<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_06_2237217</id>
	<title>More On enTourage's Dual-screen E-Book Reader</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1262774580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes  with some more information on a device <a href="https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/01/06/1515251/Microsofts-Risky-Tablet-Announcement">mentioned in passing</a> earlier today: <i>"The <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/06/entourage-edge-the-dual-screen-ebook-reader/">enTourage eDGe eBook reader</a> was the highlight of the CES Unveiled event, which gives journalists a sneak preview of what&rsquo;s set to appear this year&rsquo;s show. It has a 9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other, both of which are touchscreens, allowing you to annotate eBooks with handwritten notes or scan through web pages with the flick of a finger on the LCD screen. In a brief hands-on demonstration, the eDGe showed several clever touches, such as allowing you to perform a Google search on the term using the built-in web browser, and then link the search results to the eBook page, which is a great research tool for students reading academic texts. It's an Android device, too."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes with some more information on a device mentioned in passing earlier today : " The enTourage eDGe eBook reader was the highlight of the CES Unveiled event , which gives journalists a sneak preview of what    s set to appear this year    s show .
It has a 9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other , both of which are touchscreens , allowing you to annotate eBooks with handwritten notes or scan through web pages with the flick of a finger on the LCD screen .
In a brief hands-on demonstration , the eDGe showed several clever touches , such as allowing you to perform a Google search on the term using the built-in web browser , and then link the search results to the eBook page , which is a great research tool for students reading academic texts .
It 's an Android device , too .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes  with some more information on a device mentioned in passing earlier today: "The enTourage eDGe eBook reader was the highlight of the CES Unveiled event, which gives journalists a sneak preview of what’s set to appear this year’s show.
It has a 9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other, both of which are touchscreens, allowing you to annotate eBooks with handwritten notes or scan through web pages with the flick of a finger on the LCD screen.
In a brief hands-on demonstration, the eDGe showed several clever touches, such as allowing you to perform a Google search on the term using the built-in web browser, and then link the search results to the eBook page, which is a great research tool for students reading academic texts.
It's an Android device, too.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677254</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1262784660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the concept is awesome, but that was the first thing I thought too: damn that thing is ugly!</p><p>I don't care so much about that though, they could just use white plastic instead of grey and all of the sudden it is pretty, or black shiny plastic and suddenly it is "slick" looking.  Not that big of a hurdle really.  Straighter edges maybe, they dont' need to do much to make it a lot more attractive.</p><p>My concerns were more about the apparent bulk of the thing.  A full 10" LCD is cool, but can I separate the two if I don't want to use the LCD and find it cumbersom with it attached?  If not, does the LCD fold around the back side of the e-ink screen (looks like it does), but then how is that screen protected? Et cetera et cetera.</p><p>Like I said, I love the concept, but I'm not sure I'd buy this particular implimentation.  Still, they are definitely on the right track!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the concept is awesome , but that was the first thing I thought too : damn that thing is ugly ! I do n't care so much about that though , they could just use white plastic instead of grey and all of the sudden it is pretty , or black shiny plastic and suddenly it is " slick " looking .
Not that big of a hurdle really .
Straighter edges maybe , they dont ' need to do much to make it a lot more attractive.My concerns were more about the apparent bulk of the thing .
A full 10 " LCD is cool , but can I separate the two if I do n't want to use the LCD and find it cumbersom with it attached ?
If not , does the LCD fold around the back side of the e-ink screen ( looks like it does ) , but then how is that screen protected ?
Et cetera et cetera.Like I said , I love the concept , but I 'm not sure I 'd buy this particular implimentation .
Still , they are definitely on the right track !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the concept is awesome, but that was the first thing I thought too: damn that thing is ugly!I don't care so much about that though, they could just use white plastic instead of grey and all of the sudden it is pretty, or black shiny plastic and suddenly it is "slick" looking.
Not that big of a hurdle really.
Straighter edges maybe, they dont' need to do much to make it a lot more attractive.My concerns were more about the apparent bulk of the thing.
A full 10" LCD is cool, but can I separate the two if I don't want to use the LCD and find it cumbersom with it attached?
If not, does the LCD fold around the back side of the e-ink screen (looks like it does), but then how is that screen protected?
Et cetera et cetera.Like I said, I love the concept, but I'm not sure I'd buy this particular implimentation.
Still, they are definitely on the right track!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676702</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>icegreentea</author>
	<datestamp>1262780940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>One thing about the wide frames is that it makes it easier to hold without touching the screen. Which kinda seems important when you're dealing with touchscreens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing about the wide frames is that it makes it easier to hold without touching the screen .
Which kinda seems important when you 're dealing with touchscreens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing about the wide frames is that it makes it easier to hold without touching the screen.
Which kinda seems important when you're dealing with touchscreens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676298</id>
	<title>fags, stop eating shit out of other faggot's asses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262778840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it creates disease and it is disgusting. stop being homos. or get the aids and die.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it creates disease and it is disgusting .
stop being homos .
or get the aids and die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it creates disease and it is disgusting.
stop being homos.
or get the aids and die.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677394</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>am 2k</author>
	<datestamp>1262785560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I thought the same about the first Kindle (actually, in my opinion the first Kindle is even worse than this gadget), and it did sell well enough, as far as I've heard...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I thought the same about the first Kindle ( actually , in my opinion the first Kindle is even worse than this gadget ) , and it did sell well enough , as far as I 've heard.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I thought the same about the first Kindle (actually, in my opinion the first Kindle is even worse than this gadget), and it did sell well enough, as far as I've heard...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679390</id>
	<title>Re:Dual screens -- Neat idea</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1262803140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually... reading eink in bright sunlight isn't terrific either.</p><p>During the summer I went to the beach with my PRS 505.  Whenever I flipped the page, the "ink" was very washed out.  I noticed that if a shadow was on the reader the ink was better.  I eventually got into a rhythm where I would flip the page in the shadow, then read in full sunlight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually... reading eink in bright sunlight is n't terrific either.During the summer I went to the beach with my PRS 505 .
Whenever I flipped the page , the " ink " was very washed out .
I noticed that if a shadow was on the reader the ink was better .
I eventually got into a rhythm where I would flip the page in the shadow , then read in full sunlight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually... reading eink in bright sunlight isn't terrific either.During the summer I went to the beach with my PRS 505.
Whenever I flipped the page, the "ink" was very washed out.
I noticed that if a shadow was on the reader the ink was better.
I eventually got into a rhythm where I would flip the page in the shadow, then read in full sunlight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30686184</id>
	<title>brings one of the disadvantages of paper to ebooks</title>
	<author>vanyel</author>
	<datestamp>1262895540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the nuisances of reading a paper book is holding the thing open, now we get that inconvenience in an ebook too!</p><p>I'll stick with one page thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the nuisances of reading a paper book is holding the thing open , now we get that inconvenience in an ebook too ! I 'll stick with one page thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the nuisances of reading a paper book is holding the thing open, now we get that inconvenience in an ebook too!I'll stick with one page thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677338</id>
	<title>Re:The highlight?</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1262785200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah just according to the article, which is silly because this device clearly is not the highlight of CES.  There are quite a few candidates for that title, and I'm not sure anyone would put this device on the list.</p><p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5441762/the-best-of-ces?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed:+gizmodo/full+(Gizmodo)" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5441762/the-best-of-ces?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed:+gizmodo/full+(Gizmodo)</a> [gizmodo.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah just according to the article , which is silly because this device clearly is not the highlight of CES .
There are quite a few candidates for that title , and I 'm not sure anyone would put this device on the list.http : //gizmodo.com/5441762/the-best-of-ces ? utm \ _source = feedburner&amp;utm \ _medium = feed&amp;utm \ _campaign = Feed : + gizmodo/full + ( Gizmodo ) [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah just according to the article, which is silly because this device clearly is not the highlight of CES.
There are quite a few candidates for that title, and I'm not sure anyone would put this device on the list.http://gizmodo.com/5441762/the-best-of-ces?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed:+gizmodo/full+(Gizmodo) [gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30678432</id>
	<title>Mach3.</title>
	<author>bronney</author>
	<datestamp>1262793600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Behold!  My 3 screens ebook!!! lolbbq, before you know it, you'd be holding a 143 screen ebook containing all 143 pages of <i>Technology for Dummies</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Behold !
My 3 screens ebook ! ! !
lolbbq , before you know it , you 'd be holding a 143 screen ebook containing all 143 pages of Technology for Dummies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Behold!
My 3 screens ebook!!!
lolbbq, before you know it, you'd be holding a 143 screen ebook containing all 143 pages of Technology for Dummies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679432</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with Google searches</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1262803500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... *drum roll please*... we have google scholar to help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and .... * drum roll please * ... we have google scholar to help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and .... *drum roll please*... we have google scholar to help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676844</id>
	<title>Sorry, but looks like a hack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262781780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As much as I like the innovation to that goes into such ideas, I can't help but think of this as a hack to try and get the best of both worlds. I think it's poor design. Not to mention the problems with dual screen interfaces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I like the innovation to that goes into such ideas , I ca n't help but think of this as a hack to try and get the best of both worlds .
I think it 's poor design .
Not to mention the problems with dual screen interfaces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I like the innovation to that goes into such ideas, I can't help but think of this as a hack to try and get the best of both worlds.
I think it's poor design.
Not to mention the problems with dual screen interfaces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676656</id>
	<title>It may be a good all-in-one for travelers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262780760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TFA didn't point to the full-spec page:</p><p> <a href="http://www.entourageedge.com/devices/entourage-edge.html" title="entourageedge.com">enTourage eDGe</a> [entourageedge.com] </p><p>Battery should last 16 hours using E-reader alone. Not exactly a record breaker, but usable. The right side is a complete netbook attached to the E-reader. Not a bad combination for travelers. I kind of like the idea, whether this particular implementation is perfect or not. For what it offers, the price is not bad, either.</p><p>Just fixed the f****** capitalization of it, fer crying out loud. Is the intended market teenage mallrats?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TFA did n't point to the full-spec page : enTourage eDGe [ entourageedge.com ] Battery should last 16 hours using E-reader alone .
Not exactly a record breaker , but usable .
The right side is a complete netbook attached to the E-reader .
Not a bad combination for travelers .
I kind of like the idea , whether this particular implementation is perfect or not .
For what it offers , the price is not bad , either.Just fixed the f * * * * * * capitalization of it , fer crying out loud .
Is the intended market teenage mallrats ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TFA didn't point to the full-spec page: enTourage eDGe [entourageedge.com] Battery should last 16 hours using E-reader alone.
Not exactly a record breaker, but usable.
The right side is a complete netbook attached to the E-reader.
Not a bad combination for travelers.
I kind of like the idea, whether this particular implementation is perfect or not.
For what it offers, the price is not bad, either.Just fixed the f****** capitalization of it, fer crying out loud.
Is the intended market teenage mallrats?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679762</id>
	<title>Re:The highlight?</title>
	<author>zoewhite</author>
	<datestamp>1262894640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I agree with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I agree with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I agree with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677116</id>
	<title>It looks fine to me - who defines 'ugly piece..'</title>
	<author>gadlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1262783700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, I looked at the article and looked at the device and thought it looked very nice, not ugly, not cheap or any of the things you described. I think the iTouch is fine to look at and functions well, the Kindle looks a bit less 'cool' but darn that thing works like a charm. If it functions as described it seems pretty darn great to me and the looks are good as well. I'm reminded of the US Air Force A-10 plane, called the 'Warthog' by some, Tank Killer by others. Definitely not sleek, definitely not a corvette of a Jet but to my eyes it looked beautiful - why? Because it was good at what it does, this ereader two screen thing isn't a tank killer but it looks just fine and if it works as advertised then I'd be happy getting one - regardless of what random dude who hates everything says about how 'ugly' it is. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I looked at the article and looked at the device and thought it looked very nice , not ugly , not cheap or any of the things you described .
I think the iTouch is fine to look at and functions well , the Kindle looks a bit less 'cool ' but darn that thing works like a charm .
If it functions as described it seems pretty darn great to me and the looks are good as well .
I 'm reminded of the US Air Force A-10 plane , called the 'Warthog ' by some , Tank Killer by others .
Definitely not sleek , definitely not a corvette of a Jet but to my eyes it looked beautiful - why ?
Because it was good at what it does , this ereader two screen thing is n't a tank killer but it looks just fine and if it works as advertised then I 'd be happy getting one - regardless of what random dude who hates everything says about how 'ugly ' it is .
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I looked at the article and looked at the device and thought it looked very nice, not ugly, not cheap or any of the things you described.
I think the iTouch is fine to look at and functions well, the Kindle looks a bit less 'cool' but darn that thing works like a charm.
If it functions as described it seems pretty darn great to me and the looks are good as well.
I'm reminded of the US Air Force A-10 plane, called the 'Warthog' by some, Tank Killer by others.
Definitely not sleek, definitely not a corvette of a Jet but to my eyes it looked beautiful - why?
Because it was good at what it does, this ereader two screen thing isn't a tank killer but it looks just fine and if it works as advertised then I'd be happy getting one - regardless of what random dude who hates everything says about how 'ugly' it is.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30681796</id>
	<title>Re:Inspector Gadget - Penny's computer book</title>
	<author>BarryJacobsen</author>
	<datestamp>1262876580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I am seriously dating myself here. I've always wanted the <a href="http://10.media.tumblr.com/tumblr\_kskp6zYp2f1qzbvcio1\_500.jpg" title="tumblr.com">computer</a> [tumblr.com] <a href="http://4.media.tumblr.com/tumblr\_kskp6zYp2f1qzbvcio2\_500.jpg" title="tumblr.com">book</a> [tumblr.com] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon. I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer. The closest thing I ever found was the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-28C" title="wikipedia.org">HP-28 calculator</a> [wikipedia.org], but that's been out of production for over a decade. Now finally! we are getting it.</p></div><p>Dating yourself as what, over 25?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am seriously dating myself here .
I 've always wanted the computer [ tumblr.com ] book [ tumblr.com ] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon .
I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer .
The closest thing I ever found was the HP-28 calculator [ wikipedia.org ] , but that 's been out of production for over a decade .
Now finally !
we are getting it.Dating yourself as what , over 25 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am seriously dating myself here.
I've always wanted the computer [tumblr.com] book [tumblr.com] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon.
I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer.
The closest thing I ever found was the HP-28 calculator [wikipedia.org], but that's been out of production for over a decade.
Now finally!
we are getting it.Dating yourself as what, over 25?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676698</id>
	<title>e-ink, seriously?</title>
	<author>drfireman</author>
	<datestamp>1262780940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure this device has a lot going for it, but for my reading enjoyment, I'm still waiting for devices with better screens from qualcomm/mirasol or pixel qi.  In nicer packages, I hope.  I don't need two flawed screens hinged together, I need a single screen that's more functional than e-ink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure this device has a lot going for it , but for my reading enjoyment , I 'm still waiting for devices with better screens from qualcomm/mirasol or pixel qi .
In nicer packages , I hope .
I do n't need two flawed screens hinged together , I need a single screen that 's more functional than e-ink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure this device has a lot going for it, but for my reading enjoyment, I'm still waiting for devices with better screens from qualcomm/mirasol or pixel qi.
In nicer packages, I hope.
I don't need two flawed screens hinged together, I need a single screen that's more functional than e-ink.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676888</id>
	<title>Re:Dual screens -- Neat idea</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1262782140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Try both at the beach and get back to us.  Emissive displays just don't make sense in well-lit areas - why waste battery power trying to out-shine the sun?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption , I 'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD .
Try both at the beach and get back to us .
Emissive displays just do n't make sense in well-lit areas - why waste battery power trying to out-shine the sun ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD.
Try both at the beach and get back to us.
Emissive displays just don't make sense in well-lit areas - why waste battery power trying to out-shine the sun?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676940</id>
	<title>Re:Dual screens -- Neat idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262782500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Might sell; will probably be too pricey to be successful. I have one question: with a touchscreen on each side, how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other? Also, although I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD. Resolution is good, contrast not so much... maybe I'm just bothered by the slow page update time.</p></div><p>Power consumption is just half the story with eInk. The bigger issue is legibility. A good quality LCD screen is okay for a few pages but they aren't really up to reading a 450 page novel. Also you'd be lucky to make it through a chapter or two let alone a whole novel. eInk is ideal for reading books or articles but little else. Where I see this as a bastard hybrid that won't fly is it seems to still have the downsides of dragging an LCD screen along for the ride killing battery life. It's both an eBook reader and netbook crammed together but not as good as either one. The notes function is nice but it has the LCD draining it's power. If you are using it as a netbook then you have half the real estate covered by an eInk screen. Seemed like a nice idea but in practice it misses the mark. I have to say I do love the eBook readers for actual reading. Most of the complaints seem to come from people that try to compare them with LCD screens as opposed to just reading. One of the biggest is always page turn speed. They really aren't up to turning pages like a dead tree book. Think of it more as if you are comfortably reading a book. Once you spend say a minute reading a page a half second to turn to the next one is barely noticeable and faster than turning the page on a normal book. Thumbing through pages is just a waste of power even if they could do it. There will always be advantage to dead tree books. Where eBook readers excel is carrying a library in your pocket. Unfortunately fear of piracy is harming them. I bought one for my niece only to find her favorite books aren't available. Another family member considered one but found out her favorite writer isn't available. I doubt eBook readers will replace dead tree any time soon but they have their place.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might sell ; will probably be too pricey to be successful .
I have one question : with a touchscreen on each side , how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other ?
Also , although I 'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption , I 'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD .
Resolution is good , contrast not so much... maybe I 'm just bothered by the slow page update time.Power consumption is just half the story with eInk .
The bigger issue is legibility .
A good quality LCD screen is okay for a few pages but they are n't really up to reading a 450 page novel .
Also you 'd be lucky to make it through a chapter or two let alone a whole novel .
eInk is ideal for reading books or articles but little else .
Where I see this as a bastard hybrid that wo n't fly is it seems to still have the downsides of dragging an LCD screen along for the ride killing battery life .
It 's both an eBook reader and netbook crammed together but not as good as either one .
The notes function is nice but it has the LCD draining it 's power .
If you are using it as a netbook then you have half the real estate covered by an eInk screen .
Seemed like a nice idea but in practice it misses the mark .
I have to say I do love the eBook readers for actual reading .
Most of the complaints seem to come from people that try to compare them with LCD screens as opposed to just reading .
One of the biggest is always page turn speed .
They really are n't up to turning pages like a dead tree book .
Think of it more as if you are comfortably reading a book .
Once you spend say a minute reading a page a half second to turn to the next one is barely noticeable and faster than turning the page on a normal book .
Thumbing through pages is just a waste of power even if they could do it .
There will always be advantage to dead tree books .
Where eBook readers excel is carrying a library in your pocket .
Unfortunately fear of piracy is harming them .
I bought one for my niece only to find her favorite books are n't available .
Another family member considered one but found out her favorite writer is n't available .
I doubt eBook readers will replace dead tree any time soon but they have their place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might sell; will probably be too pricey to be successful.
I have one question: with a touchscreen on each side, how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other?
Also, although I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD.
Resolution is good, contrast not so much... maybe I'm just bothered by the slow page update time.Power consumption is just half the story with eInk.
The bigger issue is legibility.
A good quality LCD screen is okay for a few pages but they aren't really up to reading a 450 page novel.
Also you'd be lucky to make it through a chapter or two let alone a whole novel.
eInk is ideal for reading books or articles but little else.
Where I see this as a bastard hybrid that won't fly is it seems to still have the downsides of dragging an LCD screen along for the ride killing battery life.
It's both an eBook reader and netbook crammed together but not as good as either one.
The notes function is nice but it has the LCD draining it's power.
If you are using it as a netbook then you have half the real estate covered by an eInk screen.
Seemed like a nice idea but in practice it misses the mark.
I have to say I do love the eBook readers for actual reading.
Most of the complaints seem to come from people that try to compare them with LCD screens as opposed to just reading.
One of the biggest is always page turn speed.
They really aren't up to turning pages like a dead tree book.
Think of it more as if you are comfortably reading a book.
Once you spend say a minute reading a page a half second to turn to the next one is barely noticeable and faster than turning the page on a normal book.
Thumbing through pages is just a waste of power even if they could do it.
There will always be advantage to dead tree books.
Where eBook readers excel is carrying a library in your pocket.
Unfortunately fear of piracy is harming them.
I bought one for my niece only to find her favorite books aren't available.
Another family member considered one but found out her favorite writer isn't available.
I doubt eBook readers will replace dead tree any time soon but they have their place.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676954</id>
	<title>I won't own one til they gaurantee my rights</title>
	<author>BlueCoder</author>
	<datestamp>1262782620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the point in investing in an ebook reader if your locked in?</p><p>I want a central copy registry where I have legal registration for copies I own and am guaranteed indefinite ownership and am guaranteed the right to transfer my ownership for individual items..  And I want to be able to lend items to people.  Same as a physical book.</p><p>I want it an outside legal trust independent of any publisher with both the monetary backing to last over a hundred years and an endorsement by the US Senate and the EU and audited every 2 to 5 years.  It will be this agency that dictates file formats and implements standardized copy protection.  They will be required to develop and deploy software for any platform that meets certain criteria; essentially any platform with a to be determined minimal user base as well as being paid by a company or a platforms supporters to implement it.  Sort of a combination of an international copyright office and a library of congress.  They will also have the right override a publishers price according to laws in various countries with a mind toward maximizing revenue.</p><p>I further want a guarantee from all countries that they will not try to "legally confiscate" my licenses for material if I was not physically in that country when I purchased it.  So if I step off the plane in Saudi Arabia they will not confiscate my digital playboy collection...  Of course I would make the distinction between owning something and being able to use view it...  so theoretically if some small country legalized child porn for sale one could own the material but not be entitled to view it.  The latter is a separate issue.  For this discourse I only care about ownership rights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the point in investing in an ebook reader if your locked in ? I want a central copy registry where I have legal registration for copies I own and am guaranteed indefinite ownership and am guaranteed the right to transfer my ownership for individual items.. And I want to be able to lend items to people .
Same as a physical book.I want it an outside legal trust independent of any publisher with both the monetary backing to last over a hundred years and an endorsement by the US Senate and the EU and audited every 2 to 5 years .
It will be this agency that dictates file formats and implements standardized copy protection .
They will be required to develop and deploy software for any platform that meets certain criteria ; essentially any platform with a to be determined minimal user base as well as being paid by a company or a platforms supporters to implement it .
Sort of a combination of an international copyright office and a library of congress .
They will also have the right override a publishers price according to laws in various countries with a mind toward maximizing revenue.I further want a guarantee from all countries that they will not try to " legally confiscate " my licenses for material if I was not physically in that country when I purchased it .
So if I step off the plane in Saudi Arabia they will not confiscate my digital playboy collection... Of course I would make the distinction between owning something and being able to use view it... so theoretically if some small country legalized child porn for sale one could own the material but not be entitled to view it .
The latter is a separate issue .
For this discourse I only care about ownership rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the point in investing in an ebook reader if your locked in?I want a central copy registry where I have legal registration for copies I own and am guaranteed indefinite ownership and am guaranteed the right to transfer my ownership for individual items..  And I want to be able to lend items to people.
Same as a physical book.I want it an outside legal trust independent of any publisher with both the monetary backing to last over a hundred years and an endorsement by the US Senate and the EU and audited every 2 to 5 years.
It will be this agency that dictates file formats and implements standardized copy protection.
They will be required to develop and deploy software for any platform that meets certain criteria; essentially any platform with a to be determined minimal user base as well as being paid by a company or a platforms supporters to implement it.
Sort of a combination of an international copyright office and a library of congress.
They will also have the right override a publishers price according to laws in various countries with a mind toward maximizing revenue.I further want a guarantee from all countries that they will not try to "legally confiscate" my licenses for material if I was not physically in that country when I purchased it.
So if I step off the plane in Saudi Arabia they will not confiscate my digital playboy collection...  Of course I would make the distinction between owning something and being able to use view it...  so theoretically if some small country legalized child porn for sale one could own the material but not be entitled to view it.
The latter is a separate issue.
For this discourse I only care about ownership rights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30678970</id>
	<title>Good competition for the Kindle DX</title>
	<author>proxima</author>
	<datestamp>1262798400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If nothing else, maybe these new devices will put some pressure on Amazon to do one or more of:</p><p>1.) Add PDF annotation and/or zoom support.  These are important for those with lots of PDF documents/articles to read.</p><p>2.) Add a touch screen (helps with selecting text and general navigation)</p><p>3.) Lower the $489 price (looks rather silly if this device can offer a second LCD screen and both be touch screens at the same price point, though the Kindle has cell access)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If nothing else , maybe these new devices will put some pressure on Amazon to do one or more of : 1 .
) Add PDF annotation and/or zoom support .
These are important for those with lots of PDF documents/articles to read.2 .
) Add a touch screen ( helps with selecting text and general navigation ) 3 .
) Lower the $ 489 price ( looks rather silly if this device can offer a second LCD screen and both be touch screens at the same price point , though the Kindle has cell access )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If nothing else, maybe these new devices will put some pressure on Amazon to do one or more of:1.
) Add PDF annotation and/or zoom support.
These are important for those with lots of PDF documents/articles to read.2.
) Add a touch screen (helps with selecting text and general navigation)3.
) Lower the $489 price (looks rather silly if this device can offer a second LCD screen and both be touch screens at the same price point, though the Kindle has cell access)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676172</id>
	<title>Meh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262778300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Meh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676958</id>
	<title>Re:The highlight?</title>
	<author>mstahl</author>
	<datestamp>1262782680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the highlight according to TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the highlight according to TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the highlight according to TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676906</id>
	<title>Re:It may be a good all-in-one for travelers</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1262782260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just fixed the f****** capitalization of it,</p></div><p>ProTip: When you use it as a wildcard, you only need one asterisk. And what do the Flemish have to do with this device, anyway?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just fixed the f * * * * * * capitalization of it,ProTip : When you use it as a wildcard , you only need one asterisk .
And what do the Flemish have to do with this device , anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just fixed the f****** capitalization of it,ProTip: When you use it as a wildcard, you only need one asterisk.
And what do the Flemish have to do with this device, anyway?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30684306</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>d474</author>
	<datestamp>1262887320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but they are called "touch screens" so why should it be an issue to touch it if you are holding it?  There is no reason why they couldn't program in the "gesture" of holding the book so that the screen doesn't respond to a holding gesture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but they are called " touch screens " so why should it be an issue to touch it if you are holding it ?
There is no reason why they could n't program in the " gesture " of holding the book so that the screen does n't respond to a holding gesture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but they are called "touch screens" so why should it be an issue to touch it if you are holding it?
There is no reason why they couldn't program in the "gesture" of holding the book so that the screen doesn't respond to a holding gesture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</id>
	<title>No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>d474</author>
	<datestamp>1262779860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...it is a very ugly piece of hardware.  The silver plastic looks cheap, and the wide frame surrounding the screens is a major step backwards in display design.  I would be shocked if this ugly mid-90's looking DS tablet sells well at all.<br> <br> Design is important in hardware sales because it creates the emotional response in the potential customer.  Even if logic dictates that this is a "good" piece of hardware, emotion will over rule it by saying, "yeah, but it's kind of ugly, so it can't be that good...".  And emotion is always what wins over the masses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it is a very ugly piece of hardware .
The silver plastic looks cheap , and the wide frame surrounding the screens is a major step backwards in display design .
I would be shocked if this ugly mid-90 's looking DS tablet sells well at all .
Design is important in hardware sales because it creates the emotional response in the potential customer .
Even if logic dictates that this is a " good " piece of hardware , emotion will over rule it by saying , " yeah , but it 's kind of ugly , so it ca n't be that good... " .
And emotion is always what wins over the masses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it is a very ugly piece of hardware.
The silver plastic looks cheap, and the wide frame surrounding the screens is a major step backwards in display design.
I would be shocked if this ugly mid-90's looking DS tablet sells well at all.
Design is important in hardware sales because it creates the emotional response in the potential customer.
Even if logic dictates that this is a "good" piece of hardware, emotion will over rule it by saying, "yeah, but it's kind of ugly, so it can't be that good...".
And emotion is always what wins over the masses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677000</id>
	<title>Need open e-book libraries for competition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262782920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the current market, hardware-only e-book makers like this have no chance at all.  Amazon has their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Books/b/ref=amb\_link\_84210231\_3?ie=UTF8&amp;node=1286228011&amp;pf\_rd\_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf\_rd\_s=center-1&amp;pf\_rd\_r=0HWCN16JP6219J09Q4T1&amp;pf\_rd\_t=101&amp;pf\_rd\_p=48091262&amp;pf\_rd\_i=133141011" title="amazon.com">e-book library</a> [amazon.com], <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ebooks/index.asp?cm\_mmc=Google-\_-BNBrand-Broad-\_-Brand\_eBooks-\_-barnes\%26nobleebooks&amp;cm\_mmca1=9748381&amp;utm\_source=google&amp;utm\_medium=cpc&amp;utm\_campaign=BN\_Brand\_-\_Broad&amp;utm\_content=Brand\_eBooks+3664293954&amp;iq\_id=9748381&amp;H000000012" title="barnesandnoble.com">B&amp;N has one</a> [barnesandnoble.com], <a href="http://ebookstore.sony.com/" title="sony.com">Sony has one</a> [sony.com]... the proliferation of e-libraries isn't a problem in itself, except each is tied to the same brand of hardware, and nothing else.  With iTunes and iPhone apps, Apple has pushed media lock-in further than I ever thought would be successful.  I congratulate their shareholders, but I still think it's a terrible idea.  It's like we're reverting from the era of the Internet back to proprietary BBS's like GENie Online and (old) AOL, where everything was bundled together and walled up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the current market , hardware-only e-book makers like this have no chance at all .
Amazon has their e-book library [ amazon.com ] , B&amp;N has one [ barnesandnoble.com ] , Sony has one [ sony.com ] ... the proliferation of e-libraries is n't a problem in itself , except each is tied to the same brand of hardware , and nothing else .
With iTunes and iPhone apps , Apple has pushed media lock-in further than I ever thought would be successful .
I congratulate their shareholders , but I still think it 's a terrible idea .
It 's like we 're reverting from the era of the Internet back to proprietary BBS 's like GENie Online and ( old ) AOL , where everything was bundled together and walled up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the current market, hardware-only e-book makers like this have no chance at all.
Amazon has their e-book library [amazon.com], B&amp;N has one [barnesandnoble.com], Sony has one [sony.com]... the proliferation of e-libraries isn't a problem in itself, except each is tied to the same brand of hardware, and nothing else.
With iTunes and iPhone apps, Apple has pushed media lock-in further than I ever thought would be successful.
I congratulate their shareholders, but I still think it's a terrible idea.
It's like we're reverting from the era of the Internet back to proprietary BBS's like GENie Online and (old) AOL, where everything was bundled together and walled up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676400</id>
	<title>Re:Meh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262779560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bitches wouldn't be saying meh, if this was the apple iEDGe eBook reader</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bitches would n't be saying meh , if this was the apple iEDGe eBook reader</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bitches wouldn't be saying meh, if this was the apple iEDGe eBook reader</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30687434</id>
	<title>enTourage eDGe eBook - what a name</title>
	<author>baggachipz</author>
	<datestamp>1262858280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>swEeT jEsuS mAKe thE namIng iNsanIty sToP!</htmltext>
<tokenext>swEeT jEsuS mAKe thE namIng iNsanIty sToP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>swEeT jEsuS mAKe thE namIng iNsanIty sToP!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452</id>
	<title>Dual screens -- Neat idea</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1262779920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Might sell; will probably be too pricey to be successful. I have one question: with a touchscreen on each side, how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other? Also, although I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD. Resolution is good, contrast not so much... maybe I'm just bothered by the slow page update time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might sell ; will probably be too pricey to be successful .
I have one question : with a touchscreen on each side , how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other ?
Also , although I 'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption , I 'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD .
Resolution is good , contrast not so much... maybe I 'm just bothered by the slow page update time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might sell; will probably be too pricey to be successful.
I have one question: with a touchscreen on each side, how does it keep from scratching one screen up while you are using the other?
Also, although I'm sure an eInk display is a big win in terms of power consumption, I'm still not convinced it is that much more readable than a color LCD.
Resolution is good, contrast not so much... maybe I'm just bothered by the slow page update time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677462</id>
	<title>The problem with Google searches</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1262786100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with linking a google search to a page of an academic text is
that the web is dynamic. Today's search hits won't be around tomorrow, or
might be edited, have a changed layout etc, whereas an academic text is timeless.
As a student, you're much better off going to the library to look up the
references directly rather than relying on web clippings as if they were
real notes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with linking a google search to a page of an academic text is that the web is dynamic .
Today 's search hits wo n't be around tomorrow , or might be edited , have a changed layout etc , whereas an academic text is timeless .
As a student , you 're much better off going to the library to look up the references directly rather than relying on web clippings as if they were real notes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with linking a google search to a page of an academic text is
that the web is dynamic.
Today's search hits won't be around tomorrow, or
might be edited, have a changed layout etc, whereas an academic text is timeless.
As a student, you're much better off going to the library to look up the
references directly rather than relying on web clippings as if they were
real notes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679656</id>
	<title>Slashdot slowing down?</title>
	<author>brajbir</author>
	<datestamp>1262806920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I saw this video on TED a couple of weeks ago (I don't visit TED regularly). My guess is that it would have been presented in TED India conference, which was months ago. Is slashdot getting sluggish?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this video on TED a couple of weeks ago ( I do n't visit TED regularly ) .
My guess is that it would have been presented in TED India conference , which was months ago .
Is slashdot getting sluggish ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this video on TED a couple of weeks ago (I don't visit TED regularly).
My guess is that it would have been presented in TED India conference, which was months ago.
Is slashdot getting sluggish?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30680658</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1262865720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if it only encourages the more design-oriented companies that are working on these to incorporate some of the more useful features, it will have been a win (maybe not for the company, but for consumers). I'd like to have design AND functionality out of the box for once, instead of being forced to choose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if it only encourages the more design-oriented companies that are working on these to incorporate some of the more useful features , it will have been a win ( maybe not for the company , but for consumers ) .
I 'd like to have design AND functionality out of the box for once , instead of being forced to choose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if it only encourages the more design-oriented companies that are working on these to incorporate some of the more useful features, it will have been a win (maybe not for the company, but for consumers).
I'd like to have design AND functionality out of the box for once, instead of being forced to choose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30678288</id>
	<title>Grr...</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1262792640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other...</em></p><p>That strange rumble you just heard was the sound of a million obsessive-compulsive, anal-retentive, symmetry-loving neatniks simultaneously cursing upon reading those specs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other...That strange rumble you just heard was the sound of a million obsessive-compulsive , anal-retentive , symmetry-loving neatniks simultaneously cursing upon reading those specs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>9.7in e-paper display on one side and a 10.1in LCD screen on the other...That strange rumble you just heard was the sound of a million obsessive-compulsive, anal-retentive, symmetry-loving neatniks simultaneously cursing upon reading those specs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438</id>
	<title>Inspector Gadget - Penny's computer book</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262779860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am seriously dating myself here. I've always wanted the <a href="http://10.media.tumblr.com/tumblr\_kskp6zYp2f1qzbvcio1\_500.jpg" title="tumblr.com">computer</a> [tumblr.com] <a href="http://4.media.tumblr.com/tumblr\_kskp6zYp2f1qzbvcio2\_500.jpg" title="tumblr.com">book</a> [tumblr.com] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon. I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer. The closest thing I ever found was the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-28C" title="wikipedia.org">HP-28 calculator</a> [wikipedia.org], but that's been out of production for over a decade. Now finally! we are getting it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am seriously dating myself here .
I 've always wanted the computer [ tumblr.com ] book [ tumblr.com ] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon .
I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer .
The closest thing I ever found was the HP-28 calculator [ wikipedia.org ] , but that 's been out of production for over a decade .
Now finally !
we are getting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am seriously dating myself here.
I've always wanted the computer [tumblr.com] book [tumblr.com] used by Penny from the Inspector Gadget cartoon.
I always thought that was the ideal form factor for a PDA/computer.
The closest thing I ever found was the HP-28 calculator [wikipedia.org], but that's been out of production for over a decade.
Now finally!
we are getting it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30682626</id>
	<title>Re:Inspector Gadget - Penny's computer book</title>
	<author>JamesTRexx</author>
	<datestamp>1262881020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with a book being the ideal form factor. It's easier to hold a book with one hand than a laptop.<br>
One version could even provide a real keyboard split in two on the bottom of each side, no stylus typing or touchscreens needed.<br>
<br>
The scifi anime series Ergo Proxy also features a book style handheld wiith the ability to flip and rotate holographic(?) pages. Best version I've seen so far.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with a book being the ideal form factor .
It 's easier to hold a book with one hand than a laptop .
One version could even provide a real keyboard split in two on the bottom of each side , no stylus typing or touchscreens needed .
The scifi anime series Ergo Proxy also features a book style handheld wiith the ability to flip and rotate holographic ( ?
) pages .
Best version I 've seen so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with a book being the ideal form factor.
It's easier to hold a book with one hand than a laptop.
One version could even provide a real keyboard split in two on the bottom of each side, no stylus typing or touchscreens needed.
The scifi anime series Ergo Proxy also features a book style handheld wiith the ability to flip and rotate holographic(?
) pages.
Best version I've seen so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677232</id>
	<title>Re:Inspector Gadget - Penny's computer book</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1262784540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not too much of a date.  I liked that cartoon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not too much of a date .
I liked that cartoon .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not too much of a date.
I liked that cartoon.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30686778</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1262855160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Having said that, I'm not sure what the benefits of this thing (excuse me: tHIs THinG) are, over and above a separate netbook and e-reader.</p></div></blockquote><p>Price for the combined display sizes. Overall weight for the combined display sizes.</p><blockquote><div><p>tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers, but I don't see this device going anywhere. That's too bad, because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there, in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format.</p></div></blockquote><p>There's quite a lot of diversity in e-readers (and eDGe wasn't the only new one introduced at CES  -- there was also the Que proReader and the Skiff that I know of off the top of my head.) And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.epub's doing a good job at moving forward as the standard format. (Just about every reader but the Kindle supports it, and almost every independent publisher [as in, not an tied to a device vendor] uses it. Plus, its basically zipped XHTML + CSS + common image formats -- with a couple of small quirks -- so its reasonably easy to support, too.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having said that , I 'm not sure what the benefits of this thing ( excuse me : tHIs THinG ) are , over and above a separate netbook and e-reader.Price for the combined display sizes .
Overall weight for the combined display sizes.tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers , but I do n't see this device going anywhere .
That 's too bad , because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there , in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format.There 's quite a lot of diversity in e-readers ( and eDGe was n't the only new one introduced at CES -- there was also the Que proReader and the Skiff that I know of off the top of my head .
) And .epub 's doing a good job at moving forward as the standard format .
( Just about every reader but the Kindle supports it , and almost every independent publisher [ as in , not an tied to a device vendor ] uses it .
Plus , its basically zipped XHTML + CSS + common image formats -- with a couple of small quirks -- so its reasonably easy to support , too .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having said that, I'm not sure what the benefits of this thing (excuse me: tHIs THinG) are, over and above a separate netbook and e-reader.Price for the combined display sizes.
Overall weight for the combined display sizes.tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers, but I don't see this device going anywhere.
That's too bad, because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there, in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format.There's quite a lot of diversity in e-readers (and eDGe wasn't the only new one introduced at CES  -- there was also the Que proReader and the Skiff that I know of off the top of my head.
) And .epub's doing a good job at moving forward as the standard format.
(Just about every reader but the Kindle supports it, and almost every independent publisher [as in, not an tied to a device vendor] uses it.
Plus, its basically zipped XHTML + CSS + common image formats -- with a couple of small quirks -- so its reasonably easy to support, too.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676902</id>
	<title>What's the point?</title>
	<author>kmcrober</author>
	<datestamp>1262782200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love my Kindle, and often find that critics of the device who claim that it has no benefit beyond a laptop or a paperback are simply not familiar enough with the device.  Having said that, I'm not sure what the benefits of this thing (excuse me:  tHIs THinG) are, over and above a separate netbook and e-reader.  I can see some minor synergies, such as TFA's reference to sending search results to the e-ink half of the device, but is that really worth the extra weight and complexity?  Of course, I don't think I can explain why the Courier needs two screens, either, but hot damn I want one anyway.</p><p>tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers, but I don't see this device going anywhere.  That's too bad, because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there, in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format.  (Or, failing that, just to encourage Amazon to make the Kindle software platform hardware-independent.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love my Kindle , and often find that critics of the device who claim that it has no benefit beyond a laptop or a paperback are simply not familiar enough with the device .
Having said that , I 'm not sure what the benefits of this thing ( excuse me : tHIs THinG ) are , over and above a separate netbook and e-reader .
I can see some minor synergies , such as TFA 's reference to sending search results to the e-ink half of the device , but is that really worth the extra weight and complexity ?
Of course , I do n't think I can explain why the Courier needs two screens , either , but hot damn I want one anyway.tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers , but I do n't see this device going anywhere .
That 's too bad , because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there , in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format .
( Or , failing that , just to encourage Amazon to make the Kindle software platform hardware-independent .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love my Kindle, and often find that critics of the device who claim that it has no benefit beyond a laptop or a paperback are simply not familiar enough with the device.
Having said that, I'm not sure what the benefits of this thing (excuse me:  tHIs THinG) are, over and above a separate netbook and e-reader.
I can see some minor synergies, such as TFA's reference to sending search results to the e-ink half of the device, but is that really worth the extra weight and complexity?
Of course, I don't think I can explain why the Courier needs two screens, either, but hot damn I want one anyway.tHIs THinG may be perfect for a niche of readers, but I don't see this device going anywhere.
That's too bad, because I want a much more diverse field of e-readers out there, in order to encourage publishers to settle on a uniform format.
(Or, failing that, just to encourage Amazon to make the Kindle software platform hardware-independent.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30678042</id>
	<title>Where is the e-Library?</title>
	<author>Enrique1218</author>
	<datestamp>1262790240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't particularly read books. But, my girlfriend reads often. She goes to the library, checks the book out, reads it, and takes it back. She never buys a book especially fiction. I see a lot of companies developing e-readers like this one. With all these e-reader coming out, I thinking this must be the future; but, what happens to the library? How does my girlfriend check out an e-book?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't particularly read books .
But , my girlfriend reads often .
She goes to the library , checks the book out , reads it , and takes it back .
She never buys a book especially fiction .
I see a lot of companies developing e-readers like this one .
With all these e-reader coming out , I thinking this must be the future ; but , what happens to the library ?
How does my girlfriend check out an e-book ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't particularly read books.
But, my girlfriend reads often.
She goes to the library, checks the book out, reads it, and takes it back.
She never buys a book especially fiction.
I see a lot of companies developing e-readers like this one.
With all these e-reader coming out, I thinking this must be the future; but, what happens to the library?
How does my girlfriend check out an e-book?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677124</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what this thing does...</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1262783760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are missing the link between function and aesthetics in design. People often favor a design with good aesthetics, not just because of some over-ruling emotion response, but because it's often a reflection of good functional design. It shows that someone has spent a lot of time and energy thinking about the product, and that they understand certain design principles. This doesn't mean that good looking designs are always functional, of course, but they aren't on the opposite sides of a spectrum like some people here seem to think -- they are quite ingrained together. Design is about communication and aesthetics is a language many people understand. OK, that's enough designer-speak for this place today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are missing the link between function and aesthetics in design .
People often favor a design with good aesthetics , not just because of some over-ruling emotion response , but because it 's often a reflection of good functional design .
It shows that someone has spent a lot of time and energy thinking about the product , and that they understand certain design principles .
This does n't mean that good looking designs are always functional , of course , but they are n't on the opposite sides of a spectrum like some people here seem to think -- they are quite ingrained together .
Design is about communication and aesthetics is a language many people understand .
OK , that 's enough designer-speak for this place today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are missing the link between function and aesthetics in design.
People often favor a design with good aesthetics, not just because of some over-ruling emotion response, but because it's often a reflection of good functional design.
It shows that someone has spent a lot of time and energy thinking about the product, and that they understand certain design principles.
This doesn't mean that good looking designs are always functional, of course, but they aren't on the opposite sides of a spectrum like some people here seem to think -- they are quite ingrained together.
Design is about communication and aesthetics is a language many people understand.
OK, that's enough designer-speak for this place today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676244</id>
	<title>Too unwieldy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262778540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sort of device just doesn't look practical. It's not the sort of thing you can use on the tram on the way to work. Like the article says, it's more of a netbook than something sleek like the Kindle or Nook.</p><p>I got a netbook for Christmas, and I've been using it on the tram on the way to work for the past few days. I find that if I put it on my lap, it is too hot and weighs too much. The heat irritates my penis and scrotum, and the weight really bothers my penis. So it's not really all that useful to me.</p><p>This device looks like it'd be difficult to hold in an upward position for over 30 minutes. You'd probably want to put it on your lap, but this could cause irritation and discomfort.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sort of device just does n't look practical .
It 's not the sort of thing you can use on the tram on the way to work .
Like the article says , it 's more of a netbook than something sleek like the Kindle or Nook.I got a netbook for Christmas , and I 've been using it on the tram on the way to work for the past few days .
I find that if I put it on my lap , it is too hot and weighs too much .
The heat irritates my penis and scrotum , and the weight really bothers my penis .
So it 's not really all that useful to me.This device looks like it 'd be difficult to hold in an upward position for over 30 minutes .
You 'd probably want to put it on your lap , but this could cause irritation and discomfort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sort of device just doesn't look practical.
It's not the sort of thing you can use on the tram on the way to work.
Like the article says, it's more of a netbook than something sleek like the Kindle or Nook.I got a netbook for Christmas, and I've been using it on the tram on the way to work for the past few days.
I find that if I put it on my lap, it is too hot and weighs too much.
The heat irritates my penis and scrotum, and the weight really bothers my penis.
So it's not really all that useful to me.This device looks like it'd be difficult to hold in an upward position for over 30 minutes.
You'd probably want to put it on your lap, but this could cause irritation and discomfort.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266</id>
	<title>The highlight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262778660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who defines what the highlight is?  I've never been to anything CES and don't know a ton about it (aside from reading about it every year), so I don't know if maybe they actually do pick one item as a highlight... or this it the highlight according to the submitter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who defines what the highlight is ?
I 've never been to anything CES and do n't know a ton about it ( aside from reading about it every year ) , so I do n't know if maybe they actually do pick one item as a highlight... or this it the highlight according to the submitter : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who defines what the highlight is?
I've never been to anything CES and don't know a ton about it (aside from reading about it every year), so I don't know if maybe they actually do pick one item as a highlight... or this it the highlight according to the submitter :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30686778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30680658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30682626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30681796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_2237217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30684306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30681796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30682626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30680658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30684306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30678042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30676902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30686778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30679432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_2237217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_2237217.30677000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
