<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_03_015229</id>
	<title>Google Nexus One Hands-On, Video, and Impressions</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1262531880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>wkurzius writes <i>"Engadget has gotten their hands on a Nexus One and have put their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/02/exclusive-google-nexus-one-hands-on-video-and-first-impressio/">first impressions</a> up for the world to see, including whether or not they think it's the 'be-all-end-all Android phone / iPhone eviscerator.'  Their opinion? 'Not really.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>wkurzius writes " Engadget has gotten their hands on a Nexus One and have put their first impressions up for the world to see , including whether or not they think it 's the 'be-all-end-all Android phone / iPhone eviscerator .
' Their opinion ?
'Not really .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wkurzius writes "Engadget has gotten their hands on a Nexus One and have put their first impressions up for the world to see, including whether or not they think it's the 'be-all-end-all Android phone / iPhone eviscerator.
'  Their opinion?
'Not really.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629362</id>
	<title>its engadget...</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1262454780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they fail anything that do not have a half-eaten fruit as a logo...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they fail anything that do not have a half-eaten fruit as a logo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they fail anything that do not have a half-eaten fruit as a logo...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30644052</id>
	<title>Re:Critical</title>
	<author>Tacvek</author>
	<datestamp>1262634180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides the fact that I'd be very surprised if the phone lacked multitouch (what most android phones lack is multi-touch gestures, especially pinch-zoom, in the built in apps). Android 2.0 (Eclair) has support for multitouch, and a few third arty apps support it, expect more such apps in the future.</p><p>I've seen people return the Motorola Droid for the inferior HTC Droid Eris, because they actively did not want a keyboard, so no surprise there. At least this phone alleged has the high-res screen like the Droid. It also like the droid has the buttons essential to use (the menu, back and home buttons) right below the screen so they are easy to reach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides the fact that I 'd be very surprised if the phone lacked multitouch ( what most android phones lack is multi-touch gestures , especially pinch-zoom , in the built in apps ) .
Android 2.0 ( Eclair ) has support for multitouch , and a few third arty apps support it , expect more such apps in the future.I 've seen people return the Motorola Droid for the inferior HTC Droid Eris , because they actively did not want a keyboard , so no surprise there .
At least this phone alleged has the high-res screen like the Droid .
It also like the droid has the buttons essential to use ( the menu , back and home buttons ) right below the screen so they are easy to reach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides the fact that I'd be very surprised if the phone lacked multitouch (what most android phones lack is multi-touch gestures, especially pinch-zoom, in the built in apps).
Android 2.0 (Eclair) has support for multitouch, and a few third arty apps support it, expect more such apps in the future.I've seen people return the Motorola Droid for the inferior HTC Droid Eris, because they actively did not want a keyboard, so no surprise there.
At least this phone alleged has the high-res screen like the Droid.
It also like the droid has the buttons essential to use (the menu, back and home buttons) right below the screen so they are easy to reach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631950</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1262537280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well. To be honest, this sounds like a winner.</p></div><p>
Sorry, but I've heard this argument before in discussion about the iPod. 1,001 times before. Every time I hear it, it clearly tells me the commenter just doesn't get it. You clearly do not understand why the iPhone is successful. Here's a tip: the iPhone wasn't the best hardware <b>when it came out.</b> It's never been the best hardware. There's always been phones with superior hardware offerings. Yet it still is an enormous success. Figure out the reason for that "yet" and you might realize why your "better hardware" point is absolutely meaningless.<br> <br>
Or, to put it more bluntly, this phone might be a damn snazzy phone and absolutely kick ass in a lot of ways but it won't be an iPhone killer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well .
To be honest , this sounds like a winner .
Sorry , but I 've heard this argument before in discussion about the iPod .
1,001 times before .
Every time I hear it , it clearly tells me the commenter just does n't get it .
You clearly do not understand why the iPhone is successful .
Here 's a tip : the iPhone was n't the best hardware when it came out .
It 's never been the best hardware .
There 's always been phones with superior hardware offerings .
Yet it still is an enormous success .
Figure out the reason for that " yet " and you might realize why your " better hardware " point is absolutely meaningless .
Or , to put it more bluntly , this phone might be a damn snazzy phone and absolutely kick ass in a lot of ways but it wo n't be an iPhone killer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well.
To be honest, this sounds like a winner.
Sorry, but I've heard this argument before in discussion about the iPod.
1,001 times before.
Every time I hear it, it clearly tells me the commenter just doesn't get it.
You clearly do not understand why the iPhone is successful.
Here's a tip: the iPhone wasn't the best hardware when it came out.
It's never been the best hardware.
There's always been phones with superior hardware offerings.
Yet it still is an enormous success.
Figure out the reason for that "yet" and you might realize why your "better hardware" point is absolutely meaningless.
Or, to put it more bluntly, this phone might be a damn snazzy phone and absolutely kick ass in a lot of ways but it won't be an iPhone killer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629974</id>
	<title>not really? hmmm ...</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1262462040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the &quot;not really&quot; comment in the article is comparing it to the iphone. i wish people would realize that there will never be an<br>
&quot;iphone killer&quot;. android is a calculated chipping-away at the iphone. from TFA, the nexus one sounds like a big chip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the " not really " comment in the article is comparing it to the iphone .
i wish people would realize that there will never be an " iphone killer " .
android is a calculated chipping-away at the iphone .
from TFA , the nexus one sounds like a big chip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the "not really" comment in the article is comparing it to the iphone.
i wish people would realize that there will never be an
"iphone killer".
android is a calculated chipping-away at the iphone.
from TFA, the nexus one sounds like a big chip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928</id>
	<title>Only one question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262449620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it locked?  That is really the "killer app" point for me.  A commercially sold phone that is hacker friendly from the start.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it locked ?
That is really the " killer app " point for me .
A commercially sold phone that is hacker friendly from the start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it locked?
That is really the "killer app" point for me.
A commercially sold phone that is hacker friendly from the start.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629398</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262455320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get an iPhone if you want that killer feature.<br> <br>

Debian<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check<br>
root access<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check<br>
ssh + screen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check<br> <br>

apt-get install damn near anything<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... CHECK!<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/spending 2min to install blackra1n and rock/cydia and have a great phone!<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/iPhone h8ters quit yer whinning</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get an iPhone if you want that killer feature .
Debian ... check root access ... check ssh + screen ... check apt-get install damn near anything ... CHECK ! /spending 2min to install blackra1n and rock/cydia and have a great phone !
/iPhone h8ters quit yer whinning</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get an iPhone if you want that killer feature.
Debian ... check
root access ... check
ssh + screen ... check 

apt-get install damn near anything ... CHECK!  /spending 2min to install blackra1n and rock/cydia and have a great phone!
/iPhone h8ters quit yer whinning</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>NotFamousYet</author>
	<datestamp>1262450160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want a commercially sold phone that is hacker-friendly, I'd advise the Nokia N900. Have you considered that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want a commercially sold phone that is hacker-friendly , I 'd advise the Nokia N900 .
Have you considered that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want a commercially sold phone that is hacker-friendly, I'd advise the Nokia N900.
Have you considered that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629490</id>
	<title>Nexus One</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1262456460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait until they come out with the Nexus-6 models.

I might even call mine... Rachel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait until they come out with the Nexus-6 models .
I might even call mine... Rachel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait until they come out with the Nexus-6 models.
I might even call mine... Rachel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629962</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>anethema</author>
	<datestamp>1262461980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Haven't seen his in any of the replies, but the N900 is just like the Android in bands. 2G only on ATT.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't seen his in any of the replies , but the N900 is just like the Android in bands .
2G only on ATT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't seen his in any of the replies, but the N900 is just like the Android in bands.
2G only on ATT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630390</id>
	<title>Re:I laughed at the live wallpaper crashes</title>
	<author>peppepz</author>
	<datestamp>1262511780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every piece of hardware I've owned crashes once in a while. "Smart" hardware tends to crash more often, but I've seen a Motorola "dumb" phone crash when hanging up a call, an Alcatel monochrome phone crash while composing a SMS (in a reproducible way and in a very common use case), and at least two Nokia smartphones crash while listening to music. Even my ipod shuffle, a device so simple that it does not even have a display, sometimes crashes and starts emitting stuttering music - I once even needed to "reset" it via iTunes to be able again to upload songs on it.
<p>
That said, I find my HTC Android phone crashing particularly often, and the annoying thing is, that when it does, it resets the sim card - this means you won't receive incoming phone calls until you take your phone out of your pocket and realize that it is stuck at the "insert PIN..." prompt. Every other phone manufacturer I've tried - Siemens, Alcatel, Motorola, Nokia, does this thing right by not asking for the PIN number when the phone is reset by some watchdog. Android doesn't, and it's a pity, because at least my HTC phone is the most crash-prone one I've ever owned (and it wasn't exactly cheap).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every piece of hardware I 've owned crashes once in a while .
" Smart " hardware tends to crash more often , but I 've seen a Motorola " dumb " phone crash when hanging up a call , an Alcatel monochrome phone crash while composing a SMS ( in a reproducible way and in a very common use case ) , and at least two Nokia smartphones crash while listening to music .
Even my ipod shuffle , a device so simple that it does not even have a display , sometimes crashes and starts emitting stuttering music - I once even needed to " reset " it via iTunes to be able again to upload songs on it .
That said , I find my HTC Android phone crashing particularly often , and the annoying thing is , that when it does , it resets the sim card - this means you wo n't receive incoming phone calls until you take your phone out of your pocket and realize that it is stuck at the " insert PIN... " prompt .
Every other phone manufacturer I 've tried - Siemens , Alcatel , Motorola , Nokia , does this thing right by not asking for the PIN number when the phone is reset by some watchdog .
Android does n't , and it 's a pity , because at least my HTC phone is the most crash-prone one I 've ever owned ( and it was n't exactly cheap ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every piece of hardware I've owned crashes once in a while.
"Smart" hardware tends to crash more often, but I've seen a Motorola "dumb" phone crash when hanging up a call, an Alcatel monochrome phone crash while composing a SMS (in a reproducible way and in a very common use case), and at least two Nokia smartphones crash while listening to music.
Even my ipod shuffle, a device so simple that it does not even have a display, sometimes crashes and starts emitting stuttering music - I once even needed to "reset" it via iTunes to be able again to upload songs on it.
That said, I find my HTC Android phone crashing particularly often, and the annoying thing is, that when it does, it resets the sim card - this means you won't receive incoming phone calls until you take your phone out of your pocket and realize that it is stuck at the "insert PIN..." prompt.
Every other phone manufacturer I've tried - Siemens, Alcatel, Motorola, Nokia, does this thing right by not asking for the PIN number when the phone is reset by some watchdog.
Android doesn't, and it's a pity, because at least my HTC phone is the most crash-prone one I've ever owned (and it wasn't exactly cheap).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629918</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262461440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use SIP on my Moto Droid daily.  I don't see much of a problem at all with it.  Verizon hasn't decided to bill me extra and whatever QOS they are doing doesn't kill it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use SIP on my Moto Droid daily .
I do n't see much of a problem at all with it .
Verizon has n't decided to bill me extra and whatever QOS they are doing does n't kill it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use SIP on my Moto Droid daily.
I don't see much of a problem at all with it.
Verizon hasn't decided to bill me extra and whatever QOS they are doing doesn't kill it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284</id>
	<title>Critical</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1262453580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No multitouch?  Okay.

</p><p>No physical keyboard? Okay.

</p><p>No multitouch AND no physical keyboard?  Sorta fatal combination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No multitouch ?
Okay . No physical keyboard ?
Okay . No multitouch AND no physical keyboard ?
Sorta fatal combination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No multitouch?
Okay.

No physical keyboard?
Okay.

No multitouch AND no physical keyboard?
Sorta fatal combination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629798</id>
	<title>Re:I laughed at the live wallpaper crashes</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1262460240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing about the iPhone is... it crashes... often (I don't have one but the majority of my family members do, as do a few of my friends). Sometimes it fails to pick up calls, applications crash, SMS messages are sometimes delayed hours, while I would be quick to blame it on AT&amp;T, my current "dumb" phone doesn't have these problems (well, not that theres any applications to crash on the stupid thing...) while running on AT&amp;T. On my iPod touch, applications will occasionally simply refuse to load, Facebook will randomly crash when loading, there are a few websites Safari doesn't like and crashes, etc. While for a lot of people these may be simple annoyances, for some a lost call may be lost money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing about the iPhone is... it crashes... often ( I do n't have one but the majority of my family members do , as do a few of my friends ) .
Sometimes it fails to pick up calls , applications crash , SMS messages are sometimes delayed hours , while I would be quick to blame it on AT&amp;T , my current " dumb " phone does n't have these problems ( well , not that theres any applications to crash on the stupid thing... ) while running on AT&amp;T .
On my iPod touch , applications will occasionally simply refuse to load , Facebook will randomly crash when loading , there are a few websites Safari does n't like and crashes , etc .
While for a lot of people these may be simple annoyances , for some a lost call may be lost money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing about the iPhone is... it crashes... often (I don't have one but the majority of my family members do, as do a few of my friends).
Sometimes it fails to pick up calls, applications crash, SMS messages are sometimes delayed hours, while I would be quick to blame it on AT&amp;T, my current "dumb" phone doesn't have these problems (well, not that theres any applications to crash on the stupid thing...) while running on AT&amp;T.
On my iPod touch, applications will occasionally simply refuse to load, Facebook will randomly crash when loading, there are a few websites Safari doesn't like and crashes, etc.
While for a lot of people these may be simple annoyances, for some a lost call may be lost money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30632098</id>
	<title>AARGH</title>
	<author>VMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1262539020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"iPhone eviscerator"</p><p>WHAT THE "#\%#&amp;# DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?<br>A phone that will make every apple fanboy dump their iphone and rush out to buy this?</p><p>Even if a phone was worth it's own weight in antimatter, had quadruple HD resolution, with a lifetime rated powercell and software compatibility with every piece of code ever written and a gui that is so intuitive and pleasurable to use that it would herald a new era of human cooperation and focus our attention in such a way that we would solve every problem humanity faces and will ever face, and could make calls OK too..</p><p>It still wouldn't be an "iPhone eviscerator"</p><p>Now can we PLEASE<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... STOP... USING... TERMS.. LIKE<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... THAT?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" iPhone eviscerator " WHAT THE " # \ % # &amp; # DOES THAT EVEN MEAN ? A phone that will make every apple fanboy dump their iphone and rush out to buy this ? Even if a phone was worth it 's own weight in antimatter , had quadruple HD resolution , with a lifetime rated powercell and software compatibility with every piece of code ever written and a gui that is so intuitive and pleasurable to use that it would herald a new era of human cooperation and focus our attention in such a way that we would solve every problem humanity faces and will ever face , and could make calls OK too..It still would n't be an " iPhone eviscerator " Now can we PLEASE ... STOP... USING... TERMS.. LIKE ... THAT ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"iPhone eviscerator"WHAT THE "#\%#&amp;# DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?A phone that will make every apple fanboy dump their iphone and rush out to buy this?Even if a phone was worth it's own weight in antimatter, had quadruple HD resolution, with a lifetime rated powercell and software compatibility with every piece of code ever written and a gui that is so intuitive and pleasurable to use that it would herald a new era of human cooperation and focus our attention in such a way that we would solve every problem humanity faces and will ever face, and could make calls OK too..It still wouldn't be an "iPhone eviscerator"Now can we PLEASE ... STOP... USING... TERMS.. LIKE ... THAT?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30637466</id>
	<title>Looking forward to this phone</title>
	<author>motang</author>
	<datestamp>1262539500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looking for to Tuesday as to see how this one will be and how much will it cost w/o contract.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking for to Tuesday as to see how this one will be and how much will it cost w/o contract .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking for to Tuesday as to see how this one will be and how much will it cost w/o contract.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633456</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1262549340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an N800, and I'm familiar with Maemo. It has a lot of fairly basic deficiencies. For example, there has been a bug open for several years about the fact that it's impossible to set your preferences for date format. That's a bit of a killer for me, trivial as it may seem, as I use ISO format everywhere, and the last thing I need is my phone and organizer using a different format from everything else.</p><p>I've also been displeased with Nokia's lack of continuing support for older devices. When I went through the hell of reflashing my N800 for the 2008 OS release, Nokia said that would be the last reflash needed, as they had added a proper package manager. In fact, it was the last reflash needed because they dropped support for older hardware and told everyone to go buy an N900.</p><p>Then there's the fact that the windowing toolkit on the N900 is a dead end, due to be replaced by Qt in the inevitable N910--which you will no doubt have to buy, because they won't offer an OS update for the N900.</p><p>No, sorry, but Nokia does not fill me with enthusiasm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an N800 , and I 'm familiar with Maemo .
It has a lot of fairly basic deficiencies .
For example , there has been a bug open for several years about the fact that it 's impossible to set your preferences for date format .
That 's a bit of a killer for me , trivial as it may seem , as I use ISO format everywhere , and the last thing I need is my phone and organizer using a different format from everything else.I 've also been displeased with Nokia 's lack of continuing support for older devices .
When I went through the hell of reflashing my N800 for the 2008 OS release , Nokia said that would be the last reflash needed , as they had added a proper package manager .
In fact , it was the last reflash needed because they dropped support for older hardware and told everyone to go buy an N900.Then there 's the fact that the windowing toolkit on the N900 is a dead end , due to be replaced by Qt in the inevitable N910--which you will no doubt have to buy , because they wo n't offer an OS update for the N900.No , sorry , but Nokia does not fill me with enthusiasm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an N800, and I'm familiar with Maemo.
It has a lot of fairly basic deficiencies.
For example, there has been a bug open for several years about the fact that it's impossible to set your preferences for date format.
That's a bit of a killer for me, trivial as it may seem, as I use ISO format everywhere, and the last thing I need is my phone and organizer using a different format from everything else.I've also been displeased with Nokia's lack of continuing support for older devices.
When I went through the hell of reflashing my N800 for the 2008 OS release, Nokia said that would be the last reflash needed, as they had added a proper package manager.
In fact, it was the last reflash needed because they dropped support for older hardware and told everyone to go buy an N900.Then there's the fact that the windowing toolkit on the N900 is a dead end, due to be replaced by Qt in the inevitable N910--which you will no doubt have to buy, because they won't offer an OS update for the N900.No, sorry, but Nokia does not fill me with enthusiasm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631404</id>
	<title>Electric sheep?</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1262531340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe it'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in.</p></div><p>I was thinking the OS would come with a screen saver showing electric sheep<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in.I was thinking the OS would come with a screen saver showing electric sheep : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in.I was thinking the OS would come with a screen saver showing electric sheep :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629784</id>
	<title>Of course Endgadget doesn't like it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262460120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They couldn't find the Apple logo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could n't find the Apple logo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They couldn't find the Apple logo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30632344</id>
	<title>I want buttons</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1262541300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want touch screens. I want to be able to feel the buttons in the dark, without looking at the display. Can you do that google?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want touch screens .
I want to be able to feel the buttons in the dark , without looking at the display .
Can you do that google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want touch screens.
I want to be able to feel the buttons in the dark, without looking at the display.
Can you do that google?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631470</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>qwertyatwork</author>
	<datestamp>1262532120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What math are you using to get $1,975 for the iPhone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What math are you using to get $ 1,975 for the iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What math are you using to get $1,975 for the iPhone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633488</id>
	<title>Re:Criteria</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1262549760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>keyboard? - FAIL!</p></div></blockquote><p>So buy a Motorola Sholes. Much the same from a software point of view, has all your other desired features, and has a slide-out keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>keyboard ?
- FAIL ! So buy a Motorola Sholes .
Much the same from a software point of view , has all your other desired features , and has a slide-out keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>keyboard?
- FAIL!So buy a Motorola Sholes.
Much the same from a software point of view, has all your other desired features, and has a slide-out keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629818</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1262460540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...But that is assuming your wireless carrier doesn't mess with VoIP. While I don't think T-Mobile would (heck, they even supported unlocked iPhones for free!) other carriers might not be so forgiving  AT&amp;T, Verizon</htmltext>
<tokenext>...But that is assuming your wireless carrier does n't mess with VoIP .
While I do n't think T-Mobile would ( heck , they even supported unlocked iPhones for free !
) other carriers might not be so forgiving AT&amp;T , Verizon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...But that is assuming your wireless carrier doesn't mess with VoIP.
While I don't think T-Mobile would (heck, they even supported unlocked iPhones for free!
) other carriers might not be so forgiving  AT&amp;T, Verizon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788</id>
	<title>Re:Critical</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1262519100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why exactly do you need to hit more than 1 key at a time?  Hint:  You don't.</p><p>Or maybe you were suggesting that multitouch is necessary to make a touch-interface that doesn't screw up all the time.  It isn't.</p><p>I've got the G1 with the new updates and the on-screen keyboard is almost as easy to use as the physical one.  I rarely pull out the keyboard any more because it isn't worth the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why exactly do you need to hit more than 1 key at a time ?
Hint : You do n't.Or maybe you were suggesting that multitouch is necessary to make a touch-interface that does n't screw up all the time .
It is n't.I 've got the G1 with the new updates and the on-screen keyboard is almost as easy to use as the physical one .
I rarely pull out the keyboard any more because it is n't worth the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why exactly do you need to hit more than 1 key at a time?
Hint:  You don't.Or maybe you were suggesting that multitouch is necessary to make a touch-interface that doesn't screw up all the time.
It isn't.I've got the G1 with the new updates and the on-screen keyboard is almost as easy to use as the physical one.
I rarely pull out the keyboard any more because it isn't worth the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631478</id>
	<title>Re:Critical</title>
	<author>nloop</author>
	<datestamp>1262532180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Multitouch is there in the hardware, you just have to turn it on.  Same as the other Google phones that are out now.  G1/MyTouch/Droid can all multitouch if you so desire.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Multitouch is there in the hardware , you just have to turn it on .
Same as the other Google phones that are out now .
G1/MyTouch/Droid can all multitouch if you so desire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Multitouch is there in the hardware, you just have to turn it on.
Same as the other Google phones that are out now.
G1/MyTouch/Droid can all multitouch if you so desire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631552</id>
	<title>Criteria</title>
	<author>Gonoff</author>
	<datestamp>1262532780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Easy to write for? - check<br>
removable standard storage? - check<br>
GSM? - if they want to sell it outside the USA - so check<br>
touch screen? - check<br>
replacable battery? - check<br>
keyboard? - FAIL!<p>Until they get one of these (not just a picture) these things will not be of much use to people who actually have work to do. A picture of one on a touch screen might be handy for a 3 word text message but I use my blackberry for email.</p><p>I am still waiting for something.  Surely someone has to want business sales rather than just people who want an iPhone lookalike at a lower price...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy to write for ?
- check removable standard storage ?
- check GSM ?
- if they want to sell it outside the USA - so check touch screen ?
- check replacable battery ?
- check keyboard ?
- FAIL ! Until they get one of these ( not just a picture ) these things will not be of much use to people who actually have work to do .
A picture of one on a touch screen might be handy for a 3 word text message but I use my blackberry for email.I am still waiting for something .
Surely someone has to want business sales rather than just people who want an iPhone lookalike at a lower price.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy to write for?
- check
removable standard storage?
- check
GSM?
- if they want to sell it outside the USA - so check
touch screen?
- check
replacable battery?
- check
keyboard?
- FAIL!Until they get one of these (not just a picture) these things will not be of much use to people who actually have work to do.
A picture of one on a touch screen might be handy for a 3 word text message but I use my blackberry for email.I am still waiting for something.
Surely someone has to want business sales rather than just people who want an iPhone lookalike at a lower price...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631220</id>
	<title>Gadget Press Still Doesn't Get Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262528340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's remarkable that the gadget press still treats each Android phone as some kind of unique product. Reality is that Android phones are "clones" so it's a lot like comparing an ALR 386 vs a Compaq 386 back in 1990. There are differences between models, but Android phones are more of a category that a single product.</p><p>Oh, and the gadget press just got jobbed by some great PR work by Google, T-Mobile and HTC.  They fell for "ooooh a new Google Phone yet again."  (have to answer phone - my G-1 is ringing).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's remarkable that the gadget press still treats each Android phone as some kind of unique product .
Reality is that Android phones are " clones " so it 's a lot like comparing an ALR 386 vs a Compaq 386 back in 1990 .
There are differences between models , but Android phones are more of a category that a single product.Oh , and the gadget press just got jobbed by some great PR work by Google , T-Mobile and HTC .
They fell for " ooooh a new Google Phone yet again .
" ( have to answer phone - my G-1 is ringing ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's remarkable that the gadget press still treats each Android phone as some kind of unique product.
Reality is that Android phones are "clones" so it's a lot like comparing an ALR 386 vs a Compaq 386 back in 1990.
There are differences between models, but Android phones are more of a category that a single product.Oh, and the gadget press just got jobbed by some great PR work by Google, T-Mobile and HTC.
They fell for "ooooh a new Google Phone yet again.
"  (have to answer phone - my G-1 is ringing).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30632220</id>
	<title>Funny thing is</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1262540040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That the 3d performance is somewhat dissapointing, the device pushes 26 fps on the Powervr benchmark, the Acer Liquid A1 is somewhat faster. Ok the device has to push double that many pixels as the last gen of phones (which showed pretty much the same fps number), but I still wonder why no device maker does a Tegra based phone which clearly is superior to the PowerVR based Qualcom stuff most phones currently use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That the 3d performance is somewhat dissapointing , the device pushes 26 fps on the Powervr benchmark , the Acer Liquid A1 is somewhat faster .
Ok the device has to push double that many pixels as the last gen of phones ( which showed pretty much the same fps number ) , but I still wonder why no device maker does a Tegra based phone which clearly is superior to the PowerVR based Qualcom stuff most phones currently use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the 3d performance is somewhat dissapointing, the device pushes 26 fps on the Powervr benchmark, the Acer Liquid A1 is somewhat faster.
Ok the device has to push double that many pixels as the last gen of phones (which showed pretty much the same fps number), but I still wonder why no device maker does a Tegra based phone which clearly is superior to the PowerVR based Qualcom stuff most phones currently use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268</id>
	<title>I laughed at the live wallpaper crashes</title>
	<author>dafing</author>
	<datestamp>1262453400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very funny, isnt this thing meant to be coming out soon?  I realise all tech has crashes, but when you are going up against the iPhone, I think you should be able to change wallpaper without constant crashes!  Thats the sort of thing that would put me off buying a phone, if a friend told me "this is so much better than the iPhone, check out the sparkly backgrounds" and then CRASH, #2 CRASH, #3 CRASH as you try and change the background!  I'd automatically assume the rest of the phone were as buggy.  Do other Android devices have similar crashes?  I've had iPhone apps crash before, but never the actual first party OS functions before.  I dont have much hands on experience with Android, its not really available in New Zealand.
<br> <br>
Anyway, hope I dont come across as a jerk.  I have big hopes for Android, although I dont see myself leaving my iPhone soon.  The Nexus One seems to have a very nice interface with some software features that Apple would do well to copy.  I dont like the look of the hardware, I'd prefer the iPhone.  Its good to have strong and healthy competition in any market, I dont think Android handsets have been on par with the iPhone yet.  Im trying not to get too excited over the Nexus One, as too often we hear "iPhone Killer" bandied about.  Perhaps if we didnt have such high hopes, we would be more tolerant of Androids current flaws, rather than instantly dismissing the device when it turns out not to be made of solid gold and curing cancer.  I remember the ridiculous hype over the Droid, with a massive marketing campaign, and then it seems to have just fallen dead?  When I hear of the Nexus One, commenters will often mention "the Droid sucked" or "this is so much better than the Droid" etc.
<br> <br>
I hope the Nexus One comes out soon so I can see it, although New Zealand seems to only have one or possibly two Android handsets on sale?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very funny , isnt this thing meant to be coming out soon ?
I realise all tech has crashes , but when you are going up against the iPhone , I think you should be able to change wallpaper without constant crashes !
Thats the sort of thing that would put me off buying a phone , if a friend told me " this is so much better than the iPhone , check out the sparkly backgrounds " and then CRASH , # 2 CRASH , # 3 CRASH as you try and change the background !
I 'd automatically assume the rest of the phone were as buggy .
Do other Android devices have similar crashes ?
I 've had iPhone apps crash before , but never the actual first party OS functions before .
I dont have much hands on experience with Android , its not really available in New Zealand .
Anyway , hope I dont come across as a jerk .
I have big hopes for Android , although I dont see myself leaving my iPhone soon .
The Nexus One seems to have a very nice interface with some software features that Apple would do well to copy .
I dont like the look of the hardware , I 'd prefer the iPhone .
Its good to have strong and healthy competition in any market , I dont think Android handsets have been on par with the iPhone yet .
Im trying not to get too excited over the Nexus One , as too often we hear " iPhone Killer " bandied about .
Perhaps if we didnt have such high hopes , we would be more tolerant of Androids current flaws , rather than instantly dismissing the device when it turns out not to be made of solid gold and curing cancer .
I remember the ridiculous hype over the Droid , with a massive marketing campaign , and then it seems to have just fallen dead ?
When I hear of the Nexus One , commenters will often mention " the Droid sucked " or " this is so much better than the Droid " etc .
I hope the Nexus One comes out soon so I can see it , although New Zealand seems to only have one or possibly two Android handsets on sale ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very funny, isnt this thing meant to be coming out soon?
I realise all tech has crashes, but when you are going up against the iPhone, I think you should be able to change wallpaper without constant crashes!
Thats the sort of thing that would put me off buying a phone, if a friend told me "this is so much better than the iPhone, check out the sparkly backgrounds" and then CRASH, #2 CRASH, #3 CRASH as you try and change the background!
I'd automatically assume the rest of the phone were as buggy.
Do other Android devices have similar crashes?
I've had iPhone apps crash before, but never the actual first party OS functions before.
I dont have much hands on experience with Android, its not really available in New Zealand.
Anyway, hope I dont come across as a jerk.
I have big hopes for Android, although I dont see myself leaving my iPhone soon.
The Nexus One seems to have a very nice interface with some software features that Apple would do well to copy.
I dont like the look of the hardware, I'd prefer the iPhone.
Its good to have strong and healthy competition in any market, I dont think Android handsets have been on par with the iPhone yet.
Im trying not to get too excited over the Nexus One, as too often we hear "iPhone Killer" bandied about.
Perhaps if we didnt have such high hopes, we would be more tolerant of Androids current flaws, rather than instantly dismissing the device when it turns out not to be made of solid gold and curing cancer.
I remember the ridiculous hype over the Droid, with a massive marketing campaign, and then it seems to have just fallen dead?
When I hear of the Nexus One, commenters will often mention "the Droid sucked" or "this is so much better than the Droid" etc.
I hope the Nexus One comes out soon so I can see it, although New Zealand seems to only have one or possibly two Android handsets on sale?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629402</id>
	<title>Nexus six</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1262455320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, I think I'll wait a few years for them to release the Nexus Six. Maybe it'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , I think I 'll wait a few years for them to release the Nexus Six .
Maybe it 'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, I think I'll wait a few years for them to release the Nexus Six.
Maybe it'll come with a Voight-Kampff machine built in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633896</id>
	<title>no 5 row keyboard</title>
	<author>slmdmd</author>
	<datestamp>1262510820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A keyboard is an absolute must for me.  I hate touch screen keyboards.  This is the reason I never bought any of  those fat iphones.  The best phone till today with 5 row keyboard is the htc g1.  The other full keyboard ones are running stupid windows os.  Droid and Nexus have impressive specs but does not have the basic functionality where I can type numbers without any additional effort.  And yes I do type numbers very often.  So G1 still beats all the phones out in the market as of today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A keyboard is an absolute must for me .
I hate touch screen keyboards .
This is the reason I never bought any of those fat iphones .
The best phone till today with 5 row keyboard is the htc g1 .
The other full keyboard ones are running stupid windows os .
Droid and Nexus have impressive specs but does not have the basic functionality where I can type numbers without any additional effort .
And yes I do type numbers very often .
So G1 still beats all the phones out in the market as of today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A keyboard is an absolute must for me.
I hate touch screen keyboards.
This is the reason I never bought any of  those fat iphones.
The best phone till today with 5 row keyboard is the htc g1.
The other full keyboard ones are running stupid windows os.
Droid and Nexus have impressive specs but does not have the basic functionality where I can type numbers without any additional effort.
And yes I do type numbers very often.
So G1 still beats all the phones out in the market as of today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</id>
	<title>Ok..</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1262456520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you can buy a Nexus One for $530 and pick up a data SIM for $29 a month.  You get unlimited voice, unlimited SMS.  I think the data SIM is capped at 5 gigs/month....which at 4 minutes/megabyte comes to thousands of 'minutes' a month.  5 gig is a little sparse for watching youtube videos, but more than adequate for finding information and checking maps.</p><p>2 year cost comes to $1,226.  Iphone 3G two year cost is $1,975.  Pretty substantial savings.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I would guess that google voice is/will be a ton more flexible than other voice providers...can probably do VoIP using wifi whenever you are near a hotspot.  Can most likely auto-forward to a home VOIP system whenever you are at home or the phone is turned off.  If you have wireless internet at home and at work (who doesn't?), that basically means unlimited everything whenever you are there.</p><p>Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well.</p><p>To be honest, this sounds like a winner.  This smartphone can do many of the tasks of a real PC, yet the 2 year cost is about what you'd pay on the cheapest plan offered by a major wireless provider in the United States.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you can buy a Nexus One for $ 530 and pick up a data SIM for $ 29 a month .
You get unlimited voice , unlimited SMS .
I think the data SIM is capped at 5 gigs/month....which at 4 minutes/megabyte comes to thousands of 'minutes ' a month .
5 gig is a little sparse for watching youtube videos , but more than adequate for finding information and checking maps.2 year cost comes to $ 1,226 .
Iphone 3G two year cost is $ 1,975 .
Pretty substantial savings .
    I would guess that google voice is/will be a ton more flexible than other voice providers...can probably do VoIP using wifi whenever you are near a hotspot .
Can most likely auto-forward to a home VOIP system whenever you are at home or the phone is turned off .
If you have wireless internet at home and at work ( who does n't ?
) , that basically means unlimited everything whenever you are there.Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well.To be honest , this sounds like a winner .
This smartphone can do many of the tasks of a real PC , yet the 2 year cost is about what you 'd pay on the cheapest plan offered by a major wireless provider in the United States .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can buy a Nexus One for $530 and pick up a data SIM for $29 a month.
You get unlimited voice, unlimited SMS.
I think the data SIM is capped at 5 gigs/month....which at 4 minutes/megabyte comes to thousands of 'minutes' a month.
5 gig is a little sparse for watching youtube videos, but more than adequate for finding information and checking maps.2 year cost comes to $1,226.
Iphone 3G two year cost is $1,975.
Pretty substantial savings.
    I would guess that google voice is/will be a ton more flexible than other voice providers...can probably do VoIP using wifi whenever you are near a hotspot.
Can most likely auto-forward to a home VOIP system whenever you are at home or the phone is turned off.
If you have wireless internet at home and at work (who doesn't?
), that basically means unlimited everything whenever you are there.Better display and better hardware than the iphone as well.To be honest, this sounds like a winner.
This smartphone can do many of the tasks of a real PC, yet the 2 year cost is about what you'd pay on the cheapest plan offered by a major wireless provider in the United States.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629756</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1262459700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The N900 is good, but I think eventually Android development is going to catch up to the iPhone and have good commercial games. The N900 probably never will (well, aside from emulators and Quake). Its like the difference between buying a PSP and a GP2x, the GP2x is more hacker friendly, both have similar feature-sets, but you are going to get better quality games on the PSP at the expense of not being able to run a few nifty apps (assuming a non-hacked PSP). Community driven projects are great at making emulators, ports of old UNIX games (look at the 100,000 versions of nethack out there) but for new, full featured games that are more than a tech demo, you usually have to go with a commercial OS. Android is good in that it will allow unofficial "shady" development (emulators) while still enticing commercial studios.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The N900 is good , but I think eventually Android development is going to catch up to the iPhone and have good commercial games .
The N900 probably never will ( well , aside from emulators and Quake ) .
Its like the difference between buying a PSP and a GP2x , the GP2x is more hacker friendly , both have similar feature-sets , but you are going to get better quality games on the PSP at the expense of not being able to run a few nifty apps ( assuming a non-hacked PSP ) .
Community driven projects are great at making emulators , ports of old UNIX games ( look at the 100,000 versions of nethack out there ) but for new , full featured games that are more than a tech demo , you usually have to go with a commercial OS .
Android is good in that it will allow unofficial " shady " development ( emulators ) while still enticing commercial studios .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N900 is good, but I think eventually Android development is going to catch up to the iPhone and have good commercial games.
The N900 probably never will (well, aside from emulators and Quake).
Its like the difference between buying a PSP and a GP2x, the GP2x is more hacker friendly, both have similar feature-sets, but you are going to get better quality games on the PSP at the expense of not being able to run a few nifty apps (assuming a non-hacked PSP).
Community driven projects are great at making emulators, ports of old UNIX games (look at the 100,000 versions of nethack out there) but for new, full featured games that are more than a tech demo, you usually have to go with a commercial OS.
Android is good in that it will allow unofficial "shady" development (emulators) while still enticing commercial studios.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30643512</id>
	<title>Re:Critical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262631960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>unless you want to write with no caps maybe you need a shift key?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>unless you want to write with no caps maybe you need a shift key ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless you want to write with no caps maybe you need a shift key?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628996</id>
	<title>Re:Only one question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262450340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a Nokia N900 if you want that killer feature.</p><p>Debian<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check<br>root access<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check<br>ssh + screen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... check</p><p>apt-get install damn near anything<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... CHECK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a Nokia N900 if you want that killer feature.Debian ... checkroot access ... checkssh + screen ... checkapt-get install damn near anything ... CHECK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a Nokia N900 if you want that killer feature.Debian ... checkroot access ... checkssh + screen ... checkapt-get install damn near anything ... CHECK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629868</id>
	<title>The only question I have:</title>
	<author>caladine</author>
	<datestamp>1262461020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When will HTC be releasing the PassionC? I'm pretty happy with my current carrier (Verizon) which means I need a CDMA version of this phone...</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will HTC be releasing the PassionC ?
I 'm pretty happy with my current carrier ( Verizon ) which means I need a CDMA version of this phone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will HTC be releasing the PassionC?
I'm pretty happy with my current carrier (Verizon) which means I need a CDMA version of this phone...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629998</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1262462220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>where do you get a data sim for $29 / month?</htmltext>
<tokenext>where do you get a data sim for $ 29 / month ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where do you get a data sim for $29 / month?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628888</id>
	<title>fp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262449260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>post is end all and be all of evisceration....or whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>post is end all and be all of evisceration....or whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>post is end all and be all of evisceration....or whatever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30638026</id>
	<title>Re:Critical</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1262547540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seconded.  I actually found the Droid Eris's touchscreen keyboard to be slightly better than the one on the iPhone.</p><p>The high-resolution screen certainly doesn't hurt either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seconded .
I actually found the Droid Eris 's touchscreen keyboard to be slightly better than the one on the iPhone.The high-resolution screen certainly does n't hurt either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seconded.
I actually found the Droid Eris's touchscreen keyboard to be slightly better than the one on the iPhone.The high-resolution screen certainly doesn't hurt either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629934</id>
	<title>Re:Ok..</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1262461620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>2 year cost comes to $1,226. Iphone 3G two year cost is $1,975. Pretty substantial savings.</i></p><p>Sure but per-month that's only about $32/month savings, and relying on VOIP is kind of rickety for a primary phone.  Now purely as a data device, perhaps...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 year cost comes to $ 1,226 .
Iphone 3G two year cost is $ 1,975 .
Pretty substantial savings.Sure but per-month that 's only about $ 32/month savings , and relying on VOIP is kind of rickety for a primary phone .
Now purely as a data device , perhaps.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 year cost comes to $1,226.
Iphone 3G two year cost is $1,975.
Pretty substantial savings.Sure but per-month that's only about $32/month savings, and relying on VOIP is kind of rickety for a primary phone.
Now purely as a data device, perhaps...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30638026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30643512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30644052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_03_015229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30628984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30633456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30644052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30638026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30643512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629818
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30630390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30629490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30631220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_03_015229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_03_015229.30632344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
