<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_07_053257</id>
	<title>PlayStation Network Expanding To Involve Other Devices</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1262893440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>At CES, Sony's Kaz Hirai confirmed that the company will <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3177522">build out its PlayStation Network for use with other devices</a>, such as televisions, Blu-ray players, and PCs. Quoting:
<i>"... the expansion starts next month with the availability of the PSN video store on these other devices, and Hirai explained they are constructing a mechanism to create a single user ID across the entire network (if you have a PSN account, it's good to go on any other applicable Sony device, and if you create one on another device, it'll work on PSN). And finally, Hirai also announced the formation of a new Sony division &mdash; called Sony Network Entertainment, Inc. &mdash; to drive this expansion of the PSN service into a Sony-wide network."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>At CES , Sony 's Kaz Hirai confirmed that the company will build out its PlayStation Network for use with other devices , such as televisions , Blu-ray players , and PCs .
Quoting : " ... the expansion starts next month with the availability of the PSN video store on these other devices , and Hirai explained they are constructing a mechanism to create a single user ID across the entire network ( if you have a PSN account , it 's good to go on any other applicable Sony device , and if you create one on another device , it 'll work on PSN ) .
And finally , Hirai also announced the formation of a new Sony division    called Sony Network Entertainment , Inc.    to drive this expansion of the PSN service into a Sony-wide network .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At CES, Sony's Kaz Hirai confirmed that the company will build out its PlayStation Network for use with other devices, such as televisions, Blu-ray players, and PCs.
Quoting:
"... the expansion starts next month with the availability of the PSN video store on these other devices, and Hirai explained they are constructing a mechanism to create a single user ID across the entire network (if you have a PSN account, it's good to go on any other applicable Sony device, and if you create one on another device, it'll work on PSN).
And finally, Hirai also announced the formation of a new Sony division — called Sony Network Entertainment, Inc. — to drive this expansion of the PSN service into a Sony-wide network.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30688656</id>
	<title>Wall-to-wall PSN store icons</title>
	<author>Chess Piece Face</author>
	<datestamp>1262864160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now instead of the 4 built in to the XMB, we can expect links to the store everywhere on every Sony device?  It's bad enough on the PS3 - I don't want to turn on my TV/Walkman/toaster and be taken directly to an outlet for overpriced downloads that I never wanted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now instead of the 4 built in to the XMB , we can expect links to the store everywhere on every Sony device ?
It 's bad enough on the PS3 - I do n't want to turn on my TV/Walkman/toaster and be taken directly to an outlet for overpriced downloads that I never wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now instead of the 4 built in to the XMB, we can expect links to the store everywhere on every Sony device?
It's bad enough on the PS3 - I don't want to turn on my TV/Walkman/toaster and be taken directly to an outlet for overpriced downloads that I never wanted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681072</id>
	<title>Facebook vs PSN</title>
	<author>michelcultivo</author>
	<datestamp>1262870940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now you can change your Single Sign On from Facebook to PSN. Great.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you can change your Single Sign On from Facebook to PSN .
Great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you can change your Single Sign On from Facebook to PSN.
Great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262860860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did everyone forget what Sony has done in the past? http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/business/media/19online.html</p><p>
&nbsp; I wouldn't give these people any of my information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did everyone forget what Sony has done in the past ?
http : //www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/business/media/19online.html   I would n't give these people any of my information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did everyone forget what Sony has done in the past?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/business/media/19online.html
  I wouldn't give these people any of my information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683250</id>
	<title>Re:More openness in consoles?</title>
	<author>khchung</author>
	<datestamp>1262883420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've long thought that consoles could be much better (from a user standpoint) if they were more open.</p></div><p>No way.</p><p>I played online games since modem days (PC-to-PC), to multiplayer BBS games, to the first Warcraft (remember Kali?), Starcraft, WC3, and most recently on PS3.  On all these platforms, only the online games on PS3 allow me to play with random opponents, yet still have the level of enjoyment I got when playing with my friends.  That is possible mainly <b>because</b> the PS3 is so lock down!</p><p>I.e., with the console locked tight, I can be reasonably certain no one is cheating.  This is a <b>big</b> problem on PC games, from auto-aim hack in FPS games, to map hacks in RTS games.  It is incredibly frustration to playing against one cheater after another.</p><p>Go play on the PC if you want open gaming platform.  I want a platform that I can be reasonable sure everyone is on the same footing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've long thought that consoles could be much better ( from a user standpoint ) if they were more open.No way.I played online games since modem days ( PC-to-PC ) , to multiplayer BBS games , to the first Warcraft ( remember Kali ?
) , Starcraft , WC3 , and most recently on PS3 .
On all these platforms , only the online games on PS3 allow me to play with random opponents , yet still have the level of enjoyment I got when playing with my friends .
That is possible mainly because the PS3 is so lock down ! I.e. , with the console locked tight , I can be reasonably certain no one is cheating .
This is a big problem on PC games , from auto-aim hack in FPS games , to map hacks in RTS games .
It is incredibly frustration to playing against one cheater after another.Go play on the PC if you want open gaming platform .
I want a platform that I can be reasonable sure everyone is on the same footing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've long thought that consoles could be much better (from a user standpoint) if they were more open.No way.I played online games since modem days (PC-to-PC), to multiplayer BBS games, to the first Warcraft (remember Kali?
), Starcraft, WC3, and most recently on PS3.
On all these platforms, only the online games on PS3 allow me to play with random opponents, yet still have the level of enjoyment I got when playing with my friends.
That is possible mainly because the PS3 is so lock down!I.e., with the console locked tight, I can be reasonably certain no one is cheating.
This is a big problem on PC games, from auto-aim hack in FPS games, to map hacks in RTS games.
It is incredibly frustration to playing against one cheater after another.Go play on the PC if you want open gaming platform.
I want a platform that I can be reasonable sure everyone is on the same footing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414</id>
	<title>More openness in consoles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've long thought that consoles could be much better (from a user standpoint) if they were more open.</p><p>One example of this is the recent debacle with servers arguably shutting down "too soon" compared to other game types that aren't susceptible to that issue. Another example is that some people have several different consoles in order to play their favourite games and/or with their friends; this is of course a sales strategy for the vendors but not really in the interest of the consumer.</p><p>This news, of Sony expanding their console's reach essentially to outside the domain of the console itself, is good news for consumers: it shows that the boundaries are becoming hazy -- and you can't maintain strict lockdown on blurry borders. Ultimately, this ends up providing more choice for the user.</p><p>Now sadly, "more user choice" is not equal to "more user freedom" -- especially since this news is coming from Sony, peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty. But still, if they are doing it, the other vendors are bound to follow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've long thought that consoles could be much better ( from a user standpoint ) if they were more open.One example of this is the recent debacle with servers arguably shutting down " too soon " compared to other game types that are n't susceptible to that issue .
Another example is that some people have several different consoles in order to play their favourite games and/or with their friends ; this is of course a sales strategy for the vendors but not really in the interest of the consumer.This news , of Sony expanding their console 's reach essentially to outside the domain of the console itself , is good news for consumers : it shows that the boundaries are becoming hazy -- and you ca n't maintain strict lockdown on blurry borders .
Ultimately , this ends up providing more choice for the user.Now sadly , " more user choice " is not equal to " more user freedom " -- especially since this news is coming from Sony , peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty .
But still , if they are doing it , the other vendors are bound to follow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've long thought that consoles could be much better (from a user standpoint) if they were more open.One example of this is the recent debacle with servers arguably shutting down "too soon" compared to other game types that aren't susceptible to that issue.
Another example is that some people have several different consoles in order to play their favourite games and/or with their friends; this is of course a sales strategy for the vendors but not really in the interest of the consumer.This news, of Sony expanding their console's reach essentially to outside the domain of the console itself, is good news for consumers: it shows that the boundaries are becoming hazy -- and you can't maintain strict lockdown on blurry borders.
Ultimately, this ends up providing more choice for the user.Now sadly, "more user choice" is not equal to "more user freedom" -- especially since this news is coming from Sony, peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty.
But still, if they are doing it, the other vendors are bound to follow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680806</id>
	<title>Re:Pffft.....</title>
	<author>master\_twig</author>
	<datestamp>1262867700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"lock in" is fine, provided it does everything you could possibly want the device(s) to do.</p><p>If, however, all devices don't work well together, sure it'll suck. If they "just work", I don't really see an issue with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" lock in " is fine , provided it does everything you could possibly want the device ( s ) to do.If , however , all devices do n't work well together , sure it 'll suck .
If they " just work " , I do n't really see an issue with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"lock in" is fine, provided it does everything you could possibly want the device(s) to do.If, however, all devices don't work well together, sure it'll suck.
If they "just work", I don't really see an issue with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680182</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1262857800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that they can install a rootkit on your television and leave that open to the whole world to access too probably<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that they can install a rootkit on your television and leave that open to the whole world to access too probably : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that they can install a rootkit on your television and leave that open to the whole world to access too probably :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681148</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Tukz</author>
	<datestamp>1262871840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not on demand.<br>And it was just an example of use, amongst many.</p><p>May I remind you that NetFlix is coming to PSN soon, so that's NetFlix directly on your TV as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not on demand.And it was just an example of use , amongst many.May I remind you that NetFlix is coming to PSN soon , so that 's NetFlix directly on your TV as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not on demand.And it was just an example of use, amongst many.May I remind you that NetFlix is coming to PSN soon, so that's NetFlix directly on your TV as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30685200</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Dorkmaster Flek</author>
	<datestamp>1262891040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know we try to maintain a civil discourse here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. (ha), but with all due respect, <i>are you fucking serious?</i>  They denied the existence of the issue despite all evidence to the contrary; by the time they even acknowledged it was a problem, hackers were already exploiting it; and their initial "fix" to the problem didn't fix anything, and actually cause <i>more</i> security issues.  I know MS fucks you just as hard as Sony does, but how the hell did this ever get modded insightful?  It's a bloody console fanboy rant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know we try to maintain a civil discourse here on / .
( ha ) , but with all due respect , are you fucking serious ?
They denied the existence of the issue despite all evidence to the contrary ; by the time they even acknowledged it was a problem , hackers were already exploiting it ; and their initial " fix " to the problem did n't fix anything , and actually cause more security issues .
I know MS fucks you just as hard as Sony does , but how the hell did this ever get modded insightful ?
It 's a bloody console fanboy rant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know we try to maintain a civil discourse here on /.
(ha), but with all due respect, are you fucking serious?
They denied the existence of the issue despite all evidence to the contrary; by the time they even acknowledged it was a problem, hackers were already exploiting it; and their initial "fix" to the problem didn't fix anything, and actually cause more security issues.
I know MS fucks you just as hard as Sony does, but how the hell did this ever get modded insightful?
It's a bloody console fanboy rant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680752</id>
	<title>Pretty obvious</title>
	<author>watchoutbehindyou</author>
	<datestamp>1262866980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a single account / ID for company wide services seems pretty obvious to me. If you take Apple for example, they have always had a single account for their online shop, itunes, app store, etc.</p><p>Now, as others have said, I don't know how this could be useful on devices like TVs and such. And sony isn't exacty known to be very innovative in that domain. I have a sony TV that can connect to the internet, but it can't do anything with that connection (not event upgrade its firmware).</p><p>As always, it's wait-and-see. But it seems to me there's usually more waiting than seeing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a single account / ID for company wide services seems pretty obvious to me .
If you take Apple for example , they have always had a single account for their online shop , itunes , app store , etc.Now , as others have said , I do n't know how this could be useful on devices like TVs and such .
And sony is n't exacty known to be very innovative in that domain .
I have a sony TV that can connect to the internet , but it ca n't do anything with that connection ( not event upgrade its firmware ) .As always , it 's wait-and-see .
But it seems to me there 's usually more waiting than seeing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a single account / ID for company wide services seems pretty obvious to me.
If you take Apple for example, they have always had a single account for their online shop, itunes, app store, etc.Now, as others have said, I don't know how this could be useful on devices like TVs and such.
And sony isn't exacty known to be very innovative in that domain.
I have a sony TV that can connect to the internet, but it can't do anything with that connection (not event upgrade its firmware).As always, it's wait-and-see.
But it seems to me there's usually more waiting than seeing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680110</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The PSN on PS3 is pretty solid (after two years on a single platform) maybe in 2018, Sony will have gotten it right for other services as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The PSN on PS3 is pretty solid ( after two years on a single platform ) maybe in 2018 , Sony will have gotten it right for other services as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PSN on PS3 is pretty solid (after two years on a single platform) maybe in 2018, Sony will have gotten it right for other services as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681940</id>
	<title>Sony can't do software</title>
	<author>debus</author>
	<datestamp>1262877480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I installed Media Go on my PC and can't believe what a terrible piece of software it is.  It tries to update itself every time I launch it and fails.  I messed with it a few times and have never been able to get it to work and have since given up on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed Media Go on my PC and ca n't believe what a terrible piece of software it is .
It tries to update itself every time I launch it and fails .
I messed with it a few times and have never been able to get it to work and have since given up on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed Media Go on my PC and can't believe what a terrible piece of software it is.
It tries to update itself every time I launch it and fails.
I messed with it a few times and have never been able to get it to work and have since given up on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30699600</id>
	<title>sony at Consumer electronics show</title>
	<author>t3chn0n3rd</author>
	<datestamp>1262943480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>DId sony have a large booth at the consumer electronics show?</htmltext>
<tokenext>DId sony have a large booth at the consumer electronics show ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DId sony have a large booth at the consumer electronics show?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</id>
	<title>I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Fribulator</author>
	<datestamp>1262855880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why? Of what use is a network connected television? Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV, rather than using HDMI, I can't quite see the point of this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Of what use is a network connected television ?
Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV , rather than using HDMI , I ca n't quite see the point of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Of what use is a network connected television?
Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV, rather than using HDMI, I can't quite see the point of this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680082</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need the PS3, the TV can do content. Mine already does streaming video in HD formats. Samsung 600 series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need the PS3 , the TV can do content .
Mine already does streaming video in HD formats .
Samsung 600 series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need the PS3, the TV can do content.
Mine already does streaming video in HD formats.
Samsung 600 series.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681502</id>
	<title>Re:Pffft.....</title>
	<author>apostrophesemicolon</author>
	<datestamp>1262874720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i think it's less of a lock in and more of a synergy.<br><br>Lock-ins lock you to one device and for enhancement/upgrade you have to buy only from the same manufacturer.  With one-account-fits-all approach, you can get similar experience and/or share information (movies/pics/data/pr0n) across different devices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think it 's less of a lock in and more of a synergy.Lock-ins lock you to one device and for enhancement/upgrade you have to buy only from the same manufacturer .
With one-account-fits-all approach , you can get similar experience and/or share information ( movies/pics/data/pr0n ) across different devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think it's less of a lock in and more of a synergy.Lock-ins lock you to one device and for enhancement/upgrade you have to buy only from the same manufacturer.
With one-account-fits-all approach, you can get similar experience and/or share information (movies/pics/data/pr0n) across different devices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682116</id>
	<title>Re:Warning</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1262878320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry, Sony has a long history of avoiding DRM in their products.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , Sony has a long history of avoiding DRM in their products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, Sony has a long history of avoiding DRM in their products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680106</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Velocivus</author>
	<datestamp>1262856540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive, you could Download movies over the psn. and if they go that route you'll see alot more content for purchase online, maybe even blu-ray quality rentals right to your ps3? Purchases are now starting to all have digital copies, so in practice,  if you buy one it should work on your pc, and or psp.</p><p>They have also been in the works for some partnership over 3D broadcasting and movies for launch in 2012. This new PSN may become more useful for them in these new intrests over the next two years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive , you could Download movies over the psn .
and if they go that route you 'll see alot more content for purchase online , maybe even blu-ray quality rentals right to your ps3 ?
Purchases are now starting to all have digital copies , so in practice , if you buy one it should work on your pc , and or psp.They have also been in the works for some partnership over 3D broadcasting and movies for launch in 2012 .
This new PSN may become more useful for them in these new intrests over the next two years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive, you could Download movies over the psn.
and if they go that route you'll see alot more content for purchase online, maybe even blu-ray quality rentals right to your ps3?
Purchases are now starting to all have digital copies, so in practice,  if you buy one it should work on your pc, and or psp.They have also been in the works for some partnership over 3D broadcasting and movies for launch in 2012.
This new PSN may become more useful for them in these new intrests over the next two years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679972</id>
	<title>SNES</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1262897460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcomed our new SNES overlords, until I realized it stood for Sony Network Entertainment (Subsidiary).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcomed our new SNES overlords , until I realized it stood for Sony Network Entertainment ( Subsidiary ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcomed our new SNES overlords, until I realized it stood for Sony Network Entertainment (Subsidiary).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680680</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>djsmiley</author>
	<datestamp>1262866020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Different tv to the one the ps3 is connected to maybe?</p><p>Unless you've already blown all your cash on a ps3 and a sony tv of course<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Different tv to the one the ps3 is connected to maybe ? Unless you 've already blown all your cash on a ps3 and a sony tv of course ; D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Different tv to the one the ps3 is connected to maybe?Unless you've already blown all your cash on a ps3 and a sony tv of course ;D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681852</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1262876940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why? Of what use is a network connected television? Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV, rather than using HDMI, I can't quite see the point of this.</i></p><p>Fewer Set-Top Boxes.  Actually that's part of the problem.  With narrow TVs you might not even be able to HAVE a set-top box.  Maybe a sitting on the floor next to the set boxes.  So reducing the number of boxes at the TV is one advantage.</p><p>Networks are designed to send data over longer distances than traditional technologies like HDMI.  The challenge of sending video data over 100' via Cat5 is trivial.  Try doing that with an HDMI cable, or even component cables.</p><p>And consider firmware upgrades to your TV.  They could implement at USB port so you could transfer the files that way... but why go to that trouble when a network port would give you the ability to transfer files AND receive video streams over distances greater than 6'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Of what use is a network connected television ?
Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV , rather than using HDMI , I ca n't quite see the point of this.Fewer Set-Top Boxes .
Actually that 's part of the problem .
With narrow TVs you might not even be able to HAVE a set-top box .
Maybe a sitting on the floor next to the set boxes .
So reducing the number of boxes at the TV is one advantage.Networks are designed to send data over longer distances than traditional technologies like HDMI .
The challenge of sending video data over 100 ' via Cat5 is trivial .
Try doing that with an HDMI cable , or even component cables.And consider firmware upgrades to your TV .
They could implement at USB port so you could transfer the files that way... but why go to that trouble when a network port would give you the ability to transfer files AND receive video streams over distances greater than 6' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Of what use is a network connected television?
Unless I plan to stream from my PS3 over the internet to my TV, rather than using HDMI, I can't quite see the point of this.Fewer Set-Top Boxes.
Actually that's part of the problem.
With narrow TVs you might not even be able to HAVE a set-top box.
Maybe a sitting on the floor next to the set boxes.
So reducing the number of boxes at the TV is one advantage.Networks are designed to send data over longer distances than traditional technologies like HDMI.
The challenge of sending video data over 100' via Cat5 is trivial.
Try doing that with an HDMI cable, or even component cables.And consider firmware upgrades to your TV.
They could implement at USB port so you could transfer the files that way... but why go to that trouble when a network port would give you the ability to transfer files AND receive video streams over distances greater than 6'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682442</id>
	<title>heh...</title>
	<author>Kc\_spot</author>
	<datestamp>1262880120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>SWEET PSN on my iPhone!!!! wait a minute...</htmltext>
<tokenext>SWEET PSN on my iPhone ! ! ! !
wait a minute.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SWEET PSN on my iPhone!!!!
wait a minute...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682074</id>
	<title>Re:Pffft.....</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1262878140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's like my grandpa used to say when I was a boy: "Kid, the more power Sony has, the worse the world is."</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like my grandpa used to say when I was a boy : " Kid , the more power Sony has , the worse the world is .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like my grandpa used to say when I was a boy: "Kid, the more power Sony has, the worse the world is.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30685102</id>
	<title>Hopefully they solve the ID problem</title>
	<author>kaffekaine</author>
	<datestamp>1262890560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully, they'll think about the problem of multiple simultaneous PSN connections. Right now, I have two PS3's and any given PS3 WANTS to be connected to PSN all the time (for news, licensing, downloads, multiplayer, etc, etc)  but logging one in under my master account logs the other out. This is a Supreme pain in the butt if I want to play a game in one room while my kids play one in the other. I can only imagine what a mess it'd be if the TV (and the stereo and the PSP and the toaster, etc) wanted exclusive access to the ID, too.</p><p>It's not UTTERLY broken... there is a sub account feature for PSN for child accounts and stuff but I think it's really clear that they never planned on people owning multiple PS3s or having their entire home theater logged in or it'd be architected more sensibly.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully , they 'll think about the problem of multiple simultaneous PSN connections .
Right now , I have two PS3 's and any given PS3 WANTS to be connected to PSN all the time ( for news , licensing , downloads , multiplayer , etc , etc ) but logging one in under my master account logs the other out .
This is a Supreme pain in the butt if I want to play a game in one room while my kids play one in the other .
I can only imagine what a mess it 'd be if the TV ( and the stereo and the PSP and the toaster , etc ) wanted exclusive access to the ID , too.It 's not UTTERLY broken... there is a sub account feature for PSN for child accounts and stuff but I think it 's really clear that they never planned on people owning multiple PS3s or having their entire home theater logged in or it 'd be architected more sensibly .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully, they'll think about the problem of multiple simultaneous PSN connections.
Right now, I have two PS3's and any given PS3 WANTS to be connected to PSN all the time (for news, licensing, downloads, multiplayer, etc, etc)  but logging one in under my master account logs the other out.
This is a Supreme pain in the butt if I want to play a game in one room while my kids play one in the other.
I can only imagine what a mess it'd be if the TV (and the stereo and the PSP and the toaster, etc) wanted exclusive access to the ID, too.It's not UTTERLY broken... there is a sub account feature for PSN for child accounts and stuff but I think it's really clear that they never planned on people owning multiple PS3s or having their entire home theater logged in or it'd be architected more sensibly.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680128</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see a lot of uses for this, if you don't have a PS3 for example.</p><p>Turn on TV, go to PSN, start up VidZone.. Music videos right there on your TV, with no extra devices.</p><p>Just to name one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see a lot of uses for this , if you do n't have a PS3 for example.Turn on TV , go to PSN , start up VidZone.. Music videos right there on your TV , with no extra devices.Just to name one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see a lot of uses for this, if you don't have a PS3 for example.Turn on TV, go to PSN, start up VidZone.. Music videos right there on your TV, with no extra devices.Just to name one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683178</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1262883120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow, I think that if I had placed a rootkit on Sony corporate PCs I would not have gotten away with just an apology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , I think that if I had placed a rootkit on Sony corporate PCs I would not have gotten away with just an apology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, I think that if I had placed a rootkit on Sony corporate PCs I would not have gotten away with just an apology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683318</id>
	<title>Re:More openness in consoles?</title>
	<author>Gravatron</author>
	<datestamp>1262883660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the gaming division has been pretty good this generation about lock in.  Take, for example, the fact that you can install PSN games on multiple ps3's.  Makes it easier to justify that game purchase if I can share it with my friends.
<br> <br>
The movie store is a bit more locked down, but still allows for movement between devices.  <br> <br>
Toss in all the standardized hardware options (keyboards, mice, headsets, harddrives, etc) and I really wish the rest of the company would adopt the game divisions practices on openness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the gaming division has been pretty good this generation about lock in .
Take , for example , the fact that you can install PSN games on multiple ps3 's .
Makes it easier to justify that game purchase if I can share it with my friends .
The movie store is a bit more locked down , but still allows for movement between devices .
Toss in all the standardized hardware options ( keyboards , mice , headsets , harddrives , etc ) and I really wish the rest of the company would adopt the game divisions practices on openness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the gaming division has been pretty good this generation about lock in.
Take, for example, the fact that you can install PSN games on multiple ps3's.
Makes it easier to justify that game purchase if I can share it with my friends.
The movie store is a bit more locked down, but still allows for movement between devices.
Toss in all the standardized hardware options (keyboards, mice, headsets, harddrives, etc) and I really wish the rest of the company would adopt the game divisions practices on openness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680178</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262857800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive, you could Download movies over the psn.</p></div><p>Be nice if you could do that on the PS3 for countries other than the US.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive , you could Download movies over the psn.Be nice if you could do that on the PS3 for countries other than the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they start having Blu-ray players for the HD TVs on the market with a hard drive, you could Download movies over the psn.Be nice if you could do that on the PS3 for countries other than the US.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680126</id>
	<title>Re:Warning</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1262856960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? I can login to Live for Windows and XBox live at the same time no problems. It doesn't log the other account out or anything, works just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
I can login to Live for Windows and XBox live at the same time no problems .
It does n't log the other account out or anything , works just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
I can login to Live for Windows and XBox live at the same time no problems.
It doesn't log the other account out or anything, works just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262878260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One little murder and they're Jack the Ripper.</p><p>Sony recalled CDs with the rootkit, and apologized. Sony has its flaws, but they after the initial fuck-up, they at least fixed the problem, and admitted they fucked up. They handled their fuck-up in an honorable way.</p><p>That is far better than many corporations, such as Microsoft. You own an XBox? Microsoft has fucked you more than Sony ever has. And Microsoft never admits a problem, let alone apologize for creating a problem.</p><p>So stop with the rootkit bullshit already. Start complaining about Sony's tendency to go it solo on digital formats and storage devices. (BluRay was at least created and backed by a consortium of many corporations -- so BluRay isn't one of those formats. Sony does get a cut of the profits, though.) Complain about how PSN kinda blows compared to XBox Live (though this article suggests Sony is doing something about that). Whine about how the PS3 is hard to program compared to the XBox.</p><p>But for god's sake, get it through your thick fanboi skull that Sony fixed the rootkit problem, and even apologized.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One little murder and they 're Jack the Ripper.Sony recalled CDs with the rootkit , and apologized .
Sony has its flaws , but they after the initial fuck-up , they at least fixed the problem , and admitted they fucked up .
They handled their fuck-up in an honorable way.That is far better than many corporations , such as Microsoft .
You own an XBox ?
Microsoft has fucked you more than Sony ever has .
And Microsoft never admits a problem , let alone apologize for creating a problem.So stop with the rootkit bullshit already .
Start complaining about Sony 's tendency to go it solo on digital formats and storage devices .
( BluRay was at least created and backed by a consortium of many corporations -- so BluRay is n't one of those formats .
Sony does get a cut of the profits , though .
) Complain about how PSN kinda blows compared to XBox Live ( though this article suggests Sony is doing something about that ) .
Whine about how the PS3 is hard to program compared to the XBox.But for god 's sake , get it through your thick fanboi skull that Sony fixed the rootkit problem , and even apologized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One little murder and they're Jack the Ripper.Sony recalled CDs with the rootkit, and apologized.
Sony has its flaws, but they after the initial fuck-up, they at least fixed the problem, and admitted they fucked up.
They handled their fuck-up in an honorable way.That is far better than many corporations, such as Microsoft.
You own an XBox?
Microsoft has fucked you more than Sony ever has.
And Microsoft never admits a problem, let alone apologize for creating a problem.So stop with the rootkit bullshit already.
Start complaining about Sony's tendency to go it solo on digital formats and storage devices.
(BluRay was at least created and backed by a consortium of many corporations -- so BluRay isn't one of those formats.
Sony does get a cut of the profits, though.
) Complain about how PSN kinda blows compared to XBox Live (though this article suggests Sony is doing something about that).
Whine about how the PS3 is hard to program compared to the XBox.But for god's sake, get it through your thick fanboi skull that Sony fixed the rootkit problem, and even apologized.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30691260</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262891400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fanboy skull? Ha. I've had an Xbox, a Playstation, and a Nintendo during my life. This isn't about console wars. This is about rootkits and extremely shady business practices. I wouldn't use software from Sony just like I wouldn't use software from MS.</p><p>They never fixed the problem, they never apologized (if that's an apology, then WOW!), and to my knowledge they never changed.</p><p>
&nbsp; -1 troll. Bullshit. Gotta love<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. mods</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fanboy skull ?
Ha. I 've had an Xbox , a Playstation , and a Nintendo during my life .
This is n't about console wars .
This is about rootkits and extremely shady business practices .
I would n't use software from Sony just like I would n't use software from MS.They never fixed the problem , they never apologized ( if that 's an apology , then WOW !
) , and to my knowledge they never changed .
  -1 troll .
Bullshit. Got ta love / .
mods</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fanboy skull?
Ha. I've had an Xbox, a Playstation, and a Nintendo during my life.
This isn't about console wars.
This is about rootkits and extremely shady business practices.
I wouldn't use software from Sony just like I wouldn't use software from MS.They never fixed the problem, they never apologized (if that's an apology, then WOW!
), and to my knowledge they never changed.
  -1 troll.
Bullshit. Gotta love /.
mods</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680300</id>
	<title>Re:Warning</title>
	<author>hanabal</author>
	<datestamp>1262860380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can be logged in my PS3 and PSP at the same time now, so don't worry too much</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can be logged in my PS3 and PSP at the same time now , so do n't worry too much</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can be logged in my PS3 and PSP at the same time now, so don't worry too much</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683152</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>aceboomblain</author>
	<datestamp>1262883000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, but the fact that folks at Sony thought the whole CD rootkit thing was a good idea in the first place, makes them untrustworthy until that mindset and everyone involved is gone from the company.

I don't believe for a second that they had (and have) any qualms about taking control of customers computers. It wasn't until defense dept computers got infected that they apologized and offered a "fix". I bet they were threatened with being banned from selling goods in the USA for national security reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but the fact that folks at Sony thought the whole CD rootkit thing was a good idea in the first place , makes them untrustworthy until that mindset and everyone involved is gone from the company .
I do n't believe for a second that they had ( and have ) any qualms about taking control of customers computers .
It was n't until defense dept computers got infected that they apologized and offered a " fix " .
I bet they were threatened with being banned from selling goods in the USA for national security reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but the fact that folks at Sony thought the whole CD rootkit thing was a good idea in the first place, makes them untrustworthy until that mindset and everyone involved is gone from the company.
I don't believe for a second that they had (and have) any qualms about taking control of customers computers.
It wasn't until defense dept computers got infected that they apologized and offered a "fix".
I bet they were threatened with being banned from selling goods in the USA for national security reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680064</id>
	<title>Sony = Evil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.frustrationtrivia.com/" title="frustrationtrivia.com" rel="nofollow">Can you beat frustration trivia?</a> [frustrationtrivia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you beat frustration trivia ?
[ frustrationtrivia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you beat frustration trivia?
[frustrationtrivia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681098</id>
	<title>Re:I don't quite understand...</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1262871360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Music videos right there on your TV, with no extra devices.</p></div></blockquote><p>Be still my heart. You mean, I'll be able to <i>watch music videos on my own TV</i>?  OMG!</p><p>Didn't MTV do this almost three decades ago?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Music videos right there on your TV , with no extra devices.Be still my heart .
You mean , I 'll be able to watch music videos on my own TV ?
OMG ! Did n't MTV do this almost three decades ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Music videos right there on your TV, with no extra devices.Be still my heart.
You mean, I'll be able to watch music videos on my own TV?
OMG!Didn't MTV do this almost three decades ago?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681150</id>
	<title>That's great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262871840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can access it on whatever device, but... when can I have cross game voice chat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can access it on whatever device , but... when can I have cross game voice chat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can access it on whatever device, but... when can I have cross game voice chat?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978</id>
	<title>Warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262897580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wen microsoft extended Live to Windows, made imposible to be login on both machines. Don't do that again, please.</p><p>Also, the PC market already has everything, so simply the thing will not work, need to be the thing + some quality and as less drm has possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wen microsoft extended Live to Windows , made imposible to be login on both machines .
Do n't do that again , please.Also , the PC market already has everything , so simply the thing will not work , need to be the thing + some quality and as less drm has possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wen microsoft extended Live to Windows, made imposible to be login on both machines.
Don't do that again, please.Also, the PC market already has everything, so simply the thing will not work, need to be the thing + some quality and as less drm has possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683400</id>
	<title>Re:More openness in consoles?</title>
	<author>psych0munky</author>
	<datestamp>1262883960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>his news is coming from Sony, peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call\_of\_Duty" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Call of Duty</a> [wikipedia.org] is not a Sony game, but an Activision/Infinity Ward game, you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>his news is coming from Sony , peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty Call of Duty [ wikipedia.org ] is not a Sony game , but an Activision/Infinity Ward game , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>his news is coming from Sony, peddlers of lockdownware above and beyond the call of duty Call of Duty [wikipedia.org] is not a Sony game, but an Activision/Infinity Ward game, you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100</id>
	<title>Pffft.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262856480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>great, more sony lock in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>great , more sony lock in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>great, more sony lock in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30691260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30685200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_053257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30679978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681098
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30691260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30683178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30685200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_053257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30680806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30682074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_053257.30681502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
