<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_18_0338205</id>
	<title>Dark Matter Particles May Have Been Detected</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1261144260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>During two seminars at Stanford and Fermilab on Thursday, researchers described signals for two events detected deep in an old iron mine in Minnesota that might mark the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/12/two-events-hint-of-the-impact-of-dark-matter-particles.ars">first detection of dark matter</a> &mdash; or not. The presenters said the chances that the signals they detected were caused by something other than "neutralino" dark matter particles was 23 percent. "One source indicates that we'd need less than 10 total detections within the CDMS' range in order to have a high degree of confidence in the results." The NY Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/science/space/18dark.html">describes the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search</a> methodology: <i>"The cryogenic experiment is nearly half a mile underground in an old iron mine in Soudan, Minn., to shield it from cosmic rays. It consists of a stack of germanium and silicon detectors, cooled to one-hundredth of a degree Kelvin. When a particle hits one of the detectors, it produces an electrical charge and deposits a small bit of energy in the form of heat, each of which are independently measured. By comparing the amounts of charge and heat left behind, the collaboration&rsquo;s physicists can tell so-called wimps from more mundane particles like neutrons, which are expected to flood the underground chamber from radioactivity in the rocks around it."</i> Here are the research team's <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/results\_summary.pdf">summary notes of the latest results</a> (PDF).</htmltext>
<tokenext>During two seminars at Stanford and Fermilab on Thursday , researchers described signals for two events detected deep in an old iron mine in Minnesota that might mark the first detection of dark matter    or not .
The presenters said the chances that the signals they detected were caused by something other than " neutralino " dark matter particles was 23 percent .
" One source indicates that we 'd need less than 10 total detections within the CDMS ' range in order to have a high degree of confidence in the results .
" The NY Times describes the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search methodology : " The cryogenic experiment is nearly half a mile underground in an old iron mine in Soudan , Minn. , to shield it from cosmic rays .
It consists of a stack of germanium and silicon detectors , cooled to one-hundredth of a degree Kelvin .
When a particle hits one of the detectors , it produces an electrical charge and deposits a small bit of energy in the form of heat , each of which are independently measured .
By comparing the amounts of charge and heat left behind , the collaboration    s physicists can tell so-called wimps from more mundane particles like neutrons , which are expected to flood the underground chamber from radioactivity in the rocks around it .
" Here are the research team 's summary notes of the latest results ( PDF ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During two seminars at Stanford and Fermilab on Thursday, researchers described signals for two events detected deep in an old iron mine in Minnesota that might mark the first detection of dark matter — or not.
The presenters said the chances that the signals they detected were caused by something other than "neutralino" dark matter particles was 23 percent.
"One source indicates that we'd need less than 10 total detections within the CDMS' range in order to have a high degree of confidence in the results.
" The NY Times describes the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search methodology: "The cryogenic experiment is nearly half a mile underground in an old iron mine in Soudan, Minn., to shield it from cosmic rays.
It consists of a stack of germanium and silicon detectors, cooled to one-hundredth of a degree Kelvin.
When a particle hits one of the detectors, it produces an electrical charge and deposits a small bit of energy in the form of heat, each of which are independently measured.
By comparing the amounts of charge and heat left behind, the collaboration’s physicists can tell so-called wimps from more mundane particles like neutrons, which are expected to flood the underground chamber from radioactivity in the rocks around it.
" Here are the research team's summary notes of the latest results (PDF).</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494958</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody gets out of this chicken-shit outfit alive, so do the math, either pay your "fair share" in taxes or punch license plates for $0.28 an hour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody gets out of this chicken-shit outfit alive , so do the math , either pay your " fair share " in taxes or punch license plates for $ 0.28 an hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody gets out of this chicken-shit outfit alive, so do the math, either pay your "fair share" in taxes or punch license plates for $0.28 an hour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491048</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261165980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to defend anyone who is trolling, but your "love it or leave it" mentality isn't useful.</p><p>Even bad ideas help move the discussion forward. And if you don't hear what the trolls are saying, you may miss what the general public is thinking.</p><p>Also, America, Fuck Yeah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to defend anyone who is trolling , but your " love it or leave it " mentality is n't useful.Even bad ideas help move the discussion forward .
And if you do n't hear what the trolls are saying , you may miss what the general public is thinking.Also , America , Fuck Yeah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to defend anyone who is trolling, but your "love it or leave it" mentality isn't useful.Even bad ideas help move the discussion forward.
And if you don't hear what the trolls are saying, you may miss what the general public is thinking.Also, America, Fuck Yeah!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686</id>
	<title>No longer dark?</title>
	<author>mooingyak</author>
	<datestamp>1261164660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we can detect it, does that mean we have to stop calling it dark matter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we can detect it , does that mean we have to stop calling it dark matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we can detect it, does that mean we have to stop calling it dark matter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487596</id>
	<title>Tours available.</title>
	<author>mpaulsen</author>
	<datestamp>1261153500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're ever in the neighborhood, a tour of the mine and the lab are well worth the visit.<br> <br>

<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Soudan,+mn" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Soudan,+mn</a> [google.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state\_parks/soudan\_underground\_mine/index.html" title="state.mn.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state\_parks/soudan\_underground\_mine/index.html</a> [state.mn.us] <br>
<a href="http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/soudan/physics\_tour.html" title="state.mn.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/soudan/physics\_tour.html</a> [state.mn.us] <br> <br>

(Generally open June-September -- check before you come.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're ever in the neighborhood , a tour of the mine and the lab are well worth the visit .
http : //maps.google.com/maps ? q = Soudan , + mn [ google.com ] http : //www.dnr.state.mn.us/state \ _parks/soudan \ _underground \ _mine/index.html [ state.mn.us ] http : //www.dnr.state.mn.us/soudan/physics \ _tour.html [ state.mn.us ] ( Generally open June-September -- check before you come .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're ever in the neighborhood, a tour of the mine and the lab are well worth the visit.
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Soudan,+mn [google.com] 
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state\_parks/soudan\_underground\_mine/index.html [state.mn.us] 
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/soudan/physics\_tour.html [state.mn.us]  

(Generally open June-September -- check before you come.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</id>
	<title>Solar activity</title>
	<author>mseeger</author>
	<datestamp>1261149420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All detected particles are due to abnormal solar activity.</p><p>The detected particles will melt the crust within the next three years. Buy tickets for the arch from me now! Just 1.000.000 Euro each... No checks</p><p>CU, Martin</p><p>P.S. Guess which movie i watched yesterday<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All detected particles are due to abnormal solar activity.The detected particles will melt the crust within the next three years .
Buy tickets for the arch from me now !
Just 1.000.000 Euro each... No checksCU , MartinP.S .
Guess which movie i watched yesterday : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All detected particles are due to abnormal solar activity.The detected particles will melt the crust within the next three years.
Buy tickets for the arch from me now!
Just 1.000.000 Euro each... No checksCU, MartinP.S.
Guess which movie i watched yesterday :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490170</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Might have been better if they'd called it Dark Mass, as that seems to be the thing we're twigging to about it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might have been better if they 'd called it Dark Mass , as that seems to be the thing we 're twigging to about it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might have been better if they'd called it Dark Mass, as that seems to be the thing we're twigging to about it all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491478</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261167720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are two possibilities: either the Earth is flat or it isn't. Therefore the probability is 50\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are two possibilities : either the Earth is flat or it is n't .
Therefore the probability is 50 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are two possibilities: either the Earth is flat or it isn't.
Therefore the probability is 50\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</id>
	<title>One in two</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1261157040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand where they got 23\% from. There are two possibilities: either it is dark matter or it isn't. Therefore the probability is 50\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand where they got 23 \ % from .
There are two possibilities : either it is dark matter or it is n't .
Therefore the probability is 50 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand where they got 23\% from.
There are two possibilities: either it is dark matter or it isn't.
Therefore the probability is 50\%.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490576</id>
	<title>I detected some dark matter</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1261164240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I detected some dark matter, but five minutes with a plunger cleared it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I detected some dark matter , but five minutes with a plunger cleared it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I detected some dark matter, but five minutes with a plunger cleared it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489184</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1261159740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is sitting on slashdot bitching about inane things.<br>How do I best communicate to you that not eating or using energy for a year, or two, or ever, would actually do infinitely more for humanity than your comment here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the country is 1.8 trillion ( US ) in the hole this year , yet someone , somewhere , is sitting on slashdot bitching about inane things.How do I best communicate to you that not eating or using energy for a year , or two , or ever , would actually do infinitely more for humanity than your comment here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is sitting on slashdot bitching about inane things.How do I best communicate to you that not eating or using energy for a year, or two, or ever, would actually do infinitely more for humanity than your comment here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489020</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>RTFA you fucking asshole. 23\% of EVENTS DETECTED may be this dark matter shit. Fuck you're dumb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA you fucking asshole .
23 \ % of EVENTS DETECTED may be this dark matter shit .
Fuck you 're dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA you fucking asshole.
23\% of EVENTS DETECTED may be this dark matter shit.
Fuck you're dumb.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492740</id>
	<title>Re:How to tell?</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1261129080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe this is only up to +1, Funny so far.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe this is only up to + 1 , Funny so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe this is only up to +1, Funny so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494214</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1261135920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not the argument, nor the summary.</p><p>The scientists are not right because they are scientists with white lab coat. The scientists are right because their successive theories of the nature of the universe are converging upon the actual nature of the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not the argument , nor the summary.The scientists are not right because they are scientists with white lab coat .
The scientists are right because their successive theories of the nature of the universe are converging upon the actual nature of the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not the argument, nor the summary.The scientists are not right because they are scientists with white lab coat.
The scientists are right because their successive theories of the nature of the universe are converging upon the actual nature of the universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487408</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's fame: to become a Slashdot meme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's fame : to become a Slashdot meme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's fame: to become a Slashdot meme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486966</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1261150620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"How to become a billionaire by 2013"?<br>
Or maybe you try to become rich-for-cheap and downloaded the spanish cam version: "C&#243;mo hacerse rico en el 2013"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How to become a billionaire by 2013 " ?
Or maybe you try to become rich-for-cheap and downloaded the spanish cam version : " C   mo hacerse rico en el 2013 " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How to become a billionaire by 2013"?
Or maybe you try to become rich-for-cheap and downloaded the spanish cam version: "Cómo hacerse rico en el 2013"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487324</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>10Neon</author>
	<datestamp>1261152360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw that, I'll just move to Africa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw that , I 'll just move to Africa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw that, I'll just move to Africa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492218</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well your not the absolute most well fed troll of all time on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. but you did a pretty damn good job. gg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well your not the absolute most well fed troll of all time on / .
but you did a pretty damn good job .
gg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well your not the absolute most well fed troll of all time on /.
but you did a pretty damn good job.
gg</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492978</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1261130040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There are two possibilities: either it is dark matter or it isn't. Therefore the probability is 50\%."</p><p>Hidden assumption of equally likely events.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There are two possibilities : either it is dark matter or it is n't .
Therefore the probability is 50 \ % .
" Hidden assumption of equally likely events .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There are two possibilities: either it is dark matter or it isn't.
Therefore the probability is 50\%.
"Hidden assumption of equally likely events.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492000</id>
	<title>Re:No longer dark?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261169640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's not exactly beaming with light and color... and grey matter is taken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's not exactly beaming with light and color... and grey matter is taken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's not exactly beaming with light and color... and grey matter is taken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486546</id>
	<title>Teh problem wif dark mattr</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1261148520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dark mattr iz invisable!</p><p>Only ceilin cat can c it.</p><p>--<br>Today's lame post brought to you by <a href="http://speaklolcat.com/" title="speaklolcat.com" rel="nofollow">Teh Lolcat Transzlator</a> [speaklolcat.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dark mattr iz invisable ! Only ceilin cat can c it.--Today 's lame post brought to you by Teh Lolcat Transzlator [ speaklolcat.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dark mattr iz invisable!Only ceilin cat can c it.--Today's lame post brought to you by Teh Lolcat Transzlator [speaklolcat.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491486</id>
	<title>Another hypothesis ,mutual backscratching,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261167780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How could one explain big bang theory that the entire universe coming out of a single infinitesimal point. what fart physicists want us to believe!!<br>First they said ether..<br>now they say dark energy...<br>could somebody tell me what is space-time continuum: position of a particle at a certain time.... i am in restroom at 6:00am and eating lunch in cafe at 12:30 pm... why do we need space time continuum... kimshitty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How could one explain big bang theory that the entire universe coming out of a single infinitesimal point .
what fart physicists want us to believe !
! First they said ether..now they say dark energy...could somebody tell me what is space-time continuum : position of a particle at a certain time.... i am in restroom at 6 : 00am and eating lunch in cafe at 12 : 30 pm... why do we need space time continuum... kimshitty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could one explain big bang theory that the entire universe coming out of a single infinitesimal point.
what fart physicists want us to believe!
!First they said ether..now they say dark energy...could somebody tell me what is space-time continuum: position of a particle at a certain time.... i am in restroom at 6:00am and eating lunch in cafe at 12:30 pm... why do we need space time continuum... kimshitty</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486722</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>shawnap</author>
	<datestamp>1261149360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong! When did science start to feel more like religion to me...</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Did you forget a sarcasm tag, because there's nothing in TFA about global warming or evolution that I could see.<br>
Does this fucking troll apply to <em>all</em> science articles now?...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because scientist 's interpretation of what they see is never wrong !
When did science start to feel more like religion to me.. . Did you forget a sarcasm tag , because there 's nothing in TFA about global warming or evolution that I could see .
Does this fucking troll apply to all science articles now ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...

Did you forget a sarcasm tag, because there's nothing in TFA about global warming or evolution that I could see.
Does this fucking troll apply to all science articles now?...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486658</id>
	<title>Re:It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>wanerious</author>
	<datestamp>1261149060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the chances of the above being at all *right* is the 3-sigma event they're looking for.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the chances of the above being at all * right * is the 3-sigma event they 're looking for .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the chances of the above being at all *right* is the 3-sigma event they're looking for.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487268</id>
	<title>Re:It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1261152060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Something with no energy means it has no movement.</p></div><p>Or no mass.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something with no energy means it has no movement.Or no mass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something with no energy means it has no movement.Or no mass.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487318</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Fujisawa Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1261152360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is funding research half a mile underground, with superconductors, to find particles that might not exist, and if they do, don't mean anything?
How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?</p></div><p>Just pack up and move elsewhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the country is 1.8 trillion ( US ) in the hole this year , yet someone , somewhere , is funding research half a mile underground , with superconductors , to find particles that might not exist , and if they do , do n't mean anything ?
How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit ? Just pack up and move elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is funding research half a mile underground, with superconductors, to find particles that might not exist, and if they do, don't mean anything?
How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?Just pack up and move elsewhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486774</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're absolutely right.  If only we took an extremely short-sighted view of everything, things would be better today.  Who cares about tomorrow?  The advancement of knowledge is for fictional spacemen in the future, it's not up to us; all we need to do is worry about today.  And maybe yesterday.  I wish you were running things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're absolutely right .
If only we took an extremely short-sighted view of everything , things would be better today .
Who cares about tomorrow ?
The advancement of knowledge is for fictional spacemen in the future , it 's not up to us ; all we need to do is worry about today .
And maybe yesterday .
I wish you were running things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're absolutely right.
If only we took an extremely short-sighted view of everything, things would be better today.
Who cares about tomorrow?
The advancement of knowledge is for fictional spacemen in the future, it's not up to us; all we need to do is worry about today.
And maybe yesterday.
I wish you were running things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486638</id>
	<title>Re:1:4?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, 1:4 is enough for a good argument. They need 1:1000 or lower to end the argument.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , 1 : 4 is enough for a good argument .
They need 1 : 1000 or lower to end the argument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, 1:4 is enough for a good argument.
They need 1:1000 or lower to end the argument.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489146</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1261159620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it feels like religion, it's because YOU don't understand what's going on.</p><p>When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts, WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge?</p><p>Fucking hell, people who can't figure out where an apostrophe, elipsis, or question mark should go are telling me they can out-think Stephen Hawking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it feels like religion , it 's because YOU do n't understand what 's going on.When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts , WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge ? Fucking hell , people who ca n't figure out where an apostrophe , elipsis , or question mark should go are telling me they can out-think Stephen Hawking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it feels like religion, it's because YOU don't understand what's going on.When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts, WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge?Fucking hell, people who can't figure out where an apostrophe, elipsis, or question mark should go are telling me they can out-think Stephen Hawking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487416</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>asylumx</author>
	<datestamp>1261152780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Third Man In" ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Third Man In " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Third Man In" ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30497200</id>
	<title>Re:1:4?</title>
	<author>eyendall</author>
	<datestamp>1261255320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this an argument or a contradiction?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this an argument or a contradiction ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this an argument or a contradiction?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490164</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1261162920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My social studies professor would say that "black" matter is implicitly racist!</htmltext>
<tokenext>My social studies professor would say that " black " matter is implicitly racist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My social studies professor would say that "black" matter is implicitly racist!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489646</id>
	<title>Re:It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1261161420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, days on Earth get longer as the planet's rotation slows over time.  A day was around 21 hours long when <i>T. rex</i> roamed the earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , days on Earth get longer as the planet 's rotation slows over time .
A day was around 21 hours long when T. rex roamed the earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, days on Earth get longer as the planet's rotation slows over time.
A day was around 21 hours long when T. rex roamed the earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491110</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261166220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we put 1000 monkeys typing in a cave, we should get Shakespear sometime soon too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we put 1000 monkeys typing in a cave , we should get Shakespear sometime soon too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we put 1000 monkeys typing in a cave, we should get Shakespear sometime soon too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489412</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1261160640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fair enough, but where else to look for dark matter but in a dark mine? After all, everybody knows night is caused by accretions of black air...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fair enough , but where else to look for dark matter but in a dark mine ?
After all , everybody knows night is caused by accretions of black air... : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fair enough, but where else to look for dark matter but in a dark mine?
After all, everybody knows night is caused by accretions of black air... :-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487276</id>
	<title>Re:1:4?</title>
	<author>bmearns</author>
	<datestamp>1261152120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Which is exactly what they specified in the article. They're not making any argument, they're reporting on their findings, and very specifically say:
</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...we can make no claim to have discovered WIMPs</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is exactly what they specified in the article .
They 're not making any argument , they 're reporting on their findings , and very specifically say : ...we can make no claim to have discovered WIMPs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Which is exactly what they specified in the article.
They're not making any argument, they're reporting on their findings, and very specifically say:
 ...we can make no claim to have discovered WIMPs
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491684</id>
	<title>Re:Supersymmetry lives?</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1261168560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If they have really found  neutralinos  then wouldn't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed? It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
What would the experimental signature of a neutralino be, as opposed to any other WIMP? Comparing the WP neutralino article to the arxiv paper, the mass range does seem to match up roughly, but that's about all I see that would help.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they have really found neutralinos then would n't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed ?
It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics .
What would the experimental signature of a neutralino be , as opposed to any other WIMP ?
Comparing the WP neutralino article to the arxiv paper , the mass range does seem to match up roughly , but that 's about all I see that would help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they have really found  neutralinos  then wouldn't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed?
It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics.
What would the experimental signature of a neutralino be, as opposed to any other WIMP?
Comparing the WP neutralino article to the arxiv paper, the mass range does seem to match up roughly, but that's about all I see that would help.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492378</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Catiline</author>
	<datestamp>1261127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts, WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge?</p></div></blockquote><p>
In the eighth grade, when I was told that an argument that could be summed up as "Respect my authority!" with no factual backing was a fallacy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts , WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge ?
In the eighth grade , when I was told that an argument that could be summed up as " Respect my authority !
" with no factual backing was a fallacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts, WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge?
In the eighth grade, when I was told that an argument that could be summed up as "Respect my authority!
" with no factual backing was a fallacy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487612</id>
	<title>yuo Fail It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Apple too. No, Users', BigAzz, fatal mistakes, asshole to others QAnd mortifying Erosion of user recent article put having lost 93\% if you don't</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple too .
No , Users ' , BigAzz , fatal mistakes , asshole to others QAnd mortifying Erosion of user recent article put having lost 93 \ % if you do n't [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple too.
No, Users', BigAzz, fatal mistakes, asshole to others QAnd mortifying Erosion of user recent article put having lost 93\% if you don't [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490270</id>
	<title>Re:Supersymmetry lives?</title>
	<author>Parlyne</author>
	<datestamp>1261163220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if the data were strong enough to claim that they had definitely seen something not reasonably attributable to background events (which it isn't), these results would have very little bearing on the confirmation of SUSY.  Even if the results were completely consistent with the expectations for neutralinos, there are dozens of other non-SUSY models which also predict dark matter; and, many of those have regions of parameter space that would be consistent with the very same dark matter detection results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if the data were strong enough to claim that they had definitely seen something not reasonably attributable to background events ( which it is n't ) , these results would have very little bearing on the confirmation of SUSY .
Even if the results were completely consistent with the expectations for neutralinos , there are dozens of other non-SUSY models which also predict dark matter ; and , many of those have regions of parameter space that would be consistent with the very same dark matter detection results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if the data were strong enough to claim that they had definitely seen something not reasonably attributable to background events (which it isn't), these results would have very little bearing on the confirmation of SUSY.
Even if the results were completely consistent with the expectations for neutralinos, there are dozens of other non-SUSY models which also predict dark matter; and, many of those have regions of parameter space that would be consistent with the very same dark matter detection results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489228</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261159860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?</p></div><p>Move? Die? It doesn't seem that hard to figure out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit ? Move ?
Die ? It does n't seem that hard to figure out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?Move?
Die? It doesn't seem that hard to figure out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486996</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.</p></div><p>http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press\_releases/CDMS\_Photos/cdms\_2\_collaboration.JPG</p><p>Yep, sure looks like an entire pack of grey haired Caucasian scientists to me -- if I squint really hard and cover up a few people in the photo.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother , I reject these results , since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.http : //www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press \ _releases/CDMS \ _Photos/cdms \ _2 \ _collaboration.JPGYep , sure looks like an entire pack of grey haired Caucasian scientists to me -- if I squint really hard and cover up a few people in the photo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press\_releases/CDMS\_Photos/cdms\_2\_collaboration.JPGYep, sure looks like an entire pack of grey haired Caucasian scientists to me -- if I squint really hard and cover up a few people in the photo.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30511822</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261409520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the probability is not 50\%. That logic says you also have a 50\% chance of winning the lottery, since there are only two possibilities: either you win or you don't.</p><p>The sum of proabilities has to add up to 100\%, but nothing says the individual probabilities have to be the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the probability is not 50 \ % .
That logic says you also have a 50 \ % chance of winning the lottery , since there are only two possibilities : either you win or you do n't.The sum of proabilities has to add up to 100 \ % , but nothing says the individual probabilities have to be the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the probability is not 50\%.
That logic says you also have a 50\% chance of winning the lottery, since there are only two possibilities: either you win or you don't.The sum of proabilities has to add up to 100\%, but nothing says the individual probabilities have to be the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490240</id>
	<title>Re:How to tell?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1261163100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're confusing dark matter with antimatter. It's ok; it doesn't really matter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're confusing dark matter with antimatter .
It 's ok ; it does n't really matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're confusing dark matter with antimatter.
It's ok; it doesn't really matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844</id>
	<title>How to tell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261154400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I watched maybe too many star trek episodes, but I thought this dark matter stuff was in outer space and that any item touching it would implode (sort of). I am not a science expert, but would not finding dark matter inside earth's core insinuate that it was partially made of the stuff and that what we know about dark matter makes no sense??? I am sure there are no real dark matter exerts per se, as it is something we never really had contact with, however, what science knows about it to me seems very limited, and for what I do know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....dark matter should not be something we can just mine and tap into, it should be something that has a lot more involvement environmentally then I see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched maybe too many star trek episodes , but I thought this dark matter stuff was in outer space and that any item touching it would implode ( sort of ) .
I am not a science expert , but would not finding dark matter inside earth 's core insinuate that it was partially made of the stuff and that what we know about dark matter makes no sense ? ? ?
I am sure there are no real dark matter exerts per se , as it is something we never really had contact with , however , what science knows about it to me seems very limited , and for what I do know ....dark matter should not be something we can just mine and tap into , it should be something that has a lot more involvement environmentally then I see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched maybe too many star trek episodes, but I thought this dark matter stuff was in outer space and that any item touching it would implode (sort of).
I am not a science expert, but would not finding dark matter inside earth's core insinuate that it was partially made of the stuff and that what we know about dark matter makes no sense???
I am sure there are no real dark matter exerts per se, as it is something we never really had contact with, however, what science knows about it to me seems very limited, and for what I do know ....dark matter should not be something we can just mine and tap into, it should be something that has a lot more involvement environmentally then I see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487358</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>bmearns</author>
	<datestamp>1261152480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Buy tickets for the arch from me now!</p></div><p>
Ark.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy tickets for the arch from me now !
Ark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy tickets for the arch from me now!
Ark.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</id>
	<title>It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261148040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!

When did science start to feel more like religion to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because scientist 's interpretation of what they see is never wrong !
When did science start to feel more like religion to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487648</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261153680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Joe Public: "Well, I don't understand it, so it can't possibly be right."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Joe Public : " Well , I do n't understand it , so it ca n't possibly be right .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joe Public: "Well, I don't understand it, so it can't possibly be right.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30546726</id>
	<title>Re:1 Hundredth of a Degree Kevin</title>
	<author>bobbozzo</author>
	<datestamp>1261647240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But everyone has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six\_Degrees\_of\_Kevin\_Bacon" title="wikipedia.org">Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon</a> [wikipedia.org]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But everyone has Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But everyone has Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487432</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>White male science has been looking in the wrong place for dark matter. They should try looking between the ears of politicians. Mod away...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>White male science has been looking in the wrong place for dark matter .
They should try looking between the ears of politicians .
Mod away... : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>White male science has been looking in the wrong place for dark matter.
They should try looking between the ears of politicians.
Mod away... :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492826</id>
	<title>Re:Dark matter @ Home.org</title>
	<author>Roger W Moore</author>
	<datestamp>1261129380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Dark Matter exists you already have some at home, probably a lot more than you expect in fact!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Dark Matter exists you already have some at home , probably a lot more than you expect in fact !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Dark Matter exists you already have some at home, probably a lot more than you expect in fact!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30508552</id>
	<title>No Dark Matter, No Maybe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261324500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Dark Matter, No Maybe</p><p>A. From "Experiment detects particles of dark matter, maybe"<br>http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/50960/title/Experiment\_detects\_particles\_of\_dark\_matter\%2C\_maybe<br>Events in underground experiment too few for certainty, but match the signature of WIMPs.</p><p>- "...dark matter &mdash; the proposed invisible material believed to account for about 80 percent of the mass of the universe."</p><p>- "...tiny vibrations imparted by a proposed type of dark matter called weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs."</p><p>- "proof of dark matter, Hogan says, would be a huge transformation in how we do science; we would have a new form of matter to study."</p><p>- "WIMP fingerprints might be detected by a slew of experiments on the ground and in space including collisions of high-energy protons at the world&rsquo;s most powerful atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva. Physicists using the LHC, which has now resumed operation after a year of repairs, plan to look for what would be missing: a deficit of energy in the collision debris could be evidence for dark matter particles."</p><p>B. Respectfully and tired of, I refrain from more quotes and just suggest searching "Dov Henis there is no dark matter nor dark energy"</p><p>Enough is enough. Humanity has been hallucinating about dark energy and matter for circa 100 years.</p><p>See:<br>- "On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters, AND Life"<br>http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#2125</p><p>- "Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]"<br>http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108</p><p>- "Cosmic Evolution Simplified"<br>http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427</p><p>Dov Henis<br>(Comments From The 22nd Century)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Dark Matter , No MaybeA .
From " Experiment detects particles of dark matter , maybe " http : //www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/50960/title/Experiment \ _detects \ _particles \ _of \ _dark \ _matter \ % 2C \ _maybeEvents in underground experiment too few for certainty , but match the signature of WIMPs.- " ...dark matter    the proposed invisible material believed to account for about 80 percent of the mass of the universe .
" - " ...tiny vibrations imparted by a proposed type of dark matter called weakly interacting massive particles , or WIMPs .
" - " proof of dark matter , Hogan says , would be a huge transformation in how we do science ; we would have a new form of matter to study .
" - " WIMP fingerprints might be detected by a slew of experiments on the ground and in space including collisions of high-energy protons at the world    s most powerful atom smasher , the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva .
Physicists using the LHC , which has now resumed operation after a year of repairs , plan to look for what would be missing : a deficit of energy in the collision debris could be evidence for dark matter particles. " B .
Respectfully and tired of , I refrain from more quotes and just suggest searching " Dov Henis there is no dark matter nor dark energy " Enough is enough .
Humanity has been hallucinating about dark energy and matter for circa 100 years.See : - " On Energy , Mass , Gravity , Galaxies Clusters , AND Life " http : //www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page # 2125- " Implications Of E = Total [ m ( 1 + D ) ] " http : //www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page # 3108- " Cosmic Evolution Simplified " http : //www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page # 4427Dov Henis ( Comments From The 22nd Century )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Dark Matter, No MaybeA.
From "Experiment detects particles of dark matter, maybe"http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/50960/title/Experiment\_detects\_particles\_of\_dark\_matter\%2C\_maybeEvents in underground experiment too few for certainty, but match the signature of WIMPs.- "...dark matter — the proposed invisible material believed to account for about 80 percent of the mass of the universe.
"- "...tiny vibrations imparted by a proposed type of dark matter called weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
"- "proof of dark matter, Hogan says, would be a huge transformation in how we do science; we would have a new form of matter to study.
"- "WIMP fingerprints might be detected by a slew of experiments on the ground and in space including collisions of high-energy protons at the world’s most powerful atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva.
Physicists using the LHC, which has now resumed operation after a year of repairs, plan to look for what would be missing: a deficit of energy in the collision debris could be evidence for dark matter particles."B.
Respectfully and tired of, I refrain from more quotes and just suggest searching "Dov Henis there is no dark matter nor dark energy"Enough is enough.
Humanity has been hallucinating about dark energy and matter for circa 100 years.See:- "On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters, AND Life"http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#2125- "Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]"http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108- "Cosmic Evolution Simplified"http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427Dov Henis(Comments From The 22nd Century)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630</id>
	<title>1 Hundredth of a Degree Kevin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's dangerously low!</p><p>My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.</p><p>It was a particularly cold winter, and we were already down to 3 Kevins (due to their low popularity at the time).</p><p>Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather. 2 Kevins left.</p><p>Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift. I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us. "It's Lemmer. He's in bad shape. Drove right into the fucking ditch." We called the time of death at 6:15 PM.</p><p>At 6:16, all eyes turned to room 2217. Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia. His family being Catholic, he had already been given his last rights. If he couldn't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned, we would be at zero Kevins. Sure, we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins, but they're just not the same.</p><p>It was 7:15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance. "She's not due for 2 weeks!", James exclaimed. As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled, they exchanged darting glances with each other. This was their first child, and they wanted to keep the baby's sex a secret. Of course, in a small town, secrets don't get kept. Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.</p><p>The delivery was routine, and Kevin Brooks was born healthy, if a tad underweight, at 10:52 PM. Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10:54.</p><p>It was, as they say, a close one. Kevin Thomas arrived two days later, the weather having finally cleared up. To this day, we still rib him about it.</p><p>Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's dangerously low ! My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.It was a particularly cold winter , and we were already down to 3 Kevins ( due to their low popularity at the time ) .Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son 's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather .
2 Kevins left.Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift .
I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us .
" It 's Lemmer .
He 's in bad shape .
Drove right into the fucking ditch .
" We called the time of death at 6 : 15 PM.At 6 : 16 , all eyes turned to room 2217 .
Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia .
His family being Catholic , he had already been given his last rights .
If he could n't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned , we would be at zero Kevins .
Sure , we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins , but they 're just not the same.It was 7 : 15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance .
" She 's not due for 2 weeks !
" , James exclaimed .
As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled , they exchanged darting glances with each other .
This was their first child , and they wanted to keep the baby 's sex a secret .
Of course , in a small town , secrets do n't get kept .
Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.The delivery was routine , and Kevin Brooks was born healthy , if a tad underweight , at 10 : 52 PM .
Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10 : 54.It was , as they say , a close one .
Kevin Thomas arrived two days later , the weather having finally cleared up .
To this day , we still rib him about it.Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's dangerously low!My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.It was a particularly cold winter, and we were already down to 3 Kevins (due to their low popularity at the time).Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather.
2 Kevins left.Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift.
I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us.
"It's Lemmer.
He's in bad shape.
Drove right into the fucking ditch.
" We called the time of death at 6:15 PM.At 6:16, all eyes turned to room 2217.
Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia.
His family being Catholic, he had already been given his last rights.
If he couldn't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned, we would be at zero Kevins.
Sure, we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins, but they're just not the same.It was 7:15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance.
"She's not due for 2 weeks!
", James exclaimed.
As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled, they exchanged darting glances with each other.
This was their first child, and they wanted to keep the baby's sex a secret.
Of course, in a small town, secrets don't get kept.
Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.The delivery was routine, and Kevin Brooks was born healthy, if a tad underweight, at 10:52 PM.
Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10:54.It was, as they say, a close one.
Kevin Thomas arrived two days later, the weather having finally cleared up.
To this day, we still rib him about it.Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486634</id>
	<title>Re:It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1261148940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That must explain why I get the weird feeling that days are somehow getting shorter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That must explain why I get the weird feeling that days are somehow getting shorter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That must explain why I get the weird feeling that days are somehow getting shorter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490502</id>
	<title>Re:1 Hundredth of a Degree Kevin</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1261164000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny +5</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny + 5</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny +5</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486738</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.</p></div></blockquote><p>Marie Jo, I told you to dust of my PC, not to surf the web.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother , I reject these results , since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.Marie Jo , I told you to dust of my PC , not to surf the web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.Marie Jo, I told you to dust of my PC, not to surf the web.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491028</id>
	<title>Re:How to tell?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1261165920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really, how would I know, how would you know, you never posted any info about<br>answering my question. I guess it's easier to just say someone doesn't know,<br>when we don't know ourselves!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , how would I know , how would you know , you never posted any info aboutanswering my question .
I guess it 's easier to just say someone does n't know,when we do n't know ourselves ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, how would I know, how would you know, you never posted any info aboutanswering my question.
I guess it's easier to just say someone doesn't know,when we don't know ourselves!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486902</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, <b>fuck</b> basic science. I mean, what has scientific research ever done for us? It's just a bunch of eggheads playing with calculators, greedily and selfishly grasping for grant money handouts on the backs of taxpayers. The tiny sliver of the national budget that we invest in science would be much better spent on building another couple of jet-fighters that were designed for Cold War conflicts. Or better yet, it should be be returned to the taxpayers--after all, anything worth doing is also highly profitable. I'm sure the invisible hand of the free market will ensure that we learn exactly as much as we need about the universe, since people are perfectly willing to invest in fundamental scientific research with no guarantee of payoff.<br>
&nbsp; <br>If people like you always had your way, we'd still be living in caves suspiciously regarding copper as a useless metal suitable only for decoration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , fuck basic science .
I mean , what has scientific research ever done for us ?
It 's just a bunch of eggheads playing with calculators , greedily and selfishly grasping for grant money handouts on the backs of taxpayers .
The tiny sliver of the national budget that we invest in science would be much better spent on building another couple of jet-fighters that were designed for Cold War conflicts .
Or better yet , it should be be returned to the taxpayers--after all , anything worth doing is also highly profitable .
I 'm sure the invisible hand of the free market will ensure that we learn exactly as much as we need about the universe , since people are perfectly willing to invest in fundamental scientific research with no guarantee of payoff .
  If people like you always had your way , we 'd still be living in caves suspiciously regarding copper as a useless metal suitable only for decoration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, fuck basic science.
I mean, what has scientific research ever done for us?
It's just a bunch of eggheads playing with calculators, greedily and selfishly grasping for grant money handouts on the backs of taxpayers.
The tiny sliver of the national budget that we invest in science would be much better spent on building another couple of jet-fighters that were designed for Cold War conflicts.
Or better yet, it should be be returned to the taxpayers--after all, anything worth doing is also highly profitable.
I'm sure the invisible hand of the free market will ensure that we learn exactly as much as we need about the universe, since people are perfectly willing to invest in fundamental scientific research with no guarantee of payoff.
  If people like you always had your way, we'd still be living in caves suspiciously regarding copper as a useless metal suitable only for decoration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514</id>
	<title>It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261148400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We exist in space-time. 4 dimensional beings. Everything we know corresponds to these 4 dimensions.</p><p>So what happens when you have a gravitational field? Space bends. Time bends. Since everything with mass exerts a gravitational force, everything bends space around itself to a degree.</p><p>But movement is another form of energy, and energy is crucial to completing the 4 dimensional universe. Something with no energy means it has no movement. No movement means it must radiate all of its energy as gravitation. In the end, it will lose all of its mass to this gravitational leaching.</p><p>So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin, they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing. Yes, it interacts with incoming particles, but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles. In essence, the detector is detecting itself.</p><p>Of course, there is a 23\% chance I am completely wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We exist in space-time .
4 dimensional beings .
Everything we know corresponds to these 4 dimensions.So what happens when you have a gravitational field ?
Space bends .
Time bends .
Since everything with mass exerts a gravitational force , everything bends space around itself to a degree.But movement is another form of energy , and energy is crucial to completing the 4 dimensional universe .
Something with no energy means it has no movement .
No movement means it must radiate all of its energy as gravitation .
In the end , it will lose all of its mass to this gravitational leaching.So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin , they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing .
Yes , it interacts with incoming particles , but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles .
In essence , the detector is detecting itself.Of course , there is a 23 \ % chance I am completely wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We exist in space-time.
4 dimensional beings.
Everything we know corresponds to these 4 dimensions.So what happens when you have a gravitational field?
Space bends.
Time bends.
Since everything with mass exerts a gravitational force, everything bends space around itself to a degree.But movement is another form of energy, and energy is crucial to completing the 4 dimensional universe.
Something with no energy means it has no movement.
No movement means it must radiate all of its energy as gravitation.
In the end, it will lose all of its mass to this gravitational leaching.So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin, they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing.
Yes, it interacts with incoming particles, but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles.
In essence, the detector is detecting itself.Of course, there is a 23\% chance I am completely wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488248</id>
	<title>Re:White male science</title>
	<author>itlurksbeneath</author>
	<datestamp>1261156080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe you should have went to college and got a degree in physics then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should have went to college and got a degree in physics then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should have went to college and got a degree in physics then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491350</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>Bananenrepublik</author>
	<datestamp>1261167180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, there are the following possibilities<br>1) both excess events are dark matter events<br>2) the first excess event is a dark matter event, the second isn't<br>3) the first excess event is not a dark matter event, the second is<br>4) both excess events aren't actually dark matter events</p><p>Hence, in one out of four cases there is no dark matter which gives their 23\% after subtracting 2\% since we actually know that there is dark matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , there are the following possibilities1 ) both excess events are dark matter events2 ) the first excess event is a dark matter event , the second isn't3 ) the first excess event is not a dark matter event , the second is4 ) both excess events are n't actually dark matter eventsHence , in one out of four cases there is no dark matter which gives their 23 \ % after subtracting 2 \ % since we actually know that there is dark matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, there are the following possibilities1) both excess events are dark matter events2) the first excess event is a dark matter event, the second isn't3) the first excess event is not a dark matter event, the second is4) both excess events aren't actually dark matter eventsHence, in one out of four cases there is no dark matter which gives their 23\% after subtracting 2\% since we actually know that there is dark matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492526</id>
	<title>Re:No longer dark?</title>
	<author>marcosdumay</author>
	<datestamp>1261128240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably, with enough confidence astronomers will start talking about neutralino clouds, or something like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably , with enough confidence astronomers will start talking about neutralino clouds , or something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably, with enough confidence astronomers will start talking about neutralino clouds, or something like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487182</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261151700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?</p></div></blockquote><p>You can always kill yourself.  That'll solve both our problems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit ? You can always kill yourself .
That 'll solve both our problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?You can always kill yourself.
That'll solve both our problems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508</id>
	<title>1:4?</title>
	<author>Burnhard</author>
	<datestamp>1261148340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I understand it, the chances of it being some other (extra-solar) particle detected is about 1 in 4.  They need a 1:1000 to have a valid argument.  Although interesting, I can't help but wonder when the next funding cycle starts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it , the chances of it being some other ( extra-solar ) particle detected is about 1 in 4 .
They need a 1 : 1000 to have a valid argument .
Although interesting , I ca n't help but wonder when the next funding cycle starts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it, the chances of it being some other (extra-solar) particle detected is about 1 in 4.
They need a 1:1000 to have a valid argument.
Although interesting, I can't help but wonder when the next funding cycle starts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452</id>
	<title>White male science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261148040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother , I reject these results , since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a 49 yo feminist grandmother, I reject these results, since they are done by an old boys network of grey haired caucasian scientists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488072</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1261155420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>repeat after me</p><p>That movie doesnt exist</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>repeat after meThat movie doesnt exist</tokentext>
<sentencetext>repeat after meThat movie doesnt exist</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489060</id>
	<title>Re:1:4?</title>
	<author>Steve Max</author>
	<datestamp>1261159260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The chance that "nothing" (as in, no dark matter around here) would generate a signal as "big" as they saw (2 events) is 23\%. If they had so many events that the chance of "nothing" generating that number of events was under 0.1\% (they'd need 5 or more events on this analysis), they would be able to say the "null hypothesis", or the absence of dark matter, was proven wrong. With their current equipment, they can't do that, and now I'm sure this will be the same result when they analyse the full data set. It takes a bigger detector to detect those particles; or, they never existed at all, but then we'd need a bigger detector to know that anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The chance that " nothing " ( as in , no dark matter around here ) would generate a signal as " big " as they saw ( 2 events ) is 23 \ % .
If they had so many events that the chance of " nothing " generating that number of events was under 0.1 \ % ( they 'd need 5 or more events on this analysis ) , they would be able to say the " null hypothesis " , or the absence of dark matter , was proven wrong .
With their current equipment , they ca n't do that , and now I 'm sure this will be the same result when they analyse the full data set .
It takes a bigger detector to detect those particles ; or , they never existed at all , but then we 'd need a bigger detector to know that anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chance that "nothing" (as in, no dark matter around here) would generate a signal as "big" as they saw (2 events) is 23\%.
If they had so many events that the chance of "nothing" generating that number of events was under 0.1\% (they'd need 5 or more events on this analysis), they would be able to say the "null hypothesis", or the absence of dark matter, was proven wrong.
With their current equipment, they can't do that, and now I'm sure this will be the same result when they analyse the full data set.
It takes a bigger detector to detect those particles; or, they never existed at all, but then we'd need a bigger detector to know that anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506</id>
	<title>Supersymmetry lives?</title>
	<author>SloWave</author>
	<datestamp>1261160940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they have really found <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrolino" title="wikipedia.org"> neutralinos </a> [wikipedia.org] then wouldn't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed?  It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics.  There are blogs out there that are saying that CERN is about to announce something big too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they have really found neutralinos [ wikipedia.org ] then would n't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed ?
It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics .
There are blogs out there that are saying that CERN is about to announce something big too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they have really found  neutralinos  [wikipedia.org] then wouldn't that would mean supersymmetry is confirmed?
It that case it is a whole new ballgame in particle physics.
There are blogs out there that are saying that CERN is about to announce something big too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488588</id>
	<title>Re:How to tell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261157400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're mistaking anti-matter for dark matter.</p><p>There has been no accounts of a source of anti-matter in deep space as well. As far as we know, the visible universe is all made of normal matter.<br>But there is a way to produce it. Ask the LHC, they have some in stock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're mistaking anti-matter for dark matter.There has been no accounts of a source of anti-matter in deep space as well .
As far as we know , the visible universe is all made of normal matter.But there is a way to produce it .
Ask the LHC , they have some in stock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're mistaking anti-matter for dark matter.There has been no accounts of a source of anti-matter in deep space as well.
As far as we know, the visible universe is all made of normal matter.But there is a way to produce it.
Ask the LHC, they have some in stock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486900</id>
	<title>Re:Solar activity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Flirt &amp; Squirt 3?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flirt &amp; Squirt 3 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flirt &amp; Squirt 3?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</id>
	<title>Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1261149180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is funding research half a mile underground, with superconductors, to find particles that might not exist, and if they do, don't mean anything?<br>How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the country is 1.8 trillion ( US ) in the hole this year , yet someone , somewhere , is funding research half a mile underground , with superconductors , to find particles that might not exist , and if they do , do n't mean anything ? How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the country is 1.8 trillion (US) in the hole this year, yet someone, somewhere, is funding research half a mile underground, with superconductors, to find particles that might not exist, and if they do, don't mean anything?How do I get out of this chicken-shit outfit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30495588</id>
	<title>Re:No longer dark?</title>
	<author>IICV</author>
	<datestamp>1261146480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can feel the shape of a dark statue in a dark room with your hands, does it stop being dark?</p><p>No? Then no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can feel the shape of a dark statue in a dark room with your hands , does it stop being dark ? No ?
Then no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can feel the shape of a dark statue in a dark room with your hands, does it stop being dark?No?
Then no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486884</id>
	<title>Re:It's the lack of energy, stupid!</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1261150080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin, they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing. Yes, it interacts with incoming particles, but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles. In essence, the detector is detecting itself.</p><p>Of course, there is a 23\% chance I am completely wrong.</p></div><p>There's a 100\% chance you're wrong.  Gravitational waves can't be absorbed by these detectors in any meaningful way.  To notice the effects of even massive gravitational waves you need a huge detector (like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO" title="wikipedia.org">LIGO</a> [wikipedia.org]).  Also, gravitational waves happen when a gravitational field changes.  They propagate this change through the universe.  Objects at rest aren't emitting gravitational waves.</p><p>If you isolated these sensors from the universe and let them sit for a long time, they wouldn't lose their mass to gravitational radiation - they'd probably sit around until death by baryon decay in 10^33 years.</p><p>And no, they're not detecting baryon decay either.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin , they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing .
Yes , it interacts with incoming particles , but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles .
In essence , the detector is detecting itself.Of course , there is a 23 \ % chance I am completely wrong.There 's a 100 \ % chance you 're wrong .
Gravitational waves ca n't be absorbed by these detectors in any meaningful way .
To notice the effects of even massive gravitational waves you need a huge detector ( like LIGO [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
Also , gravitational waves happen when a gravitational field changes .
They propagate this change through the universe .
Objects at rest are n't emitting gravitational waves.If you isolated these sensors from the universe and let them sit for a long time , they would n't lose their mass to gravitational radiation - they 'd probably sit around until death by baryon decay in 10 ^ 33 years.And no , they 're not detecting baryon decay either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So by reducing the temperature of the sensor to half a degree Kelvin, they have reduced the energy level of the sensor to almost nothing.
Yes, it interacts with incoming particles, but it also radiates gravitational waves that could be misinterpreted as external particles.
In essence, the detector is detecting itself.Of course, there is a 23\% chance I am completely wrong.There's a 100\% chance you're wrong.
Gravitational waves can't be absorbed by these detectors in any meaningful way.
To notice the effects of even massive gravitational waves you need a huge detector (like LIGO [wikipedia.org]).
Also, gravitational waves happen when a gravitational field changes.
They propagate this change through the universe.
Objects at rest aren't emitting gravitational waves.If you isolated these sensors from the universe and let them sit for a long time, they wouldn't lose their mass to gravitational radiation - they'd probably sit around until death by baryon decay in 10^33 years.And no, they're not detecting baryon decay either.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486670</id>
	<title>Dark matter @ Home.org</title>
	<author>MindPrison</author>
	<datestamp>1261149180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring it on!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring it on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring it on!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486762</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1261149600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There haven't been any reports of success, but fire is rumored to work pretty well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have n't been any reports of success , but fire is rumored to work pretty well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There haven't been any reports of success, but fire is rumored to work pretty well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488182</id>
	<title>Re:How to tell?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1261155840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I watched maybe too many star trek episodes...</p><p>You did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I watched maybe too many star trek episodes...You did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I watched maybe too many star trek episodes...You did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489888</id>
	<title>Re:One in two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261162080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You did the maths wrong. Either (1) it is dark matter, (2) it isn't, (3) a wizard did it, (4) it was all a dream. This gives a 25\% probability that it's dark matter. The extra 2\% is due to statistical error.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You did the maths wrong .
Either ( 1 ) it is dark matter , ( 2 ) it is n't , ( 3 ) a wizard did it , ( 4 ) it was all a dream .
This gives a 25 \ % probability that it 's dark matter .
The extra 2 \ % is due to statistical error .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You did the maths wrong.
Either (1) it is dark matter, (2) it isn't, (3) a wizard did it, (4) it was all a dream.
This gives a 25\% probability that it's dark matter.
The extra 2\% is due to statistical error.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487258</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261152000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!

When did science start to feel more like religion to me...</p></div><p>Because you are just ignorant and watch too much Faux News.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because scientist 's interpretation of what they see is never wrong !
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...Because you are just ignorant and watch too much Faux News .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...Because you are just ignorant and watch too much Faux News.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486898</id>
	<title>Paper pre-print to appear on arxiv</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261150140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The paper pre-print will appear on the arxiv as 0912.3592, but is already available as <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/0912.03592v2.pdf" title="berkeley.edu" rel="nofollow">on the CDMS homepage</a> [berkeley.edu].  Two events or 23\% seems a bit low for all the hysteria...  Pentaquarks went away after 50 events were discovered at more than 10 different labs...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The paper pre-print will appear on the arxiv as 0912.3592 , but is already available as on the CDMS homepage [ berkeley.edu ] .
Two events or 23 \ % seems a bit low for all the hysteria... Pentaquarks went away after 50 events were discovered at more than 10 different labs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The paper pre-print will appear on the arxiv as 0912.3592, but is already available as on the CDMS homepage [berkeley.edu].
Two events or 23\% seems a bit low for all the hysteria...  Pentaquarks went away after 50 events were discovered at more than 10 different labs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487294</id>
	<title>Re:1:4?</title>
	<author>mrtommyb</author>
	<datestamp>1261152240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They need a 1:1000 to have a valid argument.</p> </div><p>Well, the IPCC report into climate change only reported a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental\_Panel\_on\_Climate\_Change#IPCC\_Fourth\_Assessment\_Report:\_Climate\_Change\_2007" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">9:1 chance of global warming being due to humans</a> [wikipedia.org]. I think most people would agree that climate change being anthropogenic is a valid arguement, even those who sceptical of the science.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They need a 1 : 1000 to have a valid argument .
Well , the IPCC report into climate change only reported a 9 : 1 chance of global warming being due to humans [ wikipedia.org ] .
I think most people would agree that climate change being anthropogenic is a valid arguement , even those who sceptical of the science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need a 1:1000 to have a valid argument.
Well, the IPCC report into climate change only reported a 9:1 chance of global warming being due to humans [wikipedia.org].
I think most people would agree that climate change being anthropogenic is a valid arguement, even those who sceptical of the science.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488880</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261158660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG. You Teabaggers are so effing mellow-dramatic. Republicans are such sore losers. I don't care if the Democrats <i>are</i> incompetent. I'm never voting for a whiny do-worse-than-nothing Republican again. Maybe if you and your kind stay out of power long enough you'll learn to become more sensible. God I hate the damn democrats but at least they don't sound like you bastards when they lose and act even worse when they win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG .
You Teabaggers are so effing mellow-dramatic .
Republicans are such sore losers .
I do n't care if the Democrats are incompetent .
I 'm never voting for a whiny do-worse-than-nothing Republican again .
Maybe if you and your kind stay out of power long enough you 'll learn to become more sensible .
God I hate the damn democrats but at least they do n't sound like you bastards when they lose and act even worse when they win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG.
You Teabaggers are so effing mellow-dramatic.
Republicans are such sore losers.
I don't care if the Democrats are incompetent.
I'm never voting for a whiny do-worse-than-nothing Republican again.
Maybe if you and your kind stay out of power long enough you'll learn to become more sensible.
God I hate the damn democrats but at least they don't sound like you bastards when they lose and act even worse when they win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489616</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Trails</author>
	<datestamp>1261161300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because your logic is fundamentally flawed.  If you were really questioning, and not just accepting everything at face value, you would say this:</p><p>Characterization: Isn't that where we are finding that galaxies aren't behaving as we expect them to, and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which shouldn't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.</p><p>Hypothe- err, fuck that, I mean PROOF:<br>It's God.  Literally God!!  He's got his hand in that galaxy like it was a Jeff Dunham puppet.</p><p>Deduction: If God is weakly interacting with the galaxies, all you heathen sciency evolution types are fucked!  Richard Dawkins won't be able to save you from getting cornholed by fire demons for the rest of eternity.</p><p>Experimentation:<br>Invoke the spirit of Charles Darwin.  Ask him how hot Hell is.  Fall on your knees, and hear the Angels sing.  Never question God or me again.  Now I will call you saved, please deposit $200 into the jar.</p><p>That's how you really fight the dogma of science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because your logic is fundamentally flawed .
If you were really questioning , and not just accepting everything at face value , you would say this : Characterization : Is n't that where we are finding that galaxies are n't behaving as we expect them to , and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which should n't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.Hypothe- err , fuck that , I mean PROOF : It 's God .
Literally God ! !
He 's got his hand in that galaxy like it was a Jeff Dunham puppet.Deduction : If God is weakly interacting with the galaxies , all you heathen sciency evolution types are fucked !
Richard Dawkins wo n't be able to save you from getting cornholed by fire demons for the rest of eternity.Experimentation : Invoke the spirit of Charles Darwin .
Ask him how hot Hell is .
Fall on your knees , and hear the Angels sing .
Never question God or me again .
Now I will call you saved , please deposit $ 200 into the jar.That 's how you really fight the dogma of science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because your logic is fundamentally flawed.
If you were really questioning, and not just accepting everything at face value, you would say this:Characterization: Isn't that where we are finding that galaxies aren't behaving as we expect them to, and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which shouldn't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.Hypothe- err, fuck that, I mean PROOF:It's God.
Literally God!!
He's got his hand in that galaxy like it was a Jeff Dunham puppet.Deduction: If God is weakly interacting with the galaxies, all you heathen sciency evolution types are fucked!
Richard Dawkins won't be able to save you from getting cornholed by fire demons for the rest of eternity.Experimentation:Invoke the spirit of Charles Darwin.
Ask him how hot Hell is.
Fall on your knees, and hear the Angels sing.
Never question God or me again.
Now I will call you saved, please deposit $200 into the jar.That's how you really fight the dogma of science.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486778</id>
	<title>Re:Meanwhile, Rome burns</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1261149660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears from a quick Google search that the <a href="http://www.uppermidwestherc.org/c/job.cfm?site\_id=4166&amp;sort=date\_&amp;jb=6062291" title="uppermidwestherc.org">University of Minnesota</a> [uppermidwestherc.org] is funding it. I guess you're against NASA, too, but in favor of pouring trillions down the Iraqui quagmire?</p><p>WTF are you doing on slashdot? Trolling?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears from a quick Google search that the University of Minnesota [ uppermidwestherc.org ] is funding it .
I guess you 're against NASA , too , but in favor of pouring trillions down the Iraqui quagmire ? WTF are you doing on slashdot ?
Trolling ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears from a quick Google search that the University of Minnesota [uppermidwestherc.org] is funding it.
I guess you're against NASA, too, but in favor of pouring trillions down the Iraqui quagmire?WTF are you doing on slashdot?
Trolling?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650</id>
	<title>Re:It must be true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261149060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong! When did science start to feel more like religion to me...</i></p><p>So tell me where they went fairy tale on us here?</p><p>Here is just a gross simplification, so I may not be completely accurate, but I fail to see where this is fairy-tale science.</p><p>Characterization:  Isn't that where we are finding that galaxies aren't behaving as we expect them to, and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which shouldn't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.</p><p>Hypothesis:<br>There is something there which for some reason has a lot of mass, but we can't see it.  Literally: Dark Matter</p><p>Deduction:  If Dark Matter is weakly interacting as is suggested by the fact that we can't currently see it.  If we are able to detect an interaction which cannot be accounted for among known particles, you have either discovered dark matter, or some other particle altogether if that detected particle is not massive enough when combined with the rate of interaction and the mass of the detected particle.</p><p>Experimentation:</p><p>Stick a detector way down in a mine shaft which will help filter out a lot of things which could cause a false positive.  Look for interactions which do not match any known possible interactions.</p><p>Again, that is grossly simplified, but I don't see the jump in logic you are looking for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because scientist 's interpretation of what they see is never wrong !
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...So tell me where they went fairy tale on us here ? Here is just a gross simplification , so I may not be completely accurate , but I fail to see where this is fairy-tale science.Characterization : Is n't that where we are finding that galaxies are n't behaving as we expect them to , and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which should n't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.Hypothesis : There is something there which for some reason has a lot of mass , but we ca n't see it .
Literally : Dark MatterDeduction : If Dark Matter is weakly interacting as is suggested by the fact that we ca n't currently see it .
If we are able to detect an interaction which can not be accounted for among known particles , you have either discovered dark matter , or some other particle altogether if that detected particle is not massive enough when combined with the rate of interaction and the mass of the detected particle.Experimentation : Stick a detector way down in a mine shaft which will help filter out a lot of things which could cause a false positive .
Look for interactions which do not match any known possible interactions.Again , that is grossly simplified , but I do n't see the jump in logic you are looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because scientist's interpretation of what they see is never wrong!
When did science start to feel more like religion to me...So tell me where they went fairy tale on us here?Here is just a gross simplification, so I may not be completely accurate, but I fail to see where this is fairy-tale science.Characterization:  Isn't that where we are finding that galaxies aren't behaving as we expect them to, and that behavior is in the form of gravitational interactions which shouldn't happen given the amount of mass which we can see.Hypothesis:There is something there which for some reason has a lot of mass, but we can't see it.
Literally: Dark MatterDeduction:  If Dark Matter is weakly interacting as is suggested by the fact that we can't currently see it.
If we are able to detect an interaction which cannot be accounted for among known particles, you have either discovered dark matter, or some other particle altogether if that detected particle is not massive enough when combined with the rate of interaction and the mass of the detected particle.Experimentation:Stick a detector way down in a mine shaft which will help filter out a lot of things which could cause a false positive.
Look for interactions which do not match any known possible interactions.Again, that is grossly simplified, but I don't see the jump in logic you are looking for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30495588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30497200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30546726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30511822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_18_0338205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492378
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30511822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30497200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30546726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30494958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30491048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30488880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30489646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30486658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30487268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_18_0338205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30490686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30495588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_18_0338205.30492000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
