<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_15_2237200</id>
	<title>22 Million Missing Bush White House Emails Found</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260878520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ctmurray writes <i>"Computer technicians have <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091214/ap\_on\_go\_pr\_wh/us\_white\_house\_e\_mail">found 22 million missing White House e-mails</a> from the administration of President George W. Bush, and the Obama administration is searching for dozens more days' worth of potentially lost e-mail from the Bush years, according to two groups that had filed a lawsuit &mdash; which has now been dropped &mdash; over the failure by the Bush White House to install an electronic record-keeping system. Earlier we discussed the <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/02/22/1254248/Obama-Admin-Fights-Missing-White-House-Email-Lawsuit">Obama White House's opposition</a> to the lawsuit that led to this discovery."</i> The related links reflect our discussions about the missing emails over two years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ctmurray writes " Computer technicians have found 22 million missing White House e-mails from the administration of President George W. Bush , and the Obama administration is searching for dozens more days ' worth of potentially lost e-mail from the Bush years , according to two groups that had filed a lawsuit    which has now been dropped    over the failure by the Bush White House to install an electronic record-keeping system .
Earlier we discussed the Obama White House 's opposition to the lawsuit that led to this discovery .
" The related links reflect our discussions about the missing emails over two years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ctmurray writes "Computer technicians have found 22 million missing White House e-mails from the administration of President George W. Bush, and the Obama administration is searching for dozens more days' worth of potentially lost e-mail from the Bush years, according to two groups that had filed a lawsuit — which has now been dropped — over the failure by the Bush White House to install an electronic record-keeping system.
Earlier we discussed the Obama White House's opposition to the lawsuit that led to this discovery.
" The related links reflect our discussions about the missing emails over two years.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453302</id>
	<title>Congratulations KDawson!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260890640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I haven't seen this many misinformed, misguided and biased comments/moderation since Obama got elected into office. You certainly know how to fuck with the users for no good reason.<br> <br>Fucking sack of dog shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't seen this many misinformed , misguided and biased comments/moderation since Obama got elected into office .
You certainly know how to fuck with the users for no good reason .
Fucking sack of dog shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't seen this many misinformed, misguided and biased comments/moderation since Obama got elected into office.
You certainly know how to fuck with the users for no good reason.
Fucking sack of dog shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461682</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The guy who had control of all the really incriminating emails died a month before Bush left office in a mysterious plane crash: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael\_Connell</p><p>The problem is that Bush's story creates a wonderfully consistent narrative which we are missing large parts of the evidence for, but what we do have matches perfectly with a number of conspiracy theories.</p><p>It's not credible to deny that the administration didn't take advantage of 9/11 for all it was worth, that it wasn't prepared to do so, that it hadn't planned to do so since long before the election, that it didn't NEED 9/11 to enact many of its ideological goals?  Suggest that we were in any way complicit, though, and they call you a monster or an idiot.  No, there is no hard evidence, only conjecture that is more plausible for some, via Occam's Razor, than the assertion that it all happened by chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy who had control of all the really incriminating emails died a month before Bush left office in a mysterious plane crash : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael \ _ConnellThe problem is that Bush 's story creates a wonderfully consistent narrative which we are missing large parts of the evidence for , but what we do have matches perfectly with a number of conspiracy theories.It 's not credible to deny that the administration did n't take advantage of 9/11 for all it was worth , that it was n't prepared to do so , that it had n't planned to do so since long before the election , that it did n't NEED 9/11 to enact many of its ideological goals ?
Suggest that we were in any way complicit , though , and they call you a monster or an idiot .
No , there is no hard evidence , only conjecture that is more plausible for some , via Occam 's Razor , than the assertion that it all happened by chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy who had control of all the really incriminating emails died a month before Bush left office in a mysterious plane crash: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael\_ConnellThe problem is that Bush's story creates a wonderfully consistent narrative which we are missing large parts of the evidence for, but what we do have matches perfectly with a number of conspiracy theories.It's not credible to deny that the administration didn't take advantage of 9/11 for all it was worth, that it wasn't prepared to do so, that it hadn't planned to do so since long before the election, that it didn't NEED 9/11 to enact many of its ideological goals?
Suggest that we were in any way complicit, though, and they call you a monster or an idiot.
No, there is no hard evidence, only conjecture that is more plausible for some, via Occam's Razor, than the assertion that it all happened by chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452160</id>
	<title>Love the spin</title>
	<author>sphealey</author>
	<datestamp>1260882240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the spin that is being put on this:  "found", "technical problems", etc. - esp in the Washington Post.  These e-mails just happened to have technical problems and get "lost" when 10 of the senior members of the Bush/Cheney Administration where under investigation concerning a conspiracy to violate foreign intelligence secrecy laws.  Just happened to get "lost", yessirree.</p><p>sPh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the spin that is being put on this : " found " , " technical problems " , etc .
- esp in the Washington Post .
These e-mails just happened to have technical problems and get " lost " when 10 of the senior members of the Bush/Cheney Administration where under investigation concerning a conspiracy to violate foreign intelligence secrecy laws .
Just happened to get " lost " , yessirree.sPh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the spin that is being put on this:  "found", "technical problems", etc.
- esp in the Washington Post.
These e-mails just happened to have technical problems and get "lost" when 10 of the senior members of the Bush/Cheney Administration where under investigation concerning a conspiracy to violate foreign intelligence secrecy laws.
Just happened to get "lost", yessirree.sPh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452444</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1260884100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just think of how many people would be considered to be part of the Bush administration and multiply that by the number of emails per day and any duplicates and it becomes fairly easy to see how this many emails could be sent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just think of how many people would be considered to be part of the Bush administration and multiply that by the number of emails per day and any duplicates and it becomes fairly easy to see how this many emails could be sent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just think of how many people would be considered to be part of the Bush administration and multiply that by the number of emails per day and any duplicates and it becomes fairly easy to see how this many emails could be sent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</id>
	<title>Wait</title>
	<author>BitHive</author>
	<datestamp>1260882420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we to understand that it was the <i>people</i> in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"?  Nonsense and tosh!  If people are the root cause of government's failures then the party of "government sucks" has some mirror-gazing to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush 's white house that failed , and not " the gubbermint " ?
Nonsense and tosh !
If people are the root cause of government 's failures then the party of " government sucks " has some mirror-gazing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"?
Nonsense and tosh!
If people are the root cause of government's failures then the party of "government sucks" has some mirror-gazing to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453372</id>
	<title>Triangle Plumbing (Affordable Plumbing done right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Triangle Plumbing (Affordable Plumbing done right in Raleigh Durham Winston-Salem Greensboro<br>OFFICE # Raleigh Durham (919)341 1911 Winston Salem Greensboro (336)3383882<br>triangleplumbing.net</p><p>Why Choose Triangle Plumbing?<br>Have you ever been truly satisfied with a home service company you used? Probably not! Could you still see dirty fingerprints, greasy parts, or areas that should have been cleaned up? Did you have to waste most of a day because they were late or didn't show up at all? Did they charge you a high price and need to come back to finish or do it over again? We guarantee to provide you with the most efficient and reasonably priced plumbing solutions for any predicament.<br>Tankless Water Heater Specialists<br>Click here to learn how to qualify for a $1500 tax credit and save up to 40\% off your utility bill!<br>Residential<br>We strive to meet all your plumbing needs as large or small they might be.<br>Our highly trained fully equipped mechanics are standing by for your call. Trust us to address and solve your problem, saving you time and money.<br>Our professional, friendly technicians offer a wide range of services:<br>
    Water heating systems- conventional and tankless<br>
    Repair/ replace/ install any plumbing fixture<br>
    Drains<br>
    Troubleshooting leaks and clogs in sinks, toilets, faucets, bath tubs, sewers, pipes<br>
    Garbage disposals<br>
    Video inspections<br>
    High pressure jetting<br>
    Boiler installation / repair / troubleshooting<br>
    Gas leak repair<br>Commercial<br>Most industrial and business places require the help of an experienced plumbing company in order to tackle their plumbing and heating emergency problems. Our skilled and dedicated plumbers are fully equipped with state of the art technology in order to take care of your plumbing emergencies without disrupting the flow of your business.<br>
    Water line replacement<br>
    Sewer and drain cleaning<br>
    Federal sump pump install / repair / replace/ clean<br>
    Code violation removal &amp; resolution<br>
    Annual inspection<br>
    General plumbing<br>
    All industrial plumbing appliances and fixtures<br>
    Repair clogged or leaking sinks, bathtubs, faucets, sewers, drains and/or pipes<br>
    Placing gas lines and repairing gas leaks<br>
    Water filter replacement / installation<br>
    New roughing for new construction and existing buildings<br>Backflow Installation and Certification<br>Triangle Plumbing &amp; Backflow specializes in the installation, removal, repair, and certification of Backflow Prevention Devices. We are a certified and approved tester for all of North Carolina. Our testers work on all types and sizes of valves. They are all certified to test/repair Domestic, Fire, and Irrigation assemblies. When it comes to backflow valve work we set the pricing standard for the industry. We offer discounts on installation and annual testing of backflow valves through our 5-year service contract. Due to our constant contact with every local cross-connection administrator and innovative, computer driven, paperwork processing methods we are able to provide all of the necessary forms to you and the city inspectors very shortly after completion of a job. We keep these forms on file in our computers to ensure that they are available should any other copy become lost.<br>24/7 Emergency Plumbing<br>We have plumbers on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to service your unexpected emergencies.</p><p>Our contractors happily serve the following suburbs and zip codes: Aleigh, Angier, Apex, Asbury, Auburn, Bailey, B</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Triangle Plumbing ( Affordable Plumbing done right in Raleigh Durham Winston-Salem GreensboroOFFICE # Raleigh Durham ( 919 ) 341 1911 Winston Salem Greensboro ( 336 ) 3383882triangleplumbing.netWhy Choose Triangle Plumbing ? Have you ever been truly satisfied with a home service company you used ?
Probably not !
Could you still see dirty fingerprints , greasy parts , or areas that should have been cleaned up ?
Did you have to waste most of a day because they were late or did n't show up at all ?
Did they charge you a high price and need to come back to finish or do it over again ?
We guarantee to provide you with the most efficient and reasonably priced plumbing solutions for any predicament.Tankless Water Heater SpecialistsClick here to learn how to qualify for a $ 1500 tax credit and save up to 40 \ % off your utility bill ! ResidentialWe strive to meet all your plumbing needs as large or small they might be.Our highly trained fully equipped mechanics are standing by for your call .
Trust us to address and solve your problem , saving you time and money.Our professional , friendly technicians offer a wide range of services : Water heating systems- conventional and tankless Repair/ replace/ install any plumbing fixture Drains Troubleshooting leaks and clogs in sinks , toilets , faucets , bath tubs , sewers , pipes Garbage disposals Video inspections High pressure jetting Boiler installation / repair / troubleshooting Gas leak repairCommercialMost industrial and business places require the help of an experienced plumbing company in order to tackle their plumbing and heating emergency problems .
Our skilled and dedicated plumbers are fully equipped with state of the art technology in order to take care of your plumbing emergencies without disrupting the flow of your business .
Water line replacement Sewer and drain cleaning Federal sump pump install / repair / replace/ clean Code violation removal &amp; resolution Annual inspection General plumbing All industrial plumbing appliances and fixtures Repair clogged or leaking sinks , bathtubs , faucets , sewers , drains and/or pipes Placing gas lines and repairing gas leaks Water filter replacement / installation New roughing for new construction and existing buildingsBackflow Installation and CertificationTriangle Plumbing &amp; Backflow specializes in the installation , removal , repair , and certification of Backflow Prevention Devices .
We are a certified and approved tester for all of North Carolina .
Our testers work on all types and sizes of valves .
They are all certified to test/repair Domestic , Fire , and Irrigation assemblies .
When it comes to backflow valve work we set the pricing standard for the industry .
We offer discounts on installation and annual testing of backflow valves through our 5-year service contract .
Due to our constant contact with every local cross-connection administrator and innovative , computer driven , paperwork processing methods we are able to provide all of the necessary forms to you and the city inspectors very shortly after completion of a job .
We keep these forms on file in our computers to ensure that they are available should any other copy become lost.24/7 Emergency PlumbingWe have plumbers on call 24 hours a day , 7 days a week to service your unexpected emergencies.Our contractors happily serve the following suburbs and zip codes : Aleigh , Angier , Apex , Asbury , Auburn , Bailey , B</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Triangle Plumbing (Affordable Plumbing done right in Raleigh Durham Winston-Salem GreensboroOFFICE # Raleigh Durham (919)341 1911 Winston Salem Greensboro (336)3383882triangleplumbing.netWhy Choose Triangle Plumbing?Have you ever been truly satisfied with a home service company you used?
Probably not!
Could you still see dirty fingerprints, greasy parts, or areas that should have been cleaned up?
Did you have to waste most of a day because they were late or didn't show up at all?
Did they charge you a high price and need to come back to finish or do it over again?
We guarantee to provide you with the most efficient and reasonably priced plumbing solutions for any predicament.Tankless Water Heater SpecialistsClick here to learn how to qualify for a $1500 tax credit and save up to 40\% off your utility bill!ResidentialWe strive to meet all your plumbing needs as large or small they might be.Our highly trained fully equipped mechanics are standing by for your call.
Trust us to address and solve your problem, saving you time and money.Our professional, friendly technicians offer a wide range of services:
    Water heating systems- conventional and tankless
    Repair/ replace/ install any plumbing fixture
    Drains
    Troubleshooting leaks and clogs in sinks, toilets, faucets, bath tubs, sewers, pipes
    Garbage disposals
    Video inspections
    High pressure jetting
    Boiler installation / repair / troubleshooting
    Gas leak repairCommercialMost industrial and business places require the help of an experienced plumbing company in order to tackle their plumbing and heating emergency problems.
Our skilled and dedicated plumbers are fully equipped with state of the art technology in order to take care of your plumbing emergencies without disrupting the flow of your business.
Water line replacement
    Sewer and drain cleaning
    Federal sump pump install / repair / replace/ clean
    Code violation removal &amp; resolution
    Annual inspection
    General plumbing
    All industrial plumbing appliances and fixtures
    Repair clogged or leaking sinks, bathtubs, faucets, sewers, drains and/or pipes
    Placing gas lines and repairing gas leaks
    Water filter replacement / installation
    New roughing for new construction and existing buildingsBackflow Installation and CertificationTriangle Plumbing &amp; Backflow specializes in the installation, removal, repair, and certification of Backflow Prevention Devices.
We are a certified and approved tester for all of North Carolina.
Our testers work on all types and sizes of valves.
They are all certified to test/repair Domestic, Fire, and Irrigation assemblies.
When it comes to backflow valve work we set the pricing standard for the industry.
We offer discounts on installation and annual testing of backflow valves through our 5-year service contract.
Due to our constant contact with every local cross-connection administrator and innovative, computer driven, paperwork processing methods we are able to provide all of the necessary forms to you and the city inspectors very shortly after completion of a job.
We keep these forms on file in our computers to ensure that they are available should any other copy become lost.24/7 Emergency PlumbingWe have plumbers on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to service your unexpected emergencies.Our contractors happily serve the following suburbs and zip codes: Aleigh, Angier, Apex, Asbury, Auburn, Bailey, B</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453530</id>
	<title>22 Million</title>
	<author>got2liv4him</author>
	<datestamp>1260893400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>viagra ads.... don't we have something else to worry about...</htmltext>
<tokenext>viagra ads.... do n't we have something else to worry about.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>viagra ads.... don't we have something else to worry about...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452382</id>
	<title>"Found"</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1260883680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Options<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-</p><p>1 - They were down the back of the Oval Office sofa the whole time.</p><p>2 - They were hidden in some storage area, possibly the fifty-first area, which of course, doesn't exist in our universe for large percentages of the time.</p><p>3 - They were stored under the water-boarding rig at Gitmo, and they had to wait for them all to dry out.</p><p>I mean, really, is it any wonder that conspiracy theories are born, when a simple archive of data can mysteriously "disappear" and then even more mysteriously "reappear" after a couple of years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Options : -1 - They were down the back of the Oval Office sofa the whole time.2 - They were hidden in some storage area , possibly the fifty-first area , which of course , does n't exist in our universe for large percentages of the time.3 - They were stored under the water-boarding rig at Gitmo , and they had to wait for them all to dry out.I mean , really , is it any wonder that conspiracy theories are born , when a simple archive of data can mysteriously " disappear " and then even more mysteriously " reappear " after a couple of years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Options :-1 - They were down the back of the Oval Office sofa the whole time.2 - They were hidden in some storage area, possibly the fifty-first area, which of course, doesn't exist in our universe for large percentages of the time.3 - They were stored under the water-boarding rig at Gitmo, and they had to wait for them all to dry out.I mean, really, is it any wonder that conspiracy theories are born, when a simple archive of data can mysteriously "disappear" and then even more mysteriously "reappear" after a couple of years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454770</id>
	<title>22M "We Hate Bush Emails??</title>
	<author>dila813</author>
	<datestamp>1259699220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aren't these just the 22M Hate Emails that were sent to Bush through the Web site?

Why will anyone care? No wonder these were misplaced.

Seems like a pretty weak scandal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't these just the 22M Hate Emails that were sent to Bush through the Web site ?
Why will anyone care ?
No wonder these were misplaced .
Seems like a pretty weak scandal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't these just the 22M Hate Emails that were sent to Bush through the Web site?
Why will anyone care?
No wonder these were misplaced.
Seems like a pretty weak scandal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454134</id>
	<title>Re:How many are for Viagra?</title>
	<author>ndogg</author>
	<datestamp>1260900240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You people are so mean.  These kinds of things are of a personal nature between Cheney and his wife.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You people are so mean .
These kinds of things are of a personal nature between Cheney and his wife .
/sarc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You people are so mean.
These kinds of things are of a personal nature between Cheney and his wife.
/sarc</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453994</id>
	<title>How quickly you forget...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/ethics/papers/ASEE02.pdf</p><p>(There is much more information on it, if you get off your couch and look for it...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/ethics/papers/ASEE02.pdf ( There is much more information on it , if you get off your couch and look for it... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/ethics/papers/ASEE02.pdf(There is much more information on it, if you get off your couch and look for it...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970</id>
	<title>Laura Crabtree Strikes AGAIN !!</title>
	<author>Kay in PA</author>
	<datestamp>1260898440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds to me that Homeland 'Security' has REHIRED LAURA CRABTREE !! She knew that important emails were missing, threatened those under her with dismissal if they told. Eventually, it came out, and court investigation dished out her punishment:  A 6-month PAID 'VACATION' on a 3-digit salary!!  After she was rested (NOT a-rested) and banked that tidy sum, it was THEN that she was 'let go'.  But I bet she retains her pension rights.  She was a slick one, for sure.  (I knew her when she was a GS-5)
Yup, no doubt she's been re-hired, and paid a fabulous sum to FIND missing EMAILS !!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds to me that Homeland 'Security ' has REHIRED LAURA CRABTREE ! !
She knew that important emails were missing , threatened those under her with dismissal if they told .
Eventually , it came out , and court investigation dished out her punishment : A 6-month PAID 'VACATION ' on a 3-digit salary ! !
After she was rested ( NOT a-rested ) and banked that tidy sum , it was THEN that she was 'let go' .
But I bet she retains her pension rights .
She was a slick one , for sure .
( I knew her when she was a GS-5 ) Yup , no doubt she 's been re-hired , and paid a fabulous sum to FIND missing EMAILS ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds to me that Homeland 'Security' has REHIRED LAURA CRABTREE !!
She knew that important emails were missing, threatened those under her with dismissal if they told.
Eventually, it came out, and court investigation dished out her punishment:  A 6-month PAID 'VACATION' on a 3-digit salary!!
After she was rested (NOT a-rested) and banked that tidy sum, it was THEN that she was 'let go'.
But I bet she retains her pension rights.
She was a slick one, for sure.
(I knew her when she was a GS-5)
Yup, no doubt she's been re-hired, and paid a fabulous sum to FIND missing EMAILS !!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453698</id>
	<title>Re:How many are for Viagra?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260895200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm wondering whether any of the Nigerian royalty emails to the White House might be legit.  Also, Viagra ads would be more amusing when addressed to the Clinton White House than the Bush one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wondering whether any of the Nigerian royalty emails to the White House might be legit .
Also , Viagra ads would be more amusing when addressed to the Clinton White House than the Bush one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wondering whether any of the Nigerian royalty emails to the White House might be legit.
Also, Viagra ads would be more amusing when addressed to the Clinton White House than the Bush one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454940</id>
	<title>So where's the wikileaks archive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely, some patriotic anonymous coward will be horrified to find that a large USB key, filled with these recovered emails, has fallen into his/her pocket, totally by accident, and that it somehow ended up on wikileaks after he/she tripped in front of his/her home PC and the key flew into an empty USB port, and Microsoft's autorun feature just insisted on uploading it all before anyone could hit the power switch?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely , some patriotic anonymous coward will be horrified to find that a large USB key , filled with these recovered emails , has fallen into his/her pocket , totally by accident , and that it somehow ended up on wikileaks after he/she tripped in front of his/her home PC and the key flew into an empty USB port , and Microsoft 's autorun feature just insisted on uploading it all before anyone could hit the power switch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely, some patriotic anonymous coward will be horrified to find that a large USB key, filled with these recovered emails, has fallen into his/her pocket, totally by accident, and that it somehow ended up on wikileaks after he/she tripped in front of his/her home PC and the key flew into an empty USB port, and Microsoft's autorun feature just insisted on uploading it all before anyone could hit the power switch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454538</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260904800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of them started</p><p>I am the son of the President of the United states, and I have acquired the sum of 40,000,000,000 (Forty Billion Dollars) through various nefarious deals, and would like your assistance in transferring this sum to a foreign country...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of them startedI am the son of the President of the United states , and I have acquired the sum of 40,000,000,000 ( Forty Billion Dollars ) through various nefarious deals , and would like your assistance in transferring this sum to a foreign country.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of them startedI am the son of the President of the United states, and I have acquired the sum of 40,000,000,000 (Forty Billion Dollars) through various nefarious deals, and would like your assistance in transferring this sum to a foreign country...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30462962</id>
	<title>Sneaky SysAdmins</title>
	<author>not\_hylas( )</author>
	<datestamp>1259658720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never get any credit - so insightful, I CAN tell the future!<br>Really, a no brainer, there HAD to be ONE pack-rat SysAdmin like me.</p><p>Trying To Find White House Missing E-mails</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1092423&amp;cid=26461257" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1092423&amp;cid=26461257</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never get any credit - so insightful , I CAN tell the future ! Really , a no brainer , there HAD to be ONE pack-rat SysAdmin like me.Trying To Find White House Missing E-mailshttp : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1092423&amp;cid = 26461257 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never get any credit - so insightful, I CAN tell the future!Really, a no brainer, there HAD to be ONE pack-rat SysAdmin like me.Trying To Find White House Missing E-mailshttp://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1092423&amp;cid=26461257 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454574</id>
	<title>Re:Laura Crabtree Strikes AGAIN !!</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1260905220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, and it's funny, I'm probably related to her, at some distance, via my wife.  The Crabtrees in the US apparently all come from one lineage, and the closest one is something like a great-great grandparent.  Through them, we're also connected to the Grammars ("Frasier"), again, at some distance.
<br> <br>
We've got some portraits on the wall of a pair of Crabtrees who are apparently also ancestors of "Frasier".  Not a handsome people, them.   The portraits are given out as a wedding gift from the geneologist of the family to the newly-wed, and so are hung proudly--and referred to as "The Gruesomes" in dozens of homes around this fair country of ours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and it 's funny , I 'm probably related to her , at some distance , via my wife .
The Crabtrees in the US apparently all come from one lineage , and the closest one is something like a great-great grandparent .
Through them , we 're also connected to the Grammars ( " Frasier " ) , again , at some distance .
We 've got some portraits on the wall of a pair of Crabtrees who are apparently also ancestors of " Frasier " .
Not a handsome people , them .
The portraits are given out as a wedding gift from the geneologist of the family to the newly-wed , and so are hung proudly--and referred to as " The Gruesomes " in dozens of homes around this fair country of ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and it's funny, I'm probably related to her, at some distance, via my wife.
The Crabtrees in the US apparently all come from one lineage, and the closest one is something like a great-great grandparent.
Through them, we're also connected to the Grammars ("Frasier"), again, at some distance.
We've got some portraits on the wall of a pair of Crabtrees who are apparently also ancestors of "Frasier".
Not a handsome people, them.
The portraits are given out as a wedding gift from the geneologist of the family to the newly-wed, and so are hung proudly--and referred to as "The Gruesomes" in dozens of homes around this fair country of ours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453002</id>
	<title>And now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260888240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's good that now all emails and communications on things like the health reform bills are wide open to the public and....o wait....never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's good that now all emails and communications on things like the health reform bills are wide open to the public and....o wait....never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's good that now all emails and communications on things like the health reform bills are wide open to the public and....o wait....never mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454908</id>
	<title>Hmmm..</title>
	<author>LogicalError</author>
	<datestamp>1259658540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't get me wrong, I actually like Obama, but isn't it somewhat... suspicious?.. that these emails where found a year after Obama's administration took office.. right around the time when his ratings are at an all time low?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get me wrong , I actually like Obama , but is n't it somewhat.. .
suspicious ? .. that these emails where found a year after Obama 's administration took office.. right around the time when his ratings are at an all time low ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get me wrong, I actually like Obama, but isn't it somewhat...
suspicious?.. that these emails where found a year after Obama's administration took office.. right around the time when his ratings are at an all time low?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452232</id>
	<title>The Ones I'm looking for:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>From: Dick Cheney<br>
We need to destroy freedom to save it. I want to track everything. I want to track every keystroke on every computer ever. We will all feel safer when ther eis no safety from our snooping.
<p>
From: George W. Bush<br>
I think my mind is a terrible fool thing again, hey what was that song by the Who?
</p><p>
From: ATT<br>
Dear Mr President - it is all set up. Just pick up your phone reciever and press STAR 6 6 6. This will allow you to instantly listen to conversations by REAL LIVE TERRORISTS. It might SOUND like someone ordering pizza, but really, THEY ARE ORDERING OUR DESTRUCTION! Ask Cheney - he'll tell ya.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From : Dick Cheney We need to destroy freedom to save it .
I want to track everything .
I want to track every keystroke on every computer ever .
We will all feel safer when ther eis no safety from our snooping .
From : George W. Bush I think my mind is a terrible fool thing again , hey what was that song by the Who ?
From : ATT Dear Mr President - it is all set up .
Just pick up your phone reciever and press STAR 6 6 6 .
This will allow you to instantly listen to conversations by REAL LIVE TERRORISTS .
It might SOUND like someone ordering pizza , but really , THEY ARE ORDERING OUR DESTRUCTION !
Ask Cheney - he 'll tell ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From: Dick Cheney
We need to destroy freedom to save it.
I want to track everything.
I want to track every keystroke on every computer ever.
We will all feel safer when ther eis no safety from our snooping.
From: George W. Bush
I think my mind is a terrible fool thing again, hey what was that song by the Who?
From: ATT
Dear Mr President - it is all set up.
Just pick up your phone reciever and press STAR 6 6 6.
This will allow you to instantly listen to conversations by REAL LIVE TERRORISTS.
It might SOUND like someone ordering pizza, but really, THEY ARE ORDERING OUR DESTRUCTION!
Ask Cheney - he'll tell ya.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246</id>
	<title>Standard IT issues</title>
	<author>TheDarkener</author>
	<datestamp>1260882900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"The liberal groups CREW and National Security Archive litigate for sport, distort the facts and have consistently tried to create a spooky conspiracy out of standard IT issues"
- Former Bush White House spokesman Scott Stanzel</i> <br>
<br>
Yeah, those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again. All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications, and had insanely incompetent I.T. staff at this, the richest and most powerful country in the world. What a bunch of baloney. Just an honest mistake. Tens of millions of e-mails, big whoop. Wanna fight about it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The liberal groups CREW and National Security Archive litigate for sport , distort the facts and have consistently tried to create a spooky conspiracy out of standard IT issues " - Former Bush White House spokesman Scott Stanzel Yeah , those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again .
All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications , and had insanely incompetent I.T .
staff at this , the richest and most powerful country in the world .
What a bunch of baloney .
Just an honest mistake .
Tens of millions of e-mails , big whoop .
Wan na fight about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The liberal groups CREW and National Security Archive litigate for sport, distort the facts and have consistently tried to create a spooky conspiracy out of standard IT issues"
- Former Bush White House spokesman Scott Stanzel 

Yeah, those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again.
All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications, and had insanely incompetent I.T.
staff at this, the richest and most powerful country in the world.
What a bunch of baloney.
Just an honest mistake.
Tens of millions of e-mails, big whoop.
Wanna fight about it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452442</id>
	<title>Fundraiser?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260884100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why doesn't the government try and make some money off of this? I mean, they could sell all the White House emails to Google -- $1/email -- and then google could set up a search engine for them. Something like, <a href="http://whitehouseemails.google.com/" title="google.com">whitehouseemails.google.com</a> [google.com], and we can search through them? Of course, they'd have to go through a security screen first, but still, I bet all the pundits on the right AND the left would go nuts over having access to something like this? =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does n't the government try and make some money off of this ?
I mean , they could sell all the White House emails to Google -- $ 1/email -- and then google could set up a search engine for them .
Something like , whitehouseemails.google.com [ google.com ] , and we can search through them ?
Of course , they 'd have to go through a security screen first , but still , I bet all the pundits on the right AND the left would go nuts over having access to something like this ?
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why doesn't the government try and make some money off of this?
I mean, they could sell all the White House emails to Google -- $1/email -- and then google could set up a search engine for them.
Something like, whitehouseemails.google.com [google.com], and we can search through them?
Of course, they'd have to go through a security screen first, but still, I bet all the pundits on the right AND the left would go nuts over having access to something like this?
=)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452222</id>
	<title>If they were "Lost" then they were "Found"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It probably just took this long for a large group of monkeys to re-create the same volume of "mail"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably just took this long for a large group of monkeys to re-create the same volume of " mail "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably just took this long for a large group of monkeys to re-create the same volume of "mail"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454828</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1259700120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.</i></p><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive\_Office\_of\_the\_President\_of\_the\_United\_States" title="wikipedia.org">Executive Office of the President</a> [wikipedia.org] has about 2000 employees, and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office\_of\_the\_Vice\_President\_of\_the\_United\_States" title="wikipedia.org">Office of the Vice President</a> [wikipedia.org] has another 200.  Over a year period, that is just ~30 per day per person.  I wish I only got 30 emails per day at work!</p><p>"The Administration" may also include cabinet members who are Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General.  Who knows how much email these people and their staff get!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.The Executive Office of the President [ wikipedia.org ] has about 2000 employees , and the Office of the Vice President [ wikipedia.org ] has another 200 .
Over a year period , that is just ~ 30 per day per person .
I wish I only got 30 emails per day at work !
" The Administration " may also include cabinet members who are Secretaries of Agriculture , Commerce , Defense , Education , Energy , Health and Human Services , Homeland Security , Housing and Urban Development , Interior , Labor , State , Transportation , Treasury , and Veterans Affairs , as well as the Attorney General .
Who knows how much email these people and their staff get !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.The Executive Office of the President [wikipedia.org] has about 2000 employees, and the Office of the Vice President [wikipedia.org] has another 200.
Over a year period, that is just ~30 per day per person.
I wish I only got 30 emails per day at work!
"The Administration" may also include cabinet members who are Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General.
Who knows how much email these people and their staff get!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452760</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1260886140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it hard to believe you spent more time typing out that post than the amount of time it would have taken to think up the answer on your own.  And yet, here we are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it hard to believe you spent more time typing out that post than the amount of time it would have taken to think up the answer on your own .
And yet , here we are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it hard to believe you spent more time typing out that post than the amount of time it would have taken to think up the answer on your own.
And yet, here we are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452626</id>
	<title>Strangely enough</title>
	<author>NaCh0</author>
	<datestamp>1260885180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The emails were found in Sandy Berger's <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/20/berger.probe/index.html" title="cnn.com">underpants</a> [cnn.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The emails were found in Sandy Berger 's underpants [ cnn.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The emails were found in Sandy Berger's underpants [cnn.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452806</id>
	<title>Re:Standard IT issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260886560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yeah, those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again. All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications, and had insanely incompetent I.T. staff at this, the richest and most powerful country in the world. What a bunch of baloney. Just an honest mistake. Tens of millions of e-mails, big whoop. Wanna fight about it?</i></p><p>If this wasn't purely about politics, where were their fucking lawsuits when <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/clinton-white-house-lost-emails-too" title="judicialwatch.org">the Clinton-Gore administration lost emails</a> [judicialwatch.org]?</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again .
All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications , and had insanely incompetent I.T .
staff at this , the richest and most powerful country in the world .
What a bunch of baloney .
Just an honest mistake .
Tens of millions of e-mails , big whoop .
Wan na fight about it ? If this was n't purely about politics , where were their fucking lawsuits when the Clinton-Gore administration lost emails [ judicialwatch.org ] ? LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, those stupid liberal groups are just out to hodgepodge the truth again.
All we did was violate 2 federal laws by not keeping records of our communications, and had insanely incompetent I.T.
staff at this, the richest and most powerful country in the world.
What a bunch of baloney.
Just an honest mistake.
Tens of millions of e-mails, big whoop.
Wanna fight about it?If this wasn't purely about politics, where were their fucking lawsuits when the Clinton-Gore administration lost emails [judicialwatch.org]?LK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30458466</id>
	<title>Re:How many are for Viagra?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259686260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the amount of people Bush screwed I would have to say all of 'em!</p><p>Badda Boom Ding... I will be here all week, try the veal!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the amount of people Bush screwed I would have to say all of 'em ! Badda Boom Ding... I will be here all week , try the veal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the amount of people Bush screwed I would have to say all of 'em!Badda Boom Ding... I will be here all week, try the veal!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455556</id>
	<title>Re:Laura Crabtree Strikes AGAIN !!</title>
	<author>Kay in PA</author>
	<datestamp>1259668200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummmmm wanna make that a 6-digit salary, as in over $230,000.  Crime still pays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummmmm wan na make that a 6-digit salary , as in over $ 230,000 .
Crime still pays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummmmm wanna make that a 6-digit salary, as in over $230,000.
Crime still pays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452194</id>
	<title>Now the truth will come out...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Laura and Tiger have been lovers since '03!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Laura and Tiger have been lovers since '03 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laura and Tiger have been lovers since '03!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</id>
	<title>20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1260883320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.</p><p>That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays; and at least 5 emails per minute.</p><p>Now, just tell me who in Bush's administration was spewing such an amount of email.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays ; and at least 5 emails per minute.Now , just tell me who in Bush 's administration was spewing such an amount of email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays; and at least 5 emails per minute.Now, just tell me who in Bush's administration was spewing such an amount of email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452170</id>
	<title>TWO DAY OLD NEWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this even showing up on Slashdot? Has Slashdot become the DIGG duplicator?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this even showing up on Slashdot ?
Has Slashdot become the DIGG duplicator ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this even showing up on Slashdot?
Has Slashdot become the DIGG duplicator?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452530</id>
	<title>It's not all of them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260884580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing is that it's not all of them. I would guess the emails people really want to see won't be found.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is that it 's not all of them .
I would guess the emails people really want to see wo n't be found .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is that it's not all of them.
I would guess the emails people really want to see won't be found.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461944</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a system as legalistic as most western societies are, allowing individuals to systematically corrupt the system is a failure of the protocols intended to protect the system against such corruption.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a system as legalistic as most western societies are , allowing individuals to systematically corrupt the system is a failure of the protocols intended to protect the system against such corruption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a system as legalistic as most western societies are, allowing individuals to systematically corrupt the system is a failure of the protocols intended to protect the system against such corruption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461958</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sloppy record-keeping absolutely could be an attempt to hide something.  The question is whether they purposely failed to keep records, or whether it was done through negligence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sloppy record-keeping absolutely could be an attempt to hide something .
The question is whether they purposely failed to keep records , or whether it was done through negligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sloppy record-keeping absolutely could be an attempt to hide something.
The question is whether they purposely failed to keep records, or whether it was done through negligence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455948</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259671920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They received mostly viagra advertisements and enlarge your whatever types of stuff...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They received mostly viagra advertisements and enlarge your whatever types of stuff.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They received mostly viagra advertisements and enlarge your whatever types of stuff...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452856</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260886980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"? Nonsense and tosh!</p></div><p>Clinton's Administration didn't seem to have a problem with archiving e-mails.<br>I imagine that if Obama's Administration was having problems, we'd know about it by now.<br>So with that in mind, I'm going to go ahead and say that yes, it was the people in Bush's white house that failed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush 's white house that failed , and not " the gubbermint " ?
Nonsense and tosh ! Clinton 's Administration did n't seem to have a problem with archiving e-mails.I imagine that if Obama 's Administration was having problems , we 'd know about it by now.So with that in mind , I 'm going to go ahead and say that yes , it was the people in Bush 's white house that failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"?
Nonsense and tosh!Clinton's Administration didn't seem to have a problem with archiving e-mails.I imagine that if Obama's Administration was having problems, we'd know about it by now.So with that in mind, I'm going to go ahead and say that yes, it was the people in Bush's white house that failed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452192</id>
	<title>Mystery solved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least they know what that lump in the carpet was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they know what that lump in the carpet was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they know what that lump in the carpet was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453828</id>
	<title>So where are they?</title>
	<author>m\_number4</author>
	<datestamp>1260896520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do we have a link?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we have a link ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we have a link?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30468766</id>
	<title>Re:and had insanely incompetent I.T. staff</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1259686260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were incompetent; after all, the emails were found, eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were incompetent ; after all , the emails were found , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were incompetent; after all, the emails were found, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453240</id>
	<title>Re:Standard IT issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260890100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you been to the recovery.gov site to look over their useless (GIGO) data?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you been to the recovery.gov site to look over their useless ( GIGO ) data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you been to the recovery.gov site to look over their useless (GIGO) data?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452548</id>
	<title>Re:"Found"</title>
	<author>kbob88</author>
	<datestamp>1260884700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no. They were uploaded to AT&amp;T's 3G network (sort of an online backup, y'know), and it took all year to download them again via an iPhone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no .
They were uploaded to AT&amp;T 's 3G network ( sort of an online backup , y'know ) , and it took all year to download them again via an iPhone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no.
They were uploaded to AT&amp;T's 3G network (sort of an online backup, y'know), and it took all year to download them again via an iPhone!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30473232</id>
	<title>How much did we pay for that goose chase?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1261064820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not even worth having them. The past is past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not even worth having them .
The past is past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not even worth having them.
The past is past.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459152</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>shambalagoon</author>
	<datestamp>1259688960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree that people like that live in a troubling tautology. But there's another thing at work here, and probably the most important and successful conspiracy working today - and that is the conspiracy to discredit conspiracy theorists. The popular opinion today is that conspiracy theorists are nutters, and that's a real boon to anyone involved in a conspiracy. If they're being investigated, there's already a prejudice to dismiss the investigator as crazy. How wonderfully useful.<br>
<br>
A conspiracy is when two or more people enter into a secret agreement to do something illegal. This happens ALL THE TIME. No doubt everybody here has been involved in at least one conspiracy. You can barely get through adolescence without it. That everyone now has a knee-jerk reaction to think of anyone talking conspiracy is crazy is a coup for corruption.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that people like that live in a troubling tautology .
But there 's another thing at work here , and probably the most important and successful conspiracy working today - and that is the conspiracy to discredit conspiracy theorists .
The popular opinion today is that conspiracy theorists are nutters , and that 's a real boon to anyone involved in a conspiracy .
If they 're being investigated , there 's already a prejudice to dismiss the investigator as crazy .
How wonderfully useful .
A conspiracy is when two or more people enter into a secret agreement to do something illegal .
This happens ALL THE TIME .
No doubt everybody here has been involved in at least one conspiracy .
You can barely get through adolescence without it .
That everyone now has a knee-jerk reaction to think of anyone talking conspiracy is crazy is a coup for corruption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that people like that live in a troubling tautology.
But there's another thing at work here, and probably the most important and successful conspiracy working today - and that is the conspiracy to discredit conspiracy theorists.
The popular opinion today is that conspiracy theorists are nutters, and that's a real boon to anyone involved in a conspiracy.
If they're being investigated, there's already a prejudice to dismiss the investigator as crazy.
How wonderfully useful.
A conspiracy is when two or more people enter into a secret agreement to do something illegal.
This happens ALL THE TIME.
No doubt everybody here has been involved in at least one conspiracy.
You can barely get through adolescence without it.
That everyone now has a knee-jerk reaction to think of anyone talking conspiracy is crazy is a coup for corruption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452560</id>
	<title>Re:Standard IT issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260884760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe Bush thought by running our economy into the ground we couldn't use the richest and most powerful country in the world argument. Which exonerates his supposedly terrible IT staff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Bush thought by running our economy into the ground we could n't use the richest and most powerful country in the world argument .
Which exonerates his supposedly terrible IT staff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Bush thought by running our economy into the ground we couldn't use the richest and most powerful country in the world argument.
Which exonerates his supposedly terrible IT staff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514</id>
	<title>Never really missing...</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1260884520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The tapes were all turned over to the National Archives, the existence of them has been known for over two years. It was just a matter of sorting through the sixty thousand or so to find the backups mentioned in the article. It doesn't appear any attempt was ever made to hide or destroy anything, just sloppy record-keeping.

Will be interesting to see if anything significant is found, but I predict the conspiracy theorists are going to be very disappointed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The tapes were all turned over to the National Archives , the existence of them has been known for over two years .
It was just a matter of sorting through the sixty thousand or so to find the backups mentioned in the article .
It does n't appear any attempt was ever made to hide or destroy anything , just sloppy record-keeping .
Will be interesting to see if anything significant is found , but I predict the conspiracy theorists are going to be very disappointed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tapes were all turned over to the National Archives, the existence of them has been known for over two years.
It was just a matter of sorting through the sixty thousand or so to find the backups mentioned in the article.
It doesn't appear any attempt was ever made to hide or destroy anything, just sloppy record-keeping.
Will be interesting to see if anything significant is found, but I predict the conspiracy theorists are going to be very disappointed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455660</id>
	<title>Gonna be a blame bonanza</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1259669340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot wait for the leaks, figure we can have yet another year of "see, it was Bush's fault and here is the email to prove it, not that we leaked it"</p><p>Considering that every administration has problem with records perhaps it needs to be outsourced.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not wait for the leaks , figure we can have yet another year of " see , it was Bush 's fault and here is the email to prove it , not that we leaked it " Considering that every administration has problem with records perhaps it needs to be outsourced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot wait for the leaks, figure we can have yet another year of "see, it was Bush's fault and here is the email to prove it, not that we leaked it"Considering that every administration has problem with records perhaps it needs to be outsourced.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452294</id>
	<title>So some of it is still missing?</title>
	<author>AdmiralXyz</author>
	<datestamp>1260883200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm guessing those are the "location of Iraq's WMDs" e-mails.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing those are the " location of Iraq 's WMDs " e-mails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing those are the "location of Iraq's WMDs" e-mails.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454714</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because it has the word conspiracy involved, doesn't mean the threat is any less real. They ARE depending on you to think its all silly and impossible. Thats how "They" get away with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because it has the word conspiracy involved , does n't mean the threat is any less real .
They ARE depending on you to think its all silly and impossible .
Thats how " They " get away with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because it has the word conspiracy involved, doesn't mean the threat is any less real.
They ARE depending on you to think its all silly and impossible.
Thats how "They" get away with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453584</id>
	<title>Don't forget the use of private email</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1260894060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We also know that the Bush administration purposefully pushed conversations out to private email accounts to hide what they were up to.  We have email messages where correspondents say to take conversations off the record.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We also know that the Bush administration purposefully pushed conversations out to private email accounts to hide what they were up to .
We have email messages where correspondents say to take conversations off the record .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We also know that the Bush administration purposefully pushed conversations out to private email accounts to hide what they were up to.
We have email messages where correspondents say to take conversations off the record.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946</id>
	<title>How many are for Viagra?</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1260887640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just wonderin...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wonderin.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wonderin...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459174</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>government = group of people with power</p><p>Don't dodge the issues with semantics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>government = group of people with powerDo n't dodge the issues with semantics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>government = group of people with powerDon't dodge the issues with semantics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30457366</id>
	<title>Biden asked "whats that lump in my chair cushion?"</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1259682000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its the tape of the 22 million missing emails, and
<br>
the letter in Cheney's handwriting outing Ms. Plume, and
<br>
crumpled CIA reports say they couldnt find any WMP in Iraq, and
<br>
Clarke's Aug 6, 2001 memo titled "Bin Laden intends to attack the United States".
<br> <br>
Dick was such a pack-rat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its the tape of the 22 million missing emails , and the letter in Cheney 's handwriting outing Ms. Plume , and crumpled CIA reports say they couldnt find any WMP in Iraq , and Clarke 's Aug 6 , 2001 memo titled " Bin Laden intends to attack the United States " .
Dick was such a pack-rat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its the tape of the 22 million missing emails, and

the letter in Cheney's handwriting outing Ms. Plume, and

crumpled CIA reports say they couldnt find any WMP in Iraq, and

Clarke's Aug 6, 2001 memo titled "Bin Laden intends to attack the United States".
Dick was such a pack-rat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452546</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260884640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.<br> <br>

That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays; and at least 5 emails per minute.<br> <br>

Now, just tell me who in Bush's administration was spewing such an amount of email.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

There are approx. 1,700 White House staff.  This is not counting OEOB staff that works across the street or other Executive branch personnel that most likely would have there email grouped with the White House archives.<br> <br>

If you use your figures (approx. 7,500 emails per day) then with just the White House staff that is about 4.5 emails per person per day that were lost.<br> <br>

Now my understanding is that these emails were "lost" in only a couple years and not over the whole 8 years so the above figures would be a higher per person per day count than that.  I do think you will agree that 5 emails per day is relatively easy to write/receive/edit/delete or what ever else you want to do.<br> <br>

Having said all that, I think that most likely issue here is that the IT staff were incompetent and didn't know A) where the emails were being stored, B) how to access them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails .
That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays ; and at least 5 emails per minute .
Now , just tell me who in Bush 's administration was spewing such an amount of email .
There are approx .
1,700 White House staff .
This is not counting OEOB staff that works across the street or other Executive branch personnel that most likely would have there email grouped with the White House archives .
If you use your figures ( approx .
7,500 emails per day ) then with just the White House staff that is about 4.5 emails per person per day that were lost .
Now my understanding is that these emails were " lost " in only a couple years and not over the whole 8 years so the above figures would be a higher per person per day count than that .
I do think you will agree that 5 emails per day is relatively easy to write/receive/edit/delete or what ever else you want to do .
Having said all that , I think that most likely issue here is that the IT staff were incompetent and did n't know A ) where the emails were being stored , B ) how to access them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's hard to believe that the former Bush Administration edited 22 million emails.
That would mean at least 7,500 emails per day including weekends and holidays; and at least 5 emails per minute.
Now, just tell me who in Bush's administration was spewing such an amount of email.
There are approx.
1,700 White House staff.
This is not counting OEOB staff that works across the street or other Executive branch personnel that most likely would have there email grouped with the White House archives.
If you use your figures (approx.
7,500 emails per day) then with just the White House staff that is about 4.5 emails per person per day that were lost.
Now my understanding is that these emails were "lost" in only a couple years and not over the whole 8 years so the above figures would be a higher per person per day count than that.
I do think you will agree that 5 emails per day is relatively easy to write/receive/edit/delete or what ever else you want to do.
Having said all that, I think that most likely issue here is that the IT staff were incompetent and didn't know A) where the emails were being stored, B) how to access them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452522</id>
	<title>Re:20 million? Hard to believe!</title>
	<author>MTO\_B.</author>
	<datestamp>1260884580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd guess incoming email also counts, so that figure even looks low to me when I personally might be getting half a million spam messages per day. I guess at least they did have some spam filter or the number would be much higher.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd guess incoming email also counts , so that figure even looks low to me when I personally might be getting half a million spam messages per day .
I guess at least they did have some spam filter or the number would be much higher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd guess incoming email also counts, so that figure even looks low to me when I personally might be getting half a million spam messages per day.
I guess at least they did have some spam filter or the number would be much higher.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452302</id>
	<title>Re:TWO DAY OLD NEWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260883320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone who comes to Slashdot to read the news is an absolute idiot. There are just a million sites out there that are much better and that don't need to spin every story into a sensationalistic storm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who comes to Slashdot to read the news is an absolute idiot .
There are just a million sites out there that are much better and that do n't need to spin every story into a sensationalistic storm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who comes to Slashdot to read the news is an absolute idiot.
There are just a million sites out there that are much better and that don't need to spin every story into a sensationalistic storm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30457290</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259681520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Though it's not these emails specifically, the Bush White House had plenty of reason to want emails to disappear.  As we all know, they almost never really disappear.</p><p>http://www.gregpalast.com/amy-goodman-and-greg-palast-moms-day-broadcast/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though it 's not these emails specifically , the Bush White House had plenty of reason to want emails to disappear .
As we all know , they almost never really disappear.http : //www.gregpalast.com/amy-goodman-and-greg-palast-moms-day-broadcast/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though it's not these emails specifically, the Bush White House had plenty of reason to want emails to disappear.
As we all know, they almost never really disappear.http://www.gregpalast.com/amy-goodman-and-greg-palast-moms-day-broadcast/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453604</id>
	<title>If they had really wanted to lose them.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260894240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have sent the backups with Cheney on a hunting trip!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have sent the backups with Cheney on a hunting trip !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have sent the backups with Cheney on a hunting trip!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940</id>
	<title>Re:Never really missing...</title>
	<author>gmhowell</author>
	<datestamp>1260887580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conspiracy theorists are NEVER disappointed. If they find the evidence, that is proof of the conspiracy. If they find NO evidence, that is proof that the conspiracy runs even deeper than suspected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conspiracy theorists are NEVER disappointed .
If they find the evidence , that is proof of the conspiracy .
If they find NO evidence , that is proof that the conspiracy runs even deeper than suspected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conspiracy theorists are NEVER disappointed.
If they find the evidence, that is proof of the conspiracy.
If they find NO evidence, that is proof that the conspiracy runs even deeper than suspected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459208</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>spazimodo</author>
	<datestamp>1259689140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it."<br>P. J. O'Rourke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Republicans are the party that says government does n't work and then they get elected and prove it. " P .
J. O'Rourke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it."P.
J. O'Rourke</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452272</id>
	<title>Lesson learned for the Bush regime.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260883020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next time, do:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time , do : # dd if = /dev/zero of = /dev/sda</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time, do:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30481504</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm..</title>
	<author>Uberbah</author>
	<datestamp>1261055640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, which is why Obama has blocked torture prosecutions, and continued Bush's absurd claims of executive privilege to quash lawsuits...like this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , which is why Obama has blocked torture prosecutions , and continued Bush 's absurd claims of executive privilege to quash lawsuits...like this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, which is why Obama has blocked torture prosecutions, and continued Bush's absurd claims of executive privilege to quash lawsuits...like this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454908</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30458466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30481504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30468766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30457290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2237200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30458466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30481504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30457290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30459152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30461958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30468766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30453970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30454574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30455556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2237200.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2237200.30452232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
