<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_03_1312209</id>
	<title>2016 Bug Hits Text Messages, Payment Processing</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1262527260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"It seems some systems are suffering from a Y2K16 bug. When 2009 ticked over to 2010, some Australian EFTPOS machines <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/businesses-stung-by-boq-computer-bug-20100103-lmys.html">skipped to the year 2016</a>. Coincidentally, some Windows Mobile users are also having issues with their new year SMSes <a href="http://www.wmexperts.com/y2016-sms-bug">coming from 2016</a>. What function could cause this kind of error?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " It seems some systems are suffering from a Y2K16 bug .
When 2009 ticked over to 2010 , some Australian EFTPOS machines skipped to the year 2016 .
Coincidentally , some Windows Mobile users are also having issues with their new year SMSes coming from 2016 .
What function could cause this kind of error ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "It seems some systems are suffering from a Y2K16 bug.
When 2009 ticked over to 2010, some Australian EFTPOS machines skipped to the year 2016.
Coincidentally, some Windows Mobile users are also having issues with their new year SMSes coming from 2016.
What function could cause this kind of error?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633618</id>
	<title>Fuktion</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1262551020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What function could cause this kind of error?</p></div></blockquote><p>Something like "fuckUpIn2010(time);" I would recon.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What function could cause this kind of error ? Something like " fuckUpIn2010 ( time ) ; " I would recon .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>What function could cause this kind of error?Something like "fuckUpIn2010(time);" I would recon.
   
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30635786</id>
	<title>Its the LHC effect again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262524320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another example of nature preventing us from discovering the Higgs and annihilating ourselves.<br>The Large Hadron Collider was calibrated late 2009 and began doing physics in early 2010. The Higgs was discovered in 2011 and promptly engulfed us all, absorbing all parallel universes up to about 2015 (our timescale) through entanglement of the Class I strings. Only 2016  onwards is defined.<br>Google Drs Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya and read all about it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another example of nature preventing us from discovering the Higgs and annihilating ourselves.The Large Hadron Collider was calibrated late 2009 and began doing physics in early 2010 .
The Higgs was discovered in 2011 and promptly engulfed us all , absorbing all parallel universes up to about 2015 ( our timescale ) through entanglement of the Class I strings .
Only 2016 onwards is defined.Google Drs Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya and read all about it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another example of nature preventing us from discovering the Higgs and annihilating ourselves.The Large Hadron Collider was calibrated late 2009 and began doing physics in early 2010.
The Higgs was discovered in 2011 and promptly engulfed us all, absorbing all parallel universes up to about 2015 (our timescale) through entanglement of the Class I strings.
Only 2016  onwards is defined.Google Drs Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya and read all about it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631394</id>
	<title>Some kind of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>BCD/binary mismatch?<br> <br>

0x09 = 9 decimal when interpreted as either binary or BCD.<br> <br>

0x10 = 10 decimal when interpreted as BCD, as 16 when interpreted as binary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>BCD/binary mismatch ?
0x09 = 9 decimal when interpreted as either binary or BCD .
0x10 = 10 decimal when interpreted as BCD , as 16 when interpreted as binary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BCD/binary mismatch?
0x09 = 9 decimal when interpreted as either binary or BCD.
0x10 = 10 decimal when interpreted as BCD, as 16 when interpreted as binary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684</id>
	<title>* points finger at Duct Tape Programmers</title>
	<author>amn108</author>
	<datestamp>1262534400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to quote Joel (from www.joelonsoftware.com):</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Jamie Zawinski is what I would call a duct-tape programmer. And I say that with a great deal of respect. He is the kind of programmer who is hard at work building the future, and making useful things so that people can do stuff. He is the guy you want on your team building go-carts, because he has two favorite tools: duct tape and WD-40. And he will wield them elegantly even as your go-cart is careening down the hill at a mile a minute. This will happen while other programmers are still at the starting line arguing over whether to use titanium or some kind of space-age composite material that Boeing is using in the 787 Dreamliner.</p><p>When you are done, you might have a messy go-cart, but it&rsquo;ll sure as hell fly.</p></div><p>Hey, Jamie! Your proprietary date datatype didn't fly! Would you please turn around and fix it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to quote Joel ( from www.joelonsoftware.com ) : Jamie Zawinski is what I would call a duct-tape programmer .
And I say that with a great deal of respect .
He is the kind of programmer who is hard at work building the future , and making useful things so that people can do stuff .
He is the guy you want on your team building go-carts , because he has two favorite tools : duct tape and WD-40 .
And he will wield them elegantly even as your go-cart is careening down the hill at a mile a minute .
This will happen while other programmers are still at the starting line arguing over whether to use titanium or some kind of space-age composite material that Boeing is using in the 787 Dreamliner.When you are done , you might have a messy go-cart , but it    ll sure as hell fly.Hey , Jamie !
Your proprietary date datatype did n't fly !
Would you please turn around and fix it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to quote Joel (from www.joelonsoftware.com):Jamie Zawinski is what I would call a duct-tape programmer.
And I say that with a great deal of respect.
He is the kind of programmer who is hard at work building the future, and making useful things so that people can do stuff.
He is the guy you want on your team building go-carts, because he has two favorite tools: duct tape and WD-40.
And he will wield them elegantly even as your go-cart is careening down the hill at a mile a minute.
This will happen while other programmers are still at the starting line arguing over whether to use titanium or some kind of space-age composite material that Boeing is using in the 787 Dreamliner.When you are done, you might have a messy go-cart, but it’ll sure as hell fly.Hey, Jamie!
Your proprietary date datatype didn't fly!
Would you please turn around and fix it?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30636960</id>
	<title>I can confirm this</title>
	<author>BurfCurse</author>
	<datestamp>1262534280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have an HTC Touch Diamond. All text messages I've received since the new year are showing from 2016.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an HTC Touch Diamond .
All text messages I 've received since the new year are showing from 2016 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an HTC Touch Diamond.
All text messages I've received since the new year are showing from 2016.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631688</id>
	<title>You could mess with people!</title>
	<author>olsmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1262534460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bob- Happy Nw Yr! What a decade so far. Cubs winning the series, and who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right?  Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10. Are you going to visit your wife's grave next week for the 6th anniversary? kthx!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bob- Happy Nw Yr !
What a decade so far .
Cubs winning the series , and who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right ?
Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10 .
Are you going to visit your wife 's grave next week for the 6th anniversary ?
kthx !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bob- Happy Nw Yr!
What a decade so far.
Cubs winning the series, and who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right?
Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10.
Are you going to visit your wife's grave next week for the 6th anniversary?
kthx!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30744270</id>
	<title>Not a fix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not a fix. It merely substitutes an incorrect date (the time/date the message was received) for another incorrect date. When I turn on my WM 6.1 phone, it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 4 hours to receive text messages, the timestamp inder the &ldquo;fix&rdquo; would be off considerably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a fix .
It merely substitutes an incorrect date ( the time/date the message was received ) for another incorrect date .
When I turn on my WM 6.1 phone , it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 4 hours to receive text messages , the timestamp inder the    fix    would be off considerably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a fix.
It merely substitutes an incorrect date (the time/date the message was received) for another incorrect date.
When I turn on my WM 6.1 phone, it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 4 hours to receive text messages, the timestamp inder the “fix” would be off considerably.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30637174</id>
	<title>Re:My wireless landline phones all failed 1/1/2010</title>
	<author>aminorex</author>
	<datestamp>1262536500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WinCE I am guessing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WinCE I am guessing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WinCE I am guessing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634162</id>
	<title>Re:Its the LHC!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262512860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future...</p></div><p>All things serve the beam.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future...All things serve the beam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future...All things serve the beam.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633256</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft</title>
	<author>misterduffy</author>
	<datestamp>1262547480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nearly all the POS systems i've worked with ran NT. is it possible the systems affected in this instance have some legacy NT code? is it possible windows mobile has some legacy NT code?? now *that* would be embarrassing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>nearly all the POS systems i 've worked with ran NT .
is it possible the systems affected in this instance have some legacy NT code ?
is it possible windows mobile has some legacy NT code ? ?
now * that * would be embarrassing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nearly all the POS systems i've worked with ran NT.
is it possible the systems affected in this instance have some legacy NT code?
is it possible windows mobile has some legacy NT code??
now *that* would be embarrassing...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30727344</id>
	<title>The workaround for this HAS BEEN STOLEN</title>
	<author>bdg2</author>
	<datestamp>1263243060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some slimy git on the Sprint BBS is pretending to be ziggy471 that creating the original workaround for this Wm bug and released it here:<br><a href="http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=104248" title="ppcgeeks.com" rel="nofollow">http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=104248</a> [ppcgeeks.com]<br>as "Ziggy 2016 fix.cab"<br>The main thread in the sprint BBS is this:<br><a href="http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/25879" title="sprint.com" rel="nofollow">http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/25879</a> [sprint.com]<br>The impersonator is calling himself Ziggy on the Sprint BBS.<br>He has changed the file name to "Ziggy 2016 fix final.cab" and is spouting some rubbish about the final version having been fixed so that the problem will not happen again on various other dates in 2010 and 2011!!<br>HE IS ASKING FOR DONATIONS!!<br>The real ziggy471 went on the BBS and pointed out that it was his work and he did not want donations but the idiots at Sprint appear to believe the impersonator and have locked the thread and deleted all the messages from the real ziggy471.<br>I am disgusted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some slimy git on the Sprint BBS is pretending to be ziggy471 that creating the original workaround for this Wm bug and released it here : http : //forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php ? t = 104248 [ ppcgeeks.com ] as " Ziggy 2016 fix.cab " The main thread in the sprint BBS is this : http : //community.sprint.com/baw/thread/25879 [ sprint.com ] The impersonator is calling himself Ziggy on the Sprint BBS.He has changed the file name to " Ziggy 2016 fix final.cab " and is spouting some rubbish about the final version having been fixed so that the problem will not happen again on various other dates in 2010 and 2011 !
! HE IS ASKING FOR DONATIONS !
! The real ziggy471 went on the BBS and pointed out that it was his work and he did not want donations but the idiots at Sprint appear to believe the impersonator and have locked the thread and deleted all the messages from the real ziggy471.I am disgusted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some slimy git on the Sprint BBS is pretending to be ziggy471 that creating the original workaround for this Wm bug and released it here:http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=104248 [ppcgeeks.com]as "Ziggy 2016 fix.cab"The main thread in the sprint BBS is this:http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/25879 [sprint.com]The impersonator is calling himself Ziggy on the Sprint BBS.He has changed the file name to "Ziggy 2016 fix final.cab" and is spouting some rubbish about the final version having been fixed so that the problem will not happen again on various other dates in 2010 and 2011!
!HE IS ASKING FOR DONATIONS!
!The real ziggy471 went on the BBS and pointed out that it was his work and he did not want donations but the idiots at Sprint appear to believe the impersonator and have locked the thread and deleted all the messages from the real ziggy471.I am disgusted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632830</id>
	<title>This is a comment from 2016</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262544960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi, guys!</p><p>Due to a glitch in your space-time continuum, some of us have found ways to contact you. I just wanted to let you guys know that we are yet to invent flying cars.</p><p>Please plan your expenses accordingly. That is all. Goodbye, past-commenters!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi , guys ! Due to a glitch in your space-time continuum , some of us have found ways to contact you .
I just wanted to let you guys know that we are yet to invent flying cars.Please plan your expenses accordingly .
That is all .
Goodbye , past-commenters !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi, guys!Due to a glitch in your space-time continuum, some of us have found ways to contact you.
I just wanted to let you guys know that we are yet to invent flying cars.Please plan your expenses accordingly.
That is all.
Goodbye, past-commenters!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631548</id>
	<title>Re:Y2K16-Bug?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1262532780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was actually considering that something like this might happen, due to the Y2K craze. People are scrambling to "fix" that hyped problem, testing being done haphazardly and only to make sure that it works "for now" because we have "more time later".</p><p>Then later, nobody cared about it anymore and nobody cared about the next decade. I'm actually quite happy that the biggest problem seems to be that text messages come from the future. Hey, I didn't care about those coming from the past either, so I'm fine with it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was actually considering that something like this might happen , due to the Y2K craze .
People are scrambling to " fix " that hyped problem , testing being done haphazardly and only to make sure that it works " for now " because we have " more time later " .Then later , nobody cared about it anymore and nobody cared about the next decade .
I 'm actually quite happy that the biggest problem seems to be that text messages come from the future .
Hey , I did n't care about those coming from the past either , so I 'm fine with it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was actually considering that something like this might happen, due to the Y2K craze.
People are scrambling to "fix" that hyped problem, testing being done haphazardly and only to make sure that it works "for now" because we have "more time later".Then later, nobody cared about it anymore and nobody cared about the next decade.
I'm actually quite happy that the biggest problem seems to be that text messages come from the future.
Hey, I didn't care about those coming from the past either, so I'm fine with it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30640034</id>
	<title>What about testing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262616900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely the testing strategy should be brought into question? Would seem sensible to test various dates in a currency-handling system. However, having worked for a short while as a tester for an EFT/POS company, I can fully understand. Though not the main reason for leaving, the quality of engineering practices and principles was very poor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely the testing strategy should be brought into question ?
Would seem sensible to test various dates in a currency-handling system .
However , having worked for a short while as a tester for an EFT/POS company , I can fully understand .
Though not the main reason for leaving , the quality of engineering practices and principles was very poor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely the testing strategy should be brought into question?
Would seem sensible to test various dates in a currency-handling system.
However, having worked for a short while as a tester for an EFT/POS company, I can fully understand.
Though not the main reason for leaving, the quality of engineering practices and principles was very poor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30666442</id>
	<title>Symantec scores an own-goal</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1262721180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Docken may have just gotten to the chicken...

Symantec effectively D-DOSed their update servers with code that made practically every one of their own customers think they hadn't updated recently enough and query to see if there was anything new. Nice work guys...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Docken may have just gotten to the chicken.. . Symantec effectively D-DOSed their update servers with code that made practically every one of their own customers think they had n't updated recently enough and query to see if there was anything new .
Nice work guys.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Docken may have just gotten to the chicken...

Symantec effectively D-DOSed their update servers with code that made practically every one of their own customers think they hadn't updated recently enough and query to see if there was anything new.
Nice work guys...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30652538</id>
	<title>Re:Future SMS</title>
	<author>Genocaust</author>
	<datestamp>1262684280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 Insightful</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 Insightful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 Insightful</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632372</id>
	<title>Re:Y2K16-Bug?</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1262541540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either way, 2010 and 2016 are both shorter than Y2K10 or Y2K16, so the 'abbreviation' is absurd.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either way , 2010 and 2016 are both shorter than Y2K10 or Y2K16 , so the 'abbreviation ' is absurd.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either way, 2010 and 2016 are both shorter than Y2K10 or Y2K16, so the 'abbreviation' is absurd.- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631514</id>
	<title>Re:Future SMS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262532480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>greetings earthling the good news is PEOPLE are tasty, when the motherships get here it's like thanksgiving on steroids.<br>(for the simple minded ones this is a joke)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>greetings earthling the good news is PEOPLE are tasty , when the motherships get here it 's like thanksgiving on steroids .
( for the simple minded ones this is a joke )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>greetings earthling the good news is PEOPLE are tasty, when the motherships get here it's like thanksgiving on steroids.
(for the simple minded ones this is a joke)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30679802</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262895120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dunno what PC World uses now, but when it was set up (by VT before it was sold out to DSG) it used SCO (the original, not the current fake encumbants TSG) Xenix running on Tandon 0x86 computers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno what PC World uses now , but when it was set up ( by VT before it was sold out to DSG ) it used SCO ( the original , not the current fake encumbants TSG ) Xenix running on Tandon 0x86 computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno what PC World uses now, but when it was set up (by VT before it was sold out to DSG) it used SCO (the original, not the current fake encumbants TSG) Xenix running on Tandon 0x86 computers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633408</id>
	<title>The problem is due to</title>
	<author>$0.02</author>
	<datestamp>1262548800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the Y2.01K bug</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the Y2.01K bug</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the Y2.01K bug</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30637242</id>
	<title>instead of y2k16...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262537280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shouldn't this be called y2kxf?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>should n't this be called y2kxf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shouldn't this be called y2kxf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631416</id>
	<title>10 hex is 16 decimal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could be botched string parsing. Could be binary coded decimals interpreted as binary numbers: BCD encodes two decimal digits in the high and low nibbles of a byte. Therefore BCD 10 is 0001 0000 in binary, which is 16 in decimal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be botched string parsing .
Could be binary coded decimals interpreted as binary numbers : BCD encodes two decimal digits in the high and low nibbles of a byte .
Therefore BCD 10 is 0001 0000 in binary , which is 16 in decimal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be botched string parsing.
Could be binary coded decimals interpreted as binary numbers: BCD encodes two decimal digits in the high and low nibbles of a byte.
Therefore BCD 10 is 0001 0000 in binary, which is 16 in decimal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631888</id>
	<title>and they can bill you the future rate as well</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1262536500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and they can bill you the future rate as well. In the Year 2016 texts are $2 each way. and your bill in 6 years past due.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and they can bill you the future rate as well .
In the Year 2016 texts are $ 2 each way .
and your bill in 6 years past due .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and they can bill you the future rate as well.
In the Year 2016 texts are $2 each way.
and your bill in 6 years past due.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633436</id>
	<title>Comcast spammed my email with welcome to fancast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262549160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On new years day Comcast spammed my email with "Welcome To Fancast" emails.   I got at least ten of the same email.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On new years day Comcast spammed my email with " Welcome To Fancast " emails .
I got at least ten of the same email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On new years day Comcast spammed my email with "Welcome To Fancast" emails.
I got at least ten of the same email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634380</id>
	<title>Re:* points finger at Duct Tape Programmers</title>
	<author>mibus</author>
	<datestamp>1262514300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True "duct-tape programming" would bind an existing date datatype in (either YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS, or seconds-since-1970).</p><p>Duct-tape is not used to build new things, when there are existing things nearby that will do the job. It's used to hold existing things together!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True " duct-tape programming " would bind an existing date datatype in ( either YYYY-MM-DD HH : MM : SS , or seconds-since-1970 ) .Duct-tape is not used to build new things , when there are existing things nearby that will do the job .
It 's used to hold existing things together !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True "duct-tape programming" would bind an existing date datatype in (either YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS, or seconds-since-1970).Duct-tape is not used to build new things, when there are existing things nearby that will do the job.
It's used to hold existing things together!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631454</id>
	<title>Its the LHC!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262532000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The beam collisions have opened a portal into the future...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632278</id>
	<title>Re:* points finger at Duct Tape Programmers</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1262540700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Jamie's defense, I've read that book, and Joel's interpretation of what he said is completely, totally, 100\% off-base. Plus the name "duct-tape programmer" is offensive. Usually, I'm a fan of Joel. But then again, usually he's not so wrong and offensive in his articles.</p><p>(The sad thing is that I agree with the general principle of the article, but the way it's presented, and the way it's attributed to Jamie, is completely off-base.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Jamie 's defense , I 've read that book , and Joel 's interpretation of what he said is completely , totally , 100 \ % off-base .
Plus the name " duct-tape programmer " is offensive .
Usually , I 'm a fan of Joel .
But then again , usually he 's not so wrong and offensive in his articles .
( The sad thing is that I agree with the general principle of the article , but the way it 's presented , and the way it 's attributed to Jamie , is completely off-base .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Jamie's defense, I've read that book, and Joel's interpretation of what he said is completely, totally, 100\% off-base.
Plus the name "duct-tape programmer" is offensive.
Usually, I'm a fan of Joel.
But then again, usually he's not so wrong and offensive in his articles.
(The sad thing is that I agree with the general principle of the article, but the way it's presented, and the way it's attributed to Jamie, is completely off-base.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633730</id>
	<title>It's log it's log!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262552340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What rolls down stairs<br>alone or in pairs,<br>and over your neighbor's dog?<br>What's great for a snack,<br>And fits on your back?<br>It's log, log, log</p><p>It's log, it's log,<br>It's big, it's heavy, it's wood.<br>It's log, it's log, it's better than bad, it's good."</p><p>Everyone wants a log<br>You're gonna love it, log<br>Come on and get your log<br>Everyone needs a log<br>log log log</p><p>-- Ren and Stimpy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What rolls down stairsalone or in pairs,and over your neighbor 's dog ? What 's great for a snack,And fits on your back ? It 's log , log , logIt 's log , it 's log,It 's big , it 's heavy , it 's wood.It 's log , it 's log , it 's better than bad , it 's good .
" Everyone wants a logYou 're gon na love it , logCome on and get your logEveryone needs a loglog log log-- Ren and Stimpy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What rolls down stairsalone or in pairs,and over your neighbor's dog?What's great for a snack,And fits on your back?It's log, log, logIt's log, it's log,It's big, it's heavy, it's wood.It's log, it's log, it's better than bad, it's good.
"Everyone wants a logYou're gonna love it, logCome on and get your logEveryone needs a loglog log log-- Ren and Stimpy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632302</id>
	<title>MESSAGE FROM THE FUTURE</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1262540940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an indication that the human race will survive 2012! Rejoice!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an indication that the human race will survive 2012 !
Rejoice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an indication that the human race will survive 2012!
Rejoice!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434</id>
	<title>Y2K16-Bug?</title>
	<author>kju</author>
	<datestamp>1262531700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a Y2K10-Bug. The Y2K-Bug was not titled Y1900-Bug (to name one of the bug types) as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a Y2K10-Bug .
The Y2K-Bug was not titled Y1900-Bug ( to name one of the bug types ) as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a Y2K10-Bug.
The Y2K-Bug was not titled Y1900-Bug (to name one of the bug types) as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631512</id>
	<title>Function?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1262532480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Start worrying about SMSs that warns about future events. The "avoid seeing that movie" sms could have been because a limited preview somewhere, but im still a bit worried about the "the alien landing on Jan 8 will be real" sms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Start worrying about SMSs that warns about future events .
The " avoid seeing that movie " sms could have been because a limited preview somewhere , but im still a bit worried about the " the alien landing on Jan 8 will be real " sms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start worrying about SMSs that warns about future events.
The "avoid seeing that movie" sms could have been because a limited preview somewhere, but im still a bit worried about the "the alien landing on Jan 8 will be real" sms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631448</id>
	<title>Official explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's to avoid the world ending in 2012 by skipping straight to 2016. We've left a few years either side of the fateful date as a safety buffer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's to avoid the world ending in 2012 by skipping straight to 2016 .
We 've left a few years either side of the fateful date as a safety buffer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's to avoid the world ending in 2012 by skipping straight to 2016.
We've left a few years either side of the fateful date as a safety buffer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631388</id>
	<title>Why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uncle Bill decided to do some coding. That's why.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uncle Bill decided to do some coding .
That 's why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uncle Bill decided to do some coding.
That's why.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30635408</id>
	<title>here it goes again</title>
	<author>dandu</author>
	<datestamp>1262521440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>anyone remember the zune mass suicide? <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/31/1428254" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/31/1428254</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>billy really needs to get back to basics</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>anyone remember the zune mass suicide ?
http : //it.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 08/12/31/1428254 [ slashdot.org ] billy really needs to get back to basics</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyone remember the zune mass suicide?
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/31/1428254 [slashdot.org]billy really needs to get back to basics</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414</id>
	<title>Text messaging from the future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine that, the ability to text to the past. We could get warnings about impending events!

New Text Message From Marty McFly:
I HV TO TELL U ABT TEH FUTURE

Reply from Doc Brown:
WHAT?

New Text Message From Marty McFly
ON THE NIGHT YOU GO BACK, YOU GET SH*message text missing*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine that , the ability to text to the past .
We could get warnings about impending events !
New Text Message From Marty McFly : I HV TO TELL U ABT TEH FUTURE Reply from Doc Brown : WHAT ?
New Text Message From Marty McFly ON THE NIGHT YOU GO BACK , YOU GET SH * message text missing *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine that, the ability to text to the past.
We could get warnings about impending events!
New Text Message From Marty McFly:
I HV TO TELL U ABT TEH FUTURE

Reply from Doc Brown:
WHAT?
New Text Message From Marty McFly
ON THE NIGHT YOU GO BACK, YOU GET SH*message text missing*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633312</id>
	<title>Re:10 hex is 16 decimal</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1262547960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you're on to something. I wonder why it hasn't hit the U.S. yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're on to something .
I wonder why it has n't hit the U.S. yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're on to something.
I wonder why it hasn't hit the U.S. yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632500</id>
	<title>Re:* points finger at Duct Tape Programmers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262542860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Joel is a faggy VB guy.  Literally.  He loves cock.  Hates vagina.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Joel is a faggy VB guy .
Literally. He loves cock .
Hates vagina .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joel is a faggy VB guy.
Literally.  He loves cock.
Hates vagina.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30635892</id>
	<title>What function could cause this kind of error?</title>
	<author>LuniticusTheSane</author>
	<datestamp>1262525160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Time travel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Time travel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time travel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633844</id>
	<title>solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262510280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah... they need to fix it so that this year's SMS messages are stored with a year of 0x000A instead of 0x0010. Then, there will be no more messages from 6 years in the future. And, next year better be 0x000B. The routine being used is converting decimal to hex such that the two nybbles represent the decimal digits. Hex is better anyway, one byte can store 2000 to 2255 that way (instead of 2000 to 2099).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... they need to fix it so that this year 's SMS messages are stored with a year of 0x000A instead of 0x0010 .
Then , there will be no more messages from 6 years in the future .
And , next year better be 0x000B .
The routine being used is converting decimal to hex such that the two nybbles represent the decimal digits .
Hex is better anyway , one byte can store 2000 to 2255 that way ( instead of 2000 to 2099 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... they need to fix it so that this year's SMS messages are stored with a year of 0x000A instead of 0x0010.
Then, there will be no more messages from 6 years in the future.
And, next year better be 0x000B.
The routine being used is converting decimal to hex such that the two nybbles represent the decimal digits.
Hex is better anyway, one byte can store 2000 to 2255 that way (instead of 2000 to 2099).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474</id>
	<title>Re:Future SMS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262532180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did but all they told me was that I talk like a fag and my shit's all retarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did but all they told me was that I talk like a fag and my shit 's all retarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did but all they told me was that I talk like a fag and my shit's all retarded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631402</id>
	<title>Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems Microsoft is <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/nz/windowsmobile/casestudies/4000000777.mspx" title="microsoft.com">supplying some code</a> [microsoft.com] for EFTPOS machines that is common with Windows Mobile, so it's most likely the same bug in both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems Microsoft is supplying some code [ microsoft.com ] for EFTPOS machines that is common with Windows Mobile , so it 's most likely the same bug in both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems Microsoft is supplying some code [microsoft.com] for EFTPOS machines that is common with Windows Mobile, so it's most likely the same bug in both.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632920</id>
	<title>Wow it is 2016 already ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262545560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can still recall in 2009 when they passed health care legislation, that would start after a long wait in 2014, but the time passed really quickly!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can still recall in 2009 when they passed health care legislation , that would start after a long wait in 2014 , but the time passed really quickly !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can still recall in 2009 when they passed health care legislation, that would start after a long wait in 2014, but the time passed really quickly!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632200</id>
	<title>Re:You could mess with people!</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1262539920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right? Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10.</p></div><p>Although I agree that MSFT performing well would be quite a (figurative) catastrophe, but in case of a <em>real</em> catastrophe, what good does it do to load up on <em>any</em> kind of stock certificate?</p><p>
And yes, stock certificates are generally printed on paper that's far too stiff and not absorbant enough for the "obvious" purpose...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right ?
Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10.Although I agree that MSFT performing well would be quite a ( figurative ) catastrophe , but in case of a real catastrophe , what good does it do to load up on any kind of stock certificate ?
And yes , stock certificates are generally printed on paper that 's far too stiff and not absorbant enough for the " obvious " purpose.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would have predicted that the Mayan calendar was really right?
Glad I loaded up on all the MSFT back in '10.Although I agree that MSFT performing well would be quite a (figurative) catastrophe, but in case of a real catastrophe, what good does it do to load up on any kind of stock certificate?
And yes, stock certificates are generally printed on paper that's far too stiff and not absorbant enough for the "obvious" purpose...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30635824</id>
	<title>To summarize slashdot, they were Hexed!</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1262524620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, basically, this was a simple case of code misconverting from BCD to binary, interpreting 4-bit nybbles representing 1 ten and zero ones as 1 sixteen and zero ones. Or, to summarize the summary, they were hexed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , basically , this was a simple case of code misconverting from BCD to binary , interpreting 4-bit nybbles representing 1 ten and zero ones as 1 sixteen and zero ones .
Or , to summarize the summary , they were hexed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, basically, this was a simple case of code misconverting from BCD to binary, interpreting 4-bit nybbles representing 1 ten and zero ones as 1 sixteen and zero ones.
Or, to summarize the summary, they were hexed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633342</id>
	<title>Re:My wireless landline phones all failed 1/1/2010</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262548140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007</p></div><p>Not sure your phone uses "day of week" at all, but if so, consider winding the clock back to 1999 (the last year that January 3 was on a Sunday) or 1982 (the last year that 1/3 was on a Sunday AND we were two years into the 4-year leap-year cycle).</p><p>You're going to have another problem in 3 years (when your phone thinks it's 2010 again), so at the very least you may want to go back to 2000 and buy yourself ten years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007Not sure your phone uses " day of week " at all , but if so , consider winding the clock back to 1999 ( the last year that January 3 was on a Sunday ) or 1982 ( the last year that 1/3 was on a Sunday AND we were two years into the 4-year leap-year cycle ) .You 're going to have another problem in 3 years ( when your phone thinks it 's 2010 again ) , so at the very least you may want to go back to 2000 and buy yourself ten years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007Not sure your phone uses "day of week" at all, but if so, consider winding the clock back to 1999 (the last year that January 3 was on a Sunday) or 1982 (the last year that 1/3 was on a Sunday AND we were two years into the 4-year leap-year cycle).You're going to have another problem in 3 years (when your phone thinks it's 2010 again), so at the very least you may want to go back to 2000 and buy yourself ten years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631716</id>
	<title>Re:Text messaging from the future</title>
	<author>sirkha</author>
	<datestamp>1262534700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm, I guess that means the world doesn't end in 2012, then.  Or maybe it does end in 2012, and it took them 4 years to devise their time-traveling SMS, and are now desperately trying to let us know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , I guess that means the world does n't end in 2012 , then .
Or maybe it does end in 2012 , and it took them 4 years to devise their time-traveling SMS , and are now desperately trying to let us know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, I guess that means the world doesn't end in 2012, then.
Or maybe it does end in 2012, and it took them 4 years to devise their time-traveling SMS, and are now desperately trying to let us know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410</id>
	<title>My wireless landline phones all failed 1/1/2010</title>
	<author>Gorobei</author>
	<datestamp>1262531400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No dial tone, no incoming calls.</p><p>Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007, then they started working again.  Nice job, Panasonic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No dial tone , no incoming calls.Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007 , then they started working again .
Nice job , Panasonic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No dial tone, no incoming calls.Had to reset the internal datetimes back to 2007, then they started working again.
Nice job, Panasonic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424</id>
	<title>Future SMS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262531580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quick, someone send an sms to the future and ask if they solved the climate change problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , someone send an sms to the future and ask if they solved the climate change problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, someone send an sms to the future and ask if they solved the climate change problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631964</id>
	<title>Y2K vs. Y2K10</title>
	<author>phil42</author>
	<datestamp>1262537400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are the negative effects of the Y2K10 bug worse than those of the Y2K bug ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are the negative effects of the Y2K10 bug worse than those of the Y2K bug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are the negative effects of the Y2K10 bug worse than those of the Y2K bug ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30636962</id>
	<title>Re:Future SMS</title>
	<author>Jerslan</author>
	<datestamp>1262534280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of my favorite comedies ever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my favorite comedies ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my favorite comedies ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30646218</id>
	<title>Re:Why</title>
	<author>sciencewhiz</author>
	<datestamp>1262599680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Uncle Bill" was actually a very good coder. From <a href="http://www.thocp.net/companies/microsoft/microsoft\_company.htm" title="thocp.net">http://www.thocp.net/companies/microsoft/microsoft\_company.htm</a> [thocp.net] </p><blockquote><div><p>Using the Altair's published specifications, Gates and Allen created a simulator on a DEC PDP-10 computer that allowed it to emulate the MITS machine. Working day and night, they created the first version of MICROSOFT BASIC for the Altair</p><p>Jan 2, Bill Gates and Paul Allen complete BASIC</p><p>Allen is going to deliver it to MITS president Ed Roberts in Albuquerque. Realizing he didn't have a way to load it into the computer, Paul Allen hand assembled a loader program for BASIC at 30,000 feet in the air, on the flight to New Mexico. Even though it had never been tested on an actual machine, it ran perfectly on the very first try.</p></div> </blockquote><p>If only the rest of Microsoft's Software Engineers were as good as Bill Gates and Paul Allen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Uncle Bill " was actually a very good coder .
From http : //www.thocp.net/companies/microsoft/microsoft \ _company.htm [ thocp.net ] Using the Altair 's published specifications , Gates and Allen created a simulator on a DEC PDP-10 computer that allowed it to emulate the MITS machine .
Working day and night , they created the first version of MICROSOFT BASIC for the AltairJan 2 , Bill Gates and Paul Allen complete BASICAllen is going to deliver it to MITS president Ed Roberts in Albuquerque .
Realizing he did n't have a way to load it into the computer , Paul Allen hand assembled a loader program for BASIC at 30,000 feet in the air , on the flight to New Mexico .
Even though it had never been tested on an actual machine , it ran perfectly on the very first try .
If only the rest of Microsoft 's Software Engineers were as good as Bill Gates and Paul Allen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Uncle Bill" was actually a very good coder.
From http://www.thocp.net/companies/microsoft/microsoft\_company.htm [thocp.net] Using the Altair's published specifications, Gates and Allen created a simulator on a DEC PDP-10 computer that allowed it to emulate the MITS machine.
Working day and night, they created the first version of MICROSOFT BASIC for the AltairJan 2, Bill Gates and Paul Allen complete BASICAllen is going to deliver it to MITS president Ed Roberts in Albuquerque.
Realizing he didn't have a way to load it into the computer, Paul Allen hand assembled a loader program for BASIC at 30,000 feet in the air, on the flight to New Mexico.
Even though it had never been tested on an actual machine, it ran perfectly on the very first try.
If only the rest of Microsoft's Software Engineers were as good as Bill Gates and Paul Allen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632366</id>
	<title>no that's a Y210 bug</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1262541480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y bugs are named for the year in which they occur, not the year they jump....otherwise Y2K would have been Y1.9K, or even better YMCM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y bugs are named for the year in which they occur , not the year they jump....otherwise Y2K would have been Y1.9K , or even better YMCM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y bugs are named for the year in which they occur, not the year they jump....otherwise Y2K would have been Y1.9K, or even better YMCM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30636962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30637174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30652538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30646218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30679802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_1312209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30744270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30679802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30637174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30636962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30652538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30634380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30632366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30633312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_1312209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30631388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_1312209.30646218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
