<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1810250</id>
	<title>DECAF Was Just a Stunt, Now Over</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1261162140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes to tell us of the <a href="http://www.decafme.org/">de-activation of all copies of DECAF</a>. The creators have announced that the DECAF project was nothing more than a "stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools."  Originally DECAF was billed as a tool to <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/12/16/0239231/Hackers-Counter-Microsoft-COFEE-With-Some-DECAF">stop Microsoft's forensic tool "COFEE"</a> and was covered here earlier this week. In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion, so who knows what the real goal was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes to tell us of the de-activation of all copies of DECAF .
The creators have announced that the DECAF project was nothing more than a " stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools .
" Originally DECAF was billed as a tool to stop Microsoft 's forensic tool " COFEE " and was covered here earlier this week .
In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion , so who knows what the real goal was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes to tell us of the de-activation of all copies of DECAF.
The creators have announced that the DECAF project was nothing more than a "stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools.
"  Originally DECAF was billed as a tool to stop Microsoft's forensic tool "COFEE" and was covered here earlier this week.
In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion, so who knows what the real goal was.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210</id>
	<title>Good luck with Jesus, buddy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The jokes on him when he dies and rots into the ground like all the rest of the organic lifeforms.  Meanwhile he'll waste a good portion of his life babbling about his "savior".
<br> <br>
The poor sap is going to miss out on a lot of good porn!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The jokes on him when he dies and rots into the ground like all the rest of the organic lifeforms .
Meanwhile he 'll waste a good portion of his life babbling about his " savior " .
The poor sap is going to miss out on a lot of good porn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The jokes on him when he dies and rots into the ground like all the rest of the organic lifeforms.
Meanwhile he'll waste a good portion of his life babbling about his "savior".
The poor sap is going to miss out on a lot of good porn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491604</id>
	<title>Phew..</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1261168320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh good, the site is down. Now we can all forget about what this moron's message was(whatever it was) and move on with our lives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh good , the site is down .
Now we can all forget about what this moron 's message was ( whatever it was ) and move on with our lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh good, the site is down.
Now we can all forget about what this moron's message was(whatever it was) and move on with our lives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491768</id>
	<title>Re:Not open source, don't trust it.</title>
	<author>jason.sweet</author>
	<datestamp>1261168800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing...</p></div><p>Yeah!  Right!<br>
The closest this hacker Jesus freak gets to womanizing is when his mom brings his hot pockets to the basement!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would still be with my addictive behaviors ; womanizing...Yeah !
Right ! The closest this hacker Jesus freak gets to womanizing is when his mom brings his hot pockets to the basement !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing...Yeah!
Right!
The closest this hacker Jesus freak gets to womanizing is when his mom brings his hot pockets to the basement!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491316</id>
	<title>Ha</title>
	<author>Improv</author>
	<datestamp>1261167000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the coffee was spiked with something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the coffee was spiked with something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the coffee was spiked with something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492006</id>
	<title>Countdown to REAL DECAF in 3, 2, 1 ....</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1261169640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you are aware that it wont take long before some party comes up with a working DECAF after this point, right ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you are aware that it wont take long before some party comes up with a working DECAF after this point , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you are aware that it wont take long before some party comes up with a working DECAF after this point, right ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491070</id>
	<title>Timebombware</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a perfect example of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time\_bomb\_(software)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">a software time bomb</a> [wikipedia.org]. I hope anyone who downloaded it learned their lesson. Unlikely, since anyone who downloaded it is still using Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a perfect example of a software time bomb [ wikipedia.org ] .
I hope anyone who downloaded it learned their lesson .
Unlikely , since anyone who downloaded it is still using Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a perfect example of a software time bomb [wikipedia.org].
I hope anyone who downloaded it learned their lesson.
Unlikely, since anyone who downloaded it is still using Windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493700</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck with Jesus, buddy</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1261133220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who modded this flamebait? The whole frickin story's flamebait, just go with it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who modded this flamebait ?
The whole frickin story 's flamebait , just go with it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who modded this flamebait?
The whole frickin story's flamebait, just go with it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188</id>
	<title>Good luck with that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all "shame on you!" for downloading and using software that they themselves created, provided, and handed out.  I can't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously, as a result.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all " shame on you !
" for downloading and using software that they themselves created , provided , and handed out .
I ca n't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously , as a result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all "shame on you!
" for downloading and using software that they themselves created, provided, and handed out.
I can't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously, as a result.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491670</id>
	<title>Re:What is it that is bad, exactly?</title>
	<author>LOLLinux</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because using lies and hoaxes to spread the word of Jeebus is somewhat hypocritical?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because using lies and hoaxes to spread the word of Jeebus is somewhat hypocritical ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because using lies and hoaxes to spread the word of Jeebus is somewhat hypocritical?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414</id>
	<title>Disabled? How?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How exactly are they going to disable it remotely, when my firewall blocks the connections, and I can always reinstall a cracked download, when it disables itself with a timer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How exactly are they going to disable it remotely , when my firewall blocks the connections , and I can always reinstall a cracked download , when it disables itself with a timer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How exactly are they going to disable it remotely, when my firewall blocks the connections, and I can always reinstall a cracked download, when it disables itself with a timer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492178</id>
	<title>Re:Huh what?</title>
	<author>Captain Splendid</author>
	<datestamp>1261127100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, bravo!  Kudos, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , bravo !
Kudos , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, bravo!
Kudos, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491862</id>
	<title>First Po5t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To them...then IT a break, If</htmltext>
<tokenext>To them...then IT a break , If</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To them...then IT a break, If</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491502</id>
	<title>Clearly this was chicory</title>
	<author>assemblerex</author>
	<datestamp>1261167840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and not even cofee based in the first place...</htmltext>
<tokenext>and not even cofee based in the first place.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and not even cofee based in the first place...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492130</id>
	<title>Re:Ummmm... Okay?</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1261126860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When I saw the original announcement of this program, I was skeptical of what it was actually for.   However, I didn't see this type of angle coming!  LOL, wow!</p></div><p>Few would have guessed that there was an <i>angel</i> coming.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw the original announcement of this program , I was skeptical of what it was actually for .
However , I did n't see this type of angle coming !
LOL , wow ! Few would have guessed that there was an angel coming .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw the original announcement of this program, I was skeptical of what it was actually for.
However, I didn't see this type of angle coming!
LOL, wow!Few would have guessed that there was an angel coming.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491320</id>
	<title>Re:Huh what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491092</id>
	<title>I believe I speak for everybody</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1261166160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When after reading that I reply with "WTF?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When after reading that I reply with " WTF ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When after reading that I reply with "WTF?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493068</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck with Jesus, buddy</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1261130400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?</p></div><p>If when you're 16 someone emails you and arranges to send you millions of dollars from Nigeria what's the point of having an education?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway ? If when you 're 16 someone emails you and arranges to send you millions of dollars from Nigeria what 's the point of having an education ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?If when you're 16 someone emails you and arranges to send you millions of dollars from Nigeria what's the point of having an education?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492106</id>
	<title>Re:Disabled? How?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. It's a silly claim to say 'we have deactivated all copies of DECAF'. It's a bit hard to deactivate DECAF in an isolated virtual machine where every day is December 1st 2009.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
It 's a silly claim to say 'we have deactivated all copies of DECAF' .
It 's a bit hard to deactivate DECAF in an isolated virtual machine where every day is December 1st 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
It's a silly claim to say 'we have deactivated all copies of DECAF'.
It's a bit hard to deactivate DECAF in an isolated virtual machine where every day is December 1st 2009.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492492</id>
	<title>Re:Not open source, don't trust it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting. DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions."
<br> <br>
Except this "Christian" did those things.  DECAF did involve lying and manipulation.  I'd probably include hacking and maybe stealing as well.  It certainly wasn't something an honorable Christian would do.  We're all hypocrites at times, but I find it hard to take this guy seriously.  Maybe he only stopped because he his religious beliefs conflicted with what he was doing.  If so, the first step in atoning is admitting you've sinned.  It's not mocking others.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I would still be with my addictive behaviors ; womanizing , pornography , stealing , hacking , lieing , manipulating , and fighting .
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions .
" Except this " Christian " did those things .
DECAF did involve lying and manipulation .
I 'd probably include hacking and maybe stealing as well .
It certainly was n't something an honorable Christian would do .
We 're all hypocrites at times , but I find it hard to take this guy seriously .
Maybe he only stopped because he his religious beliefs conflicted with what he was doing .
If so , the first step in atoning is admitting you 've sinned .
It 's not mocking others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting.
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions.
"
 
Except this "Christian" did those things.
DECAF did involve lying and manipulation.
I'd probably include hacking and maybe stealing as well.
It certainly wasn't something an honorable Christian would do.
We're all hypocrites at times, but I find it hard to take this guy seriously.
Maybe he only stopped because he his religious beliefs conflicted with what he was doing.
If so, the first step in atoning is admitting you've sinned.
It's not mocking others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495216</id>
	<title>Re:Not open source, don't trust it.</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1261142520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It certainly wasn't something an honorable Christian would do."</p><p>There are no "honorable" Christians, because their superstition exists to empower those who would enslave the rest of us to their social vision.</p><p>The only people who speak of honor in conjunction with religion are superstitionists themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It certainly was n't something an honorable Christian would do .
" There are no " honorable " Christians , because their superstition exists to empower those who would enslave the rest of us to their social vision.The only people who speak of honor in conjunction with religion are superstitionists themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It certainly wasn't something an honorable Christian would do.
"There are no "honorable" Christians, because their superstition exists to empower those who would enslave the rest of us to their social vision.The only people who speak of honor in conjunction with religion are superstitionists themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30501440</id>
	<title>I'm a numerologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261230180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DECAF + C0FFEE = 13560989</p><p>This makes more sense than the target article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DECAF + C0FFEE = 13560989This makes more sense than the target article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DECAF + C0FFEE = 13560989This makes more sense than the target article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30496574</id>
	<title>Re:Disabled? How?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neither of those two will get it working again, it phones home and breaks if the proper message isn't sent. Of course you can set up a virtual host in Apache and a script to send the message and modify your hosts to point to your local copy, and it will work as before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither of those two will get it working again , it phones home and breaks if the proper message is n't sent .
Of course you can set up a virtual host in Apache and a script to send the message and modify your hosts to point to your local copy , and it will work as before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither of those two will get it working again, it phones home and breaks if the proper message isn't sent.
Of course you can set up a virtual host in Apache and a script to send the message and modify your hosts to point to your local copy, and it will work as before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492926</id>
	<title>Re:Not open source, don't trust it.</title>
	<author>cfalcon</author>
	<datestamp>1261129860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Offtopic lol.  GOOD MOD JOB BRO

Anyway, the other thing that was great is that they originally claimed not to release the source code because they didn't want Microsoft to patch around them, or some other nonsense.  Everyone in the original article who said that they wouldn't trust an anti-forensic tool that was closed source was 100\% correct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Offtopic lol .
GOOD MOD JOB BRO Anyway , the other thing that was great is that they originally claimed not to release the source code because they did n't want Microsoft to patch around them , or some other nonsense .
Everyone in the original article who said that they would n't trust an anti-forensic tool that was closed source was 100 \ % correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offtopic lol.
GOOD MOD JOB BRO

Anyway, the other thing that was great is that they originally claimed not to release the source code because they didn't want Microsoft to patch around them, or some other nonsense.
Everyone in the original article who said that they wouldn't trust an anti-forensic tool that was closed source was 100\% correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491036</id>
	<title>Just wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow at self righteous religious bullcrap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow at self righteous religious bullcrap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow at self righteous religious bullcrap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491012</id>
	<title>OMFG WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are we going to do now?!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are we going to do now ? ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are we going to do now?!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491284</id>
	<title>disappointing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion so who knows what the real goal was.</p></div></blockquote><p>  Considering that all but the first paragraph of the article was the religious message its self, I'd say that it is pretty clear what the goal was.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion so who knows what the real goal was .
Considering that all but the first paragraph of the article was the religious message its self , I 'd say that it is pretty clear what the goal was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion so who knows what the real goal was.
Considering that all but the first paragraph of the article was the religious message its self, I'd say that it is pretty clear what the goal was.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492324</id>
	<title>Re:What is it that is bad, exactly?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1261127520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that all copies of the software were deactivated remotely. It's a needless act of destruction, only somewhat justified by the fact that they themselves created it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that all copies of the software were deactivated remotely .
It 's a needless act of destruction , only somewhat justified by the fact that they themselves created it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that all copies of the software were deactivated remotely.
It's a needless act of destruction, only somewhat justified by the fact that they themselves created it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492360</id>
	<title>goverment threatens decafe authors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well it seems rather suspect to me that this comes out soo long after the tool was released. As the ideas behind the program where not out of teh relm of possiblity. I think the goverment would have a huge intrest in removing this software from peoples comeputers and punishing the authors. I mean if i was an author who wrote an anti govt comp forensics tool and they came knocking at my door threating to make me disapear like the rest of the terrorist they capture i would come out and say it was a hoax and deactivate it as well. I smell the stench of a goverment hand in this... Can some body say conspiracy............</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well it seems rather suspect to me that this comes out soo long after the tool was released .
As the ideas behind the program where not out of teh relm of possiblity .
I think the goverment would have a huge intrest in removing this software from peoples comeputers and punishing the authors .
I mean if i was an author who wrote an anti govt comp forensics tool and they came knocking at my door threating to make me disapear like the rest of the terrorist they capture i would come out and say it was a hoax and deactivate it as well .
I smell the stench of a goverment hand in this... Can some body say conspiracy........... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well it seems rather suspect to me that this comes out soo long after the tool was released.
As the ideas behind the program where not out of teh relm of possiblity.
I think the goverment would have a huge intrest in removing this software from peoples comeputers and punishing the authors.
I mean if i was an author who wrote an anti govt comp forensics tool and they came knocking at my door threating to make me disapear like the rest of the terrorist they capture i would come out and say it was a hoax and deactivate it as well.
I smell the stench of a goverment hand in this... Can some body say conspiracy............</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30497216</id>
	<title>Hacking  bad????</title>
	<author>jdc18</author>
	<datestamp>1261255560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>. I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting.

Since when hacking is a bad thing?

Or pornography?

 I will give it you stealing and womanizing. but hacking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
I would still be with my addictive behaviors ; womanizing , pornography , stealing , hacking , lieing , manipulating , and fighting .
Since when hacking is a bad thing ?
Or pornography ?
I will give it you stealing and womanizing .
but hacking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting.
Since when hacking is a bad thing?
Or pornography?
I will give it you stealing and womanizing.
but hacking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396</id>
	<title>Re:Huh what?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1261167360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you meant this:</p><p>1.  Make fake software.<br>2.  Make fake software work like it will outshine proprietary software.<br>3.  ???<br>4.  Prophet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you meant this : 1 .
Make fake software.2 .
Make fake software work like it will outshine proprietary software.3 .
? ? ? 4. Prophet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you meant this:1.
Make fake software.2.
Make fake software work like it will outshine proprietary software.3.
???4.  Prophet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491196</id>
	<title>Ummmm...  Okay?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I saw the original announcement of this program, I was skeptical of what it was actually for.   However, I didn't see this type of angle coming!  LOL, wow!
<br>
<br>
If you actually downloaded this thing, let this be a valuable lesson.  Don't be gullible.  This could have been a virus for your computer, instead of one for your mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw the original announcement of this program , I was skeptical of what it was actually for .
However , I did n't see this type of angle coming !
LOL , wow !
If you actually downloaded this thing , let this be a valuable lesson .
Do n't be gullible .
This could have been a virus for your computer , instead of one for your mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw the original announcement of this program, I was skeptical of what it was actually for.
However, I didn't see this type of angle coming!
LOL, wow!
If you actually downloaded this thing, let this be a valuable lesson.
Don't be gullible.
This could have been a virus for your computer, instead of one for your mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492150</id>
	<title>Re:I believe I speak for everybody</title>
	<author>r00tyroot</author>
	<datestamp>1261126920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>or, WTFWJD?</htmltext>
<tokenext>or , WTFWJD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or, WTFWJD?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492568</id>
	<title>Re:Huh what?</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1261128360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well played sir. The only time a 123??4 Profit joke has ever made me laugh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well played sir .
The only time a 123 ?
? 4 Profit joke has ever made me laugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well played sir.
The only time a 123?
?4 Profit joke has ever made me laugh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30494956</id>
	<title>Re:So release a crack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Already been disassembled!  I'd have to track it down for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Already been disassembled !
I 'd have to track it down for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Already been disassembled!
I'd have to track it down for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30496714</id>
	<title>What a load of nonsense</title>
	<author>danielkennedy74</author>
	<datestamp>1261160640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The tool didn't send data to decafme, didn't open any backdoors, isn't really disabled for anyone with half a brain, and was a stunt but never a hoax:

Reactivate DECAF in two minutes:
<a href="http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/12/reactivating-decaf-in-two-minutes/" title="praetorianprefect.com" rel="nofollow">http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/12/reactivating-decaf-in-two-minutes/</a> [praetorianprefect.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The tool did n't send data to decafme , did n't open any backdoors , is n't really disabled for anyone with half a brain , and was a stunt but never a hoax : Reactivate DECAF in two minutes : http : //praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/12/reactivating-decaf-in-two-minutes/ [ praetorianprefect.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tool didn't send data to decafme, didn't open any backdoors, isn't really disabled for anyone with half a brain, and was a stunt but never a hoax:

Reactivate DECAF in two minutes:
http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/12/reactivating-decaf-in-two-minutes/ [praetorianprefect.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492234</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck with Jesus, buddy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?</p></div><p>If all you need to do is accept Jeebus as your saviour to earn eternal bliss, then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway ? If all you need to do is accept Jeebus as your saviour to earn eternal bliss , then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?If all you need to do is accept Jeebus as your saviour to earn eternal bliss, then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470</id>
	<title>Not open source, don't trust it.</title>
	<author>cfalcon</author>
	<datestamp>1261167720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't ever go wrong with that, this is just one more example.</p><p>Shame on slashdot for being fooled.  And shame on anyone who trusted a bunch of anti-privacy lunatics with religious motivation.  Here's a great quote:</p><p>"I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting. DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions."</p><p>He's ok with centralization of power.  I wonder what he would think if that power was used to detect and eliminate religious people, if having a copy of the Bible was what "computer forensic" tools were used for.  These windbags can't see past their own nose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't ever go wrong with that , this is just one more example.Shame on slashdot for being fooled .
And shame on anyone who trusted a bunch of anti-privacy lunatics with religious motivation .
Here 's a great quote : " I would still be with my addictive behaviors ; womanizing , pornography , stealing , hacking , lieing , manipulating , and fighting .
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions .
" He 's ok with centralization of power .
I wonder what he would think if that power was used to detect and eliminate religious people , if having a copy of the Bible was what " computer forensic " tools were used for .
These windbags ca n't see past their own nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't ever go wrong with that, this is just one more example.Shame on slashdot for being fooled.
And shame on anyone who trusted a bunch of anti-privacy lunatics with religious motivation.
Here's a great quote:"I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting.
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions.
"He's ok with centralization of power.
I wonder what he would think if that power was used to detect and eliminate religious people, if having a copy of the Bible was what "computer forensic" tools were used for.
These windbags can't see past their own nose.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30501410</id>
	<title>Hmm. Our Lord and Savior, Windows</title>
	<author>Torodung</author>
	<datestamp>1261229820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, now we know why it works so well on XP.</p><p>(Read that as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi\_Rho" title="wikipedia.org">Chi-Rho</a> [wikipedia.org], as often seen on altars)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , now we know why it works so well on XP .
( Read that as Chi-Rho [ wikipedia.org ] , as often seen on altars )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, now we know why it works so well on XP.
(Read that as Chi-Rho [wikipedia.org], as often seen on altars)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491100</id>
	<title>Lurn 2 speel</title>
	<author>grub</author>
	<datestamp>1261166160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the page:<br> <b>Athiesm</b> didn't do it for me.<br> <br>Try <b>Atheism</b>, it does work!</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the page : Athiesm did n't do it for me .
Try Atheism , it does work !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the page: Athiesm didn't do it for me.
Try Atheism, it does work!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182</id>
	<title>Huh what?</title>
	<author>runyonave</author>
	<datestamp>1261166520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ol>
<li>make fake software.</li><li>make fake software work like it will outshine a proprietary software.</li></ol><p>
Result<br>
Make people fall for my religion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>make fake software.make fake software work like it will outshine a proprietary software .
Result Make people fall for my religion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
make fake software.make fake software work like it will outshine a proprietary software.
Result
Make people fall for my religion</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491734</id>
	<title>It's not hard to figure out what their intent was.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MS created a forensic tool.  People became paranoid that this tool might expose their activities, which are sometimes illegal, and often immoral, to the light of day.  Two people developed a piece of software as a form of social commentary to show how depraved modern society is, because people want to hide their shameful activities.  They did a good job, up until their final explanation.  If they explained their intentions more clearly, then it would have been a success.  Instead, it fell short at the end.  Good job, but not quite good enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MS created a forensic tool .
People became paranoid that this tool might expose their activities , which are sometimes illegal , and often immoral , to the light of day .
Two people developed a piece of software as a form of social commentary to show how depraved modern society is , because people want to hide their shameful activities .
They did a good job , up until their final explanation .
If they explained their intentions more clearly , then it would have been a success .
Instead , it fell short at the end .
Good job , but not quite good enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS created a forensic tool.
People became paranoid that this tool might expose their activities, which are sometimes illegal, and often immoral, to the light of day.
Two people developed a piece of software as a form of social commentary to show how depraved modern society is, because people want to hide their shameful activities.
They did a good job, up until their final explanation.
If they explained their intentions more clearly, then it would have been a success.
Instead, it fell short at the end.
Good job, but not quite good enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491514</id>
	<title>Lie, cheat, and steal for Christ!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're doing it wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're doing it wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495872</id>
	<title>Did they want DECAF to be taken seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow, I get the impression that they didn't want DECAF to be taken seriously.</p><p>From the start, even.</p><p>As for the thing about salvation and Jesus, well, for example, Jesus said (paraphrased), "You should learn the truth. Learning the truth will make you free." Putting that into context for you, truth is about reality, and COFEE was/is not about reality, and their DECAF was an unreal response to security snake-oil.</p><p>Poorly implemented, perhaps, but I read the message as something like, "You're not free if you trust someone whose primary purpose is to sell you more and more software to do things that really can't be done."</p><p>Maybe I'm reading things into it, but then I never downloaded DECAF, and I don't have any Microsoft software at all on my computers anyway.</p><p>"Don't keep buying the snake-oil when you know it's snake-oil." seems to be a really difficult message to get across.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , I get the impression that they did n't want DECAF to be taken seriously.From the start , even.As for the thing about salvation and Jesus , well , for example , Jesus said ( paraphrased ) , " You should learn the truth .
Learning the truth will make you free .
" Putting that into context for you , truth is about reality , and COFEE was/is not about reality , and their DECAF was an unreal response to security snake-oil.Poorly implemented , perhaps , but I read the message as something like , " You 're not free if you trust someone whose primary purpose is to sell you more and more software to do things that really ca n't be done .
" Maybe I 'm reading things into it , but then I never downloaded DECAF , and I do n't have any Microsoft software at all on my computers anyway .
" Do n't keep buying the snake-oil when you know it 's snake-oil .
" seems to be a really difficult message to get across .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, I get the impression that they didn't want DECAF to be taken seriously.From the start, even.As for the thing about salvation and Jesus, well, for example, Jesus said (paraphrased), "You should learn the truth.
Learning the truth will make you free.
" Putting that into context for you, truth is about reality, and COFEE was/is not about reality, and their DECAF was an unreal response to security snake-oil.Poorly implemented, perhaps, but I read the message as something like, "You're not free if you trust someone whose primary purpose is to sell you more and more software to do things that really can't be done.
"Maybe I'm reading things into it, but then I never downloaded DECAF, and I don't have any Microsoft software at all on my computers anyway.
"Don't keep buying the snake-oil when you know it's snake-oil.
" seems to be a really difficult message to get across.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491528</id>
	<title>That wasn't weird or anything...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad that wasn't weird or anything... lol wtf</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad that was n't weird or anything... lol wtf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad that wasn't weird or anything... lol wtf</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck with Jesus, buddy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you just die and rot then what difference does it make how you spend your time anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491432</id>
	<title>Re:heh</title>
	<author>batquux</author>
	<datestamp>1261167540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DECAF l33t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DECAF l33t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DECAF l33t</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30494266</id>
	<title>We need to hate them</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1261136280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Amazon is hated for pulling a single book, we obviously MUST hate Jesus now! Do not allow him to infiltrate your home, especially during the Christmas season! Avoid any place where he is treated with respect, like those "church" places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Amazon is hated for pulling a single book , we obviously MUST hate Jesus now !
Do not allow him to infiltrate your home , especially during the Christmas season !
Avoid any place where he is treated with respect , like those " church " places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Amazon is hated for pulling a single book, we obviously MUST hate Jesus now!
Do not allow him to infiltrate your home, especially during the Christmas season!
Avoid any place where he is treated with respect, like those "church" places.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491580</id>
	<title>I See A Beautiful Thing Here</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1261168200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Genie is out of the bottle.  This has been an excellent learning experience.  We now know of a couple of hundred utilities that will clean up some far away places in Windows.  My personal thanks to those that made these programs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Genie is out of the bottle .
This has been an excellent learning experience .
We now know of a couple of hundred utilities that will clean up some far away places in Windows .
My personal thanks to those that made these programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Genie is out of the bottle.
This has been an excellent learning experience.
We now know of a couple of hundred utilities that will clean up some far away places in Windows.
My personal thanks to those that made these programs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492158</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck with that.</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1261126980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all "shame on you!" for downloading and using software that they themselves created, provided, and handed out.  I can't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously, as a result.</p></div><p>The lesson here is that serious security software is not a black box.  It's something you can audit and verify.  And yes, shame on anyone who thought otherwise and fell for this.  They should consider themselves fortunate that this one was rather benign.  It could have easily done real damage.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all " shame on you !
" for downloading and using software that they themselves created , provided , and handed out .
I ca n't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously , as a result.The lesson here is that serious security software is not a black box .
It 's something you can audit and verify .
And yes , shame on anyone who thought otherwise and fell for this .
They should consider themselves fortunate that this one was rather benign .
It could have easily done real damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all "shame on you!
" for downloading and using software that they themselves created, provided, and handed out.
I can't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously, as a result.The lesson here is that serious security software is not a black box.
It's something you can audit and verify.
And yes, shame on anyone who thought otherwise and fell for this.
They should consider themselves fortunate that this one was rather benign.
It could have easily done real damage.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491602</id>
	<title>So release a crack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261168260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on, this is good and easy fun.  Pop it in IDA, trace it down to its fail point (calls to check the date?), replace critical code (i.e. jumps) with a fixed condition (i.e. jmp rather than jge), and done.  The branch can be fixed; or the entire call/compare/branch can even be replaced with nop, nop, jump.  It's even feasible to replace the 4 + 2 byte call with CMP \%eax, \%eax and a NOP, and the branch with a JZ branch (jump if comparison is equal/zero/etc).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , this is good and easy fun .
Pop it in IDA , trace it down to its fail point ( calls to check the date ?
) , replace critical code ( i.e .
jumps ) with a fixed condition ( i.e .
jmp rather than jge ) , and done .
The branch can be fixed ; or the entire call/compare/branch can even be replaced with nop , nop , jump .
It 's even feasible to replace the 4 + 2 byte call with CMP \ % eax , \ % eax and a NOP , and the branch with a JZ branch ( jump if comparison is equal/zero/etc ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, this is good and easy fun.
Pop it in IDA, trace it down to its fail point (calls to check the date?
), replace critical code (i.e.
jumps) with a fixed condition (i.e.
jmp rather than jge), and done.
The branch can be fixed; or the entire call/compare/branch can even be replaced with nop, nop, jump.
It's even feasible to replace the 4 + 2 byte call with CMP \%eax, \%eax and a NOP, and the branch with a JZ branch (jump if comparison is equal/zero/etc).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491294</id>
	<title>For the lulz...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This troop reminds me of the Yes Men! Their efforts point out the flaws and absurdities in things that should otherwise not have been.</p><p>I applaud them for their efforts, since they seem to have succeeded in raising awareness. Combating and defeating COFEE on the other hand, is something left up to the user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This troop reminds me of the Yes Men !
Their efforts point out the flaws and absurdities in things that should otherwise not have been.I applaud them for their efforts , since they seem to have succeeded in raising awareness .
Combating and defeating COFEE on the other hand , is something left up to the user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This troop reminds me of the Yes Men!
Their efforts point out the flaws and absurdities in things that should otherwise not have been.I applaud them for their efforts, since they seem to have succeeded in raising awareness.
Combating and defeating COFEE on the other hand, is something left up to the user.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536</id>
	<title>What is it that is bad, exactly?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is it that is bad, exactly?<ol> <li>All copies of the software were deactivated remotely</li><li>The whole thing was a hoax</li><li>The hoax was to raise awareness</li><li>The author used the publicity to advocate a cause that he personally considers important</li></ol><p>Which of these are bad?  And why?  I've often heard that getting a personal message out via publicity stunts is a good thing (The Yes Men) and now all the sudden it's bad, and we should pay no attention to these reprehensible people whose only method is deceit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is it that is bad , exactly ?
All copies of the software were deactivated remotelyThe whole thing was a hoaxThe hoax was to raise awarenessThe author used the publicity to advocate a cause that he personally considers importantWhich of these are bad ?
And why ?
I 've often heard that getting a personal message out via publicity stunts is a good thing ( The Yes Men ) and now all the sudden it 's bad , and we should pay no attention to these reprehensible people whose only method is deceit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is it that is bad, exactly?
All copies of the software were deactivated remotelyThe whole thing was a hoaxThe hoax was to raise awarenessThe author used the publicity to advocate a cause that he personally considers importantWhich of these are bad?
And why?
I've often heard that getting a personal message out via publicity stunts is a good thing (The Yes Men) and now all the sudden it's bad, and we should pay no attention to these reprehensible people whose only method is deceit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491004</id>
	<title>heh</title>
	<author>farlukar</author>
	<datestamp>1261165860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>0xDECAFBAD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>0xDECAFBAD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0xDECAFBAD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491714</id>
	<title>Text of Site since it is down</title>
	<author>DarKnyht</author>
	<datestamp>1261168680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We want to thank every media outlet, financial supporter, security expert, and forensic investigator that showed us support.</p><p>As you probably noticed, your copy of DECAF no longer works. We have disabled every copy of DECAF. We hope that as you realize this was a stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools that you would reconsider cutting corners on corporate security. Also, governments should not rely on a tool to automate the process of forensics but rather invest in the education of investigators and forensic tool experts. If we were able to assist every government agency in their computer crime investigations, we would. The problem is DECAF is just two people. As a security community at large, we need to band together and start relieving some of the burden off our government by giving back.</p><p>It also goes to show that if two people can make an impact as big as DECAF did; imagine how much positive we could all do together. Lately our media has been presenting many individual people (balloon boy, white house visitors, etc) who have been manipulating media outlets for selfish publicity in hopes of being "successful". The problem is that America has grown to be selfish, self-reliant, prideful, and a arrogant monster. We leave our marriages, neglect our kids, chase positions/status at work, chase materialistic property and only think of ourselves. In the mean time our whole country goes down the tubes.</p><p>These problems individuals are facing are not new. They are due to you trying to fill the void in your life with things of this world. Most everyone has bitter roots, some have been victimized, others are just neglected. You go through the woes of life with no life support.</p><p>I too would still be swallowed up in my prideful and selfish ways. I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting. DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions. Instead I used it as a way to bring you a message. A message of freedom, a message of peace, a message of transparency and a message of unity. As you learn a little about me, understand I faced the same things I am speaking about. I didn't address the fruits of my life, I addressed the bitter roots of my life. Religion didn't do it for me. Catholicism didn't do it for me. Athiesm didn't do it for me. Agnostic didn't do it for me. Unity and education did it for me. Only one man gets credit for it. Jesus Christ. Once I learned Christ wasn't about that foolishness I seen on t.v. or seen in other "Christians", I realized I was missing the point. I couldn't look past the Christians to see the CHRIST. I accepted Him as my savior and then started putting Him in positions over my life. My life changed and yours can too. It was about relationship.</p><p>Romans 10:9 - "That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved."</p><p>Stay tuned for the release of the forum and if you are interested in joining, please send an email to join@decafme.org</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We want to thank every media outlet , financial supporter , security expert , and forensic investigator that showed us support.As you probably noticed , your copy of DECAF no longer works .
We have disabled every copy of DECAF .
We hope that as you realize this was a stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools that you would reconsider cutting corners on corporate security .
Also , governments should not rely on a tool to automate the process of forensics but rather invest in the education of investigators and forensic tool experts .
If we were able to assist every government agency in their computer crime investigations , we would .
The problem is DECAF is just two people .
As a security community at large , we need to band together and start relieving some of the burden off our government by giving back.It also goes to show that if two people can make an impact as big as DECAF did ; imagine how much positive we could all do together .
Lately our media has been presenting many individual people ( balloon boy , white house visitors , etc ) who have been manipulating media outlets for selfish publicity in hopes of being " successful " .
The problem is that America has grown to be selfish , self-reliant , prideful , and a arrogant monster .
We leave our marriages , neglect our kids , chase positions/status at work , chase materialistic property and only think of ourselves .
In the mean time our whole country goes down the tubes.These problems individuals are facing are not new .
They are due to you trying to fill the void in your life with things of this world .
Most everyone has bitter roots , some have been victimized , others are just neglected .
You go through the woes of life with no life support.I too would still be swallowed up in my prideful and selfish ways .
I would still be with my addictive behaviors ; womanizing , pornography , stealing , hacking , lieing , manipulating , and fighting .
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions .
Instead I used it as a way to bring you a message .
A message of freedom , a message of peace , a message of transparency and a message of unity .
As you learn a little about me , understand I faced the same things I am speaking about .
I did n't address the fruits of my life , I addressed the bitter roots of my life .
Religion did n't do it for me .
Catholicism did n't do it for me .
Athiesm did n't do it for me .
Agnostic did n't do it for me .
Unity and education did it for me .
Only one man gets credit for it .
Jesus Christ .
Once I learned Christ was n't about that foolishness I seen on t.v .
or seen in other " Christians " , I realized I was missing the point .
I could n't look past the Christians to see the CHRIST .
I accepted Him as my savior and then started putting Him in positions over my life .
My life changed and yours can too .
It was about relationship.Romans 10 : 9 - " That if you confess with your mouth , " Jesus is Lord , " and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead , you will be saved .
" Stay tuned for the release of the forum and if you are interested in joining , please send an email to join @ decafme.org</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We want to thank every media outlet, financial supporter, security expert, and forensic investigator that showed us support.As you probably noticed, your copy of DECAF no longer works.
We have disabled every copy of DECAF.
We hope that as you realize this was a stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools that you would reconsider cutting corners on corporate security.
Also, governments should not rely on a tool to automate the process of forensics but rather invest in the education of investigators and forensic tool experts.
If we were able to assist every government agency in their computer crime investigations, we would.
The problem is DECAF is just two people.
As a security community at large, we need to band together and start relieving some of the burden off our government by giving back.It also goes to show that if two people can make an impact as big as DECAF did; imagine how much positive we could all do together.
Lately our media has been presenting many individual people (balloon boy, white house visitors, etc) who have been manipulating media outlets for selfish publicity in hopes of being "successful".
The problem is that America has grown to be selfish, self-reliant, prideful, and a arrogant monster.
We leave our marriages, neglect our kids, chase positions/status at work, chase materialistic property and only think of ourselves.
In the mean time our whole country goes down the tubes.These problems individuals are facing are not new.
They are due to you trying to fill the void in your life with things of this world.
Most everyone has bitter roots, some have been victimized, others are just neglected.
You go through the woes of life with no life support.I too would still be swallowed up in my prideful and selfish ways.
I would still be with my addictive behaviors; womanizing, pornography, stealing, hacking, lieing, manipulating, and fighting.
DECAF would have been a perfect way to feed my addictions.
Instead I used it as a way to bring you a message.
A message of freedom, a message of peace, a message of transparency and a message of unity.
As you learn a little about me, understand I faced the same things I am speaking about.
I didn't address the fruits of my life, I addressed the bitter roots of my life.
Religion didn't do it for me.
Catholicism didn't do it for me.
Athiesm didn't do it for me.
Agnostic didn't do it for me.
Unity and education did it for me.
Only one man gets credit for it.
Jesus Christ.
Once I learned Christ wasn't about that foolishness I seen on t.v.
or seen in other "Christians", I realized I was missing the point.
I couldn't look past the Christians to see the CHRIST.
I accepted Him as my savior and then started putting Him in positions over my life.
My life changed and yours can too.
It was about relationship.Romans 10:9 - "That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
"Stay tuned for the release of the forum and if you are interested in joining, please send an email to join@decafme.org</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493196</id>
	<title>Re:Disabled? How?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the software never did anything in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the software never did anything in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the software never did anything in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491612</id>
	<title>Re:Disabled? How?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1261168320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you?</p><p>Have you evaluated it and figured out that it does anything useful?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you ? Have you evaluated it and figured out that it does anything useful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you?Have you evaluated it and figured out that it does anything useful?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30496676</id>
	<title>Bowtrol Colon</title>
	<author>tammyyy</author>
	<datestamp>1261160040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, actually, there is no hard evidence that COFFEE itself (or the caffeine in it) will stunt your growth, but since it is the caffeine that is suspect, decaf should not have any affect.
<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Bowtrol-Colon-Cleanse-Review---Does-Bowtrol-Cleanse-Work?&amp;id=2926555" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">http://ezinearticles.com/?Bowtrol-Colon-Cleanse-Review---Does-Bowtrol-Cleanse-Work?&amp;id=2926555</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , actually , there is no hard evidence that COFFEE itself ( or the caffeine in it ) will stunt your growth , but since it is the caffeine that is suspect , decaf should not have any affect .
http : //ezinearticles.com/ ? Bowtrol-Colon-Cleanse-Review---Does-Bowtrol-Cleanse-Work ? &amp;id = 2926555 [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, actually, there is no hard evidence that COFFEE itself (or the caffeine in it) will stunt your growth, but since it is the caffeine that is suspect, decaf should not have any affect.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Bowtrol-Colon-Cleanse-Review---Does-Bowtrol-Cleanse-Work?&amp;id=2926555 [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30496574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1810250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30494956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30494956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30496574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30495872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1810250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30491590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30492234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1810250.30493700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
