<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1835258</id>
	<title>Google Found Guilty of French Copyright Infringement</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1261123920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>adeelarshad82 writes <i>"A Paris court on Friday <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8420876.stm">found Google guilty of violating copyright</a> by digitizing books and putting extracts online, following a legal challenge by major French publishers. The court found against Google after the La Martiniere group, which controls the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house, argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>adeelarshad82 writes " A Paris court on Friday found Google guilty of violating copyright by digitizing books and putting extracts online , following a legal challenge by major French publishers .
The court found against Google after the La Martiniere group , which controls the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house , argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adeelarshad82 writes "A Paris court on Friday found Google guilty of violating copyright by digitizing books and putting extracts online, following a legal challenge by major French publishers.
The court found against Google after the La Martiniere group, which controls the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house, argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493346</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1261131540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nonsense.  <br> <br>My distaste for French people is based entirely on how they post on Slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nonsense .
My distaste for French people is based entirely on how they post on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nonsense.
My distaste for French people is based entirely on how they post on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493240</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Coren22</author>
	<datestamp>1261131180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it allows people to see how awful the writing of the author is?  Not that I can write, but if the author is truly bad, it would probably show in an excerpt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it allows people to see how awful the writing of the author is ?
Not that I can write , but if the author is truly bad , it would probably show in an excerpt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it allows people to see how awful the writing of the author is?
Not that I can write, but if the author is truly bad, it would probably show in an excerpt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493600</id>
	<title>And now after this --</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1261132620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>||<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house, argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution." ||</p><p>They just ensured that they will continue "losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution". Great thinking, yeah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>| | ...the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house , argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution .
" | | They just ensured that they will continue " losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution " .
Great thinking , yeah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>|| ...the highbrow Editions du Seuil publishing house, argued that publishers and authors were losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution.
" ||They just ensured that they will continue "losing out in the latest stage of the digital revolution".
Great thinking, yeah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492988</id>
	<title>What I was wondering...</title>
	<author>JeanPaulBob</author>
	<datestamp>1261130040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean Google infringed copyright with tongue?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean Google infringed copyright with tongue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean Google infringed copyright with tongue?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492590</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but it's France....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google should fight. Or, better yet, just threaten to fight. If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.</p></div><p>Unfortunately, that's the french military.. so no such guarantee here.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should fight .
Or , better yet , just threaten to fight .
If the past is any indication , the French will surrender.Unfortunately , that 's the french military.. so no such guarantee here .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should fight.
Or, better yet, just threaten to fight.
If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.Unfortunately, that's the french military.. so no such guarantee here.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496774</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>pla</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Google wasn't found guilty. They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts
of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.  They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is
valid even for a mega corp like Google.</i> <br>
<br>
I think you've missed the bigger picture of what Google <b>does</b>...<br>
<br>
Every single website in existence falls under the Berne treaty, and no one except the author has any legal right whatsoever
to view it except as the author wishes.  Which means, put simply, Google can't legally exist under this ruling.  This has nothing
to do with books, except insofar as publishers whined the loudest so far, and found a forum willing to humor them (note that the
RIAA, as evil as we consider them, deliberately chose a visible yet inherently useless strategy; the publishing industry has
chosen to actually attack the real "problem", for good or for bad).
<br>
<br>
Do you remember the dark days before internet search engines?  I, for one, do; and to state it bluntly, the modern web
as we know it centers around the search engine.  Without that, you have nothing but a collection of megacorp portals and
ego sites.  Thanks, but no thanks.  If what Google does breaks the law, we need the law broken.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google was n't found guilty .
They were openly , admittedly , unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to .
They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is valid even for a mega corp like Google .
I think you 've missed the bigger picture of what Google does.. . Every single website in existence falls under the Berne treaty , and no one except the author has any legal right whatsoever to view it except as the author wishes .
Which means , put simply , Google ca n't legally exist under this ruling .
This has nothing to do with books , except insofar as publishers whined the loudest so far , and found a forum willing to humor them ( note that the RIAA , as evil as we consider them , deliberately chose a visible yet inherently useless strategy ; the publishing industry has chosen to actually attack the real " problem " , for good or for bad ) .
Do you remember the dark days before internet search engines ?
I , for one , do ; and to state it bluntly , the modern web as we know it centers around the search engine .
Without that , you have nothing but a collection of megacorp portals and ego sites .
Thanks , but no thanks .
If what Google does breaks the law , we need the law broken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google wasn't found guilty.
They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts
of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.
They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is
valid even for a mega corp like Google.
I think you've missed the bigger picture of what Google does...

Every single website in existence falls under the Berne treaty, and no one except the author has any legal right whatsoever
to view it except as the author wishes.
Which means, put simply, Google can't legally exist under this ruling.
This has nothing
to do with books, except insofar as publishers whined the loudest so far, and found a forum willing to humor them (note that the
RIAA, as evil as we consider them, deliberately chose a visible yet inherently useless strategy; the publishing industry has
chosen to actually attack the real "problem", for good or for bad).
Do you remember the dark days before internet search engines?
I, for one, do; and to state it bluntly, the modern web
as we know it centers around the search engine.
Without that, you have nothing but a collection of megacorp portals and
ego sites.
Thanks, but no thanks.
If what Google does breaks the law, we need the law broken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</id>
	<title>Yeah, but it's France....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google should fight. Or, better yet, just threaten to fight. If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should fight .
Or , better yet , just threaten to fight .
If the past is any indication , the French will surrender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should fight.
Or, better yet, just threaten to fight.
If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495738</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but it's France....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.</p><p>I hope you're not talking about WWII, because the French fought bravely with insufficient men and resources until they were forced to give up. Yes, they surrendered - but hardly without a fight. They lost 100,000 soldiers in the process.</p><p>Why don't you do some research, and tell us how you would have beat the Germans in France's place back then. Good luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; If the past is any indication , the French will surrender.I hope you 're not talking about WWII , because the French fought bravely with insufficient men and resources until they were forced to give up .
Yes , they surrendered - but hardly without a fight .
They lost 100,000 soldiers in the process.Why do n't you do some research , and tell us how you would have beat the Germans in France 's place back then .
Good luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; If the past is any indication, the French will surrender.I hope you're not talking about WWII, because the French fought bravely with insufficient men and resources until they were forced to give up.
Yes, they surrendered - but hardly without a fight.
They lost 100,000 soldiers in the process.Why don't you do some research, and tell us how you would have beat the Germans in France's place back then.
Good luck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496604</id>
	<title>Re:War of the cultures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who the hell wants to read French books anyway? Let the frog authors die off, like the French language did in international travel and diplomacy...<br>Like they say (and it is certainly applicable here) nothing to see here, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell wants to read French books anyway ?
Let the frog authors die off , like the French language did in international travel and diplomacy...Like they say ( and it is certainly applicable here ) nothing to see here , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell wants to read French books anyway?
Let the frog authors die off, like the French language did in international travel and diplomacy...Like they say (and it is certainly applicable here) nothing to see here, move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497224</id>
	<title>who cares?</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1261255740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These people don't seem to understand that they are competing for limited attention.  If the French don't want their literature noticed and accessible by the rest of the world, well, that's their business; the French language is already enough of a barrier to begin with.</p><p>France is making themselves more and more irrelevant, and wasting EU 1 billion of French taxpayers' money in the process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These people do n't seem to understand that they are competing for limited attention .
If the French do n't want their literature noticed and accessible by the rest of the world , well , that 's their business ; the French language is already enough of a barrier to begin with.France is making themselves more and more irrelevant , and wasting EU 1 billion of French taxpayers ' money in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These people don't seem to understand that they are competing for limited attention.
If the French don't want their literature noticed and accessible by the rest of the world, well, that's their business; the French language is already enough of a barrier to begin with.France is making themselves more and more irrelevant, and wasting EU 1 billion of French taxpayers' money in the process.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492754</id>
	<title>Obligatory Simpsons quote...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rJAw-fuYHk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Bonjour, you cheese eating surrender monkeys!!!!</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bonjour , you cheese eating surrender monkeys ! ! ! !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bonjour, you cheese eating surrender monkeys!!!!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493680</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1261133100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe for once, they can change the law to be for the better... Not likely of course, since if they do get the law change, the new law would probably end up screwing over authors. But still, one can hope.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe for once , they can change the law to be for the better... Not likely of course , since if they do get the law change , the new law would probably end up screwing over authors .
But still , one can hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe for once, they can change the law to be for the better... Not likely of course, since if they do get the law change, the new law would probably end up screwing over authors.
But still, one can hope.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496226</id>
	<title>Re:Make sense</title>
	<author>Xyrus</author>
	<datestamp>1261153080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.</p></div><p>You are. You're getting free advertising. If you want even better advertising, you can pay more for it. But only the utterly delusional/idiotic would think that they are getting NOTHING from having Google link to their content.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?</p></div><p>Originally? Or now?</p><p>The original copyright laws were to grant the author a monopoly for a fixed period of time to reward them for their works. Now, copyright laws are used to create a perpetual monopoly and act as cultural sledgehammer.</p><p>Look, if you want to be a complete jackass and prevent any search engines for indexing your content, then lock your precious copyrighted materials behind a paywall. Use robots.txt. Make requests to have your content removed. But I'll bet you dollars to dog nuts that you're shooting yourself in the ass by doing so. These days, if it doesn't come up in a search engine IT DOES NOT EXIST.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in it</p></div><p>In a fair world, you should be on your knees thanking the gods of technology and software that something like Google even exists to link your content to the outside world FOR FREE. You are getting advertisement FOR FREE. Thousands, if not millions of people who would never know you're content existed will know it does FOR FREE. You are getting worldwide exposure FOR FREE.</p><p>So choose. Pay for that exposure out of you're own pocket, or have search engines like Google do it FOR FREE.</p><p>~X~</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your content shows up in Google 's results and they make any money off it , then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.You are .
You 're getting free advertising .
If you want even better advertising , you can pay more for it .
But only the utterly delusional/idiotic would think that they are getting NOTHING from having Google link to their content.Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all ? Originally ?
Or now ? The original copyright laws were to grant the author a monopoly for a fixed period of time to reward them for their works .
Now , copyright laws are used to create a perpetual monopoly and act as cultural sledgehammer.Look , if you want to be a complete jackass and prevent any search engines for indexing your content , then lock your precious copyrighted materials behind a paywall .
Use robots.txt .
Make requests to have your content removed .
But I 'll bet you dollars to dog nuts that you 're shooting yourself in the ass by doing so .
These days , if it does n't come up in a search engine IT DOES NOT EXIST.In a fair world , google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site 's contents appears in a search result with ads in itIn a fair world , you should be on your knees thanking the gods of technology and software that something like Google even exists to link your content to the outside world FOR FREE .
You are getting advertisement FOR FREE .
Thousands , if not millions of people who would never know you 're content existed will know it does FOR FREE .
You are getting worldwide exposure FOR FREE.So choose .
Pay for that exposure out of you 're own pocket , or have search engines like Google do it FOR FREE. ~ X ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.You are.
You're getting free advertising.
If you want even better advertising, you can pay more for it.
But only the utterly delusional/idiotic would think that they are getting NOTHING from having Google link to their content.Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?Originally?
Or now?The original copyright laws were to grant the author a monopoly for a fixed period of time to reward them for their works.
Now, copyright laws are used to create a perpetual monopoly and act as cultural sledgehammer.Look, if you want to be a complete jackass and prevent any search engines for indexing your content, then lock your precious copyrighted materials behind a paywall.
Use robots.txt.
Make requests to have your content removed.
But I'll bet you dollars to dog nuts that you're shooting yourself in the ass by doing so.
These days, if it doesn't come up in a search engine IT DOES NOT EXIST.In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in itIn a fair world, you should be on your knees thanking the gods of technology and software that something like Google even exists to link your content to the outside world FOR FREE.
You are getting advertisement FOR FREE.
Thousands, if not millions of people who would never know you're content existed will know it does FOR FREE.
You are getting worldwide exposure FOR FREE.So choose.
Pay for that exposure out of you're own pocket, or have search engines like Google do it FOR FREE.~X~
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30503330</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>cyberthanasis12</author>
	<datestamp>1261316220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the US people rebelled against Great Britain so long ago, they... <p><div class="quote"><p> brazenly did shit that was completely illegal.  I am glad they got hit for it.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the US people rebelled against Great Britain so long ago , they... brazenly did shit that was completely illegal .
I am glad they got hit for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the US people rebelled against Great Britain so long ago, they...  brazenly did shit that was completely illegal.
I am glad they got hit for it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30501618</id>
	<title>Re:English, in France</title>
	<author>phayes</author>
	<datestamp>1261233300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ouais c'est &#231;a, c'est gr&#226;ce a Mitterand que tous les jeunes parlent anglais, mon cul oui...

France, despite the it's ingrained anti "anglo-saxon" snobbery (which is even more present in the teachers unions than it is in the rest of french society) has been ever so slowly opening up to english because everyone realizes that by refusing to learn english that they are cutting off their nose to spite their face. English is often the only common language business partners throughout europe will have in common. While everything anglo-saxon is commonly equated with everything that is bad in modern France (as in outsoucing=bad, pollution=bad, fast-food=bad, etc) having thousands of France's most motivated young adults leave the country to work in the UK &amp; have that regularly shown on TV is finally getting through the chauvinism.

My wife teaches english in a high school &amp; I have two kids that were in grade school during Mitterand's tenure. Mitterand's "great" measure was to declare that all grade school kids would receive an hour and a half of english a week for a semester without hiring any new teachers or allotting a budget to train the existing teachers.The only reason My kids (&amp; all their classmates) actually received their allotted hour and a half a week is because my wife used some of her private time and taught them for free. This was only possible because she was already a teacher. Wow, thanks Mitterand...

Chirac, &amp; now Sarko have done more for the teaching of english to kids in France than Mitterand did by actually financing what little they decided on forcing through the teachers unions. The kids of my friends are actually getting english classes without having to beg for volunteers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ouais c'est   a , c'est gr   ce a Mitterand que tous les jeunes parlent anglais , mon cul oui.. . France , despite the it 's ingrained anti " anglo-saxon " snobbery ( which is even more present in the teachers unions than it is in the rest of french society ) has been ever so slowly opening up to english because everyone realizes that by refusing to learn english that they are cutting off their nose to spite their face .
English is often the only common language business partners throughout europe will have in common .
While everything anglo-saxon is commonly equated with everything that is bad in modern France ( as in outsoucing = bad , pollution = bad , fast-food = bad , etc ) having thousands of France 's most motivated young adults leave the country to work in the UK &amp; have that regularly shown on TV is finally getting through the chauvinism .
My wife teaches english in a high school &amp; I have two kids that were in grade school during Mitterand 's tenure .
Mitterand 's " great " measure was to declare that all grade school kids would receive an hour and a half of english a week for a semester without hiring any new teachers or allotting a budget to train the existing teachers.The only reason My kids ( &amp; all their classmates ) actually received their allotted hour and a half a week is because my wife used some of her private time and taught them for free .
This was only possible because she was already a teacher .
Wow , thanks Mitterand.. . Chirac , &amp; now Sarko have done more for the teaching of english to kids in France than Mitterand did by actually financing what little they decided on forcing through the teachers unions .
The kids of my friends are actually getting english classes without having to beg for volunteers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ouais c'est ça, c'est grâce a Mitterand que tous les jeunes parlent anglais, mon cul oui...

France, despite the it's ingrained anti "anglo-saxon" snobbery (which is even more present in the teachers unions than it is in the rest of french society) has been ever so slowly opening up to english because everyone realizes that by refusing to learn english that they are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
English is often the only common language business partners throughout europe will have in common.
While everything anglo-saxon is commonly equated with everything that is bad in modern France (as in outsoucing=bad, pollution=bad, fast-food=bad, etc) having thousands of France's most motivated young adults leave the country to work in the UK &amp; have that regularly shown on TV is finally getting through the chauvinism.
My wife teaches english in a high school &amp; I have two kids that were in grade school during Mitterand's tenure.
Mitterand's "great" measure was to declare that all grade school kids would receive an hour and a half of english a week for a semester without hiring any new teachers or allotting a budget to train the existing teachers.The only reason My kids (&amp; all their classmates) actually received their allotted hour and a half a week is because my wife used some of her private time and taught them for free.
This was only possible because she was already a teacher.
Wow, thanks Mitterand...

Chirac, &amp; now Sarko have done more for the teaching of english to kids in France than Mitterand did by actually financing what little they decided on forcing through the teachers unions.
The kids of my friends are actually getting english classes without having to beg for volunteers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496544</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>rtb61</author>
	<datestamp>1261158000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> That of course was not the way it was working. In most cases people where only interested in the bit of information they were after. So do the search, find the paragraph and you have your answer, no need to buy the whole bloody way overpriced textbook. Now this sounds bigger than it really was, often the paragraph rarely answered you full question, however it did reinforce the habit in searching the internet to find your answers and never buying text books (the answer you seek is always somewhere on the internet you just have to find it). </p><p> Now if you where writing something you could find your accurate answers say on Wikipedia, use them and then use google book search to find reference able quotes to justify those answers and yeah, you only need the one paragraph, page number, book and author and year of publishing (all based upon your referencing style). Of course that is also becoming largely redundant as more quality, referenced and open information sources are becoming available online, all of course self published. </p><p> Hmm, self publishing, it is cheap, it is open, it is really useful across the board (writers as proof of skills, readers for answering questions and industry to demonstrate expertise and government to inform their citizens) and of course it totally fucks over existing profit bloated middle man for profit publishers. Face it, corporate publishers are 20th century dinosaurs, they should just STFU and die already, they are not needed any more and no longer provide any real benefit in the 21st century internet age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That of course was not the way it was working .
In most cases people where only interested in the bit of information they were after .
So do the search , find the paragraph and you have your answer , no need to buy the whole bloody way overpriced textbook .
Now this sounds bigger than it really was , often the paragraph rarely answered you full question , however it did reinforce the habit in searching the internet to find your answers and never buying text books ( the answer you seek is always somewhere on the internet you just have to find it ) .
Now if you where writing something you could find your accurate answers say on Wikipedia , use them and then use google book search to find reference able quotes to justify those answers and yeah , you only need the one paragraph , page number , book and author and year of publishing ( all based upon your referencing style ) .
Of course that is also becoming largely redundant as more quality , referenced and open information sources are becoming available online , all of course self published .
Hmm , self publishing , it is cheap , it is open , it is really useful across the board ( writers as proof of skills , readers for answering questions and industry to demonstrate expertise and government to inform their citizens ) and of course it totally fucks over existing profit bloated middle man for profit publishers .
Face it , corporate publishers are 20th century dinosaurs , they should just STFU and die already , they are not needed any more and no longer provide any real benefit in the 21st century internet age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> That of course was not the way it was working.
In most cases people where only interested in the bit of information they were after.
So do the search, find the paragraph and you have your answer, no need to buy the whole bloody way overpriced textbook.
Now this sounds bigger than it really was, often the paragraph rarely answered you full question, however it did reinforce the habit in searching the internet to find your answers and never buying text books (the answer you seek is always somewhere on the internet you just have to find it).
Now if you where writing something you could find your accurate answers say on Wikipedia, use them and then use google book search to find reference able quotes to justify those answers and yeah, you only need the one paragraph, page number, book and author and year of publishing (all based upon your referencing style).
Of course that is also becoming largely redundant as more quality, referenced and open information sources are becoming available online, all of course self published.
Hmm, self publishing, it is cheap, it is open, it is really useful across the board (writers as proof of skills, readers for answering questions and industry to demonstrate expertise and government to inform their citizens) and of course it totally fucks over existing profit bloated middle man for profit publishers.
Face it, corporate publishers are 20th century dinosaurs, they should just STFU and die already, they are not needed any more and no longer provide any real benefit in the 21st century internet age.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492482</id>
	<title>Typical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First Microsoft, now Google... who's next?</p><p>All the French see is an American company with huge amounts of money and they contrive ways to raid the piggy bank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First Microsoft , now Google... who 's next ? All the French see is an American company with huge amounts of money and they contrive ways to raid the piggy bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Microsoft, now Google... who's next?All the French see is an American company with huge amounts of money and they contrive ways to raid the piggy bank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493646</id>
	<title>Wanted more info on Editions du Seuil...</title>
	<author>cdrudge</author>
	<datestamp>1261132860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was looking for a french book publisher, so I tried to do a google search for "Editions du Seuil publishing house".  It didn't return back any results though.  Weird.  I guess I'll go with someone else that has an online presence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was looking for a french book publisher , so I tried to do a google search for " Editions du Seuil publishing house " .
It did n't return back any results though .
Weird. I guess I 'll go with someone else that has an online presence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was looking for a french book publisher, so I tried to do a google search for "Editions du Seuil publishing house".
It didn't return back any results though.
Weird.  I guess I'll go with someone else that has an online presence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493262</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>bdunogier</author>
	<datestamp>1261131240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice. Yes, we are about as great with foreign languages as most US citizens are. Yes, I do consider I'm able to communicate with anyone who speaks english<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Us ? Arrogant ? You must be kidding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice .
Yes , we are about as great with foreign languages as most US citizens are .
Yes , I do consider I 'm able to communicate with anyone who speaks english ; ) Us ?
Arrogant ?
You must be kidding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice.
Yes, we are about as great with foreign languages as most US citizens are.
Yes, I do consider I'm able to communicate with anyone who speaks english ;)Us ?
Arrogant ?
You must be kidding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493016</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1261130160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I cannot believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales, and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers.</p><p>So what are they complaining about?</p></div></blockquote><p> I would imagine that an only exception to this would be if the book wasn't worth buying in the first place.  In that case, an excerpt may very well dissuade someone from buying the book.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales , and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers.So what are they complaining about ?
I would imagine that an only exception to this would be if the book was n't worth buying in the first place .
In that case , an excerpt may very well dissuade someone from buying the book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales, and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers.So what are they complaining about?
I would imagine that an only exception to this would be if the book wasn't worth buying in the first place.
In that case, an excerpt may very well dissuade someone from buying the book.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493622</id>
	<title>Ever walk into a library and smell....</title>
	<author>BruceSchaller</author>
	<datestamp>1261132800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That sweet sickly smell in libraries...  That is the smell of the collection rotting.  <p>

That is the waste of human knowledge with time.  Failing to secure the knowledge of the world's past is criminal.  Digital copies of all published work should exist, in a single location, for the preservation of knowledge. </p><p>

I agree that rightholders should be able to control access to their content.  Perhaps a payment system can be worked into the equation.  The cost should be considerably less than print works, simply because digital data doesn't require printing, etc, etc...  Orphan works should, however, remain part of our history, and should be accessible. Furthermore, any work in the public domain should be available. </p><p>

So far, I've bought three books for which excerpts were available.  They were scientific works, which I would not have considered buying unless I had seen a preview, to ensure they had the relevant data I needed.  I then donated those books to my library. </p><p>

Win, win, win, for everybody.  Vive le googlebooks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sweet sickly smell in libraries... That is the smell of the collection rotting .
That is the waste of human knowledge with time .
Failing to secure the knowledge of the world 's past is criminal .
Digital copies of all published work should exist , in a single location , for the preservation of knowledge .
I agree that rightholders should be able to control access to their content .
Perhaps a payment system can be worked into the equation .
The cost should be considerably less than print works , simply because digital data does n't require printing , etc , etc... Orphan works should , however , remain part of our history , and should be accessible .
Furthermore , any work in the public domain should be available .
So far , I 've bought three books for which excerpts were available .
They were scientific works , which I would not have considered buying unless I had seen a preview , to ensure they had the relevant data I needed .
I then donated those books to my library .
Win , win , win , for everybody .
Vive le googlebooks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sweet sickly smell in libraries...  That is the smell of the collection rotting.
That is the waste of human knowledge with time.
Failing to secure the knowledge of the world's past is criminal.
Digital copies of all published work should exist, in a single location, for the preservation of knowledge.
I agree that rightholders should be able to control access to their content.
Perhaps a payment system can be worked into the equation.
The cost should be considerably less than print works, simply because digital data doesn't require printing, etc, etc...  Orphan works should, however, remain part of our history, and should be accessible.
Furthermore, any work in the public domain should be available.
So far, I've bought three books for which excerpts were available.
They were scientific works, which I would not have considered buying unless I had seen a preview, to ensure they had the relevant data I needed.
I then donated those books to my library.
Win, win, win, for everybody.
Vive le googlebooks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30511004</id>
	<title>Google is too big to fail ...</title>
	<author>alphan1L0</author>
	<datestamp>1261402740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... or intend to be.

If digitizing books is found legal, others should get the same technology, and prepare for it right now.

All these books in all languages may improve search engines, translators, and even feed "chatterbots" with knowledge (AI).

The french should do the same and sue google to save time. But I live in France and I have never heard about any project to consolidate french informatics. French software is about industrial computer science but is invisible in informatics.

France can loose at defending her culture herself. The best example is that giant magnetoresistance is a french discovery but this resistance has been applied and copyrighted by the americans, and now google uses its petabytes storage cloud to sell to the french their own books<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... or intend to be .
If digitizing books is found legal , others should get the same technology , and prepare for it right now .
All these books in all languages may improve search engines , translators , and even feed " chatterbots " with knowledge ( AI ) .
The french should do the same and sue google to save time .
But I live in France and I have never heard about any project to consolidate french informatics .
French software is about industrial computer science but is invisible in informatics .
France can loose at defending her culture herself .
The best example is that giant magnetoresistance is a french discovery but this resistance has been applied and copyrighted by the americans , and now google uses its petabytes storage cloud to sell to the french their own books .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or intend to be.
If digitizing books is found legal, others should get the same technology, and prepare for it right now.
All these books in all languages may improve search engines, translators, and even feed "chatterbots" with knowledge (AI).
The french should do the same and sue google to save time.
But I live in France and I have never heard about any project to consolidate french informatics.
French software is about industrial computer science but is invisible in informatics.
France can loose at defending her culture herself.
The best example is that giant magnetoresistance is a french discovery but this resistance has been applied and copyrighted by the americans, and now google uses its petabytes storage cloud to sell to the french their own books ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494686</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1261138560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would seem better we had a compulsory license fee on book so that google, or whomever, could pay a fee for unit of book copied/scanned/duplicated. Then there would be a fee for each page served.
<p>
But this is not the case, and google is testing how far it can push the copyright laws to enhance it's business position. Many firms do this.  MS did this.  I don't like Google doing this because they are not trying to open information.  Rather, they are trying to control information so that eyeballs have to view ads brokered by Google.
</p><p>
However, my like or dislike is not relevant.  What is relevant is that google is the method many people use to find information. What is relevant is that France is a tiny little country with a language that diminishing number of people speak, and diminishing influence. Many schools in the US are more likely to teach Russian or German or Japanese rather than French.  There was a time when France actively tried to fight this negative position by liberally distributing french material.  It's seems that they have now given up and will become a country just go to for vacation, like Jamaica.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would seem better we had a compulsory license fee on book so that google , or whomever , could pay a fee for unit of book copied/scanned/duplicated .
Then there would be a fee for each page served .
But this is not the case , and google is testing how far it can push the copyright laws to enhance it 's business position .
Many firms do this .
MS did this .
I do n't like Google doing this because they are not trying to open information .
Rather , they are trying to control information so that eyeballs have to view ads brokered by Google .
However , my like or dislike is not relevant .
What is relevant is that google is the method many people use to find information .
What is relevant is that France is a tiny little country with a language that diminishing number of people speak , and diminishing influence .
Many schools in the US are more likely to teach Russian or German or Japanese rather than French .
There was a time when France actively tried to fight this negative position by liberally distributing french material .
It 's seems that they have now given up and will become a country just go to for vacation , like Jamaica .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would seem better we had a compulsory license fee on book so that google, or whomever, could pay a fee for unit of book copied/scanned/duplicated.
Then there would be a fee for each page served.
But this is not the case, and google is testing how far it can push the copyright laws to enhance it's business position.
Many firms do this.
MS did this.
I don't like Google doing this because they are not trying to open information.
Rather, they are trying to control information so that eyeballs have to view ads brokered by Google.
However, my like or dislike is not relevant.
What is relevant is that google is the method many people use to find information.
What is relevant is that France is a tiny little country with a language that diminishing number of people speak, and diminishing influence.
Many schools in the US are more likely to teach Russian or German or Japanese rather than French.
There was a time when France actively tried to fight this negative position by liberally distributing french material.
It's seems that they have now given up and will become a country just go to for vacation, like Jamaica.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392</id>
	<title>Still better than the CRIA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.thestar.com/business/article/735096--geist-record-industry-faces-liability-over-infringement" title="thestar.com">Record industry faces liability over `infringement'</a> [thestar.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Record industry faces liability over ` infringement ' [ thestar.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Record industry faces liability over `infringement' [thestar.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492798</id>
	<title>Yeah but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long until someone tries to sue Google for caching (aka copying and saving = copyright infring) their web content.</p><p>My guess is that it has already been tried(?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long until someone tries to sue Google for caching ( aka copying and saving = copyright infring ) their web content.My guess is that it has already been tried ( ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long until someone tries to sue Google for caching (aka copying and saving = copyright infring) their web content.My guess is that it has already been tried(?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493982</id>
	<title>Don't be so sure!</title>
	<author>Xenographic</author>
	<datestamp>1261134600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be too sure about that!  <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sarkozys-cronies-make-song-and-\%20dance-of-it-1843098.html" title="independent.co.uk">President Sarkozy just got his third strike</a> [independent.co.uk] as a party to copyright infringement!</p><p>So we have a giant asshole who has no trouble with letting his party infringe upon the copyrights of others, while pushing 3-strikes laws for everyone else.  If he wants us to go along with that, he should ban his own political party from the internet on principle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be too sure about that !
President Sarkozy just got his third strike [ independent.co.uk ] as a party to copyright infringement ! So we have a giant asshole who has no trouble with letting his party infringe upon the copyrights of others , while pushing 3-strikes laws for everyone else .
If he wants us to go along with that , he should ban his own political party from the internet on principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be too sure about that!
President Sarkozy just got his third strike [independent.co.uk] as a party to copyright infringement!So we have a giant asshole who has no trouble with letting his party infringe upon the copyrights of others, while pushing 3-strikes laws for everyone else.
If he wants us to go along with that, he should ban his own political party from the internet on principle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494320</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261136520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been to France quite often, and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French. I was never subject to any ridicule, but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French. I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole, but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.</p></div><p>Most people go to Paris and Parisians can be very rude which is completely unexpected from a big city. Everyone in London, New York and L.A. come off as people you'd find running a little "Mom &amp; Pop" store in the country.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been to France quite often , and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French .
I was never subject to any ridicule , but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French .
I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole , but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.Most people go to Paris and Parisians can be very rude which is completely unexpected from a big city .
Everyone in London , New York and L.A. come off as people you 'd find running a little " Mom &amp; Pop " store in the country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been to France quite often, and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French.
I was never subject to any ridicule, but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French.
I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole, but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.Most people go to Paris and Parisians can be very rude which is completely unexpected from a big city.
Everyone in London, New York and L.A. come off as people you'd find running a little "Mom &amp; Pop" store in the country.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493562</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but it's France....</title>
	<author>cntThnkofAname</author>
	<datestamp>1261132440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wooo look at me I'm jumping on the bash the French bandwagon!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wooo look at me I 'm jumping on the bash the French bandwagon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wooo look at me I'm jumping on the bash the French bandwagon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494456</id>
	<title>English, in France</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261137180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live about 120k from the French border, the Baseler grenze, at which I stop speaking German and shift to French. Thanks to ex President Francois Mitterand almost all young French speak English since they have to pass a spoken English test to go to French University.<br><br>In the Alsace, almost all speak German as well, and in the  South West Spanish "je n comprend pas" is very much a thing of the past, largely as a consequence of the mobility of labour in the EU.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live about 120k from the French border , the Baseler grenze , at which I stop speaking German and shift to French .
Thanks to ex President Francois Mitterand almost all young French speak English since they have to pass a spoken English test to go to French University.In the Alsace , almost all speak German as well , and in the South West Spanish " je n comprend pas " is very much a thing of the past , largely as a consequence of the mobility of labour in the EU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live about 120k from the French border, the Baseler grenze, at which I stop speaking German and shift to French.
Thanks to ex President Francois Mitterand almost all young French speak English since they have to pass a spoken English test to go to French University.In the Alsace, almost all speak German as well, and in the  South West Spanish "je n comprend pas" is very much a thing of the past, largely as a consequence of the mobility of labour in the EU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494180</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>uncanny</author>
	<datestamp>1261135800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who's law?  Does that mean they should follow all laws of, say Cuba, or some other weird little country?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's law ?
Does that mean they should follow all laws of , say Cuba , or some other weird little country ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's law?
Does that mean they should follow all laws of, say Cuba, or some other weird little country?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493402</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of what you say may be true, but if the authors / publishers aren't on board then Google doesn't really have any right to do this.  I don't know the specifics of French laws in regards to fair use excerpts, but obviously Google must have overstepped the bounds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of what you say may be true , but if the authors / publishers are n't on board then Google does n't really have any right to do this .
I do n't know the specifics of French laws in regards to fair use excerpts , but obviously Google must have overstepped the bounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of what you say may be true, but if the authors / publishers aren't on board then Google doesn't really have any right to do this.
I don't know the specifics of French laws in regards to fair use excerpts, but obviously Google must have overstepped the bounds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495636</id>
	<title>Profit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is google profiting off of the scanned books (are they displaying ads)? If they are, fuck 'em, the French are right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is google profiting off of the scanned books ( are they displaying ads ) ?
If they are , fuck 'em , the French are right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is google profiting off of the scanned books (are they displaying ads)?
If they are, fuck 'em, the French are right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494036</id>
	<title>misread the subject header</title>
	<author>stephencrane</author>
	<datestamp>1261135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On first pass I thought this said, "Google Found French Guilty of Copyright Infringement"</htmltext>
<tokenext>On first pass I thought this said , " Google Found French Guilty of Copyright Infringement "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On first pass I thought this said, "Google Found French Guilty of Copyright Infringement"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492436</id>
	<title>sacre bleu!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love french vajayjay!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love french vajayjay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love french vajayjay!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492886</id>
	<title>Oh no! pas les books!</title>
	<author>g3k0</author>
	<datestamp>1261129680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sacre Bleu!  Cordon Bleu! ArrrhHH!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sacre Bleu !
Cordon Bleu !
ArrrhHH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sacre Bleu!
Cordon Bleu!
ArrrhHH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412</id>
	<title>LMAO this is BS</title>
	<author>robinstar1574</author>
	<datestamp>1261127760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then again, they are the Idiot stupide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then again , they are the Idiot stupide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then again, they are the Idiot stupide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492704</id>
	<title>So....</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1261128900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to go after book reviewers next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to go after book reviewers next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to go after book reviewers next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495004</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure what the Internet revolution is supposed to mean in France.  Here, it means that everyone will now have a fair shot at being made famous by a demotivational image, failblog post, or old school text-style trolling comment.</p><p>In this day and age, it would be truly unjust to deny any human being the experience of being relentlessly and publicly insulted just because they happen to come from a country other than the US of A.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what the Internet revolution is supposed to mean in France .
Here , it means that everyone will now have a fair shot at being made famous by a demotivational image , failblog post , or old school text-style trolling comment.In this day and age , it would be truly unjust to deny any human being the experience of being relentlessly and publicly insulted just because they happen to come from a country other than the US of A .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what the Internet revolution is supposed to mean in France.
Here, it means that everyone will now have a fair shot at being made famous by a demotivational image, failblog post, or old school text-style trolling comment.In this day and age, it would be truly unjust to deny any human being the experience of being relentlessly and publicly insulted just because they happen to come from a country other than the US of A.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493814</id>
	<title>War of the cultures</title>
	<author>AlexBirch</author>
	<datestamp>1261133880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>France just lost another major battle for the war of the cultures. If Google stays away from all of the copyrighted material in French, that means the world would be more apt to find Victor Hugo in English than in French. I'm grateful that for the most part, the internet is English territory (/. is a great example).<br> <br>
It's just sad to see the French surrender yet another battle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>France just lost another major battle for the war of the cultures .
If Google stays away from all of the copyrighted material in French , that means the world would be more apt to find Victor Hugo in English than in French .
I 'm grateful that for the most part , the internet is English territory ( / .
is a great example ) .
It 's just sad to see the French surrender yet another battle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>France just lost another major battle for the war of the cultures.
If Google stays away from all of the copyrighted material in French, that means the world would be more apt to find Victor Hugo in English than in French.
I'm grateful that for the most part, the internet is English territory (/.
is a great example).
It's just sad to see the French surrender yet another battle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493312</id>
	<title>Now if only Sarkozy would be found guilty.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all he violated his own laws 3 times, and now, according to his own laws, should be thrown off the Internet.</p><p>He even did it with intent. As he asked the media industry first, then they denied the request, but then he used it <em>anyway</em>.</p><p>Is long as Sarkozy is not behind bars and off the net, this whole thing is a farce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all he violated his own laws 3 times , and now , according to his own laws , should be thrown off the Internet.He even did it with intent .
As he asked the media industry first , then they denied the request , but then he used it anyway.Is long as Sarkozy is not behind bars and off the net , this whole thing is a farce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all he violated his own laws 3 times, and now, according to his own laws, should be thrown off the Internet.He even did it with intent.
As he asked the media industry first, then they denied the request, but then he used it anyway.Is long as Sarkozy is not behind bars and off the net, this whole thing is a farce.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493186</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>bdunogier</author>
	<datestamp>1261130880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you for that.

To be a bit more accurate, publishers have sued google for making available complete versions of books google didn't have an agreement for, BUT only books that weren't commercialized anymore. I'm hesitating here: on one hand, the publishers pretending that doing that is an insult to the author's work, making available a book that's no longer available for purchase is also a bit insulting... the only interests I see protected here are the publisher's. So... ideally, google would contest the trial's result, and this would end up in a deal everyone would benefit from.

But law should be the same for everybody, whatever the size of your lawyer's team.

Oh, and by the way, in response to godrik's comment above (http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483636&amp;cid=30492642) both left AND right wing do believe in this carbon crap. And you should too</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for that .
To be a bit more accurate , publishers have sued google for making available complete versions of books google did n't have an agreement for , BUT only books that were n't commercialized anymore .
I 'm hesitating here : on one hand , the publishers pretending that doing that is an insult to the author 's work , making available a book that 's no longer available for purchase is also a bit insulting... the only interests I see protected here are the publisher 's .
So... ideally , google would contest the trial 's result , and this would end up in a deal everyone would benefit from .
But law should be the same for everybody , whatever the size of your lawyer 's team .
Oh , and by the way , in response to godrik 's comment above ( http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1483636&amp;cid = 30492642 ) both left AND right wing do believe in this carbon crap .
And you should too</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for that.
To be a bit more accurate, publishers have sued google for making available complete versions of books google didn't have an agreement for, BUT only books that weren't commercialized anymore.
I'm hesitating here: on one hand, the publishers pretending that doing that is an insult to the author's work, making available a book that's no longer available for purchase is also a bit insulting... the only interests I see protected here are the publisher's.
So... ideally, google would contest the trial's result, and this would end up in a deal everyone would benefit from.
But law should be the same for everybody, whatever the size of your lawyer's team.
Oh, and by the way, in response to godrik's comment above (http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483636&amp;cid=30492642) both left AND right wing do believe in this carbon crap.
And you should too</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495444</id>
	<title>Re:Make sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261144860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If your content shows up in Google's results, then Google is giving you advertising and publicity.</p></div><p>Clearly google is "giving" you far less in advertising and publicity then they are profiting from your content.  This is self-evident from google's bottom line.  So, yes, content producers would be better off paying for advertising while not getting ripped off by google.</p><p>Except that doing so, while google is "giving" all the other content producers the shaft, would be suicide.  Google is effectively operating a protection racket, where they make money off your work and protecting your rights is costly or dangerous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your content shows up in Google 's results , then Google is giving you advertising and publicity.Clearly google is " giving " you far less in advertising and publicity then they are profiting from your content .
This is self-evident from google 's bottom line .
So , yes , content producers would be better off paying for advertising while not getting ripped off by google.Except that doing so , while google is " giving " all the other content producers the shaft , would be suicide .
Google is effectively operating a protection racket , where they make money off your work and protecting your rights is costly or dangerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your content shows up in Google's results, then Google is giving you advertising and publicity.Clearly google is "giving" you far less in advertising and publicity then they are profiting from your content.
This is self-evident from google's bottom line.
So, yes, content producers would be better off paying for advertising while not getting ripped off by google.Except that doing so, while google is "giving" all the other content producers the shaft, would be suicide.
Google is effectively operating a protection racket, where they make money off your work and protecting your rights is costly or dangerous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495798</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261148340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google wasn't found guilty.  They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.</p></div><p>Perhaps you haven't heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair\_use" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Fair Use</a> [wikipedia.org]? I don't know about it France, but in the US it makes the line less Black and White.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google was n't found guilty .
They were openly , admittedly , unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.Perhaps you have n't heard of Fair Use [ wikipedia.org ] ?
I do n't know about it France , but in the US it makes the line less Black and White .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google wasn't found guilty.
They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.Perhaps you haven't heard of Fair Use [wikipedia.org]?
I don't know about it France, but in the US it makes the line less Black and White.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493400</id>
	<title>Way to kill a minority dialect</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1261131720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last I looked the French language although still in use by millions within France doesn't have a high international growth of new speakers. The Japanese faced the same problem and now they go out of their way to export their culture and make it available on the web. So now Japanese culture and the language has become a big money earner for them but the actions of the French seem to me to be a backwards step for a language that is becoming more and more a minority dialect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last I looked the French language although still in use by millions within France does n't have a high international growth of new speakers .
The Japanese faced the same problem and now they go out of their way to export their culture and make it available on the web .
So now Japanese culture and the language has become a big money earner for them but the actions of the French seem to me to be a backwards step for a language that is becoming more and more a minority dialect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last I looked the French language although still in use by millions within France doesn't have a high international growth of new speakers.
The Japanese faced the same problem and now they go out of their way to export their culture and make it available on the web.
So now Japanese culture and the language has become a big money earner for them but the actions of the French seem to me to be a backwards step for a language that is becoming more and more a minority dialect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498204</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>DarkofPeace</author>
	<datestamp>1261234500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, if they have a server in Cuba. Now if the Cubans want to go to Google.us or Google<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bfe, then thats not Google's fault.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , if they have a server in Cuba .
Now if the Cubans want to go to Google.us or Google .bfe , then thats not Google 's fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, if they have a server in Cuba.
Now if the Cubans want to go to Google.us or Google .bfe, then thats not Google's fault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492936</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1261129860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>French publishers have bit the hand that feeds them.  The obvious solution is for Google to no longer digitize French books, and laugh as people buy less of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>French publishers have bit the hand that feeds them .
The obvious solution is for Google to no longer digitize French books , and laugh as people buy less of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>French publishers have bit the hand that feeds them.
The obvious solution is for Google to no longer digitize French books, and laugh as people buy less of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30552802</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>luisdom</author>
	<datestamp>1261738200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) As a Spanish employee of a french company, I can honestly say that they're quite polite in language misuse, <b> if you are polite to them</b><br>2) Applies to every capital city of the countries I've visited: England, Germany, France... and Spain is no exception: the "capitalers" are assholes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) As a Spanish employee of a french company , I can honestly say that they 're quite polite in language misuse , if you are polite to them2 ) Applies to every capital city of the countries I 've visited : England , Germany , France... and Spain is no exception : the " capitalers " are assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) As a Spanish employee of a french company, I can honestly say that they're quite polite in language misuse,  if you are polite to them2) Applies to every capital city of the countries I've visited: England, Germany, France... and Spain is no exception: the "capitalers" are assholes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.<br>
2) From what I have heard, the country French are a very hospitable people, warm and willing to share their culture with the world. It is really only the Parisians that have a (deserved) reputation for being arrogant. Unfortunately, Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit.<br>
3) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond "bi-lingualism" and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians.<br>
In general, France was once a big global superpower; France was once the center for tecnology, and French was the "Lingua Franca" used in diplomacy throughout the world. The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true. However, this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world. If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before, just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) It hard to " speak with people " who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule , especially when you do n't speak French .
2 ) From what I have heard , the country French are a very hospitable people , warm and willing to share their culture with the world .
It is really only the Parisians that have a ( deserved ) reputation for being arrogant .
Unfortunately , Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit .
3 ) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond " bi-lingualism " and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians .
In general , France was once a big global superpower ; France was once the center for tecnology , and French was the " Lingua Franca " used in diplomacy throughout the world .
The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true .
However , this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world .
If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before , just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.
2) From what I have heard, the country French are a very hospitable people, warm and willing to share their culture with the world.
It is really only the Parisians that have a (deserved) reputation for being arrogant.
Unfortunately, Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit.
3) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond "bi-lingualism" and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians.
In general, France was once a big global superpower; France was once the center for tecnology, and French was the "Lingua Franca" used in diplomacy throughout the world.
The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true.
However, this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world.
If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before, just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493502</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>ElKry</author>
	<datestamp>1261132140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must be new here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493992</id>
	<title>Re:Wanted more info on Editions du Seuil...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261134720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their website: http://www.editionsduseuil.fr/</p><p>Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/\%C3\%89ditions\_du\_Seuil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their website : http : //www.editionsduseuil.fr/Wikipedia : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ \ % C3 \ % 89ditions \ _du \ _Seuil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their website: http://www.editionsduseuil.fr/Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/\%C3\%89ditions\_du\_Seuil</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492938</id>
	<title>/eyerolls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Serge Eyrolles, head of the French publisher's union Syndicat National de l'Edition, said he was "completely satisfied with the verdict".'</p><p>Really?  Eyrolles?  Can anyone take him seriously?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Serge Eyrolles , head of the French publisher 's union Syndicat National de l'Edition , said he was " completely satisfied with the verdict " .'Really ?
Eyrolles ? Can anyone take him seriously ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Serge Eyrolles, head of the French publisher's union Syndicat National de l'Edition, said he was "completely satisfied with the verdict".'Really?
Eyrolles?  Can anyone take him seriously?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550</id>
	<title>\_Some\_ US authors and publishers</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261128300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...It agreed to a settlement with US authors and publishers...</p></div></blockquote><p>

It agreed to a settlement with <strong>some</strong> US authors and publishers.
Most authors were not involved.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...It agreed to a settlement with US authors and publishers.. . It agreed to a settlement with some US authors and publishers .
Most authors were not involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...It agreed to a settlement with US authors and publishers...

It agreed to a settlement with some US authors and publishers.
Most authors were not involved.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497334</id>
	<title>Re:Make NO sense</title>
	<author>romiz</author>
	<datestamp>1261216140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no "Fair Use" in French law.

</p><p>The relevant law, the "Code de la Propri&#233;t&#233; intellectuelle", governs all the exceptions to the author's rights. The default state is that the author retains all rights to his work, and any use of this work needs his authorization. Then the law adds a significant list of exemptions, which builds a system that functions in a way similar to the "Fair Use" system. But the relevant article describing the exceptions is more detailed than the fair use provisions. (<a href="http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006069414&amp;idArticle=LEGIARTI000020740486&amp;dateTexte=20091219" title="legifrance.gouv.fr">Original article</a> [legifrance.gouv.fr] of  the law, if you read French)

</p><p>The provision the closest to what Google is doing is number 8 for the article (L122-5 of the CPI), which allows global reproduction for conservation and study by patrons for research or private use, but only if that service is provided by a library open to the public, a museum or an archival service, and the resulting work is only available on dedicated consultation terminals within the building, and only if this does not provide commercial or economic advantage to the entity providing the service. It does not state, however, that no compensation is required, only that the author may not prevent this to be done with works that have been divulged to the public.

</p><p>But since Google doesn't qualify for this exemption, it means that the copies were unlawful. The only thing in question in this judgment is how much of a prejudice to the authors the use Google made was, and there the ruling is much more debatable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no " Fair Use " in French law .
The relevant law , the " Code de la Propri   t   intellectuelle " , governs all the exceptions to the author 's rights .
The default state is that the author retains all rights to his work , and any use of this work needs his authorization .
Then the law adds a significant list of exemptions , which builds a system that functions in a way similar to the " Fair Use " system .
But the relevant article describing the exceptions is more detailed than the fair use provisions .
( Original article [ legifrance.gouv.fr ] of the law , if you read French ) The provision the closest to what Google is doing is number 8 for the article ( L122-5 of the CPI ) , which allows global reproduction for conservation and study by patrons for research or private use , but only if that service is provided by a library open to the public , a museum or an archival service , and the resulting work is only available on dedicated consultation terminals within the building , and only if this does not provide commercial or economic advantage to the entity providing the service .
It does not state , however , that no compensation is required , only that the author may not prevent this to be done with works that have been divulged to the public .
But since Google does n't qualify for this exemption , it means that the copies were unlawful .
The only thing in question in this judgment is how much of a prejudice to the authors the use Google made was , and there the ruling is much more debatable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no "Fair Use" in French law.
The relevant law, the "Code de la Propriété intellectuelle", governs all the exceptions to the author's rights.
The default state is that the author retains all rights to his work, and any use of this work needs his authorization.
Then the law adds a significant list of exemptions, which builds a system that functions in a way similar to the "Fair Use" system.
But the relevant article describing the exceptions is more detailed than the fair use provisions.
(Original article [legifrance.gouv.fr] of  the law, if you read French)

The provision the closest to what Google is doing is number 8 for the article (L122-5 of the CPI), which allows global reproduction for conservation and study by patrons for research or private use, but only if that service is provided by a library open to the public, a museum or an archival service, and the resulting work is only available on dedicated consultation terminals within the building, and only if this does not provide commercial or economic advantage to the entity providing the service.
It does not state, however, that no compensation is required, only that the author may not prevent this to be done with works that have been divulged to the public.
But since Google doesn't qualify for this exemption, it means that the copies were unlawful.
The only thing in question in this judgment is how much of a prejudice to the authors the use Google made was, and there the ruling is much more debatable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494252</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261136160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.</p></div><p>You mean like the numerous Americans and English who mock immigrants who don't speak perfect English even though the immigrant knows two or three languages and the native English speaker can only (if lucky) manage one?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) It hard to " speak with people " who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule , especially when you do n't speak French.You mean like the numerous Americans and English who mock immigrants who do n't speak perfect English even though the immigrant knows two or three languages and the native English speaker can only ( if lucky ) manage one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.You mean like the numerous Americans and English who mock immigrants who don't speak perfect English even though the immigrant knows two or three languages and the native English speaker can only (if lucky) manage one?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493034</id>
	<title>Does that mean</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>it involved using the tongue?</htmltext>
<tokenext>it involved using the tongue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it involved using the tongue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>dropadrop</author>
	<datestamp>1261134120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.</p></div><p>I've been to France quite often, and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French. I was never subject to any ridicule, but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French. I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole, but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>2) From what I have heard, the country French are a very hospitable people, warm and willing to share their culture with the world. It is really only the Parisians that have a (deserved) reputation for being arrogant. Unfortunately, Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit.

3) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond "bi-lingualism" and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians.

In general, France was once a big global superpower; France was once the center for tecnology, and French was the "Lingua Franca" used in diplomacy throughout the world. The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true. However, this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world. If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before, just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like!</p></div><p>My findings with modern young french people is that most of them do actually speak some English (mind you this is just Paris I'm talking about). However they are very ashamed to try as they are very bad at it. I don't know if it's really due to the way most native French speaking people play with words in a way you can't really do with English and it makes their attempts feel even worse, but that's the feeling I got.

Anyway, I've found that after making a total fool out of yourself trying to communicate with your hands and bad french almost everybody suddenly speaks English...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) It hard to " speak with people " who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule , especially when you do n't speak French.I 've been to France quite often , and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French .
I was never subject to any ridicule , but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French .
I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole , but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.2 ) From what I have heard , the country French are a very hospitable people , warm and willing to share their culture with the world .
It is really only the Parisians that have a ( deserved ) reputation for being arrogant .
Unfortunately , Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit .
3 ) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond " bi-lingualism " and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians .
In general , France was once a big global superpower ; France was once the center for tecnology , and French was the " Lingua Franca " used in diplomacy throughout the world .
The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true .
However , this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world .
If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before , just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like ! My findings with modern young french people is that most of them do actually speak some English ( mind you this is just Paris I 'm talking about ) .
However they are very ashamed to try as they are very bad at it .
I do n't know if it 's really due to the way most native French speaking people play with words in a way you ca n't really do with English and it makes their attempts feel even worse , but that 's the feeling I got .
Anyway , I 've found that after making a total fool out of yourself trying to communicate with your hands and bad french almost everybody suddenly speaks English.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) It hard to "speak with people" who insist that everyone speak perfect French or be subject ridicule, especially when you don't speak French.I've been to France quite often, and on most of my visits I did not speak a word of French.
I was never subject to any ridicule, but I never expected anyone to speak more English or Finnish then I spoke French.
I understand somebody could have bad luck and meet an asshole, but if everybody you meet are assholes you should look in the mirror for a cause.2) From what I have heard, the country French are a very hospitable people, warm and willing to share their culture with the world.
It is really only the Parisians that have a (deserved) reputation for being arrogant.
Unfortunately, Paris is the only part of France that most people ever visit.
3) The Quebecois have earned some degree of disrespect since their insistence on the use of French goes far beyond "bi-lingualism" and may be regarded by some as discriminating against the majority English-speaking Canadians.
In general, France was once a big global superpower; France was once the center for tecnology, and French was the "Lingua Franca" used in diplomacy throughout the world.
The French appear more than a little pissed off that this is no longer true.
However, this just gives us a preview of the kind of attitude we will be getting from the Americans in a few years when China becomes the economic and technological center of the world.
If you thought the French were acting like arrogant assholes before, just wait 'til you see what the Americans act like!My findings with modern young french people is that most of them do actually speak some English (mind you this is just Paris I'm talking about).
However they are very ashamed to try as they are very bad at it.
I don't know if it's really due to the way most native French speaking people play with words in a way you can't really do with English and it makes their attempts feel even worse, but that's the feeling I got.
Anyway, I've found that after making a total fool out of yourself trying to communicate with your hands and bad french almost everybody suddenly speaks English...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493802</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>grumbel</author>
	<datestamp>1261133820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds to me like Google is doing a little civil disobedience here. The publishers and libraries had now a good 10 years to get their act together and put a decent online offering up, but what have they done? Pretty much nothing. So Google being a little ignorant to the law and doing what they think is the right thing to do, really sounds like a good thing, as it might one way or the other, lead finally to a situation where the Internet is no longer ignored by the other side.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds to me like Google is doing a little civil disobedience here .
The publishers and libraries had now a good 10 years to get their act together and put a decent online offering up , but what have they done ?
Pretty much nothing .
So Google being a little ignorant to the law and doing what they think is the right thing to do , really sounds like a good thing , as it might one way or the other , lead finally to a situation where the Internet is no longer ignored by the other side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds to me like Google is doing a little civil disobedience here.
The publishers and libraries had now a good 10 years to get their act together and put a decent online offering up, but what have they done?
Pretty much nothing.
So Google being a little ignorant to the law and doing what they think is the right thing to do, really sounds like a good thing, as it might one way or the other, lead finally to a situation where the Internet is no longer ignored by the other side.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492968</id>
	<title>Wait for it...</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1261129980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cue all the Americans whining about those Europeans daring to stand in the way of their corporate imperialism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cue all the Americans whining about those Europeans daring to stand in the way of their corporate imperialism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cue all the Americans whining about those Europeans daring to stand in the way of their corporate imperialism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498182</id>
	<title>Re:\_Some\_ US authors and publishers</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1261234260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not exactly.  I have a book published in the USA, so I was recently informed that I was part of this lawsuit.  Because it was granted class status, you have to explicitly opt out not to be considered part of the class, so most authors were involved, they just didn't give more than their implicit consent to be involved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not exactly .
I have a book published in the USA , so I was recently informed that I was part of this lawsuit .
Because it was granted class status , you have to explicitly opt out not to be considered part of the class , so most authors were involved , they just did n't give more than their implicit consent to be involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not exactly.
I have a book published in the USA, so I was recently informed that I was part of this lawsuit.
Because it was granted class status, you have to explicitly opt out not to be considered part of the class, so most authors were involved, they just didn't give more than their implicit consent to be involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</id>
	<title>Found?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1261130160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google wasn't found guilty.  They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.</p><p>They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is valid even for a mega corp like Google.</p><p>THAT, my friends, is the real shocker.</p><p>And all you Googlebots can bitch about the law all you want, that's fine.  Get the laws changed (in France, here, wherever).  But Google brazenly did shit that was completely illegal.  I am glad they got hit for it.</p><p>Corporations should NOT be above the law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google was n't found guilty .
They were openly , admittedly , unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is valid even for a mega corp like Google.THAT , my friends , is the real shocker.And all you Googlebots can bitch about the law all you want , that 's fine .
Get the laws changed ( in France , here , wherever ) .
But Google brazenly did shit that was completely illegal .
I am glad they got hit for it.Corporations should NOT be above the law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google wasn't found guilty.
They were openly, admittedly, unabashedly guilty of digitizing and putting up excerpts of books they did not hold ANY copyright to.They only thing that happened was that the court decided the this law is valid even for a mega corp like Google.THAT, my friends, is the real shocker.And all you Googlebots can bitch about the law all you want, that's fine.
Get the laws changed (in France, here, wherever).
But Google brazenly did shit that was completely illegal.
I am glad they got hit for it.Corporations should NOT be above the law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128</id>
	<title>Make sense</title>
	<author>0xABADC0DA</author>
	<datestamp>1261130640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google makes unauthorized copies of people's work to store in their servers, in some way similar to how Psystar is found guilty of making unauthorized copies of Mac OS X when it loads it into memory.</p><p>Then Google makes money hand over fist from it by selling search results/ads and the people producing the content get nothing or -at best- a very tiny fraction of the income.  'Take from the rich and keep for our own rich selves' sounds a lot like 'do evil' to me.</p><p>If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.  Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?  In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google makes unauthorized copies of people 's work to store in their servers , in some way similar to how Psystar is found guilty of making unauthorized copies of Mac OS X when it loads it into memory.Then Google makes money hand over fist from it by selling search results/ads and the people producing the content get nothing or -at best- a very tiny fraction of the income .
'Take from the rich and keep for our own rich selves ' sounds a lot like 'do evil ' to me.If your content shows up in Google 's results and they make any money off it , then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money .
Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all ?
In a fair world , google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site 's contents appears in a search result with ads in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google makes unauthorized copies of people's work to store in their servers, in some way similar to how Psystar is found guilty of making unauthorized copies of Mac OS X when it loads it into memory.Then Google makes money hand over fist from it by selling search results/ads and the people producing the content get nothing or -at best- a very tiny fraction of the income.
'Take from the rich and keep for our own rich selves' sounds a lot like 'do evil' to me.If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.
Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?
In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497240</id>
	<title>Just curious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261256220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is <i>3-strikes law</i> applicable to Google in France?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is 3-strikes law applicable to Google in France ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is 3-strikes law applicable to Google in France?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492910</id>
	<title>That's like regular copyright infringement but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...with tongues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...with tongues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...with tongues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493500</id>
	<title>Make NO sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference is "Fair Use".</p><p>The Doctrine of Fair Use states that very small excerpts of a copyrighted work may be used for academic teaching, political commentary, and indexing.</p><p>Competition with the actual author of the work with a verbatim copy, as in the Psystar case, is clearly not fair use.</p><p>This ruling, upholding the French version of the DMCA (except far more draconian), essentially says that you can sue a Phone Book company for putting the copyrighted name of your business in their phone book.   It also makes programming open/free software into a "<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/27/frances-new-copyrigh.html" title="boingboing.net">suicide mission</a> [boingboing.net]".   France is going to suffer decreased competition from these laws, and likely stunt their intellectual services economy as a result.</p><p>Maybe it's not the same degree of mistake as Vietnam and Iraq that the French warned Americans against, but it will hurt them economically in the long run quite badly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is " Fair Use " .The Doctrine of Fair Use states that very small excerpts of a copyrighted work may be used for academic teaching , political commentary , and indexing.Competition with the actual author of the work with a verbatim copy , as in the Psystar case , is clearly not fair use.This ruling , upholding the French version of the DMCA ( except far more draconian ) , essentially says that you can sue a Phone Book company for putting the copyrighted name of your business in their phone book .
It also makes programming open/free software into a " suicide mission [ boingboing.net ] " .
France is going to suffer decreased competition from these laws , and likely stunt their intellectual services economy as a result.Maybe it 's not the same degree of mistake as Vietnam and Iraq that the French warned Americans against , but it will hurt them economically in the long run quite badly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is "Fair Use".The Doctrine of Fair Use states that very small excerpts of a copyrighted work may be used for academic teaching, political commentary, and indexing.Competition with the actual author of the work with a verbatim copy, as in the Psystar case, is clearly not fair use.This ruling, upholding the French version of the DMCA (except far more draconian), essentially says that you can sue a Phone Book company for putting the copyrighted name of your business in their phone book.
It also makes programming open/free software into a "suicide mission [boingboing.net]".
France is going to suffer decreased competition from these laws, and likely stunt their intellectual services economy as a result.Maybe it's not the same degree of mistake as Vietnam and Iraq that the French warned Americans against, but it will hurt them economically in the long run quite badly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30510620</id>
	<title>Undoing wrong moderation - do not read</title>
	<author>langarto</author>
	<datestamp>1261397460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This comment is to undo a wrong moderation. Slashdot interface sucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This comment is to undo a wrong moderation .
Slashdot interface sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This comment is to undo a wrong moderation.
Slashdot interface sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493252</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1261131180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The effectiveness of a particular promotional channel is irrelevant if the act itself is illegal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The effectiveness of a particular promotional channel is irrelevant if the act itself is illegal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The effectiveness of a particular promotional channel is irrelevant if the act itself is illegal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492512</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but it's France....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perfect. +5 Funny</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perfect .
+ 5 Funny</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perfect.
+5 Funny</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493758</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261133520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about we go all big picture here.... google's mission is to learn as much about you as possible to use that information against you to sell you things and sway your political opinion.</p><p>Knowing what books you read is some pretty heavy shit.</p><p>Get over the "google is so open-source it makes my thighs sweat" and take a moment to think about the future implications of a single CORPORATION knowing so much about you.</p><p>And please don't give me the "just don't use it" argument, 99 percent of users don't understand the difference between the monitor and the actual computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we go all big picture here.... google 's mission is to learn as much about you as possible to use that information against you to sell you things and sway your political opinion.Knowing what books you read is some pretty heavy shit.Get over the " google is so open-source it makes my thighs sweat " and take a moment to think about the future implications of a single CORPORATION knowing so much about you.And please do n't give me the " just do n't use it " argument , 99 percent of users do n't understand the difference between the monitor and the actual computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we go all big picture here.... google's mission is to learn as much about you as possible to use that information against you to sell you things and sway your political opinion.Knowing what books you read is some pretty heavy shit.Get over the "google is so open-source it makes my thighs sweat" and take a moment to think about the future implications of a single CORPORATION knowing so much about you.And please don't give me the "just don't use it" argument, 99 percent of users don't understand the difference between the monitor and the actual computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493266</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261131300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>France didn't surender to Google???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>France did n't surender to Google ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>France didn't surender to Google??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30500190</id>
	<title>Strike One?</title>
	<author>BSalita</author>
	<datestamp>1261255620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this count under the French three strike rule? I bet it will. Nothing like a good threat to extract the upper hand in negotiations. I'll bet some mouthy minister takes up the threat to cut off Google's Internet access under the three strike rule. Nationalism, populism and greed will surely overpower any talk about citizen's benefits. The big loser is not Google, it's the citizens of France.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this count under the French three strike rule ?
I bet it will .
Nothing like a good threat to extract the upper hand in negotiations .
I 'll bet some mouthy minister takes up the threat to cut off Google 's Internet access under the three strike rule .
Nationalism , populism and greed will surely overpower any talk about citizen 's benefits .
The big loser is not Google , it 's the citizens of France .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this count under the French three strike rule?
I bet it will.
Nothing like a good threat to extract the upper hand in negotiations.
I'll bet some mouthy minister takes up the threat to cut off Google's Internet access under the three strike rule.
Nationalism, populism and greed will surely overpower any talk about citizen's benefits.
The big loser is not Google, it's the citizens of France.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493594</id>
	<title>Re:With the rise of the EU...</title>
	<author>ivucica</author>
	<datestamp>1261132620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now that the "fuck you" attitude is suddenly coming from this side of the atlantic, it's a problem? Software patents, copyright lobbyists are European products, right? If the coin needs flipping sometimes, I'm all for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now that the " fuck you " attitude is suddenly coming from this side of the atlantic , it 's a problem ?
Software patents , copyright lobbyists are European products , right ?
If the coin needs flipping sometimes , I 'm all for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now that the "fuck you" attitude is suddenly coming from this side of the atlantic, it's a problem?
Software patents, copyright lobbyists are European products, right?
If the coin needs flipping sometimes, I'm all for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493570</id>
	<title>Re:Make sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261132500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.  Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?  In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in it.</p></div><p>If your content shows up in Google's results, then Google is giving you advertising and publicity. Would you rather pay for that? Is your perfect model that Google pays you for indexing your data, and then you pay Google for offering that content in their searches?<br> <br>

Additionally, if you don't want to show up on their results because it's unfair that your website is making them so much money, I have a robots.txt to sell you, Mr Murdoch...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your content shows up in Google 's results and they make any money off it , then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money .
Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all ?
In a fair world , google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site 's contents appears in a search result with ads in it.If your content shows up in Google 's results , then Google is giving you advertising and publicity .
Would you rather pay for that ?
Is your perfect model that Google pays you for indexing your data , and then you pay Google for offering that content in their searches ?
Additionally , if you do n't want to show up on their results because it 's unfair that your website is making them so much money , I have a robots.txt to sell you , Mr Murdoch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your content shows up in Google's results and they make any money off it, then you as the creator of that content should get a portion of that money.
Otherwise why do we have copyright laws at all?
In a fair world, google and bing should need to set up accounts for each website and pay back a portion of their revenue each time that site's contents appears in a search result with ads in it.If your content shows up in Google's results, then Google is giving you advertising and publicity.
Would you rather pay for that?
Is your perfect model that Google pays you for indexing your data, and then you pay Google for offering that content in their searches?
Additionally, if you don't want to show up on their results because it's unfair that your website is making them so much money, I have a robots.txt to sell you, Mr Murdoch...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494106</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>j00r0m4nc3r</author>
	<datestamp>1261135440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I look down on everyone, without bias or prejudice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I look down on everyone , without bias or prejudice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look down on everyone, without bias or prejudice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492966</id>
	<title>Re:Still better than the CRIA</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1261129980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot help but smile at the karmic deliciousness of a "RIA" organization being sued for billions for infringement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not help but smile at the karmic deliciousness of a " RIA " organization being sued for billions for infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot help but smile at the karmic deliciousness of a "RIA" organization being sued for billions for infringement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493818</id>
	<title>Re:Still better than the CRIA</title>
	<author>cababunga</author>
	<datestamp>1261133880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow! This deserves its own story on Slashdot. Or there was one but I missed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
This deserves its own story on Slashdot .
Or there was one but I missed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
This deserves its own story on Slashdot.
Or there was one but I missed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493790</id>
	<title>Re:Make sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261133700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit. Fair use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .
Fair use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.
Fair use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497782</id>
	<title>Copyright is not absolute, even in France</title>
	<author>jjo</author>
	<datestamp>1261226340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the court decided was that Google's actions do not come within the scope of the exceptions to French Copyright law (Article 122-5 of the <i>Code de la propri&#233;t&#233; intellectuelle</i>).  While France does not recognize "fair use" as do some common-law countries such as the USA, it does provide for a number of exceptions which are similar in nature.  The court case hinged on whether Google's admitted actions fell within these exceptions.
<p>
Corporations should indeed not be above the law, including corporations that hold copyrights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the court decided was that Google 's actions do not come within the scope of the exceptions to French Copyright law ( Article 122-5 of the Code de la propri   t   intellectuelle ) .
While France does not recognize " fair use " as do some common-law countries such as the USA , it does provide for a number of exceptions which are similar in nature .
The court case hinged on whether Google 's admitted actions fell within these exceptions .
Corporations should indeed not be above the law , including corporations that hold copyrights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the court decided was that Google's actions do not come within the scope of the exceptions to French Copyright law (Article 122-5 of the Code de la propriété intellectuelle).
While France does not recognize "fair use" as do some common-law countries such as the USA, it does provide for a number of exceptions which are similar in nature.
The court case hinged on whether Google's admitted actions fell within these exceptions.
Corporations should indeed not be above the law, including corporations that hold copyrights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746</id>
	<title>I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261129080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have thought that extracts of books on Google would be the best possible advertising that you could have for a book - you do a search, and find a useful extract from a book, naturally you want to know more, but google won't give you any more, so you follow the handy advertising link at the side and buy it off Amazon - everyone wins.<br> <br>

I cannot believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales, and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers. <br> <br>

So what are they complaining about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have thought that extracts of books on Google would be the best possible advertising that you could have for a book - you do a search , and find a useful extract from a book , naturally you want to know more , but google wo n't give you any more , so you follow the handy advertising link at the side and buy it off Amazon - everyone wins .
I can not believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales , and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers .
So what are they complaining about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have thought that extracts of books on Google would be the best possible advertising that you could have for a book - you do a search, and find a useful extract from a book, naturally you want to know more, but google won't give you any more, so you follow the handy advertising link at the side and buy it off Amazon - everyone wins.
I cannot believe that google extracts are in any way damaging book sales, and therefore causing harm to the authors or publishers.
So what are they complaining about?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492430</id>
	<title>With the rise of the EU...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the rise of the EU, which is now a direct business competitor to other major powers like the US, Russia and China, we are bound to see more fuck-you rulings like this.</p><p>We've already seen it with the Oracle-Sun acquisition. Being mainly American companies, the EU has dicked them around time and time again when it comes to reviewing the proposed merging of the companies.</p><p>This should raise a warning flag when dealing with European businesses or getting into European markets. Just being from the wrong side of the Atlantic could raise a whole lot of headaches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the rise of the EU , which is now a direct business competitor to other major powers like the US , Russia and China , we are bound to see more fuck-you rulings like this.We 've already seen it with the Oracle-Sun acquisition .
Being mainly American companies , the EU has dicked them around time and time again when it comes to reviewing the proposed merging of the companies.This should raise a warning flag when dealing with European businesses or getting into European markets .
Just being from the wrong side of the Atlantic could raise a whole lot of headaches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the rise of the EU, which is now a direct business competitor to other major powers like the US, Russia and China, we are bound to see more fuck-you rulings like this.We've already seen it with the Oracle-Sun acquisition.
Being mainly American companies, the EU has dicked them around time and time again when it comes to reviewing the proposed merging of the companies.This should raise a warning flag when dealing with European businesses or getting into European markets.
Just being from the wrong side of the Atlantic could raise a whole lot of headaches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492484</id>
	<title>Re:LMAO this is BS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">goatse.<b>fr</b> </a> [goatse.fr] for a reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's goatse.fr [ goatse.fr ] for a reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's goatse.fr  [goatse.fr] for a reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494282</id>
	<title>Re:Really impressive</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1261136340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The French are often very nice and easy to get along with so I'm cool with them. But like any other group, some individuals are nice and some aren't.
<br> <br>
The US, unfortunately, kept a hold of the islander mentality that the English have so many of them are afraid of anything different.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The French are often very nice and easy to get along with so I 'm cool with them .
But like any other group , some individuals are nice and some are n't .
The US , unfortunately , kept a hold of the islander mentality that the English have so many of them are afraid of anything different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The French are often very nice and easy to get along with so I'm cool with them.
But like any other group, some individuals are nice and some aren't.
The US, unfortunately, kept a hold of the islander mentality that the English have so many of them are afraid of anything different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858</id>
	<title>Really impressive</title>
	<author>bdunogier</author>
	<datestamp>1261129500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi ! French / Frog / Egg eater (pick the one you like the most) here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

While I'm also a bit annoyed by this decision, they still have a point... but this is not what I wanna debate here.
Even though I try to get the funny parts of most comments here, I am still extremely impressed by how you guys can look down on people you probably haven't ever spoke with (frenchies I mean), probably based on what you can see/read in the medias. Yes, most frenchies do look down on you the same way, but as slashdot users, who pretend to be part of the "internet revolution", which as far as I see it should provide all of us with accurate, real information standard, main stream media wouldn't provide us with. Really ironic.

And yes, I do think the same about a good proportion of my fellow frenchies.

No offense indended here, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi !
French / Frog / Egg eater ( pick the one you like the most ) here : ) While I 'm also a bit annoyed by this decision , they still have a point... but this is not what I wan na debate here .
Even though I try to get the funny parts of most comments here , I am still extremely impressed by how you guys can look down on people you probably have n't ever spoke with ( frenchies I mean ) , probably based on what you can see/read in the medias .
Yes , most frenchies do look down on you the same way , but as slashdot users , who pretend to be part of the " internet revolution " , which as far as I see it should provide all of us with accurate , real information standard , main stream media would n't provide us with .
Really ironic .
And yes , I do think the same about a good proportion of my fellow frenchies .
No offense indended here , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi !
French / Frog / Egg eater (pick the one you like the most) here :)

While I'm also a bit annoyed by this decision, they still have a point... but this is not what I wanna debate here.
Even though I try to get the funny parts of most comments here, I am still extremely impressed by how you guys can look down on people you probably haven't ever spoke with (frenchies I mean), probably based on what you can see/read in the medias.
Yes, most frenchies do look down on you the same way, but as slashdot users, who pretend to be part of the "internet revolution", which as far as I see it should provide all of us with accurate, real information standard, main stream media wouldn't provide us with.
Really ironic.
And yes, I do think the same about a good proportion of my fellow frenchies.
No offense indended here, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496736</id>
	<title>Re:LMAO this is BS</title>
	<author>ps2os2</author>
	<datestamp>1261160820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who thinks Jerry Louis was funny has some lame idea what funny is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who thinks Jerry Louis was funny has some lame idea what funny is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who thinks Jerry Louis was funny has some lame idea what funny is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493264</id>
	<title>Re:Found?</title>
	<author>Sparr0</author>
	<datestamp>1261131240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until today I didn't know Google had a presence in France.  How many billions of dollars would a judgment need to be to make it worthwhile for them to just pack up and leave?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until today I did n't know Google had a presence in France .
How many billions of dollars would a judgment need to be to make it worthwhile for them to just pack up and leave ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until today I didn't know Google had a presence in France.
How many billions of dollars would a judgment need to be to make it worthwhile for them to just pack up and leave?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30510620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30501618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30503330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30552802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1835258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493142
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30552802
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493870
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494320
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494456
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30501618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494252
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30510620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30492968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30495798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30496774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30503330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30494180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30498204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30497782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1835258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1835258.30493034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
