<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_31_1322251</id>
	<title>Sir Patrick Stewart</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262267880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>david.emery was one of a few folks who noted that Patrick Stewart can now be referred to as Sir Captain as he <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/30/patrick.stewart.knighthood/index.html">will be knighted by the Queen</a>.  This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>david.emery was one of a few folks who noted that Patrick Stewart can now be referred to as Sir Captain as he will be knighted by the Queen .
This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>david.emery was one of a few folks who noted that Patrick Stewart can now be referred to as Sir Captain as he will be knighted by the Queen.
This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605064</id>
	<title>elrous0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262274000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only one surprised to learn that <b>I'm</b> *not* gay? Seriously, I don't mean that as a troll, I honestly always assumed <b>I</b> was until I noticed I was masturbating to hetero porn!</p><p><div class="quote"></div></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that I 'm * not * gay ?
Seriously , I do n't mean that as a troll , I honestly always assumed I was until I noticed I was masturbating to hetero porn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that I'm *not* gay?
Seriously, I don't mean that as a troll, I honestly always assumed I was until I noticed I was masturbating to hetero porn!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608366</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262289180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>he's not <i>really</i> a captain</p></div></blockquote><p><strong>YES.</strong></p><p><strong>HE.</strong></p><p><strong>IS.</strong></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>he 's not really a captainYES.HE.IS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he's not really a captainYES.HE.IS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606402</id>
	<title>Peter Jackson, too...</title>
	<author>dr00g911</author>
	<datestamp>1262281380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Curious how Patrick Stewart got a mention here, but Peter Jackson slipped under the radar:</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/local/3199875/Peter-Jackson-says-knighthood-a-tribute-to-parents" title="stuff.co.nz">http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/local/3199875/Peter-Jackson-says-knighthood-a-tribute-to-parents</a> [stuff.co.nz]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Curious how Patrick Stewart got a mention here , but Peter Jackson slipped under the radar : http : //www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/local/3199875/Peter-Jackson-says-knighthood-a-tribute-to-parents [ stuff.co.nz ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Curious how Patrick Stewart got a mention here, but Peter Jackson slipped under the radar:http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/local/3199875/Peter-Jackson-says-knighthood-a-tribute-to-parents [stuff.co.nz]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605308</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1262275860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering stewart has been divorced twice and dated and married ladies hes worked with. I doubt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering stewart has been divorced twice and dated and married ladies hes worked with .
I doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering stewart has been divorced twice and dated and married ladies hes worked with.
I doubt it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30609672</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262253360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what luck !<br>I agree completely about Godot, but to see those two do anything would be a treat !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what luck ! I agree completely about Godot , but to see those two do anything would be a treat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what luck !I agree completely about Godot, but to see those two do anything would be a treat !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622438</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1230913320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who? Shatner? <br>
Having been born in Canada, he is indeed a British SUBJECT, providing he has still kept his Canadian citizenship.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who ?
Shatner ? Having been born in Canada , he is indeed a British SUBJECT , providing he has still kept his Canadian citizenship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who?
Shatner? 
Having been born in Canada, he is indeed a British SUBJECT, providing he has still kept his Canadian citizenship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607298</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262284620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he is polite and well spoken, which in America is sort of shorthand for gay, but it turns out there are exceptions....<br>lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he is polite and well spoken , which in America is sort of shorthand for gay , but it turns out there are exceptions....lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he is polite and well spoken, which in America is sort of shorthand for gay, but it turns out there are exceptions....lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608438</id>
	<title>Extras</title>
	<author>duppyconqueror</author>
	<datestamp>1262289660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>His role was hi-larious: "I've seen everything, I've seen it all." <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg\_cwI1Xj4M" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg\_cwI1Xj4M</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>His role was hi-larious : " I 've seen everything , I 've seen it all .
" http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Fg \ _cwI1Xj4M [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His role was hi-larious: "I've seen everything, I've seen it all.
" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg\_cwI1Xj4M [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30621982</id>
	<title>Re:Great actor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1230909240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding me?  I thought it was the worst version of A Christmas Carol ever.  It was like Patrick Stewart was still playing in role for Picard FFS.  Maybe it's just that I've seen the version with Albert Finney and Alec Guinness too many times but I really thought the Patrick Stewart version was bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding me ?
I thought it was the worst version of A Christmas Carol ever .
It was like Patrick Stewart was still playing in role for Picard FFS .
Maybe it 's just that I 've seen the version with Albert Finney and Alec Guinness too many times but I really thought the Patrick Stewart version was bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding me?
I thought it was the worst version of A Christmas Carol ever.
It was like Patrick Stewart was still playing in role for Picard FFS.
Maybe it's just that I've seen the version with Albert Finney and Alec Guinness too many times but I really thought the Patrick Stewart version was bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607740</id>
	<title>Re:Vacuous Star Trek? Not Stewart.</title>
	<author>rumkee</author>
	<datestamp>1262286300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>flute episode <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Inner\_Light\_(Star\_Trek:\_The\_Next\_Generation)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">The Inner Light</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>flute episode The Inner Light [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>flute episode The Inner Light [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504</id>
	<title>Vacuous Star Trek?  Not Stewart.</title>
	<author>OpenGLFan</author>
	<datestamp>1262276820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this will sound like hopeless fanboyism, but Stewart was no slouch in ST:TNG, and he didn't just phone it in.  I can't think of many other actors who could have pulled off "There Are Four Lights", or the episode where he lived an entire life in another planet and learned to play the flute (can't remember the name.)  After a few seasons, the writers realized just how good "that Shakespeare guy" was, and they wrote some demanding episodes for Stewart.</p><p>Watch the first season, just watching Picard: it's a textbook example of how a talented actor can take a largely untried cast and some occasionally shaky writing and forge a solid character.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this will sound like hopeless fanboyism , but Stewart was no slouch in ST : TNG , and he did n't just phone it in .
I ca n't think of many other actors who could have pulled off " There Are Four Lights " , or the episode where he lived an entire life in another planet and learned to play the flute ( ca n't remember the name .
) After a few seasons , the writers realized just how good " that Shakespeare guy " was , and they wrote some demanding episodes for Stewart.Watch the first season , just watching Picard : it 's a textbook example of how a talented actor can take a largely untried cast and some occasionally shaky writing and forge a solid character .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this will sound like hopeless fanboyism, but Stewart was no slouch in ST:TNG, and he didn't just phone it in.
I can't think of many other actors who could have pulled off "There Are Four Lights", or the episode where he lived an entire life in another planet and learned to play the flute (can't remember the name.
)  After a few seasons, the writers realized just how good "that Shakespeare guy" was, and they wrote some demanding episodes for Stewart.Watch the first season, just watching Picard: it's a textbook example of how a talented actor can take a largely untried cast and some occasionally shaky writing and forge a solid character.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606804</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1262282760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sir Billy of Shat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sir Billy of Shat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sir Billy of Shat!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606220</id>
	<title>Meaningless without money</title>
	<author>microbox</author>
	<datestamp>1262280240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Actually, a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them. It's not just silly tradition.</i> <br>
<br>
Life would be so meaningless without money, eh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them .
It 's not just silly tradition .
Life would be so meaningless without money , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them.
It's not just silly tradition.
Life would be so meaningless without money, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604742</id>
	<title>I....</title>
	<author>buanzo</author>
	<datestamp>1262271900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... welcome our new Sir Borg!

We love you patrick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... welcome our new Sir Borg !
We love you patrick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... welcome our new Sir Borg!
We love you patrick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</id>
	<title>X-men</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262272620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work.  Much more likely to be related to his work on the stage.  I recently saw him in Waiting for Godot (alongside Sir Ian McKellen) and he was magnificent even though I've not got much time for that particular play.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work .
Much more likely to be related to his work on the stage .
I recently saw him in Waiting for Godot ( alongside Sir Ian McKellen ) and he was magnificent even though I 've not got much time for that particular play .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work.
Much more likely to be related to his work on the stage.
I recently saw him in Waiting for Godot (alongside Sir Ian McKellen) and he was magnificent even though I've not got much time for that particular play.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605272</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1262275560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"...I've not got much time for that particular play."</i></p><p><i><i>Wait around until the end.. It's quite a surprise.</i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...I 've not got much time for that particular play .
" Wait around until the end.. It 's quite a surprise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...I've not got much time for that particular play.
"Wait around until the end.. It's quite a surprise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605086</id>
	<title>Lifeforce!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262274180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Awwright!  He finally gets recognition for that ever-lasting impression he made in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089489/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Lifeforce</a> [imdb.com]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Awwright !
He finally gets recognition for that ever-lasting impression he made in Lifeforce [ imdb.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awwright!
He finally gets recognition for that ever-lasting impression he made in Lifeforce [imdb.com]!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608318</id>
	<title>X-Men</title>
	<author>seeker\_1us</author>
	<datestamp>1262288880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You mean they won't be all about Wolverine anymore?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies .
You mean they wo n't be all about Wolverine anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies.
You mean they won't be all about Wolverine anymore?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30694214</id>
	<title>Brits keep saying this.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1231429500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I have never met anybody that comes to Britain specifically to see the Queen palaces only.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I have never met anybody that comes to Britain specifically to see the Queen palaces only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I have never met anybody that comes to Britain specifically to see the Queen palaces only.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606514</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1262281860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In English We spell it with a 'K', so "I now dub thee Knight" is correct (but We don't pronounce the "K" -- go figure).</p></div><p>Who are you to say what he was dubbed? Maybe he was dubbed "Night", it may be a new designation or rank. Obviously someone may be also dubbed "Day", but there also may be "Dawn" and "Dusk", as in: "His Grace, the Dawn of Westminster".<br> <br>
I think this is a positive turn of events. Knights are getting old, and there are too many of them around. It's also no fun "dubbing" if the only thing you're ever realistically going to dub someone is "Knight".<br>
I congratulate Sir Patrick Stewart, Night!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In English We spell it with a 'K ' , so " I now dub thee Knight " is correct ( but We do n't pronounce the " K " -- go figure ) .Who are you to say what he was dubbed ?
Maybe he was dubbed " Night " , it may be a new designation or rank .
Obviously someone may be also dubbed " Day " , but there also may be " Dawn " and " Dusk " , as in : " His Grace , the Dawn of Westminster " .
I think this is a positive turn of events .
Knights are getting old , and there are too many of them around .
It 's also no fun " dubbing " if the only thing you 're ever realistically going to dub someone is " Knight " .
I congratulate Sir Patrick Stewart , Night !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In English We spell it with a 'K', so "I now dub thee Knight" is correct (but We don't pronounce the "K" -- go figure).Who are you to say what he was dubbed?
Maybe he was dubbed "Night", it may be a new designation or rank.
Obviously someone may be also dubbed "Day", but there also may be "Dawn" and "Dusk", as in: "His Grace, the Dawn of Westminster".
I think this is a positive turn of events.
Knights are getting old, and there are too many of them around.
It's also no fun "dubbing" if the only thing you're ever realistically going to dub someone is "Knight".
I congratulate Sir Patrick Stewart, Night!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608846</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262291820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The silent "K" in knight and knee is a remnant from a time when they were pronounced.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The silent " K " in knight and knee is a remnant from a time when they were pronounced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The silent "K" in knight and knee is a remnant from a time when they were pronounced.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605708</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>oracleofbargth</author>
	<datestamp>1262277960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until about 50 years ago, it would have made him eligible to be elected to the House of Lords in the British Parliament, but now that is reserved only for most hereditary titles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until about 50 years ago , it would have made him eligible to be elected to the House of Lords in the British Parliament , but now that is reserved only for most hereditary titles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until about 50 years ago, it would have made him eligible to be elected to the House of Lords in the British Parliament, but now that is reserved only for most hereditary titles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607228</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1262284320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although most Americans balk at it, RIPA isn't particularly out of character for the British government.  The UK government has done a decent job of upholding civil liberties while appeasing the public's demand for a nanny state.</p><p>The Queen's veto power is reserved for <i>profoundly insane</i> pieces of legislation (ie. invading Poland and initiating a genocide).  The Queen uses her power sparingly, theoretically making the public far more likely to support her, should she ever choose to invoke this privilege.  It is literally a last resort.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although most Americans balk at it , RIPA is n't particularly out of character for the British government .
The UK government has done a decent job of upholding civil liberties while appeasing the public 's demand for a nanny state.The Queen 's veto power is reserved for profoundly insane pieces of legislation ( ie .
invading Poland and initiating a genocide ) .
The Queen uses her power sparingly , theoretically making the public far more likely to support her , should she ever choose to invoke this privilege .
It is literally a last resort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although most Americans balk at it, RIPA isn't particularly out of character for the British government.
The UK government has done a decent job of upholding civil liberties while appeasing the public's demand for a nanny state.The Queen's veto power is reserved for profoundly insane pieces of legislation (ie.
invading Poland and initiating a genocide).
The Queen uses her power sparingly, theoretically making the public far more likely to support her, should she ever choose to invoke this privilege.
It is literally a last resort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30609240</id>
	<title>Excalibur!</title>
	<author>Slur</author>
	<datestamp>1262250660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will this be like the knight's competition scene where the armored not-yet-Sir Patrick gets a slap in the face with a juniper branch before trying to pull the sword from the stone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this be like the knight 's competition scene where the armored not-yet-Sir Patrick gets a slap in the face with a juniper branch before trying to pull the sword from the stone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this be like the knight's competition scene where the armored not-yet-Sir Patrick gets a slap in the face with a juniper branch before trying to pull the sword from the stone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605622</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1262277360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he's *not* gay?</i></p><p>Probably not, but it's OK if you are.  Stewart was named the "sexiest man alive" at one point, so wishful thinking can be forgiven.</p><p>He did play a gay man in a bad movie once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he 's * not * gay ? Probably not , but it 's OK if you are .
Stewart was named the " sexiest man alive " at one point , so wishful thinking can be forgiven.He did play a gay man in a bad movie once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he's *not* gay?Probably not, but it's OK if you are.
Stewart was named the "sexiest man alive" at one point, so wishful thinking can be forgiven.He did play a gay man in a bad movie once.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604994</id>
	<title>So</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does that mean he can now compete in jousting tournaments?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does that mean he can now compete in jousting tournaments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does that mean he can now compete in jousting tournaments?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606906</id>
	<title>In Sir Patrick's honour, enjoy these ST treats!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262283120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm happy to hear Patrick Stewart will be knighted, he is a truly amazing actor! In his honour, enjoy these ST treats, it' ST, but not as we know it:</p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iGq54CfG-U" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Outtakes Volume II by Day Job Orchestra</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFXZkxrBVgU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG and TOS - Outtakes Volume I by Day Job Orchestra (Warning: also appearing: Khaaaan!)</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DObOrURrVs" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Captain Picard's favourite TV show</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6YbUB0\_JPA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG cast swearing</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPYGFNIv\_Ak" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Data Krupa by Day Job Orchestra</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs33sTLGOIg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Acid by Day Job Orchestra</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdaiVRibVHI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Non trequitur by Day Job Orchestra</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWq56gcbOi8" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Soup kitchen by Day Job Orchestra</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReOw\_2f4lpY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - The sexed generation</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs33sTLGOIg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Patrick Stewart's reaction to the new Star Trek movie</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtvlr-ReaBs" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Star Trek TNG - Jonathan Frakes' reaction to Patrick Stewart being knighted</a> [youtube.com] </p><p>Sir Patrick, thank you for so many precious moments, we're looking forward to many more, may you live long and prosper!</p><p>*humming* <i>We're gonna party like... it's your birthday...</i></p><p><i>We're gonna sip Bacardi like... it's your birthday...</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm happy to hear Patrick Stewart will be knighted , he is a truly amazing actor !
In his honour , enjoy these ST treats , it ' ST , but not as we know it : Star Trek TNG - Outtakes Volume II by Day Job Orchestra [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG and TOS - Outtakes Volume I by Day Job Orchestra ( Warning : also appearing : Khaaaan !
) [ youtube.com ] Captain Picard 's favourite TV show [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG cast swearing [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - Data Krupa by Day Job Orchestra [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - Acid by Day Job Orchestra [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - Non trequitur by Day Job Orchestra [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - Soup kitchen by Day Job Orchestra [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - The sexed generation [ youtube.com ] Patrick Stewart 's reaction to the new Star Trek movie [ youtube.com ] Star Trek TNG - Jonathan Frakes ' reaction to Patrick Stewart being knighted [ youtube.com ] Sir Patrick , thank you for so many precious moments , we 're looking forward to many more , may you live long and prosper !
* humming * We 're gon na party like... it 's your birthday...We 're gon na sip Bacardi like... it 's your birthday.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm happy to hear Patrick Stewart will be knighted, he is a truly amazing actor!
In his honour, enjoy these ST treats, it' ST, but not as we know it: Star Trek TNG - Outtakes Volume II by Day Job Orchestra [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG and TOS - Outtakes Volume I by Day Job Orchestra (Warning: also appearing: Khaaaan!
) [youtube.com]  Captain Picard's favourite TV show [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG cast swearing [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - Data Krupa by Day Job Orchestra [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - Acid by Day Job Orchestra [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - Non trequitur by Day Job Orchestra [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - Soup kitchen by Day Job Orchestra [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - The sexed generation [youtube.com]  Patrick Stewart's reaction to the new Star Trek movie [youtube.com]  Star Trek TNG - Jonathan Frakes' reaction to Patrick Stewart being knighted [youtube.com] Sir Patrick, thank you for so many precious moments, we're looking forward to many more, may you live long and prosper!
*humming* We're gonna party like... it's your birthday...We're gonna sip Bacardi like... it's your birthday...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605412</id>
	<title>Well Deserved</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1262276220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always enjoyed it when he ran around to that funny music and Benny Hill slapped him on his bald head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always enjoyed it when he ran around to that funny music and Benny Hill slapped him on his bald head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always enjoyed it when he ran around to that funny music and Benny Hill slapped him on his bald head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622464</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1230913620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext> <p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...even though I've not got much time for that particular play</p> </div><p>

That's OK,  Vladimir or Estrogen can lend you some of theirs...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...even though I 've not got much time for that particular play That 's OK , Vladimir or Estrogen can lend you some of theirs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  ...even though I've not got much time for that particular play 

That's OK,  Vladimir or Estrogen can lend you some of theirs...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1262273820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And to be further pedantic, he's not <i>really</i> a captain, so "Captain Sir" isn't actually appropriate.  Appropriate forms of address would also include "Sir Patrick", and "Sir Patrick Stewart", but not "Sir Stewart".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And to be further pedantic , he 's not really a captain , so " Captain Sir " is n't actually appropriate .
Appropriate forms of address would also include " Sir Patrick " , and " Sir Patrick Stewart " , but not " Sir Stewart " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And to be further pedantic, he's not really a captain, so "Captain Sir" isn't actually appropriate.
Appropriate forms of address would also include "Sir Patrick", and "Sir Patrick Stewart", but not "Sir Stewart".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605426</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>Rolgar</author>
	<datestamp>1262276340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the father of 2, I was going to guess it was for Bambi II.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>What British born international celebrity of 20 years doesn't eventually get knighted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the father of 2 , I was going to guess it was for Bambi II .
; ) What British born international celebrity of 20 years does n't eventually get knighted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the father of 2, I was going to guess it was for Bambi II.
;)What British born international celebrity of 20 years doesn't eventually get knighted?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608336</id>
	<title>Re:It would be Captain Sir Jean-Luc</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1262289000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except Jean-Luc Picard is (a) ficticious and, worse still (b) <i>French</i> so he wouldn't be allowed to use the title anyway...
</p><p>(Obviously, France has annexed Yorkshire by the time of Star Trek...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except Jean-Luc Picard is ( a ) ficticious and , worse still ( b ) French so he would n't be allowed to use the title anyway.. . ( Obviously , France has annexed Yorkshire by the time of Star Trek... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except Jean-Luc Picard is (a) ficticious and, worse still (b) French so he wouldn't be allowed to use the title anyway...
(Obviously, France has annexed Yorkshire by the time of Star Trek...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604836</id>
	<title>More pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>varn\_ix</author>
	<datestamp>1262272620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...technically, OBE does not admit an individual into knighthood automatically, only KBE and GBE do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...technically , OBE does not admit an individual into knighthood automatically , only KBE and GBE do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...technically, OBE does not admit an individual into knighthood automatically, only KBE and GBE do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604948</id>
	<title>Old news is old</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>david.emery is definitely NOT one of the few who noticed. It was already published yesterday in the biggest swedish tabloid "Aftonbladet". Old news is old. However congrats to Patrick Stewart.    He is one of my favourite actors, and probably one the best actors at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>david.emery is definitely NOT one of the few who noticed .
It was already published yesterday in the biggest swedish tabloid " Aftonbladet " .
Old news is old .
However congrats to Patrick Stewart .
He is one of my favourite actors , and probably one the best actors at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>david.emery is definitely NOT one of the few who noticed.
It was already published yesterday in the biggest swedish tabloid "Aftonbladet".
Old news is old.
However congrats to Patrick Stewart.
He is one of my favourite actors, and probably one the best actors at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604984</id>
	<title>As a 49 year old feminist grandmother</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was surprised when I read an article about Stewart saying that space exploration isn't a good idea right now because of starving children in Africa. I mean seriously, judging by that logic Albert bloody Einstein should've beaten his work desk into a primitive farming tool, given up physics and dedicated his life to working a rice paddy to help feed some orphans. But that's just my opinion as a 49 year old feminist grandmother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was surprised when I read an article about Stewart saying that space exploration is n't a good idea right now because of starving children in Africa .
I mean seriously , judging by that logic Albert bloody Einstein should 've beaten his work desk into a primitive farming tool , given up physics and dedicated his life to working a rice paddy to help feed some orphans .
But that 's just my opinion as a 49 year old feminist grandmother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was surprised when I read an article about Stewart saying that space exploration isn't a good idea right now because of starving children in Africa.
I mean seriously, judging by that logic Albert bloody Einstein should've beaten his work desk into a primitive farming tool, given up physics and dedicated his life to working a rice paddy to help feed some orphans.
But that's just my opinion as a 49 year old feminist grandmother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608032</id>
	<title>Re:Great actor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262287500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing else</i></p><p>I don't usually aspire to represent the voice of the thousands of us geeks here on Slashdot. That said, please indulge me the liberty of speaking for all of us when I tell you to leave this website and never come back.</p><p>You, sir, are not a geek, but some vile impostor pretending to be a geek. You must surrender your geek-card immediately.</p><p>Who turned down the standards for getting a geek-card anyway??? I thought you had to have seen at least all of TOS, and at least 50\% of TNG before you could even sign up for geek membership...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing elseI do n't usually aspire to represent the voice of the thousands of us geeks here on Slashdot .
That said , please indulge me the liberty of speaking for all of us when I tell you to leave this website and never come back.You , sir , are not a geek , but some vile impostor pretending to be a geek .
You must surrender your geek-card immediately.Who turned down the standards for getting a geek-card anyway ? ? ?
I thought you had to have seen at least all of TOS , and at least 50 \ % of TNG before you could even sign up for geek membership.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing elseI don't usually aspire to represent the voice of the thousands of us geeks here on Slashdot.
That said, please indulge me the liberty of speaking for all of us when I tell you to leave this website and never come back.You, sir, are not a geek, but some vile impostor pretending to be a geek.
You must surrender your geek-card immediately.Who turned down the standards for getting a geek-card anyway???
I thought you had to have seen at least all of TOS, and at least 50\% of TNG before you could even sign up for geek membership...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605382</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>MORB</author>
	<datestamp>1262276100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope. I think he got knighted for his outstanding rendition of the facepalm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
I think he got knighted for his outstanding rendition of the facepalm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
I think he got knighted for his outstanding rendition of the facepalm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605060</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262274000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>And certainly not "Idiot" or "You captain!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>And certainly not " Idiot " or " You captain !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And certainly not "Idiot" or "You captain!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606044</id>
	<title>She should adopt him and make him KING!</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1262279460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Charles and his kids are not very impressive material.  Why not bring some new blood into the family, Liz?  The Windsors are all about acting like monarchy, anyway!  Bring in a real actor!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Charles and his kids are not very impressive material .
Why not bring some new blood into the family , Liz ?
The Windsors are all about acting like monarchy , anyway !
Bring in a real actor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charles and his kids are not very impressive material.
Why not bring some new blood into the family, Liz?
The Windsors are all about acting like monarchy, anyway!
Bring in a real actor!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30614840</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1230833880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We used to. In Aberdeenshire, anyone speaking a really strong Doric will still pronounce it exactly as written (and any other kword, like knife).</htmltext>
<tokenext>We used to .
In Aberdeenshire , anyone speaking a really strong Doric will still pronounce it exactly as written ( and any other kword , like knife ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We used to.
In Aberdeenshire, anyone speaking a really strong Doric will still pronounce it exactly as written (and any other kword, like knife).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606512</id>
	<title>If that was the case</title>
	<author>maroberts</author>
	<datestamp>1262281860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mathilda May would be a countess by now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mathilda May would be a countess by now : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mathilda May would be a countess by now :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610594</id>
	<title>I'm getting old.</title>
	<author>jocknerd</author>
	<datestamp>1262259480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I saw this about Patrick Stewart, I didn't even think about him in X-Men. I still think of him as Captn. Picard in Star Trek:TNG. And Scrooge to a lesser extent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw this about Patrick Stewart , I did n't even think about him in X-Men .
I still think of him as Captn .
Picard in Star Trek : TNG .
And Scrooge to a lesser extent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw this about Patrick Stewart, I didn't even think about him in X-Men.
I still think of him as Captn.
Picard in Star Trek:TNG.
And Scrooge to a lesser extent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605008</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sleeve of wizard</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sleeve of wizard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sleeve of wizard</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604772</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262272140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>with the freezing rain and snow and cold in the UK these days, it might be soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with the freezing rain and snow and cold in the UK these days , it might be soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with the freezing rain and snow and cold in the UK these days, it might be soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610406</id>
	<title>I beg to differ</title>
	<author>Eightbitgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1262257800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yes he is a Captain. The finest captain</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes he is a Captain .
The finest captain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes he is a Captain.
The finest captain</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610108</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262255880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forbids?  Don't tell all those Czars!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forbids ?
Do n't tell all those Czars !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forbids?
Don't tell all those Czars!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605596</id>
	<title>Sir Picard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262277240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Captain Picard knighted by Q</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Captain Picard knighted by Q</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Captain Picard knighted by Q</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604758</id>
	<title>I think I've seen this episode before!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I've just been paid a visit by Q. She wants to do something nice for me."


Qpid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've just been paid a visit by Q. She wants to do something nice for me .
" Qpid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've just been paid a visit by Q. She wants to do something nice for me.
"


Qpid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610564</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1262259120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I believe the correct form is "Sir bald-headed British Shakespearian actor playing a French Captain".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I believe the correct form is " Sir bald-headed British Shakespearian actor playing a French Captain " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I believe the correct form is "Sir bald-headed British Shakespearian actor playing a French Captain".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</id>
	<title>Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262272860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he's *not* gay? Seriously, I don't mean that as a troll, I honestly always assumed he was until I read about his wife.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he 's * not * gay ?
Seriously , I do n't mean that as a troll , I honestly always assumed he was until I read about his wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one surprised to learn that he's *not* gay?
Seriously, I don't mean that as a troll, I honestly always assumed he was until I read about his wife.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</id>
	<title>Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The correct order to put the two in would be "Captain Sir", not "Sir Captain"</htmltext>
<tokenext>The correct order to put the two in would be " Captain Sir " , not " Sir Captain "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The correct order to put the two in would be "Captain Sir", not "Sir Captain"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607736</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262286300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blasphemy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blasphemy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blasphemy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604748</id>
	<title>The hell with the Queen</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1262271960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She is a secret Italian agent trying to emasculate America and mock our GOD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She is a secret Italian agent trying to emasculate America and mock our GOD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She is a secret Italian agent trying to emasculate America and mock our GOD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606500</id>
	<title>you have failed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262281800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>failed meme is failed.  you failed is failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>failed meme is failed .
you failed is failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>failed meme is failed.
you failed is failed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604806</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262272440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure what your point is, given that the queen just rubber stamps the honours list; it's prepared by the Prime Minister.  As to the point of the monarch, I thought she was there to veto insane government legislation, but when she signed RIPA I realised that she was just a waste of taxpayers' money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what your point is , given that the queen just rubber stamps the honours list ; it 's prepared by the Prime Minister .
As to the point of the monarch , I thought she was there to veto insane government legislation , but when she signed RIPA I realised that she was just a waste of taxpayers ' money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what your point is, given that the queen just rubber stamps the honours list; it's prepared by the Prime Minister.
As to the point of the monarch, I thought she was there to veto insane government legislation, but when she signed RIPA I realised that she was just a waste of taxpayers' money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606696</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1262282460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, on this ship, you are to refer to me as "Idiot", not "You Captain!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , on this ship , you are to refer to me as " Idiot " , not " You Captain !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, on this ship, you are to refer to me as "Idiot", not "You Captain!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610020</id>
	<title>No respect from Riker</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1262255340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And to be further pedantic, he's not really a captain, so "Captain Sir" isn't actually appropriate. Appropriate forms of address would also include "Sir Patrick", and "Sir Patrick Stewart", but not "Sir Stewart".</i></p><p>Riker still calls him "that old fucker that won't give up the chair"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And to be further pedantic , he 's not really a captain , so " Captain Sir " is n't actually appropriate .
Appropriate forms of address would also include " Sir Patrick " , and " Sir Patrick Stewart " , but not " Sir Stewart " .Riker still calls him " that old fucker that wo n't give up the chair "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And to be further pedantic, he's not really a captain, so "Captain Sir" isn't actually appropriate.
Appropriate forms of address would also include "Sir Patrick", and "Sir Patrick Stewart", but not "Sir Stewart".Riker still calls him "that old fucker that won't give up the chair"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605478</id>
	<title>In related news</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1262276640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/31/jackson\_knighted/" title="theregister.co.uk">Peter Jackson was knighted too</a> [theregister.co.uk] this days, in Middle Eart... i mean, New Zealand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Peter Jackson was knighted too [ theregister.co.uk ] this days , in Middle Eart... i mean , New Zealand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peter Jackson was knighted too [theregister.co.uk] this days, in Middle Eart... i mean, New Zealand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604954</id>
	<title>er what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/. says Sir Captain</p><p>and the article says Sir Patrick</p><p>but wouldn't it go by his last name?</p><p>Sir Stewart?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
says Sir Captainand the article says Sir Patrickbut would n't it go by his last name ? Sir Stewart ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
says Sir Captainand the article says Sir Patrickbut wouldn't it go by his last name?Sir Stewart?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604968</id>
	<title>Re:Pedantic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262273520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Moot point for this.  They are knighting Picard, so I don't think you use "Sir" with the character.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moot point for this .
They are knighting Picard , so I do n't think you use " Sir " with the character .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moot point for this.
They are knighting Picard, so I don't think you use "Sir" with the character.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608174</id>
	<title>Re:Vacuous Star Trek? Not Stewart.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262288160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inner Light.  That was one of my favorite episodes of any Trek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inner Light .
That was one of my favorite episodes of any Trek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inner Light.
That was one of my favorite episodes of any Trek.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607516</id>
	<title>Re:Great actor</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1262285400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who enjoys Christmas Carols? The only Christmas Carol I could enjoy would be a hooker with an extra-dirty fantasy. ^^</p><p>Oh, and now a quote from the best Christmas movie ever:</p><p>&ldquo;Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa!&rdquo; XD</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who enjoys Christmas Carols ?
The only Christmas Carol I could enjoy would be a hooker with an extra-dirty fantasy .
^ ^ Oh , and now a quote from the best Christmas movie ever :    Fuck me Santa !
Fuck me Santa !
Fuck me Santa !
Fuck me Santa !    XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who enjoys Christmas Carols?
The only Christmas Carol I could enjoy would be a hooker with an extra-dirty fantasy.
^^Oh, and now a quote from the best Christmas movie ever:“Fuck me Santa!
Fuck me Santa!
Fuck me Santa!
Fuck me Santa!” XD
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608052</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>Don\_dumb</author>
	<datestamp>1262287560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I also saw Waiting For Godot earlier this year.<br>I can safely say that I will never see a cast as great as that in my life. They pushed Simon Callow (no small actor) to third billing and this was outside of London.<br>It was a joy to behold, McKellen and Stewart had a brilliant chemistry. If Ian deserves a knighthood for simply acting (I know he had done a lot of gays rights campaigning to add to that) then Patrick is as deserving an actor.<br> <br>Although I must admit that his work in ST:TNG should count towards the honour of his career. He was probably the first actor to really show that it didn't have to be costume drama for masterful acting in popular television, and this lead to good actors getting leading roles in prime-time shows. As a sibling poster OpenGLFan points out, it was clear that at times the writers and producers were simply writing episodes to show his skill off.<br>For selling the RSC and British acting to the world he deserves his Knighthood.<br> <br>PS - if in the future he does an Ibsen play, see it. I also saw him magnificently lead in The Master Builder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also saw Waiting For Godot earlier this year.I can safely say that I will never see a cast as great as that in my life .
They pushed Simon Callow ( no small actor ) to third billing and this was outside of London.It was a joy to behold , McKellen and Stewart had a brilliant chemistry .
If Ian deserves a knighthood for simply acting ( I know he had done a lot of gays rights campaigning to add to that ) then Patrick is as deserving an actor .
Although I must admit that his work in ST : TNG should count towards the honour of his career .
He was probably the first actor to really show that it did n't have to be costume drama for masterful acting in popular television , and this lead to good actors getting leading roles in prime-time shows .
As a sibling poster OpenGLFan points out , it was clear that at times the writers and producers were simply writing episodes to show his skill off.For selling the RSC and British acting to the world he deserves his Knighthood .
PS - if in the future he does an Ibsen play , see it .
I also saw him magnificently lead in The Master Builder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also saw Waiting For Godot earlier this year.I can safely say that I will never see a cast as great as that in my life.
They pushed Simon Callow (no small actor) to third billing and this was outside of London.It was a joy to behold, McKellen and Stewart had a brilliant chemistry.
If Ian deserves a knighthood for simply acting (I know he had done a lot of gays rights campaigning to add to that) then Patrick is as deserving an actor.
Although I must admit that his work in ST:TNG should count towards the honour of his career.
He was probably the first actor to really show that it didn't have to be costume drama for masterful acting in popular television, and this lead to good actors getting leading roles in prime-time shows.
As a sibling poster OpenGLFan points out, it was clear that at times the writers and producers were simply writing episodes to show his skill off.For selling the RSC and British acting to the world he deserves his Knighthood.
PS - if in the future he does an Ibsen play, see it.
I also saw him magnificently lead in The Master Builder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607564</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1262285580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Foreigners can receive a title from the Queen but  they can't use the the title Sir or they hold less weight. I can't remember the specifics but they can be award a title.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Foreigners can receive a title from the Queen but they ca n't use the the title Sir or they hold less weight .
I ca n't remember the specifics but they can be award a title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Foreigners can receive a title from the Queen but  they can't use the the title Sir or they hold less weight.
I can't remember the specifics but they can be award a title.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608524</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>iamthelaw</author>
	<datestamp>1262290080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopeless to explain jokes, I think, but all the poster meant is that he starred in the movies alongside Sir Ian McKellen -- the balance alluded to is that both the good guy and the bad guy would be knights rather than just the one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopeless to explain jokes , I think , but all the poster meant is that he starred in the movies alongside Sir Ian McKellen -- the balance alluded to is that both the good guy and the bad guy would be knights rather than just the one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopeless to explain jokes, I think, but all the poster meant is that he starred in the movies alongside Sir Ian McKellen -- the balance alluded to is that both the good guy and the bad guy would be knights rather than just the one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605764</id>
	<title>Stage acting</title>
	<author>sxmjmae</author>
	<datestamp>1262278260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He is a spectacular stage actor.  </p><p>I had seen him long ago and remember how good his was then. </p><p>His talent was opening door for him long before Star Trek.  But TV series launched him as a very recognizable actor.   I am sure he would have been noticed with out Star Trek but it did help is Career and maybe got him knight a few years early.  </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He is a spectacular stage actor .
I had seen him long ago and remember how good his was then .
His talent was opening door for him long before Star Trek .
But TV series launched him as a very recognizable actor .
I am sure he would have been noticed with out Star Trek but it did help is Career and maybe got him knight a few years early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is a spectacular stage actor.
I had seen him long ago and remember how good his was then.
His talent was opening door for him long before Star Trek.
But TV series launched him as a very recognizable actor.
I am sure he would have been noticed with out Star Trek but it did help is Career and maybe got him knight a few years early.  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30618710</id>
	<title>Re:X-men</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1230823380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work.</p></div></blockquote><p>Being a world-famous British subject, while not an utter embarrassment, is all that is required for Knighthood today.  See: Sir Elton John</p><p>I seriously doubt his theatre experience would have merited a knighthood, without his world-wide fame brought about by Star Trek: TNG.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work.Being a world-famous British subject , while not an utter embarrassment , is all that is required for Knighthood today .
See : Sir Elton JohnI seriously doubt his theatre experience would have merited a knighthood , without his world-wide fame brought about by Star Trek : TNG .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously doubt the knighthood was anything to do with the vacuous X-men/Trek work.Being a world-famous British subject, while not an utter embarrassment, is all that is required for Knighthood today.
See: Sir Elton JohnI seriously doubt his theatre experience would have merited a knighthood, without his world-wide fame brought about by Star Trek: TNG.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When's Shatner getting knighted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When 's Shatner getting knighted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When's Shatner getting knighted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</id>
	<title>Great actor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262274780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a Star Trek fan (I've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing else), but I really like Stewart's works. For example I enjoyed his "Christmas Carol" much more than any other Christmas Carol (and there are several out there) as well as Henry II in The Lion in Winter. Actually I have to watch that movie again now that I think about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a Star Trek fan ( I 've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing else ) , but I really like Stewart 's works .
For example I enjoyed his " Christmas Carol " much more than any other Christmas Carol ( and there are several out there ) as well as Henry II in The Lion in Winter .
Actually I have to watch that movie again now that I think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a Star Trek fan (I've only watched a few episodes of the original and nothing else), but I really like Stewart's works.
For example I enjoyed his "Christmas Carol" much more than any other Christmas Carol (and there are several out there) as well as Henry II in The Lion in Winter.
Actually I have to watch that movie again now that I think about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608850</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>VJ42</author>
	<datestamp>1262291820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic.  I've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it.  It's Picard for God's sakes.

More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what?  If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos, could we have Picard as our last line of defense?  Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us?</p></div><p>Not really, it does get technically get him a place in the order of precedence, so if enough people were to be killed he could become King, but he's low enough down that theses are probably thousands above him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic .
I 've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it .
It 's Picard for God 's sakes .
More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what ?
If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos , could we have Picard as our last line of defense ?
Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us ? Not really , it does get technically get him a place in the order of precedence , so if enough people were to be killed he could become King , but he 's low enough down that theses are probably thousands above him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic.
I've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it.
It's Picard for God's sakes.
More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what?
If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos, could we have Picard as our last line of defense?
Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us?Not really, it does get technically get him a place in the order of precedence, so if enough people were to be killed he could become King, but he's low enough down that theses are probably thousands above him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604710</id>
	<title>Balance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies.....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... and to the Universe!  Congratulations Sir Stewart<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies..... .... and to the Universe !
Congratulations Sir Stewart ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should bring balance to any future X-Men movies..... .... and to the Universe!
Congratulations Sir Stewart ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608126</id>
	<title>The Queen...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262287920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all coming together now...</p><p>I for one, welcome our new overlord, Sir Locutus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all coming together now...I for one , welcome our new overlord , Sir Locutus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all coming together now...I for one, welcome our new overlord, Sir Locutus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605996</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1262279340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>So, for the sake of tourism, the Monarch is the head of state.. and commander in chief? I see.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , for the sake of tourism , the Monarch is the head of state.. and commander in chief ?
I see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, for the sake of tourism, the Monarch is the head of state.. and commander in chief?
I see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724</id>
	<title>Abolishment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And people ask what the point of having the monarchy around is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And people ask what the point of having the monarchy around is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And people ask what the point of having the monarchy around is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262275140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>night</p></div><p>In English We spell it with a 'K', so "I now dub thee Knight" is correct (but We don't pronounce the "K" -- go figure).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>nightIn English We spell it with a 'K ' , so " I now dub thee Knight " is correct ( but We do n't pronounce the " K " -- go figure ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nightIn English We spell it with a 'K', so "I now dub thee Knight" is correct (but We don't pronounce the "K" -- go figure).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700</id>
	<title>I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262271600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Make it so" <br>
Though we both know it's because he and the Queen both roll with the Earl Grey posse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Make it so " Though we both know it 's because he and the Queen both roll with the Earl Grey posse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Make it so" 
Though we both know it's because he and the Queen both roll with the Earl Grey posse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>daninspokane</author>
	<datestamp>1262273580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic.  I've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it.  It's Picard for God's sakes.

More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what?  If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos, could we have Picard as our last line of defense?  Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic .
I 've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it .
It 's Picard for God 's sakes .
More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what ?
If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos , could we have Picard as our last line of defense ?
Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thought never crossed my mind... and I am not being sarcastic.
I've heard people debate it and argue it but I never even considered it.
It's Picard for God's sakes.
More on topic - do Knights actually hold any government sway or what?
If the British Empire were to collapse and the world dive in to chaos, could we have Picard as our last line of defense?
Say the whole cabinent were to be assassinated... could we vote Jean Luc in to save us?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611528</id>
	<title>Re:Great actor</title>
	<author>Erbo</author>
	<datestamp>1262268300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was lucky enough to see Stewart do his one-man show of "A Christmas Carol" (at Campbell Hall, UCSB), so, when TNT announced their new version starring him as Ebenezer Scrooge, I <i>knew</i> he could pull it off brilliantly.  Of course, he did.<p>And there was a nice <i>TNG</i> echo of that in the teaser of one episode, where Data plays Scrooge on the holodeck, and Picard critiques his performance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was lucky enough to see Stewart do his one-man show of " A Christmas Carol " ( at Campbell Hall , UCSB ) , so , when TNT announced their new version starring him as Ebenezer Scrooge , I knew he could pull it off brilliantly .
Of course , he did.And there was a nice TNG echo of that in the teaser of one episode , where Data plays Scrooge on the holodeck , and Picard critiques his performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was lucky enough to see Stewart do his one-man show of "A Christmas Carol" (at Campbell Hall, UCSB), so, when TNT announced their new version starring him as Ebenezer Scrooge, I knew he could pull it off brilliantly.
Of course, he did.And there was a nice TNG echo of that in the teaser of one episode, where Data plays Scrooge on the holodeck, and Picard critiques his performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607474</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262285220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shut up fag</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shut up fag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shut up fag</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605462</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>magpie</author>
	<datestamp>1262276580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>erm he was born in Yorkshire so he is a subject of the queen, once a subject of the queen/king always a subject. You can take any other nationality you like but your still a subject</htmltext>
<tokenext>erm he was born in Yorkshire so he is a subject of the queen , once a subject of the queen/king always a subject .
You can take any other nationality you like but your still a subject</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erm he was born in Yorkshire so he is a subject of the queen, once a subject of the queen/king always a subject.
You can take any other nationality you like but your still a subject</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611484</id>
	<title>Re:I think I've seen this episode before!</title>
	<author>Erbo</author>
	<datestamp>1262267940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To which Riker gives the single most appropriate answer you could possibly give to that statement:<p>"I'll alert the crew."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To which Riker gives the single most appropriate answer you could possibly give to that statement : " I 'll alert the crew .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To which Riker gives the single most appropriate answer you could possibly give to that statement:"I'll alert the crew.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605452</id>
	<title>Re:Great actor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262276460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen to A Christmas Carol. I had recorded it when it was on TNT originally in 1999, but set it aside and never watched it.   About two weeks ago I picked it up and me and my family watched it.  We loved it, even the four year old and the 2 year old.   They rendered their opinion of Scrooge as "He's a grumpy old man who doesn't like Christmas."</p><p>I liked it so much I ordered the DVD from Amazon so I wouldn't have to put up with the commercials.  Of course, the kids found the "Muppet Christmas Carol" so now it's tough to watch anything but that; but it's okay, I like Michael Caine too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen to A Christmas Carol .
I had recorded it when it was on TNT originally in 1999 , but set it aside and never watched it .
About two weeks ago I picked it up and me and my family watched it .
We loved it , even the four year old and the 2 year old .
They rendered their opinion of Scrooge as " He 's a grumpy old man who does n't like Christmas .
" I liked it so much I ordered the DVD from Amazon so I would n't have to put up with the commercials .
Of course , the kids found the " Muppet Christmas Carol " so now it 's tough to watch anything but that ; but it 's okay , I like Michael Caine too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen to A Christmas Carol.
I had recorded it when it was on TNT originally in 1999, but set it aside and never watched it.
About two weeks ago I picked it up and me and my family watched it.
We loved it, even the four year old and the 2 year old.
They rendered their opinion of Scrooge as "He's a grumpy old man who doesn't like Christmas.
"I liked it so much I ordered the DVD from Amazon so I wouldn't have to put up with the commercials.
Of course, the kids found the "Muppet Christmas Carol" so now it's tough to watch anything but that; but it's okay, I like Michael Caine too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262275020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them. It's not just silly tradition.</p><p>That and you can give people cool titles, which by contrast the US Constitution strictly forbids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them .
It 's not just silly tradition.That and you can give people cool titles , which by contrast the US Constitution strictly forbids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, a major reason the Brits keep the monarchy around is that it makes about as much in tourism as it costs them.
It's not just silly tradition.That and you can give people cool titles, which by contrast the US Constitution strictly forbids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608682</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262290920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But in France, we pronounce ze "K", you silly English k-nigghh-itt, with your stupid knees bent running about.  Log out, or I shall taunt you second time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But in France , we pronounce ze " K " , you silly English k-nigghh-itt , with your stupid knees bent running about .
Log out , or I shall taunt you second time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in France, we pronounce ze "K", you silly English k-nigghh-itt, with your stupid knees bent running about.
Log out, or I shall taunt you second time!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30615274</id>
	<title>By Neruos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1230838860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not everyone should be allowed to vote and as such is shown in the current system. Humans, mainly Americans need to understand that not everyone is equal. A large amount of the public is on average, an idiot. Most western governments take note on the fact. Hence the slander actions that all of them go through to win votes. Anyone who says, everyone should be allow a vote either is an idiot or understands this ploy and doesn't want the current systems to change.</p><p>Mod me whatever, but fact is fact, take your personal opinion out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone should be allowed to vote and as such is shown in the current system .
Humans , mainly Americans need to understand that not everyone is equal .
A large amount of the public is on average , an idiot .
Most western governments take note on the fact .
Hence the slander actions that all of them go through to win votes .
Anyone who says , everyone should be allow a vote either is an idiot or understands this ploy and does n't want the current systems to change.Mod me whatever , but fact is fact , take your personal opinion out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone should be allowed to vote and as such is shown in the current system.
Humans, mainly Americans need to understand that not everyone is equal.
A large amount of the public is on average, an idiot.
Most western governments take note on the fact.
Hence the slander actions that all of them go through to win votes.
Anyone who says, everyone should be allow a vote either is an idiot or understands this ploy and doesn't want the current systems to change.Mod me whatever, but fact is fact, take your personal opinion out of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604830</id>
	<title>Re:Abolishment?</title>
	<author>arnodf</author>
	<datestamp>1262272620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>he certainly deserved it</htmltext>
<tokenext>he certainly deserved it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he certainly deserved it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606076</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262279580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make it Sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make it Sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make it Sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607172</id>
	<title>Not for TNG</title>
	<author>lurker412</author>
	<datestamp>1262284140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might come as a surprise to many here that Stewart was (and remains) a fine stage actor in the best British tradition.  But on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. I suppose you could say he was hoist with his own Picard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might come as a surprise to many here that Stewart was ( and remains ) a fine stage actor in the best British tradition .
But on / .
I suppose you could say he was hoist with his own Picard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might come as a surprise to many here that Stewart was (and remains) a fine stage actor in the best British tradition.
But on /.
I suppose you could say he was hoist with his own Picard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>yincrash</author>
	<datestamp>1262272260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not a british citizen</htmltext>
<tokenext>not a british citizen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not a british citizen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605602</id>
	<title>Re:I now dub thee night</title>
	<author>Tellarin</author>
	<datestamp>1262277300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and when I read that, I thought of the Borg queen... Humm...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and when I read that , I thought of the Borg queen... Humm... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...and when I read that, I thought of the Borg queen... Humm... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604816</id>
	<title>It would be Captain Sir Jean-Luc</title>
	<author>ed</author>
	<datestamp>1262272500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Earned Rank comes first</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Earned Rank comes first</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earned Rank comes first</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30694214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30621982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30614840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30618710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30609672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_31_1322251_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30621982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604976
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30614840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608366
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30611484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30694214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30610108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30606402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_31_1322251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30604838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30622464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30605504
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30607740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30618710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30609672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_31_1322251.30608052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
