<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_20_1923227</id>
	<title>The First Robot To Cross the Atlantic Ocean Underwater</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261302360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"She was at sea for 221 days, alone, often in dangerous places, and usually out of touch. Most of the time she was<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/14/AR2009121402861.html"> out of contact underwater, moving slowly up and down to depths of 600 feet</a>, safe from ships, nets, and storms. Her predecessor had disappeared on a similar trip, probably killed by a shark. 'She was a hero,' says Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn after retrieving Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain. An engineer working for the company that made the submersible said, 'We think this will just be a precursor, like Lindbergh's trip across the Atlantic. In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips.' The people responsible for building, funding, and flying Scarlet hope the end of the robot's successful voyage will <a href="http://rucool.marine.rutgers.edu/atlantic/">mark a new beginning in ocean and climate research</a>. From its position at each surfacing &mdash; when the glider surfaced and called home via an Iridium telephone parked in its tail &mdash; researchers could calculate the net effect of currents deep and shallow. After surface currents were measured, the scientists could then make inferences about what was happening deeper in the water column. Scarlet called home to upload data to researchers three times a day. 'When we have hundreds of them, or thousands of them, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/LYOTFJUbkn0&amp;hl=en\_US&amp;fs=1&amp;">it will revolutionize how we can observe the oceans</a>,' says Jerry L. Miller, a senior policy analyst at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who accompanied the research team to Spain."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " She was at sea for 221 days , alone , often in dangerous places , and usually out of touch .
Most of the time she was out of contact underwater , moving slowly up and down to depths of 600 feet , safe from ships , nets , and storms .
Her predecessor had disappeared on a similar trip , probably killed by a shark .
'She was a hero, ' says Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn after retrieving Scarlet Knight , the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain .
An engineer working for the company that made the submersible said , 'We think this will just be a precursor , like Lindbergh 's trip across the Atlantic .
In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips .
' The people responsible for building , funding , and flying Scarlet hope the end of the robot 's successful voyage will mark a new beginning in ocean and climate research .
From its position at each surfacing    when the glider surfaced and called home via an Iridium telephone parked in its tail    researchers could calculate the net effect of currents deep and shallow .
After surface currents were measured , the scientists could then make inferences about what was happening deeper in the water column .
Scarlet called home to upload data to researchers three times a day .
'When we have hundreds of them , or thousands of them , it will revolutionize how we can observe the oceans, ' says Jerry L. Miller , a senior policy analyst at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy , who accompanied the research team to Spain .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "She was at sea for 221 days, alone, often in dangerous places, and usually out of touch.
Most of the time she was out of contact underwater, moving slowly up and down to depths of 600 feet, safe from ships, nets, and storms.
Her predecessor had disappeared on a similar trip, probably killed by a shark.
'She was a hero,' says Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn after retrieving Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain.
An engineer working for the company that made the submersible said, 'We think this will just be a precursor, like Lindbergh's trip across the Atlantic.
In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips.
' The people responsible for building, funding, and flying Scarlet hope the end of the robot's successful voyage will mark a new beginning in ocean and climate research.
From its position at each surfacing — when the glider surfaced and called home via an Iridium telephone parked in its tail — researchers could calculate the net effect of currents deep and shallow.
After surface currents were measured, the scientists could then make inferences about what was happening deeper in the water column.
Scarlet called home to upload data to researchers three times a day.
'When we have hundreds of them, or thousands of them, it will revolutionize how we can observe the oceans,' says Jerry L. Miller, a senior policy analyst at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who accompanied the research team to Spain.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507122</id>
	<title>This being Slashdot and all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261308060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm looking forward to someone here pulling off the same stunt six months from now with something made with a hacked Roomba, a netbook running Gentoo, a few extra laptop batteries, a trash can, and a lot of waterproof caulking<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking forward to someone here pulling off the same stunt six months from now with something made with a hacked Roomba , a netbook running Gentoo , a few extra laptop batteries , a trash can , and a lot of waterproof caulking : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm looking forward to someone here pulling off the same stunt six months from now with something made with a hacked Roomba, a netbook running Gentoo, a few extra laptop batteries, a trash can, and a lot of waterproof caulking :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509558</id>
	<title>Re:The Wave Glider could probably make that trip</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1261337340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<i>The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti.</i>
</p><p>
So far, one hasn't been run over by a large ship.
But they think the bow wave may
just push it under for a while.
Their control center on shore
steers the Wave Riders of the way of large ships (for which position reporting is
available.)
</p><p>They had discussions with the U.S. Coast Guard.  Should they
have the thing show a light?  The Coast Guard decided it was better if
they didn't, because ships would then expect it to obey the Rules of the Road, or attempt to rescue it.  So the Coast Guard classifies it as "floating debris".   The floater is basically a surfboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti .
So far , one has n't been run over by a large ship .
But they think the bow wave may just push it under for a while .
Their control center on shore steers the Wave Riders of the way of large ships ( for which position reporting is available .
) They had discussions with the U.S. Coast Guard .
Should they have the thing show a light ?
The Coast Guard decided it was better if they did n't , because ships would then expect it to obey the Rules of the Road , or attempt to rescue it .
So the Coast Guard classifies it as " floating debris " .
The floater is basically a surfboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti.
So far, one hasn't been run over by a large ship.
But they think the bow wave may
just push it under for a while.
Their control center on shore
steers the Wave Riders of the way of large ships (for which position reporting is
available.
)
They had discussions with the U.S. Coast Guard.
Should they
have the thing show a light?
The Coast Guard decided it was better if
they didn't, because ships would then expect it to obey the Rules of the Road, or attempt to rescue it.
So the Coast Guard classifies it as "floating debris".
The floater is basically a surfboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508222</id>
	<title>Re:The Wave Glider could probably make that trip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261320960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507526</id>
	<title>Oceanographer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261311960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Interesting co-incidence - actor Scott Glenn played submarine captain Bart Mancuso in "The Hunt for Red October'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn ...Interesting co-incidence - actor Scott Glenn played submarine captain Bart Mancuso in " The Hunt for Red October' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn ...Interesting co-incidence - actor Scott Glenn played submarine captain Bart Mancuso in "The Hunt for Red October'.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508116</id>
	<title>Re:Dwindling batteries</title>
	<author>aaarrrgggh</author>
	<datestamp>1261319580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New here?  It is a glider, changing bouyancy to go up and down, and using the lift of it's wings to provide horizontal motion. I understand it has a small prop to generate power for the electronics and hydraulics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New here ?
It is a glider , changing bouyancy to go up and down , and using the lift of it 's wings to provide horizontal motion .
I understand it has a small prop to generate power for the electronics and hydraulics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New here?
It is a glider, changing bouyancy to go up and down, and using the lift of it's wings to provide horizontal motion.
I understand it has a small prop to generate power for the electronics and hydraulics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508474</id>
	<title>Huge Potential</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1261323720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>     These gliders promise enormous benefits across several disciplines. Movement of schools of fish, under water mapping, temperature and current studies as well as military uses abound. Perhaps tens of thousands of these units can function together giving us real time information never before dreamed about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These gliders promise enormous benefits across several disciplines .
Movement of schools of fish , under water mapping , temperature and current studies as well as military uses abound .
Perhaps tens of thousands of these units can function together giving us real time information never before dreamed about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>     These gliders promise enormous benefits across several disciplines.
Movement of schools of fish, under water mapping, temperature and current studies as well as military uses abound.
Perhaps tens of thousands of these units can function together giving us real time information never before dreamed about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507892</id>
	<title>"The putt breaks to the right"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261316580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did no one else else immediately think of Gilligan's Island?  Granted that robot \_walked\_ across the bottom of the \_Pacific\_ Ocean.  Maybe I'm just showing my age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did no one else else immediately think of Gilligan 's Island ?
Granted that robot \ _walked \ _ across the bottom of the \ _Pacific \ _ Ocean .
Maybe I 'm just showing my age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did no one else else immediately think of Gilligan's Island?
Granted that robot \_walked\_ across the bottom of the \_Pacific\_ Ocean.
Maybe I'm just showing my age.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511066</id>
	<title>Re:Complementing the Argo fleet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261403820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.</p></div><p>They already do that, well i'm not sure if they pay them but cargo ships do carry sensors for oceanographers. Its called the ships of opportunity program -http://www.ifremer.fr/ird/soopip/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.They already do that , well i 'm not sure if they pay them but cargo ships do carry sensors for oceanographers .
Its called the ships of opportunity program -http : //www.ifremer.fr/ird/soopip/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.They already do that, well i'm not sure if they pay them but cargo ships do carry sensors for oceanographers.
Its called the ships of opportunity program -http://www.ifremer.fr/ird/soopip/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506970</id>
	<title>strange</title>
	<author>olborro</author>
	<datestamp>1261306980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the predecessor had been killed by a shark, was he\she\it a human ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the predecessor had been killed by a shark , was he \ she \ it a human ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the predecessor had been killed by a shark, was he\she\it a human ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507430</id>
	<title>Dwindling batteries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261310880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The WP article says very little about the batteries.  Did they pack sufficient juice for the entire trans-Atlantic trip, or was there some hydrodynamic principle used to recharge the batteries?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The WP article says very little about the batteries .
Did they pack sufficient juice for the entire trans-Atlantic trip , or was there some hydrodynamic principle used to recharge the batteries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The WP article says very little about the batteries.
Did they pack sufficient juice for the entire trans-Atlantic trip, or was there some hydrodynamic principle used to recharge the batteries?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511582</id>
	<title>Payload size?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261408140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the cost to build an AUV and how big a payload can it target on a trip from spain to New York?<br>Seems like it might be difficult to trace its origin.<br>A bit slow, but for a patient man, perhaps the ideal delivery system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the cost to build an AUV and how big a payload can it target on a trip from spain to New York ? Seems like it might be difficult to trace its origin.A bit slow , but for a patient man , perhaps the ideal delivery system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the cost to build an AUV and how big a payload can it target on a trip from spain to New York?Seems like it might be difficult to trace its origin.A bit slow, but for a patient man, perhaps the ideal delivery system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507338</id>
	<title>I, for one,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>welcome our, er, udersea, over, er, underlords, er, underladies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our , er , udersea , over , er , underlords , er , underladies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our, er, udersea, over, er, underlords, er, underladies</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507396</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>barwasp</author>
	<datestamp>1261310340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if not nukes, anthrax, VX<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or in best case dirty money</htmltext>
<tokenext>if not nukes , anthrax , VX ... or in best case dirty money</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if not nukes, anthrax, VX ... or in best case dirty money</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507232</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261308960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me when an android can pilot a sailboat across the ocean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me when an android can pilot a sailboat across the ocean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me when an android can pilot a sailboat across the ocean.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512216</id>
	<title>Re:It</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1261411860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Modes of transport</i> are <i>common</i> exceptions, in most languages that don't otherwise use gender pronouns for objects.  In english ships (boats, etc.), planes, space ships and land vehicles are usually female.  Unmanned submersibles seem to more often be male though, perhaps because of the famous ALVIN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Modes of transport are common exceptions , in most languages that do n't otherwise use gender pronouns for objects .
In english ships ( boats , etc .
) , planes , space ships and land vehicles are usually female .
Unmanned submersibles seem to more often be male though , perhaps because of the famous ALVIN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Modes of transport are common exceptions, in most languages that don't otherwise use gender pronouns for objects.
In english ships (boats, etc.
), planes, space ships and land vehicles are usually female.
Unmanned submersibles seem to more often be male though, perhaps because of the famous ALVIN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508512</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>trapnest</author>
	<datestamp>1261324140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like how everyone in this thread completely missed the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how everyone in this thread completely missed the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how everyone in this thread completely missed the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507402</id>
	<title>Hey, Washington Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261310460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about some godamn photos of the robot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about some godamn photos of the robot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about some godamn photos of the robot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506956</id>
	<title>Take That, Frikken Sharks</title>
	<author>Mornedhel</author>
	<datestamp>1261306920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HA !</p><p>Clearly our new laser-avoidance algorithms give us an advantage in the upcoming man vs. sharks-with-frikken-lasers war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HA ! Clearly our new laser-avoidance algorithms give us an advantage in the upcoming man vs. sharks-with-frikken-lasers war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HA !Clearly our new laser-avoidance algorithms give us an advantage in the upcoming man vs. sharks-with-frikken-lasers war.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507608</id>
	<title>What about UAVs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261312860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this was the first autopiloted robot to cross the Atlantic</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Spirit\_of\_Butts\_Farm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this was the first autopiloted robot to cross the Atlantichttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Spirit \ _of \ _Butts \ _Farm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this was the first autopiloted robot to cross the Atlantichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Spirit\_of\_Butts\_Farm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506992</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261307100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it would need modification. Would it need to be made of some sort of stealth material (or shape), to avoid sonar detection? Or is it already small enough that it would be mistaken for debris?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it would need modification .
Would it need to be made of some sort of stealth material ( or shape ) , to avoid sonar detection ?
Or is it already small enough that it would be mistaken for debris ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it would need modification.
Would it need to be made of some sort of stealth material (or shape), to avoid sonar detection?
Or is it already small enough that it would be mistaken for debris?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509670</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>SCVirus</author>
	<datestamp>1261425840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Suicide by Shark... I wouldn't want to be an early robot either. Tragic, really, did anyone ever find her iPod?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suicide by Shark... I would n't want to be an early robot either .
Tragic , really , did anyone ever find her iPod ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suicide by Shark... I wouldn't want to be an early robot either.
Tragic, really, did anyone ever find her iPod?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507298</id>
	<title>Re:Proud of these guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should name their next robot "Nappy-Headed Ho".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should name their next robot " Nappy-Headed Ho " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should name their next robot "Nappy-Headed Ho".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</id>
	<title>Did anyone else</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261306320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>read "she was an hero" in the summary?</htmltext>
<tokenext>read " she was an hero " in the summary ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>read "she was an hero" in the summary?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510676</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261398300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, sure, just as soon as she finishes her record-setting transatlantic swim, here come the doping accusations.</p><p>Men feel so threatened when a woman does something better than them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , sure , just as soon as she finishes her record-setting transatlantic swim , here come the doping accusations.Men feel so threatened when a woman does something better than them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, sure, just as soon as she finishes her record-setting transatlantic swim, here come the doping accusations.Men feel so threatened when a woman does something better than them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506902</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261306500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>we have robots that can cross oceans, yet still fucking yo mama is like a hotdog in a hallway.  damn that woman gets around.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we have robots that can cross oceans , yet still fucking yo mama is like a hotdog in a hallway .
damn that woman gets around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we have robots that can cross oceans, yet still fucking yo mama is like a hotdog in a hallway.
damn that woman gets around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506892</id>
	<title>get ready for the Matrix...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261306440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll be hacked by a Victor Frankenstein, who will turn them into a swarm of pirates.  And that's the pleasant, early part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll be hacked by a Victor Frankenstein , who will turn them into a swarm of pirates .
And that 's the pleasant , early part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll be hacked by a Victor Frankenstein, who will turn them into a swarm of pirates.
And that's the pleasant, early part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507610</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>MooUK</author>
	<datestamp>1261312920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The *first* one was *an* hero. This one survived.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The * first * one was * an * hero .
This one survived .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The *first* one was *an* hero.
This one survived.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509518</id>
	<title>Bot wars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261336560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 2010 they went to the seas. Now in 2018 they are coming back, and they are angry!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 2010 they went to the seas .
Now in 2018 they are coming back , and they are angry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 2010 they went to the seas.
Now in 2018 they are coming back, and they are angry!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508146</id>
	<title>Usher in the next enviroscare trend.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261320000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once we get a few decades of accurate water movement records from every significant body of water well surely know enough to say that we are experiencing man made current slowing due to boat propellers, and we may all be dead within 50 years if we don't give another multiple billion dollar payment to the worlds most oppresive regimes.  Maybe we can have those talks in Copenhagen too.  Yep that would be awesome!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once we get a few decades of accurate water movement records from every significant body of water well surely know enough to say that we are experiencing man made current slowing due to boat propellers , and we may all be dead within 50 years if we do n't give another multiple billion dollar payment to the worlds most oppresive regimes .
Maybe we can have those talks in Copenhagen too .
Yep that would be awesome !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once we get a few decades of accurate water movement records from every significant body of water well surely know enough to say that we are experiencing man made current slowing due to boat propellers, and we may all be dead within 50 years if we don't give another multiple billion dollar payment to the worlds most oppresive regimes.
Maybe we can have those talks in Copenhagen too.
Yep that would be awesome!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190</id>
	<title>those guys dropped the ball</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261308600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They named it Scarlet and the thing is *yellow*?  Are you kidding me?  Freakin Beatles fans...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They named it Scarlet and the thing is * yellow * ?
Are you kidding me ?
Freakin Beatles fans.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They named it Scarlet and the thing is *yellow*?
Are you kidding me?
Freakin Beatles fans...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507886</id>
	<title>The title's slightly incorrect...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261316520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I submit the <a href="http://www.aerosonde.com/products/products.html" title="aerosonde.com" rel="nofollow">Aerosonde</a> [aerosonde.com] as the first robot to cross the Atlantic Ocean. Admittedly a slightly easier task when flying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I submit the Aerosonde [ aerosonde.com ] as the first robot to cross the Atlantic Ocean .
Admittedly a slightly easier task when flying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I submit the Aerosonde [aerosonde.com] as the first robot to cross the Atlantic Ocean.
Admittedly a slightly easier task when flying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507448</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261311000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, fill them full of copyrighted songs so that the RIAA has to spend boatloads of their cash chasing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , fill them full of copyrighted songs so that the RIAA has to spend boatloads of their cash chasing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, fill them full of copyrighted songs so that the RIAA has to spend boatloads of their cash chasing them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507230</id>
	<title>Sorry Dexter,</title>
	<author>esmrg</author>
	<datestamp>1261308960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but it looks like they are going to find your bodies again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but it looks like they are going to find your bodies again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it looks like they are going to find your bodies again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508566</id>
	<title>Re:Lonely hearts adrift at sea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261324740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>@"She's looking for a soul mate, but not somebody who's clingy"</p><p>Well I'm a barnacle, so thats me out of luck and she has such a nice ass as well. I could get really attached to her.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>@ " She 's looking for a soul mate , but not somebody who 's clingy " Well I 'm a barnacle , so thats me out of luck and she has such a nice ass as well .
I could get really attached to her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>@"She's looking for a soul mate, but not somebody who's clingy"Well I'm a barnacle, so thats me out of luck and she has such a nice ass as well.
I could get really attached to her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507680</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1261313700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; It's very common to call ships (boats, canoes, etc) "she".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    It 's very common to call ships ( boats , canoes , etc ) " she " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    It's very common to call ships (boats, canoes, etc) "she".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507876</id>
	<title>Not the first</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1261316400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A robotic aircraft crossed over a year ago</p><p><a href="http://tam.plannet21.com/" title="plannet21.com">http://tam.plannet21.com/</a> [plannet21.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A robotic aircraft crossed over a year agohttp : //tam.plannet21.com/ [ plannet21.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A robotic aircraft crossed over a year agohttp://tam.plannet21.com/ [plannet21.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30520992</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1261423320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously.</p></div></blockquote><p>Just because the algorithms are simple, doesn't mean the real world of doing is simple.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so.</p></div></blockquote><p>If compact powerful computers were a noticeable barrier, you'd have a point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles , there is nothing very difficult , algorithmically , about running a sub or plane autonomously.Just because the algorithms are simple , does n't mean the real world of doing is simple .
  The only reason we have n't done more of it yet is because we 've only had sufficiently compact , powerful , computers for a decade or so.If compact powerful computers were a noticeable barrier , you 'd have a point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously.Just because the algorithms are simple, doesn't mean the real world of doing is simple.
  The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so.If compact powerful computers were a noticeable barrier, you'd have a point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507938</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261317180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>drone subs have already been used to transport drugs for DECADES though nothing as far as a cross atlantic trip. what I am wondering is if the Navy will start using drone subs since UAVs have been so successful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>drone subs have already been used to transport drugs for DECADES though nothing as far as a cross atlantic trip .
what I am wondering is if the Navy will start using drone subs since UAVs have been so successful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drone subs have already been used to transport drugs for DECADES though nothing as far as a cross atlantic trip.
what I am wondering is if the Navy will start using drone subs since UAVs have been so successful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507460</id>
	<title>Without help now</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261311120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next feat will be doing it entirely without human assistance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next feat will be doing it entirely without human assistance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next feat will be doing it entirely without human assistance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507496</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1261311660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B. They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want, unlike stealth fighters and bombers. So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith, whereas their existence is a matter of fact. How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.</i></p><p>It doesn't even have to be much of technological fight to speak of; just going for the basics. Small UAVs can be built from basically wood and styrofoam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B. They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want , unlike stealth fighters and bombers .
So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith , whereas their existence is a matter of fact .
How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.It does n't even have to be much of technological fight to speak of ; just going for the basics .
Small UAVs can be built from basically wood and styrofoam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B. They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want, unlike stealth fighters and bombers.
So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith, whereas their existence is a matter of fact.
How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.It doesn't even have to be much of technological fight to speak of; just going for the basics.
Small UAVs can be built from basically wood and styrofoam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511346</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1261406520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Welcome to the post 9/11 dumbing down of the word Hero.  It literally has no meaning anymore because EVERYONE is a hero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the post 9/11 dumbing down of the word Hero .
It literally has no meaning anymore because EVERYONE is a hero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the post 9/11 dumbing down of the word Hero.
It literally has no meaning anymore because EVERYONE is a hero.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</id>
	<title>Drugs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261306380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In ten years the coast guard will spending all of its resources on locating these things because they'll be full of drugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In ten years the coast guard will spending all of its resources on locating these things because they 'll be full of drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In ten years the coast guard will spending all of its resources on locating these things because they'll be full of drugs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000</id>
	<title>It</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1261307220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>English generally applies the neuter pronoun to inanimate objects, ships are a rare exception, the occupants (almost exclusively male) spend months at sea inside them, their lives depend on them.</p><p>A robot as a she? nah.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>English generally applies the neuter pronoun to inanimate objects , ships are a rare exception , the occupants ( almost exclusively male ) spend months at sea inside them , their lives depend on them.A robot as a she ?
nah .    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>English generally applies the neuter pronoun to inanimate objects, ships are a rare exception, the occupants (almost exclusively male) spend months at sea inside them, their lives depend on them.A robot as a she?
nah.
   </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507216</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261308840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/An\_hero" title="encycloped...matica.com" rel="nofollow">http://encyclopediadramatica.com/An\_hero</a> [encycloped...matica.com] - that is all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //encyclopediadramatica.com/An \ _hero [ encycloped...matica.com ] - that is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://encyclopediadramatica.com/An\_hero [encycloped...matica.com] - that is all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507848</id>
	<title>Lithium bomb</title>
	<author>assemblerex</author>
	<datestamp>1261315980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So one autonomous lithium bomb, coordinates for a harbor, and launch. Frightening really..</htmltext>
<tokenext>So one autonomous lithium bomb , coordinates for a harbor , and launch .
Frightening really. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So one autonomous lithium bomb, coordinates for a harbor, and launch.
Frightening really..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30518462</id>
	<title>Re:The Wave Glider could probably make that trip</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1261399740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course. The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that. So there's nothing to run out of. It just keeps going.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Typical short-sighted assessment. When Earth has stopped rotating due to all these gliders in the oceans, then we'll see whether they "just keep going". Hmpf!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course .
The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that .
So there 's nothing to run out of .
It just keeps going .
Typical short-sighted assessment .
When Earth has stopped rotating due to all these gliders in the oceans , then we 'll see whether they " just keep going " .
Hmpf !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course.
The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that.
So there's nothing to run out of.
It just keeps going.
Typical short-sighted assessment.
When Earth has stopped rotating due to all these gliders in the oceans, then we'll see whether they "just keep going".
Hmpf!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507520</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>Stupid McStupidson</author>
	<datestamp>1261311900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> It's odd that everyone latched onto the "she" bit. The reason people are identified as hero's is not simply that they accomplish some feat, it's because they do so by persevering at great cost or difficulty. The robot had no choice, was completely incapable of making a selfish(or selfless) decision. It did exactly what it was supposed to do, within the parameters it was told to do so. It didn't care about the outcome either way. And of course, I for one welcome our sea traversing heroic female robot overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's odd that everyone latched onto the " she " bit .
The reason people are identified as hero 's is not simply that they accomplish some feat , it 's because they do so by persevering at great cost or difficulty .
The robot had no choice , was completely incapable of making a selfish ( or selfless ) decision .
It did exactly what it was supposed to do , within the parameters it was told to do so .
It did n't care about the outcome either way .
And of course , I for one welcome our sea traversing heroic female robot overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's odd that everyone latched onto the "she" bit.
The reason people are identified as hero's is not simply that they accomplish some feat, it's because they do so by persevering at great cost or difficulty.
The robot had no choice, was completely incapable of making a selfish(or selfless) decision.
It did exactly what it was supposed to do, within the parameters it was told to do so.
It didn't care about the outcome either way.
And of course, I for one welcome our sea traversing heroic female robot overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508382</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>tchdab1</author>
	<datestamp>1261322880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 years? Smugglers have money, can buy talent, and are always willing to accept some risk: I would be VERY surprised if there aren't a bunch of these things in the process of moving wares underwater right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 years ?
Smugglers have money , can buy talent , and are always willing to accept some risk : I would be VERY surprised if there are n't a bunch of these things in the process of moving wares underwater right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 years?
Smugglers have money, can buy talent, and are always willing to accept some risk: I would be VERY surprised if there aren't a bunch of these things in the process of moving wares underwater right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507300</id>
	<title>What makes a robot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what makes it a robot: how autonomous does a robot have to be?</p><p>These guys flew a radio-controlled model plane across the Atlantic several years ago:</p><p>http://tam.plannet21.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what makes it a robot : how autonomous does a robot have to be ? These guys flew a radio-controlled model plane across the Atlantic several years ago : http : //tam.plannet21.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what makes it a robot: how autonomous does a robot have to be?These guys flew a radio-controlled model plane across the Atlantic several years ago:http://tam.plannet21.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507922</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1261317000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>read "she was an hero" in the summary?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, but that's much ado about nothing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>read " she was an hero " in the summary ? Yes , but that 's much ado about nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>read "she was an hero" in the summary?Yes, but that's much ado about nothing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506922</id>
	<title>Proud of these guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261306680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked with this group from Rutgers for about 10 years. They're *always* doing cool stuff like this, and they work harder at it than you would believe.</p><p>Scott probably didn't sleep during the whole project.</p><p>Congrats to them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked with this group from Rutgers for about 10 years .
They 're * always * doing cool stuff like this , and they work harder at it than you would believe.Scott probably did n't sleep during the whole project.Congrats to them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked with this group from Rutgers for about 10 years.
They're *always* doing cool stuff like this, and they work harder at it than you would believe.Scott probably didn't sleep during the whole project.Congrats to them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507238</id>
	<title>Re:This being Slashdot and all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? Ain't no one here who's ever accomplished shit. This place is just a bunch of malcontents that like to sit around and bitch about other people who accomplish shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
Ai n't no one here who 's ever accomplished shit .
This place is just a bunch of malcontents that like to sit around and bitch about other people who accomplish shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
Ain't no one here who's ever accomplished shit.
This place is just a bunch of malcontents that like to sit around and bitch about other people who accomplish shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507378</id>
	<title>Re:those guys dropped the ball</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1261310220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe we slashdotters can work together to remake the lyrics to Yellow Submarine for it. Draft 1:</p><p>In the town, where I was born<br>We made a bot, which sailed to sea<br>And it radioed, us of its life<br>In the land, of submarines</p><p>So it sailed, without the sun<br>Till it found, the sea of green<br>And it glided, beneath the waves<br>It's our yellow, bot submarine</p><p>We all monitor the yellow submarine<br>Yellow submarine, yellow submarine<br>We all monitor the yellow submarine<br>Yellow submarine, yellow submarine<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe we slashdotters can work together to remake the lyrics to Yellow Submarine for it .
Draft 1 : In the town , where I was bornWe made a bot , which sailed to seaAnd it radioed , us of its lifeIn the land , of submarinesSo it sailed , without the sunTill it found , the sea of greenAnd it glided , beneath the wavesIt 's our yellow , bot submarineWe all monitor the yellow submarineYellow submarine , yellow submarineWe all monitor the yellow submarineYellow submarine , yellow submarine .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe we slashdotters can work together to remake the lyrics to Yellow Submarine for it.
Draft 1:In the town, where I was bornWe made a bot, which sailed to seaAnd it radioed, us of its lifeIn the land, of submarinesSo it sailed, without the sunTill it found, the sea of greenAnd it glided, beneath the wavesIt's our yellow, bot submarineWe all monitor the yellow submarineYellow submarine, yellow submarineWe all monitor the yellow submarineYellow submarine, yellow submarine ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507724</id>
	<title>Not the the first at all</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1261314300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is predated by at 6 years by the robotic model airplane built by Maynard Hill, et. al. <a href="http://www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E\_atlantic\_crossing\_II.htm" title="barnardmicrosystems.com">http://www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E\_atlantic\_crossing\_II.htm</a> [barnardmicrosystems.com]. Details are similar to this case, GPS, autonomous guidance, etc.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is predated by at 6 years by the robotic model airplane built by Maynard Hill , et .
al. http : //www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E \ _atlantic \ _crossing \ _II.htm [ barnardmicrosystems.com ] .
Details are similar to this case , GPS , autonomous guidance , etc .
        Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is predated by at 6 years by the robotic model airplane built by Maynard Hill, et.
al. http://www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E\_atlantic\_crossing\_II.htm [barnardmicrosystems.com].
Details are similar to this case, GPS, autonomous guidance, etc.
        Brett</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261311240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the war on drugs was already won?</p><p>Also be aware that supply and demand is standard economics. Just legalize it and then tax the hell out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the war on drugs was already won ? Also be aware that supply and demand is standard economics .
Just legalize it and then tax the hell out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the war on drugs was already won?Also be aware that supply and demand is standard economics.
Just legalize it and then tax the hell out of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506998</id>
	<title>Lonely hearts adrift at sea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261307160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain.</p></div><p>Her turn ons include long strolls along the beach at night, powerful servos, and embedded Linux. Her turn offs include shark nets and unreliable power sources. She's looking for a soul mate, but not somebody who's clingy, as she previously had a bad relationship with a Giant Squid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scarlet Knight , the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain.Her turn ons include long strolls along the beach at night , powerful servos , and embedded Linux .
Her turn offs include shark nets and unreliable power sources .
She 's looking for a soul mate , but not somebody who 's clingy , as she previously had a bad relationship with a Giant Squid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain.Her turn ons include long strolls along the beach at night, powerful servos, and embedded Linux.
Her turn offs include shark nets and unreliable power sources.
She's looking for a soul mate, but not somebody who's clingy, as she previously had a bad relationship with a Giant Squid.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510416</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261394400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You obviously missed the memo. It wasn't won, it was subsumed into the war on terror. All drug sales now directly or indirectly support terrorism, as does piracy, or trying to protect your personal freedoms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You obviously missed the memo .
It was n't won , it was subsumed into the war on terror .
All drug sales now directly or indirectly support terrorism , as does piracy , or trying to protect your personal freedoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You obviously missed the memo.
It wasn't won, it was subsumed into the war on terror.
All drug sales now directly or indirectly support terrorism, as does piracy, or trying to protect your personal freedoms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507700</id>
	<title>Re:It</title>
	<author>d4nowar</author>
	<datestamp>1261314000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My car is a she. My computer is a she. My chair is a she. My bed is even a she.</p><p>It's all about who built the thing and/or who's using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My car is a she .
My computer is a she .
My chair is a she .
My bed is even a she.It 's all about who built the thing and/or who 's using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My car is a she.
My computer is a she.
My chair is a she.
My bed is even a she.It's all about who built the thing and/or who's using it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507836</id>
	<title>Re:those guys dropped the ball</title>
	<author>RagingFuryBlack</author>
	<datestamp>1261315740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scarlet Night is the mascot of the Rutgers State University of New Jersey.  The robot was obviously named for the school.  Engineering students have school pride, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scarlet Night is the mascot of the Rutgers State University of New Jersey .
The robot was obviously named for the school .
Engineering students have school pride , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scarlet Night is the mascot of the Rutgers State University of New Jersey.
The robot was obviously named for the school.
Engineering students have school pride, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30514108</id>
	<title>Re:Drugs</title>
	<author>CKW</author>
	<datestamp>1261420500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where have you been?</p><p><a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=coast\%20guard\%20submersible" title="google.com">http://images.google.com/images?q=coast\%20guard\%20submersible</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where have you been ? http : //images.google.com/images ? q = coast \ % 20guard \ % 20submersible [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where have you been?http://images.google.com/images?q=coast\%20guard\%20submersible [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512122</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1261411260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically "an hero" is correct.  You use "an" as opposed to "a" when the next word starts with a vowel, or with an h because in english the leading h is usually more or less silent, resulting in the word starting with a vowel sound.  If you pronounce "hero" with some english accents, it works perfectly well in that case too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically " an hero " is correct .
You use " an " as opposed to " a " when the next word starts with a vowel , or with an h because in english the leading h is usually more or less silent , resulting in the word starting with a vowel sound .
If you pronounce " hero " with some english accents , it works perfectly well in that case too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically "an hero" is correct.
You use "an" as opposed to "a" when the next word starts with a vowel, or with an h because in english the leading h is usually more or less silent, resulting in the word starting with a vowel sound.
If you pronounce "hero" with some english accents, it works perfectly well in that case too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507616</id>
	<title>it's really dumb actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261312920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>unless there is a way to ensure that a drone will make it into the right hands there won't be too many of these things filled with anything of any real value floating around.  It's just impossible to make a deal this way, what one sides sends a drone full of cocaine, while the other sends a drone full of greenback or some other currency?</p><p>Makes no sense, how do you ever prove that the package made it to the right hands and that money must be paid? It's ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>unless there is a way to ensure that a drone will make it into the right hands there wo n't be too many of these things filled with anything of any real value floating around .
It 's just impossible to make a deal this way , what one sides sends a drone full of cocaine , while the other sends a drone full of greenback or some other currency ? Makes no sense , how do you ever prove that the package made it to the right hands and that money must be paid ?
It 's ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless there is a way to ensure that a drone will make it into the right hands there won't be too many of these things filled with anything of any real value floating around.
It's just impossible to make a deal this way, what one sides sends a drone full of cocaine, while the other sends a drone full of greenback or some other currency?Makes no sense, how do you ever prove that the package made it to the right hands and that money must be paid?
It's ridiculous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30532058</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1261496340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously. The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so. But I expect in the next decade we'll see a whole lot more of it, making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is wrong..  UAVs have a significantly higher accident rate than piloted aircraft because human pilots are better at takeoffs and landings, especially in a crosswind.  And it's not a hardware problem, either.  We simply don't know how to write software that's as good as a person is when it comes to the task of landing an aircraft.  Are UAV autopilots good enough for what they do?  Sure, because nobody dies when they crash.  You won't see commercial airliners taking off or landing on autopilot.
</p><p>Also, borders have nothing to do with technology.  They're legal concepts.  You are not going to get away with sending stealth aircraft over other countries' borders.  For one thing "stealth" doesn't mean invisible, even to radar, and for another even if the country in question can't shoot your aircraft down you've just committed an act of war they will be compelled to respond to, one way or another.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles , there is nothing very difficult , algorithmically , about running a sub or plane autonomously .
The only reason we have n't done more of it yet is because we 've only had sufficiently compact , powerful , computers for a decade or so .
But I expect in the next decade we 'll see a whole lot more of it , making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.This is wrong.. UAVs have a significantly higher accident rate than piloted aircraft because human pilots are better at takeoffs and landings , especially in a crosswind .
And it 's not a hardware problem , either .
We simply do n't know how to write software that 's as good as a person is when it comes to the task of landing an aircraft .
Are UAV autopilots good enough for what they do ?
Sure , because nobody dies when they crash .
You wo n't see commercial airliners taking off or landing on autopilot .
Also , borders have nothing to do with technology .
They 're legal concepts .
You are not going to get away with sending stealth aircraft over other countries ' borders .
For one thing " stealth " does n't mean invisible , even to radar , and for another even if the country in question ca n't shoot your aircraft down you 've just committed an act of war they will be compelled to respond to , one way or another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously.
The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so.
But I expect in the next decade we'll see a whole lot more of it, making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.This is wrong..  UAVs have a significantly higher accident rate than piloted aircraft because human pilots are better at takeoffs and landings, especially in a crosswind.
And it's not a hardware problem, either.
We simply don't know how to write software that's as good as a person is when it comes to the task of landing an aircraft.
Are UAV autopilots good enough for what they do?
Sure, because nobody dies when they crash.
You won't see commercial airliners taking off or landing on autopilot.
Also, borders have nothing to do with technology.
They're legal concepts.
You are not going to get away with sending stealth aircraft over other countries' borders.
For one thing "stealth" doesn't mean invisible, even to radar, and for another even if the country in question can't shoot your aircraft down you've just committed an act of war they will be compelled to respond to, one way or another.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30515030</id>
	<title>Farnsworth is a genius</title>
	<author>kalel666</author>
	<datestamp>1261424520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a natural extension to being the first robot to qualify for a boat loan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a natural extension to being the first robot to qualify for a boat loan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a natural extension to being the first robot to qualify for a boat loan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1261308900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain  filled with cocaine<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</i></p><p>I've been surprised we don't see autonomous drone aircraft being used for this purpose.  It just isn't that hard.</p><p>And of course, it's also a good way to get nuclear weapons over cities before detonating them, which is really where you want them to be for maximum damage, which is caused by the firestorm they start, not blast or radiation damage (just ask the good people of Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you disagree.)</p><p>Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously.  The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so.  But I expect in the next decade we'll see a whole lot more of it, making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.</p><p>Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B.  They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want, unlike stealth fighters and bombers.  So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith, whereas their existence is a matter of fact.  How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.</p><p>Unlike idiotic movies (Terminator Salvation and later films in the Matrix trilogy come to mind) the real risk from autonomous machines is not that they will go rogue and take over the world, but that stupid human cowards will use them to randomly destroy stuff at a sufficiently high rate to endanger the large-scale structures that sustain what we are wont to call civilization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain filled with cocaine .I 've been surprised we do n't see autonomous drone aircraft being used for this purpose .
It just is n't that hard.And of course , it 's also a good way to get nuclear weapons over cities before detonating them , which is really where you want them to be for maximum damage , which is caused by the firestorm they start , not blast or radiation damage ( just ask the good people of Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you disagree .
) Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles , there is nothing very difficult , algorithmically , about running a sub or plane autonomously .
The only reason we have n't done more of it yet is because we 've only had sufficiently compact , powerful , computers for a decade or so .
But I expect in the next decade we 'll see a whole lot more of it , making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B. They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want , unlike stealth fighters and bombers .
So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith , whereas their existence is a matter of fact .
How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.Unlike idiotic movies ( Terminator Salvation and later films in the Matrix trilogy come to mind ) the real risk from autonomous machines is not that they will go rogue and take over the world , but that stupid human cowards will use them to randomly destroy stuff at a sufficiently high rate to endanger the large-scale structures that sustain what we are wont to call civilization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain  filled with cocaine .I've been surprised we don't see autonomous drone aircraft being used for this purpose.
It just isn't that hard.And of course, it's also a good way to get nuclear weapons over cities before detonating them, which is really where you want them to be for maximum damage, which is caused by the firestorm they start, not blast or radiation damage (just ask the good people of Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you disagree.
)Despite the mystique of piloted vehicles, there is nothing very difficult, algorithmically, about running a sub or plane autonomously.
The only reason we haven't done more of it yet is because we've only had sufficiently compact, powerful, computers for a decade or so.
But I expect in the next decade we'll see a whole lot more of it, making nonsense of traditional notions of borders.Stealth technologies are just too simple for vehicles that have no mission profile except to get from point A to point B.  They can fly as low as they want and as slow as they want, unlike stealth fighters and bombers.
So anyone who claims these things will be detectable is taking a whole lot on faith, whereas their existence is a matter of fact.
How the technological fight between detection and penetration capabilities turns out will have a large effect on the future viability of nation-states.Unlike idiotic movies (Terminator Salvation and later films in the Matrix trilogy come to mind) the real risk from autonomous machines is not that they will go rogue and take over the world, but that stupid human cowards will use them to randomly destroy stuff at a sufficiently high rate to endanger the large-scale structures that sustain what we are wont to call civilization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512378</id>
	<title>Next up, weaponisation</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1261412880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you've got here is the autonomous intercontinental torpedo.</p><p>A slow, stealthy underwater cruise missile, as it were.</p><p>Fit 'em out, put them on automatic deterrence patrol, and when they receive war orders they seek out enemy shipping or shore targets.</p><p>I have a sick sad mind, but I suspect someone has already though of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you 've got here is the autonomous intercontinental torpedo.A slow , stealthy underwater cruise missile , as it were.Fit 'em out , put them on automatic deterrence patrol , and when they receive war orders they seek out enemy shipping or shore targets.I have a sick sad mind , but I suspect someone has already though of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you've got here is the autonomous intercontinental torpedo.A slow, stealthy underwater cruise missile, as it were.Fit 'em out, put them on automatic deterrence patrol, and when they receive war orders they seek out enemy shipping or shore targets.I have a sick sad mind, but I suspect someone has already though of this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506982</id>
	<title>Complementing the Argo fleet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261307040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This might fill a few gaps in the already running Argo fleet of passive probes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo\_(oceanography)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo\_(oceanography)</a> [wikipedia.org]. These probes, of which there are already thousands around, are probably more cost efficient than something actively plowing through the ocean. Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.<br> <br>

But then again the article mentions the U.S. Navy, so this is probably for something more than just harmless oceanography.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This might fill a few gaps in the already running Argo fleet of passive probes http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo \ _ ( oceanography ) [ wikipedia.org ] .
These probes , of which there are already thousands around , are probably more cost efficient than something actively plowing through the ocean .
Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well .
But then again the article mentions the U.S. Navy , so this is probably for something more than just harmless oceanography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might fill a few gaps in the already running Argo fleet of passive probes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo\_(oceanography) [wikipedia.org].
These probes, of which there are already thousands around, are probably more cost efficient than something actively plowing through the ocean.
Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.
But then again the article mentions the U.S. Navy, so this is probably for something more than just harmless oceanography.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507352</id>
	<title>Re:It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261310040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You argue for using 'it', but you wouldn't have written this comment if the OP had used 'he'. If a women had written a similar comment, you would have complained about unnecessary sexism paranoia.</p><p>I would say it's up to the creator to define the name &amp; sex of his/her robot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You argue for using 'it ' , but you would n't have written this comment if the OP had used 'he' .
If a women had written a similar comment , you would have complained about unnecessary sexism paranoia.I would say it 's up to the creator to define the name &amp; sex of his/her robot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You argue for using 'it', but you wouldn't have written this comment if the OP had used 'he'.
If a women had written a similar comment, you would have complained about unnecessary sexism paranoia.I would say it's up to the creator to define the name &amp; sex of his/her robot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507442</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>kryptKnight</author>
	<datestamp>1261310940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah... It's probably a cynical prediction...</p></div><p>I think you've confused cynicism with optimism<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... It 's probably a cynical prediction...I think you 've confused cynicism with optimism : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... It's probably a cynical prediction...I think you've confused cynicism with optimism :p
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512658</id>
	<title>Re:Dwindling batteries</title>
	<author>Flyin' Low</author>
	<datestamp>1261414200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To answer the grandfather post, and correct this one, this particular glider does use batteries to run its processor, sensors, comms, and the buoyancy change pump.  It differs from the stock Slocum Electric gliders in that it has a larger battery pack.  It was not recharged at all en-route - there is no power-generating turbine (that would cause way too much drag) - and in fact had a fair amount of juice left.  The other energy-saving measure they used compared to normal glider ops is shallower dives, which require less pumping power than deep ones.

There are operational thermally-powered gliders out there, and they can dive deeper, but have not made this long of a trip yet (though several gliders have gone Bermuda-Cape Cod and one of them may have been thermal, I'm not sure).</htmltext>
<tokenext>To answer the grandfather post , and correct this one , this particular glider does use batteries to run its processor , sensors , comms , and the buoyancy change pump .
It differs from the stock Slocum Electric gliders in that it has a larger battery pack .
It was not recharged at all en-route - there is no power-generating turbine ( that would cause way too much drag ) - and in fact had a fair amount of juice left .
The other energy-saving measure they used compared to normal glider ops is shallower dives , which require less pumping power than deep ones .
There are operational thermally-powered gliders out there , and they can dive deeper , but have not made this long of a trip yet ( though several gliders have gone Bermuda-Cape Cod and one of them may have been thermal , I 'm not sure ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To answer the grandfather post, and correct this one, this particular glider does use batteries to run its processor, sensors, comms, and the buoyancy change pump.
It differs from the stock Slocum Electric gliders in that it has a larger battery pack.
It was not recharged at all en-route - there is no power-generating turbine (that would cause way too much drag) - and in fact had a fair amount of juice left.
The other energy-saving measure they used compared to normal glider ops is shallower dives, which require less pumping power than deep ones.
There are operational thermally-powered gliders out there, and they can dive deeper, but have not made this long of a trip yet (though several gliders have gone Bermuda-Cape Cod and one of them may have been thermal, I'm not sure).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507320</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261309860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop trying to infect the rest of the internet with "4chan" crap.</p><p>It's retarded and puerile, and no one cares, and there are lice eating your brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop trying to infect the rest of the internet with " 4chan " crap.It 's retarded and puerile , and no one cares , and there are lice eating your brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop trying to infect the rest of the internet with "4chan" crap.It's retarded and puerile, and no one cares, and there are lice eating your brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510830</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261400220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Legalization in Spain? Clearly you don't live here. We're still trying to decide if bullfighting is cruel or not, or whether we should allow the government to close web pages without judicial order; let alone being progressive for a change. But maybe 10 years from now, when every bishop is six feet under...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legalization in Spain ?
Clearly you do n't live here .
We 're still trying to decide if bullfighting is cruel or not , or whether we should allow the government to close web pages without judicial order ; let alone being progressive for a change .
But maybe 10 years from now , when every bishop is six feet under.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legalization in Spain?
Clearly you don't live here.
We're still trying to decide if bullfighting is cruel or not, or whether we should allow the government to close web pages without judicial order; let alone being progressive for a change.
But maybe 10 years from now, when every bishop is six feet under...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652</id>
	<title>The Wave Glider could probably make that trip</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1261313400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<a href="http://www.liquidr.com/products.aspx" title="liquidr.com">Wave Gliders</a> [liquidr.com], from Liquid Robotics, have already made autonomous trips from Hawaii to California.  They sent one up the coast from California to Alaska and back.  They could probably do the Atlantic, but they're based in Hawaii, so they tend to work the Pacific Ocean.
</p><p>
Those are cute little machines.  There are two parts; the floater, which looks like a surfboard with solar panels, and the glider, which is tethered to the floater by a cable of about 10 meters.  The gilder has
elevator-like flaps, which are spring-loaded to return to center.  As wave action moves the floater up, the pull on the cable pulls the glider upward too, which forces the flaps down.  The water pushing against the flaps pushes the glider forward, towing the floater.  On down waves, the glider sinks further, the flaps are pushed up, and in that position, the falling glider then pulls the floater forward.
</p><p>Wave Gliders have only one powered moving part, the rudder.  That's on the glider.  Up top, on the floater, there's a GPS, a compass, an Iridium transceiver, and a microcontroller. This is enough to keep the Wave Glider
on course.  It normally stays within 50m of the desired track, and averages about 1 knot; more in storms, less on calm days.  Storms don't bother it too much; the glider pulls the floater through big waves, like a surfboard.
</p><p>
It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course. The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that.  So there's nothing to run out of. It just keeps going.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wave Gliders [ liquidr.com ] , from Liquid Robotics , have already made autonomous trips from Hawaii to California .
They sent one up the coast from California to Alaska and back .
They could probably do the Atlantic , but they 're based in Hawaii , so they tend to work the Pacific Ocean .
Those are cute little machines .
There are two parts ; the floater , which looks like a surfboard with solar panels , and the glider , which is tethered to the floater by a cable of about 10 meters .
The gilder has elevator-like flaps , which are spring-loaded to return to center .
As wave action moves the floater up , the pull on the cable pulls the glider upward too , which forces the flaps down .
The water pushing against the flaps pushes the glider forward , towing the floater .
On down waves , the glider sinks further , the flaps are pushed up , and in that position , the falling glider then pulls the floater forward .
Wave Gliders have only one powered moving part , the rudder .
That 's on the glider .
Up top , on the floater , there 's a GPS , a compass , an Iridium transceiver , and a microcontroller .
This is enough to keep the Wave Glider on course .
It normally stays within 50m of the desired track , and averages about 1 knot ; more in storms , less on calm days .
Storms do n't bother it too much ; the glider pulls the floater through big waves , like a surfboard .
It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course .
The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that .
So there 's nothing to run out of .
It just keeps going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Wave Gliders [liquidr.com], from Liquid Robotics, have already made autonomous trips from Hawaii to California.
They sent one up the coast from California to Alaska and back.
They could probably do the Atlantic, but they're based in Hawaii, so they tend to work the Pacific Ocean.
Those are cute little machines.
There are two parts; the floater, which looks like a surfboard with solar panels, and the glider, which is tethered to the floater by a cable of about 10 meters.
The gilder has
elevator-like flaps, which are spring-loaded to return to center.
As wave action moves the floater up, the pull on the cable pulls the glider upward too, which forces the flaps down.
The water pushing against the flaps pushes the glider forward, towing the floater.
On down waves, the glider sinks further, the flaps are pushed up, and in that position, the falling glider then pulls the floater forward.
Wave Gliders have only one powered moving part, the rudder.
That's on the glider.
Up top, on the floater, there's a GPS, a compass, an Iridium transceiver, and a microcontroller.
This is enough to keep the Wave Glider
on course.
It normally stays within 50m of the desired track, and averages about 1 knot; more in storms, less on calm days.
Storms don't bother it too much; the glider pulls the floater through big waves, like a surfboard.
It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course.
The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that.
So there's nothing to run out of.
It just keeps going.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508042</id>
	<title>Re:Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1261318560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, if you overdo the "low and slow and light" strategy, you'll get past the fancy radar just fine; but the trusty "shotgun and bird-dog" air defence system will get you every time.<br> <br>

(especially if it is common knowledge that, every time you take one down, you have even odds of being hailed as a hero for preventing a terrorist attach, or receiving several kilos of cocaine, almost as good as new)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , if you overdo the " low and slow and light " strategy , you 'll get past the fancy radar just fine ; but the trusty " shotgun and bird-dog " air defence system will get you every time .
( especially if it is common knowledge that , every time you take one down , you have even odds of being hailed as a hero for preventing a terrorist attach , or receiving several kilos of cocaine , almost as good as new )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, if you overdo the "low and slow and light" strategy, you'll get past the fancy radar just fine; but the trusty "shotgun and bird-dog" air defence system will get you every time.
(especially if it is common knowledge that, every time you take one down, you have even odds of being hailed as a hero for preventing a terrorist attach, or receiving several kilos of cocaine, almost as good as new)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507078</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone else</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1261307760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"she" is used a lot in some cases, all big oil rigs are "shes" for example...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" she " is used a lot in some cases , all big oil rigs are " shes " for example.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"she" is used a lot in some cases, all big oil rigs are "shes" for example...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006</id>
	<title>Just a thought.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261307220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain <b> <i>filled with cocaine</i></b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips <b> <i>filled with cocaine</i></b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>At a price of $100,000 to $150,000 apiece (which is likely to drop once large-scale production begins), fleets of aquatic gliders outfitted with varying arrays of physical, chemical, acoustical and optical sensors promise to increase the store of data considerably at reasonable cost. <i> <b>The U.S. Navy has just ordered 150 to detect rogue aquatic gliders filled with cocaine</b></i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah... It's probably a cynical prediction, but how many of you think it would become true?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain filled with cocaine .In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips filled with cocaine .At a price of $ 100,000 to $ 150,000 apiece ( which is likely to drop once large-scale production begins ) , fleets of aquatic gliders outfitted with varying arrays of physical , chemical , acoustical and optical sensors promise to increase the store of data considerably at reasonable cost .
The U.S. Navy has just ordered 150 to detect rogue aquatic gliders filled with cocaine .Yeah... It 's probably a cynical prediction , but how many of you think it would become true ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain  filled with cocaine .In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips  filled with cocaine .At a price of $100,000 to $150,000 apiece (which is likely to drop once large-scale production begins), fleets of aquatic gliders outfitted with varying arrays of physical, chemical, acoustical and optical sensors promise to increase the store of data considerably at reasonable cost.
The U.S. Navy has just ordered 150 to detect rogue aquatic gliders filled with cocaine .Yeah... It's probably a cynical prediction, but how many of you think it would become true?
:)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30514108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30532058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30518462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30520992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_20_1923227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30514108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30510830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507496
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30520992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30532058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30518462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30508512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30512122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30511346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30507922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30509518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_20_1923227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_20_1923227.30506956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
