<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_27_1639207</id>
	<title>Fifth Anniversary of a Cosmic Onslaught</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1261938660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:thebadastronomerNO@SPAMgmail.com" rel="nofollow">The Bad Astronomer</a> writes <i>"Five years ago today (December 27, 2004), <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/27/anniversary-of-a-cosmic-blast/">a vast wave of high-energy gamma and X-rays washed over the Earth</a>, blinding satellites and partially ionizing the Earth's atmosphere. The culprit was a superflare from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar">magnetar</a> SGR 1806-20, located 50,000 light years away. The energy released was mind-numbing: in one-fifth of a second, this supercharged magnetic neutron star blasted out as much energy as the Sun does in 250,000 years!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Bad Astronomer writes " Five years ago today ( December 27 , 2004 ) , a vast wave of high-energy gamma and X-rays washed over the Earth , blinding satellites and partially ionizing the Earth 's atmosphere .
The culprit was a superflare from the magnetar SGR 1806-20 , located 50,000 light years away .
The energy released was mind-numbing : in one-fifth of a second , this supercharged magnetic neutron star blasted out as much energy as the Sun does in 250,000 years !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Bad Astronomer writes "Five years ago today (December 27, 2004), a vast wave of high-energy gamma and X-rays washed over the Earth, blinding satellites and partially ionizing the Earth's atmosphere.
The culprit was a superflare from the magnetar SGR 1806-20, located 50,000 light years away.
The energy released was mind-numbing: in one-fifth of a second, this supercharged magnetic neutron star blasted out as much energy as the Sun does in 250,000 years!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030</id>
	<title>Tsunami</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261905000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just 1 day after the tsunami. Could there be a connection?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just 1 day after the tsunami .
Could there be a connection ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just 1 day after the tsunami.
Could there be a connection?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022</id>
	<title>Eta Carinae</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261912260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>50,000 light years away and did all that? Imagine if it was say only 500 ly. We are kind of lucky that we don't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we?.....(cue scary music).</p></div><p>Eta Carinae is expected to go supernova real soon (astronomical time scale - could be tomorrow, could be 10^6 years from now). It's less than 8000 ly away which is not very close, but much closer than 50000ly. And when it goes pop, Eta Carinae will be a pretty big one. Its rotation axis does not point towards us, so effects would be mostly limited to satellites and anything in the upper atmosphere.<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>50,000 light years away and did all that ?
Imagine if it was say only 500 ly .
We are kind of lucky that we do n't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we ? .... .
( cue scary music ) .Eta Carinae is expected to go supernova real soon ( astronomical time scale - could be tomorrow , could be 10 ^ 6 years from now ) .
It 's less than 8000 ly away which is not very close , but much closer than 50000ly .
And when it goes pop , Eta Carinae will be a pretty big one .
Its rotation axis does not point towards us , so effects would be mostly limited to satellites and anything in the upper atmosphere .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta \ _Carinae [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>50,000 light years away and did all that?
Imagine if it was say only 500 ly.
We are kind of lucky that we don't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we?.....
(cue scary music).Eta Carinae is expected to go supernova real soon (astronomical time scale - could be tomorrow, could be 10^6 years from now).
It's less than 8000 ly away which is not very close, but much closer than 50000ly.
And when it goes pop, Eta Carinae will be a pretty big one.
Its rotation axis does not point towards us, so effects would be mostly limited to satellites and anything in the upper atmosphere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575584</id>
	<title>Re: 50,000?</title>
	<author>cffrost</author>
	<datestamp>1261994520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(cue scary music)</p></div><p>Roger, <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/ominous\_music\_heard\_throughout\_u" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">cuing scary music.</a> [theonion.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( cue scary music ) Roger , cuing scary music .
[ theonion.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(cue scary music)Roger, cuing scary music.
[theonion.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564538</id>
	<title>ZOMG! Are we OK?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261943520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ZOMG! Are we OK? Are we still here? Did we survive?</htmltext>
<tokenext>ZOMG !
Are we OK ?
Are we still here ?
Did we survive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ZOMG!
Are we OK?
Are we still here?
Did we survive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564518</id>
	<title>Coincidence?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261943340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This happened 1 day after the 9.3 magnitude Indian Ocean earthquake.</p><p>Coincidence?  I think not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This happened 1 day after the 9.3 magnitude Indian Ocean earthquake.Coincidence ?
I think not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This happened 1 day after the 9.3 magnitude Indian Ocean earthquake.Coincidence?
I think not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575948</id>
	<title>Re:Was there anyone in space that day?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1261996200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.</i> Well, there was that good-looking astronaut named Sue Richards that was in orbit at the time, but they can't check her because for some reason nobody can find her. When asked about it, NASA's only reply was "We haven't seen her."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four , maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked .
Well , there was that good-looking astronaut named Sue Richards that was in orbit at the time , but they ca n't check her because for some reason nobody can find her .
When asked about it , NASA 's only reply was " We have n't seen her .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.
Well, there was that good-looking astronaut named Sue Richards that was in orbit at the time, but they can't check her because for some reason nobody can find her.
When asked about it, NASA's only reply was "We haven't seen her.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567576</id>
	<title>Re:Blasted Whom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261926240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i have one question to add to yours: during those 200ms, was I 'sun'bathing or indoors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i have one question to add to yours : during those 200ms , was I 'sun'bathing or indoors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have one question to add to yours: during those 200ms, was I 'sun'bathing or indoors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564792</id>
	<title>So that way I got a 771 error</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1261946400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that way I got a 771 error</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that way I got a 771 error</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that way I got a 771 error</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567112</id>
	<title>Nope. There was about 43.5 hours between them</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1261921920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the tsunami was west of the dateline, and TFA didn't mention the time or coordinate system used, I thought it might have been possible...<br>
But according to wikipedia, the earthquake that caused the tsunami occurred at 2004-12-26 00:58 UTC. According to <a href="http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1538-4357/637/2/L117/20172.text.html" title="iop.org">this paper</a> [iop.org], the "cosmic onslaught" hit us at 2004-12-27 21:30 UTC.
<br>So, no. It isn't possible for the neutron star event to have caused the tsunami as it was outside of the tsunami event's light cone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the tsunami was west of the dateline , and TFA did n't mention the time or coordinate system used , I thought it might have been possible.. . But according to wikipedia , the earthquake that caused the tsunami occurred at 2004-12-26 00 : 58 UTC .
According to this paper [ iop.org ] , the " cosmic onslaught " hit us at 2004-12-27 21 : 30 UTC .
So , no .
It is n't possible for the neutron star event to have caused the tsunami as it was outside of the tsunami event 's light cone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the tsunami was west of the dateline, and TFA didn't mention the time or coordinate system used, I thought it might have been possible...
But according to wikipedia, the earthquake that caused the tsunami occurred at 2004-12-26 00:58 UTC.
According to this paper [iop.org], the "cosmic onslaught" hit us at 2004-12-27 21:30 UTC.
So, no.
It isn't possible for the neutron star event to have caused the tsunami as it was outside of the tsunami event's light cone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564502</id>
	<title>and then bruce willis</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1261943220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and an orange hair milla jovovich stopped it in time by kissing with 4 rocks taken from the abdomen of a blue opera diva, after blowing up a chrome domed gary oldman and some french mid 1990s supermodels who morph into orcs. and chris tucker stuttered a lot</p><p>seriously, most entertaining french sci fi since jules verne</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and an orange hair milla jovovich stopped it in time by kissing with 4 rocks taken from the abdomen of a blue opera diva , after blowing up a chrome domed gary oldman and some french mid 1990s supermodels who morph into orcs .
and chris tucker stuttered a lotseriously , most entertaining french sci fi since jules verne</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and an orange hair milla jovovich stopped it in time by kissing with 4 rocks taken from the abdomen of a blue opera diva, after blowing up a chrome domed gary oldman and some french mid 1990s supermodels who morph into orcs.
and chris tucker stuttered a lotseriously, most entertaining french sci fi since jules verne</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567154</id>
	<title>Re:coincidence ???</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1261922280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; tl;dr.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I'll wait for the good remake of the movie, and just read the summary here on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  tl ; dr .     I 'll wait for the good remake of the movie , and just read the summary here on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  tl;dr.
    I'll wait for the good remake of the movie, and just read the summary here on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567908</id>
	<title>Re:Eta Carinae</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261929660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The annoying thing, of course, being that it may already have gone supernova. We won't be able to tell whether it has or not until the wave hits us. Fragging speed of light observations...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The annoying thing , of course , being that it may already have gone supernova .
We wo n't be able to tell whether it has or not until the wave hits us .
Fragging speed of light observations.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The annoying thing, of course, being that it may already have gone supernova.
We won't be able to tell whether it has or not until the wave hits us.
Fragging speed of light observations...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564456</id>
	<title>Five year old news?</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1261942860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess slashdot's servers must by 5 light years away huh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess slashdot 's servers must by 5 light years away huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess slashdot's servers must by 5 light years away huh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656</id>
	<title>50,000?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261944900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>50,000 light years away and did all that? Imagine if it was say only 500 ly. We are kind of lucky that we don't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we?.....(cue scary music).</p><p>Or sometimes far off stars merely have to "point" our way. Magnetism and other forces can focus radiation like a lens, and it may all point to a narrow spot in the sky. If your planet happens to be in the path of the beam, woes be. God doesn't play dice with the universe, he plays Russian Roulette. Time to buy some galactic insurance.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>50,000 light years away and did all that ?
Imagine if it was say only 500 ly .
We are kind of lucky that we do n't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we ? .... .
( cue scary music ) .Or sometimes far off stars merely have to " point " our way .
Magnetism and other forces can focus radiation like a lens , and it may all point to a narrow spot in the sky .
If your planet happens to be in the path of the beam , woes be .
God does n't play dice with the universe , he plays Russian Roulette .
Time to buy some galactic insurance .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>50,000 light years away and did all that?
Imagine if it was say only 500 ly.
We are kind of lucky that we don't have any flaky stars nearby....or do we?.....
(cue scary music).Or sometimes far off stars merely have to "point" our way.
Magnetism and other forces can focus radiation like a lens, and it may all point to a narrow spot in the sky.
If your planet happens to be in the path of the beam, woes be.
God doesn't play dice with the universe, he plays Russian Roulette.
Time to buy some galactic insurance.
     </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30570000</id>
	<title>Re:Blasted Whom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262008200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SGT means Sagittarius, therefore the blast came from that constellation, galaxy's core is in that direction also. This piece of sky is pretty much under or behind the horizon most of the time in the northern hemisphere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SGT means Sagittarius , therefore the blast came from that constellation , galaxy 's core is in that direction also .
This piece of sky is pretty much under or behind the horizon most of the time in the northern hemisphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SGT means Sagittarius, therefore the blast came from that constellation, galaxy's core is in that direction also.
This piece of sky is pretty much under or behind the horizon most of the time in the northern hemisphere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565538</id>
	<title>coincidence ???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261908420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>interesting that it happened almost 7 years to the day before the winter solstice of 2012<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. did those Mayans know something after all<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>maybe the Buddhist too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>THE TIMELESSNESS OF MIND</p><p>If one knows how to apply in a threefold manner this knowing of the mind,<br>all past knowledge lost to memory becomes perfectly clear, <strong>and also of the future thought of as unborn and unconcieved.</strong><br>In the present, when the mind remains as it is naturally it is ordinarily comprehended in its own time.</p><p>THE TRANSCENDENT AT-ONE-MENT</p><p>There being really no duality, pluralism is untrue.<br>Until duality is transcended and at-one-ment realized Enlightenment cannot be attained.<br>The whole of Sangsara and Nirvana, as an inseparable unity, <strong>are one's own mind.</strong></p><p>THE GREAT SELF-LIBERATION</p><p>Owing to worldly beliefs, <strong>which he is free to accept or reject,</strong> man wanders in Sangsara.<br>Therefore, practicing the Dharma, freed from every attachment,<br>grasp the whole essence of these teachings expounded in the yoga of Self-Liberation by Knowing the Mind in its Real Nature.<br>The truths set forth herein are known as 'The great Self-Liberation'; and in them culminates the Doctrine of the Great Ultimate Perfection.</p><p>THE GURU'S THIRD CHARGE TO THE DISCIPLES</p><p>Samaya gya, gya, gya.</p><p>THE NATURE OF MIND</p><p>That which is commonly called mind is of intuitive Wisdom.<br>Although the One Mind is, it has no existence.<br>Being the source of <strong>all the bliss of Nirvana and of all the sorrow of the Sangsara,</strong> it is cherished like the eleven Yanas.</p><p>THE NAMES GIVEN TO THE MIND</p><p>The various names given to it are innumerable.</p><p>Some call it 'The Mental Self'.<br>Certain heretics call it 'The Ego'.<br>By the Hinayanists it is called 'The Essentiality of Doctrines'.<br>By the Yogachara it is called 'Wisdom'.<br>Some call it 'The Means of Attaining the Other Shore of Wisdom'.<br>Some call it 'The Buddha Essence'.<br>Some call it 'The Great Symbol'.<br>Some call it 'The Sole Seed'.<br>Some call it 'The Potentiality of Truth'.<br>Some call it 'The All-Foundation'.<br>Other names, in ordinary language, are also given to it.</p><p>THE WONDEROUSNESS OF THESE TEACHINGS</p><p>This, self-originated Clear Light, eternally unborn, is a parentless babe of Wisdom. Wondrous is this.<br>Being non-created, it is Natural Wisdom. Wondrous is this.<br>Not having known birth, it knows not death. Wondrous is this.<br>Although it is Total Reality, there is no perceiver of it . Wondrous is this.<br><strong>Although wandering in the Sangsara, it remains undefiled by evil. wondrous is this.</strong><br><strong>Although seeing the Buddha, it remains unallied to good. Wondrous is this.</strong><br>Although possessed by all beings, it is not recognized. Wondrous is this.<br>Those not knowing the fruit of this yoga seek other fruit. Wondrous is this.<br><strong>Although the Clear Light of Reality shines within one's own mind, the multitude look for it elsewhere. Wondrous is this.</strong></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>interesting that it happened almost 7 years to the day before the winter solstice of 2012 .. did those Mayans know something after all ..maybe the Buddhist too ..THE TIMELESSNESS OF MINDIf one knows how to apply in a threefold manner this knowing of the mind,all past knowledge lost to memory becomes perfectly clear , and also of the future thought of as unborn and unconcieved.In the present , when the mind remains as it is naturally it is ordinarily comprehended in its own time.THE TRANSCENDENT AT-ONE-MENTThere being really no duality , pluralism is untrue.Until duality is transcended and at-one-ment realized Enlightenment can not be attained.The whole of Sangsara and Nirvana , as an inseparable unity , are one 's own mind.THE GREAT SELF-LIBERATIONOwing to worldly beliefs , which he is free to accept or reject , man wanders in Sangsara.Therefore , practicing the Dharma , freed from every attachment,grasp the whole essence of these teachings expounded in the yoga of Self-Liberation by Knowing the Mind in its Real Nature.The truths set forth herein are known as 'The great Self-Liberation ' ; and in them culminates the Doctrine of the Great Ultimate Perfection.THE GURU 'S THIRD CHARGE TO THE DISCIPLESSamaya gya , gya , gya.THE NATURE OF MINDThat which is commonly called mind is of intuitive Wisdom.Although the One Mind is , it has no existence.Being the source of all the bliss of Nirvana and of all the sorrow of the Sangsara , it is cherished like the eleven Yanas.THE NAMES GIVEN TO THE MINDThe various names given to it are innumerable.Some call it 'The Mental Self'.Certain heretics call it 'The Ego'.By the Hinayanists it is called 'The Essentiality of Doctrines'.By the Yogachara it is called 'Wisdom'.Some call it 'The Means of Attaining the Other Shore of Wisdom'.Some call it 'The Buddha Essence'.Some call it 'The Great Symbol'.Some call it 'The Sole Seed'.Some call it 'The Potentiality of Truth'.Some call it 'The All-Foundation'.Other names , in ordinary language , are also given to it.THE WONDEROUSNESS OF THESE TEACHINGSThis , self-originated Clear Light , eternally unborn , is a parentless babe of Wisdom .
Wondrous is this.Being non-created , it is Natural Wisdom .
Wondrous is this.Not having known birth , it knows not death .
Wondrous is this.Although it is Total Reality , there is no perceiver of it .
Wondrous is this.Although wandering in the Sangsara , it remains undefiled by evil .
wondrous is this.Although seeing the Buddha , it remains unallied to good .
Wondrous is this.Although possessed by all beings , it is not recognized .
Wondrous is this.Those not knowing the fruit of this yoga seek other fruit .
Wondrous is this.Although the Clear Light of Reality shines within one 's own mind , the multitude look for it elsewhere .
Wondrous is this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>interesting that it happened almost 7 years to the day before the winter solstice of 2012 .. did those Mayans know something after all ..maybe the Buddhist too ..THE TIMELESSNESS OF MINDIf one knows how to apply in a threefold manner this knowing of the mind,all past knowledge lost to memory becomes perfectly clear, and also of the future thought of as unborn and unconcieved.In the present, when the mind remains as it is naturally it is ordinarily comprehended in its own time.THE TRANSCENDENT AT-ONE-MENTThere being really no duality, pluralism is untrue.Until duality is transcended and at-one-ment realized Enlightenment cannot be attained.The whole of Sangsara and Nirvana, as an inseparable unity, are one's own mind.THE GREAT SELF-LIBERATIONOwing to worldly beliefs, which he is free to accept or reject, man wanders in Sangsara.Therefore, practicing the Dharma, freed from every attachment,grasp the whole essence of these teachings expounded in the yoga of Self-Liberation by Knowing the Mind in its Real Nature.The truths set forth herein are known as 'The great Self-Liberation'; and in them culminates the Doctrine of the Great Ultimate Perfection.THE GURU'S THIRD CHARGE TO THE DISCIPLESSamaya gya, gya, gya.THE NATURE OF MINDThat which is commonly called mind is of intuitive Wisdom.Although the One Mind is, it has no existence.Being the source of all the bliss of Nirvana and of all the sorrow of the Sangsara, it is cherished like the eleven Yanas.THE NAMES GIVEN TO THE MINDThe various names given to it are innumerable.Some call it 'The Mental Self'.Certain heretics call it 'The Ego'.By the Hinayanists it is called 'The Essentiality of Doctrines'.By the Yogachara it is called 'Wisdom'.Some call it 'The Means of Attaining the Other Shore of Wisdom'.Some call it 'The Buddha Essence'.Some call it 'The Great Symbol'.Some call it 'The Sole Seed'.Some call it 'The Potentiality of Truth'.Some call it 'The All-Foundation'.Other names, in ordinary language, are also given to it.THE WONDEROUSNESS OF THESE TEACHINGSThis, self-originated Clear Light, eternally unborn, is a parentless babe of Wisdom.
Wondrous is this.Being non-created, it is Natural Wisdom.
Wondrous is this.Not having known birth, it knows not death.
Wondrous is this.Although it is Total Reality, there is no perceiver of it .
Wondrous is this.Although wandering in the Sangsara, it remains undefiled by evil.
wondrous is this.Although seeing the Buddha, it remains unallied to good.
Wondrous is this.Although possessed by all beings, it is not recognized.
Wondrous is this.Those not knowing the fruit of this yoga seek other fruit.
Wondrous is this.Although the Clear Light of Reality shines within one's own mind, the multitude look for it elsewhere.
Wondrous is this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564510</id>
	<title>Re:Frist Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261943280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that was covered with the breathless "partially ionizing the Earth's atmosphere." I sure hope the van allen belt doesn't catch on fire.</p><p>The article was interesting and full of neat facts, but it was spun like those overly apocalyptic science hype shows on cable.</p><p>The event was super by our relatively short historical perspective, but how many times must something like this have happened during our evolution. But facts like this might dumb down the impact with the masses.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that was covered with the breathless " partially ionizing the Earth 's atmosphere .
" I sure hope the van allen belt does n't catch on fire.The article was interesting and full of neat facts , but it was spun like those overly apocalyptic science hype shows on cable.The event was super by our relatively short historical perspective , but how many times must something like this have happened during our evolution .
But facts like this might dumb down the impact with the masses .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that was covered with the breathless "partially ionizing the Earth's atmosphere.
" I sure hope the van allen belt doesn't catch on fire.The article was interesting and full of neat facts, but it was spun like those overly apocalyptic science hype shows on cable.The event was super by our relatively short historical perspective, but how many times must something like this have happened during our evolution.
But facts like this might dumb down the impact with the masses.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564524</id>
	<title>Re:Zero warning</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1261943460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, some places on earth have an advantage. They're a little farther awa</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , some places on earth have an advantage .
They 're a little farther awa</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, some places on earth have an advantage.
They're a little farther awa</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564464</id>
	<title>Zero warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261942920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gamma rays travel at the speed of light, so there is no possible warning should something like this happen closer to us. When you see it, it's already there. It could all be over any minu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gamma rays travel at the speed of light , so there is no possible warning should something like this happen closer to us .
When you see it , it 's already there .
It could all be over any minu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gamma rays travel at the speed of light, so there is no possible warning should something like this happen closer to us.
When you see it, it's already there.
It could all be over any minu</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565680</id>
	<title>Re:Tsunami</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261909500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not likely.  Tsunamis rarely cause starquakes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not likely .
Tsunamis rarely cause starquakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not likely.
Tsunamis rarely cause starquakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564776</id>
	<title>Pics!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261946220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really wish we could get actual photos of these awesome sounding stars. Hubble usually just shows a yellow/red/white dot and only when its many lightyears wide will it get the detail.</p><p>I would love to see real photos of this star up close.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really wish we could get actual photos of these awesome sounding stars .
Hubble usually just shows a yellow/red/white dot and only when its many lightyears wide will it get the detail.I would love to see real photos of this star up close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really wish we could get actual photos of these awesome sounding stars.
Hubble usually just shows a yellow/red/white dot and only when its many lightyears wide will it get the detail.I would love to see real photos of this star up close.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30572884</id>
	<title>Re:Was there anyone in space that day?</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1262024220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On an outer-space adventure<br>They got hit by cosmic rays<br>And the four would change forever<br>In some most fantastic ways</p><p>No need to fear<br>They're here<br>Just call for Four<br>Fantastic Four</p><p>"Don't need no more."<br>"That's ungrammatical!"</p><p>Oh, Reed Richards is elastic<br>Sue can fade from sight<br>Johnny is The Human Torch<br>The Thing just loves to fight</p><p>Call for Four<br>Fantastic Four<br>Fantastic Four</p><p>There's Galactus looking hungry<br>And old Dr. Doom is near<br>Here come the Skrulls invading<br>Do you run and hide in fear?</p><p>No way, no way<br>No way<br>Just call for Four<br>Fantastic Four</p><p>"That's all. No more. Now <em>that's</em> grammatical!"</p><p>Oh, Reed Richards is elastic<br>Sue can fade from sight<br>Johnny is The Human Torch<br>The Thing just loves to fight</p><p>Call for Four<br>Fantastic Four<br>Fantastic Four</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On an outer-space adventureThey got hit by cosmic raysAnd the four would change foreverIn some most fantastic waysNo need to fearThey 're hereJust call for FourFantastic Four " Do n't need no more .
" " That 's ungrammatical !
" Oh , Reed Richards is elasticSue can fade from sightJohnny is The Human TorchThe Thing just loves to fightCall for FourFantastic FourFantastic FourThere 's Galactus looking hungryAnd old Dr. Doom is nearHere come the Skrulls invadingDo you run and hide in fear ? No way , no wayNo wayJust call for FourFantastic Four " That 's all .
No more .
Now that 's grammatical !
" Oh , Reed Richards is elasticSue can fade from sightJohnny is The Human TorchThe Thing just loves to fightCall for FourFantastic FourFantastic Four</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On an outer-space adventureThey got hit by cosmic raysAnd the four would change foreverIn some most fantastic waysNo need to fearThey're hereJust call for FourFantastic Four"Don't need no more.
""That's ungrammatical!
"Oh, Reed Richards is elasticSue can fade from sightJohnny is The Human TorchThe Thing just loves to fightCall for FourFantastic FourFantastic FourThere's Galactus looking hungryAnd old Dr. Doom is nearHere come the Skrulls invadingDo you run and hide in fear?No way, no wayNo wayJust call for FourFantastic Four"That's all.
No more.
Now that's grammatical!
"Oh, Reed Richards is elasticSue can fade from sightJohnny is The Human TorchThe Thing just loves to fightCall for FourFantastic FourFantastic Four</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564532</id>
	<title>Cause</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1261943460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After investigating further, the scientists found that the the star likely ate at Chipotle earlier in the day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After investigating further , the scientists found that the the star likely ate at Chipotle earlier in the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After investigating further, the scientists found that the the star likely ate at Chipotle earlier in the day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568206</id>
	<title>Re:Blasted Whom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261933680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's an interesting question.</p><p>I did some quick calculations, and it appears that the blast was "above" 23.28 degrees S and 142.13 degrees W. This is over ocean, but Tahiti (and other islands) are nearby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's an interesting question.I did some quick calculations , and it appears that the blast was " above " 23.28 degrees S and 142.13 degrees W. This is over ocean , but Tahiti ( and other islands ) are nearby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's an interesting question.I did some quick calculations, and it appears that the blast was "above" 23.28 degrees S and 142.13 degrees W. This is over ocean, but Tahiti (and other islands) are nearby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564942</id>
	<title>Re:50005 years ago?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261904400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it doesn't mean anything to you then don't read it you small minded cunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does n't mean anything to you then do n't read it you small minded cunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it doesn't mean anything to you then don't read it you small minded cunt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564606</id>
	<title>50005 years ago?</title>
	<author>rosencreuz</author>
	<datestamp>1261944240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what if something big happened somewhere in universe 50005 years ago? Things happen, move on!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what if something big happened somewhere in universe 50005 years ago ?
Things happen , move on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what if something big happened somewhere in universe 50005 years ago?
Things happen, move on!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30574524</id>
	<title>Cover Up!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262032020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly this story is a cover up for the real event which was the explosion of a massive space station a long time ago, in a galaxy far far away!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly this story is a cover up for the real event which was the explosion of a massive space station a long time ago , in a galaxy far far away !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly this story is a cover up for the real event which was the explosion of a massive space station a long time ago, in a galaxy far far away!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565720</id>
	<title>How could it cause events before then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261909740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, because these were various kinds of high energy photons, which by definition travel at the speed of light.  Nothing could have gotten here faster than light, so this is merely a coincidence.  In the unlikely event you were claiming that the tsunami could have caused the burst of cosmic rays, I'd like to point out that it's 50k light years away from here.  So if you wanted to connect the events, you'd have to connect it to something that happened a VERY long time ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because these were various kinds of high energy photons , which by definition travel at the speed of light .
Nothing could have gotten here faster than light , so this is merely a coincidence .
In the unlikely event you were claiming that the tsunami could have caused the burst of cosmic rays , I 'd like to point out that it 's 50k light years away from here .
So if you wanted to connect the events , you 'd have to connect it to something that happened a VERY long time ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because these were various kinds of high energy photons, which by definition travel at the speed of light.
Nothing could have gotten here faster than light, so this is merely a coincidence.
In the unlikely event you were claiming that the tsunami could have caused the burst of cosmic rays, I'd like to point out that it's 50k light years away from here.
So if you wanted to connect the events, you'd have to connect it to something that happened a VERY long time ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565638</id>
	<title>Cheela</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261909140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how the Cheela are doing?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon\%27s\_Egg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how the Cheela are doing ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon \ % 27s \ _Egg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how the Cheela are doing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon\%27s\_Egg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564680</id>
	<title>It was me.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1261945260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I activated my Saturday Night Fever Ray Device i hid near pluton. Puny earthlings. Expect more of this to come - i will turn all of you to freaks like below :</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHWeuQyFouo#t=0m16s" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHWeuQyFouo#t=0m16s</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I activated my Saturday Night Fever Ray Device i hid near pluton .
Puny earthlings .
Expect more of this to come - i will turn all of you to freaks like below : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = IHWeuQyFouo # t = 0m16s [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I activated my Saturday Night Fever Ray Device i hid near pluton.
Puny earthlings.
Expect more of this to come - i will turn all of you to freaks like below :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHWeuQyFouo#t=0m16s [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568162</id>
	<title>Re:Eta Carinae... what about WR104?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261933140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unlike  Eta Carinae, we *ARE* directly in  path of the gamma ray blast of WR104 if it goes nova.   So.... don't worry be happy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlike Eta Carinae , we * ARE * directly in path of the gamma ray blast of WR104 if it goes nova .
So.... do n't worry be happy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlike  Eta Carinae, we *ARE* directly in  path of the gamma ray blast of WR104 if it goes nova.
So.... don't worry be happy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566080</id>
	<title>Re: 50,000?</title>
	<author>Rockoon</author>
	<datestamp>1261912800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this planet were a lot closer to stars like the article describes, then we wouldn't be here to ask such questions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this planet were a lot closer to stars like the article describes , then we would n't be here to ask such questions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this planet were a lot closer to stars like the article describes, then we wouldn't be here to ask such questions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786</id>
	<title>Was there anyone in space that day?</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1261910400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four , maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567126</id>
	<title>Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those</title>
	<author>play\_in\_traffic</author>
	<datestamp>1261922040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine what you could do with a Beowulf Cluster of them there Magnetars</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine what you could do with a Beowulf Cluster of them there Magnetars</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine what you could do with a Beowulf Cluster of them there Magnetars</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840</id>
	<title>Blasted Whom?</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1261911060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The blast lasted 200ms. During that time, half the Earth was facing away, shielded by not just atmosphere, but the rock of the solid Earth. Which direction relative to the Earth (latitude, longitude) did the blast come in from, and hit directly (except for atmosphere, and a bit of satellite shadow)?</p><p>On a related subject, which direction does our Solar System "point" at? When it's the Winter Solstice in the Northern Hemisphere, what angle on our solar orbit are we making with a line directly to the galactic core? What angle that day with the a tangent to our galactic orbit? Where are we looking at, anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The blast lasted 200ms .
During that time , half the Earth was facing away , shielded by not just atmosphere , but the rock of the solid Earth .
Which direction relative to the Earth ( latitude , longitude ) did the blast come in from , and hit directly ( except for atmosphere , and a bit of satellite shadow ) ? On a related subject , which direction does our Solar System " point " at ?
When it 's the Winter Solstice in the Northern Hemisphere , what angle on our solar orbit are we making with a line directly to the galactic core ?
What angle that day with the a tangent to our galactic orbit ?
Where are we looking at , anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The blast lasted 200ms.
During that time, half the Earth was facing away, shielded by not just atmosphere, but the rock of the solid Earth.
Which direction relative to the Earth (latitude, longitude) did the blast come in from, and hit directly (except for atmosphere, and a bit of satellite shadow)?On a related subject, which direction does our Solar System "point" at?
When it's the Winter Solstice in the Northern Hemisphere, what angle on our solar orbit are we making with a line directly to the galactic core?
What angle that day with the a tangent to our galactic orbit?
Where are we looking at, anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566552</id>
	<title>stupidist density comparision yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261917120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That&rsquo;s very roughly the combined mass of every single car on the United States, squeezed down into the size of a sugar cube.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Astronomy/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com" rel="nofollow">Astronomy</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com" rel="nofollow">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That    s very roughly the combined mass of every single car on the United States , squeezed down into the size of a sugar cube .
--- Astronomy [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That’s very roughly the combined mass of every single car on the United States, squeezed down into the size of a sugar cube.
---

Astronomy [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450</id>
	<title>Frist Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261942800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564604</id>
	<title>I don't know.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261944180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about the lights, but don't get me angry. You won't like me when I am angry!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about the lights , but do n't get me angry .
You wo n't like me when I am angry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about the lights, but don't get me angry.
You won't like me when I am angry!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30569032</id>
	<title>Re:Was there anyone in space that day?</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1262033640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.</p></div><p>I call dibs on checking the chick you've not yet found. You can keep the rocky formation, the Bonzo impersonator and the unmanly... unmanlily?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...unmanley?...  gay stretchy guy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four , maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.I call dibs on checking the chick you 've not yet found .
You can keep the rocky formation , the Bonzo impersonator and the unmanly... unmanlily ? ...unmanley ? .. .
gay stretchy guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously this sounds like the event that made the Fantastic Four, maybe some astronauts or cosmonauts need to be checked.I call dibs on checking the chick you've not yet found.
You can keep the rocky formation, the Bonzo impersonator and the unmanly... unmanlily? ...unmanley?...
gay stretchy guy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568722</id>
	<title>Re:Pics!</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1261942200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/swift\_nsu\_0205.html" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">This page</a> [nasa.gov] has an <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mpg/108538main\_radio\_data2\_NASA\%20WebV\_1.mpg" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">MPEG</a> [nasa.gov] of the aftermath of this event.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This page [ nasa.gov ] has an MPEG [ nasa.gov ] of the aftermath of this event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This page [nasa.gov] has an MPEG [nasa.gov] of the aftermath of this event.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568862</id>
	<title>Re:Five year old news?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1262030520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The news is actually 50,005years old gawd.. RTFS</htmltext>
<tokenext>The news is actually 50,005years old gawd.. RTFS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The news is actually 50,005years old gawd.. RTFS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567890</id>
	<title>Re:Blasted Whom?</title>
	<author>Smitty825</author>
	<datestamp>1261929480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The earth always "points" the same direction, towards Polaris in the North.  (Always is relative..., but in this instance, "always" defines a few human lifetimes)</p><p>So, since the center of the galaxy is located somewhere between Sagittarius and Scorpius, and those constellations are visible during the northern hemisphere's summer, I'm assuming that the Northern Hemisphere points away from the Galatic center, while the Southern Hemisphere points (slightly) towards the center.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The earth always " points " the same direction , towards Polaris in the North .
( Always is relative... , but in this instance , " always " defines a few human lifetimes ) So , since the center of the galaxy is located somewhere between Sagittarius and Scorpius , and those constellations are visible during the northern hemisphere 's summer , I 'm assuming that the Northern Hemisphere points away from the Galatic center , while the Southern Hemisphere points ( slightly ) towards the center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earth always "points" the same direction, towards Polaris in the North.
(Always is relative..., but in this instance, "always" defines a few human lifetimes)So, since the center of the galaxy is located somewhere between Sagittarius and Scorpius, and those constellations are visible during the northern hemisphere's summer, I'm assuming that the Northern Hemisphere points away from the Galatic center, while the Southern Hemisphere points (slightly) towards the center.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564936</id>
	<title>Re:Frist Post!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261947540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this?</p></div></blockquote><p>They called into work sick.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this ? They called into work sick .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>does anyone know what happened to the Northern/Southern lights due to this?They called into work sick.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30570000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30572884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30569032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_27_1639207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30569032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30572884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30570000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30565720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30575584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30567908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30566080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_27_1639207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30564776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_27_1639207.30568722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
