<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_07_0522258</id>
	<title>Microsoft Announces "Game Room," Confirms Natal For Late 2010</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1262862840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Microsoft has confirmed that their upcoming motion-control system, Natal, will be <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/06/microsoft-says-project-natal-coming-holiday-season-2010/">released during the 2010 holiday season</a>. The announcement was made during CES, alongside news of "Game Room," a service that will act like a virtual arcade, bringing classic games to users of the Xbox 360 and Games for Windows Live. It's due out this spring with 30 games to start, and will gradually ramp up to over a thousand titles. According to Kotaku, "You can buy a game for between 240-400 Microsoft Points, or if you really want that old arcade feeling, you can <a href="http://kotaku.com/5442198/xbox-game-room-to-feature-over-1000-classic-arcade-games">pay 40 Microsoft Points and play the game once</a>, like it was 1985 and you'd just dropped a quarter." Another interesting bit of news is that subscribers to AT&amp;T's U-Verse will soon be able to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/xbox-360-will-support-atandts-u-verse-tv-later-this-year/">use the Xbox 360 as their set-top box</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft has confirmed that their upcoming motion-control system , Natal , will be released during the 2010 holiday season .
The announcement was made during CES , alongside news of " Game Room , " a service that will act like a virtual arcade , bringing classic games to users of the Xbox 360 and Games for Windows Live .
It 's due out this spring with 30 games to start , and will gradually ramp up to over a thousand titles .
According to Kotaku , " You can buy a game for between 240-400 Microsoft Points , or if you really want that old arcade feeling , you can pay 40 Microsoft Points and play the game once , like it was 1985 and you 'd just dropped a quarter .
" Another interesting bit of news is that subscribers to AT&amp;T 's U-Verse will soon be able to use the Xbox 360 as their set-top box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft has confirmed that their upcoming motion-control system, Natal, will be released during the 2010 holiday season.
The announcement was made during CES, alongside news of "Game Room," a service that will act like a virtual arcade, bringing classic games to users of the Xbox 360 and Games for Windows Live.
It's due out this spring with 30 games to start, and will gradually ramp up to over a thousand titles.
According to Kotaku, "You can buy a game for between 240-400 Microsoft Points, or if you really want that old arcade feeling, you can pay 40 Microsoft Points and play the game once, like it was 1985 and you'd just dropped a quarter.
" Another interesting bit of news is that subscribers to AT&amp;T's U-Verse will soon be able to use the Xbox 360 as their set-top box.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792</id>
	<title>A quarter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262867580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only Microsoft could charge you $.50 to make you feel like you dropped a quarter.  I swear these guys could nickel-and-dime nickels and dimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only Microsoft could charge you $ .50 to make you feel like you dropped a quarter .
I swear these guys could nickel-and-dime nickels and dimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only Microsoft could charge you $.50 to make you feel like you dropped a quarter.
I swear these guys could nickel-and-dime nickels and dimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30686060</id>
	<title>Re:dumbest name ever</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1262894820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But this way they will also be able to use it for other things than gaming: <br>
Customer credits, "rebates", prize money,..</htmltext>
<tokenext>But this way they will also be able to use it for other things than gaming : Customer credits , " rebates " , prize money,. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this way they will also be able to use it for other things than gaming: 
Customer credits, "rebates", prize money,..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188</id>
	<title>I liked it when it was called Virtual Console</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262872200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So MS has copied Nintendo's motion control idea and now their virtual console idea. Yet they claim they're not in the same market as Nintendo so it doesn't really matter that Nintendo handed their ass to them.
<br> <br>
They're going to have to try harder and maybe innovate for once if they want to be number one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So MS has copied Nintendo 's motion control idea and now their virtual console idea .
Yet they claim they 're not in the same market as Nintendo so it does n't really matter that Nintendo handed their ass to them .
They 're going to have to try harder and maybe innovate for once if they want to be number one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So MS has copied Nintendo's motion control idea and now their virtual console idea.
Yet they claim they're not in the same market as Nintendo so it doesn't really matter that Nintendo handed their ass to them.
They're going to have to try harder and maybe innovate for once if they want to be number one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681408</id>
	<title>Arcade at home?</title>
	<author>Rikiji7</author>
	<datestamp>1262874060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought buying consoles was the equivalent to drop a bunch of quarters in an arcade machine!
Not buying consoles AND pay to play</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought buying consoles was the equivalent to drop a bunch of quarters in an arcade machine !
Not buying consoles AND pay to play</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought buying consoles was the equivalent to drop a bunch of quarters in an arcade machine!
Not buying consoles AND pay to play</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30686954</id>
	<title>Microsoft's concept of "classic games"</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1262856120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I look forward to the announcement of Chip's Challenge being available for purchase in XBox 360's game area!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I look forward to the announcement of Chip 's Challenge being available for purchase in XBox 360 's game area !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look forward to the announcement of Chip's Challenge being available for purchase in XBox 360's game area!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681392</id>
	<title>Re:AT&amp;T's taunting me . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262873940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've already done that with the PS3 slim. Probably my greatest coup in our 24 year marriage. I still can't beleive she let me do it!!  LOL</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already done that with the PS3 slim .
Probably my greatest coup in our 24 year marriage .
I still ca n't beleive she let me do it ! !
LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already done that with the PS3 slim.
Probably my greatest coup in our 24 year marriage.
I still can't beleive she let me do it!!
LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778</id>
	<title>Credit suck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262867460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why can't I pay with real money instead of fake money which I can only buy in certain quantities so that I will always have left over fake money.</p><p>That's the second reason why I won't buy anything from Games for Windows Live Market. The first reason is that I don't trust Microsoft to keep that service running.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't I pay with real money instead of fake money which I can only buy in certain quantities so that I will always have left over fake money.That 's the second reason why I wo n't buy anything from Games for Windows Live Market .
The first reason is that I do n't trust Microsoft to keep that service running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't I pay with real money instead of fake money which I can only buy in certain quantities so that I will always have left over fake money.That's the second reason why I won't buy anything from Games for Windows Live Market.
The first reason is that I don't trust Microsoft to keep that service running.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30693120</id>
	<title>Re:screw your "points"</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1262958420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and yet, Microsoft points work out better for me in the UK at least.</p><p>See here for an overview:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms\_points" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms\_points</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>In the UK, we pay only 11\% more than the US for games, which is actually a bargain because we have 15\% sales tax more to pay. Not every currency is fortunate as us in this respect, but if you contrast to other real money systems, like Steam, where despite using real currency you can sometimes pay 100\% more (i.e. $29.99 USD = &pound;29.99 GBP even when it was $2 to &pound;1).</p><p>So despite your conspiracy theory, the reality is that MS points still offer a much better deal than most real money charges in terms of currency worth.</p><p>It may be that from a marketing point of view people more freely spend points than real money certainly, I wont dispute arguments like that, but in terms of side stepping the real worth of currency your theory is irrelevant because companies do this even with real currency by artificially charging more where it is not warranted, again as Valve does with Steam for example and Apple does it with iTunes. It's the same story for many physical goods too- the real world cost of the Playstation 3 in the UK on release for example was almost twice as much in the UK as in the US, the same goes for the likes of even Windows and many other things. It's something all companies do regardless, but ironically in this case, MS points are one of the least abusive ways of charging customers right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and yet , Microsoft points work out better for me in the UK at least.See here for an overview : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms \ _points [ wikipedia.org ] In the UK , we pay only 11 \ % more than the US for games , which is actually a bargain because we have 15 \ % sales tax more to pay .
Not every currency is fortunate as us in this respect , but if you contrast to other real money systems , like Steam , where despite using real currency you can sometimes pay 100 \ % more ( i.e .
$ 29.99 USD =   29.99 GBP even when it was $ 2 to   1 ) .So despite your conspiracy theory , the reality is that MS points still offer a much better deal than most real money charges in terms of currency worth.It may be that from a marketing point of view people more freely spend points than real money certainly , I wont dispute arguments like that , but in terms of side stepping the real worth of currency your theory is irrelevant because companies do this even with real currency by artificially charging more where it is not warranted , again as Valve does with Steam for example and Apple does it with iTunes .
It 's the same story for many physical goods too- the real world cost of the Playstation 3 in the UK on release for example was almost twice as much in the UK as in the US , the same goes for the likes of even Windows and many other things .
It 's something all companies do regardless , but ironically in this case , MS points are one of the least abusive ways of charging customers right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and yet, Microsoft points work out better for me in the UK at least.See here for an overview:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms\_points [wikipedia.org]In the UK, we pay only 11\% more than the US for games, which is actually a bargain because we have 15\% sales tax more to pay.
Not every currency is fortunate as us in this respect, but if you contrast to other real money systems, like Steam, where despite using real currency you can sometimes pay 100\% more (i.e.
$29.99 USD = £29.99 GBP even when it was $2 to £1).So despite your conspiracy theory, the reality is that MS points still offer a much better deal than most real money charges in terms of currency worth.It may be that from a marketing point of view people more freely spend points than real money certainly, I wont dispute arguments like that, but in terms of side stepping the real worth of currency your theory is irrelevant because companies do this even with real currency by artificially charging more where it is not warranted, again as Valve does with Steam for example and Apple does it with iTunes.
It's the same story for many physical goods too- the real world cost of the Playstation 3 in the UK on release for example was almost twice as much in the UK as in the US, the same goes for the likes of even Windows and many other things.
It's something all companies do regardless, but ironically in this case, MS points are one of the least abusive ways of charging customers right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680722</id>
	<title>Thank you.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262866740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you, Microsoft, for popping by and allowing us to pay every time we play a game. It's so nice of you to help us be nostalgic this way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , Microsoft , for popping by and allowing us to pay every time we play a game .
It 's so nice of you to help us be nostalgic this way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, Microsoft, for popping by and allowing us to pay every time we play a game.
It's so nice of you to help us be nostalgic this way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680954</id>
	<title>All Muslims, read this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262869800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FUCK MUHAMMAD!!! FUCK ALLAH!!! FUCK ISLAM!!!!
<br> <br>
your so-called brothers in afganistan are fucking 13 year old boys in the ass. how does allah feel about that shit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>FUCK MUHAMMAD ! ! !
FUCK ALLAH ! ! !
FUCK ISLAM ! ! ! !
your so-called brothers in afganistan are fucking 13 year old boys in the ass .
how does allah feel about that shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FUCK MUHAMMAD!!!
FUCK ALLAH!!!
FUCK ISLAM!!!!
your so-called brothers in afganistan are fucking 13 year old boys in the ass.
how does allah feel about that shit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683414</id>
	<title>Re:Credit suck</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1262884020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two reasons </p><p>1. Most people don't keep track of the exchange rate and they don't pay attention and don't consider "credits" to be money</p><p>2. Its easier for the live team to set the price of XYZ to 800 credits, and then charge different amounts in different regions .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two reasons 1 .
Most people do n't keep track of the exchange rate and they do n't pay attention and do n't consider " credits " to be money2 .
Its easier for the live team to set the price of XYZ to 800 credits , and then charge different amounts in different regions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two reasons 1.
Most people don't keep track of the exchange rate and they don't pay attention and don't consider "credits" to be money2.
Its easier for the live team to set the price of XYZ to 800 credits, and then charge different amounts in different regions .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681830</id>
	<title>The Natal name...</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1262876820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nah, I'm just curious if they'll name the beta version of Natal, "Prenatal". And the "new" version of Natal, could be Neonatal... Their logo could be cute little babies... playing Halo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , I 'm just curious if they 'll name the beta version of Natal , " Prenatal " .
And the " new " version of Natal , could be Neonatal... Their logo could be cute little babies... playing Halo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, I'm just curious if they'll name the beta version of Natal, "Prenatal".
And the "new" version of Natal, could be Neonatal... Their logo could be cute little babies... playing Halo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>Namarrgon</author>
	<datestamp>1262869500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a bit out of touch, but don't arcade games cost somewhat more than a quarter these days?Last I saw here (AU), games often cost a dollar coin (US$0.90) to play, or more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a bit out of touch , but do n't arcade games cost somewhat more than a quarter these days ? Last I saw here ( AU ) , games often cost a dollar coin ( US $ 0.90 ) to play , or more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a bit out of touch, but don't arcade games cost somewhat more than a quarter these days?Last I saw here (AU), games often cost a dollar coin (US$0.90) to play, or more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682682</id>
	<title>Re:Will you still need to pay att $7 to use the xb</title>
	<author>jmac\_the\_man</author>
	<datestamp>1262881380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Old, old, ass ones don't necessarily have an HDMI port, but there's an adapter you can buy to have an HDMI output from it. All XBoxes manufactured since 2007 have normal HDMI.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old , old , ass ones do n't necessarily have an HDMI port , but there 's an adapter you can buy to have an HDMI output from it .
All XBoxes manufactured since 2007 have normal HDMI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old, old, ass ones don't necessarily have an HDMI port, but there's an adapter you can buy to have an HDMI output from it.
All XBoxes manufactured since 2007 have normal HDMI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681628</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades. Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash? Either way, it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience. Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this?</i></p><p>Sure they can! But they reserve that experience for right after you purchase Windows  and connect to the net the first time to validate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , you 'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades .
Is he going to knife you , offer you drugs , or steal your cash ?
Either way , it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience .
Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this ? Sure they can !
But they reserve that experience for right after you purchase Windows and connect to the net the first time to validate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades.
Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash?
Either way, it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience.
Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this?Sure they can!
But they reserve that experience for right after you purchase Windows  and connect to the net the first time to validate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30685662</id>
	<title>Re:dumbest name ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262893080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would name it "piece of ten". It is the metric version of the good old "piece of eight". And you would have to buy it at the url "pot4live.com" and get a confirmation from "dealer@pot4live.com".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would name it " piece of ten " .
It is the metric version of the good old " piece of eight " .
And you would have to buy it at the url " pot4live.com " and get a confirmation from " dealer @ pot4live.com " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would name it "piece of ten".
It is the metric version of the good old "piece of eight".
And you would have to buy it at the url "pot4live.com" and get a confirmation from "dealer@pot4live.com".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682052</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive...</title>
	<author>flitty</author>
	<datestamp>1262878020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Price is my only complaint about this idea.  If I could put $2.00 worth of "Coins" into my account, and if the games were something like 5 points a play, (which allows for what, 32 plays of these games?), This idea would be great.  Only pay for what you play.  I don't need to pay $5 to play most of these games more than a few times, and the low price gives you incentive to "go to the arcade" to play, making the arcade a social hub, as well as a gaming hub.  By making buying the game only worth 10 plays, there is NO reason to actually use tokens. <br> <br> The point of arcades and tokens (at least from my born in the 80's perspective) is to allow you to play a bunch of random games that you wouldn't have the money to afford to buy and play on your home computer, or to play games that your home computer couldn't run.  Considering that these games are being run in an emulated arcade inside your xbox, the latter reason is out the window, and the only reason to use tokens is affordability, which they seem to have missed the mark.<br> <br>
This whole "build your own arcade" idea would be more interesting if you could build your own arcade that your friends could come and "play" for free if you actually bought the game, but I don't think they're going this route either.  this idea screams accountants messing with, and missing, the entire point of an Arcade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Price is my only complaint about this idea .
If I could put $ 2.00 worth of " Coins " into my account , and if the games were something like 5 points a play , ( which allows for what , 32 plays of these games ?
) , This idea would be great .
Only pay for what you play .
I do n't need to pay $ 5 to play most of these games more than a few times , and the low price gives you incentive to " go to the arcade " to play , making the arcade a social hub , as well as a gaming hub .
By making buying the game only worth 10 plays , there is NO reason to actually use tokens .
The point of arcades and tokens ( at least from my born in the 80 's perspective ) is to allow you to play a bunch of random games that you would n't have the money to afford to buy and play on your home computer , or to play games that your home computer could n't run .
Considering that these games are being run in an emulated arcade inside your xbox , the latter reason is out the window , and the only reason to use tokens is affordability , which they seem to have missed the mark .
This whole " build your own arcade " idea would be more interesting if you could build your own arcade that your friends could come and " play " for free if you actually bought the game , but I do n't think they 're going this route either .
this idea screams accountants messing with , and missing , the entire point of an Arcade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Price is my only complaint about this idea.
If I could put $2.00 worth of "Coins" into my account, and if the games were something like 5 points a play, (which allows for what, 32 plays of these games?
), This idea would be great.
Only pay for what you play.
I don't need to pay $5 to play most of these games more than a few times, and the low price gives you incentive to "go to the arcade" to play, making the arcade a social hub, as well as a gaming hub.
By making buying the game only worth 10 plays, there is NO reason to actually use tokens.
The point of arcades and tokens (at least from my born in the 80's perspective) is to allow you to play a bunch of random games that you wouldn't have the money to afford to buy and play on your home computer, or to play games that your home computer couldn't run.
Considering that these games are being run in an emulated arcade inside your xbox, the latter reason is out the window, and the only reason to use tokens is affordability, which they seem to have missed the mark.
This whole "build your own arcade" idea would be more interesting if you could build your own arcade that your friends could come and "play" for free if you actually bought the game, but I don't think they're going this route either.
this idea screams accountants messing with, and missing, the entire point of an Arcade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681086</id>
	<title>byte-sized shovelware</title>
	<author>sw33tjimmy</author>
	<datestamp>1262871120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xbla games (by and large) qualify as shovelware. this venture i see as no different... it'll just be byte-sized shovelware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xbla games ( by and large ) qualify as shovelware .
this venture i see as no different... it 'll just be byte-sized shovelware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xbla games (by and large) qualify as shovelware.
this venture i see as no different... it'll just be byte-sized shovelware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680976</id>
	<title>Two evils in One</title>
	<author>thomasw\_lrd</author>
	<datestamp>1262869980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally Microsoft and AT&amp;T are combining into the one force that all geeks must hate.  This is a good day for slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally Microsoft and AT&amp;T are combining into the one force that all geeks must hate .
This is a good day for slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally Microsoft and AT&amp;T are combining into the one force that all geeks must hate.
This is a good day for slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683632</id>
	<title>Re:I liked it when it was called Virtual Console</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1262884800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I hope they don't innovate all that much.  I don't like the dumb motion control things.  It's fine for parties, but when I want to relax give me a nice controller with lots of buttons so I can kick back on my couch.  Natal is of absolutely no interest to me.<br> <br>Fanbois get all uppity about sales.  Who cares?  The gamecube sold like crap yet you still liked it, right?  Personally, I think Nintendo has the worst games of the three this time around.  I still like Nintendo, I am still glad they exist.  Just get over the idiocy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I hope they do n't innovate all that much .
I do n't like the dumb motion control things .
It 's fine for parties , but when I want to relax give me a nice controller with lots of buttons so I can kick back on my couch .
Natal is of absolutely no interest to me .
Fanbois get all uppity about sales .
Who cares ?
The gamecube sold like crap yet you still liked it , right ?
Personally , I think Nintendo has the worst games of the three this time around .
I still like Nintendo , I am still glad they exist .
Just get over the idiocy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I hope they don't innovate all that much.
I don't like the dumb motion control things.
It's fine for parties, but when I want to relax give me a nice controller with lots of buttons so I can kick back on my couch.
Natal is of absolutely no interest to me.
Fanbois get all uppity about sales.
Who cares?
The gamecube sold like crap yet you still liked it, right?
Personally, I think Nintendo has the worst games of the three this time around.
I still like Nintendo, I am still glad they exist.
Just get over the idiocy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680798</id>
	<title>Expensive...</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1262867640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering you play using your hardware, your electricity, your room, and get no supervision to intervene in case of problems (only phone support), $0.50 per credit sounds rather steep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering you play using your hardware , your electricity , your room , and get no supervision to intervene in case of problems ( only phone support ) , $ 0.50 per credit sounds rather steep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering you play using your hardware, your electricity, your room, and get no supervision to intervene in case of problems (only phone support), $0.50 per credit sounds rather steep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680864</id>
	<title>Re:Or Just install MAME on your computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262868360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...and play all those classics for free...</p></div><p>.. and illegally.</p><p>You can also break and enter into an amusement park, use crowbar to open the cabinets and set them to free play. That's also free.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and play all those classics for free..... and illegally.You can also break and enter into an amusement park , use crowbar to open the cabinets and set them to free play .
That 's also free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...and play all those classics for free..... and illegally.You can also break and enter into an amusement park, use crowbar to open the cabinets and set them to free play.
That's also free.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683786</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>MMMDI</author>
	<datestamp>1262885460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Players have three options: 400 points ($5) grants a dual-platform license (playable on Xbox 360 and PC), 240 points ($3) gets you the virtual arcade cabinet on one platform (Xbox 360 or PC), and, for the old-fashioned types, <b>40 points ($0.50) is exactly "two quarters" worth of playtime</b> -- for an authentic arcade experience, minus the sticky floors."
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/07/xbox-game-room-pricing-partners-detailed/" title="joystiq.com">http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/07/xbox-game-room-pricing-partners-detailed/</a> [joystiq.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Players have three options : 400 points ( $ 5 ) grants a dual-platform license ( playable on Xbox 360 and PC ) , 240 points ( $ 3 ) gets you the virtual arcade cabinet on one platform ( Xbox 360 or PC ) , and , for the old-fashioned types , 40 points ( $ 0.50 ) is exactly " two quarters " worth of playtime -- for an authentic arcade experience , minus the sticky floors .
" http : //www.joystiq.com/2010/01/07/xbox-game-room-pricing-partners-detailed/ [ joystiq.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Players have three options: 400 points ($5) grants a dual-platform license (playable on Xbox 360 and PC), 240 points ($3) gets you the virtual arcade cabinet on one platform (Xbox 360 or PC), and, for the old-fashioned types, 40 points ($0.50) is exactly "two quarters" worth of playtime -- for an authentic arcade experience, minus the sticky floors.
"
 
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/07/xbox-game-room-pricing-partners-detailed/ [joystiq.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682320</id>
	<title>Re:I liked it when it was called Virtual Console</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262879340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.  Microsoft ripped of Virtual Console with XBLA so fast that it actually came out a year before the Wii.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Microsoft ripped of Virtual Console with XBLA so fast that it actually came out a year before the Wii .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Microsoft ripped of Virtual Console with XBLA so fast that it actually came out a year before the Wii.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683496</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1262884320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At Chuck E. Cheese's all games are one token which averages out to $0.22 IIRC, the coin slots can also run off of actual quarters if you want, that was usually 0.01\% tops.<br>
&nbsp; <br>I worked at CEC in HS and Freshman year summer, making my info about 6y/o.<br>Also because its always asked, I don't mind the kids, kids are kids, but fuck parents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At Chuck E. Cheese 's all games are one token which averages out to $ 0.22 IIRC , the coin slots can also run off of actual quarters if you want , that was usually 0.01 \ % tops .
  I worked at CEC in HS and Freshman year summer , making my info about 6y/o.Also because its always asked , I do n't mind the kids , kids are kids , but fuck parents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At Chuck E. Cheese's all games are one token which averages out to $0.22 IIRC, the coin slots can also run off of actual quarters if you want, that was usually 0.01\% tops.
  I worked at CEC in HS and Freshman year summer, making my info about 6y/o.Also because its always asked, I don't mind the kids, kids are kids, but fuck parents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30685818</id>
	<title>Compensate Me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262893680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the new business model.</p><p>You don't "own" anything, but you can pay-per-use each time you use it, on "your" hardware that you lease.</p><p>When you are finished with it, there is no residual value, since you "own" nothing.</p><p>This solves the piracy problem, and the recurring revenue problem. "Give-away" the hardware, and have people pay most of your costs.</p><p>You will pay for the electricity.<br>You will pay for the network.<br>You will pay-for-each-play<br>You will pay for storage</p><p>You will pay for your own hardware upkeep, etc.</p><p>Get used to making "small monthly payments" for applications that you once owned.</p><p>Microsoft Word, from 5.99/Mo<br>Microsoft Office, from 2.99/Mo<br>Storage from 2.50/Gb</p><p>You just pay for electricity, maintenance, upgrades, backup.</p><p>You will get:</p><p>NO WARRANTY<br>NO FITNESS not even for a PARTICULAR PURPOSE<br>NO COMPENSATION for OUTAGES<br>NO RIGHTS</p><p>It already works for cellphones..get ready to make just a few more small monthly payments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the new business model.You do n't " own " anything , but you can pay-per-use each time you use it , on " your " hardware that you lease.When you are finished with it , there is no residual value , since you " own " nothing.This solves the piracy problem , and the recurring revenue problem .
" Give-away " the hardware , and have people pay most of your costs.You will pay for the electricity.You will pay for the network.You will pay-for-each-playYou will pay for storageYou will pay for your own hardware upkeep , etc.Get used to making " small monthly payments " for applications that you once owned.Microsoft Word , from 5.99/MoMicrosoft Office , from 2.99/MoStorage from 2.50/GbYou just pay for electricity , maintenance , upgrades , backup.You will get : NO WARRANTYNO FITNESS not even for a PARTICULAR PURPOSENO COMPENSATION for OUTAGESNO RIGHTSIt already works for cellphones..get ready to make just a few more small monthly payments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the new business model.You don't "own" anything, but you can pay-per-use each time you use it, on "your" hardware that you lease.When you are finished with it, there is no residual value, since you "own" nothing.This solves the piracy problem, and the recurring revenue problem.
"Give-away" the hardware, and have people pay most of your costs.You will pay for the electricity.You will pay for the network.You will pay-for-each-playYou will pay for storageYou will pay for your own hardware upkeep, etc.Get used to making "small monthly payments" for applications that you once owned.Microsoft Word, from 5.99/MoMicrosoft Office, from 2.99/MoStorage from 2.50/GbYou just pay for electricity, maintenance, upgrades, backup.You will get:NO WARRANTYNO FITNESS not even for a PARTICULAR PURPOSENO COMPENSATION for OUTAGESNO RIGHTSIt already works for cellphones..get ready to make just a few more small monthly payments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682180</id>
	<title>Re:Credit suck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262878620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all fake. The job of currency is to fool people into believing it's worth something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all fake .
The job of currency is to fool people into believing it 's worth something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all fake.
The job of currency is to fool people into believing it's worth something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148</id>
	<title>dumbest name ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262878500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, I know, everyone and his dog is inventing his own "virtual currency" and all that.</p><p>But... "microsoft points"? Did that win the Bad Taste Awards or why was it chosen? It's got the sex appeal of Steve Ballmer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , I know , everyone and his dog is inventing his own " virtual currency " and all that.But... " microsoft points " ?
Did that win the Bad Taste Awards or why was it chosen ?
It 's got the sex appeal of Steve Ballmer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, I know, everyone and his dog is inventing his own "virtual currency" and all that.But... "microsoft points"?
Did that win the Bad Taste Awards or why was it chosen?
It's got the sex appeal of Steve Ballmer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T's taunting me . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262868900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be awesome, clutter-reducing, wife-inspring news if Microsoft would support blu-ray on the Xbox.  Then, we could get rid of both our POS cable box AND move our blu-ray player to another room AND (this next part is the holy grail of my house) have a good excuse to connect a console to our big flat screen in the living room.  Woo-hoo!!!  "Just ONE box connected to the TV, Honey!!!"  . . .  .  "Yes, I KNOW it's a game console, but JUST ONE BOX!!!"</p><p>Eventually the "just one box" mantra would win out.  F*** you, Microsoft, for not supporting blu-ray.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be awesome , clutter-reducing , wife-inspring news if Microsoft would support blu-ray on the Xbox .
Then , we could get rid of both our POS cable box AND move our blu-ray player to another room AND ( this next part is the holy grail of my house ) have a good excuse to connect a console to our big flat screen in the living room .
Woo-hoo ! ! ! " Just ONE box connected to the TV , Honey ! ! !
" .
. .
. " Yes , I KNOW it 's a game console , but JUST ONE BOX ! ! !
" Eventually the " just one box " mantra would win out .
F * * * you , Microsoft , for not supporting blu-ray .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be awesome, clutter-reducing, wife-inspring news if Microsoft would support blu-ray on the Xbox.
Then, we could get rid of both our POS cable box AND move our blu-ray player to another room AND (this next part is the holy grail of my house) have a good excuse to connect a console to our big flat screen in the living room.
Woo-hoo!!!  "Just ONE box connected to the TV, Honey!!!
"  .
. .
.  "Yes, I KNOW it's a game console, but JUST ONE BOX!!!
"Eventually the "just one box" mantra would win out.
F*** you, Microsoft, for not supporting blu-ray.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681476</id>
	<title>Re:I liked it when it was called Virtual Console</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262874540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How exactly did MS copy anything Nintendo did? MS Control system is camera based Nintendo is Gyro based. MS has been doing the Live arcade since before the Wii even was released in the US</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How exactly did MS copy anything Nintendo did ?
MS Control system is camera based Nintendo is Gyro based .
MS has been doing the Live arcade since before the Wii even was released in the US</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How exactly did MS copy anything Nintendo did?
MS Control system is camera based Nintendo is Gyro based.
MS has been doing the Live arcade since before the Wii even was released in the US</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680706</id>
	<title>Mind Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262866500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did I read "motion control" as "mind control"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did I read " motion control " as " mind control " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did I read "motion control" as "mind control"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681602</id>
	<title>Will you still need to pay att $7 to use the xbox+</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will you still need to pay att $7/M to use the xbox + $50 a year for live as well? and likey you will still need to have 1 att DVR box as well and it's to bad that all xbox360 don't have HDMI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will you still need to pay att $ 7/M to use the xbox + $ 50 a year for live as well ?
and likey you will still need to have 1 att DVR box as well and it 's to bad that all xbox360 do n't have HDMI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will you still need to pay att $7/M to use the xbox + $50 a year for live as well?
and likey you will still need to have 1 att DVR box as well and it's to bad that all xbox360 don't have HDMI.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682006</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1262877840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They said "old arcade" which in AU would be 20c. If my wasted youth recollections of 20c -&gt; 40c -&gt; 60c/2 for $1 -&gt; $1 -&gt; $2 are vaguely accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They said " old arcade " which in AU would be 20c .
If my wasted youth recollections of 20c - &gt; 40c - &gt; 60c/2 for $ 1 - &gt; $ 1 - &gt; $ 2 are vaguely accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They said "old arcade" which in AU would be 20c.
If my wasted youth recollections of 20c -&gt; 40c -&gt; 60c/2 for $1 -&gt; $1 -&gt; $2 are vaguely accurate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681976</id>
	<title>Re:I liked it when it was called Virtual Console</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1262877720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ummmmmm....</p><p>Pretty sure that you could buy games from Xbox Live long before Wii had arrived, and motion control on the Xbox live level is more akin to an improved Playstation 2 EyeTV.</p><p>Besides, the Wii-mote isn't all that unique either, it's just an update to the Power Glove after removing the stupid glove part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummmmmm....Pretty sure that you could buy games from Xbox Live long before Wii had arrived , and motion control on the Xbox live level is more akin to an improved Playstation 2 EyeTV.Besides , the Wii-mote is n't all that unique either , it 's just an update to the Power Glove after removing the stupid glove part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummmmmm....Pretty sure that you could buy games from Xbox Live long before Wii had arrived, and motion control on the Xbox live level is more akin to an improved Playstation 2 EyeTV.Besides, the Wii-mote isn't all that unique either, it's just an update to the Power Glove after removing the stupid glove part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30684316</id>
	<title>Re:Or Just install MAME on your computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262887380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True. I heard Pirate Ba... no wait Demonoi... no.. Supernov... hmmm no... Isohu....</p><p>Shit.. Where do I get 5000+ pirated games for free again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
I heard Pirate Ba... no wait Demonoi... no.. Supernov... hmmm no... Isohu....Shit.. Where do I get 5000 + pirated games for free again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
I heard Pirate Ba... no wait Demonoi... no.. Supernov... hmmm no... Isohu....Shit.. Where do I get 5000+ pirated games for free again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681020</id>
	<title>-1 Illegal</title>
	<author>Namarrgon</author>
	<datestamp>1262870460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or did you buy original copies of all those game ROMs you're playing for "free"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or did you buy original copies of all those game ROMs you 're playing for " free " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or did you buy original copies of all those game ROMs you're playing for "free"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770</id>
	<title>Or Just install MAME on your computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262867340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and play all those classics for free...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and play all those classics for free.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and play all those classics for free...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30788800</id>
	<title>Re:AT&amp;T's taunting me . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263637500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pussywhipped much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pussywhipped much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pussywhipped much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681978</id>
	<title>ATT and Windows Media Center is more interesting</title>
	<author>keithpreston</author>
	<datestamp>1262877780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they would integrate with the DVR capability of Windows Media Center well, I would consider paying paying for cable (although the $50 a month is still tough). Honestly Media Center with Over the Air broadcasts, 4 tuners, and 3 extenders is the only Microsoft product I have liked in a long time (and saved me tons of money not paying for cable). The first content provider that integrates into this system well with a decent pricing model (pay per channel is the best!) will win my business.   Getting raped by cable companies only to get locked in to their junky DVR is not worth it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they would integrate with the DVR capability of Windows Media Center well , I would consider paying paying for cable ( although the $ 50 a month is still tough ) .
Honestly Media Center with Over the Air broadcasts , 4 tuners , and 3 extenders is the only Microsoft product I have liked in a long time ( and saved me tons of money not paying for cable ) .
The first content provider that integrates into this system well with a decent pricing model ( pay per channel is the best !
) will win my business .
Getting raped by cable companies only to get locked in to their junky DVR is not worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they would integrate with the DVR capability of Windows Media Center well, I would consider paying paying for cable (although the $50 a month is still tough).
Honestly Media Center with Over the Air broadcasts, 4 tuners, and 3 extenders is the only Microsoft product I have liked in a long time (and saved me tons of money not paying for cable).
The first content provider that integrates into this system well with a decent pricing model (pay per channel is the best!
) will win my business.
Getting raped by cable companies only to get locked in to their junky DVR is not worth it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680718</id>
	<title>screw your "points"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262866680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we all know that "points" means a way of sidestepping a nations currencys real worth<br>the whole thing is seedy and scammy<br>i guess MS must really be desperate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we all know that " points " means a way of sidestepping a nations currencys real worththe whole thing is seedy and scammyi guess MS must really be desperate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we all know that "points" means a way of sidestepping a nations currencys real worththe whole thing is seedy and scammyi guess MS must really be desperate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681326</id>
	<title>Re:AT&amp;T's taunting me . . .</title>
	<author>Rude Turnip</author>
	<datestamp>1262873460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you're joking, but you can stream 1080p movies into XBox 360 with Zune Marketplace.  I'm not big on having physical copies of movies (with a tiny handful of exceptions), so 1080p streaming to my 360 pretty much negates any need for me to get a blu-ray player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you 're joking , but you can stream 1080p movies into XBox 360 with Zune Marketplace .
I 'm not big on having physical copies of movies ( with a tiny handful of exceptions ) , so 1080p streaming to my 360 pretty much negates any need for me to get a blu-ray player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you're joking, but you can stream 1080p movies into XBox 360 with Zune Marketplace.
I'm not big on having physical copies of movies (with a tiny handful of exceptions), so 1080p streaming to my 360 pretty much negates any need for me to get a blu-ray player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30684392</id>
	<title>"Holiday Season"</title>
	<author>kegon</author>
	<datestamp>1262887620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of us who aren't American, can someone please translate "Holiday Season" ?</p><p>Christmas ? Easter ? Spring break ? Summer ?</p><p>Thanks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of us who are n't American , can someone please translate " Holiday Season " ? Christmas ?
Easter ?
Spring break ?
Summer ? Thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of us who aren't American, can someone please translate "Holiday Season" ?Christmas ?
Easter ?
Spring break ?
Summer ?Thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1262870580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it was the paying for every game that was half the fun!   I can't tell you how many times I've finished playing a game on my Xbox with an empty feeling of disappointment, simply because I still have cash in my pocket.  Now I won't have to immediately run out into the street and force coins on strangers in order to get that true arcade experience.  Thank you Microsoft!</p><p>Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades.  Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash?  Either way, it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience.  Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it was the paying for every game that was half the fun !
I ca n't tell you how many times I 've finished playing a game on my Xbox with an empty feeling of disappointment , simply because I still have cash in my pocket .
Now I wo n't have to immediately run out into the street and force coins on strangers in order to get that true arcade experience .
Thank you Microsoft ! Of course , you 'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades .
Is he going to knife you , offer you drugs , or steal your cash ?
Either way , it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience .
Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it was the paying for every game that was half the fun!
I can't tell you how many times I've finished playing a game on my Xbox with an empty feeling of disappointment, simply because I still have cash in my pocket.
Now I won't have to immediately run out into the street and force coins on strangers in order to get that true arcade experience.
Thank you Microsoft!Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades.
Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash?
Either way, it added to the sense of heightened awarenesses necessary for a true arcade experience.
Surely Microsoft can manage to replicate this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30687882</id>
	<title>Re:A quarter?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1262860620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades. Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash?</p> </div><p>No, he's just the guy from the FBI who makes sure that Winners Don't Do Drugs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , you 'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades .
Is he going to knife you , offer you drugs , or steal your cash ?
No , he 's just the guy from the FBI who makes sure that Winners Do n't Do Drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, you'll will still be lacking the frisson of implied threat that you got from the shady character that stood in the dark corner of most arcades.
Is he going to knife you, offer you drugs, or steal your cash?
No, he's just the guy from the FBI who makes sure that Winners Don't Do Drugs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30686060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30687882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30693120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30788800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30685662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30684316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_07_0522258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30685662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30686060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30693120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30687882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30683414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30788800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30682052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30680864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30684316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30681020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_07_0522258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_07_0522258.30684392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
