<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_06_1416212</id>
	<title>Giant Black Hole At Milky Way's Core Stays Slim</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262790900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>thomst writes <i>"A team of researchers from Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society a new theoretical model of how the super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way consumes gas from surrounding star clusters, based on a million seconds of observation by the orbital Chandra X-ray telescope. Astronomers had previously believed that the object, known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star') consumed only around one percent of the gases it stripped from the star clusters around it, but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent (i.e. &mdash; two orders of magnitude). Physorg.com's uncredited reporter <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news181933944.html">gets the story right</a>, while space.com's Andrea Thomspon <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/100106-aas-black-hole-eating-disorder.html">clearly doesn't understand the mechanism behind the phenomenon</a> (essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity well)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>thomst writes " A team of researchers from Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society a new theoretical model of how the super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way consumes gas from surrounding star clusters , based on a million seconds of observation by the orbital Chandra X-ray telescope .
Astronomers had previously believed that the object , known as Sagittarius A * ( pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star ' ) consumed only around one percent of the gases it stripped from the star clusters around it , but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent ( i.e .
   two orders of magnitude ) .
Physorg.com 's uncredited reporter gets the story right , while space.com 's Andrea Thomspon clearly does n't understand the mechanism behind the phenomenon ( essentially , thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas , causing it to expand , and thus move away from Sagittarius A * 's gravity well ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thomst writes "A team of researchers from Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society a new theoretical model of how the super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way consumes gas from surrounding star clusters, based on a million seconds of observation by the orbital Chandra X-ray telescope.
Astronomers had previously believed that the object, known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star') consumed only around one percent of the gases it stripped from the star clusters around it, but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent (i.e.
— two orders of magnitude).
Physorg.com's uncredited reporter gets the story right, while space.com's Andrea Thomspon clearly doesn't understand the mechanism behind the phenomenon (essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity well).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672114</id>
	<title>Babylon 5</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1262803380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that CNN's Andrea Thompson who was on <a href="http://babylon5.wikia.com/wiki/Talia\_Winters" title="wikia.com">Babylon 5</a> [wikia.com]? You'd think she'd know about thing or two black holes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that CNN 's Andrea Thompson who was on Babylon 5 [ wikia.com ] ?
You 'd think she 'd know about thing or two black holes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that CNN's Andrea Thompson who was on Babylon 5 [wikia.com]?
You'd think she'd know about thing or two black holes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673938</id>
	<title>Re:Danger Will Robinson! Science article!</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1262811420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to mod this Off-Topic or Redundant, but then I decided I really need to mod it "Self-referential" but that's not available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to mod this Off-Topic or Redundant , but then I decided I really need to mod it " Self-referential " but that 's not available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to mod this Off-Topic or Redundant, but then I decided I really need to mod it "Self-referential" but that's not available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670016</id>
	<title>Authorship and accuracy</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1262795580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the Space.com story does mention the correct mechanism (<i>"It also creates pressure that helps some stellar winds avoid the black hole's gravitational grasp altogether."</i>), but also a second one (<i>"The conduction causes some of the heat in the gas to travel outwards, reducing the strength of the radiation that results from the black hole's consumption."</i>) that sounds a bit odd. Physorg doesn't credit a reporter because they're printing a CfA-authored story (as evidenced by the "Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the Space.com story does mention the correct mechanism ( " It also creates pressure that helps some stellar winds avoid the black hole 's gravitational grasp altogether .
" ) , but also a second one ( " The conduction causes some of the heat in the gas to travel outwards , reducing the strength of the radiation that results from the black hole 's consumption .
" ) that sounds a bit odd .
Physorg does n't credit a reporter because they 're printing a CfA-authored story ( as evidenced by the " Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the Space.com story does mention the correct mechanism ("It also creates pressure that helps some stellar winds avoid the black hole's gravitational grasp altogether.
"), but also a second one ("The conduction causes some of the heat in the gas to travel outwards, reducing the strength of the radiation that results from the black hole's consumption.
") that sounds a bit odd.
Physorg doesn't credit a reporter because they're printing a CfA-authored story (as evidenced by the "Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics").</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669900</id>
	<title>So who cares?</title>
	<author>tetrahedrassface</author>
	<datestamp>1262795220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So is this story about the black hole, or about the fact that one place got the story right, while another author got confused? Sounds like a hit job to me, and probably better ways to fulfill vendettas.. Just sayin'...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is this story about the black hole , or about the fact that one place got the story right , while another author got confused ?
Sounds like a hit job to me , and probably better ways to fulfill vendettas.. Just sayin'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is this story about the black hole, or about the fact that one place got the story right, while another author got confused?
Sounds like a hit job to me, and probably better ways to fulfill vendettas.. Just sayin'...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678834</id>
	<title>Re:Galactic Voids....</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1262796960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The idea that there are "white holes" on "the other side" of black holes is pretty much without support.</p></div><p>I'm pretty sure that even black holes are rather difficult to prove. Seriously, the center of the galaxy is awfully dense. I'm sure the science is rigorous but I'm sure other phenomenon can explain this observation. Guess, I'll have to get my astrophysics books out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea that there are " white holes " on " the other side " of black holes is pretty much without support.I 'm pretty sure that even black holes are rather difficult to prove .
Seriously , the center of the galaxy is awfully dense .
I 'm sure the science is rigorous but I 'm sure other phenomenon can explain this observation .
Guess , I 'll have to get my astrophysics books out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea that there are "white holes" on "the other side" of black holes is pretty much without support.I'm pretty sure that even black holes are rather difficult to prove.
Seriously, the center of the galaxy is awfully dense.
I'm sure the science is rigorous but I'm sure other phenomenon can explain this observation.
Guess, I'll have to get my astrophysics books out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30675768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673834</id>
	<title>Re:A million seconds?</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1262810880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably it was written that way to suggest a million seconds of data acquired over many nights, maybe thousands, not in a week and a half. Just a guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably it was written that way to suggest a million seconds of data acquired over many nights , maybe thousands , not in a week and a half .
Just a guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably it was written that way to suggest a million seconds of data acquired over many nights, maybe thousands, not in a week and a half.
Just a guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669766</id>
	<title>Clearly not named by a Canadian.</title>
	<author>drainbramage</author>
	<datestamp>1262794680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then it would be Sagittarius A* eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then it would be Sagittarius A * eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then it would be Sagittarius A* eh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672658</id>
	<title>Trolhl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262805660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">EFNe7, andW apply sanctions, and</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>EFNe7 , andW apply sanctions , and [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EFNe7, andW apply sanctions, and [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670846</id>
	<title>Re:So who cares?</title>
	<author>thomst</author>
	<datestamp>1262798400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope. I personally don't know or care about Andrea Thompson at all. But her name was on the space.com story, so I mentioned it. That's called "creditng the source."
<p>
As for my story, it is, of course, about both things - the new theory about Sagittarius A*, and the <i>reporting</i> about the theory - because both are relevant to me.
</p><p>
You're welcome not to care about either, though. Just try not to impute motives to other people without justification, lest you, yourself be judged a cynical troll with <b>way</b> too much time on its grubby little hands.
</p><p>
Just sayin'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
I personally do n't know or care about Andrea Thompson at all .
But her name was on the space.com story , so I mentioned it .
That 's called " creditng the source .
" As for my story , it is , of course , about both things - the new theory about Sagittarius A * , and the reporting about the theory - because both are relevant to me .
You 're welcome not to care about either , though .
Just try not to impute motives to other people without justification , lest you , yourself be judged a cynical troll with way too much time on its grubby little hands .
Just sayin ' .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
I personally don't know or care about Andrea Thompson at all.
But her name was on the space.com story, so I mentioned it.
That's called "creditng the source.
"

As for my story, it is, of course, about both things - the new theory about Sagittarius A*, and the reporting about the theory - because both are relevant to me.
You're welcome not to care about either, though.
Just try not to impute motives to other people without justification, lest you, yourself be judged a cynical troll with way too much time on its grubby little hands.
Just sayin' ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308</id>
	<title>And let me be the first to say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262796600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After reading that yawner of a story, I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading that yawner of a story , I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading that yawner of a story, I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671174</id>
	<title>Danger Will Robinson! Science article!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262799840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get read for the know-nothings to make stupid posts about nothing at all. Fantastic!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get read for the know-nothings to make stupid posts about nothing at all .
Fantastic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get read for the know-nothings to make stupid posts about nothing at all.
Fantastic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670080</id>
	<title>7g of saturated fat</title>
	<author>dgr73</author>
	<datestamp>1262795760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know this is slightly off topic, but in my opinion the words "Milky Way" and "Slim" should not be used in the same sentence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is slightly off topic , but in my opinion the words " Milky Way " and " Slim " should not be used in the same sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is slightly off topic, but in my opinion the words "Milky Way" and "Slim" should not be used in the same sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670464</id>
	<title>Connections</title>
	<author>geoffrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1262797260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So women tend to like chocolate and telling them that they are slim. Milky Way's are made out of chocolate. It is all becoming clear now.</p><p>The Milky Way is on a diet because it is right after New Year's and after the holidays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So women tend to like chocolate and telling them that they are slim .
Milky Way 's are made out of chocolate .
It is all becoming clear now.The Milky Way is on a diet because it is right after New Year 's and after the holidays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So women tend to like chocolate and telling them that they are slim.
Milky Way's are made out of chocolate.
It is all becoming clear now.The Milky Way is on a diet because it is right after New Year's and after the holidays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672338</id>
	<title>Re:Quick Question</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1262804220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naw, their society is an autonomous collective, specifically an anarcho-syndicalist commune. They take it in turns to act as sort-of-executive officer for the week but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting by a simple majority, in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two thirds majority, in the case of more major issues.</p><p>Hope that helps!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naw , their society is an autonomous collective , specifically an anarcho-syndicalist commune .
They take it in turns to act as sort-of-executive officer for the week but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting by a simple majority , in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two thirds majority , in the case of more major issues.Hope that helps !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naw, their society is an autonomous collective, specifically an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
They take it in turns to act as sort-of-executive officer for the week but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting by a simple majority, in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two thirds majority, in the case of more major issues.Hope that helps!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673316</id>
	<title>nassim haramein has anice teory about this</title>
	<author>gygy</author>
	<datestamp>1262808420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take look at this: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfqbxhk" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfqbxhk</a> [tinyurl.com]

Haramein, who has spent his lifetime researching fields of physics from quantum theory to relativistic equations and cosmology, will lead you along a fascinating discussion geared to a layman's understanding of the fundamental nature of the universe and creation that includes black holes, gravitational forces, dimensions, and the very structure of space itself - all of which are integral parts of his now-complete Unified Field Theory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take look at this : http : //tinyurl.com/yfqbxhk [ tinyurl.com ] Haramein , who has spent his lifetime researching fields of physics from quantum theory to relativistic equations and cosmology , will lead you along a fascinating discussion geared to a layman 's understanding of the fundamental nature of the universe and creation that includes black holes , gravitational forces , dimensions , and the very structure of space itself - all of which are integral parts of his now-complete Unified Field Theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take look at this: http://tinyurl.com/yfqbxhk [tinyurl.com]

Haramein, who has spent his lifetime researching fields of physics from quantum theory to relativistic equations and cosmology, will lead you along a fascinating discussion geared to a layman's understanding of the fundamental nature of the universe and creation that includes black holes, gravitational forces, dimensions, and the very structure of space itself - all of which are integral parts of his now-complete Unified Field Theory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670350</id>
	<title>It's not rocket science...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262796720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To Andrea Thomspon's credit, Astrophysics <b> <i>is</i> </b> very difficult. It's my guess that the source material (i.e. press release, article in a science journal, etc...) was neither well written or clearly explained.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To Andrea Thomspon 's credit , Astrophysics is very difficult .
It 's my guess that the source material ( i.e .
press release , article in a science journal , etc... ) was neither well written or clearly explained .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Andrea Thomspon's credit, Astrophysics  is  very difficult.
It's my guess that the source material (i.e.
press release, article in a science journal, etc...) was neither well written or clearly explained.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670680</id>
	<title>Re:And let me be the first to say...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262797920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>After reading that yawner of a story, I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.<br></i><br>If the story's boring it's the writer's fault. A good writer can write "how to mow a lawn" and make it interesting. Bad writing and boring teachers are what turns school kids off on learning, and most people off on science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading that yawner of a story , I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.If the story 's boring it 's the writer 's fault .
A good writer can write " how to mow a lawn " and make it interesting .
Bad writing and boring teachers are what turns school kids off on learning , and most people off on science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading that yawner of a story, I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.If the story's boring it's the writer's fault.
A good writer can write "how to mow a lawn" and make it interesting.
Bad writing and boring teachers are what turns school kids off on learning, and most people off on science.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669794</id>
	<title>Drumroll please.</title>
	<author>Kc\_spot</author>
	<datestamp>1262794800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well it looks like this sucks... a little.

*cues CSI:Miami Theme music!*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it looks like this sucks... a little .
* cues CSI : Miami Theme music !
*</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it looks like this sucks... a little.
*cues CSI:Miami Theme music!
*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671190</id>
	<title>paper</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1262799900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3255" title="arxiv.org">Here</a> [arxiv.org] is the scientific paper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ arxiv.org ] is the scientific paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [arxiv.org] is the scientific paper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669978</id>
	<title>1 million seconds</title>
	<author>qazsedcft</author>
	<datestamp>1262795520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A million seconds is about 11.5 days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A million seconds is about 11.5 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A million seconds is about 11.5 days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654</id>
	<title>Galactic Voids....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262797860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I figured out WHY there are galactic voids.   The voids used to full of Galaxies ie. "The Missing Mass" that no one could find.   If a galaxy's black hole gets too big it triggers the collapse of the Galaxy in question into a violent Quasar and it disappears from this universe within a few million years.  The Mass is then removed from this universe as it tunnels itself into a another universal where it expands into it's own "Big Bang".  The mass that is constantly being removed makes it appear the expansion of the universe is accelerating.    Of course this process weeded out 90\% of the Galaxies that were formed after the big bang and we are one of the few lucky survivors..   These survivors ended up with galactic black holes that were big enough to "throw off enough mass" to prevent them from going "critical mass" which would remove them and their host galaxies from the universe.</p><p>There, I have just solved the "Missing Mass", "Accelerating Expansion of the Universe", and "Dark Matter" problems in cosmology, I would like my prize now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I figured out WHY there are galactic voids .
The voids used to full of Galaxies ie .
" The Missing Mass " that no one could find .
If a galaxy 's black hole gets too big it triggers the collapse of the Galaxy in question into a violent Quasar and it disappears from this universe within a few million years .
The Mass is then removed from this universe as it tunnels itself into a another universal where it expands into it 's own " Big Bang " .
The mass that is constantly being removed makes it appear the expansion of the universe is accelerating .
Of course this process weeded out 90 \ % of the Galaxies that were formed after the big bang and we are one of the few lucky survivors.. These survivors ended up with galactic black holes that were big enough to " throw off enough mass " to prevent them from going " critical mass " which would remove them and their host galaxies from the universe.There , I have just solved the " Missing Mass " , " Accelerating Expansion of the Universe " , and " Dark Matter " problems in cosmology , I would like my prize now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I figured out WHY there are galactic voids.
The voids used to full of Galaxies ie.
"The Missing Mass" that no one could find.
If a galaxy's black hole gets too big it triggers the collapse of the Galaxy in question into a violent Quasar and it disappears from this universe within a few million years.
The Mass is then removed from this universe as it tunnels itself into a another universal where it expands into it's own "Big Bang".
The mass that is constantly being removed makes it appear the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
Of course this process weeded out 90\% of the Galaxies that were formed after the big bang and we are one of the few lucky survivors..   These survivors ended up with galactic black holes that were big enough to "throw off enough mass" to prevent them from going "critical mass" which would remove them and their host galaxies from the universe.There, I have just solved the "Missing Mass", "Accelerating Expansion of the Universe", and "Dark Matter" problems in cosmology, I would like my prize now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671470</id>
	<title>Re:A Rose By Any Other Name</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1262800920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The star is meant to refer to the asterisk in the name - not to describe the object with the name.  Or are you trying to make a cute joke?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The star is meant to refer to the asterisk in the name - not to describe the object with the name .
Or are you trying to make a cute joke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The star is meant to refer to the asterisk in the name - not to describe the object with the name.
Or are you trying to make a cute joke?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30674122</id>
	<title>I'm envious</title>
	<author>heritage727</author>
	<datestamp>1262768880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's eating a Milky Way the size of a galaxy and it <b>stays slim</b>? Must have a terrific metabolism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's eating a Milky Way the size of a galaxy and it stays slim ?
Must have a terrific metabolism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's eating a Milky Way the size of a galaxy and it stays slim?
Must have a terrific metabolism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671400</id>
	<title>Astronomical object naming</title>
	<author>thewiz</author>
	<datestamp>1262800620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps someone can answer this question:<br>Will there ever be a Fred A*?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps someone can answer this question : Will there ever be a Fred A * ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps someone can answer this question:Will there ever be a Fred A*?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671062</id>
	<title>WhaHuhh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262799360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent (i.e. &mdash; two orders of magnitude)</p></div></blockquote><p>WhaHuhhhh?????</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent ( i.e .
   two orders of magnitude ) WhaHuhhhh ? ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent (i.e.
— two orders of magnitude)WhaHuhhhh????
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30675768</id>
	<title>Re:Galactic Voids....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262776260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea that there are "white holes" on "the other side" of black holes is pretty much without support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea that there are " white holes " on " the other side " of black holes is pretty much without support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea that there are "white holes" on "the other side" of black holes is pretty much without support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678920</id>
	<title>Re:Galactic Voids....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262797800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stephen Hawking beat you to this by a number of years. He famously restated his theory that information is not lost in a black hole, it just becomes information somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stephen Hawking beat you to this by a number of years .
He famously restated his theory that information is not lost in a black hole , it just becomes information somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stephen Hawking beat you to this by a number of years.
He famously restated his theory that information is not lost in a black hole, it just becomes information somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670150</id>
	<title>Paging Andrea Thomspon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262796060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is your cue to come in and post,<p>

"I am Andrea Thomspon, you insensitive clod".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is your cue to come in and post , " I am Andrea Thomspon , you insensitive clod " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is your cue to come in and post,

"I am Andrea Thomspon, you insensitive clod".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671334</id>
	<title>Re:And let me be the first to say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262800380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew you slept with Astro in college. George Jetson will be so pissed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew you slept with Astro in college .
George Jetson will be so pissed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew you slept with Astro in college.
George Jetson will be so pissed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30681054</id>
	<title>Exercise</title>
	<author>ma11achy</author>
	<datestamp>1262870700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why exercise is good for you, people. Look at all the stuff its eating and it still manages to stay slim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why exercise is good for you , people .
Look at all the stuff its eating and it still manages to stay slim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why exercise is good for you, people.
Look at all the stuff its eating and it still manages to stay slim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670370</id>
	<title>The Singularity Inductor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262796840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one who heard the Academician's voice and the eerie background music when I saw <a href="http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/peeringintot.jpg" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [physorg.com] Chandra image?
<p>
"What actually transpires beneath the veil of an event horizon? Decent people... shouldn't think too much about that."
- Prokhor Zakharov, <i>For I Have Tasted The Fruit</i>
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who heard the Academician 's voice and the eerie background music when I saw this [ physorg.com ] Chandra image ?
" What actually transpires beneath the veil of an event horizon ?
Decent people... should n't think too much about that .
" - Prokhor Zakharov , For I Have Tasted The Fruit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who heard the Academician's voice and the eerie background music when I saw this [physorg.com] Chandra image?
"What actually transpires beneath the veil of an event horizon?
Decent people... shouldn't think too much about that.
"
- Prokhor Zakharov, For I Have Tasted The Fruit
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670952</id>
	<title>Car makers should take this into account</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1262798940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The discovery that black holes can reduce their gas consumption of two orders of magnitude should help car makers to build better SUVs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The discovery that black holes can reduce their gas consumption of two orders of magnitude should help car makers to build better SUVs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The discovery that black holes can reduce their gas consumption of two orders of magnitude should help car makers to build better SUVs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30679536</id>
	<title>Pronunciation of Source Name</title>
	<author>rickshaf</author>
	<datestamp>1262805000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star')"

Oh, horse puckey!  I did radio astronomy for a lotta years.  Most folks refer to that source as "Sag-A", although a few folks tried "Saj-A".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" known as Sagittarius A * ( pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star ' ) " Oh , horse puckey !
I did radio astronomy for a lotta years .
Most folks refer to that source as " Sag-A " , although a few folks tried " Saj-A " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star')"

Oh, horse puckey!
I did radio astronomy for a lotta years.
Most folks refer to that source as "Sag-A", although a few folks tried "Saj-A".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671270</id>
	<title>A Rose By Any Other Name</title>
	<author>digitalgiblet</author>
	<datestamp>1262800200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;"Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star')"</p><p>So... it isn't a star but they call it A-Star?</p><p>Perhaps "The Saggitarius Object Formerly Known As A-Star"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " Sagittarius A * ( pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star ' ) " So... it is n't a star but they call it A-Star ? Perhaps " The Saggitarius Object Formerly Known As A-Star " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;"Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star')"So... it isn't a star but they call it A-Star?Perhaps "The Saggitarius Object Formerly Known As A-Star"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30681572</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262875200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Andrea got it right. Try reading her piece a little more carefully. Please tell me that you assumed she was wrong for some reason other than her sex. Also please tell me you trashed her without bothering to take a careful reading for some reason other than her sex. I hope it is not, "Gosh, everybody knows girls can't do math and science, so why waste the time to reconsider a hasty judgement." (I like judgement, so don't rush to a hasty judgment that I can't spell just because I do not follow all of Webster's peeves, crotchets, and quirks.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Andrea got it right .
Try reading her piece a little more carefully .
Please tell me that you assumed she was wrong for some reason other than her sex .
Also please tell me you trashed her without bothering to take a careful reading for some reason other than her sex .
I hope it is not , " Gosh , everybody knows girls ca n't do math and science , so why waste the time to reconsider a hasty judgement .
" ( I like judgement , so do n't rush to a hasty judgment that I ca n't spell just because I do not follow all of Webster 's peeves , crotchets , and quirks .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Andrea got it right.
Try reading her piece a little more carefully.
Please tell me that you assumed she was wrong for some reason other than her sex.
Also please tell me you trashed her without bothering to take a careful reading for some reason other than her sex.
I hope it is not, "Gosh, everybody knows girls can't do math and science, so why waste the time to reconsider a hasty judgement.
" (I like judgement, so don't rush to a hasty judgment that I can't spell just because I do not follow all of Webster's peeves, crotchets, and quirks.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672676</id>
	<title>Misread?</title>
	<author>mpfife</author>
	<datestamp>1262805720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was I the only one who read that first as:<p>
"...known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Hole')...."

Made a lot more sense when they talked about the accretion disk around the black-hole...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was I the only one who read that first as : " ...known as Sagittarius A * ( pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Hole ' ) .... " Made a lot more sense when they talked about the accretion disk around the black-hole.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was I the only one who read that first as:
"...known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Hole')...."

Made a lot more sense when they talked about the accretion disk around the black-hole...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670324</id>
	<title>gas expansion means...?</title>
	<author>MadCow42</author>
	<datestamp>1262796660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; <i>essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity well</i></p><p>If there is a dense enough concentration of gas that thermal expansion (i.e. pressure) can keep it out of the gravity well, then is there enough density to actually call that an atmosphere?  It's an interesting thought... although going from "atmosphere" to anything else (life, etc.) has about a billion hurdles in-between.</p><p>I would assume that in the disc there is a range of concentration/pressure, but never thought it would reach/exceed our atmospheric pressure.  That would be cool.</p><p>MadCow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; essentially , thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas , causing it to expand , and thus move away from Sagittarius A * 's gravity wellIf there is a dense enough concentration of gas that thermal expansion ( i.e .
pressure ) can keep it out of the gravity well , then is there enough density to actually call that an atmosphere ?
It 's an interesting thought... although going from " atmosphere " to anything else ( life , etc .
) has about a billion hurdles in-between.I would assume that in the disc there is a range of concentration/pressure , but never thought it would reach/exceed our atmospheric pressure .
That would be cool.MadCow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity wellIf there is a dense enough concentration of gas that thermal expansion (i.e.
pressure) can keep it out of the gravity well, then is there enough density to actually call that an atmosphere?
It's an interesting thought... although going from "atmosphere" to anything else (life, etc.
) has about a billion hurdles in-between.I would assume that in the disc there is a range of concentration/pressure, but never thought it would reach/exceed our atmospheric pressure.
That would be cool.MadCow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671210</id>
	<title>should be called the 'Sagittarius A-Hole'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262799960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.   How can you skip a joke like that?   It's reaching out and grabbing you, pulling you in to never let go and never let anything escape.</p><p>PS:  How much more do I have to type to get past the lameness filter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
How can you skip a joke like that ?
It 's reaching out and grabbing you , pulling you in to never let go and never let anything escape.PS : How much more do I have to type to get past the lameness filter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
How can you skip a joke like that?
It's reaching out and grabbing you, pulling you in to never let go and never let anything escape.PS:  How much more do I have to type to get past the lameness filter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670540</id>
	<title>A million seconds?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262797440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eleven and a half days is a lot more understandable. Who wrote that, Star Trek's Data?</p><p>Actually it's 11.574074074074074074074074074074 days, if Data's watching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eleven and a half days is a lot more understandable .
Who wrote that , Star Trek 's Data ? Actually it 's 11.574074074074074074074074074074 days , if Data 's watching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eleven and a half days is a lot more understandable.
Who wrote that, Star Trek's Data?Actually it's 11.574074074074074074074074074074 days, if Data's watching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669768</id>
	<title>Quick Question</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1262794680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society</p> </div><p>Does this mean there is a President of <i>Astro</i>physics?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society Does this mean there is a President of Astrophysics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society Does this mean there is a President of Astrophysics?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30675768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_06_1416212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30675768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30678834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30672338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30669900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30673834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30671334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_06_1416212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_06_1416212.30670016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
