<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_24_1329204</id>
	<title>iPhone 4 Rumors Rumble</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1261662180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>padraic\_93 writes <i>"Information has become available which reveals <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/23/iphone\_rumors/">development is underway for the new iPhone 4</a>, as well as suggestions of features and Apple's plans for the phone.

A report on PinchMedia, which made repeated use of the term 'iPhone 4,' was cited on the website MacRumors, though the website admitted that such reports can often be forged. The report also made allusions to a 'Corporate Event' planned for June 28th &mdash; July 2nd 2010, which have been taken as referring to the next WWDC."</i>

A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091223PD225.html">40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras</a>, which might hint at new functionality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>padraic \ _93 writes " Information has become available which reveals development is underway for the new iPhone 4 , as well as suggestions of features and Apple 's plans for the phone .
A report on PinchMedia , which made repeated use of the term 'iPhone 4, ' was cited on the website MacRumors , though the website admitted that such reports can often be forged .
The report also made allusions to a 'Corporate Event ' planned for June 28th    July 2nd 2010 , which have been taken as referring to the next WWDC .
" A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered 40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras , which might hint at new functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>padraic\_93 writes "Information has become available which reveals development is underway for the new iPhone 4, as well as suggestions of features and Apple's plans for the phone.
A report on PinchMedia, which made repeated use of the term 'iPhone 4,' was cited on the website MacRumors, though the website admitted that such reports can often be forged.
The report also made allusions to a 'Corporate Event' planned for June 28th — July 2nd 2010, which have been taken as referring to the next WWDC.
"

A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered 40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras, which might hint at new functionality.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</id>
	<title>It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Part of <a href="http://www.misterbg.org/AppleProductCycle/" title="misterbg.org">The Apple Product Cycle.</a> [misterbg.org]</p><p>Slashdot is one of those "Mac Internet forums" described therein. Or do you think that it is a coincidence that Slashdot's sections are:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>    * Main<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Apple<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * AskSlashdot<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Book Reviews<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Developers<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Games<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Hardware<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * IT<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Idle<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Index<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Interviews<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Mobile<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Politics<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Science<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Technology<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * YRO</p></div><p>Linux? HA!<br>Linux is a topic here only to attract more M$ haters.<br>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing? See what I mean? Exactly!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Part of The Apple Product Cycle .
[ misterbg.org ] Slashdot is one of those " Mac Internet forums " described therein .
Or do you think that it is a coincidence that Slashdot 's sections are : * Main         * Apple         * AskSlashdot         * Book Reviews         * Developers         * Games         * Hardware         * IT         * Idle         * Index         * Interviews         * Linux         * Mobile         * Politics         * Science         * Technology         * YROLinux ?
HA ! Linux is a topic here only to attract more M $ haters.When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing ?
See what I mean ?
Exactly !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Part of The Apple Product Cycle.
[misterbg.org]Slashdot is one of those "Mac Internet forums" described therein.
Or do you think that it is a coincidence that Slashdot's sections are:    * Main
        * Apple
        * AskSlashdot
        * Book Reviews
        * Developers
        * Games
        * Hardware
        * IT
        * Idle
        * Index
        * Interviews
        * Linux
        * Mobile
        * Politics
        * Science
        * Technology
        * YROLinux?
HA!Linux is a topic here only to attract more M$ haters.When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing?
See what I mean?
Exactly!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544154</id>
	<title>Well hooray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261672200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone is soon at nearing smartphones with 4 year old Symbian technology.<br>I guess it's time to whip out the champaign!</p><p>The whole USA seems to think there were no smartphones of any kind in existence until Google (Android) and Apple (iPhone) came up with their product propositions. But in reality the rest of the world has enjoyed similar stuff (of course with somewhat crappier UI) since like 6 years ago.</p><p>12-megapixel smartphone cameras is the shit now. iPhone comes up with 5 Mpix. Serious question: so what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone is soon at nearing smartphones with 4 year old Symbian technology.I guess it 's time to whip out the champaign ! The whole USA seems to think there were no smartphones of any kind in existence until Google ( Android ) and Apple ( iPhone ) came up with their product propositions .
But in reality the rest of the world has enjoyed similar stuff ( of course with somewhat crappier UI ) since like 6 years ago.12-megapixel smartphone cameras is the shit now .
iPhone comes up with 5 Mpix .
Serious question : so what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone is soon at nearing smartphones with 4 year old Symbian technology.I guess it's time to whip out the champaign!The whole USA seems to think there were no smartphones of any kind in existence until Google (Android) and Apple (iPhone) came up with their product propositions.
But in reality the rest of the world has enjoyed similar stuff (of course with somewhat crappier UI) since like 6 years ago.12-megapixel smartphone cameras is the shit now.
iPhone comes up with 5 Mpix.
Serious question: so what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543500</id>
	<title>Attention!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steve Jobs is taking dump.<br>ifone is the best chinese portable in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Jobs is taking dump.ifone is the best chinese portable in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Jobs is taking dump.ifone is the best chinese portable in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543604</id>
	<title>iPhone 4 Rumors Rumble</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261668060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew when I read the headline that I was in for another slashvertisement and PR for IPhone.</p><p>I do wish these things would be correctly labelled as publicity handout rather than the phony, "Hey, guess what I heard..." I'm-your-pal style nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew when I read the headline that I was in for another slashvertisement and PR for IPhone.I do wish these things would be correctly labelled as publicity handout rather than the phony , " Hey , guess what I heard... " I 'm-your-pal style nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew when I read the headline that I was in for another slashvertisement and PR for IPhone.I do wish these things would be correctly labelled as publicity handout rather than the phony, "Hey, guess what I heard..." I'm-your-pal style nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543856</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>DaveGod</author>
	<datestamp>1261669980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair the iPhone is an extremely significant piece of technology, both as a consumer handset and driving forward technological change. True, the new phone probably won't include much in the way of technological breakthrough - or even true innovation, but it will set the standard of the entire mobile phone industry by putting the tech in the hands of the mass market.</p><p>Anyway, if you're the kind of person who reads<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. it's kind of expected that when a friend imparts that they intend to buy a 3GS, you should be able to respond "looking like a new one isn't being announced until June, then there's some lead time so yeah no point waiting around for the next one".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair the iPhone is an extremely significant piece of technology , both as a consumer handset and driving forward technological change .
True , the new phone probably wo n't include much in the way of technological breakthrough - or even true innovation , but it will set the standard of the entire mobile phone industry by putting the tech in the hands of the mass market.Anyway , if you 're the kind of person who reads / .
it 's kind of expected that when a friend imparts that they intend to buy a 3GS , you should be able to respond " looking like a new one is n't being announced until June , then there 's some lead time so yeah no point waiting around for the next one " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair the iPhone is an extremely significant piece of technology, both as a consumer handset and driving forward technological change.
True, the new phone probably won't include much in the way of technological breakthrough - or even true innovation, but it will set the standard of the entire mobile phone industry by putting the tech in the hands of the mass market.Anyway, if you're the kind of person who reads /.
it's kind of expected that when a friend imparts that they intend to buy a 3GS, you should be able to respond "looking like a new one isn't being announced until June, then there's some lead time so yeah no point waiting around for the next one".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543710</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261668900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be rude, but really, <i>get over it</i>. The iPhone is popular and people want to know even the flimsiest of rumors. I can't say I blame them considering the state of the competition. As others have pointed out, you could stop your trolling and tweak your Slashdot user prefs., then your dilemma would be solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be rude , but really , get over it .
The iPhone is popular and people want to know even the flimsiest of rumors .
I ca n't say I blame them considering the state of the competition .
As others have pointed out , you could stop your trolling and tweak your Slashdot user prefs. , then your dilemma would be solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be rude, but really, get over it.
The iPhone is popular and people want to know even the flimsiest of rumors.
I can't say I blame them considering the state of the competition.
As others have pointed out, you could stop your trolling and tweak your Slashdot user prefs., then your dilemma would be solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545082</id>
	<title>The camera you have with you</title>
	<author>earnest murderer</author>
	<datestamp>1261678020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is better than the one you left at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is better than the one you left at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is better than the one you left at home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543690</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261668660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah Sure.   Not that I haven't seen a dozen or so articles recently on Droid, Android, Apple's app policies, blah blah.   I think it is news that someone has seen something like an iPhone 4 available in the wild.  People, this isn't two years ago when everyone and their dog was talking about the iPhone...now we have Android, Palm, Apple to share the hype!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah Sure .
Not that I have n't seen a dozen or so articles recently on Droid , Android , Apple 's app policies , blah blah .
I think it is news that someone has seen something like an iPhone 4 available in the wild .
People , this is n't two years ago when everyone and their dog was talking about the iPhone...now we have Android , Palm , Apple to share the hype !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah Sure.
Not that I haven't seen a dozen or so articles recently on Droid, Android, Apple's app policies, blah blah.
I think it is news that someone has seen something like an iPhone 4 available in the wild.
People, this isn't two years ago when everyone and their dog was talking about the iPhone...now we have Android, Palm, Apple to share the hype!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546830</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1261648080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe they are only making ~21 million phones like they did with the current generation (according to the article).

What about the other 20 million cameras you ask? Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera, so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup.



Tom...</p></div><p>iPod Touch with 5MP camera, the Tablet and more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they are only making ~ 21 million phones like they did with the current generation ( according to the article ) .
What about the other 20 million cameras you ask ?
Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera , so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup .
Tom...iPod Touch with 5MP camera , the Tablet and more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they are only making ~21 million phones like they did with the current generation (according to the article).
What about the other 20 million cameras you ask?
Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera, so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup.
Tom...iPod Touch with 5MP camera, the Tablet and more.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>samkass</author>
	<datestamp>1261669980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing?</p></div><p>You've got to be joking.  We heard how RMS thinks MySQL's mixed closed/open source is better than a pure GPL license.  We got an article about how Linus should win the Nobel Peace Prize.  Just do some searches for Stallman or Linus on Slashdot and you'll get the same drivel you do for jobs.</p><p>Personally, I think rumors about the latest and greatest tech gadgets are Slashdot's bread and butter, and the Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing ? You 've got to be joking .
We heard how RMS thinks MySQL 's mixed closed/open source is better than a pure GPL license .
We got an article about how Linus should win the Nobel Peace Prize .
Just do some searches for Stallman or Linus on Slashdot and you 'll get the same drivel you do for jobs.Personally , I think rumors about the latest and greatest tech gadgets are Slashdot 's bread and butter , and the Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing?You've got to be joking.
We heard how RMS thinks MySQL's mixed closed/open source is better than a pure GPL license.
We got an article about how Linus should win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Just do some searches for Stallman or Linus on Slashdot and you'll get the same drivel you do for jobs.Personally, I think rumors about the latest and greatest tech gadgets are Slashdot's bread and butter, and the Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544010</id>
	<title>Touchscreen Phone's Need HDTV Reception</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261671120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will Apple be generous enough to give us all HD TV reception.  The TV reception is after all free, and we know how not being able to make any moey off of a feature drive Apple nuts.</p><p>My guess is that the Google phones will have this first.  Just look at history.  Apple = proprietary everything, with a hoarding of everything to themselves.  Google and IBM, a little more open and easier to get along with.   This behavior dates back to the 70's and 80's for those of us who have been around since the beginning.  Apple ahas always been overpriced, not willing o get along with other computer makers, and just plain unreasonable in general.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will Apple be generous enough to give us all HD TV reception .
The TV reception is after all free , and we know how not being able to make any moey off of a feature drive Apple nuts.My guess is that the Google phones will have this first .
Just look at history .
Apple = proprietary everything , with a hoarding of everything to themselves .
Google and IBM , a little more open and easier to get along with .
This behavior dates back to the 70 's and 80 's for those of us who have been around since the beginning .
Apple ahas always been overpriced , not willing o get along with other computer makers , and just plain unreasonable in general .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will Apple be generous enough to give us all HD TV reception.
The TV reception is after all free, and we know how not being able to make any moey off of a feature drive Apple nuts.My guess is that the Google phones will have this first.
Just look at history.
Apple = proprietary everything, with a hoarding of everything to themselves.
Google and IBM, a little more open and easier to get along with.
This behavior dates back to the 70's and 80's for those of us who have been around since the beginning.
Apple ahas always been overpriced, not willing o get along with other computer makers, and just plain unreasonable in general.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543584</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261667760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sure-as-hell don't want a 5 Megapixel HD closeup of your face during a videocall<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure-as-hell do n't want a 5 Megapixel HD closeup of your face during a videocall : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure-as-hell don't want a 5 Megapixel HD closeup of your face during a videocall :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448</id>
	<title>Breaking News!</title>
	<author>ircmaxell</author>
	<datestamp>1261666140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Breaking News!  Company plans on updating a successful product line!<br> <br>
Seriously, why is this news?  We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point.  The only "new" information here (for me at least) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras...<br> <br>
What I found more interesting than what's posted here, is what Engadget reported yesterday:<blockquote><div><p>The most interesting word, however, comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider, who is quoting a "plugged-in source in the mobile industry" who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a "new, larger mobile device."</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/" title="engadget.com">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/</a> [engadget.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking News !
Company plans on updating a successful product line !
Seriously , why is this news ?
We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point .
The only " new " information here ( for me at least ) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras.. . What I found more interesting than what 's posted here , is what Engadget reported yesterday : The most interesting word , however , comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider , who is quoting a " plugged-in source in the mobile industry " who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a " new , larger mobile device .
" http : //www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/ [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking News!
Company plans on updating a successful product line!
Seriously, why is this news?
We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point.
The only "new" information here (for me at least) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras... 
What I found more interesting than what's posted here, is what Engadget reported yesterday:The most interesting word, however, comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider, who is quoting a "plugged-in source in the mobile industry" who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a "new, larger mobile device.
"
http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/ [engadget.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30573778</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1262028360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap ones</p></div><p>Awk! Puny penis!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap onesAwk !
Puny penis !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap onesAwk!
Puny penis!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543706</id>
	<title>Cameras ..</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1261668900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about the current generation of iPod touch which is missing the camera - and every man and his dog was expecting it to have one.  Or even the tablet that is likely to be coming out next year.  Apple does make devices other than the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the current generation of iPod touch which is missing the camera - and every man and his dog was expecting it to have one .
Or even the tablet that is likely to be coming out next year .
Apple does make devices other than the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the current generation of iPod touch which is missing the camera - and every man and his dog was expecting it to have one.
Or even the tablet that is likely to be coming out next year.
Apple does make devices other than the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544650</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1261675320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing? See what I mean?</p></div><p>That's because Linus and RMS are both a little bit wack while Steve Jobs...oh, wait a minute...never mind...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing ?
See what I mean ? That 's because Linus and RMS are both a little bit wack while Steve Jobs...oh , wait a minute...never mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time we had a story about Linus or RMS sneezing?
See what I mean?That's because Linus and RMS are both a little bit wack while Steve Jobs...oh, wait a minute...never mind...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545068</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>Failed Physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1261677840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Talking about this - anyone know of a good current/next-gen phone with such a forward facing camera? I was looking for an open internet tablet/smartphone, which I planned to use solely with wifi (no plan with a carrier at all). Having a camera so I can videochat in google voice (or any other videoconferencing program) would be a definite plus but I haven't seen one in any android or maemo phone...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talking about this - anyone know of a good current/next-gen phone with such a forward facing camera ?
I was looking for an open internet tablet/smartphone , which I planned to use solely with wifi ( no plan with a carrier at all ) .
Having a camera so I can videochat in google voice ( or any other videoconferencing program ) would be a definite plus but I have n't seen one in any android or maemo phone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talking about this - anyone know of a good current/next-gen phone with such a forward facing camera?
I was looking for an open internet tablet/smartphone, which I planned to use solely with wifi (no plan with a carrier at all).
Having a camera so I can videochat in google voice (or any other videoconferencing program) would be a definite plus but I haven't seen one in any android or maemo phone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544058</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261671540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Slashdot, news for nerds. Yes, we must have a story every time the iphone gets an update. Get over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Slashdot , news for nerds .
Yes , we must have a story every time the iphone gets an update .
Get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Slashdot, news for nerds.
Yes, we must have a story every time the iphone gets an update.
Get over it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543830</id>
	<title>it's already shipping!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261669860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called the N900 [ducks...]</p><p>But seriously, that's where the action is for open platform phones.  It's less locked down than either the iPhone or the Androids.  And you get root right out of the box, no need to jailbreak it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called the N900 [ ducks... ] But seriously , that 's where the action is for open platform phones .
It 's less locked down than either the iPhone or the Androids .
And you get root right out of the box , no need to jailbreak it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called the N900 [ducks...]But seriously, that's where the action is for open platform phones.
It's less locked down than either the iPhone or the Androids.
And you get root right out of the box, no need to jailbreak it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543534</id>
	<title>I am feeling a little nauseated...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261667160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>by the incessant Apple rumor-mongering lately.  I love Apple products but I don't need to hear about every little detail.  Is it really a surprise to anyone that Apple is preparing to upgrade its hardware to something comparable to the Droid or the forthcoming Nexus One?  Frankly I'd rather be surprised but here I am reading this article, right?  Now I feel self-loathing setting in... Great!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by the incessant Apple rumor-mongering lately .
I love Apple products but I do n't need to hear about every little detail .
Is it really a surprise to anyone that Apple is preparing to upgrade its hardware to something comparable to the Droid or the forthcoming Nexus One ?
Frankly I 'd rather be surprised but here I am reading this article , right ?
Now I feel self-loathing setting in... Great !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by the incessant Apple rumor-mongering lately.
I love Apple products but I don't need to hear about every little detail.
Is it really a surprise to anyone that Apple is preparing to upgrade its hardware to something comparable to the Droid or the forthcoming Nexus One?
Frankly I'd rather be surprised but here I am reading this article, right?
Now I feel self-loathing setting in... Great!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546342</id>
	<title>Re:I might have missed the memo....</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261686960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, this is why we have a front page news story for every other technology, for every of their technology products, when there's a rumour that they might have a newer version at some point in the future, possibly.</p><p>Oh wait, we don't, unless it's for amusement value - the Iphone is the new Duke Nukem Forever.</p><p>I mean, nevermind all the far more popular companies in the phone market, if we really applied your standard of newsworthiness for every kind of techology, it would be flooded. It would, well in your own words, be completely insane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , this is why we have a front page news story for every other technology , for every of their technology products , when there 's a rumour that they might have a newer version at some point in the future , possibly.Oh wait , we do n't , unless it 's for amusement value - the Iphone is the new Duke Nukem Forever.I mean , nevermind all the far more popular companies in the phone market , if we really applied your standard of newsworthiness for every kind of techology , it would be flooded .
It would , well in your own words , be completely insane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, this is why we have a front page news story for every other technology, for every of their technology products, when there's a rumour that they might have a newer version at some point in the future, possibly.Oh wait, we don't, unless it's for amusement value - the Iphone is the new Duke Nukem Forever.I mean, nevermind all the far more popular companies in the phone market, if we really applied your standard of newsworthiness for every kind of techology, it would be flooded.
It would, well in your own words, be completely insane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728</id>
	<title>5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261669020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With mainstream phones going high with 12+MP en HD video cameras, frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic.<br>Certain innovation seems to never have reached America?</p><p>Why is this news after all, an underperforming status symbol from a totally close minded corporation who pretends to be better than anyone else (or fools everybody into it) and that grabs its loving customers so strong into its arms with fixed do/don't do action lists as if it owned them..</p><p>Then come fixed subscription costs in America and other countries, skyrocketing for this phone only for no reason at all, despite insufficient Internet coverage in many of them.</p><p>And extra applications you have to pay to get anything out of it, but you may buy just the things they want you to buy according to their free will.. but they're forever bound to your credit card in the meantime.</p><p>Oh, please, PLEASE. No, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With mainstream phones going high with 12 + MP en HD video cameras , frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic.Certain innovation seems to never have reached America ? Why is this news after all , an underperforming status symbol from a totally close minded corporation who pretends to be better than anyone else ( or fools everybody into it ) and that grabs its loving customers so strong into its arms with fixed do/do n't do action lists as if it owned them..Then come fixed subscription costs in America and other countries , skyrocketing for this phone only for no reason at all , despite insufficient Internet coverage in many of them.And extra applications you have to pay to get anything out of it , but you may buy just the things they want you to buy according to their free will.. but they 're forever bound to your credit card in the meantime.Oh , please , PLEASE .
No , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With mainstream phones going high with 12+MP en HD video cameras, frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic.Certain innovation seems to never have reached America?Why is this news after all, an underperforming status symbol from a totally close minded corporation who pretends to be better than anyone else (or fools everybody into it) and that grabs its loving customers so strong into its arms with fixed do/don't do action lists as if it owned them..Then come fixed subscription costs in America and other countries, skyrocketing for this phone only for no reason at all, despite insufficient Internet coverage in many of them.And extra applications you have to pay to get anything out of it, but you may buy just the things they want you to buy according to their free will.. but they're forever bound to your credit card in the meantime.Oh, please, PLEASE.
No, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547610</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261655160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod the poster down.</p><p>As the owner of a Pixon12 (12 mega-pixel phone-camera) and a Nikon D90, I'd like to call bull-shit on the parent poster.<br>"As a practical matter, a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP"<br>Let me say that either you expect ALOT from a 2mp camera - or you're talking from no experience other than your opinion (which is WRONG).</p><p>The photos from the Pixon12 on the whole are very good.  They don't stand up to my Nikon 50 (let alone the Nikon D90) - but I don't expect them to.  They wipe the floor with just about any 2/3/4/5/6 mega-pixel point-n-shoot that I can name.  I hear your floored argument now "yes, but a point-n-shoot is not a real camera - it has to be a DSLR".  This is typical of the egos at Slashdot.</p><p>Let's compare apples with apples.  A DSLR is another class of camera.  To discount camera phones because they don't perform like a DSLR is just plain stupid.<br>AC</p><p>PS Slashdot, please stop modding up arguments where people can't substantiate their claims - and have never tested the kit.<br>PPS "The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth".  If this were true, I couldn't tell the difference between my 2mp phone camera and my 12mp phone camera.  Again, I call BULLSHIT to your urban myth - the difference is STAGGERING!!!!!<br>PPPS I agree that megapixels are not the sum-total of image quality - but they certainly do count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod the poster down.As the owner of a Pixon12 ( 12 mega-pixel phone-camera ) and a Nikon D90 , I 'd like to call bull-shit on the parent poster .
" As a practical matter , a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP " Let me say that either you expect ALOT from a 2mp camera - or you 're talking from no experience other than your opinion ( which is WRONG ) .The photos from the Pixon12 on the whole are very good .
They do n't stand up to my Nikon 50 ( let alone the Nikon D90 ) - but I do n't expect them to .
They wipe the floor with just about any 2/3/4/5/6 mega-pixel point-n-shoot that I can name .
I hear your floored argument now " yes , but a point-n-shoot is not a real camera - it has to be a DSLR " .
This is typical of the egos at Slashdot.Let 's compare apples with apples .
A DSLR is another class of camera .
To discount camera phones because they do n't perform like a DSLR is just plain stupid.ACPS Slashdot , please stop modding up arguments where people ca n't substantiate their claims - and have never tested the kit.PPS " The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth " .
If this were true , I could n't tell the difference between my 2mp phone camera and my 12mp phone camera .
Again , I call BULLSHIT to your urban myth - the difference is STAGGERING ! ! ! !
! PPPS I agree that megapixels are not the sum-total of image quality - but they certainly do count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod the poster down.As the owner of a Pixon12 (12 mega-pixel phone-camera) and a Nikon D90, I'd like to call bull-shit on the parent poster.
"As a practical matter, a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP"Let me say that either you expect ALOT from a 2mp camera - or you're talking from no experience other than your opinion (which is WRONG).The photos from the Pixon12 on the whole are very good.
They don't stand up to my Nikon 50 (let alone the Nikon D90) - but I don't expect them to.
They wipe the floor with just about any 2/3/4/5/6 mega-pixel point-n-shoot that I can name.
I hear your floored argument now "yes, but a point-n-shoot is not a real camera - it has to be a DSLR".
This is typical of the egos at Slashdot.Let's compare apples with apples.
A DSLR is another class of camera.
To discount camera phones because they don't perform like a DSLR is just plain stupid.ACPS Slashdot, please stop modding up arguments where people can't substantiate their claims - and have never tested the kit.PPS "The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth".
If this were true, I couldn't tell the difference between my 2mp phone camera and my 12mp phone camera.
Again, I call BULLSHIT to your urban myth - the difference is STAGGERING!!!!
!PPPS I agree that megapixels are not the sum-total of image quality - but they certainly do count.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543446</id>
	<title>I might have missed the memo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..But when did<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. become an Apple rumor site?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..But when did / .
become an Apple rumor site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..But when did /.
become an Apple rumor site?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543938</id>
	<title>oh really ???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261670520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh what a shock: a phone company will release a new version of their flagship product. And what a sensation: it will include a crappy CMOS camera too !<br>I think you could run that story for each and every phone company. Better still, the other phone companies offer choice in their range so ytou'd have to run  the same article multiple times a year...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh what a shock : a phone company will release a new version of their flagship product .
And what a sensation : it will include a crappy CMOS camera too ! I think you could run that story for each and every phone company .
Better still , the other phone companies offer choice in their range so ytou 'd have to run the same article multiple times a year.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh what a shock: a phone company will release a new version of their flagship product.
And what a sensation: it will include a crappy CMOS camera too !I think you could run that story for each and every phone company.
Better still, the other phone companies offer choice in their range so ytou'd have to run  the same article multiple times a year...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546292</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261686540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular.</i></p><p>Except it isn't. And we're not haters - we're just one of the 95\%+ of the market that use another brand of phone. They do exist, but you wouldn't know it if you only read Slashdot.</p><p>Indeed, your mistaken belief of the Iphone's market share demonstrates the problem: you seriously believe that it's one of the most popular phones, because that's all you hear about on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular.Except it is n't .
And we 're not haters - we 're just one of the 95 \ % + of the market that use another brand of phone .
They do exist , but you would n't know it if you only read Slashdot.Indeed , your mistaken belief of the Iphone 's market share demonstrates the problem : you seriously believe that it 's one of the most popular phones , because that 's all you hear about on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple haters are just infuriated the iPhone remains so popular.Except it isn't.
And we're not haters - we're just one of the 95\%+ of the market that use another brand of phone.
They do exist, but you wouldn't know it if you only read Slashdot.Indeed, your mistaken belief of the Iphone's market share demonstrates the problem: you seriously believe that it's one of the most popular phones, because that's all you hear about on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544228</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261672560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"With mainstream phones going high with 12+MP en HD video cameras, frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic."</p><p>Other way around, actually.  A 12 MP (or even a 5 MP) sensor in a cell phone is a ludicrously pathetic marketing trick.  As a practical matter, a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP.  Pairing that with a high resolution sensor just means you're measuring the blur more accurately, and wasting storage and processing capacity.  Note - there ARE some (rare) cell phones that use bigger lenses, and those might actually get 3 or 4 MP, but definitely not 12.</p><p>You can measure the MTF yourself if you want.  Last time I had this argument with somebody he actually posted a picture from his 5 MP cell phone camera and we compared with an appropriately blurred version from my 6 MP SLR.  Guess what?  His picture had an effective resolution of about 2 MP (and horrible noise).  Which brings up another point - small lenses will always give you poor low light performance, but you make it much, much worse by trying to capture an crazy number of pixels to boot.</p><p>The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth.  Camera manufacturers have started giving up that marketing tactic, with newer cameras going to less resolution and emphasizing noise performance.  If the rumors are true, it's actually too bad Apple has given into this ploy... although it's probably hard to source lower resolution sensors now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" With mainstream phones going high with 12 + MP en HD video cameras , frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic .
" Other way around , actually .
A 12 MP ( or even a 5 MP ) sensor in a cell phone is a ludicrously pathetic marketing trick .
As a practical matter , a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP .
Pairing that with a high resolution sensor just means you 're measuring the blur more accurately , and wasting storage and processing capacity .
Note - there ARE some ( rare ) cell phones that use bigger lenses , and those might actually get 3 or 4 MP , but definitely not 12.You can measure the MTF yourself if you want .
Last time I had this argument with somebody he actually posted a picture from his 5 MP cell phone camera and we compared with an appropriately blurred version from my 6 MP SLR .
Guess what ?
His picture had an effective resolution of about 2 MP ( and horrible noise ) .
Which brings up another point - small lenses will always give you poor low light performance , but you make it much , much worse by trying to capture an crazy number of pixels to boot.The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth .
Camera manufacturers have started giving up that marketing tactic , with newer cameras going to less resolution and emphasizing noise performance .
If the rumors are true , it 's actually too bad Apple has given into this ploy... although it 's probably hard to source lower resolution sensors now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"With mainstream phones going high with 12+MP en HD video cameras, frankly the 5MB I heard about the new phone are ludicrously pathetic.
"Other way around, actually.
A 12 MP (or even a 5 MP) sensor in a cell phone is a ludicrously pathetic marketing trick.
As a practical matter, a typical cell phone lens is going to give you about 2 MP.
Pairing that with a high resolution sensor just means you're measuring the blur more accurately, and wasting storage and processing capacity.
Note - there ARE some (rare) cell phones that use bigger lenses, and those might actually get 3 or 4 MP, but definitely not 12.You can measure the MTF yourself if you want.
Last time I had this argument with somebody he actually posted a picture from his 5 MP cell phone camera and we compared with an appropriately blurred version from my 6 MP SLR.
Guess what?
His picture had an effective resolution of about 2 MP (and horrible noise).
Which brings up another point - small lenses will always give you poor low light performance, but you make it much, much worse by trying to capture an crazy number of pixels to boot.The cell phone appears to be the last bastion of the megapixel myth.
Camera manufacturers have started giving up that marketing tactic, with newer cameras going to less resolution and emphasizing noise performance.
If the rumors are true, it's actually too bad Apple has given into this ploy... although it's probably hard to source lower resolution sensors now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543474</id>
	<title>I wouldn't get it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not buying it, rumor has it that they'll be updating the iPhone sometime after version 4 is released... safer to wait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not buying it , rumor has it that they 'll be updating the iPhone sometime after version 4 is released... safer to wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not buying it, rumor has it that they'll be updating the iPhone sometime after version 4 is released... safer to wait.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544092</id>
	<title>OLED screen with resistive touch yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261671720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yawn.  Call me when the phones with organic LED screens that use resistive pressure sensing (rather than capacitive touch sensing, which sucks donkey balls since my scarred fingertips don't work on capacitive) hit the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yawn .
Call me when the phones with organic LED screens that use resistive pressure sensing ( rather than capacitive touch sensing , which sucks donkey balls since my scarred fingertips do n't work on capacitive ) hit the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yawn.
Call me when the phones with organic LED screens that use resistive pressure sensing (rather than capacitive touch sensing, which sucks donkey balls since my scarred fingertips don't work on capacitive) hit the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543852</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261669980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been visiting this site for quite some time (since 2001 I think).  No I don't have an account; no I'm not a Linux / Unix user; no I don't hate MS... here come there "yes's"... yes I've seen rumors about ATI / Nvidia at the height of PC gaming and read comments such as "Jesus f**king Christ, another ATI / Nvidia rumor"; yes I think it's funny that Slashdot uses a borg'd version of Bill Gates; yes I think people like ChrisMP1 bitch bitch bitch...</p><p>I'd like to be the first if you haven't been "formally" introduced yet...</p><p>Welcome to the World Wide Web ChrisMP1!!!  (that '1' in his name is a mistaken '!')</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been visiting this site for quite some time ( since 2001 I think ) .
No I do n't have an account ; no I 'm not a Linux / Unix user ; no I do n't hate MS... here come there " yes 's " ... yes I 've seen rumors about ATI / Nvidia at the height of PC gaming and read comments such as " Jesus f * * king Christ , another ATI / Nvidia rumor " ; yes I think it 's funny that Slashdot uses a borg 'd version of Bill Gates ; yes I think people like ChrisMP1 bitch bitch bitch...I 'd like to be the first if you have n't been " formally " introduced yet...Welcome to the World Wide Web ChrisMP1 ! ! !
( that '1 ' in his name is a mistaken ' !
' )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been visiting this site for quite some time (since 2001 I think).
No I don't have an account; no I'm not a Linux / Unix user; no I don't hate MS... here come there "yes's"... yes I've seen rumors about ATI / Nvidia at the height of PC gaming and read comments such as "Jesus f**king Christ, another ATI / Nvidia rumor"; yes I think it's funny that Slashdot uses a borg'd version of Bill Gates; yes I think people like ChrisMP1 bitch bitch bitch...I'd like to be the first if you haven't been "formally" introduced yet...Welcome to the World Wide Web ChrisMP1!!!
(that '1' in his name is a mistaken '!
')</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543898</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking News!</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261670220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have in inside scoop... After $ProductName version @VersionNumber there just may be an $ProductName version @VersionNumber+1 with stuff that isn't in $ProductName version @VersionNumber.  As well the next generation of $ProductName will have even newer features and probably will run faster and do more then the old version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have in inside scoop... After $ ProductName version @ VersionNumber there just may be an $ ProductName version @ VersionNumber + 1 with stuff that is n't in $ ProductName version @ VersionNumber .
As well the next generation of $ ProductName will have even newer features and probably will run faster and do more then the old version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have in inside scoop... After $ProductName version @VersionNumber there just may be an $ProductName version @VersionNumber+1 with stuff that isn't in $ProductName version @VersionNumber.
As well the next generation of $ProductName will have even newer features and probably will run faster and do more then the old version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546364</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1261687140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed - but then by this reasoning, why is it news in the first place that a possible future version of an existing Apple product might have a 5 MP camera? If MP isn't relevant, this shouldn't be newsworthy in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed - but then by this reasoning , why is it news in the first place that a possible future version of an existing Apple product might have a 5 MP camera ?
If MP is n't relevant , this should n't be newsworthy in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed - but then by this reasoning, why is it news in the first place that a possible future version of an existing Apple product might have a 5 MP camera?
If MP isn't relevant, this shouldn't be newsworthy in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544546</id>
	<title>Features?</title>
	<author>waa</author>
	<datestamp>1261674720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it be able to make phone calls?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it be able to make phone calls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it be able to make phone calls?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546752</id>
	<title>Easy to predict!</title>
	<author>LynnwoodRooster</author>
	<datestamp>1261647480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just look at the features available in other smart phones for the last 6 years...  Since the big update for the 3GS phone was the addition of this thing called "cut and paste", I predict the next big change will be in the hardware realm, where Apple will invent some way of sticking a thing called a MicroSD memory card into the phone!  Innovation at Apple will abound evermore!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just look at the features available in other smart phones for the last 6 years... Since the big update for the 3GS phone was the addition of this thing called " cut and paste " , I predict the next big change will be in the hardware realm , where Apple will invent some way of sticking a thing called a MicroSD memory card into the phone !
Innovation at Apple will abound evermore !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just look at the features available in other smart phones for the last 6 years...  Since the big update for the 3GS phone was the addition of this thing called "cut and paste", I predict the next big change will be in the hardware realm, where Apple will invent some way of sticking a thing called a MicroSD memory card into the phone!
Innovation at Apple will abound evermore!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543580</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Enleth</author>
	<datestamp>1261667760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Click on the "Sections" header on the left.<br>2. Click on the very first radio button in the list of topics that appears.<br>3. Scroll down and click "Save".<br>4. ???<br>5. Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Click on the " Sections " header on the left.2 .
Click on the very first radio button in the list of topics that appears.3 .
Scroll down and click " Save " .4 .
? ? ? 5. Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Click on the "Sections" header on the left.2.
Click on the very first radio button in the list of topics that appears.3.
Scroll down and click "Save".4.
???5. Profit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543726</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261669020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steve Jobs sneezed?  HOLY FUCKING SHIT, STOP THE PRESSES!</p><p>Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!<br>Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Jobs sneezed ?
HOLY FUCKING SHIT , STOP THE PRESSES ! Lameness filter encountered .
Post aborted ! Filter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like YELLING .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Jobs sneezed?
HOLY FUCKING SHIT, STOP THE PRESSES!Lameness filter encountered.
Post aborted!Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like YELLING.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</id>
	<title>21 million</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they are only making ~21 million phones like they did with the current generation (according to the article).<br> <br>What about the other 20 million cameras you ask? Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera, so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup.
<br> <br>
Tom...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they are only making ~ 21 million phones like they did with the current generation ( according to the article ) .
What about the other 20 million cameras you ask ?
Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera , so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup .
Tom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they are only making ~21 million phones like they did with the current generation (according to the article).
What about the other 20 million cameras you ask?
Well surely one facing the user as well as the rear camera, so that you can video call - functionality still lacking from the current lineup.
Tom...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544028</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking News!</title>
	<author>xRelisH</author>
	<datestamp>1261671240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but it generates page hits, thus ore ad revenue, thus more money for slashdot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br> <br>
It's the same reason why you see so many Apple related posts on Engadget.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but it generates page hits , thus ore ad revenue , thus more money for slashdot : ) It 's the same reason why you see so many Apple related posts on Engadget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it generates page hits, thus ore ad revenue, thus more money for slashdot :)
 
It's the same reason why you see so many Apple related posts on Engadget.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543972</id>
	<title>Planned obsolescense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261670820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, have they finally figured out a way of fitting the <br>

And don't give me this "most people only use their phone for a year so its pointless to make one that lasts longer" crap. Plenty of people using 5+ and 10 year old phones that still work perfectly. Even if nobody will be using it as their primary phone doesn't mean it should break after less than 2 years.<br> <br>

I still don't understand how a company like Apple can get an award from Greenpeace for being environmentally friendly when they produce such disposable crap and go out of their way to enforce planned obsolescense.<br> <br>

Posting as AC to avoid the wrath of overzealous Mac fanboys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , have they finally figured out a way of fitting the And do n't give me this " most people only use their phone for a year so its pointless to make one that lasts longer " crap .
Plenty of people using 5 + and 10 year old phones that still work perfectly .
Even if nobody will be using it as their primary phone does n't mean it should break after less than 2 years .
I still do n't understand how a company like Apple can get an award from Greenpeace for being environmentally friendly when they produce such disposable crap and go out of their way to enforce planned obsolescense .
Posting as AC to avoid the wrath of overzealous Mac fanboys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, have they finally figured out a way of fitting the 

And don't give me this "most people only use their phone for a year so its pointless to make one that lasts longer" crap.
Plenty of people using 5+ and 10 year old phones that still work perfectly.
Even if nobody will be using it as their primary phone doesn't mean it should break after less than 2 years.
I still don't understand how a company like Apple can get an award from Greenpeace for being environmentally friendly when they produce such disposable crap and go out of their way to enforce planned obsolescense.
Posting as AC to avoid the wrath of overzealous Mac fanboys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543620</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1261668120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure Apple would bother with that functionality until it can do it reliably for most people. Is bandwidth and coverage good enough to support such video streams at the moment? I'm guessing it's also taxing on the hardware and battery.</p><p>Would be nice, but I wouldn't expect to see it just yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure Apple would bother with that functionality until it can do it reliably for most people .
Is bandwidth and coverage good enough to support such video streams at the moment ?
I 'm guessing it 's also taxing on the hardware and battery.Would be nice , but I would n't expect to see it just yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure Apple would bother with that functionality until it can do it reliably for most people.
Is bandwidth and coverage good enough to support such video streams at the moment?
I'm guessing it's also taxing on the hardware and battery.Would be nice, but I wouldn't expect to see it just yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30563052</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking News!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261928340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Breaking News!  Company plans on updating a successful product line!</p><p>Seriously, why is this news?  We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point.  The only "new" information here (for me at least) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras...</p><p>What I found more interesting than what's posted here, is what Engadget reported yesterday:</p><blockquote><div><p>The most interesting word, however, comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider, who is quoting a "plugged-in source in the mobile industry" who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a "new, larger mobile device."</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/</a> [engadget.com] </p></div><p>This is NEWS, because pretty much all major carriers have caught up with the iPhone (both OS and Hardware) in terms of what they offer. The question is, will Apple be able to increase the gap once again with a new revision of both the Hardware and OS of a new device ? What new features can they establish that can steer them apart ? The original iPhone was major because Multi-touch was still in its infancy, but now what new feature(s) are they going to cook up if any ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking News !
Company plans on updating a successful product line ! Seriously , why is this news ?
We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point .
The only " new " information here ( for me at least ) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras...What I found more interesting than what 's posted here , is what Engadget reported yesterday : The most interesting word , however , comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider , who is quoting a " plugged-in source in the mobile industry " who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a " new , larger mobile device .
" http : //www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/ [ engadget.com ] This is NEWS , because pretty much all major carriers have caught up with the iPhone ( both OS and Hardware ) in terms of what they offer .
The question is , will Apple be able to increase the gap once again with a new revision of both the Hardware and OS of a new device ?
What new features can they establish that can steer them apart ?
The original iPhone was major because Multi-touch was still in its infancy , but now what new feature ( s ) are they going to cook up if any ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking News!
Company plans on updating a successful product line!Seriously, why is this news?
We all know that a new revision will come down the road at some point.
The only "new" information here (for me at least) is the ordering of the 5mp cameras...What I found more interesting than what's posted here, is what Engadget reported yesterday:The most interesting word, however, comes out of the Silicon Alley Insider, who is quoting a "plugged-in source in the mobile industry" who says that Apple is working with some select app makers on prepping high-res apps to demo on a "new, larger mobile device.
"http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/apple-planning-event-for-january-with-high-res-iphone-or-small/ [engadget.com] This is NEWS, because pretty much all major carriers have caught up with the iPhone (both OS and Hardware) in terms of what they offer.
The question is, will Apple be able to increase the gap once again with a new revision of both the Hardware and OS of a new device ?
What new features can they establish that can steer them apart ?
The original iPhone was major because Multi-touch was still in its infancy, but now what new feature(s) are they going to cook up if any ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543760</id>
	<title>The only thing really worth while...</title>
	<author>Ronin Developer</author>
	<datestamp>1261669260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is having a version that can work on either GSM or CDMA based on an inter-changable carrier module.</p><p>That would unlease the iPhone from AT&amp;T and permit it to be used on a network that can support the load.</p><p>I still get irritated that AT&amp;T tries to counter Verizon with that stupid Post-card covered coverage map.  Verizon doesn't say anything about AT&amp;T's voice coverage<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... they only remark on the piss poor 3G coverage (needed for data).  AT&amp;T is trying to compare Apples to Aston Martins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is having a version that can work on either GSM or CDMA based on an inter-changable carrier module.That would unlease the iPhone from AT&amp;T and permit it to be used on a network that can support the load.I still get irritated that AT&amp;T tries to counter Verizon with that stupid Post-card covered coverage map .
Verizon does n't say anything about AT&amp;T 's voice coverage ... they only remark on the piss poor 3G coverage ( needed for data ) .
AT&amp;T is trying to compare Apples to Aston Martins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is having a version that can work on either GSM or CDMA based on an inter-changable carrier module.That would unlease the iPhone from AT&amp;T and permit it to be used on a network that can support the load.I still get irritated that AT&amp;T tries to counter Verizon with that stupid Post-card covered coverage map.
Verizon doesn't say anything about AT&amp;T's voice coverage ... they only remark on the piss poor 3G coverage (needed for data).
AT&amp;T is trying to compare Apples to Aston Martins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546582</id>
	<title>lucky number 7</title>
	<author>secondhand\_Buddah</author>
	<datestamp>1261645620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm holding out for the iPhone 7....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm holding out for the iPhone 7... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm holding out for the iPhone 7....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544216</id>
	<title>In other news....</title>
	<author>RealRedMist</author>
	<datestamp>1261672500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, Microsoft planning successor to Xbox 360, Nintendo planning successor to Wii, Sony planning successor to PS3, Microsoft successor to Windows 7, bears shit in the woods, pope catholic, etc</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , Microsoft planning successor to Xbox 360 , Nintendo planning successor to Wii , Sony planning successor to PS3 , Microsoft successor to Windows 7 , bears shit in the woods , pope catholic , etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, Microsoft planning successor to Xbox 360, Nintendo planning successor to Wii, Sony planning successor to PS3, Microsoft successor to Windows 7, bears shit in the woods, pope catholic, etc</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546138</id>
	<title>Re:Breaking News!</title>
	<author>DarkHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1261685040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I don't understand is why these high resolution apps can't be for the next generation iPhone...</p><p>Compared to the Droid, the screen on the iPhone is lacking.  Apple might be looking to compete with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't understand is why these high resolution apps ca n't be for the next generation iPhone...Compared to the Droid , the screen on the iPhone is lacking .
Apple might be looking to compete with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't understand is why these high resolution apps can't be for the next generation iPhone...Compared to the Droid, the screen on the iPhone is lacking.
Apple might be looking to compete with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544938</id>
	<title>Wonderful</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1261677060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered 40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras, which might hint at new functionality</i></p><p>Oooo, on June 28th -- July 2nd 2010, the Apple fanbois can enjoy the same functionality the rest of the world has had for at least 2 years. How proud you must all be of this latest Apple "groundbreaking innovation".</p><p>Pity there's no Sarcasm mod, I'll have to put up with the usual Flamebait or Offtopic I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered 40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras , which might hint at new functionalityOooo , on June 28th -- July 2nd 2010 , the Apple fanbois can enjoy the same functionality the rest of the world has had for at least 2 years .
How proud you must all be of this latest Apple " groundbreaking innovation " .Pity there 's no Sarcasm mod , I 'll have to put up with the usual Flamebait or Offtopic I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A related rumor holds that Apple has ordered 40-45 million 5-megapixel cameras, which might hint at new functionalityOooo, on June 28th -- July 2nd 2010, the Apple fanbois can enjoy the same functionality the rest of the world has had for at least 2 years.
How proud you must all be of this latest Apple "groundbreaking innovation".Pity there's no Sarcasm mod, I'll have to put up with the usual Flamebait or Offtopic I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543452</id>
	<title>Hello.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alright gentlemen, I'm in a bit of a bind. You see, I had some time here in my cubicle where my boss and co-workers were out to lunch (I'm across the pond from you Yanks). After already eaten a huge burrito I felt the need to "break wind." Figuring that it'd be courteous to do so along I let her rip. Well, now my co-workers and boss are back in the office. And now I think I might have accidentally shat myself.</p><p>I'm pretty sure I feel the warm stream of feces running down my leg as I'm now typing this. So what am I to do? I'm pretty positive that my co-workers can smell what's going on, judging by the stench. The bathroom is way down the hall past my boss' office. If he stops me while I'm walking by I fear that he will immediately know what's going on as well. Heck, even if I make it to the bathroom I don't have a change of clothes and my pants are practically stained all the way through...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright gentlemen , I 'm in a bit of a bind .
You see , I had some time here in my cubicle where my boss and co-workers were out to lunch ( I 'm across the pond from you Yanks ) .
After already eaten a huge burrito I felt the need to " break wind .
" Figuring that it 'd be courteous to do so along I let her rip .
Well , now my co-workers and boss are back in the office .
And now I think I might have accidentally shat myself.I 'm pretty sure I feel the warm stream of feces running down my leg as I 'm now typing this .
So what am I to do ?
I 'm pretty positive that my co-workers can smell what 's going on , judging by the stench .
The bathroom is way down the hall past my boss ' office .
If he stops me while I 'm walking by I fear that he will immediately know what 's going on as well .
Heck , even if I make it to the bathroom I do n't have a change of clothes and my pants are practically stained all the way through.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright gentlemen, I'm in a bit of a bind.
You see, I had some time here in my cubicle where my boss and co-workers were out to lunch (I'm across the pond from you Yanks).
After already eaten a huge burrito I felt the need to "break wind.
" Figuring that it'd be courteous to do so along I let her rip.
Well, now my co-workers and boss are back in the office.
And now I think I might have accidentally shat myself.I'm pretty sure I feel the warm stream of feces running down my leg as I'm now typing this.
So what am I to do?
I'm pretty positive that my co-workers can smell what's going on, judging by the stench.
The bathroom is way down the hall past my boss' office.
If he stops me while I'm walking by I fear that he will immediately know what's going on as well.
Heck, even if I make it to the bathroom I don't have a change of clothes and my pants are practically stained all the way through...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547322</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>the ReviveR</author>
	<datestamp>1261652880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MP counts say nothing. I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used. Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap.<br> <br>

1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap ones</p></div><p>I've had a bit different experience, although I do agree that the MP count is mostly meaningless. High MP actually seriously drops the quality because of the tiny sensors can't get enough light.<br> <br>

Nokia seems to have the upper hand in mobile cameras and once again these phones are not something most americans end up seeing. Most of their top of the line phones have had Carl Zeiss optics for a while now. The tiny sensor is still a problem so any low light situation creates ugly grainy images. However with proper lighting (or with Xenon flash like in the old Nokia N82) you can get some really good pics. Nokia pretty much stopped increasing the sensor size a few years ago at 5 MP and has been trying to improve the quality since.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MP counts say nothing .
I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00 's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used .
Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap .
1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap onesI 've had a bit different experience , although I do agree that the MP count is mostly meaningless .
High MP actually seriously drops the quality because of the tiny sensors ca n't get enough light .
Nokia seems to have the upper hand in mobile cameras and once again these phones are not something most americans end up seeing .
Most of their top of the line phones have had Carl Zeiss optics for a while now .
The tiny sensor is still a problem so any low light situation creates ugly grainy images .
However with proper lighting ( or with Xenon flash like in the old Nokia N82 ) you can get some really good pics .
Nokia pretty much stopped increasing the sensor size a few years ago at 5 MP and has been trying to improve the quality since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MP counts say nothing.
I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used.
Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap.
1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap onesI've had a bit different experience, although I do agree that the MP count is mostly meaningless.
High MP actually seriously drops the quality because of the tiny sensors can't get enough light.
Nokia seems to have the upper hand in mobile cameras and once again these phones are not something most americans end up seeing.
Most of their top of the line phones have had Carl Zeiss optics for a while now.
The tiny sensor is still a problem so any low light situation creates ugly grainy images.
However with proper lighting (or with Xenon flash like in the old Nokia N82) you can get some really good pics.
Nokia pretty much stopped increasing the sensor size a few years ago at 5 MP and has been trying to improve the quality since.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30569858</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>Wovel</author>
	<datestamp>1262006340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And not a single article suggesting Jobs should win anything..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And not a single article suggesting Jobs should win anything. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And not a single article suggesting Jobs should win anything..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544268</id>
	<title>5 megapixels?</title>
	<author>desmogod</author>
	<datestamp>1261672860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A 5 megapixel CCD is still completely useless unless they fix the abysmal image quality issues.
My 3Gs has a 3.2 and should be more than capable of producing a nice photo.
It doesn't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 5 megapixel CCD is still completely useless unless they fix the abysmal image quality issues .
My 3Gs has a 3.2 and should be more than capable of producing a nice photo .
It does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 5 megapixel CCD is still completely useless unless they fix the abysmal image quality issues.
My 3Gs has a 3.2 and should be more than capable of producing a nice photo.
It doesn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547172</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>Strider-</author>
	<datestamp>1261651500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the lenses that most of these camera phones use, typically 1 megapixel is more than enough.  These cameras are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction-limited\_system" title="wikipedia.org">Diffraction LImited Systems</a> [wikipedia.org] and thus throwing more pixels at it in the same size solves nothing.</p><p>To put it in simple language, the resolution limit of the camera is due to the diameter of the lens, not the number of pixels on the sensor.  This is part of the reason why Canon went from the 14Megapixel sensor on the G10 to an 11 megapixel sensor on the G11.  The G10 was diffraction limited, while the G11 roughly matched between the lens system and sensor.  Thus, the two will produce pictures with equivalent resolution, despite one having fewer pixels than the other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the lenses that most of these camera phones use , typically 1 megapixel is more than enough .
These cameras are Diffraction LImited Systems [ wikipedia.org ] and thus throwing more pixels at it in the same size solves nothing.To put it in simple language , the resolution limit of the camera is due to the diameter of the lens , not the number of pixels on the sensor .
This is part of the reason why Canon went from the 14Megapixel sensor on the G10 to an 11 megapixel sensor on the G11 .
The G10 was diffraction limited , while the G11 roughly matched between the lens system and sensor .
Thus , the two will produce pictures with equivalent resolution , despite one having fewer pixels than the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the lenses that most of these camera phones use, typically 1 megapixel is more than enough.
These cameras are Diffraction LImited Systems [wikipedia.org] and thus throwing more pixels at it in the same size solves nothing.To put it in simple language, the resolution limit of the camera is due to the diameter of the lens, not the number of pixels on the sensor.
This is part of the reason why Canon went from the 14Megapixel sensor on the G10 to an 11 megapixel sensor on the G11.
The G10 was diffraction limited, while the G11 roughly matched between the lens system and sensor.
Thus, the two will produce pictures with equivalent resolution, despite one having fewer pixels than the other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544220</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>Bertie</author>
	<datestamp>1261672560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why, it's almost like they're in alphabetical order or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , it 's almost like they 're in alphabetical order or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, it's almost like they're in alphabetical order or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543796</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Mr Stubby</author>
	<datestamp>1261669560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was only commenting to a mate a few weeks ago that i was supprised at the lack of iphone 4 rumours but it seems its begun.. I'm not big on alot of the BS from Apple, but the annual rumour mill on the next iphone is always a load of fun.

I only have a few requests, make it easier to get the freakin sim card out, make the touch screen extend past the screen so u can scroll etc off the screen without your fingers getting in the road and i'll be a happy chappy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was only commenting to a mate a few weeks ago that i was supprised at the lack of iphone 4 rumours but it seems its begun.. I 'm not big on alot of the BS from Apple , but the annual rumour mill on the next iphone is always a load of fun .
I only have a few requests , make it easier to get the freakin sim card out , make the touch screen extend past the screen so u can scroll etc off the screen without your fingers getting in the road and i 'll be a happy chappy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was only commenting to a mate a few weeks ago that i was supprised at the lack of iphone 4 rumours but it seems its begun.. I'm not big on alot of the BS from Apple, but the annual rumour mill on the next iphone is always a load of fun.
I only have a few requests, make it easier to get the freakin sim card out, make the touch screen extend past the screen so u can scroll etc off the screen without your fingers getting in the road and i'll be a happy chappy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543772</id>
	<title>Development</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1261669380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... development is underway for the new iPhone 4...</p></div><p>
I hate to break it to you but development for iPhone 4 was probably underway, oh, about a year or more ago. Heck, development for iPhone 5 features are probably underway right now as well. Apple is, among many things, a very forward-thinking company (like virtually all companies of their size and success) so they are developing many things that are years (plural) away from release.<br> <br>
In other words, this is news how? Who here didn't already know that development was underway?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... development is underway for the new iPhone 4.. . I hate to break it to you but development for iPhone 4 was probably underway , oh , about a year or more ago .
Heck , development for iPhone 5 features are probably underway right now as well .
Apple is , among many things , a very forward-thinking company ( like virtually all companies of their size and success ) so they are developing many things that are years ( plural ) away from release .
In other words , this is news how ?
Who here did n't already know that development was underway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... development is underway for the new iPhone 4...
I hate to break it to you but development for iPhone 4 was probably underway, oh, about a year or more ago.
Heck, development for iPhone 5 features are probably underway right now as well.
Apple is, among many things, a very forward-thinking company (like virtually all companies of their size and success) so they are developing many things that are years (plural) away from release.
In other words, this is news how?
Who here didn't already know that development was underway?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543516</id>
	<title>Re:I might have missed the memo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL. In case you've been sleeping under a rock in a different galaxy, here's a quick update:
A) Slashdot is about, among other things, technology.
B) Apple is a technology company.
C) There ARE people who read this site, who are interested in the next iPhone.

How dare they post an item about technology on Slashdot. It's completely insane!</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL .
In case you 've been sleeping under a rock in a different galaxy , here 's a quick update : A ) Slashdot is about , among other things , technology .
B ) Apple is a technology company .
C ) There ARE people who read this site , who are interested in the next iPhone .
How dare they post an item about technology on Slashdot .
It 's completely insane !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL.
In case you've been sleeping under a rock in a different galaxy, here's a quick update:
A) Slashdot is about, among other things, technology.
B) Apple is a technology company.
C) There ARE people who read this site, who are interested in the next iPhone.
How dare they post an item about technology on Slashdot.
It's completely insane!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543862</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1261670040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they cut the main functionality of OrbLive's live tv streaming, which had been working great for many months but removed yesterday because of Apple, you can be sure they won't allow two way video calling.  They haven't even allowed skype over 3G even though ATT says their ready.  What about tethering, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they cut the main functionality of OrbLive 's live tv streaming , which had been working great for many months but removed yesterday because of Apple , you can be sure they wo n't allow two way video calling .
They have n't even allowed skype over 3G even though ATT says their ready .
What about tethering , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they cut the main functionality of OrbLive's live tv streaming, which had been working great for many months but removed yesterday because of Apple, you can be sure they won't allow two way video calling.
They haven't even allowed skype over 3G even though ATT says their ready.
What about tethering, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130</id>
	<title>Re:5 Megapixel camera?!? Why this thing again?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1261671960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>MP counts say nothing. I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used. Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap.<br> <br>

1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap ones</htmltext>
<tokenext>MP counts say nothing .
I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00 's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used .
Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap .
1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap ones</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MP counts say nothing.
I have used a 1.3MP digital camera from the early 00's that takes better pictures than every camera phone I ever used.
Unless you get a phone with optical zoom you can almost be guaranteed the quality will be crap.
1 good megapixel is better than 8 crap ones</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543956</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1261670640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet people like you are the people who complain about every Linux point release (not saying it's you, just people like you)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet people like you are the people who complain about every Linux point release ( not saying it 's you , just people like you )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet people like you are the people who complain about every Linux point release (not saying it's you, just people like you)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</id>
	<title>Who Cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261666080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be rude, but really, who cares? Must we have a story <i>every time</i> Steve Jobs sneezes? Yeah, that's what technology companies do &mdash; they release new versions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be rude , but really , who cares ?
Must we have a story every time Steve Jobs sneezes ?
Yeah , that 's what technology companies do    they release new versions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be rude, but really, who cares?
Must we have a story every time Steve Jobs sneezes?
Yeah, that's what technology companies do — they release new versions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30548646</id>
	<title>Re:Who Cares?</title>
	<author>netsharc</author>
	<datestamp>1261668600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, who cares, the fact that there's going to be a version 4 is as clear as that number 4 comes after number 3. Of course they're going to build in new features into the device and OS, do the idiots who go into frenzy when they hear about "iPhone 4" really think Apple said "we have enough money, we don't need to make any new products."?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , who cares , the fact that there 's going to be a version 4 is as clear as that number 4 comes after number 3 .
Of course they 're going to build in new features into the device and OS , do the idiots who go into frenzy when they hear about " iPhone 4 " really think Apple said " we have enough money , we do n't need to make any new products .
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, who cares, the fact that there's going to be a version 4 is as clear as that number 4 comes after number 3.
Of course they're going to build in new features into the device and OS, do the idiots who go into frenzy when they hear about "iPhone 4" really think Apple said "we have enough money, we don't need to make any new products.
"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543790</id>
	<title>Re:It's obligatory...</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1261669560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Early 2000s, they're sprinkled here and there.<br>Although 1998 was a bumper year, a ton of Linus stories.<br><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=98/04/17/8597" title="slashdot.org">Linus has a kid</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=98/08/04/1850234" title="slashdot.org">Linus talking about grandpa</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/03/004214" title="slashdot.org">Linus on Git</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=98/07/13/1723219" title="slashdot.org">Linus Sightings</a> [slashdot.org]<br>Linus moves to Moscow, Linus moves to Oregon, Linus on 2.4, Linus on 2.6, Linus a Fermilab, Linus shows up in * magazine, Linus suffers Ego-bump, * interviews Linus.</p><p>Same with RMS. RMS turns 50, RMS interviewed by *, etc</p><p>Slashdot is also user driven. If you don't write the fodder stories, they can't ever get approved. (I'm not saying which way it is either way).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Early 2000s , they 're sprinkled here and there.Although 1998 was a bumper year , a ton of Linus stories.Linus has a kid [ slashdot.org ] Linus talking about grandpa [ slashdot.org ] Linus on Git [ slashdot.org ] Linus Sightings [ slashdot.org ] Linus moves to Moscow , Linus moves to Oregon , Linus on 2.4 , Linus on 2.6 , Linus a Fermilab , Linus shows up in * magazine , Linus suffers Ego-bump , * interviews Linus.Same with RMS .
RMS turns 50 , RMS interviewed by * , etcSlashdot is also user driven .
If you do n't write the fodder stories , they ca n't ever get approved .
( I 'm not saying which way it is either way ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Early 2000s, they're sprinkled here and there.Although 1998 was a bumper year, a ton of Linus stories.Linus has a kid [slashdot.org]Linus talking about grandpa [slashdot.org]Linus on Git [slashdot.org]Linus Sightings [slashdot.org]Linus moves to Moscow, Linus moves to Oregon, Linus on 2.4, Linus on 2.6, Linus a Fermilab, Linus shows up in * magazine, Linus suffers Ego-bump, * interviews Linus.Same with RMS.
RMS turns 50, RMS interviewed by *, etcSlashdot is also user driven.
If you don't write the fodder stories, they can't ever get approved.
(I'm not saying which way it is either way).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544902</id>
	<title>How unpredictable and surprising</title>
	<author>devleopard</author>
	<datestamp>1261676760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple is going to release a new version of the iPhone in the summer? Wow, how surprising and unprecedented</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is going to release a new version of the iPhone in the summer ?
Wow , how surprising and unprecedented</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is going to release a new version of the iPhone in the summer?
Wow, how surprising and unprecedented</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543780</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261669440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They need to add a camera to the iPod Touch and all their laptops come with cameras... If they are using them in multiple products(iPod, iPhone, Macbook), then this may be a small shipment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to add a camera to the iPod Touch and all their laptops come with cameras... If they are using them in multiple products ( iPod , iPhone , Macbook ) , then this may be a small shipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to add a camera to the iPod Touch and all their laptops come with cameras... If they are using them in multiple products(iPod, iPhone, Macbook), then this may be a small shipment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544038</id>
	<title>Re:21 million</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261671420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe they're just putting the cameras into another device.  For example, the iPod.  Especially the iPod Touch is curiously missing camera functionality which is even available on the low-end Nano nowadays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe they 're just putting the cameras into another device .
For example , the iPod .
Especially the iPod Touch is curiously missing camera functionality which is even available on the low-end Nano nowadays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe they're just putting the cameras into another device.
For example, the iPod.
Especially the iPod Touch is curiously missing camera functionality which is even available on the low-end Nano nowadays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30569858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30548646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30573778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30563052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_24_1329204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543846
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30569858
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30548646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30547322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30573778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30563052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30545068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30546830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30544154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_24_1329204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_24_1329204.30543706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
