<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_04_170217</id>
	<title>Freescale Unveils Design For $199 Tablet</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262628000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"Freescale Semiconductor has designs on new smartbook tablet computers, and to prove it, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924\_3-10423606-64.html?tag=newsLatestHeadlinesArea.0">it's rolling out a second-generation reference design</a> at the Consumer Electronics Show. For under $200, Freescale envisions an instant-on device with persistent connectivity and all-day battery life with the following additional features: 7" (1024 x 600) touch screen, Freescale i.MX515 processor (based on ARM Cortex-A8 core), 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 2.1, GPS, 3G modem (optional), 512 MB DDR2 memory, 4GB to 64GB internal storage, removable micro SD, 3 Mpixel camera (video up to VGA 30fps), 3-axis accelerometer, ambient light sensor, Adobe Flash support, Android or Linux OS."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Freescale Semiconductor has designs on new smartbook tablet computers , and to prove it , it 's rolling out a second-generation reference design at the Consumer Electronics Show .
For under $ 200 , Freescale envisions an instant-on device with persistent connectivity and all-day battery life with the following additional features : 7 " ( 1024 x 600 ) touch screen , Freescale i.MX515 processor ( based on ARM Cortex-A8 core ) , 802.11 b/g/n , Bluetooth 2.1 , GPS , 3G modem ( optional ) , 512 MB DDR2 memory , 4GB to 64GB internal storage , removable micro SD , 3 Mpixel camera ( video up to VGA 30fps ) , 3-axis accelerometer , ambient light sensor , Adobe Flash support , Android or Linux OS .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Freescale Semiconductor has designs on new smartbook tablet computers, and to prove it, it's rolling out a second-generation reference design at the Consumer Electronics Show.
For under $200, Freescale envisions an instant-on device with persistent connectivity and all-day battery life with the following additional features: 7" (1024 x 600) touch screen, Freescale i.MX515 processor (based on ARM Cortex-A8 core), 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 2.1, GPS, 3G modem (optional), 512 MB DDR2 memory, 4GB to 64GB internal storage, removable micro SD, 3 Mpixel camera (video up to VGA 30fps), 3-axis accelerometer, ambient light sensor, Adobe Flash support, Android or Linux OS.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894</id>
	<title>Some Questions</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1262633400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1024 by 600?  Why not 1024 by 768?<br>
<br>
can i install unbuntu/kubuntu on it?<br>
<br>
64 gBit? where? how much?<br>
<br>
Where can I buy one so I can get my trembling fingers on it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1024 by 600 ?
Why not 1024 by 768 ?
can i install unbuntu/kubuntu on it ?
64 gBit ?
where ? how much ?
Where can I buy one so I can get my trembling fingers on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1024 by 600?
Why not 1024 by 768?
can i install unbuntu/kubuntu on it?
64 gBit?
where? how much?
Where can I buy one so I can get my trembling fingers on it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644262</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating Touchbook</title>
	<author>haruchai</author>
	<datestamp>1262635140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks. I stumbled onto this last year and forgot to bookmark it. It's certainly attractive but the SD card only option is<br>a downer - why not an SSD? Also, they're being quite coy about the amount of installed RAM - which isn't upgradeable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks .
I stumbled onto this last year and forgot to bookmark it .
It 's certainly attractive but the SD card only option isa downer - why not an SSD ?
Also , they 're being quite coy about the amount of installed RAM - which is n't upgradeable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks.
I stumbled onto this last year and forgot to bookmark it.
It's certainly attractive but the SD card only option isa downer - why not an SSD?
Also, they're being quite coy about the amount of installed RAM - which isn't upgradeable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647284</id>
	<title>Ships with Debian Etch installed?</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1262604180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>presumably they'd offer Win7 as an extra-cost downgrade...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>presumably they 'd offer Win7 as an extra-cost downgrade.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>presumably they'd offer Win7 as an extra-cost downgrade...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644126</id>
	<title>Re:Some Questions</title>
	<author>mmell</author>
	<datestamp>1262634540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a reference design, not a finished product.  Similar to vaporware - think of it as "smokeware"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:^)<p>
4-64GB RAM (that's GigaBYTEs, not GigaBITs).  Not a server, so I'm not sure I see why you'd want more than 4GB RAM - but I'll admit that 640K isn't enough for everyone, so I'm sure the price differential will be based on memory costs.</p><p>
There's an Ubunto/ARM distro - IF (as I've commented elsewhere) they provide access to the firmware I'm sure a well-experienced UNIX engineer should be able to install that for you, otherwise I'd say stick with the pre-packaged OS.  ARM/PROM-based OS's (embedded systems, in essence) are not quite what your average Linux users is used to.</p><p>
1024x600 - yeah, that's kinda dorky, but I suppose they wanted a specific aspect ratio on their finished product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a reference design , not a finished product .
Similar to vaporware - think of it as " smokeware " : ^ ) 4-64GB RAM ( that 's GigaBYTEs , not GigaBITs ) .
Not a server , so I 'm not sure I see why you 'd want more than 4GB RAM - but I 'll admit that 640K is n't enough for everyone , so I 'm sure the price differential will be based on memory costs .
There 's an Ubunto/ARM distro - IF ( as I 've commented elsewhere ) they provide access to the firmware I 'm sure a well-experienced UNIX engineer should be able to install that for you , otherwise I 'd say stick with the pre-packaged OS .
ARM/PROM-based OS 's ( embedded systems , in essence ) are not quite what your average Linux users is used to .
1024x600 - yeah , that 's kinda dorky , but I suppose they wanted a specific aspect ratio on their finished product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a reference design, not a finished product.
Similar to vaporware - think of it as "smokeware" :^)
4-64GB RAM (that's GigaBYTEs, not GigaBITs).
Not a server, so I'm not sure I see why you'd want more than 4GB RAM - but I'll admit that 640K isn't enough for everyone, so I'm sure the price differential will be based on memory costs.
There's an Ubunto/ARM distro - IF (as I've commented elsewhere) they provide access to the firmware I'm sure a well-experienced UNIX engineer should be able to install that for you, otherwise I'd say stick with the pre-packaged OS.
ARM/PROM-based OS's (embedded systems, in essence) are not quite what your average Linux users is used to.
1024x600 - yeah, that's kinda dorky, but I suppose they wanted a specific aspect ratio on their finished product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646034</id>
	<title>They got it all wrong</title>
	<author>Compuser</author>
	<datestamp>1262599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The niche that is not filled right now is not yet another tablet with a low price tag. Those are aplenty on ebay.<br>What is lacking is a slate tablet with NTrig or equivalent screen so multitouch and pen input would both work.<br>Now add NVidia ion or somesuch so HD videos could be played, add 1024x768 (not x600) display or better,<br>make it 2 lb or lighter and make the battery last at least 10 hours. Now keep the price below $500 and you'll<br>sell a bucket-load of these.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The niche that is not filled right now is not yet another tablet with a low price tag .
Those are aplenty on ebay.What is lacking is a slate tablet with NTrig or equivalent screen so multitouch and pen input would both work.Now add NVidia ion or somesuch so HD videos could be played , add 1024x768 ( not x600 ) display or better,make it 2 lb or lighter and make the battery last at least 10 hours .
Now keep the price below $ 500 and you'llsell a bucket-load of these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The niche that is not filled right now is not yet another tablet with a low price tag.
Those are aplenty on ebay.What is lacking is a slate tablet with NTrig or equivalent screen so multitouch and pen input would both work.Now add NVidia ion or somesuch so HD videos could be played, add 1024x768 (not x600) display or better,make it 2 lb or lighter and make the battery last at least 10 hours.
Now keep the price below $500 and you'llsell a bucket-load of these.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652622</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1262685240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tablets used to be much more expensive than normal laptops. So only people who had a very very good reason to buy one, would.
</p><p>These devices are roughly the same price as common netbooks (similar screen size and other hardware specs). That may make a huge difference.
</p><p>Technology has advanced a lot since the first tablets were conceived, both hardware and software. The first tablets well they had a nice turnable/flippable screen but not much use for the touch screen itself. This has certainly changed by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tablets used to be much more expensive than normal laptops .
So only people who had a very very good reason to buy one , would .
These devices are roughly the same price as common netbooks ( similar screen size and other hardware specs ) .
That may make a huge difference .
Technology has advanced a lot since the first tablets were conceived , both hardware and software .
The first tablets well they had a nice turnable/flippable screen but not much use for the touch screen itself .
This has certainly changed by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tablets used to be much more expensive than normal laptops.
So only people who had a very very good reason to buy one, would.
These devices are roughly the same price as common netbooks (similar screen size and other hardware specs).
That may make a huge difference.
Technology has advanced a lot since the first tablets were conceived, both hardware and software.
The first tablets well they had a nice turnable/flippable screen but not much use for the touch screen itself.
This has certainly changed by now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649316</id>
	<title>Re:"Smartphone", "netbook", "ebook", "smartbook"..</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1262613360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At this point I would say that the phone book *is* far, far behind us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At this point I would say that the phone book * is * far , far behind us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At this point I would say that the phone book *is* far, far behind us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643660</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262632500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a PDA, it's a portable media device. I guess everyone will have to go without a device type because *you* cannot see a use for it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a PDA , it 's a portable media device .
I guess everyone will have to go without a device type because * you * can not see a use for it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a PDA, it's a portable media device.
I guess everyone will have to go without a device type because *you* cannot see a use for it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647956</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>shic</author>
	<datestamp>1262607060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>people don't like tablets.</p></div><p>Pray, how do you know that?  I've never bought a tablet - and wouldn't buy from any to-date because they don't meet my minimum expectations. Don't be fooled, however, I'd love to use a good tablet PC.</p><p>Sticking points for me are :<br>* High resolution A4-ish screen (to read PDFs page-at-a-time)<br>* Long battery life (at least a day)<br>* Wi-fi connectivity and cheap 3G (perhaps via a bluetooth phone)  for generic Web access</p><p>When technology meets my demands (and I'm sure it eventually will) I'll buy one - as, I suspect, will the rest of the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>people do n't like tablets.Pray , how do you know that ?
I 've never bought a tablet - and would n't buy from any to-date because they do n't meet my minimum expectations .
Do n't be fooled , however , I 'd love to use a good tablet PC.Sticking points for me are : * High resolution A4-ish screen ( to read PDFs page-at-a-time ) * Long battery life ( at least a day ) * Wi-fi connectivity and cheap 3G ( perhaps via a bluetooth phone ) for generic Web accessWhen technology meets my demands ( and I 'm sure it eventually will ) I 'll buy one - as , I suspect , will the rest of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people don't like tablets.Pray, how do you know that?
I've never bought a tablet - and wouldn't buy from any to-date because they don't meet my minimum expectations.
Don't be fooled, however, I'd love to use a good tablet PC.Sticking points for me are :* High resolution A4-ish screen (to read PDFs page-at-a-time)* Long battery life (at least a day)* Wi-fi connectivity and cheap 3G (perhaps via a bluetooth phone)  for generic Web accessWhen technology meets my demands (and I'm sure it eventually will) I'll buy one - as, I suspect, will the rest of the world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645422</id>
	<title>512 MB of ram</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262596860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the way browsers eat RAM, and given how cheap RAM is, bump that to 1 GB of RAM and I'm sold.</p><p>Honestly, I'd rather pay $300 for a nicer tablet with a higher-red OLED screen and more RAM than $200 for a cheap tablet with a low-res screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the way browsers eat RAM , and given how cheap RAM is , bump that to 1 GB of RAM and I 'm sold.Honestly , I 'd rather pay $ 300 for a nicer tablet with a higher-red OLED screen and more RAM than $ 200 for a cheap tablet with a low-res screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the way browsers eat RAM, and given how cheap RAM is, bump that to 1 GB of RAM and I'm sold.Honestly, I'd rather pay $300 for a nicer tablet with a higher-red OLED screen and more RAM than $200 for a cheap tablet with a low-res screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644708</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1262637180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember where mp3 players were geek-only gadgets? or touchscreens or cheap/small notebooks something without future?<br><br>Technology advances, and people preference does too. Maybe 5 years ago tablets had no big appeal, culture wasnt built on consumers, then most smartphones started to have a touchscreen, but maybe sometimes you fould feel that the screen is too small and you are start to build a potential market. Foldable keyboards or twistable screens to turn tablets back and forth to something more like notebooks/desktops could help a bit in that area too.<br><br>Sometimes this kind of things ends being just fads, but if that is the case with tablets, probably won't be evident this year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember where mp3 players were geek-only gadgets ?
or touchscreens or cheap/small notebooks something without future ? Technology advances , and people preference does too .
Maybe 5 years ago tablets had no big appeal , culture wasnt built on consumers , then most smartphones started to have a touchscreen , but maybe sometimes you fould feel that the screen is too small and you are start to build a potential market .
Foldable keyboards or twistable screens to turn tablets back and forth to something more like notebooks/desktops could help a bit in that area too.Sometimes this kind of things ends being just fads , but if that is the case with tablets , probably wo n't be evident this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember where mp3 players were geek-only gadgets?
or touchscreens or cheap/small notebooks something without future?Technology advances, and people preference does too.
Maybe 5 years ago tablets had no big appeal, culture wasnt built on consumers, then most smartphones started to have a touchscreen, but maybe sometimes you fould feel that the screen is too small and you are start to build a potential market.
Foldable keyboards or twistable screens to turn tablets back and forth to something more like notebooks/desktops could help a bit in that area too.Sometimes this kind of things ends being just fads, but if that is the case with tablets, probably won't be evident this year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645870</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1262598300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets <i>that are more expensive than a traditional notebook</i> is very small.</p></div><p>FTFY</p><p>I'd have to insist that the market for such a device at the stated pricepoint has never been tested.  You do remember your economics, right?  Supply/Demand, Price?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets that are more expensive than a traditional notebook is very small.FTFYI 'd have to insist that the market for such a device at the stated pricepoint has never been tested .
You do remember your economics , right ?
Supply/Demand , Price ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets that are more expensive than a traditional notebook is very small.FTFYI'd have to insist that the market for such a device at the stated pricepoint has never been tested.
You do remember your economics, right?
Supply/Demand, Price?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647722</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1262605980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And they're only doing it because of the incessant, unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market.</p></div><p>It's not tablets. It's tablets with an entire ecosystem for apps and content attached. Hardware with just an OS and a few apps on it is lame nowadays.</p><p>People have learned with the iPhone that having a device *and* a store *and* some cool company caring for all this is the thing. Like it or not. Geeks buy gadgets. People buy packages, because they're sick of naked gadgets and having to fight them and make them into something usable.</p><p>I don't like to say it, but selling cheap gadgets to geeks is becoming economically unsound. Compared to all the consumers out there they're a minority. Expect dozens of tablets coming in 2010 and going half a year later with no traces left. And expect Apple to swipe that market empty. I hate it, but naked hardware is just useless for the majority of people. They want something they can buy and unwrap and use for years, with things pushed to them and them having just to nod or tap "Buy" or "Update" and be done with it and have fun. The PC and its spirit of tinkering and building and nursing along is DEAD. People want to buy things as they buy TV sets and a cable contract and channels to zap around in.</p><p>Consumers are called consumers because they consume. If you're wise join in and use your time to create content instead of playing with your hard- and software, because free content will become much more important than open hardware or free software. Learn that now and don't waste your time by fighting windmills while chasing the latest $200 hardware with nothing you can do with it but tinkering.</p><p>And now mod me down, please.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And they 're only doing it because of the incessant , unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market.It 's not tablets .
It 's tablets with an entire ecosystem for apps and content attached .
Hardware with just an OS and a few apps on it is lame nowadays.People have learned with the iPhone that having a device * and * a store * and * some cool company caring for all this is the thing .
Like it or not .
Geeks buy gadgets .
People buy packages , because they 're sick of naked gadgets and having to fight them and make them into something usable.I do n't like to say it , but selling cheap gadgets to geeks is becoming economically unsound .
Compared to all the consumers out there they 're a minority .
Expect dozens of tablets coming in 2010 and going half a year later with no traces left .
And expect Apple to swipe that market empty .
I hate it , but naked hardware is just useless for the majority of people .
They want something they can buy and unwrap and use for years , with things pushed to them and them having just to nod or tap " Buy " or " Update " and be done with it and have fun .
The PC and its spirit of tinkering and building and nursing along is DEAD .
People want to buy things as they buy TV sets and a cable contract and channels to zap around in.Consumers are called consumers because they consume .
If you 're wise join in and use your time to create content instead of playing with your hard- and software , because free content will become much more important than open hardware or free software .
Learn that now and do n't waste your time by fighting windmills while chasing the latest $ 200 hardware with nothing you can do with it but tinkering.And now mod me down , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And they're only doing it because of the incessant, unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market.It's not tablets.
It's tablets with an entire ecosystem for apps and content attached.
Hardware with just an OS and a few apps on it is lame nowadays.People have learned with the iPhone that having a device *and* a store *and* some cool company caring for all this is the thing.
Like it or not.
Geeks buy gadgets.
People buy packages, because they're sick of naked gadgets and having to fight them and make them into something usable.I don't like to say it, but selling cheap gadgets to geeks is becoming economically unsound.
Compared to all the consumers out there they're a minority.
Expect dozens of tablets coming in 2010 and going half a year later with no traces left.
And expect Apple to swipe that market empty.
I hate it, but naked hardware is just useless for the majority of people.
They want something they can buy and unwrap and use for years, with things pushed to them and them having just to nod or tap "Buy" or "Update" and be done with it and have fun.
The PC and its spirit of tinkering and building and nursing along is DEAD.
People want to buy things as they buy TV sets and a cable contract and channels to zap around in.Consumers are called consumers because they consume.
If you're wise join in and use your time to create content instead of playing with your hard- and software, because free content will become much more important than open hardware or free software.
Learn that now and don't waste your time by fighting windmills while chasing the latest $200 hardware with nothing you can do with it but tinkering.And now mod me down, please.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649008</id>
	<title>Re:"Envisions"</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1262611920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Freescale has already released a product, it's called the i.MX515 and it's a pretty nice SoC.  This device is not a prototype of something Freescale will ever ship, it's a reference design.  It's intended as a base for i.MX515 customers to build on (or discard entirely).  It's Freescale's SoC customers, not Freescale, who might release something like this.  If you want to build them, Freescale will happily give you the design along with your order for i.MX515s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Freescale has already released a product , it 's called the i.MX515 and it 's a pretty nice SoC .
This device is not a prototype of something Freescale will ever ship , it 's a reference design .
It 's intended as a base for i.MX515 customers to build on ( or discard entirely ) .
It 's Freescale 's SoC customers , not Freescale , who might release something like this .
If you want to build them , Freescale will happily give you the design along with your order for i.MX515s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freescale has already released a product, it's called the i.MX515 and it's a pretty nice SoC.
This device is not a prototype of something Freescale will ever ship, it's a reference design.
It's intended as a base for i.MX515 customers to build on (or discard entirely).
It's Freescale's SoC customers, not Freescale, who might release something like this.
If you want to build them, Freescale will happily give you the design along with your order for i.MX515s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648036</id>
	<title>Re:"Smartphone", "netbook", "ebook", "smartbook"..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262607540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can the "phonebook" be far behind?</p></div><p>I think someone beat you to it...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can the " phonebook " be far behind ? I think someone beat you to it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can the "phonebook" be far behind?I think someone beat you to it...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644432</id>
	<title>Re:Two points</title>
	<author>citizenr</author>
	<datestamp>1262635980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1) Reference design != product

2) Cost of $199 is based on Freescale's projected cost of components, meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher (probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price)</p></div><p>chumby one $119.95<br>
<a href="https://store.chumby.com/" title="chumby.com">https://store.chumby.com/</a> [chumby.com]

most of the specs are the same (minus screen of course)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Reference design ! = product 2 ) Cost of $ 199 is based on Freescale 's projected cost of components , meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher ( probably closer to the rumored $ 300 iSlate price ) chumby one $ 119.95 https : //store.chumby.com/ [ chumby.com ] most of the specs are the same ( minus screen of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Reference design != product

2) Cost of $199 is based on Freescale's projected cost of components, meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher (probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price)chumby one $119.95
https://store.chumby.com/ [chumby.com]

most of the specs are the same (minus screen of course)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004</id>
	<title>"Smartphone", "netbook", "ebook", "smartbook"...</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1262633940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can the "phonebook" be far behind?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can the " phonebook " be far behind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can the "phonebook" be far behind?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643858</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262633220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So lemme get this straight - you've never used, say, a clipboard, right?  Or are you generally just not a fan of the tablet PC form-factor?  Incidentally, tablet PC's aren't generally a first choice for data-entry tasks - typing on an on-screen keyboard is generally a painful exercise at best and considerably slower than typing on a decent keyboard in any event.  Tablets are designed as a highly portable data presentation device - using handwriting recognition software, they make a decent data capture device (e.g., handwritten notes) - but for data entry, get yourself a clerk and a desktop PC with a good keyboard.  The right tool for the right job.<p>
This thing looks <i>exactly</i> like what I've been  looking for, except for the "auto-on" bit (which I take to mean OS in firmware).  If there's a mechanism for me to flash my own OS, I'm a happy man (see: SheevaPlug).  If it's in EEPROM, fine.  If OTOH it's in ROM, well - I don't care if they DO let me add software to a local hard drive, I'll wait for the next guy's offering.  The hardware is a really good match to what I want, and I'll handle my own software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So lem me get this straight - you 've never used , say , a clipboard , right ?
Or are you generally just not a fan of the tablet PC form-factor ?
Incidentally , tablet PC 's are n't generally a first choice for data-entry tasks - typing on an on-screen keyboard is generally a painful exercise at best and considerably slower than typing on a decent keyboard in any event .
Tablets are designed as a highly portable data presentation device - using handwriting recognition software , they make a decent data capture device ( e.g. , handwritten notes ) - but for data entry , get yourself a clerk and a desktop PC with a good keyboard .
The right tool for the right job .
This thing looks exactly like what I 've been looking for , except for the " auto-on " bit ( which I take to mean OS in firmware ) .
If there 's a mechanism for me to flash my own OS , I 'm a happy man ( see : SheevaPlug ) .
If it 's in EEPROM , fine .
If OTOH it 's in ROM , well - I do n't care if they DO let me add software to a local hard drive , I 'll wait for the next guy 's offering .
The hardware is a really good match to what I want , and I 'll handle my own software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So lemme get this straight - you've never used, say, a clipboard, right?
Or are you generally just not a fan of the tablet PC form-factor?
Incidentally, tablet PC's aren't generally a first choice for data-entry tasks - typing on an on-screen keyboard is generally a painful exercise at best and considerably slower than typing on a decent keyboard in any event.
Tablets are designed as a highly portable data presentation device - using handwriting recognition software, they make a decent data capture device (e.g., handwritten notes) - but for data entry, get yourself a clerk and a desktop PC with a good keyboard.
The right tool for the right job.
This thing looks exactly like what I've been  looking for, except for the "auto-on" bit (which I take to mean OS in firmware).
If there's a mechanism for me to flash my own OS, I'm a happy man (see: SheevaPlug).
If it's in EEPROM, fine.
If OTOH it's in ROM, well - I don't care if they DO let me add software to a local hard drive, I'll wait for the next guy's offering.
The hardware is a really good match to what I want, and I'll handle my own software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643834</id>
	<title>Velcro</title>
	<author>JoshDD</author>
	<datestamp>1262633100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Put velcro straps on it strap it to your left forearm and type with your right hand. And it would even give big dumb jock yet another excuse to beat up nerds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put velcro straps on it strap it to your left forearm and type with your right hand .
And it would even give big dumb jock yet another excuse to beat up nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put velcro straps on it strap it to your left forearm and type with your right hand.
And it would even give big dumb jock yet another excuse to beat up nerds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646910</id>
	<title>Total Cost of Ownership and the OLPC</title>
	<author>randall\_burns</author>
	<datestamp>1262602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The basic problem with devices like this tablet is they are largely disposable.</p><p>The \_only\_ netbook I have seen that is designed to be repaired is the OLPC. I can get parts for it at reasonable prices from places like <a href="http://xoexplosion.com/" title="xoexplosion.com">http://xoexplosion.com/</a> [xoexplosion.com] and <a href="http://ilovemyxo.com/" title="ilovemyxo.com">http://ilovemyxo.com/</a> [ilovemyxo.com] and the repair manuals for the OLPC are readily available.</p><p>I suspect that we'll see a \_much\_ longer lifespan for these OLPC devices than any proprietary tablets and what not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The basic problem with devices like this tablet is they are largely disposable.The \ _only \ _ netbook I have seen that is designed to be repaired is the OLPC .
I can get parts for it at reasonable prices from places like http : //xoexplosion.com/ [ xoexplosion.com ] and http : //ilovemyxo.com/ [ ilovemyxo.com ] and the repair manuals for the OLPC are readily available.I suspect that we 'll see a \ _much \ _ longer lifespan for these OLPC devices than any proprietary tablets and what not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The basic problem with devices like this tablet is they are largely disposable.The \_only\_ netbook I have seen that is designed to be repaired is the OLPC.
I can get parts for it at reasonable prices from places like http://xoexplosion.com/ [xoexplosion.com] and http://ilovemyxo.com/ [ilovemyxo.com] and the repair manuals for the OLPC are readily available.I suspect that we'll see a \_much\_ longer lifespan for these OLPC devices than any proprietary tablets and what not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262632920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 'netbooks' are shrinking on the low end to compete with smartphones and growing on the high end to compete with laptops.  This is real competition at work : there's going to be a computing device ranging from pocket sized all the way up to a desktop with 30" screens.</p><p>The interesting bit is that all of these computing devices tend to be all-in one type machines that can take pictures and video, make calls, browse the web, play music, play games, GPS navigate, etc.  More specialized devices that only play music (ipod) or GPS navigate (tom tom) or display email (blackberry) or let you write down notes (newton) or take pictures (compact digital camera) are rapidly becoming obsolete.</p><p>Every one of these devices, from the smart phone up to the monster desktop, is able to do it all.</p><p>On the bad side, the cell phone companies have a stranglehold on the wireless data these devices all need to function.  Not only is there clear collusion and oligopoly pricing, but the companies tend to price things based upon arbitrary metrics rather than actual cost.  If there was actual free market competition in the wireless industry, text messages would be almost free and downloading video data would cost a fortune.  Yet you can get an unlimited data plan for $40-$70 while texting costs at least $20 for unlimited.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'netbooks ' are shrinking on the low end to compete with smartphones and growing on the high end to compete with laptops .
This is real competition at work : there 's going to be a computing device ranging from pocket sized all the way up to a desktop with 30 " screens.The interesting bit is that all of these computing devices tend to be all-in one type machines that can take pictures and video , make calls , browse the web , play music , play games , GPS navigate , etc .
More specialized devices that only play music ( ipod ) or GPS navigate ( tom tom ) or display email ( blackberry ) or let you write down notes ( newton ) or take pictures ( compact digital camera ) are rapidly becoming obsolete.Every one of these devices , from the smart phone up to the monster desktop , is able to do it all.On the bad side , the cell phone companies have a stranglehold on the wireless data these devices all need to function .
Not only is there clear collusion and oligopoly pricing , but the companies tend to price things based upon arbitrary metrics rather than actual cost .
If there was actual free market competition in the wireless industry , text messages would be almost free and downloading video data would cost a fortune .
Yet you can get an unlimited data plan for $ 40- $ 70 while texting costs at least $ 20 for unlimited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'netbooks' are shrinking on the low end to compete with smartphones and growing on the high end to compete with laptops.
This is real competition at work : there's going to be a computing device ranging from pocket sized all the way up to a desktop with 30" screens.The interesting bit is that all of these computing devices tend to be all-in one type machines that can take pictures and video, make calls, browse the web, play music, play games, GPS navigate, etc.
More specialized devices that only play music (ipod) or GPS navigate (tom tom) or display email (blackberry) or let you write down notes (newton) or take pictures (compact digital camera) are rapidly becoming obsolete.Every one of these devices, from the smart phone up to the monster desktop, is able to do it all.On the bad side, the cell phone companies have a stranglehold on the wireless data these devices all need to function.
Not only is there clear collusion and oligopoly pricing, but the companies tend to price things based upon arbitrary metrics rather than actual cost.
If there was actual free market competition in the wireless industry, text messages would be almost free and downloading video data would cost a fortune.
Yet you can get an unlimited data plan for $40-$70 while texting costs at least $20 for unlimited.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643906</id>
	<title>Re:Just a little Nit</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1262633460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is based on a mobile distribution of linux, but it is also a java like language and a set of APIs.</p><p>It is probably better to say that it is implemented on top of a linux kernel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is based on a mobile distribution of linux , but it is also a java like language and a set of APIs.It is probably better to say that it is implemented on top of a linux kernel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is based on a mobile distribution of linux, but it is also a java like language and a set of APIs.It is probably better to say that it is implemented on top of a linux kernel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652732</id>
	<title>Re: all-day battery life</title>
	<author>ikono</author>
	<datestamp>1262686380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't the rumoured apple tablet, you know...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't the rumoured apple tablet , you know.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't the rumoured apple tablet, you know...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644348</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262635500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow I think a GPS-enabled desktop misses the point of both GPS (mobility) and a desktop (stationary power).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I think a GPS-enabled desktop misses the point of both GPS ( mobility ) and a desktop ( stationary power ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I think a GPS-enabled desktop misses the point of both GPS (mobility) and a desktop (stationary power).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644596</id>
	<title>Re:Two points</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262636640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>(probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price)</i> <br>
<br>
Errr, not sure what rumors you've been hearing, but everything I've heard lately (past 5 or 6 months) has pegged the iSlate in the $600-1000 range.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( probably closer to the rumored $ 300 iSlate price ) Errr , not sure what rumors you 've been hearing , but everything I 've heard lately ( past 5 or 6 months ) has pegged the iSlate in the $ 600-1000 range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price) 

Errr, not sure what rumors you've been hearing, but everything I've heard lately (past 5 or 6 months) has pegged the iSlate in the $600-1000 range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646228</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>Mr\_DW</author>
	<datestamp>1262599740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you forgot "and GET OFF my lawn!!!!!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>you forgot " and GET OFF my lawn ! ! ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you forgot "and GET OFF my lawn!!!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649286</id>
	<title>Re:Resolution sucks</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1262613240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 movies</p></div><p>Uh, it's an i.MX515.  It can <i>encode</i> 720p H.264 in realtime.  It can also drive a TV at that resolution and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (i.e. fully programmable pipeline).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 moviesUh , it 's an i.MX515 .
It can encode 720p H.264 in realtime .
It can also drive a TV at that resolution and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 ( i.e .
fully programmable pipeline ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 moviesUh, it's an i.MX515.
It can encode 720p H.264 in realtime.
It can also drive a TV at that resolution and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (i.e.
fully programmable pipeline).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644390</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262635740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I totally agree with everything you said, but I find Apple's impending foray into tablets very interesting.  Granted Apple is a niche player in the PC market, but I can't believe that they would enter the very difficult market of tablets without being sure they could be successful.  History has proven that even Apple is not immune from mistakes like that, so it will be very interesting to see how successful Apple is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally agree with everything you said , but I find Apple 's impending foray into tablets very interesting .
Granted Apple is a niche player in the PC market , but I ca n't believe that they would enter the very difficult market of tablets without being sure they could be successful .
History has proven that even Apple is not immune from mistakes like that , so it will be very interesting to see how successful Apple is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally agree with everything you said, but I find Apple's impending foray into tablets very interesting.
Granted Apple is a niche player in the PC market, but I can't believe that they would enter the very difficult market of tablets without being sure they could be successful.
History has proven that even Apple is not immune from mistakes like that, so it will be very interesting to see how successful Apple is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318</id>
	<title>This has been done before!</title>
	<author>kurt555gs</author>
	<datestamp>1262635380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only the Freescale device had 2 knobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.etch-a-sketch.com/" title="etch-a-sketch.com">http://www.etch-a-sketch.com/</a> [etch-a-sketch.com]</p><p>Cheers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only the Freescale device had 2 knobs.http : //www.etch-a-sketch.com/ [ etch-a-sketch.com ] Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only the Freescale device had 2 knobs.http://www.etch-a-sketch.com/ [etch-a-sketch.com]Cheers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644296</id>
	<title>Looks familiar</title>
	<author>orgelspieler</author>
	<datestamp>1262635320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging from the <a href="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20100103/freescale-tablet-01-10-(2)-small.jpg" title="com.com">bright red color</a> [com.com], I'm guessing you have to turn it upside-down and shake it to reboot. (Apologies to Scott Adams)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging from the bright red color [ com.com ] , I 'm guessing you have to turn it upside-down and shake it to reboot .
( Apologies to Scott Adams )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging from the bright red color [com.com], I'm guessing you have to turn it upside-down and shake it to reboot.
(Apologies to Scott Adams)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644220</id>
	<title>Not cutesy enough</title>
	<author>Myrcutio</author>
	<datestamp>1262634900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It needs a lower cased letter placed ambiguously to inform the consumer that it's good enough for his ePeen.  I suggest "Phone-y-book", or "eFingerBook"</htmltext>
<tokenext>It needs a lower cased letter placed ambiguously to inform the consumer that it 's good enough for his ePeen .
I suggest " Phone-y-book " , or " eFingerBook "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It needs a lower cased letter placed ambiguously to inform the consumer that it's good enough for his ePeen.
I suggest "Phone-y-book", or "eFingerBook"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643810</id>
	<title>7 days</title>
	<author>Jailbrekr</author>
	<datestamp>1262633040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By my prediction, that is how long it is going to take for OLPC to take credit for this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By my prediction , that is how long it is going to take for OLPC to take credit for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By my prediction, that is how long it is going to take for OLPC to take credit for this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643680</id>
	<title>What about the A9?</title>
	<author>roe-roe</author>
	<datestamp>1262632560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been waiting, as patiently as I can, for ARM based netbooks with the A9 chip.  The ARM integrators have a window of opportunity to effect the netbook/smartbook market significantly.  The current Intel Atom offerings are, IMHO, not very good.  The licenced Cortex-A9 chip can compete with the Atom processor on a purely performance basis, and blow the pants off of the atom processor on a performance/power ratio.  By delaying, Intel is slowly closing the power and performance gaps with new generation Atom processors.  Once Intel gets close enough, the ability for ARM based machines to impact the market will be gone.
<br>
<br>
I fully understand that it takes time to bring the A9 to market, and a chip that can't run windows (I'm not including WinCE) has little appeal in the broader market.  On the other hand, if integrators are going to put time and money behind new ARM products why use the A8?  I long for when I can get my 2ghz dual-core ARM netbook with a 10" screen and all the connectivity I can think of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been waiting , as patiently as I can , for ARM based netbooks with the A9 chip .
The ARM integrators have a window of opportunity to effect the netbook/smartbook market significantly .
The current Intel Atom offerings are , IMHO , not very good .
The licenced Cortex-A9 chip can compete with the Atom processor on a purely performance basis , and blow the pants off of the atom processor on a performance/power ratio .
By delaying , Intel is slowly closing the power and performance gaps with new generation Atom processors .
Once Intel gets close enough , the ability for ARM based machines to impact the market will be gone .
I fully understand that it takes time to bring the A9 to market , and a chip that ca n't run windows ( I 'm not including WinCE ) has little appeal in the broader market .
On the other hand , if integrators are going to put time and money behind new ARM products why use the A8 ?
I long for when I can get my 2ghz dual-core ARM netbook with a 10 " screen and all the connectivity I can think of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been waiting, as patiently as I can, for ARM based netbooks with the A9 chip.
The ARM integrators have a window of opportunity to effect the netbook/smartbook market significantly.
The current Intel Atom offerings are, IMHO, not very good.
The licenced Cortex-A9 chip can compete with the Atom processor on a purely performance basis, and blow the pants off of the atom processor on a performance/power ratio.
By delaying, Intel is slowly closing the power and performance gaps with new generation Atom processors.
Once Intel gets close enough, the ability for ARM based machines to impact the market will be gone.
I fully understand that it takes time to bring the A9 to market, and a chip that can't run windows (I'm not including WinCE) has little appeal in the broader market.
On the other hand, if integrators are going to put time and money behind new ARM products why use the A8?
I long for when I can get my 2ghz dual-core ARM netbook with a 10" screen and all the connectivity I can think of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</id>
	<title>Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1262633880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG GOOGLE TABLET  OMG APPLE TABLET  OMG THE OLPC OF TABLETS.<br>Shut the fuck up.  If your company missed the "netbook" boat, then too bad.  If you're not Amazon, you didn't make the Kindle - too bad.</p><p>This industry has gone from innovation to theft to bandwagon jumping to bandwagon hyping to hyping of planned bandwagon hyping.</p><p>History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets is very small.  I don't give a shit how much hot air you blow into the media's ass, you're not going to make a bigger market for tablets because people don't like tablets.</p><p>As for this proposed tablet?  It's sheer feature / price point marketing.  The PHBs called a meeting with marketing and wrote some features on the board, then they came up with a price.  And they're only doing it because of the incessant, unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG GOOGLE TABLET OMG APPLE TABLET OMG THE OLPC OF TABLETS.Shut the fuck up .
If your company missed the " netbook " boat , then too bad .
If you 're not Amazon , you did n't make the Kindle - too bad.This industry has gone from innovation to theft to bandwagon jumping to bandwagon hyping to hyping of planned bandwagon hyping.History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets is very small .
I do n't give a shit how much hot air you blow into the media 's ass , you 're not going to make a bigger market for tablets because people do n't like tablets.As for this proposed tablet ?
It 's sheer feature / price point marketing .
The PHBs called a meeting with marketing and wrote some features on the board , then they came up with a price .
And they 're only doing it because of the incessant , unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG GOOGLE TABLET  OMG APPLE TABLET  OMG THE OLPC OF TABLETS.Shut the fuck up.
If your company missed the "netbook" boat, then too bad.
If you're not Amazon, you didn't make the Kindle - too bad.This industry has gone from innovation to theft to bandwagon jumping to bandwagon hyping to hyping of planned bandwagon hyping.History has proven time and time again that the market for tablets is very small.
I don't give a shit how much hot air you blow into the media's ass, you're not going to make a bigger market for tablets because people don't like tablets.As for this proposed tablet?
It's sheer feature / price point marketing.
The PHBs called a meeting with marketing and wrote some features on the board, then they came up with a price.
And they're only doing it because of the incessant, unfounded rumors that tablets are going to be the next big market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645610</id>
	<title>Don't want a cheap model</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262597400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I in the minority here, but I'd rather pay $300 for a model with a nice higher res OLED screen and a full GB of RAM rather than a cheap $200 model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I in the minority here , but I 'd rather pay $ 300 for a model with a nice higher res OLED screen and a full GB of RAM rather than a cheap $ 200 model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I in the minority here, but I'd rather pay $300 for a model with a nice higher res OLED screen and a full GB of RAM rather than a cheap $200 model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582</id>
	<title>Always Innovating Touchbook</title>
	<author>compass46</author>
	<datestamp>1262632260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember reading about this about a year ago.  Does anyone actually have one?  Similar idea with a bigger screen but a little more expensive.</p><p><a href="http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/" title="alwaysinnovating.com">http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/</a> [alwaysinnovating.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading about this about a year ago .
Does anyone actually have one ?
Similar idea with a bigger screen but a little more expensive.http : //www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/ [ alwaysinnovating.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading about this about a year ago.
Does anyone actually have one?
Similar idea with a bigger screen but a little more expensive.http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/ [alwaysinnovating.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649728</id>
	<title>Oxygen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262615700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it is using Oxygen KDE icon theme nice!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it is using Oxygen KDE icon theme nice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it is using Oxygen KDE icon theme nice!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646026</id>
	<title>Re:This has been done before!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262598960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that device even uses dual ARM processors and a shake-to-undo GUI -- definitely way ahead of its time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that device even uses dual ARM processors and a shake-to-undo GUI -- definitely way ahead of its time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that device even uses dual ARM processors and a shake-to-undo GUI -- definitely way ahead of its time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644602</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>Rene S. Hollan</author>
	<datestamp>1262636640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er, I dunno.</p><p>I think tablets make for <b>great</b> remote controls and under $200 they start to get reasonable: one remote to control them all, with a web interface on each device.</p><p>I suppose a smart phone could do that as well, but sometimes the extra display real estate is handy: movie previews from the cable company's On Demand service should be streamable to the remote/tablet so as to not interfere with the program already displayed, if desired.</p><p>Accessing recipes in the kitchen, or an "in a pinch" browser would be handy as well. Think of them as intelligent display devices and not computing platforms. Shove in an SD card with a movie on it for the kids to watch in the car. That kind of stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , I dunno.I think tablets make for great remote controls and under $ 200 they start to get reasonable : one remote to control them all , with a web interface on each device.I suppose a smart phone could do that as well , but sometimes the extra display real estate is handy : movie previews from the cable company 's On Demand service should be streamable to the remote/tablet so as to not interfere with the program already displayed , if desired.Accessing recipes in the kitchen , or an " in a pinch " browser would be handy as well .
Think of them as intelligent display devices and not computing platforms .
Shove in an SD card with a movie on it for the kids to watch in the car .
That kind of stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, I dunno.I think tablets make for great remote controls and under $200 they start to get reasonable: one remote to control them all, with a web interface on each device.I suppose a smart phone could do that as well, but sometimes the extra display real estate is handy: movie previews from the cable company's On Demand service should be streamable to the remote/tablet so as to not interfere with the program already displayed, if desired.Accessing recipes in the kitchen, or an "in a pinch" browser would be handy as well.
Think of them as intelligent display devices and not computing platforms.
Shove in an SD card with a movie on it for the kids to watch in the car.
That kind of stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30653058</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>emilper</author>
	<datestamp>1262690400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>don't need a dockable keyboard, just an usb port and support for keyboard in software<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  and maybe a on-screen keyboard.</p><p>At 200$ I would probably buy one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do n't need a dockable keyboard , just an usb port and support for keyboard in software ... and maybe a on-screen keyboard.At 200 $ I would probably buy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>don't need a dockable keyboard, just an usb port and support for keyboard in software ...  and maybe a on-screen keyboard.At 200$ I would probably buy one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643652</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1262632440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?   If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.  If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.  A 2-handed PDA sucks.</p></div><p>You've never written on a clipboard?  You hold it with one hand and write with the other.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you do data entry , even touch screen , if you need both hands to hold it ?
If I want to put a computer on my lap , I 'll buy a laptop .
If I want a PDA , I 'll use a PDA .
A 2-handed PDA sucks.You 've never written on a clipboard ?
You hold it with one hand and write with the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?
If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.
If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.
A 2-handed PDA sucks.You've never written on a clipboard?
You hold it with one hand and write with the other.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648606</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1262610120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$3000 - cost of your current phone plan. People often forget that, almost giddy with happiness at being able to quote a larger number without justification.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 3000 - cost of your current phone plan .
People often forget that , almost giddy with happiness at being able to quote a larger number without justification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$3000 - cost of your current phone plan.
People often forget that, almost giddy with happiness at being able to quote a larger number without justification.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643642</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1262632440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So hows that job going?</p><p>You know, the one where you are the perfect proxy for the entire consumer market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So hows that job going ? You know , the one where you are the perfect proxy for the entire consumer market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So hows that job going?You know, the one where you are the perfect proxy for the entire consumer market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646840</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>faragon</author>
	<datestamp>1262602260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has started with the <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1496606&amp;cid=30646506" title="slashdot.org">Nokia N900</a> [slashdot.org], targets almost everything (the only "mistake" is using a TV-out instead of a HDMI output).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has started with the Nokia N900 [ slashdot.org ] , targets almost everything ( the only " mistake " is using a TV-out instead of a HDMI output ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has started with the Nokia N900 [slashdot.org], targets almost everything (the only "mistake" is using a TV-out instead of a HDMI output).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648622</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1262610300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is far too much money going around for companies to ignore this.</p><p>What is wrong with competition, or do you feel that there is too many netbooks? Can't see how that is necessarily a bad thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is far too much money going around for companies to ignore this.What is wrong with competition , or do you feel that there is too many netbooks ?
Ca n't see how that is necessarily a bad thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is far too much money going around for companies to ignore this.What is wrong with competition, or do you feel that there is too many netbooks?
Can't see how that is necessarily a bad thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</id>
	<title>Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262632080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?   If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.  If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.  A 2-handed PDA sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you do data entry , even touch screen , if you need both hands to hold it ?
If I want to put a computer on my lap , I 'll buy a laptop .
If I want a PDA , I 'll use a PDA .
A 2-handed PDA sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?
If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.
If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.
A 2-handed PDA sucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644526</id>
	<title>Isn't this missing something?</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1262636340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Without a built-in, semi-accurate compass, you don't get "augmented reality" applications. Seems like a pretty big oversight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without a built-in , semi-accurate compass , you do n't get " augmented reality " applications .
Seems like a pretty big oversight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without a built-in, semi-accurate compass, you don't get "augmented reality" applications.
Seems like a pretty big oversight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644162</id>
	<title>Re:Some Questions</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1262634660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>1024 by 600? Why not 1024 by 768?</p></div></blockquote><p>WSVGA. The width of XGA (minimum native for most web sites) in a smaller package.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1024 by 600 ?
Why not 1024 by 768 ? WSVGA .
The width of XGA ( minimum native for most web sites ) in a smaller package .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1024 by 600?
Why not 1024 by 768?WSVGA.
The width of XGA (minimum native for most web sites) in a smaller package.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646314</id>
	<title>Re:"Envisions"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262600100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually this is the nightmare scenario that Microsoft envisioned way back at<br>the beginning of the PC 'revolution', that hardware manufacturers would come<br>up with their own OS, or software or shared standard, not Microsoft's and would freeze<br>them out of the market.</p><p>With Linux, it looks as if this is coming to pass. So any hardware manufacturer even<br>envisioning such a thing is a  step in the right direction in my book.</p><p>Dunno why you think it'll look like a pizza box though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..?</p><p>Maaaario!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually this is the nightmare scenario that Microsoft envisioned way back atthe beginning of the PC 'revolution ' , that hardware manufacturers would comeup with their own OS , or software or shared standard , not Microsoft 's and would freezethem out of the market.With Linux , it looks as if this is coming to pass .
So any hardware manufacturer evenenvisioning such a thing is a step in the right direction in my book.Dunno why you think it 'll look like a pizza box though .. ? Maaaario !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually this is the nightmare scenario that Microsoft envisioned way back atthe beginning of the PC 'revolution', that hardware manufacturers would comeup with their own OS, or software or shared standard, not Microsoft's and would freezethem out of the market.With Linux, it looks as if this is coming to pass.
So any hardware manufacturer evenenvisioning such a thing is a  step in the right direction in my book.Dunno why you think it'll look like a pizza box though ..?Maaaario!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644858</id>
	<title>Re:Just a little Nit</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1262637960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux is just a Kernel, not an OS.  Android is an OS with a Linux kernel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is just a Kernel , not an OS .
Android is an OS with a Linux kernel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is just a Kernel, not an OS.
Android is an OS with a Linux kernel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30661046</id>
	<title>Re:Just a little Nit</title>
	<author>Nicolay77</author>
	<datestamp>1262687760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It uses the Linux kernel.</p><p>But it is not a Linux distro in the traditional sense, there's no common GNU/UNIX stack there, everything on top of the kernel is custom software made by Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It uses the Linux kernel.But it is not a Linux distro in the traditional sense , there 's no common GNU/UNIX stack there , everything on top of the kernel is custom software made by Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It uses the Linux kernel.But it is not a Linux distro in the traditional sense, there's no common GNU/UNIX stack there, everything on top of the kernel is custom software made by Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646582</id>
	<title>Re:Resolution sucks</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1262601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the HP Mini 111 has an upgrade screen with a broadcom video accelerator to push 720p content fullscreen. They exist, but they're about 50\% more expensive than your regular, run of the mill HP Mini 110, which is already 300-350 depending on price and features. I think for the most part they're only avalible online. I've never seen one retail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the HP Mini 111 has an upgrade screen with a broadcom video accelerator to push 720p content fullscreen .
They exist , but they 're about 50 \ % more expensive than your regular , run of the mill HP Mini 110 , which is already 300-350 depending on price and features .
I think for the most part they 're only avalible online .
I 've never seen one retail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the HP Mini 111 has an upgrade screen with a broadcom video accelerator to push 720p content fullscreen.
They exist, but they're about 50\% more expensive than your regular, run of the mill HP Mini 110, which is already 300-350 depending on price and features.
I think for the most part they're only avalible online.
I've never seen one retail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643698</id>
	<title>stealing Apple's thunder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262632620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds good and will surely be 5x cheaper than the supposed iSlate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds good and will surely be 5x cheaper than the supposed iSlate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds good and will surely be 5x cheaper than the supposed iSlate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649170</id>
	<title>Re:What about the A9?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1262612700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ARM has licensed the A9 IP core to a few people, and a few companies have announced products based on it, but I've not seen any SoCs in the wild that use it (apparently TI is shipping OMAP4s, but only to their closest friends).  The A9 should be faster than the A8 (although possibly similar in speed to the Snapdragon), but not by a huge amount clock-for-clock.  The big advantage of the A9 is that it's an MPCore, so you can put four of them on one die.  This gives it a bit of headroom and you can expect to see it shipping in a few devices in 2010.  The A8, however, is available now and is shipping now.  The OMAP3 used in things like the N900 is a relatively mature SoC and is shipping in volume.</p><p>
Basically, if you want to get a product out now, you use an A8.  At 1GH+ it's pretty respectable, especially since it can offload a lot to the DSP and GPU in a typical SoC.  If you want to get one out sometime this year, you might use an A9.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ARM has licensed the A9 IP core to a few people , and a few companies have announced products based on it , but I 've not seen any SoCs in the wild that use it ( apparently TI is shipping OMAP4s , but only to their closest friends ) .
The A9 should be faster than the A8 ( although possibly similar in speed to the Snapdragon ) , but not by a huge amount clock-for-clock .
The big advantage of the A9 is that it 's an MPCore , so you can put four of them on one die .
This gives it a bit of headroom and you can expect to see it shipping in a few devices in 2010 .
The A8 , however , is available now and is shipping now .
The OMAP3 used in things like the N900 is a relatively mature SoC and is shipping in volume .
Basically , if you want to get a product out now , you use an A8 .
At 1GH + it 's pretty respectable , especially since it can offload a lot to the DSP and GPU in a typical SoC .
If you want to get one out sometime this year , you might use an A9 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ARM has licensed the A9 IP core to a few people, and a few companies have announced products based on it, but I've not seen any SoCs in the wild that use it (apparently TI is shipping OMAP4s, but only to their closest friends).
The A9 should be faster than the A8 (although possibly similar in speed to the Snapdragon), but not by a huge amount clock-for-clock.
The big advantage of the A9 is that it's an MPCore, so you can put four of them on one die.
This gives it a bit of headroom and you can expect to see it shipping in a few devices in 2010.
The A8, however, is available now and is shipping now.
The OMAP3 used in things like the N900 is a relatively mature SoC and is shipping in volume.
Basically, if you want to get a product out now, you use an A8.
At 1GH+ it's pretty respectable, especially since it can offload a lot to the DSP and GPU in a typical SoC.
If you want to get one out sometime this year, you might use an A9.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818</id>
	<title>Just a little Nit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262633100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...<i>"Adobe Flash support, Android or Linux OS."</i></p><p>Isn't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... " Adobe Flash support , Android or Linux OS .
" Is n't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..."Adobe Flash support, Android or Linux OS.
"Isn't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647440</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>Shotgun</author>
	<datestamp>1262604780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>History has proven that the tablet market was set at a price point that was to high.  Traditionally, the typical tablet has been a very overpriced but underpowered laptop.</p><p>Many, MANY uses can be found for these type of tablets, IFF they're cheap enough.  That is just now starting to happen.</p><p>The thing that hasn't changed is this industry moving from "hyping of planned bandwagon hyping".  That has always been the case, and without some government enforced consent agreements (re IBM) it will continue to be the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>History has proven that the tablet market was set at a price point that was to high .
Traditionally , the typical tablet has been a very overpriced but underpowered laptop.Many , MANY uses can be found for these type of tablets , IFF they 're cheap enough .
That is just now starting to happen.The thing that has n't changed is this industry moving from " hyping of planned bandwagon hyping " .
That has always been the case , and without some government enforced consent agreements ( re IBM ) it will continue to be the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>History has proven that the tablet market was set at a price point that was to high.
Traditionally, the typical tablet has been a very overpriced but underpowered laptop.Many, MANY uses can be found for these type of tablets, IFF they're cheap enough.
That is just now starting to happen.The thing that hasn't changed is this industry moving from "hyping of planned bandwagon hyping".
That has always been the case, and without some government enforced consent agreements (re IBM) it will continue to be the case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644046</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1262634120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Every one of these devices, from the smart phone up to the monster desktop, is able to do it all....</p></div><p>... very poorly.  In fact, just barely well enough to not get class action lawsuits, usually, which is not exactly glowing praise.</p><p>Possibly the lowest res worst quality digital cameras ever made on cellphones, complete with greasy lenses dusty sensors and dim slow sensitivity.  Viewing the web thru a screen the size of a postage stamp, even webtv was better.  Non-apple music player user interfaces that make you wish for the good old days of the 1997 Diamond Rio, but thankfully the phone battery will die in an hour or two so you won't have to suffer long.  GPS navigators that work great on any trip shorter than two hours (after which the device overheats and/or the battery dies).  Games released for phones in 2009 that would make a Vic-20 user cringe at the poor graphics.  Email reader with all the features of "elm" from 1991, albeit with a nice slow GUI.</p><p>Or you can get something like an iphone, which does most of that, sort of well, but costs about $3000 over about two years, some upfront, plus hefty monthly fees, soon bandwidth charges will make that even higher if you make the mistake of actually using it.</p><p>If over a hundred bucks a month won't do it, I guess a perfect machine would cost at least two or three hundred a month.  I can get a nice car for that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every one of these devices , from the smart phone up to the monster desktop , is able to do it all....... very poorly .
In fact , just barely well enough to not get class action lawsuits , usually , which is not exactly glowing praise.Possibly the lowest res worst quality digital cameras ever made on cellphones , complete with greasy lenses dusty sensors and dim slow sensitivity .
Viewing the web thru a screen the size of a postage stamp , even webtv was better .
Non-apple music player user interfaces that make you wish for the good old days of the 1997 Diamond Rio , but thankfully the phone battery will die in an hour or two so you wo n't have to suffer long .
GPS navigators that work great on any trip shorter than two hours ( after which the device overheats and/or the battery dies ) .
Games released for phones in 2009 that would make a Vic-20 user cringe at the poor graphics .
Email reader with all the features of " elm " from 1991 , albeit with a nice slow GUI.Or you can get something like an iphone , which does most of that , sort of well , but costs about $ 3000 over about two years , some upfront , plus hefty monthly fees , soon bandwidth charges will make that even higher if you make the mistake of actually using it.If over a hundred bucks a month wo n't do it , I guess a perfect machine would cost at least two or three hundred a month .
I can get a nice car for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every one of these devices, from the smart phone up to the monster desktop, is able to do it all....... very poorly.
In fact, just barely well enough to not get class action lawsuits, usually, which is not exactly glowing praise.Possibly the lowest res worst quality digital cameras ever made on cellphones, complete with greasy lenses dusty sensors and dim slow sensitivity.
Viewing the web thru a screen the size of a postage stamp, even webtv was better.
Non-apple music player user interfaces that make you wish for the good old days of the 1997 Diamond Rio, but thankfully the phone battery will die in an hour or two so you won't have to suffer long.
GPS navigators that work great on any trip shorter than two hours (after which the device overheats and/or the battery dies).
Games released for phones in 2009 that would make a Vic-20 user cringe at the poor graphics.
Email reader with all the features of "elm" from 1991, albeit with a nice slow GUI.Or you can get something like an iphone, which does most of that, sort of well, but costs about $3000 over about two years, some upfront, plus hefty monthly fees, soon bandwidth charges will make that even higher if you make the mistake of actually using it.If over a hundred bucks a month won't do it, I guess a perfect machine would cost at least two or three hundred a month.
I can get a nice car for that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645926</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Tablets</title>
	<author>limaxray</author>
	<datestamp>1262598540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you're taking tablets too literally; this has absolutely nothing to do with tablets.  The point here is Freescale, a semiconductor manufacturer (and not a system OEM), built a tablet device to show off their SoC designs to OEMs.  It is a reference design and nothing more - actual OEM developers use it as a guide to see how to best implement Freescale's products.<br> <br>The point here is Freescale is advertising to OEMs "Hey look how easy and cheap it is to develop with our product".  This is not aimed at you, and they don't care if you want a tablet or not.  They only care that you probably want a small, portable, yet fairly powerful device (be it a netbook, tablet, smartphone, whatever) that could be implemented with their products.<br> <br>And why did they choose a tablet you ask?  It's easier to build, plain and simple.  No hinge, no moving parts - just bolt an LCD to a PCB board and put it in an enclosure and you have CES worthy development board.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're taking tablets too literally ; this has absolutely nothing to do with tablets .
The point here is Freescale , a semiconductor manufacturer ( and not a system OEM ) , built a tablet device to show off their SoC designs to OEMs .
It is a reference design and nothing more - actual OEM developers use it as a guide to see how to best implement Freescale 's products .
The point here is Freescale is advertising to OEMs " Hey look how easy and cheap it is to develop with our product " .
This is not aimed at you , and they do n't care if you want a tablet or not .
They only care that you probably want a small , portable , yet fairly powerful device ( be it a netbook , tablet , smartphone , whatever ) that could be implemented with their products .
And why did they choose a tablet you ask ?
It 's easier to build , plain and simple .
No hinge , no moving parts - just bolt an LCD to a PCB board and put it in an enclosure and you have CES worthy development board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're taking tablets too literally; this has absolutely nothing to do with tablets.
The point here is Freescale, a semiconductor manufacturer (and not a system OEM), built a tablet device to show off their SoC designs to OEMs.
It is a reference design and nothing more - actual OEM developers use it as a guide to see how to best implement Freescale's products.
The point here is Freescale is advertising to OEMs "Hey look how easy and cheap it is to develop with our product".
This is not aimed at you, and they don't care if you want a tablet or not.
They only care that you probably want a small, portable, yet fairly powerful device (be it a netbook, tablet, smartphone, whatever) that could be implemented with their products.
And why did they choose a tablet you ask?
It's easier to build, plain and simple.
No hinge, no moving parts - just bolt an LCD to a PCB board and put it in an enclosure and you have CES worthy development board.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644022</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>xpuppykickerx</author>
	<datestamp>1262634000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like you've never used anything too big for one hand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you 've never used anything too big for one hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you've never used anything too big for one hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644068</id>
	<title>Re:Some Questions</title>
	<author>Lisandro</author>
	<datestamp>1262634240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>1024x600 is the standard "widescreen" resolution for 10" netbook displays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1024x600 is the standard " widescreen " resolution for 10 " netbook displays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1024x600 is the standard "widescreen" resolution for 10" netbook displays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643664</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1262632500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have a dockable Keyboard to turn it into a netbook, practically.</p><p>As for touch screen, all you need is a spot to mount it on your dashboard to use it like a GPS.</p><p>It's not the worlds most amazing product, especially since its a mere $200, but the applications are there, you just aren't looking hard enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have a dockable Keyboard to turn it into a netbook , practically.As for touch screen , all you need is a spot to mount it on your dashboard to use it like a GPS.It 's not the worlds most amazing product , especially since its a mere $ 200 , but the applications are there , you just are n't looking hard enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have a dockable Keyboard to turn it into a netbook, practically.As for touch screen, all you need is a spot to mount it on your dashboard to use it like a GPS.It's not the worlds most amazing product, especially since its a mere $200, but the applications are there, you just aren't looking hard enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776</id>
	<title>Two points</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1262632920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) Reference design != product<br>
2) Cost of $199 is based on Freescale's projected cost of components, meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher (probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price)<br>
However, if you add a tie-in to a decent eBook/mp3/video vendor, this device could have a decent niche market. In fact, it could adopt the cellphone business model and be given away for "free" with a commitment to a monthly subscription fee. Would you pay $20/month for two years for this if it included content?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Reference design ! = product 2 ) Cost of $ 199 is based on Freescale 's projected cost of components , meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher ( probably closer to the rumored $ 300 iSlate price ) However , if you add a tie-in to a decent eBook/mp3/video vendor , this device could have a decent niche market .
In fact , it could adopt the cellphone business model and be given away for " free " with a commitment to a monthly subscription fee .
Would you pay $ 20/month for two years for this if it included content ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Reference design != product
2) Cost of $199 is based on Freescale's projected cost of components, meaning actual cost to consumers would be higher (probably closer to the rumored $300 iSlate price)
However, if you add a tie-in to a decent eBook/mp3/video vendor, this device could have a decent niche market.
In fact, it could adopt the cellphone business model and be given away for "free" with a commitment to a monthly subscription fee.
Would you pay $20/month for two years for this if it included content?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644968</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>eav</author>
	<datestamp>1262638440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?   If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.  If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.  A 2-handed PDA sucks.</p></div><p>Does not seem to be made for data entry.  I otherwise don't see holding it with one hand as a problem.  I mean, just to test it out I picked up my 13" laptop and closed its easily holdable with one hand.  Input with one hand should be easy.

Whats bad is how ugly the samples they show are.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you do data entry , even touch screen , if you need both hands to hold it ?
If I want to put a computer on my lap , I 'll buy a laptop .
If I want a PDA , I 'll use a PDA .
A 2-handed PDA sucks.Does not seem to be made for data entry .
I otherwise do n't see holding it with one hand as a problem .
I mean , just to test it out I picked up my 13 " laptop and closed its easily holdable with one hand .
Input with one hand should be easy .
Whats bad is how ugly the samples they show are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you do data entry, even touch screen, if you need both hands to hold it?
If I want to put a computer on my lap, I'll buy a laptop.
If I want a PDA, I'll use a PDA.
A 2-handed PDA sucks.Does not seem to be made for data entry.
I otherwise don't see holding it with one hand as a problem.
I mean, just to test it out I picked up my 13" laptop and closed its easily holdable with one hand.
Input with one hand should be easy.
Whats bad is how ugly the samples they show are.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644768</id>
	<title>They said all of this of netbooks too...</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1262637540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And good luck finding a retail, non-refurbished netbook at the $200 pricepoint these days.</p><p>I paid $300 for mine and I still feel I overpaid by about $100 for its underpoweredness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And good luck finding a retail , non-refurbished netbook at the $ 200 pricepoint these days.I paid $ 300 for mine and I still feel I overpaid by about $ 100 for its underpoweredness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And good luck finding a retail, non-refurbished netbook at the $200 pricepoint these days.I paid $300 for mine and I still feel I overpaid by about $100 for its underpoweredness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476</id>
	<title>That kills the google welfarebook</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1262631780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And that's a good thing.  Google's "netbook" was going to be too locked-down.  Not able to install any software locally, not able to run anything not approved by and signed by google, and any attempt to change it resulting in the welfarebook re-imaging itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And that 's a good thing .
Google 's " netbook " was going to be too locked-down .
Not able to install any software locally , not able to run anything not approved by and signed by google , and any attempt to change it resulting in the welfarebook re-imaging itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that's a good thing.
Google's "netbook" was going to be too locked-down.
Not able to install any software locally, not able to run anything not approved by and signed by google, and any attempt to change it resulting in the welfarebook re-imaging itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566</id>
	<title>"Envisions"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262632140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I envision all of that, too. But I think I'm about as close to releasing that product as Freescale is.</p><p>But my vision also includes tomato bacon pizza, so maybe my local pizzeria is actually the closest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I envision all of that , too .
But I think I 'm about as close to releasing that product as Freescale is.But my vision also includes tomato bacon pizza , so maybe my local pizzeria is actually the closest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I envision all of that, too.
But I think I'm about as close to releasing that product as Freescale is.But my vision also includes tomato bacon pizza, so maybe my local pizzeria is actually the closest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644944</id>
	<title>Re:That kills the google welfarebook</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1262638320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And that's a good thing.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'll say.</p><p>Where do I go to order one of these beauties right now?  I wish Freescale the best with this product.  It looks exactly like what I've been waiting for.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And that 's a good thing.I 'll say.Where do I go to order one of these beauties right now ?
I wish Freescale the best with this product .
It looks exactly like what I 've been waiting for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that's a good thing.I'll say.Where do I go to order one of these beauties right now?
I wish Freescale the best with this product.
It looks exactly like what I've been waiting for.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646536</id>
	<title>Re:"Envisions"</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1262600880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh what the hell I thought you were PizzaAnalogyGuy. Get outta here, we got enough of yous guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh what the hell I thought you were PizzaAnalogyGuy .
Get outta here , we got enough of yous guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh what the hell I thought you were PizzaAnalogyGuy.
Get outta here, we got enough of yous guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645818</id>
	<title>I've been "envisioning" this for 2 years</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1262598180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And still waiting for the Always Innovating Touchbook to actually be available and in stock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And still waiting for the Always Innovating Touchbook to actually be available and in stock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And still waiting for the Always Innovating Touchbook to actually be available and in stock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648934</id>
	<title>Re:That kills the google welfarebook</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1262611500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No it won't.  It's a reference design, which is a technical term meaning 'shiny thing that will never become a production model.'  FreeScale doesn't make laptops and isn't trying to get into that business.  This machine exists so that FreeScale can show it to potential customers and say 'hey guys, look at what you could build with our chips!'  Some OEM may pick it up and decide to manufacture it, but they may not.  Google may decide to base their machine on this design, but the leaked specs so far showed that they are using a Snapdragon (which should be faster clock-for-clock than the i.MX515 looking at the pipeline diagrams for both, but you'd need to check benchmarks to be certain).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No it wo n't .
It 's a reference design , which is a technical term meaning 'shiny thing that will never become a production model .
' FreeScale does n't make laptops and is n't trying to get into that business .
This machine exists so that FreeScale can show it to potential customers and say 'hey guys , look at what you could build with our chips !
' Some OEM may pick it up and decide to manufacture it , but they may not .
Google may decide to base their machine on this design , but the leaked specs so far showed that they are using a Snapdragon ( which should be faster clock-for-clock than the i.MX515 looking at the pipeline diagrams for both , but you 'd need to check benchmarks to be certain ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it won't.
It's a reference design, which is a technical term meaning 'shiny thing that will never become a production model.
'  FreeScale doesn't make laptops and isn't trying to get into that business.
This machine exists so that FreeScale can show it to potential customers and say 'hey guys, look at what you could build with our chips!
'  Some OEM may pick it up and decide to manufacture it, but they may not.
Google may decide to base their machine on this design, but the leaked specs so far showed that they are using a Snapdragon (which should be faster clock-for-clock than the i.MX515 looking at the pipeline diagrams for both, but you'd need to check benchmarks to be certain).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644254</id>
	<title>Re:Too big for 1 hand, so how do you type</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1262635140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you need two hands to hold it, you shouldn't be here on Slashdot.  Most guys here seem to be perfectly capable of using just one hand to hold it.  Many probably dream of a 2-handed PDA that sucks too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need two hands to hold it , you should n't be here on Slashdot .
Most guys here seem to be perfectly capable of using just one hand to hold it .
Many probably dream of a 2-handed PDA that sucks too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need two hands to hold it, you shouldn't be here on Slashdot.
Most guys here seem to be perfectly capable of using just one hand to hold it.
Many probably dream of a 2-handed PDA that sucks too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30651882</id>
	<title>Possible use...</title>
	<author>tanveer1979</author>
	<datestamp>1262633640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many in car GPS systems cost 200$+<br>This device could be an all in 1, wifi, GPS, phone etc., with an AV player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many in car GPS systems cost 200 $ + This device could be an all in 1 , wifi , GPS , phone etc. , with an AV player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many in car GPS systems cost 200$+This device could be an all in 1, wifi, GPS, phone etc., with an AV player.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645210</id>
	<title>Re: all-day battery life</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1262596140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably about double or triple the size of an iPhone's battery. I fully expect this to be a glorified 10" ipod touch/iphone running the same/a variant of the iPhone OS. They don't use a whole lot of power in standby mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably about double or triple the size of an iPhone 's battery .
I fully expect this to be a glorified 10 " ipod touch/iphone running the same/a variant of the iPhone OS .
They do n't use a whole lot of power in standby mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably about double or triple the size of an iPhone's battery.
I fully expect this to be a glorified 10" ipod touch/iphone running the same/a variant of the iPhone OS.
They don't use a whole lot of power in standby mode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646360</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating Touchbook</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1262600220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right in the specs it has 256 megs of ram. This isn't a PC, the TI OMAP 3 chip is a fully integrated system on a chip. Its ram, eprom, graphics accelerators and cpu are all cut from a single chip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right in the specs it has 256 megs of ram .
This is n't a PC , the TI OMAP 3 chip is a fully integrated system on a chip .
Its ram , eprom , graphics accelerators and cpu are all cut from a single chip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right in the specs it has 256 megs of ram.
This isn't a PC, the TI OMAP 3 chip is a fully integrated system on a chip.
Its ram, eprom, graphics accelerators and cpu are all cut from a single chip.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645292</id>
	<title>Re:"Smartphone", "netbook", "ebook", "smartbook"..</title>
	<author>greenguy</author>
	<datestamp>1262596380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And when small computers use e-paper for their display, we'll have paperbackbooks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And when small computers use e-paper for their display , we 'll have paperbackbooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And when small computers use e-paper for their display, we'll have paperbackbooks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470</id>
	<title>all-day battery life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262631780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How freaking big will the battery be?  If I leave the radio and wifi on on my Nook it needs a recharge at the end of the day, and that's with little use of the color screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How freaking big will the battery be ?
If I leave the radio and wifi on on my Nook it needs a recharge at the end of the day , and that 's with little use of the color screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How freaking big will the battery be?
If I leave the radio and wifi on on my Nook it needs a recharge at the end of the day, and that's with little use of the color screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644876</id>
	<title>Re: all-day battery life</title>
	<author>msclrhd</author>
	<datestamp>1262638020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do know that an ARM processor consumes less power than an Intel Atom processor, and thus increases battery life. In addition to that, the Pixel Qi LCD technology with an ARM processor can give 15-20 hours or more worth of battery life [1] (Pixel Qi uses 1/2 to 1/4 of the power that standard LCD screens use [2]).</p><p>[1] <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/154541/jepsen\_works\_to\_raise\_laptop\_battery\_life\_to\_2040\_hours.html" title="pcworld.com">http://www.pcworld.com/article/154541/jepsen\_works\_to\_raise\_laptop\_battery\_life\_to\_2040\_hours.html</a> [pcworld.com]<br>[2] <a href="http://www.pixelqi.com/" title="pixelqi.com">http://www.pixelqi.com/</a> [pixelqi.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know that an ARM processor consumes less power than an Intel Atom processor , and thus increases battery life .
In addition to that , the Pixel Qi LCD technology with an ARM processor can give 15-20 hours or more worth of battery life [ 1 ] ( Pixel Qi uses 1/2 to 1/4 of the power that standard LCD screens use [ 2 ] ) .
[ 1 ] http : //www.pcworld.com/article/154541/jepsen \ _works \ _to \ _raise \ _laptop \ _battery \ _life \ _to \ _2040 \ _hours.html [ pcworld.com ] [ 2 ] http : //www.pixelqi.com/ [ pixelqi.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know that an ARM processor consumes less power than an Intel Atom processor, and thus increases battery life.
In addition to that, the Pixel Qi LCD technology with an ARM processor can give 15-20 hours or more worth of battery life [1] (Pixel Qi uses 1/2 to 1/4 of the power that standard LCD screens use [2]).
[1] http://www.pcworld.com/article/154541/jepsen\_works\_to\_raise\_laptop\_battery\_life\_to\_2040\_hours.html [pcworld.com][2] http://www.pixelqi.com/ [pixelqi.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643888</id>
	<title>Re:Just a little Nit</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1262633340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux?</p></div><p>No.</p><p> <strong>What is Android?</strong> <br>
Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications. The Android SDK provides the tools and APIs necessary to begin developing applications on the Android platform using the Java programming language.</p><p>http://developer.android.com/guide/basics/what-is-android.html</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux ? No .
What is Android ?
Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system , middleware and key applications .
The Android SDK provides the tools and APIs necessary to begin developing applications on the Android platform using the Java programming language.http : //developer.android.com/guide/basics/what-is-android.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't Android just a mobile distribution of Linux?No.
What is Android?
Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications.
The Android SDK provides the tools and APIs necessary to begin developing applications on the Android platform using the Java programming language.http://developer.android.com/guide/basics/what-is-android.html
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647690</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1262605860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>More specialized devices that only play music (ipod) or GPS navigate (tom tom) or display email (blackberry) or let you write down notes (newton) or take pictures (compact digital camera) are rapidly becoming obsolete.</p></div></blockquote><p>As they well should. All of the devices you mention are basically the same (architecture-wise) as general-purpose computers, just smaller.</p><p>I just bought myself an iPod Touch for christmas (my first Apple purchase) and have experienced equal parts of both fascination and frustration while using the device. The fact that they've managed to give such a small device a very capable web browser is nothing short of amazing, nevermind the zillion other cool things the device does.</p><p>It's a shame, however, that Apple has such a strong hold on what I'm able to do with the device after I've bought it. It's ludicrous that there's no access to the filesystem and absolutely no way to put data of any kind on the device without the approval of iTunes. I'd love to develop for it, but I'm not slapping down $99 plus whatever the lowest-end Mac costs just to tinker around. The most worrisome thing, however, is that Apple appears to be more anti-open-source than Microsoft at the same time that they directly benefit from a large number of open source frameworks and libraries in virtually all of their software.</p><p>I know, I can always jailbreak the iPod and get most of the functionality I'm asking for (and I probably will eventually), but it would be nice for a change if a company could engineer a device without going through so much trouble to lock it down to one or two functions. And/or perceived their more technical customers to be assets rather than enemies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specialized devices that only play music ( ipod ) or GPS navigate ( tom tom ) or display email ( blackberry ) or let you write down notes ( newton ) or take pictures ( compact digital camera ) are rapidly becoming obsolete.As they well should .
All of the devices you mention are basically the same ( architecture-wise ) as general-purpose computers , just smaller.I just bought myself an iPod Touch for christmas ( my first Apple purchase ) and have experienced equal parts of both fascination and frustration while using the device .
The fact that they 've managed to give such a small device a very capable web browser is nothing short of amazing , nevermind the zillion other cool things the device does.It 's a shame , however , that Apple has such a strong hold on what I 'm able to do with the device after I 've bought it .
It 's ludicrous that there 's no access to the filesystem and absolutely no way to put data of any kind on the device without the approval of iTunes .
I 'd love to develop for it , but I 'm not slapping down $ 99 plus whatever the lowest-end Mac costs just to tinker around .
The most worrisome thing , however , is that Apple appears to be more anti-open-source than Microsoft at the same time that they directly benefit from a large number of open source frameworks and libraries in virtually all of their software.I know , I can always jailbreak the iPod and get most of the functionality I 'm asking for ( and I probably will eventually ) , but it would be nice for a change if a company could engineer a device without going through so much trouble to lock it down to one or two functions .
And/or perceived their more technical customers to be assets rather than enemies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specialized devices that only play music (ipod) or GPS navigate (tom tom) or display email (blackberry) or let you write down notes (newton) or take pictures (compact digital camera) are rapidly becoming obsolete.As they well should.
All of the devices you mention are basically the same (architecture-wise) as general-purpose computers, just smaller.I just bought myself an iPod Touch for christmas (my first Apple purchase) and have experienced equal parts of both fascination and frustration while using the device.
The fact that they've managed to give such a small device a very capable web browser is nothing short of amazing, nevermind the zillion other cool things the device does.It's a shame, however, that Apple has such a strong hold on what I'm able to do with the device after I've bought it.
It's ludicrous that there's no access to the filesystem and absolutely no way to put data of any kind on the device without the approval of iTunes.
I'd love to develop for it, but I'm not slapping down $99 plus whatever the lowest-end Mac costs just to tinker around.
The most worrisome thing, however, is that Apple appears to be more anti-open-source than Microsoft at the same time that they directly benefit from a large number of open source frameworks and libraries in virtually all of their software.I know, I can always jailbreak the iPod and get most of the functionality I'm asking for (and I probably will eventually), but it would be nice for a change if a company could engineer a device without going through so much trouble to lock it down to one or two functions.
And/or perceived their more technical customers to be assets rather than enemies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644974</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating Touchbook</title>
	<author>mtemmerm</author>
	<datestamp>1262638440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ordered mine in September and it should be on it's way any day now!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ordered mine in September and it should be on it 's way any day now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ordered mine in September and it should be on it's way any day now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644656</id>
	<title>Re:Some Questions</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1262636940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a very standard resolution.   I think a Tablet with Native 1080p or at least Native 720p resolution would be a great place to start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a very standard resolution .
I think a Tablet with Native 1080p or at least Native 720p resolution would be a great place to start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a very standard resolution.
I think a Tablet with Native 1080p or at least Native 720p resolution would be a great place to start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644492</id>
	<title>Would it have been that much more for native 720p?</title>
	<author>Rene S. Hollan</author>
	<datestamp>1262636220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1280x720 native resolution would have made far more sense, no?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1280x720 native resolution would have made far more sense , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1280x720 native resolution would have made far more sense, no?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644190</id>
	<title>Freescale</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262634780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rocks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rocks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286</id>
	<title>Resolution sucks</title>
	<author>mariushm</author>
	<datestamp>1262635260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously... couldn't they at least have 1280x720 instead of that 1024x600... though I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously... could n't they at least have 1280x720 instead of that 1024x600... though I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously... couldn't they at least have 1280x720 instead of that 1024x600... though I doubt the processor is fast enough to decode regular 720p h264 movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30653058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30661046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_170217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30661046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30653058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30648606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30647690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30645210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30652732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30643776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_170217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30644286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30649286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_170217.30646582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
