<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_08_1455236</id>
	<title>Control Your Apps Without Your Finger</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262965980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>VincenzoRomano writes <i>"You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch screens. You'll <a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/01/07/control-your-apps-without-your-finger/">move your arms, hands and fingers</a> (or whatever else applies) in the air or shake the handset. The phone camera(s), the G-sensor, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands. This breakthrough comes from a company called <a href="http://www.gesturetek.com/">GestureTek</a>, a non-startup company in this field."</i> I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.  I hate the idea of people doing this on a bus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>VincenzoRomano writes " You wo n't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch screens .
You 'll move your arms , hands and fingers ( or whatever else applies ) in the air or shake the handset .
The phone camera ( s ) , the G-sensor , the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands .
This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek , a non-startup company in this field .
" I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged .
I hate the idea of people doing this on a bus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VincenzoRomano writes "You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch screens.
You'll move your arms, hands and fingers (or whatever else applies) in the air or shake the handset.
The phone camera(s), the G-sensor, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands.
This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek, a non-startup company in this field.
" I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.
I hate the idea of people doing this on a bus.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697164</id>
	<title>Ok, are we done yet?</title>
	<author>LarrySDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1262976600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They said one day we'd be so high level we'd communicate our requests in interpretive dance. I figured saying "No way you'll get people to do that" was as safe as "640k will be enough for anyone". Ok, so you got me. Point an laugh. It's for sure what I'll do.

I was thinking by now the backlash would have started. Sure, grind away the last few nanometers of the learning curve by shoving usefulness into the dirt and stepping on it. At some point, people will realize learning touch type wasn't such a bad idea because while it didn't work crazy good out of the box, it's way fast. Morse code with two switches beats T9. It's going to be a while until we beat the human brain for processing, so how about we use what we have?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They said one day we 'd be so high level we 'd communicate our requests in interpretive dance .
I figured saying " No way you 'll get people to do that " was as safe as " 640k will be enough for anyone " .
Ok , so you got me .
Point an laugh .
It 's for sure what I 'll do .
I was thinking by now the backlash would have started .
Sure , grind away the last few nanometers of the learning curve by shoving usefulness into the dirt and stepping on it .
At some point , people will realize learning touch type was n't such a bad idea because while it did n't work crazy good out of the box , it 's way fast .
Morse code with two switches beats T9 .
It 's going to be a while until we beat the human brain for processing , so how about we use what we have ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They said one day we'd be so high level we'd communicate our requests in interpretive dance.
I figured saying "No way you'll get people to do that" was as safe as "640k will be enough for anyone".
Ok, so you got me.
Point an laugh.
It's for sure what I'll do.
I was thinking by now the backlash would have started.
Sure, grind away the last few nanometers of the learning curve by shoving usefulness into the dirt and stepping on it.
At some point, people will realize learning touch type wasn't such a bad idea because while it didn't work crazy good out of the box, it's way fast.
Morse code with two switches beats T9.
It's going to be a while until we beat the human brain for processing, so how about we use what we have?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695438</id>
	<title>Control apps with your ass!</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1262970000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a brand new, incredibly innovative input method for your touchphone! Simply put the phone in your back pocket, and sit on it. Then my revolutionary new AssSwiper (TM) will translate certain butt movements into commands on your phone. Want to skip that song? Just shift your weight back and forth a few times. You'll never use your phone the same way again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a brand new , incredibly innovative input method for your touchphone !
Simply put the phone in your back pocket , and sit on it .
Then my revolutionary new AssSwiper ( TM ) will translate certain butt movements into commands on your phone .
Want to skip that song ?
Just shift your weight back and forth a few times .
You 'll never use your phone the same way again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a brand new, incredibly innovative input method for your touchphone!
Simply put the phone in your back pocket, and sit on it.
Then my revolutionary new AssSwiper (TM) will translate certain butt movements into commands on your phone.
Want to skip that song?
Just shift your weight back and forth a few times.
You'll never use your phone the same way again!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695668</id>
	<title>Obligatory Back to the Future 2...</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1262970780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's toy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean you have to use your hands ?
That 's like a baby 's toy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean you have to use your hands?
That's like a baby's toy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696646</id>
	<title>Fuck This Shit</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1262974440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like buttons.<br>I like direct control.</p><p>I don't want to have to perform a fucking rain dance to appease the Apple gods (and let's face it - this is all because of Apple) to try and get my device to do a simple task.</p><p>I might as well try to arrange marshmallows while wearing boxing gloves.</p><p>Fuck this shit.</p><p>Touch screen, multitouch, gestures, accelerometers!<br>Shitty keyboard, no keyboard, fewer buttons, gimmicky unreliable shit!</p><p>You ever have a friend around while you're writing on physical paper?  He invariably knocks your hand or grabs the paper in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).<br>You ever have a friend around while you're typing or mousing?  He invariably mashes the keys, grabs the mouse and starts clicking, etc. in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).<br>You ever have a friend around while you're ordering from a touch screen at Jack in the Box or something?  He invariably taps the screen frantically in an attempt to mess up your order and make you buy 30 "<a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=jack\%20box\%20taco" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">tacos</a> [google.com]" (as he SHOULD).<br>You ever have a friend around while you've got arms?  He invariably grabs them and uses them to hit you while asking why you're hitting yourself (as he SHOULD).<br>You ever have a friend around while you're trying to do something delicate, like build a house of cards?  He invariably stomps and tromps until it all comes tumbling down (as he SHOULD).<br>You ever have a friend around while you're on the phone?  He invariably dances around to distract you, makes loud sexual noises or silly voices, and if it's a land line picks up another handset to mash the keypad, listen in, or breathe heavily (as he SHOULD).</p><p>I just don't like the idea of a new tech device that enables more ass hattery.  Now all you'll have to do is wave your hands about, make some noise, or give a little shake.  Will this shit erase everything after a few good shakes like an etch-a-sketch?  Knowing the shitty gimmicky features they tack on, it'll be an option on several devices.</p><p>Oh well.  Plebes, buy your retarded devices with shitty interfaces.  I will make your life hell.  Me?  You'll at least have to pry my devices from my hands before you can interrupt me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like buttons.I like direct control.I do n't want to have to perform a fucking rain dance to appease the Apple gods ( and let 's face it - this is all because of Apple ) to try and get my device to do a simple task.I might as well try to arrange marshmallows while wearing boxing gloves.Fuck this shit.Touch screen , multitouch , gestures , accelerometers ! Shitty keyboard , no keyboard , fewer buttons , gimmicky unreliable shit ! You ever have a friend around while you 're writing on physical paper ?
He invariably knocks your hand or grabs the paper in order to mess you up ( as he SHOULD ) .You ever have a friend around while you 're typing or mousing ?
He invariably mashes the keys , grabs the mouse and starts clicking , etc .
in order to mess you up ( as he SHOULD ) .You ever have a friend around while you 're ordering from a touch screen at Jack in the Box or something ?
He invariably taps the screen frantically in an attempt to mess up your order and make you buy 30 " tacos [ google.com ] " ( as he SHOULD ) .You ever have a friend around while you 've got arms ?
He invariably grabs them and uses them to hit you while asking why you 're hitting yourself ( as he SHOULD ) .You ever have a friend around while you 're trying to do something delicate , like build a house of cards ?
He invariably stomps and tromps until it all comes tumbling down ( as he SHOULD ) .You ever have a friend around while you 're on the phone ?
He invariably dances around to distract you , makes loud sexual noises or silly voices , and if it 's a land line picks up another handset to mash the keypad , listen in , or breathe heavily ( as he SHOULD ) .I just do n't like the idea of a new tech device that enables more ass hattery .
Now all you 'll have to do is wave your hands about , make some noise , or give a little shake .
Will this shit erase everything after a few good shakes like an etch-a-sketch ?
Knowing the shitty gimmicky features they tack on , it 'll be an option on several devices.Oh well .
Plebes , buy your retarded devices with shitty interfaces .
I will make your life hell .
Me ? You 'll at least have to pry my devices from my hands before you can interrupt me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like buttons.I like direct control.I don't want to have to perform a fucking rain dance to appease the Apple gods (and let's face it - this is all because of Apple) to try and get my device to do a simple task.I might as well try to arrange marshmallows while wearing boxing gloves.Fuck this shit.Touch screen, multitouch, gestures, accelerometers!Shitty keyboard, no keyboard, fewer buttons, gimmicky unreliable shit!You ever have a friend around while you're writing on physical paper?
He invariably knocks your hand or grabs the paper in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).You ever have a friend around while you're typing or mousing?
He invariably mashes the keys, grabs the mouse and starts clicking, etc.
in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).You ever have a friend around while you're ordering from a touch screen at Jack in the Box or something?
He invariably taps the screen frantically in an attempt to mess up your order and make you buy 30 "tacos [google.com]" (as he SHOULD).You ever have a friend around while you've got arms?
He invariably grabs them and uses them to hit you while asking why you're hitting yourself (as he SHOULD).You ever have a friend around while you're trying to do something delicate, like build a house of cards?
He invariably stomps and tromps until it all comes tumbling down (as he SHOULD).You ever have a friend around while you're on the phone?
He invariably dances around to distract you, makes loud sexual noises or silly voices, and if it's a land line picks up another handset to mash the keypad, listen in, or breathe heavily (as he SHOULD).I just don't like the idea of a new tech device that enables more ass hattery.
Now all you'll have to do is wave your hands about, make some noise, or give a little shake.
Will this shit erase everything after a few good shakes like an etch-a-sketch?
Knowing the shitty gimmicky features they tack on, it'll be an option on several devices.Oh well.
Plebes, buy your retarded devices with shitty interfaces.
I will make your life hell.
Me?  You'll at least have to pry my devices from my hands before you can interrupt me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699310</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1262942340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Genius.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697688</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1262978640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to agree, it's like Earth: Final Conflict's interfaces for the shuttles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree , it 's like Earth : Final Conflict 's interfaces for the shuttles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree, it's like Earth: Final Conflict's interfaces for the shuttles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696266</id>
	<title>saroman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262972940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I picture someone perched over their iphone like saroman with his fingers all contorted gesturing the palatir in his tower.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I picture someone perched over their iphone like saroman with his fingers all contorted gesturing the palatir in his tower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I picture someone perched over their iphone like saroman with his fingers all contorted gesturing the palatir in his tower.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696680</id>
	<title>#irc.trolltalNk.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262974620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and diwstraction up today!  If you</htmltext>
<tokenext>and diwstraction up today !
If you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and diwstraction up today!
If you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30700420</id>
	<title>already thought of..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262946900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was the device input method of choice in Tad William's Otherland series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was the device input method of choice in Tad William 's Otherland series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was the device input method of choice in Tad William's Otherland series.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338</id>
	<title>I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1262969700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>(Gets bag of popcorn, sits on park bench)<br> <br>
This ought to be amusing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Gets bag of popcorn , sits on park bench ) This ought to be amusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Gets bag of popcorn, sits on park bench) 
This ought to be amusing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695736</id>
	<title>Re:Prior Art - for decades</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1262971020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>prior art indeed, funny to see the same things reinvented again and again over the decades.  Having worked in CADD/CAM since 70s, seen at trade shows all manner of gesture sensors, 3D viewing systems, gloves and other body position transducers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>prior art indeed , funny to see the same things reinvented again and again over the decades .
Having worked in CADD/CAM since 70s , seen at trade shows all manner of gesture sensors , 3D viewing systems , gloves and other body position transducers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>prior art indeed, funny to see the same things reinvented again and again over the decades.
Having worked in CADD/CAM since 70s, seen at trade shows all manner of gesture sensors, 3D viewing systems, gloves and other body position transducers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695350</id>
	<title>Wait, I still have to move?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought this was 2010.  Where's my mind control?  Fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this was 2010 .
Where 's my mind control ?
Fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this was 2010.
Where's my mind control?
Fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696354</id>
	<title>re</title>
	<author>S-4'N3</author>
	<datestamp>1262973300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*waves hand* These aren't the droids your looking for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* waves hand * These are n't the droids your looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*waves hand* These aren't the droids your looking for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695446</id>
	<title>Frustration</title>
	<author>domatic</author>
	<datestamp>1262970000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And when I commit the crime of the millenium and want to hear news reports about myself I'll be waving my hands frantically around it.....at least until my girlfriend gets sick of it and chucks a pencil through the on/off space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And when I commit the crime of the millenium and want to hear news reports about myself I 'll be waving my hands frantically around it.....at least until my girlfriend gets sick of it and chucks a pencil through the on/off space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And when I commit the crime of the millenium and want to hear news reports about myself I'll be waving my hands frantically around it.....at least until my girlfriend gets sick of it and chucks a pencil through the on/off space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422</id>
	<title>gesture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Showing middle finger to open an app on iPhone (There should be already one) on the bus and suddenly I am arrested for obscene gesture.

Stop this nonsense now</htmltext>
<tokenext>Showing middle finger to open an app on iPhone ( There should be already one ) on the bus and suddenly I am arrested for obscene gesture .
Stop this nonsense now</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Showing middle finger to open an app on iPhone (There should be already one) on the bus and suddenly I am arrested for obscene gesture.
Stop this nonsense now</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696298</id>
	<title>G-sensor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262973060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought newest research shows it doesn't exist? Oh, wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought newest research shows it does n't exist ?
Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought newest research shows it doesn't exist?
Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695666</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, I still have to move?</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1262970720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought this was 2010. Where's my mind control? Fail.</p></div><p>Not to worry.  We have that.</p><p>Thanks,<br>The CIA</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this was 2010 .
Where 's my mind control ?
Fail.Not to worry .
We have that.Thanks,The CIA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this was 2010.
Where's my mind control?
Fail.Not to worry.
We have that.Thanks,The CIA
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695642</id>
	<title>Bluetooth</title>
	<author>Flozzin</author>
	<datestamp>1262970660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great. Now on top of blue tooth making people looking they they talk to themselves. We will have people having seizures. This seems like too much effort all around. I can only imagine my phone calling grandma at 2 am since I left the phone on the table and wanted to get a snack to eat. How about track my eye movements? But even then if I look away it would have problems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
Now on top of blue tooth making people looking they they talk to themselves .
We will have people having seizures .
This seems like too much effort all around .
I can only imagine my phone calling grandma at 2 am since I left the phone on the table and wanted to get a snack to eat .
How about track my eye movements ?
But even then if I look away it would have problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
Now on top of blue tooth making people looking they they talk to themselves.
We will have people having seizures.
This seems like too much effort all around.
I can only imagine my phone calling grandma at 2 am since I left the phone on the table and wanted to get a snack to eat.
How about track my eye movements?
But even then if I look away it would have problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695892</id>
	<title>Pull my finger...</title>
	<author>scorpivs</author>
	<datestamp>1262971560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fixed that.<br> <br>What's this on your shirt...<br> <br>Hey, look over there...<br> <br> <br>The technology may mean the end to rude people, if it's not impolitic of a person to point that out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>fixed that .
What 's this on your shirt... Hey , look over there... The technology may mean the end to rude people , if it 's not impolitic of a person to point that out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fixed that.
What's this on your shirt... Hey, look over there...  The technology may mean the end to rude people, if it's not impolitic of a person to point that out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695832</id>
	<title>Re:gesture</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1262971320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In what dark age country are you arrested for &ldquo;obscene gestures&rdquo;?? Not even in the USA can it be that bad, can it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In what dark age country are you arrested for    obscene gestures    ? ?
Not even in the USA can it be that bad , can it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what dark age country are you arrested for “obscene gestures”??
Not even in the USA can it be that bad, can it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699876</id>
	<title>Re:gesture nope not illegal in the us</title>
	<author>splatter</author>
	<datestamp>1262944560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry but mods are wrong.</p><p>Arrested yes, charged no... PAID well yes.. matter of fact he was $50,000 thank you very much.</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1923125,00.html" title="time.com">http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1923125,00.html</a> [time.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry but mods are wrong.Arrested yes , charged no... PAID well yes.. matter of fact he was $ 50,000 thank you very much.http : //www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1923125,00.html [ time.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry but mods are wrong.Arrested yes, charged no... PAID well yes.. matter of fact he was $50,000 thank you very much.http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1923125,00.html [time.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701194</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>puppet10</author>
	<datestamp>1262950440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly...</p><p>Passer-by walks by someone making wild gyrations and jerking their arms and legs around.</p><p>"Hello are you ok??"</p><p>"Yes, (arm whistles past passer-by's face) I'm fine.  (leg swings up and starts a pirouette)  I'm just trying to see what the weather will be this week (goes back to jerking arms and legs all over the place looking like a seizure is in progress).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly...Passer-by walks by someone making wild gyrations and jerking their arms and legs around .
" Hello are you ok ? ?
" " Yes , ( arm whistles past passer-by 's face ) I 'm fine .
( leg swings up and starts a pirouette ) I 'm just trying to see what the weather will be this week ( goes back to jerking arms and legs all over the place looking like a seizure is in progress ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly...Passer-by walks by someone making wild gyrations and jerking their arms and legs around.
"Hello are you ok??
""Yes, (arm whistles past passer-by's face) I'm fine.
(leg swings up and starts a pirouette)  I'm just trying to see what the weather will be this week (goes back to jerking arms and legs all over the place looking like a seizure is in progress).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695504</id>
	<title>dialing wand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262970240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ultimate input device for tubby fingers - a dialing wand.</p><p>Where is the consideration for people with a few extra pounds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ultimate input device for tubby fingers - a dialing wand.Where is the consideration for people with a few extra pounds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ultimate input device for tubby fingers - a dialing wand.Where is the consideration for people with a few extra pounds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696106</id>
	<title>Other analogies</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1262972280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kinda like a theramin. Or one of those games where you maneuver a marble around on a board and try to keep it out of the holes.</p><p>Please, people, the idea is to make <b> <i>better</i></b>  interfaces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda like a theramin .
Or one of those games where you maneuver a marble around on a board and try to keep it out of the holes.Please , people , the idea is to make better interfaces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda like a theramin.
Or one of those games where you maneuver a marble around on a board and try to keep it out of the holes.Please, people, the idea is to make  better  interfaces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695902</id>
	<title>Oh, uses the camera to help?</title>
	<author>billsayswow</author>
	<datestamp>1262971620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Raise your hand if you have ever had a hair or bit of dust get stuck to your optical mouse's sensor...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raise your hand if you have ever had a hair or bit of dust get stuck to your optical mouse 's sensor.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raise your hand if you have ever had a hair or bit of dust get stuck to your optical mouse's sensor...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695434</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<b>You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch (areas)</b>. <b>You'll move your</b> arms, <b>hands and fingers (or whatever else applies)</b> in the air or will shake the handset. <b>The phone camera(s), the G-sensor</b>, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands. This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek, a non-startup company in this field."</p><p>I thought you only needed a finger to activate the G-sensor. I wonder if this new technology will worth with other body parts, such as tongues. I think it's wonderful that by interfacing with the G-Sensor, you can get your entire phone to vibrate wildly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You wo n't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch ( areas ) .
You 'll move your arms , hands and fingers ( or whatever else applies ) in the air or will shake the handset .
The phone camera ( s ) , the G-sensor , the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands .
This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek , a non-startup company in this field .
" I thought you only needed a finger to activate the G-sensor .
I wonder if this new technology will worth with other body parts , such as tongues .
I think it 's wonderful that by interfacing with the G-Sensor , you can get your entire phone to vibrate wildly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch (areas).
You'll move your arms, hands and fingers (or whatever else applies) in the air or will shake the handset.
The phone camera(s), the G-sensor, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands.
This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek, a non-startup company in this field.
"I thought you only needed a finger to activate the G-sensor.
I wonder if this new technology will worth with other body parts, such as tongues.
I think it's wonderful that by interfacing with the G-Sensor, you can get your entire phone to vibrate wildly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262973840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.</p><p>This adds a whole new dimension to the game.</p><p>"He's not shaking his phone up and down, he's masturbating on a porn page"</p><p>I can see the marketing song for this, to the Village People's "YMCA":</p><p>"Young man!  Want to open that app?<br>I say.<br>Touch Screen!  covers your screen with crap,<br>so now,<br>Gestures!, keep your hands off your screen,<br>and then,<br>your...<br>phone...<br>will...<br>stay...<br>so...<br>clean...</p><p>Open your apps to the Y! M! C! A!<br>Dance, tap, and shake your phone the touchless way.</p><p>You can open an app,<br>your phone stays free of crap,<br>you can stay in great shape<br>and then you, can, wave, like an ape...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back when Bluetooth first came out , we used to play the game " Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds " , where we 'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.This adds a whole new dimension to the game .
" He 's not shaking his phone up and down , he 's masturbating on a porn page " I can see the marketing song for this , to the Village People 's " YMCA " : " Young man !
Want to open that app ? I say.Touch Screen !
covers your screen with crap,so now,Gestures ! , keep your hands off your screen,and then,your...phone...will...stay...so...clean...Open your apps to the Y !
M ! C !
A ! Dance , tap , and shake your phone the touchless way.You can open an app,your phone stays free of crap,you can stay in great shapeand then you , can , wave , like an ape.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.This adds a whole new dimension to the game.
"He's not shaking his phone up and down, he's masturbating on a porn page"I can see the marketing song for this, to the Village People's "YMCA":"Young man!
Want to open that app?I say.Touch Screen!
covers your screen with crap,so now,Gestures!, keep your hands off your screen,and then,your...phone...will...stay...so...clean...Open your apps to the Y!
M! C!
A!Dance, tap, and shake your phone the touchless way.You can open an app,your phone stays free of crap,you can stay in great shapeand then you, can, wave, like an ape...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30801940</id>
	<title>Prior use?</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1263727740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phones already control software through the accelerometer data- namely switching between portrait and landscape when you turn the phone sideways.</p><p>Besides, I like the idea, but the reason you want it is finger smudging? Wash your hands and stop picking your nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phones already control software through the accelerometer data- namely switching between portrait and landscape when you turn the phone sideways.Besides , I like the idea , but the reason you want it is finger smudging ?
Wash your hands and stop picking your nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phones already control software through the accelerometer data- namely switching between portrait and landscape when you turn the phone sideways.Besides, I like the idea, but the reason you want it is finger smudging?
Wash your hands and stop picking your nose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696740</id>
	<title>Re:So everyone will soon look like</title>
	<author>interploy</author>
	<datestamp>1262974920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Got a point... People who talk on the phone with those earbud headsets already look crazy if you can't see the headset. What are we supposed to think of people waving their arms about for no apparent reason or waggling their fingers at their phones like they're a magician? "Abra-cadabra! Call my mom."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got a point... People who talk on the phone with those earbud headsets already look crazy if you ca n't see the headset .
What are we supposed to think of people waving their arms about for no apparent reason or waggling their fingers at their phones like they 're a magician ?
" Abra-cadabra ! Call my mom .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Got a point... People who talk on the phone with those earbud headsets already look crazy if you can't see the headset.
What are we supposed to think of people waving their arms about for no apparent reason or waggling their fingers at their phones like they're a magician?
"Abra-cadabra! Call my mom.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695492</id>
	<title>The bird</title>
	<author>kaoshin</author>
	<datestamp>1262970180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this is integrated into many other applications, because there are several that I would like to flip a certain gesture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this is integrated into many other applications , because there are several that I would like to flip a certain gesture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this is integrated into many other applications, because there are several that I would like to flip a certain gesture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697212</id>
	<title>I did something similar a year ago</title>
	<author>S3D</author>
	<datestamp>1262976840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJCJrircyfM" title="youtube.com">Phone as 3d pointing device</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67bxQmEl7tQ" title="youtube.com">This one recognize some simple gestures  with phone</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
And both could be downloaded for Symbian OS 9.*. It seems I did mistake with choice of platform - Symbian OS is in decline now. But if you still keep old Symbian S60 3rd ed around you can download and try.
Those demos use markers, but markerless approach also viable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Phone as 3d pointing device [ youtube.com ] This one recognize some simple gestures with phone [ youtube.com ] And both could be downloaded for Symbian OS 9. * .
It seems I did mistake with choice of platform - Symbian OS is in decline now .
But if you still keep old Symbian S60 3rd ed around you can download and try .
Those demos use markers , but markerless approach also viable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phone as 3d pointing device [youtube.com]

This one recognize some simple gestures  with phone [youtube.com]

And both could be downloaded for Symbian OS 9.*.
It seems I did mistake with choice of platform - Symbian OS is in decline now.
But if you still keep old Symbian S60 3rd ed around you can download and try.
Those demos use markers, but markerless approach also viable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697010</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262976000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely!  It'll be more fun than watching people "talk to themselves" as they walk down the street or down the grocery store aisle!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely !
It 'll be more fun than watching people " talk to themselves " as they walk down the street or down the grocery store aisle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely!
It'll be more fun than watching people "talk to themselves" as they walk down the street or down the grocery store aisle!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30698842</id>
	<title>Smudged phone screens not going away</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262983680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you somehow have no natural oils in the skin/hair of your face/ears, you're going to have to wipe your screen occasionally; if you're female in a culture where cell phones are common, there's a good chance makeup causes similar problems.  This happens to the tiny screen on my (effectively) antique brick phone, so there's no way it won't happen to the much larger screens on touch phones.  This gesture technology might be interesting, but not because of smudges.</p><p>- T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you somehow have no natural oils in the skin/hair of your face/ears , you 're going to have to wipe your screen occasionally ; if you 're female in a culture where cell phones are common , there 's a good chance makeup causes similar problems .
This happens to the tiny screen on my ( effectively ) antique brick phone , so there 's no way it wo n't happen to the much larger screens on touch phones .
This gesture technology might be interesting , but not because of smudges.- T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you somehow have no natural oils in the skin/hair of your face/ears, you're going to have to wipe your screen occasionally; if you're female in a culture where cell phones are common, there's a good chance makeup causes similar problems.
This happens to the tiny screen on my (effectively) antique brick phone, so there's no way it won't happen to the much larger screens on touch phones.
This gesture technology might be interesting, but not because of smudges.- T</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30700280</id>
	<title>Re:More effort required</title>
	<author>spidkit</author>
	<datestamp>1262946240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if you could master it, you might look like your playing a Theremin.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSzTPGlNa5U" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSzTPGlNa5U</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if you could master it , you might look like your playing a Theremin .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = pSzTPGlNa5U [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if you could master it, you might look like your playing a Theremin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSzTPGlNa5U [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695334</id>
	<title>*yawn*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.</p></div><p>Oh no! You have to spend all of 3 seconds to wipe off your screen occasionally.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.Oh no !
You have to spend all of 3 seconds to wipe off your screen occasionally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.Oh no!
You have to spend all of 3 seconds to wipe off your screen occasionally.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695502</id>
	<title>This could be bad</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1262970240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine a group of people watching a soccer(football) match at your place:<br>
[Announcer]:  And Barcelona scores a GOOOOAL!<br>
[You]: WTF?  *Gives middle finger*<br>
[Computer]:  Loading favorites.  *Goatse.cx appears*<br>
[Everyone looks at you and starts to leave]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a group of people watching a soccer ( football ) match at your place : [ Announcer ] : And Barcelona scores a GOOOOAL !
[ You ] : WTF ?
* Gives middle finger * [ Computer ] : Loading favorites .
* Goatse.cx appears * [ Everyone looks at you and starts to leave ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a group of people watching a soccer(football) match at your place:
[Announcer]:  And Barcelona scores a GOOOOAL!
[You]: WTF?
*Gives middle finger*
[Computer]:  Loading favorites.
*Goatse.cx appears*
[Everyone looks at you and starts to leave]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697182</id>
	<title>Re:I'm loving it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262976720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.</p></div></blockquote><p>There's was actually a fairly brilliant ad here in Canada for Rogers -- a cable and cell phone company.</p><p>They show this little old lady with a walker going down the road, apparently talking to herself, and saying all sorts of strange things and getting the corresponding strange looks.  (For example, as she passes by the mailman she's saying "Oh, you look pretty in that dress".)</p><p>At the end of the commercial they flip around to show a different view than we've seen of her, and she's wearing a blue-tooth headset and talking to her grand daughter.</p><p>A damned funny commercial, and definitely ties into the "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds" you referenced.  I've only recently stopped assuming people are slightly mad when I see them talking to themselves -- unless, I'm right downtown that is.  Then you need some other visual clues to try to sort out if you need to cross the street or not.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back when Bluetooth first came out , we used to play the game " Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds " , where we 'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.There 's was actually a fairly brilliant ad here in Canada for Rogers -- a cable and cell phone company.They show this little old lady with a walker going down the road , apparently talking to herself , and saying all sorts of strange things and getting the corresponding strange looks .
( For example , as she passes by the mailman she 's saying " Oh , you look pretty in that dress " .
) At the end of the commercial they flip around to show a different view than we 've seen of her , and she 's wearing a blue-tooth headset and talking to her grand daughter.A damned funny commercial , and definitely ties into the " Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds " you referenced .
I 've only recently stopped assuming people are slightly mad when I see them talking to themselves -- unless , I 'm right downtown that is .
Then you need some other visual clues to try to sort out if you need to cross the street or not .
: -PCheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.There's was actually a fairly brilliant ad here in Canada for Rogers -- a cable and cell phone company.They show this little old lady with a walker going down the road, apparently talking to herself, and saying all sorts of strange things and getting the corresponding strange looks.
(For example, as she passes by the mailman she's saying "Oh, you look pretty in that dress".
)At the end of the commercial they flip around to show a different view than we've seen of her, and she's wearing a blue-tooth headset and talking to her grand daughter.A damned funny commercial, and definitely ties into the "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds" you referenced.
I've only recently stopped assuming people are slightly mad when I see them talking to themselves -- unless, I'm right downtown that is.
Then you need some other visual clues to try to sort out if you need to cross the street or not.
:-PCheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695546</id>
	<title>Prior Art</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1262970360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't Nintendo have prior art in the Wiimote?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't Nintendo have prior art in the Wiimote ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't Nintendo have prior art in the Wiimote?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695488</id>
	<title>Uh... Bad idea.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262970180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Once the software is enabled, users can shake, rock or roll their phone to play games, answer calls, shuffle playlists, navigate maps, scroll, pan, zoom, turn pages and even browse the web &ndash; all without pressing a button or touching the screen.</p></div><p>Wow, that is possibly the most idiotic idea for interface design I have ever read. It looks like this makes it incredibly easy to roll your phone and accidentally call your boss.
<br> <br>
Also, if I am reading something I don't want to take my eyes off it while my device "rocks and rolls" to turn the page.
<br> <br>
All in all, this is definitely not well thought out. Gesture technology was cool when touchscreens sucked, but now that touchscreens are good, gestures are good addons (Such as the rotate on the iphone, still even that is sometimes annoying).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once the software is enabled , users can shake , rock or roll their phone to play games , answer calls , shuffle playlists , navigate maps , scroll , pan , zoom , turn pages and even browse the web    all without pressing a button or touching the screen.Wow , that is possibly the most idiotic idea for interface design I have ever read .
It looks like this makes it incredibly easy to roll your phone and accidentally call your boss .
Also , if I am reading something I do n't want to take my eyes off it while my device " rocks and rolls " to turn the page .
All in all , this is definitely not well thought out .
Gesture technology was cool when touchscreens sucked , but now that touchscreens are good , gestures are good addons ( Such as the rotate on the iphone , still even that is sometimes annoying ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once the software is enabled, users can shake, rock or roll their phone to play games, answer calls, shuffle playlists, navigate maps, scroll, pan, zoom, turn pages and even browse the web – all without pressing a button or touching the screen.Wow, that is possibly the most idiotic idea for interface design I have ever read.
It looks like this makes it incredibly easy to roll your phone and accidentally call your boss.
Also, if I am reading something I don't want to take my eyes off it while my device "rocks and rolls" to turn the page.
All in all, this is definitely not well thought out.
Gesture technology was cool when touchscreens sucked, but now that touchscreens are good, gestures are good addons (Such as the rotate on the iphone, still even that is sometimes annoying).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696786</id>
	<title>Why not for laptops with integrated webcams?</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1262975040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never understood why this hasn't been implemented on laptops with integrated webcams. More than three years ago, one guy used the Sudden Movement Sensor in his Apple MacBook to create a SmackBook. He'd slap the MacBook on the keyboard to undo, go back etc. Later he implemented a less violent version using the integrated webcam. Check out <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slZDN7zeMWI" title="youtube.com">this video on YouTube</a> [youtube.com] where he waves his left hand (at 0:27 in the movie) to go to another desktop.</p><p>I love it, but have not seen it implemented yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood why this has n't been implemented on laptops with integrated webcams .
More than three years ago , one guy used the Sudden Movement Sensor in his Apple MacBook to create a SmackBook .
He 'd slap the MacBook on the keyboard to undo , go back etc .
Later he implemented a less violent version using the integrated webcam .
Check out this video on YouTube [ youtube.com ] where he waves his left hand ( at 0 : 27 in the movie ) to go to another desktop.I love it , but have not seen it implemented yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood why this hasn't been implemented on laptops with integrated webcams.
More than three years ago, one guy used the Sudden Movement Sensor in his Apple MacBook to create a SmackBook.
He'd slap the MacBook on the keyboard to undo, go back etc.
Later he implemented a less violent version using the integrated webcam.
Check out this video on YouTube [youtube.com] where he waves his left hand (at 0:27 in the movie) to go to another desktop.I love it, but have not seen it implemented yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697104</id>
	<title>Don't move!</title>
	<author>oren</author>
	<datestamp>1262976360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:</p><p>"For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive -- you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure, of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Hitchhiker 's Guide to the Galaxy : " For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials ; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive -- you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers ; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope .
It saved a lot of muscular expenditure , of course , but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:"For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive -- you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope.
It saved a lot of muscular expenditure, of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695722</id>
	<title>MIME -- it's not just for file types now</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1262970960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for the "Mime" HID driver.  You pretend to open a file and guess what happens to the file?  Pretend to crumple up some paper and guess what happens to the file?  I leave other gestures to the imagination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the " Mime " HID driver .
You pretend to open a file and guess what happens to the file ?
Pretend to crumple up some paper and guess what happens to the file ?
I leave other gestures to the imagination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the "Mime" HID driver.
You pretend to open a file and guess what happens to the file?
Pretend to crumple up some paper and guess what happens to the file?
I leave other gestures to the imagination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696962</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds tiring</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262975820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.</p><p>I'm sure there is a 'your mom' joke in there somewhere!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I have 2 arms and 10 fingers , seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.I 'm sure there is a 'your mom ' joke in there somewhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.I'm sure there is a 'your mom' joke in there somewhere!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696686</id>
	<title>Re:So everyone will soon look like</title>
	<author>Max(10)</author>
	<datestamp>1262974620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Elaine dancing?</p></div></blockquote><p>Only when rearranging the desktop icons. Here's a list of the most common gestures:<br>- raise arm and perform air-wipe over icon = launch application<br>- raise arm all the way up and perform slam-dunk motion = close application in active window<br>- perform one finger salute motion = shutdown -p now<br>- raise both arms, look up as if asking "Why, God, why?", drop arms and shake head = restart Microsoft Windows after a hard reset</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Elaine dancing ? Only when rearranging the desktop icons .
Here 's a list of the most common gestures : - raise arm and perform air-wipe over icon = launch application- raise arm all the way up and perform slam-dunk motion = close application in active window- perform one finger salute motion = shutdown -p now- raise both arms , look up as if asking " Why , God , why ?
" , drop arms and shake head = restart Microsoft Windows after a hard reset</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Elaine dancing?Only when rearranging the desktop icons.
Here's a list of the most common gestures:- raise arm and perform air-wipe over icon = launch application- raise arm all the way up and perform slam-dunk motion = close application in active window- perform one finger salute motion = shutdown -p now- raise both arms, look up as if asking "Why, God, why?
", drop arms and shake head = restart Microsoft Windows after a hard reset
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697514</id>
	<title>Control Your Apps Without Your Finger..</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1262978040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can do that now, it's called a penis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can do that now , it 's called a penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can do that now, it's called a penis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695676</id>
	<title>Buttons are best!</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1262970780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Properly placed physical buttons and dials are, by far, the best control scheme for digital cameras. You need that physical feedback in order to know what you're pressing when you're taking photos. I'd rather keep my eyes on the subject instead of having to look down at the camera constantly to see what I'm doing. In cars it's even more important that your eyes stay focus on the road and aren't distracted by touch screens and whatnot.</p><p>Tablet PCs are far more logical. And for desktops, I'm not sure why no one has developed a PC where the display sits closer to the user, inclined like a drafting table. You look down on it like reading a book, and it's far more comfortable to interact with the touch screen since it's no different than moving around stuff on the desk.</p><p>The only viable use for gesture controls is computers and gaming consoles.  And even then the value is dubious outside of games. It's impractical and exhausting. Imagine trying to keep your arms elevated for any length of time and manipulating items on screen with precision. This is all a stupid fad derived from recent sci fi movies. Technology may reach a point when we we'll get tactile feedback in mid-air making this sort of thing viable, but we're not there yet. And by the time we get to that point we will probably be able to effectively interact with computers using thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Properly placed physical buttons and dials are , by far , the best control scheme for digital cameras .
You need that physical feedback in order to know what you 're pressing when you 're taking photos .
I 'd rather keep my eyes on the subject instead of having to look down at the camera constantly to see what I 'm doing .
In cars it 's even more important that your eyes stay focus on the road and are n't distracted by touch screens and whatnot.Tablet PCs are far more logical .
And for desktops , I 'm not sure why no one has developed a PC where the display sits closer to the user , inclined like a drafting table .
You look down on it like reading a book , and it 's far more comfortable to interact with the touch screen since it 's no different than moving around stuff on the desk.The only viable use for gesture controls is computers and gaming consoles .
And even then the value is dubious outside of games .
It 's impractical and exhausting .
Imagine trying to keep your arms elevated for any length of time and manipulating items on screen with precision .
This is all a stupid fad derived from recent sci fi movies .
Technology may reach a point when we we 'll get tactile feedback in mid-air making this sort of thing viable , but we 're not there yet .
And by the time we get to that point we will probably be able to effectively interact with computers using thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Properly placed physical buttons and dials are, by far, the best control scheme for digital cameras.
You need that physical feedback in order to know what you're pressing when you're taking photos.
I'd rather keep my eyes on the subject instead of having to look down at the camera constantly to see what I'm doing.
In cars it's even more important that your eyes stay focus on the road and aren't distracted by touch screens and whatnot.Tablet PCs are far more logical.
And for desktops, I'm not sure why no one has developed a PC where the display sits closer to the user, inclined like a drafting table.
You look down on it like reading a book, and it's far more comfortable to interact with the touch screen since it's no different than moving around stuff on the desk.The only viable use for gesture controls is computers and gaming consoles.
And even then the value is dubious outside of games.
It's impractical and exhausting.
Imagine trying to keep your arms elevated for any length of time and manipulating items on screen with precision.
This is all a stupid fad derived from recent sci fi movies.
Technology may reach a point when we we'll get tactile feedback in mid-air making this sort of thing viable, but we're not there yet.
And by the time we get to that point we will probably be able to effectively interact with computers using thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696798</id>
	<title>I'd rather have...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262975100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... Face Gestures.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkNxbyp6thM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Opera Face Gestures</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... Face Gestures.Opera Face Gestures [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Face Gestures.Opera Face Gestures [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696396</id>
	<title>Back in the Day...</title>
	<author>JoeD</author>
	<datestamp>1262973480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone walked down the street talking to themselves and waving their arms around, everyone else would give them a wide berth and think they had something wrong with them...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone walked down the street talking to themselves and waving their arms around , everyone else would give them a wide berth and think they had something wrong with them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone walked down the street talking to themselves and waving their arms around, everyone else would give them a wide berth and think they had something wrong with them...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701668</id>
	<title>Re:Control apps with your ass!</title>
	<author>hack  slash</author>
	<datestamp>1262952840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's already a female version on the market: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qsWy9r\_EuA" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qsWy9r\_EuA</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a female version on the market : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 7qsWy9r \ _EuA [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a female version on the market: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qsWy9r\_EuA [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30700374</id>
	<title>Ironically, no arm waving in the article</title>
	<author>TomRC</author>
	<datestamp>1262946540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ironically, the technology being announced has absolutely nothing to do with waving arms or using hands or even fingers to make gestures.</p><p>The "eyemo" technology enabled for Android uses the camera to detect movement of the phone.  Yes, to move your phone you'll probably hold it in your hand and move it around a little, for those who love to nit-pick.</p><p>The arm waving apparently originated wholly in the mind of the original poster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , the technology being announced has absolutely nothing to do with waving arms or using hands or even fingers to make gestures.The " eyemo " technology enabled for Android uses the camera to detect movement of the phone .
Yes , to move your phone you 'll probably hold it in your hand and move it around a little , for those who love to nit-pick.The arm waving apparently originated wholly in the mind of the original poster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, the technology being announced has absolutely nothing to do with waving arms or using hands or even fingers to make gestures.The "eyemo" technology enabled for Android uses the camera to detect movement of the phone.
Yes, to move your phone you'll probably hold it in your hand and move it around a little, for those who love to nit-pick.The arm waving apparently originated wholly in the mind of the original poster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695568</id>
	<title>Etch-a-Sketch?</title>
	<author>FrozenGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1262970480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:  "...shake the handset..."   So we really have gone back to the etch-a-sketch?   (FWIW, about 10 years ago, when a friend of mine was promoted [demoted?] to a management position, I bought him a new "management laptop" aka an Etch-a-Sketch.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " ...shake the handset... " So we really have gone back to the etch-a-sketch ?
( FWIW , about 10 years ago , when a friend of mine was promoted [ demoted ?
] to a management position , I bought him a new " management laptop " aka an Etch-a-Sketch .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:  "...shake the handset..."   So we really have gone back to the etch-a-sketch?
(FWIW, about 10 years ago, when a friend of mine was promoted [demoted?
] to a management position, I bought him a new "management laptop" aka an Etch-a-Sketch.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695346</id>
	<title>Sounds tiring</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1262969700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would anyone think it would be easier to control a device with big unwieldy arms instead of small light dexterous fingers?  Also, I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would anyone think it would be easier to control a device with big unwieldy arms instead of small light dexterous fingers ?
Also , I have 2 arms and 10 fingers , seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would anyone think it would be easier to control a device with big unwieldy arms instead of small light dexterous fingers?
Also, I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695580</id>
	<title>The ancients knew it all along.</title>
	<author>abhishekupadhya</author>
	<datestamp>1262970540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the YMCA dance will be used to control apps now.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y.M.C.A.\_(song)#Origin\_of\_hand\_movement\_and\_dance" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y.M.C.A.\_(song)#Origin\_of\_hand\_movement\_and\_dance</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the YMCA dance will be used to control apps now .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y.M.C.A. \ _ ( song ) # Origin \ _of \ _hand \ _movement \ _and \ _dance [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the YMCA dance will be used to control apps now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y.M.C.A.\_(song)#Origin\_of\_hand\_movement\_and\_dance [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697260</id>
	<title>What, you kidding?  This would be great!</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1262977020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will be so much more entertaining to watch than all the sad, tired commuters on the bus I see every day.  It will be like weird interpretive hand dances going on all the time, with people occasionally getting frustrated and swinging their fingers faster and faster.  Someone will be touching their screen, and the person next to them will develop a smug look on their face, and you know they're thinking "Freakin newbies".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be so much more entertaining to watch than all the sad , tired commuters on the bus I see every day .
It will be like weird interpretive hand dances going on all the time , with people occasionally getting frustrated and swinging their fingers faster and faster .
Someone will be touching their screen , and the person next to them will develop a smug look on their face , and you know they 're thinking " Freakin newbies " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be so much more entertaining to watch than all the sad, tired commuters on the bus I see every day.
It will be like weird interpretive hand dances going on all the time, with people occasionally getting frustrated and swinging their fingers faster and faster.
Someone will be touching their screen, and the person next to them will develop a smug look on their face, and you know they're thinking "Freakin newbies".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696684</id>
	<title>Works for me</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1262974620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>or shake the handset</p></div><p>Works on my Blackberry like a charm, every time I throw it against the wall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or shake the handsetWorks on my Blackberry like a charm , every time I throw it against the wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or shake the handsetWorks on my Blackberry like a charm, every time I throw it against the wall.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696904</id>
	<title>making Facebook easier!</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1262975520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, to de-friend someone on Facebook or Twitter, all you'll have to do is to flip the bird to your cell phone or computer? Sounds like a WIN to me!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , to de-friend someone on Facebook or Twitter , all you 'll have to do is to flip the bird to your cell phone or computer ?
Sounds like a WIN to me !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, to de-friend someone on Facebook or Twitter, all you'll have to do is to flip the bird to your cell phone or computer?
Sounds like a WIN to me!
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696950</id>
	<title>Re:gesture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262975760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, there are places in the US that still have obscenity laws, which cover naughty words and obscene gestures.  People can be, and have been, arrested for violating such laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , there are places in the US that still have obscenity laws , which cover naughty words and obscene gestures .
People can be , and have been , arrested for violating such laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, there are places in the US that still have obscenity laws, which cover naughty words and obscene gestures.
People can be, and have been, arrested for violating such laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30698938</id>
	<title>G-sensor</title>
	<author>HyperQuantum</author>
	<datestamp>1262984040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>makes me wonder what happens if you move it too close to a G-spot...</htmltext>
<tokenext>makes me wonder what happens if you move it too close to a G-spot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>makes me wonder what happens if you move it too close to a G-spot...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697448</id>
	<title>G-sensor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262977800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some women have a very sensitive G-sensor, the G-spot. Although some argue that it does not exist.......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some women have a very sensitive G-sensor , the G-spot .
Although some argue that it does not exist...... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some women have a very sensitive G-sensor, the G-spot.
Although some argue that it does not exist.......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701310</id>
	<title>What could go wrong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262950920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't get a mouse or touchpad to work reliably. This should be far:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Better<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Worse<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Input not understood. Please turn off device and restart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't get a mouse or touchpad to work reliably .
This should be far :         * Better         * Worse         * Input not understood .
Please turn off device and restart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't get a mouse or touchpad to work reliably.
This should be far:
        * Better
        * Worse
        * Input not understood.
Please turn off device and restart.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695426</id>
	<title>More effort required</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1262969940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm willing to bet that using such a device will require more effort to use than say a trackball or mouse. <br> <br>

Trackball - move your fingers<br>
Mouse - move your hand<br>
Touch screen / gesture thing - move your arm<br>
Motion based gaming thing - move everything<br> <br>

Sure all these gesture things are great for games and helping fatties lose weight but for ordinary folk who actually need to use it for a large part of their day it will just cause gorilla arm <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla\_arm#Gorilla\_Arm" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla\_arm#Gorilla\_Arm</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm willing to bet that using such a device will require more effort to use than say a trackball or mouse .
Trackball - move your fingers Mouse - move your hand Touch screen / gesture thing - move your arm Motion based gaming thing - move everything Sure all these gesture things are great for games and helping fatties lose weight but for ordinary folk who actually need to use it for a large part of their day it will just cause gorilla arm http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla \ _arm # Gorilla \ _Arm [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm willing to bet that using such a device will require more effort to use than say a trackball or mouse.
Trackball - move your fingers
Mouse - move your hand
Touch screen / gesture thing - move your arm
Motion based gaming thing - move everything 

Sure all these gesture things are great for games and helping fatties lose weight but for ordinary folk who actually need to use it for a large part of their day it will just cause gorilla arm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla\_arm#Gorilla\_Arm [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696026</id>
	<title>And look like a fool while at it...</title>
	<author>georgemoot</author>
	<datestamp>1262972040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen some people furiously shake their iPhone, on purpose.  When asked what they're doing, they say that shaking makes the App do a "refresh", only it doesn't always register the command, so they have to do it again.  You know what I do to make an app refresh it's content?  I hit the refresh button with my finger, which has benefits including, but not limited to: not looking like a fool, not accidentally launching my phone across the room, not requiring an order of magnitude more energy to perform, and oh, did I mention not looking like a fool?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen some people furiously shake their iPhone , on purpose .
When asked what they 're doing , they say that shaking makes the App do a " refresh " , only it does n't always register the command , so they have to do it again .
You know what I do to make an app refresh it 's content ?
I hit the refresh button with my finger , which has benefits including , but not limited to : not looking like a fool , not accidentally launching my phone across the room , not requiring an order of magnitude more energy to perform , and oh , did I mention not looking like a fool ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen some people furiously shake their iPhone, on purpose.
When asked what they're doing, they say that shaking makes the App do a "refresh", only it doesn't always register the command, so they have to do it again.
You know what I do to make an app refresh it's content?
I hit the refresh button with my finger, which has benefits including, but not limited to: not looking like a fool, not accidentally launching my phone across the room, not requiring an order of magnitude more energy to perform, and oh, did I mention not looking like a fool?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696746</id>
	<title>i don't buy it.</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1262974920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The g-sensor is a myth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The g-sensor is a myth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The g-sensor is a myth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695474</id>
	<title>"Non-startup"?</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1262970120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, pray tell, does that mean? They had to start up at some point. Or do they just mean "we're on the up and up, honest, guvnor, we're not some fly by night outfit, nosiree, we've been around ages"? In which case calling attention to it has a shade of "the lady doth protest too much".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , pray tell , does that mean ?
They had to start up at some point .
Or do they just mean " we 're on the up and up , honest , guvnor , we 're not some fly by night outfit , nosiree , we 've been around ages " ?
In which case calling attention to it has a shade of " the lady doth protest too much " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, pray tell, does that mean?
They had to start up at some point.
Or do they just mean "we're on the up and up, honest, guvnor, we're not some fly by night outfit, nosiree, we've been around ages"?
In which case calling attention to it has a shade of "the lady doth protest too much".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696736</id>
	<title>Re:gesture</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1262974860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hand gesture recognition? I seem to remember an <a href="http://www.nesfanz.com/accessories/images/powerglove.jpg" title="nesfanz.com">early prototype of this</a> [nesfanz.com] a while back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hand gesture recognition ?
I seem to remember an early prototype of this [ nesfanz.com ] a while back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hand gesture recognition?
I seem to remember an early prototype of this [nesfanz.com] a while back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695626</id>
	<title>Re:dialing wand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262970660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>learn2stylus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>learn2stylus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>learn2stylus</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695826</id>
	<title>next killer app -- oil-repelling screen coating</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1262971320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>touchscreens get absolutely disgusting after a day's use. Looks like I rubbed a pepperoni pizza all over it and this is with clean hands. Humans are oily, disgusting meat sacks. Developing a smudge-phobia where once I had none.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>touchscreens get absolutely disgusting after a day 's use .
Looks like I rubbed a pepperoni pizza all over it and this is with clean hands .
Humans are oily , disgusting meat sacks .
Developing a smudge-phobia where once I had none .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>touchscreens get absolutely disgusting after a day's use.
Looks like I rubbed a pepperoni pizza all over it and this is with clean hands.
Humans are oily, disgusting meat sacks.
Developing a smudge-phobia where once I had none.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376</id>
	<title>So everyone will soon look like</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Elaine dancing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Elaine dancing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Elaine dancing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696146</id>
	<title>New control device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262972460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A new control device will be unveiled...called a STYLUS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A new control device will be unveiled...called a STYLUS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A new control device will be unveiled...called a STYLUS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30700280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_08_1455236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30700280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696950
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30701194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30696482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30699310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30697182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_08_1455236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_08_1455236.30695502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
