<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_22_1446253</id>
	<title>Climate, Habitat Threaten Wild Coffee Species</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1261495860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"BBC reports that Dr. Aaron Davis of the <a href="http://www.kew.org/">Royal Botanical Gardens</a> claims 'almost <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8424817.stm">three-quarters of the world's wild coffee species are threatened</a>, as a result of habitat loss and climate change. "Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup, particularly as coffee plantations are highly susceptible to climate change.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " BBC reports that Dr. Aaron Davis of the Royal Botanical Gardens claims 'almost three-quarters of the world 's wild coffee species are threatened , as a result of habitat loss and climate change .
" Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup , particularly as coffee plantations are highly susceptible to climate change .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "BBC reports that Dr. Aaron Davis of the Royal Botanical Gardens claims 'almost three-quarters of the world's wild coffee species are threatened, as a result of habitat loss and climate change.
"Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup, particularly as coffee plantations are highly susceptible to climate change.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525050</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261504020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Global Warming threatens (fill in favorite vice/past time/ethnic group/international cause here), women and children hit hardest.</p><p>Global Warming is now a caricature of itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Global Warming threatens ( fill in favorite vice/past time/ethnic group/international cause here ) , women and children hit hardest.Global Warming is now a caricature of itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global Warming threatens (fill in favorite vice/past time/ethnic group/international cause here), women and children hit hardest.Global Warming is now a caricature of itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524794</id>
	<title>Re:Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1261502760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Coffee trees enjoy warm climates; what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops?</i></p><p>Nope, sorry.  Coffee trees enjoy a very *specific* type of climate, which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes, latitudes, rainfall rates, and so forth.  Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.</p><p><i>That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events</i></p><p>In their current form?  Doubtful.  All plants either evolve or die off.  More likely is that the tree evolved to fit a particular niche that wasn't filled by any other plant.  But the current species is now very sensitive to it's growing conditions, as it's exquisitely well adapted to where it grows (as any coffee cultivator will tell you).</p><p>Of course, given enough time, species will typically evolve to new pressures (although they may just as often die out... when was the last time you saw a sabre toothed tiger?).  Unless, of course, the rate of change is too drastic, and the species is unable to adapt before those pressures become overwhelming (poor poor tigers)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coffee trees enjoy warm climates ; what if " global warming " will BENEFIT coffee crops ? Nope , sorry .
Coffee trees enjoy a very * specific * type of climate , which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes , latitudes , rainfall rates , and so forth .
Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic eventsIn their current form ?
Doubtful. All plants either evolve or die off .
More likely is that the tree evolved to fit a particular niche that was n't filled by any other plant .
But the current species is now very sensitive to it 's growing conditions , as it 's exquisitely well adapted to where it grows ( as any coffee cultivator will tell you ) .Of course , given enough time , species will typically evolve to new pressures ( although they may just as often die out... when was the last time you saw a sabre toothed tiger ? ) .
Unless , of course , the rate of change is too drastic , and the species is unable to adapt before those pressures become overwhelming ( poor poor tigers ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coffee trees enjoy warm climates; what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops?Nope, sorry.
Coffee trees enjoy a very *specific* type of climate, which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes, latitudes, rainfall rates, and so forth.
Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic eventsIn their current form?
Doubtful.  All plants either evolve or die off.
More likely is that the tree evolved to fit a particular niche that wasn't filled by any other plant.
But the current species is now very sensitive to it's growing conditions, as it's exquisitely well adapted to where it grows (as any coffee cultivator will tell you).Of course, given enough time, species will typically evolve to new pressures (although they may just as often die out... when was the last time you saw a sabre toothed tiger?).
Unless, of course, the rate of change is too drastic, and the species is unable to adapt before those pressures become overwhelming (poor poor tigers)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526784</id>
	<title>BEER?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261511640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMGWTF!!!!  Burn those motherfuckers down!!!1111  Goddamned Earthkillers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMGWTF ! ! ! !
Burn those motherfuckers down ! !
! 1111 Goddamned Earthkillers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMGWTF!!!!
Burn those motherfuckers down!!
!1111  Goddamned Earthkillers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524702</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm trolling...</title>
	<author>HeLLFiRe1151</author>
	<datestamp>1261502400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only thing about climate change that I do care about is the amount of bullshit news there is about it. Every problem in the world is somehow associated with it in a knee jerk fashion. Yet somehow, researchers are always discovering these species of animals and plants that were thought to be extinct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing about climate change that I do care about is the amount of bullshit news there is about it .
Every problem in the world is somehow associated with it in a knee jerk fashion .
Yet somehow , researchers are always discovering these species of animals and plants that were thought to be extinct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing about climate change that I do care about is the amount of bullshit news there is about it.
Every problem in the world is somehow associated with it in a knee jerk fashion.
Yet somehow, researchers are always discovering these species of animals and plants that were thought to be extinct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806</id>
	<title>No cause for alarm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261502820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First off this quote is key</p><p>The discoveries showed how little of the world's plant species had been documented, the researchers said.</p><p>In other words, they are extrapolating, or in layman's terms pulling numbers of out their ass while capitalizing on the global warming scare which they still believe the public to have fully bought.</p><p>Second it is about "wild" plants, meaning not what you tend to find at your supermarket or local bistro.</p><p>whats next?  Threaten beer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First off this quote is keyThe discoveries showed how little of the world 's plant species had been documented , the researchers said.In other words , they are extrapolating , or in layman 's terms pulling numbers of out their ass while capitalizing on the global warming scare which they still believe the public to have fully bought.Second it is about " wild " plants , meaning not what you tend to find at your supermarket or local bistro.whats next ?
Threaten beer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First off this quote is keyThe discoveries showed how little of the world's plant species had been documented, the researchers said.In other words, they are extrapolating, or in layman's terms pulling numbers of out their ass while capitalizing on the global warming scare which they still believe the public to have fully bought.Second it is about "wild" plants, meaning not what you tend to find at your supermarket or local bistro.whats next?
Threaten beer?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524620</id>
	<title>Who gives a Civet shit ...</title>
	<author>tyroneking</author>
	<datestamp>1261502040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... because eventually Good Ol' Global Warming (GOGW) will devastate those tropical countries too stupid to take extreme advantage of their natural crop resources to subjugate the world - and eventually it will all be grown in England! Coffee, wine, bananas, Civets, all that 1st world cash-crop crap; hell, even cocaine! And then England can finally return to its rightful place as the oppressor of millions / billions through simple honest restriction of trade! And the US can go f**k itself! (totally unrelated of course, because the US will have all that soya crop and probably more cocaine).</p><p>Seriously for a minute, is it really in the western world's interest to stop GOGW if we get to grow coffee, wine and cocaine (and Civets) in our own back yards? I mean really.</p><p>(This post is sponsored by the Illuminati or the Boy Scouts of America)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... because eventually Good Ol ' Global Warming ( GOGW ) will devastate those tropical countries too stupid to take extreme advantage of their natural crop resources to subjugate the world - and eventually it will all be grown in England !
Coffee , wine , bananas , Civets , all that 1st world cash-crop crap ; hell , even cocaine !
And then England can finally return to its rightful place as the oppressor of millions / billions through simple honest restriction of trade !
And the US can go f * * k itself !
( totally unrelated of course , because the US will have all that soya crop and probably more cocaine ) .Seriously for a minute , is it really in the western world 's interest to stop GOGW if we get to grow coffee , wine and cocaine ( and Civets ) in our own back yards ?
I mean really .
( This post is sponsored by the Illuminati or the Boy Scouts of America )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... because eventually Good Ol' Global Warming (GOGW) will devastate those tropical countries too stupid to take extreme advantage of their natural crop resources to subjugate the world - and eventually it will all be grown in England!
Coffee, wine, bananas, Civets, all that 1st world cash-crop crap; hell, even cocaine!
And then England can finally return to its rightful place as the oppressor of millions / billions through simple honest restriction of trade!
And the US can go f**k itself!
(totally unrelated of course, because the US will have all that soya crop and probably more cocaine).Seriously for a minute, is it really in the western world's interest to stop GOGW if we get to grow coffee, wine and cocaine (and Civets) in our own back yards?
I mean really.
(This post is sponsored by the Illuminati or the Boy Scouts of America)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528126</id>
	<title>Re:Do they make drinkable coffee?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261472940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those &ldquo;green-tards&rdquo; are some day save your worthless life, that of your children, and that of everybody on this planed, douchebag!</p><p>We other people fix the shit that you fuck up, in your egocentric little world. And the only reason we save you and don&rsquo;t just leave you to die, like nature chose for you, is because we&rsquo;re in the boat too, and can&rsquo;t get out.</p><p>But trust me: As soon as we find a way to leave you behind, we will. And then good luck with your attitude...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those    green-tards    are some day save your worthless life , that of your children , and that of everybody on this planed , douchebag ! We other people fix the shit that you fuck up , in your egocentric little world .
And the only reason we save you and don    t just leave you to die , like nature chose for you , is because we    re in the boat too , and can    t get out.But trust me : As soon as we find a way to leave you behind , we will .
And then good luck with your attitude.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those “green-tards” are some day save your worthless life, that of your children, and that of everybody on this planed, douchebag!We other people fix the shit that you fuck up, in your egocentric little world.
And the only reason we save you and don’t just leave you to die, like nature chose for you, is because we’re in the boat too, and can’t get out.But trust me: As soon as we find a way to leave you behind, we will.
And then good luck with your attitude...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525254</id>
	<title>Might improve coffee flavor?</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1261504980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if younger or less aware drinkers have noticed, but there is a lot of truly horrid southeast Asian farmed coffee that has entered the market. I've been tasting it mixed with more expensive beans to make "morning blends", or used in flavored coffee where its lack of coffee aroma and its aftertaste of lemongrass is concealed. The next time you visit one of those less successful coffee bars, try to get a good whiff of the beans before they're ground to see why they're so much less expensive and so much less successful. The distinction between the richer, more full-scented, quality beans and the weird, always half-priced, Asian sacks of mud, sticks, and a few coffee beans is quite noticeable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if younger or less aware drinkers have noticed , but there is a lot of truly horrid southeast Asian farmed coffee that has entered the market .
I 've been tasting it mixed with more expensive beans to make " morning blends " , or used in flavored coffee where its lack of coffee aroma and its aftertaste of lemongrass is concealed .
The next time you visit one of those less successful coffee bars , try to get a good whiff of the beans before they 're ground to see why they 're so much less expensive and so much less successful .
The distinction between the richer , more full-scented , quality beans and the weird , always half-priced , Asian sacks of mud , sticks , and a few coffee beans is quite noticeable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if younger or less aware drinkers have noticed, but there is a lot of truly horrid southeast Asian farmed coffee that has entered the market.
I've been tasting it mixed with more expensive beans to make "morning blends", or used in flavored coffee where its lack of coffee aroma and its aftertaste of lemongrass is concealed.
The next time you visit one of those less successful coffee bars, try to get a good whiff of the beans before they're ground to see why they're so much less expensive and so much less successful.
The distinction between the richer, more full-scented, quality beans and the weird, always half-priced, Asian sacks of mud, sticks, and a few coffee beans is quite noticeable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525160</id>
	<title>Re:Adaption</title>
	<author>jfengel</author>
	<datestamp>1261504620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very much so.  Michael Pollan's book "Botany of Desire" is about the way four plants' usefulness has been a great advantage to the plant.  Not just deliciousness (apples and potatoes) but also attractiveness (tulips) and, uh... cannabis.</p><p>Very good read.</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Botany-Desire-Plants-Eye-View-World/dp/0375501290#reader\_0375501290" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/Botany-Desire-Plants-Eye-View-World/dp/0375501290#reader\_0375501290</a> [amazon.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very much so .
Michael Pollan 's book " Botany of Desire " is about the way four plants ' usefulness has been a great advantage to the plant .
Not just deliciousness ( apples and potatoes ) but also attractiveness ( tulips ) and , uh... cannabis.Very good read.http : //www.amazon.com/Botany-Desire-Plants-Eye-View-World/dp/0375501290 # reader \ _0375501290 [ amazon.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very much so.
Michael Pollan's book "Botany of Desire" is about the way four plants' usefulness has been a great advantage to the plant.
Not just deliciousness (apples and potatoes) but also attractiveness (tulips) and, uh... cannabis.Very good read.http://www.amazon.com/Botany-Desire-Plants-Eye-View-World/dp/0375501290#reader\_0375501290 [amazon.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524724</id>
	<title>It's obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261502460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If something is happening to the environment, you MUST invoke climate change.  It's a rule.</p><p>If the local population strips the island of trees and all the soil is washed into the ocean, YOU MUST INVOKE CLIMATE CHANGE.  It's not their fault, it's the fault of the rich fat cat Americans who cause climate change.  If we just get all the nasty carbon dioxide pollution out of the atmosphere, all our problems will disappear.  It's true, within a very few years, we won't be worrying about climate change any more*.</p><p>I think it's some kind of magic formula or something<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or maybe an arcane rite<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  I have no clue why, but climate change must be invoked.</p><p>*because all the plants will be dead, followed shortly after by most of us, but that's good because we will no longer be worrying about climate change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If something is happening to the environment , you MUST invoke climate change .
It 's a rule.If the local population strips the island of trees and all the soil is washed into the ocean , YOU MUST INVOKE CLIMATE CHANGE .
It 's not their fault , it 's the fault of the rich fat cat Americans who cause climate change .
If we just get all the nasty carbon dioxide pollution out of the atmosphere , all our problems will disappear .
It 's true , within a very few years , we wo n't be worrying about climate change any more * .I think it 's some kind of magic formula or something ... or maybe an arcane rite ... I have no clue why , but climate change must be invoked .
* because all the plants will be dead , followed shortly after by most of us , but that 's good because we will no longer be worrying about climate change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If something is happening to the environment, you MUST invoke climate change.
It's a rule.If the local population strips the island of trees and all the soil is washed into the ocean, YOU MUST INVOKE CLIMATE CHANGE.
It's not their fault, it's the fault of the rich fat cat Americans who cause climate change.
If we just get all the nasty carbon dioxide pollution out of the atmosphere, all our problems will disappear.
It's true, within a very few years, we won't be worrying about climate change any more*.I think it's some kind of magic formula or something ... or maybe an arcane rite ...  I have no clue why, but climate change must be invoked.
*because all the plants will be dead, followed shortly after by most of us, but that's good because we will no longer be worrying about climate change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</id>
	<title>So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261499880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater? Not a serious problem. But threaten my coffee supply and I'll take to the streets!</p><p>Something might be a bit off on the priorities there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater ?
Not a serious problem .
But threaten my coffee supply and I 'll take to the streets ! Something might be a bit off on the priorities there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater?
Not a serious problem.
But threaten my coffee supply and I'll take to the streets!Something might be a bit off on the priorities there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502</id>
	<title>Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>vvaduva</author>
	<datestamp>1261501620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they are running out of boogie men - now it's "you'll lose your daily caffeine."  Coffee trees enjoy warm climates; what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops?  Most of these guys don't know their asses from their coffee cups, how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change?</p><p>That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events; I am sure it will be just fine, especially under the protection of mankind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they are running out of boogie men - now it 's " you 'll lose your daily caffeine .
" Coffee trees enjoy warm climates ; what if " global warming " will BENEFIT coffee crops ?
Most of these guys do n't know their asses from their coffee cups , how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change ? That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events ; I am sure it will be just fine , especially under the protection of mankind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they are running out of boogie men - now it's "you'll lose your daily caffeine.
"  Coffee trees enjoy warm climates; what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops?
Most of these guys don't know their asses from their coffee cups, how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change?That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events; I am sure it will be just fine, especially under the protection of mankind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525322</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261505340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tend to think it's more because coffee plant cultivation is an extremely delicate process. Anyone who's tried to grow coffee can tell you how finicky they are. If temperature is just slightly off, the plants freak out. Calling global warming on stuff is the new fun thing to do these days, so I think pepople are just looking for something new to freak out over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tend to think it 's more because coffee plant cultivation is an extremely delicate process .
Anyone who 's tried to grow coffee can tell you how finicky they are .
If temperature is just slightly off , the plants freak out .
Calling global warming on stuff is the new fun thing to do these days , so I think pepople are just looking for something new to freak out over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tend to think it's more because coffee plant cultivation is an extremely delicate process.
Anyone who's tried to grow coffee can tell you how finicky they are.
If temperature is just slightly off, the plants freak out.
Calling global warming on stuff is the new fun thing to do these days, so I think pepople are just looking for something new to freak out over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524288</id>
	<title>Watch out for the USA, Cameroon!</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1261500540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"'almost three-quarters of the world's wild coffee species are threatened"</i></p><p>Finally, American politicians might take notice of climate change and seriously engage with the issue!</p><p>Oh wait, when their access to oil was threatened they just invaded an oil producing country. Err, watch out Cameroon....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 'almost three-quarters of the world 's wild coffee species are threatened " Finally , American politicians might take notice of climate change and seriously engage with the issue ! Oh wait , when their access to oil was threatened they just invaded an oil producing country .
Err , watch out Cameroon.... ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"'almost three-quarters of the world's wild coffee species are threatened"Finally, American politicians might take notice of climate change and seriously engage with the issue!Oh wait, when their access to oil was threatened they just invaded an oil producing country.
Err, watch out Cameroon.... ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530098</id>
	<title>Re:They're recruiting</title>
	<author>zapakh</author>
	<datestamp>1261481220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"There is a way, my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest...", while the disoriented geek looks up, licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar, bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested:
"Wut?"</p></div><p>You mean that caffeinated bar was SOAP?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" There is a way , my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest... " , while the disoriented geek looks up , licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar , bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested : " Wut ?
" You mean that caffeinated bar was SOAP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There is a way, my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest...", while the disoriented geek looks up, licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar, bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested:
"Wut?
"You mean that caffeinated bar was SOAP?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096</id>
	<title>Daily cup?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261499820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try hourly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try hourly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try hourly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526130</id>
	<title>Re:No cause for alarm</title>
	<author>mhelander</author>
	<datestamp>1261509240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I find really intriguing is that, when read carefully, TFA seems to subtly signal a different attitude towards climate change compared to the impression I got from most of the press before COP15 and Climategate: one towards adapting to inevitable changes rather than trying to prevent them.</p><p>The article doesn't really suggest that we try to stop climate change to save coffee plantations: It notes that coffee plantations are sensitive to climate change, and thus in the interest of being able to adapt to such change, we should be interested in keeping the natural genetic diversity in the wild coffee gene pool around. To do that, we may want to focus on good old environmental policies about not cutting down said wild coffee plants, more so than trying to save them by stopping the climate from changing. (Because if we could do that, the argument for keeping genetic diversity around as a way of dealing with that change would become invalid - preservation of genetic diversity would still have many excellent supporting arguments, but not the particular one lifted in TFA).</p><p>If we see a policy change from trying to prevent change towards trying to adapt to it, I would see that as a strong vindication for the people I have seen advocating this very position for years in different Internet forums, but who have been consistently branded as "deniers" by the more prevention oriented crowd and lumped together with the obvious madhats from their opposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I find really intriguing is that , when read carefully , TFA seems to subtly signal a different attitude towards climate change compared to the impression I got from most of the press before COP15 and Climategate : one towards adapting to inevitable changes rather than trying to prevent them.The article does n't really suggest that we try to stop climate change to save coffee plantations : It notes that coffee plantations are sensitive to climate change , and thus in the interest of being able to adapt to such change , we should be interested in keeping the natural genetic diversity in the wild coffee gene pool around .
To do that , we may want to focus on good old environmental policies about not cutting down said wild coffee plants , more so than trying to save them by stopping the climate from changing .
( Because if we could do that , the argument for keeping genetic diversity around as a way of dealing with that change would become invalid - preservation of genetic diversity would still have many excellent supporting arguments , but not the particular one lifted in TFA ) .If we see a policy change from trying to prevent change towards trying to adapt to it , I would see that as a strong vindication for the people I have seen advocating this very position for years in different Internet forums , but who have been consistently branded as " deniers " by the more prevention oriented crowd and lumped together with the obvious madhats from their opposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I find really intriguing is that, when read carefully, TFA seems to subtly signal a different attitude towards climate change compared to the impression I got from most of the press before COP15 and Climategate: one towards adapting to inevitable changes rather than trying to prevent them.The article doesn't really suggest that we try to stop climate change to save coffee plantations: It notes that coffee plantations are sensitive to climate change, and thus in the interest of being able to adapt to such change, we should be interested in keeping the natural genetic diversity in the wild coffee gene pool around.
To do that, we may want to focus on good old environmental policies about not cutting down said wild coffee plants, more so than trying to save them by stopping the climate from changing.
(Because if we could do that, the argument for keeping genetic diversity around as a way of dealing with that change would become invalid - preservation of genetic diversity would still have many excellent supporting arguments, but not the particular one lifted in TFA).If we see a policy change from trying to prevent change towards trying to adapt to it, I would see that as a strong vindication for the people I have seen advocating this very position for years in different Internet forums, but who have been consistently branded as "deniers" by the more prevention oriented crowd and lumped together with the obvious madhats from their opposition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533106</id>
	<title>Re:Horse shit</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1261510320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit. OK, if the climate warms up a few degrees, the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit. Big deal. You guys crack me up.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Because its guaranteed to be linear progression of temperatures rather then a drastic shift of climate patterns. Anyone else notice Australia is having extreme highs <b>whilst</b> Europe is having extreme lows.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit .
OK , if the climate warms up a few degrees , the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit .
Big deal .
You guys crack me up .
Because its guaranteed to be linear progression of temperatures rather then a drastic shift of climate patterns .
Anyone else notice Australia is having extreme highs whilst Europe is having extreme lows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit.
OK, if the climate warms up a few degrees, the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit.
Big deal.
You guys crack me up.
Because its guaranteed to be linear progression of temperatures rather then a drastic shift of climate patterns.
Anyone else notice Australia is having extreme highs whilst Europe is having extreme lows.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525430</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1261506000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could you provide a list of things you do eat, drink, use?</p><p>You know, a whitelist so we don't waste our time worrying about things that don't affect LWATCDR in future...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could you provide a list of things you do eat , drink , use ? You know , a whitelist so we do n't waste our time worrying about things that do n't affect LWATCDR in future.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could you provide a list of things you do eat, drink, use?You know, a whitelist so we don't waste our time worrying about things that don't affect LWATCDR in future...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524568</id>
	<title>Doesn't Matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261501800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I exploit cheap labour and don't drink wild coffee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I exploit cheap labour and do n't drink wild coffee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I exploit cheap labour and don't drink wild coffee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526120</id>
	<title>Seed Vaults and Domestication Programs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261509180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this why most nations have some sort of seed vault and plant domestication program?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard\_Global\_Seed\_Vault" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> Svalbard </a> [wikipedia.org] was the most recent. However if massive glaciation reoccurs Im not sure who can get to it.</p><p>Other countries have found out the hard way for crop failures. Ireland's potato famine (began in 1845), the USA with dutch elm disease, the chestnut blight (1904).</p><p>Plants in general have no defense against a rapid ecological or geographic change but do have the advantage over the long run.</p><p>I remember the 1980's pushes for anti-pollution. Why are we not still focused on that?  Global warming is a possible effect not a proven reality. The rational thing is to name the cause and fight that. Focusing to solve a possibility like Global warming detracts from efforts to grapple with global pollution which comes from human activities and results in learned helplessness, mental and physical disease, overuse of land, poisoning of the food web with mutagenic chemicals and endocrine disruptors.</p><p>We  shall fart methane but we will also use intellect and will figure something out and survive. And thats the crux of the problem. Humans are the only species hell bent on eugenics.</p><p>The Biologists say the \_minimal\_ replacement value for maintaining a mammal species is just over 2 offspring per couple. The West is hell bound in legislating under <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/francis/archive/2009/12/07/the-inconvenient-truth-overpopulation.aspx" title="nationalpost.com" rel="nofollow">global warming subterfuge</a> [nationalpost.com] 1 child per couple. They don't say who will decide who gets to breed. This is the door to GATTAGA. A nice life for those deemed worthy to be useful. Hitler actually went forward with it in his Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring (1933) and the T-4 euthanasia program.</p><p>For me I want to have as many children as possible so as to ensure my seed survives without the need for a seed vault. More importantly it is that my culture - that which I give to my children will also survive over those who voluntarily castrate themselves.</p><p>I pre thank those who have already done this, for my children shall sip their coffee and watch and enjoy today's endangered species when your seed is dead from the earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this why most nations have some sort of seed vault and plant domestication program ?
Svalbard [ wikipedia.org ] was the most recent .
However if massive glaciation reoccurs Im not sure who can get to it.Other countries have found out the hard way for crop failures .
Ireland 's potato famine ( began in 1845 ) , the USA with dutch elm disease , the chestnut blight ( 1904 ) .Plants in general have no defense against a rapid ecological or geographic change but do have the advantage over the long run.I remember the 1980 's pushes for anti-pollution .
Why are we not still focused on that ?
Global warming is a possible effect not a proven reality .
The rational thing is to name the cause and fight that .
Focusing to solve a possibility like Global warming detracts from efforts to grapple with global pollution which comes from human activities and results in learned helplessness , mental and physical disease , overuse of land , poisoning of the food web with mutagenic chemicals and endocrine disruptors.We shall fart methane but we will also use intellect and will figure something out and survive .
And thats the crux of the problem .
Humans are the only species hell bent on eugenics.The Biologists say the \ _minimal \ _ replacement value for maintaining a mammal species is just over 2 offspring per couple .
The West is hell bound in legislating under global warming subterfuge [ nationalpost.com ] 1 child per couple .
They do n't say who will decide who gets to breed .
This is the door to GATTAGA .
A nice life for those deemed worthy to be useful .
Hitler actually went forward with it in his Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring ( 1933 ) and the T-4 euthanasia program.For me I want to have as many children as possible so as to ensure my seed survives without the need for a seed vault .
More importantly it is that my culture - that which I give to my children will also survive over those who voluntarily castrate themselves.I pre thank those who have already done this , for my children shall sip their coffee and watch and enjoy today 's endangered species when your seed is dead from the earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this why most nations have some sort of seed vault and plant domestication program?
Svalbard  [wikipedia.org] was the most recent.
However if massive glaciation reoccurs Im not sure who can get to it.Other countries have found out the hard way for crop failures.
Ireland's potato famine (began in 1845), the USA with dutch elm disease, the chestnut blight (1904).Plants in general have no defense against a rapid ecological or geographic change but do have the advantage over the long run.I remember the 1980's pushes for anti-pollution.
Why are we not still focused on that?
Global warming is a possible effect not a proven reality.
The rational thing is to name the cause and fight that.
Focusing to solve a possibility like Global warming detracts from efforts to grapple with global pollution which comes from human activities and results in learned helplessness, mental and physical disease, overuse of land, poisoning of the food web with mutagenic chemicals and endocrine disruptors.We  shall fart methane but we will also use intellect and will figure something out and survive.
And thats the crux of the problem.
Humans are the only species hell bent on eugenics.The Biologists say the \_minimal\_ replacement value for maintaining a mammal species is just over 2 offspring per couple.
The West is hell bound in legislating under global warming subterfuge [nationalpost.com] 1 child per couple.
They don't say who will decide who gets to breed.
This is the door to GATTAGA.
A nice life for those deemed worthy to be useful.
Hitler actually went forward with it in his Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring (1933) and the T-4 euthanasia program.For me I want to have as many children as possible so as to ensure my seed survives without the need for a seed vault.
More importantly it is that my culture - that which I give to my children will also survive over those who voluntarily castrate themselves.I pre thank those who have already done this, for my children shall sip their coffee and watch and enjoy today's endangered species when your seed is dead from the earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524290</id>
	<title>They're recruiting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261500540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... geeks for the anti-global-warming ring:</p><p>Happy day, geek walking up to coffee machine to read note: "Please be informed, due to potential global warming, there is no more coffee, EVER.".<br> <br>Geek falls on his knees to the floor, with his dilbert printed mug explodes in chards upon impact on the same floor, with a sharp sound as the geek releases a load screaming while shaking his fist at the heavens:<br>"OMG NOT MY COFFEE! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! ID ANYTHING FOR COFFEE! IF I ONLY SAW THIS ONE COMING! I was soo proud, thinking I could bend nature, the fool I have been", while he rests his face, sobbing, in his hands in the mids of his fallen empire of productivity, the once caffeinated multitasking geek, he.</p><p>That very deperate moment the globalwarming-genie pops in with a puff of black CO2-rich smoke:<br>"There is a way, my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest...", while the disoriented geek looks up, licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar, bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested:<br>"Wut?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup ... geeks for the anti-global-warming ring : Happy day , geek walking up to coffee machine to read note : " Please be informed , due to potential global warming , there is no more coffee , EVER. " .
Geek falls on his knees to the floor , with his dilbert printed mug explodes in chards upon impact on the same floor , with a sharp sound as the geek releases a load screaming while shaking his fist at the heavens : " OMG NOT MY COFFEE !
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD !
ID ANYTHING FOR COFFEE !
IF I ONLY SAW THIS ONE COMING !
I was soo proud , thinking I could bend nature , the fool I have been " , while he rests his face , sobbing , in his hands in the mids of his fallen empire of productivity , the once caffeinated multitasking geek , he.That very deperate moment the globalwarming-genie pops in with a puff of black CO2-rich smoke : " There is a way , my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest... " , while the disoriented geek looks up , licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar , bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested : " Wut ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conserving the genetic diversity within this genus has implications for the sustainability of our daily cup ... geeks for the anti-global-warming ring:Happy day, geek walking up to coffee machine to read note: "Please be informed, due to potential global warming, there is no more coffee, EVER.".
Geek falls on his knees to the floor, with his dilbert printed mug explodes in chards upon impact on the same floor, with a sharp sound as the geek releases a load screaming while shaking his fist at the heavens:"OMG NOT MY COFFEE!
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!
ID ANYTHING FOR COFFEE!
IF I ONLY SAW THIS ONE COMING!
I was soo proud, thinking I could bend nature, the fool I have been", while he rests his face, sobbing, in his hands in the mids of his fallen empire of productivity, the once caffeinated multitasking geek, he.That very deperate moment the globalwarming-genie pops in with a puff of black CO2-rich smoke:"There is a way, my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest...", while the disoriented geek looks up, licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar, bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested:"Wut?
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527070</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm trolling...</title>
	<author>cmacb</author>
	<datestamp>1261512660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, until they figure out that the remedies have costs in terms of human comfort too:</p><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091220/sc\_afp/lifestyleclimatewarminganimalsfood" title="yahoo.com">http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091220/sc\_afp/lifestyleclimatewarminganimalsfood</a> [yahoo.com] </p><blockquote><div><p> Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly, "Our animals give us so much that I don't feel like a polluter at all.</p></div></blockquote><p>There is very little logic that goes into either side of this "debate".  It's all about finding some OTHER groups of people to demonize, those who lead lives that are not like ours, believe in things we don't, or don't believe in things we do.</p><p>After our freedoms are gone, it will be those who ushered them out the door that complain the loudest.  The "struggle" to give up your freedom to others is a downhill struggle.  Going back won't be so easy, or even possible.</p><p>What I wonder is:  If we can finally prove that man contributes to climate change at all and thus that changes in the way we live will have an definite impact, then wouldn't it be important to be absolutely sure which long-term direction climate is taking and whether the actions that are being proposed will have the correct, that is reverse effect?</p><p>It would seem that instead we are for some reason in a hurry to do something/anything, even though we know that the problem (if it is a problem) has been creeping along for thousands of years.</p><p>The notion that we are at some sort of trigger point or point of no return seems more than just a little bit contrived to me.  Especially when you realize that most of the leaders in this movement have set themselves up to gain financially by the proposed changes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , until they figure out that the remedies have costs in terms of human comfort too : http : //news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091220/sc \ _afp/lifestyleclimatewarminganimalsfood [ yahoo.com ] Comont , proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly , " Our animals give us so much that I do n't feel like a polluter at all.There is very little logic that goes into either side of this " debate " .
It 's all about finding some OTHER groups of people to demonize , those who lead lives that are not like ours , believe in things we do n't , or do n't believe in things we do.After our freedoms are gone , it will be those who ushered them out the door that complain the loudest .
The " struggle " to give up your freedom to others is a downhill struggle .
Going back wo n't be so easy , or even possible.What I wonder is : If we can finally prove that man contributes to climate change at all and thus that changes in the way we live will have an definite impact , then would n't it be important to be absolutely sure which long-term direction climate is taking and whether the actions that are being proposed will have the correct , that is reverse effect ? It would seem that instead we are for some reason in a hurry to do something/anything , even though we know that the problem ( if it is a problem ) has been creeping along for thousands of years.The notion that we are at some sort of trigger point or point of no return seems more than just a little bit contrived to me .
Especially when you realize that most of the leaders in this movement have set themselves up to gain financially by the proposed changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, until they figure out that the remedies have costs in terms of human comfort too:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091220/sc\_afp/lifestyleclimatewarminganimalsfood [yahoo.com]  Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly, "Our animals give us so much that I don't feel like a polluter at all.There is very little logic that goes into either side of this "debate".
It's all about finding some OTHER groups of people to demonize, those who lead lives that are not like ours, believe in things we don't, or don't believe in things we do.After our freedoms are gone, it will be those who ushered them out the door that complain the loudest.
The "struggle" to give up your freedom to others is a downhill struggle.
Going back won't be so easy, or even possible.What I wonder is:  If we can finally prove that man contributes to climate change at all and thus that changes in the way we live will have an definite impact, then wouldn't it be important to be absolutely sure which long-term direction climate is taking and whether the actions that are being proposed will have the correct, that is reverse effect?It would seem that instead we are for some reason in a hurry to do something/anything, even though we know that the problem (if it is a problem) has been creeping along for thousands of years.The notion that we are at some sort of trigger point or point of no return seems more than just a little bit contrived to me.
Especially when you realize that most of the leaders in this movement have set themselves up to gain financially by the proposed changes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524914</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1261503240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Something might be a bit off on the priorities there.</p></div><p>Absolutely. Those Pacific islands should be figuring out what coffee grown in their soil or crapped out by the local fauna will taste like.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something might be a bit off on the priorities there.Absolutely .
Those Pacific islands should be figuring out what coffee grown in their soil or crapped out by the local fauna will taste like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something might be a bit off on the priorities there.Absolutely.
Those Pacific islands should be figuring out what coffee grown in their soil or crapped out by the local fauna will taste like.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524548</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>von\_rick</author>
	<datestamp>1261501740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But your system admin survives on that stuff. Would you want a your system admin to go nuts because he didn't get his 3 cups of coffee before lunch?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But your system admin survives on that stuff .
Would you want a your system admin to go nuts because he did n't get his 3 cups of coffee before lunch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But your system admin survives on that stuff.
Would you want a your system admin to go nuts because he didn't get his 3 cups of coffee before lunch?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114</id>
	<title>Maybe I'm trolling...</title>
	<author>Xacid</author>
	<datestamp>1261499940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch now that people will suddenly care about climate change just as people only cared about fuel efficiency when gas prices rose!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch now that people will suddenly care about climate change just as people only cared about fuel efficiency when gas prices rose !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch now that people will suddenly care about climate change just as people only cared about fuel efficiency when gas prices rose!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30529594</id>
	<title>Fat Folder Defense...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261478940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, an almost daily barrage on Slashdot (and other news media) about the dangers of global warming.. Its almost as if people are redoubling their efforts on the scare tactics and burying some unpleasant bit of information.</p><p>In research when we review a candidate there is the inevitable 'Fat Folder' candidate.  The candidate whose folder is much larger then everyone else's.</p><p>There are the candidates with not much to show, they may be up and coming, or they may just not have much there.</p><p>There are the exceptional candidates.  They don't need to show much, we already know who they are, or if we don't, just a few pointers of who they are lets their work speak for themselves.  (Seriously, would you expect the CEO of GE to put his college transcript on a job application?)</p><p>Then there is the fat folder.  The folder is full of information of all sorts.  Transcripts, letters of recommendations, awards, publications, fellowships, letters from parents, current girlfriend, ex girlfirned... Its daunting.. But inevitably you find IT.  IT is there too... the reason for all of the fluff.  a 5 year absence from any work; an imprisonment, a conviction, discovery of academic dishonesty, etc..  Just hoping that its lost amongst all of the extra data.  Because of this the fat folders are selected for extra care, the very act of attempting to hide the data brings on closer scrutiny.</p><p>We have a fat-folder here.  The data that is trying to be buried?  CRU.</p><p>But like the fat folder, every story that comes up to 'bury' it instead just calls even more attention to the situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , an almost daily barrage on Slashdot ( and other news media ) about the dangers of global warming.. Its almost as if people are redoubling their efforts on the scare tactics and burying some unpleasant bit of information.In research when we review a candidate there is the inevitable 'Fat Folder ' candidate .
The candidate whose folder is much larger then everyone else 's.There are the candidates with not much to show , they may be up and coming , or they may just not have much there.There are the exceptional candidates .
They do n't need to show much , we already know who they are , or if we do n't , just a few pointers of who they are lets their work speak for themselves .
( Seriously , would you expect the CEO of GE to put his college transcript on a job application ?
) Then there is the fat folder .
The folder is full of information of all sorts .
Transcripts , letters of recommendations , awards , publications , fellowships , letters from parents , current girlfriend , ex girlfirned... Its daunting.. But inevitably you find IT .
IT is there too... the reason for all of the fluff .
a 5 year absence from any work ; an imprisonment , a conviction , discovery of academic dishonesty , etc.. Just hoping that its lost amongst all of the extra data .
Because of this the fat folders are selected for extra care , the very act of attempting to hide the data brings on closer scrutiny.We have a fat-folder here .
The data that is trying to be buried ?
CRU.But like the fat folder , every story that comes up to 'bury ' it instead just calls even more attention to the situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, an almost daily barrage on Slashdot (and other news media) about the dangers of global warming.. Its almost as if people are redoubling their efforts on the scare tactics and burying some unpleasant bit of information.In research when we review a candidate there is the inevitable 'Fat Folder' candidate.
The candidate whose folder is much larger then everyone else's.There are the candidates with not much to show, they may be up and coming, or they may just not have much there.There are the exceptional candidates.
They don't need to show much, we already know who they are, or if we don't, just a few pointers of who they are lets their work speak for themselves.
(Seriously, would you expect the CEO of GE to put his college transcript on a job application?
)Then there is the fat folder.
The folder is full of information of all sorts.
Transcripts, letters of recommendations, awards, publications, fellowships, letters from parents, current girlfriend, ex girlfirned... Its daunting.. But inevitably you find IT.
IT is there too... the reason for all of the fluff.
a 5 year absence from any work; an imprisonment, a conviction, discovery of academic dishonesty, etc..  Just hoping that its lost amongst all of the extra data.
Because of this the fat folders are selected for extra care, the very act of attempting to hide the data brings on closer scrutiny.We have a fat-folder here.
The data that is trying to be buried?
CRU.But like the fat folder, every story that comes up to 'bury' it instead just calls even more attention to the situation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525756</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1261507620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the first time.</p><p>Ever stopped to consider the implications of speed bumps?</p><p>The prospect of running over some hapless pedestrian isn't enough to get most people to slow down.<br>The prospect of slowly wearing out your suspension and feeling mild discomfort for a second, however, will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the first time.Ever stopped to consider the implications of speed bumps ? The prospect of running over some hapless pedestrian is n't enough to get most people to slow down.The prospect of slowly wearing out your suspension and feeling mild discomfort for a second , however , will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the first time.Ever stopped to consider the implications of speed bumps?The prospect of running over some hapless pedestrian isn't enough to get most people to slow down.The prospect of slowly wearing out your suspension and feeling mild discomfort for a second, however, will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525368</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Prefader</author>
	<datestamp>1261505640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ELAINE:  We've been thrown off course just a tad.<br>
PASSENGER:  What's that mean?<br>
ELAINE:  In space terms, about 70 million miles.<br>
The Passengers appear interested and sensible, nod their heads.<br>
ELAINE:  The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids smashing into the hull.<br>
The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall.  The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.<br>
ELAINE:  Also, we're heading right for the sun and can't seem to change course.<br>
The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.  They all put on sunglasses.<br>
PASSENGER:  Are you telling us everything?<br>
ELAINE:  Not exactly.  We're also out of coffee.<br>
The Passengers errupt in total panic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ELAINE : We 've been thrown off course just a tad .
PASSENGER : What 's that mean ?
ELAINE : In space terms , about 70 million miles .
The Passengers appear interested and sensible , nod their heads .
ELAINE : The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids smashing into the hull .
The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall .
The Passengers still appear interested and sensible .
ELAINE : Also , we 're heading right for the sun and ca n't seem to change course .
The Passengers still appear interested and sensible .
They all put on sunglasses .
PASSENGER : Are you telling us everything ?
ELAINE : Not exactly .
We 're also out of coffee .
The Passengers errupt in total panic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ELAINE:  We've been thrown off course just a tad.
PASSENGER:  What's that mean?
ELAINE:  In space terms, about 70 million miles.
The Passengers appear interested and sensible, nod their heads.
ELAINE:  The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids smashing into the hull.
The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall.
The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.
ELAINE:  Also, we're heading right for the sun and can't seem to change course.
The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.
They all put on sunglasses.
PASSENGER:  Are you telling us everything?
ELAINE:  Not exactly.
We're also out of coffee.
The Passengers errupt in total panic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524182</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261500180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>man will have a true incentive que stop polluting.</p><p>There's a joke in Brazil about a lion that fled the zoo and ended up in a government building. Each day he would eat a civil servant. He was doing very well, until one day he ate the lady in charge of making coffee. Then people finally noticed something bad had happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>man will have a true incentive que stop polluting.There 's a joke in Brazil about a lion that fled the zoo and ended up in a government building .
Each day he would eat a civil servant .
He was doing very well , until one day he ate the lady in charge of making coffee .
Then people finally noticed something bad had happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>man will have a true incentive que stop polluting.There's a joke in Brazil about a lion that fled the zoo and ended up in a government building.
Each day he would eat a civil servant.
He was doing very well, until one day he ate the lady in charge of making coffee.
Then people finally noticed something bad had happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524688</id>
	<title>Irony</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261502340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So now Glenn Beck will be sleepy and mellow when he rants about "The Global Warming Hoax".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now Glenn Beck will be sleepy and mellow when he rants about " The Global Warming Hoax " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now Glenn Beck will be sleepy and mellow when he rants about "The Global Warming Hoax".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526228</id>
	<title>You know</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1261509600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flooding, living on a house boat, having to wear an EVA suit... I can deal with that.</p><p>But take away my coffee and things will go rough for you. Get me to Copenhagen so I can knock some sense into those people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flooding , living on a house boat , having to wear an EVA suit... I can deal with that.But take away my coffee and things will go rough for you .
Get me to Copenhagen so I can knock some sense into those people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flooding, living on a house boat, having to wear an EVA suit... I can deal with that.But take away my coffee and things will go rough for you.
Get me to Copenhagen so I can knock some sense into those people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524640</id>
	<title>Re:Not a new warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261502100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As found on the warmlist, this isn't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening coffee. Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence...</i></p><p>Well, given that every species on the planet, including ourselves, is thoroughly adapted to their current environment=, I'm a little shocked you find that surprising.</p><p>Of course, species will adapt or die off, but that's really the point:  The species we rely on now are exquisitely adapted to their specific climates (coffee has a very narrow growth range, AFAIK, and is very sensitive to temperature, humidity, and so forth), so it should be no great news that their survival is threatened by climate change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As found on the warmlist , this is n't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening coffee .
Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence...Well , given that every species on the planet , including ourselves , is thoroughly adapted to their current environment = , I 'm a little shocked you find that surprising.Of course , species will adapt or die off , but that 's really the point : The species we rely on now are exquisitely adapted to their specific climates ( coffee has a very narrow growth range , AFAIK , and is very sensitive to temperature , humidity , and so forth ) , so it should be no great news that their survival is threatened by climate change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As found on the warmlist, this isn't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening coffee.
Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence...Well, given that every species on the planet, including ourselves, is thoroughly adapted to their current environment=, I'm a little shocked you find that surprising.Of course, species will adapt or die off, but that's really the point:  The species we rely on now are exquisitely adapted to their specific climates (coffee has a very narrow growth range, AFAIK, and is very sensitive to temperature, humidity, and so forth), so it should be no great news that their survival is threatened by climate change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527426</id>
	<title>A rebbutal</title>
	<author>Bragador</author>
	<datestamp>1261513920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not always.</p><p>Some species were actually quite tasty but didn't produce as much fruits as others. Our modern watermelon is a good example. There are other more tasty melons out there but since the modern watermelon doesn't need as much care and produces more melon (more water inside), it is used and sold everywhere. A hundred years ago, the Montreal's melon was a great success and was being sold at crazy prices in New York. Good luck finding that melon now.</p><p>Look at our strawberries! Gigantic fruits full of water! The smaller and more tasty varieties are not used anymore because people want big strawberries even though they are less tasty.</p><p>Taste is NOT a very powerful adaptation. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not always.Some species were actually quite tasty but did n't produce as much fruits as others .
Our modern watermelon is a good example .
There are other more tasty melons out there but since the modern watermelon does n't need as much care and produces more melon ( more water inside ) , it is used and sold everywhere .
A hundred years ago , the Montreal 's melon was a great success and was being sold at crazy prices in New York .
Good luck finding that melon now.Look at our strawberries !
Gigantic fruits full of water !
The smaller and more tasty varieties are not used anymore because people want big strawberries even though they are less tasty.Taste is NOT a very powerful adaptation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not always.Some species were actually quite tasty but didn't produce as much fruits as others.
Our modern watermelon is a good example.
There are other more tasty melons out there but since the modern watermelon doesn't need as much care and produces more melon (more water inside), it is used and sold everywhere.
A hundred years ago, the Montreal's melon was a great success and was being sold at crazy prices in New York.
Good luck finding that melon now.Look at our strawberries!
Gigantic fruits full of water!
The smaller and more tasty varieties are not used anymore because people want big strawberries even though they are less tasty.Taste is NOT a very powerful adaptation. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530466</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>antirelic</author>
	<datestamp>1261482780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry I dont have any mod points at the moment, but if I did I would mod you up. Not that it would make much of a difference, lets face it, slashkos isnt a tag for nothin.</p><p>There are plenty of people who want nothing more than to believe that the Western way of life is "evil" simply because they do not identify with it. Not to get into a history recap about fellow travelers and the early 20th century progressive movement, the people who control the media (ironically) are the people who spread the anti-western (anti-capitalist) propaganda (class conflict). Its never more evident than watching the people at the Copenhagen climate change conference cheer on Hugo Chavez as he rails against "capitalism" and quote Karl Marx.</p><p>I dont care about the science behind "Climate Change". I know the political ends summed up with "Climate Justice" and "Redistributive Change". Climate Change is the vehicle of the Neo-Marxists. I'd rather live on the surface of Venus than live under the yolk of a Soviet style bureaucracy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry I dont have any mod points at the moment , but if I did I would mod you up .
Not that it would make much of a difference , lets face it , slashkos isnt a tag for nothin.There are plenty of people who want nothing more than to believe that the Western way of life is " evil " simply because they do not identify with it .
Not to get into a history recap about fellow travelers and the early 20th century progressive movement , the people who control the media ( ironically ) are the people who spread the anti-western ( anti-capitalist ) propaganda ( class conflict ) .
Its never more evident than watching the people at the Copenhagen climate change conference cheer on Hugo Chavez as he rails against " capitalism " and quote Karl Marx.I dont care about the science behind " Climate Change " .
I know the political ends summed up with " Climate Justice " and " Redistributive Change " .
Climate Change is the vehicle of the Neo-Marxists .
I 'd rather live on the surface of Venus than live under the yolk of a Soviet style bureaucracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry I dont have any mod points at the moment, but if I did I would mod you up.
Not that it would make much of a difference, lets face it, slashkos isnt a tag for nothin.There are plenty of people who want nothing more than to believe that the Western way of life is "evil" simply because they do not identify with it.
Not to get into a history recap about fellow travelers and the early 20th century progressive movement, the people who control the media (ironically) are the people who spread the anti-western (anti-capitalist) propaganda (class conflict).
Its never more evident than watching the people at the Copenhagen climate change conference cheer on Hugo Chavez as he rails against "capitalism" and quote Karl Marx.I dont care about the science behind "Climate Change".
I know the political ends summed up with "Climate Justice" and "Redistributive Change".
Climate Change is the vehicle of the Neo-Marxists.
I'd rather live on the surface of Venus than live under the yolk of a Soviet style bureaucracy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524678</id>
	<title>Here, have a slogan...</title>
	<author>TrickFred</author>
	<datestamp>1261502280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go Green, Save The Bean!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go Green , Save The Bean !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go Green, Save The Bean!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526198</id>
	<title>With apologies to Joss Whedon</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1261509480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take my mug, take my hand<br>
Withdrawal I cannot stand<br>
I don't care for caffeine-free,<br>
You can't take my bean from me.<br>
Pour me out a cup of black<br>
Tell Juan to bring another sack.<br>
Burn the land and boil the sea<br>
You can't take my bean from me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take my mug , take my hand Withdrawal I can not stand I do n't care for caffeine-free , You ca n't take my bean from me .
Pour me out a cup of black Tell Juan to bring another sack .
Burn the land and boil the sea You ca n't take my bean from me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take my mug, take my hand
Withdrawal I cannot stand
I don't care for caffeine-free,
You can't take my bean from me.
Pour me out a cup of black
Tell Juan to bring another sack.
Burn the land and boil the sea
You can't take my bean from me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526642</id>
	<title>omg end of software!!</title>
	<author>Jorgandar</author>
	<datestamp>1261511160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without coffee there will be no more sufficiently awake programmers!  All software development will stop!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without coffee there will be no more sufficiently awake programmers !
All software development will stop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without coffee there will be no more sufficiently awake programmers!
All software development will stop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528496</id>
	<title>Politicians lacking coffee?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261474320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that would get COP15 in Copenhagen in a rush to save the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that would get COP15 in Copenhagen in a rush to save the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that would get COP15 in Copenhagen in a rush to save the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526664</id>
	<title>Re:Seed Vaults and Domestication Programs</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1261511220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is the door to GATTAGA.</p></div> </blockquote><p>That's "GATTACA".  If you have a "G" instead of a "C" in that next to last position, you're subnormal and no reproduction for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the door to GATTAGA .
That 's " GATTACA " .
If you have a " G " instead of a " C " in that next to last position , you 're subnormal and no reproduction for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the door to GATTAGA.
That's "GATTACA".
If you have a "G" instead of a "C" in that next to last position, you're subnormal and no reproduction for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525218</id>
	<title>God dammit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261504800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Republicans don't drink coffee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Republicans do n't drink coffee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Republicans don't drink coffee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525308</id>
	<title>Truth is stranger than fiction</title>
	<author>patiodragon</author>
	<datestamp>1261505220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Please, ladies and gentlemen, please calm down.  Listen to me!   [They calm down.]<br>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; We've been thrown off course just a tad.<br>PASSENGER<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; What's that mean?<br>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In space terms, about 70 million miles. [The Passengers appear interested and sensible, nod their heads]<br>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids  smashing into the hull.   The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall.  [The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.]<br>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Also, we're heading right for the sun and can't seem to change course.  [Passengers still appear interested and sensible.  They all put on sunglasses.]<br>PASSENGER<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Are you telling us everything?<br>ELAINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Not exactly.  We're also out of coffee. [The Passengers erupt in total panic.]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ELAINE       Please , ladies and gentlemen , please calm down .
Listen to me !
[ They calm down .
] ELAINE       We 've been thrown off course just a tad.PASSENGER         What 's that mean ? ELAINE       In space terms , about 70 million miles .
[ The Passengers appear interested and sensible , nod their heads ] ELAINE     The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids smashing into the hull .
The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall .
[ The Passengers still appear interested and sensible .
] ELAINE       Also , we 're heading right for the sun and ca n't seem to change course .
[ Passengers still appear interested and sensible .
They all put on sunglasses .
] PASSENGER       Are you telling us everything ? ELAINE       Not exactly .
We 're also out of coffee .
[ The Passengers erupt in total panic .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ELAINE
      Please, ladies and gentlemen, please calm down.
Listen to me!
[They calm down.
]ELAINE
      We've been thrown off course just a tad.PASSENGER
        What's that mean?ELAINE
      In space terms, about 70 million miles.
[The Passengers appear interested and sensible, nod their heads]ELAINE
    The bumps you feel are car-sized asteroids  smashing into the hull.
The hood of a car smashes through the cabin wall.
[The Passengers still appear interested and sensible.
]ELAINE
      Also, we're heading right for the sun and can't seem to change course.
[Passengers still appear interested and sensible.
They all put on sunglasses.
]PASSENGER
      Are you telling us everything?ELAINE
      Not exactly.
We're also out of coffee.
[The Passengers erupt in total panic.
]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1261503960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater? Not a serious problem."</p><p>Not to be harsh, but the nations that would be underwater are small and not worth sacrifice by the large and important. I understand that there is sentiment in behalf of preserving every culture, but outside that there is no reason to do so. There are vast quantities of humans and as with other animals, some will thrive at the expense of others.</p><p>As for coastal cities, they can be replaced in a generation with improved infrastructure. That which man builds he can build again, and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater ?
Not a serious problem .
" Not to be harsh , but the nations that would be underwater are small and not worth sacrifice by the large and important .
I understand that there is sentiment in behalf of preserving every culture , but outside that there is no reason to do so .
There are vast quantities of humans and as with other animals , some will thrive at the expense of others.As for coastal cities , they can be replaced in a generation with improved infrastructure .
That which man builds he can build again , and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A risk of Pacific island nations ending up underwater?
Not a serious problem.
"Not to be harsh, but the nations that would be underwater are small and not worth sacrifice by the large and important.
I understand that there is sentiment in behalf of preserving every culture, but outside that there is no reason to do so.
There are vast quantities of humans and as with other animals, some will thrive at the expense of others.As for coastal cities, they can be replaced in a generation with improved infrastructure.
That which man builds he can build again, and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332</id>
	<title>ha.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1261500840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Switch to tea. Sorted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Switch to tea .
Sorted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Switch to tea.
Sorted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1261500000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't drink coffee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't drink coffee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't drink coffee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530024</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1261480920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But threaten my coffee supply and I'll take to the streets!</i></p><p>Not <b>my</b> (industrially grown) coffee, but that of the effete snobs that drink stuff made from cat poo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But threaten my coffee supply and I 'll take to the streets ! Not my ( industrially grown ) coffee , but that of the effete snobs that drink stuff made from cat poo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But threaten my coffee supply and I'll take to the streets!Not my (industrially grown) coffee, but that of the effete snobs that drink stuff made from cat poo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144</id>
	<title>Not a new warning</title>
	<author>phlinn</author>
	<datestamp>1261500060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As found on the <a href="http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm" title="numberwatch.co.uk">warmlist</a> [numberwatch.co.uk], this isn't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening <a href="http://www.terradaily.com/2007/080208050443.h29y1ps4.html" title="terradaily.com">coffee</a> [terradaily.com].  Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As found on the warmlist [ numberwatch.co.uk ] , this is n't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening coffee [ terradaily.com ] .
Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As found on the warmlist [numberwatch.co.uk], this isn't the first time climate change has been accused of threatening coffee [terradaily.com].
Amazing how climate change seems to be the bane of all existence...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524134</id>
	<title>Do they make drinkable coffee?</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1261500000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free market saves.</p><p>Specifically harvest and sell these beans with the usual "its green 25-50\%" markup plus the 10-15\% free trade thing. Becomes desirable to save these species for profitability, the green-tards are separated from their money before they can do something annoying with it, and  everyone wins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free market saves.Specifically harvest and sell these beans with the usual " its green 25-50 \ % " markup plus the 10-15 \ % free trade thing .
Becomes desirable to save these species for profitability , the green-tards are separated from their money before they can do something annoying with it , and everyone wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free market saves.Specifically harvest and sell these beans with the usual "its green 25-50\%" markup plus the 10-15\% free trade thing.
Becomes desirable to save these species for profitability, the green-tards are separated from their money before they can do something annoying with it, and  everyone wins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30529372</id>
	<title>THE BEST PART OF WAKING UP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261477860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is knowing the AGW Hoax has been laid bare for what it is, bulllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiitttttttttttt, Rich French Roast or Not!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is knowing the AGW Hoax has been laid bare for what it is , bulllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiitttttttttttt , Rich French Roast or Not !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is knowing the AGW Hoax has been laid bare for what it is, bulllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiitttttttttttt, Rich French Roast or Not!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462</id>
	<title>Horse shit</title>
	<author>fnj</author>
	<datestamp>1261501440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit.  OK, if the climate warms up a few degrees, the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit.  Big deal.  You guys crack me up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit .
OK , if the climate warms up a few degrees , the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit .
Big deal .
You guys crack me up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Chicken Little global warming horse shit.
OK, if the climate warms up a few degrees, the latitudes where coffee is grown may conceivably shift north and south a bit.
Big deal.
You guys crack me up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528108</id>
	<title>The real culprit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261472880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is Lex Luthor!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is Lex Luthor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is Lex Luthor!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526332</id>
	<title>Re:Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1261510080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that this article is alarmist, but your arguments are invalid.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops? Most of these guys don't know their asses from their coffee cups, how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change?</p></div><p>I suspect that the Royal Botanical Gardens knows more than you do about the effect of global warming on coffee crops.  Asking "how do they know" is not an argument that they do not know.  It is an argument showing that <i>you</i> do not know.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events;</p> </div><p>1) Not as far as we know.  We have no evidence of the existence of the coffee tree before the 15th century.  <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Qyz5CnOaH9oC&amp;pg=PA3&amp;dq=coffee+goat+ethiopia+Kaldi&amp;lr=&amp;ei=paxHStuDJ4XuzATj97hf#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" title="google.com">It might be a relatively new species.</a> [google.com]</p><p>2) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gros\_Michel\_banana" title="wikipedia.org">Other tree species have died recently</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>3) Past performance is not indicative of future returns.</p><p>4) The human species is capable of some pretty catacylsmic events.  Hopefully, we won't create any <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic\_bombings\_of\_Hiroshima\_and\_Nagasaki" title="wikipedia.org">more</a> [wikipedia.org] of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl\_disaster" title="wikipedia.org">them</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that this article is alarmist , but your arguments are invalid.what if " global warming " will BENEFIT coffee crops ?
Most of these guys do n't know their asses from their coffee cups , how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change ? I suspect that the Royal Botanical Gardens knows more than you do about the effect of global warming on coffee crops .
Asking " how do they know " is not an argument that they do not know .
It is an argument showing that you do not know.That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events ; 1 ) Not as far as we know .
We have no evidence of the existence of the coffee tree before the 15th century .
It might be a relatively new species .
[ google.com ] 2 ) Other tree species have died recently [ wikipedia.org ] 3 ) Past performance is not indicative of future returns.4 ) The human species is capable of some pretty catacylsmic events .
Hopefully , we wo n't create any more [ wikipedia.org ] of them [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that this article is alarmist, but your arguments are invalid.what if "global warming" will BENEFIT coffee crops?
Most of these guys don't know their asses from their coffee cups, how do they know how an entire species of trees will react to climate change?I suspect that the Royal Botanical Gardens knows more than you do about the effect of global warming on coffee crops.
Asking "how do they know" is not an argument that they do not know.
It is an argument showing that you do not know.That tree survived for millions of years on a planet that faced all kinds of cataclysmic events; 1) Not as far as we know.
We have no evidence of the existence of the coffee tree before the 15th century.
It might be a relatively new species.
[google.com]2) Other tree species have died recently [wikipedia.org]3) Past performance is not indicative of future returns.4) The human species is capable of some pretty catacylsmic events.
Hopefully, we won't create any more [wikipedia.org] of them [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530430</id>
	<title>Re:Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261482660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If coffee trees enjoyed warm climates, Florida would be full of coffee plantations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If coffee trees enjoyed warm climates , Florida would be full of coffee plantations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If coffee trees enjoyed warm climates, Florida would be full of coffee plantations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527778</id>
	<title>New habitat being created as old destroyed?</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1261514940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a question: it seems to me that, if climate change is destroying some areas that were previously suitable habitat for different coffee varieties, wouldn't it also be converting areas which were previously un-suitable, into suitable areas?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a question : it seems to me that , if climate change is destroying some areas that were previously suitable habitat for different coffee varieties , would n't it also be converting areas which were previously un-suitable , into suitable areas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a question: it seems to me that, if climate change is destroying some areas that were previously suitable habitat for different coffee varieties, wouldn't it also be converting areas which were previously un-suitable, into suitable areas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524588</id>
	<title>Re:Daily cup?</title>
	<author>WormholeFiend</author>
	<datestamp>1261501860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like you're drinking failcoffee.</p><p>Switch to freshly roasted (but not too dark) quality coffee, which is ground just before brewing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you 're drinking failcoffee.Switch to freshly roasted ( but not too dark ) quality coffee , which is ground just before brewing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you're drinking failcoffee.Switch to freshly roasted (but not too dark) quality coffee, which is ground just before brewing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525594</id>
	<title>Already happened - the great Hops shortage 2007+</title>
	<author>turtleshadow</author>
	<datestamp>1261506780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2008/05/beer?currentPage=all" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow"> This has already happened</a> [wired.com]. Lack of growers, a major warehouse fire and generally increasing consumption caused a shortage on the spice that which gives beer its flavoring.</p><blockquote><div><p>In the United States alone, there were an estimated 515 hop growers in 1950; 75 in 2000 and just 45 today[2008], Ward says. In 2006, about 2 million pounds of hops were destroyed in an S.S. Steiner warehouse in Yakima, equaling about 4 percent of the U.S. hop crop.<br>All the while, beer sales are increasing worldwide by about 1 to 2 percent annually. The craft brewing industry is growing yearly by 12 percent. That economic reality is pushing hop growers back into the fields.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has already happened [ wired.com ] .
Lack of growers , a major warehouse fire and generally increasing consumption caused a shortage on the spice that which gives beer its flavoring.In the United States alone , there were an estimated 515 hop growers in 1950 ; 75 in 2000 and just 45 today [ 2008 ] , Ward says .
In 2006 , about 2 million pounds of hops were destroyed in an S.S. Steiner warehouse in Yakima , equaling about 4 percent of the U.S. hop crop.All the while , beer sales are increasing worldwide by about 1 to 2 percent annually .
The craft brewing industry is growing yearly by 12 percent .
That economic reality is pushing hop growers back into the fields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This has already happened [wired.com].
Lack of growers, a major warehouse fire and generally increasing consumption caused a shortage on the spice that which gives beer its flavoring.In the United States alone, there were an estimated 515 hop growers in 1950; 75 in 2000 and just 45 today[2008], Ward says.
In 2006, about 2 million pounds of hops were destroyed in an S.S. Steiner warehouse in Yakima, equaling about 4 percent of the U.S. hop crop.All the while, beer sales are increasing worldwide by about 1 to 2 percent annually.
The craft brewing industry is growing yearly by 12 percent.
That economic reality is pushing hop growers back into the fields.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528000</id>
	<title>that does it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261472460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We must fight global warming NOW! Nothing gets between me and my coffee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We must fight global warming NOW !
Nothing gets between me and my coffee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must fight global warming NOW!
Nothing gets between me and my coffee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232</id>
	<title>Adaption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261500360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As <i>Coffea arabica</i> has shown us, in the age of man, being delicious is a <b>very</b> powerful adaption.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Coffea arabica has shown us , in the age of man , being delicious is a very powerful adaption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Coffea arabica has shown us, in the age of man, being delicious is a very powerful adaption.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30529344</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>thomasw\_lrd</author>
	<datestamp>1261477740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everything is affected by climate change.  What's next.  Climate change will kill all the Panda bears?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything is affected by climate change .
What 's next .
Climate change will kill all the Panda bears ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything is affected by climate change.
What's next.
Climate change will kill all the Panda bears?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524520</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1261501680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't either, but I'm surrounded by people who do, which makes it a problem for me. I'd imagine you're in the same situation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't either , but I 'm surrounded by people who do , which makes it a problem for me .
I 'd imagine you 're in the same situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't either, but I'm surrounded by people who do, which makes it a problem for me.
I'd imagine you're in the same situation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524788</id>
	<title>Next on the shortage list...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261502760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pizza and Mt. Dew</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pizza and Mt .
Dew</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pizza and Mt.
Dew</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530504</id>
	<title>Re:Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>VolcanoEspresso</author>
	<datestamp>1261483020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A HUGE contributor to climate change is farming of sheep and beef. New Zealand used to be covered almost entirely in rainforst. Now it is covered almost entirely in grassland for free range production of dairy, sheep &amp; beef.

People in cities don't notice this. People think of New Zealand as a stunning, 'clean, green' paradise. It used to be, before the 1800's, before the white man cleared the land. Now it is a massive freerange meat and dairy factory. People from cities think endless rolling hills filled with sheep &amp; cows is beautiful, but it's not 'natural'.  We cut down 2000 year old kauri trees and shipped them to California for flooring.

Alot of farmers are climate change deniers, it's inconvenient for them to believe otherwise.

I believe one of the best things we can do to postively affect the environment is to reduce meat and dairy consumption. It's also the most difficult as meat is so delicious...But it's not meat eating per se that is the problem, it's the removal of rainforests to grow the meat and dairy that is the issue. We can still eat wild goat, deer, possum etc that lives in the forest. You can see how hokey that would sound to some people which is why I believe it's our biggest challenge.

Plant more native forests. Protect native forests.
You need to see these forests to believe how absolutely stunning they are.

I am a coffee roaster, thank you for reading this rant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A HUGE contributor to climate change is farming of sheep and beef .
New Zealand used to be covered almost entirely in rainforst .
Now it is covered almost entirely in grassland for free range production of dairy , sheep &amp; beef .
People in cities do n't notice this .
People think of New Zealand as a stunning , 'clean , green ' paradise .
It used to be , before the 1800 's , before the white man cleared the land .
Now it is a massive freerange meat and dairy factory .
People from cities think endless rolling hills filled with sheep &amp; cows is beautiful , but it 's not 'natural' .
We cut down 2000 year old kauri trees and shipped them to California for flooring .
Alot of farmers are climate change deniers , it 's inconvenient for them to believe otherwise .
I believe one of the best things we can do to postively affect the environment is to reduce meat and dairy consumption .
It 's also the most difficult as meat is so delicious...But it 's not meat eating per se that is the problem , it 's the removal of rainforests to grow the meat and dairy that is the issue .
We can still eat wild goat , deer , possum etc that lives in the forest .
You can see how hokey that would sound to some people which is why I believe it 's our biggest challenge .
Plant more native forests .
Protect native forests .
You need to see these forests to believe how absolutely stunning they are .
I am a coffee roaster , thank you for reading this rant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A HUGE contributor to climate change is farming of sheep and beef.
New Zealand used to be covered almost entirely in rainforst.
Now it is covered almost entirely in grassland for free range production of dairy, sheep &amp; beef.
People in cities don't notice this.
People think of New Zealand as a stunning, 'clean, green' paradise.
It used to be, before the 1800's, before the white man cleared the land.
Now it is a massive freerange meat and dairy factory.
People from cities think endless rolling hills filled with sheep &amp; cows is beautiful, but it's not 'natural'.
We cut down 2000 year old kauri trees and shipped them to California for flooring.
Alot of farmers are climate change deniers, it's inconvenient for them to believe otherwise.
I believe one of the best things we can do to postively affect the environment is to reduce meat and dairy consumption.
It's also the most difficult as meat is so delicious...But it's not meat eating per se that is the problem, it's the removal of rainforests to grow the meat and dairy that is the issue.
We can still eat wild goat, deer, possum etc that lives in the forest.
You can see how hokey that would sound to some people which is why I believe it's our biggest challenge.
Plant more native forests.
Protect native forests.
You need to see these forests to believe how absolutely stunning they are.
I am a coffee roaster, thank you for reading this rant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525234</id>
	<title>Re:Horse shit</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1261504920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TOA refers to wild coffee. You think the wild coffee will magically migrate along with the climate patterns? Leaping over any unsuitable terrain?</p><p>Even for farmed coffee, I can foresee significant obstacles to moving production. Will there be enough land at the new latitude? Will whatever is currently grown there also be displaced? If not, where can the coffee go? Is the terrain suitable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TOA refers to wild coffee .
You think the wild coffee will magically migrate along with the climate patterns ?
Leaping over any unsuitable terrain ? Even for farmed coffee , I can foresee significant obstacles to moving production .
Will there be enough land at the new latitude ?
Will whatever is currently grown there also be displaced ?
If not , where can the coffee go ?
Is the terrain suitable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TOA refers to wild coffee.
You think the wild coffee will magically migrate along with the climate patterns?
Leaping over any unsuitable terrain?Even for farmed coffee, I can foresee significant obstacles to moving production.
Will there be enough land at the new latitude?
Will whatever is currently grown there also be displaced?
If not, where can the coffee go?
Is the terrain suitable?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524122</id>
	<title>So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>SQL\_SAM</author>
	<datestamp>1261499940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we redistribute the wealth of America for the hoax of global warming (which is what Copenhagen was about) we'll save some coffee beans?  That's okay I'll drink tea.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we redistribute the wealth of America for the hoax of global warming ( which is what Copenhagen was about ) we 'll save some coffee beans ?
That 's okay I 'll drink tea.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we redistribute the wealth of America for the hoax of global warming (which is what Copenhagen was about) we'll save some coffee beans?
That's okay I'll drink tea.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524572</id>
	<title>they got us by the BEANS!</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1261501860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Took them long enough, but finally this is the right Global Warming spin! General public doesn't give a rats ass about atolls, glaciers, or endangered species, but threaten the daily Cup Of Joe and the masses will rally!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Took them long enough , but finally this is the right Global Warming spin !
General public does n't give a rats ass about atolls , glaciers , or endangered species , but threaten the daily Cup Of Joe and the masses will rally !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Took them long enough, but finally this is the right Global Warming spin!
General public doesn't give a rats ass about atolls, glaciers, or endangered species, but threaten the daily Cup Of Joe and the masses will rally!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525944</id>
	<title>Who cares!</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1261508400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we are all in agreement here, that as long as the regular coffee bean stays in production, we don't care about the rest of them.<br>So many more important things then coffee beans have gone extinct due to our hand, or because of our pollution, that we can not seriously worry about this without bursting out laughing.</p><p>Are you kidding me!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we are all in agreement here , that as long as the regular coffee bean stays in production , we do n't care about the rest of them.So many more important things then coffee beans have gone extinct due to our hand , or because of our pollution , that we can not seriously worry about this without bursting out laughing.Are you kidding me !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we are all in agreement here, that as long as the regular coffee bean stays in production, we don't care about the rest of them.So many more important things then coffee beans have gone extinct due to our hand, or because of our pollution, that we can not seriously worry about this without bursting out laughing.Are you kidding me!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30531070</id>
	<title>Re:Do they make drinkable coffee?</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1261486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've reached an accord then. I'll keep my sane and sensible land management and environmental policies (such as those espoused by Ducks Unlimited, Ted Nugent, and other hunting and outdoorsman type organizations). You can keep your green label, your carbon credits, and your ever so successful climate change summits.</p><p>I deride the "green" label because it is such a useless label. It in no way represents an understanding of anything nor an effective change in lifestyle.</p><p>There is a very large, but mostly silent group that actually understands about and care about our environment. We've been out there learning to appreciate nature and doing our small part to protect it. The most we ever get out of it is dirty and occasionally a good meal. We're tired of you trendy assholes, your useless labels, and your holier than thou attitude.</p><p>You sit and crunch numbers and watch things happen on TV. We see our favorite mountains get less snow each year. We see our favorite access paths get graveled and paved over so your fat ass can drive where we used to camp. We see your tears when we drive by with a fresh deer then take your money when you want them out of your organic garden.</p><p>While we're busy staying out of each others way I will be:<br>
&nbsp; - climbing ice covered mountains<br>
&nbsp; - backpacking<br>
&nbsp; - caving - you have not met a more cautious group of environmentalists. Talk about saving the world once you've entered and left a micro-ecosystem without a trace<br>
&nbsp; - working from home (no commute)<br>
&nbsp; - walking to the shops (1/2 to 1 mile from home, no need to drive)<br>
&nbsp; - keep my 25 year old car on the road</p><p>I do none of that to be "green". I do it because its a way that I can improve my life and the world around me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've reached an accord then .
I 'll keep my sane and sensible land management and environmental policies ( such as those espoused by Ducks Unlimited , Ted Nugent , and other hunting and outdoorsman type organizations ) .
You can keep your green label , your carbon credits , and your ever so successful climate change summits.I deride the " green " label because it is such a useless label .
It in no way represents an understanding of anything nor an effective change in lifestyle.There is a very large , but mostly silent group that actually understands about and care about our environment .
We 've been out there learning to appreciate nature and doing our small part to protect it .
The most we ever get out of it is dirty and occasionally a good meal .
We 're tired of you trendy assholes , your useless labels , and your holier than thou attitude.You sit and crunch numbers and watch things happen on TV .
We see our favorite mountains get less snow each year .
We see our favorite access paths get graveled and paved over so your fat ass can drive where we used to camp .
We see your tears when we drive by with a fresh deer then take your money when you want them out of your organic garden.While we 're busy staying out of each others way I will be :   - climbing ice covered mountains   - backpacking   - caving - you have not met a more cautious group of environmentalists .
Talk about saving the world once you 've entered and left a micro-ecosystem without a trace   - working from home ( no commute )   - walking to the shops ( 1/2 to 1 mile from home , no need to drive )   - keep my 25 year old car on the roadI do none of that to be " green " .
I do it because its a way that I can improve my life and the world around me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've reached an accord then.
I'll keep my sane and sensible land management and environmental policies (such as those espoused by Ducks Unlimited, Ted Nugent, and other hunting and outdoorsman type organizations).
You can keep your green label, your carbon credits, and your ever so successful climate change summits.I deride the "green" label because it is such a useless label.
It in no way represents an understanding of anything nor an effective change in lifestyle.There is a very large, but mostly silent group that actually understands about and care about our environment.
We've been out there learning to appreciate nature and doing our small part to protect it.
The most we ever get out of it is dirty and occasionally a good meal.
We're tired of you trendy assholes, your useless labels, and your holier than thou attitude.You sit and crunch numbers and watch things happen on TV.
We see our favorite mountains get less snow each year.
We see our favorite access paths get graveled and paved over so your fat ass can drive where we used to camp.
We see your tears when we drive by with a fresh deer then take your money when you want them out of your organic garden.While we're busy staying out of each others way I will be:
  - climbing ice covered mountains
  - backpacking
  - caving - you have not met a more cautious group of environmentalists.
Talk about saving the world once you've entered and left a micro-ecosystem without a trace
  - working from home (no commute)
  - walking to the shops (1/2 to 1 mile from home, no need to drive)
  - keep my 25 year old car on the roadI do none of that to be "green".
I do it because its a way that I can improve my life and the world around me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525270</id>
	<title>Re:Who gives a Civet shit ...</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1261505040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nifty trolling. But the UK doesn't have enough land to grow enough produce to feed its current population. Without drastic population reduction (unachievable without significant economic strife) we need imports.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nifty trolling .
But the UK does n't have enough land to grow enough produce to feed its current population .
Without drastic population reduction ( unachievable without significant economic strife ) we need imports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nifty trolling.
But the UK doesn't have enough land to grow enough produce to feed its current population.
Without drastic population reduction (unachievable without significant economic strife) we need imports.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526602</id>
	<title>Re:Scare tactics...</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1261510980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Nope, sorry. Coffee trees enjoy a very *specific* type of climate, which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes, latitudes, rainfall rates, and so forth. Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.</p></div></blockquote><p>Coffee grows in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Vietnam, Costa Rica, Mexico, Indonesia, Jamaica, Ghana, Ethiopia, and numerous other places around the world.  It has its limitations; it's not going to grow in North Dakota.  But it's not quite the hothouse flower you make it out to be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , sorry .
Coffee trees enjoy a very * specific * type of climate , which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes , latitudes , rainfall rates , and so forth .
Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.Coffee grows in Hawaii , Puerto Rico , Vietnam , Costa Rica , Mexico , Indonesia , Jamaica , Ghana , Ethiopia , and numerous other places around the world .
It has its limitations ; it 's not going to grow in North Dakota .
But it 's not quite the hothouse flower you make it out to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, sorry.
Coffee trees enjoy a very *specific* type of climate, which is why the growing regions are restricted to specific altitudes, latitudes, rainfall rates, and so forth.
Change that environment significantly and the result would be very destructive.Coffee grows in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Vietnam, Costa Rica, Mexico, Indonesia, Jamaica, Ghana, Ethiopia, and numerous other places around the world.
It has its limitations; it's not going to grow in North Dakota.
But it's not quite the hothouse flower you make it out to be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524150</id>
	<title>now it's serious</title>
	<author>rgravina</author>
	<datestamp>1261500060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK Earth, you've threated my coffee supply. Now I'm listening!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK Earth , you 've threated my coffee supply .
Now I 'm listening !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK Earth, you've threated my coffee supply.
Now I'm listening!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525514</id>
	<title>Re:ha.</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1261506360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About all they have in common is caffeine, wetness and (different degrees of) hotness.</p><p>There are more things to enjoy about coffee than just these three things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About all they have in common is caffeine , wetness and ( different degrees of ) hotness.There are more things to enjoy about coffee than just these three things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About all they have in common is caffeine, wetness and (different degrees of) hotness.There are more things to enjoy about coffee than just these three things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524164</id>
	<title>This is an outrage!</title>
	<author>PakProtector</author>
	<datestamp>1261500120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's it.  I didn't really care about climate change before, and whether or not it was anthropogenic, but THIS MUST END NOW!</p><p>WE MUST SAVE THE COFFEE!  SAVE THE COFFEE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's it .
I did n't really care about climate change before , and whether or not it was anthropogenic , but THIS MUST END NOW ! WE MUST SAVE THE COFFEE !
SAVE THE COFFEE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's it.
I didn't really care about climate change before, and whether or not it was anthropogenic, but THIS MUST END NOW!WE MUST SAVE THE COFFEE!
SAVE THE COFFEE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524306</id>
	<title>Big woop.</title>
	<author>yourassOA</author>
	<datestamp>1261500660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3/4 of the plants the the world used for human consumption are threatened/damn near extinct ( except in their genetically modified form) thanks to Monsanto. Take mangoes, monsanto's modified mangos have cross pollinated with all the non monsanto mangos now all the mangos are monsanto. Here in Canada if your neighbours round up ready canola cross polinates with your canola you have to pay monsanto for their crop infecting yours. And as far as the coffe maybe they should stop cutting down trees to raise cows? And give the global warming a break can't find anything else to blame? The earth was warmer in the past than it is now so why didn't all these plants and animals die out in the midevil warming period. remember one degree with kill thousands of species of plants and animals right? How come it is alright for monsanto to kill off thousands of species of plants replacing them with geneticaly modified wierdos and then the governments gives them patents on all the plants. Didn't know most of your food is patented huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>3/4 of the plants the the world used for human consumption are threatened/damn near extinct ( except in their genetically modified form ) thanks to Monsanto .
Take mangoes , monsanto 's modified mangos have cross pollinated with all the non monsanto mangos now all the mangos are monsanto .
Here in Canada if your neighbours round up ready canola cross polinates with your canola you have to pay monsanto for their crop infecting yours .
And as far as the coffe maybe they should stop cutting down trees to raise cows ?
And give the global warming a break ca n't find anything else to blame ?
The earth was warmer in the past than it is now so why did n't all these plants and animals die out in the midevil warming period .
remember one degree with kill thousands of species of plants and animals right ?
How come it is alright for monsanto to kill off thousands of species of plants replacing them with geneticaly modified wierdos and then the governments gives them patents on all the plants .
Did n't know most of your food is patented huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3/4 of the plants the the world used for human consumption are threatened/damn near extinct ( except in their genetically modified form) thanks to Monsanto.
Take mangoes, monsanto's modified mangos have cross pollinated with all the non monsanto mangos now all the mangos are monsanto.
Here in Canada if your neighbours round up ready canola cross polinates with your canola you have to pay monsanto for their crop infecting yours.
And as far as the coffe maybe they should stop cutting down trees to raise cows?
And give the global warming a break can't find anything else to blame?
The earth was warmer in the past than it is now so why didn't all these plants and animals die out in the midevil warming period.
remember one degree with kill thousands of species of plants and animals right?
How come it is alright for monsanto to kill off thousands of species of plants replacing them with geneticaly modified wierdos and then the governments gives them patents on all the plants.
Didn't know most of your food is patented huh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525714</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261507440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That which man builds he can build again, and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus.</p></div></blockquote><p>Broken window fallacy.<br> <br>Now, I'm not normally one to trot out a canard often (mis)used by the armchair Austrian economists, but it definitely applies here.  <br> <br>We're far better off spending cash as a "stimulus" on building new infrastructure, extending capabilities, than in replacing destroyed infrastructure.  I use the term "infrastructure" broadly here -- pollution-prevention or remediation efforts should be included as infrastructure, IMO, since they are required for sustainable economic activity.<br> <br>Besides which I'd just like to note that rebuilding a coastal city is probably a little more expensive, and time-consuming, than you might imagine.  You have to remember that the economic activity in the city has practically stopped, and will only grow slowly, post-cataclysmic event, until the infrastructure is rebuilt.  Who'll pay for the rebuilding?  How much will that hamper their own economic activity?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That which man builds he can build again , and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus.Broken window fallacy .
Now , I 'm not normally one to trot out a canard often ( mis ) used by the armchair Austrian economists , but it definitely applies here .
We 're far better off spending cash as a " stimulus " on building new infrastructure , extending capabilities , than in replacing destroyed infrastructure .
I use the term " infrastructure " broadly here -- pollution-prevention or remediation efforts should be included as infrastructure , IMO , since they are required for sustainable economic activity .
Besides which I 'd just like to note that rebuilding a coastal city is probably a little more expensive , and time-consuming , than you might imagine .
You have to remember that the economic activity in the city has practically stopped , and will only grow slowly , post-cataclysmic event , until the infrastructure is rebuilt .
Who 'll pay for the rebuilding ?
How much will that hamper their own economic activity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That which man builds he can build again, and reconstruction is a great economic stimulus.Broken window fallacy.
Now, I'm not normally one to trot out a canard often (mis)used by the armchair Austrian economists, but it definitely applies here.
We're far better off spending cash as a "stimulus" on building new infrastructure, extending capabilities, than in replacing destroyed infrastructure.
I use the term "infrastructure" broadly here -- pollution-prevention or remediation efforts should be included as infrastructure, IMO, since they are required for sustainable economic activity.
Besides which I'd just like to note that rebuilding a coastal city is probably a little more expensive, and time-consuming, than you might imagine.
You have to remember that the economic activity in the city has practically stopped, and will only grow slowly, post-cataclysmic event, until the infrastructure is rebuilt.
Who'll pay for the rebuilding?
How much will that hamper their own economic activity?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30531310</id>
	<title>An Interesting if Inaccurate Article</title>
	<author>Ferretman</author>
	<datestamp>1261488420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is basically a retread of the stuff we've seen before--we're losing too much of the rain forest and we need to stop it.
<br>
<br>
Change in climate isn't even *mentioned* as a possible contributor until very nearly the end of the article, and even then it has a "got to blame that too" kind of feel to it that one often sees in similar BBC News articles.
<br>
<br>
I'm sure it's *much* more significant that people cut down 150 acres per *minute* of rainforest.  THAT is what we need to focus on, not speculative climate science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is basically a retread of the stuff we 've seen before--we 're losing too much of the rain forest and we need to stop it .
Change in climate is n't even * mentioned * as a possible contributor until very nearly the end of the article , and even then it has a " got to blame that too " kind of feel to it that one often sees in similar BBC News articles .
I 'm sure it 's * much * more significant that people cut down 150 acres per * minute * of rainforest .
THAT is what we need to focus on , not speculative climate science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is basically a retread of the stuff we've seen before--we're losing too much of the rain forest and we need to stop it.
Change in climate isn't even *mentioned* as a possible contributor until very nearly the end of the article, and even then it has a "got to blame that too" kind of feel to it that one often sees in similar BBC News articles.
I'm sure it's *much* more significant that people cut down 150 acres per *minute* of rainforest.
THAT is what we need to focus on, not speculative climate science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527180</id>
	<title>Re:So let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Skuld-Chan</author>
	<datestamp>1261513080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a lot of people in America who buy into the Calvinist philosophy that if you are poor then its because of something horrible you did.</p><p>Likewise if you are rich - its because you are blessed by God to be rich and are righteous in anything you do. (this works on a personal or national level - whatever we are doing as a country abroad is good for that country right?).</p><p>While there's certainly examples of people who did bad things or made poor choices who are poor because of that, there are more examples of people who are poor because they have been taken advantage of (like many Pacific Island nations) or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time (people who live in Afghanistan or Iraq as a good recent example).</p><p>In other words - just because they are poor doesn't mean we have to forget about them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a lot of people in America who buy into the Calvinist philosophy that if you are poor then its because of something horrible you did.Likewise if you are rich - its because you are blessed by God to be rich and are righteous in anything you do .
( this works on a personal or national level - whatever we are doing as a country abroad is good for that country right ?
) .While there 's certainly examples of people who did bad things or made poor choices who are poor because of that , there are more examples of people who are poor because they have been taken advantage of ( like many Pacific Island nations ) or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time ( people who live in Afghanistan or Iraq as a good recent example ) .In other words - just because they are poor does n't mean we have to forget about them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a lot of people in America who buy into the Calvinist philosophy that if you are poor then its because of something horrible you did.Likewise if you are rich - its because you are blessed by God to be rich and are righteous in anything you do.
(this works on a personal or national level - whatever we are doing as a country abroad is good for that country right?
).While there's certainly examples of people who did bad things or made poor choices who are poor because of that, there are more examples of people who are poor because they have been taken advantage of (like many Pacific Island nations) or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time (people who live in Afghanistan or Iraq as a good recent example).In other words - just because they are poor doesn't mean we have to forget about them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533922</id>
	<title>Re:ha.</title>
	<author>riverat1</author>
	<datestamp>1259754420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine climate change will have some effect on tea growing as well.  I guess no one has done the research yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine climate change will have some effect on tea growing as well .
I guess no one has done the research yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine climate change will have some effect on tea growing as well.
I guess no one has done the research yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525546</id>
	<title>Re:Daily cup?</title>
	<author>mrjb</author>
	<datestamp>1261506480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Sounds like you're drinking failcoffee.</p></div></blockquote><p>Au contraire. The better the coffee, the more cups I'll have. At home, I'll either have espresso or French-press/cafetiere coffee. On the move, Starbucks espresso is a bit too dark a roast to my taste, but Italian ice cream parlors are usually a relatively safe bet for a good cup. When given the choice between instant coffee and tea, I'll have tea. Life's too short for bad coffee. And there's definitely more to coffee than just caffeine content or bucket sized cups.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you 're drinking failcoffee.Au contraire .
The better the coffee , the more cups I 'll have .
At home , I 'll either have espresso or French-press/cafetiere coffee .
On the move , Starbucks espresso is a bit too dark a roast to my taste , but Italian ice cream parlors are usually a relatively safe bet for a good cup .
When given the choice between instant coffee and tea , I 'll have tea .
Life 's too short for bad coffee .
And there 's definitely more to coffee than just caffeine content or bucket sized cups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you're drinking failcoffee.Au contraire.
The better the coffee, the more cups I'll have.
At home, I'll either have espresso or French-press/cafetiere coffee.
On the move, Starbucks espresso is a bit too dark a roast to my taste, but Italian ice cream parlors are usually a relatively safe bet for a good cup.
When given the choice between instant coffee and tea, I'll have tea.
Life's too short for bad coffee.
And there's definitely more to coffee than just caffeine content or bucket sized cups.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524588</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30531070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_22_1446253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30526602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30528126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30531070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30530024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30527180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30533922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30525218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_22_1446253.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_22_1446253.30524288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
