<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_04_175241</id>
	<title>2009 Darwin Award Winners Announced</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1262594880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Greg Lindahl writes <i>"From the woman who jumped in a swollen creek to rescue her drowning moped, to the man who hopped over the divider at the edge of the highway to take a leak, and plunged 65 feet to his death, 2009 was a year both exceptional and unexceptional for <a href="http://www.darwinawards.com/">Darwin Award-worthy behavior</a>!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Greg Lindahl writes " From the woman who jumped in a swollen creek to rescue her drowning moped , to the man who hopped over the divider at the edge of the highway to take a leak , and plunged 65 feet to his death , 2009 was a year both exceptional and unexceptional for Darwin Award-worthy behavior !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greg Lindahl writes "From the woman who jumped in a swollen creek to rescue her drowning moped, to the man who hopped over the divider at the edge of the highway to take a leak, and plunged 65 feet to his death, 2009 was a year both exceptional and unexceptional for Darwin Award-worthy behavior!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646052</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1262599140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're all random people no one knows, and frankly, people don't feel a lot for people they don't know. I think it's more stupid when people go "oh no, 50 people died on other side of the world - let's pretend we're sad" and then completely ignoring how many people die every die, and how many people die in wars and such. I can bet you don't really feel sad for the iraqi insurgents, do you? If you feel sad for a random person, you should feel sad for another random person too.</p><p>And black humor is old thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're all random people no one knows , and frankly , people do n't feel a lot for people they do n't know .
I think it 's more stupid when people go " oh no , 50 people died on other side of the world - let 's pretend we 're sad " and then completely ignoring how many people die every die , and how many people die in wars and such .
I can bet you do n't really feel sad for the iraqi insurgents , do you ?
If you feel sad for a random person , you should feel sad for another random person too.And black humor is old thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're all random people no one knows, and frankly, people don't feel a lot for people they don't know.
I think it's more stupid when people go "oh no, 50 people died on other side of the world - let's pretend we're sad" and then completely ignoring how many people die every die, and how many people die in wars and such.
I can bet you don't really feel sad for the iraqi insurgents, do you?
If you feel sad for a random person, you should feel sad for another random person too.And black humor is old thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646082</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>sproingie</author>
	<datestamp>1262599200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For me it's not so much the mockery as the snarky self-righteousness mixed with credulity.  There's a big list of folks who I'd like to keep from propagating their kind of stupidity, and the people who click "forward" on every "Darwin Award" announcement are way up there on it.</p><p>Slashdot editors: Take Darwin's picture off this.  He deserves better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For me it 's not so much the mockery as the snarky self-righteousness mixed with credulity .
There 's a big list of folks who I 'd like to keep from propagating their kind of stupidity , and the people who click " forward " on every " Darwin Award " announcement are way up there on it.Slashdot editors : Take Darwin 's picture off this .
He deserves better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me it's not so much the mockery as the snarky self-righteousness mixed with credulity.
There's a big list of folks who I'd like to keep from propagating their kind of stupidity, and the people who click "forward" on every "Darwin Award" announcement are way up there on it.Slashdot editors: Take Darwin's picture off this.
He deserves better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646208</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>hkz</author>
	<datestamp>1262599620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget about the dead; that chipper, gloating tone that those little "tales" always have, is an insult to the living. It rubs me the wrong way and is the main reason why the Darwin Awards annoy me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget about the dead ; that chipper , gloating tone that those little " tales " always have , is an insult to the living .
It rubs me the wrong way and is the main reason why the Darwin Awards annoy me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget about the dead; that chipper, gloating tone that those little "tales" always have, is an insult to the living.
It rubs me the wrong way and is the main reason why the Darwin Awards annoy me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647662</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1262605740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred, these things never to have to happen again.</p></div><p>See this is the only thing that really bugs me, it suggests that because of a persons ONE mistake in life they shouldn't have the right to pass on Genes.</p><p>Its fine to have "Odd News" and some tiny jabs at ridiculous scenarios. It does exactly as you said - spread information thats beneficial to everyone. Informs people of dangers, good stuff.</p><p>It's just the arrogance associated with "It's better off they died" - whether to promote a message or to remove "bad genes" that puts me off.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred , these things never to have to happen again.See this is the only thing that really bugs me , it suggests that because of a persons ONE mistake in life they should n't have the right to pass on Genes.Its fine to have " Odd News " and some tiny jabs at ridiculous scenarios .
It does exactly as you said - spread information thats beneficial to everyone .
Informs people of dangers , good stuff.It 's just the arrogance associated with " It 's better off they died " - whether to promote a message or to remove " bad genes " that puts me off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred, these things never to have to happen again.See this is the only thing that really bugs me, it suggests that because of a persons ONE mistake in life they shouldn't have the right to pass on Genes.Its fine to have "Odd News" and some tiny jabs at ridiculous scenarios.
It does exactly as you said - spread information thats beneficial to everyone.
Informs people of dangers, good stuff.It's just the arrogance associated with "It's better off they died" - whether to promote a message or to remove "bad genes" that puts me off.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648560</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>The -e**(i*pi)</author>
	<datestamp>1262610000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>undoing wrong mod</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>undoing wrong mod</tokentext>
<sentencetext>undoing wrong mod</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647352</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>hondo77</author>
	<datestamp>1262604420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead...am I the only one who feels this way?</p></div><p>Yes.  Yes you are.

</p><p>Next!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little distasteful to insult the dead...am I the only one who feels this way ? Yes .
Yes you are .
Next !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead...am I the only one who feels this way?Yes.
Yes you are.
Next!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650486</id>
	<title>What about the crotch bomber?</title>
	<author>eagl</author>
	<datestamp>1262620500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the crotch bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab?  He ought to get at least a 2009 Darwin honorable mention since the misfired high explosives in his underpants simply burned his reproductive organs quite badly.  Medical details have not been released, but as the effect of the botched suicide bombing was very similar to what you'd get if you shoved a lit road flare down your pants, it seems likely that he is no longer part of the gene pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the crotch bomber , Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab ?
He ought to get at least a 2009 Darwin honorable mention since the misfired high explosives in his underpants simply burned his reproductive organs quite badly .
Medical details have not been released , but as the effect of the botched suicide bombing was very similar to what you 'd get if you shoved a lit road flare down your pants , it seems likely that he is no longer part of the gene pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the crotch bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab?
He ought to get at least a 2009 Darwin honorable mention since the misfired high explosives in his underpants simply burned his reproductive organs quite badly.
Medical details have not been released, but as the effect of the botched suicide bombing was very similar to what you'd get if you shoved a lit road flare down your pants, it seems likely that he is no longer part of the gene pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646098</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>ryanvm</author>
	<datestamp>1262599260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646658</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>rumblin'rabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1262601540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But did you think of how many lives (or genitals) this award has saved? There are some out there who might consider using their plugged-in laptop while in the bathtub, or stick their johnson down a garburator. Such people, lacking the ability to think through the consequences of these ideas, at least have the benefit of other people's experiences to draw on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did you think of how many lives ( or genitals ) this award has saved ?
There are some out there who might consider using their plugged-in laptop while in the bathtub , or stick their johnson down a garburator .
Such people , lacking the ability to think through the consequences of these ideas , at least have the benefit of other people 's experiences to draw on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But did you think of how many lives (or genitals) this award has saved?
There are some out there who might consider using their plugged-in laptop while in the bathtub, or stick their johnson down a garburator.
Such people, lacking the ability to think through the consequences of these ideas, at least have the benefit of other people's experiences to draw on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646872</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262602440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall down an open manhole cover and die.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.npcentral.net/humor/quotes.shtml" title="npcentral.net" rel="nofollow">Mel Brooks</a> [npcentral.net]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tragedy is when I cut my finger .
Comedy is when you fall down an open manhole cover and die .
Mel Brooks [ npcentral.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tragedy is when I cut my finger.
Comedy is when you fall down an open manhole cover and die.
Mel Brooks [npcentral.net]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646036</id>
	<title>My cock, your mouth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fag!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fag !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fag!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648680</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Obfuscant</author>
	<datestamp>1262610600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about, or doing, instead of driving, that was worth the life of their children. It may be disrespectful to the dead, and I admit I cannot know the circumstances around the incident, but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard.</i> <p>
What those parents were doing that was worth the life of their children was DRIVING THEM TO SCHOOL so they could turn out to be self-appointed judges for other people's mistakes, just like YOUR parents drove YOU to school so you could be here today.</p><p>
You make the point for this thread better than anything anyone else has said. You have NO IDEA what happened, but you'll happily assume that the parents were grossly negligent ("instead of driving") and condemn them for an accident that may very well not have been their fault. In case you missed the point, the only difference between your saintly parents and "those parents" who are obviously scum for killing their children is that YOUR parent's child didn't die in a traffic accident and their's did. There's a saying that some civilized people use: "There but for the grace of God go I". In case you don't understand, it means "whatever it was that happened to THEM could have happened to ME, instead."</p><p>
I expect you've never seen black ice form on an overpass, or a sleepy 18-wheel driver try to use your lane, or any of a thousand other things that could have caused the accident without it being the fault of "those parents" you regard so lowly. But obviously, they were negligent somehow, because YOU know they were, even after you admit you know NOTHING about what happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about , or doing , instead of driving , that was worth the life of their children .
It may be disrespectful to the dead , and I admit I can not know the circumstances around the incident , but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard .
What those parents were doing that was worth the life of their children was DRIVING THEM TO SCHOOL so they could turn out to be self-appointed judges for other people 's mistakes , just like YOUR parents drove YOU to school so you could be here today .
You make the point for this thread better than anything anyone else has said .
You have NO IDEA what happened , but you 'll happily assume that the parents were grossly negligent ( " instead of driving " ) and condemn them for an accident that may very well not have been their fault .
In case you missed the point , the only difference between your saintly parents and " those parents " who are obviously scum for killing their children is that YOUR parent 's child did n't die in a traffic accident and their 's did .
There 's a saying that some civilized people use : " There but for the grace of God go I " .
In case you do n't understand , it means " whatever it was that happened to THEM could have happened to ME , instead .
" I expect you 've never seen black ice form on an overpass , or a sleepy 18-wheel driver try to use your lane , or any of a thousand other things that could have caused the accident without it being the fault of " those parents " you regard so lowly .
But obviously , they were negligent somehow , because YOU know they were , even after you admit you know NOTHING about what happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about, or doing, instead of driving, that was worth the life of their children.
It may be disrespectful to the dead, and I admit I cannot know the circumstances around the incident, but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard.
What those parents were doing that was worth the life of their children was DRIVING THEM TO SCHOOL so they could turn out to be self-appointed judges for other people's mistakes, just like YOUR parents drove YOU to school so you could be here today.
You make the point for this thread better than anything anyone else has said.
You have NO IDEA what happened, but you'll happily assume that the parents were grossly negligent ("instead of driving") and condemn them for an accident that may very well not have been their fault.
In case you missed the point, the only difference between your saintly parents and "those parents" who are obviously scum for killing their children is that YOUR parent's child didn't die in a traffic accident and their's did.
There's a saying that some civilized people use: "There but for the grace of God go I".
In case you don't understand, it means "whatever it was that happened to THEM could have happened to ME, instead.
"
I expect you've never seen black ice form on an overpass, or a sleepy 18-wheel driver try to use your lane, or any of a thousand other things that could have caused the accident without it being the fault of "those parents" you regard so lowly.
But obviously, they were negligent somehow, because YOU know they were, even after you admit you know NOTHING about what happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30708742</id>
	<title>I used to think...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263066660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that these things were funny.  But then I saw the photograph of somebody from years back who won one of these awards.  Guess what?  He was a human being, and you could see the suffering in his face from having injured himself.  There but for the grace of God.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that these things were funny .
But then I saw the photograph of somebody from years back who won one of these awards .
Guess what ?
He was a human being , and you could see the suffering in his face from having injured himself .
There but for the grace of God .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that these things were funny.
But then I saw the photograph of somebody from years back who won one of these awards.
Guess what?
He was a human being, and you could see the suffering in his face from having injured himself.
There but for the grace of God.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651950</id>
	<title>Let's laugh at dead people</title>
	<author>CuteSteveJobs</author>
	<datestamp>1262634420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was one I heard... a pregnant woman thought she could fix a washing machine, but she got electrocuted. Her and her fetus died. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH!!! WHAT AN IDIOT!!!! HAHAHAHHAHAH!!!</p><p>That's a real story, and like the Darwin Awards, I don't think it's funny at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was one I heard... a pregnant woman thought she could fix a washing machine , but she got electrocuted .
Her and her fetus died .
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH ! ! ! WHAT AN IDIOT ! ! ! !
HAHAHAHHAHAH ! ! ! That 's a real story , and like the Darwin Awards , I do n't think it 's funny at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was one I heard... a pregnant woman thought she could fix a washing machine, but she got electrocuted.
Her and her fetus died.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH!!! WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!
HAHAHAHHAHAH!!!That's a real story, and like the Darwin Awards, I don't think it's funny at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646592</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>yurtinus</author>
	<datestamp>1262601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All sorts of people find all sorts of things distasteful. It doesn't make anybody wrong or right. There's no reason to get judgmental over something so trivial as humor. I think our ability to sit back and chuckle at life rather than get offended is a tremendously useful trait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All sorts of people find all sorts of things distasteful .
It does n't make anybody wrong or right .
There 's no reason to get judgmental over something so trivial as humor .
I think our ability to sit back and chuckle at life rather than get offended is a tremendously useful trait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All sorts of people find all sorts of things distasteful.
It doesn't make anybody wrong or right.
There's no reason to get judgmental over something so trivial as humor.
I think our ability to sit back and chuckle at life rather than get offended is a tremendously useful trait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646008</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1262598900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they died honorably rescuing people or something, yeah.

Jumping in a creek after a freaking moped, not so much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they died honorably rescuing people or something , yeah .
Jumping in a creek after a freaking moped , not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they died honorably rescuing people or something, yeah.
Jumping in a creek after a freaking moped, not so much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648414</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1262609340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nonono, we're not mocking them for dying. We're mocking them for being stupid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nonono , we 're not mocking them for dying .
We 're mocking them for being stupid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nonono, we're not mocking them for dying.
We're mocking them for being stupid!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646484</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they got over the dead of a friend or relative, they can handle a joke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they got over the dead of a friend or relative , they can handle a joke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they got over the dead of a friend or relative, they can handle a joke</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646370</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They make it a point of not including anyone on the list who died because of anything other than what your average person would stop and think "now wait, how could this go wrong" if not twice but at least once.  But in all fairness think of how smart the average person is.  Then think that half of them are dumber.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They make it a point of not including anyone on the list who died because of anything other than what your average person would stop and think " now wait , how could this go wrong " if not twice but at least once .
But in all fairness think of how smart the average person is .
Then think that half of them are dumber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They make it a point of not including anyone on the list who died because of anything other than what your average person would stop and think "now wait, how could this go wrong" if not twice but at least once.
But in all fairness think of how smart the average person is.
Then think that half of them are dumber.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262598720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have thought it would take a lot longer than three days to read all the urban myths in the spam folder...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have thought it would take a lot longer than three days to read all the urban myths in the spam folder.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have thought it would take a lot longer than three days to read all the urban myths in the spam folder...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646150</id>
	<title>Coral Cache link to avoid /.ing Darwin Awards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.darwinawards.com.nyud.net:8080/" title="nyud.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.darwinawards.com.nyud.net:8080/</a> [nyud.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.darwinawards.com.nyud.net : 8080/ [ nyud.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.darwinawards.com.nyud.net:8080/ [nyud.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646286</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not everyone who is a candidate ends up dead - just unable to procreate.</p><p>When the site is up again - check for "Milk The Balls".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone who is a candidate ends up dead - just unable to procreate.When the site is up again - check for " Milk The Balls " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone who is a candidate ends up dead - just unable to procreate.When the site is up again - check for "Milk The Balls".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646190</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I may get -1 flamed for this, but...</p></div></blockquote><p>Anyone who says this automatically deserves it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I may get -1 flamed for this , but...Anyone who says this automatically deserves it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may get -1 flamed for this, but...Anyone who says this automatically deserves it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647448</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>dvice\_null</author>
	<datestamp>1262604780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I never understood the "don't speak ill of the dead" idea.</p><p>It is for historical reasons. We used to bury our dead with their stuff, but we broke their weapons before putting them into the grave, for our own protection. For the same reason, it was not wise to speak ill of them.</p><p>The reason why we still have that rule is best explained with the famous bananas and monkeys example:<br><a href="http://paws.kettering.edu/~jhuggins/humor/banana.html" title="kettering.edu">http://paws.kettering.edu/~jhuggins/humor/banana.html</a> [kettering.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I never understood the " do n't speak ill of the dead " idea.It is for historical reasons .
We used to bury our dead with their stuff , but we broke their weapons before putting them into the grave , for our own protection .
For the same reason , it was not wise to speak ill of them.The reason why we still have that rule is best explained with the famous bananas and monkeys example : http : //paws.kettering.edu/ ~ jhuggins/humor/banana.html [ kettering.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I never understood the "don't speak ill of the dead" idea.It is for historical reasons.
We used to bury our dead with their stuff, but we broke their weapons before putting them into the grave, for our own protection.
For the same reason, it was not wise to speak ill of them.The reason why we still have that rule is best explained with the famous bananas and monkeys example:http://paws.kettering.edu/~jhuggins/humor/banana.html [kettering.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</id>
	<title>While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262598780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead. I may get -1 flamed for this, but am I the only one who feels this way?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little distasteful to insult the dead .
I may get -1 flamed for this , but am I the only one who feels this way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead.
I may get -1 flamed for this, but am I the only one who feels this way?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646446</id>
	<title>I do feel sad for the Iraqi insurgents.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1262600580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they can be better nourished so that they can be bigger and  easier targets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they can be better nourished so that they can be bigger and easier targets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they can be better nourished so that they can be bigger and  easier targets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651090</id>
	<title>Re:What about the crotch bomber?</title>
	<author>mbstone</author>
	<datestamp>1262625420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did submit the crotch bomber to Darwin on account of his apparently having sterilized himself, and I received the following replies from their mods:</p><p>Bruce said:<br>Definitely Toss: No Self-Selection<br>Thanks, but we don't award terrorists. First off, he knew what he was trying to do, which means he didn't care what happened to him. Second, he intended to hurt/kill hundreds of others. For both those reasons a DA isn't appropriate for terrorists.</p><p>Darwin said:<br>Definitely Toss: Not Amusing<br>Dude. Use your noggin. Many, many people were at risk; although what you say is true, people just don't laugh at terrorist acts, and the Darwin Awards is meant to amuse. Appreciate the "thought" but it simply ain't a winner, m.b. Don't mean to harsh you. You aren't the unlucky recipient of flame emails... we gotta keep it amusing by refusing to accept submissions where innocent people were imperiled. Keep lookin' for more...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did submit the crotch bomber to Darwin on account of his apparently having sterilized himself , and I received the following replies from their mods : Bruce said : Definitely Toss : No Self-SelectionThanks , but we do n't award terrorists .
First off , he knew what he was trying to do , which means he did n't care what happened to him .
Second , he intended to hurt/kill hundreds of others .
For both those reasons a DA is n't appropriate for terrorists.Darwin said : Definitely Toss : Not AmusingDude .
Use your noggin .
Many , many people were at risk ; although what you say is true , people just do n't laugh at terrorist acts , and the Darwin Awards is meant to amuse .
Appreciate the " thought " but it simply ai n't a winner , m.b .
Do n't mean to harsh you .
You are n't the unlucky recipient of flame emails... we got ta keep it amusing by refusing to accept submissions where innocent people were imperiled .
Keep lookin ' for more.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did submit the crotch bomber to Darwin on account of his apparently having sterilized himself, and I received the following replies from their mods:Bruce said:Definitely Toss: No Self-SelectionThanks, but we don't award terrorists.
First off, he knew what he was trying to do, which means he didn't care what happened to him.
Second, he intended to hurt/kill hundreds of others.
For both those reasons a DA isn't appropriate for terrorists.Darwin said:Definitely Toss: Not AmusingDude.
Use your noggin.
Many, many people were at risk; although what you say is true, people just don't laugh at terrorist acts, and the Darwin Awards is meant to amuse.
Appreciate the "thought" but it simply ain't a winner, m.b.
Don't mean to harsh you.
You aren't the unlucky recipient of flame emails... we gotta keep it amusing by refusing to accept submissions where innocent people were imperiled.
Keep lookin' for more...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647076</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1262603220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why deify the dead? Just because they died doesn't mean they were good people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why deify the dead ?
Just because they died does n't mean they were good people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why deify the dead?
Just because they died doesn't mean they were good people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647270</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>dummondwhu</author>
	<datestamp>1262604060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are plenty of dead who deserve to be insulted.  Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong.  So, I'm not sure where the idea of being dead elevates one above being spoken ill of by the living.  It's just a matter of deciding where to draw the line between respecting a dead individual or not.  Your line may vary, but there is certainly nothing inherently distasteful about insulting the dead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are plenty of dead who deserve to be insulted .
Stalin , Hitler , Pol Pot , Mao Zedong .
So , I 'm not sure where the idea of being dead elevates one above being spoken ill of by the living .
It 's just a matter of deciding where to draw the line between respecting a dead individual or not .
Your line may vary , but there is certainly nothing inherently distasteful about insulting the dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are plenty of dead who deserve to be insulted.
Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong.
So, I'm not sure where the idea of being dead elevates one above being spoken ill of by the living.
It's just a matter of deciding where to draw the line between respecting a dead individual or not.
Your line may vary, but there is certainly nothing inherently distasteful about insulting the dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648064</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Tomfrh</author>
	<datestamp>1262607660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It certainly is distasteful. We've all done stupid things in our lives, but that doesn't mean you deserve to die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It certainly is distasteful .
We 've all done stupid things in our lives , but that does n't mean you deserve to die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It certainly is distasteful.
We've all done stupid things in our lives, but that doesn't mean you deserve to die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646040</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are dead, they don't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are dead , they do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are dead, they don't care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647554</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1262605260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5JV0Fs\_GE8" title="youtube.com">Dead caveman</a> [youtube.com] around the world applaud your stance against Geico.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little distasteful to insult the dead .
Dead caveman [ youtube.com ] around the world applaud your stance against Geico .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead.
Dead caveman [youtube.com] around the world applaud your stance against Geico.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648356</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1262609100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but it's poking fun at morons that just happen to be dead. We'd laugh just as much if they somehow survived.</p><p>And, bluntly, this year's winner really, really, really deserves it. Whether I mean the award or death is up to the reader. Let's see:</p><p>1) Driving with a motorcycle in a thunderstorm, with water already flooding the streets, in an area where you have been living all your life and probably already saw this before.<br>2) Driving (speeding, no less) past a police road block telling you that the road ahead is flooded.<br>3) Being flushed into the river that drags you with it and nearly drowns you, if it weren't for that helpful police man who pretty much saved your life.<br>4) Jumping back into said river.</p><p>I dunno. I might be cold hearted but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is it me or does that constitute "really asking for it"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but it 's poking fun at morons that just happen to be dead .
We 'd laugh just as much if they somehow survived.And , bluntly , this year 's winner really , really , really deserves it .
Whether I mean the award or death is up to the reader .
Let 's see : 1 ) Driving with a motorcycle in a thunderstorm , with water already flooding the streets , in an area where you have been living all your life and probably already saw this before.2 ) Driving ( speeding , no less ) past a police road block telling you that the road ahead is flooded.3 ) Being flushed into the river that drags you with it and nearly drowns you , if it were n't for that helpful police man who pretty much saved your life.4 ) Jumping back into said river.I dunno .
I might be cold hearted but ... is it me or does that constitute " really asking for it " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but it's poking fun at morons that just happen to be dead.
We'd laugh just as much if they somehow survived.And, bluntly, this year's winner really, really, really deserves it.
Whether I mean the award or death is up to the reader.
Let's see:1) Driving with a motorcycle in a thunderstorm, with water already flooding the streets, in an area where you have been living all your life and probably already saw this before.2) Driving (speeding, no less) past a police road block telling you that the road ahead is flooded.3) Being flushed into the river that drags you with it and nearly drowns you, if it weren't for that helpful police man who pretty much saved your life.4) Jumping back into said river.I dunno.
I might be cold hearted but ... is it me or does that constitute "really asking for it"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646332</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1262600100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is it distasteful to insult the dead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it distasteful to insult the dead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it distasteful to insult the dead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650172</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>quanticle</author>
	<datestamp>1262618340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's so bullshit about it?  As even Forrest Gump knew, "Stupid is as stupid does."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's so bullshit about it ?
As even Forrest Gump knew , " Stupid is as stupid does .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's so bullshit about it?
As even Forrest Gump knew, "Stupid is as stupid does.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262606880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm not calling you stupid, I'm just saying you do stupid things."  Yeah, heard that one before.  It was bullshit then and it's bullshit now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm not calling you stupid , I 'm just saying you do stupid things .
" Yeah , heard that one before .
It was bullshit then and it 's bullshit now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm not calling you stupid, I'm just saying you do stupid things.
"  Yeah, heard that one before.
It was bullshit then and it's bullshit now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646030</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, this is just another sign of how selfish and hateful the "rational and scientific" crowd is.  Respect for the dead is something only rel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this is just another sign of how selfish and hateful the " rational and scientific " crowd is .
Respect for the dead is something only rel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this is just another sign of how selfish and hateful the "rational and scientific" crowd is.
Respect for the dead is something only rel</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648346</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1262609100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's perfectly possible to <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insult" title="reference.com">insult</a> [reference.com] the dead. It's just impossible for them to be offended by it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's perfectly possible to insult [ reference.com ] the dead .
It 's just impossible for them to be offended by it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's perfectly possible to insult [reference.com] the dead.
It's just impossible for them to be offended by it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1262601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand the sentiments, but think for a second what is actually going on.  The Darwin awards are publicizing fatal accidents that should not have really occurred, and they are doing so in a not so stupid way.  They could have "The stupid awards for people who offed themselves in the stupidest manner possible and left there friends and family grieving as asking why things like this happen", but they don't.  They have an award for people who off themselves in unexpected ways, and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred, these things never to have to happen again.  In fact, by spreading the meme that stupid accidents are preventable, what they may actually be doing to saving another family from having to grieve over a family member that chooses physical possessions over life.
<p>
I do take this kind of seriously.  When I was 10 and in school, one of my classmates, in fact her entire family, died instantly when they drove off an over pass or a freeway.  I was brought to school over this overpass everyday.  At that time there was very little traffic.  To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about, or doing, instead of driving, that was worth the life of their children.  It may be disrespectful to the dead, and I admit I cannot know the circumstances around the incident, but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard.
</p><p>
I can't help but feel these cautionary tales are a good public service.  They remind us that the world is dangerous, and the miracle is that we humans have a brain that we can use to survive.  Unless we don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand the sentiments , but think for a second what is actually going on .
The Darwin awards are publicizing fatal accidents that should not have really occurred , and they are doing so in a not so stupid way .
They could have " The stupid awards for people who offed themselves in the stupidest manner possible and left there friends and family grieving as asking why things like this happen " , but they do n't .
They have an award for people who off themselves in unexpected ways , and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred , these things never to have to happen again .
In fact , by spreading the meme that stupid accidents are preventable , what they may actually be doing to saving another family from having to grieve over a family member that chooses physical possessions over life .
I do take this kind of seriously .
When I was 10 and in school , one of my classmates , in fact her entire family , died instantly when they drove off an over pass or a freeway .
I was brought to school over this overpass everyday .
At that time there was very little traffic .
To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about , or doing , instead of driving , that was worth the life of their children .
It may be disrespectful to the dead , and I admit I can not know the circumstances around the incident , but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard .
I ca n't help but feel these cautionary tales are a good public service .
They remind us that the world is dangerous , and the miracle is that we humans have a brain that we can use to survive .
Unless we do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand the sentiments, but think for a second what is actually going on.
The Darwin awards are publicizing fatal accidents that should not have really occurred, and they are doing so in a not so stupid way.
They could have "The stupid awards for people who offed themselves in the stupidest manner possible and left there friends and family grieving as asking why things like this happen", but they don't.
They have an award for people who off themselves in unexpected ways, and the hope is that since the genes were not transferred, these things never to have to happen again.
In fact, by spreading the meme that stupid accidents are preventable, what they may actually be doing to saving another family from having to grieve over a family member that chooses physical possessions over life.
I do take this kind of seriously.
When I was 10 and in school, one of my classmates, in fact her entire family, died instantly when they drove off an over pass or a freeway.
I was brought to school over this overpass everyday.
At that time there was very little traffic.
To this day i wonder what the parents were thinking about, or doing, instead of driving, that was worth the life of their children.
It may be disrespectful to the dead, and I admit I cannot know the circumstances around the incident, but I do certainly hold those parents in low regard.
I can't help but feel these cautionary tales are a good public service.
They remind us that the world is dangerous, and the miracle is that we humans have a brain that we can use to survive.
Unless we don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647122</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1262603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're not insulting them; we're honoring them for removing their genes from the gene pool before they could replicate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're not insulting them ; we 're honoring them for removing their genes from the gene pool before they could replicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're not insulting them; we're honoring them for removing their genes from the gene pool before they could replicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30660020</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1262684040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that the awards do a very important public service. Just because they do it in a humorous way doesn't make it any less important. Not everybody knows that paint is toxic to breathe in. Not everybody looks before they leap (how many times have you sat on your remote control that's laying on the couch). These stories, while humorous, have very important lessons. After all, common sense isn't nearly so common.</p><p>The humor softens the blow, so to speak. If a somebody went around telling grown adults to look before leaping or they might die, most people would likely brush it off as a nag or a lecture or some crazy talk. But if the lesson is masked with humor, it goes in easier. A spoonful of sugar, as some might say.</p><p>As for your classmate, I wouldn't judge without knowing the whole story. Perhaps the driver was distracted, or perhaps the driver had a heart attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that the awards do a very important public service .
Just because they do it in a humorous way does n't make it any less important .
Not everybody knows that paint is toxic to breathe in .
Not everybody looks before they leap ( how many times have you sat on your remote control that 's laying on the couch ) .
These stories , while humorous , have very important lessons .
After all , common sense is n't nearly so common.The humor softens the blow , so to speak .
If a somebody went around telling grown adults to look before leaping or they might die , most people would likely brush it off as a nag or a lecture or some crazy talk .
But if the lesson is masked with humor , it goes in easier .
A spoonful of sugar , as some might say.As for your classmate , I would n't judge without knowing the whole story .
Perhaps the driver was distracted , or perhaps the driver had a heart attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that the awards do a very important public service.
Just because they do it in a humorous way doesn't make it any less important.
Not everybody knows that paint is toxic to breathe in.
Not everybody looks before they leap (how many times have you sat on your remote control that's laying on the couch).
These stories, while humorous, have very important lessons.
After all, common sense isn't nearly so common.The humor softens the blow, so to speak.
If a somebody went around telling grown adults to look before leaping or they might die, most people would likely brush it off as a nag or a lecture or some crazy talk.
But if the lesson is masked with humor, it goes in easier.
A spoonful of sugar, as some might say.As for your classmate, I wouldn't judge without knowing the whole story.
Perhaps the driver was distracted, or perhaps the driver had a heart attack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646016</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>dschmit1</author>
	<datestamp>1262598960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is not the dead that are being insulted, it is the manner in which they decided to become so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not the dead that are being insulted , it is the manner in which they decided to become so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not the dead that are being insulted, it is the manner in which they decided to become so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646330</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>dirk</author>
	<datestamp>1262600100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never understood the "don't speak ill of the dead" idea.  Yes, you should never stand around and cheer people's deaths, but if they were stupid, why should I not say so just because they are dead?  Imagine you heard about someone who almost drowned trying to save their moped from a flooded creek.  Most people's first reaction would be "what a moron".  Why should that change just because the person died?  Did they become smarter in death?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood the " do n't speak ill of the dead " idea .
Yes , you should never stand around and cheer people 's deaths , but if they were stupid , why should I not say so just because they are dead ?
Imagine you heard about someone who almost drowned trying to save their moped from a flooded creek .
Most people 's first reaction would be " what a moron " .
Why should that change just because the person died ?
Did they become smarter in death ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood the "don't speak ill of the dead" idea.
Yes, you should never stand around and cheer people's deaths, but if they were stupid, why should I not say so just because they are dead?
Imagine you heard about someone who almost drowned trying to save their moped from a flooded creek.
Most people's first reaction would be "what a moron".
Why should that change just because the person died?
Did they become smarter in death?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646132</id>
	<title>I wish I'd get that far ... mirror anyone ?</title>
	<author>OeLeWaPpErKe</author>
	<datestamp>1262599380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps a meta-darwin award for hosting a famous website on a single "green solar powered" (see lmi.net, their hoster) hoster.</p><p>At the moment, you see, they're using 1.2 kw for <i>not</i> showing us that site. You'd almost think they're working for the government<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps a meta-darwin award for hosting a famous website on a single " green solar powered " ( see lmi.net , their hoster ) hoster.At the moment , you see , they 're using 1.2 kw for not showing us that site .
You 'd almost think they 're working for the government .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps a meta-darwin award for hosting a famous website on a single "green solar powered" (see lmi.net, their hoster) hoster.At the moment, you see, they're using 1.2 kw for not showing us that site.
You'd almost think they're working for the government ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647608</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1262605560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude - errr - Monkee,<br>It's no big deal.  Some people are jerks, and need to be made fun of.  They don't stop being jerks or being funny just because they are dead.  You loved your (mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, dog or whatever) before he/she died, right?  You still love him/her?  See, nothing has changed, except you can't hug them or talk to them.  Same deal here.  The village idiots are still the village idiots.  Dead village idiots are even better than live ones, because the manner of their deaths is usually educational.<br>Just read, and enjoy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude - errr - Monkee,It 's no big deal .
Some people are jerks , and need to be made fun of .
They do n't stop being jerks or being funny just because they are dead .
You loved your ( mom , dad , grandma , grandpa , dog or whatever ) before he/she died , right ?
You still love him/her ?
See , nothing has changed , except you ca n't hug them or talk to them .
Same deal here .
The village idiots are still the village idiots .
Dead village idiots are even better than live ones , because the manner of their deaths is usually educational.Just read , and enjoy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude - errr - Monkee,It's no big deal.
Some people are jerks, and need to be made fun of.
They don't stop being jerks or being funny just because they are dead.
You loved your (mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, dog or whatever) before he/she died, right?
You still love him/her?
See, nothing has changed, except you can't hug them or talk to them.
Same deal here.
The village idiots are still the village idiots.
Dead village idiots are even better than live ones, because the manner of their deaths is usually educational.Just read, and enjoy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651078</id>
	<title>The double award winners are not from Belgium ...</title>
	<author>clarkie.mg</author>
	<datestamp>1262625300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In defence of this little country, I have to say that the double award winners in the story titled "Crushing Debt" are not from Belgium, they are from Kosovo :</p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1216735/Two-bank-robbers-killed-explosives-trying-blow-safe.html" title="dailymail.co.uk">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1216735/Two-bank-robbers-killed-explosives-trying-blow-safe.html</a> [dailymail.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In defence of this little country , I have to say that the double award winners in the story titled " Crushing Debt " are not from Belgium , they are from Kosovo : http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1216735/Two-bank-robbers-killed-explosives-trying-blow-safe.html [ dailymail.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In defence of this little country, I have to say that the double award winners in the story titled "Crushing Debt" are not from Belgium, they are from Kosovo :http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1216735/Two-bank-robbers-killed-explosives-trying-blow-safe.html [dailymail.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062</id>
	<title>Re:While slightly humorous</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1262599140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead. I may get -1 flamed for this, but am I the only one who feels this way?</p></div><p>It is impossible to insult the dead, although it's possible to offend their living friends and relatives...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little distasteful to insult the dead .
I may get -1 flamed for this , but am I the only one who feels this way ? It is impossible to insult the dead , although it 's possible to offend their living friends and relatives.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little distasteful to insult the dead.
I may get -1 flamed for this, but am I the only one who feels this way?It is impossible to insult the dead, although it's possible to offend their living friends and relatives...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30660020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_175241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_175241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_175241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_175241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30651950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_175241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30645980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30660020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646016
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647918
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30650172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30648064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30647270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_175241.30646446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
