<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_07_2316237</id>
	<title>USGS Develops Twitter-Based Earthquake Detection</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1262867580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>sprinkletown writes <i>"A team of seismologists at the US Geological Survey has found that Twitter is the fastest way to get information out of an earthquake area, especially in those less densely populated. Seeing the Twitter community as an untapped resource, the USGS has developed a new way to <a href="http://ecopolitology.org/2010/01/07/usgs-develops-twitter-based-earthquake-detection-system/">track earthquakes by clustering quake-centric tweets</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>sprinkletown writes " A team of seismologists at the US Geological Survey has found that Twitter is the fastest way to get information out of an earthquake area , especially in those less densely populated .
Seeing the Twitter community as an untapped resource , the USGS has developed a new way to track earthquakes by clustering quake-centric tweets .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sprinkletown writes "A team of seismologists at the US Geological Survey has found that Twitter is the fastest way to get information out of an earthquake area, especially in those less densely populated.
Seeing the Twitter community as an untapped resource, the USGS has developed a new way to track earthquakes by clustering quake-centric tweets.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691796</id>
	<title>Re:A real purpose to Twitter</title>
	<author>Facegarden</author>
	<datestamp>1262941620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously.  This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.</p><p>It's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast.   Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is. Or how much a bastard Billy is, oh but he's such a hunk. Or what color Aston K's turds are.</p><p>Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying.</p></div><p>OMG, Malinda is SUCH a skank!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.It 's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast .
Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is .
Or how much a bastard Billy is , oh but he 's such a hunk .
Or what color Aston K 's turds are.Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying.OMG , Malinda is SUCH a skank !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.It's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast.
Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is.
Or how much a bastard Billy is, oh but he's such a hunk.
Or what color Aston K's turds are.Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying.OMG, Malinda is SUCH a skank!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691502</id>
	<title>The evil donut</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1262980800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been thinking that if there is a really big
one, we'll see a "donut" pattern when you map the data.
</p><p>This mornings 4.1 (which I felt) was exciting, and
tweet-worthy.  The BIG ONE will not be tweeted near
the epicenter.  The power will go out.  Even if it doesn't
go out, you'll have better things to do.</p><p>Eventually the power would come back on and the hole
would fill in; but I would think that the existance of
the hole in the data would be one indicator of how strong
the quake really is.</p><p>Has this ever been observed before in "crowdsourced"
quake data?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been thinking that if there is a really big one , we 'll see a " donut " pattern when you map the data .
This mornings 4.1 ( which I felt ) was exciting , and tweet-worthy .
The BIG ONE will not be tweeted near the epicenter .
The power will go out .
Even if it does n't go out , you 'll have better things to do.Eventually the power would come back on and the hole would fill in ; but I would think that the existance of the hole in the data would be one indicator of how strong the quake really is.Has this ever been observed before in " crowdsourced " quake data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been thinking that if there is a really big
one, we'll see a "donut" pattern when you map the data.
This mornings 4.1 (which I felt) was exciting, and
tweet-worthy.
The BIG ONE will not be tweeted near
the epicenter.
The power will go out.
Even if it doesn't
go out, you'll have better things to do.Eventually the power would come back on and the hole
would fill in; but I would think that the existance of
the hole in the data would be one indicator of how strong
the quake really is.Has this ever been observed before in "crowdsourced"
quake data?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690094</id>
	<title>Quake Trolls</title>
	<author>grayshirtninja</author>
	<datestamp>1262876040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before a group of trolls picks up on this and starts creating false reports?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before a group of trolls picks up on this and starts creating false reports ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before a group of trolls picks up on this and starts creating false reports?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689868</id>
	<title>Re:Able to use a phone post earthquake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think about the areas surrounding the really damaged area.  If you notice a bunch of tweets coming from around an area, but not a particular area, you could still determine the approximate location of the quake.  Just because it's a 7.0 in one city, doesn't mean it's still a 7.0 miles away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about the areas surrounding the really damaged area .
If you notice a bunch of tweets coming from around an area , but not a particular area , you could still determine the approximate location of the quake .
Just because it 's a 7.0 in one city , does n't mean it 's still a 7.0 miles away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about the areas surrounding the really damaged area.
If you notice a bunch of tweets coming from around an area, but not a particular area, you could still determine the approximate location of the quake.
Just because it's a 7.0 in one city, doesn't mean it's still a 7.0 miles away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689746</id>
	<title>HELP ME!! I'M BURNING!!</title>
	<author>ClintJCL</author>
	<datestamp>1262872320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690192</id>
	<title>Re:Able to use a phone post earthquake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262877000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I concur.  I was 0.7 miles away from the epicenter of the Northridge quake.  The house became completely dark during the quake where street lighting and nightlights had provided at least some light before it started -- however it was certainly not silent.  The crashing sounds of breakage continued throughout the shaking.  During the first few seconds of the "aftermath", in absolute darkness and only the sounds of automobile theft alarms, I noted that the pictures from the walls had scattered layers of glass everywhere.  Walking in bare feet in the dark would be incredibly stupid.  I was beginning to think I wouldn't find a solution, when startlingly the dial-button lights of my telephone lit up.  No dial tone, however.  In the light of the dial buttons I could easily find slippers and plot where to step to reach the closet where a flashlight could be found inside of a backpack.  I left the telephone off-hook on the bed for maximum light.  I walked through the flashlight darkness to go turn off the gas and water valves leading to the to the water heater.  I couldn't get through the kitchen -- the layer of glass and ceramic chards was at least six inches thick from wall-to-wall, I could hear dripping noises and see erupting cans of soda.  When I returned the bedroom, the telephone was no longer lit up.  About 30 seconds later it lit up and there was an audible dial tone.  I made two quick phone calls -- connected to two different family members -- and talked for a few seconds to each.  We were not able to complete another telephone call until about 12 hours later.  Travel by car was not reasonable for a couple of days from my street as every hundred feet or so the pavement was displaced so there was an 8-10" rise or drop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I concur .
I was 0.7 miles away from the epicenter of the Northridge quake .
The house became completely dark during the quake where street lighting and nightlights had provided at least some light before it started -- however it was certainly not silent .
The crashing sounds of breakage continued throughout the shaking .
During the first few seconds of the " aftermath " , in absolute darkness and only the sounds of automobile theft alarms , I noted that the pictures from the walls had scattered layers of glass everywhere .
Walking in bare feet in the dark would be incredibly stupid .
I was beginning to think I would n't find a solution , when startlingly the dial-button lights of my telephone lit up .
No dial tone , however .
In the light of the dial buttons I could easily find slippers and plot where to step to reach the closet where a flashlight could be found inside of a backpack .
I left the telephone off-hook on the bed for maximum light .
I walked through the flashlight darkness to go turn off the gas and water valves leading to the to the water heater .
I could n't get through the kitchen -- the layer of glass and ceramic chards was at least six inches thick from wall-to-wall , I could hear dripping noises and see erupting cans of soda .
When I returned the bedroom , the telephone was no longer lit up .
About 30 seconds later it lit up and there was an audible dial tone .
I made two quick phone calls -- connected to two different family members -- and talked for a few seconds to each .
We were not able to complete another telephone call until about 12 hours later .
Travel by car was not reasonable for a couple of days from my street as every hundred feet or so the pavement was displaced so there was an 8-10 " rise or drop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I concur.
I was 0.7 miles away from the epicenter of the Northridge quake.
The house became completely dark during the quake where street lighting and nightlights had provided at least some light before it started -- however it was certainly not silent.
The crashing sounds of breakage continued throughout the shaking.
During the first few seconds of the "aftermath", in absolute darkness and only the sounds of automobile theft alarms, I noted that the pictures from the walls had scattered layers of glass everywhere.
Walking in bare feet in the dark would be incredibly stupid.
I was beginning to think I wouldn't find a solution, when startlingly the dial-button lights of my telephone lit up.
No dial tone, however.
In the light of the dial buttons I could easily find slippers and plot where to step to reach the closet where a flashlight could be found inside of a backpack.
I left the telephone off-hook on the bed for maximum light.
I walked through the flashlight darkness to go turn off the gas and water valves leading to the to the water heater.
I couldn't get through the kitchen -- the layer of glass and ceramic chards was at least six inches thick from wall-to-wall, I could hear dripping noises and see erupting cans of soda.
When I returned the bedroom, the telephone was no longer lit up.
About 30 seconds later it lit up and there was an audible dial tone.
I made two quick phone calls -- connected to two different family members -- and talked for a few seconds to each.
We were not able to complete another telephone call until about 12 hours later.
Travel by car was not reasonable for a couple of days from my street as every hundred feet or so the pavement was displaced so there was an 8-10" rise or drop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30694126</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Sfing\_ter</author>
	<datestamp>1262965080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shakin' it over here Boss, Shakin' it over here!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shakin ' it over here Boss , Shakin ' it over here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shakin' it over here Boss, Shakin' it over here!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690506</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter as a news search engine</title>
	<author>cortesoft</author>
	<datestamp>1262880720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely agree.  I have only posted tweets for work purposes (an app we wrote has twitter support.... as everything does these days), but I search on twitter whenever I am trying to figure out up to the minute info on an event.</p><p>For example, a couple of days ago the police had a road near my house blocked off, and with a quick twitter search, I was able to learn that there were police and SWAT teams chasing a burglary suspect, and there were even posted pictures of the guy being taken into custody... all posted on twitter within a few minutes.</p><p>Twitter is perfect for that type of search, and up until now there has been nothing else that can satisfy that sort of up-to-date information gathering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree .
I have only posted tweets for work purposes ( an app we wrote has twitter support.... as everything does these days ) , but I search on twitter whenever I am trying to figure out up to the minute info on an event.For example , a couple of days ago the police had a road near my house blocked off , and with a quick twitter search , I was able to learn that there were police and SWAT teams chasing a burglary suspect , and there were even posted pictures of the guy being taken into custody... all posted on twitter within a few minutes.Twitter is perfect for that type of search , and up until now there has been nothing else that can satisfy that sort of up-to-date information gathering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree.
I have only posted tweets for work purposes (an app we wrote has twitter support.... as everything does these days), but I search on twitter whenever I am trying to figure out up to the minute info on an event.For example, a couple of days ago the police had a road near my house blocked off, and with a quick twitter search, I was able to learn that there were police and SWAT teams chasing a burglary suspect, and there were even posted pictures of the guy being taken into custody... all posted on twitter within a few minutes.Twitter is perfect for that type of search, and up until now there has been nothing else that can satisfy that sort of up-to-date information gathering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690352</id>
	<title>geologists</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1262878800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>figures they would come up with such a horribly flawed plan. i remmeber the chief geo at a place i worked trying to explain to me how geologists weren't trained to think in uni, and how that's a good thing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>figures they would come up with such a horribly flawed plan .
i remmeber the chief geo at a place i worked trying to explain to me how geologists were n't trained to think in uni , and how that 's a good thing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>figures they would come up with such a horribly flawed plan.
i remmeber the chief geo at a place i worked trying to explain to me how geologists weren't trained to think in uni, and how that's a good thing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690728</id>
	<title>Re:Accelerometer Quake Detection</title>
	<author>Titoxd</author>
	<datestamp>1262883480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A automated, networked, accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable. Sure, a lot of mobile phones would be moving around, but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements, maybe this could work.</p></div><p>Are you donating the resources to do that sort of data processing? There are a <i>lot</i> of cell phones out there, so you'd need a way of transmitting and accessing all that data (if you DO have an earthquake in the area, the communications lines will be either down or saturated, so you have to take that into account). Then, you'd need a way of determining which synchronized movements match a pattern, and not just random noise; then, finally, to determine whether the patterns are quake-related or not. (See those two isolated phones that are moving at a 0.75 Hz rate in perfect synchrony? It's not a quake, it's a couple dry humping in the middle of nowhere...) On top, you'd need to find a way of telling people that the tracking is not invasive of their privacy. Not sure how that would work out...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A automated , networked , accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable .
Sure , a lot of mobile phones would be moving around , but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements , maybe this could work.Are you donating the resources to do that sort of data processing ?
There are a lot of cell phones out there , so you 'd need a way of transmitting and accessing all that data ( if you DO have an earthquake in the area , the communications lines will be either down or saturated , so you have to take that into account ) .
Then , you 'd need a way of determining which synchronized movements match a pattern , and not just random noise ; then , finally , to determine whether the patterns are quake-related or not .
( See those two isolated phones that are moving at a 0.75 Hz rate in perfect synchrony ?
It 's not a quake , it 's a couple dry humping in the middle of nowhere... ) On top , you 'd need to find a way of telling people that the tracking is not invasive of their privacy .
Not sure how that would work out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A automated, networked, accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable.
Sure, a lot of mobile phones would be moving around, but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements, maybe this could work.Are you donating the resources to do that sort of data processing?
There are a lot of cell phones out there, so you'd need a way of transmitting and accessing all that data (if you DO have an earthquake in the area, the communications lines will be either down or saturated, so you have to take that into account).
Then, you'd need a way of determining which synchronized movements match a pattern, and not just random noise; then, finally, to determine whether the patterns are quake-related or not.
(See those two isolated phones that are moving at a 0.75 Hz rate in perfect synchrony?
It's not a quake, it's a couple dry humping in the middle of nowhere...) On top, you'd need to find a way of telling people that the tracking is not invasive of their privacy.
Not sure how that would work out...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690068</id>
	<title>A real purpose to Twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.  This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.</p><p>It's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast.   Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is. Or how much a bastard Billy is, oh but he's such a hunk. Or what color Aston K's turds are.</p><p>Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.It 's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast .
Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is .
Or how much a bastard Billy is , oh but he 's such a hunk .
Or what color Aston K 's turds are.Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
This is the sort of thing twitter is really good at.It's not knowing what Britney is eating for breakfast.
Or how much a SKANK Malinda next door is.
Or how much a bastard Billy is, oh but he's such a hunk.
Or what color Aston K's turds are.Thank goodness twitter popularity is dying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691300</id>
	<title>Data API</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1262891880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just wish the earthquake data provided by the USGS was available through a web API. XML, JSON, whatever. I poked around and there's some quake data available through various obscure programs or protocols, but nothing easy to get at. Nothing I could find, anyway. Maybe someone else knows of something more useful?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish the earthquake data provided by the USGS was available through a web API .
XML , JSON , whatever .
I poked around and there 's some quake data available through various obscure programs or protocols , but nothing easy to get at .
Nothing I could find , anyway .
Maybe someone else knows of something more useful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wish the earthquake data provided by the USGS was available through a web API.
XML, JSON, whatever.
I poked around and there's some quake data available through various obscure programs or protocols, but nothing easy to get at.
Nothing I could find, anyway.
Maybe someone else knows of something more useful?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689634</id>
	<title>Thats a great idea</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1262871420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter users can be repurposed as sensors for vibration, voltage and even temperature!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter users can be repurposed as sensors for vibration , voltage and even temperature !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter users can be repurposed as sensors for vibration, voltage and even temperature!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690028</id>
	<title>False hits?</title>
	<author>Psaakyrn</author>
	<datestamp>1262875260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter has also been know for false hits as well though, so how can one prevent such a situation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter has also been know for false hits as well though , so how can one prevent such a situation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter has also been know for false hits as well though, so how can one prevent such a situation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691118</id>
	<title>Good!!</title>
	<author>oliverbrown</author>
	<datestamp>1262889240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a good news!! This is a step in the right direction. It will help in reducing the loss of life.
<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Force-Factor-Reviews---Do-Force-Factor-Supplements-Work?&amp;id=2921490" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">http://ezinearticles.com/?Force-Factor-Reviews---Do-Force-Factor-Supplements-Work?&amp;id=2921490</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a good news ! !
This is a step in the right direction .
It will help in reducing the loss of life .
http : //ezinearticles.com/ ? Force-Factor-Reviews---Do-Force-Factor-Supplements-Work ? &amp;id = 2921490 [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a good news!!
This is a step in the right direction.
It will help in reducing the loss of life.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Force-Factor-Reviews---Do-Force-Factor-Supplements-Work?&amp;id=2921490 [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690314</id>
	<title>Build your own earthquake reflector</title>
	<author>i\_want\_you\_to\_throw\_</author>
	<datestamp>1262878380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're handy with a soldering iron the you should build this nifty <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/The-Seismic-Reflector/" title="instructables.com">Seismic Reflector</a> [instructables.com]. From the website...<br> <br>
<i>This project has two strands, a software and a hardware component. The aim is to build a device which responds to earthquakes being reported in near-real time via the USGS RSS feeds. The device responds by illustrating the magnitude of the reported earthquake via two fairly chunky vibration motors of the kind used in video game controllers. The device is connected to a PC via a virtual com port over USB (thanks to an on board Arduino). On the PC, an application sits there checking the RSS feed periodically and when a new event it posted to the RSS feed, the desktop app parses the data out of it and presents the magnitude of the quake to the Arduino which interpreters this as rate at which to activate the vibration motors. </i></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're handy with a soldering iron the you should build this nifty Seismic Reflector [ instructables.com ] .
From the website.. . This project has two strands , a software and a hardware component .
The aim is to build a device which responds to earthquakes being reported in near-real time via the USGS RSS feeds .
The device responds by illustrating the magnitude of the reported earthquake via two fairly chunky vibration motors of the kind used in video game controllers .
The device is connected to a PC via a virtual com port over USB ( thanks to an on board Arduino ) .
On the PC , an application sits there checking the RSS feed periodically and when a new event it posted to the RSS feed , the desktop app parses the data out of it and presents the magnitude of the quake to the Arduino which interpreters this as rate at which to activate the vibration motors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're handy with a soldering iron the you should build this nifty Seismic Reflector [instructables.com].
From the website... 
This project has two strands, a software and a hardware component.
The aim is to build a device which responds to earthquakes being reported in near-real time via the USGS RSS feeds.
The device responds by illustrating the magnitude of the reported earthquake via two fairly chunky vibration motors of the kind used in video game controllers.
The device is connected to a PC via a virtual com port over USB (thanks to an on board Arduino).
On the PC, an application sits there checking the RSS feed periodically and when a new event it posted to the RSS feed, the desktop app parses the data out of it and presents the magnitude of the quake to the Arduino which interpreters this as rate at which to activate the vibration motors. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691154</id>
	<title>Re:Accelerometer Quake Detection</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1262890020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already such a project underway from Stanford: <a href="http://qcn.stanford.edu/" title="stanford.edu">http://qcn.stanford.edu/</a> [stanford.edu]. Doesn't extend to phones yet (as far as I know, though they're probably working on it) but will use the accelerometer in MacBooks, Thinkpads, other laptops that may have them, or you can get a USB attachment that has one for desktop computers. Works essentially as you describe.</p><p>Phones might be tough because they move around a lot with the person who carries it, but would be especially useful because if they've got an accelerometer it's likely they also have a GPS unit and a way to tell which direction it's pointing, which you don't have on laptops. If people were in the habit of leaving their phone on their desk while they're sitting there, it could certainly be useful - you could just ignore those with a lot of motion because obviously the person is moving around with the phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already such a project underway from Stanford : http : //qcn.stanford.edu/ [ stanford.edu ] .
Does n't extend to phones yet ( as far as I know , though they 're probably working on it ) but will use the accelerometer in MacBooks , Thinkpads , other laptops that may have them , or you can get a USB attachment that has one for desktop computers .
Works essentially as you describe.Phones might be tough because they move around a lot with the person who carries it , but would be especially useful because if they 've got an accelerometer it 's likely they also have a GPS unit and a way to tell which direction it 's pointing , which you do n't have on laptops .
If people were in the habit of leaving their phone on their desk while they 're sitting there , it could certainly be useful - you could just ignore those with a lot of motion because obviously the person is moving around with the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already such a project underway from Stanford: http://qcn.stanford.edu/ [stanford.edu].
Doesn't extend to phones yet (as far as I know, though they're probably working on it) but will use the accelerometer in MacBooks, Thinkpads, other laptops that may have them, or you can get a USB attachment that has one for desktop computers.
Works essentially as you describe.Phones might be tough because they move around a lot with the person who carries it, but would be especially useful because if they've got an accelerometer it's likely they also have a GPS unit and a way to tell which direction it's pointing, which you don't have on laptops.
If people were in the habit of leaving their phone on their desk while they're sitting there, it could certainly be useful - you could just ignore those with a lot of motion because obviously the person is moving around with the phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690032</id>
	<title>Faking the next San Fransisco earthquake, anyone?</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1262875260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a really bad idea because Twitter can so easily be utilized to spread misinformation. Look at all the "x is dead!!!!!!!!!!!!" shit that happens with celebrities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a really bad idea because Twitter can so easily be utilized to spread misinformation .
Look at all the " x is dead ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
" shit that happens with celebrities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a really bad idea because Twitter can so easily be utilized to spread misinformation.
Look at all the "x is dead!!!!!!!!!!!!
" shit that happens with celebrities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30695178</id>
	<title>I have lived in first person a twitted-quake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262969160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last month there was an earthquake ("terremoto" in spanish) in the South West of Spain and Portugal at 2:37 AM (local time=. Ten minutes later there were dozens of people twitting the event. Twitter was very fast and the primary source of information.<br>It was also blogged live: http://www.madeinhuelva.es/2009/12/terremoto-en-huelva-y-sevilla/</p><p>The second source of information was the USGS directly.</p><p>The third source of information were the radio stations, were people started to make phone calls providing information of the event.</p><p>Finally, a couple of hours later, the information appeared on national online newspapers.</p><p>So, definitely, Twitter+Blogs inform much better in real time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last month there was an earthquake ( " terremoto " in spanish ) in the South West of Spain and Portugal at 2 : 37 AM ( local time = .
Ten minutes later there were dozens of people twitting the event .
Twitter was very fast and the primary source of information.It was also blogged live : http : //www.madeinhuelva.es/2009/12/terremoto-en-huelva-y-sevilla/The second source of information was the USGS directly.The third source of information were the radio stations , were people started to make phone calls providing information of the event.Finally , a couple of hours later , the information appeared on national online newspapers.So , definitely , Twitter + Blogs inform much better in real time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last month there was an earthquake ("terremoto" in spanish) in the South West of Spain and Portugal at 2:37 AM (local time=.
Ten minutes later there were dozens of people twitting the event.
Twitter was very fast and the primary source of information.It was also blogged live: http://www.madeinhuelva.es/2009/12/terremoto-en-huelva-y-sevilla/The second source of information was the USGS directly.The third source of information were the radio stations, were people started to make phone calls providing information of the event.Finally, a couple of hours later, the information appeared on national online newspapers.So, definitely, Twitter+Blogs inform much better in real time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30705820</id>
	<title>Good use of twitter</title>
	<author>vtstarin</author>
	<datestamp>1263030840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This a really very good use of twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This a really very good use of twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This a really very good use of twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689852</id>
	<title>Re:Able to use a phone post earthquake</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1262873160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bingo. In a real quake, infrastructure to support the mobile phones may get knocked out, and if not, it will surely be overloaded. Radio FTW.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo .
In a real quake , infrastructure to support the mobile phones may get knocked out , and if not , it will surely be overloaded .
Radio FTW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo.
In a real quake, infrastructure to support the mobile phones may get knocked out, and if not, it will surely be overloaded.
Radio FTW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689772</id>
	<title>Posting news at the speed of Slashdot</title>
	<author>tautog</author>
	<datestamp>1262872500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even NPR scooped Slashdot this time:</p><p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121448432" title="npr.org" rel="nofollow">From December 14, 2009</a> [npr.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even NPR scooped Slashdot this time : From December 14 , 2009 [ npr.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even NPR scooped Slashdot this time:From December 14, 2009 [npr.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691344</id>
	<title>Ironic name</title>
	<author>AthanasiusKircher</author>
	<datestamp>1262892420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the Oxford English Dictionary:<p><div class="quote"><p>TWITTER
<br>...<br>
3. <i>intr.</i> To move tremulously, tremble, shake, quiver, shiver...</p></div><p>So, for an alternative article summary: the USGS will use twitterers on Twitter who are twittering about <i>twittering</i>.
<br> <br>
[cue chorus of groans]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Oxford English Dictionary : TWITTER .. . 3. intr .
To move tremulously , tremble , shake , quiver , shiver...So , for an alternative article summary : the USGS will use twitterers on Twitter who are twittering about twittering .
[ cue chorus of groans ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Oxford English Dictionary:TWITTER
...
3. intr.
To move tremulously, tremble, shake, quiver, shiver...So, for an alternative article summary: the USGS will use twitterers on Twitter who are twittering about twittering.
[cue chorus of groans]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690078</id>
	<title>You could combine this with a flashmob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And drown a bunch of wankers in a tsunami.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And drown a bunch of wankers in a tsunami .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And drown a bunch of wankers in a tsunami.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689762</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter as a news search engine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262872440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information</p></div><p>
The data, it seems, is quite frugal<br>
When I type 'earthquake' into searchbar Google<br>
The info, surprisingly, is much quicker and fitter<br>
When I hear about it from that obnoxious source Twitter<br>
Of course, only when anxious I'd do a desperate thing<br>
And secretly type my query in Bing</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information The data , it seems , is quite frugal When I type 'earthquake ' into searchbar Google The info , surprisingly , is much quicker and fitter When I hear about it from that obnoxious source Twitter Of course , only when anxious I 'd do a desperate thing And secretly type my query in Bing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information
The data, it seems, is quite frugal
When I type 'earthquake' into searchbar Google
The info, surprisingly, is much quicker and fitter
When I hear about it from that obnoxious source Twitter
Of course, only when anxious I'd do a desperate thing
And secretly type my query in Bing
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30693490</id>
	<title>Re:Faking the next San Fransisco earthquake, anyon</title>
	<author>forand</author>
	<datestamp>1262961480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think that they are going to use this to announce an earthquake but to determine location and propagation parameters. Their sensors can tell them for certain IF a quake hit long before twitter will say anything but they need to correlate other measurements to get a good location estimation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that they are going to use this to announce an earthquake but to determine location and propagation parameters .
Their sensors can tell them for certain IF a quake hit long before twitter will say anything but they need to correlate other measurements to get a good location estimation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that they are going to use this to announce an earthquake but to determine location and propagation parameters.
Their sensors can tell them for certain IF a quake hit long before twitter will say anything but they need to correlate other measurements to get a good location estimation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874</id>
	<title>Accelerometer Quake Detection</title>
	<author>sonamchauhan</author>
	<datestamp>1262873580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A automated, networked, accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable. Sure, a lot of mobile phones would be moving around, but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements, maybe this could work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A automated , networked , accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable .
Sure , a lot of mobile phones would be moving around , but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements , maybe this could work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A automated, networked, accelerometer-based quake detection process may be more reliable.
Sure, a lot of mobile phones would be moving around, but if enough phones in the same areas showed synchronised movements, maybe this could work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689604</id>
	<title>First post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262871180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Earth quake! Run!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Earth quake !
Run ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earth quake!
Run!!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689640</id>
	<title>survival law</title>
	<author>jweyrich</author>
	<datestamp>1262871480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always knew the whales were going to kill us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always knew the whales were going to kill us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always knew the whales were going to kill us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630</id>
	<title>Twitter as a news search engine</title>
	<author>eihab</author>
	<datestamp>1262871300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've used Twitter's search before (out of desperation) when my wife thought that we had an earth quake and I didn't.</p><p>To my surprise just 3 minutes later (time it took me to exhaust regular search engines), someone tweeted that they're having an earthquake a few miles away from where we live.</p><p>Since that day I've been using Twitter's search to find up to the minute updates for topics that interest me (Intel's SSD firmware bug, conferences, etc.).</p><p>I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information, if you can manage to find gems in the pile of "I just landed. WOOT!" tweets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've used Twitter 's search before ( out of desperation ) when my wife thought that we had an earth quake and I did n't.To my surprise just 3 minutes later ( time it took me to exhaust regular search engines ) , someone tweeted that they 're having an earthquake a few miles away from where we live.Since that day I 've been using Twitter 's search to find up to the minute updates for topics that interest me ( Intel 's SSD firmware bug , conferences , etc .
) .I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information , if you can manage to find gems in the pile of " I just landed .
WOOT ! " tweets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've used Twitter's search before (out of desperation) when my wife thought that we had an earth quake and I didn't.To my surprise just 3 minutes later (time it took me to exhaust regular search engines), someone tweeted that they're having an earthquake a few miles away from where we live.Since that day I've been using Twitter's search to find up to the minute updates for topics that interest me (Intel's SSD firmware bug, conferences, etc.
).I think Twitter is shaking up to be a very good source of news/information, if you can manage to find gems in the pile of "I just landed.
WOOT!" tweets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689710</id>
	<title>What a bunch of nitwits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262872080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You want the national emergency broadcast system to rely on twitter? WTF have the people at USGS been smoking?</p><p>I'd rather die than depend on twitter in any way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You want the national emergency broadcast system to rely on twitter ?
WTF have the people at USGS been smoking ? I 'd rather die than depend on twitter in any way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want the national emergency broadcast system to rely on twitter?
WTF have the people at USGS been smoking?I'd rather die than depend on twitter in any way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689846</id>
	<title>Re:Able to use a phone post earthquake</title>
	<author>frosty\_tsm</author>
	<datestamp>1262873160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new &mdash; at least in twitter years. People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July, 2008, after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls, they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app.</p></div><p>
I find this solution to be really silly.  After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994, no one in the area could even use the phones.  There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work.  The earthquake they're referring to was tiny in comparison.  People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on.</p></div><p>Except.. they say that instead of phones we should use SMS because it's impact on the wireless network is far lighter (see every<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ article about price gouging at 20 cents per 140 characters).  That said, if you are on AT&amp;T and wish to use twitter during an emergency good luck trying to get your slice of bandwidth.<br> <br>

"Help, my internet is down!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new    at least in twitter years .
People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July , 2008 , after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls , they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app .
I find this solution to be really silly .
After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994 , no one in the area could even use the phones .
There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work .
The earthquake they 're referring to was tiny in comparison .
People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on.Except.. they say that instead of phones we should use SMS because it 's impact on the wireless network is far lighter ( see every ./ article about price gouging at 20 cents per 140 characters ) .
That said , if you are on AT&amp;T and wish to use twitter during an emergency good luck trying to get your slice of bandwidth .
" Help , my internet is down !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new — at least in twitter years.
People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July, 2008, after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls, they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app.
I find this solution to be really silly.
After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994, no one in the area could even use the phones.
There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work.
The earthquake they're referring to was tiny in comparison.
People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on.Except.. they say that instead of phones we should use SMS because it's impact on the wireless network is far lighter (see every ./ article about price gouging at 20 cents per 140 characters).
That said, if you are on AT&amp;T and wish to use twitter during an emergency good luck trying to get your slice of bandwidth.
"Help, my internet is down!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760</id>
	<title>Able to use a phone post earthquake</title>
	<author>drexlor</author>
	<datestamp>1262872380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new &mdash; at least in twitter years. People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July, 2008, after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls, they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app.</p></div><p>
I find this solution to be really silly.  After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994, no one in the area could even use the phones.  There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work.  The earthquake they're referring to was tiny in comparison.  People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new    at least in twitter years .
People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July , 2008 , after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls , they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app .
I find this solution to be really silly .
After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994 , no one in the area could even use the phones .
There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work .
The earthquake they 're referring to was tiny in comparison .
People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweeting about earthquakes is hardly new — at least in twitter years.
People turned to twitter during an earthquake in Southern California in July, 2008, after they finding they were unable to make or receive any cell phone calls, they could still use twitter via SMS or another mobile twitter app.
I find this solution to be really silly.
After the Northridge Earthquake in Southern California in 1994, no one in the area could even use the phones.
There was too many people trying to make calls for anything to work.
The earthquake they're referring to was tiny in comparison.
People should be looking to a battery based radio or working with their neighbors to figure out what is going on.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30693490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_2316237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30693490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30695178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30689846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_2316237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30690068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_2316237.30691796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
