<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_04_0158217</id>
	<title>The Top 5 Technology Panics of 2009</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1262617860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>destinyland writes <i>"An A.I. researcher lists <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/politics/top-5-technology-panics-2009">the Top 5 Technology Panics of 2009</a> &mdash; along with the corresponding reality. There's exploding iPods, the uproar over 'bombing' the moon, and even a flesh-eating robot. But in each case, he supplies some much-needed perspective.  'These incidents are incredibly rare ... the rocket stage weighs around two tons, while the Moon weighs in at a 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war &mdash; and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " An A.I .
researcher lists the Top 5 Technology Panics of 2009    along with the corresponding reality .
There 's exploding iPods , the uproar over 'bombing ' the moon , and even a flesh-eating robot .
But in each case , he supplies some much-needed perspective .
'These incidents are incredibly rare ... the rocket stage weighs around two tons , while the Moon weighs in at a 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war    and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "An A.I.
researcher lists the Top 5 Technology Panics of 2009 — along with the corresponding reality.
There's exploding iPods, the uproar over 'bombing' the moon, and even a flesh-eating robot.
But in each case, he supplies some much-needed perspective.
'These incidents are incredibly rare ... the rocket stage weighs around two tons, while the Moon weighs in at a 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war — and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637058</id>
	<title>Plant matter is good...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262535420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but animal fats are better!</htmltext>
<tokenext>but animal fats are better !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but animal fats are better!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432</id>
	<title>Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262539140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>After the rumors started making their way around the Internet, EATR's designers stepped in to clarify: the "flesh-eating robot" will consume vegetable matter only, and it comes equipped with a suite of sensors and computers to help it determine whether the things it comes across are animal, vegetable or neither. After all, desecration of the dead is against the laws of war and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway. There are a lot more bushes to feast upon than human bodies.</p></div></blockquote><p>Human bodies are better fuel, because it has more energy available per bite. That's why top predators eat meat, though it costs so much energy to get. That mere assertion is no defense.</p><p>The laws of war are more broken than honored. Torture? Lies to invade Iraq? How are those laws stopping terrorists?</p><p>Nobody can be expected to believe those reasons why robots won't eat us. If that's all they've got to say they won't, we can expect these robots "to serve man" pretty soon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After the rumors started making their way around the Internet , EATR 's designers stepped in to clarify : the " flesh-eating robot " will consume vegetable matter only , and it comes equipped with a suite of sensors and computers to help it determine whether the things it comes across are animal , vegetable or neither .
After all , desecration of the dead is against the laws of war and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway .
There are a lot more bushes to feast upon than human bodies.Human bodies are better fuel , because it has more energy available per bite .
That 's why top predators eat meat , though it costs so much energy to get .
That mere assertion is no defense.The laws of war are more broken than honored .
Torture ? Lies to invade Iraq ?
How are those laws stopping terrorists ? Nobody can be expected to believe those reasons why robots wo n't eat us .
If that 's all they 've got to say they wo n't , we can expect these robots " to serve man " pretty soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the rumors started making their way around the Internet, EATR's designers stepped in to clarify: the "flesh-eating robot" will consume vegetable matter only, and it comes equipped with a suite of sensors and computers to help it determine whether the things it comes across are animal, vegetable or neither.
After all, desecration of the dead is against the laws of war and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway.
There are a lot more bushes to feast upon than human bodies.Human bodies are better fuel, because it has more energy available per bite.
That's why top predators eat meat, though it costs so much energy to get.
That mere assertion is no defense.The laws of war are more broken than honored.
Torture? Lies to invade Iraq?
How are those laws stopping terrorists?Nobody can be expected to believe those reasons why robots won't eat us.
If that's all they've got to say they won't, we can expect these robots "to serve man" pretty soon.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640496</id>
	<title>Sad comparison</title>
	<author>CFBMoo1</author>
	<datestamp>1262619900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>73,477,000,000,000,000,000.00 (Moon weight in tons)<br>00,000,012,162,748,511,374.98 (US Debt) ** Only 6 more decimal places to go! **<br><br>I think it's sad that when I look at numbers referring to things like moon weight or number of stars in the galaxy that the first thing that comes to my mind is my countries national debt in relation to those numbers. http://www.brillig.com/debt\_clock/ -&gt; $12,162,748,511,374.98 as of January 4th, 2010.</htmltext>
<tokenext>73,477,000,000,000,000,000.00 ( Moon weight in tons ) 00,000,012,162,748,511,374.98 ( US Debt ) * * Only 6 more decimal places to go !
* * I think it 's sad that when I look at numbers referring to things like moon weight or number of stars in the galaxy that the first thing that comes to my mind is my countries national debt in relation to those numbers .
http : //www.brillig.com/debt \ _clock/ - &gt; $ 12,162,748,511,374.98 as of January 4th , 2010 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>73,477,000,000,000,000,000.00 (Moon weight in tons)00,000,012,162,748,511,374.98 (US Debt) ** Only 6 more decimal places to go!
**I think it's sad that when I look at numbers referring to things like moon weight or number of stars in the galaxy that the first thing that comes to my mind is my countries national debt in relation to those numbers.
http://www.brillig.com/debt\_clock/ -&gt; $12,162,748,511,374.98 as of January 4th, 2010.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642534</id>
	<title>Re:It "weighs" two tons?</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1262627760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent +5 pedantic.
<p>
In normal English we say something "weighs" two tons, rather than "masses" two tons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent + 5 pedantic .
In normal English we say something " weighs " two tons , rather than " masses " two tons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent +5 pedantic.
In normal English we say something "weighs" two tons, rather than "masses" two tons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638790</id>
	<title>Chris sardius</title>
	<author>phanerus</author>
	<datestamp>1262601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those are really small fears now, how about mobile phone radiations that are said to cause cancers and tumors ( we are discussing that on <a href="http://smsdam.com/" title="smsdam.com" rel="nofollow">http://smsdam.com/</a> [smsdam.com] ) an asteroid rain with invading aliens and the 666 with the fallen angels that show up in human form.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are really small fears now , how about mobile phone radiations that are said to cause cancers and tumors ( we are discussing that on http : //smsdam.com/ [ smsdam.com ] ) an asteroid rain with invading aliens and the 666 with the fallen angels that show up in human form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are really small fears now, how about mobile phone radiations that are said to cause cancers and tumors ( we are discussing that on http://smsdam.com/ [smsdam.com] ) an asteroid rain with invading aliens and the 666 with the fallen angels that show up in human form.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638190</id>
	<title>Re:Weight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262635740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're confusing accuracy and precision.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're confusing accuracy and precision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're confusing accuracy and precision.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30646896</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1262602500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of the recent conflicts seem to have taken place in desert regions, which don't have a lot of foliage.  If we were currently fighting in Vietnam, your comment would make a lot of sense, but with Iraq and even worse, Afghanistan, it doesn't.  There isn't a lot growing in those places.</p><p>And remember, it takes a lot less energy to digest meat and get energy from it, than to eat plants and digest them.  That's why cows have 4 stomach chambers and rabbits have to eat their own shit, and predators like cats have extremely short digestive tracks by comparison.</p><p>As for body armor, most combatants don't seem to have any of that on these days.  Taliban fighters, I imagine, don't have easy access to such things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of the recent conflicts seem to have taken place in desert regions , which do n't have a lot of foliage .
If we were currently fighting in Vietnam , your comment would make a lot of sense , but with Iraq and even worse , Afghanistan , it does n't .
There is n't a lot growing in those places.And remember , it takes a lot less energy to digest meat and get energy from it , than to eat plants and digest them .
That 's why cows have 4 stomach chambers and rabbits have to eat their own shit , and predators like cats have extremely short digestive tracks by comparison.As for body armor , most combatants do n't seem to have any of that on these days .
Taliban fighters , I imagine , do n't have easy access to such things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of the recent conflicts seem to have taken place in desert regions, which don't have a lot of foliage.
If we were currently fighting in Vietnam, your comment would make a lot of sense, but with Iraq and even worse, Afghanistan, it doesn't.
There isn't a lot growing in those places.And remember, it takes a lot less energy to digest meat and get energy from it, than to eat plants and digest them.
That's why cows have 4 stomach chambers and rabbits have to eat their own shit, and predators like cats have extremely short digestive tracks by comparison.As for body armor, most combatants don't seem to have any of that on these days.
Taliban fighters, I imagine, don't have easy access to such things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637826</id>
	<title>Re:Conficker April 1st</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262544240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You obviously have no idea how many "patch-avoiders" there are. It might come to you as a surprise but people don't always choose the most rational thing to do. (Which is part of why they're using windoze to begin with...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You obviously have no idea how many " patch-avoiders " there are .
It might come to you as a surprise but people do n't always choose the most rational thing to do .
( Which is part of why they 're using windoze to begin with... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You obviously have no idea how many "patch-avoiders" there are.
It might come to you as a surprise but people don't always choose the most rational thing to do.
(Which is part of why they're using windoze to begin with...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637510</id>
	<title>Re:The entire Internet is a panic then?</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1262539920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>  So the entire Internet is a panic then?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Pfft. Old news. That's why *I* only buy cell phones with the words DON'T PANIC
written in large friendly letters on their covers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the entire Internet is a panic then ?
Pfft. Old news .
That 's why * I * only buy cell phones with the words DO N'T PANIC written in large friendly letters on their covers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  So the entire Internet is a panic then?
Pfft. Old news.
That's why *I* only buy cell phones with the words DON'T PANIC
written in large friendly letters on their covers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637132</id>
	<title>Sexting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262536080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give me a break. Does it matter who commits the crime? Does it mean that if a minor kills another minor it's really not murder?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me a break .
Does it matter who commits the crime ?
Does it mean that if a minor kills another minor it 's really not murder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me a break.
Does it matter who commits the crime?
Does it mean that if a minor kills another minor it's really not murder?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</id>
	<title>Weight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262536200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You cannot weigh the moon, this is nonsense.</p><p>"The mass of the moon is 7,35E22 kg" sounds correctly to me - which is determined by the Newton's law of gravity.</p><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons</p> </div><p>Which uncertainty? Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons?!</p><p>Sounds like a "journalist" wrote this article<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Please feel free to discuss or correct me if I'm wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... *sigh*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can not weigh the moon , this is nonsense .
" The mass of the moon is 7,35E22 kg " sounds correctly to me - which is determined by the Newton 's law of gravity .
... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons Which uncertainty ?
Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons ?
! Sounds like a " journalist " wrote this article ... Please feel free to discuss or correct me if I 'm wrong ... * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You cannot weigh the moon, this is nonsense.
"The mass of the moon is 7,35E22 kg" sounds correctly to me - which is determined by the Newton's law of gravity.
... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons Which uncertainty?
Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons?
!Sounds like a "journalist" wrote this article ... Please feel free to discuss or correct me if I'm wrong ... *sigh*
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639552</id>
	<title>Re:And an 'F' for the parent.</title>
	<author>pant</author>
	<datestamp>1262612640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grandparent gets an F and parent gets a D-. The earth, sun and moon don't weigh anything, unless they are sitting on a scale. They do, however, have mass. Submitter gets a basic B because he was trying to relate the actual differences in an understandable way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grandparent gets an F and parent gets a D- .
The earth , sun and moon do n't weigh anything , unless they are sitting on a scale .
They do , however , have mass .
Submitter gets a basic B because he was trying to relate the actual differences in an understandable way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grandparent gets an F and parent gets a D-.
The earth, sun and moon don't weigh anything, unless they are sitting on a scale.
They do, however, have mass.
Submitter gets a basic B because he was trying to relate the actual differences in an understandable way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639648</id>
	<title>Re:Weight...</title>
	<author>Sique</author>
	<datestamp>1262613660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is pretty easy to weigh the Moon. Put it on the surface of a known mass(*) and measure the gravitational force between the two masses. The force is called "weight".</p><p>(*) You can also put a known mass on the surface of the Moon. Makes no difference for the measurement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is pretty easy to weigh the Moon .
Put it on the surface of a known mass ( * ) and measure the gravitational force between the two masses .
The force is called " weight " .
( * ) You can also put a known mass on the surface of the Moon .
Makes no difference for the measurement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is pretty easy to weigh the Moon.
Put it on the surface of a known mass(*) and measure the gravitational force between the two masses.
The force is called "weight".
(*) You can also put a known mass on the surface of the Moon.
Makes no difference for the measurement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640284</id>
	<title>Re:How is the LHC not on here?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1262618700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was no (general) panic, only small groups of people who didn't believe what the physicists were telling them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was no ( general ) panic , only small groups of people who did n't believe what the physicists were telling them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was no (general) panic, only small groups of people who didn't believe what the physicists were telling them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637352</id>
	<title>Re:I wish that robot WAS flesh-eating.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262538300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I die, I want my body to be consumed by this robot. You wouldn't deny a dead person their final wish, would you? Ignore the laws of war, I'm CONSENTING to be eaten after I die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I die , I want my body to be consumed by this robot .
You would n't deny a dead person their final wish , would you ?
Ignore the laws of war , I 'm CONSENTING to be eaten after I die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I die, I want my body to be consumed by this robot.
You wouldn't deny a dead person their final wish, would you?
Ignore the laws of war, I'm CONSENTING to be eaten after I die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637262</id>
	<title>Re:Weight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262537520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhh, you can do it really easy: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/ast99/ast99487.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhh , you can do it really easy : http : //www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/ast99/ast99487.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhh, you can do it really easy: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/ast99/ast99487.htm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>FlyingSquidStudios</author>
	<datestamp>1262542860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about the simple fact that there are a hell of a lot more plants then there are human corpses on and around the average battlefield? Hoping it will find a corpse to chow down on (after it gets through the body armor and so on) seems like a silly move if it can just start munching away on the local foliage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about the simple fact that there are a hell of a lot more plants then there are human corpses on and around the average battlefield ?
Hoping it will find a corpse to chow down on ( after it gets through the body armor and so on ) seems like a silly move if it can just start munching away on the local foliage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about the simple fact that there are a hell of a lot more plants then there are human corpses on and around the average battlefield?
Hoping it will find a corpse to chow down on (after it gets through the body armor and so on) seems like a silly move if it can just start munching away on the local foliage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342</id>
	<title>Conficker April 1st</title>
	<author>ScottCooperDotNet</author>
	<datestamp>1262538180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about the incredibly overrated <a href="http://certifiedbug.com/blog/2009/03/27/conficker-april-1st-distraction/" title="certifiedbug.com" rel="nofollow">Conficker</a> [certifiedbug.com] / <a href="http://www.kaspersky.com/technews?id=203038750" title="kaspersky.com" rel="nofollow">Kido</a> [kaspersky.com] / <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/worms/conficker.aspx" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Downadup</a> [microsoft.com] worm that was going to cause the end of the Internet on April 1st 2009?  Big media blew it out of proportion considering Microsoft had patched the flaw and all major AV vendors had protected against it months before April 1st.  The only people really affected by it were the patch-avoiders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about the incredibly overrated Conficker [ certifiedbug.com ] / Kido [ kaspersky.com ] / Downadup [ microsoft.com ] worm that was going to cause the end of the Internet on April 1st 2009 ?
Big media blew it out of proportion considering Microsoft had patched the flaw and all major AV vendors had protected against it months before April 1st .
The only people really affected by it were the patch-avoiders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about the incredibly overrated Conficker [certifiedbug.com] / Kido [kaspersky.com] / Downadup [microsoft.com] worm that was going to cause the end of the Internet on April 1st 2009?
Big media blew it out of proportion considering Microsoft had patched the flaw and all major AV vendors had protected against it months before April 1st.
The only people really affected by it were the patch-avoiders.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30643342</id>
	<title>Please.</title>
	<author>Zotdogg</author>
	<datestamp>1262631180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could we just have one fucking year where we don't have to dodge the "Top X of X for the year X" articles. Fuck me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could we just have one fucking year where we do n't have to dodge the " Top X of X for the year X " articles .
Fuck me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could we just have one fucking year where we don't have to dodge the "Top X of X for the year X" articles.
Fuck me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>angel'o'sphere</author>
	<datestamp>1262626980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>Human bodies are better fuel, because it has more energy available per bite. That's why top predators eat meat, though it costs so much energy to get. That mere assertion is no defense.<br></i><br>That is bullshit.<br>First of all, calories in meat mainly com from fat, no fat means only a very few calories. Low fat meat has roughly half the calories more fatty meat has.<br>Even with fat taken into account (e.g. a fatty T-Bone steak, see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat</a> [wikipedia.org] <b>NOTE THIS ARE CALIRIES</b>) meat has roughly 15\% of the calories e.g. potatoes have (http://www.nutracheck.co.uk/calories/calories\_in\_vegetables/calories\_in\_potatoes.html <b>NOTE then numbers here are kilo-calories</b></p><p>angel'o'sphere</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Human bodies are better fuel , because it has more energy available per bite .
That 's why top predators eat meat , though it costs so much energy to get .
That mere assertion is no defense.That is bullshit.First of all , calories in meat mainly com from fat , no fat means only a very few calories .
Low fat meat has roughly half the calories more fatty meat has.Even with fat taken into account ( e.g .
a fatty T-Bone steak , see : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat [ wikipedia.org ] NOTE THIS ARE CALIRIES ) meat has roughly 15 \ % of the calories e.g .
potatoes have ( http : //www.nutracheck.co.uk/calories/calories \ _in \ _vegetables/calories \ _in \ _potatoes.html NOTE then numbers here are kilo-caloriesangel'o'sphere</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Human bodies are better fuel, because it has more energy available per bite.
That's why top predators eat meat, though it costs so much energy to get.
That mere assertion is no defense.That is bullshit.First of all, calories in meat mainly com from fat, no fat means only a very few calories.
Low fat meat has roughly half the calories more fatty meat has.Even with fat taken into account (e.g.
a fatty T-Bone steak, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat [wikipedia.org] NOTE THIS ARE CALIRIES) meat has roughly 15\% of the calories e.g.
potatoes have (http://www.nutracheck.co.uk/calories/calories\_in\_vegetables/calories\_in\_potatoes.html NOTE then numbers here are kilo-caloriesangel'o'sphere</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637040</id>
	<title>Not even worth...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262535240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...a "first post" post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...a " first post " post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a "first post" post.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640368</id>
	<title>Re:The entire Internet is a panic then?</title>
	<author>tomrud</author>
	<datestamp>1262619300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A picture she knew was being taken gets out, and suddenly it's a career-ended.</p></div><p>Career-ended? It seems that according to IMDB she's involved in four more movies after High School Musical.</p><p>She want be part of the HSM series anymore, because according to the story her character left school after the third movie. Maybe that's what confuses you.</p><p>I have a seven year old daughter, that's why I know a few things about High School Musical.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A picture she knew was being taken gets out , and suddenly it 's a career-ended.Career-ended ?
It seems that according to IMDB she 's involved in four more movies after High School Musical.She want be part of the HSM series anymore , because according to the story her character left school after the third movie .
Maybe that 's what confuses you.I have a seven year old daughter , that 's why I know a few things about High School Musical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A picture she knew was being taken gets out, and suddenly it's a career-ended.Career-ended?
It seems that according to IMDB she's involved in four more movies after High School Musical.She want be part of the HSM series anymore, because according to the story her character left school after the third movie.
Maybe that's what confuses you.I have a seven year old daughter, that's why I know a few things about High School Musical.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062</id>
	<title>It "weighs" two tons?</title>
	<author>hellop2</author>
	<datestamp>1262547780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The rocket booster weighs two tons where?  On Earth, the moon, space?  I wonder how much the Earth weighs.   Oh yeah, it's weightless, because it's in space.<br> <br>
Submitter gets an 'F' for failing to understand basic physics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The rocket booster weighs two tons where ?
On Earth , the moon , space ?
I wonder how much the Earth weighs .
Oh yeah , it 's weightless , because it 's in space .
Submitter gets an 'F ' for failing to understand basic physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rocket booster weighs two tons where?
On Earth, the moon, space?
I wonder how much the Earth weighs.
Oh yeah, it's weightless, because it's in space.
Submitter gets an 'F' for failing to understand basic physics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637388</id>
	<title>Death-by-IPv4</title>
	<author>lq\_x\_pl</author>
	<datestamp>1262538660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It gave me a chuckle to see this story immediately above <i>yet another</i> article on the rapidly diminishing number of IPv4 addresses, and the doom awaiting us when they run out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It gave me a chuckle to see this story immediately above yet another article on the rapidly diminishing number of IPv4 addresses , and the doom awaiting us when they run out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gave me a chuckle to see this story immediately above yet another article on the rapidly diminishing number of IPv4 addresses, and the doom awaiting us when they run out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637364</id>
	<title>Fris7 pSot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262538480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bought the farm... turned over to yet Be in a scene and here, but what !is</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bought the farm... turned over to yet Be in a scene and here , but what ! is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bought the farm... turned over to yet Be in a scene and here, but what !is</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637200</id>
	<title>There's an app for that!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262536740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want a bricked iPhone, there's an app for that you can't refuse.<br>If you want an exploding battery on an iPhone, there's an app for that.<br>Here at Crapple, we strive to give you a crappy overpriced product for you fudgepacking, twinkie sucking faggots out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want a bricked iPhone , there 's an app for that you ca n't refuse.If you want an exploding battery on an iPhone , there 's an app for that.Here at Crapple , we strive to give you a crappy overpriced product for you fudgepacking , twinkie sucking faggots out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want a bricked iPhone, there's an app for that you can't refuse.If you want an exploding battery on an iPhone, there's an app for that.Here at Crapple, we strive to give you a crappy overpriced product for you fudgepacking, twinkie sucking faggots out there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637274</id>
	<title>Re:The entire Internet is a panic then?</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1262537640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The panic is that kids think that pictures given privately to their friends are going to be kept that way... nope. One wrong friend who publishes it and there's no end to it.</p><p>Look what happened to Vanessa Hudgens. She was a Disney star with a song out and part of the High School Musical cast. A picture she knew was being taken gets out, and suddenly it's a career-ended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The panic is that kids think that pictures given privately to their friends are going to be kept that way... nope. One wrong friend who publishes it and there 's no end to it.Look what happened to Vanessa Hudgens .
She was a Disney star with a song out and part of the High School Musical cast .
A picture she knew was being taken gets out , and suddenly it 's a career-ended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The panic is that kids think that pictures given privately to their friends are going to be kept that way... nope. One wrong friend who publishes it and there's no end to it.Look what happened to Vanessa Hudgens.
She was a Disney star with a song out and part of the High School Musical cast.
A picture she knew was being taken gets out, and suddenly it's a career-ended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637540</id>
	<title>Killer electronics is nothing new</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1262540220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If one works on any piece of machinery without turning it off one is likely to get maimed.  Try changing the blades on a lawnmower without disabling it.  Or working on the innards of the refrigerator.  This has much less to with killer robots than humans that are not nearly scared enough of machinery.  I always check twice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If one works on any piece of machinery without turning it off one is likely to get maimed .
Try changing the blades on a lawnmower without disabling it .
Or working on the innards of the refrigerator .
This has much less to with killer robots than humans that are not nearly scared enough of machinery .
I always check twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If one works on any piece of machinery without turning it off one is likely to get maimed.
Try changing the blades on a lawnmower without disabling it.
Or working on the innards of the refrigerator.
This has much less to with killer robots than humans that are not nearly scared enough of machinery.
I always check twice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639072</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1262606220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not necessarily, while not typically, I tend to think that the battlefield at Gettysburg was more filled with human corpses than plants. And likewise in any large battle in some place like Iraq, it doesn't take that many bodies for the rotting dead to outnumber the vegetation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not necessarily , while not typically , I tend to think that the battlefield at Gettysburg was more filled with human corpses than plants .
And likewise in any large battle in some place like Iraq , it does n't take that many bodies for the rotting dead to outnumber the vegetation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not necessarily, while not typically, I tend to think that the battlefield at Gettysburg was more filled with human corpses than plants.
And likewise in any large battle in some place like Iraq, it doesn't take that many bodies for the rotting dead to outnumber the vegetation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637218</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262536920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every comment so far on this article has been modded down at least once. Who the fuck gets mod points around here anymore? Slashdot is quickly outliving it's usefulness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every comment so far on this article has been modded down at least once .
Who the fuck gets mod points around here anymore ?
Slashdot is quickly outliving it 's usefulness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every comment so far on this article has been modded down at least once.
Who the fuck gets mod points around here anymore?
Slashdot is quickly outliving it's usefulness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637520</id>
	<title>Ignores a lot more panics</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1262540100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This really ignores a lot of panics that are more relevant in both mass-media and tech circles alike. The main one is the LHC. Even non-geeks were talking about it and the end of the world. Another one is Conficker, you know the virus/botnet that was supposed to destroy the world in April 2009 when it.... did nothing. Then everyone got worried that it would strike the next month... and nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This really ignores a lot of panics that are more relevant in both mass-media and tech circles alike .
The main one is the LHC .
Even non-geeks were talking about it and the end of the world .
Another one is Conficker , you know the virus/botnet that was supposed to destroy the world in April 2009 when it.... did nothing .
Then everyone got worried that it would strike the next month... and nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This really ignores a lot of panics that are more relevant in both mass-media and tech circles alike.
The main one is the LHC.
Even non-geeks were talking about it and the end of the world.
Another one is Conficker, you know the virus/botnet that was supposed to destroy the world in April 2009 when it.... did nothing.
Then everyone got worried that it would strike the next month... and nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639474</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1262611800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, killer robots will eat us. And I posted that specifically so that <i>you</i> would panic. Thanks for playing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , killer robots will eat us .
And I posted that specifically so that you would panic .
Thanks for playing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, killer robots will eat us.
And I posted that specifically so that you would panic.
Thanks for playing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640682</id>
	<title>Re:How is the LHC not on here?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1262620680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The world could have ended" would be a rubbish excuse in a physics lesson.<br> <br>"My homework is in my bag, but the act of observing it may destroy it" would be much more worthy of being let off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The world could have ended " would be a rubbish excuse in a physics lesson .
" My homework is in my bag , but the act of observing it may destroy it " would be much more worthy of being let off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The world could have ended" would be a rubbish excuse in a physics lesson.
"My homework is in my bag, but the act of observing it may destroy it" would be much more worthy of being let off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637150</id>
	<title>A.I. researcher</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1262536260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Thomas McCabe is a mathematics student at Yale University and a research associate at the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence.</i></p><p>Not sure that's the mainstream definition of "A.I. researcher", but more relevantly, I can think of another technology panic that seems to keep recurring that the <i>Singularity</i> Institute might have something to do with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thomas McCabe is a mathematics student at Yale University and a research associate at the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence.Not sure that 's the mainstream definition of " A.I .
researcher " , but more relevantly , I can think of another technology panic that seems to keep recurring that the Singularity Institute might have something to do with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thomas McCabe is a mathematics student at Yale University and a research associate at the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence.Not sure that's the mainstream definition of "A.I.
researcher", but more relevantly, I can think of another technology panic that seems to keep recurring that the Singularity Institute might have something to do with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637890</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262545560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me get this straight - you are actually arguing <i>for</i> the propositions in the linked article?  You're saying we're not sufficiently terrified of killer cannibal robots, and we need to link this with terrorists somehow?  BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Seriously, I'm laughing so hard right now.  <b>Everybody panic!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me get this straight - you are actually arguing for the propositions in the linked article ?
You 're saying we 're not sufficiently terrified of killer cannibal robots , and we need to link this with terrorists somehow ?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! Seriously , I 'm laughing so hard right now .
Everybody panic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me get this straight - you are actually arguing for the propositions in the linked article?
You're saying we're not sufficiently terrified of killer cannibal robots, and we need to link this with terrorists somehow?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Seriously, I'm laughing so hard right now.
Everybody panic!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048</id>
	<title>The entire Internet is a panic then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262535300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the "sexting" one, it mentions this quote: "[the cell phone's] portability and user friendliness -- makes it extremely easy to get and send pornographic images of anyone."</p><p>So the entire Internet is a panic then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the " sexting " one , it mentions this quote : " [ the cell phone 's ] portability and user friendliness -- makes it extremely easy to get and send pornographic images of anyone .
" So the entire Internet is a panic then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the "sexting" one, it mentions this quote: "[the cell phone's] portability and user friendliness -- makes it extremely easy to get and send pornographic images of anyone.
"So the entire Internet is a panic then?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638274</id>
	<title>Why Not LHC?</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1262636760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LHC isn't on the list for the simple reason that there was nothing to panic about.</p><p>In 2009.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LHC is n't on the list for the simple reason that there was nothing to panic about.In 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LHC isn't on the list for the simple reason that there was nothing to panic about.In 2009.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638206</id>
	<title>And an 'F' for the parent.</title>
	<author>CountBrass</author>
	<datestamp>1262635980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's gravity in space as well you know, which is why the Earth still circles the Sun and the Moon still orbits us. Which means the Earth isn't weightless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's gravity in space as well you know , which is why the Earth still circles the Sun and the Moon still orbits us .
Which means the Earth is n't weightless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's gravity in space as well you know, which is why the Earth still circles the Sun and the Moon still orbits us.
Which means the Earth isn't weightless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637492</id>
	<title>Re:A.I. researcher</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1262539800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in fairness, he is pretty optimistic for a guy whose name sounds like <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/macabre" title="reference.com">macabre</a> [reference.com]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in fairness , he is pretty optimistic for a guy whose name sounds like macabre [ reference.com ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in fairness, he is pretty optimistic for a guy whose name sounds like macabre [reference.com]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637834</id>
	<title>Re:Conficker April 1st</title>
	<author>zkiwi34</author>
	<datestamp>1262544420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which of course waves away the observation that more than a few million computers got zoinked with Confiker and its variants.

Ah well, I guess if it's only a couple of million then it must be over-rated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which of course waves away the observation that more than a few million computers got zoinked with Confiker and its variants .
Ah well , I guess if it 's only a couple of million then it must be over-rated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which of course waves away the observation that more than a few million computers got zoinked with Confiker and its variants.
Ah well, I guess if it's only a couple of million then it must be over-rated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637098</id>
	<title>Large Haldron Collider</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262535780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.livescience.com/technology/090128-lhc-black-holes.html" title="livescience.com" rel="nofollow">Black Holes Won't Destroy the Earth</a> [livescience.com]</p><p>"Probabaly."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Black Holes Wo n't Destroy the Earth [ livescience.com ] " Probabaly .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Black Holes Won't Destroy the Earth [livescience.com]"Probabaly.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649516</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262614320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"We completely understand the public&rsquo;s concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population"</p></div><p>heh, I think making a CEO actually have to say this should get some kind of trolling reward or something.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We completely understand the public    s concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population " heh , I think making a CEO actually have to say this should get some kind of trolling reward or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We completely understand the public’s concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population"heh, I think making a CEO actually have to say this should get some kind of trolling reward or something.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637790</id>
	<title>0th</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1262543700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Windows 7 got released.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 7 got released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 7 got released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637946</id>
	<title>Flesh Eating Robots - FAIL</title>
	<author>nicc777</author>
	<datestamp>1262546460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously they have not battle tested this yet. I have been in a couple of engagements. All I can say is that after the fact there is not much "green stuff" left. The battlefield is mostly burned down. As for deployment in a desert... Well, I'm sure you can figure that out on your own<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously they have not battle tested this yet .
I have been in a couple of engagements .
All I can say is that after the fact there is not much " green stuff " left .
The battlefield is mostly burned down .
As for deployment in a desert... Well , I 'm sure you can figure that out on your own : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously they have not battle tested this yet.
I have been in a couple of engagements.
All I can say is that after the fact there is not much "green stuff" left.
The battlefield is mostly burned down.
As for deployment in a desert... Well, I'm sure you can figure that out on your own :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639502</id>
	<title>Wait..What!?</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1262612100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"<br>THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"<br>THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"<br>THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"<br>THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"</p><p>Dude, what a rollercoaster!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First I was like.. " Wow " ...then I was " Oh Shit " ...Then I was all " Phew " THEN I was like.. " Wow " ...then I was " Oh Shit " ...Then I was all " Phew " THEN I was like.. " Wow " ...then I was " Oh Shit " ...Then I was all " Phew " THEN I was like.. " Wow " ...then I was " Oh Shit " ...Then I was all " Phew " THEN I was like.. " Wow " ...then I was " Oh Shit " ...Then I was all " Phew " Dude , what a rollercoaster !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"THEN I was like.."Wow"...then I was "Oh Shit"...Then I was all "Phew"Dude, what a rollercoaster!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637370</id>
	<title>Re:Weight...</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1262538540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As O'l Archimedes said: Give me a place to stand and I'll weigh the moon for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As O'l Archimedes said : Give me a place to stand and I 'll weigh the moon for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As O'l Archimedes said: Give me a place to stand and I'll weigh the moon for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308</id>
	<title>How is the LHC not on here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262537940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The day before it powered up, my physics teacher had to field a dozen or so inane questions about how it would destroy the Earth, and more than a few kids decided not to do their homework. Then again, the panic could also fall under "Public Science Knowledge FAIL"</htmltext>
<tokenext>The day before it powered up , my physics teacher had to field a dozen or so inane questions about how it would destroy the Earth , and more than a few kids decided not to do their homework .
Then again , the panic could also fall under " Public Science Knowledge FAIL "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day before it powered up, my physics teacher had to field a dozen or so inane questions about how it would destroy the Earth, and more than a few kids decided not to do their homework.
Then again, the panic could also fall under "Public Science Knowledge FAIL"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637538</id>
	<title>Re:Weight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262540220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tons</p><p>Which uncertainty? Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons?!</p></div></blockquote><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; No. The correct nomenclature is 7.3477x10^19. And we certainly know it to 5 significant figures, which is all original value in TFA states.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tonsWhich uncertainty ?
Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons ? !
    No .
The correct nomenclature is 7.3477x10 ^ 19 .
And we certainly know it to 5 significant figures , which is all original value in TFA states .
          Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... 73,477,000,000,000,000,000 tonsWhich uncertainty?
Is it EXACTLY 7,3477E19 tons?!
    No.
The correct nomenclature is 7.3477x10^19.
And we certainly know it to 5 significant figures, which is all original value in TFA states.
          Brett
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639066</id>
	<title>Re:How is the LHC not on here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262606100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then latter they realized that the math was done incorrectly and that the likelihood of the LHC creating an Earth destroying black hole was significantly more likely than previously believed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then latter they realized that the math was done incorrectly and that the likelihood of the LHC creating an Earth destroying black hole was significantly more likely than previously believed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then latter they realized that the math was done incorrectly and that the likelihood of the LHC creating an Earth destroying black hole was significantly more likely than previously believed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637234</id>
	<title>Mod Parent Down... oops, it's the story!</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1262537160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're already on the 3rd, about to roll over to the 4th day of the year. (And some of our international readers are already there.) We're still doing year-end pieces? CES can't come soon enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're already on the 3rd , about to roll over to the 4th day of the year .
( And some of our international readers are already there .
) We 're still doing year-end pieces ?
CES ca n't come soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're already on the 3rd, about to roll over to the 4th day of the year.
(And some of our international readers are already there.
) We're still doing year-end pieces?
CES can't come soon enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649492</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1262614200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tree wood has about 2300 (kilo)calories per pound, while human meat has somewhere from 800-2000 (kilo)calories per pound. But bones have even more calories than wood. And I don't think the flesh-eating robots we've seen can eat wood (or bone), but rather leaves. Which have about <a href="http://caloriecount.about.com/cc/search2.php?search\_type=foods&amp;searchpro=leaves&amp;x=0&amp;y=0" title="about.com">100 (kilo)calories per pound</a> [about.com]. Meat is a better fuel.</p><p>Bullshit, I couldn't find the calories for.</p><p>Potatoes have some of the highest calories of any staple plant, which is why Europe went through a population explosion after bringing them back from the Western Hemisphere. But there aren't a lot of potatoes in battlefields. Not as many calories per acre as in human bodies. Especially in the camps around the battlefields.</p><p>And why bother sic'ing your ravenous robots on the enemy's potato fields, when they can chew through their troops instead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tree wood has about 2300 ( kilo ) calories per pound , while human meat has somewhere from 800-2000 ( kilo ) calories per pound .
But bones have even more calories than wood .
And I do n't think the flesh-eating robots we 've seen can eat wood ( or bone ) , but rather leaves .
Which have about 100 ( kilo ) calories per pound [ about.com ] .
Meat is a better fuel.Bullshit , I could n't find the calories for.Potatoes have some of the highest calories of any staple plant , which is why Europe went through a population explosion after bringing them back from the Western Hemisphere .
But there are n't a lot of potatoes in battlefields .
Not as many calories per acre as in human bodies .
Especially in the camps around the battlefields.And why bother sic'ing your ravenous robots on the enemy 's potato fields , when they can chew through their troops instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tree wood has about 2300 (kilo)calories per pound, while human meat has somewhere from 800-2000 (kilo)calories per pound.
But bones have even more calories than wood.
And I don't think the flesh-eating robots we've seen can eat wood (or bone), but rather leaves.
Which have about 100 (kilo)calories per pound [about.com].
Meat is a better fuel.Bullshit, I couldn't find the calories for.Potatoes have some of the highest calories of any staple plant, which is why Europe went through a population explosion after bringing them back from the Western Hemisphere.
But there aren't a lot of potatoes in battlefields.
Not as many calories per acre as in human bodies.
Especially in the camps around the battlefields.And why bother sic'ing your ravenous robots on the enemy's potato fields, when they can chew through their troops instead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637210</id>
	<title>I wish that robot WAS flesh-eating.</title>
	<author>Akira Kogami</author>
	<datestamp>1262536860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, giant robots devouring the mangled corpses of our enemies? Yes, please!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , giant robots devouring the mangled corpses of our enemies ?
Yes , please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, giant robots devouring the mangled corpses of our enemies?
Yes, please!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30647048</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1262603100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red herring.  Potatoes are not a food that most herbivores can eat; they're roots.  Most herbivores, like cows, eat only plants growing above ground: leaves, grass, etc.  Only a few animals, like wild pigs and moles, eat tubers naturally.</p><p>More importantly, tubers like potatoes are very hard to digest by most animals, including humans.  That's why humans invented "cooking", to make the starchy tuber turn into something more easily digested and absorbed.  Some believe this was an important part of human evolution:</p><p><a href="http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/Pennisi\_99.html" title="ucla.edu">http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/Pennisi\_99.html</a> [ucla.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red herring .
Potatoes are not a food that most herbivores can eat ; they 're roots .
Most herbivores , like cows , eat only plants growing above ground : leaves , grass , etc .
Only a few animals , like wild pigs and moles , eat tubers naturally.More importantly , tubers like potatoes are very hard to digest by most animals , including humans .
That 's why humans invented " cooking " , to make the starchy tuber turn into something more easily digested and absorbed .
Some believe this was an important part of human evolution : http : //cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/Pennisi \ _99.html [ ucla.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red herring.
Potatoes are not a food that most herbivores can eat; they're roots.
Most herbivores, like cows, eat only plants growing above ground: leaves, grass, etc.
Only a few animals, like wild pigs and moles, eat tubers naturally.More importantly, tubers like potatoes are very hard to digest by most animals, including humans.
That's why humans invented "cooking", to make the starchy tuber turn into something more easily digested and absorbed.
Some believe this was an important part of human evolution:http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/Pennisi\_99.html [ucla.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638614</id>
	<title>Re:How is the LHC not on here?</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1262598840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>more than a few kids decided not to do their homework</p></div><p>Hardly surprising, given it's a newer excuse than "dog ate it". Maybe someone will believe they were actually afraid and cut them a break for going out and getting drunk instead of doing their work...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>more than a few kids decided not to do their homeworkHardly surprising , given it 's a newer excuse than " dog ate it " .
Maybe someone will believe they were actually afraid and cut them a break for going out and getting drunk instead of doing their work.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more than a few kids decided not to do their homeworkHardly surprising, given it's a newer excuse than "dog ate it".
Maybe someone will believe they were actually afraid and cut them a break for going out and getting drunk instead of doing their work...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637444</id>
	<title>You forgot..</title>
	<author>Thaidog</author>
	<datestamp>1262539200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When a hard drive died on one of the servers at my startup... According to management that was definitely the biggest of 2009.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When a hard drive died on one of the servers at my startup... According to management that was definitely the biggest of 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When a hard drive died on one of the servers at my startup... According to management that was definitely the biggest of 2009.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638772</id>
	<title>No one has Global Warming on here either...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262601600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Global Warming is green-speak for 'Technology is bad - stop it!'</p><p>You could see at Copenhagen that none of the Greens were interested in generating CO2-free energy, they wanted a tax on ALL energy. If this isn't the biggest technological scare, I don't know what is....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Global Warming is green-speak for 'Technology is bad - stop it !
'You could see at Copenhagen that none of the Greens were interested in generating CO2-free energy , they wanted a tax on ALL energy .
If this is n't the biggest technological scare , I do n't know what is... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global Warming is green-speak for 'Technology is bad - stop it!
'You could see at Copenhagen that none of the Greens were interested in generating CO2-free energy, they wanted a tax on ALL energy.
If this isn't the biggest technological scare, I don't know what is....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639836</id>
	<title>batteries not included?</title>
	<author>K10W</author>
	<datestamp>1262615160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and the ever present risk of exploding lithium cells which many bang on about like it's a regular occurence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and the ever present risk of exploding lithium cells which many bang on about like it 's a regular occurence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the ever present risk of exploding lithium cells which many bang on about like it's a regular occurence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639528</id>
	<title>Re:Flesh-eating Robots Will Devour Us All</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1262612400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the robots designed to eat human flesh will be there only to eat the humans. And there will be plenty of human flesh to fuel their eating frenzy.</p><p>What kind of a war are you running where your robots scare the shit out of the bushes, not the enemy soldiers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the robots designed to eat human flesh will be there only to eat the humans .
And there will be plenty of human flesh to fuel their eating frenzy.What kind of a war are you running where your robots scare the shit out of the bushes , not the enemy soldiers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the robots designed to eat human flesh will be there only to eat the humans.
And there will be plenty of human flesh to fuel their eating frenzy.What kind of a war are you running where your robots scare the shit out of the bushes, not the enemy soldiers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639704</id>
	<title>Re:Sexting</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1262614140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And thus the "Sex Offender List" becomes a address book where people can get <i>all</i> the info they need about horny little brats who like to show off. Isn't moronic legislation^W^W technology great?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And thus the " Sex Offender List " becomes a address book where people can get all the info they need about horny little brats who like to show off .
Is n't moronic legislation ^ W ^ W technology great ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And thus the "Sex Offender List" becomes a address book where people can get all the info they need about horny little brats who like to show off.
Isn't moronic legislation^W^W technology great?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30641610</id>
	<title>laws of war?</title>
	<author>angel'o'sphere</author>
	<datestamp>1262624400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war -- and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... </i></p><p>The torturing of war prisoners of war in Iraq and the interviews with the involved army personal clearly showed that the US military have no clue about "laws of war". Several convicted US soldiers admitted frankly they never had heard about the convention of Geneva.</p><p>angel'o'sphere</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war -- and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway ... The torturing of war prisoners of war in Iraq and the interviews with the involved army personal clearly showed that the US military have no clue about " laws of war " .
Several convicted US soldiers admitted frankly they never had heard about the convention of Geneva.angel'o'sphere</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... and desecration of the dead is against the laws of war -- and plant matter is a much better fuel source anyway ... The torturing of war prisoners of war in Iraq and the interviews with the involved army personal clearly showed that the US military have no clue about "laws of war".
Several convicted US soldiers admitted frankly they never had heard about the convention of Geneva.angel'o'sphere</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30646896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_04_0158217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30647048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637890
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30646896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30647048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30649492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30642534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30640368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30638772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_04_0158217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30637132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_04_0158217.30639704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
