<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_30_1730241</id>
	<title>Impressive Robot Hand From Shadow</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262160000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>kkleiner writes <i>"The <a href="http://singularityhub.com/2009/12/30/robot-hand-from-shadow-continues-to-impress-video/">Shadow Dextrous Hand</a> is a robotic arm that allows for fine motor control and precise movements. It's accurate enough to pick up an egg, screw in a light bulb, or thread a needle. Even cooler, researchers can control it with a 'Cyber glove,' allowing for 24 distinct human movements that mimic the user's own hand. A British based company, Shadow, has been displaying the hand for several years now, and recently <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMHvziAikok&amp;feature=player\_embedded#">demonstrated its latest model</a> at IREX 2009. The hand, toted as the world's most advanced, is available for sale to researchers (pricing has not been made public)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kkleiner writes " The Shadow Dextrous Hand is a robotic arm that allows for fine motor control and precise movements .
It 's accurate enough to pick up an egg , screw in a light bulb , or thread a needle .
Even cooler , researchers can control it with a 'Cyber glove, ' allowing for 24 distinct human movements that mimic the user 's own hand .
A British based company , Shadow , has been displaying the hand for several years now , and recently demonstrated its latest model at IREX 2009 .
The hand , toted as the world 's most advanced , is available for sale to researchers ( pricing has not been made public ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kkleiner writes "The Shadow Dextrous Hand is a robotic arm that allows for fine motor control and precise movements.
It's accurate enough to pick up an egg, screw in a light bulb, or thread a needle.
Even cooler, researchers can control it with a 'Cyber glove,' allowing for 24 distinct human movements that mimic the user's own hand.
A British based company, Shadow, has been displaying the hand for several years now, and recently demonstrated its latest model at IREX 2009.
The hand, toted as the world's most advanced, is available for sale to researchers (pricing has not been made public).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601506</id>
	<title>Price tag</title>
	<author>nghiaho12</author>
	<datestamp>1259847840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a chance to see a similar model from Shadow at IROS2008 (big robotics conference) in France and spoke to the sales rep. I remember he quoted the demo hand to be around 100k British pounds (yes, 6 figures!). Had to be one of the most expensive price/weight thing I've ever got to touched.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a chance to see a similar model from Shadow at IROS2008 ( big robotics conference ) in France and spoke to the sales rep. I remember he quoted the demo hand to be around 100k British pounds ( yes , 6 figures ! ) .
Had to be one of the most expensive price/weight thing I 've ever got to touched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a chance to see a similar model from Shadow at IROS2008 (big robotics conference) in France and spoke to the sales rep. I remember he quoted the demo hand to be around 100k British pounds (yes, 6 figures!).
Had to be one of the most expensive price/weight thing I've ever got to touched.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600368</id>
	<title>You're an 'Egg fraud'</title>
	<author>rts008</author>
	<datestamp>1259839980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.</p></div><p>Have you ever tried?<br>It's easy to do, and with practice you can let out only the egg from your fist, leaving all the broken shell in your hand to be discarded. It's quicker than the traditional way of breaking eggs to make am omelet. Since you should wash your hands after handling eggs anyhow, no time is lost there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try it yourself , you ca n't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.Have you ever tried ? It 's easy to do , and with practice you can let out only the egg from your fist , leaving all the broken shell in your hand to be discarded .
It 's quicker than the traditional way of breaking eggs to make am omelet .
Since you should wash your hands after handling eggs anyhow , no time is lost there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.Have you ever tried?It's easy to do, and with practice you can let out only the egg from your fist, leaving all the broken shell in your hand to be discarded.
It's quicker than the traditional way of breaking eggs to make am omelet.
Since you should wash your hands after handling eggs anyhow, no time is lost there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30603858</id>
	<title>Cool but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262254980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the video is uploaded 2006. Not very "recently" IMHO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the video is uploaded 2006 .
Not very " recently " IMHO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the video is uploaded 2006.
Not very "recently" IMHO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598856</id>
	<title>Virtual Prostitution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259831580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A device like this could create a whole new industry of virtual prostitution. Although, I wouldn't get too excited because as soon as that happens, the nanny-state politicians from both sides of the aisle will no doubt move to outlaw it. I still don't understand how a government in a free society is able to tell people what they can and can't do with their body, especially when it comes to sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A device like this could create a whole new industry of virtual prostitution .
Although , I would n't get too excited because as soon as that happens , the nanny-state politicians from both sides of the aisle will no doubt move to outlaw it .
I still do n't understand how a government in a free society is able to tell people what they can and ca n't do with their body , especially when it comes to sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A device like this could create a whole new industry of virtual prostitution.
Although, I wouldn't get too excited because as soon as that happens, the nanny-state politicians from both sides of the aisle will no doubt move to outlaw it.
I still don't understand how a government in a free society is able to tell people what they can and can't do with their body, especially when it comes to sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30602854</id>
	<title>Better Option</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1259861460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would much prefer it if we were using Vorlon technology for our synthetic hands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would much prefer it if we were using Vorlon technology for our synthetic hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would much prefer it if we were using Vorlon technology for our synthetic hands.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599386</id>
	<title>Re:Lesser known corollaries</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1259833920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hmm... I'm sure I couldn't crush an egg in my armpit, because all the force I could exert would just deform my somewhat-flabby hairpits.  But next time I'm already on antibiotics for some reason, I'll try one against my eyesocket.  Seems to me it should be possible, as long as the egg is large enough to bridge the from the upper orbital to the cheekbone.  That's just over two finger-widths for me... maybe a jumbo egg would be big enough.<br> <br>One other thing to note... I've noticed lately that some eggs (especially the cheapest ones) have VERY thin shells.  I broke one making Christmas cookies just picking it up out of the carton -- but it's possible it had a hairline fracture I didn't see.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket , or in your armpit , as these perfectly cup the egg , again dissipating the forces.Hmm... I 'm sure I could n't crush an egg in my armpit , because all the force I could exert would just deform my somewhat-flabby hairpits .
But next time I 'm already on antibiotics for some reason , I 'll try one against my eyesocket .
Seems to me it should be possible , as long as the egg is large enough to bridge the from the upper orbital to the cheekbone .
That 's just over two finger-widths for me... maybe a jumbo egg would be big enough .
One other thing to note... I 've noticed lately that some eggs ( especially the cheapest ones ) have VERY thin shells .
I broke one making Christmas cookies just picking it up out of the carton -- but it 's possible it had a hairline fracture I did n't see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.Hmm... I'm sure I couldn't crush an egg in my armpit, because all the force I could exert would just deform my somewhat-flabby hairpits.
But next time I'm already on antibiotics for some reason, I'll try one against my eyesocket.
Seems to me it should be possible, as long as the egg is large enough to bridge the from the upper orbital to the cheekbone.
That's just over two finger-widths for me... maybe a jumbo egg would be big enough.
One other thing to note... I've noticed lately that some eggs (especially the cheapest ones) have VERY thin shells.
I broke one making Christmas cookies just picking it up out of the carton -- but it's possible it had a hairline fracture I didn't see.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</id>
	<title>Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259831760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it.  This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg.  Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.  Where was the well-educated, erudite journalist on this one, exposing this hoary old "Newton's Apple" gimmick to the world?  Oh wait, the linked article is a press release passed off as an article, and slashdot is just a blog not a news source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it .
This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg .
Try it yourself , you ca n't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze .
Where was the well-educated , erudite journalist on this one , exposing this hoary old " Newton 's Apple " gimmick to the world ?
Oh wait , the linked article is a press release passed off as an article , and slashdot is just a blog not a news source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it.
This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg.
Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.
Where was the well-educated, erudite journalist on this one, exposing this hoary old "Newton's Apple" gimmick to the world?
Oh wait, the linked article is a press release passed off as an article, and slashdot is just a blog not a news source.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600862</id>
	<title>Robotic hand replacements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259843040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You better practice on a hot dog first...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You better practice on a hot dog first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You better practice on a hot dog first...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598972</id>
	<title>Re:I want one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, I think you're going to need more than just one bottle of wine to get the robot drunk enough for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , I think you 're going to need more than just one bottle of wine to get the robot drunk enough for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, I think you're going to need more than just one bottle of wine to get the robot drunk enough for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798</id>
	<title>I must say,</title>
	<author>palegray.net</author>
	<datestamp>1259831220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this sure seems like a handy invention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this sure seems like a handy invention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this sure seems like a handy invention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599292</id>
	<title>*This* is a robotic hand</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1259833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Video on YouTube of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KxjVlaLBmk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">High-Speed Robot Hand</a> [youtube.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Video on YouTube of High-Speed Robot Hand [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Video on YouTube of High-Speed Robot Hand [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599446</id>
	<title>Prosthetics?</title>
	<author>divisionbyzero</author>
	<datestamp>1259834220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would any of this tech. be useful for prosthetic arms?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would any of this tech .
be useful for prosthetic arms ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would any of this tech.
be useful for prosthetic arms?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30602890</id>
	<title>Re:I must say,</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1259861880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give that man a hand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give that man a hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give that man a hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600236</id>
	<title>That's just creepy.</title>
	<author>John Sokol</author>
	<datestamp>1259839020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just creepy.</p><p>It didn't seem to track the hand movements very well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just creepy.It did n't seem to track the hand movements very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just creepy.It didn't seem to track the hand movements very well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600286</id>
	<title>saw this in the 70's</title>
	<author>StickANeedleInMyEye</author>
	<datestamp>1259839380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who has a hand impairment like a quadriplegic or has studied hand movement knows that full wrist articulation is paramount.  The wrist can even expand and contract some atrophied hand and forearm muscles so that fingers partly open and close. </p><p>Even if this isn't their newest video, what it shows is sadly they don't understand fundamental hand/wrist finger interaction. </p><p>I suppose this is not a robotic related rant<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but the sense of touch is still missing here and that seems lacking in the restorative efforts of researchers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who has a hand impairment like a quadriplegic or has studied hand movement knows that full wrist articulation is paramount .
The wrist can even expand and contract some atrophied hand and forearm muscles so that fingers partly open and close .
Even if this is n't their newest video , what it shows is sadly they do n't understand fundamental hand/wrist finger interaction .
I suppose this is not a robotic related rant ... but the sense of touch is still missing here and that seems lacking in the restorative efforts of researchers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who has a hand impairment like a quadriplegic or has studied hand movement knows that full wrist articulation is paramount.
The wrist can even expand and contract some atrophied hand and forearm muscles so that fingers partly open and close.
Even if this isn't their newest video, what it shows is sadly they don't understand fundamental hand/wrist finger interaction.
I suppose this is not a robotic related rant ... but the sense of touch is still missing here and that seems lacking in the restorative efforts of researchers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599958</id>
	<title>Re:DARPA research from the 80s</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259837160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also handy to have your robots be able to pick up an enemy's weapon and use it.... handy for them, not for us humans i.e. the enemy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also handy to have your robots be able to pick up an enemy 's weapon and use it.... handy for them , not for us humans i.e .
the enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also handy to have your robots be able to pick up an enemy's weapon and use it.... handy for them, not for us humans i.e.
the enemy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605102</id>
	<title>Re:waldo, not robot?</title>
	<author>rich\_from\_shadow</author>
	<datestamp>1262274300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The video is showing a standalone Shadow Hand connected to a standalone CyberGlove which does the control. You can drive the Hand from any source of position data you want to generate - teleoperating it with a CyberGlove is just <b>one</b> of the options for control. So it's a robot that can be used as a waldo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The video is showing a standalone Shadow Hand connected to a standalone CyberGlove which does the control .
You can drive the Hand from any source of position data you want to generate - teleoperating it with a CyberGlove is just one of the options for control .
So it 's a robot that can be used as a waldo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video is showing a standalone Shadow Hand connected to a standalone CyberGlove which does the control.
You can drive the Hand from any source of position data you want to generate - teleoperating it with a CyberGlove is just one of the options for control.
So it's a robot that can be used as a waldo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605326</id>
	<title>Re:Lesser known corollaries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262275920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.</p></div><p>There will be somebody, \_somewhere\_ that will now break an egg on their eye, and that's hilarious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket , or in your armpit , as these perfectly cup the egg , again dissipating the forces.There will be somebody , \ _somewhere \ _ that will now break an egg on their eye , and that 's hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.There will be somebody, \_somewhere\_ that will now break an egg on their eye, and that's hilarious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599098</id>
	<title>Self-replication a la Escher</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the robot hand dextrous enough to build a dextrous robot hand?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the robot hand dextrous enough to build a dextrous robot hand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the robot hand dextrous enough to build a dextrous robot hand?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796</id>
	<title>I want one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259831220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of these, a rubber glove, lube and a bottle of wine and I'm set.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of these , a rubber glove , lube and a bottle of wine and I 'm set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of these, a rubber glove, lube and a bottle of wine and I'm set.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598908</id>
	<title>Looks useful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259831820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This might be something to remember if your father ever cuts off your hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This might be something to remember if your father ever cuts off your hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might be something to remember if your father ever cuts off your hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598942</id>
	<title>It's so bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love it cause it's so bad...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love it cause it 's so bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love it cause it's so bad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601236</id>
	<title>Slashdot</title>
	<author>epp\_b</author>
	<datestamp>1259845740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot.  News for birds.  Stuff that splatters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot .
News for birds .
Stuff that splatters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot.
News for birds.
Stuff that splatters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598866</id>
	<title>Yours for...</title>
	<author>BigSlowTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1259831640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No published price and 'for sale to researchers' means $100k+.  That's competitive with the current robot hand market such as it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No published price and 'for sale to researchers ' means $ 100k + .
That 's competitive with the current robot hand market such as it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No published price and 'for sale to researchers' means $100k+.
That's competitive with the current robot hand market such as it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599664</id>
	<title>Re:I want one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259835420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hah, you can have all the benefits of a <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stranger" title="urbandictionary.com" rel="nofollow">stranger</a> [urbandictionary.com] without having to sit on your hand for 20 minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah , you can have all the benefits of a stranger [ urbandictionary.com ] without having to sit on your hand for 20 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah, you can have all the benefits of a stranger [urbandictionary.com] without having to sit on your hand for 20 minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30602968</id>
	<title>Well, it's official</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1259863200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A robot hand gets more action than I do!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A robot hand gets more action than I do !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A robot hand gets more action than I do!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600082</id>
	<title>Whoops...</title>
	<author>northernfrights</author>
	<datestamp>1259837940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The hand, toted as the world's most advanced, is available for sale to researchers..."

Damn, that must get heavy after a while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The hand , toted as the world 's most advanced , is available for sale to researchers... " Damn , that must get heavy after a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The hand, toted as the world's most advanced, is available for sale to researchers..."

Damn, that must get heavy after a while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599312</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding?  I can easily crush an egg using only two fingers.  Which is similar to how this robot hand would grasp it.  In fact it is probably easier to crush in the robot hand since it is hard with sharp edges.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding ?
I can easily crush an egg using only two fingers .
Which is similar to how this robot hand would grasp it .
In fact it is probably easier to crush in the robot hand since it is hard with sharp edges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding?
I can easily crush an egg using only two fingers.
Which is similar to how this robot hand would grasp it.
In fact it is probably easier to crush in the robot hand since it is hard with sharp edges.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599074</id>
	<title>Oblamatorily</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blah blah cyberdyne blah blah</p><p>Just trying to get it out of the way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blah blah cyberdyne blah blahJust trying to get it out of the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blah blah cyberdyne blah blahJust trying to get it out of the way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598744</id>
	<title>go for the boob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259830980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>grab her tits</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>grab her tits</tokentext>
<sentencetext>grab her tits</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598926</id>
	<title>combine this with the story below...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259831940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>robot hand + machine-written journalism = infinite fun!</htmltext>
<tokenext>robot hand + machine-written journalism = infinite fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>robot hand + machine-written journalism = infinite fun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599970</id>
	<title>No one is welcoming our new overlords yet?</title>
	<author>HeckRuler</author>
	<datestamp>1259837220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because I for one was expecting that hand to rip out that girl's throat at the end of that video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I for one was expecting that hand to rip out that girl 's throat at the end of that video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I for one was expecting that hand to rip out that girl's throat at the end of that video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599018</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1259832300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>WARNING: Do not actually try this!!<blockquote><div><p>Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hey douchebag, that's not true at all.  I've got egg all over my desk, my monitor, my pants, and my shirt now.<br> <br>Of course, it could just be because I used my masturbating hand to do it... that hand is much stronger.<br> <br>Anyway, it's not the distribution of force over the shell that makes hand-crushing an egg difficult.  It's the fact that most people simply can't generate enough force at that position due to how the hand is shaped -- a lot of the force is dispersed by deforming the hand tissue, not the egg.  The trick is to have the narrow end of the egg towards your thumb, and to squeeze like you're milking a cow but with the palm, not with the fingers).  This loads the first portion of the force exerted into deforming your palm, and the last portion is almost entirely directed into the egg.<br> <br>Note also that a robotic hand does not have the physiological limitations a human hand does.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WARNING : Do not actually try this !
! Try it yourself , you ca n't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.Hey douchebag , that 's not true at all .
I 've got egg all over my desk , my monitor , my pants , and my shirt now .
Of course , it could just be because I used my masturbating hand to do it... that hand is much stronger .
Anyway , it 's not the distribution of force over the shell that makes hand-crushing an egg difficult .
It 's the fact that most people simply ca n't generate enough force at that position due to how the hand is shaped -- a lot of the force is dispersed by deforming the hand tissue , not the egg .
The trick is to have the narrow end of the egg towards your thumb , and to squeeze like you 're milking a cow but with the palm , not with the fingers ) .
This loads the first portion of the force exerted into deforming your palm , and the last portion is almost entirely directed into the egg .
Note also that a robotic hand does not have the physiological limitations a human hand does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WARNING: Do not actually try this!
!Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.Hey douchebag, that's not true at all.
I've got egg all over my desk, my monitor, my pants, and my shirt now.
Of course, it could just be because I used my masturbating hand to do it... that hand is much stronger.
Anyway, it's not the distribution of force over the shell that makes hand-crushing an egg difficult.
It's the fact that most people simply can't generate enough force at that position due to how the hand is shaped -- a lot of the force is dispersed by deforming the hand tissue, not the egg.
The trick is to have the narrow end of the egg towards your thumb, and to squeeze like you're milking a cow but with the palm, not with the fingers).
This loads the first portion of the force exerted into deforming your palm, and the last portion is almost entirely directed into the egg.
Note also that a robotic hand does not have the physiological limitations a human hand does.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600110</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259838120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes you can.  But do it outside.  The force is dissipated over the surface of the egg, but eggs are not perfectly spherical, neither is your hand.  When it is crushed, it is one of the most satisfying explosions of poultry related products I have ever seen.  I had egg on the side of my house over twenty two feet high (that's as high as my ladder would go).  I've done it several times since to prove to people it can be done.  You don't dig your fingers in.  Just squeeze with all of your might.  It may take two or three times for the girly men out there.  But it is a lot of fun to do to someone who says it cannot be done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes you can .
But do it outside .
The force is dissipated over the surface of the egg , but eggs are not perfectly spherical , neither is your hand .
When it is crushed , it is one of the most satisfying explosions of poultry related products I have ever seen .
I had egg on the side of my house over twenty two feet high ( that 's as high as my ladder would go ) .
I 've done it several times since to prove to people it can be done .
You do n't dig your fingers in .
Just squeeze with all of your might .
It may take two or three times for the girly men out there .
But it is a lot of fun to do to someone who says it can not be done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes you can.
But do it outside.
The force is dissipated over the surface of the egg, but eggs are not perfectly spherical, neither is your hand.
When it is crushed, it is one of the most satisfying explosions of poultry related products I have ever seen.
I had egg on the side of my house over twenty two feet high (that's as high as my ladder would go).
I've done it several times since to prove to people it can be done.
You don't dig your fingers in.
Just squeeze with all of your might.
It may take two or three times for the girly men out there.
But it is a lot of fun to do to someone who says it cannot be done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600946</id>
	<title>No more</title>
	<author>Master Moose</author>
	<datestamp>1259843580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..Sitting on my arm until it goes numb so I can pretend I have a girlfriend</htmltext>
<tokenext>..Sitting on my arm until it goes numb so I can pretend I have a girlfriend</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..Sitting on my arm until it goes numb so I can pretend I have a girlfriend</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600246</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1259839080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg. Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.</i></p><p>I read this once too.  Place an egg in the palm of your hand and try to crush it.  When I was 12 I couldn't do it. By 18 it was a simple thing to squish it to pieces. If you don't place it precisely in your hand so that your fingers aren't exerting pressure then it will break very easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg .
Try it yourself , you ca n't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.I read this once too .
Place an egg in the palm of your hand and try to crush it .
When I was 12 I could n't do it .
By 18 it was a simple thing to squish it to pieces .
If you do n't place it precisely in your hand so that your fingers are n't exerting pressure then it will break very easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg.
Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.I read this once too.
Place an egg in the palm of your hand and try to crush it.
When I was 12 I couldn't do it.
By 18 it was a simple thing to squish it to pieces.
If you don't place it precisely in your hand so that your fingers aren't exerting pressure then it will break very easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30604170</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262263140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually Shadow use air muscles- so the cables are the motors, although  I presume there will be a big compressor lurking somewhere in the background.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually Shadow use air muscles- so the cables are the motors , although I presume there will be a big compressor lurking somewhere in the background .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually Shadow use air muscles- so the cables are the motors, although  I presume there will be a big compressor lurking somewhere in the background.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599246</id>
	<title>Spiderish</title>
	<author>Daxx22</author>
	<datestamp>1259833260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Movements reminded me of a spider.   Kinda creepy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Movements reminded me of a spider .
Kinda creepy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Movements reminded me of a spider.
Kinda creepy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599324</id>
	<title>I saw this in 1991...</title>
	<author>LtCol Burrito</author>
	<datestamp>1259833680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Sarah and John Connor will come by with a big guy from the future to get it back soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Sarah and John Connor will come by with a big guy from the future to get it back soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Sarah and John Connor will come by with a big guy from the future to get it back soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599274</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1259833440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit, you really are a scrawny nerd.</p><p>Maybe you should do a little exercise</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit , you really are a scrawny nerd.Maybe you should do a little exercise</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit, you really are a scrawny nerd.Maybe you should do a little exercise</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600278</id>
	<title>Re:waldo, not robot?</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1259839320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous</p></div><p>It is not. In fact "robot" is quite ill defined.</p><p>Some people want it to only mean autonomous machines, others only human-shaped machines, but in its originating play, it referred to what we'd now call replicants. It's used to refer to androids and remote controlled planes and everything in between.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomousIt is not .
In fact " robot " is quite ill defined.Some people want it to only mean autonomous machines , others only human-shaped machines , but in its originating play , it referred to what we 'd now call replicants .
It 's used to refer to androids and remote controlled planes and everything in between .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomousIt is not.
In fact "robot" is quite ill defined.Some people want it to only mean autonomous machines, others only human-shaped machines, but in its originating play, it referred to what we'd now call replicants.
It's used to refer to androids and remote controlled planes and everything in between.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605238</id>
	<title>Re:no wrist?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262275380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er, it does have a wrist. You can see it right there in the video.</p><p>Hugo Elias</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , it does have a wrist .
You can see it right there in the video.Hugo Elias</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, it does have a wrist.
You can see it right there in the video.Hugo Elias</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601386</id>
	<title>Re:That's just creepy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
After that bit at the end, the <em>lag</em> is what creeps you out?
</p><p>
DON'T DATE ROBOTS!
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After that bit at the end , the lag is what creeps you out ?
DO N'T DATE ROBOTS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
After that bit at the end, the lag is what creeps you out?
DON'T DATE ROBOTS!
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599068</id>
	<title>DARPA research from the 80s</title>
	<author>StCredZero</author>
	<datestamp>1259832540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DARPA funded research on haptics and "Waldoes" (nickname for remotely operated manipulators from Heinlein) starting in the 80s.  A lot of this know-how ended up in Sarcos corporation.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.sarcos.com/teleop\_videos.html" title="sarcos.com">http://www.sarcos.com/teleop\_videos.html</a> [sarcos.com]</p><p>The problem with haptics technology is that mechanisms complicated enough to mimic parts of the human body, like the arms and hands, will tend to be more expensive and less robust than simpler manipulators.  Much of the DARPA research from the 80s was motivated by the need to work underwater at great depths.  Most current underwaters RPVs don't use advanced haptics, because the work can be done with simpler and more robust manipulators.</p><p>Prosthesis can change this, however.  A mass produced prosthetic arm could drive down the cost of such mechanisms.  This could lead to further advances and cost reduction in haptics technology.</p><p>We are actually at the point where we could build a Gundam style mecha.  (Has to be large enough to contain a whole-body haptic harness with complete freedom of motion.)  But there is no practical reason to do so.  (Other than to provide an even cooler spectacle at "monster truck" rallies.)</p><p>(Also it would probably have an Evangelion-like extension cord coming out the back for power and possibly hydraulics.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DARPA funded research on haptics and " Waldoes " ( nickname for remotely operated manipulators from Heinlein ) starting in the 80s .
A lot of this know-how ended up in Sarcos corporation.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Nhj3Z9o6t0g [ youtube.com ] http : //www.sarcos.com/teleop \ _videos.html [ sarcos.com ] The problem with haptics technology is that mechanisms complicated enough to mimic parts of the human body , like the arms and hands , will tend to be more expensive and less robust than simpler manipulators .
Much of the DARPA research from the 80s was motivated by the need to work underwater at great depths .
Most current underwaters RPVs do n't use advanced haptics , because the work can be done with simpler and more robust manipulators.Prosthesis can change this , however .
A mass produced prosthetic arm could drive down the cost of such mechanisms .
This could lead to further advances and cost reduction in haptics technology.We are actually at the point where we could build a Gundam style mecha .
( Has to be large enough to contain a whole-body haptic harness with complete freedom of motion .
) But there is no practical reason to do so .
( Other than to provide an even cooler spectacle at " monster truck " rallies .
) ( Also it would probably have an Evangelion-like extension cord coming out the back for power and possibly hydraulics .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DARPA funded research on haptics and "Waldoes" (nickname for remotely operated manipulators from Heinlein) starting in the 80s.
A lot of this know-how ended up in Sarcos corporation.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g [youtube.com]http://www.sarcos.com/teleop\_videos.html [sarcos.com]The problem with haptics technology is that mechanisms complicated enough to mimic parts of the human body, like the arms and hands, will tend to be more expensive and less robust than simpler manipulators.
Much of the DARPA research from the 80s was motivated by the need to work underwater at great depths.
Most current underwaters RPVs don't use advanced haptics, because the work can be done with simpler and more robust manipulators.Prosthesis can change this, however.
A mass produced prosthetic arm could drive down the cost of such mechanisms.
This could lead to further advances and cost reduction in haptics technology.We are actually at the point where we could build a Gundam style mecha.
(Has to be large enough to contain a whole-body haptic harness with complete freedom of motion.
)  But there is no practical reason to do so.
(Other than to provide an even cooler spectacle at "monster truck" rallies.
)(Also it would probably have an Evangelion-like extension cord coming out the back for power and possibly hydraulics.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598886</id>
	<title>Next addon for the Lunar rover? ISS</title>
	<author>Tekfactory</author>
	<datestamp>1259831760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously I think the delay might be a bit much for a Mars rover, but it might be nice to have one of thes to collect samples, turn over rocks or something with a rover.</p><p>The ISS has the Canadarm, but it also has a robot named Dextre to move along the Canadarm tracks on the ISS, it has different power tools it could use, this might be a nice new one.</p><p>If course the last question is are there direct kits without the glove that let the electrocdes in the brain guys tinker with its life-like hand movements?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously I think the delay might be a bit much for a Mars rover , but it might be nice to have one of thes to collect samples , turn over rocks or something with a rover.The ISS has the Canadarm , but it also has a robot named Dextre to move along the Canadarm tracks on the ISS , it has different power tools it could use , this might be a nice new one.If course the last question is are there direct kits without the glove that let the electrocdes in the brain guys tinker with its life-like hand movements ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously I think the delay might be a bit much for a Mars rover, but it might be nice to have one of thes to collect samples, turn over rocks or something with a rover.The ISS has the Canadarm, but it also has a robot named Dextre to move along the Canadarm tracks on the ISS, it has different power tools it could use, this might be a nice new one.If course the last question is are there direct kits without the glove that let the electrocdes in the brain guys tinker with its life-like hand movements?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599684</id>
	<title>Go, Mighty Orbots</title>
	<author>tekrat</author>
	<datestamp>1259835540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the Robotic Hand from Shadow be able to defeat the Orbots?<br>Tune in after the break to find out!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the Robotic Hand from Shadow be able to defeat the Orbots ? Tune in after the break to find out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the Robotic Hand from Shadow be able to defeat the Orbots?Tune in after the break to find out!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020</id>
	<title>Lesser known corollaries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket , or in your armpit , as these perfectly cup the egg , again dissipating the forces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600000</id>
	<title>Lucas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259837400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the Cyber Glove... It's so BAD!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the Cyber Glove... It 's so BAD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the Cyber Glove... It's so BAD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599296</id>
	<title>Lame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No shock, no middle finger? And they say it can do everything. Ha!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No shock , no middle finger ?
And they say it can do everything .
Ha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shock, no middle finger?
And they say it can do everything.
Ha!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600164</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1259838540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, what fraud with the egg? The article nor the summary doesn't talk about crushing an egg, nor is it in the video. The article mentions the word "egg" once:</p><blockquote><div><p>Its accurate enough to pick up an egg, [...]</p></div></blockquote><p>That being said, even if they DID have a demo of it crushing an egg, there are several ways to do this:<br>1) Using an empty egg shell in the gesturing hand.<br>2) Not having an egg at all in the gesturing hand.<br>3) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwYsQEzIs-k&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">Actually breaking the egg by hand</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>As others have pointed out, the robot doesn't have our physical limitations. You tell it to move its fingers to a certain position, and it could have plenty of power to do it. It doesn't have pain receptors, it doesn't have flesh that spreads the force over a bigger area - it just has metal tips and joints that are much harder than the thin calcium shell of the egg.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , what fraud with the egg ?
The article nor the summary does n't talk about crushing an egg , nor is it in the video .
The article mentions the word " egg " once : Its accurate enough to pick up an egg , [ ... ] That being said , even if they DID have a demo of it crushing an egg , there are several ways to do this : 1 ) Using an empty egg shell in the gesturing hand.2 ) Not having an egg at all in the gesturing hand.3 ) Actually breaking the egg by hand [ youtube.com ] As others have pointed out , the robot does n't have our physical limitations .
You tell it to move its fingers to a certain position , and it could have plenty of power to do it .
It does n't have pain receptors , it does n't have flesh that spreads the force over a bigger area - it just has metal tips and joints that are much harder than the thin calcium shell of the egg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, what fraud with the egg?
The article nor the summary doesn't talk about crushing an egg, nor is it in the video.
The article mentions the word "egg" once:Its accurate enough to pick up an egg, [...]That being said, even if they DID have a demo of it crushing an egg, there are several ways to do this:1) Using an empty egg shell in the gesturing hand.2) Not having an egg at all in the gesturing hand.3) Actually breaking the egg by hand [youtube.com]As others have pointed out, the robot doesn't have our physical limitations.
You tell it to move its fingers to a certain position, and it could have plenty of power to do it.
It doesn't have pain receptors, it doesn't have flesh that spreads the force over a bigger area - it just has metal tips and joints that are much harder than the thin calcium shell of the egg.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598946</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>scapermoya</author>
	<datestamp>1259832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that's definitely not true at all. you just want people to get egg on their trousers. wow, i've never used the word trousers before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's definitely not true at all .
you just want people to get egg on their trousers .
wow , i 've never used the word trousers before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's definitely not true at all.
you just want people to get egg on their trousers.
wow, i've never used the word trousers before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599930</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259836980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you apply the force evenly. Also, it's almost impossible for normal human strength.</p><p>You don't really ahve much of a grasp of news source.</p><p>heh, I said grasp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you apply the force evenly .
Also , it 's almost impossible for normal human strength.You do n't really ahve much of a grasp of news source.heh , I said grasp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you apply the force evenly.
Also, it's almost impossible for normal human strength.You don't really ahve much of a grasp of news source.heh, I said grasp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30606518</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1262281860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... squeeze like you're milking a cow but with the palm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>I have no idea what that is. The closest I've gotten to touching a cow is a Gateway computer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... squeeze like you 're milking a cow but with the palm ...I have no idea what that is .
The closest I 've gotten to touching a cow is a Gateway computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... squeeze like you're milking a cow but with the palm ...I have no idea what that is.
The closest I've gotten to touching a cow is a Gateway computer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599112</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1259832720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are still using (animatronic) cables for joint movements, and the controlling motors in the "arm" make it ginormous!<br>
Any hobbyist with bicycle brake cable and a few servos can build something like this.  And the latency displayed in the video between glove &amp; machine is horrible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are still using ( animatronic ) cables for joint movements , and the controlling motors in the " arm " make it ginormous !
Any hobbyist with bicycle brake cable and a few servos can build something like this .
And the latency displayed in the video between glove &amp; machine is horrible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are still using (animatronic) cables for joint movements, and the controlling motors in the "arm" make it ginormous!
Any hobbyist with bicycle brake cable and a few servos can build something like this.
And the latency displayed in the video between glove &amp; machine is horrible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598960</id>
	<title>how many robot hands does it take to...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q: how many robot hands does it take to screw in a lightbulb?<br>A: Just one... didn't you RTFA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : how many robot hands does it take to screw in a lightbulb ? A : Just one... did n't you RTFA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: how many robot hands does it take to screw in a lightbulb?A: Just one... didn't you RTFA?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599622</id>
	<title>Re:I must say,</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1259835060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, I gotta hand it to them, this is the first model I've seen which isn't all thumbs.  Looks like we've finally got a grip on this technology!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , I got ta hand it to them , this is the first model I 've seen which is n't all thumbs .
Looks like we 've finally got a grip on this technology !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, I gotta hand it to them, this is the first model I've seen which isn't all thumbs.
Looks like we've finally got a grip on this technology!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600046</id>
	<title>Re:Looks useful</title>
	<author>interploy</author>
	<datestamp>1259837700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sure hope that's where this is heading. Now that they have the basics, they need to start shrinking it down to human size and partnering with researchers who do mind-machine interfaces. And of course the power issue. But it's amazing to think that in perhaps one or two more generations people might be able to get a fully articulated replacement arm and hand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure hope that 's where this is heading .
Now that they have the basics , they need to start shrinking it down to human size and partnering with researchers who do mind-machine interfaces .
And of course the power issue .
But it 's amazing to think that in perhaps one or two more generations people might be able to get a fully articulated replacement arm and hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure hope that's where this is heading.
Now that they have the basics, they need to start shrinking it down to human size and partnering with researchers who do mind-machine interfaces.
And of course the power issue.
But it's amazing to think that in perhaps one or two more generations people might be able to get a fully articulated replacement arm and hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598950</id>
	<title>Links are old</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Links above go to 2006 video. Here's a link to the current demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV6wkczWopY</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Links above go to 2006 video .
Here 's a link to the current demo http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = YV6wkczWopY</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Links above go to 2006 video.
Here's a link to the current demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV6wkczWopY</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256</id>
	<title>waldo, not robot?</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1259833320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't this a waldo, rather than a robot? My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous, at least to the extent that it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybernetics#Overview" title="wikipedia.org">incorporates a feedback loop</a> [wikipedia.org]. For instance, some of the earliest robots from the mid-20th century were little things that rolled around on the floor searching for bright light. A Roomba is a robot. If all it does is shadow the motion of your hand, then I think it's called a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldo\_(device)" title="wikipedia.org">waldo</a> [wikipedia.org] (named after a science fiction story by Robert Heinlein) or a remote manipulator. Most likely they're using the term "robot" because it makes a better marketing term.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this a waldo , rather than a robot ?
My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous , at least to the extent that it incorporates a feedback loop [ wikipedia.org ] .
For instance , some of the earliest robots from the mid-20th century were little things that rolled around on the floor searching for bright light .
A Roomba is a robot .
If all it does is shadow the motion of your hand , then I think it 's called a waldo [ wikipedia.org ] ( named after a science fiction story by Robert Heinlein ) or a remote manipulator .
Most likely they 're using the term " robot " because it makes a better marketing term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this a waldo, rather than a robot?
My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous, at least to the extent that it incorporates a feedback loop [wikipedia.org].
For instance, some of the earliest robots from the mid-20th century were little things that rolled around on the floor searching for bright light.
A Roomba is a robot.
If all it does is shadow the motion of your hand, then I think it's called a waldo [wikipedia.org] (named after a science fiction story by Robert Heinlein) or a remote manipulator.
Most likely they're using the term "robot" because it makes a better marketing term.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599032</id>
	<title>no wrist?</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1259832360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm surprised that this is their most advanced model and appears to have no wrist articulation whatsoever.</p><p>And the index finger control was obviously off by quite a bit.</p><p>NOT impressed.  Anyone remember their Robotron?  and this is all the better we've gotten in all those years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised that this is their most advanced model and appears to have no wrist articulation whatsoever.And the index finger control was obviously off by quite a bit.NOT impressed .
Anyone remember their Robotron ?
and this is all the better we 've gotten in all those years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised that this is their most advanced model and appears to have no wrist articulation whatsoever.And the index finger control was obviously off by quite a bit.NOT impressed.
Anyone remember their Robotron?
and this is all the better we've gotten in all those years?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599168</id>
	<title>Re:Egg fraud</title>
	<author>Ractive</author>
	<datestamp>1259832900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it.</p> </div><p>It's OK Mr Burns...     but some people actually can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it .
It 's OK Mr Burns... but some people actually can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it.
It's OK Mr Burns...     but some people actually can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30604170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30606518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30602890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1730241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30602890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30604170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30598946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30601236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30605326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30600164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30606518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1730241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1730241.30599684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
