<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_31_1925207</id>
	<title>Motorola's Rumored Android Phone Focuses on Screen Size</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1262287560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>nottheusualsuspect excerpts from this speculation-laden report at Brighthand that <i>"Motorola is reportedly working on a device that will have <a href="http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=16052&amp;news=Motorola+Shadow+Google+Android+OS">one of the largest displays of any smartphone</a>. Code-named the Shadow, it will sport a 4.3-inch WVGA+ touchscreen, Google's Android OS, and a range of other high-end features. When it comes to screen size, the Shadow will be equaled only by the Windows Mobile-based HTC HD2. The closest Android-powered model will be the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10, which will sport a 4.0-inch display. Most other models, like the Motorola Droid and Google Nexus One, have 3.7-inch screens. The display on this upcoming Motorola smartphone will allegedly have a resolution of 850 by 484 pixels."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nottheusualsuspect excerpts from this speculation-laden report at Brighthand that " Motorola is reportedly working on a device that will have one of the largest displays of any smartphone .
Code-named the Shadow , it will sport a 4.3-inch WVGA + touchscreen , Google 's Android OS , and a range of other high-end features .
When it comes to screen size , the Shadow will be equaled only by the Windows Mobile-based HTC HD2 .
The closest Android-powered model will be the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 , which will sport a 4.0-inch display .
Most other models , like the Motorola Droid and Google Nexus One , have 3.7-inch screens .
The display on this upcoming Motorola smartphone will allegedly have a resolution of 850 by 484 pixels .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nottheusualsuspect excerpts from this speculation-laden report at Brighthand that "Motorola is reportedly working on a device that will have one of the largest displays of any smartphone.
Code-named the Shadow, it will sport a 4.3-inch WVGA+ touchscreen, Google's Android OS, and a range of other high-end features.
When it comes to screen size, the Shadow will be equaled only by the Windows Mobile-based HTC HD2.
The closest Android-powered model will be the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10, which will sport a 4.0-inch display.
Most other models, like the Motorola Droid and Google Nexus One, have 3.7-inch screens.
The display on this upcoming Motorola smartphone will allegedly have a resolution of 850 by 484 pixels.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611726</id>
	<title>FAI^LZO6RS.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262270820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">AMERICA) might Be Jesus Up The Lite is straining 1. Therefore it's elected, we took list of other numbers continue fact came into</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>AMERICA ) might Be Jesus Up The Lite is straining 1 .
Therefore it 's elected , we took list of other numbers continue fact came into [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AMERICA) might Be Jesus Up The Lite is straining 1.
Therefore it's elected, we took list of other numbers continue fact came into [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609212</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262250540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard, I am sticking with my BlackBerry.</p><p>The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.</p></div><p>Exactly.  The danger series had good keyboards, as did the antediluvian Motorola T-900 series.  I could clock nearly 30WPM on those.  And as much as I like the folks at Palm, I couldn't use their chiclets at all.</p><p>The G1 keyboard is just barely tolerable.  I've noticed the amount of actual work I get done on my G1 is a tenth of what I used to do.  Sure, I can see web pages more clearly and get the info I need more quickly, but as far as acting on it, without an ergonomic keyboard, I can't do much typing.</p><p>I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/technology/personaltech/31pogue.html#secondParagraph" title="nytimes.com">iPhone wannabe</a> [nytimes.com], and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.</p><p>Or, else, stop agreeing with as the Onion's quote <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple\_introduces\_revolutionary" title="theonion.com">attributed</a> [theonion.com] to Steve Jobs, "People who use keyboards are standing in the way of progress."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard , I am sticking with my BlackBerry.The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe , all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.Exactly .
The danger series had good keyboards , as did the antediluvian Motorola T-900 series .
I could clock nearly 30WPM on those .
And as much as I like the folks at Palm , I could n't use their chiclets at all.The G1 keyboard is just barely tolerable .
I 've noticed the amount of actual work I get done on my G1 is a tenth of what I used to do .
Sure , I can see web pages more clearly and get the info I need more quickly , but as far as acting on it , without an ergonomic keyboard , I ca n't do much typing.I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an iPhone wannabe [ nytimes.com ] , and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.Or , else , stop agreeing with as the Onion 's quote attributed [ theonion.com ] to Steve Jobs , " People who use keyboards are standing in the way of progress .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard, I am sticking with my BlackBerry.The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.Exactly.
The danger series had good keyboards, as did the antediluvian Motorola T-900 series.
I could clock nearly 30WPM on those.
And as much as I like the folks at Palm, I couldn't use their chiclets at all.The G1 keyboard is just barely tolerable.
I've noticed the amount of actual work I get done on my G1 is a tenth of what I used to do.
Sure, I can see web pages more clearly and get the info I need more quickly, but as far as acting on it, without an ergonomic keyboard, I can't do much typing.I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an iPhone wannabe [nytimes.com], and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.Or, else, stop agreeing with as the Onion's quote attributed [theonion.com] to Steve Jobs, "People who use keyboards are standing in the way of progress.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608924</id>
	<title>Re:Motorola Android dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, Europe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608960</id>
	<title>But I thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Size doesn't matter!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Size does n't matter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Size doesn't matter!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609124</id>
	<title>mo3 up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262250120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Code.' Don't a cons3ious stand NeCtBSD user</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Code .
' Do n't a cons3ious stand NeCtBSD user [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Code.
' Don't a cons3ious stand NeCtBSD user [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609456</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262252040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n900.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n900 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n900.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609146</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Fizzol</author>
	<datestamp>1262250240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>HTC Touch Pro 2</htmltext>
<tokenext>HTC Touch Pro 2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HTC Touch Pro 2</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609182</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>modmans2ndcoming</author>
	<datestamp>1262250360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>perhaps people should start using units that do not rely on pixels to display their app? how about em?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps people should start using units that do not rely on pixels to display their app ?
how about em ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps people should start using units that do not rely on pixels to display their app?
how about em?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609128</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262250120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keyboards are overrated. The next new thing in cellphones will be the brain implants that let you think the character.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keyboards are overrated .
The next new thing in cellphones will be the brain implants that let you think the character .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keyboards are overrated.
The next new thing in cellphones will be the brain implants that let you think the character.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611136</id>
	<title>Still waiting...</title>
	<author>dr. chuck bunsen</author>
	<datestamp>1262264700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been waiting for the right Android phone to replace my G1. The Verizon Droid is pretty close to what I've been hoping for, but it is for Verizon, not Tmobile. The Cliq is still too bulky, slow processor, etc. I love the form factor of the new MyTouch, but I've got to have hard keyboard, and again the processor is blah. If someone would just make a nice slim package with hard keys, a larger screen, and a great processor I would pay for it immediately.

Android is a great mobile OS, we just haven't got the right package quite yet. So maybe this rumored unit will be the one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been waiting for the right Android phone to replace my G1 .
The Verizon Droid is pretty close to what I 've been hoping for , but it is for Verizon , not Tmobile .
The Cliq is still too bulky , slow processor , etc .
I love the form factor of the new MyTouch , but I 've got to have hard keyboard , and again the processor is blah .
If someone would just make a nice slim package with hard keys , a larger screen , and a great processor I would pay for it immediately .
Android is a great mobile OS , we just have n't got the right package quite yet .
So maybe this rumored unit will be the one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been waiting for the right Android phone to replace my G1.
The Verizon Droid is pretty close to what I've been hoping for, but it is for Verizon, not Tmobile.
The Cliq is still too bulky, slow processor, etc.
I love the form factor of the new MyTouch, but I've got to have hard keyboard, and again the processor is blah.
If someone would just make a nice slim package with hard keys, a larger screen, and a great processor I would pay for it immediately.
Android is a great mobile OS, we just haven't got the right package quite yet.
So maybe this rumored unit will be the one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613720</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1230820560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I highly recommend the Nokia N900.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I highly recommend the Nokia N900 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I highly recommend the Nokia N900.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609118</id>
	<title>I'm holding out.</title>
	<author>Beelzebud</author>
	<datestamp>1262250000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's only a matter of time before I can get my hands on a 65 inch mobile phone, with Blu-Ray, a media center, and digital cable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only a matter of time before I can get my hands on a 65 inch mobile phone , with Blu-Ray , a media center , and digital cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only a matter of time before I can get my hands on a 65 inch mobile phone, with Blu-Ray, a media center, and digital cable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30615188</id>
	<title>Re:Motorola Android dreams</title>
	<author>webmistressrachel</author>
	<datestamp>1230838080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posts like this are why I just could not condone stopping AC, ever.</p><p>Internet trolls can be sophisticated, well-written, erotic, provocative, and funny. They challenge social "norms", and make us re-evaluate them.</p><p>This is actually a nice troll, and yes, I am a woman. The ending is hilarious, but ruins the fun I was having before... but that's the whole point of the troll!!! I know, I'm stating the obvious but I just loved this one, and I have a right to! We're forgetting that, folks. He/she has a right to those fantasies, and I have a right to read them. I think lol.</p><p>
&nbsp; Long live the AC to feed our dirty minds!</p><p>Thanks AC, Rachel x</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posts like this are why I just could not condone stopping AC , ever.Internet trolls can be sophisticated , well-written , erotic , provocative , and funny .
They challenge social " norms " , and make us re-evaluate them.This is actually a nice troll , and yes , I am a woman .
The ending is hilarious , but ruins the fun I was having before... but that 's the whole point of the troll ! ! !
I know , I 'm stating the obvious but I just loved this one , and I have a right to !
We 're forgetting that , folks .
He/she has a right to those fantasies , and I have a right to read them .
I think lol .
  Long live the AC to feed our dirty minds ! Thanks AC , Rachel x</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posts like this are why I just could not condone stopping AC, ever.Internet trolls can be sophisticated, well-written, erotic, provocative, and funny.
They challenge social "norms", and make us re-evaluate them.This is actually a nice troll, and yes, I am a woman.
The ending is hilarious, but ruins the fun I was having before... but that's the whole point of the troll!!!
I know, I'm stating the obvious but I just loved this one, and I have a right to!
We're forgetting that, folks.
He/she has a right to those fantasies, and I have a right to read them.
I think lol.
  Long live the AC to feed our dirty minds!Thanks AC, Rachel x</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608834</id>
	<title>Key words</title>
	<author>ianare</author>
	<datestamp>1262291760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I <b>might</b> be the son of god, who <b>allegedly</b> created the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I might be the son of god , who allegedly created the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I might be the son of god, who allegedly created the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609636</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1262253180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean, like, a droid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean , like , a droid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean, like, a droid?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609090</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262293020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia N900</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia N900</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia N900</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609882</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1262254620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I'm pretty sure the scalable UI is going to involve at least some effort above a fixed layout, which is exactly a compromise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I 'm pretty sure the scalable UI is going to involve at least some effort above a fixed layout , which is exactly a compromise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I'm pretty sure the scalable UI is going to involve at least some effort above a fixed layout, which is exactly a compromise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30612106</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1262276340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right.</p> </div><p>Here's a brilliant idea: use dynamic scalable/reflowing UI layouts. You know, like we've been doing on the desktop and the Web for the last 15 years or so?</p><p>In fact, I'm so generous I won't even patent that idea. Feel free to use (but also check with Nokia, just in case).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right .
Here 's a brilliant idea : use dynamic scalable/reflowing UI layouts .
You know , like we 've been doing on the desktop and the Web for the last 15 years or so ? In fact , I 'm so generous I wo n't even patent that idea .
Feel free to use ( but also check with Nokia , just in case ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right.
Here's a brilliant idea: use dynamic scalable/reflowing UI layouts.
You know, like we've been doing on the desktop and the Web for the last 15 years or so?In fact, I'm so generous I won't even patent that idea.
Feel free to use (but also check with Nokia, just in case).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609180</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>beakerMeep</author>
	<datestamp>1262250360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the same resolution as the Droid and Nexus One.  There are really only 2 main screen resolutions out there.
<br> <br>
If your QA is backing up for android, maybe you did a bad job porting.  Or maybe you should have designed for android to begin with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the same resolution as the Droid and Nexus One .
There are really only 2 main screen resolutions out there .
If your QA is backing up for android , maybe you did a bad job porting .
Or maybe you should have designed for android to begin with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the same resolution as the Droid and Nexus One.
There are really only 2 main screen resolutions out there.
If your QA is backing up for android, maybe you did a bad job porting.
Or maybe you should have designed for android to begin with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609158</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>modmans2ndcoming</author>
	<datestamp>1262250300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>keyboards are too inflexible. I can't imagine using a hardware KB on a smartphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>keyboards are too inflexible .
I ca n't imagine using a hardware KB on a smartphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>keyboards are too inflexible.
I can't imagine using a hardware KB on a smartphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609102</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262293140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Droid has the same resolution as the shadow.  The physical size of the screen is irrelevant. Also, millions of Windows Mobile handsets have the same UI and hardware spec (because some are the same model), unless you mean that all different windows handsets are different - a tautology!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Droid has the same resolution as the shadow .
The physical size of the screen is irrelevant .
Also , millions of Windows Mobile handsets have the same UI and hardware spec ( because some are the same model ) , unless you mean that all different windows handsets are different - a tautology !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Droid has the same resolution as the shadow.
The physical size of the screen is irrelevant.
Also, millions of Windows Mobile handsets have the same UI and hardware spec (because some are the same model), unless you mean that all different windows handsets are different - a tautology!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613036</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1230805200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it was really that difficult, you'd have no end of problems with printing stuff, since printer resolutions really do vary a lot - and they have solved all the issues so no one notices any problems.  Of course it is easier once your DPI is high enough that you never have to worry about individual pixels.  But handheld devices are getting there, what with even this Motorola screen sporting 227 DPI.  No one's going to read 6x8 pixel characters on that screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was really that difficult , you 'd have no end of problems with printing stuff , since printer resolutions really do vary a lot - and they have solved all the issues so no one notices any problems .
Of course it is easier once your DPI is high enough that you never have to worry about individual pixels .
But handheld devices are getting there , what with even this Motorola screen sporting 227 DPI .
No one 's going to read 6x8 pixel characters on that screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was really that difficult, you'd have no end of problems with printing stuff, since printer resolutions really do vary a lot - and they have solved all the issues so no one notices any problems.
Of course it is easier once your DPI is high enough that you never have to worry about individual pixels.
But handheld devices are getting there, what with even this Motorola screen sporting 227 DPI.
No one's going to read 6x8 pixel characters on that screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609308</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>TheRecklessWanderer</author>
	<datestamp>1262251140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly the reason i never got one of the iPhones.  must have keyboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly the reason i never got one of the iPhones .
must have keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly the reason i never got one of the iPhones.
must have keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611676</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1262270100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using my Nokia 5800 with a stylus, rather than fingers, makes the touch keyboard work fine. Handwriting recognition is even better. And no, that doesn't make it an Iphone wannabe - Nokia were making phones long before the Iphone was even thought of, and Apple are still playing catchup to feature phones, let alone smart phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using my Nokia 5800 with a stylus , rather than fingers , makes the touch keyboard work fine .
Handwriting recognition is even better .
And no , that does n't make it an Iphone wannabe - Nokia were making phones long before the Iphone was even thought of , and Apple are still playing catchup to feature phones , let alone smart phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using my Nokia 5800 with a stylus, rather than fingers, makes the touch keyboard work fine.
Handwriting recognition is even better.
And no, that doesn't make it an Iphone wannabe - Nokia were making phones long before the Iphone was even thought of, and Apple are still playing catchup to feature phones, let alone smart phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608980</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.</p></div><p>Motorola Droid also has a keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe , all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.Motorola Droid also has a keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.Motorola Droid also has a keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610206</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1262256600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm not a developer, but even so, I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem. I'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen, but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600, or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch, 1368x768 netbook screen. Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size? Nevertheless, it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution, but different sizes. Or am I wrong?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's not that it's hard, but it's impractical to test. Ever test high-DPI on Windows? And see how badly apps break? Because the screen sizes of most cellphones and PDAs is pretty standard, the high-res ones run in high DPI mode all the time so buttons don't get impossibly small to operate. Apps have to be coded to be DPI aware so they can scale their UI appropriately. This is easy on most apps using default widgets, but apps with custom widgets often have to be aware of resolution issues (games usually require this).</p><p>It's like websites that use Flash, and you move from a 1024x768 screen to a 1920x1200 screen. Suddenly that QVGA flash game you like suddenly becomes 10x harder to use because you can't see it well anymore. Or streaming video - that app that looked nice at HVGA (320x480) looks bad at VGA+ resolutions because the video was QVGA, and has borders and is now a quarter the size. You could scale, but if you're taxed for CPU time, it's even worse.</p><p>But mostly, it's high-DPI. And Windows apps already prove that most devs can't handle high DPI. Or flash apps.</p><p>In theory, the Apple devices stress the need to produce DPI-aware apps in the SDK, but it'll take a screen change to see it actually happen.</p><p>Some devices (old PalmOS, for starters) actually scaled apps on high-DPI mode if they weren't high-DPI aware. Looked ugly and pixellated, but worked for a large chunk of unaware apps...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a developer , but even so , I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem .
I 'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen , but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600 , or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch , 1368x768 netbook screen .
Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size ?
Nevertheless , it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution , but different sizes .
Or am I wrong ? It 's not that it 's hard , but it 's impractical to test .
Ever test high-DPI on Windows ?
And see how badly apps break ?
Because the screen sizes of most cellphones and PDAs is pretty standard , the high-res ones run in high DPI mode all the time so buttons do n't get impossibly small to operate .
Apps have to be coded to be DPI aware so they can scale their UI appropriately .
This is easy on most apps using default widgets , but apps with custom widgets often have to be aware of resolution issues ( games usually require this ) .It 's like websites that use Flash , and you move from a 1024x768 screen to a 1920x1200 screen .
Suddenly that QVGA flash game you like suddenly becomes 10x harder to use because you ca n't see it well anymore .
Or streaming video - that app that looked nice at HVGA ( 320x480 ) looks bad at VGA + resolutions because the video was QVGA , and has borders and is now a quarter the size .
You could scale , but if you 're taxed for CPU time , it 's even worse.But mostly , it 's high-DPI .
And Windows apps already prove that most devs ca n't handle high DPI .
Or flash apps.In theory , the Apple devices stress the need to produce DPI-aware apps in the SDK , but it 'll take a screen change to see it actually happen.Some devices ( old PalmOS , for starters ) actually scaled apps on high-DPI mode if they were n't high-DPI aware .
Looked ugly and pixellated , but worked for a large chunk of unaware apps.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a developer, but even so, I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem.
I'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen, but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600, or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch, 1368x768 netbook screen.
Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size?
Nevertheless, it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution, but different sizes.
Or am I wrong?It's not that it's hard, but it's impractical to test.
Ever test high-DPI on Windows?
And see how badly apps break?
Because the screen sizes of most cellphones and PDAs is pretty standard, the high-res ones run in high DPI mode all the time so buttons don't get impossibly small to operate.
Apps have to be coded to be DPI aware so they can scale their UI appropriately.
This is easy on most apps using default widgets, but apps with custom widgets often have to be aware of resolution issues (games usually require this).It's like websites that use Flash, and you move from a 1024x768 screen to a 1920x1200 screen.
Suddenly that QVGA flash game you like suddenly becomes 10x harder to use because you can't see it well anymore.
Or streaming video - that app that looked nice at HVGA (320x480) looks bad at VGA+ resolutions because the video was QVGA, and has borders and is now a quarter the size.
You could scale, but if you're taxed for CPU time, it's even worse.But mostly, it's high-DPI.
And Windows apps already prove that most devs can't handle high DPI.
Or flash apps.In theory, the Apple devices stress the need to produce DPI-aware apps in the SDK, but it'll take a screen change to see it actually happen.Some devices (old PalmOS, for starters) actually scaled apps on high-DPI mode if they weren't high-DPI aware.
Looked ugly and pixellated, but worked for a large chunk of unaware apps...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613696</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Vintermann</author>
	<datestamp>1230820260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want something with two screens, that can be flipped towards each other when not in use to protect against scratches, etc. Like the Nintendo DS. And for you, they could make a software keyboard on the lower one. It wouldn't be any more cramped trying to type on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want something with two screens , that can be flipped towards each other when not in use to protect against scratches , etc .
Like the Nintendo DS .
And for you , they could make a software keyboard on the lower one .
It would n't be any more cramped trying to type on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want something with two screens, that can be flipped towards each other when not in use to protect against scratches, etc.
Like the Nintendo DS.
And for you, they could make a software keyboard on the lower one.
It wouldn't be any more cramped trying to type on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609934</id>
	<title>Apparel + Fashion industry needs to respond</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262254860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, you can carry over-sized mobile devices in a purse or other small bag, but sales of such devices probably do a lot better if people perceive they can carry them on their <i>person</i> and still be <i>normal</i> people.<p>
 

Right now, the standard layman outfit of jeans/slacks + shirt provides limited options...  keys + wallet + other junk already leave little space for more than a tiny cell phone as it is.</p><p>

I'd bet some apparel company could make a killing, for example, if they made a real attempt to market cargo pants, with larger sized pockets for all the gee-whiz gadgets, to the Best Buy loving crowd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , you can carry over-sized mobile devices in a purse or other small bag , but sales of such devices probably do a lot better if people perceive they can carry them on their person and still be normal people .
Right now , the standard layman outfit of jeans/slacks + shirt provides limited options... keys + wallet + other junk already leave little space for more than a tiny cell phone as it is .
I 'd bet some apparel company could make a killing , for example , if they made a real attempt to market cargo pants , with larger sized pockets for all the gee-whiz gadgets , to the Best Buy loving crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, you can carry over-sized mobile devices in a purse or other small bag, but sales of such devices probably do a lot better if people perceive they can carry them on their person and still be normal people.
Right now, the standard layman outfit of jeans/slacks + shirt provides limited options...  keys + wallet + other junk already leave little space for more than a tiny cell phone as it is.
I'd bet some apparel company could make a killing, for example, if they made a real attempt to market cargo pants, with larger sized pockets for all the gee-whiz gadgets, to the Best Buy loving crowd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609340</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262251320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know, the iPhone has a keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know , the iPhone has a keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know, the iPhone has a keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610312</id>
	<title>Re:WVGA+? WTF? W is for Wide!</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1262257320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore? I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600</i></p><p>The ones that start with 'W' are merely the wide versions of the originals, so generally you take the width of the next higher-up resolution and use that with the height of the one you're dealing with.</p><p>VGA = 640x480<br>WVGA = 800x480 (common for cellphones, but due to panel sizes, they're also coming out in 854x480)<br>SVGA = 800x600<br>WSVGA = 1024x600 (usually seen in netbooks)<br>XGA = 1024x768</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore ?
I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600The ones that start with 'W ' are merely the wide versions of the originals , so generally you take the width of the next higher-up resolution and use that with the height of the one you 're dealing with.VGA = 640x480WVGA = 800x480 ( common for cellphones , but due to panel sizes , they 're also coming out in 854x480 ) SVGA = 800x600WSVGA = 1024x600 ( usually seen in netbooks ) XGA = 1024x768</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore?
I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600The ones that start with 'W' are merely the wide versions of the originals, so generally you take the width of the next higher-up resolution and use that with the height of the one you're dealing with.VGA = 640x480WVGA = 800x480 (common for cellphones, but due to panel sizes, they're also coming out in 854x480)SVGA = 800x600WSVGA = 1024x600 (usually seen in netbooks)XGA = 1024x768</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613714</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Vintermann</author>
	<datestamp>1230820500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an iPhone wannabe [nytimes.com], and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.</p><p>That worked so well for Windows CE, eh? Plenty of keyboards there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an iPhone wannabe [ nytimes.com ] , and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.That worked so well for Windows CE , eh ?
Plenty of keyboards there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I wish Android partners would give up on being what David Pogue calls an iPhone wannabe [nytimes.com], and focus on the real promise of small mobile devices.That worked so well for Windows CE, eh?
Plenty of keyboards there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609334</id>
	<title>Go Back To Apple. You Won't Be Missed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262251320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one gives a shit about some fucking iPhone dev crying about stupid shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one gives a shit about some fucking iPhone dev crying about stupid shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one gives a shit about some fucking iPhone dev crying about stupid shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609208</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262250540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.geeksphone.com/en/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.geeksphone.com/en/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.geeksphone.com/en/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608896</id>
	<title>About the resolution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds really odd that it will be 850x484. I believe it will have 854x480 instead, which makes a lot more sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds really odd that it will be 850x484 .
I believe it will have 854x480 instead , which makes a lot more sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds really odd that it will be 850x484.
I believe it will have 854x480 instead, which makes a lot more sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262253660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF? Have you ever heard of dynamic layouting?</p><p>Yes, I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920*1080 without compromises. And so should you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Have you ever heard of dynamic layouting ? Yes , I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920 * 1080 without compromises .
And so should you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Have you ever heard of dynamic layouting?Yes, I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920*1080 without compromises.
And so should you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608802</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>gregarican</author>
	<datestamp>1262291520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is rumor article about a rumored mobile device. This fascinates me and I'd love to know more. While I'm waiting I'll page through my Star magazine to see about Lindsey Lohan's latest escapades...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is rumor article about a rumored mobile device .
This fascinates me and I 'd love to know more .
While I 'm waiting I 'll page through my Star magazine to see about Lindsey Lohan 's latest escapades.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is rumor article about a rumored mobile device.
This fascinates me and I'd love to know more.
While I'm waiting I'll page through my Star magazine to see about Lindsey Lohan's latest escapades...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609262</id>
	<title>Still cheaper than buying an unlocked phone...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262250840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is probably cheaper than buying an unlocked phone from some supplier...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably cheaper than buying an unlocked phone from some supplier.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably cheaper than buying an unlocked phone from some supplier...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610100</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262255880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually this is one thing Palm's WebOS takes care of for you.  Because it's written in HTML, it automatically adjusts for screen size.  granted, it might not be fully automatic, I don't develop, so I don't know, but I do no it's much easir to switch from the Pre to the Pixi and vise versa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually this is one thing Palm 's WebOS takes care of for you .
Because it 's written in HTML , it automatically adjusts for screen size .
granted , it might not be fully automatic , I do n't develop , so I do n't know , but I do no it 's much easir to switch from the Pre to the Pixi and vise versa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually this is one thing Palm's WebOS takes care of for you.
Because it's written in HTML, it automatically adjusts for screen size.
granted, it might not be fully automatic, I don't develop, so I don't know, but I do no it's much easir to switch from the Pre to the Pixi and vise versa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609852</id>
	<title>All that screen real estate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262254440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and it still won't play back avi, divx, quicktime, wmv, or xvid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and it still wo n't play back avi , divx , quicktime , wmv , or xvid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and it still won't play back avi, divx, quicktime, wmv, or xvid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610090</id>
	<title>WWOt? fp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262255760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">ass 0ntil I hit my</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>ass 0ntil I hit my [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ass 0ntil I hit my [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609988</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262255220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, there are many apps which only run on the 3G S, or on all except first gen iPod Touches, etc.  This is a myth.</p><p>Further, if you've actually developed for Android you'd know that the OS framework handles these multiple resolutions incredibly gracefully, nothing like how badly WinMO or Palm OS did.  Look it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , there are many apps which only run on the 3G S , or on all except first gen iPod Touches , etc .
This is a myth.Further , if you 've actually developed for Android you 'd know that the OS framework handles these multiple resolutions incredibly gracefully , nothing like how badly WinMO or Palm OS did .
Look it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, there are many apps which only run on the 3G S, or on all except first gen iPod Touches, etc.
This is a myth.Further, if you've actually developed for Android you'd know that the OS framework handles these multiple resolutions incredibly gracefully, nothing like how badly WinMO or Palm OS did.
Look it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608868</id>
	<title>Ugh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262291940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, it's never a good sign when you measure your package using a decimal point, Slashdot. Second this article makes you look like a whore. You should be ashamed! What would your mother think if she saw you dressed in those fishnets, a stolen wonderbra, and humping an android? This is not the way to get in touch with your feminine side, young man. When you've put some decent clothes on, come back down and I'm taking you down to the hex shop and we're going to find you something to play with that won't hurt as much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , it 's never a good sign when you measure your package using a decimal point , Slashdot .
Second this article makes you look like a whore .
You should be ashamed !
What would your mother think if she saw you dressed in those fishnets , a stolen wonderbra , and humping an android ?
This is not the way to get in touch with your feminine side , young man .
When you 've put some decent clothes on , come back down and I 'm taking you down to the hex shop and we 're going to find you something to play with that wo n't hurt as much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, it's never a good sign when you measure your package using a decimal point, Slashdot.
Second this article makes you look like a whore.
You should be ashamed!
What would your mother think if she saw you dressed in those fishnets, a stolen wonderbra, and humping an android?
This is not the way to get in touch with your feminine side, young man.
When you've put some decent clothes on, come back down and I'm taking you down to the hex shop and we're going to find you something to play with that won't hurt as much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609806</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Night64</author>
	<datestamp>1262254080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not a developer, but even so, I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem. I'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen, but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600, or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch, 1368x768 netbook screen. Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size?
Nevertheless, it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution, but different sizes. Or am I wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a developer , but even so , I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem .
I 'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen , but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600 , or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch , 1368x768 netbook screen .
Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size ?
Nevertheless , it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution , but different sizes .
Or am I wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a developer, but even so, I have a hard time with this so called screen size problem.
I'm typing this on a 19 inch 1440x900 screen, but Chrome would work just fine in 800x600, or 1024x768 or my 10.1 inch, 1368x768 netbook screen.
Why is so hard develop for Android with regard to screen size?
Nevertheless, it seems that all Android 2.0 have the same resolution, but different sizes.
Or am I wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610778</id>
	<title>Sliced HAM EHB Planar High-res</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262261040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, you need the name because the resolution alone, doesn't tell you important things like whether or not it uses hold-and-modify mode, extra-half-bright, planar pixels, or a Copper list to change registers mid-frame.  A good, exciting video mode is too complicated to sum up with just a few numbers, so you need a <em>name</em> for it -- oh wait, what decade is this?  Never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you need the name because the resolution alone , does n't tell you important things like whether or not it uses hold-and-modify mode , extra-half-bright , planar pixels , or a Copper list to change registers mid-frame .
A good , exciting video mode is too complicated to sum up with just a few numbers , so you need a name for it -- oh wait , what decade is this ?
Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you need the name because the resolution alone, doesn't tell you important things like whether or not it uses hold-and-modify mode, extra-half-bright, planar pixels, or a Copper list to change registers mid-frame.
A good, exciting video mode is too complicated to sum up with just a few numbers, so you need a name for it -- oh wait, what decade is this?
Never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610576</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1262259300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ha, you never did Symbian development, I take it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha , you never did Symbian development , I take it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha, you never did Symbian development, I take it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608870</id>
	<title>GOOG employee rumored to take a shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262291940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seventeen other employees post about it on Slashdot.</p><p>Enough, already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seventeen other employees post about it on Slashdot.Enough , already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seventeen other employees post about it on Slashdot.Enough, already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609598</id>
	<title>Re:I'm holding out.</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1262252880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's gonna be some belt holster.  Better get some suspenders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's gon na be some belt holster .
Better get some suspenders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's gonna be some belt holster.
Better get some suspenders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796</id>
	<title>Motorola Android dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262291460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>She lies back on the nude beach, her tumescent clit glistening in the sun, labia minora almost moving every time there's a strong breeze. Her ever so slight blonde peach fuzz barely visible in the sun. She coyly spreads her legs, appearing to be nonchalant but secretly enjoying the gazes of the horny boys who have gathered around her. Her nipples are pointed skywards, partly from the cool breeze but mostly from the thought of every male for fifty yards staring at her young naked perfection. She turns over and adjusts her towel on the sand, knees on the towel, elbows on the ground, and her heart-shaped ass thrust up in the air just a little too much, revealing her puffy labia and pink anus. Her perfect full breasts hang down and jiggle slightly from the motion as she pretends to smooth out the towel. She lies down again on her back and spreads her knees far apart with the heels together, as if her only motivation were to tan the insides of her thighs. She drapes a light cloth over her face, which serves a dual purpose: it keeps her face cool but also encourages the growing crowd of boys around her to stare unabashedly at her pussy, knowing that she won't be able to see them gawking lewdly while their rock hard cocks press into the sand longing for release. She drifts off into a brief nap and awakens to find that the boys have moved closer to her, some within five yards. A few are sitting crosslegged, naked and casually stroking their cocks, their eyes fixed on her pussy so intently they don't notice she is now awake and can see them by peeking through the light cloth. She pretends to continue sleeping and absent-mindedly touches her pussy as if to scratch an itch. Her fingers tug at her vulva, spreading apart her pussy lips to reveal the moist inner labia and her engorged clit before returning her arm to her side. Once spread her pussy lips stay slightly open, revealing the amazingly pink inner flesh. She drifts back to sleep, dreaming of using the Motorola Android phone as wave after wave of orgasm cascades over her body and she shudders in pure bliss.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She lies back on the nude beach , her tumescent clit glistening in the sun , labia minora almost moving every time there 's a strong breeze .
Her ever so slight blonde peach fuzz barely visible in the sun .
She coyly spreads her legs , appearing to be nonchalant but secretly enjoying the gazes of the horny boys who have gathered around her .
Her nipples are pointed skywards , partly from the cool breeze but mostly from the thought of every male for fifty yards staring at her young naked perfection .
She turns over and adjusts her towel on the sand , knees on the towel , elbows on the ground , and her heart-shaped ass thrust up in the air just a little too much , revealing her puffy labia and pink anus .
Her perfect full breasts hang down and jiggle slightly from the motion as she pretends to smooth out the towel .
She lies down again on her back and spreads her knees far apart with the heels together , as if her only motivation were to tan the insides of her thighs .
She drapes a light cloth over her face , which serves a dual purpose : it keeps her face cool but also encourages the growing crowd of boys around her to stare unabashedly at her pussy , knowing that she wo n't be able to see them gawking lewdly while their rock hard cocks press into the sand longing for release .
She drifts off into a brief nap and awakens to find that the boys have moved closer to her , some within five yards .
A few are sitting crosslegged , naked and casually stroking their cocks , their eyes fixed on her pussy so intently they do n't notice she is now awake and can see them by peeking through the light cloth .
She pretends to continue sleeping and absent-mindedly touches her pussy as if to scratch an itch .
Her fingers tug at her vulva , spreading apart her pussy lips to reveal the moist inner labia and her engorged clit before returning her arm to her side .
Once spread her pussy lips stay slightly open , revealing the amazingly pink inner flesh .
She drifts back to sleep , dreaming of using the Motorola Android phone as wave after wave of orgasm cascades over her body and she shudders in pure bliss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She lies back on the nude beach, her tumescent clit glistening in the sun, labia minora almost moving every time there's a strong breeze.
Her ever so slight blonde peach fuzz barely visible in the sun.
She coyly spreads her legs, appearing to be nonchalant but secretly enjoying the gazes of the horny boys who have gathered around her.
Her nipples are pointed skywards, partly from the cool breeze but mostly from the thought of every male for fifty yards staring at her young naked perfection.
She turns over and adjusts her towel on the sand, knees on the towel, elbows on the ground, and her heart-shaped ass thrust up in the air just a little too much, revealing her puffy labia and pink anus.
Her perfect full breasts hang down and jiggle slightly from the motion as she pretends to smooth out the towel.
She lies down again on her back and spreads her knees far apart with the heels together, as if her only motivation were to tan the insides of her thighs.
She drapes a light cloth over her face, which serves a dual purpose: it keeps her face cool but also encourages the growing crowd of boys around her to stare unabashedly at her pussy, knowing that she won't be able to see them gawking lewdly while their rock hard cocks press into the sand longing for release.
She drifts off into a brief nap and awakens to find that the boys have moved closer to her, some within five yards.
A few are sitting crosslegged, naked and casually stroking their cocks, their eyes fixed on her pussy so intently they don't notice she is now awake and can see them by peeking through the light cloth.
She pretends to continue sleeping and absent-mindedly touches her pussy as if to scratch an itch.
Her fingers tug at her vulva, spreading apart her pussy lips to reveal the moist inner labia and her engorged clit before returning her arm to her side.
Once spread her pussy lips stay slightly open, revealing the amazingly pink inner flesh.
She drifts back to sleep, dreaming of using the Motorola Android phone as wave after wave of orgasm cascades over her body and she shudders in pure bliss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609210</id>
	<title>That's no phone...</title>
	<author>vandoravp</author>
	<datestamp>1262250540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that's a tablet.

Seriously, do they think cargo pockets are the predominant pocket variety?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that 's a tablet .
Seriously , do they think cargo pockets are the predominant pocket variety ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that's a tablet.
Seriously, do they think cargo pockets are the predominant pocket variety?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610478</id>
	<title>Will large screens be robust against dog attacks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262258280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder about the downside of increasingly-larger displays.  I very much in favor of large displays (in both pixels and physical dimension) for fixed equipment, but expect larger screens in portable devices to have robustness problems.

My current phone is an aged HTC Dash with a mere 2.5 inch diagonal screen, but in a year and a half I've had to replace a cracked screen twice.  The first breakage happened in a fight with my dog over possession of a tennis ball; the second was probably a non-FAA-sanctioned interaction with an airline seatbelt, but I was asleep at the time.

The price of replacement screens on Ebay continues to drop, they work pretty well, and I'm getting experienced in doing the replacement, but it is an inconvenience.  I hope these large display phones have adequate attention to screen protection -- without being two inches thick and 24 ounces.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder about the downside of increasingly-larger displays .
I very much in favor of large displays ( in both pixels and physical dimension ) for fixed equipment , but expect larger screens in portable devices to have robustness problems .
My current phone is an aged HTC Dash with a mere 2.5 inch diagonal screen , but in a year and a half I 've had to replace a cracked screen twice .
The first breakage happened in a fight with my dog over possession of a tennis ball ; the second was probably a non-FAA-sanctioned interaction with an airline seatbelt , but I was asleep at the time .
The price of replacement screens on Ebay continues to drop , they work pretty well , and I 'm getting experienced in doing the replacement , but it is an inconvenience .
I hope these large display phones have adequate attention to screen protection -- without being two inches thick and 24 ounces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder about the downside of increasingly-larger displays.
I very much in favor of large displays (in both pixels and physical dimension) for fixed equipment, but expect larger screens in portable devices to have robustness problems.
My current phone is an aged HTC Dash with a mere 2.5 inch diagonal screen, but in a year and a half I've had to replace a cracked screen twice.
The first breakage happened in a fight with my dog over possession of a tennis ball; the second was probably a non-FAA-sanctioned interaction with an airline seatbelt, but I was asleep at the time.
The price of replacement screens on Ebay continues to drop, they work pretty well, and I'm getting experienced in doing the replacement, but it is an inconvenience.
I hope these large display phones have adequate attention to screen protection -- without being two inches thick and 24 ounces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609292</id>
	<title>Rumored joke soon follows</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1262251020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey babah, pop quiz. Is that a phone in my pocket or did I just get penis enlargement surgery?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey babah , pop quiz .
Is that a phone in my pocket or did I just get penis enlargement surgery ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey babah, pop quiz.
Is that a phone in my pocket or did I just get penis enlargement surgery?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611644</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1262269740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, anyone would think this was about a rumoured next generation Iphone device!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , anyone would think this was about a rumoured next generation Iphone device !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, anyone would think this was about a rumoured next generation Iphone device!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609214</id>
	<title>Just what we need</title>
	<author>gardel999</author>
	<datestamp>1262250600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just what we need... a larger brick to carry around.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just what we need... a larger brick to carry around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just what we need... a larger brick to carry around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610112</id>
	<title>Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262256000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The twin problems of huge display and interaction with said display have already been solved in the form of a projector + Johnny Chung Lee's graduate work.  We're just waiting for the business to catch up with the engineering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The twin problems of huge display and interaction with said display have already been solved in the form of a projector + Johnny Chung Lee 's graduate work .
We 're just waiting for the business to catch up with the engineering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The twin problems of huge display and interaction with said display have already been solved in the form of a projector + Johnny Chung Lee's graduate work.
We're just waiting for the business to catch up with the engineering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609062</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1262292840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard</p></div></blockquote><p>Motorola Cliq</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboardMotorola Cliq</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboardMotorola Cliq
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611956</id>
	<title>Android is starting to get as bad as WinMo?</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1262274300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WinMo never did run right on any of the dozens of devices I've tried it on.  It crashed, it memory leaked, it lost connection to its devices every couple minutes.  It has an oboard critical task sensor that would cause it to fail when the loss of the minimal utility the device offered would do the most damage. It lost data - lots of it. It sucked the life from endless batteries in record time and many thousands of minutes from my life that I would like back.  Platform diversity was the least of its problems. Please don't talk about somebody else's QA and WinMo in the same post.
</p><p>Windows Mobile killed the PDA.  The PDA was a great idea and many of them were quite cool - except that once you put WinMo on them they were universally craptacular.
</p><p>Oh, and while I'm here, yeah.  This thing looks cool and all, but that iSlate rumor is looking pretty sweet too.  It would be nice if the Goog came up with a webcam tablet thingy that used low power processors and wireless or 3G.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WinMo never did run right on any of the dozens of devices I 've tried it on .
It crashed , it memory leaked , it lost connection to its devices every couple minutes .
It has an oboard critical task sensor that would cause it to fail when the loss of the minimal utility the device offered would do the most damage .
It lost data - lots of it .
It sucked the life from endless batteries in record time and many thousands of minutes from my life that I would like back .
Platform diversity was the least of its problems .
Please do n't talk about somebody else 's QA and WinMo in the same post .
Windows Mobile killed the PDA .
The PDA was a great idea and many of them were quite cool - except that once you put WinMo on them they were universally craptacular .
Oh , and while I 'm here , yeah .
This thing looks cool and all , but that iSlate rumor is looking pretty sweet too .
It would be nice if the Goog came up with a webcam tablet thingy that used low power processors and wireless or 3G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WinMo never did run right on any of the dozens of devices I've tried it on.
It crashed, it memory leaked, it lost connection to its devices every couple minutes.
It has an oboard critical task sensor that would cause it to fail when the loss of the minimal utility the device offered would do the most damage.
It lost data - lots of it.
It sucked the life from endless batteries in record time and many thousands of minutes from my life that I would like back.
Platform diversity was the least of its problems.
Please don't talk about somebody else's QA and WinMo in the same post.
Windows Mobile killed the PDA.
The PDA was a great idea and many of them were quite cool - except that once you put WinMo on them they were universally craptacular.
Oh, and while I'm here, yeah.
This thing looks cool and all, but that iSlate rumor is looking pretty sweet too.
It would be nice if the Goog came up with a webcam tablet thingy that used low power processors and wireless or 3G.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611148</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1262264820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920*1080 without compromises. And so should you.</p></div><p>Please show me Photoshop running at 128x128 with no compromises.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920 * 1080 without compromises .
And so should you.Please show me Photoshop running at 128x128 with no compromises .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I can write one UI that scales from 128x128 to 1920*1080 without compromises.
And so should you.Please show me Photoshop running at 128x128 with no compromises.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30612632</id>
	<title>wasted effort me thinks</title>
	<author>Xanj</author>
	<datestamp>1262286120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>im more interested in the screens they are developing that transmits the screen directly to your retina get the feeling once that gets out on the market no will give a damn how big your phones screen is lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>im more interested in the screens they are developing that transmits the screen directly to your retina get the feeling once that gets out on the market no will give a damn how big your phones screen is lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>im more interested in the screens they are developing that transmits the screen directly to your retina get the feeling once that gets out on the market no will give a damn how big your phones screen is lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610364</id>
	<title>Fashion in cycles?</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1262257620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it's just about the right time
for the hefty, shoulder-carried piece of
tech to come back in fashion.  Anybody remember
the boom-box?</p><p>Actually, the first thing that popped
into my head was to imagine Sting singing
"I want my big screen phone".</p><p>Start workin' out guys.  Annoying, shoulder-carried
big screen portable TV with a phone in it.  Videophone
your GF on the subway.  Oh, this is Slashdot... nevermind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just about the right time for the hefty , shoulder-carried piece of tech to come back in fashion .
Anybody remember the boom-box ? Actually , the first thing that popped into my head was to imagine Sting singing " I want my big screen phone " .Start workin ' out guys .
Annoying , shoulder-carried big screen portable TV with a phone in it .
Videophone your GF on the subway .
Oh , this is Slashdot... nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just about the right time
for the hefty, shoulder-carried piece of
tech to come back in fashion.
Anybody remember
the boom-box?Actually, the first thing that popped
into my head was to imagine Sting singing
"I want my big screen phone".Start workin' out guys.
Annoying, shoulder-carried
big screen portable TV with a phone in it.
Videophone
your GF on the subway.
Oh, this is Slashdot... nevermind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958</id>
	<title>Wow, so yet another screen size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right.  Android is starting to get as bad as WinMo.  We ported our iPhone apps over to Android, but testing and QA is starting to rack up on the Android side of the house.</p><p>Love of hate Apple, their basic configuration is the same across the various iPhone/iPod Touch models.  Make it work well on one, it works well on all 30M or so devices out there.  Even Blackberry is basically 2 configs, classic and storm.</p><p>But Windows Mobile is a nightmare as just about every handset has a different UI and hardware spec.  And Google seems to be heading down the same road.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right .
Android is starting to get as bad as WinMo .
We ported our iPhone apps over to Android , but testing and QA is starting to rack up on the Android side of the house.Love of hate Apple , their basic configuration is the same across the various iPhone/iPod Touch models .
Make it work well on one , it works well on all 30M or so devices out there .
Even Blackberry is basically 2 configs , classic and storm.But Windows Mobile is a nightmare as just about every handset has a different UI and hardware spec .
And Google seems to be heading down the same road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That we will have to test against to make sure our apps work right.
Android is starting to get as bad as WinMo.
We ported our iPhone apps over to Android, but testing and QA is starting to rack up on the Android side of the house.Love of hate Apple, their basic configuration is the same across the various iPhone/iPod Touch models.
Make it work well on one, it works well on all 30M or so devices out there.
Even Blackberry is basically 2 configs, classic and storm.But Windows Mobile is a nightmare as just about every handset has a different UI and hardware spec.
And Google seems to be heading down the same road.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609278</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh.</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1262250900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, not only a girl posting on slashdot, but two funny and resque comments from her! Please don't wake me up...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , not only a girl posting on slashdot , but two funny and resque comments from her !
Please do n't wake me up.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, not only a girl posting on slashdot, but two funny and resque comments from her!
Please don't wake me up...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609150</id>
	<title>Re:Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1262250240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe my Curve is too small, but it's easier for me to type on my iphone in landscape mode than on my BB Curve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe my Curve is too small , but it 's easier for me to type on my iphone in landscape mode than on my BB Curve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe my Curve is too small, but it's easier for me to type on my iphone in landscape mode than on my BB Curve</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326</id>
	<title>WVGA+? WTF?</title>
	<author>JesseL</author>
	<datestamp>1262251260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore? I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600, after that the letters get meaningless and I've got to go <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vector\_Video\_Standards2.svg" title="wikipedia.org">. So why not just save the trouble and tell me the damned resolution from the beginning?</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore ?
I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600 , after that the letters get meaningless and I 've got to go .
So why not just save the trouble and tell me the damned resolution from the beginning ?
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody keep a mental table of what these obscure abbreviations actually mean anymore?
I can remember that VGA is 640x480 and SVGA is 800x600, after that the letters get meaningless and I've got to go .
So why not just save the trouble and tell me the damned resolution from the beginning?
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934</id>
	<title>Basic Requirement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262292120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard, I am sticking with my BlackBerry.</p><p>The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard , I am sticking with my BlackBerry.The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe , all shiny and pretty but missing that important item .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until someone shows me something with a keyboard, I am sticking with my BlackBerry.The G1 was a good first attempt but everything since has been an iPhone wannabe, all shiny and pretty but missing that important item.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30615188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30612106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1925207_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610206
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30612106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30610576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30611676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30613714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30615188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30609598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1925207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1925207.30608834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
