<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_040235</id>
	<title>After Berlusconi Attack, Italy Considers Web Censorship</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1261135620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The Italian government has <a href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/330180/">proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet</a> after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours. However, the planned clampdown on Internet hate speech sparked a heated debate over censorship and freedom of expression, leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours .
However , the planned clampdown on Internet hate speech sparked a heated debate over censorship and freedom of expression , leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours.
However, the planned clampdown on Internet hate speech sparked a heated debate over censorship and freedom of expression, leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30542654</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>giuda</author>
	<datestamp>1261649880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Videocracy sucks. It's an absolute ripoff. It's a documentary about people that do everything to go on TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Videocracy sucks .
It 's an absolute ripoff .
It 's a documentary about people that do everything to go on TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Videocracy sucks.
It's an absolute ripoff.
It's a documentary about people that do everything to go on TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487066</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Italy and they are working. Either they are blocked only through DNS, or their geolocation sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Italy and they are working .
Either they are blocked only through DNS , or their geolocation sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Italy and they are working.
Either they are blocked only through DNS, or their geolocation sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485380</id>
	<title>They never learn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OR, the Italian government could use this as an opportunity to gauge the public disapproval for their senior politicians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OR , the Italian government could use this as an opportunity to gauge the public disapproval for their senior politicians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OR, the Italian government could use this as an opportunity to gauge the public disapproval for their senior politicians.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485476</id>
	<title>this reminds me...</title>
	<author>papabob</author>
	<datestamp>1261141080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's in "Forever Peace" where the goverment nukes a city (Denver?) and acusses the then new 'nanotechnology' of the incident to take control over every production line and create a politicians-controlled monopoly.</p><p>Maybe in 50 years we discover that the attacker is a member of the AISI (italian intelligence agency); or maybe not, because the web would be controlled by government...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's in " Forever Peace " where the goverment nukes a city ( Denver ?
) and acusses the then new 'nanotechnology ' of the incident to take control over every production line and create a politicians-controlled monopoly.Maybe in 50 years we discover that the attacker is a member of the AISI ( italian intelligence agency ) ; or maybe not , because the web would be controlled by government.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's in "Forever Peace" where the goverment nukes a city (Denver?
) and acusses the then new 'nanotechnology' of the incident to take control over every production line and create a politicians-controlled monopoly.Maybe in 50 years we discover that the attacker is a member of the AISI (italian intelligence agency); or maybe not, because the web would be controlled by government...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485598</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>tsa</author>
	<datestamp>1261142160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the EU had any balls they would have kicked Italy out long ago because of Berlusconi's behaviour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the EU had any balls they would have kicked Italy out long ago because of Berlusconi 's behaviour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the EU had any balls they would have kicked Italy out long ago because of Berlusconi's behaviour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486924</id>
	<title>tro8llkore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Taken- over by BSDI ASSOCIATION OF The latest Netcraft off the play area</htmltext>
<tokenext>Taken- over by BSDI ASSOCIATION OF The latest Netcraft off the play area</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taken- over by BSDI ASSOCIATION OF The latest Netcraft off the play area</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485792</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1261144200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?</p></div><p>It depends on how fast someone got in with something to mop up the blood. I guess that was pretty quick (the video of the events was pretty confused...) We also don't know the extent to which his teeth were damaged; "broken" might be a mistransation of (the Italian word for) "chipped" or "cracked".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible to have two broken teeth , broken nose , and a white shirt with no red stain ? It depends on how fast someone got in with something to mop up the blood .
I guess that was pretty quick ( the video of the events was pretty confused... ) We also do n't know the extent to which his teeth were damaged ; " broken " might be a mistransation of ( the Italian word for ) " chipped " or " cracked " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?It depends on how fast someone got in with something to mop up the blood.
I guess that was pretty quick (the video of the events was pretty confused...) We also don't know the extent to which his teeth were damaged; "broken" might be a mistransation of (the Italian word for) "chipped" or "cracked".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485550</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry to say this, but there's an astonishingly high number of facts that show that your forecast is just wishful thinking. The first that comes to mind: the sex scandals of Noemi Letizia, D'Addario, the infamous Lodo Alfano. And these aren't nearly the worst ones, just the ones people know about, and just go "meh, we can't do anything about it".</p><p>Just so that you know: with astonishingly perfect timing, the "assault" helped covering the privatization of the Italian Army, hidden in the Finanziaria. No television obviously has spoken about it, and a <a href="http://news.google.it/news/search?aq=0&amp;pz=1&amp;cf=all&amp;ned=it&amp;hl=it&amp;q=forze+armate+privatizzate" title="google.it" rel="nofollow">google news search</a> [google.it] brings up four (4) results about it.</p><p>If this Internet censhorship thing goes on, I'm confident it will easily be worked around by anyone with a little bit of computer knowledge, because they're too stupid to do things with the help from people that know what they're doing. But that's a puny consolation, because most of the people won't be willing/able to do what will be necessary to work around it.</p><p>I f$\%&amp;/n' hate being italian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry to say this , but there 's an astonishingly high number of facts that show that your forecast is just wishful thinking .
The first that comes to mind : the sex scandals of Noemi Letizia , D'Addario , the infamous Lodo Alfano .
And these are n't nearly the worst ones , just the ones people know about , and just go " meh , we ca n't do anything about it " .Just so that you know : with astonishingly perfect timing , the " assault " helped covering the privatization of the Italian Army , hidden in the Finanziaria .
No television obviously has spoken about it , and a google news search [ google.it ] brings up four ( 4 ) results about it.If this Internet censhorship thing goes on , I 'm confident it will easily be worked around by anyone with a little bit of computer knowledge , because they 're too stupid to do things with the help from people that know what they 're doing .
But that 's a puny consolation , because most of the people wo n't be willing/able to do what will be necessary to work around it.I f $ \ % &amp;/n ' hate being italian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry to say this, but there's an astonishingly high number of facts that show that your forecast is just wishful thinking.
The first that comes to mind: the sex scandals of Noemi Letizia, D'Addario, the infamous Lodo Alfano.
And these aren't nearly the worst ones, just the ones people know about, and just go "meh, we can't do anything about it".Just so that you know: with astonishingly perfect timing, the "assault" helped covering the privatization of the Italian Army, hidden in the Finanziaria.
No television obviously has spoken about it, and a google news search [google.it] brings up four (4) results about it.If this Internet censhorship thing goes on, I'm confident it will easily be worked around by anyone with a little bit of computer knowledge, because they're too stupid to do things with the help from people that know what they're doing.
But that's a puny consolation, because most of the people won't be willing/able to do what will be necessary to work around it.I f$\%&amp;/n' hate being italian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487912</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I am in Italy, connected thru 'Alice Telecom' that is one of the largest ISP, and I can connect to those two sites</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I am in Italy , connected thru 'Alice Telecom ' that is one of the largest ISP , and I can connect to those two sites</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I am in Italy, connected thru 'Alice Telecom' that is one of the largest ISP, and I can connect to those two sites</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486450</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Shin-LaC</author>
	<datestamp>1261148040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are three major players in the TV market in Italy: Rai, Mediaset and Sky.<ul> <li>Rai is owned by the state, and runs three major TV channels (Rai 1, Rai 2, Rai 3). The various parties exert some control on the different channels: it's not the case that the majority takes all. There is a parliamentary commission that watches over Rai, and it is controlled by the opposition.</li>
<li>Mediaset is owned by Berlusconi, and runs three major TV channels (Canale 5, Italia 1, Rete 4).</li>
<li>Sky is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and controls the entirety of the satellite TV market (the others use terrestrial broadcasting). It is the same size as Mediaset in terms of revenue, and is growing faster. Murdoch hates Berlusconi.</li></ul><p>
As for newspapers, the two main Italian papers are La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera.</p><ul> <li>La Repubblica is owned by Carlo De Benedetti, who hates Berlusconi. It follows a very strong anti-Berlusconi line.</li>
<li>Il Corriere is owned by a collection of financial and industrial interests. They don't like Berlusconi. The paper itself generally follows a moderate line. It officially endorsed Berlusconi's opponents in the past.</li>
<li>Berlusconi controls the newspaper Il Giornale, which is far smaller than Corriere or Repubblica. Libero, which is smaller yet than Il Giornale, supports Berlusconi, but is actually owned by a completely unrelated entrepeneur (Angelucci). Il Foglio is a tiny, tiny "opinion" paper owned by Berlusconi's divorcing wife.</li></ul><p>
There are other players in both the TV and newspaper market (especially the latter), but these are the most significant ones. To sum up, while Berlusconi has a larger control of the media than we would like, he does not "own all the major tv stations"; in fact, he doesn't even own half.  The claim that he owns "all newspapers" is plain nonsense, he owns a small minority.<br> <br>
Another thing to bear in mind is that in Italy, as in most countries, educated people generally lean to the left. To make TV programs, or write news, you need artists and journalists, who mostly lean to the left. The only exception is Rete 4's news, but only old people watch it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are three major players in the TV market in Italy : Rai , Mediaset and Sky .
Rai is owned by the state , and runs three major TV channels ( Rai 1 , Rai 2 , Rai 3 ) .
The various parties exert some control on the different channels : it 's not the case that the majority takes all .
There is a parliamentary commission that watches over Rai , and it is controlled by the opposition .
Mediaset is owned by Berlusconi , and runs three major TV channels ( Canale 5 , Italia 1 , Rete 4 ) .
Sky is owned by Rupert Murdoch , and controls the entirety of the satellite TV market ( the others use terrestrial broadcasting ) .
It is the same size as Mediaset in terms of revenue , and is growing faster .
Murdoch hates Berlusconi .
As for newspapers , the two main Italian papers are La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera .
La Repubblica is owned by Carlo De Benedetti , who hates Berlusconi .
It follows a very strong anti-Berlusconi line .
Il Corriere is owned by a collection of financial and industrial interests .
They do n't like Berlusconi .
The paper itself generally follows a moderate line .
It officially endorsed Berlusconi 's opponents in the past .
Berlusconi controls the newspaper Il Giornale , which is far smaller than Corriere or Repubblica .
Libero , which is smaller yet than Il Giornale , supports Berlusconi , but is actually owned by a completely unrelated entrepeneur ( Angelucci ) .
Il Foglio is a tiny , tiny " opinion " paper owned by Berlusconi 's divorcing wife .
There are other players in both the TV and newspaper market ( especially the latter ) , but these are the most significant ones .
To sum up , while Berlusconi has a larger control of the media than we would like , he does not " own all the major tv stations " ; in fact , he does n't even own half .
The claim that he owns " all newspapers " is plain nonsense , he owns a small minority .
Another thing to bear in mind is that in Italy , as in most countries , educated people generally lean to the left .
To make TV programs , or write news , you need artists and journalists , who mostly lean to the left .
The only exception is Rete 4 's news , but only old people watch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are three major players in the TV market in Italy: Rai, Mediaset and Sky.
Rai is owned by the state, and runs three major TV channels (Rai 1, Rai 2, Rai 3).
The various parties exert some control on the different channels: it's not the case that the majority takes all.
There is a parliamentary commission that watches over Rai, and it is controlled by the opposition.
Mediaset is owned by Berlusconi, and runs three major TV channels (Canale 5, Italia 1, Rete 4).
Sky is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and controls the entirety of the satellite TV market (the others use terrestrial broadcasting).
It is the same size as Mediaset in terms of revenue, and is growing faster.
Murdoch hates Berlusconi.
As for newspapers, the two main Italian papers are La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera.
La Repubblica is owned by Carlo De Benedetti, who hates Berlusconi.
It follows a very strong anti-Berlusconi line.
Il Corriere is owned by a collection of financial and industrial interests.
They don't like Berlusconi.
The paper itself generally follows a moderate line.
It officially endorsed Berlusconi's opponents in the past.
Berlusconi controls the newspaper Il Giornale, which is far smaller than Corriere or Repubblica.
Libero, which is smaller yet than Il Giornale, supports Berlusconi, but is actually owned by a completely unrelated entrepeneur (Angelucci).
Il Foglio is a tiny, tiny "opinion" paper owned by Berlusconi's divorcing wife.
There are other players in both the TV and newspaper market (especially the latter), but these are the most significant ones.
To sum up, while Berlusconi has a larger control of the media than we would like, he does not "own all the major tv stations"; in fact, he doesn't even own half.
The claim that he owns "all newspapers" is plain nonsense, he owns a small minority.
Another thing to bear in mind is that in Italy, as in most countries, educated people generally lean to the left.
To make TV programs, or write news, you need artists and journalists, who mostly lean to the left.
The only exception is Rete 4's news, but only old people watch it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485600</id>
	<title>Good on you, Italy</title>
	<author>Gadget\_Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1261142280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good on you, Italy. At least you are being honest about why you would want to censor the net. None of the usual "terrorist pedophile" nonsense. Just a nice, simple message to the populous: "we don't want to hear from you, please go away".</p><p>However, since I am against censorship, I might have to reconsider the answer to <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1482880&amp;cid=30484544" title="slashdot.org">my Simpson quote</a> [slashdot.org] regarding asteroid targets from earlier today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good on you , Italy .
At least you are being honest about why you would want to censor the net .
None of the usual " terrorist pedophile " nonsense .
Just a nice , simple message to the populous : " we do n't want to hear from you , please go away " .However , since I am against censorship , I might have to reconsider the answer to my Simpson quote [ slashdot.org ] regarding asteroid targets from earlier today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good on you, Italy.
At least you are being honest about why you would want to censor the net.
None of the usual "terrorist pedophile" nonsense.
Just a nice, simple message to the populous: "we don't want to hear from you, please go away".However, since I am against censorship, I might have to reconsider the answer to my Simpson quote [slashdot.org] regarding asteroid targets from earlier today.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486018</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261145940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Berlusconi may own "just" some newspapers and other magazines, plus his TV networks, but he also owns some of the biggest advertising companies in Italy, which gives him nearly total control over what is being published. If a newspaper or TV station he doesn't own publishes some news he doesn't like, advertisers start magically fleeing away from there. It happened already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Berlusconi may own " just " some newspapers and other magazines , plus his TV networks , but he also owns some of the biggest advertising companies in Italy , which gives him nearly total control over what is being published .
If a newspaper or TV station he does n't own publishes some news he does n't like , advertisers start magically fleeing away from there .
It happened already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Berlusconi may own "just" some newspapers and other magazines, plus his TV networks, but he also owns some of the biggest advertising companies in Italy, which gives him nearly total control over what is being published.
If a newspaper or TV station he doesn't own publishes some news he doesn't like, advertisers start magically fleeing away from there.
It happened already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485704</id>
	<title>Internet Censorship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261143360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Censors-hip becomes trendy. It is time to tell governments who is whos employer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Censors-hip becomes trendy .
It is time to tell governments who is whos employer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Censors-hip becomes trendy.
It is time to tell governments who is whos employer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30488488</id>
	<title>true free speech is rare in the world</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1261157040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>America gets critized for a lot of things, many justifiably.  But its so-called Bill of Rights is mroe firmly followed than in most other countries, inlcuding "liberal Europe".  Cults like Scientology and Mormonism are banend in parts of Europe.  "Pre-trial publicity" and "reasonable doubt" are not as entrenched in other places liek the during the recent Italian trial of the the Seattle woman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>America gets critized for a lot of things , many justifiably .
But its so-called Bill of Rights is mroe firmly followed than in most other countries , inlcuding " liberal Europe " .
Cults like Scientology and Mormonism are banend in parts of Europe .
" Pre-trial publicity " and " reasonable doubt " are not as entrenched in other places liek the during the recent Italian trial of the the Seattle woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America gets critized for a lot of things, many justifiably.
But its so-called Bill of Rights is mroe firmly followed than in most other countries, inlcuding "liberal Europe".
Cults like Scientology and Mormonism are banend in parts of Europe.
"Pre-trial publicity" and "reasonable doubt" are not as entrenched in other places liek the during the recent Italian trial of the the Seattle woman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497012</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261164900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if I disagree with democracy as a whole.??</p><p>I often get the "If you dont like it here you can just leave".<br>But can I really, where do I go if I dont want any part of your fucked up society. I would love to "just get out", but there is no place for me to escape to. So whats left for me?  Terrorism??</p><p>Yes I am an anarchist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I disagree with democracy as a whole. ?
? I often get the " If you dont like it here you can just leave " .But can I really , where do I go if I dont want any part of your fucked up society .
I would love to " just get out " , but there is no place for me to escape to .
So whats left for me ?
Terrorism ? ? Yes I am an anarchist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I disagree with democracy as a whole.?
?I often get the "If you dont like it here you can just leave".But can I really, where do I go if I dont want any part of your fucked up society.
I would love to "just get out", but there is no place for me to escape to.
So whats left for me?
Terrorism??Yes I am an anarchist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</id>
	<title>Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Must be very hard for Mr Berlusconi that there is media he doesn't control.</p><p>For anyone not familiar with Italy he already owns all the major tv stations and newspapers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Must be very hard for Mr Berlusconi that there is media he does n't control.For anyone not familiar with Italy he already owns all the major tv stations and newspapers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must be very hard for Mr Berlusconi that there is media he doesn't control.For anyone not familiar with Italy he already owns all the major tv stations and newspapers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485726</id>
	<title>Partial U turn?</title>
	<author>Nomaxxx</author>
	<datestamp>1261143540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn."

What's a partial U-turn?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...a L-turn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn .
" What 's a partial U-turn ?
...a L-turn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn.
"

What's a partial U-turn?
...a L-turn?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30499840</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261251120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that one day somebody will bash his face in. (And all others like him).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that one day somebody will bash his face in .
( And all others like him ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that one day somebody will bash his face in.
(And all others like him).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485496</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what about, e.g., Libero ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what about , e.g. , Libero ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about, e.g., Libero ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30496990</id>
	<title>google translate tells me liberta</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can you spell "freedom" in Italian? We cannot.</p></div><p>liberta</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you spell " freedom " in Italian ?
We can not.liberta</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you spell "freedom" in Italian?
We cannot.liberta
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486074</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The actual reason Berluscon is able to stay in power is because Italy is full of goombahs and guidos who are too self-centered and clueless to do anything about this situation. In a real European country Berluscon's media network and political party would've been boycotted into oblivion long ago.</p><p>Instead the only viable alternative to Berluscon's administration is a left-wing coalition which makes the Socialist Party USA look like a bastion of free-market thinking. (For the record, it fielded candidates with a Commy background both in the 2008 PM election and in Italy's nomination for the EU's high representative. Eastern European countries especially were not impressed by the latter stunt.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The actual reason Berluscon is able to stay in power is because Italy is full of goombahs and guidos who are too self-centered and clueless to do anything about this situation .
In a real European country Berluscon 's media network and political party would 've been boycotted into oblivion long ago.Instead the only viable alternative to Berluscon 's administration is a left-wing coalition which makes the Socialist Party USA look like a bastion of free-market thinking .
( For the record , it fielded candidates with a Commy background both in the 2008 PM election and in Italy 's nomination for the EU 's high representative .
Eastern European countries especially were not impressed by the latter stunt .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The actual reason Berluscon is able to stay in power is because Italy is full of goombahs and guidos who are too self-centered and clueless to do anything about this situation.
In a real European country Berluscon's media network and political party would've been boycotted into oblivion long ago.Instead the only viable alternative to Berluscon's administration is a left-wing coalition which makes the Socialist Party USA look like a bastion of free-market thinking.
(For the record, it fielded candidates with a Commy background both in the 2008 PM election and in Italy's nomination for the EU's high representative.
Eastern European countries especially were not impressed by the latter stunt.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485640</id>
	<title>Re:Who are italians</title>
	<author>emanem</author>
	<datestamp>1261142700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll translate the (most significant parts of) second one that is more insightful:<br>
<b>Average Italian</b> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I remember old habits, social satire, today I'm trying to find Luttazzi (a satire comedian who has been censored by Berlusconi) on TV but can't<br>
Anyway, I'm the good average italian citizen, I've updated my mobile ringtones, I drink a glass of wine with a panino and I'm happy if Costanzo (a showman) pretends to be funny in his show<br>
I got an holy picture in the living room, I pray it just so I can win the lotto<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that will make me millionaire like Silvio (Berlusconi) with Paolo's (Berlusconi - his borther) newspaper and <i>his controlled TV news</i> (I had to render it like this because in Italian is said as a joke with names)<br>
This year I've been poor but for two weeks I've pretended to be rich at Porto Cervo (one of the most posh area of Sardinia, where Gates &amp; co. go every summer)<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
I don't care a lot about anything these days, I go to the shopping mall and my issue is where to park my car<br>
But you know what? I don't care a lot because I'm Italian and I sing! Just give me TV shows...<br>
<br>
Well I hope this gives you an idea about Italy and the average italian...<br>
<br>
Sadly,</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll translate the ( most significant parts of ) second one that is more insightful : Average Italian ...I remember old habits , social satire , today I 'm trying to find Luttazzi ( a satire comedian who has been censored by Berlusconi ) on TV but ca n't Anyway , I 'm the good average italian citizen , I 've updated my mobile ringtones , I drink a glass of wine with a panino and I 'm happy if Costanzo ( a showman ) pretends to be funny in his show I got an holy picture in the living room , I pray it just so I can win the lotto ... that will make me millionaire like Silvio ( Berlusconi ) with Paolo 's ( Berlusconi - his borther ) newspaper and his controlled TV news ( I had to render it like this because in Italian is said as a joke with names ) This year I 've been poor but for two weeks I 've pretended to be rich at Porto Cervo ( one of the most posh area of Sardinia , where Gates &amp; co. go every summer ) .. . I do n't care a lot about anything these days , I go to the shopping mall and my issue is where to park my car But you know what ?
I do n't care a lot because I 'm Italian and I sing !
Just give me TV shows.. . Well I hope this gives you an idea about Italy and the average italian.. . Sadly,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll translate the (most significant parts of) second one that is more insightful:
Average Italian  ...I remember old habits, social satire, today I'm trying to find Luttazzi (a satire comedian who has been censored by Berlusconi) on TV but can't
Anyway, I'm the good average italian citizen, I've updated my mobile ringtones, I drink a glass of wine with a panino and I'm happy if Costanzo (a showman) pretends to be funny in his show
I got an holy picture in the living room, I pray it just so I can win the lotto ... that will make me millionaire like Silvio (Berlusconi) with Paolo's (Berlusconi - his borther) newspaper and his controlled TV news (I had to render it like this because in Italian is said as a joke with names)
This year I've been poor but for two weeks I've pretended to be rich at Porto Cervo (one of the most posh area of Sardinia, where Gates &amp; co. go every summer) ...
I don't care a lot about anything these days, I go to the shopping mall and my issue is where to park my car
But you know what?
I don't care a lot because I'm Italian and I sing!
Just give me TV shows...

Well I hope this gives you an idea about Italy and the average italian...

Sadly,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486354</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261147680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am in Italy right now, and I didn't know there was any censorship. I tried those two sites, and you're right, they are in fact censored, with a notice referencing the law that brought the censorship into place.

Thank you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am in Italy right now , and I did n't know there was any censorship .
I tried those two sites , and you 're right , they are in fact censored , with a notice referencing the law that brought the censorship into place .
Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am in Italy right now, and I didn't know there was any censorship.
I tried those two sites, and you're right, they are in fact censored, with a notice referencing the law that brought the censorship into place.
Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485854</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261144740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you don't know the slightest thing about Italy and it's government, do you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you do n't know the slightest thing about Italy and it 's government , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you don't know the slightest thing about Italy and it's government, do you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486434</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1261147980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not surprised Italy is having a problem with the internet after they sentenced <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/04/italy.knox.trial/index.html" title="cnn.com">Amanda Knox to 26 years</a> [cnn.com] on <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6947979.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">100\% circumstantial evidence that would be laughable even for a TV drama</a> [timesonline.co.uk].  What other BS do you want to do Italy?  My wife wanted to go someday but not now, not ever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not surprised Italy is having a problem with the internet after they sentenced Amanda Knox to 26 years [ cnn.com ] on 100 \ % circumstantial evidence that would be laughable even for a TV drama [ timesonline.co.uk ] .
What other BS do you want to do Italy ?
My wife wanted to go someday but not now , not ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not surprised Italy is having a problem with the internet after they sentenced Amanda Knox to 26 years [cnn.com] on 100\% circumstantial evidence that would be laughable even for a TV drama [timesonline.co.uk].
What other BS do you want to do Italy?
My wife wanted to go someday but not now, not ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</id>
	<title>That's already in place.</title>
	<author>VincenzoRomano</author>
	<datestamp>1261142520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Italy you are not allowed to reach some international websites, mainly related to betting.<br>
You get directed to a generic web page (hosted at the government company <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sogei" title="wikipedia.org">SOGEI Spa</a> [wikipedia.org]) that says that you are not allowed to visit those websites.<br>
If you are in Italy you can try <a href="http://www.ladbrokes.com/" title="ladbrokes.com">http://www.ladbrokes.com/</a> [ladbrokes.com] or <a href="http://www.skybet.com/" title="skybet.com">http://www.skybet.com/</a> [skybet.com].<br>
Can you spell "freedom" in Italian? We cannot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Italy you are not allowed to reach some international websites , mainly related to betting .
You get directed to a generic web page ( hosted at the government company SOGEI Spa [ wikipedia.org ] ) that says that you are not allowed to visit those websites .
If you are in Italy you can try http : //www.ladbrokes.com/ [ ladbrokes.com ] or http : //www.skybet.com/ [ skybet.com ] .
Can you spell " freedom " in Italian ?
We can not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Italy you are not allowed to reach some international websites, mainly related to betting.
You get directed to a generic web page (hosted at the government company SOGEI Spa [wikipedia.org]) that says that you are not allowed to visit those websites.
If you are in Italy you can try http://www.ladbrokes.com/ [ladbrokes.com] or http://www.skybet.com/ [skybet.com].
Can you spell "freedom" in Italian?
We cannot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485396</id>
	<title>A partial U-turn</title>
	<author>Sarten-X</author>
	<datestamp>1261139880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Usually, we just call that "turning left" (or right, depending on your country)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually , we just call that " turning left " ( or right , depending on your country )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually, we just call that "turning left" (or right, depending on your country)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486714</id>
	<title>Wrong title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should have read:</p><p>
<b>AFTER BERLUCONI ATTACK, ITALIAN GOVERNMENT SHOWS HIS PLANS FOR CENSORSHIP</b>.
</p><p>Anyone with info about how Berlusconi deals with the basis of democracy (independent news, respect to the Constitution, independent judges) would have expected these plans to be in the works. The attack gives them an opportunity to show them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should have read : AFTER BERLUCONI ATTACK , ITALIAN GOVERNMENT SHOWS HIS PLANS FOR CENSORSHIP .
Anyone with info about how Berlusconi deals with the basis of democracy ( independent news , respect to the Constitution , independent judges ) would have expected these plans to be in the works .
The attack gives them an opportunity to show them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should have read:
AFTER BERLUCONI ATTACK, ITALIAN GOVERNMENT SHOWS HIS PLANS FOR CENSORSHIP.
Anyone with info about how Berlusconi deals with the basis of democracy (independent news, respect to the Constitution, independent judges) would have expected these plans to be in the works.
The attack gives them an opportunity to show them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485634</id>
	<title>Godwin bomb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261142700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if a German polititian was attacked, a new censorship reigime in place, guess what happens next.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if a German polititian was attacked , a new censorship reigime in place , guess what happens next .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if a German polititian was attacked, a new censorship reigime in place, guess what happens next.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485480</id>
	<title>Re:A partial U-turn</title>
	<author>MrHanky</author>
	<datestamp>1261141140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A J-turn or L-turn, depending on direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A J-turn or L-turn , depending on direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A J-turn or L-turn, depending on direction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485668</id>
	<title>Berlusconi already in control - of Slashdot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261143000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, look at the facts. If this had been an incident in France, we would have two dozen posts with surrender jokes already. But here we have an Italian story and not one submarine screen door, bottom of the ocean, five reverse gears, pulling the pins and throwing them back reference. Someone has to be preventing this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , look at the facts .
If this had been an incident in France , we would have two dozen posts with surrender jokes already .
But here we have an Italian story and not one submarine screen door , bottom of the ocean , five reverse gears , pulling the pins and throwing them back reference .
Someone has to be preventing this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, look at the facts.
If this had been an incident in France, we would have two dozen posts with surrender jokes already.
But here we have an Italian story and not one submarine screen door, bottom of the ocean, five reverse gears, pulling the pins and throwing them back reference.
Someone has to be preventing this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485420</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wishful thinking. I have yet to see a backlash against proposed or actual censorship, even in countries that have a strong freedom of speech culture.</p><p>This little blip will not bring down Musso^H^H^HBerlusconi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wishful thinking .
I have yet to see a backlash against proposed or actual censorship , even in countries that have a strong freedom of speech culture.This little blip will not bring down Musso ^ H ^ H ^ HBerlusconi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wishful thinking.
I have yet to see a backlash against proposed or actual censorship, even in countries that have a strong freedom of speech culture.This little blip will not bring down Musso^H^H^HBerlusconi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261142940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you disagree with the current politician's policies, run on your own platform. Simple as that. If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved. If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail. Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that. Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless. i.e. Put Up or Shut Up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you disagree with the current politician 's policies , run on your own platform .
Simple as that .
If the population agrees with you , change occurs and problem solved .
If you 're actively censored , you can retaliate with force , and you should ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail .
Thoreau 's Civil Disobedience and all that .
Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless .
i.e. Put Up or Shut Up : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you disagree with the current politician's policies, run on your own platform.
Simple as that.
If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved.
If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail.
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that.
Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless.
i.e. Put Up or Shut Up :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492710</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261128900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're mere DNS redirects...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're mere DNS redirects.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're mere DNS redirects...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487314</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>malkien</author>
	<datestamp>1261152360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I watched an analysis of the last few moments leading to the aggression.<br>It's surprising how the whole security team spectacularly failed at protecting him.<br>The aggressor had several seconds to actually take aim from a few feet away.<br>This is a little beyond incompetent. I'm not sure how far beyond...</p><p>The only certainty is that this event did wonders for his falling popularity.<br>Here in Italy everybody is cheering for him at the moment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched an analysis of the last few moments leading to the aggression.It 's surprising how the whole security team spectacularly failed at protecting him.The aggressor had several seconds to actually take aim from a few feet away.This is a little beyond incompetent .
I 'm not sure how far beyond...The only certainty is that this event did wonders for his falling popularity.Here in Italy everybody is cheering for him at the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched an analysis of the last few moments leading to the aggression.It's surprising how the whole security team spectacularly failed at protecting him.The aggressor had several seconds to actually take aim from a few feet away.This is a little beyond incompetent.
I'm not sure how far beyond...The only certainty is that this event did wonders for his falling popularity.Here in Italy everybody is cheering for him at the moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485470</id>
	<title>So this is how it is going to happen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Create some incident. Any incident will do.<br>2. Blame it on people on the web. You can call them "terrorists", if necessary.<br>3. Censor the web. The more the better. Pass some bill overnight if necessary.<br>4. If someone in media raises questions about censorship, publish some irrelevant "scandal" to deflect public attention.<br>5. ???<br>6. Profit!</p><p>If that doesn't work completely, continue boiling the frog, rinse and repeat.</p><p>Surely profit, but not for us, folks. You are screwed, wherever on this Earth you are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Create some incident .
Any incident will do.2 .
Blame it on people on the web .
You can call them " terrorists " , if necessary.3 .
Censor the web .
The more the better .
Pass some bill overnight if necessary.4 .
If someone in media raises questions about censorship , publish some irrelevant " scandal " to deflect public attention.5 .
? ? ? 6. Profit ! If that does n't work completely , continue boiling the frog , rinse and repeat.Surely profit , but not for us , folks .
You are screwed , wherever on this Earth you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Create some incident.
Any incident will do.2.
Blame it on people on the web.
You can call them "terrorists", if necessary.3.
Censor the web.
The more the better.
Pass some bill overnight if necessary.4.
If someone in media raises questions about censorship, publish some irrelevant "scandal" to deflect public attention.5.
???6. Profit!If that doesn't work completely, continue boiling the frog, rinse and repeat.Surely profit, but not for us, folks.
You are screwed, wherever on this Earth you are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485492</id>
	<title>It's All About CONTROL!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Governments *hate* the idea of people having too much freedom.</p><p>Why?<br>It means you'll start asking too many questions and governments don't like that!</p><p>It also means you become difficult to control.</p><p>How?<br>By keeping you fearful - global warming, recession, terrorism, nuclear arms and now the freedom of the Internet (terrorists and paedophiles use it)<br>These subjects in themselves are genuine concerns but governments have a knack of focusing on them and using them to conrol the general population. Usually by using extreme measures via law and policy legislation.</p><p>Web censorship is no different. Governments need us to be passive and compliant. Fortunately free speech is *impossible* to control it's part of who you are. You can censor or prohibit the *mechanisms* that express free speech but never "control" it.</p><p>Suppose Italy do censor the Internet and other countries follow. Do you really think that will be the end of it?</p><p>I don't think so.</p><p>If they start blocking web sites (probably at ISP level) then people will turn to encryption and deliver content that way. If encrypting the web becomes illegal then some other mechanism will manifest itself (e.g. bypassing the ISP entirely).</p><p>I hate to say this, but some form of government control is coming to the Internet whether you like it or not.</p><p>So, be prepared.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Governments * hate * the idea of people having too much freedom.Why ? It means you 'll start asking too many questions and governments do n't like that ! It also means you become difficult to control.How ? By keeping you fearful - global warming , recession , terrorism , nuclear arms and now the freedom of the Internet ( terrorists and paedophiles use it ) These subjects in themselves are genuine concerns but governments have a knack of focusing on them and using them to conrol the general population .
Usually by using extreme measures via law and policy legislation.Web censorship is no different .
Governments need us to be passive and compliant .
Fortunately free speech is * impossible * to control it 's part of who you are .
You can censor or prohibit the * mechanisms * that express free speech but never " control " it.Suppose Italy do censor the Internet and other countries follow .
Do you really think that will be the end of it ? I do n't think so.If they start blocking web sites ( probably at ISP level ) then people will turn to encryption and deliver content that way .
If encrypting the web becomes illegal then some other mechanism will manifest itself ( e.g .
bypassing the ISP entirely ) .I hate to say this , but some form of government control is coming to the Internet whether you like it or not.So , be prepared .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Governments *hate* the idea of people having too much freedom.Why?It means you'll start asking too many questions and governments don't like that!It also means you become difficult to control.How?By keeping you fearful - global warming, recession, terrorism, nuclear arms and now the freedom of the Internet (terrorists and paedophiles use it)These subjects in themselves are genuine concerns but governments have a knack of focusing on them and using them to conrol the general population.
Usually by using extreme measures via law and policy legislation.Web censorship is no different.
Governments need us to be passive and compliant.
Fortunately free speech is *impossible* to control it's part of who you are.
You can censor or prohibit the *mechanisms* that express free speech but never "control" it.Suppose Italy do censor the Internet and other countries follow.
Do you really think that will be the end of it?I don't think so.If they start blocking web sites (probably at ISP level) then people will turn to encryption and deliver content that way.
If encrypting the web becomes illegal then some other mechanism will manifest itself (e.g.
bypassing the ISP entirely).I hate to say this, but some form of government control is coming to the Internet whether you like it or not.So, be prepared.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487186</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least they have experienced terrorism in Italy before, both from the left and from the right. So at least they know the how the little guy reacts as he is robbed from his voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they have experienced terrorism in Italy before , both from the left and from the right .
So at least they know the how the little guy reacts as he is robbed from his voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they have experienced terrorism in Italy before, both from the left and from the right.
So at least they know the how the little guy reacts as he is robbed from his voice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485718</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261143480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..</p></div><p>Sounds much like what the leader(s) of the United States are trying to do with their citizens.  Poor America.  They are slowing turning marxist/socialist, and according to the polls, 50\% of the people don't seem to mind.</p><p>Sad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..Sounds much like what the leader ( s ) of the United States are trying to do with their citizens .
Poor America .
They are slowing turning marxist/socialist , and according to the polls , 50 \ % of the people do n't seem to mind.Sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..Sounds much like what the leader(s) of the United States are trying to do with their citizens.
Poor America.
They are slowing turning marxist/socialist, and according to the polls, 50\% of the people don't seem to mind.Sad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485394</id>
	<title>Wrong response</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1261139760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The last thing you do is try and stop people from hearing about it. You make light of it, show it as not a big deal, and move on.<br> <br>"Yeah, some guy hit me with a souvenir... Oh well, shit happens! The security guards are stepping it up a notch or two, but it's not like I was shot or anything. Thanks god, you know? Wouldn't want to leave my wife having to look for an inferior lover! Vote for me, you guys... I'm easy going."<br> <br>And the world moves on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The last thing you do is try and stop people from hearing about it .
You make light of it , show it as not a big deal , and move on .
" Yeah , some guy hit me with a souvenir... Oh well , shit happens !
The security guards are stepping it up a notch or two , but it 's not like I was shot or anything .
Thanks god , you know ?
Would n't want to leave my wife having to look for an inferior lover !
Vote for me , you guys... I 'm easy going .
" And the world moves on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last thing you do is try and stop people from hearing about it.
You make light of it, show it as not a big deal, and move on.
"Yeah, some guy hit me with a souvenir... Oh well, shit happens!
The security guards are stepping it up a notch or two, but it's not like I was shot or anything.
Thanks god, you know?
Wouldn't want to leave my wife having to look for an inferior lover!
Vote for me, you guys... I'm easy going.
" And the world moves on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492630</id>
	<title>Re:Hrmm</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1261128600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you disagree with the current politician's policies, <b>and you are a millionaire</b>, run on your own platform. Simple as that. If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved.</p> </div><p>I tend to dislike FIFY posts, but this seemed inevitable...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should <b>(but won't)</b> ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail. Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that. Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless. i.e. Put Up or Shut Up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>Open insurrection would only cause accusations of terrorism from the ruling cadre and you will end up killed by the forces of the goverment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you disagree with the current politician 's policies , and you are a millionaire , run on your own platform .
Simple as that .
If the population agrees with you , change occurs and problem solved .
I tend to dislike FIFY posts , but this seemed inevitable...If you 're actively censored , you can retaliate with force , and you should ( but wo n't ) ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail .
Thoreau 's Civil Disobedience and all that .
Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless .
i.e. Put Up or Shut Up : ) Open insurrection would only cause accusations of terrorism from the ruling cadre and you will end up killed by the forces of the goverment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you disagree with the current politician's policies, and you are a millionaire, run on your own platform.
Simple as that.
If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved.
I tend to dislike FIFY posts, but this seemed inevitable...If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should (but won't) ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail.
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that.
Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless.
i.e. Put Up or Shut Up :)Open insurrection would only cause accusations of terrorism from the ruling cadre and you will end up killed by the forces of the goverment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487974</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't be that hard. The government tries to pass a net censorship law because someone threw a cheap souvenir at a prime minister.</p><p>STOP - souvenir throwing and net censorship?</p><p>How are the two linked? Nobody asking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't be that hard .
The government tries to pass a net censorship law because someone threw a cheap souvenir at a prime minister.STOP - souvenir throwing and net censorship ? How are the two linked ?
Nobody asking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't be that hard.
The government tries to pass a net censorship law because someone threw a cheap souvenir at a prime minister.STOP - souvenir throwing and net censorship?How are the two linked?
Nobody asking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370</id>
	<title>Hrmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just goes to show, politicians everywhere dont like a medium that allows the little guy to have a voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just goes to show , politicians everywhere dont like a medium that allows the little guy to have a voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just goes to show, politicians everywhere dont like a medium that allows the little guy to have a voice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486012</id>
	<title>Berlusconi Dangerously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261145940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After seeing the words "Minister Robert Maroni," all I can picture in my mind is a man with dark eyebrows seeing the Facebook page and then ranting about "iceholes" and "fargin' bastiges."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After seeing the words " Minister Robert Maroni , " all I can picture in my mind is a man with dark eyebrows seeing the Facebook page and then ranting about " iceholes " and " fargin ' bastiges .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After seeing the words "Minister Robert Maroni," all I can picture in my mind is a man with dark eyebrows seeing the Facebook page and then ranting about "iceholes" and "fargin' bastiges.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485466</id>
	<title>Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The patriot act comes to mind. (Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.)</i> <p>
Dear Citizen,</p><p>
The Patriot Act was infact a great help it stopping Nidal Hasan from killing more people than he did! Infact, if we allow full wiretapping, remove all that paperwork that gets in the way of stopping police from stopping and searching you, as well as any probable cause requirements involved, this would never have happenned! It just turns out the soft liberal types, who are first to defend cartoon depictions of child pornography, obviously direct support for paedophiles I might add, which prevents us from keeping you safe from terrorists (You do remember 9/11 right?).
</p><p>
Our inability to stop and hold suspects without probable cause gives them time to destroy all evidence of there terrorist or paedophilic activities! This is why it is vital to detain them imediately so that such evidence can be found, and justice served! Won't you please think of the children?
</p><p>
Signed, Your bought Politician.
</p><p>
<i>For those interested they can already do this in the UK, US I'm not so sure.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The patriot act comes to mind .
( Which , btw , did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people .
) Dear Citizen , The Patriot Act was infact a great help it stopping Nidal Hasan from killing more people than he did !
Infact , if we allow full wiretapping , remove all that paperwork that gets in the way of stopping police from stopping and searching you , as well as any probable cause requirements involved , this would never have happenned !
It just turns out the soft liberal types , who are first to defend cartoon depictions of child pornography , obviously direct support for paedophiles I might add , which prevents us from keeping you safe from terrorists ( You do remember 9/11 right ? ) .
Our inability to stop and hold suspects without probable cause gives them time to destroy all evidence of there terrorist or paedophilic activities !
This is why it is vital to detain them imediately so that such evidence can be found , and justice served !
Wo n't you please think of the children ?
Signed , Your bought Politician .
For those interested they can already do this in the UK , US I 'm not so sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The patriot act comes to mind.
(Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.
) 
Dear Citizen,
The Patriot Act was infact a great help it stopping Nidal Hasan from killing more people than he did!
Infact, if we allow full wiretapping, remove all that paperwork that gets in the way of stopping police from stopping and searching you, as well as any probable cause requirements involved, this would never have happenned!
It just turns out the soft liberal types, who are first to defend cartoon depictions of child pornography, obviously direct support for paedophiles I might add, which prevents us from keeping you safe from terrorists (You do remember 9/11 right?).
Our inability to stop and hold suspects without probable cause gives them time to destroy all evidence of there terrorist or paedophilic activities!
This is why it is vital to detain them imediately so that such evidence can be found, and justice served!
Won't you please think of the children?
Signed, Your bought Politician.
For those interested they can already do this in the UK, US I'm not so sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30489286</id>
	<title>Pro-communism parades in Rome.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261160100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in Rome last week for the first time and saw Pro-communism parades going on while I was there.</p><p>As an American, this blew my mind.</p><p>I'm not sure they'd have the right to have such a parade if they were under communism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in Rome last week for the first time and saw Pro-communism parades going on while I was there.As an American , this blew my mind.I 'm not sure they 'd have the right to have such a parade if they were under communism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in Rome last week for the first time and saw Pro-communism parades going on while I was there.As an American, this blew my mind.I'm not sure they'd have the right to have such a parade if they were under communism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485848</id>
	<title>The train of thought</title>
	<author>Balau</author>
	<datestamp>1261144740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It goes on like this:<br>
-Berlusconi was attacked by Mr.Tartaglia because he hated him.<br>
-The attack was caused by the hateful mood (<a href="http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/politica/2009/12/15/visualizza\_new.html\_1646244271.html/" title="www.ansa.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/politica/2009/12/15/visualizza\_new.html\_1646244271.html/</a> [www.ansa.it])<br>
-Facebook is full of political hatred (<a href="http://www.ilgiornale.it/interni/su\_facebook\_tartaglia\_eroe\_chi\_odia/tartaglia-facebook-berlusconi/13-12-2009/articolo-id=406674-page=0-comments=1/" title="ilgiornale.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilgiornale.it/interni/su\_facebook\_tartaglia\_eroe\_chi\_odia/tartaglia-facebook-berlusconi/13-12-2009/articolo-id=406674-page=0-comments=1/</a> [ilgiornale.it])<br>
-Facebook is on the Internet<br>
-The solution is to control Facebook, and also the whole Internet to avoid mistakes (<a href="http://www.repubblica.it/2009/12/sezioni/politica/giustizia-22/rodota/rodota.html/" title="repubblica.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.repubblica.it/2009/12/sezioni/politica/giustizia-22/rodota/rodota.html/</a> [repubblica.it])</htmltext>
<tokenext>It goes on like this : -Berlusconi was attacked by Mr.Tartaglia because he hated him .
-The attack was caused by the hateful mood ( http : //www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/politica/2009/12/15/visualizza \ _new.html \ _1646244271.html/ [ www.ansa.it ] ) -Facebook is full of political hatred ( http : //www.ilgiornale.it/interni/su \ _facebook \ _tartaglia \ _eroe \ _chi \ _odia/tartaglia-facebook-berlusconi/13-12-2009/articolo-id = 406674-page = 0-comments = 1/ [ ilgiornale.it ] ) -Facebook is on the Internet -The solution is to control Facebook , and also the whole Internet to avoid mistakes ( http : //www.repubblica.it/2009/12/sezioni/politica/giustizia-22/rodota/rodota.html/ [ repubblica.it ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It goes on like this:
-Berlusconi was attacked by Mr.Tartaglia because he hated him.
-The attack was caused by the hateful mood (http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/politica/2009/12/15/visualizza\_new.html\_1646244271.html/ [www.ansa.it])
-Facebook is full of political hatred (http://www.ilgiornale.it/interni/su\_facebook\_tartaglia\_eroe\_chi\_odia/tartaglia-facebook-berlusconi/13-12-2009/articolo-id=406674-page=0-comments=1/ [ilgiornale.it])
-Facebook is on the Internet
-The solution is to control Facebook, and also the whole Internet to avoid mistakes (http://www.repubblica.it/2009/12/sezioni/politica/giustizia-22/rodota/rodota.html/ [repubblica.it])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486124</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be entirely fair, there were some pages on faceboook theorizing the killing of Mr Berlusconi. Now some politician belonging to his political alliance (not him so, as Mr Berlusconi hasn't spoken yet) are taking advantage of what happened suggesting various censoring laws. It must also be  stressed however  that very few people on his coalition would speak without his consent as they could be politically and personally destroyed if they were not aligned to his will (for example one newspaper belinging to him destroyed the reputation of another newspaper director with charges of homosexuality and crimson)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be entirely fair , there were some pages on faceboook theorizing the killing of Mr Berlusconi .
Now some politician belonging to his political alliance ( not him so , as Mr Berlusconi has n't spoken yet ) are taking advantage of what happened suggesting various censoring laws .
It must also be stressed however that very few people on his coalition would speak without his consent as they could be politically and personally destroyed if they were not aligned to his will ( for example one newspaper belinging to him destroyed the reputation of another newspaper director with charges of homosexuality and crimson )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be entirely fair, there were some pages on faceboook theorizing the killing of Mr Berlusconi.
Now some politician belonging to his political alliance (not him so, as Mr Berlusconi hasn't spoken yet) are taking advantage of what happened suggesting various censoring laws.
It must also be  stressed however  that very few people on his coalition would speak without his consent as they could be politically and personally destroyed if they were not aligned to his will (for example one newspaper belinging to him destroyed the reputation of another newspaper director with charges of homosexuality and crimson)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485796</id>
	<title>Re:Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261144260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could be worse - you could be British<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be worse - you could be British : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be worse - you could be British :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30488516</id>
	<title>Don't forget the "Italian Crackdown" in 1992.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget the "Italian Crackdown" in 1992.</p><p>To fight against crime, police busted all italian fidonet BBS.<br>122 arrest and 159 BBS confiscated.</p><p>Ref: http://www.altx.com/interzones2/italy/crackdown.html</p><p>Regard,<br>Dan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the " Italian Crackdown " in 1992.To fight against crime , police busted all italian fidonet BBS.122 arrest and 159 BBS confiscated.Ref : http : //www.altx.com/interzones2/italy/crackdown.htmlRegard,Dan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the "Italian Crackdown" in 1992.To fight against crime, police busted all italian fidonet BBS.122 arrest and 159 BBS confiscated.Ref: http://www.altx.com/interzones2/italy/crackdown.htmlRegard,Dan</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485490</id>
	<title>Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction by a government, the first thought that pops into my head is "Oh, my.  Are they nuclear?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction by a government , the first thought that pops into my head is " Oh , my .
Are they nuclear ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction by a government, the first thought that pops into my head is "Oh, my.
Are they nuclear?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497578</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261221120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you do read the posts you will see none of them actually speaks about Berlusconi's politics.<br><br>Rightwing or leftwing, it does not matter. His reputation is what's really killing Italy's image to the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do read the posts you will see none of them actually speaks about Berlusconi 's politics.Rightwing or leftwing , it does not matter .
His reputation is what 's really killing Italy 's image to the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you do read the posts you will see none of them actually speaks about Berlusconi's politics.Rightwing or leftwing, it does not matter.
His reputation is what's really killing Italy's image to the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392</id>
	<title>Please Do It, Italy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261139760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they do go ahead with it, the serious backlash will surely bring down the Berlusconi regime. Or is this just wishful thinking? His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do go ahead with it , the serious backlash will surely bring down the Berlusconi regime .
Or is this just wishful thinking ?
His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they do go ahead with it, the serious backlash will surely bring down the Berlusconi regime.
Or is this just wishful thinking?
His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485534</id>
	<title>Who are italians</title>
	<author>emanem</author>
	<datestamp>1261141680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Italians can be identified by these two songs:<br>
Articolo 31 - Domani smetto<br>
Articolo 31 - Italiano medio<br>
You'll be perfectly able to understand what's going on if you listen to these songs...to bad I can't find a pre-made English translation..<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Ps. I'm Italian</htmltext>
<tokenext>Italians can be identified by these two songs : Articolo 31 - Domani smetto Articolo 31 - Italiano medio You 'll be perfectly able to understand what 's going on if you listen to these songs...to bad I ca n't find a pre-made English translation. . Cheers , Ps .
I 'm Italian</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Italians can be identified by these two songs:
Articolo 31 - Domani smetto
Articolo 31 - Italiano medio
You'll be perfectly able to understand what's going on if you listen to these songs...to bad I can't find a pre-made English translation..
Cheers,

Ps.
I'm Italian</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485630</id>
	<title>Re:It's All About CONTROL!</title>
	<author>VincenzoRomano</author>
	<datestamp>1261142580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Freedom is not for you is you are not someone. That's it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Freedom is not for you is you are not someone .
That 's it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freedom is not for you is you are not someone.
That's it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485464</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my to-watch-list, there's a recent-ish documentary about Berlusconis Italy, titled "Videocracy". <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1500516/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1500516/</a> [imdb.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.atmo.se/film-and-tv/videocracy/" title="www.atmo.se">http://www.atmo.se/film-and-tv/videocracy/</a> [www.atmo.se]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:</p><blockquote><div><p>In a videocracy the key to power is the image.</p><p>In Italy one man only has kept the domination of the image over three entire decades. As a TV-magnate and then as Presidente, Silvio Berlusconi has created a perfect system of TV-entertainment and politics. [...]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...a remarkable story, born out of the scary reality of TV-republic Italy, a country where the step from TV-showgirl to Minister for Gender Equality is only natural.</p></div></blockquote><p>Coming soon to a festival (or internet) near you!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On my to-watch-list , there 's a recent-ish documentary about Berlusconis Italy , titled " Videocracy " .
http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt1500516/ [ imdb.com ] http : //www.atmo.se/film-and-tv/videocracy/ [ www.atmo.se ] : In a videocracy the key to power is the image.In Italy one man only has kept the domination of the image over three entire decades .
As a TV-magnate and then as Presidente , Silvio Berlusconi has created a perfect system of TV-entertainment and politics .
[ ... ] ...a remarkable story , born out of the scary reality of TV-republic Italy , a country where the step from TV-showgirl to Minister for Gender Equality is only natural.Coming soon to a festival ( or internet ) near you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my to-watch-list, there's a recent-ish documentary about Berlusconis Italy, titled "Videocracy".
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1500516/ [imdb.com]http://www.atmo.se/film-and-tv/videocracy/ [www.atmo.se] :In a videocracy the key to power is the image.In Italy one man only has kept the domination of the image over three entire decades.
As a TV-magnate and then as Presidente, Silvio Berlusconi has created a perfect system of TV-entertainment and politics.
[...] ...a remarkable story, born out of the scary reality of TV-republic Italy, a country where the step from TV-showgirl to Minister for Gender Equality is only natural.Coming soon to a festival (or internet) near you!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30499196</id>
	<title>They've got it all wrong!</title>
	<author>dsouza42</author>
	<datestamp>1261245660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.caixapretta.com.br/2009/12/a-verdade-sobre-o-caso-berlusconi/?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed:+CaixaPretta+(Caixa+PreTTa+-+J\%C3\%A1+leu+um+blog+hoje\%3F)&amp;utm\_content=Google+Reader" title="caixapretta.com.br" rel="nofollow">This is what really happened</a> [caixapretta.com.br]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what really happened [ caixapretta.com.br ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what really happened [caixapretta.com.br]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382</id>
	<title>If this were a nobody that was attacked</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1261139640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The government would treat it just like any other case, even with such a facebook group.</p><p>It never ceases to amaze me how the government uses high-profile cases to grab at power and suppress the people while having their whole-hearted support of such measures.  The patriot act comes to mind.  (Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.)</p><p>These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The government would treat it just like any other case , even with such a facebook group.It never ceases to amaze me how the government uses high-profile cases to grab at power and suppress the people while having their whole-hearted support of such measures .
The patriot act comes to mind .
( Which , btw , did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people .
) These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power , and who should be voted out ASAP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The government would treat it just like any other case, even with such a facebook group.It never ceases to amaze me how the government uses high-profile cases to grab at power and suppress the people while having their whole-hearted support of such measures.
The patriot act comes to mind.
(Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.
)These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485838</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261144620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, if there were no broken theeth and nose. The souvenir barely hit him, if you look at the videos you can see his head doesn't even move when it impacts. If somethings hits you with enough force to break 2 theeth and your nose, your head is bound to shake around like a springy-bouncing-head-car-thingy. Unless you're superman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , if there were no broken theeth and nose .
The souvenir barely hit him , if you look at the videos you can see his head does n't even move when it impacts .
If somethings hits you with enough force to break 2 theeth and your nose , your head is bound to shake around like a springy-bouncing-head-car-thingy .
Unless you 're superman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, if there were no broken theeth and nose.
The souvenir barely hit him, if you look at the videos you can see his head doesn't even move when it impacts.
If somethings hits you with enough force to break 2 theeth and your nose, your head is bound to shake around like a springy-bouncing-head-car-thingy.
Unless you're superman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485478</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we'd get all the jokes and justifications here if Berlusconi was a "progressive" and the attacker an "extreme right-winger".......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we 'd get all the jokes and justifications here if Berlusconi was a " progressive " and the attacker an " extreme right-winger " ...... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we'd get all the jokes and justifications here if Berlusconi was a "progressive" and the attacker an "extreme right-winger".......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the major newspapers? As far as I know he owns Il Giornale. Could you name other newspapers he owns?</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the major newspapers ?
As far as I know he owns Il Giornale .
Could you name other newspapers he owns ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the major newspapers?
As far as I know he owns Il Giornale.
Could you name other newspapers he owns?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485800</id>
	<title>welcome censorship!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261144320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think before talk. And talk if u KNOW.<br>In Italy we have dumb people that loves terrorists. And this is a fact. They show it many times.<br>(Yes, they also went happy for 11 september, and they are the same of today)<br>And in the same way they incitate the dumbass that hits our President.<br>I wonder what police would do to the culprit in China, or Russia, or USA... (In China &amp; Russia the right thing. I love that countries)<br>So, if censorship means "close that idiot facebook, the idiots community" and give a break to monkey writings like "kill him, kill her"...<br>welcome censorship!<br>Like we make laws to avoid people "shitting" in the road, is right to keep clean also the network.</p><p>I'm not PRO Berlusconi, but against stupid people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think before talk .
And talk if u KNOW.In Italy we have dumb people that loves terrorists .
And this is a fact .
They show it many times .
( Yes , they also went happy for 11 september , and they are the same of today ) And in the same way they incitate the dumbass that hits our President.I wonder what police would do to the culprit in China , or Russia , or USA... ( In China &amp; Russia the right thing .
I love that countries ) So , if censorship means " close that idiot facebook , the idiots community " and give a break to monkey writings like " kill him , kill her " ...welcome censorship ! Like we make laws to avoid people " shitting " in the road , is right to keep clean also the network.I 'm not PRO Berlusconi , but against stupid people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think before talk.
And talk if u KNOW.In Italy we have dumb people that loves terrorists.
And this is a fact.
They show it many times.
(Yes, they also went happy for 11 september, and they are the same of today)And in the same way they incitate the dumbass that hits our President.I wonder what police would do to the culprit in China, or Russia, or USA... (In China &amp; Russia the right thing.
I love that countries)So, if censorship means "close that idiot facebook, the idiots community" and give a break to monkey writings like "kill him, kill her"...welcome censorship!Like we make laws to avoid people "shitting" in the road, is right to keep clean also the network.I'm not PRO Berlusconi, but against stupid people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485926</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>hamvil</author>
	<datestamp>1261145400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could access both the websites from Italy. I tried both from work and from home (using my VPN).

So sir your are wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could access both the websites from Italy .
I tried both from work and from home ( using my VPN ) .
So sir your are wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could access both the websites from Italy.
I tried both from work and from home (using my VPN).
So sir your are wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30490128</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an ex sysadmin for ladbrokes.... can i point out you can go to http://www.ladbrokes.it</p><p>We went through f**king loads of hoops to get the local site there!</p><p>As far as i'm aware it is not being blocked by itally, ladbrokes do a geo ip lookup via quova and block you.</p><p>Just my 2c</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an ex sysadmin for ladbrokes.... can i point out you can go to http : //www.ladbrokes.itWe went through f * * king loads of hoops to get the local site there ! As far as i 'm aware it is not being blocked by itally , ladbrokes do a geo ip lookup via quova and block you.Just my 2c</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an ex sysadmin for ladbrokes.... can i point out you can go to http://www.ladbrokes.itWe went through f**king loads of hoops to get the local site there!As far as i'm aware it is not being blocked by itally, ladbrokes do a geo ip lookup via quova and block you.Just my 2c</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485576</id>
	<title>Fans</title>
	<author>TimeElf1</author>
	<datestamp>1261141980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours.</i>
<br>
<br>
Well that is a rather knee jerk reaction, last I checked Facebook was not for just people from Italy. Besides people will become fans of anything on Facebook, from beer, to Jeffrey Dahmer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours .
Well that is a rather knee jerk reaction , last I checked Facebook was not for just people from Italy .
Besides people will become fans of anything on Facebook , from beer , to Jeffrey Dahmer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours.
Well that is a rather knee jerk reaction, last I checked Facebook was not for just people from Italy.
Besides people will become fans of anything on Facebook, from beer, to Jeffrey Dahmer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487966</id>
	<title>Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read this, if you haven't already: http://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0805079831</p><p>Using economic, military or environmental shocks to introduce what would be otherwise unpopular laws or legislation on a stunned public has been the paradigm of almost every new economically neo-liberal state in the past 40 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read this , if you have n't already : http : //www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0805079831Using economic , military or environmental shocks to introduce what would be otherwise unpopular laws or legislation on a stunned public has been the paradigm of almost every new economically neo-liberal state in the past 40 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read this, if you haven't already: http://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0805079831Using economic, military or environmental shocks to introduce what would be otherwise unpopular laws or legislation on a stunned public has been the paradigm of almost every new economically neo-liberal state in the past 40 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486976</id>
	<title>Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.</p></div><p>If only voting actually worked, letting the many incompetent decide who is competent is a really bad idea. On a personal note, any celebrity that goes into politics have my support, just for the amusement factor. I wish my country had a governator.</p><p>BTW. love the scene in Religulous with the Texas senator...</p><p>Bill Maher: See, this is my problem, is, I'm trying - I mean, you're - you're a Senator. You are one of the very few people who are really running this country. It worries me that people are running my country who think - who believe in a talking snake. Um...<br>Mark Pryor: You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate, though.</p><p>His facial expression is just priceless *chuckle*.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power , and who should be voted out ASAP.If only voting actually worked , letting the many incompetent decide who is competent is a really bad idea .
On a personal note , any celebrity that goes into politics have my support , just for the amusement factor .
I wish my country had a governator.BTW .
love the scene in Religulous with the Texas senator...Bill Maher : See , this is my problem , is , I 'm trying - I mean , you 're - you 're a Senator .
You are one of the very few people who are really running this country .
It worries me that people are running my country who think - who believe in a talking snake .
Um...Mark Pryor : You do n't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate , though.His facial expression is just priceless * chuckle * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.If only voting actually worked, letting the many incompetent decide who is competent is a really bad idea.
On a personal note, any celebrity that goes into politics have my support, just for the amusement factor.
I wish my country had a governator.BTW.
love the scene in Religulous with the Texas senator...Bill Maher: See, this is my problem, is, I'm trying - I mean, you're - you're a Senator.
You are one of the very few people who are really running this country.
It worries me that people are running my country who think - who believe in a talking snake.
Um...Mark Pryor: You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate, though.His facial expression is just priceless *chuckle*.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486688</id>
	<title>Pretty Arrogant</title>
	<author>Milican</author>
	<datestamp>1261149240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's too bad, but people get attacked all the time. However, when a leader gets attacked then we need to shut down the Internet. Pretty arrogant and self-centered. I'm glad the Internet is pretty free, but it's only a matter of time until politicians invent an excuse to control it. I'm sure it will be for the children, or to stop some possible terrorist scenario. Then it'll creep out from there.</p><p>JOhn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's too bad , but people get attacked all the time .
However , when a leader gets attacked then we need to shut down the Internet .
Pretty arrogant and self-centered .
I 'm glad the Internet is pretty free , but it 's only a matter of time until politicians invent an excuse to control it .
I 'm sure it will be for the children , or to stop some possible terrorist scenario .
Then it 'll creep out from there.JOhn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's too bad, but people get attacked all the time.
However, when a leader gets attacked then we need to shut down the Internet.
Pretty arrogant and self-centered.
I'm glad the Internet is pretty free, but it's only a matter of time until politicians invent an excuse to control it.
I'm sure it will be for the children, or to stop some possible terrorist scenario.
Then it'll creep out from there.JOhn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485616</id>
	<title>Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked</title>
	<author>DrSkwid</author>
	<datestamp>1261142520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Telephone intercepts are not admissible evidence in UK courts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Telephone intercepts are not admissible evidence in UK courts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Telephone intercepts are not admissible evidence in UK courts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487674</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm in Italy, in Milan, and I've absolutely no problem to visit both the websites... maybe it depends on the ISP?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in Italy , in Milan , and I 've absolutely no problem to visit both the websites... maybe it depends on the ISP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in Italy, in Milan, and I've absolutely no problem to visit both the websites... maybe it depends on the ISP?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485760</id>
	<title>It just shows you</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1261143960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It just shows you why a constitution is a good idea. The best time to make a cool decision about freedom of speech and censorship is probably not while you are nursing wounds after being attacked, but a change made now would be difficult to get reveresed in the furure. The same could happen in the UK, where I live - one event could lead to hasty loss of liberty.

Oh, wait it <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/feb/19/civil-liberties-terrorism" title="guardian.co.uk">already has</a> [guardian.co.uk].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It just shows you why a constitution is a good idea .
The best time to make a cool decision about freedom of speech and censorship is probably not while you are nursing wounds after being attacked , but a change made now would be difficult to get reveresed in the furure .
The same could happen in the UK , where I live - one event could lead to hasty loss of liberty .
Oh , wait it already has [ guardian.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just shows you why a constitution is a good idea.
The best time to make a cool decision about freedom of speech and censorship is probably not while you are nursing wounds after being attacked, but a change made now would be difficult to get reveresed in the furure.
The same could happen in the UK, where I live - one event could lead to hasty loss of liberty.
Oh, wait it already has [guardian.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486032</id>
	<title>Re:That's already in place.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261146000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just change your DNS servers and make them point to OpenDNS or another service like it, you jerk.</p><p>Unlicensed gambling sites are blacklisted only for tax purposes, freedom is quite a different thing. Just try to run an unlicensed gambling outfit in any country, then come back and tell me that not being able to reach Ladbrokes site is proof of Berlusconi dictatorship.<br>You moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just change your DNS servers and make them point to OpenDNS or another service like it , you jerk.Unlicensed gambling sites are blacklisted only for tax purposes , freedom is quite a different thing .
Just try to run an unlicensed gambling outfit in any country , then come back and tell me that not being able to reach Ladbrokes site is proof of Berlusconi dictatorship.You moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just change your DNS servers and make them point to OpenDNS or another service like it, you jerk.Unlicensed gambling sites are blacklisted only for tax purposes, freedom is quite a different thing.
Just try to run an unlicensed gambling outfit in any country, then come back and tell me that not being able to reach Ladbrokes site is proof of Berlusconi dictatorship.You moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518</id>
	<title>Re:Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261141560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He owns Il Giornale, via his brother Paolo. Il Foglio, it is owned by his recently divorcing wife. Mondadori, the biggest italian publisher, with a myriad of magazines, is in the hands of his daughter Marina. About the latter, he has just been sentenced guilty of taking over Mondadori by means of corruption back in 1990 and will have to pay 750 megaeuros. Mediaset is controlled by Piersilvio, his son, and owns 3 private national channels out of 7 plus a bunch of digital tv channels. Other than these, are the three national tv channels of RAI (state television) which is mostly controlled by the government.<br>If this is not enough, well... unfortunely he has way much more power than this...</p><p>by the way<br>what do<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ers think of the aggression itself? I mean... is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He owns Il Giornale , via his brother Paolo .
Il Foglio , it is owned by his recently divorcing wife .
Mondadori , the biggest italian publisher , with a myriad of magazines , is in the hands of his daughter Marina .
About the latter , he has just been sentenced guilty of taking over Mondadori by means of corruption back in 1990 and will have to pay 750 megaeuros .
Mediaset is controlled by Piersilvio , his son , and owns 3 private national channels out of 7 plus a bunch of digital tv channels .
Other than these , are the three national tv channels of RAI ( state television ) which is mostly controlled by the government.If this is not enough , well... unfortunely he has way much more power than this...by the waywhat do ./ers think of the aggression itself ?
I mean... is it possible to have two broken teeth , broken nose , and a white shirt with no red stain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He owns Il Giornale, via his brother Paolo.
Il Foglio, it is owned by his recently divorcing wife.
Mondadori, the biggest italian publisher, with a myriad of magazines, is in the hands of his daughter Marina.
About the latter, he has just been sentenced guilty of taking over Mondadori by means of corruption back in 1990 and will have to pay 750 megaeuros.
Mediaset is controlled by Piersilvio, his son, and owns 3 private national channels out of 7 plus a bunch of digital tv channels.
Other than these, are the three national tv channels of RAI (state television) which is mostly controlled by the government.If this is not enough, well... unfortunely he has way much more power than this...by the waywhat do ./ers think of the aggression itself?
I mean... is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30542654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30499840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30496990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30490128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_040235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485518
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485838
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485792
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30542654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30499840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497012
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30496990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30490128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30492710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30487674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30497578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30486074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_040235.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_040235.30485470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
