; the drones would only be allowed to use laptops where the backside is a window to the front.  A lot less Facebook and Farmville would eat into company time that way.  Or at least, this may be how the pointy-haired dictator might think when placing bulk-orders for laptops.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could change the game for small tablets ; you could hold the tablet on either side and use your fingers behind the screen to manipulate images without obstructing your view of them.I 've seen variations of such a solution which artificially create a 'finger ' effect through graphics with the touch pad on the back of the device , but this would be the real thing.Interesting.Also .
. .People are obviously worried about the privacy factor of see-through computer screens , but I could see this being considered a huge plus in the evil corporate work environment ; the drones would only be allowed to use laptops where the backside is a window to the front .
A lot less Facebook and Farmville would eat into company time that way .
Or at least , this may be how the pointy-haired dictator might think when placing bulk-orders for laptops.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could change the game for small tablets; you could hold the tablet on either side and use your fingers behind the screen to manipulate images without obstructing your view of them.I've seen variations of such a solution which artificially create a 'finger' effect through graphics with the touch pad on the back of the device, but this would be the real thing.Interesting.Also.
. .People are obviously worried about the privacy factor of see-through computer screens, but I could see this being considered a huge plus in the evil corporate work environment; the drones would only be allowed to use laptops where the backside is a window to the front.
A lot less Facebook and Farmville would eat into company time that way.
Or at least, this may be how the pointy-haired dictator might think when placing bulk-orders for laptops.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972</id>
	<title>also</title>
	<author>snarkh</author>
	<datestamp>1263068640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Car windows, particularly the windshield.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Car windows , particularly the windshield .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Car windows, particularly the windshield.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711378</id>
	<title>Re:Transparent OLED isn't new</title>
	<author>KIRBY1986</author>
	<datestamp>1263047040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult <a href="http://www.allbyer.com/" title="allbyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.allbyer.com/</a> [allbyer.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ] Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular , most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts , jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3 ) $ 35HANDBGAS ( COACH,L V , DG , ED HARDY ) $ 35TSHIRTS ( POLO ,ED HARDY , LACOSTE ) $ 16 thanks... For details , please consult http : //www.allbyer.com/ [ allbyer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]
Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO ,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16
thanks... For details, please consult http://www.allbyer.com/ [allbyer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709204</id>
	<title>Its all fun and games until...</title>
	<author>LunarEffect</author>
	<datestamp>1263070440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>you are playing Left 4 Dead and suddenly you see your mother in law appear among the zombies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you are playing Left 4 Dead and suddenly you see your mother in law appear among the zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you are playing Left 4 Dead and suddenly you see your mother in law appear among the zombies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30715762</id>
	<title>Re:Realistic Uses</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263151500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>- Glasses</em></p><p><em>- 3D Displays<br></em></p><p>Next: stack them together and wear them as glasses</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Glasses- 3D DisplaysNext : stack them together and wear them as glasses</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Glasses- 3D DisplaysNext: stack them together and wear them as glasses</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30732600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30715762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_09_1715222_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30715762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709610
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709324
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709470
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709398
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30732600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30712670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30711374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30708988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30709246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_09_1715222.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_09_1715222.30710590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
