<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_1344246</id>
	<title>Netflix Sued For Privacy Invasion</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261146720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>We've discussed the <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/09/21/2312245/BellKor-Wins-Netflix-1-Million-By-20-Minutes">Netflix Prize</a> numerous times as the contest ran, including the news two years ago that the <a href="//it.slashdot.org/story/07/11/27/1334244/Anonymity-of-Netflix-Prize-Dataset-Broken">anonymity of the dataset had been broken</a>. Now reader azoblue sends in this excerpt from Wired: <i>"An in-the-closet lesbian mother is suing Netflix for privacy invasion, alleging the movie rental company made it possible for her to be outed when it <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/netflix-privacy-lawsuit/">disclosed insufficiently anonymous information</a> about nearly half-a-million customers as part of its $1 million contest to improve its recommendation system. ... The lead attorney on the new suit, Joseph Malley, recently reached a multimillion-dollar settlement with Facebook over its <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/story/09/12/08/223206/Facebook-Axes-Beacon-Donates-95M-To-Settle-Suit">failed Beacon program</a>, which drew fire in part for sharing users&rsquo; Blockbuster rentals with their friends. ... If a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified."</i> The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset's anonymity could be broken, two years before researchers demonstrated that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've discussed the Netflix Prize numerous times as the contest ran , including the news two years ago that the anonymity of the dataset had been broken .
Now reader azoblue sends in this excerpt from Wired : " An in-the-closet lesbian mother is suing Netflix for privacy invasion , alleging the movie rental company made it possible for her to be outed when it disclosed insufficiently anonymous information about nearly half-a-million customers as part of its $ 1 million contest to improve its recommendation system .
... The lead attorney on the new suit , Joseph Malley , recently reached a multimillion-dollar settlement with Facebook over its failed Beacon program , which drew fire in part for sharing users    Blockbuster rentals with their friends .
... If a data set reveals a person 's ZIP code , birthdate and gender , there 's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified .
" The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset 's anonymity could be broken , two years before researchers demonstrated that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've discussed the Netflix Prize numerous times as the contest ran, including the news two years ago that the anonymity of the dataset had been broken.
Now reader azoblue sends in this excerpt from Wired: "An in-the-closet lesbian mother is suing Netflix for privacy invasion, alleging the movie rental company made it possible for her to be outed when it disclosed insufficiently anonymous information about nearly half-a-million customers as part of its $1 million contest to improve its recommendation system.
... The lead attorney on the new suit, Joseph Malley, recently reached a multimillion-dollar settlement with Facebook over its failed Beacon program, which drew fire in part for sharing users’ Blockbuster rentals with their friends.
... If a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.
" The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset's anonymity could be broken, two years before researchers demonstrated that.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002</id>
	<title>netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't recall handing over my birthdate when I signed up for my account.  I just went through all of the account screens and couldn't find it either.  What part of their service expects you to tell them your birthday?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't recall handing over my birthdate when I signed up for my account .
I just went through all of the account screens and could n't find it either .
What part of their service expects you to tell them your birthday ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't recall handing over my birthdate when I signed up for my account.
I just went through all of the account screens and couldn't find it either.
What part of their service expects you to tell them your birthday?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488708</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1261157880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the birthdate is just for adult material, they may as well just ask for the month and year- or only let the month and year be used in algorithms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the birthdate is just for adult material , they may as well just ask for the month and year- or only let the month and year be used in algorithms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the birthdate is just for adult material, they may as well just ask for the month and year- or only let the month and year be used in algorithms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</id>
	<title>So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... this woman is a closeted lesbian.  She came to the realization that, if someone hypothetical person were to come along and get into the NetFlix user data system, he could find out she's a lesbian.  In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed, she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit, charging that they had created a potential for people to find out her sexual preferences.  How many days do you think it'll be before her picture is all over the web, sitting right next to the headline "formerly closeted lesbian pulled out of closet by attaching her name and face to a privacy lawsuit"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... this woman is a closeted lesbian .
She came to the realization that , if someone hypothetical person were to come along and get into the NetFlix user data system , he could find out she 's a lesbian .
In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed , she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit , charging that they had created a potential for people to find out her sexual preferences .
How many days do you think it 'll be before her picture is all over the web , sitting right next to the headline " formerly closeted lesbian pulled out of closet by attaching her name and face to a privacy lawsuit " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... this woman is a closeted lesbian.
She came to the realization that, if someone hypothetical person were to come along and get into the NetFlix user data system, he could find out she's a lesbian.
In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed, she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit, charging that they had created a potential for people to find out her sexual preferences.
How many days do you think it'll be before her picture is all over the web, sitting right next to the headline "formerly closeted lesbian pulled out of closet by attaching her name and face to a privacy lawsuit"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490504</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1261164000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I lie about my birthday on almost all websites.  I consider it part of my password -- there's no need for them to have a valid birth date unless they're a credit validation company or my bank, and giving it out just leaves way too much information open for cross-referencing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I lie about my birthday on almost all websites .
I consider it part of my password -- there 's no need for them to have a valid birth date unless they 're a credit validation company or my bank , and giving it out just leaves way too much information open for cross-referencing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lie about my birthday on almost all websites.
I consider it part of my password -- there's no need for them to have a valid birth date unless they're a credit validation company or my bank, and giving it out just leaves way too much information open for cross-referencing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220</id>
	<title>In that I do not use NetFlix, I have some question</title>
	<author>pgmrdlm</author>
	<datestamp>1261155960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When the movies are sent to you, do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting?  Or, as when ordering from an adult store it comes in generic brown paper with an alias name of the company that sent it? I always look foward to my brown paper mail deliveries by the way.</p><p>Could who ever delivered the package to her door have figured out her taste of movies?</p><p>Which brings up another question I have. When ordering the movies, is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope?</p><p>Shoot, how many marketing firms have been sued for this same type of privacy issue?</p><p>5 out of 11 people in the Cleveland ohio(now you know where I live, kind of) like to watch porn who were born in 1959(how old am I really?) or earlier. Males make up 80 percent of this catagory with women all admiting they LOVE porn(Am I male or female).</p><p>I understand her concern for privacy, I just don't see enough information being provided to support that concern.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the movies are sent to you , do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting ?
Or , as when ordering from an adult store it comes in generic brown paper with an alias name of the company that sent it ?
I always look foward to my brown paper mail deliveries by the way.Could who ever delivered the package to her door have figured out her taste of movies ? Which brings up another question I have .
When ordering the movies , is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope ? Shoot , how many marketing firms have been sued for this same type of privacy issue ? 5 out of 11 people in the Cleveland ohio ( now you know where I live , kind of ) like to watch porn who were born in 1959 ( how old am I really ?
) or earlier .
Males make up 80 percent of this catagory with women all admiting they LOVE porn ( Am I male or female ) .I understand her concern for privacy , I just do n't see enough information being provided to support that concern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the movies are sent to you, do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting?
Or, as when ordering from an adult store it comes in generic brown paper with an alias name of the company that sent it?
I always look foward to my brown paper mail deliveries by the way.Could who ever delivered the package to her door have figured out her taste of movies?Which brings up another question I have.
When ordering the movies, is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope?Shoot, how many marketing firms have been sued for this same type of privacy issue?5 out of 11 people in the Cleveland ohio(now you know where I live, kind of) like to watch porn who were born in 1959(how old am I really?
) or earlier.
Males make up 80 percent of this catagory with women all admiting they LOVE porn(Am I male or female).I understand her concern for privacy, I just don't see enough information being provided to support that concern.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488370</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if a rental list was somehow connected to her, I'm sure there were many other factors that would have "outed" her.  It's not hard for a neighbour to witness activity around her house or seeing her at the store, co-workers suspicious blah blah blah.<br>All that aside..  My opinion, if you are gay, why are you hiding it?  If you are afraid of being treated differently at work or being discriminated against in your neighbourhood, handle that DISCRIMINATION problem when and if it happens.  The discrimination is the problem, not the fact that people now know your sexual orientation.  If you are worried about how people would feel about it or what people will be saying about it at the water cooler, well, tough crap.  People are different and they all have opinions.  Welcome to the real world, THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THAT EVER, any one that is different in any way shape or form will have more comments said about them behind the scenes.  It is not a crime for people to have their own opinions and to not like a certain thing(s).  It is a crime to discriminate in the work place and most places in society so deal with that when it happens.  I work at a company with about 5000 employees and our personnel director is openly gay.  He worked his way up through the company and he is respected as much as any personnel administrator should expect.  Does he care that people might be talking about him behind his back?  Based on my talking with him, he doesn't care a single bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if a rental list was somehow connected to her , I 'm sure there were many other factors that would have " outed " her .
It 's not hard for a neighbour to witness activity around her house or seeing her at the store , co-workers suspicious blah blah blah.All that aside.. My opinion , if you are gay , why are you hiding it ?
If you are afraid of being treated differently at work or being discriminated against in your neighbourhood , handle that DISCRIMINATION problem when and if it happens .
The discrimination is the problem , not the fact that people now know your sexual orientation .
If you are worried about how people would feel about it or what people will be saying about it at the water cooler , well , tough crap .
People are different and they all have opinions .
Welcome to the real world , THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THAT EVER , any one that is different in any way shape or form will have more comments said about them behind the scenes .
It is not a crime for people to have their own opinions and to not like a certain thing ( s ) .
It is a crime to discriminate in the work place and most places in society so deal with that when it happens .
I work at a company with about 5000 employees and our personnel director is openly gay .
He worked his way up through the company and he is respected as much as any personnel administrator should expect .
Does he care that people might be talking about him behind his back ?
Based on my talking with him , he does n't care a single bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if a rental list was somehow connected to her, I'm sure there were many other factors that would have "outed" her.
It's not hard for a neighbour to witness activity around her house or seeing her at the store, co-workers suspicious blah blah blah.All that aside..  My opinion, if you are gay, why are you hiding it?
If you are afraid of being treated differently at work or being discriminated against in your neighbourhood, handle that DISCRIMINATION problem when and if it happens.
The discrimination is the problem, not the fact that people now know your sexual orientation.
If you are worried about how people would feel about it or what people will be saying about it at the water cooler, well, tough crap.
People are different and they all have opinions.
Welcome to the real world, THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THAT EVER, any one that is different in any way shape or form will have more comments said about them behind the scenes.
It is not a crime for people to have their own opinions and to not like a certain thing(s).
It is a crime to discriminate in the work place and most places in society so deal with that when it happens.
I work at a company with about 5000 employees and our personnel director is openly gay.
He worked his way up through the company and he is respected as much as any personnel administrator should expect.
Does he care that people might be talking about him behind his back?
Based on my talking with him, he doesn't care a single bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30502594</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261340220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't the UK have the greatest number of public surveillance cameras monitoring everyone like Big Brother?  Where's the outrage there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't the UK have the greatest number of public surveillance cameras monitoring everyone like Big Brother ?
Where 's the outrage there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't the UK have the greatest number of public surveillance cameras monitoring everyone like Big Brother?
Where's the outrage there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490672</id>
	<title>Zipcodes known to help uniquely identify</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1261164600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've done enough work for companies in my years to know that zipcodes can be used to uniquely identify individuals.  Since there are still parts of this country in which a person may own a very large piece of land and Zipcodes use the +4 to determine specific blocks within a zip code range, then all one needs is a name or the other info mentioned above to uniquely identify a person.  This has been known by banks and the post office for as long as the +4 has been around.  Banks have strict guidelines around uniquely identified people and what they must do if they are identified when dealing with offers of credit.</p><p>Netflix works with the post office for mass mailing, they would be aware of the ways to uniquely identify people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've done enough work for companies in my years to know that zipcodes can be used to uniquely identify individuals .
Since there are still parts of this country in which a person may own a very large piece of land and Zipcodes use the + 4 to determine specific blocks within a zip code range , then all one needs is a name or the other info mentioned above to uniquely identify a person .
This has been known by banks and the post office for as long as the + 4 has been around .
Banks have strict guidelines around uniquely identified people and what they must do if they are identified when dealing with offers of credit.Netflix works with the post office for mass mailing , they would be aware of the ways to uniquely identify people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've done enough work for companies in my years to know that zipcodes can be used to uniquely identify individuals.
Since there are still parts of this country in which a person may own a very large piece of land and Zipcodes use the +4 to determine specific blocks within a zip code range, then all one needs is a name or the other info mentioned above to uniquely identify a person.
This has been known by banks and the post office for as long as the +4 has been around.
Banks have strict guidelines around uniquely identified people and what they must do if they are identified when dealing with offers of credit.Netflix works with the post office for mass mailing, they would be aware of the ways to uniquely identify people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489050</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the mother was outed by the movies she rented, she was probably renting adult material.</p></div><p>Quite a leap of assumption there!

</p><p>1. Of the gay women I've known who actively enjoy porn, there's a bias towards straight porn, and even sometimes gay (men) porn, not surprising given how crap and cliched and made-for-men most "lesbian" porn actually is. (One thing I've learnt over the last few years is - beware of making assumptions on the subject of sexuality... It really is a subject that's as deep and wide as the ocean.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

</p><p>2. If I knew a woman had just watched Monster, If These Walls Could Talk 2, Boys Don't Cry, Prey for Rock n Roll, or any of a whole host of other lgbt-women-oriented non-porn films, and so had many of her friends, then my gaydar would be bleeping like crazy (again assumptions can be dangerous, but if her friends had a similar film bias I'd give it a good 90\%.)

</p><p>Although I don't (well until I started to read some of the comments on slashdot, I didn't) think most of the intelligent world is quite so bothered about peoples' sexualities, things were very different 10 or 20 years ago, and it's easy to get real paranoid and lose track of reality as it usually is now (there's sadly still enough homophobia out there capable of hurting folk who're already struggling to learn to love and accept themselves.)

</p><p>And yes, it can take some (many) folk time to really get to grips with their sexuality. It's not uncommon for a woman to have relationships with men and even children before discovering their sexuality. Plus sexuality can sometimes move around. I had no idea that I'd enjoy sex with women until my first experiences, even then it took time, now I'm addicted and there's no going back!

</p><p>Sexuality is complicated!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the mother was outed by the movies she rented , she was probably renting adult material.Quite a leap of assumption there !
1. Of the gay women I 've known who actively enjoy porn , there 's a bias towards straight porn , and even sometimes gay ( men ) porn , not surprising given how crap and cliched and made-for-men most " lesbian " porn actually is .
( One thing I 've learnt over the last few years is - beware of making assumptions on the subject of sexuality... It really is a subject that 's as deep and wide as the ocean .
: ) 2 .
If I knew a woman had just watched Monster , If These Walls Could Talk 2 , Boys Do n't Cry , Prey for Rock n Roll , or any of a whole host of other lgbt-women-oriented non-porn films , and so had many of her friends , then my gaydar would be bleeping like crazy ( again assumptions can be dangerous , but if her friends had a similar film bias I 'd give it a good 90 \ % .
) Although I do n't ( well until I started to read some of the comments on slashdot , I did n't ) think most of the intelligent world is quite so bothered about peoples ' sexualities , things were very different 10 or 20 years ago , and it 's easy to get real paranoid and lose track of reality as it usually is now ( there 's sadly still enough homophobia out there capable of hurting folk who 're already struggling to learn to love and accept themselves .
) And yes , it can take some ( many ) folk time to really get to grips with their sexuality .
It 's not uncommon for a woman to have relationships with men and even children before discovering their sexuality .
Plus sexuality can sometimes move around .
I had no idea that I 'd enjoy sex with women until my first experiences , even then it took time , now I 'm addicted and there 's no going back !
Sexuality is complicated !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the mother was outed by the movies she rented, she was probably renting adult material.Quite a leap of assumption there!
1. Of the gay women I've known who actively enjoy porn, there's a bias towards straight porn, and even sometimes gay (men) porn, not surprising given how crap and cliched and made-for-men most "lesbian" porn actually is.
(One thing I've learnt over the last few years is - beware of making assumptions on the subject of sexuality... It really is a subject that's as deep and wide as the ocean.
:)

2.
If I knew a woman had just watched Monster, If These Walls Could Talk 2, Boys Don't Cry, Prey for Rock n Roll, or any of a whole host of other lgbt-women-oriented non-porn films, and so had many of her friends, then my gaydar would be bleeping like crazy (again assumptions can be dangerous, but if her friends had a similar film bias I'd give it a good 90\%.
)

Although I don't (well until I started to read some of the comments on slashdot, I didn't) think most of the intelligent world is quite so bothered about peoples' sexualities, things were very different 10 or 20 years ago, and it's easy to get real paranoid and lose track of reality as it usually is now (there's sadly still enough homophobia out there capable of hurting folk who're already struggling to learn to love and accept themselves.
)

And yes, it can take some (many) folk time to really get to grips with their sexuality.
It's not uncommon for a woman to have relationships with men and even children before discovering their sexuality.
Plus sexuality can sometimes move around.
I had no idea that I'd enjoy sex with women until my first experiences, even then it took time, now I'm addicted and there's no going back!
Sexuality is complicated!
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491208</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>multisync</author>
	<datestamp>1261166580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Odd choice of words there, multisynch</p><p>Straight. Heh.</p></div></blockquote><p>It was Carik (205890)'s word choice, not mine. But yep, that was the joke.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Odd choice of words there , multisynchStraight .
Heh.It was Carik ( 205890 ) 's word choice , not mine .
But yep , that was the joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Odd choice of words there, multisynchStraight.
Heh.It was Carik (205890)'s word choice, not mine.
But yep, that was the joke.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488346</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1261156440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My zip code has around 4,000 people in it.  This includes a town, several townships, and the countryside in a 10 mile diameter circle around the town.  A person wouldn't have to do much digging to find out who so and so is based on a zip code and a birthday.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My zip code has around 4,000 people in it .
This includes a town , several townships , and the countryside in a 10 mile diameter circle around the town .
A person would n't have to do much digging to find out who so and so is based on a zip code and a birthday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My zip code has around 4,000 people in it.
This includes a town, several townships, and the countryside in a 10 mile diameter circle around the town.
A person wouldn't have to do much digging to find out who so and so is based on a zip code and a birthday.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489544</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>ncc74656</author>
	<datestamp>1261161120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time, though.</p></div></blockquote><p>I usually give them the month and year, but leave the day at 1 (and no, I wasn't born on the 1st of the month).  If it's optional, though, I just won't give them anything at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time , though.I usually give them the month and year , but leave the day at 1 ( and no , I was n't born on the 1st of the month ) .
If it 's optional , though , I just wo n't give them anything at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time, though.I usually give them the month and year, but leave the day at 1 (and no, I wasn't born on the 1st of the month).
If it's optional, though, I just won't give them anything at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488822</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>Zequel</author>
	<datestamp>1261158360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hah, oh no - Netflix has a lot of adult movies, just gotta know where to look - try steamy romance for one. Once you find one, you can look link to the others with related movies. Try "Emannuelle" for one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah , oh no - Netflix has a lot of adult movies , just got ta know where to look - try steamy romance for one .
Once you find one , you can look link to the others with related movies .
Try " Emannuelle " for one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah, oh no - Netflix has a lot of adult movies, just gotta know where to look - try steamy romance for one.
Once you find one, you can look link to the others with related movies.
Try "Emannuelle" for one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490700</id>
	<title>Who am I?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261164720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10-14-1986, male, 64111.</p><p>Go!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10-14-1986 , male , 64111.Go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10-14-1986, male, 64111.Go!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490930</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1261165560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't think a secret of mine will be revealed by giving netflix information, because I expect netflix not to disclose that information to random 3rd parties!<br> <br>Information like birthday and gender are a reasonable thing to provide to a big, known legit company that will be billing you. I've provided it to many companies before. I think it's unreasonable to expect her to predict that that information would later come back to haunt her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't think a secret of mine will be revealed by giving netflix information , because I expect netflix not to disclose that information to random 3rd parties !
Information like birthday and gender are a reasonable thing to provide to a big , known legit company that will be billing you .
I 've provided it to many companies before .
I think it 's unreasonable to expect her to predict that that information would later come back to haunt her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't think a secret of mine will be revealed by giving netflix information, because I expect netflix not to disclose that information to random 3rd parties!
Information like birthday and gender are a reasonable thing to provide to a big, known legit company that will be billing you.
I've provided it to many companies before.
I think it's unreasonable to expect her to predict that that information would later come back to haunt her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494914</id>
	<title>Re:In that I do not use NetFlix, I have some quest</title>
	<author>concept14</author>
	<datestamp>1261140000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When ordering the movies, is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope?</p></div></blockquote><p>The movies are ordered online, on a plain old http: rather than https: page. So no, not a sealed envelope.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When ordering the movies , is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope ? The movies are ordered online , on a plain old http : rather than https : page .
So no , not a sealed envelope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When ordering the movies, is the order a post card type of request or a sealed envelope?The movies are ordered online, on a plain old http: rather than https: page.
So no, not a sealed envelope.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487220</id>
	<title>not quite</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1261151820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>She signed up for this netflix thing, then found out some actual researchers, not hypothetical ones, cracked the publicly available data for a couple of users.  She then joined a class action suit but didn't use her real name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She signed up for this netflix thing , then found out some actual researchers , not hypothetical ones , cracked the publicly available data for a couple of users .
She then joined a class action suit but did n't use her real name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She signed up for this netflix thing, then found out some actual researchers, not hypothetical ones, cracked the publicly available data for a couple of users.
She then joined a class action suit but didn't use her real name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490040</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's her backup plan. She sues the lawyer for outing her!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's her backup plan .
She sues the lawyer for outing her !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's her backup plan.
She sues the lawyer for outing her!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487316</id>
	<title>Stop.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop watching gay movies. This will prevent people from learning that you are... gay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop watching gay movies .
This will prevent people from learning that you are... gay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop watching gay movies.
This will prevent people from learning that you are... gay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398</id>
	<title>The closet can be a scary, stupid place</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking as a gay guy with a lot of gay and lesbian friends, I can tell you that some people get really worked up over being &quot;in the closet&quot;.  They can start to worry about really stupid things that are outside of the bounds of possibility, and work themselves into all kinds of trouble.</p><p>Case in point: a friend of mine got herself fired over this.  She knew that her supervisor didn't like gay people and so she was in the closet, as far as work was concerned.  She got called up for jury duty.  The court case didn't last long at all, but in the meantime, one of our mutual friends' father passed away.  So, my friend was invited to the funeral which happened to fall on the day after her jury duty ended.  She was so worked up over the idea that her boss would figure out that she's a lesbian if she took a personal day to go to her gay friend's dad's funeral that she lied and told her boss that she was still on jury duty for the day of the funeral.  Well, the boss didn't like her and he called the court clerk to confirm that she was still on jury duty - and then fired her for lying about it.</p><p>Had she just took a personal day and said &quot;I'm going to the funeral of a friend's dad&quot; nothing would have happened.  As far as I know, there's no mechanism by which you can figure out if the relatives of a dead person (whose name you don't have) are gay or not.</p><p>Maybe this lawsuit lady should read up on the Streisand Effect (you know her name's going to come out eventually), stop worrying so much about what other people think about her sexual orientation, and concentrate on living her life.  Can she truly be deluded enough to think that anyone in her life (work, social, government or otherwise) is going to trawl netflix's database to figure out if she's a lesbian and then use that information against her?</p><p>Seriously, this is like when my boss didn't want to have his pay directly deposited because he thought the payroll company could snoop in his bank account.  It's just not grounded in reality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking as a gay guy with a lot of gay and lesbian friends , I can tell you that some people get really worked up over being " in the closet " .
They can start to worry about really stupid things that are outside of the bounds of possibility , and work themselves into all kinds of trouble.Case in point : a friend of mine got herself fired over this .
She knew that her supervisor did n't like gay people and so she was in the closet , as far as work was concerned .
She got called up for jury duty .
The court case did n't last long at all , but in the meantime , one of our mutual friends ' father passed away .
So , my friend was invited to the funeral which happened to fall on the day after her jury duty ended .
She was so worked up over the idea that her boss would figure out that she 's a lesbian if she took a personal day to go to her gay friend 's dad 's funeral that she lied and told her boss that she was still on jury duty for the day of the funeral .
Well , the boss did n't like her and he called the court clerk to confirm that she was still on jury duty - and then fired her for lying about it.Had she just took a personal day and said " I 'm going to the funeral of a friend 's dad " nothing would have happened .
As far as I know , there 's no mechanism by which you can figure out if the relatives of a dead person ( whose name you do n't have ) are gay or not.Maybe this lawsuit lady should read up on the Streisand Effect ( you know her name 's going to come out eventually ) , stop worrying so much about what other people think about her sexual orientation , and concentrate on living her life .
Can she truly be deluded enough to think that anyone in her life ( work , social , government or otherwise ) is going to trawl netflix 's database to figure out if she 's a lesbian and then use that information against her ? Seriously , this is like when my boss did n't want to have his pay directly deposited because he thought the payroll company could snoop in his bank account .
It 's just not grounded in reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking as a gay guy with a lot of gay and lesbian friends, I can tell you that some people get really worked up over being "in the closet".
They can start to worry about really stupid things that are outside of the bounds of possibility, and work themselves into all kinds of trouble.Case in point: a friend of mine got herself fired over this.
She knew that her supervisor didn't like gay people and so she was in the closet, as far as work was concerned.
She got called up for jury duty.
The court case didn't last long at all, but in the meantime, one of our mutual friends' father passed away.
So, my friend was invited to the funeral which happened to fall on the day after her jury duty ended.
She was so worked up over the idea that her boss would figure out that she's a lesbian if she took a personal day to go to her gay friend's dad's funeral that she lied and told her boss that she was still on jury duty for the day of the funeral.
Well, the boss didn't like her and he called the court clerk to confirm that she was still on jury duty - and then fired her for lying about it.Had she just took a personal day and said "I'm going to the funeral of a friend's dad" nothing would have happened.
As far as I know, there's no mechanism by which you can figure out if the relatives of a dead person (whose name you don't have) are gay or not.Maybe this lawsuit lady should read up on the Streisand Effect (you know her name's going to come out eventually), stop worrying so much about what other people think about her sexual orientation, and concentrate on living her life.
Can she truly be deluded enough to think that anyone in her life (work, social, government or otherwise) is going to trawl netflix's database to figure out if she's a lesbian and then use that information against her?Seriously, this is like when my boss didn't want to have his pay directly deposited because he thought the payroll company could snoop in his bank account.
It's just not grounded in reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492774</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous privacy revealed. We should say NO</title>
	<author>AaronMK</author>
	<datestamp>1261129200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, since when was being a lesbian illicit?! You say "No, we won't help you hide." as if she has done something despicable that the public has a right to know about.  All the information likely you have about this person is that she is a lesbian, yet you conclude she engages "illicit sexual escapades" and "lesbian romps".</p><p>But let us forget the fact for a moment that you have drawn a lot of conclusions based on very limited information.  You then talk as if her use of a voluntary service is something that gives the company providing that service the right to indiscriminately publicize details of that use.</p><p>"If you want to hide the things you do, try being more discreet next time."</p><p>Existing privacy laws require companies to be discreet when it comes personally identifiable rental histories.  It is a reasonable for her to expect that a company with which she is doing business will obey the law.  It was the company's failure to be discreet, not hers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , since when was being a lesbian illicit ? !
You say " No , we wo n't help you hide .
" as if she has done something despicable that the public has a right to know about .
All the information likely you have about this person is that she is a lesbian , yet you conclude she engages " illicit sexual escapades " and " lesbian romps " .But let us forget the fact for a moment that you have drawn a lot of conclusions based on very limited information .
You then talk as if her use of a voluntary service is something that gives the company providing that service the right to indiscriminately publicize details of that use .
" If you want to hide the things you do , try being more discreet next time .
" Existing privacy laws require companies to be discreet when it comes personally identifiable rental histories .
It is a reasonable for her to expect that a company with which she is doing business will obey the law .
It was the company 's failure to be discreet , not hers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, since when was being a lesbian illicit?!
You say "No, we won't help you hide.
" as if she has done something despicable that the public has a right to know about.
All the information likely you have about this person is that she is a lesbian, yet you conclude she engages "illicit sexual escapades" and "lesbian romps".But let us forget the fact for a moment that you have drawn a lot of conclusions based on very limited information.
You then talk as if her use of a voluntary service is something that gives the company providing that service the right to indiscriminately publicize details of that use.
"If you want to hide the things you do, try being more discreet next time.
"Existing privacy laws require companies to be discreet when it comes personally identifiable rental histories.
It is a reasonable for her to expect that a company with which she is doing business will obey the law.
It was the company's failure to be discreet, not hers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487604</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>More to the point, what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian? I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?" button when I signed up for my account.</i></p><p>More to the point, is she a hot lesbian?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More to the point , what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian ?
I do n't recall seeing a " Are you a closet homosexual ?
" button when I signed up for my account.More to the point , is she a hot lesbian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More to the point, what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian?
I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?
" button when I signed up for my account.More to the point, is she a hot lesbian?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491574</id>
	<title>Re:Who am I?</title>
	<author>dazedNconfuzed</author>
	<datestamp>1261168200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know your name, but you live with someone in an apartment and want to buy a Welsh Terrier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know your name , but you live with someone in an apartment and want to buy a Welsh Terrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know your name, but you live with someone in an apartment and want to buy a Welsh Terrier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487350</id>
	<title>Jane Doe - If we don't know who the mom is..</title>
	<author>log0n</author>
	<datestamp>1261152480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then how was she outed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then how was she outed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then how was she outed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489136</id>
	<title>This is really cool.</title>
	<author>v(*\_*)vvvv</author>
	<datestamp>1261159560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So anonymity in this case was simply a type of encryption. Making information less obvious doesn't mean the information is lost. True anonymity can only be achieved by purging information, and hence only no information is truly anonymous. Or is it?</p><p>Cracking google's anonymity code is another related topic. It is good that these companies anonymity cards are being challenged.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So anonymity in this case was simply a type of encryption .
Making information less obvious does n't mean the information is lost .
True anonymity can only be achieved by purging information , and hence only no information is truly anonymous .
Or is it ? Cracking google 's anonymity code is another related topic .
It is good that these companies anonymity cards are being challenged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So anonymity in this case was simply a type of encryption.
Making information less obvious doesn't mean the information is lost.
True anonymity can only be achieved by purging information, and hence only no information is truly anonymous.
Or is it?Cracking google's anonymity code is another related topic.
It is good that these companies anonymity cards are being challenged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491304</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous privacy revealed. We should say NO</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1261166940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, using netflix is voluntary, but she did not volunteer to have them divulge personal information about her. In fact they promised her they would not in their privacy policy: <a href="http://www.netflix.com/Popup?id=5136#collection" title="netflix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.netflix.com/Popup?id=5136#collection</a> [netflix.com]. Are you saying she has to conform to their terms of service but the service she is paying for should have the right to screw her anyway they like regardless of what they promised specifically not to do or we live in a "totalitarion state"? (http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483310&amp;cid=30488934). I disagree; the case IS just and so is the law. (well we'll see. The two of us don't know the specifics of the case, 12people we'll be so informed their ears bleed and probably be in a much better position to decide.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , using netflix is voluntary , but she did not volunteer to have them divulge personal information about her .
In fact they promised her they would not in their privacy policy : http : //www.netflix.com/Popup ? id = 5136 # collection [ netflix.com ] .
Are you saying she has to conform to their terms of service but the service she is paying for should have the right to screw her anyway they like regardless of what they promised specifically not to do or we live in a " totalitarion state " ?
( http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1483310&amp;cid = 30488934 ) . I disagree ; the case IS just and so is the law .
( well we 'll see .
The two of us do n't know the specifics of the case , 12people we 'll be so informed their ears bleed and probably be in a much better position to decide .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, using netflix is voluntary, but she did not volunteer to have them divulge personal information about her.
In fact they promised her they would not in their privacy policy: http://www.netflix.com/Popup?id=5136#collection [netflix.com].
Are you saying she has to conform to their terms of service but the service she is paying for should have the right to screw her anyway they like regardless of what they promised specifically not to do or we live in a "totalitarion state"?
(http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483310&amp;cid=30488934). I disagree; the case IS just and so is the law.
(well we'll see.
The two of us don't know the specifics of the case, 12people we'll be so informed their ears bleed and probably be in a much better position to decide.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489294</id>
	<title>Go sue yourself.</title>
	<author>dogdick</author>
	<datestamp>1261160100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look how many people KNOW you are a lesbian now rather than before when a few nerds could have an 87\% chance of figuring it out if they gave a shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look how many people KNOW you are a lesbian now rather than before when a few nerds could have an 87 \ % chance of figuring it out if they gave a shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look how many people KNOW you are a lesbian now rather than before when a few nerds could have an 87\% chance of figuring it out if they gave a shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified</i></p><p>What idiot answers all those questions correctly?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a data set reveals a person 's ZIP code , birthdate and gender , there 's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identifiedWhat idiot answers all those questions correctly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identifiedWhat idiot answers all those questions correctly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491154</id>
	<title>Re:Outed by movie rentals?</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1261166400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Via email this morning, asking how the picture quality was, I found out that last night my daughter watched Baby Geniuses while my wife and I were at her company's Christmas party.  Do you think I'll ever be able to run for public office with that kind of thing on my record?  Do you?  Just by posting this, I'm probably going to have to start over with a new slashdot account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Via email this morning , asking how the picture quality was , I found out that last night my daughter watched Baby Geniuses while my wife and I were at her company 's Christmas party .
Do you think I 'll ever be able to run for public office with that kind of thing on my record ?
Do you ?
Just by posting this , I 'm probably going to have to start over with a new slashdot account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Via email this morning, asking how the picture quality was, I found out that last night my daughter watched Baby Geniuses while my wife and I were at her company's Christmas party.
Do you think I'll ever be able to run for public office with that kind of thing on my record?
Do you?
Just by posting this, I'm probably going to have to start over with a new slashdot account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489664</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>casings</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Infidelity is a leap yes, not a "major: one, but certainly a leap.  What isn't much of a leap however would be if she never told her husband (if she has one) that she is a lesbian, then that would be a CLEAR violation of trust.  If you don't tell your partner that you aren't sexually attracted to them, then that is pretty indicative of a serious character flaw in that person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Infidelity is a leap yes , not a " major : one , but certainly a leap .
What is n't much of a leap however would be if she never told her husband ( if she has one ) that she is a lesbian , then that would be a CLEAR violation of trust .
If you do n't tell your partner that you are n't sexually attracted to them , then that is pretty indicative of a serious character flaw in that person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Infidelity is a leap yes, not a "major: one, but certainly a leap.
What isn't much of a leap however would be if she never told her husband (if she has one) that she is a lesbian, then that would be a CLEAR violation of trust.
If you don't tell your partner that you aren't sexually attracted to them, then that is pretty indicative of a serious character flaw in that person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487646</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Certainly if you think some important secret of yours will be revealed by giving Netflix that information, you shouldn't give it.  However, for me, I like giving them that information because they have used it to recommend movies quite successfully.  I don't care if anybody knows I watched Kate &amp; Leopold three times in a row.  I'm not going to go out of my way to post what I watch on my FB profile, but if it was there, I wouldn't care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Certainly if you think some important secret of yours will be revealed by giving Netflix that information , you should n't give it .
However , for me , I like giving them that information because they have used it to recommend movies quite successfully .
I do n't care if anybody knows I watched Kate &amp; Leopold three times in a row .
I 'm not going to go out of my way to post what I watch on my FB profile , but if it was there , I would n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Certainly if you think some important secret of yours will be revealed by giving Netflix that information, you shouldn't give it.
However, for me, I like giving them that information because they have used it to recommend movies quite successfully.
I don't care if anybody knows I watched Kate &amp; Leopold three times in a row.
I'm not going to go out of my way to post what I watch on my FB profile, but if it was there, I wouldn't care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488288</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>chrysrobyn</author>
	<datestamp>1261156260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not familiar with the odds, but there are a whole wide range of other possibilities.  I went to college with a girl whose mom was a lesbian.  She had married young to the guy who made all the sense in the world, who loved her and who treated her like a princess, assuming she'd fall in love eventually.  Their marriage was consummated, producing a daughter.  Mom figured things out, they divorced amicably (supposedly; personally, I can't imagine that going well), and the girl I went to school with would periodically talk about her mom and her mom's girlfriend just as any of us would periodically discuss our families.</p><p>Of course, there's also the artificial insemination route, but I think that's relatively uncommon.  If she lives in a state where adoptive parents damn well better be straight, then remaining closeted may very well be in her best interests.  I know of an instance where a lesbian wanted a child and couldn't afford anything other than "the natural route", so she found a "willing donor" and did things the natural way, finding her desire for a child stronger than her desire for a man not to touch her that way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.I 'm not familiar with the odds , but there are a whole wide range of other possibilities .
I went to college with a girl whose mom was a lesbian .
She had married young to the guy who made all the sense in the world , who loved her and who treated her like a princess , assuming she 'd fall in love eventually .
Their marriage was consummated , producing a daughter .
Mom figured things out , they divorced amicably ( supposedly ; personally , I ca n't imagine that going well ) , and the girl I went to school with would periodically talk about her mom and her mom 's girlfriend just as any of us would periodically discuss our families.Of course , there 's also the artificial insemination route , but I think that 's relatively uncommon .
If she lives in a state where adoptive parents damn well better be straight , then remaining closeted may very well be in her best interests .
I know of an instance where a lesbian wanted a child and could n't afford anything other than " the natural route " , so she found a " willing donor " and did things the natural way , finding her desire for a child stronger than her desire for a man not to touch her that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.I'm not familiar with the odds, but there are a whole wide range of other possibilities.
I went to college with a girl whose mom was a lesbian.
She had married young to the guy who made all the sense in the world, who loved her and who treated her like a princess, assuming she'd fall in love eventually.
Their marriage was consummated, producing a daughter.
Mom figured things out, they divorced amicably (supposedly; personally, I can't imagine that going well), and the girl I went to school with would periodically talk about her mom and her mom's girlfriend just as any of us would periodically discuss our families.Of course, there's also the artificial insemination route, but I think that's relatively uncommon.
If she lives in a state where adoptive parents damn well better be straight, then remaining closeted may very well be in her best interests.
I know of an instance where a lesbian wanted a child and couldn't afford anything other than "the natural route", so she found a "willing donor" and did things the natural way, finding her desire for a child stronger than her desire for a man not to touch her that way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487154</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>bmearns</author>
	<datestamp>1261151640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the outter was the particular list of movies she was renting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the outter was the particular list of movies she was renting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the outter was the particular list of movies she was renting...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30495568</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The kind of idiot that wants their Netflix DVDs to reach their letterbox, their credit card verification to pass, and their mail to not be addressed to "Mrs John Smith".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The kind of idiot that wants their Netflix DVDs to reach their letterbox , their credit card verification to pass , and their mail to not be addressed to " Mrs John Smith " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The kind of idiot that wants their Netflix DVDs to reach their letterbox, their credit card verification to pass, and their mail to not be addressed to "Mrs John Smith".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487116</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1261151460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ain't America grand?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ai n't America grand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ain't America grand?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487722</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Infidelity? WTF?  That's a major leap of logic.  Because she prefers chicks, she obviously cheated on her husband?  Who modded this up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Infidelity ?
WTF ? That 's a major leap of logic .
Because she prefers chicks , she obviously cheated on her husband ?
Who modded this up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Infidelity?
WTF?  That's a major leap of logic.
Because she prefers chicks, she obviously cheated on her husband?
Who modded this up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491456</id>
	<title>Correlation?</title>
	<author>johntkucz</author>
	<datestamp>1261167600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree this was poor and invasive on netflix's part, but how was "suit known as Doe v. Netflix " "outing a lesbian"?  Like netflix released information of a bunch of gay movie rentals??? releasing private info is fail, I just don't see the correlation with the lesbian woman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree this was poor and invasive on netflix 's part , but how was " suit known as Doe v. Netflix " " outing a lesbian " ?
Like netflix released information of a bunch of gay movie rentals ? ? ?
releasing private info is fail , I just do n't see the correlation with the lesbian woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree this was poor and invasive on netflix's part, but how was "suit known as Doe v. Netflix " "outing a lesbian"?
Like netflix released information of a bunch of gay movie rentals???
releasing private info is fail, I just don't see the correlation with the lesbian woman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036</id>
	<title>Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>whoda</author>
	<datestamp>1261151100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can a legal-aged adult file as Jane Doe just because of her secret of being 'in the closet'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can a legal-aged adult file as Jane Doe just because of her secret of being 'in the closet ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can a legal-aged adult file as Jane Doe just because of her secret of being 'in the closet'?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487812</id>
	<title>Yuo Fail I't!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">started 3ork8 on</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>started 3ork8 on [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>started 3ork8 on [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487278</id>
	<title>Don't you need to have actual damages?</title>
	<author>joeflies</author>
	<datestamp>1261152180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way that I thought that it worked was that you sue in civil court when you actuall suffer damages even when the other party was doing something illegal.</p><p>For instance, you can't sue a drunk driver for almost hitting your car.  You could press that they did something illegal and have him charged in criminal court, but there's no payday in that.  Given that these types of cases seem to be this lawyer's modus operandi, I'm thinking that this case is more about the payday and not about building stronger standards for privacy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way that I thought that it worked was that you sue in civil court when you actuall suffer damages even when the other party was doing something illegal.For instance , you ca n't sue a drunk driver for almost hitting your car .
You could press that they did something illegal and have him charged in criminal court , but there 's no payday in that .
Given that these types of cases seem to be this lawyer 's modus operandi , I 'm thinking that this case is more about the payday and not about building stronger standards for privacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way that I thought that it worked was that you sue in civil court when you actuall suffer damages even when the other party was doing something illegal.For instance, you can't sue a drunk driver for almost hitting your car.
You could press that they did something illegal and have him charged in criminal court, but there's no payday in that.
Given that these types of cases seem to be this lawyer's modus operandi, I'm thinking that this case is more about the payday and not about building stronger standards for privacy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492024</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>fast turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1261169700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're only partly right. Yes it does provide possible grounds for divorce but that's not the big issue. That revolves around Child Custody and Alimony. An argument that could be used due to her being gay is "Unfit as a mother". because of the risk of STD's such as Aids. If there is any money involved, it could have lots of bearing on how much alimony she's awarded. Note that Alimony is not Child Support, which is determined seperately and usually via published Guidelines.</p><p>Nope. The 5th ammendment has nothing to do with this matter as it's strictly a civil case. Now if there was the potential of "The State of" prosecuting her for a crime, then it's possible to supress this as evidence under the 5th but not really likely as its discovery was not by the Court or persons of the Court, nor is it held under Attorney/Client Privelage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're only partly right .
Yes it does provide possible grounds for divorce but that 's not the big issue .
That revolves around Child Custody and Alimony .
An argument that could be used due to her being gay is " Unfit as a mother " .
because of the risk of STD 's such as Aids .
If there is any money involved , it could have lots of bearing on how much alimony she 's awarded .
Note that Alimony is not Child Support , which is determined seperately and usually via published Guidelines.Nope .
The 5th ammendment has nothing to do with this matter as it 's strictly a civil case .
Now if there was the potential of " The State of " prosecuting her for a crime , then it 's possible to supress this as evidence under the 5th but not really likely as its discovery was not by the Court or persons of the Court , nor is it held under Attorney/Client Privelage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're only partly right.
Yes it does provide possible grounds for divorce but that's not the big issue.
That revolves around Child Custody and Alimony.
An argument that could be used due to her being gay is "Unfit as a mother".
because of the risk of STD's such as Aids.
If there is any money involved, it could have lots of bearing on how much alimony she's awarded.
Note that Alimony is not Child Support, which is determined seperately and usually via published Guidelines.Nope.
The 5th ammendment has nothing to do with this matter as it's strictly a civil case.
Now if there was the potential of "The State of" prosecuting her for a crime, then it's possible to supress this as evidence under the 5th but not really likely as its discovery was not by the Court or persons of the Court, nor is it held under Attorney/Client Privelage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491834</id>
	<title>Re:The closet can be a scary, stupid place</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is off-topic but I really like your sig. Every time I see someone with "Slashdot doesn't have a -1 disagree option" (maybe it is just one person but I see it a lot) or something like that I get the almost irresistible urge to moderate them -1 Troll. I don't moderate people down because I disagree with them but I also have an innate hatred for strangers telling me what to do. Also having something inflammatory/political in your sig makes me want to mod you down no matter how reasonable your post is.
<br> <br>
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is off-topic but I really like your sig .
Every time I see someone with " Slashdot does n't have a -1 disagree option " ( maybe it is just one person but I see it a lot ) or something like that I get the almost irresistible urge to moderate them -1 Troll .
I do n't moderate people down because I disagree with them but I also have an innate hatred for strangers telling me what to do .
Also having something inflammatory/political in your sig makes me want to mod you down no matter how reasonable your post is .
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is off-topic but I really like your sig.
Every time I see someone with "Slashdot doesn't have a -1 disagree option" (maybe it is just one person but I see it a lot) or something like that I get the almost irresistible urge to moderate them -1 Troll.
I don't moderate people down because I disagree with them but I also have an innate hatred for strangers telling me what to do.
Also having something inflammatory/political in your sig makes me want to mod you down no matter how reasonable your post is.
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487162</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>multisync</author>
	<datestamp>1261151640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed, she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... How many days do you think it'll be before her picture is all over the web</p></div></blockquote><p>From TFA:</p><blockquote><div><p>That's why the lesbian mom joined the lawsuit as a <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/netflix-privacy-lawsuit/" title="wired.com">Jane Doe</a> [wired.com], according to the complaint</p></div></blockquote><p>But bonus points for "lemme get this <strong>straight</strong>"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed , she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit ... How many days do you think it 'll be before her picture is all over the webFrom TFA : That 's why the lesbian mom joined the lawsuit as a Jane Doe [ wired.com ] , according to the complaintBut bonus points for " lem me get this straight "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to protect herself from being potentially exposed, she decided to join a high-profile national lawsuit ... How many days do you think it'll be before her picture is all over the webFrom TFA:That's why the lesbian mom joined the lawsuit as a Jane Doe [wired.com], according to the complaintBut bonus points for "lemme get this straight"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487010</id>
	<title>Birthdate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The entire birthday?  Holy crap!  What did they expect?!  Even just narrowing it down to birth year gives you a way to narrow the set considerably when combined with the other two items.  What was wrong with the traditional "18-24, 25-40, etc." age ranges?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire birthday ?
Holy crap !
What did they expect ? !
Even just narrowing it down to birth year gives you a way to narrow the set considerably when combined with the other two items .
What was wrong with the traditional " 18-24 , 25-40 , etc .
" age ranges ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entire birthday?
Holy crap!
What did they expect?!
Even just narrowing it down to birth year gives you a way to narrow the set considerably when combined with the other two items.
What was wrong with the traditional "18-24, 25-40, etc.
" age ranges?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488056</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>TheSeventh</author>
	<datestamp>1261155360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>However, this is a good response to Google's stance on privacy issues that "if you're doing something on the internet you don't want anyone to know about, maybe you shouldn't be doing it."

<br> <br>I don't see how renting whatever mainstream movies she wanted and wanting to keep her orientation a private matter equates to "something she shouldn't be doing."</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , this is a good response to Google 's stance on privacy issues that " if you 're doing something on the internet you do n't want anyone to know about , maybe you should n't be doing it .
" I do n't see how renting whatever mainstream movies she wanted and wanting to keep her orientation a private matter equates to " something she should n't be doing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, this is a good response to Google's stance on privacy issues that "if you're doing something on the internet you don't want anyone to know about, maybe you shouldn't be doing it.
"

 I don't see how renting whatever mainstream movies she wanted and wanting to keep her orientation a private matter equates to "something she shouldn't be doing.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486958</id>
	<title>eat my shorts slashdot !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eat my shorts slashdot !!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488356</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>if a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place? I never give those things to companies, and if I can't avoid it (forced to enter something when signing up) I give bogus information. Neither of those are any of Netflix's business.</p></div><p>im assuming the DOB is necessary for renting R rated movies?
<br> <br>
Netflix should default to month and year, not dd/mm/yy
<br> <br>
BTW, great sig.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if a data set reveals a person 's ZIP code , birthdate and gender , there 's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place ?
I never give those things to companies , and if I ca n't avoid it ( forced to enter something when signing up ) I give bogus information .
Neither of those are any of Netflix 's business.im assuming the DOB is necessary for renting R rated movies ?
Netflix should default to month and year , not dd/mm/yy BTW , great sig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place?
I never give those things to companies, and if I can't avoid it (forced to enter something when signing up) I give bogus information.
Neither of those are any of Netflix's business.im assuming the DOB is necessary for renting R rated movies?
Netflix should default to month and year, not dd/mm/yy
 
BTW, great sig.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488014</id>
	<title>Re:Outed by movie rentals?</title>
	<author>Spazztastic</author>
	<datestamp>1261155120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't this a bit of a stretch.  I've rented a rather broad range of films <em>[snip]</em> </p></div><p>I share a Netflix account with my mom. I have the movies go to her address and I use the streaming to my 360 at my apartment. Going by what you mentioned, they must think I'm a menopausal woman who has an infatuation with James Bond.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this a bit of a stretch .
I 've rented a rather broad range of films [ snip ] I share a Netflix account with my mom .
I have the movies go to her address and I use the streaming to my 360 at my apartment .
Going by what you mentioned , they must think I 'm a menopausal woman who has an infatuation with James Bond .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this a bit of a stretch.
I've rented a rather broad range of films [snip] I share a Netflix account with my mom.
I have the movies go to her address and I use the streaming to my 360 at my apartment.
Going by what you mentioned, they must think I'm a menopausal woman who has an infatuation with James Bond.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487730</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>djdbass</author>
	<datestamp>1261153980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So there is an 87\% chance that the person can be uniquely identified.<br>Though taking your point into account means there's only a 50\% chance of that.<br> <br>And then looking at that 50\% chance, there's a 50\% chance that<em> that</em> is right.<br>So the overall chance approaches zero. Amirite?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So there is an 87 \ % chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Though taking your point into account means there 's only a 50 \ % chance of that .
And then looking at that 50 \ % chance , there 's a 50 \ % chance that that is right.So the overall chance approaches zero .
Amirite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So there is an 87\% chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Though taking your point into account means there's only a 50\% chance of that.
And then looking at that 50\% chance, there's a 50\% chance that that is right.So the overall chance approaches zero.
Amirite?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488318</id>
	<title>Privacy concerns</title>
	<author>chadplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1261156320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't RTFA, but exactly how detailed is this information?  Will my facade of sophistication bolstered by my renting/viewing of foreign films remain intact?  Or will it be torn asunder when it is revealed I only fast forwarded to the sex scenes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't RTFA , but exactly how detailed is this information ?
Will my facade of sophistication bolstered by my renting/viewing of foreign films remain intact ?
Or will it be torn asunder when it is revealed I only fast forwarded to the sex scenes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't RTFA, but exactly how detailed is this information?
Will my facade of sophistication bolstered by my renting/viewing of foreign films remain intact?
Or will it be torn asunder when it is revealed I only fast forwarded to the sex scenes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30493118</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261130640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ordered a movie from netflix based on an HP Lovecraft story. The movie studio that made the movie turned out to be a producer of films with gay and lesbian themes and actors. They changed the main character to a gay man, and there was a gay love scene.</p><p>Not my thing anymore than watching straight sex would be to my gay friends, and no big deal.</p><p>But Netflix began "suggesting" dozens of gay themed movies to me after that. Took a little work to get that "straightened" out.</p><p>I don't care, but some insurance company or future right wing government might, if they were to get the data from Netflix.</p><p>Think it won't happen? Look up what IBM did for the German's during WW2. History always repeats itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ordered a movie from netflix based on an HP Lovecraft story .
The movie studio that made the movie turned out to be a producer of films with gay and lesbian themes and actors .
They changed the main character to a gay man , and there was a gay love scene.Not my thing anymore than watching straight sex would be to my gay friends , and no big deal.But Netflix began " suggesting " dozens of gay themed movies to me after that .
Took a little work to get that " straightened " out.I do n't care , but some insurance company or future right wing government might , if they were to get the data from Netflix.Think it wo n't happen ?
Look up what IBM did for the German 's during WW2 .
History always repeats itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ordered a movie from netflix based on an HP Lovecraft story.
The movie studio that made the movie turned out to be a producer of films with gay and lesbian themes and actors.
They changed the main character to a gay man, and there was a gay love scene.Not my thing anymore than watching straight sex would be to my gay friends, and no big deal.But Netflix began "suggesting" dozens of gay themed movies to me after that.
Took a little work to get that "straightened" out.I don't care, but some insurance company or future right wing government might, if they were to get the data from Netflix.Think it won't happen?
Look up what IBM did for the German's during WW2.
History always repeats itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487496</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The UK comes under the European Data Protection Act. Any company releasing any personal data will be in deep shit if caught. The rules have also been tightened since the early version in 1984. If there's a remote chance someone receiving the data can piece bits together, expect a massive fine. Bizarrely, you can buy PAF and telephone directories on CDs though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK comes under the European Data Protection Act .
Any company releasing any personal data will be in deep shit if caught .
The rules have also been tightened since the early version in 1984 .
If there 's a remote chance someone receiving the data can piece bits together , expect a massive fine .
Bizarrely , you can buy PAF and telephone directories on CDs though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK comes under the European Data Protection Act.
Any company releasing any personal data will be in deep shit if caught.
The rules have also been tightened since the early version in 1984.
If there's a remote chance someone receiving the data can piece bits together, expect a massive fine.
Bizarrely, you can buy PAF and telephone directories on CDs though!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494702</id>
	<title>Netflix didn't just anonymize the data</title>
	<author>eggspurt</author>
	<datestamp>1261138620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Via <a href="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2009/12/privacy\_vs\_know.html" title="columbia.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2009/12/privacy\_vs\_know.html</a> [columbia.edu]:

<p>I'm not sure whether the litigators have read this particular section of the <a href="http://www.netflixprize.com//rules" title="netflixprize.com" rel="nofollow">Netflix prize rules</a> [netflixprize.com]:</p><blockquote><div><p>To prevent certain inferences being drawn about the Netflix customer base, some of the rating data for some customers in the training and qualifying sets have been deliberately perturbed in one or more of the following ways: deleting ratings; inserting alternative ratings and dates; and modifying rating dates.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>So yes, you can match a set of reviews with someone else, but how will you know that it's really a person and not a random coincidence? 0.5 million review traces give plenty of opportunity for a false positive match. Netflix learned from AOL's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL\_search\_data\_scandal" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">data release disaster</a> [wikipedia.org], which resulted in a few people getting <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2006-08-22-n51.html" title="blogoscoped.com" rel="nofollow">fired</a> [blogoscoped.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Via http : //www.stat.columbia.edu/ ~ cook/movabletype/archives/2009/12/privacy \ _vs \ _know.html [ columbia.edu ] : I 'm not sure whether the litigators have read this particular section of the Netflix prize rules [ netflixprize.com ] : To prevent certain inferences being drawn about the Netflix customer base , some of the rating data for some customers in the training and qualifying sets have been deliberately perturbed in one or more of the following ways : deleting ratings ; inserting alternative ratings and dates ; and modifying rating dates .
So yes , you can match a set of reviews with someone else , but how will you know that it 's really a person and not a random coincidence ?
0.5 million review traces give plenty of opportunity for a false positive match .
Netflix learned from AOL 's data release disaster [ wikipedia.org ] , which resulted in a few people getting fired [ blogoscoped.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Via http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2009/12/privacy\_vs\_know.html [columbia.edu]:

I'm not sure whether the litigators have read this particular section of the Netflix prize rules [netflixprize.com]:To prevent certain inferences being drawn about the Netflix customer base, some of the rating data for some customers in the training and qualifying sets have been deliberately perturbed in one or more of the following ways: deleting ratings; inserting alternative ratings and dates; and modifying rating dates.
So yes, you can match a set of reviews with someone else, but how will you know that it's really a person and not a random coincidence?
0.5 million review traces give plenty of opportunity for a false positive match.
Netflix learned from AOL's data release disaster [wikipedia.org], which resulted in a few people getting fired [blogoscoped.com].
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487194</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1261151700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all the Rosie O'Donnell and Margaret Cho comedy specials in her queue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all the Rosie O'Donnell and Margaret Cho comedy specials in her queue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all the Rosie O'Donnell and Margaret Cho comedy specials in her queue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487520</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?" button when I signed up for my account.</i>
<br>
<br>
You wouldn't, it was a radio button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't recall seeing a " Are you a closet homosexual ?
" button when I signed up for my account .
You would n't , it was a radio button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?
" button when I signed up for my account.
You wouldn't, it was a radio button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>Neon Spiral Injector</author>
	<datestamp>1261152000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netflix has no "adult" material.  Sure, a few NC-17 films (many of them for violence as much as sex), and some unrated titles, which may get a little blue.  But nothing like the backroom of local rental stores.</p><p>They don't require an age to be specified because they assume if you have a credit card (which is required) then you can rent anything they have.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix has no " adult " material .
Sure , a few NC-17 films ( many of them for violence as much as sex ) , and some unrated titles , which may get a little blue .
But nothing like the backroom of local rental stores.They do n't require an age to be specified because they assume if you have a credit card ( which is required ) then you can rent anything they have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix has no "adult" material.
Sure, a few NC-17 films (many of them for violence as much as sex), and some unrated titles, which may get a little blue.
But nothing like the backroom of local rental stores.They don't require an age to be specified because they assume if you have a credit card (which is required) then you can rent anything they have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487086</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Diss Champ</author>
	<datestamp>1261151400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It depends on whether it is the long zip or the short zip. The short zip is 5 digits, and that's what most people use when sending personal letters and such; the shorter zip adds additional digits and narrows things considerably.</p><p>Some quick back of the envelope says that 5 digits has 100,000 combinations, meaning that you only have thousands of people (~3k) per zip (some zips more, some less, they assigned them before some population movement). With 366 possible birth days across a number of years (I'm assuming year is specified), even the 5 digit narrows things down uniquely for lots of people.</p><p>If they released the long zip, which they compute to speed their mailing based on your address, then it gets real easy to narrow things. The extra zip has another 4 digits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on whether it is the long zip or the short zip .
The short zip is 5 digits , and that 's what most people use when sending personal letters and such ; the shorter zip adds additional digits and narrows things considerably.Some quick back of the envelope says that 5 digits has 100,000 combinations , meaning that you only have thousands of people ( ~ 3k ) per zip ( some zips more , some less , they assigned them before some population movement ) .
With 366 possible birth days across a number of years ( I 'm assuming year is specified ) , even the 5 digit narrows things down uniquely for lots of people.If they released the long zip , which they compute to speed their mailing based on your address , then it gets real easy to narrow things .
The extra zip has another 4 digits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on whether it is the long zip or the short zip.
The short zip is 5 digits, and that's what most people use when sending personal letters and such; the shorter zip adds additional digits and narrows things considerably.Some quick back of the envelope says that 5 digits has 100,000 combinations, meaning that you only have thousands of people (~3k) per zip (some zips more, some less, they assigned them before some population movement).
With 366 possible birth days across a number of years (I'm assuming year is specified), even the 5 digit narrows things down uniquely for lots of people.If they released the long zip, which they compute to speed their mailing based on your address, then it gets real easy to narrow things.
The extra zip has another 4 digits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489188</id>
	<title>Should Netflix have known?</title>
	<author>awilden</author>
	<datestamp>1261159740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are a lot of comments about whether she could/should have been outed by the data set or not, but nobody answered the question as to whether Netflix really should have known that the data they published was personally identifiable.  The answer is an unmitigated 'yes'.  People have been working on privacy in databases issues for a very long time (US census in the late 1800s, anyone?) but with the EU's strict privacy regulations, it's 'recently' become an important area of computer science research (see the "Privacy in Statistical Databases" conferences like <a href="http://unescoprivacychair.urv.cat/psd2008/" title="urv.cat" rel="nofollow">PSD 2008</a> [urv.cat]).</p><p>The fact is though that there are several standard techniques that are well understood, easy to implement, and would have let them release the data without releasing any information.  Probably the best fit would be to just lie about the zip codes -- take the data and make sure that there are at least n people in each "zip code", merging adjacent codes into one until you get enough to protect the innocent.  There's also a lot of research about generating fake records that maintain similar statistical properties to the original data set.  Both techniques do result in some loss of information, but remember that's a good thing because it helps protect the privacy.  Besides, if for example I live in Green Bay, I really fail to see how much additional information can be gained by associating my records with the individual zip code for Green Bay instead of grouping everyone together into a single zip for the entire city.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a lot of comments about whether she could/should have been outed by the data set or not , but nobody answered the question as to whether Netflix really should have known that the data they published was personally identifiable .
The answer is an unmitigated 'yes' .
People have been working on privacy in databases issues for a very long time ( US census in the late 1800s , anyone ?
) but with the EU 's strict privacy regulations , it 's 'recently ' become an important area of computer science research ( see the " Privacy in Statistical Databases " conferences like PSD 2008 [ urv.cat ] ) .The fact is though that there are several standard techniques that are well understood , easy to implement , and would have let them release the data without releasing any information .
Probably the best fit would be to just lie about the zip codes -- take the data and make sure that there are at least n people in each " zip code " , merging adjacent codes into one until you get enough to protect the innocent .
There 's also a lot of research about generating fake records that maintain similar statistical properties to the original data set .
Both techniques do result in some loss of information , but remember that 's a good thing because it helps protect the privacy .
Besides , if for example I live in Green Bay , I really fail to see how much additional information can be gained by associating my records with the individual zip code for Green Bay instead of grouping everyone together into a single zip for the entire city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a lot of comments about whether she could/should have been outed by the data set or not, but nobody answered the question as to whether Netflix really should have known that the data they published was personally identifiable.
The answer is an unmitigated 'yes'.
People have been working on privacy in databases issues for a very long time (US census in the late 1800s, anyone?
) but with the EU's strict privacy regulations, it's 'recently' become an important area of computer science research (see the "Privacy in Statistical Databases" conferences like PSD 2008 [urv.cat]).The fact is though that there are several standard techniques that are well understood, easy to implement, and would have let them release the data without releasing any information.
Probably the best fit would be to just lie about the zip codes -- take the data and make sure that there are at least n people in each "zip code", merging adjacent codes into one until you get enough to protect the innocent.
There's also a lot of research about generating fake records that maintain similar statistical properties to the original data set.
Both techniques do result in some loss of information, but remember that's a good thing because it helps protect the privacy.
Besides, if for example I live in Green Bay, I really fail to see how much additional information can be gained by associating my records with the individual zip code for Green Bay instead of grouping everyone together into a single zip for the entire city.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488178</id>
	<title>"state-of-the-art defense" and strict liability.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset's anonymity could be broken, two years before researchers demonstrated that.</p></div><p>This is called a "state-of-the-art" defense, and generally doesn't work.</p><p>State of the art defense is the defense that permits a manufacturer to avoid liability in a design defect case if at the time of manufacture there was no safer design available, or in a failure to warn case if at the time of manufacture there was no way the manufacturer could have known of the danger he/she failed to warn against.</p><p>Lets say I was making Asbestos oven mitts, no one knew it was dangerous. The state of the oven mitt industry and materials science (the art) was that Asbestos was fine. Then, 50 years later we find out it's dangerous. The lawsuits will probably prevail because the "state of the art" defense doesn't stand up to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict\_liability" title="wikipedia.org">strict liability</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>On the upside, she'll probably make some new friends in PTA. And who doesn't love hot buttered soccer moms?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset 's anonymity could be broken , two years before researchers demonstrated that.This is called a " state-of-the-art " defense , and generally does n't work.State of the art defense is the defense that permits a manufacturer to avoid liability in a design defect case if at the time of manufacture there was no safer design available , or in a failure to warn case if at the time of manufacture there was no way the manufacturer could have known of the danger he/she failed to warn against.Lets say I was making Asbestos oven mitts , no one knew it was dangerous .
The state of the oven mitt industry and materials science ( the art ) was that Asbestos was fine .
Then , 50 years later we find out it 's dangerous .
The lawsuits will probably prevail because the " state of the art " defense does n't stand up to strict liability [ wikipedia.org ] .On the upside , she 'll probably make some new friends in PTA .
And who does n't love hot buttered soccer moms ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The suit turns on the question of whether Netflix should have known that their dataset's anonymity could be broken, two years before researchers demonstrated that.This is called a "state-of-the-art" defense, and generally doesn't work.State of the art defense is the defense that permits a manufacturer to avoid liability in a design defect case if at the time of manufacture there was no safer design available, or in a failure to warn case if at the time of manufacture there was no way the manufacturer could have known of the danger he/she failed to warn against.Lets say I was making Asbestos oven mitts, no one knew it was dangerous.
The state of the oven mitt industry and materials science (the art) was that Asbestos was fine.
Then, 50 years later we find out it's dangerous.
The lawsuits will probably prevail because the "state of the art" defense doesn't stand up to strict liability [wikipedia.org].On the upside, she'll probably make some new friends in PTA.
And who doesn't love hot buttered soccer moms?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487160</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>patrickthbold</author>
	<datestamp>1261151640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe she's "taking one for the team."

Seriously, I really don't want these companies that have a lot of our private data to have the attitude that, "It doesn't matter if this gets out because if anyonesays anything then they will just draw more attention to themselves."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe she 's " taking one for the team .
" Seriously , I really do n't want these companies that have a lot of our private data to have the attitude that , " It does n't matter if this gets out because if anyonesays anything then they will just draw more attention to themselves .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe she's "taking one for the team.
"

Seriously, I really don't want these companies that have a lot of our private data to have the attitude that, "It doesn't matter if this gets out because if anyonesays anything then they will just draw more attention to themselves.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489086</id>
	<title>Re:The closet can be a scary, stupid place</title>
	<author>mrs clear plastic</author>
	<datestamp>1261159380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May I please fully agree with your essay.</p><p>I can further suggest, however, that the woman who's the subject of this article take a look at organizations such as Out and Equal, who make it their mission to support a safe working environment for GLBT community (gay lesbian bisexual, and transgender) members.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May I please fully agree with your essay.I can further suggest , however , that the woman who 's the subject of this article take a look at organizations such as Out and Equal , who make it their mission to support a safe working environment for GLBT community ( gay lesbian bisexual , and transgender ) members .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May I please fully agree with your essay.I can further suggest, however, that the woman who's the subject of this article take a look at organizations such as Out and Equal, who make it their mission to support a safe working environment for GLBT community (gay lesbian bisexual, and transgender) members.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488882</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Yo Grark</author>
	<datestamp>1261158660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right, that was TIVO:</p><p><a href="http://snarkiness.typepad.com/snarkattack/2002/11/my\_tivo\_thinks\_.html" title="typepad.com">http://snarkiness.typepad.com/snarkattack/2002/11/my\_tivo\_thinks\_.html</a> [typepad.com]</p><p>Yo Grark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , that was TIVO : http : //snarkiness.typepad.com/snarkattack/2002/11/my \ _tivo \ _thinks \ _.html [ typepad.com ] Yo Grark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, that was TIVO:http://snarkiness.typepad.com/snarkattack/2002/11/my\_tivo\_thinks\_.html [typepad.com]Yo Grark</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488054</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1261155300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The issue I have sometimes with giving a fake birthday is that it's usually a security question when you go to try the "forgot password" function. If I were to give a different birthday every time, I wouldn't remember which is for which. I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue I have sometimes with giving a fake birthday is that it 's usually a security question when you go to try the " forgot password " function .
If I were to give a different birthday every time , I would n't remember which is for which .
I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue I have sometimes with giving a fake birthday is that it's usually a security question when you go to try the "forgot password" function.
If I were to give a different birthday every time, I wouldn't remember which is for which.
I suppose I could just give the same fake birthday every time, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487300</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The woman <b>bore a child as part of her cover.  </b>  Not saying that means there aren't damages, but clearly there are some issues there with good decision making.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The woman bore a child as part of her cover .
Not saying that means there are n't damages , but clearly there are some issues there with good decision making .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The woman bore a child as part of her cover.
Not saying that means there aren't damages, but clearly there are some issues there with good decision making.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487076</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1261151340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL, but she's filed the suit as Jane Doe.  Whether this actually protects her or not someone who is a lawyer may be able to chime in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL , but she 's filed the suit as Jane Doe .
Whether this actually protects her or not someone who is a lawyer may be able to chime in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL, but she's filed the suit as Jane Doe.
Whether this actually protects her or not someone who is a lawyer may be able to chime in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488130</id>
	<title>Re:The closet can be a scary, stupid place</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261155600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should meet my sister.  SHE LOVES to snoop thru peoples information.  Its creepy as hell.  I have told her this on many occasions.  There are people out there who not only would do it but LIKE to do it.  You would be massively surprised on the information that is out there about people.</p><p>But in general you are right.  Dont worry about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should meet my sister .
SHE LOVES to snoop thru peoples information .
Its creepy as hell .
I have told her this on many occasions .
There are people out there who not only would do it but LIKE to do it .
You would be massively surprised on the information that is out there about people.But in general you are right .
Dont worry about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should meet my sister.
SHE LOVES to snoop thru peoples information.
Its creepy as hell.
I have told her this on many occasions.
There are people out there who not only would do it but LIKE to do it.
You would be massively surprised on the information that is out there about people.But in general you are right.
Dont worry about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487864</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>BOFslime</author>
	<datestamp>1261154520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OH-EM-GEE! they also have my FULL NAME and my CREDIT CARD INFORMATION!  What was I thinking giving a company this information!

(And they only thing they ask for is birthYEAR not birthdate.  I'd rather get recommendation's for twenty-something male's then the chick flick crap a 30 something female would receive.. but hey.. to each their own.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>OH-EM-GEE !
they also have my FULL NAME and my CREDIT CARD INFORMATION !
What was I thinking giving a company this information !
( And they only thing they ask for is birthYEAR not birthdate .
I 'd rather get recommendation 's for twenty-something male 's then the chick flick crap a 30 something female would receive.. but hey.. to each their own .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OH-EM-GEE!
they also have my FULL NAME and my CREDIT CARD INFORMATION!
What was I thinking giving a company this information!
(And they only thing they ask for is birthYEAR not birthdate.
I'd rather get recommendation's for twenty-something male's then the chick flick crap a 30 something female would receive.. but hey.. to each their own.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487224</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...you put the lime in the coconut.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...you put the lime in the coconut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...you put the lime in the coconut.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487102</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1261151460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Springfield, Il (Where Alderman Simpson lives) has a population of 110,000 and roughly five zip codes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Springfield , Il ( Where Alderman Simpson lives ) has a population of 110,000 and roughly five zip codes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Springfield, Il (Where Alderman Simpson lives) has a population of 110,000 and roughly five zip codes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678</id>
	<title>Ridiculous privacy revealed. We should say NO</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1261153800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This case shows the ridiculous extremes that "privacy" has come to.  Netflix, apparently, has some sort of affirmative obligation to help this woman hide her illicit sexual escapades.  The government is going to require Netflix to help cover up for her proclivities.</p><p>Lesbian romps are voluntary.  Using Netflix is voluntary.  Telling Netflix about yourself is voluntary.  Netflix voluntarily rents you videos.  Every aspect of this case involves people freely engaging in voluntary action.  And now we're being asked to get the government involved to force Netflix to hide information against their will, and, by the way, hide it retroactive to several years ago.</p><p>Why shouldn't we just say <b>no</b> to people like this?  No, we won't help you hide.  No, we won't force other people (against their will) to help you hide.  No.  If you want to hide the things you do, try being more discreet next time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This case shows the ridiculous extremes that " privacy " has come to .
Netflix , apparently , has some sort of affirmative obligation to help this woman hide her illicit sexual escapades .
The government is going to require Netflix to help cover up for her proclivities.Lesbian romps are voluntary .
Using Netflix is voluntary .
Telling Netflix about yourself is voluntary .
Netflix voluntarily rents you videos .
Every aspect of this case involves people freely engaging in voluntary action .
And now we 're being asked to get the government involved to force Netflix to hide information against their will , and , by the way , hide it retroactive to several years ago.Why should n't we just say no to people like this ?
No , we wo n't help you hide .
No , we wo n't force other people ( against their will ) to help you hide .
No. If you want to hide the things you do , try being more discreet next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This case shows the ridiculous extremes that "privacy" has come to.
Netflix, apparently, has some sort of affirmative obligation to help this woman hide her illicit sexual escapades.
The government is going to require Netflix to help cover up for her proclivities.Lesbian romps are voluntary.
Using Netflix is voluntary.
Telling Netflix about yourself is voluntary.
Netflix voluntarily rents you videos.
Every aspect of this case involves people freely engaging in voluntary action.
And now we're being asked to get the government involved to force Netflix to hide information against their will, and, by the way, hide it retroactive to several years ago.Why shouldn't we just say no to people like this?
No, we won't help you hide.
No, we won't force other people (against their will) to help you hide.
No.  If you want to hide the things you do, try being more discreet next time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489210</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1261159800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.  Realistically, for her to declare that she is "in closet"  and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery.  Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.</p><p>So, protection from self incrimination?</p></div><ul>
<li>Or she is just trying to avoid the backlash of being a lesbian in a morally conservative area where people talk about homosexuals burning in a pit of fire for eternity.</li><li>Maybe she wants to protect her children from the ridicule that comes with having a homosexual parent(kids are cruel).</li><li>Perhaps her beliefs don't include divorce</li><li>Maybe she loves the person she is married to, but she is just not sexually attracted to them, but she doesn't want to hurt them because of this.</li><li>Or maybe she just wants to come out on her terms, and not because some company had the information with a bit too much personally identifiable information.</li></ul><p>
Just because someone is a homosexual doesn't mean that they are unfaithful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity .
Realistically , for her to declare that she is " in closet " and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery .
Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.So , protection from self incrimination ?
Or she is just trying to avoid the backlash of being a lesbian in a morally conservative area where people talk about homosexuals burning in a pit of fire for eternity.Maybe she wants to protect her children from the ridicule that comes with having a homosexual parent ( kids are cruel ) .Perhaps her beliefs do n't include divorceMaybe she loves the person she is married to , but she is just not sexually attracted to them , but she does n't want to hurt them because of this.Or maybe she just wants to come out on her terms , and not because some company had the information with a bit too much personally identifiable information .
Just because someone is a homosexual does n't mean that they are unfaithful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.
Realistically, for her to declare that she is "in closet"  and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery.
Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.So, protection from self incrimination?
Or she is just trying to avoid the backlash of being a lesbian in a morally conservative area where people talk about homosexuals burning in a pit of fire for eternity.Maybe she wants to protect her children from the ridicule that comes with having a homosexual parent(kids are cruel).Perhaps her beliefs don't include divorceMaybe she loves the person she is married to, but she is just not sexually attracted to them, but she doesn't want to hurt them because of this.Or maybe she just wants to come out on her terms, and not because some company had the information with a bit too much personally identifiable information.
Just because someone is a homosexual doesn't mean that they are unfaithful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487192</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>bmearns</author>
	<datestamp>1261151700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a term for that: <a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/The\_Streisand\_effect" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/The\_Streisand\_effect</a> [wikimedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a term for that : https : //secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/The \ _Streisand \ _effect [ wikimedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a term for that: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/The\_Streisand\_effect [wikimedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489708</id>
	<title>Re:In that I do not use NetFlix, I have some quest</title>
	<author>ncc74656</author>
	<datestamp>1261161600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When the movies are sent to you, do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting?</p></div> </blockquote><p>Netflix sends movies in a Tyvek sleeve with a label with the title, plot synopsis, and a few other details.  This, in turn, goes in a paper envelope that hides everything on the label, except a barcode.  I don't know what is encoded in the barcode; if I had to guess, it's a unique identifier Netflix uses for inventory purposes.  Without a way to tie that to a movie title, the only way someone's going to know what you're ordering from Netflix would be if someone intercepted your mail and pulled out the movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the movies are sent to you , do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting ?
Netflix sends movies in a Tyvek sleeve with a label with the title , plot synopsis , and a few other details .
This , in turn , goes in a paper envelope that hides everything on the label , except a barcode .
I do n't know what is encoded in the barcode ; if I had to guess , it 's a unique identifier Netflix uses for inventory purposes .
Without a way to tie that to a movie title , the only way someone 's going to know what you 're ordering from Netflix would be if someone intercepted your mail and pulled out the movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the movies are sent to you, do they arive in any type of packaging that indicate what type of movie you are getting?
Netflix sends movies in a Tyvek sleeve with a label with the title, plot synopsis, and a few other details.
This, in turn, goes in a paper envelope that hides everything on the label, except a barcode.
I don't know what is encoded in the barcode; if I had to guess, it's a unique identifier Netflix uses for inventory purposes.
Without a way to tie that to a movie title, the only way someone's going to know what you're ordering from Netflix would be if someone intercepted your mail and pulled out the movie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487958</id>
	<title>Ummm, yeah I'm thinking...</title>
	<author>gfolkert</author>
	<datestamp>1261154880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely agree, even then... let us consider how many people are in a specific Zip Code, especially in places that are super heavily populated... 87\% chance? doubtful.</p><p>87\% of all statistics are pulled from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dev/ass, including this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree , even then... let us consider how many people are in a specific Zip Code , especially in places that are super heavily populated... 87 \ % chance ?
doubtful.87 \ % of all statistics are pulled from /dev/ass , including this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree, even then... let us consider how many people are in a specific Zip Code, especially in places that are super heavily populated... 87\% chance?
doubtful.87\% of all statistics are pulled from /dev/ass, including this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491164</id>
	<title>Ok, i read the article and I still have questions</title>
	<author>pgmrdlm</author>
	<datestamp>1261166460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netflix did not give out zip code, age, or gender. That was being offered in the second phase of the contest.<br>*****<br>The suit is also asking the court to stop Netflix from launching its promised second contest to improve the recommendations &mdash; this time giving out user data that includes ZIP codes, ages and gender, along with movie ratings and ID numbers substituted for user names<br>****</p><p>The actual data given out, which the law suit was filed against says 2 data bases with only the following description of what was in it.<br>****<br>In order to get a better movie recommendation algorithm, the online DVD rental company gave more than 50,000 Netflix Prize contestants two massive datasets. The first included 100 million movie ratings, along with the date of the rating, a unique ID number for the subscriber, and the movie info. Based on this data from 480,000 customers, contestants had to come up with a recommendation algorithm that could predict 10 percent better than Netflix how those same subscribers rated other movies.<br>****</p><p>Ok, I'm confused.  I do not see anything in the first descript that would identify a person.  The zip code, age, gender was NOT given out. YET.</p><p>They talk about two data base's, but only describe the contents of one. They talk about future release of data. Which is age, gender, zip. But it hasn't been given out.</p><p>What type of information was in the second data base.</p><p>What specificatly is the data the origional law suit was filed about??????</p><p>I know, stupid questions.. But there is somethign missing here, or I'm just stupid.  or blind(this I will admit to).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix did not give out zip code , age , or gender .
That was being offered in the second phase of the contest .
* * * * * The suit is also asking the court to stop Netflix from launching its promised second contest to improve the recommendations    this time giving out user data that includes ZIP codes , ages and gender , along with movie ratings and ID numbers substituted for user names * * * * The actual data given out , which the law suit was filed against says 2 data bases with only the following description of what was in it .
* * * * In order to get a better movie recommendation algorithm , the online DVD rental company gave more than 50,000 Netflix Prize contestants two massive datasets .
The first included 100 million movie ratings , along with the date of the rating , a unique ID number for the subscriber , and the movie info .
Based on this data from 480,000 customers , contestants had to come up with a recommendation algorithm that could predict 10 percent better than Netflix how those same subscribers rated other movies .
* * * * Ok , I 'm confused .
I do not see anything in the first descript that would identify a person .
The zip code , age , gender was NOT given out .
YET.They talk about two data base 's , but only describe the contents of one .
They talk about future release of data .
Which is age , gender , zip .
But it has n't been given out.What type of information was in the second data base.What specificatly is the data the origional law suit was filed about ? ? ? ? ?
? I know , stupid questions.. But there is somethign missing here , or I 'm just stupid .
or blind ( this I will admit to ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix did not give out zip code, age, or gender.
That was being offered in the second phase of the contest.
*****The suit is also asking the court to stop Netflix from launching its promised second contest to improve the recommendations — this time giving out user data that includes ZIP codes, ages and gender, along with movie ratings and ID numbers substituted for user names****The actual data given out, which the law suit was filed against says 2 data bases with only the following description of what was in it.
****In order to get a better movie recommendation algorithm, the online DVD rental company gave more than 50,000 Netflix Prize contestants two massive datasets.
The first included 100 million movie ratings, along with the date of the rating, a unique ID number for the subscriber, and the movie info.
Based on this data from 480,000 customers, contestants had to come up with a recommendation algorithm that could predict 10 percent better than Netflix how those same subscribers rated other movies.
****Ok, I'm confused.
I do not see anything in the first descript that would identify a person.
The zip code, age, gender was NOT given out.
YET.They talk about two data base's, but only describe the contents of one.
They talk about future release of data.
Which is age, gender, zip.
But it hasn't been given out.What type of information was in the second data base.What specificatly is the data the origional law suit was filed about?????
?I know, stupid questions.. But there is somethign missing here, or I'm just stupid.
or blind(this I will admit to).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.  Realistically, for her to declare that she is "in closet"  and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery.  Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.</p><p>So, protection from self incrimination?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity .
Realistically , for her to declare that she is " in closet " and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery .
Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.So , protection from self incrimination ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throw in a good chance that if her id is revealed her husband may be able to divorce on grounds of infidelity.
Realistically, for her to declare that she is "in closet"  and that Netflix did something to jeopardize her status she is effectively stating she is or has committed adultery.
Needless to say that would put her on weaker footing should a divorce case come along.So, protection from self incrimination?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487620</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>BOFslime</author>
	<datestamp>1261153620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I double checked my account profile and the only thing it has is birth year, which is used for age group movie recommendations.  There is also a pull down menu for the account owner and any sub users on the account as to what movies they are allowed to rent/watch (instantly) Highest is R but there is also 'unrated family'.

No where did I enter my full birth date, only year and gender.  But this also looks partly removable (or you could lie), but I don't have anything to hide so I don't care and I will enjoy proper recommendations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I double checked my account profile and the only thing it has is birth year , which is used for age group movie recommendations .
There is also a pull down menu for the account owner and any sub users on the account as to what movies they are allowed to rent/watch ( instantly ) Highest is R but there is also 'unrated family' .
No where did I enter my full birth date , only year and gender .
But this also looks partly removable ( or you could lie ) , but I do n't have anything to hide so I do n't care and I will enjoy proper recommendations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I double checked my account profile and the only thing it has is birth year, which is used for age group movie recommendations.
There is also a pull down menu for the account owner and any sub users on the account as to what movies they are allowed to rent/watch (instantly) Highest is R but there is also 'unrated family'.
No where did I enter my full birth date, only year and gender.
But this also looks partly removable (or you could lie), but I don't have anything to hide so I don't care and I will enjoy proper recommendations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494860</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous privacy revealed. We should say NO</title>
	<author>concept14</author>
	<datestamp>1261139700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No mod points today, so I'll just point out that if you had not written "illicit sexual escapades" and "lesbian romps", I wouldn't call you a troll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No mod points today , so I 'll just point out that if you had not written " illicit sexual escapades " and " lesbian romps " , I would n't call you a troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No mod points today, so I'll just point out that if you had not written "illicit sexual escapades" and "lesbian romps", I wouldn't call you a troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487770</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps pecause being a lesbian in Los Angeles, CA (<a href="http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/06037.html" title="census.gov">pop. 9,862,049</a> [census.gov]) is very different from being a lesbian in Moss Landing, CA (<a href="http://www.city-data.com/city/Moss-Landing-California.html" title="city-data.com">pop. 304</a> [city-data.com])?  Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps pecause being a lesbian in Los Angeles , CA ( pop .
9,862,049 [ census.gov ] ) is very different from being a lesbian in Moss Landing , CA ( pop .
304 [ city-data.com ] ) ?
Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps pecause being a lesbian in Los Angeles, CA (pop.
9,862,049 [census.gov]) is very different from being a lesbian in Moss Landing, CA (pop.
304 [city-data.com])?
Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487916</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Bakkster</author>
	<datestamp>1261154640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, only people who want deliveries to their actual house give their correct ZIP code!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , only people who want deliveries to their actual house give their correct ZIP code !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, only people who want deliveries to their actual house give their correct ZIP code!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488558</id>
	<title>Re:Filing as Jane Doe?</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1261157280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks.</p></div></blockquote><p>The ignorance! It burns!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks.The ignorance !
It burns !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone is as broad minded as big city folks.The ignorance!
It burns!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490636</id>
	<title>a mashup away from a serious problem</title>
	<author>patSPLAT</author>
	<datestamp>1261164480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most repliers are unsympathetic to this complaint, but if this dataset was hooked up to an online tool which quickly did the look-up it would be a major issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most repliers are unsympathetic to this complaint , but if this dataset was hooked up to an online tool which quickly did the look-up it would be a major issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most repliers are unsympathetic to this complaint, but if this dataset was hooked up to an online tool which quickly did the look-up it would be a major issue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</id>
	<title>Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>if a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place? I never give those things to companies, and if I can't avoid it (forced to enter something when signing up) I give bogus information. Neither of those are any of Netflix's business.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if a data set reveals a person 's ZIP code , birthdate and gender , there 's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place ?
I never give those things to companies , and if I ca n't avoid it ( forced to enter something when signing up ) I give bogus information .
Neither of those are any of Netflix 's business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if a data set reveals a person's ZIP code, birthdate and gender, there's an 87 percent chance that the person can be uniquely identified.Why are you giving Netflix your birthdate and gender in the first place?
I never give those things to companies, and if I can't avoid it (forced to enter something when signing up) I give bogus information.
Neither of those are any of Netflix's business.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134</id>
	<title>Re:netflix tracks birthdates?</title>
	<author>bmearns</author>
	<datestamp>1261151520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm guessing they probably ask if you're renting adult material. If the mother was outed by the movies she rented, she was probably renting adult material.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing they probably ask if you 're renting adult material .
If the mother was outed by the movies she rented , she was probably renting adult material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing they probably ask if you're renting adult material.
If the mother was outed by the movies she rented, she was probably renting adult material.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487028</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1261151040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How large an area is a zip code in the states?</p></div><p>Depends on how many households and businesses there are in the area.  In a rural setting a zip code may cover an entire city or county.  In a heavily urbanized area it may only cover a single building or city block.
</p><p>The five digit zip code doesn't tell the whole story though.  There's actually the nine digit zip code plus a two digit delivery point code.  Every single address in the United States will have a unique nine digit zip code + delivery code.  It doesn't mean much to the layman but the USPS can actually represent every single address in the United States with an 11 digit number.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How large an area is a zip code in the states ? Depends on how many households and businesses there are in the area .
In a rural setting a zip code may cover an entire city or county .
In a heavily urbanized area it may only cover a single building or city block .
The five digit zip code does n't tell the whole story though .
There 's actually the nine digit zip code plus a two digit delivery point code .
Every single address in the United States will have a unique nine digit zip code + delivery code .
It does n't mean much to the layman but the USPS can actually represent every single address in the United States with an 11 digit number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How large an area is a zip code in the states?Depends on how many households and businesses there are in the area.
In a rural setting a zip code may cover an entire city or county.
In a heavily urbanized area it may only cover a single building or city block.
The five digit zip code doesn't tell the whole story though.
There's actually the nine digit zip code plus a two digit delivery point code.
Every single address in the United States will have a unique nine digit zip code + delivery code.
It doesn't mean much to the layman but the USPS can actually represent every single address in the United States with an 11 digit number.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487588</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do not want to be perceived as rude, but I believe your mother could be one of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not want to be perceived as rude , but I believe your mother could be one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not want to be perceived as rude, but I believe your mother could be one of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487750</id>
	<title>Re:Stop giving out personal info that isn't needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I can find it in the registration form, I always select "Zulu". I like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I can find it in the registration form , I always select " Zulu " .
I like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I can find it in the registration form, I always select "Zulu".
I like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488300</id>
	<title>Re:The closet can be a scary, stupid place</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261156260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a friend like this as well.  She actually was just coerced into quitting because she told a female co-worker that she loved her and it caused a big problem. If she'd been more level-headed about it, I doubt she'd have disclosed that information before being 100\% sure about the woman's reaction and even after, when they were trying to coerce her into quitting, she'd have been more level-headed about the problem if she hadn't kept saying things like 'They'll out me and the whole town will hate me.'  It isn't even the town she lives in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a friend like this as well .
She actually was just coerced into quitting because she told a female co-worker that she loved her and it caused a big problem .
If she 'd been more level-headed about it , I doubt she 'd have disclosed that information before being 100 \ % sure about the woman 's reaction and even after , when they were trying to coerce her into quitting , she 'd have been more level-headed about the problem if she had n't kept saying things like 'They 'll out me and the whole town will hate me .
' It is n't even the town she lives in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a friend like this as well.
She actually was just coerced into quitting because she told a female co-worker that she loved her and it caused a big problem.
If she'd been more level-headed about it, I doubt she'd have disclosed that information before being 100\% sure about the woman's reaction and even after, when they were trying to coerce her into quitting, she'd have been more level-headed about the problem if she hadn't kept saying things like 'They'll out me and the whole town will hate me.
'  It isn't even the town she lives in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050</id>
	<title>Re:So lemme get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More to the point, what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian?  I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?" button when I signed up for my account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More to the point , what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian ?
I do n't recall seeing a " Are you a closet homosexual ?
" button when I signed up for my account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More to the point, what data does Netflix have on you that reveals you to be a closed lesbian?
I don't recall seeing a "Are you a closet homosexual?
" button when I signed up for my account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</id>
	<title>Yes</title>
	<author>RichardJenkins</author>
	<datestamp>1261150740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How large an area is a zip code in the states? I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there'd be outrage. Muppets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How large an area is a zip code in the states ?
I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there 'd be outrage .
Muppets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How large an area is a zip code in the states?
I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there'd be outrage.
Muppets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30496074</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1261151100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How large an area is a zip code in the states? I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there'd be outrage. Muppets.</p></div><p>Exactly.  How about my information between me and the company just stays that way?  How about I get a little respect from the people who I pay money to?</p><p>I would *always* rather pay more for something, knowing that the seller will respect me (honor warranty, replace item, PROTECT MY DATA, etc).</p><p>Why play stupid stunts to generate stimulation and end up screwing people when you could just run an honest business?</p><p>Let me guess... the american expectation of cheapness drives it....  We want EVERYTHING, and we want it for a dollar.  Why are cellphones tied to plans? We want the unit to be cheap.  Why is everything manufactured half-assed and unreliable?  We need it made in china to meet our price points.  Why are our foods full of GMO, hormones, antiboitics, and preservatives?  We want more food and we want it cheap, that way we can afford a cell phone and a bunch of plastic toys....</p><p>So there is a 2 part disease here.  Cheapness-fueled mega consumerisim, and corporate/business greed.  We don't need so much crap, and businesses don't need to keep pushing for MORE profits.</p><p>Its our own fault.  We just won't admit it because its too hard to look in the mirror and say "I buy tons of crap with my money and I don't really know why."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How large an area is a zip code in the states ?
I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there 'd be outrage .
Muppets.Exactly. How about my information between me and the company just stays that way ?
How about I get a little respect from the people who I pay money to ? I would * always * rather pay more for something , knowing that the seller will respect me ( honor warranty , replace item , PROTECT MY DATA , etc ) .Why play stupid stunts to generate stimulation and end up screwing people when you could just run an honest business ? Let me guess... the american expectation of cheapness drives it.... We want EVERYTHING , and we want it for a dollar .
Why are cellphones tied to plans ?
We want the unit to be cheap .
Why is everything manufactured half-assed and unreliable ?
We need it made in china to meet our price points .
Why are our foods full of GMO , hormones , antiboitics , and preservatives ?
We want more food and we want it cheap , that way we can afford a cell phone and a bunch of plastic toys....So there is a 2 part disease here .
Cheapness-fueled mega consumerisim , and corporate/business greed .
We do n't need so much crap , and businesses do n't need to keep pushing for MORE profits.Its our own fault .
We just wo n't admit it because its too hard to look in the mirror and say " I buy tons of crap with my money and I do n't really know why .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How large an area is a zip code in the states?
I think in the UK if a company publicly released sensitive data about a people with their birthday and postcode attached there'd be outrage.
Muppets.Exactly.  How about my information between me and the company just stays that way?
How about I get a little respect from the people who I pay money to?I would *always* rather pay more for something, knowing that the seller will respect me (honor warranty, replace item, PROTECT MY DATA, etc).Why play stupid stunts to generate stimulation and end up screwing people when you could just run an honest business?Let me guess... the american expectation of cheapness drives it....  We want EVERYTHING, and we want it for a dollar.
Why are cellphones tied to plans?
We want the unit to be cheap.
Why is everything manufactured half-assed and unreliable?
We need it made in china to meet our price points.
Why are our foods full of GMO, hormones, antiboitics, and preservatives?
We want more food and we want it cheap, that way we can afford a cell phone and a bunch of plastic toys....So there is a 2 part disease here.
Cheapness-fueled mega consumerisim, and corporate/business greed.
We don't need so much crap, and businesses don't need to keep pushing for MORE profits.Its our own fault.
We just won't admit it because its too hard to look in the mirror and say "I buy tons of crap with my money and I don't really know why.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100</id>
	<title>Outed by movie rentals?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The member&rsquo;s movie data exposes a Netflix member&rsquo;s personal interest and/or struggles with various highly personal issues, including sexuality, mental illness, recovery from alcoholism, and victimization from incest, physical abuse, domestic violence, adultery, and rape."</p><p>Isn't this a bit of a stretch.  I've rented a rather broad range of films, over the past year some of the films I have watched include Apt Pupil, Lords of Dogtown, Girl Interrupted, A History of violence, A Beautiful Mind, Brokeback Mountain and Super High Me.  Evidently I'm a mentally disturbed,abusive, homosexual, drug abusing, skateboarding, autistic nazi and didn't know it.</p><p>The woman who was outed wasn't outed by her movie choices but by her paranoia leading to her own disclosure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The member    s movie data exposes a Netflix member    s personal interest and/or struggles with various highly personal issues , including sexuality , mental illness , recovery from alcoholism , and victimization from incest , physical abuse , domestic violence , adultery , and rape .
" Is n't this a bit of a stretch .
I 've rented a rather broad range of films , over the past year some of the films I have watched include Apt Pupil , Lords of Dogtown , Girl Interrupted , A History of violence , A Beautiful Mind , Brokeback Mountain and Super High Me .
Evidently I 'm a mentally disturbed,abusive , homosexual , drug abusing , skateboarding , autistic nazi and did n't know it.The woman who was outed was n't outed by her movie choices but by her paranoia leading to her own disclosure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The member’s movie data exposes a Netflix member’s personal interest and/or struggles with various highly personal issues, including sexuality, mental illness, recovery from alcoholism, and victimization from incest, physical abuse, domestic violence, adultery, and rape.
"Isn't this a bit of a stretch.
I've rented a rather broad range of films, over the past year some of the films I have watched include Apt Pupil, Lords of Dogtown, Girl Interrupted, A History of violence, A Beautiful Mind, Brokeback Mountain and Super High Me.
Evidently I'm a mentally disturbed,abusive, homosexual, drug abusing, skateboarding, autistic nazi and didn't know it.The woman who was outed wasn't outed by her movie choices but by her paranoia leading to her own disclosure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30493118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30495568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30496074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30502594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_1344246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487050
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30493118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487520
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487722
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30502594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30496074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30489050
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487252
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30488822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30490700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30494860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30492774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30491304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30495568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30487916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_1344246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_1344246.30486958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
