<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_17_1444250</id>
	<title>Did Chandrayaan Find Organic Matter On the Moon?</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1261065180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Matt\_dk writes <i>"Surendra Pal, associate director of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) Satellite Centre says that Chandrayaan-1 picked up <a href="http://spacefellowship.com/2009/12/16/signs-of-life-detected-on-the-moon/">signatures of organic matter on parts of the Moon's surface</a>. 'The findings are being analyzed and scrutinized for validation by ISRO scientists and peer reviewers,' Pal said. At a press conference Tuesday at the American Geophysical Union fall conference, scientists from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter also hinted at possible organics locked away in the lunar regolith. When asked directly about the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon, NASA's chief lunar scientist, Mike Wargo, certainly did not dismiss the idea."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Matt \ _dk writes " Surendra Pal , associate director of the Indian Space Research Organization ( ISRO ) Satellite Centre says that Chandrayaan-1 picked up signatures of organic matter on parts of the Moon 's surface .
'The findings are being analyzed and scrutinized for validation by ISRO scientists and peer reviewers, ' Pal said .
At a press conference Tuesday at the American Geophysical Union fall conference , scientists from NASA 's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter also hinted at possible organics locked away in the lunar regolith .
When asked directly about the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon , NASA 's chief lunar scientist , Mike Wargo , certainly did not dismiss the idea .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Matt\_dk writes "Surendra Pal, associate director of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) Satellite Centre says that Chandrayaan-1 picked up signatures of organic matter on parts of the Moon's surface.
'The findings are being analyzed and scrutinized for validation by ISRO scientists and peer reviewers,' Pal said.
At a press conference Tuesday at the American Geophysical Union fall conference, scientists from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter also hinted at possible organics locked away in the lunar regolith.
When asked directly about the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon, NASA's chief lunar scientist, Mike Wargo, certainly did not dismiss the idea.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476610</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261078680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jimmy Hoffa?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jimmy Hoffa ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jimmy Hoffa?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30485326</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261138800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No,but the Indian newspaper DNA that first reported this made the jump.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No,but the Indian newspaper DNA that first reported this made the jump .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No,but the Indian newspaper DNA that first reported this made the jump.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475350</id>
	<title>Organic matter?? ... Armstrong!!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1261073580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You DID take a shit on the moon!</p><p>And as usual, an Indian is the lucky one, who finds it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You DID take a shit on the moon ! And as usual , an Indian is the lucky one , who finds it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You DID take a shit on the moon!And as usual, an Indian is the lucky one, who finds it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474492</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1261069920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And aren't there lots of sources of organic molecules that don't involve life?</i></p><p>Don't be silly. <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060808\_st\_life\_molecules.html" title="space.com">Vitalism is alive and well.</a> [space.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And are n't there lots of sources of organic molecules that do n't involve life ? Do n't be silly .
Vitalism is alive and well .
[ space.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And aren't there lots of sources of organic molecules that don't involve life?Don't be silly.
Vitalism is alive and well.
[space.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475340</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1261073520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Re: your sig</p><p>Religion = a belief without proof</p><p>Atheism = a belief that there is no God, afterlife, and all that</p><p>Not even caring enough to have a label is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Re : your sigReligion = a belief without proofAtheism = a belief that there is no God , afterlife , and all thatNot even caring enough to have a label is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Re: your sigReligion = a belief without proofAtheism = a belief that there is no God, afterlife, and all thatNot even caring enough to have a label is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30495278</id>
	<title>Re:Impact</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1261143120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that "splashed" to become the moon?</p></div> </blockquote><p>Impossible? No.<br>Implausible? Yes.</p><blockquote><div><p>If so, could it mean that life has developed here twice?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's fairly mainstream (as much as there is a "mainstream" in OOL (Origin Of Life) studies) that, if life could develop on an Earth-like planet in a hundred million years (end of Late Heavy Bombardment around 3800 Mya ; first generally-accepted fossils either 3200 Mya or 3500 Mya, depending on which mainstream you paddle in ; controversial claims of "biological signatures" as early as 3700 Mya), then it could plausibly have developed several times during the Late Heavy Bombardment, but been blown/ boiled/ baked away repeatedly. So, postulating that life could have originated on Earth multiple times is not an unrealistic position to defend.</p><p>There's a PhD thesis in there, if you want to go for it and you've got a spare 3-4 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that " splashed " to become the moon ?
Impossible ? No.Implausible ?
Yes.If so , could it mean that life has developed here twice ? It 's fairly mainstream ( as much as there is a " mainstream " in OOL ( Origin Of Life ) studies ) that , if life could develop on an Earth-like planet in a hundred million years ( end of Late Heavy Bombardment around 3800 Mya ; first generally-accepted fossils either 3200 Mya or 3500 Mya , depending on which mainstream you paddle in ; controversial claims of " biological signatures " as early as 3700 Mya ) , then it could plausibly have developed several times during the Late Heavy Bombardment , but been blown/ boiled/ baked away repeatedly .
So , postulating that life could have originated on Earth multiple times is not an unrealistic position to defend.There 's a PhD thesis in there , if you want to go for it and you 've got a spare 3-4 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that "splashed" to become the moon?
Impossible? No.Implausible?
Yes.If so, could it mean that life has developed here twice?It's fairly mainstream (as much as there is a "mainstream" in OOL (Origin Of Life) studies) that, if life could develop on an Earth-like planet in a hundred million years (end of Late Heavy Bombardment around 3800 Mya ; first generally-accepted fossils either 3200 Mya or 3500 Mya, depending on which mainstream you paddle in ; controversial claims of "biological signatures" as early as 3700 Mya), then it could plausibly have developed several times during the Late Heavy Bombardment, but been blown/ boiled/ baked away repeatedly.
So, postulating that life could have originated on Earth multiple times is not an unrealistic position to defend.There's a PhD thesis in there, if you want to go for it and you've got a spare 3-4 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474808</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>wisdom\_brewing</author>
	<datestamp>1261071300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what they found was the expected - live bacteria that causes the mould in cheese</htmltext>
<tokenext>what they found was the expected - live bacteria that causes the mould in cheese</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what they found was the expected - live bacteria that causes the mould in cheese</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474324</id>
	<title>Organic matter is the basis of life</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1261069200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Though organic matter is the basis of life, it does not guarantee that life would exist. It is just a type of matter composed of carbon-based molecules. Is there carbon out there? You bet. That means that organic matter will also exist out there in space.</p><p>Colin Powell was crucified for claiming the existence of WMDs in Iraq. It took a couple years, but we never found the smoking gun. Don't be too quick to jump on the first piece of evidence you find.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though organic matter is the basis of life , it does not guarantee that life would exist .
It is just a type of matter composed of carbon-based molecules .
Is there carbon out there ?
You bet .
That means that organic matter will also exist out there in space.Colin Powell was crucified for claiming the existence of WMDs in Iraq .
It took a couple years , but we never found the smoking gun .
Do n't be too quick to jump on the first piece of evidence you find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though organic matter is the basis of life, it does not guarantee that life would exist.
It is just a type of matter composed of carbon-based molecules.
Is there carbon out there?
You bet.
That means that organic matter will also exist out there in space.Colin Powell was crucified for claiming the existence of WMDs in Iraq.
It took a couple years, but we never found the smoking gun.
Don't be too quick to jump on the first piece of evidence you find.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474698</id>
	<title>welcome</title>
	<author>OMFG it's Rici</author>
	<datestamp>1261070880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new lunar overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new lunar overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new lunar overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474478</id>
	<title>Re:Neil Armstrong's Pee</title>
	<author>metlin</author>
	<datestamp>1261069860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, no scotch drinking person I know would ever waste a bottle lying around, especially not when you could never get to it (say, the moon). Heck, what better place to get trashed than on the moon itself? Screw the mission.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , no scotch drinking person I know would ever waste a bottle lying around , especially not when you could never get to it ( say , the moon ) .
Heck , what better place to get trashed than on the moon itself ?
Screw the mission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, no scotch drinking person I know would ever waste a bottle lying around, especially not when you could never get to it (say, the moon).
Heck, what better place to get trashed than on the moon itself?
Screw the mission.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474304</id>
	<title>Impact</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1261069140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that "splashed" to become the moon? If so, could it mean that life has developed here twice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that " splashed " to become the moon ?
If so , could it mean that life has developed here twice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there was life on Earth before it was struck by the object that "splashed" to become the moon?
If so, could it mean that life has developed here twice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475002</id>
	<title>In other news, moons only indigenous life...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261072020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, moons only indigenous life destroyed by rocket. Film at 11!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , moons only indigenous life destroyed by rocket .
Film at 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, moons only indigenous life destroyed by rocket.
Film at 11!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30478516</id>
	<title>Re:boooo panspermia!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261042320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>panspermia is a terrible theory. it doesn't fully address where the componets of life came from, it's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.</p></div><p>Yes, and modern evolutionary theory doesn't fully account for how the very first organism(s) appeared, so you must think it's a terrible theory too, right?</p><p>Theories have scopes.  When one theory's scope ends, another theory should begin.  If you want to know how the first organism(s) appeared, don't count on evolutionary theory to tell you--it's outside the scope.  If you want to know the full story of where the components of life came from, don't count on panspermia to tell you--it's outside the scope.</p><p>Panspermia may or may not be a terrible theory, but complaining that it fails to address things outside its scope is just silly.  It answers (perhaps badly) the question "Where did all these organic building blocks come from?"  It does not answer how those organic building blocks came to exist.  It does not answer how they eventually turned into a squirrel.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>panspermia is a terrible theory .
it does n't fully address where the componets of life came from , it 's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.Yes , and modern evolutionary theory does n't fully account for how the very first organism ( s ) appeared , so you must think it 's a terrible theory too , right ? Theories have scopes .
When one theory 's scope ends , another theory should begin .
If you want to know how the first organism ( s ) appeared , do n't count on evolutionary theory to tell you--it 's outside the scope .
If you want to know the full story of where the components of life came from , do n't count on panspermia to tell you--it 's outside the scope.Panspermia may or may not be a terrible theory , but complaining that it fails to address things outside its scope is just silly .
It answers ( perhaps badly ) the question " Where did all these organic building blocks come from ?
" It does not answer how those organic building blocks came to exist .
It does not answer how they eventually turned into a squirrel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>panspermia is a terrible theory.
it doesn't fully address where the componets of life came from, it's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.Yes, and modern evolutionary theory doesn't fully account for how the very first organism(s) appeared, so you must think it's a terrible theory too, right?Theories have scopes.
When one theory's scope ends, another theory should begin.
If you want to know how the first organism(s) appeared, don't count on evolutionary theory to tell you--it's outside the scope.
If you want to know the full story of where the components of life came from, don't count on panspermia to tell you--it's outside the scope.Panspermia may or may not be a terrible theory, but complaining that it fails to address things outside its scope is just silly.
It answers (perhaps badly) the question "Where did all these organic building blocks come from?
"  It does not answer how those organic building blocks came to exist.
It does not answer how they eventually turned into a squirrel.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474318</id>
	<title>curry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261069200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it was curry he found. and he was happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it was curry he found .
and he was happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was curry he found.
and he was happy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474678</id>
	<title>ZOMG!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1261070820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It *is* cheese!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It * is * cheese !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It *is* cheese!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30485236</id>
	<title>Organic only means carbon based and nothing more</title>
	<author>spathi-wa</author>
	<datestamp>1261137060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The logic jump from there being possible organic matter on the moon, to the near-assumption that this organic matter is life-based or life-supporting was apparently made by the writer of the original article <a href="http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report\_indian-scientists-detect-signs-of-life-on-moon\_1322785" title="dnaindia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report\_indian-scientists-detect-signs-of-life-on-moon\_1322785</a> [dnaindia.com]</p><p>While a lay person such as the reporter may claim ignorance of the difference between "carbon-based matter" and "carbon-based matter that supports or has come from live organisms", I am truly surprised at just how many non-humorous posts we have here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. about life in space/on the moon/new intelligences etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The logic jump from there being possible organic matter on the moon , to the near-assumption that this organic matter is life-based or life-supporting was apparently made by the writer of the original article http : //www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report \ _indian-scientists-detect-signs-of-life-on-moon \ _1322785 [ dnaindia.com ] While a lay person such as the reporter may claim ignorance of the difference between " carbon-based matter " and " carbon-based matter that supports or has come from live organisms " , I am truly surprised at just how many non-humorous posts we have here on / .
about life in space/on the moon/new intelligences etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The logic jump from there being possible organic matter on the moon, to the near-assumption that this organic matter is life-based or life-supporting was apparently made by the writer of the original article http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report\_indian-scientists-detect-signs-of-life-on-moon\_1322785 [dnaindia.com]While a lay person such as the reporter may claim ignorance of the difference between "carbon-based matter" and "carbon-based matter that supports or has come from live organisms", I am truly surprised at just how many non-humorous posts we have here on /.
about life in space/on the moon/new intelligences etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475738</id>
	<title>Cheese is organic, just sayin' (eom)</title>
	<author>Punk CPA</author>
	<datestamp>1261075260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I said "eom," dammit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I said " eom , " dammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I said "eom," dammit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474480</id>
	<title>just a thought...</title>
	<author>Dilbert Knows</author>
	<datestamp>1261069860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the Apollo missions and various probes sent to the moon since the 60's... Wouldn't you expect to find some organic material on the moon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the Apollo missions and various probes sent to the moon since the 60 's... Would n't you expect to find some organic material on the moon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the Apollo missions and various probes sent to the moon since the 60's... Wouldn't you expect to find some organic material on the moon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474758</id>
	<title>No, it was Alan Shepard's balls . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1261071060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, golf balls, that is: <a href="http://www.pasturegolf.com/archive/shepard.htm" title="pasturegolf.com">http://www.pasturegolf.com/archive/shepard.htm</a> [pasturegolf.com]
</p><p>Being the joker that he was, I wouldn't be surprised if he took the time to take a dump and have a wank, as well.
</p><p>"Hello Moon!  Welcome to what humanity is going to do to you!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , golf balls , that is : http : //www.pasturegolf.com/archive/shepard.htm [ pasturegolf.com ] Being the joker that he was , I would n't be surprised if he took the time to take a dump and have a wank , as well .
" Hello Moon !
Welcome to what humanity is going to do to you !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, golf balls, that is: http://www.pasturegolf.com/archive/shepard.htm [pasturegolf.com]
Being the joker that he was, I wouldn't be surprised if he took the time to take a dump and have a wank, as well.
"Hello Moon!
Welcome to what humanity is going to do to you!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475442</id>
	<title>boooo panspermia!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>panspermia is a terrible theory. it doesn't fully address where the componets of life came from, it's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.</p><p>One of the many problems I have with the theory is that no where have I seen evidence that these organic molecules are more likely to appear when exposed to the hard radiation of space. And only thing it has going for it, in my opinion, is that you can have much larger time scales for life to appear if you take the Earth out of the picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>panspermia is a terrible theory .
it does n't fully address where the componets of life came from , it 's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.One of the many problems I have with the theory is that no where have I seen evidence that these organic molecules are more likely to appear when exposed to the hard radiation of space .
And only thing it has going for it , in my opinion , is that you can have much larger time scales for life to appear if you take the Earth out of the picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>panspermia is a terrible theory.
it doesn't fully address where the componets of life came from, it's just sticking your fingers in your ears shouting IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE.One of the many problems I have with the theory is that no where have I seen evidence that these organic molecules are more likely to appear when exposed to the hard radiation of space.
And only thing it has going for it, in my opinion, is that you can have much larger time scales for life to appear if you take the Earth out of the picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475582</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261074600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>break open a capsule of blue germicide, seal it up in the bag, and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed!</p></div></blockquote><p>Aww, come on man.  Some of us read Slashdot during our lunch break.</p><p>That's just nasty!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>break open a capsule of blue germicide , seal it up in the bag , and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed ! Aww , come on man .
Some of us read Slashdot during our lunch break.That 's just nasty !
: -PCheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>break open a capsule of blue germicide, seal it up in the bag, and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed!Aww, come on man.
Some of us read Slashdot during our lunch break.That's just nasty!
:-PCheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475782</id>
	<title>Re:Remember that in Chemistry has a precise meanin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261075440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So even better than life on the moon, there's oil on the moon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So even better than life on the moon , there 's oil on the moon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So even better than life on the moon, there's oil on the moon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476126</id>
	<title>Blowback from Earth?</title>
	<author>geoffrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1261077000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some people have guessed that there may be or may have been life on Mars due to a meteor striking Earth and putting Earth material into space. I would assume the Moon, being so much closer, would have caught a lot of organic material over the years from numerous meteor impacts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people have guessed that there may be or may have been life on Mars due to a meteor striking Earth and putting Earth material into space .
I would assume the Moon , being so much closer , would have caught a lot of organic material over the years from numerous meteor impacts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people have guessed that there may be or may have been life on Mars due to a meteor striking Earth and putting Earth material into space.
I would assume the Moon, being so much closer, would have caught a lot of organic material over the years from numerous meteor impacts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261069920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Humans have been there.  Humans carry organic matter with them (water, waste etc).   So no surprise here in my opinion...<br> <br>
For those wondering about the toilets - From the book called A Man on the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts:<br> <br>

But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration didn't make up for it. If this marvel of engineering called Apollo had one major design flaw, it was the 'Waste Management System,' perhaps the most euphemistic use of English ever recorded. For urine collection there was a hose with a condom-like fitting at one end which led, by way of a valve, to a vent on the side of the spacecraft. On paper at least, it seemed like a reasonable, if low-tech, way to handle urinating in zero g, assuming you got over your anxiety about connecting yor private parts to the vacuum of space. You roll on the condom, open the valve, and it all goes into the void where it freezes into droplets of ice that are iridescent in the sunlight. One astronaut answered the question "What's the most beautiful sight you ever saw in space?" with "Urine dump at sunset."<br> <br>

In reality, using the urine collector didn't work so well. For one thing, it could be painful. If you opened the valve too soon, some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis, which prevented you from urinating. And at that point, as if to confirm your worst fears, the suction began to pull you in. Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time, so you shut the valve, and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it. It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again. Next time you had a strategy: start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve. But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland, floating around and making your misfortune everybody's misfortune! And in no time at all the whole device reeked; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there.
<br> <br>
The astronauts got used to the urine collector, though, and they got used to mopping up afterwards. But there was no getting used to the other part of the Waste Management System. Tucked away in a strange locker was a supply of special plastic bags, each of which resembled a top hat with an adhesive coating on the brim. Each bag had a finger-shaped pocket built into the side of it. When the call came you had to flypaper this thing to your rear end, and then you were supposed to reach in there through the pocket with your finger---after all, nothing falls in zero gravity---and suddenly you were wishing you had never left home. And after you had it in the bag, so to speak, you had one last delightful task: break open a capsule of blue germicide, seal it up in the bag, and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed! At best, the operation was an ordeal. In the confined space of the Apollo command module, your crewmates suffered, too. One of the Apollo 7 astronauts said the smell was so bad it woke him out of a deep sleep. When the crew came back they wrote a memo about it: "Get naked, allow an hour, have plenty of tissues handy."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Humans have been there .
Humans carry organic matter with them ( water , waste etc ) .
So no surprise here in my opinion.. . For those wondering about the toilets - From the book called A Man on the Moon : The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts : But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration did n't make up for it .
If this marvel of engineering called Apollo had one major design flaw , it was the 'Waste Management System, ' perhaps the most euphemistic use of English ever recorded .
For urine collection there was a hose with a condom-like fitting at one end which led , by way of a valve , to a vent on the side of the spacecraft .
On paper at least , it seemed like a reasonable , if low-tech , way to handle urinating in zero g , assuming you got over your anxiety about connecting yor private parts to the vacuum of space .
You roll on the condom , open the valve , and it all goes into the void where it freezes into droplets of ice that are iridescent in the sunlight .
One astronaut answered the question " What 's the most beautiful sight you ever saw in space ?
" with " Urine dump at sunset .
" In reality , using the urine collector did n't work so well .
For one thing , it could be painful .
If you opened the valve too soon , some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis , which prevented you from urinating .
And at that point , as if to confirm your worst fears , the suction began to pull you in .
Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time , so you shut the valve , and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it .
It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again .
Next time you had a strategy : start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve .
But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland , floating around and making your misfortune everybody 's misfortune !
And in no time at all the whole device reeked ; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there .
The astronauts got used to the urine collector , though , and they got used to mopping up afterwards .
But there was no getting used to the other part of the Waste Management System .
Tucked away in a strange locker was a supply of special plastic bags , each of which resembled a top hat with an adhesive coating on the brim .
Each bag had a finger-shaped pocket built into the side of it .
When the call came you had to flypaper this thing to your rear end , and then you were supposed to reach in there through the pocket with your finger---after all , nothing falls in zero gravity---and suddenly you were wishing you had never left home .
And after you had it in the bag , so to speak , you had one last delightful task : break open a capsule of blue germicide , seal it up in the bag , and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed !
At best , the operation was an ordeal .
In the confined space of the Apollo command module , your crewmates suffered , too .
One of the Apollo 7 astronauts said the smell was so bad it woke him out of a deep sleep .
When the crew came back they wrote a memo about it : " Get naked , allow an hour , have plenty of tissues handy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Humans have been there.
Humans carry organic matter with them (water, waste etc).
So no surprise here in my opinion... 
For those wondering about the toilets - From the book called A Man on the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts: 

But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration didn't make up for it.
If this marvel of engineering called Apollo had one major design flaw, it was the 'Waste Management System,' perhaps the most euphemistic use of English ever recorded.
For urine collection there was a hose with a condom-like fitting at one end which led, by way of a valve, to a vent on the side of the spacecraft.
On paper at least, it seemed like a reasonable, if low-tech, way to handle urinating in zero g, assuming you got over your anxiety about connecting yor private parts to the vacuum of space.
You roll on the condom, open the valve, and it all goes into the void where it freezes into droplets of ice that are iridescent in the sunlight.
One astronaut answered the question "What's the most beautiful sight you ever saw in space?
" with "Urine dump at sunset.
" 

In reality, using the urine collector didn't work so well.
For one thing, it could be painful.
If you opened the valve too soon, some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis, which prevented you from urinating.
And at that point, as if to confirm your worst fears, the suction began to pull you in.
Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time, so you shut the valve, and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it.
It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again.
Next time you had a strategy: start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve.
But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland, floating around and making your misfortune everybody's misfortune!
And in no time at all the whole device reeked; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there.
The astronauts got used to the urine collector, though, and they got used to mopping up afterwards.
But there was no getting used to the other part of the Waste Management System.
Tucked away in a strange locker was a supply of special plastic bags, each of which resembled a top hat with an adhesive coating on the brim.
Each bag had a finger-shaped pocket built into the side of it.
When the call came you had to flypaper this thing to your rear end, and then you were supposed to reach in there through the pocket with your finger---after all, nothing falls in zero gravity---and suddenly you were wishing you had never left home.
And after you had it in the bag, so to speak, you had one last delightful task: break open a capsule of blue germicide, seal it up in the bag, and knead the contents to make sure they were fully mixed!
At best, the operation was an ordeal.
In the confined space of the Apollo command module, your crewmates suffered, too.
One of the Apollo 7 astronauts said the smell was so bad it woke him out of a deep sleep.
When the crew came back they wrote a memo about it: "Get naked, allow an hour, have plenty of tissues handy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475820</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1261075620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's even worse.  The discovery seems to be a mass spec observation of carbon.  Either the article or the ISRO suggests that it's possible some actual organic compounds of some sort might have been deposited by meteors.  The summary then mentions life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's even worse .
The discovery seems to be a mass spec observation of carbon .
Either the article or the ISRO suggests that it 's possible some actual organic compounds of some sort might have been deposited by meteors .
The summary then mentions life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's even worse.
The discovery seems to be a mass spec observation of carbon.
Either the article or the ISRO suggests that it's possible some actual organic compounds of some sort might have been deposited by meteors.
The summary then mentions life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475370</id>
	<title>Mars, Europa, now our moon</title>
	<author>frog\_strat</author>
	<datestamp>1261073700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Richard Hoagland says it will go like this:<br>
-we discover microbes<br>
-we discover artifacts<br>
-we discover other intelligent life<br> <br>

Maybe all the retired military and intelligence guys, with their "I want to say this before I die" stories, weren't lying after all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Richard Hoagland says it will go like this : -we discover microbes -we discover artifacts -we discover other intelligent life Maybe all the retired military and intelligence guys , with their " I want to say this before I die " stories , were n't lying after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Richard Hoagland says it will go like this:
-we discover microbes
-we discover artifacts
-we discover other intelligent life 

Maybe all the retired military and intelligence guys, with their "I want to say this before I die" stories, weren't lying after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474452</id>
	<title>mmmm....</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1261069740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Green cheese....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Green cheese... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Green cheese....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475384</id>
	<title>Organic Compounds != Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261073760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is methane in Jupiter.  Cows fart and burp methane.  Therefore, there must be cows on Jupiter.</p><p>It is more likely to be a carbon based compound (like methane or even carbon dioxide).  These organic reactions occur very commonly outside of life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is methane in Jupiter .
Cows fart and burp methane .
Therefore , there must be cows on Jupiter.It is more likely to be a carbon based compound ( like methane or even carbon dioxide ) .
These organic reactions occur very commonly outside of life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is methane in Jupiter.
Cows fart and burp methane.
Therefore, there must be cows on Jupiter.It is more likely to be a carbon based compound (like methane or even carbon dioxide).
These organic reactions occur very commonly outside of life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475488</id>
	<title>Debris from Earth?</title>
	<author>jolyonr</author>
	<datestamp>1261074240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lunar meteorites are not that uncommon here (chunks of the moon blasted out of the moon after asteroid/meteorite impacts onto the moon which then fall on earth).</p><p>The reverse has no doubt happened too, over geological time, chunks of Earth rock have been blasted into space during particularly nasty collisions (think of the one that ended the dinosaurs), and while most of it would rain back down on Earth, a small percentage could eventually end up caught by the moon.</p><p>Now, this doesn't necessarily mean the traces of organic chemicals found on the moon are from the Earth, there are far more likely sources (such as comets) where organic chemicals are found.</p><p>But it opens up an interesting possiblity - because much of the Earth's surface is constantly subducted and renewed at plate boundaries, much of the fossil record of very early times is lost - and there has been speculation that the best place to find fossils of very early life on earth is on meteorite fragments on the surface of the moon.</p><p>I'm quite happy to go up there and do some collecting for anyone, if they'll pay my fare.</p><p>Jolyon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lunar meteorites are not that uncommon here ( chunks of the moon blasted out of the moon after asteroid/meteorite impacts onto the moon which then fall on earth ) .The reverse has no doubt happened too , over geological time , chunks of Earth rock have been blasted into space during particularly nasty collisions ( think of the one that ended the dinosaurs ) , and while most of it would rain back down on Earth , a small percentage could eventually end up caught by the moon.Now , this does n't necessarily mean the traces of organic chemicals found on the moon are from the Earth , there are far more likely sources ( such as comets ) where organic chemicals are found.But it opens up an interesting possiblity - because much of the Earth 's surface is constantly subducted and renewed at plate boundaries , much of the fossil record of very early times is lost - and there has been speculation that the best place to find fossils of very early life on earth is on meteorite fragments on the surface of the moon.I 'm quite happy to go up there and do some collecting for anyone , if they 'll pay my fare.Jolyon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lunar meteorites are not that uncommon here (chunks of the moon blasted out of the moon after asteroid/meteorite impacts onto the moon which then fall on earth).The reverse has no doubt happened too, over geological time, chunks of Earth rock have been blasted into space during particularly nasty collisions (think of the one that ended the dinosaurs), and while most of it would rain back down on Earth, a small percentage could eventually end up caught by the moon.Now, this doesn't necessarily mean the traces of organic chemicals found on the moon are from the Earth, there are far more likely sources (such as comets) where organic chemicals are found.But it opens up an interesting possiblity - because much of the Earth's surface is constantly subducted and renewed at plate boundaries, much of the fossil record of very early times is lost - and there has been speculation that the best place to find fossils of very early life on earth is on meteorite fragments on the surface of the moon.I'm quite happy to go up there and do some collecting for anyone, if they'll pay my fare.Jolyon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475646</id>
	<title>Re:Remember that in Chemistry has a precise meanin</title>
	<author>xupere</author>
	<datestamp>1261074900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gasoline <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum#Formation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">used to be life</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gasoline used to be life [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gasoline used to be life [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476872</id>
	<title>Eeewww, gross!!</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1261079580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't touch that slimy thing. You don't know where its been!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't touch that slimy thing .
You do n't know where its been !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't touch that slimy thing.
You don't know where its been!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474232</id>
	<title>The year</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261068840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool, just in time for 2010</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , just in time for 2010</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, just in time for 2010</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475780</id>
	<title>*Now* I remember...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1261075440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's that bag of dope I was hiding from my Mom in 1973!</p><p>Man, was I high!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's that bag of dope I was hiding from my Mom in 1973 ! Man , was I high !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's that bag of dope I was hiding from my Mom in 1973!Man, was I high!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480276</id>
	<title>Re:Organic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261048980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>note, it's not "anything that contains carbon"; cyanide is the first example i can think of off the top of my head</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>note , it 's not " anything that contains carbon " ; cyanide is the first example i can think of off the top of my head</tokentext>
<sentencetext>note, it's not "anything that contains carbon"; cyanide is the first example i can think of off the top of my head</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400</id>
	<title>Neil Armstrong's Pee</title>
	<author>Saint Stephen</author>
	<datestamp>1261069440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet what they found was some of our astronaut's pee pee on the moon.</p><p>Or maybe a discarded moon pie wrapper.</p><p>Or maybe a bottle of scotch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet what they found was some of our astronaut 's pee pee on the moon.Or maybe a discarded moon pie wrapper.Or maybe a bottle of scotch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet what they found was some of our astronaut's pee pee on the moon.Or maybe a discarded moon pie wrapper.Or maybe a bottle of scotch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480006</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>mother\_reincarnated</author>
	<datestamp>1261047840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's like Facebook, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like Facebook , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like Facebook, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479946</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>nozzo</author>
	<datestamp>1261047600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You get a lunch break?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You get a lunch break ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You get a lunch break?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475898</id>
	<title>Re:Remember that in Chemistry has a precise meanin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261075920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No surprise, as gasoline is made out of crushed dinosaurs. Or so I'm told.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No surprise , as gasoline is made out of crushed dinosaurs .
Or so I 'm told .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No surprise, as gasoline is made out of crushed dinosaurs.
Or so I'm told.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474886</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1261071600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Carbon is the 4th most common element in our galaxy.  It would be surprising if there weren't organic molecules on any rock of appreciable size.  There's methane in all of the gas giants, and moons like Titan.  No one claims that came from life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Carbon is the 4th most common element in our galaxy .
It would be surprising if there were n't organic molecules on any rock of appreciable size .
There 's methane in all of the gas giants , and moons like Titan .
No one claims that came from life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carbon is the 4th most common element in our galaxy.
It would be surprising if there weren't organic molecules on any rock of appreciable size.
There's methane in all of the gas giants, and moons like Titan.
No one claims that came from life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474310</id>
	<title>organic buzzword</title>
	<author>hort\_wort</author>
	<datestamp>1261069140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So from reading the article, it sounds like they just found some carbon dust in the cloud they stirred up.  Am I the only one not excited at all by finding carbon?  Isn't it a common mineral?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So from reading the article , it sounds like they just found some carbon dust in the cloud they stirred up .
Am I the only one not excited at all by finding carbon ?
Is n't it a common mineral ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So from reading the article, it sounds like they just found some carbon dust in the cloud they stirred up.
Am I the only one not excited at all by finding carbon?
Isn't it a common mineral?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479422</id>
	<title>And just like that...</title>
	<author>fzammett</author>
	<datestamp>1261045560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...the human race declares war on an alien civilization by accidentally killing thousands of its microscopic citizens!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the human race declares war on an alien civilization by accidentally killing thousands of its microscopic citizens !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the human race declares war on an alien civilization by accidentally killing thousands of its microscopic citizens!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475292</id>
	<title>What do they mean by "organics"?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1261073280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Organic chemistry just refers to any chemical containing carbon... I've no doubt there are organic chemicals on the moon. I seriously doubt they mean "could only have been created as a by-product of living creatures" when they say "organics".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Organic chemistry just refers to any chemical containing carbon... I 've no doubt there are organic chemicals on the moon .
I seriously doubt they mean " could only have been created as a by-product of living creatures " when they say " organics " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Organic chemistry just refers to any chemical containing carbon... I've no doubt there are organic chemicals on the moon.
I seriously doubt they mean "could only have been created as a by-product of living creatures" when they say "organics".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475878</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1261075800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration didn't make up for it. For one thing, it could be painful.... If you opened the valve too soon, some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis, which prevented you from urinating. And at that point, as if to confirm your worst fears, the suction began to pull you in. Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time, so you shut the valve, and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it. It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again. Next time you had a strategy: start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve. But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland, floating around and making your misfortune everybody's misfortune! And in no time at all the whole device reeked; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there.</p> </div><p>You're speaking to the wrong audience.  For most of these guys, that sounds like the closest thing to a blowjob they'll ever get.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration did n't make up for it .
For one thing , it could be painful.... If you opened the valve too soon , some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis , which prevented you from urinating .
And at that point , as if to confirm your worst fears , the suction began to pull you in .
Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time , so you shut the valve , and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it .
It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again .
Next time you had a strategy : start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve .
But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland , floating around and making your misfortune everybody 's misfortune !
And in no time at all the whole device reeked ; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there .
You 're speaking to the wrong audience .
For most of these guys , that sounds like the closest thing to a blowjob they 'll ever get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But one aspect of weightlessness was so unpleasant was so unpleasant that even the thrill of exploration didn't make up for it.
For one thing, it could be painful.... If you opened the valve too soon, some part of the mechanism was liable to poke into the end of your penis, which prevented you from urinating.
And at that point, as if to confirm your worst fears, the suction began to pull you in.
Now you were being jabbed and pulled at the same time, so you shut the valve, and as the mechanism resealed itself it caught a little piece of you in it.
It took only one episode like that to convince you to never let it happen again.
Next time you had a strategy: start flowing a split-second before you turn on the valve.
But once you began to urinate the condom popped off and out came a flurry of little golden droplets at play in the wonderland, floating around and making your misfortune everybody's misfortune!
And in no time at all the whole device reeked; it was an affront to the senses just sitting there.
You're speaking to the wrong audience.
For most of these guys, that sounds like the closest thing to a blowjob they'll ever get.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338</id>
	<title>Why is this surprising?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261069260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming the theory of "panspermia" is a reasonably close to accurate description of how life arrived on earth  (Amino acids and water carried inside asteroids brought life to Earth)  and knowing that the Moon has acted as an Asteroid barrier for BILLIONS of years, is it all that surprising that we would ALSO find "organic signatures" on the moon?</p><p>Indeed, one would almost EXPECT to find them there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming the theory of " panspermia " is a reasonably close to accurate description of how life arrived on earth ( Amino acids and water carried inside asteroids brought life to Earth ) and knowing that the Moon has acted as an Asteroid barrier for BILLIONS of years , is it all that surprising that we would ALSO find " organic signatures " on the moon ? Indeed , one would almost EXPECT to find them there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming the theory of "panspermia" is a reasonably close to accurate description of how life arrived on earth  (Amino acids and water carried inside asteroids brought life to Earth)  and knowing that the Moon has acted as an Asteroid barrier for BILLIONS of years, is it all that surprising that we would ALSO find "organic signatures" on the moon?Indeed, one would almost EXPECT to find them there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</id>
	<title>"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>thirty-seven</author>
	<datestamp>1261069080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary seems to make a jump from talking about "organics" and "organic matter" to "the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon".  Is the ISRO actually claiming to have found <i>life</i> on the moon?  And aren't there lots of sources of organic molecules that don't involve life?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary seems to make a jump from talking about " organics " and " organic matter " to " the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon " .
Is the ISRO actually claiming to have found life on the moon ?
And are n't there lots of sources of organic molecules that do n't involve life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary seems to make a jump from talking about "organics" and "organic matter" to "the Chandrayaan-1 claim of finding life on the Moon".
Is the ISRO actually claiming to have found life on the moon?
And aren't there lots of sources of organic molecules that don't involve life?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475462</id>
	<title>Contamination Concerns</title>
	<author>Drache Kubisuro</author>
	<datestamp>1261074180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, even U.S. scientists are very careful about the potential for organic contamination.  Hopefully the satellite isn't simply detecting something deposited onto the detectors or nearby areas on the spacecraft.  Carbon and oxygen are all over the universe, so even if contamination isn't a problem, detection of organics on the moon is not a surprise.  To give an idea about the abundance of carbon, very large stars may end up in a carbon-nitrogen-oxygen (CNO) burning phase once they're used up all their heavier elements.

What is really of interest is what organic molecules have been found.  Amines would be exciting; particularly if they are amino acids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , even U.S. scientists are very careful about the potential for organic contamination .
Hopefully the satellite is n't simply detecting something deposited onto the detectors or nearby areas on the spacecraft .
Carbon and oxygen are all over the universe , so even if contamination is n't a problem , detection of organics on the moon is not a surprise .
To give an idea about the abundance of carbon , very large stars may end up in a carbon-nitrogen-oxygen ( CNO ) burning phase once they 're used up all their heavier elements .
What is really of interest is what organic molecules have been found .
Amines would be exciting ; particularly if they are amino acids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, even U.S. scientists are very careful about the potential for organic contamination.
Hopefully the satellite isn't simply detecting something deposited onto the detectors or nearby areas on the spacecraft.
Carbon and oxygen are all over the universe, so even if contamination isn't a problem, detection of organics on the moon is not a surprise.
To give an idea about the abundance of carbon, very large stars may end up in a carbon-nitrogen-oxygen (CNO) burning phase once they're used up all their heavier elements.
What is really of interest is what organic molecules have been found.
Amines would be exciting; particularly if they are amino acids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476174</id>
	<title>Re:Why is this surprising?</title>
	<author>catchblue22</author>
	<datestamp>1261077180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could some of these chemicals have originated on Earth and were blasted onto the moon by an asteroid impact?  </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could some of these chemicals have originated on Earth and were blasted onto the moon by an asteroid impact ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could some of these chemicals have originated on Earth and were blasted onto the moon by an asteroid impact?  </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476884</id>
	<title>Biased</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261079640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a general bias towards finding life in space because there is a general bias in astronomy and NASA towards funding projects that have anything to do with life in space. Once you've seen this trend enough you can see the $ symbols in the eyes of the NASA scientists who work on lunar exploration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a general bias towards finding life in space because there is a general bias in astronomy and NASA towards funding projects that have anything to do with life in space .
Once you 've seen this trend enough you can see the $ symbols in the eyes of the NASA scientists who work on lunar exploration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a general bias towards finding life in space because there is a general bias in astronomy and NASA towards funding projects that have anything to do with life in space.
Once you've seen this trend enough you can see the $ symbols in the eyes of the NASA scientists who work on lunar exploration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475874</id>
	<title>With him being on the moon</title>
	<author>trickyrickb</author>
	<datestamp>1261075800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose theres no chance of Sixth Sense II being released any time soon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose theres no chance of Sixth Sense II being released any time soon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose theres no chance of Sixth Sense II being released any time soon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261071720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say the timeline was something like this:</p><p>JFK: We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decade<br>NASA 3 months later: ok we put a man on the moon!<br>After small coverup<br>JFK: We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decade, and bring him back.</p><p>40 years later,<br>Chandrayyaan:  What's this spot of organic matter on the moon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say the timeline was something like this : JFK : We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decadeNASA 3 months later : ok we put a man on the moon ! After small coverupJFK : We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decade , and bring him back.40 years later,Chandrayyaan : What 's this spot of organic matter on the moon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say the timeline was something like this:JFK: We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decadeNASA 3 months later: ok we put a man on the moon!After small coverupJFK: We will put a man on the moon by the end of the decade, and bring him back.40 years later,Chandrayyaan:  What's this spot of organic matter on the moon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476782</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>mpdolan37</author>
	<datestamp>1261079280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if the image of this organic matter looks like footprints...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the image of this organic matter looks like footprints.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the image of this organic matter looks like footprints...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475242</id>
	<title>Moontrap?</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1261072980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, get Chekov and Brisco County Jr. up there to take a look at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , get Chekov and Brisco County Jr. up there to take a look at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, get Chekov and Brisco County Jr. up there to take a look at it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475264</id>
	<title>Rabbit</title>
	<author>Issarlk</author>
	<datestamp>1261073100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They found the rabbit on the moon,  that's all. And this makes the news?

I cite, directly from wikipedia: "The Moon rabbit, also called the Jade Rabbit, is a rabbit that lives on the moon"</htmltext>
<tokenext>They found the rabbit on the moon , that 's all .
And this makes the news ?
I cite , directly from wikipedia : " The Moon rabbit , also called the Jade Rabbit , is a rabbit that lives on the moon "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They found the rabbit on the moon,  that's all.
And this makes the news?
I cite, directly from wikipedia: "The Moon rabbit, also called the Jade Rabbit, is a rabbit that lives on the moon"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475432</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1261074000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not just the summary making the leap from carbon to life.  The entire article makes the same leap, though to be fair - it does indicate that the leap is a very large one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just the summary making the leap from carbon to life .
The entire article makes the same leap , though to be fair - it does indicate that the leap is a very large one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just the summary making the leap from carbon to life.
The entire article makes the same leap, though to be fair - it does indicate that the leap is a very large one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474660</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>godless dave</author>
	<datestamp>1261070760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article just says organic matter, but the headline says life. I'm guessing the former is what they found.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article just says organic matter , but the headline says life .
I 'm guessing the former is what they found .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article just says organic matter, but the headline says life.
I'm guessing the former is what they found.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475676</id>
	<title>Detected by mass spectrometer?</title>
	<author>AmonRa1979</author>
	<datestamp>1261075080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article "An anonymous Chandrayaan-1 scientist said MIP's mass spectrometer detected chemical signatures of organic matter in the soil kicked up by the impact".  From the information I could find it sounded like the mass spectrometer was directly on the impactor and was only to be used for atmospheric analysis as the MIP descended.  If the mass spectrometer detected the debris kicked up by the impactor either it separated and passed through a cloud of debris or it survived the impact.  I can't find the details on whether or not the MIP had two stages, the impactor and sensors or if another probe went through the debris cloud.  I thought analysis of the debris kicked up by the impactor was only through photon spectroscopy, in which case I would have to wonder if earthshine played a part in this organic signature.  However, it has been said that organic doesn't necessarily mean life and that it wouldn't be implausible to find it on the moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article " An anonymous Chandrayaan-1 scientist said MIP 's mass spectrometer detected chemical signatures of organic matter in the soil kicked up by the impact " .
From the information I could find it sounded like the mass spectrometer was directly on the impactor and was only to be used for atmospheric analysis as the MIP descended .
If the mass spectrometer detected the debris kicked up by the impactor either it separated and passed through a cloud of debris or it survived the impact .
I ca n't find the details on whether or not the MIP had two stages , the impactor and sensors or if another probe went through the debris cloud .
I thought analysis of the debris kicked up by the impactor was only through photon spectroscopy , in which case I would have to wonder if earthshine played a part in this organic signature .
However , it has been said that organic does n't necessarily mean life and that it would n't be implausible to find it on the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article "An anonymous Chandrayaan-1 scientist said MIP's mass spectrometer detected chemical signatures of organic matter in the soil kicked up by the impact".
From the information I could find it sounded like the mass spectrometer was directly on the impactor and was only to be used for atmospheric analysis as the MIP descended.
If the mass spectrometer detected the debris kicked up by the impactor either it separated and passed through a cloud of debris or it survived the impact.
I can't find the details on whether or not the MIP had two stages, the impactor and sensors or if another probe went through the debris cloud.
I thought analysis of the debris kicked up by the impactor was only through photon spectroscopy, in which case I would have to wonder if earthshine played a part in this organic signature.
However, it has been said that organic doesn't necessarily mean life and that it wouldn't be implausible to find it on the moon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474682</id>
	<title>New proof!</title>
	<author>sajuuk</author>
	<datestamp>1261070880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>New proof that the cartoonists were right!  Possible cheese discovered on moon!  Story at 11!</htmltext>
<tokenext>New proof that the cartoonists were right !
Possible cheese discovered on moon !
Story at 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New proof that the cartoonists were right!
Possible cheese discovered on moon!
Story at 11!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475070</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1261072320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Water isn't an organic molecule.</p><p>I would think carbon monoxide would be more likely a find than human waste...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Water is n't an organic molecule.I would think carbon monoxide would be more likely a find than human waste.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water isn't an organic molecule.I would think carbon monoxide would be more likely a find than human waste...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474726</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1261071000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everything you're saying is correct, but you're missing the point of the media. The media asked NASA about the "Life on the moon" - ISRO never makes that claim.</p><p>The media is there to find the <b>BOLDEST</b> statement you can make. Then when it's wrong they work their way backwards until the news is no longer interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything you 're saying is correct , but you 're missing the point of the media .
The media asked NASA about the " Life on the moon " - ISRO never makes that claim.The media is there to find the BOLDEST statement you can make .
Then when it 's wrong they work their way backwards until the news is no longer interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything you're saying is correct, but you're missing the point of the media.
The media asked NASA about the "Life on the moon" - ISRO never makes that claim.The media is there to find the BOLDEST statement you can make.
Then when it's wrong they work their way backwards until the news is no longer interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30477096</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Kingrames</author>
	<datestamp>1261080420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh my god, they finally found Jimmy Hoffa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my god , they finally found Jimmy Hoffa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my god, they finally found Jimmy Hoffa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475228</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1261072920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474934</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Zalbik</author>
	<datestamp>1261071780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it might just be a particle of preanimate matter caught in the matrix...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it might just be a particle of preanimate matter caught in the matrix.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it might just be a particle of preanimate matter caught in the matrix...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474928</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1261071780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... peer review, remember that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... peer review , remember that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... peer review, remember that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30482734</id>
	<title>Re:The year</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261063260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indians find life where there is none?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indians find life where there is none ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indians find life where there is none?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474354</id>
	<title>Oblig. Futurama quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261069320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So THAT'S where I left those skin flakes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So THAT 'S where I left those skin flakes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So THAT'S where I left those skin flakes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30483860</id>
	<title>Re:Organic?</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1261074060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>At the bare minimum it's "anything that contains carbon".</i></p><p>No doubt the USDA would take exception to that definition!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the bare minimum it 's " anything that contains carbon " .No doubt the USDA would take exception to that definition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the bare minimum it's "anything that contains carbon".No doubt the USDA would take exception to that definition!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475698</id>
	<title>Re:organic buzzword</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1261075140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, they're only certain that they saw carbon.  That <i>could</i> mean hydrocarbons/organics, or it could essentially be graphite.  They admit it's a leap yet to get to organics from what they've discovered.  Of course it was an interviewer who then made the additional leap to life.  Which of course the researcher wouldn't rule out, because that would be silly when you still don't know what you're looking at.</p><p>Though as TFA mentions it's not like organic compounds are all that rare in space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , they 're only certain that they saw carbon .
That could mean hydrocarbons/organics , or it could essentially be graphite .
They admit it 's a leap yet to get to organics from what they 've discovered .
Of course it was an interviewer who then made the additional leap to life .
Which of course the researcher would n't rule out , because that would be silly when you still do n't know what you 're looking at.Though as TFA mentions it 's not like organic compounds are all that rare in space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, they're only certain that they saw carbon.
That could mean hydrocarbons/organics, or it could essentially be graphite.
They admit it's a leap yet to get to organics from what they've discovered.
Of course it was an interviewer who then made the additional leap to life.
Which of course the researcher wouldn't rule out, because that would be silly when you still don't know what you're looking at.Though as TFA mentions it's not like organic compounds are all that rare in space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708</id>
	<title>Remember that in Chemistry has a precise meaning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261070940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It means hydrocarbons. So before any one asks to a chemist gasoline is organic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It means hydrocarbons .
So before any one asks to a chemist gasoline is organic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It means hydrocarbons.
So before any one asks to a chemist gasoline is organic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475674</id>
	<title>On the topic of Organic matter on the moon...</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1261075020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A recent anonymous hacker hacked the hackings of hackery into the datas of the database datastores of the NASA research on the topic that is subject at hand.</p><p>Several NASA e-mails indicate that there was an argument at the coffee machine that did not go well and that one of the arguers, Bob Shandley, said something to the tune of 'booshit there ain't not organic matter on the moon!'.</p><p>While most would consider a discussion at the coffee machine unofficial and casual, many are fueled in their skepticism of NASA as a whole; they reason that if Bob could be so bold and deny the recent data, that there must be a serious level of corruption within NASA that may even bring into question the validity of the moon landing.</p><p>Mary Jenkins, a Washington Elementary fourth Grader is quoted saying "Well. If the guy says something isn't true but it is true.  Well then he's lying.  And my mom says liars hang out with liars, and so.. well... NASA is full of liars.  We never landed on the moon."</p><p>Attempts to contact the Obama administration for comment on the topic have yielded no results.  We assume the silence is likely due to cooperation between the administration and NASA to coverup the extreme level of non-science going on at NASA, regarding Bob Shandley's coverup.</p><p>Thousands rallied against corruption and conspiracy outside the Austin, TX NASA launchpad on Friday; a day of high expectations set for the launch of NASA's new the Eagle II rocket.  People from all walks of life stood through the cold and dry afternoon in protest with signs like "IF BOB WON'T, I WON'T" and "WHAT IS BOB HIDING".</p><p>One protester standing a mere 400 feet from the Eagle II, who wishes to remain anonymous is quoted with the observation "That rocket doesn't even have a red tip.  Chances are it's not even a real rocket, this is probably some 3d projection or something.  Those damn NASA scientists are so full of lies and tricks we cannot trust them!"</p><p>After the recent uncovering of Bob's coffee-machine side argument, the world is clearly up in arms and now standing in disbelief of everything NASA.</p><p>Next at 5: Are America's youth getting dumber?  New research indicates widespread failure in critical thinking, mathematics, and basic sciences among public school students.  Check back for more in a half hour for more details.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent anonymous hacker hacked the hackings of hackery into the datas of the database datastores of the NASA research on the topic that is subject at hand.Several NASA e-mails indicate that there was an argument at the coffee machine that did not go well and that one of the arguers , Bob Shandley , said something to the tune of 'booshit there ai n't not organic matter on the moon !
'.While most would consider a discussion at the coffee machine unofficial and casual , many are fueled in their skepticism of NASA as a whole ; they reason that if Bob could be so bold and deny the recent data , that there must be a serious level of corruption within NASA that may even bring into question the validity of the moon landing.Mary Jenkins , a Washington Elementary fourth Grader is quoted saying " Well .
If the guy says something is n't true but it is true .
Well then he 's lying .
And my mom says liars hang out with liars , and so.. well... NASA is full of liars .
We never landed on the moon .
" Attempts to contact the Obama administration for comment on the topic have yielded no results .
We assume the silence is likely due to cooperation between the administration and NASA to coverup the extreme level of non-science going on at NASA , regarding Bob Shandley 's coverup.Thousands rallied against corruption and conspiracy outside the Austin , TX NASA launchpad on Friday ; a day of high expectations set for the launch of NASA 's new the Eagle II rocket .
People from all walks of life stood through the cold and dry afternoon in protest with signs like " IF BOB WO N'T , I WO N'T " and " WHAT IS BOB HIDING " .One protester standing a mere 400 feet from the Eagle II , who wishes to remain anonymous is quoted with the observation " That rocket does n't even have a red tip .
Chances are it 's not even a real rocket , this is probably some 3d projection or something .
Those damn NASA scientists are so full of lies and tricks we can not trust them !
" After the recent uncovering of Bob 's coffee-machine side argument , the world is clearly up in arms and now standing in disbelief of everything NASA.Next at 5 : Are America 's youth getting dumber ?
New research indicates widespread failure in critical thinking , mathematics , and basic sciences among public school students .
Check back for more in a half hour for more details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A recent anonymous hacker hacked the hackings of hackery into the datas of the database datastores of the NASA research on the topic that is subject at hand.Several NASA e-mails indicate that there was an argument at the coffee machine that did not go well and that one of the arguers, Bob Shandley, said something to the tune of 'booshit there ain't not organic matter on the moon!
'.While most would consider a discussion at the coffee machine unofficial and casual, many are fueled in their skepticism of NASA as a whole; they reason that if Bob could be so bold and deny the recent data, that there must be a serious level of corruption within NASA that may even bring into question the validity of the moon landing.Mary Jenkins, a Washington Elementary fourth Grader is quoted saying "Well.
If the guy says something isn't true but it is true.
Well then he's lying.
And my mom says liars hang out with liars, and so.. well... NASA is full of liars.
We never landed on the moon.
"Attempts to contact the Obama administration for comment on the topic have yielded no results.
We assume the silence is likely due to cooperation between the administration and NASA to coverup the extreme level of non-science going on at NASA, regarding Bob Shandley's coverup.Thousands rallied against corruption and conspiracy outside the Austin, TX NASA launchpad on Friday; a day of high expectations set for the launch of NASA's new the Eagle II rocket.
People from all walks of life stood through the cold and dry afternoon in protest with signs like "IF BOB WON'T, I WON'T" and "WHAT IS BOB HIDING".One protester standing a mere 400 feet from the Eagle II, who wishes to remain anonymous is quoted with the observation "That rocket doesn't even have a red tip.
Chances are it's not even a real rocket, this is probably some 3d projection or something.
Those damn NASA scientists are so full of lies and tricks we cannot trust them!
"After the recent uncovering of Bob's coffee-machine side argument, the world is clearly up in arms and now standing in disbelief of everything NASA.Next at 5: Are America's youth getting dumber?
New research indicates widespread failure in critical thinking, mathematics, and basic sciences among public school students.
Check back for more in a half hour for more details.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479620</id>
	<title>Saturday night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261046160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Get naked, allow an hour, have plenty of tissues handy."</p><p>Sounds like my Saturday nights.  Except by "an hour" I mean "a few minutes" and by Saturday I mean every day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Get naked , allow an hour , have plenty of tissues handy .
" Sounds like my Saturday nights .
Except by " an hour " I mean " a few minutes " and by Saturday I mean every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Get naked, allow an hour, have plenty of tissues handy.
"Sounds like my Saturday nights.
Except by "an hour" I mean "a few minutes" and by Saturday I mean every day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942</id>
	<title>Organic?</title>
	<author>VincenzoRomano</author>
	<datestamp>1261071780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It depends on what do they mean with "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic\_matter" title="wikipedia.org">organic</a> [wikipedia.org]"!<br>
At the bare minimum it's "anything that contains carbon". Which is not that hard to find when you stroll close to a star.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on what do they mean with " organic [ wikipedia.org ] " !
At the bare minimum it 's " anything that contains carbon " .
Which is not that hard to find when you stroll close to a star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on what do they mean with "organic [wikipedia.org]"!
At the bare minimum it's "anything that contains carbon".
Which is not that hard to find when you stroll close to a star.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30477894</id>
	<title>Re:"Life" or "organics"?</title>
	<author>plsander</author>
	<datestamp>1261083240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That or...</p><p>Supreme leader, I regret to inform you that our forward observation post on the moon orbiting the third planet has been destroyed by enemy action...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That or...Supreme leader , I regret to inform you that our forward observation post on the moon orbiting the third planet has been destroyed by enemy action.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That or...Supreme leader, I regret to inform you that our forward observation post on the moon orbiting the third planet has been destroyed by enemy action...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30481244</id>
	<title>Fossil fuel is organic, isn't it?</title>
	<author>vlad valis</author>
	<datestamp>1261053960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could it not be residue from earlier moon missions?  I sure hope so.  Otherwise, we basically bombed the moon in 2009 only to find out in 2010 it's inhabited.  Humans are the rednecks of the galaxy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could it not be residue from earlier moon missions ?
I sure hope so .
Otherwise , we basically bombed the moon in 2009 only to find out in 2010 it 's inhabited .
Humans are the rednecks of the galaxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could it not be residue from earlier moon missions?
I sure hope so.
Otherwise, we basically bombed the moon in 2009 only to find out in 2010 it's inhabited.
Humans are the rednecks of the galaxy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30478516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30483860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30477894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30485326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30482734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30495278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_17_1444250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475582
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30479946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30485326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30477894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30482734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30478516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30476174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30495278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30475898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_17_1444250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30474942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30480276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_17_1444250.30483860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
