<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_24_1353205</id>
	<title>More on the Waterworld Goldilocks Planet</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1261677060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>goldilocksmission writes with this snippet from Goldilocks Mission: <i>"News spread recently about a super-earth-sized planet that has been recently discovered to <a href="http://www.goldilocksmission.com/blog/2009/12/24/9-waterworld-goldilocks-planet.html">contain one of the most essential compounds for life</a> to exist in the universe: water. ... GJ1214b is a massive planet that can house about six earths and is about forty light-years away from us. ... The significant discovery leap of detecting Gliese 581d to the more goldilocks planet oriented GJ1214b is a testament to the advances in the technology of detecting earth-like exoplanets."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>goldilocksmission writes with this snippet from Goldilocks Mission : " News spread recently about a super-earth-sized planet that has been recently discovered to contain one of the most essential compounds for life to exist in the universe : water .
... GJ1214b is a massive planet that can house about six earths and is about forty light-years away from us .
... The significant discovery leap of detecting Gliese 581d to the more goldilocks planet oriented GJ1214b is a testament to the advances in the technology of detecting earth-like exoplanets .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>goldilocksmission writes with this snippet from Goldilocks Mission: "News spread recently about a super-earth-sized planet that has been recently discovered to contain one of the most essential compounds for life to exist in the universe: water.
... GJ1214b is a massive planet that can house about six earths and is about forty light-years away from us.
... The significant discovery leap of detecting Gliese 581d to the more goldilocks planet oriented GJ1214b is a testament to the advances in the technology of detecting earth-like exoplanets.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547384</id>
	<title>Re:something I could not figure out about waterwor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261653480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't need no stinking fuel or jet skis. They are a green planet.</p><p>Al Gore has already been there, after all he invented the term Goldilocks. They've given up their carbon base and gone green. Solar powered and Wind powered.</p><p>I mean on a planet of that size you'd need a huge area displacement in order to remain afloat, mayaswell stick a few solar panels on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't need no stinking fuel or jet skis .
They are a green planet.Al Gore has already been there , after all he invented the term Goldilocks .
They 've given up their carbon base and gone green .
Solar powered and Wind powered.I mean on a planet of that size you 'd need a huge area displacement in order to remain afloat , mayaswell stick a few solar panels on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't need no stinking fuel or jet skis.
They are a green planet.Al Gore has already been there, after all he invented the term Goldilocks.
They've given up their carbon base and gone green.
Solar powered and Wind powered.I mean on a planet of that size you'd need a huge area displacement in order to remain afloat, mayaswell stick a few solar panels on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Snarkalicious</author>
	<datestamp>1261682460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This KoolAid is juuusssst right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This KoolAid is juuusssst right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This KoolAid is juuusssst right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545526</id>
	<title>Jet Skiers Rejoice!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261680840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Greetings to our new super-sized Waterworld Goldilocks overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Greetings to our new super-sized Waterworld Goldilocks overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greetings to our new super-sized Waterworld Goldilocks overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547496</id>
	<title>Re:Actually...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261654260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed UFC will now be two aliens rolling around on the floor doing something that could be fighting or could be mating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed UFC will now be two aliens rolling around on the floor doing something that could be fighting or could be mating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed UFC will now be two aliens rolling around on the floor doing something that could be fighting or could be mating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550200</id>
	<title>Re: one of the most essential compounds for life</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1261742520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These guys are scientists, so they'd consider beer to be a mixture (or possibly a solution) rather than a compound.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These guys are scientists , so they 'd consider beer to be a mixture ( or possibly a solution ) rather than a compound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These guys are scientists, so they'd consider beer to be a mixture (or possibly a solution) rather than a compound.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546288</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1261686420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot definitely got trolled.  The article itself is pretty funny.  Besides the bits you mention about the "Goldilocks Mission," they also think the planet is habitable but they might have to build a space elevator because it's thick atmosphere will block out light.</p><p>I wonder how many 18-34 year old women in top physical condition they get, who are willing to live in a "Space Center" in the desert?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot definitely got trolled .
The article itself is pretty funny .
Besides the bits you mention about the " Goldilocks Mission , " they also think the planet is habitable but they might have to build a space elevator because it 's thick atmosphere will block out light.I wonder how many 18-34 year old women in top physical condition they get , who are willing to live in a " Space Center " in the desert ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot definitely got trolled.
The article itself is pretty funny.
Besides the bits you mention about the "Goldilocks Mission," they also think the planet is habitable but they might have to build a space elevator because it's thick atmosphere will block out light.I wonder how many 18-34 year old women in top physical condition they get, who are willing to live in a "Space Center" in the desert?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516</id>
	<title>Overlords</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261680840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new aquatic overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new aquatic overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new aquatic overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546044</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261684200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</id>
	<title>nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you RTFA there is nothing new here. In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission. "The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age, healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition, and who have read the book, GOLDILOCKS MISSION: Man&rsquo;s Next Migration." They are looking for "Skydets" who will live in a "Space Center" "in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico" to research humanities next migration to the stars. It has the feel of a new cult.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you RTFA there is nothing new here .
In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission .
" The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age , healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition , and who have read the book , GOLDILOCKS MISSION : Man    s Next Migration .
" They are looking for " Skydets " who will live in a " Space Center " " in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico " to research humanities next migration to the stars .
It has the feel of a new cult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you RTFA there is nothing new here.
In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission.
"The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age, healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition, and who have read the book, GOLDILOCKS MISSION: Man’s Next Migration.
" They are looking for "Skydets" who will live in a "Space Center" "in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico" to research humanities next migration to the stars.
It has the feel of a new cult.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545988</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1261683720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another Apple fanboy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another Apple fanboy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another Apple fanboy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545982</id>
	<title>Inaccurate article</title>
	<author>plavchan</author>
	<datestamp>1261683720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Contrary to what the article states, MEarth is not an amateur astronomy group.  MEarth is headed by the former Discover Magazine's Scientist of the Year, Harvard professor David Charbonneau.  The business of identifying tiny changes in the brightness in the star from among an ensemble of thousands of carefully selected targets is no easy task.  That being said, many amateur scientists have been able to follow-up and confirm transiting planets.  I say amateur, but many have telescope rigs and detectors costing upwards of $50k (USD).  In that sense, the amateur community has contributed greatly to the follow-up of transiting planets.

Also, the article mentions GJ 1214 to be 300 times "cooler" than the Sun.  It's 300 times less luminous, not cooler (although the stellar surface is cooler by a factor of a few).

I will wait for the confirmation of water from transit transmission and absorption spectroscopy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Contrary to what the article states , MEarth is not an amateur astronomy group .
MEarth is headed by the former Discover Magazine 's Scientist of the Year , Harvard professor David Charbonneau .
The business of identifying tiny changes in the brightness in the star from among an ensemble of thousands of carefully selected targets is no easy task .
That being said , many amateur scientists have been able to follow-up and confirm transiting planets .
I say amateur , but many have telescope rigs and detectors costing upwards of $ 50k ( USD ) .
In that sense , the amateur community has contributed greatly to the follow-up of transiting planets .
Also , the article mentions GJ 1214 to be 300 times " cooler " than the Sun .
It 's 300 times less luminous , not cooler ( although the stellar surface is cooler by a factor of a few ) .
I will wait for the confirmation of water from transit transmission and absorption spectroscopy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Contrary to what the article states, MEarth is not an amateur astronomy group.
MEarth is headed by the former Discover Magazine's Scientist of the Year, Harvard professor David Charbonneau.
The business of identifying tiny changes in the brightness in the star from among an ensemble of thousands of carefully selected targets is no easy task.
That being said, many amateur scientists have been able to follow-up and confirm transiting planets.
I say amateur, but many have telescope rigs and detectors costing upwards of $50k (USD).
In that sense, the amateur community has contributed greatly to the follow-up of transiting planets.
Also, the article mentions GJ 1214 to be 300 times "cooler" than the Sun.
It's 300 times less luminous, not cooler (although the stellar surface is cooler by a factor of a few).
I will wait for the confirmation of water from transit transmission and absorption spectroscopy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547266</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261652460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I definitely felt the wierdness while browsing that site. You forgot to mention the compulsory daily meditation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I definitely felt the wierdness while browsing that site .
You forgot to mention the compulsory daily meditation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I definitely felt the wierdness while browsing that site.
You forgot to mention the compulsory daily meditation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546512</id>
	<title>Re: one of the most essential compounds for life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261688100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There should totally be an x-prize for discovering a beer planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There should totally be an x-prize for discovering a beer planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There should totally be an x-prize for discovering a beer planet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546386</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261687260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...shouldn't it be called the Baby Bear planet?</p></div><p>Only for the most nitpickiest of bastards which you appear to be...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...should n't it be called the Baby Bear planet ? Only for the most nitpickiest of bastards which you appear to be.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...shouldn't it be called the Baby Bear planet?Only for the most nitpickiest of bastards which you appear to be...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545846</id>
	<title>What a misleading title</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1261682820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was hoping to read about a planet full of blond beauties in bikinis</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was hoping to read about a planet full of blond beauties in bikinis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was hoping to read about a planet full of blond beauties in bikinis</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548208</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1261661400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>(thud)</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>( thud )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(thud)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549584</id>
	<title>Cover a geothermaly unbalanced planet with Water</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261683660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cover that planet with water on it's surface, and that water will insulate it to be just the right temperature.  I'm surprised that most Scientists and Slashdot patrons ignore this fact that dropping the same amount of Earth water would make Mars livable by balancing the temperature.  Stop looking for water under the soil, and always expect to see visible water on the poles where the lack of an O-zone layer above or below would allow the extremes to build.  Just consider that water is important not as a foundation of life but a function to balance a planet's environment, geothermal extremes, as well as create the climate of winds in the air.</p><p>Get your ass to Mars first! Don't follow NASA's failure by making it into such a long sermon when <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0869SYhwSU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">it all makes more sence otherwise.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cover that planet with water on it 's surface , and that water will insulate it to be just the right temperature .
I 'm surprised that most Scientists and Slashdot patrons ignore this fact that dropping the same amount of Earth water would make Mars livable by balancing the temperature .
Stop looking for water under the soil , and always expect to see visible water on the poles where the lack of an O-zone layer above or below would allow the extremes to build .
Just consider that water is important not as a foundation of life but a function to balance a planet 's environment , geothermal extremes , as well as create the climate of winds in the air.Get your ass to Mars first !
Do n't follow NASA 's failure by making it into such a long sermon when it all makes more sence otherwise .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cover that planet with water on it's surface, and that water will insulate it to be just the right temperature.
I'm surprised that most Scientists and Slashdot patrons ignore this fact that dropping the same amount of Earth water would make Mars livable by balancing the temperature.
Stop looking for water under the soil, and always expect to see visible water on the poles where the lack of an O-zone layer above or below would allow the extremes to build.
Just consider that water is important not as a foundation of life but a function to balance a planet's environment, geothermal extremes, as well as create the climate of winds in the air.Get your ass to Mars first!
Don't follow NASA's failure by making it into such a long sermon when it all makes more sence otherwise.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</id>
	<title>Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1261681140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't get the Goldilocks reference. Is it because this planet is "just right"? If so, shouldn't it be called the Baby Bear planet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get the Goldilocks reference .
Is it because this planet is " just right " ?
If so , should n't it be called the Baby Bear planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get the Goldilocks reference.
Is it because this planet is "just right"?
If so, shouldn't it be called the Baby Bear planet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547542</id>
	<title>Waterworld Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261654680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was half expecting Kevin Costner with long blonde hair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was half expecting Kevin Costner with long blonde hair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was half expecting Kevin Costner with long blonde hair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545626</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heaven forfend you should actually look for the term in, say, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks\_planet" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia.</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heaven forfend you should actually look for the term in , say , Wikipedia .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heaven forfend you should actually look for the term in, say, Wikipedia.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546560</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261645440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It has the feel of a new cult.</i></p><p>Not only that, but they have the inane thought that a planet 1/40th of the distance from Mercury to Sol might actually be habitable because "a red dwarf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is significantly more than three hundred times cooler than our own", neglecting the inverse square law, and that it would be red light, not the rainbow spectrum we require.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has the feel of a new cult.Not only that , but they have the inane thought that a planet 1/40th of the distance from Mercury to Sol might actually be habitable because " a red dwarf ... is significantly more than three hundred times cooler than our own " , neglecting the inverse square law , and that it would be red light , not the rainbow spectrum we require .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has the feel of a new cult.Not only that, but they have the inane thought that a planet 1/40th of the distance from Mercury to Sol might actually be habitable because "a red dwarf ... is significantly more than three hundred times cooler than our own", neglecting the inverse square law, and that it would be red light, not the rainbow spectrum we require.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546604</id>
	<title>Re:something I could not figure out about waterwor</title>
	<author>Lije Baley</author>
	<datestamp>1261645800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They siphoned the gas out of Dennis Hopper's chopper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They siphoned the gas out of Dennis Hopper 's chopper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They siphoned the gas out of Dennis Hopper's chopper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545742</id>
	<title>Re:something I could not figure out about waterwor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261682160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis?"</p><p>their home base was an oil tanker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis ?
" their home base was an oil tanker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis?
"their home base was an oil tanker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546216</id>
	<title>Doesn't seem to hold water</title>
	<author>Minter92</author>
	<datestamp>1261685640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reading the article doesn't add much credence to what they are claiming.  Seems like an advertisement for some fringe group.  The article is lacking in scientific explanation. How do they know there's water on the planet etc...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading the article does n't add much credence to what they are claiming .
Seems like an advertisement for some fringe group .
The article is lacking in scientific explanation .
How do they know there 's water on the planet etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading the article doesn't add much credence to what they are claiming.
Seems like an advertisement for some fringe group.
The article is lacking in scientific explanation.
How do they know there's water on the planet etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648</id>
	<title>something I could not figure out about waterworld</title>
	<author>ravenspear</author>
	<datestamp>1261681620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did they get fuel for the fricking jet skis?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548088</id>
	<title>Re:I'll say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261659720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy there, Kirk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy there , Kirk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy there, Kirk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545624</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the planet (moon) from Return of the Jedi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the planet ( moon ) from Return of the Jedi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the planet (moon) from Return of the Jedi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554058</id>
	<title>Re:Inaccurate article</title>
	<author>goldilocksmission</author>
	<datestamp>1261761060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree and apologize for using the "amateur" word. They are great scientists and should be commended for this discovery. I will ask the blog writer to amend that part including the part about luminosity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree and apologize for using the " amateur " word .
They are great scientists and should be commended for this discovery .
I will ask the blog writer to amend that part including the part about luminosity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree and apologize for using the "amateur" word.
They are great scientists and should be commended for this discovery.
I will ask the blog writer to amend that part including the part about luminosity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550560</id>
	<title>Re:Actually...</title>
	<author>StripedCow</author>
	<datestamp>1261750740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually, lifeforms will probably be much smaller due to the gravity...</p><p>ever wondered why mammals the size of a whale do not exist on land (on earth)? they would instantly collapse; actually when a whale gets stranded on a beach, it collapses...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually , lifeforms will probably be much smaller due to the gravity...ever wondered why mammals the size of a whale do not exist on land ( on earth ) ?
they would instantly collapse ; actually when a whale gets stranded on a beach , it collapses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually, lifeforms will probably be much smaller due to the gravity...ever wondered why mammals the size of a whale do not exist on land (on earth)?
they would instantly collapse; actually when a whale gets stranded on a beach, it collapses...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545600</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it's because like Goldilocks, we'll go in and still all of their resources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's because like Goldilocks , we 'll go in and still all of their resources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's because like Goldilocks, we'll go in and still all of their resources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548692</id>
	<title>Re:Actually...</title>
	<author>secolactico</author>
	<datestamp>1261669500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In hindsight, if they can kick our ass, maybe we shouldn't have named their homeworld Goldilocks.  Quick, erase the records before they find out!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In hindsight , if they can kick our ass , maybe we should n't have named their homeworld Goldilocks .
Quick , erase the records before they find out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In hindsight, if they can kick our ass, maybe we shouldn't have named their homeworld Goldilocks.
Quick, erase the records before they find out!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546322</id>
	<title>link no workie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261686780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when clicking on it, I something that runs on php spitting its guts in some sort of error (too lazy to go back and see what the error says.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when clicking on it , I something that runs on php spitting its guts in some sort of error ( too lazy to go back and see what the error says .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when clicking on it, I something that runs on php spitting its guts in some sort of error (too lazy to go back and see what the error says.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547066</id>
	<title>Re:something I could not figure out about waterwor</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1261650660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fuel was reserved to rescue a refridgerator in Florida. However, the senator was sacked before he could recover it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fuel was reserved to rescue a refridgerator in Florida .
However , the senator was sacked before he could recover it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fuel was reserved to rescue a refridgerator in Florida.
However, the senator was sacked before he could recover it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576</id>
	<title>Re:  one of the most essential compounds for life</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1261681200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was going to say beer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was going to say beer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was going to say beer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a serious answer, the Goldilocks zone is the orbital distance that lends itself to an earth-like amount of incident solar energy and (potentially) a higher likelihood of life friendly conditions existing.</p><p>The porridge isn't too hot or too cold... it's just right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a serious answer , the Goldilocks zone is the orbital distance that lends itself to an earth-like amount of incident solar energy and ( potentially ) a higher likelihood of life friendly conditions existing.The porridge is n't too hot or too cold... it 's just right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a serious answer, the Goldilocks zone is the orbital distance that lends itself to an earth-like amount of incident solar energy and (potentially) a higher likelihood of life friendly conditions existing.The porridge isn't too hot or too cold... it's just right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30660070</id>
	<title>Re:I'll say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1231148160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they'll be blue too, and live atop riches and riches of Unobtainium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 'll be blue too , and live atop riches and riches of Unobtainium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they'll be blue too, and live atop riches and riches of Unobtainium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546400</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261687380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow, people are so naive. we have just begun to research what humans would need to survive extended stays in space or on other planets. there are so many variables. i have read science fiction for decades, and most of the books just gloss over the problems for the sake of storytelling. this wacko group is read to say we could live on the planet. tell me, have you worked out the kinks in your bussard ramjet designs? have you considered the ethics of forcing children of space travellers to be space travellers as well? what about protein incompatibility (or worse, protein COMPATIBILITY and new diseases) if we find life? psychological effects of isolation from the human species in a group too small to avoid inbreeding? psychological effects of living in an environment hostile to our form of life? the danger of having too few technological/raw material resources (say your backup nuclear power plant fails: on earth, 6 billion people and 10000 years of worldwide resource development are behind every thing we construct. not so on a new planet. one false step and you are SO dead). all of these attempts at isolating a group of people to determine our survivability in space are pie in the sky. sure, some value will come from them, but it is hubris to think we are gonna move out into the universe like we moved over our planet. its cold and hard out there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , people are so naive .
we have just begun to research what humans would need to survive extended stays in space or on other planets .
there are so many variables .
i have read science fiction for decades , and most of the books just gloss over the problems for the sake of storytelling .
this wacko group is read to say we could live on the planet .
tell me , have you worked out the kinks in your bussard ramjet designs ?
have you considered the ethics of forcing children of space travellers to be space travellers as well ?
what about protein incompatibility ( or worse , protein COMPATIBILITY and new diseases ) if we find life ?
psychological effects of isolation from the human species in a group too small to avoid inbreeding ?
psychological effects of living in an environment hostile to our form of life ?
the danger of having too few technological/raw material resources ( say your backup nuclear power plant fails : on earth , 6 billion people and 10000 years of worldwide resource development are behind every thing we construct .
not so on a new planet .
one false step and you are SO dead ) .
all of these attempts at isolating a group of people to determine our survivability in space are pie in the sky .
sure , some value will come from them , but it is hubris to think we are gon na move out into the universe like we moved over our planet .
its cold and hard out there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, people are so naive.
we have just begun to research what humans would need to survive extended stays in space or on other planets.
there are so many variables.
i have read science fiction for decades, and most of the books just gloss over the problems for the sake of storytelling.
this wacko group is read to say we could live on the planet.
tell me, have you worked out the kinks in your bussard ramjet designs?
have you considered the ethics of forcing children of space travellers to be space travellers as well?
what about protein incompatibility (or worse, protein COMPATIBILITY and new diseases) if we find life?
psychological effects of isolation from the human species in a group too small to avoid inbreeding?
psychological effects of living in an environment hostile to our form of life?
the danger of having too few technological/raw material resources (say your backup nuclear power plant fails: on earth, 6 billion people and 10000 years of worldwide resource development are behind every thing we construct.
not so on a new planet.
one false step and you are SO dead).
all of these attempts at isolating a group of people to determine our survivability in space are pie in the sky.
sure, some value will come from them, but it is hubris to think we are gonna move out into the universe like we moved over our planet.
its cold and hard out there...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545632</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>let me Google that for you:
<a href="http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=goldilocks+planet" title="lmgtfy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=goldilocks+planet</a> [lmgtfy.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>let me Google that for you : http : //www.lmgtfy.com/ ? q = goldilocks + planet [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>let me Google that for you:
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=goldilocks+planet [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545598</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261681380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it inhabited by Bears?</p><p>Givrn its size, it must have a greater gravity than earth, so the inhabitants will be super strong - maybe we should keep away from there, else they will really become our overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it inhabited by Bears ? Givrn its size , it must have a greater gravity than earth , so the inhabitants will be super strong - maybe we should keep away from there , else they will really become our overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it inhabited by Bears?Givrn its size, it must have a greater gravity than earth, so the inhabitants will be super strong - maybe we should keep away from there, else they will really become our overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550262</id>
	<title>Re:I'll say it...</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1261744140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You may not want to.  The way it works for them is, the female captures a male, forces him into her reproductive organ, and clamps down, smothering him.  As the male suffocates, his body convulses rapidly (which brings the female pleasure).  When he is finally dead, the reproductive pods on his surface rupture, releasing his genetic material, which impregnates the female (if she is not using contraceptives).  The pods also release a hormone which causes the female more pleasure.  Her reproductive cavity then seals itself off to form a womb, and so she cannot have intercourse again for the duration of the thirty-year gestation period, but the hormone that causes libido continually builds up.  When she finally gives birth (to a litter of thousands, most of them male), she can't take it any more and immediately goes looking for (adult) males again, sometimes stuffing three or four in there at once, thus impregnating herself again.  By the time she gives birth to the new batch, the former batch of offspring are fully raised and have moved out on their own.<br><br>Of course, modern females use contraceptives most of the time, so they can suffocate a couple of males a day without becoming impregnated.  This has really helped to even out the gender imbalance in the population.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may not want to .
The way it works for them is , the female captures a male , forces him into her reproductive organ , and clamps down , smothering him .
As the male suffocates , his body convulses rapidly ( which brings the female pleasure ) .
When he is finally dead , the reproductive pods on his surface rupture , releasing his genetic material , which impregnates the female ( if she is not using contraceptives ) .
The pods also release a hormone which causes the female more pleasure .
Her reproductive cavity then seals itself off to form a womb , and so she can not have intercourse again for the duration of the thirty-year gestation period , but the hormone that causes libido continually builds up .
When she finally gives birth ( to a litter of thousands , most of them male ) , she ca n't take it any more and immediately goes looking for ( adult ) males again , sometimes stuffing three or four in there at once , thus impregnating herself again .
By the time she gives birth to the new batch , the former batch of offspring are fully raised and have moved out on their own.Of course , modern females use contraceptives most of the time , so they can suffocate a couple of males a day without becoming impregnated .
This has really helped to even out the gender imbalance in the population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may not want to.
The way it works for them is, the female captures a male, forces him into her reproductive organ, and clamps down, smothering him.
As the male suffocates, his body convulses rapidly (which brings the female pleasure).
When he is finally dead, the reproductive pods on his surface rupture, releasing his genetic material, which impregnates the female (if she is not using contraceptives).
The pods also release a hormone which causes the female more pleasure.
Her reproductive cavity then seals itself off to form a womb, and so she cannot have intercourse again for the duration of the thirty-year gestation period, but the hormone that causes libido continually builds up.
When she finally gives birth (to a litter of thousands, most of them male), she can't take it any more and immediately goes looking for (adult) males again, sometimes stuffing three or four in there at once, thus impregnating herself again.
By the time she gives birth to the new batch, the former batch of offspring are fully raised and have moved out on their own.Of course, modern females use contraceptives most of the time, so they can suffocate a couple of males a day without becoming impregnated.
This has really helped to even out the gender imbalance in the population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740</id>
	<title>Actually...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261647360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity, any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human's ass.</p><p>UFC will never be the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity , any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human 's ass.UFC will never be the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity, any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human's ass.UFC will never be the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</id>
	<title>I'll say it...</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1261687200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real question on everyone's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question on everyone 's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question on everyone's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546912</id>
	<title>Replace "life" with "life as we know it" in title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261648860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replace "life" in the article title with "life as we know it".  Thermodynamics predicts we could have "life" (intelligent energy-based beings) on old Sol, but it wouldn't be life as we know it (it would be much, much faster, probably couldn't see us in the frozen void &amp; couldn't receive radio waves -- too much noise).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replace " life " in the article title with " life as we know it " .
Thermodynamics predicts we could have " life " ( intelligent energy-based beings ) on old Sol , but it would n't be life as we know it ( it would be much , much faster , probably could n't see us in the frozen void &amp; could n't receive radio waves -- too much noise ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replace "life" in the article title with "life as we know it".
Thermodynamics predicts we could have "life" (intelligent energy-based beings) on old Sol, but it wouldn't be life as we know it (it would be much, much faster, probably couldn't see us in the frozen void &amp; couldn't receive radio waves -- too much noise).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547794</id>
	<title>Re:I'll say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261656780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The real question on everyone's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives?</p></div></blockquote><p>Look around you. Everything non-human on this planet would qualify as 'exotic natives'. I'm fairly certain most would only go for the humanoid species, but what makes you think that any intelligent alien life form would be prettier than an orangutan?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question on everyone 's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives ? Look around you .
Everything non-human on this planet would qualify as 'exotic natives' .
I 'm fairly certain most would only go for the humanoid species , but what makes you think that any intelligent alien life form would be prettier than an orangutan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question on everyone's mind is when can we start having sex with the exotic natives?Look around you.
Everything non-human on this planet would qualify as 'exotic natives'.
I'm fairly certain most would only go for the humanoid species, but what makes you think that any intelligent alien life form would be prettier than an orangutan?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545780</id>
	<title>Higher Ice Phases</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261682400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A "waterworld" would actually have a fairly shallow ocean, on the order of 75 to 100 km deep for an Earth size planet, as <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0308324" title="arxiv.org">other ice phases would form at the bottom of the ocean </a> [arxiv.org] at depth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A " waterworld " would actually have a fairly shallow ocean , on the order of 75 to 100 km deep for an Earth size planet , as other ice phases would form at the bottom of the ocean [ arxiv.org ] at depth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A "waterworld" would actually have a fairly shallow ocean, on the order of 75 to 100 km deep for an Earth size planet, as other ice phases would form at the bottom of the ocean  [arxiv.org] at depth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546664</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261646460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as they have regular orgies, I'm in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they have regular orgies , I 'm in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they have regular orgies, I'm in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554044</id>
	<title>Re:nothing new here</title>
	<author>goldilocksmission</author>
	<datestamp>1261760640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you RTFA there is nothing new here. In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission. "The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age, healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition, and who have read the book, GOLDILOCKS MISSION: Man&rsquo;s Next Migration." They are looking for "Skydets" who will live in a "Space Center" "in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico" to research humanities next migration to the stars. It has the feel of a new cult.</p></div><p>It's not cult. The organization is in its early stages. They are quite serious about it. In fact, the goal is to do it within the next three decades. Emerging technologies today will continue to develop quite rapidly as we have seen in the past 60 years alone. I would highly recommend reading the book Man's Next Migration <a href="http://www.goldilocksmission.com/mans-next-migration-book.html" title="goldilocksmission.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.goldilocksmission.com/mans-next-migration-book.html</a> [goldilocksmission.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you RTFA there is nothing new here .
In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission .
" The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age , healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition , and who have read the book , GOLDILOCKS MISSION : Man    s Next Migration .
" They are looking for " Skydets " who will live in a " Space Center " " in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico " to research humanities next migration to the stars .
It has the feel of a new cult.It 's not cult .
The organization is in its early stages .
They are quite serious about it .
In fact , the goal is to do it within the next three decades .
Emerging technologies today will continue to develop quite rapidly as we have seen in the past 60 years alone .
I would highly recommend reading the book Man 's Next Migration http : //www.goldilocksmission.com/mans-next-migration-book.html [ goldilocksmission.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you RTFA there is nothing new here.
In fact this is more of an advertisement for some wackjob organization called Goldilocks Mission.
"The Goldilocks Mission is sending an open invitation to men and women around the globe between 18 and 34 years of age, healthy in every way and in top physical and psychological condition, and who have read the book, GOLDILOCKS MISSION: Man’s Next Migration.
" They are looking for "Skydets" who will live in a "Space Center" "in a corner of Southwestern New Mexico" to research humanities next migration to the stars.
It has the feel of a new cult.It's not cult.
The organization is in its early stages.
They are quite serious about it.
In fact, the goal is to do it within the next three decades.
Emerging technologies today will continue to develop quite rapidly as we have seen in the past 60 years alone.
I would highly recommend reading the book Man's Next Migration http://www.goldilocksmission.com/mans-next-migration-book.html [goldilocksmission.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549992</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1261736820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really like this new term. It expands my vocabulary greatly. Instead of saying I want the right-sized monitor, I can say I want a Goldilocks monitor. Or instead of the right temperature in my house, I can say I want the Goldilocks temperature. Then people will have to ask me what the hell I mean, and I can enjoy answering. Of course I can't just say that it means "suitable"; I must tell a story involving bears and porridge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like this new term .
It expands my vocabulary greatly .
Instead of saying I want the right-sized monitor , I can say I want a Goldilocks monitor .
Or instead of the right temperature in my house , I can say I want the Goldilocks temperature .
Then people will have to ask me what the hell I mean , and I can enjoy answering .
Of course I ca n't just say that it means " suitable " ; I must tell a story involving bears and porridge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like this new term.
It expands my vocabulary greatly.
Instead of saying I want the right-sized monitor, I can say I want a Goldilocks monitor.
Or instead of the right temperature in my house, I can say I want the Goldilocks temperature.
Then people will have to ask me what the hell I mean, and I can enjoy answering.
Of course I can't just say that it means "suitable"; I must tell a story involving bears and porridge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549114</id>
	<title>Re:Actually...</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1261675860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity, any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human's ass.</p></div></blockquote><p>Umm, no.  That particular planet has a surface gravity of 0.9g.  Six times Earth's mass, but only 1/3 Earth's density....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity , any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human 's ass.Umm , no .
That particular planet has a surface gravity of 0.9g .
Six times Earth 's mass , but only 1/3 Earth 's density... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With six times the mass of earth and subsequently higher gravity, any bi-pedal life from that evolves there will most certianly be able to kick your average human's ass.Umm, no.
That particular planet has a surface gravity of 0.9g.
Six times Earth's mass, but only 1/3 Earth's density....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547464</id>
	<title>Re:I'll say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261654080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You first, my good man.  We sincerely await your forthcoming J. Astrobio. paper,  "Surprising Prevalence of Vaginal Dentata Amongst Tripedal Natives of GJ 1214" .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You first , my good man .
We sincerely await your forthcoming J. Astrobio. paper , " Surprising Prevalence of Vaginal Dentata Amongst Tripedal Natives of GJ 1214 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You first, my good man.
We sincerely await your forthcoming J. Astrobio. paper,  "Surprising Prevalence of Vaginal Dentata Amongst Tripedal Natives of GJ 1214" .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546854</id>
	<title>Re:Goldilocks?</title>
	<author>ncohafmuta</author>
	<datestamp>1261648200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>except that they estimate the surface temp. of the planet is 200 deg. C. how is that in the Goldilocks zone?</p><p>-Tony</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>except that they estimate the surface temp .
of the planet is 200 deg .
C. how is that in the Goldilocks zone ? -Tony</tokentext>
<sentencetext>except that they estimate the surface temp.
of the planet is 200 deg.
C. how is that in the Goldilocks zone?-Tony</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30660070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1353205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30550262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30547794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30548088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30660070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30554058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1353205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30549992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30546386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1353205.30545598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
