<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_25_1744225</id>
	<title>Wikileaks Needs Help, and Not Just Money</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1261736100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>st1d writes to tell us that Wikileaks has <a href="http://www.wikileaks.org/">put out a call for help</a>. However, instead of just asking for money, they have also suggested technical and legal avenues for support.  In the site's short life, Wikileaks has been at the center of many breaking scandals and investigations.  <i>"Wikileaks is currently overloaded by readers. This is a regular difficulty that can only be resolved by deploying additional resources. If you support our mission, you can help us by integrating new hardware into our project infrastructure or developing software for the project. Become patron of a WikiLeaks server or other parts of our technology, adding more pillars to the stability and balance of the WikiLeaks platform. Servers come trouble-free and legally fortified, software is uniquely challenging.  If you can provide rackspace, power and an uplink, or a dedicated server or storage space, for at least 12 months, or software development work for WikiLeaks, please write to wl-supporters@sunshinepress.org."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>st1d writes to tell us that Wikileaks has put out a call for help .
However , instead of just asking for money , they have also suggested technical and legal avenues for support .
In the site 's short life , Wikileaks has been at the center of many breaking scandals and investigations .
" Wikileaks is currently overloaded by readers .
This is a regular difficulty that can only be resolved by deploying additional resources .
If you support our mission , you can help us by integrating new hardware into our project infrastructure or developing software for the project .
Become patron of a WikiLeaks server or other parts of our technology , adding more pillars to the stability and balance of the WikiLeaks platform .
Servers come trouble-free and legally fortified , software is uniquely challenging .
If you can provide rackspace , power and an uplink , or a dedicated server or storage space , for at least 12 months , or software development work for WikiLeaks , please write to wl-supporters @ sunshinepress.org .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>st1d writes to tell us that Wikileaks has put out a call for help.
However, instead of just asking for money, they have also suggested technical and legal avenues for support.
In the site's short life, Wikileaks has been at the center of many breaking scandals and investigations.
"Wikileaks is currently overloaded by readers.
This is a regular difficulty that can only be resolved by deploying additional resources.
If you support our mission, you can help us by integrating new hardware into our project infrastructure or developing software for the project.
Become patron of a WikiLeaks server or other parts of our technology, adding more pillars to the stability and balance of the WikiLeaks platform.
Servers come trouble-free and legally fortified, software is uniquely challenging.
If you can provide rackspace, power and an uplink, or a dedicated server or storage space, for at least 12 months, or software development work for WikiLeaks, please write to wl-supporters@sunshinepress.org.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30558762</id>
	<title>Re:Mirrors for popular files</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261825140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Magnet links seem perfect for this. It would also give us a more legitimate use for bittorrent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Magnet links seem perfect for this .
It would also give us a more legitimate use for bittorrent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Magnet links seem perfect for this.
It would also give us a more legitimate use for bittorrent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30554700</id>
	<title>Re:I'm at the point in my life...</title>
	<author>michaelhood</author>
	<datestamp>1261860480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>simply cannot be expected to do so without some form of legal immunity</p></div><p>Anyone volunteering to pitch this to AT&amp;T?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>simply can not be expected to do so without some form of legal immunityAnyone volunteering to pitch this to AT&amp;T ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>simply cannot be expected to do so without some form of legal immunityAnyone volunteering to pitch this to AT&amp;T?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660</id>
	<title>I'm at the point in my life...</title>
	<author>pongo000</author>
	<datestamp>1261752600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that I can't afford to be the legal test case for running a Tor exit node or a Wikileaks server, much as I believe in both of these projects.  And I would imagine there are many who, while they possess the desire and the technical know-how to engage in such activities, simply cannot be expected to do so without some form of legal immunity (or at least a guarantee of unlimited legal representation).  Until that time comes, I simply don't see many people stepping forward with offers of hosting assistance.</p><p>Perhaps an effort should be made to secure guaranteed legal representation from the EFF, FSF, and other groups for those who volunteer to run exit nodes, servers, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that I ca n't afford to be the legal test case for running a Tor exit node or a Wikileaks server , much as I believe in both of these projects .
And I would imagine there are many who , while they possess the desire and the technical know-how to engage in such activities , simply can not be expected to do so without some form of legal immunity ( or at least a guarantee of unlimited legal representation ) .
Until that time comes , I simply do n't see many people stepping forward with offers of hosting assistance.Perhaps an effort should be made to secure guaranteed legal representation from the EFF , FSF , and other groups for those who volunteer to run exit nodes , servers , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that I can't afford to be the legal test case for running a Tor exit node or a Wikileaks server, much as I believe in both of these projects.
And I would imagine there are many who, while they possess the desire and the technical know-how to engage in such activities, simply cannot be expected to do so without some form of legal immunity (or at least a guarantee of unlimited legal representation).
Until that time comes, I simply don't see many people stepping forward with offers of hosting assistance.Perhaps an effort should be made to secure guaranteed legal representation from the EFF, FSF, and other groups for those who volunteer to run exit nodes, servers, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553314</id>
	<title>Re:Bad times</title>
	<author>lorenlal</author>
	<datestamp>1261747200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're also one of the few places where I feel we can see the facts behind some of the reasons so many people are struggling right now.</p><p>Seriously - We get fed all sorts of BS from the news agencies...  WikiLeaks posts the stuff that can often verify or debunk much of that BS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're also one of the few places where I feel we can see the facts behind some of the reasons so many people are struggling right now.Seriously - We get fed all sorts of BS from the news agencies... WikiLeaks posts the stuff that can often verify or debunk much of that BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're also one of the few places where I feel we can see the facts behind some of the reasons so many people are struggling right now.Seriously - We get fed all sorts of BS from the news agencies...  WikiLeaks posts the stuff that can often verify or debunk much of that BS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553646</id>
	<title>More than Money</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1261752480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm suddenly reminded of a scene an early Simpsons season.  It goes something like this.</p><p>Homer searches through the couch, while looking for a dropped peanut.  He finds a bunch of stuff including a $20 bill.<br>Homer Simpson: Awww<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 20 dollars!? I wanted a peanut.<br>Homer's brain: 20 dollars can buy many peanuts!<br>Homer Simpson: Explain how!<br>Homer's brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services.<br>Homer Simpson: Woo hoo!</p><p>So... why not exchange those donations for goods and services?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm suddenly reminded of a scene an early Simpsons season .
It goes something like this.Homer searches through the couch , while looking for a dropped peanut .
He finds a bunch of stuff including a $ 20 bill.Homer Simpson : Awww ... 20 dollars ! ?
I wanted a peanut.Homer 's brain : 20 dollars can buy many peanuts ! Homer Simpson : Explain how ! Homer 's brain : Money can be exchanged for goods and services.Homer Simpson : Woo hoo ! So... why not exchange those donations for goods and services ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm suddenly reminded of a scene an early Simpsons season.
It goes something like this.Homer searches through the couch, while looking for a dropped peanut.
He finds a bunch of stuff including a $20 bill.Homer Simpson: Awww ... 20 dollars!?
I wanted a peanut.Homer's brain: 20 dollars can buy many peanuts!Homer Simpson: Explain how!Homer's brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services.Homer Simpson: Woo hoo!So... why not exchange those donations for goods and services?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30554330</id>
	<title>An Anarcho-Capitalist Perspective</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1261766400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a big fan of Wikileaks.  I run a local caching proxy (sorta like a mirror) that I and others access it through, and I certainly would encourage everyone to send a few bucks their way whenever possible (and I do try to follow that advice myself).</p><p>However, what comes to my mind when I read about the legal troubles of sites like that is a paraphrasing of a famous Alexander Haig quote:  "Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  Winning back your right to march (or to Wikileak) is commendable, but it is not an end in of itself.</p><p>Free speech is only a small part of the battle for liberty, because dissent through speech alone is largely useless in the face of an all-powerful government that has near-total influence over public opinion.  Dissenting opinions can not only be hijacked, marginalized, and ignored by the government-licensed media, but individuals can be preprogrammed to ignore them from their early childhood education onward!  Tyranny 2.0 finds it more profitable to keep its slaves on longer chains, thus we can have things like the Internet, but those chains are nonetheless there lest you ever venture too far!</p><p>The best hope for resistance against such massive concentration of power comes in movements like the Free State Project (google it), which can make further tax resistance and secession movements possible in the future.  Partisan democracy is a sham - only through intergovernmental competition can governments be forced to stop treating their citizens as subjects, and start treating them as consumers of their services <i>who actually have a choice!</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a big fan of Wikileaks .
I run a local caching proxy ( sorta like a mirror ) that I and others access it through , and I certainly would encourage everyone to send a few bucks their way whenever possible ( and I do try to follow that advice myself ) .However , what comes to my mind when I read about the legal troubles of sites like that is a paraphrasing of a famous Alexander Haig quote : " Let them march all they want , as long as they pay their taxes .
" Winning back your right to march ( or to Wikileak ) is commendable , but it is not an end in of itself.Free speech is only a small part of the battle for liberty , because dissent through speech alone is largely useless in the face of an all-powerful government that has near-total influence over public opinion .
Dissenting opinions can not only be hijacked , marginalized , and ignored by the government-licensed media , but individuals can be preprogrammed to ignore them from their early childhood education onward !
Tyranny 2.0 finds it more profitable to keep its slaves on longer chains , thus we can have things like the Internet , but those chains are nonetheless there lest you ever venture too far ! The best hope for resistance against such massive concentration of power comes in movements like the Free State Project ( google it ) , which can make further tax resistance and secession movements possible in the future .
Partisan democracy is a sham - only through intergovernmental competition can governments be forced to stop treating their citizens as subjects , and start treating them as consumers of their services who actually have a choice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a big fan of Wikileaks.
I run a local caching proxy (sorta like a mirror) that I and others access it through, and I certainly would encourage everyone to send a few bucks their way whenever possible (and I do try to follow that advice myself).However, what comes to my mind when I read about the legal troubles of sites like that is a paraphrasing of a famous Alexander Haig quote:  "Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.
"  Winning back your right to march (or to Wikileak) is commendable, but it is not an end in of itself.Free speech is only a small part of the battle for liberty, because dissent through speech alone is largely useless in the face of an all-powerful government that has near-total influence over public opinion.
Dissenting opinions can not only be hijacked, marginalized, and ignored by the government-licensed media, but individuals can be preprogrammed to ignore them from their early childhood education onward!
Tyranny 2.0 finds it more profitable to keep its slaves on longer chains, thus we can have things like the Internet, but those chains are nonetheless there lest you ever venture too far!The best hope for resistance against such massive concentration of power comes in movements like the Free State Project (google it), which can make further tax resistance and secession movements possible in the future.
Partisan democracy is a sham - only through intergovernmental competition can governments be forced to stop treating their citizens as subjects, and start treating them as consumers of their services who actually have a choice!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552880</id>
	<title>HTTP gateway timed out</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1261739820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For once, the article submitter isn't lying!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For once , the article submitter is n't lying !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For once, the article submitter isn't lying!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553116</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1261743720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not <i>that of which we do not speak</i>?<br>It's distributed world wide, mirrored about everywhere, everyone has access to it, it's fast as hell (maxes out my connection), you can post massive binaries to it, text files. Most places have up to 400 day retention now. It would be trivial to setup a script to repost stuff every 100 days. Put everything in a 7za and it shouldn't take up too much space.</p><p>If the RIAA/MPAA hasn't figured out how to touch it, I doubt many will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not that of which we do not speak ? It 's distributed world wide , mirrored about everywhere , everyone has access to it , it 's fast as hell ( maxes out my connection ) , you can post massive binaries to it , text files .
Most places have up to 400 day retention now .
It would be trivial to setup a script to repost stuff every 100 days .
Put everything in a 7za and it should n't take up too much space.If the RIAA/MPAA has n't figured out how to touch it , I doubt many will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not that of which we do not speak?It's distributed world wide, mirrored about everywhere, everyone has access to it, it's fast as hell (maxes out my connection), you can post massive binaries to it, text files.
Most places have up to 400 day retention now.
It would be trivial to setup a script to repost stuff every 100 days.
Put everything in a 7za and it shouldn't take up too much space.If the RIAA/MPAA hasn't figured out how to touch it, I doubt many will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553014</id>
	<title>Wiki admins are fucking bastards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261742040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you petersymonds and leinad. Also D, Entlinkt, Thogo and S1.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you petersymonds and leinad .
Also D , Entlinkt , Thogo and S1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you petersymonds and leinad.
Also D, Entlinkt, Thogo and S1.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30611862</id>
	<title>Remailers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262272680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  Could using the remailer system work in submitting articles?  It is still quite active.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could using the remailer system work in submitting articles ?
It is still quite active .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Could using the remailer system work in submitting articles?
It is still quite active.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</id>
	<title>Freenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261740240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems that Wikileaks should operate over <a href="http://freenetproject.org/" title="freenetproject.org">Freenet</a> [freenetproject.org].  Leaks could be submitted anonymously that way, and also distributed anonymously.  The advantage would be that it would be entirely decentralized, so there would be no organization vulnerable to legal action.
<p>
Freenet has been slow and hard to use in the past, but its improved quite a bit.  It is the obvious platform for something like Wikileaks.  Of course, there is nothing to prevent people from mirroring content on the web (since installing Freenet, like any piece of software, is a hassle).  But at least there will be an unimpeachable backup of all data on Freenet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that Wikileaks should operate over Freenet [ freenetproject.org ] .
Leaks could be submitted anonymously that way , and also distributed anonymously .
The advantage would be that it would be entirely decentralized , so there would be no organization vulnerable to legal action .
Freenet has been slow and hard to use in the past , but its improved quite a bit .
It is the obvious platform for something like Wikileaks .
Of course , there is nothing to prevent people from mirroring content on the web ( since installing Freenet , like any piece of software , is a hassle ) .
But at least there will be an unimpeachable backup of all data on Freenet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that Wikileaks should operate over Freenet [freenetproject.org].
Leaks could be submitted anonymously that way, and also distributed anonymously.
The advantage would be that it would be entirely decentralized, so there would be no organization vulnerable to legal action.
Freenet has been slow and hard to use in the past, but its improved quite a bit.
It is the obvious platform for something like Wikileaks.
Of course, there is nothing to prevent people from mirroring content on the web (since installing Freenet, like any piece of software, is a hassle).
But at least there will be an unimpeachable backup of all data on Freenet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552974</id>
	<title>Mathematical properties, confidence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261741320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Three questions about freenet:</p><p>Are there mathematically sound measures of the degree of anonymity that freenet provides an end-user?</p><p>Is there a threshold number of collaborating operators of compromised nodes above which it is possible to deduce information about, or the identities of, files being served or downloaded? Is the threshold hard or soft?</p><p>How does the anonymity of freenet vary as a function of the proportion of nodes that are compromised increases?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Three questions about freenet : Are there mathematically sound measures of the degree of anonymity that freenet provides an end-user ? Is there a threshold number of collaborating operators of compromised nodes above which it is possible to deduce information about , or the identities of , files being served or downloaded ?
Is the threshold hard or soft ? How does the anonymity of freenet vary as a function of the proportion of nodes that are compromised increases ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three questions about freenet:Are there mathematically sound measures of the degree of anonymity that freenet provides an end-user?Is there a threshold number of collaborating operators of compromised nodes above which it is possible to deduce information about, or the identities of, files being served or downloaded?
Is the threshold hard or soft?How does the anonymity of freenet vary as a function of the proportion of nodes that are compromised increases?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552892</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261739940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where did you get this info??<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:O</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where did you get this info ? ?
: O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where did you get this info??
:O</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553088</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>gparent</author>
	<datestamp>1261743420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one uses Freenet. It's too slow for regular usage, and the last thing I want to do is to wait 30 mins to find out a leak didn't interest me anyway.
<br> <br>
Setting up a torrent tracker would be a much better idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No one uses Freenet .
It 's too slow for regular usage , and the last thing I want to do is to wait 30 mins to find out a leak did n't interest me anyway .
Setting up a torrent tracker would be a much better idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one uses Freenet.
It's too slow for regular usage, and the last thing I want to do is to wait 30 mins to find out a leak didn't interest me anyway.
Setting up a torrent tracker would be a much better idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553212</id>
	<title>Mirrors for popular files</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1261745220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I downloaded ba-038-air-traffic-control-tape.wmv from wikileaks and distributed it to a few co-workers and friends. I don't have the resources to run a full mirror but I would be happy to mirror that file. If wikileaks had the ability to point to mirrors for specific files and verify the MD5s of the files on an ongoing basis then some load could be taken off their servers.</p><p>I suppose a sneaky mirror host could serve different files to different IP addresses though but I can't immediately see a reason for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I downloaded ba-038-air-traffic-control-tape.wmv from wikileaks and distributed it to a few co-workers and friends .
I do n't have the resources to run a full mirror but I would be happy to mirror that file .
If wikileaks had the ability to point to mirrors for specific files and verify the MD5s of the files on an ongoing basis then some load could be taken off their servers.I suppose a sneaky mirror host could serve different files to different IP addresses though but I ca n't immediately see a reason for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I downloaded ba-038-air-traffic-control-tape.wmv from wikileaks and distributed it to a few co-workers and friends.
I don't have the resources to run a full mirror but I would be happy to mirror that file.
If wikileaks had the ability to point to mirrors for specific files and verify the MD5s of the files on an ongoing basis then some load could be taken off their servers.I suppose a sneaky mirror host could serve different files to different IP addresses though but I can't immediately see a reason for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553376</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1261747980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wikileaks in <a href="http://gaddbiwdftapglkq.onion/wiki/Wikileaks" title="gaddbiwdftapglkq.onion">TOR</a> [gaddbiwdftapglkq.onion] and <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8888/freenet:USK@zvSQ2SQCYQ6uAxSfS42F4pyYAA4fBfH5c8iMeHeqYfQ,LL9WfZhmg21-ABgDIzFT4JVkQdnlHgxxGdUXE3jp8j0,AQACAAE/wikileaks/1/" title="127.0.0.1">Freenet</a> [127.0.0.1]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikileaks in TOR [ gaddbiwdftapglkq.onion ] and Freenet [ 127.0.0.1 ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikileaks in TOR [gaddbiwdftapglkq.onion] and Freenet [127.0.0.1]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30555102</id>
	<title>Distributed Hosting</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1261828140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've often wondered if it is possible to involve the community in hosting websites like Wikileaks and Wikipedia. A large part of the cost these organizations have is the hardware and bandwidth required to serve the content. However, this content is mostly static. It seems to me it ought to be easy to set up an extensive mirroring system for such content. It also seems to me that it ought to be able to set up a system where people can contribute a bit of disk space and other computer resources and form part of a sort of distributed hosting system. I think Freenet does something like this, and even optimizes things by moving frequently requested content closer to where it is being requested.</p><p>Can we set up such a system for the worldwide web? Is there any existing software package that makes this possible? Can we write one? Or can we perhaps modify open source web browsers so that distributed hosting can really work?</p><p>I think I speak for many others when I say that I have plenty of disk space, bandwidth, and CPU cycles available, but my capacity to support worthy causes financially is rather limited. So if I could contribute my computer resources, I think I could help out a lot more then I can by making donations. So if we have the technology to make that possible, let's start using it! And if we don't have the technology, let's build it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've often wondered if it is possible to involve the community in hosting websites like Wikileaks and Wikipedia .
A large part of the cost these organizations have is the hardware and bandwidth required to serve the content .
However , this content is mostly static .
It seems to me it ought to be easy to set up an extensive mirroring system for such content .
It also seems to me that it ought to be able to set up a system where people can contribute a bit of disk space and other computer resources and form part of a sort of distributed hosting system .
I think Freenet does something like this , and even optimizes things by moving frequently requested content closer to where it is being requested.Can we set up such a system for the worldwide web ?
Is there any existing software package that makes this possible ?
Can we write one ?
Or can we perhaps modify open source web browsers so that distributed hosting can really work ? I think I speak for many others when I say that I have plenty of disk space , bandwidth , and CPU cycles available , but my capacity to support worthy causes financially is rather limited .
So if I could contribute my computer resources , I think I could help out a lot more then I can by making donations .
So if we have the technology to make that possible , let 's start using it !
And if we do n't have the technology , let 's build it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've often wondered if it is possible to involve the community in hosting websites like Wikileaks and Wikipedia.
A large part of the cost these organizations have is the hardware and bandwidth required to serve the content.
However, this content is mostly static.
It seems to me it ought to be easy to set up an extensive mirroring system for such content.
It also seems to me that it ought to be able to set up a system where people can contribute a bit of disk space and other computer resources and form part of a sort of distributed hosting system.
I think Freenet does something like this, and even optimizes things by moving frequently requested content closer to where it is being requested.Can we set up such a system for the worldwide web?
Is there any existing software package that makes this possible?
Can we write one?
Or can we perhaps modify open source web browsers so that distributed hosting can really work?I think I speak for many others when I say that I have plenty of disk space, bandwidth, and CPU cycles available, but my capacity to support worthy causes financially is rather limited.
So if I could contribute my computer resources, I think I could help out a lot more then I can by making donations.
So if we have the technology to make that possible, let's start using it!
And if we don't have the technology, let's build it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552888</id>
	<title>Torrents</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261739940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Publish via torrents.
<br> <br>
Win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Publish via torrents .
Win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Publish via torrents.
Win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553432</id>
	<title>Re:Irresponsible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261748880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.</p></div><p>Ah yes. The old "if you mod me down, I'll become stronger than you can ever imagine!" ploy. In this case though, you're just crazy.</p><p>As for your refugees comment, why would someone want to post the refugee information online where everyone can see it, rather than just send it to whoever is doing the slaughtering? Plausible deniability? Right. Because when sending troops to slaughter refugees, you will care about an email that says "refugees be here".</p><p>Face it: the only thing that is useful to be distributed online is something that someone has, but can't do anything with it. Instead, it is distributed for the world to see so that someone, somewhere, can pick it up in full view of everyone watching, and run with it. And that's just not the mode of operation of someone committing a crime.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a " troll " and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.Ah yes .
The old " if you mod me down , I 'll become stronger than you can ever imagine !
" ploy .
In this case though , you 're just crazy.As for your refugees comment , why would someone want to post the refugee information online where everyone can see it , rather than just send it to whoever is doing the slaughtering ?
Plausible deniability ?
Right. Because when sending troops to slaughter refugees , you will care about an email that says " refugees be here " .Face it : the only thing that is useful to be distributed online is something that someone has , but ca n't do anything with it .
Instead , it is distributed for the world to see so that someone , somewhere , can pick it up in full view of everyone watching , and run with it .
And that 's just not the mode of operation of someone committing a crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.Ah yes.
The old "if you mod me down, I'll become stronger than you can ever imagine!
" ploy.
In this case though, you're just crazy.As for your refugees comment, why would someone want to post the refugee information online where everyone can see it, rather than just send it to whoever is doing the slaughtering?
Plausible deniability?
Right. Because when sending troops to slaughter refugees, you will care about an email that says "refugees be here".Face it: the only thing that is useful to be distributed online is something that someone has, but can't do anything with it.
Instead, it is distributed for the world to see so that someone, somewhere, can pick it up in full view of everyone watching, and run with it.
And that's just not the mode of operation of someone committing a crime.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553142</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>calmofthestorm</author>
	<datestamp>1261744140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Put it on Freenet, and few people will read it because it's hard. The Powers That Be then win, and probably don't try to stop it.<br>Might be a good idea for dual-deployment, however, if it would take any load off the http.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Put it on Freenet , and few people will read it because it 's hard .
The Powers That Be then win , and probably do n't try to stop it.Might be a good idea for dual-deployment , however , if it would take any load off the http .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put it on Freenet, and few people will read it because it's hard.
The Powers That Be then win, and probably don't try to stop it.Might be a good idea for dual-deployment, however, if it would take any load off the http.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261741620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with Freenet is that no-one uses it. Wikileaks kicks real-world arse because it's on the World Wide Web, where everyone else is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with Freenet is that no-one uses it .
Wikileaks kicks real-world arse because it 's on the World Wide Web , where everyone else is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with Freenet is that no-one uses it.
Wikileaks kicks real-world arse because it's on the World Wide Web, where everyone else is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30560902</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>JackieBrown</author>
	<datestamp>1261851480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you mention a good one to use (or email me the name of one?  I don't hide my email address.)</p><p>I have looked into this but find it difficult to know where to start.</p><p>I know each server has different groups or rooms that have different content.  Do servers mostly have the same content (just different group names?)  If I was interested in scifi information, would one be better than another?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you mention a good one to use ( or email me the name of one ?
I do n't hide my email address .
) I have looked into this but find it difficult to know where to start.I know each server has different groups or rooms that have different content .
Do servers mostly have the same content ( just different group names ?
) If I was interested in scifi information , would one be better than another ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you mention a good one to use (or email me the name of one?
I don't hide my email address.
)I have looked into this but find it difficult to know where to start.I know each server has different groups or rooms that have different content.
Do servers mostly have the same content (just different group names?
)  If I was interested in scifi information, would one be better than another?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30555872</id>
	<title>Wikileaks is not what it claims to be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261844100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wikileaks happily hosted the leaked membership list of the BNP (a right wing British political party), though I doubt they would just as happily host the membership list of, say, the Animal Liberation Front, or some random left wing group.</p><p>While they pick and choose which document they will publish and which they will suppress, I won't support them.</p><p>If they agree to publish any document which had previously been kept secret then I would be all for it, but they won't do that. They are selective about what they publish,  just like any other media organisation. Theirs happens to be left/liberal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikileaks happily hosted the leaked membership list of the BNP ( a right wing British political party ) , though I doubt they would just as happily host the membership list of , say , the Animal Liberation Front , or some random left wing group.While they pick and choose which document they will publish and which they will suppress , I wo n't support them.If they agree to publish any document which had previously been kept secret then I would be all for it , but they wo n't do that .
They are selective about what they publish , just like any other media organisation .
Theirs happens to be left/liberal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikileaks happily hosted the leaked membership list of the BNP (a right wing British political party), though I doubt they would just as happily host the membership list of, say, the Animal Liberation Front, or some random left wing group.While they pick and choose which document they will publish and which they will suppress, I won't support them.If they agree to publish any document which had previously been kept secret then I would be all for it, but they won't do that.
They are selective about what they publish,  just like any other media organisation.
Theirs happens to be left/liberal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553622</id>
	<title>XDOLL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261752240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>encountered while We nned to address</htmltext>
<tokenext>encountered while We nned to address</tokentext>
<sentencetext>encountered while We nned to address</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553132</id>
	<title>Bad times</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261743900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wikileaks are asking for help at a time when people are financially struggling. If the aspects of the internet that enhance personal freedom depend on people committing their time and resources, this is a dangerous time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikileaks are asking for help at a time when people are financially struggling .
If the aspects of the internet that enhance personal freedom depend on people committing their time and resources , this is a dangerous time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikileaks are asking for help at a time when people are financially struggling.
If the aspects of the internet that enhance personal freedom depend on people committing their time and resources, this is a dangerous time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553062</id>
	<title>Re:Irresponsible</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1261742760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.</p></div></blockquote><p>Who would waste a mod point on an Anonymous Coward?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a " troll " and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.Who would waste a mod point on an Anonymous Coward ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.Who would waste a mod point on an Anonymous Coward?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010</id>
	<title>Irresponsible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261741800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bunch of irresponsible cunts. Some things have no business being leaked or their leaking can lead to unintended consequences. I'd laugh my ass off if someone could prove a connection between Wikileaks and a bunch of refuges being slaughtered. It might teach the fucking hypocrites a lesson. I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line. Thanks for giving me a laugh in advance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bunch of irresponsible cunts .
Some things have no business being leaked or their leaking can lead to unintended consequences .
I 'd laugh my ass off if someone could prove a connection between Wikileaks and a bunch of refuges being slaughtered .
It might teach the fucking hypocrites a lesson .
I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a " troll " and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line .
Thanks for giving me a laugh in advance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bunch of irresponsible cunts.
Some things have no business being leaked or their leaking can lead to unintended consequences.
I'd laugh my ass off if someone could prove a connection between Wikileaks and a bunch of refuges being slaughtered.
It might teach the fucking hypocrites a lesson.
I post this in the expectation group-think will mark the comment down as a "troll" and it will come back and bite you bunch of bastards down the line.
Thanks for giving me a laugh in advance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553790</id>
	<title>Re:HTTP gateway timed out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261754880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but using Mediawiki for read-only content is not the smartest thing to do, it prohibits caching.<br>If Mediawiki would allow proxies to cache their content (maybe there is a plugin, but Wikipedia doesn't allow it either), a lot of trouble would go away. And does Wikileaks need uncached requests? No.</p><p>I am not talking about <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Cache" title="mediawiki.org">(web) server-side improvements</a> [mediawiki.org], I am talking about the problematic 'Cache-Control: private, s-maxage=0, max-age=0, must-revalidate' HTTP header. HTTP caching is so misunderstood. <a href="http://www.mnot.net/cache\_docs/#WHY" title="mnot.net">http://www.mnot.net/cache\_docs/#WHY</a> [mnot.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but using Mediawiki for read-only content is not the smartest thing to do , it prohibits caching.If Mediawiki would allow proxies to cache their content ( maybe there is a plugin , but Wikipedia does n't allow it either ) , a lot of trouble would go away .
And does Wikileaks need uncached requests ?
No.I am not talking about ( web ) server-side improvements [ mediawiki.org ] , I am talking about the problematic 'Cache-Control : private , s-maxage = 0 , max-age = 0 , must-revalidate ' HTTP header .
HTTP caching is so misunderstood .
http : //www.mnot.net/cache \ _docs/ # WHY [ mnot.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but using Mediawiki for read-only content is not the smartest thing to do, it prohibits caching.If Mediawiki would allow proxies to cache their content (maybe there is a plugin, but Wikipedia doesn't allow it either), a lot of trouble would go away.
And does Wikileaks need uncached requests?
No.I am not talking about (web) server-side improvements [mediawiki.org], I am talking about the problematic 'Cache-Control: private, s-maxage=0, max-age=0, must-revalidate' HTTP header.
HTTP caching is so misunderstood.
http://www.mnot.net/cache\_docs/#WHY [mnot.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552970</id>
	<title>(plus one InformatiVe)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261741200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">for a momen7 and [anti-slash.org] used to.  SHIT ON wasn't on Steve's</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>for a momen7 and [ anti-slash.org ] used to .
SHIT ON was n't on Steve 's [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for a momen7 and [anti-slash.org] used to.
SHIT ON wasn't on Steve's [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553724</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261753620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What has Wikileaks done so big? I ask because I have not seen anything earth shattering on it and a lot that is nothing but tabloid press level junk. Just some examples would be nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What has Wikileaks done so big ?
I ask because I have not seen anything earth shattering on it and a lot that is nothing but tabloid press level junk .
Just some examples would be nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What has Wikileaks done so big?
I ask because I have not seen anything earth shattering on it and a lot that is nothing but tabloid press level junk.
Just some examples would be nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553188</id>
	<title>I'll donate bandwidth</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1261744860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll host one image for them, no larger than 128x128px off my own web server on a DSL line. I know it's not much but it's all I can offer in today's recessionary times</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll host one image for them , no larger than 128x128px off my own web server on a DSL line .
I know it 's not much but it 's all I can offer in today 's recessionary times</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll host one image for them, no larger than 128x128px off my own web server on a DSL line.
I know it's not much but it's all I can offer in today's recessionary times</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30555040</id>
	<title>Re:I'm at the point in my life...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261826460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm at the point in my life that I can't afford to <b>stand for what I believe</b>.</p></div><p>There, fixed it for you.

Enjoy your "safe" life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm at the point in my life that I ca n't afford to stand for what I believe.There , fixed it for you .
Enjoy your " safe " life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm at the point in my life that I can't afford to stand for what I believe.There, fixed it for you.
Enjoy your "safe" life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553886</id>
	<title>Couldn't we just avoid reading Wikileaks?</title>
	<author>Roblimo</author>
	<datestamp>1261756980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Wikileaks' biggest problem is that it's overwhelmed with readers, wouldn't our simplest and most direct way to help solve the problem be to simply not read Wikileaks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Wikileaks ' biggest problem is that it 's overwhelmed with readers , would n't our simplest and most direct way to help solve the problem be to simply not read Wikileaks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Wikileaks' biggest problem is that it's overwhelmed with readers, wouldn't our simplest and most direct way to help solve the problem be to simply not read Wikileaks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552876</id>
	<title>I donated money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261739820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but then I reverted it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but then I reverted it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but then I reverted it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553274</id>
	<title>Do not visit Wikileaks!</title>
	<author>paxcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1261746360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless to make a donation. Otherwise, they will only feel the bad side of Slashdotting.<br>This is what probably provides the info you'd want anyway: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless to make a donation .
Otherwise , they will only feel the bad side of Slashdotting.This is what probably provides the info you 'd want anyway : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless to make a donation.
Otherwise, they will only feel the bad side of Slashdotting.This is what probably provides the info you'd want anyway: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553102</id>
	<title>Politics and sausage are alike</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261743540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In that no one should ever see either being made....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that no one should ever see either being made... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that no one should ever see either being made....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553152</id>
	<title>Re:Freenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261744380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only reason to use Freenet, ever, is if you are a massive fucking paedophile. Are you a massive fucking paedophile? No? Then why the fuck are you on Freenet? Stop trying to legitimize your massive mirrored preteen stash and fuck off. Wikileaks my ass, that shit provides a service, Freenet just rapes childhoods.

Honestly, you might as well be tearing little kids' asses every time you open that shit up. Fuck you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason to use Freenet , ever , is if you are a massive fucking paedophile .
Are you a massive fucking paedophile ?
No ? Then why the fuck are you on Freenet ?
Stop trying to legitimize your massive mirrored preteen stash and fuck off .
Wikileaks my ass , that shit provides a service , Freenet just rapes childhoods .
Honestly , you might as well be tearing little kids ' asses every time you open that shit up .
Fuck you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason to use Freenet, ever, is if you are a massive fucking paedophile.
Are you a massive fucking paedophile?
No? Then why the fuck are you on Freenet?
Stop trying to legitimize your massive mirrored preteen stash and fuck off.
Wikileaks my ass, that shit provides a service, Freenet just rapes childhoods.
Honestly, you might as well be tearing little kids' asses every time you open that shit up.
Fuck you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553162</id>
	<title>The Cloud ...</title>
	<author>zummit</author>
	<datestamp>1261744440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't "The Cloud" solve all of WikiLeaks problems?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't " The Cloud " solve all of WikiLeaks problems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't "The Cloud" solve all of WikiLeaks problems?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553370</id>
	<title>wikileaks huh?</title>
	<author>Mystra007</author>
	<datestamp>1261747860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In before the "I submitted something secret to wikileak---NO CARRIER---" jokes</htmltext>
<tokenext>In before the " I submitted something secret to wikileak---NO CARRIER--- " jokes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In before the "I submitted something secret to wikileak---NO CARRIER---" jokes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30558762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30555040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30560902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30554700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_25_1744225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30554330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553142
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30560902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30554700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30555040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30558762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_25_1744225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30552880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_25_1744225.30553790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
