<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_17_2218257</id>
	<title>26 Gigapixel Photo Sets New World Record</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1261045680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>FrenchSilk writes <i>"The <a href="http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate\_c?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.sz-online.de/nachrichten/artikel.asp\%3Fid\%3D2341875&amp;rurl=translate.google.com&amp;twu=1&amp;usg=ALkJrhjGnOg0hy2ixhC7Nf7JKEOIjWBwbg">largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR</a> camera was made by A.F.B. Media GmbH in Dresden, Germany.  1655 images, each 21.6 megapixels in size, were taken with a Canon 5D Mark II and a 400 mm lens over a period of 176 minutes.  The images were stitched on a 16 processor system with 48GB of main memory, taking 94 hours to create the final result.  The <a href="http://www.dresden-26-gigapixels.com/dresden26GP">interactive view can be found here</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>FrenchSilk writes " The largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR camera was made by A.F.B .
Media GmbH in Dresden , Germany .
1655 images , each 21.6 megapixels in size , were taken with a Canon 5D Mark II and a 400 mm lens over a period of 176 minutes .
The images were stitched on a 16 processor system with 48GB of main memory , taking 94 hours to create the final result .
The interactive view can be found here .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FrenchSilk writes "The largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR camera was made by A.F.B.
Media GmbH in Dresden, Germany.
1655 images, each 21.6 megapixels in size, were taken with a Canon 5D Mark II and a 400 mm lens over a period of 176 minutes.
The images were stitched on a 16 processor system with 48GB of main memory, taking 94 hours to create the final result.
The interactive view can be found here.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481740</id>
	<title>I am shocked and amazed!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1261056720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What are the chances that a web server serving up a 26GByte picture would be slashdotted?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the chances that a web server serving up a 26GByte picture would be slashdotted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the chances that a web server serving up a 26GByte picture would be slashdotted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481346</id>
	<title>Re:Google Earth</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1261054680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a 111 MP single sensor camera that just got installed on a telescope.  There's not a whole lot of point though.  It's easier, cheaper and more reliable to create a multichip camera like the 1.4 GP camera installed on one of the telescopes in Hawaii.  It's still one camera though, and takes the whole 1.4 GP in one shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a 111 MP single sensor camera that just got installed on a telescope .
There 's not a whole lot of point though .
It 's easier , cheaper and more reliable to create a multichip camera like the 1.4 GP camera installed on one of the telescopes in Hawaii .
It 's still one camera though , and takes the whole 1.4 GP in one shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a 111 MP single sensor camera that just got installed on a telescope.
There's not a whole lot of point though.
It's easier, cheaper and more reliable to create a multichip camera like the 1.4 GP camera installed on one of the telescopes in Hawaii.
It's still one camera though, and takes the whole 1.4 GP in one shot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485456</id>
	<title>stitching gone wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261140780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like the computer messed up something when processing the hotel. (just click the 'hotel' icon in the carousel). You can see the same guy in the same position in 2 windows plus the hotel sign is messed up too. Other than that, it's a good job.</p><p>Bo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like the computer messed up something when processing the hotel .
( just click the 'hotel ' icon in the carousel ) .
You can see the same guy in the same position in 2 windows plus the hotel sign is messed up too .
Other than that , it 's a good job.Bo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like the computer messed up something when processing the hotel.
(just click the 'hotel' icon in the carousel).
You can see the same guy in the same position in 2 windows plus the hotel sign is messed up too.
Other than that, it's a good job.Bo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481666</id>
	<title>Obvious they don't watch movies</title>
	<author>IronicToo</author>
	<datestamp>1261056420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This functionality and resolution is easy to get and can be obtained from a normal single photo, not 1655.

All you need is a standard "enhancement" filter found on any movie of TV show worth its salt. You zoom in, everything is blurry, enhance, it gets clear again and repeat ad nauseum, or at least until the scientists in your audience are nauseated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This functionality and resolution is easy to get and can be obtained from a normal single photo , not 1655 .
All you need is a standard " enhancement " filter found on any movie of TV show worth its salt .
You zoom in , everything is blurry , enhance , it gets clear again and repeat ad nauseum , or at least until the scientists in your audience are nauseated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This functionality and resolution is easy to get and can be obtained from a normal single photo, not 1655.
All you need is a standard "enhancement" filter found on any movie of TV show worth its salt.
You zoom in, everything is blurry, enhance, it gets clear again and repeat ad nauseum, or at least until the scientists in your audience are nauseated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480778</id>
	<title>Re:Google Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261051080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://xkcd.com/331/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/331/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/331/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480470</id>
	<title>Is it really impressive to stich a pic together?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be an impressive achievement to note the largest picture taken at one time with a camera.

However, stitching together 1655 photos together  doesn't exactly seem to be as interesting as a feat.

If that qualifies as a record, then just how many photos does the a global satellite view like Google Maps have in "total resolution"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be an impressive achievement to note the largest picture taken at one time with a camera .
However , stitching together 1655 photos together does n't exactly seem to be as interesting as a feat .
If that qualifies as a record , then just how many photos does the a global satellite view like Google Maps have in " total resolution " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be an impressive achievement to note the largest picture taken at one time with a camera.
However, stitching together 1655 photos together  doesn't exactly seem to be as interesting as a feat.
If that qualifies as a record, then just how many photos does the a global satellite view like Google Maps have in "total resolution"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</id>
	<title>Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>GigaHurtsMyRobot</author>
	<datestamp>1261049460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?  Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't take it all in at once , what 's the big deal ?
Would n't Google earth have the largest 'photo ' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?
Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480924</id>
	<title>Shadows</title>
	<author>Potor</author>
	<datestamp>1261052100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. And since they couldn't take it all at once, but needed almost a three-hour span, the shadows are all over the place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
And since they could n't take it all at once , but needed almost a three-hour span , the shadows are all over the place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
And since they couldn't take it all at once, but needed almost a three-hour span, the shadows are all over the place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480852</id>
	<title>I hope I have enough ram...</title>
	<author>socz</author>
	<datestamp>1261051500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to load that image!</htmltext>
<tokenext>to load that image !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to load that image!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480370</id>
	<title>Frosty Fuckin Piss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you stop a bunch of niggers from raping a white woman?  Throw them a basketball!
<br> <br>
Hurry up and mod me down, you fucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you stop a bunch of niggers from raping a white woman ?
Throw them a basketball !
Hurry up and mod me down , you fucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you stop a bunch of niggers from raping a white woman?
Throw them a basketball!
Hurry up and mod me down, you fucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460</id>
	<title>Google Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we're gonna stitch photos together, i think Google Earth is probably by far "higher-resolution" than this.</p><p>Show me a SINGLE image sensor that can do 26GP and i'll be impressed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we 're gon na stitch photos together , i think Google Earth is probably by far " higher-resolution " than this.Show me a SINGLE image sensor that can do 26GP and i 'll be impressed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we're gonna stitch photos together, i think Google Earth is probably by far "higher-resolution" than this.Show me a SINGLE image sensor that can do 26GP and i'll be impressed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480982</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261052460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably a single file version of it exists somewhere but for demonstration purpose they prepared the interactive view. Google earth however is not available as a single file (even internally at Google). Could Google go ahead and use its vast processing power to make a single image by stitching all of Google earth pictures together? Perhaps but unless they actually do it, it would not set a record.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably a single file version of it exists somewhere but for demonstration purpose they prepared the interactive view .
Google earth however is not available as a single file ( even internally at Google ) .
Could Google go ahead and use its vast processing power to make a single image by stitching all of Google earth pictures together ?
Perhaps but unless they actually do it , it would not set a record .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably a single file version of it exists somewhere but for demonstration purpose they prepared the interactive view.
Google earth however is not available as a single file (even internally at Google).
Could Google go ahead and use its vast processing power to make a single image by stitching all of Google earth pictures together?
Perhaps but unless they actually do it, it would not set a record.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30493234</id>
	<title>They should have cleaned the sensor first</title>
	<author>Etherized</author>
	<datestamp>1261131120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's dust on the sensor - you can see it in shots of the sky. It gives you an idea of how large each individual image is, as the sensor dust spots are visible at regular intervals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's dust on the sensor - you can see it in shots of the sky .
It gives you an idea of how large each individual image is , as the sensor dust spots are visible at regular intervals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's dust on the sensor - you can see it in shots of the sky.
It gives you an idea of how large each individual image is, as the sensor dust spots are visible at regular intervals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481318</id>
	<title>Boring</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261054560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I couldn't find one person in a compromising position or act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could n't find one person in a compromising position or act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I couldn't find one person in a compromising position or act.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482280</id>
	<title>Re:Google Earth</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1261060020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Earth is not a uniform resolution.</p><p>Still, David Pogue is sure to arrive on site soon and tell us we should do this with a 3 megapixel camera and just be quiet about all this gigapixel tom foolery.</p><p><a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E1DD113FF93BA35751C0A9619C8B63" title="nytimes.com">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E1DD113FF93BA35751C0A9619C8B63</a> [nytimes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Earth is not a uniform resolution.Still , David Pogue is sure to arrive on site soon and tell us we should do this with a 3 megapixel camera and just be quiet about all this gigapixel tom foolery.http : //query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html ? res = 9507E1DD113FF93BA35751C0A9619C8B63 [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Earth is not a uniform resolution.Still, David Pogue is sure to arrive on site soon and tell us we should do this with a 3 megapixel camera and just be quiet about all this gigapixel tom foolery.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E1DD113FF93BA35751C0A9619C8B63 [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480828</id>
	<title>6mod down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261051380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FreeBSD because COMPANY A 2 'Yes' to any eulogies to BSD's of BSD/OS. A Discussion I'm failure, its co!rpse aacounts for less</htmltext>
<tokenext>FreeBSD because COMPANY A 2 'Yes ' to any eulogies to BSD 's of BSD/OS .
A Discussion I 'm failure , its co ! rpse aacounts for less</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FreeBSD because COMPANY A 2 'Yes' to any eulogies to BSD's of BSD/OS.
A Discussion I'm failure, its co!rpse aacounts for less</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480578</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261050180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482498</id>
	<title>Re:Honestly? Goggle Traslate impressed me more.</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1261061580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, that worked like gangbusters and didn't read as particularly awkward. That's quite an accomplishment.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , that worked like gangbusters and did n't read as particularly awkward .
That 's quite an accomplishment .
                      Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, that worked like gangbusters and didn't read as particularly awkward.
That's quite an accomplishment.
                      Brett</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481888</id>
	<title>Re:Messed up stitching...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261057560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures. When you stitch together "picture with car" and "picture with no car", that's what you get.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures .
When you stitch together " picture with car " and " picture with no car " , that 's what you get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures.
When you stitch together "picture with car" and "picture with no car", that's what you get.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30484390</id>
	<title>Baby in the red car</title>
	<author>sml156</author>
	<datestamp>1261168200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you look at the parking lot zoom in on the row that has the half car ( the one that is puliing out ) the red car that is parked in the second spot from the end ( beside the red mini van ) you will see a baby in the back seat if you go full zoom</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look at the parking lot zoom in on the row that has the half car ( the one that is puliing out ) the red car that is parked in the second spot from the end ( beside the red mini van ) you will see a baby in the back seat if you go full zoom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look at the parking lot zoom in on the row that has the half car ( the one that is puliing out ) the red car that is parked in the second spot from the end ( beside the red mini van ) you will see a baby in the back seat if you go full zoom</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481864</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1261057380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't using a building as a camera pretty much limit your choice of subject material? There just might be a reason why <b>portable</b> cameras were invented! (Unless, of course, you can get a large number of people to pose in front of the building.<br> <br>
I remember as a child, the sun shining through a hole in the garage door onto the freezer door created a camera obscura, although it really only displayed a silhoette of the trees. And of course, the image was upside down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't using a building as a camera pretty much limit your choice of subject material ?
There just might be a reason why portable cameras were invented !
( Unless , of course , you can get a large number of people to pose in front of the building .
I remember as a child , the sun shining through a hole in the garage door onto the freezer door created a camera obscura , although it really only displayed a silhoette of the trees .
And of course , the image was upside down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't using a building as a camera pretty much limit your choice of subject material?
There just might be a reason why portable cameras were invented!
(Unless, of course, you can get a large number of people to pose in front of the building.
I remember as a child, the sun shining through a hole in the garage door onto the freezer door created a camera obscura, although it really only displayed a silhoette of the trees.
And of course, the image was upside down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482464</id>
	<title>Re:megapixels?</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1261061340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>David Pogue?  Is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>David Pogue ?
Is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>David Pogue?
Is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480534</id>
	<title>lolcats</title>
	<author>tholomyes</author>
	<datestamp>1261050000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and 20 minutes later, the world's largest lolcat was created. ("i can haz gigapixelz?")</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and 20 minutes later , the world 's largest lolcat was created .
( " i can haz gigapixelz ?
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and 20 minutes later, the world's largest lolcat was created.
("i can haz gigapixelz?
")</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480968</id>
	<title>I am on dialup!</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1261052340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>(you insensitive clods.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>( you insensitive clods .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(you insensitive clods.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480990</id>
	<title>On your marks.. get set..</title>
	<author>spraguetc201</author>
	<datestamp>1261052520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here! Here!

I third the shenanigans call. More like a cry..

The real question is who can 'stitch' the fastest...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here !
Here ! I third the shenanigans call .
More like a cry. . The real question is who can 'stitch ' the fastest.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here!
Here!

I third the shenanigans call.
More like a cry..

The real question is who can 'stitch' the fastest...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480426</id>
	<title>Slashdot effect</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1261049520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>in 3...2..1</htmltext>
<tokenext>in 3...2..1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 3...2..1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481176</id>
	<title>Created with 16 processor system with 48GB</title>
	<author>belthize</author>
	<datestamp>1261053480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Sadly the server for viewing is a 486 with an AT1500-BT 10mbit coax connection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Sadly the server for viewing is a 486 with an AT1500-BT 10mbit coax connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Sadly the server for viewing is a 486 with an AT1500-BT 10mbit coax connection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30486026</id>
	<title>Re:Messed up stitching...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1261146000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures. When you stitch together "picture with car" and "picture with no car", that's what you get.<br>--<br>Invisibility cloak?!? Ha! I'll believe it when I see it!</p></div><p>pretty sure your sig has the answer. they turned off the cloak to park, so nobody opened a door on them. that or they're turning it on as they back out, it's hard to tell with this few pixels per meter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures .
When you stitch together " picture with car " and " picture with no car " , that 's what you get.--Invisibility cloak ? ! ?
Ha ! I 'll believe it when I see it ! pretty sure your sig has the answer .
they turned off the cloak to park , so nobody opened a door on them .
that or they 're turning it on as they back out , it 's hard to tell with this few pixels per meter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, somebody moved their car while they were taking the pictures.
When you stitch together "picture with car" and "picture with no car", that's what you get.--Invisibility cloak?!?
Ha! I'll believe it when I see it!pretty sure your sig has the answer.
they turned off the cloak to park, so nobody opened a door on them.
that or they're turning it on as they back out, it's hard to tell with this few pixels per meter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482032</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>Jarik C-Bol</author>
	<datestamp>1261058400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>in a related note, i once accidentally converted my friends dorm room into a pinhole camera. we where lying there watching TV, and we turned the TV off, and i was staring at the wall, when i realized that the weird colors moving on the wall, was a projection of what was going on outside, it was just upside down. (small hole in the blanket over the window as it turns out)</htmltext>
<tokenext>in a related note , i once accidentally converted my friends dorm room into a pinhole camera .
we where lying there watching TV , and we turned the TV off , and i was staring at the wall , when i realized that the weird colors moving on the wall , was a projection of what was going on outside , it was just upside down .
( small hole in the blanket over the window as it turns out )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in a related note, i once accidentally converted my friends dorm room into a pinhole camera.
we where lying there watching TV, and we turned the TV off, and i was staring at the wall, when i realized that the weird colors moving on the wall, was a projection of what was going on outside, it was just upside down.
(small hole in the blanket over the window as it turns out)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482524</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1261061760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Points for building such a huge camera obscura.  Points off for whatever issues made a photograph that huge so incredibly noisy.  I suspect the exposure was too short since a pinhole camera of that size would have to be open for weeks to gather enough light to cover the canvas.  Possibly light leakage from unintentional pinholes was also a problem.  A photo that large should be unbelievably rich in detail or there's no point in making it, except to photograph the <em>process</em> of making a photograph that large.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Points for building such a huge camera obscura .
Points off for whatever issues made a photograph that huge so incredibly noisy .
I suspect the exposure was too short since a pinhole camera of that size would have to be open for weeks to gather enough light to cover the canvas .
Possibly light leakage from unintentional pinholes was also a problem .
A photo that large should be unbelievably rich in detail or there 's no point in making it , except to photograph the process of making a photograph that large .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Points for building such a huge camera obscura.
Points off for whatever issues made a photograph that huge so incredibly noisy.
I suspect the exposure was too short since a pinhole camera of that size would have to be open for weeks to gather enough light to cover the canvas.
Possibly light leakage from unintentional pinholes was also a problem.
A photo that large should be unbelievably rich in detail or there's no point in making it, except to photograph the process of making a photograph that large.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488</id>
	<title>Messed up stitching...</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1261055520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They messed up the stitching... that of <a href="http://yfrog.com/jlcamocarj" title="yfrog.com">someone invented a camouflage car</a> [yfrog.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>They messed up the stitching... that of someone invented a camouflage car [ yfrog.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They messed up the stitching... that of someone invented a camouflage car [yfrog.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480748</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>jcoy42</author>
	<datestamp>1261050960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do these sites insist on resizing my browser window for me?</p><p>I really hate that..</p><p>Yes, I know I could prevent it.  I don't see why I should though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do these sites insist on resizing my browser window for me ? I really hate that..Yes , I know I could prevent it .
I do n't see why I should though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do these sites insist on resizing my browser window for me?I really hate that..Yes, I know I could prevent it.
I don't see why I should though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482396</id>
	<title>Re:CSI style zoom!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261060920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pffft.... just enhance it.  You know, it's in the "filters" menu.  Just do enhance a few times and you can get crystal-clear photographs of reflections of reflections off of oddly shaped metallic objects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pffft.... just enhance it .
You know , it 's in the " filters " menu .
Just do enhance a few times and you can get crystal-clear photographs of reflections of reflections off of oddly shaped metallic objects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pffft.... just enhance it.
You know, it's in the "filters" menu.
Just do enhance a few times and you can get crystal-clear photographs of reflections of reflections off of oddly shaped metallic objects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480364</id>
	<title>GOATSE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>26 GP of stretched anus! OMFG!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>26 GP of stretched anus !
OMFG !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>26 GP of stretched anus!
OMFG!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481876</id>
	<title>Re:Google Earth</title>
	<author>reub2000</author>
	<datestamp>1261057440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't it be easier and a whole ton cheaper to do a 4000dpi scan off of a 8x10 negative? I mean there's almost 1.3GP in one shot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be easier and a whole ton cheaper to do a 4000dpi scan off of a 8x10 negative ?
I mean there 's almost 1.3GP in one shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be easier and a whole ton cheaper to do a 4000dpi scan off of a 8x10 negative?
I mean there's almost 1.3GP in one shot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481430</id>
	<title>Don't click on that link!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261055220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...unless you want to get slammed in the face with a gigapixel of goatce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...unless you want to get slammed in the face with a gigapixel of goatce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...unless you want to get slammed in the face with a gigapixel of goatce.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480958</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1261052340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>view of the entire globe stitched together</p></div><p>No, it hasn't. I dare bet large chunks of the oceans and poles aren't quite as detailed as some of the cities.</p><p>You probably can still find a big chunk detailed enough to beat the 26 gigapixel record, but the resolution of any chunk should be measured by the lowest resolution part and should be without any missing parts.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>view of the entire globe stitched togetherNo , it has n't .
I dare bet large chunks of the oceans and poles are n't quite as detailed as some of the cities.You probably can still find a big chunk detailed enough to beat the 26 gigapixel record , but the resolution of any chunk should be measured by the lowest resolution part and should be without any missing parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>view of the entire globe stitched togetherNo, it hasn't.
I dare bet large chunks of the oceans and poles aren't quite as detailed as some of the cities.You probably can still find a big chunk detailed enough to beat the 26 gigapixel record, but the resolution of any chunk should be measured by the lowest resolution part and should be without any missing parts.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481852</id>
	<title>Re:megapixels?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261057320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>bah, megapixels mean nothing...</p></div><p> Argh, the megapixels! They do nothing!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>bah , megapixels mean nothing... Argh , the megapixels !
They do nothing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bah, megapixels mean nothing... Argh, the megapixels!
They do nothing!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480794</id>
	<title>No fun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261051200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can only see the thumbnail from the article, but it doesn't look like a good Where's Waldo type picture. Giant photographs are no fun until you can spend an hour trying to find the woman in the shower that one guy says he found when you zoom in enough to count the pixels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can only see the thumbnail from the article , but it does n't look like a good Where 's Waldo type picture .
Giant photographs are no fun until you can spend an hour trying to find the woman in the shower that one guy says he found when you zoom in enough to count the pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can only see the thumbnail from the article, but it doesn't look like a good Where's Waldo type picture.
Giant photographs are no fun until you can spend an hour trying to find the woman in the shower that one guy says he found when you zoom in enough to count the pixels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481384</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>dov\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1261054920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Increasingly large megapixel photos are an interesting thing though, but to me they are only interesting if the focus is small. Imagine you are a woman looking at dress photos online. The photos have such amazing detail that you can zoom in and see the weave of the fabric itself, the details of the patterns. Then imagine you're looking at a mate's car photos. You can zoom in and read the badges etc. On a photo of a forest you can zoom in and check out a bee landing on an interesting flower.</p><p>Oh, ye. The interactive view appears to be slashdotted...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Increasingly large megapixel photos are an interesting thing though , but to me they are only interesting if the focus is small .
Imagine you are a woman looking at dress photos online .
The photos have such amazing detail that you can zoom in and see the weave of the fabric itself , the details of the patterns .
Then imagine you 're looking at a mate 's car photos .
You can zoom in and read the badges etc .
On a photo of a forest you can zoom in and check out a bee landing on an interesting flower.Oh , ye .
The interactive view appears to be slashdotted.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Increasingly large megapixel photos are an interesting thing though, but to me they are only interesting if the focus is small.
Imagine you are a woman looking at dress photos online.
The photos have such amazing detail that you can zoom in and see the weave of the fabric itself, the details of the patterns.
Then imagine you're looking at a mate's car photos.
You can zoom in and read the badges etc.
On a photo of a forest you can zoom in and check out a bee landing on an interesting flower.Oh, ye.
The interactive view appears to be slashdotted...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483884</id>
	<title>which</title>
	<author>Pooch Bushey</author>
	<datestamp>1261074480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>do i need a vt100 or a vt102 to see this gigathing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>do i need a vt100 or a vt102 to see this gigathing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do i need a vt100 or a vt102 to see this gigathing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483072</id>
	<title>Re:Naked women</title>
	<author>dfm3</author>
	<datestamp>1261066140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you mean she's not naked.<br> <br>

(typing this while sitting at my computer naked, except for khakis, a pair of boxers, and a t-shirt.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you mean she 's not naked .
( typing this while sitting at my computer naked , except for khakis , a pair of boxers , and a t-shirt .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you mean she's not naked.
(typing this while sitting at my computer naked, except for khakis, a pair of boxers, and a t-shirt.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480560</id>
	<title>It's a fake guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261050060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks 'shopped.  You can tell by the pixels and I have seen quite a few 'shops in my day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks 'shopped .
You can tell by the pixels and I have seen quite a few 'shops in my day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks 'shopped.
You can tell by the pixels and I have seen quite a few 'shops in my day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485520</id>
	<title>Interesting things to see in the photos.</title>
	<author>purpledinoz</author>
	<datestamp>1261141620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you look at the hills on the left side, the big white buildings are the Infineon fabs, and the now bankrupt Qimonda fab. Also, you can almost tell which part of Dresden was destroyed from the WWII bombings by the types of buildings that are there now. The apartment box-like buildings were built during the communist times after the war.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look at the hills on the left side , the big white buildings are the Infineon fabs , and the now bankrupt Qimonda fab .
Also , you can almost tell which part of Dresden was destroyed from the WWII bombings by the types of buildings that are there now .
The apartment box-like buildings were built during the communist times after the war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look at the hills on the left side, the big white buildings are the Infineon fabs, and the now bankrupt Qimonda fab.
Also, you can almost tell which part of Dresden was destroyed from the WWII bombings by the types of buildings that are there now.
The apartment box-like buildings were built during the communist times after the war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481188</id>
	<title>Pity they picked afternoon to shoot this photo</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1261053540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a pity they picked afternoon to shoot this photo. As a result the most beautiful part of the city, historic center, is in a deep shadow. With so much work put into this, one would think image aesthetics would be also be a consideration besides just technological accomplishment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a pity they picked afternoon to shoot this photo .
As a result the most beautiful part of the city , historic center , is in a deep shadow .
With so much work put into this , one would think image aesthetics would be also be a consideration besides just technological accomplishment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a pity they picked afternoon to shoot this photo.
As a result the most beautiful part of the city, historic center, is in a deep shadow.
With so much work put into this, one would think image aesthetics would be also be a consideration besides just technological accomplishment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30498228</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>FrenchSilk</author>
	<datestamp>1261234800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't take it in all at once on your puny computer, but there is a single full resolution image file somewhere that could conceivably be printed at 100\% if there were a printer in existence that could print 30 meter wide rolls (or whatever it would take) or a monitor with enough pixels to display it.  So, lacking those means of displaying the image, the next best thing is a zoomable image such as shown here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't take it in all at once on your puny computer , but there is a single full resolution image file somewhere that could conceivably be printed at 100 \ % if there were a printer in existence that could print 30 meter wide rolls ( or whatever it would take ) or a monitor with enough pixels to display it .
So , lacking those means of displaying the image , the next best thing is a zoomable image such as shown here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't take it in all at once on your puny computer, but there is a single full resolution image file somewhere that could conceivably be printed at 100\% if there were a printer in existence that could print 30 meter wide rolls (or whatever it would take) or a monitor with enough pixels to display it.
So, lacking those means of displaying the image, the next best thing is a zoomable image such as shown here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481304</id>
	<title>And they still</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261054440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> couldn't get all of Jlo's butt!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could n't get all of Jlo 's butt !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> couldn't get all of Jlo's butt!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498</id>
	<title>megapixels?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261049820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bah, megapixels mean nothing...</p><p>what about signal to noise ratio, dynamic range, plenoptic capabilities, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bah , megapixels mean nothing...what about signal to noise ratio , dynamic range , plenoptic capabilities , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bah, megapixels mean nothing...what about signal to noise ratio, dynamic range, plenoptic capabilities, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483454</id>
	<title>"One thousand billion worlds"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261069800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The raw stitch of this: http://www.sergebrunier.com/gallerie/pleinciel/index-eng.html was 145 Gb. They even did a huge print of it.</p><p>Lovely stuff.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and, their site actually works!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The raw stitch of this : http : //www.sergebrunier.com/gallerie/pleinciel/index-eng.html was 145 Gb .
They even did a huge print of it.Lovely stuff .
...and , their site actually works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The raw stitch of this: http://www.sergebrunier.com/gallerie/pleinciel/index-eng.html was 145 Gb.
They even did a huge print of it.Lovely stuff.
...and, their site actually works!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942</id>
	<title>CSI style zoom!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261052220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal? </i></p><p>Finally a photo that works like photos do on CSI when it comes to zoom!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't take it all in at once , what 's the big deal ?
Finally a photo that works like photos do on CSI when it comes to zoom !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?
Finally a photo that works like photos do on CSI when it comes to zoom!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481920</id>
	<title>265 meter penis sets new world record</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261057740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so it's really only 16 cm, but I stroked it 1655 times today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so it 's really only 16 cm , but I stroked it 1655 times today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so it's really only 16 cm, but I stroked it 1655 times today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480860</id>
	<title>Apparently...</title>
	<author>Ugarte</author>
	<datestamp>1261051620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>their web server does not have 16 processors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>their web server does not have 16 processors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>their web server does not have 16 processors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483548</id>
	<title>Number Plates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261070820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hurray for all the number plates: MEI U552 silver station wagon for one</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hurray for all the number plates : MEI U552 silver station wagon for one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hurray for all the number plates: MEI U552 silver station wagon for one</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483510</id>
	<title>Time warp!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261070220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look what I found in there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>http://i48.tinypic.com/160onzd.jpg</p><p>AnnotatedSnark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look what I found in there : ) http : //i48.tinypic.com/160onzd.jpgAnnotatedSnark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look what I found in there :)http://i48.tinypic.com/160onzd.jpgAnnotatedSnark</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480792</id>
	<title>PNG!</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1261051200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I swear to god if this is a VLCsnap.png I am going to be really mad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I swear to god if this is a VLCsnap.png I am going to be really mad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I swear to god if this is a VLCsnap.png I am going to be really mad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481136</id>
	<title>Re:Honestly? Goggle Traslate impressed me more.</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1261053240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This has been done and its going to be "done" many times before.</p><p>What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article.  Its not perfect, but you can read it and understand fairly clearly.</p></div><p>Posting on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. about how something's "been done before" has been done before. <br> <br>What amazed me was that Slashdot spellcheck did a REALLY good job of spellchecking that post. It's not perfect, but you can read and understand it fairly easily.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been done and its going to be " done " many times before.What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article .
Its not perfect , but you can read it and understand fairly clearly.Posting on / .
about how something 's " been done before " has been done before .
What amazed me was that Slashdot spellcheck did a REALLY good job of spellchecking that post .
It 's not perfect , but you can read and understand it fairly easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been done and its going to be "done" many times before.What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article.
Its not perfect, but you can read it and understand fairly clearly.Posting on /.
about how something's "been done before" has been done before.
What amazed me was that Slashdot spellcheck did a REALLY good job of spellchecking that post.
It's not perfect, but you can read and understand it fairly easily.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481162</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Picture?</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1261053360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a world record slashdotting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a world record slashdotting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a world record slashdotting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482824</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>jasonwc</author>
	<datestamp>1261063980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But that wasn't what the article or the summary claimed:</p><p>"The largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR camera"</p><p>Satellites aren't using DSLR cameras<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But that was n't what the article or the summary claimed : " The largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR camera " Satellites are n't using DSLR cameras : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But that wasn't what the article or the summary claimed:"The largest gigapixel photograph ever created with a DSLR camera"Satellites aren't using DSLR cameras :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482510</id>
	<title>Re:Is it really impressive to stich a pic together</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1261061700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Stitch job is pretty good.</p><p>But the girl riding her bike on the bridge has gained a twin, and a couple cars in the parking lot seem to have lost their rear ends.</p><p>Serial imaging leads to anomalies.  Simultaneous imaging would be more impressive.  I'm not as concerned that there are multiple sensors involved as I am that the same sensor was used serially and with enough of an interval that a person could plod along on a bike for 200 feet.</p><p>Still its pretty impressive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Stitch job is pretty good.But the girl riding her bike on the bridge has gained a twin , and a couple cars in the parking lot seem to have lost their rear ends.Serial imaging leads to anomalies .
Simultaneous imaging would be more impressive .
I 'm not as concerned that there are multiple sensors involved as I am that the same sensor was used serially and with enough of an interval that a person could plod along on a bike for 200 feet.Still its pretty impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Stitch job is pretty good.But the girl riding her bike on the bridge has gained a twin, and a couple cars in the parking lot seem to have lost their rear ends.Serial imaging leads to anomalies.
Simultaneous imaging would be more impressive.
I'm not as concerned that there are multiple sensors involved as I am that the same sensor was used serially and with enough of an interval that a person could plod along on a bike for 200 feet.Still its pretty impressive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480940</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261052220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope. From TFA, the new photo is 105x35 meters. The photo you referenced is only 32.9x8.5 meters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
From TFA , the new photo is 105x35 meters .
The photo you referenced is only 32.9x8.5 meters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
From TFA, the new photo is 105x35 meters.
The photo you referenced is only 32.9x8.5 meters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481018</id>
	<title>Re:Naked women</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1261052700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's just cruel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just cruel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just cruel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800</id>
	<title>Honestly?  Goggle Traslate impressed me more.</title>
	<author>WarlockD</author>
	<datestamp>1261051200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has been done and its going to be "done" many times before.</p><p>What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article.  Its not perfect, but you can read it and understand fairly clearly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been done and its going to be " done " many times before.What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article .
Its not perfect , but you can read it and understand fairly clearly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been done and its going to be "done" many times before.What amazed me was that Google translate did a REALLY good job of traslating that article.
Its not perfect, but you can read it and understand fairly clearly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480846</id>
	<title>Largest Image Sensor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261051440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some related knowledge:  The largest Image sensor (that I've heard of) is part of the "Large Synoptic Survey Telescope" in Chile and it weighs in at 3200 Megapixels</p><p><a href="http://www.megapixelmyth.com/?p=127" title="megapixelmyth.com">http://www.megapixelmyth.com/?p=127</a> [megapixelmyth.com]</p><p>Shameless plug:  check out my blog at megapixelmyth.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some related knowledge : The largest Image sensor ( that I 've heard of ) is part of the " Large Synoptic Survey Telescope " in Chile and it weighs in at 3200 Megapixelshttp : //www.megapixelmyth.com/ ? p = 127 [ megapixelmyth.com ] Shameless plug : check out my blog at megapixelmyth.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some related knowledge:  The largest Image sensor (that I've heard of) is part of the "Large Synoptic Survey Telescope" in Chile and it weighs in at 3200 Megapixelshttp://www.megapixelmyth.com/?p=127 [megapixelmyth.com]Shameless plug:  check out my blog at megapixelmyth.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481602</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261056120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>105m at 66ppi...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>105m at 66ppi.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>105m at 66ppi...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480568</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>novalis112</author>
	<datestamp>1261050120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I third the motion.  How many do we need for it to pass?  I thought the articles were moderated on this website?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I third the motion .
How many do we need for it to pass ?
I thought the articles were moderated on this website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I third the motion.
How many do we need for it to pass?
I thought the articles were moderated on this website?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480408</id>
	<title>Actual Picture?</title>
	<author>DarkSabreLord</author>
	<datestamp>1261049460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get a "security error" when I try to view the actual picture from that website...anyone have another link?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get a " security error " when I try to view the actual picture from that website...anyone have another link ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get a "security error" when I try to view the actual picture from that website...anyone have another link?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480612</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>H0p313ss</author>
	<datestamp>1261050360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?  Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together?</p></div><p>A 26 gigapixel image is cool for any computer geek / graphics nut / photographer.</p><p>I for one welcome our new, gigapixel image toting, overlords</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't take it all in at once , what 's the big deal ?
Would n't Google earth have the largest 'photo ' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together ? A 26 gigapixel image is cool for any computer geek / graphics nut / photographer.I for one welcome our new , gigapixel image toting , overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?
Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo' since it has an interactive view of the entire globe stitched together?A 26 gigapixel image is cool for any computer geek / graphics nut / photographer.I for one welcome our new, gigapixel image toting, overlords
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480626</id>
	<title>Can you send me the thumbnail?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261050420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It didn't fit on my screen, can you send me the 1600x1200 wallpaper?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It did n't fit on my screen , can you send me the 1600x1200 wallpaper ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It didn't fit on my screen, can you send me the 1600x1200 wallpaper?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481810</id>
	<title>Wheres....</title>
	<author>Bobfrankly1</author>
	<datestamp>1261057140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey! I found Waldo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey !
I found Waldo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!
I found Waldo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</id>
	<title>Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1261050240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.legacyphotoproject.com/" title="legacyphotoproject.com">Legacy Project</a> [legacyphotoproject.com], they converted an old hanger into a pinhole camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legacy Project [ legacyphotoproject.com ] , they converted an old hanger into a pinhole camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legacy Project [legacyphotoproject.com], they converted an old hanger into a pinhole camera.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481532</id>
	<title>No mirror?</title>
	<author>redphive</author>
	<datestamp>1261055760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was anyone able to mirror the image before the server went down?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was anyone able to mirror the image before the server went down ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was anyone able to mirror the image before the server went down?
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480692</id>
	<title>in the office</title>
	<author>ravenspear</author>
	<datestamp>1261050660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>AFB Media Exec: Hey IT guy, can our server handle the load if I post a 26 gigapixel image to slashdot?
<br> <br>
IT Guy: Of course it can, we run BSD, which as you know, is not....</htmltext>
<tokenext>AFB Media Exec : Hey IT guy , can our server handle the load if I post a 26 gigapixel image to slashdot ?
IT Guy : Of course it can , we run BSD , which as you know , is not... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFB Media Exec: Hey IT guy, can our server handle the load if I post a 26 gigapixel image to slashdot?
IT Guy: Of course it can, we run BSD, which as you know, is not....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485176</id>
	<title>I love finding things...</title>
	<author>FlameWise</author>
	<datestamp>1261136040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the same two bladers getting pictured 5 times:</p><p><a href="http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/3808/stopmotion.png" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/3808/stopmotion.png</a> [imageshack.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the same two bladers getting pictured 5 times : http : //img697.imageshack.us/img697/3808/stopmotion.png [ imageshack.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the same two bladers getting pictured 5 times:http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/3808/stopmotion.png [imageshack.us]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481324</id>
	<title>Holy Carp!</title>
	<author>ittybad</author>
	<datestamp>1261054560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forget about the whose-a-ma-wuchit umpty-ump gigapixel technology...I want to know about the partial-cloaking field device implemented on the car in the parking lot!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget about the whose-a-ma-wuchit umpty-ump gigapixel technology...I want to know about the partial-cloaking field device implemented on the car in the parking lot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget about the whose-a-ma-wuchit umpty-ump gigapixel technology...I want to know about the partial-cloaking field device implemented on the car in the parking lot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742</id>
	<title>Naked women</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1261050960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you zoom in a bit, there is a women in that photo who is naked, all except a red and white striped bikini top.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you zoom in a bit , there is a women in that photo who is naked , all except a red and white striped bikini top .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you zoom in a bit, there is a women in that photo who is naked, all except a red and white striped bikini top.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483774</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>wwwillem</author>
	<datestamp>1261073040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</i></p><p>Google's satellite picture of the earth is one million giga-pixels large (if I didn't make some calculation error).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't Google earth have the largest 'photo ' ...Google 's satellite picture of the earth is one million giga-pixels large ( if I did n't make some calculation error ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't Google earth have the largest 'photo' ...Google's satellite picture of the earth is one million giga-pixels large (if I didn't make some calculation error).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30484510</id>
	<title>Re:Shadows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261127640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly they needed to use a lot more than one camera.  Perhaps a beowolf cluster of a few hundred or so could speed up this inherently parallel process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly they needed to use a lot more than one camera .
Perhaps a beowolf cluster of a few hundred or so could speed up this inherently parallel process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly they needed to use a lot more than one camera.
Perhaps a beowolf cluster of a few hundred or so could speed up this inherently parallel process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480868</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Largest Photo</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1261051680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do all record making photographs have to be so aesthetically repulsive!?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do all record making photographs have to be so aesthetically repulsive ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do all record making photographs have to be so aesthetically repulsive!?!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482072</id>
	<title>Re:CSI style zoom!!!</title>
	<author>Brian Gordon</author>
	<datestamp>1261058760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all we need are criminals who will stand still for 176 minutes so we can get a good shot of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need are criminals who will stand still for 176 minutes so we can get a good shot of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need are criminals who will stand still for 176 minutes so we can get a good shot of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482318</id>
	<title>Re:Woop de freakin do</title>
	<author>spartacus\_prime</author>
	<datestamp>1261060320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?</p></div><p>That's what she said.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't take it all in at once , what 's the big deal ? That 's what she said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't take it all in at once, what's the big deal?That's what she said.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30484510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30498228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30486026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_2218257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482498
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30486026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30485520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30484510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30483774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30498228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30481602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30482524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_2218257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_2218257.30480626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
