<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_30_1446221</id>
	<title>5th Underhanded C Contest Now Open</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1262193900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Xcott Craver writes <i>"The next <a href="http://underhanded.xcott.com/">Underhanded C Contest</a> has begun, with a deadline of March 1st.  The object of the contest is to write short, readable, clear and innocent C code that somehow commits an evil act.  This year's challenge:  write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.  The prize is a gift certificate to ThinkGeek.com."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xcott Craver writes " The next Underhanded C Contest has begun , with a deadline of March 1st .
The object of the contest is to write short , readable , clear and innocent C code that somehow commits an evil act .
This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field .
The prize is a gift certificate to ThinkGeek.com .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xcott Craver writes "The next Underhanded C Contest has begun, with a deadline of March 1st.
The object of the contest is to write short, readable, clear and innocent C code that somehow commits an evil act.
This year's challenge:  write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.
The prize is a gift certificate to ThinkGeek.com.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598002</id>
	<title>Developers: 5th Underhanded C Contest Now Open</title>
	<author>weicco</author>
	<datestamp>1259871360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a program, actually a large system, that sends boxes to different areas in warehouse depending from various aspects. Sending/transfer is done by conveyor belts and sometimes even with robots. Boxes are actual physical boxes containing food items.</p><p>It has a little defect though which I've been unable to track down. Sometimes when it tries to send box to place A the box is actually found in place B but the UI tells that it is located in places C and D, which of course is impossibility.</p><p>Unfortunately it is not written in C. Otherwise it could a clear winner with couple of minor modifications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a program , actually a large system , that sends boxes to different areas in warehouse depending from various aspects .
Sending/transfer is done by conveyor belts and sometimes even with robots .
Boxes are actual physical boxes containing food items.It has a little defect though which I 've been unable to track down .
Sometimes when it tries to send box to place A the box is actually found in place B but the UI tells that it is located in places C and D , which of course is impossibility.Unfortunately it is not written in C. Otherwise it could a clear winner with couple of minor modifications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a program, actually a large system, that sends boxes to different areas in warehouse depending from various aspects.
Sending/transfer is done by conveyor belts and sometimes even with robots.
Boxes are actual physical boxes containing food items.It has a little defect though which I've been unable to track down.
Sometimes when it tries to send box to place A the box is actually found in place B but the UI tells that it is located in places C and D, which of course is impossibility.Unfortunately it is not written in C. Otherwise it could a clear winner with couple of minor modifications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599146</id>
	<title>Re:Wait a sec...</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1259832840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What, we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature?</p></div><p>Their logic is sound:<br>
Code written <i>not</i> to make this mistake <i>will</i> make it. How do you solve the problem? Write code that <i>does</i> make the mistake. The resulting software will then, logically, avoid making the mistake.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature ? Their logic is sound : Code written not to make this mistake will make it .
How do you solve the problem ?
Write code that does make the mistake .
The resulting software will then , logically , avoid making the mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature?Their logic is sound:
Code written not to make this mistake will make it.
How do you solve the problem?
Write code that does make the mistake.
The resulting software will then, logically, avoid making the mistake.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597784</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1259870580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why? My teeth are fine!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
My teeth are fine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
My teeth are fine!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599864</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>bonch</author>
	<datestamp>1259836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's pretty paranoid of you.  The point of the contest is to illustrate your knowledge of esoteric bugs as a lesson to all.  You don't want to work for an employer who sees your programming awareness and experience as a negative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's pretty paranoid of you .
The point of the contest is to illustrate your knowledge of esoteric bugs as a lesson to all .
You do n't want to work for an employer who sees your programming awareness and experience as a negative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's pretty paranoid of you.
The point of the contest is to illustrate your knowledge of esoteric bugs as a lesson to all.
You don't want to work for an employer who sees your programming awareness and experience as a negative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608382</id>
	<title>Re:Not fair!</title>
	<author>nortcele</author>
	<datestamp>1262289240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Relax.  No one is going to submit the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bat file currently used to route luggage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Relax .
No one is going to submit the .bat file currently used to route luggage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Relax.
No one is going to submit the .bat file currently used to route luggage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30600602</id>
	<title>Re:Useless use of Cat</title>
	<author>Firedog</author>
	<datestamp>1259841240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That wouldn't work since the data file comes in on stdin, right? But this line should be equivalent:
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>./lug UA129086 - - - <b>&lt; luggage.dat</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would n't work since the data file comes in on stdin , right ?
But this line should be equivalent : ./lug UA129086 - - -</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That wouldn't work since the data file comes in on stdin, right?
But this line should be equivalent:
  ./lug UA129086 - - - </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596528</id>
	<title>BAE Automated was just too early</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They wrote the right software for Denver International's baggage handling system, but just a tad too soon and in the wrong place!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They wrote the right software for Denver International 's baggage handling system , but just a tad too soon and in the wrong place !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wrote the right software for Denver International's baggage handling system, but just a tad too soon and in the wrong place!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597054</id>
	<title>Re:For Slashdot Lamerz:</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1259867700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>None of the above adjectives apply to C.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, that's the challenge. The misrouting part is easy.</p><p>(I'm only partly kidding.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P )</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>None of the above adjectives apply to C.Well , that 's the challenge .
The misrouting part is easy .
( I 'm only partly kidding .
: P )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>None of the above adjectives apply to C.Well, that's the challenge.
The misrouting part is easy.
(I'm only partly kidding.
:P )
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1259867100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.</p></div><p>I am <i>certain</i> that this is already a feature of existing luggage routing software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.I am certain that this is already a feature of existing luggage routing software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.I am certain that this is already a feature of existing luggage routing software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599652</id>
	<title>No change in functionality</title>
	<author>geek2k5</author>
	<datestamp>1259835300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the code has a comment field for special handling, you wouldn't need much to do this.  The biggest problem would be to make it so that somebody can't correlate bad handling to the comment.  You might want to have a 'bad handling' string that varies from hour to hour, one that is displayed as part of a 'quote of the moment'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the code has a comment field for special handling , you would n't need much to do this .
The biggest problem would be to make it so that somebody ca n't correlate bad handling to the comment .
You might want to have a 'bad handling ' string that varies from hour to hour , one that is displayed as part of a 'quote of the moment' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the code has a comment field for special handling, you wouldn't need much to do this.
The biggest problem would be to make it so that somebody can't correlate bad handling to the comment.
You might want to have a 'bad handling' string that varies from hour to hour, one that is displayed as part of a 'quote of the moment'.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524</id>
	<title>Easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Public Static String default\_Address = "1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA" --- hide this somewhere</p><p>Private Sub Void Route\_Bagggage(bag b)<br>{<br>if (comment.text == NULL)<br>{<br>b.destination = default\_Address<br>}<br>else<br>{<br>b.destination = comment.text<br>}<br>}</p><p>Or do I have to make it slightly more deceptive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Public Static String default \ _Address = " 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW , Washington , DC 20500 , USA " --- hide this somewherePrivate Sub Void Route \ _Bagggage ( bag b ) { if ( comment.text = = NULL ) { b.destination = default \ _Address } else { b.destination = comment.text } } Or do I have to make it slightly more deceptive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Public Static String default\_Address = "1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA" --- hide this somewherePrivate Sub Void Route\_Bagggage(bag b){if (comment.text == NULL){b.destination = default\_Address}else{b.destination = comment.text}}Or do I have to make it slightly more deceptive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596452</id>
	<title>Why not, I suppose.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.</p></div><p>Eh, why re-invent the wheel? The software already in use does a good enough job of that already.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.Eh , why re-invent the wheel ?
The software already in use does a good enough job of that already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.Eh, why re-invent the wheel?
The software already in use does a good enough job of that already.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>markkezner</author>
	<datestamp>1259867880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny, but you've got a point. What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it. Would you hire that guy? </p><p>It's not worth the $100 gift certificate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , but you 've got a point .
What would a potential employer think when , upon googling your name , they learn that you 're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it .
Would you hire that guy ?
It 's not worth the $ 100 gift certificate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, but you've got a point.
What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it.
Would you hire that guy?
It's not worth the $100 gift certificate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601458</id>
	<title>Re:Possibilities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259847540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not very good... the obvious question (during code review) is "why are you looking for the last occurrence and not the first?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not very good... the obvious question ( during code review ) is " why are you looking for the last occurrence and not the first ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not very good... the obvious question (during code review) is "why are you looking for the last occurrence and not the first?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</id>
	<title>Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259864820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.</p></div><p>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596438</id>
	<title>Wait a sec...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>| This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.</p><p>What, we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>| This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.What , we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>| This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field.What, we actually need to write code for something that happens by nature?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597390</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259868960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You think any of these guys are going to submit with their real names?

Nah, they'll spend the extra 10 minutes to come up with a super-sweet hacker name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You think any of these guys are going to submit with their real names ?
Nah , they 'll spend the extra 10 minutes to come up with a super-sweet hacker name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think any of these guys are going to submit with their real names?
Nah, they'll spend the extra 10 minutes to come up with a super-sweet hacker name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596672</id>
	<title>Contest or Job Posting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259866140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag</p></div><p>sounds like Delta is looking for new programmers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bagsounds like Delta is looking for new programmers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bagsounds like Delta is looking for new programmers
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598046</id>
	<title>Re:For extra points:</title>
	<author>Rigrig</author>
	<datestamp>1259871540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Might raise a few eyebrows though:</p><p>*) Extend the uni2asc/asc2uni =&gt; OPENSSL\_uni2asc/OPENSSL\_asc2uni<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; renaming to all platforms (within the 0.9.8 branch, this was<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; done conditionally on Netware platforms to avoid a name clash).</p><p>*) Support for routing luggage.</p><p>*) Add a new SSL\_MODE\_RELEASE\_BUFFERS mode flag to release unused buffer<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RAM on SSL connections.  This option can save about 34k per idle SSL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might raise a few eyebrows though : * ) Extend the uni2asc/asc2uni = &gt; OPENSSL \ _uni2asc/OPENSSL \ _asc2uni           renaming to all platforms ( within the 0.9.8 branch , this was           done conditionally on Netware platforms to avoid a name clash ) .
* ) Support for routing luggage .
* ) Add a new SSL \ _MODE \ _RELEASE \ _BUFFERS mode flag to release unused buffer           RAM on SSL connections .
This option can save about 34k per idle SSL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might raise a few eyebrows though:*) Extend the uni2asc/asc2uni =&gt; OPENSSL\_uni2asc/OPENSSL\_asc2uni
          renaming to all platforms (within the 0.9.8 branch, this was
          done conditionally on Netware platforms to avoid a name clash).
*) Support for routing luggage.
*) Add a new SSL\_MODE\_RELEASE\_BUFFERS mode flag to release unused buffer
          RAM on SSL connections.
This option can save about 34k per idle SSL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596550</id>
	<title>Candy from a baby</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1259865720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got this nailed.  But do you have to know in advance the mystery input combo?  I could never figure that out before I throw it over to QA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got this nailed .
But do you have to know in advance the mystery input combo ?
I could never figure that out before I throw it over to QA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got this nailed.
But do you have to know in advance the mystery input combo?
I could never figure that out before I throw it over to QA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596</id>
	<title>For Slashdot Lamerz:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> "write short, readable, clear and innocent C code"</p><p>1. None of the above adjectives apply to C.</p><p>2. The deadline is actually April 1, not March 1, 2010 for the idiots who would participate in such a waste of time.</p><p>Yours In Ashgabat,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" write short , readable , clear and innocent C code " 1 .
None of the above adjectives apply to C.2 .
The deadline is actually April 1 , not March 1 , 2010 for the idiots who would participate in such a waste of time.Yours In Ashgabat,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "write short, readable, clear and innocent C code"1.
None of the above adjectives apply to C.2.
The deadline is actually April 1, not March 1, 2010 for the idiots who would participate in such a waste of time.Yours In Ashgabat,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597758</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259870460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Funny, but you've got a point.</p> </div><p>The best humor also makes a good point. Thanks for noticing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , but you 've got a point .
The best humor also makes a good point .
Thanks for noticing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, but you've got a point.
The best humor also makes a good point.
Thanks for noticing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30650984</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Geminii</author>
	<datestamp>1231088400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Current routing software stops before the "if".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Current routing software stops before the " if " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Current routing software stops before the "if".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598298</id>
	<title>Re:For extra points:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259872380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel, you get a job at the NSA.</p></div><p>No, you should write a self-reproducing 'bug' for a well-known compiler suite: <a href="http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html" title="bell-labs.com" rel="nofollow">Reflections on Trusting Trust</a> [bell-labs.com] </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel , you get a job at the NSA.No , you should write a self-reproducing 'bug ' for a well-known compiler suite : Reflections on Trusting Trust [ bell-labs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel, you get a job at the NSA.No, you should write a self-reproducing 'bug' for a well-known compiler suite: Reflections on Trusting Trust [bell-labs.com] 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597748</id>
	<title>Re:Possibilities</title>
	<author>bberens</author>
	<datestamp>1259870400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could see this... have the front-end and back-end communicate over a socket or something and have a simple delimited message format where someone could alter the results by using a sql-injection style attack on your parser.  That way, at least, the input has to be somewhat complex, but the code could look very innocent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could see this... have the front-end and back-end communicate over a socket or something and have a simple delimited message format where someone could alter the results by using a sql-injection style attack on your parser .
That way , at least , the input has to be somewhat complex , but the code could look very innocent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could see this... have the front-end and back-end communicate over a socket or something and have a simple delimited message format where someone could alter the results by using a sql-injection style attack on your parser.
That way, at least, the input has to be somewhat complex, but the code could look very innocent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546</id>
	<title>Possibilities</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1259865660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have the time for something like this, but it seems to me a good possibility would be to have all of your inputs that the clerk fills out be contiguous in memory, including the destination, have the algorithm to figure out what destination to go to scan through the whole destination string looking for matches (rather than looking for an exact match) and taking the last one it finds, and have a broken bounds check for the length of that string so that the algorithm looks into the comments section as well.</p><p>So, for example, if the clerk fills out the destination as "LAX" but writes in the comments section, "Do not confuse his bags with those owned by  CID who is also going to a different final destination; they're very similar looking.", the bags would be routed to Cedar Rapids (CID) instead of Los Angeles (LAX).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have the time for something like this , but it seems to me a good possibility would be to have all of your inputs that the clerk fills out be contiguous in memory , including the destination , have the algorithm to figure out what destination to go to scan through the whole destination string looking for matches ( rather than looking for an exact match ) and taking the last one it finds , and have a broken bounds check for the length of that string so that the algorithm looks into the comments section as well.So , for example , if the clerk fills out the destination as " LAX " but writes in the comments section , " Do not confuse his bags with those owned by CID who is also going to a different final destination ; they 're very similar looking .
" , the bags would be routed to Cedar Rapids ( CID ) instead of Los Angeles ( LAX ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have the time for something like this, but it seems to me a good possibility would be to have all of your inputs that the clerk fills out be contiguous in memory, including the destination, have the algorithm to figure out what destination to go to scan through the whole destination string looking for matches (rather than looking for an exact match) and taking the last one it finds, and have a broken bounds check for the length of that string so that the algorithm looks into the comments section as well.So, for example, if the clerk fills out the destination as "LAX" but writes in the comments section, "Do not confuse his bags with those owned by  CID who is also going to a different final destination; they're very similar looking.
", the bags would be routed to Cedar Rapids (CID) instead of Los Angeles (LAX).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982</id>
	<title>Write up of last entry</title>
	<author>John Meacham</author>
	<datestamp>1259837280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am the winner of the previous underhanded C contest. If anyone is interested, I wrote up a description of my entry on my blog here: <a href="http://notanumber.net/archives/54/underhanded-c-the-leaky-redaction" title="notanumber.net">http://notanumber.net/archives/54/underhanded-c-the-leaky-redaction</a> [notanumber.net]</p><p>It was a fun contest to enter and now I can shop at thinkgeek for silly gadgets without feeling guitly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am the winner of the previous underhanded C contest .
If anyone is interested , I wrote up a description of my entry on my blog here : http : //notanumber.net/archives/54/underhanded-c-the-leaky-redaction [ notanumber.net ] It was a fun contest to enter and now I can shop at thinkgeek for silly gadgets without feeling guitly : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am the winner of the previous underhanded C contest.
If anyone is interested, I wrote up a description of my entry on my blog here: http://notanumber.net/archives/54/underhanded-c-the-leaky-redaction [notanumber.net]It was a fun contest to enter and now I can shop at thinkgeek for silly gadgets without feeling guitly :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597778</id>
	<title>Re:Easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259870520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>C motherfucker, do you speak it?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>C motherfucker , do you speak it ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C motherfucker, do you speak it?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604152</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1262262600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603272</id>
	<title>Re:Write up of last entry</title>
	<author>troll8901</author>
	<datestamp>1259867460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got just five words to all the successful contestants:</p><p>YOU GUYS ARE TEH WINZ !!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got just five words to all the successful contestants : YOU GUYS ARE TEH WINZ ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got just five words to all the successful contestants:YOU GUYS ARE TEH WINZ !!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596730</id>
	<title>Re:This sounds familiar to,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259866380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IOCC rocks!</p><p> <a href="http://www0.us.ioccc.org/1987/korn.c" title="ioccc.org" rel="nofollow">korn.c</a> [ioccc.org] is a good example, probably one of the best one-liner programs I have seen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IOCC rocks !
korn.c [ ioccc.org ] is a good example , probably one of the best one-liner programs I have seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IOCC rocks!
korn.c [ioccc.org] is a good example, probably one of the best one-liner programs I have seen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601360</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1259846760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it.</p><p>Thats a pretty lousy line of reasoning and probably responsible for all the mediocrity out there in the computer world.  Heck, what if your employer found out you were in the military and fought? Do you want to hire the guy who shot at Iraqis with a 50 caliber machine gun?  Or the guy who wrote an ad blocking program? Or the guy who wrote a cover letter well enough to fool you into interviewing him?</p><p>Yes, you do because all these things are signs of courage and intelligence.  Once you start filtering anyone with any background in anything controversial, powerful, different, or mildly questionable then you can pretty much guarantee yourself a staff of dim bulbs and products that do miserably in the market.</p><p>This is also why I think its so hard for smart people to be in politics. The electorate is so scared of anything that deviates from the mainstream that we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat' overly-religious men, who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives and going to church but not so good at governing and coming up with and implementing good solutions for the public good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; What would a potential employer think when , upon googling your name , they learn that you 're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it.Thats a pretty lousy line of reasoning and probably responsible for all the mediocrity out there in the computer world .
Heck , what if your employer found out you were in the military and fought ?
Do you want to hire the guy who shot at Iraqis with a 50 caliber machine gun ?
Or the guy who wrote an ad blocking program ?
Or the guy who wrote a cover letter well enough to fool you into interviewing him ? Yes , you do because all these things are signs of courage and intelligence .
Once you start filtering anyone with any background in anything controversial , powerful , different , or mildly questionable then you can pretty much guarantee yourself a staff of dim bulbs and products that do miserably in the market.This is also why I think its so hard for smart people to be in politics .
The electorate is so scared of anything that deviates from the mainstream that we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat ' overly-religious men , who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives and going to church but not so good at governing and coming up with and implementing good solutions for the public good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it.Thats a pretty lousy line of reasoning and probably responsible for all the mediocrity out there in the computer world.
Heck, what if your employer found out you were in the military and fought?
Do you want to hire the guy who shot at Iraqis with a 50 caliber machine gun?
Or the guy who wrote an ad blocking program?
Or the guy who wrote a cover letter well enough to fool you into interviewing him?Yes, you do because all these things are signs of courage and intelligence.
Once you start filtering anyone with any background in anything controversial, powerful, different, or mildly questionable then you can pretty much guarantee yourself a staff of dim bulbs and products that do miserably in the market.This is also why I think its so hard for smart people to be in politics.
The electorate is so scared of anything that deviates from the mainstream that we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat' overly-religious men, who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives and going to church but not so good at governing and coming up with and implementing good solutions for the public good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597060</id>
	<title>We're sorry, Mr...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259867700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I. C. Weener, we seem to have misplaced your luggage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I. C. Weener , we seem to have misplaced your luggage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I. C. Weener, we seem to have misplaced your luggage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30626392</id>
	<title>The original winner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1230892800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And in other news: we learn that C was actually invented during the Underhanded Programming Language Contest of 1972.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And in other news : we learn that C was actually invented during the Underhanded Programming Language Contest of 1972 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in other news: we learn that C was actually invented during the Underhanded Programming Language Contest of 1972.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597914</id>
	<title>Re:For extra points:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259871060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But what project accepts code as specialized on a specific task as this?<br>Is there such a do-all software?</p><p>Oh, wait... there&rsquo;s Emacs, of course! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But what project accepts code as specialized on a specific task as this ? Is there such a do-all software ? Oh , wait... there    s Emacs , of course !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what project accepts code as specialized on a specific task as this?Is there such a do-all software?Oh, wait... there’s Emacs, of course!
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604592</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1262270460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.</p></div><p>Actually, I fully expect the entries to receive this very sort of examination...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.Actually , I fully expect the entries to receive this very sort of examination.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.Actually, I fully expect the entries to receive this very sort of examination...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348</id>
	<title>This sounds familiar to,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ioccc.org/" title="ioccc.org" rel="nofollow">The International Obfuscated C Code Contest</a> [ioccc.org].<br>
If anyone can do something underhanded and make it compile it is a C programmer.<br>
Of course if VB was an actual programming language you could say the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The International Obfuscated C Code Contest [ ioccc.org ] .
If anyone can do something underhanded and make it compile it is a C programmer .
Of course if VB was an actual programming language you could say the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The International Obfuscated C Code Contest [ioccc.org].
If anyone can do something underhanded and make it compile it is a C programmer.
Of course if VB was an actual programming language you could say the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30651686</id>
	<title>As opposed to?</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1231095300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
As opposed to the current system that does it at random?  If you come up with a system that ONLY does it when malicious text is written in the comment field, the government wants to talk with you.  They paid $500 per LINE for a <a href="http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~mmoore/CIS3300/handouts/SciAmSept1994.html" title="gsu.edu">baggage-routing system that never worked.</a> [gsu.edu] It was finally abandoned after half a billion was sunk into it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This year 's challenge : write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer 's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field As opposed to the current system that does it at random ?
If you come up with a system that ONLY does it when malicious text is written in the comment field , the government wants to talk with you .
They paid $ 500 per LINE for a baggage-routing system that never worked .
[ gsu.edu ] It was finally abandoned after half a billion was sunk into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This year's challenge: write a luggage routing program that mysteriously misroutes a customer's bag if a check-in clerk places just the right kind of text in a comment field

As opposed to the current system that does it at random?
If you come up with a system that ONLY does it when malicious text is written in the comment field, the government wants to talk with you.
They paid $500 per LINE for a baggage-routing system that never worked.
[gsu.edu] It was finally abandoned after half a billion was sunk into it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598714</id>
	<title>What happened to the obfuscated C contest?</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1259830920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is way cool, yes.  But I miss the obfuscated C contest which was also way cool eg in terms of discovering legal features of the language that probably should never get used LOL.  What happened to it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is way cool , yes .
But I miss the obfuscated C contest which was also way cool eg in terms of discovering legal features of the language that probably should never get used LOL .
What happened to it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is way cool, yes.
But I miss the obfuscated C contest which was also way cool eg in terms of discovering legal features of the language that probably should never get used LOL.
What happened to it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608738</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262291220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it. Would you hire that guy?</p></div><p>I am fairly sure that you are able to hit someone on the head. Should I hire you or not, based on the risk of you hitting some colleague on the head?</p><p>Stupid reasoning.</p><p><b>Of course</b> I would hire such a person. Obviously talented. I always assume people have some sense of ethics until I see a reason not to. How do <b>you</b> survive in this world?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would a potential employer think when , upon googling your name , they learn that you 're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it .
Would you hire that guy ? I am fairly sure that you are able to hit someone on the head .
Should I hire you or not , based on the risk of you hitting some colleague on the head ? Stupid reasoning.Of course I would hire such a person .
Obviously talented .
I always assume people have some sense of ethics until I see a reason not to .
How do you survive in this world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would a potential employer think when, upon googling your name, they learn that you're so good at hiding malicious code that you won a contest for it.
Would you hire that guy?I am fairly sure that you are able to hit someone on the head.
Should I hire you or not, based on the risk of you hitting some colleague on the head?Stupid reasoning.Of course I would hire such a person.
Obviously talented.
I always assume people have some sense of ethics until I see a reason not to.
How do you survive in this world?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598218</id>
	<title>Re:For extra points:</title>
	<author>Rycross</author>
	<datestamp>1259872140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://kerneltrap.org/node/1584" title="kerneltrap.org">Someone tried something similar to that.</a> [kerneltrap.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone tried something similar to that .
[ kerneltrap.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone tried something similar to that.
[kerneltrap.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609868</id>
	<title>Re:Easy?</title>
	<author>AniVisual</author>
	<datestamp>1262254500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see an abuse of sprintf() some in handy... Where it normally does sprintf("Insert comment here"), typing "\%s" will, well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see an abuse of sprintf ( ) some in handy... Where it normally does sprintf ( " Insert comment here " ) , typing " \ % s " will , well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see an abuse of sprintf() some in handy... Where it normally does sprintf("Insert comment here"), typing "\%s" will, well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596544</id>
	<title>A challenge?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems like this has already been done and is in use at airports worldwide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like this has already been done and is in use at airports worldwide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like this has already been done and is in use at airports worldwide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603916</id>
	<title>Re:Easy?</title>
	<author>pjt33</author>
	<datestamp>1262256840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>O, stewardess! I speak Java.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>O , stewardess !
I speak Java .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O, stewardess!
I speak Java.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598052</id>
	<title>Re:Possibilities</title>
	<author>bonkeydcow</author>
	<datestamp>1259871540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the method I would use, I was already thinking this before I read your post. I'm sure this method will be implemented a lot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the method I would use , I was already thinking this before I read your post .
I 'm sure this method will be implemented a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the method I would use, I was already thinking this before I read your post.
I'm sure this method will be implemented a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596874</id>
	<title>Re:For Slashdot Lamerz:</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259866980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> "write short, readable, clear and innocent C code"</p><p>1. None of the above adjectives apply to C.</p></div><p>See, thats why its a contest. It has nothing to do with the scenario.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" write short , readable , clear and innocent C code " 1 .
None of the above adjectives apply to C.See , thats why its a contest .
It has nothing to do with the scenario .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "write short, readable, clear and innocent C code"1.
None of the above adjectives apply to C.See, thats why its a contest.
It has nothing to do with the scenario.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597900</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259871000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, especially if the word "fragile" or "valuable" is in the comment field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , especially if the word " fragile " or " valuable " is in the comment field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, especially if the word "fragile" or "valuable" is in the comment field.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599868</id>
	<title>Something like</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1259836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never done this myself, but people have inserted backdoors into Unix V7 kernels they compiled by replacing a "if (userid == 0)" with a "if (userid = 0)" check. I assume they are looking for a more sophisticated version of that trick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never done this myself , but people have inserted backdoors into Unix V7 kernels they compiled by replacing a " if ( userid = = 0 ) " with a " if ( userid = 0 ) " check .
I assume they are looking for a more sophisticated version of that trick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never done this myself, but people have inserted backdoors into Unix V7 kernels they compiled by replacing a "if (userid == 0)" with a "if (userid = 0)" check.
I assume they are looking for a more sophisticated version of that trick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597926</id>
	<title>Technology makes many things obsolete ...</title>
	<author>Krishnoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259871060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depending on the number of working entries, I think this guy will have to update <a href="http://www.spaff.com/poesy/50\_ways.html" title="spaff.com">his song</a> [spaff.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depending on the number of working entries , I think this guy will have to update his song [ spaff.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depending on the number of working entries, I think this guy will have to update his song [spaff.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601206</id>
	<title>Re:For extra points:</title>
	<author>bjamesv</author>
	<datestamp>1259845440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>protip: if you're just talking about the kernel.. you just call it Linux.
<p>
and policing a patch for a buffer overflow is a little easier then hunting through a whole app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>protip : if you 're just talking about the kernel.. you just call it Linux .
and policing a patch for a buffer overflow is a little easier then hunting through a whole app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>protip: if you're just talking about the kernel.. you just call it Linux.
and policing a patch for a buffer overflow is a little easier then hunting through a whole app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599162</id>
	<title>Re:Not fair!</title>
	<author>Skater</author>
	<datestamp>1259832900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone else remember the new Denver Airport's original luggage system?  This system singlehandedly delayed the airport's opening for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver\_International\_Airport#Automated\_baggage\_system" title="wikipedia.org">over a year</a> [wikipedia.org].  Eventually the airport retrofitted a standard baggage moving system.  If someone has access to the code of the original system, they could easily submit that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else remember the new Denver Airport 's original luggage system ?
This system singlehandedly delayed the airport 's opening for over a year [ wikipedia.org ] .
Eventually the airport retrofitted a standard baggage moving system .
If someone has access to the code of the original system , they could easily submit that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else remember the new Denver Airport's original luggage system?
This system singlehandedly delayed the airport's opening for over a year [wikipedia.org].
Eventually the airport retrofitted a standard baggage moving system.
If someone has access to the code of the original system, they could easily submit that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597854</id>
	<title>Re:Easy?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259870820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. You easily failed! ^^</p><p>The whole point of the contest is, that there is no &ldquo;hide somewhere&rdquo;. <em>All</em> the code must pass an inspection and look reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
You easily failed !
^ ^ The whole point of the contest is , that there is no    hide somewhere    .
All the code must pass an inspection and look reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
You easily failed!
^^The whole point of the contest is, that there is no “hide somewhere”.
All the code must pass an inspection and look reasonable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134</id>
	<title>For extra points:</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1259867940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For extra points submit this to your favourite open source project and have it accepted into the main code release - since it appears to be prefectly geniune, compiles, and can do what it appears to - it's certainly possible. Finally demonstrate your backdoor when the project is released to the wild. <br> <br> If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel, you get a job at the NSA.<p><div class="quote"><p>Write short, readable, perfectly innocent looking C code, that somehow commits an evil act under certain circumstances.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For extra points submit this to your favourite open source project and have it accepted into the main code release - since it appears to be prefectly geniune , compiles , and can do what it appears to - it 's certainly possible .
Finally demonstrate your backdoor when the project is released to the wild .
If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel , you get a job at the NSA.Write short , readable , perfectly innocent looking C code , that somehow commits an evil act under certain circumstances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For extra points submit this to your favourite open source project and have it accepted into the main code release - since it appears to be prefectly geniune, compiles, and can do what it appears to - it's certainly possible.
Finally demonstrate your backdoor when the project is released to the wild.
If you manage to get this into the GNU/Linux Kernel, you get a job at the NSA.Write short, readable, perfectly innocent looking C code, that somehow commits an evil act under certain circumstances.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598958</id>
	<title>Useless use of Cat</title>
	<author>Saint Stephen</author>
	<datestamp>1259832060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't the example on the contest page qualify as Useless Use of Cat?</p><p>i.e., shouldn't this line:<br>cat luggage.dat |<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./lug UA129086 - - -</p><p>be this:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./lug UA129086 - - - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat\_(Unix)#Useless\_use\_of\_cat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't the example on the contest page qualify as Useless Use of Cat ? i.e. , should n't this line : cat luggage.dat | ./lug UA129086 - - -be this : ./lug UA129086 - - - http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat \ _ ( Unix ) # Useless \ _use \ _of \ _cat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't the example on the contest page qualify as Useless Use of Cat?i.e., shouldn't this line:cat luggage.dat | ./lug UA129086 - - -be this: ./lug UA129086 - - - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat\_(Unix)#Useless\_use\_of\_cat</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597324</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>FenwayFrank</author>
	<datestamp>1259868720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.</p></div><p>Second prize: two of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.Second prize : two of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All participants will also receive complimentary cavity-searches at airport checkpoints.Second prize: two of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599300</id>
	<title>My Entry</title>
	<author>Cruxus</author>
	<datestamp>1259833560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>if (strcmp(entry-&gt;description, "lose luggage") == 0) {
        loseLuggage(entry);
}</tt>
(It's been awhile since I've done anything vaguely C.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>if ( strcmp ( entry- &gt; description , " lose luggage " ) = = 0 ) { loseLuggage ( entry ) ; } ( It 's been awhile since I 've done anything vaguely C. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if (strcmp(entry-&gt;description, "lose luggage") == 0) {
        loseLuggage(entry);
}
(It's been awhile since I've done anything vaguely C.)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605862</id>
	<title>Re:Possibilities</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1262278740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&ldquo;Um, why are you using sockets to do this? We just asked for you to read some luggage records from stdin and send the output to stdout.&rdquo;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>   Um , why are you using sockets to do this ?
We just asked for you to read some luggage records from stdin and send the output to stdout.   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>“Um, why are you using sockets to do this?
We just asked for you to read some luggage records from stdin and send the output to stdout.”</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597058</id>
	<title>I'm really impressed</title>
	<author>troll8901</author>
	<datestamp>1259867700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've read the entire blog, and I must say, I'm impressed.  Very impressed.  <i>Very, very</i> impressed.</p><p>The person who writes the criteria knows what he's/she's writing about.</p><p>And the winners who submit the results are <i>really, really</i> good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've read the entire blog , and I must say , I 'm impressed .
Very impressed .
Very , very impressed.The person who writes the criteria knows what he 's/she 's writing about.And the winners who submit the results are really , really good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've read the entire blog, and I must say, I'm impressed.
Very impressed.
Very, very impressed.The person who writes the criteria knows what he's/she's writing about.And the winners who submit the results are really, really good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597094</id>
	<title>Re:This sounds familiar to,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259867820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to say, don't forget Perl programmers, but then I remembered the legibility requirement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to say , do n't forget Perl programmers , but then I remembered the legibility requirement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to say, don't forget Perl programmers, but then I remembered the legibility requirement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609694</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really impressed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262253480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, that was a really helpful comment. "Dude...it was all...<i>good</i>...
<br> <br>Yeah, I know, this comment is real helpful, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that was a really helpful comment .
" Dude...it was all...good.. . Yeah , I know , this comment is real helpful , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that was a really helpful comment.
"Dude...it was all...good...
 Yeah, I know, this comment is real helpful, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603208</id>
	<title>CONFESSIONS: Who here admits to underhanded code?</title>
	<author>md65536</author>
	<datestamp>1259866260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who here has put underhanded code in released products?</p><p>I admit to adding and concealing the <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/rpg/starwarsknightsoftor/hints.html" title="gamespot.com" rel="nofollow">flight cam easter egg </a> [gamespot.com] in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Rebublic.  It wasn't nearly as clever as the contest entries, and it would be impossible to claim innocence if I was caught, but I enabled the "debug" cam using a generic-sounding external variable, put the code inside an "#ifndef \_DEBUG" block, added a comment to describe the code as some boring debug message thing (hardly worth looking at), and had a little loop to decode the "Punch it, Chewie!" message to that the string wouldn't show up in the executable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who here has put underhanded code in released products ? I admit to adding and concealing the flight cam easter egg [ gamespot.com ] in Star Wars : Knights of the Old Rebublic .
It was n't nearly as clever as the contest entries , and it would be impossible to claim innocence if I was caught , but I enabled the " debug " cam using a generic-sounding external variable , put the code inside an " # ifndef \ _DEBUG " block , added a comment to describe the code as some boring debug message thing ( hardly worth looking at ) , and had a little loop to decode the " Punch it , Chewie !
" message to that the string would n't show up in the executable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who here has put underhanded code in released products?I admit to adding and concealing the flight cam easter egg  [gamespot.com] in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Rebublic.
It wasn't nearly as clever as the contest entries, and it would be impossible to claim innocence if I was caught, but I enabled the "debug" cam using a generic-sounding external variable, put the code inside an "#ifndef \_DEBUG" block, added a comment to describe the code as some boring debug message thing (hardly worth looking at), and had a little loop to decode the "Punch it, Chewie!
" message to that the string wouldn't show up in the executable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605114</id>
	<title>Re:Write up of last entry</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1262274420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I loved your solution, by the way. Will you be entering this year&rsquo;s contest &ndash; or have you already? (Okay, so it&rsquo;s only two days in as of yet...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I loved your solution , by the way .
Will you be entering this year    s contest    or have you already ?
( Okay , so it    s only two days in as of yet... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loved your solution, by the way.
Will you be entering this year’s contest – or have you already?
(Okay, so it’s only two days in as of yet...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598180</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>the\_fat\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1259872020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more like a complimentary DMCA take down for reproducing the current system.<br>I mean, realy, isn't this what it does now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more like a complimentary DMCA take down for reproducing the current system.I mean , realy , is n't this what it does now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more like a complimentary DMCA take down for reproducing the current system.I mean, realy, isn't this what it does now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597264</id>
	<title>Totally opposite</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1259868480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The true "Underhanded" program would be one that was perfectly readable, so readable in fact that you totally overlook the sneaky thing it was doing because what you think it's doing seems so clear.</p><p>The ObsfuC contest is all about code that even after staring you can't tell what the heck is going on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The true " Underhanded " program would be one that was perfectly readable , so readable in fact that you totally overlook the sneaky thing it was doing because what you think it 's doing seems so clear.The ObsfuC contest is all about code that even after staring you ca n't tell what the heck is going on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The true "Underhanded" program would be one that was perfectly readable, so readable in fact that you totally overlook the sneaky thing it was doing because what you think it's doing seems so clear.The ObsfuC contest is all about code that even after staring you can't tell what the heck is going on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604336</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1262266740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat' overly-religious<br>&gt; men, who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives...<br><br>Right.  Which President are you referring to?<br><br>Barack Obama is practically the opposite of conformist, ramming his program down everyone's throats, including the congresspersons of his own party.  George W. Bush rocked the boat all over the place, taking us to war when a good chunk of the world was adamantly against it, not once but twice.  Clinton is mostly known for cheating on his wife.  Do I really need to go through the whole list?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat ' overly-religious &gt; men , who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives...Right .
Which President are you referring to ? Barack Obama is practically the opposite of conformist , ramming his program down everyone 's throats , including the congresspersons of his own party .
George W. Bush rocked the boat all over the place , taking us to war when a good chunk of the world was adamantly against it , not once but twice .
Clinton is mostly known for cheating on his wife .
Do I really need to go through the whole list ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; we only vote in conformist 'never rock the boat' overly-religious&gt; men, who turn out to be good at not cheating on their wives...Right.
Which President are you referring to?Barack Obama is practically the opposite of conformist, ramming his program down everyone's throats, including the congresspersons of his own party.
George W. Bush rocked the boat all over the place, taking us to war when a good chunk of the world was adamantly against it, not once but twice.
Clinton is mostly known for cheating on his wife.
Do I really need to go through the whole list?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424</id>
	<title>Not fair!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259865300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone who works at any major airline can just submit the real production code they use for luggage routing and win the contest for sure!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597930</id>
	<title>So that's what happened at DIA!</title>
	<author>plopez</author>
	<datestamp>1259871060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But years before the contest.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver\_International\_Airport#Automated\_baggage\_system" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver\_International\_Airport#Automated\_baggage\_system</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/problems.html" title="calpoly.edu">http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/problems.html</a> [calpoly.edu]</p><p>The second article sounds familiar. All the warning signs of a risky project failure were there, but no one seemed to know it or pay attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But years before the contest.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver \ _International \ _Airport # Automated \ _baggage \ _system [ wikipedia.org ] http : //users.csc.calpoly.edu/ ~ dstearns/SchlohProject/problems.html [ calpoly.edu ] The second article sounds familiar .
All the warning signs of a risky project failure were there , but no one seemed to know it or pay attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But years before the contest.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver\_International\_Airport#Automated\_baggage\_system [wikipedia.org]http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/problems.html [calpoly.edu]The second article sounds familiar.
All the warning signs of a risky project failure were there, but no one seemed to know it or pay attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597434</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259869080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes it is. Dude, that's like 3 sets of buckyballs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes it is .
Dude , that 's like 3 sets of buckyballs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes it is.
Dude, that's like 3 sets of buckyballs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599192</id>
	<title>Been There, Seen it, Done it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259833020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You all remember London Heathrow Terminal 5 don't you?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You all remember London Heathrow Terminal 5 do n't you ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You all remember London Heathrow Terminal 5 don't you?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30651686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30650984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_30_1446221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30600602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30600602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30605114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30601360
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30608738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30651686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30650984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30598180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30604592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30599146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30603916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30597854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30609868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_30_1446221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_30_1446221.30596550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
