<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_15_2113213</id>
	<title>White House Holding Piracy Summit</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260870120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:DesScorp@Gmail.com" rel="nofollow">DesScorp</a> writes in to let us know about a <a href="http://www.wilshireandwashington.com/2009/12/industry-leaders-to-the-white-house-for-piracy-summit.html">White House piracy summit</a>, which is going on this afternoon. Judging by the press accounts, the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders. <i>"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC, regardless of who is in power, with a White House summit on piracy to be attended by the top executives in Hollywood, as well as the music industry. Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy. Also at the summit will be the Obama Administration's new Copyright Czar, Victoria Espinal. The summit comes after <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content\_display/news/e3i323ddc5ff8ac61422da08c74204a0a56">Congress has earmarked $30 million dollars of taxpayer funds</a> for anti-piracy efforts."</i> According to one attendee's tweet, <a href="http://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/6707260931">the press was kicked out of the meeting</a> around 20:45 GMT.</htmltext>
<tokenext>DesScorp writes in to let us know about a White House piracy summit , which is going on this afternoon .
Judging by the press accounts , the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers , not individual downloaders .
" Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC , regardless of who is in power , with a White House summit on piracy to be attended by the top executives in Hollywood , as well as the music industry .
Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy .
Also at the summit will be the Obama Administration 's new Copyright Czar , Victoria Espinal .
The summit comes after Congress has earmarked $ 30 million dollars of taxpayer funds for anti-piracy efforts .
" According to one attendee 's tweet , the press was kicked out of the meeting around 20 : 45 GMT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DesScorp writes in to let us know about a White House piracy summit, which is going on this afternoon.
Judging by the press accounts, the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders.
"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC, regardless of who is in power, with a White House summit on piracy to be attended by the top executives in Hollywood, as well as the music industry.
Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy.
Also at the summit will be the Obama Administration's new Copyright Czar, Victoria Espinal.
The summit comes after Congress has earmarked $30 million dollars of taxpayer funds for anti-piracy efforts.
" According to one attendee's tweet, the press was kicked out of the meeting around 20:45 GMT.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456540</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I second the motion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I second the motion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I second the motion!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451878</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260880680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyways, the USA can't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization.</p></div><p>Bullshit. The USA is a sovereign nation. "International law" is a figure of speech insofar as it refers to domestic matters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyways , the USA ca n't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization.Bullshit .
The USA is a sovereign nation .
" International law " is a figure of speech insofar as it refers to domestic matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyways, the USA can't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization.Bullshit.
The USA is a sovereign nation.
"International law" is a figure of speech insofar as it refers to domestic matters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450968</id>
	<title>Joe Biden?</title>
	<author>NullProg</author>
	<datestamp>1260876180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy. </i></p><p>You mean this Joe Biden: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=joe+biden+plagiarism&amp;aq=0&amp;oq=joe+biden+pl&amp;aqi=g10" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=joe+biden+plagiarism&amp;aq=0&amp;oq=joe+biden+pl&amp;aqi=g10</a> [google.com]</p><p>Maybe someone will ask Joe the difference between bits in a track and the letters in a book.</p><p>Enjoy,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy .
You mean this Joe Biden : http : //www.google.com/search ? hl = en&amp;source = hp&amp;q = joe + biden + plagiarism&amp;aq = 0&amp;oq = joe + biden + pl&amp;aqi = g10 [ google.com ] Maybe someone will ask Joe the difference between bits in a track and the letters in a book.Enjoy,</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Vice President Joe Biden will be leading the summit to discuss organized cooperation between the federal government and the entertainment industry on all matters of piracy.
You mean this Joe Biden: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=joe+biden+plagiarism&amp;aq=0&amp;oq=joe+biden+pl&amp;aqi=g10 [google.com]Maybe someone will ask Joe the difference between bits in a track and the letters in a book.Enjoy,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30454868</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yea, it is on FSF's list of words to avoid or use with care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , it is on FSF 's list of words to avoid or use with care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, it is on FSF's list of words to avoid or use with care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450780</id>
	<title>Full text</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1260875280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders</i> [for now]. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers , not individual downloaders [ for now ] .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders [for now].
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455686</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1259669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.</p></div><p>When was this proven? Information is not a sentient entity, therefore, it can't "want" anything. Perhaps when you say "proven right" you mean "downright stupid"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As we said early on , and have continually been proven right , Information just wants to be free.When was this proven ?
Information is not a sentient entity , therefore , it ca n't " want " anything .
Perhaps when you say " proven right " you mean " downright stupid " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.When was this proven?
Information is not a sentient entity, therefore, it can't "want" anything.
Perhaps when you say "proven right" you mean "downright stupid"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455312</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Language is dynamic. The proper word is the word that everybody uses.</p><p>Your little rant isn't going to have any effect, so instead, just deal with it and move on.</p><p>Halloween pirate costumes also make light of murderous thugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Language is dynamic .
The proper word is the word that everybody uses.Your little rant is n't going to have any effect , so instead , just deal with it and move on.Halloween pirate costumes also make light of murderous thugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Language is dynamic.
The proper word is the word that everybody uses.Your little rant isn't going to have any effect, so instead, just deal with it and move on.Halloween pirate costumes also make light of murderous thugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451722</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1260879840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.</p></div><p>So when we do all this, it stops wanting to be free and this amount of trying will work in the end?  Or does it still want to be free?  That part isn't clear.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work , remove patent protection for software , and let 's get back to creating and away from lining CEO 's pockets.So when we do all this , it stops wanting to be free and this amount of trying will work in the end ?
Or does it still want to be free ?
That part is n't clear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.So when we do all this, it stops wanting to be free and this amount of trying will work in the end?
Or does it still want to be free?
That part isn't clear.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30463568</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How in the world does the n-word make it into just about every topic on this website?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How in the world does the n-word make it into just about every topic on this website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How in the world does the n-word make it into just about every topic on this website?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456468</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259676540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the 89th time, piracy has been used to refer to copyright infringment since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright\_infringement" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">1603</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the 89th time , piracy has been used to refer to copyright infringment since 1603 [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the 89th time, piracy has been used to refer to copyright infringment since 1603 [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453156</id>
	<title>Grammar Nazi in training.</title>
	<author>yamfry</author>
	<datestamp>1260889440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>According to one attendee's tweet, the press was kicked out of the meeting around 20:45 GMT.</p></div></blockquote><p>
The press <i>were</i> kicked out?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to one attendee 's tweet , the press was kicked out of the meeting around 20 : 45 GMT .
The press were kicked out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to one attendee's tweet, the press was kicked out of the meeting around 20:45 GMT.
The press were kicked out?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453896</id>
	<title>List of attendees</title>
	<author>ClickWir</author>
	<datestamp>1260897300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's quite a list of people that will be there. And which one of those is representing the people? I don't see any.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's quite a list of people that will be there .
And which one of those is representing the people ?
I do n't see any .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's quite a list of people that will be there.
And which one of those is representing the people?
I don't see any.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455494</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.</p></div></blockquote><p>What's the point? You have irrefutable proof that no amount of trying will stop information from being free (or people being greedy, apparently).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work , remove patent protection for software , and let 's get back to creating and away from lining CEO 's pockets.What 's the point ?
You have irrefutable proof that no amount of trying will stop information from being free ( or people being greedy , apparently ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.What's the point?
You have irrefutable proof that no amount of trying will stop information from being free (or people being greedy, apparently).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452350</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't help when we refer to it as piracy</title>
	<author>east coast</author>
	<datestamp>1260883500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because a dozen people post exactly what you posted any time they call it piracy and posts and hits are the selling points that Slashdot uses to sell ads. All you're doing is to help keep the practice going.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because a dozen people post exactly what you posted any time they call it piracy and posts and hits are the selling points that Slashdot uses to sell ads .
All you 're doing is to help keep the practice going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because a dozen people post exactly what you posted any time they call it piracy and posts and hits are the selling points that Slashdot uses to sell ads.
All you're doing is to help keep the practice going.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882</id>
	<title>Fair and Balanced</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1260875760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC, regardless of who is in power</i> </p><p>Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington.</p><p>Bonus points for cultural exports.</p><p> If you are a Brit, ask yourself what the return has been on Sherlock Holmes, The Beatles, James Bond, Harry Potter.</p><p>Bonus points for clean industries. Bonus points for tech. Bonus points for skilled labor and labor-intensive industries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC , regardless of who is in power Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington.Bonus points for cultural exports .
If you are a Brit , ask yourself what the return has been on Sherlock Holmes , The Beatles , James Bond , Harry Potter.Bonus points for clean industries .
Bonus points for tech .
Bonus points for skilled labor and labor-intensive industries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC, regardless of who is in power Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington.Bonus points for cultural exports.
If you are a Brit, ask yourself what the return has been on Sherlock Holmes, The Beatles, James Bond, Harry Potter.Bonus points for clean industries.
Bonus points for tech.
Bonus points for skilled labor and labor-intensive industries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30458248</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1259685540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did Piracy become a bad term around here? I know it's thrown around recklessly by the accusers, but I thought that fellow internet pirates were proud to be called as such.

Whadda ya say, lads?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did Piracy become a bad term around here ?
I know it 's thrown around recklessly by the accusers , but I thought that fellow internet pirates were proud to be called as such .
Whadda ya say , lads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did Piracy become a bad term around here?
I know it's thrown around recklessly by the accusers, but I thought that fellow internet pirates were proud to be called as such.
Whadda ya say, lads?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450442</id>
	<title>Re:!change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260874140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be inclined to doubt it. Even the most starry-eyed members of the uncritical Obama fans club don't have any real use for Biden or the Obama administration's general chumminess with Team Content.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be inclined to doubt it .
Even the most starry-eyed members of the uncritical Obama fans club do n't have any real use for Biden or the Obama administration 's general chumminess with Team Content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be inclined to doubt it.
Even the most starry-eyed members of the uncritical Obama fans club don't have any real use for Biden or the Obama administration's general chumminess with Team Content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453638</id>
	<title>Why does this shock people?</title>
	<author>Eskarel</author>
	<datestamp>1260894660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether you believe in IP or not, it's pretty much the only thing the US still makes that anyone actually wants to buy.</p><p>No one wants what few physical goods the US still produces, there's pretty much zero resources export. The US economy is based almost entirely on ideas(IP) and military hardware. Any president, regardless of their political ideology or personal philosophy is going to work very hard to protect that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether you believe in IP or not , it 's pretty much the only thing the US still makes that anyone actually wants to buy.No one wants what few physical goods the US still produces , there 's pretty much zero resources export .
The US economy is based almost entirely on ideas ( IP ) and military hardware .
Any president , regardless of their political ideology or personal philosophy is going to work very hard to protect that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether you believe in IP or not, it's pretty much the only thing the US still makes that anyone actually wants to buy.No one wants what few physical goods the US still produces, there's pretty much zero resources export.
The US economy is based almost entirely on ideas(IP) and military hardware.
Any president, regardless of their political ideology or personal philosophy is going to work very hard to protect that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451888</id>
	<title>Re:Fair and Balanced</title>
	<author>cpghost</author>
	<datestamp>1260880740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington.</p></div></blockquote><p>

True.
</p><div><p>
Bonus points also for an industry that has the power to sway public opinion at home. MPAA and RIAA can easily make and destroy politicians.</p><blockquote><div><p>Bonus points for cultural exports.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Not so many anymore. In the 70-ies and 80-ies, a LOT more US films and series were available in third world countries. Due to insane licensing costs nowadays, US cultural exports have dropped significantly there.</p><blockquote><div><p>Bonus points for clean industries.</p></div></blockquote><p>

To decrypt Blu-Ray DRM in consumer players requires significantly more electricity than, say, DVD. Maybe they're not so green after all?</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington .
True . Bonus points also for an industry that has the power to sway public opinion at home .
MPAA and RIAA can easily make and destroy politicians.Bonus points for cultural exports .
Not so many anymore .
In the 70-ies and 80-ies , a LOT more US films and series were available in third world countries .
Due to insane licensing costs nowadays , US cultural exports have dropped significantly there.Bonus points for clean industries .
To decrypt Blu-Ray DRM in consumer players requires significantly more electricity than , say , DVD .
Maybe they 're not so green after all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Industries that generate significant export dollars are guaranteed a hearing in Washington.
True.

Bonus points also for an industry that has the power to sway public opinion at home.
MPAA and RIAA can easily make and destroy politicians.Bonus points for cultural exports.
Not so many anymore.
In the 70-ies and 80-ies, a LOT more US films and series were available in third world countries.
Due to insane licensing costs nowadays, US cultural exports have dropped significantly there.Bonus points for clean industries.
To decrypt Blu-Ray DRM in consumer players requires significantly more electricity than, say, DVD.
Maybe they're not so green after all?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452362</id>
	<title>And They Wonder Why People are Cynical?</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1260883620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are any number of more pressing matters currently facing our nation and the Obama administration is wasting their time with Hollywood moguls? This demonstrates yet again that the Obama administration has a rather tenuous grasp of what the American people consider to be important. The economy is in the toilet, we are engaged in two major wars (or as they like to call them in the Obama administration, "overseas contingency operations"), and we are still hemorrhaging jobs. In fact, the number one issue with most Americans right now is JOBS. Just about every American either knows someone who has lost their job, fears losing their own, or in fact has already lost it. This has an effect similar to a giant parachute retarding the acceleration of economic growth necessary for a full recovery.</p><p>The Obama administration, if it cares at all about its own political survival, has got to stop the bleeding on jobs or their goose will be cooked in the 2010 congressional elections and they can kiss a second term goodbye. I suppose it could be argued that Hollywood does produce some jobs and that copyright infringement does have some effect on those jobs, but any number of industries are both bigger and employ more people than the entertainment industry. The only consolation in this whole affair is that the Vice President, Joe Biden, is chairing the summit (which practically ensures that nothing useful is going to come of it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are any number of more pressing matters currently facing our nation and the Obama administration is wasting their time with Hollywood moguls ?
This demonstrates yet again that the Obama administration has a rather tenuous grasp of what the American people consider to be important .
The economy is in the toilet , we are engaged in two major wars ( or as they like to call them in the Obama administration , " overseas contingency operations " ) , and we are still hemorrhaging jobs .
In fact , the number one issue with most Americans right now is JOBS .
Just about every American either knows someone who has lost their job , fears losing their own , or in fact has already lost it .
This has an effect similar to a giant parachute retarding the acceleration of economic growth necessary for a full recovery.The Obama administration , if it cares at all about its own political survival , has got to stop the bleeding on jobs or their goose will be cooked in the 2010 congressional elections and they can kiss a second term goodbye .
I suppose it could be argued that Hollywood does produce some jobs and that copyright infringement does have some effect on those jobs , but any number of industries are both bigger and employ more people than the entertainment industry .
The only consolation in this whole affair is that the Vice President , Joe Biden , is chairing the summit ( which practically ensures that nothing useful is going to come of it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are any number of more pressing matters currently facing our nation and the Obama administration is wasting their time with Hollywood moguls?
This demonstrates yet again that the Obama administration has a rather tenuous grasp of what the American people consider to be important.
The economy is in the toilet, we are engaged in two major wars (or as they like to call them in the Obama administration, "overseas contingency operations"), and we are still hemorrhaging jobs.
In fact, the number one issue with most Americans right now is JOBS.
Just about every American either knows someone who has lost their job, fears losing their own, or in fact has already lost it.
This has an effect similar to a giant parachute retarding the acceleration of economic growth necessary for a full recovery.The Obama administration, if it cares at all about its own political survival, has got to stop the bleeding on jobs or their goose will be cooked in the 2010 congressional elections and they can kiss a second term goodbye.
I suppose it could be argued that Hollywood does produce some jobs and that copyright infringement does have some effect on those jobs, but any number of industries are both bigger and employ more people than the entertainment industry.
The only consolation in this whole affair is that the Vice President, Joe Biden, is chairing the summit (which practically ensures that nothing useful is going to come of it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451082</id>
	<title>http://SHIP.BayWords.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260876780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BIDEN:</p><p>There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal (non-economic) environment.</p><p>YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS' POPULATION.</p><p>I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately, this is not the first time I've had to call you directly.</p><p>http://SHIP.BayWords.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BIDEN : There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal ( non-economic ) environment.YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS , CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS ' POPULATION.I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately , this is not the first time I 've had to call you directly.http : //SHIP.BayWords.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BIDEN:There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal (non-economic) environment.YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS' POPULATION.I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately, this is not the first time I've had to call you directly.http://SHIP.BayWords.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451136</id>
	<title>privacy summit?</title>
	<author>CSEMike</author>
	<datestamp>1260877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>perhaps someday privacy will be a concern, in addition to piracy. Until then, use <a href="https://oneswarm.cs.washington.edu/" title="washington.edu" rel="nofollow">OneSwarm</a> [washington.edu].</htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps someday privacy will be a concern , in addition to piracy .
Until then , use OneSwarm [ washington.edu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps someday privacy will be a concern, in addition to piracy.
Until then, use OneSwarm [washington.edu].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452106</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1260882000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.</p><p>And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.</p></div><p>No, but governments can make life unbearable in its pursuit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As we said early on , and have continually been proven right , Information just wants to be free.And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.No , but governments can make life unbearable in its pursuit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.No, but governments can make life unbearable in its pursuit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451608</id>
	<title>It doesn't help when we refer to it as piracy</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1260879360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do we on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ continue to perpetrate the lie? This is not piracy. It is copyright infringement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do we on ./ continue to perpetrate the lie ?
This is not piracy .
It is copyright infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do we on ./ continue to perpetrate the lie?
This is not piracy.
It is copyright infringement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456820</id>
	<title>How about $5 off coupons for 15 million people?</title>
	<author>osopolar</author>
	<datestamp>1259678760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about $5 off coupons for 15 million people, that way people can pay about $5 per movie - about what they are worth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about $ 5 off coupons for 15 million people , that way people can pay about $ 5 per movie - about what they are worth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about $5 off coupons for 15 million people, that way people can pay about $5 per movie - about what they are worth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450490</id>
	<title>Re:!change</title>
	<author>Beelzebud</author>
	<datestamp>1260874260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why post that when it's so much more fun to watch you knock down strawmen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why post that when it 's so much more fun to watch you knock down strawmen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why post that when it's so much more fun to watch you knock down strawmen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450558</id>
	<title>Re:!change</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1260874560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll find very few people here who ever worshiped the Obamassiah. It's no secret that the Dems are just as much in the pocket of the media companies as the Republicans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll find very few people here who ever worshiped the Obamassiah .
It 's no secret that the Dems are just as much in the pocket of the media companies as the Republicans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll find very few people here who ever worshiped the Obamassiah.
It's no secret that the Dems are just as much in the pocket of the media companies as the Republicans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451466</id>
	<title>Re:Piracy at sea</title>
	<author>poopdeville</author>
	<datestamp>1260878580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already a known solution for the Somalia piracy problem.  Europe needs to control its mafias, so that they stop dumping toxic waste in Somali waters.  Europe also needs to reign in its fisheries, which are illegally trawling off of Somalia.  Between these, there's no fish left for Somali fishermen.  The vast majority of pirates are hungry fishermen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a known solution for the Somalia piracy problem .
Europe needs to control its mafias , so that they stop dumping toxic waste in Somali waters .
Europe also needs to reign in its fisheries , which are illegally trawling off of Somalia .
Between these , there 's no fish left for Somali fishermen .
The vast majority of pirates are hungry fishermen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a known solution for the Somalia piracy problem.
Europe needs to control its mafias, so that they stop dumping toxic waste in Somali waters.
Europe also needs to reign in its fisheries, which are illegally trawling off of Somalia.
Between these, there's no fish left for Somali fishermen.
The vast majority of pirates are hungry fishermen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451194</id>
	<title>Though Entertainment Media is Commerce Only...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260877260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Biden:</p><p>There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal (non-economic) environment.</p><p>YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS' POPULATION.</p><p>I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately, this is not the first time I've had to call you directly.</p><p>And check your pegged budgets: http://ship.baywords.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Biden : There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal ( non-economic ) environment.YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS , CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS ' POPULATION.I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately , this is not the first time I 've had to call you directly.And check your pegged budgets : http : //ship.baywords.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Biden:There is a major difference between issues of theft and counterfeit in the commerce sector versus legitimate use in an educational and personal (non-economic) environment.YOU STILL FAIL TO MAKE CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, CHOOSING TO SUPPORT ORGANIZED CRIME OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLDS' POPULATION.I strongly suggest you fix your policy and approach immediately, this is not the first time I've had to call you directly.And check your pegged budgets: http://ship.baywords.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30511172</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>Kethinov</author>
	<datestamp>1261404900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work</p></div></blockquote><p>If you truly want information to be free, then you should be advocating the legalization of all noncommercial copyright infringement. All this fussing about the length of copyright is completely irrelevant and arbitrary. I don't care if copyright lasts for four thousand years if noncommercial infringement is legal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the workIf you truly want information to be free , then you should be advocating the legalization of all noncommercial copyright infringement .
All this fussing about the length of copyright is completely irrelevant and arbitrary .
I do n't care if copyright lasts for four thousand years if noncommercial infringement is legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the workIf you truly want information to be free, then you should be advocating the legalization of all noncommercial copyright infringement.
All this fussing about the length of copyright is completely irrelevant and arbitrary.
I don't care if copyright lasts for four thousand years if noncommercial infringement is legal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450996</id>
	<title>Now we know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260876300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where to drop a bomb to rid us of all of the MPAA Assholes in one shot.  It gets the RIAA as well.  Sweet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where to drop a bomb to rid us of all of the MPAA Assholes in one shot .
It gets the RIAA as well .
Sweet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where to drop a bomb to rid us of all of the MPAA Assholes in one shot.
It gets the RIAA as well.
Sweet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742</id>
	<title>Wrong way round</title>
	<author>newhoggy</author>
	<datestamp>1260875160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC"</p><p>should be</p><p>"Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood"</p><p>It's your political system that's broken - not Hollywood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC " should be " Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood " It 's your political system that 's broken - not Hollywood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC"should be"Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood"It's your political system that's broken - not Hollywood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455284</id>
	<title>And in this corner, weighing in /w only 5 members</title>
	<author>freescv</author>
	<datestamp>1259665380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well we'll have OUR OWN MEETINGS,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/w black jack, and hookers!<br>
<br>
Seriously tho, "Who is representing the consumer's interests?" is the exact reason I logged in and am gonna get 4 hours of glorious sleep tonight.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<br>
<br>
I love when I can't HELP logging in b/c of great posts like this. Ya, they cheat to steal votes, they buy whomever wins who didn't cheat. They exclusively listen to lobbyists and corps over their own people.<br>
<br>
I believe it's fair these guys get THEIR shot. Their voices heard. It's the exclusiveness that bothers me.<br>
<br>
<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...it bothered me enough to shell out 15 bucks in tribute to Linux and Open Source code:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.opensourceg.com/" title="opensourceg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensourceg.com/</a> [opensourceg.com] <br>
<br>
Just a garbageman who's got a dream. That one day all men's voices will be heard equally. That we will have a vote on EVERY decision THEY get a vote on as 7 billion humans on earth, without color of skin, without nationality, without rich stealing 99\% of the vote for the win, every time.<br>
<br>
I'm advocating for daily voting, transparency in government, and talk about what people'd vote for WHEN we get a vote.<br>
<br>
Voting every 5 years? People still DO THAT? WHY? We both know your vote will be bought 3 days after elections. That's our problem here, it's not Hollywood's fault as another pointed out, it's our govt not being biased for these corps.<br>
<br>
Jobs, how small of them to think of that. They'll STILL have work, people will still visit movie theatres. It's basically a tax for putting your stuff public.<br>
<br>
Anyways, even if it WAS theft (which it's not, it's copying files) I'd LOVE to see 330,000,000+ people's vote (Mexicans should get a vote too damnit!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P)<br>
<br>
Love to see how many wouldn't really CARE that these greedy companies lose money to personal downloads. I bet it's over 50\%.<br>
<br>
They can have private meetings that all the cool kids aren't allowed to go to. Those cool kids (and all the people sue'd or angry at the industry for it's criminal practices) will be pushed to the enemy camp of freedom, democracy, and P2P file sharing.<br>
<br>
Site's been up for 2 weeks, it's getting about 50 hits/day, seen it viewed in the following countries so far:<br>
Canada<br>
USA<br>
Japan<br>
Russia<br>
France<br>
United Kingdom<br>
&amp; China<br>
<br>
Now everyone planet wide is getting squashed atm. I don't claim to have a daily voting machine btw, just pushing for one, would love it in open source, somehow online and locked out from double voting, white hats guarding it, black hats attacking it's enemies world wide, and more powerful with people's stats/voting power then any one government.<br>
<br>
Well I never got the html skills down nor can I code, I just know Firefox was great for browsing.<br>
Then I found Ubuntu Linux and LOVED IT! (live add/remove programs ROCKS, so does banshee music player)<br>
<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...so the next step of "what's important to me???" seemed to be Open Source Government<br>
<br>
Love some advise, comments sure would make the site better (my own sandbox no one plays in yet. lmao). I'm also not sure of all the awesome aps or plugins osg COULD have (not even "my" site so much as ANY 3rd part that's NOT the US govt running it, you know, people who still have credibility and public trust)<br>
<br>
Soon as someone actually makes it I'll be RIGHT THERE to link to it!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<br>
<br>
Free SCV</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well we 'll have OUR OWN MEETINGS , /w black jack , and hookers !
Seriously tho , " Who is representing the consumer 's interests ?
" is the exact reason I logged in and am gon na get 4 hours of glorious sleep tonight .
: D I love when I ca n't HELP logging in b/c of great posts like this .
Ya , they cheat to steal votes , they buy whomever wins who did n't cheat .
They exclusively listen to lobbyists and corps over their own people .
I believe it 's fair these guys get THEIR shot .
Their voices heard .
It 's the exclusiveness that bothers me .
...it bothered me enough to shell out 15 bucks in tribute to Linux and Open Source code : http : //www.opensourceg.com/ [ opensourceg.com ] Just a garbageman who 's got a dream .
That one day all men 's voices will be heard equally .
That we will have a vote on EVERY decision THEY get a vote on as 7 billion humans on earth , without color of skin , without nationality , without rich stealing 99 \ % of the vote for the win , every time .
I 'm advocating for daily voting , transparency in government , and talk about what people 'd vote for WHEN we get a vote .
Voting every 5 years ?
People still DO THAT ?
WHY ? We both know your vote will be bought 3 days after elections .
That 's our problem here , it 's not Hollywood 's fault as another pointed out , it 's our govt not being biased for these corps .
Jobs , how small of them to think of that .
They 'll STILL have work , people will still visit movie theatres .
It 's basically a tax for putting your stuff public .
Anyways , even if it WAS theft ( which it 's not , it 's copying files ) I 'd LOVE to see 330,000,000 + people 's vote ( Mexicans should get a vote too damnit !
: P ) Love to see how many would n't really CARE that these greedy companies lose money to personal downloads .
I bet it 's over 50 \ % .
They can have private meetings that all the cool kids are n't allowed to go to .
Those cool kids ( and all the people sue 'd or angry at the industry for it 's criminal practices ) will be pushed to the enemy camp of freedom , democracy , and P2P file sharing .
Site 's been up for 2 weeks , it 's getting about 50 hits/day , seen it viewed in the following countries so far : Canada USA Japan Russia France United Kingdom &amp; China Now everyone planet wide is getting squashed atm .
I do n't claim to have a daily voting machine btw , just pushing for one , would love it in open source , somehow online and locked out from double voting , white hats guarding it , black hats attacking it 's enemies world wide , and more powerful with people 's stats/voting power then any one government .
Well I never got the html skills down nor can I code , I just know Firefox was great for browsing .
Then I found Ubuntu Linux and LOVED IT !
( live add/remove programs ROCKS , so does banshee music player ) ...so the next step of " what 's important to me ? ? ?
" seemed to be Open Source Government Love some advise , comments sure would make the site better ( my own sandbox no one plays in yet .
lmao ) . I 'm also not sure of all the awesome aps or plugins osg COULD have ( not even " my " site so much as ANY 3rd part that 's NOT the US govt running it , you know , people who still have credibility and public trust ) Soon as someone actually makes it I 'll be RIGHT THERE to link to it !
: D Free SCV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well we'll have OUR OWN MEETINGS, /w black jack, and hookers!
Seriously tho, "Who is representing the consumer's interests?
" is the exact reason I logged in and am gonna get 4 hours of glorious sleep tonight.
:D

I love when I can't HELP logging in b/c of great posts like this.
Ya, they cheat to steal votes, they buy whomever wins who didn't cheat.
They exclusively listen to lobbyists and corps over their own people.
I believe it's fair these guys get THEIR shot.
Their voices heard.
It's the exclusiveness that bothers me.
...it bothered me enough to shell out 15 bucks in tribute to Linux and Open Source code:

http://www.opensourceg.com/ [opensourceg.com] 

Just a garbageman who's got a dream.
That one day all men's voices will be heard equally.
That we will have a vote on EVERY decision THEY get a vote on as 7 billion humans on earth, without color of skin, without nationality, without rich stealing 99\% of the vote for the win, every time.
I'm advocating for daily voting, transparency in government, and talk about what people'd vote for WHEN we get a vote.
Voting every 5 years?
People still DO THAT?
WHY? We both know your vote will be bought 3 days after elections.
That's our problem here, it's not Hollywood's fault as another pointed out, it's our govt not being biased for these corps.
Jobs, how small of them to think of that.
They'll STILL have work, people will still visit movie theatres.
It's basically a tax for putting your stuff public.
Anyways, even if it WAS theft (which it's not, it's copying files) I'd LOVE to see 330,000,000+ people's vote (Mexicans should get a vote too damnit!
:P)

Love to see how many wouldn't really CARE that these greedy companies lose money to personal downloads.
I bet it's over 50\%.
They can have private meetings that all the cool kids aren't allowed to go to.
Those cool kids (and all the people sue'd or angry at the industry for it's criminal practices) will be pushed to the enemy camp of freedom, democracy, and P2P file sharing.
Site's been up for 2 weeks, it's getting about 50 hits/day, seen it viewed in the following countries so far:
Canada
USA
Japan
Russia
France
United Kingdom
&amp; China

Now everyone planet wide is getting squashed atm.
I don't claim to have a daily voting machine btw, just pushing for one, would love it in open source, somehow online and locked out from double voting, white hats guarding it, black hats attacking it's enemies world wide, and more powerful with people's stats/voting power then any one government.
Well I never got the html skills down nor can I code, I just know Firefox was great for browsing.
Then I found Ubuntu Linux and LOVED IT!
(live add/remove programs ROCKS, so does banshee music player)
 ...so the next step of "what's important to me???
" seemed to be Open Source Government

Love some advise, comments sure would make the site better (my own sandbox no one plays in yet.
lmao). I'm also not sure of all the awesome aps or plugins osg COULD have (not even "my" site so much as ANY 3rd part that's NOT the US govt running it, you know, people who still have credibility and public trust)

Soon as someone actually makes it I'll be RIGHT THERE to link to it!
:D

Free SCV</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</id>
	<title>Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>WillAffleckUW</author>
	<datestamp>1260874860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.</p><p>And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.</p><p>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As we said early on , and have continually been proven right , Information just wants to be free.And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work , remove patent protection for software , and let 's get back to creating and away from lining CEO 's pockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we said early on, and have continually been proven right, Information just wants to be free.And no amount of trying to stop that will end up working in the end.Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451980</id>
	<title>Re:Full text</title>
	<author>sharkbiter</author>
	<datestamp>1260881280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In short, 30 million tax payer dollars are going into this effort. I can think of a lot of better things that 30 million dollars could go into instead of a few individuals' bank accounts. As a tax payer, I insist that the Music Companies pay a reward to the hard working people who made it possible for them to do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In short , 30 million tax payer dollars are going into this effort .
I can think of a lot of better things that 30 million dollars could go into instead of a few individuals ' bank accounts .
As a tax payer , I insist that the Music Companies pay a reward to the hard working people who made it possible for them to do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In short, 30 million tax payer dollars are going into this effort.
I can think of a lot of better things that 30 million dollars could go into instead of a few individuals' bank accounts.
As a tax payer, I insist that the Music Companies pay a reward to the hard working people who made it possible for them to do this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452186</id>
	<title>Planning the invasion of Canada</title>
	<author>martijnd</author>
	<datestamp>1260882420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Michael Geist points out , these executives owe Canadian musicians 6 billion CA$.....</p><p>http://www.thestar.com/business/article/735096--geist-record-industry-faces-liability-over-infringement</p><p>No wonder that they need a little strategic "planning" at the white house.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Michael Geist points out , these executives owe Canadian musicians 6 billion CA $ .....http : //www.thestar.com/business/article/735096--geist-record-industry-faces-liability-over-infringementNo wonder that they need a little strategic " planning " at the white house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Michael Geist points out , these executives owe Canadian musicians 6 billion CA$.....http://www.thestar.com/business/article/735096--geist-record-industry-faces-liability-over-infringementNo wonder that they need a little strategic "planning" at the white house.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455652</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1259669340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way things are going, the punishment for actual piracy and stealing a boat-load of DVD's and selling them on the blackmarket, will be less than the average Torrent downloader gets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way things are going , the punishment for actual piracy and stealing a boat-load of DVD 's and selling them on the blackmarket , will be less than the average Torrent downloader gets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way things are going, the punishment for actual piracy and stealing a boat-load of DVD's and selling them on the blackmarket, will be less than the average Torrent downloader gets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451274</id>
	<title>Piracy at sea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260877680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was I the only one who hoped this was an effort to address the real issue of pirates off the coast of Somalia?  Millions of dollars in ransoms being funneled into black markets and mafias.  That sounds to me like a bigger problem for our security.

Somehow that seems like a more important issue for the Federal Government to deal with.  You know, provide for the common defense and all.

My mistake, its just a power grab by big corporations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was I the only one who hoped this was an effort to address the real issue of pirates off the coast of Somalia ?
Millions of dollars in ransoms being funneled into black markets and mafias .
That sounds to me like a bigger problem for our security .
Somehow that seems like a more important issue for the Federal Government to deal with .
You know , provide for the common defense and all .
My mistake , its just a power grab by big corporations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was I the only one who hoped this was an effort to address the real issue of pirates off the coast of Somalia?
Millions of dollars in ransoms being funneled into black markets and mafias.
That sounds to me like a bigger problem for our security.
Somehow that seems like a more important issue for the Federal Government to deal with.
You know, provide for the common defense and all.
My mistake, its just a power grab by big corporations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455706</id>
	<title>Re:And as usual......</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1259669760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who is representing the consumer's interests?</p></div><p>Nobody is representing your interests if you call yourself  "consumer", other than the companies that want to sell to you. A consumer's interest is only to consume, so why would a consumer have any problem with meetings like this? After all, the aim is to benefit the companies that feed the consumers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is representing the consumer 's interests ? Nobody is representing your interests if you call yourself " consumer " , other than the companies that want to sell to you .
A consumer 's interest is only to consume , so why would a consumer have any problem with meetings like this ?
After all , the aim is to benefit the companies that feed the consumers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is representing the consumer's interests?Nobody is representing your interests if you call yourself  "consumer", other than the companies that want to sell to you.
A consumer's interest is only to consume, so why would a consumer have any problem with meetings like this?
After all, the aim is to benefit the companies that feed the consumers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451440</id>
	<title>Thank God!</title>
	<author>Croakus</author>
	<datestamp>1260878460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad to see that the Obama administration cares about protecting the rights of creators and I hope something positive can come out of this meeting that benefits BOTH sides of the equation.  I'm sick and damn tired of hearing stories of insane RIAA lawsuits against teenage girls, but I'm even more tired of watching people take and enjoy the fruits of an artists labor without due respect and compensation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad to see that the Obama administration cares about protecting the rights of creators and I hope something positive can come out of this meeting that benefits BOTH sides of the equation .
I 'm sick and damn tired of hearing stories of insane RIAA lawsuits against teenage girls , but I 'm even more tired of watching people take and enjoy the fruits of an artists labor without due respect and compensation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad to see that the Obama administration cares about protecting the rights of creators and I hope something positive can come out of this meeting that benefits BOTH sides of the equation.
I'm sick and damn tired of hearing stories of insane RIAA lawsuits against teenage girls, but I'm even more tired of watching people take and enjoy the fruits of an artists labor without due respect and compensation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452084</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong way round</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1260881820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too true.  Hollywood was instrumental in getting Obama elected, and as a reward, he created a new, entirely pointless, position of "Hollywood Liason" that he gave to Kal Penn to repay him for all the hard work he did in getting Obama elected.  That's why I laugh when Democrats complain about corruption with Republican politicians while they cheer on the corruption among Democrat politicians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too true .
Hollywood was instrumental in getting Obama elected , and as a reward , he created a new , entirely pointless , position of " Hollywood Liason " that he gave to Kal Penn to repay him for all the hard work he did in getting Obama elected .
That 's why I laugh when Democrats complain about corruption with Republican politicians while they cheer on the corruption among Democrat politicians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too true.
Hollywood was instrumental in getting Obama elected, and as a reward, he created a new, entirely pointless, position of "Hollywood Liason" that he gave to Kal Penn to repay him for all the hard work he did in getting Obama elected.
That's why I laugh when Democrats complain about corruption with Republican politicians while they cheer on the corruption among Democrat politicians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451044</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong way round</title>
	<author>Rayonic</author>
	<datestamp>1260876600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC"</p><p>"Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood"</p></div><p>Ha, sounds like the Republican vs. Democratic versions of the relationship.  Kind of a lame "In Soviet Russia..." style joke.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC " " Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood " Ha , sounds like the Republican vs. Democratic versions of the relationship .
Kind of a lame " In Soviet Russia... " style joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hollywood once again demonstrates its close ties to Washington DC""Washington DC once again demonstrates its close ties to Hollywood"Ha, sounds like the Republican vs. Democratic versions of the relationship.
Kind of a lame "In Soviet Russia..." style joke.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451106</id>
	<title>jews</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260876900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>get back to the oven kikes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>get back to the oven kikes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>get back to the oven kikes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451220</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>chucklebutte</author>
	<datestamp>1260877320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>^ what this guy said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>^ what this guy said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>^ what this guy said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453112</id>
	<title>Re:Fair and Balanced</title>
	<author>MeNeXT</author>
	<datestamp>1260889140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get labor out of your sentence. Nobody cares about the common folk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get labor out of your sentence .
Nobody cares about the common folk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get labor out of your sentence.
Nobody cares about the common folk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451486</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260878700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the hell not? It's not like they don't ignore international treaties at will in other cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the hell not ?
It 's not like they do n't ignore international treaties at will in other cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the hell not?
It's not like they don't ignore international treaties at will in other cases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</id>
	<title>!Piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260882060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the 88th Time:</p><p>Piracy is ship to ship armed robbery. Calling copyright infringement piracy makes light of murderous thugs, and makes infringement sound worse than it is. It doesn't even work as a metaphor. When we use their misnomer, they win. Then one of two things will happen. Either infringers will be demonized people sharing 1s and 0s or the word piracy will lose its gravity.</p><p>Cue the "langwijiz morf, get/it" crowd.</p><p>And yeah, get off my lawn, or whatever other dismissiveness you want to conjure. Disagree all you want, but try to do it without dismissing me as pedantic or a grammar nazi. Try some substance.</p><p>Language matters; word choice matters. All actions start as thoughts, thoughts happen in words. By calling a government a regime, we can make overthrowing it more palatable. By calling a person a kike, nigger, rag head, witch etc, we can make them not human, so killing them won't be murder. Hacker was a positive term. The "man" (media, law, etc) has corrupted the word hacker to refer to criminals. It's like calling Nazis German over and over until the word German means Nazi. When we blur the distinction between words we lose expressiveness and have to invent awkward ways to regain specificity that we threw away out of laziness and ignorance. Yeah languages change over time, but there is evolution and there is devolution and corruption. Change is not inherently good.</p><p>And stand up for yourselves.</p><p>Last time you guys modded this "redundant", let's see if you do better this time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the 88th Time : Piracy is ship to ship armed robbery .
Calling copyright infringement piracy makes light of murderous thugs , and makes infringement sound worse than it is .
It does n't even work as a metaphor .
When we use their misnomer , they win .
Then one of two things will happen .
Either infringers will be demonized people sharing 1s and 0s or the word piracy will lose its gravity.Cue the " langwijiz morf , get/it " crowd.And yeah , get off my lawn , or whatever other dismissiveness you want to conjure .
Disagree all you want , but try to do it without dismissing me as pedantic or a grammar nazi .
Try some substance.Language matters ; word choice matters .
All actions start as thoughts , thoughts happen in words .
By calling a government a regime , we can make overthrowing it more palatable .
By calling a person a kike , nigger , rag head , witch etc , we can make them not human , so killing them wo n't be murder .
Hacker was a positive term .
The " man " ( media , law , etc ) has corrupted the word hacker to refer to criminals .
It 's like calling Nazis German over and over until the word German means Nazi .
When we blur the distinction between words we lose expressiveness and have to invent awkward ways to regain specificity that we threw away out of laziness and ignorance .
Yeah languages change over time , but there is evolution and there is devolution and corruption .
Change is not inherently good.And stand up for yourselves.Last time you guys modded this " redundant " , let 's see if you do better this time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the 88th Time:Piracy is ship to ship armed robbery.
Calling copyright infringement piracy makes light of murderous thugs, and makes infringement sound worse than it is.
It doesn't even work as a metaphor.
When we use their misnomer, they win.
Then one of two things will happen.
Either infringers will be demonized people sharing 1s and 0s or the word piracy will lose its gravity.Cue the "langwijiz morf, get/it" crowd.And yeah, get off my lawn, or whatever other dismissiveness you want to conjure.
Disagree all you want, but try to do it without dismissing me as pedantic or a grammar nazi.
Try some substance.Language matters; word choice matters.
All actions start as thoughts, thoughts happen in words.
By calling a government a regime, we can make overthrowing it more palatable.
By calling a person a kike, nigger, rag head, witch etc, we can make them not human, so killing them won't be murder.
Hacker was a positive term.
The "man" (media, law, etc) has corrupted the word hacker to refer to criminals.
It's like calling Nazis German over and over until the word German means Nazi.
When we blur the distinction between words we lose expressiveness and have to invent awkward ways to regain specificity that we threw away out of laziness and ignorance.
Yeah languages change over time, but there is evolution and there is devolution and corruption.
Change is not inherently good.And stand up for yourselves.Last time you guys modded this "redundant", let's see if you do better this time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450812</id>
	<title>Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260875400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders"</p><p>The law won't discriminate.  Neither will the lawyers.</p><p>If they write it, someone will sue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers , not individual downloaders " The law wo n't discriminate .
Neither will the lawyers.If they write it , someone will sue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" the sort of intellectual property criminals they are interested in are large-scale DVD bootleggers, not individual downloaders"The law won't discriminate.
Neither will the lawyers.If they write it, someone will sue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451598</id>
	<title>Rightful ownership of information</title>
	<author>spikenerd</author>
	<datestamp>1260879300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Copyright doesn't just grant ownership to the creator. It grants him the right to give copies to other people and still tell them what they're allowed to do with them. That is not some inherent right. It requires lots of laws and government infrastructure to make it work. Consequently, even the content creator should not really "own" what he creates. All of us that help pay for the infrastructure to make that work with our taxes deserve a piece of that ownership. That's what the public domain is all about. When they extended Copyright, they robbed many years worth of valuable content from the public that rightly owns it. As one who was blatantly robbed of my rightful property by my government, am I supposed to now be happy about them cracking down on people that copy information? I think not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Copyright does n't just grant ownership to the creator .
It grants him the right to give copies to other people and still tell them what they 're allowed to do with them .
That is not some inherent right .
It requires lots of laws and government infrastructure to make it work .
Consequently , even the content creator should not really " own " what he creates .
All of us that help pay for the infrastructure to make that work with our taxes deserve a piece of that ownership .
That 's what the public domain is all about .
When they extended Copyright , they robbed many years worth of valuable content from the public that rightly owns it .
As one who was blatantly robbed of my rightful property by my government , am I supposed to now be happy about them cracking down on people that copy information ?
I think not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Copyright doesn't just grant ownership to the creator.
It grants him the right to give copies to other people and still tell them what they're allowed to do with them.
That is not some inherent right.
It requires lots of laws and government infrastructure to make it work.
Consequently, even the content creator should not really "own" what he creates.
All of us that help pay for the infrastructure to make that work with our taxes deserve a piece of that ownership.
That's what the public domain is all about.
When they extended Copyright, they robbed many years worth of valuable content from the public that rightly owns it.
As one who was blatantly robbed of my rightful property by my government, am I supposed to now be happy about them cracking down on people that copy information?
I think not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452318</id>
	<title>PRO-IP Act</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260883380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to wikipedia the history of the law that ties Obama into appointing a copyright czar is:</p><p><i>"On 2007-12-05 introduced into the House of Representatives by John Conyers. [3]<br>On 2008-05-08 the House of Representatives passed the bill 410 to 11. 2008 Presidential candidates Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are among those who voted against the bill.[4][5] The Senate bill was S 3325.[6]<br>On 2008-10-13 President George W. Bush signed the bill into law."</i></p><p>More crap being blamed on Obama yet again on Slashdot? What is with you guys? I'm no Obama fan but I don't blindly point fingers at others either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to wikipedia the history of the law that ties Obama into appointing a copyright czar is : " On 2007-12-05 introduced into the House of Representatives by John Conyers .
[ 3 ] On 2008-05-08 the House of Representatives passed the bill 410 to 11 .
2008 Presidential candidates Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are among those who voted against the bill .
[ 4 ] [ 5 ] The Senate bill was S 3325 .
[ 6 ] On 2008-10-13 President George W. Bush signed the bill into law .
" More crap being blamed on Obama yet again on Slashdot ?
What is with you guys ?
I 'm no Obama fan but I do n't blindly point fingers at others either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to wikipedia the history of the law that ties Obama into appointing a copyright czar is:"On 2007-12-05 introduced into the House of Representatives by John Conyers.
[3]On 2008-05-08 the House of Representatives passed the bill 410 to 11.
2008 Presidential candidates Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are among those who voted against the bill.
[4][5] The Senate bill was S 3325.
[6]On 2008-10-13 President George W. Bush signed the bill into law.
"More crap being blamed on Obama yet again on Slashdot?
What is with you guys?
I'm no Obama fan but I don't blindly point fingers at others either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30454716</id>
	<title>Piracy summit?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1259698080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama is finally paying attention to piracy? Just a few months ago he didn't care a whit about it. See:</p><p><a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1637109/obamas\_somali\_pirate\_hostage\_crisis.html" title="associatedcontent.com">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1637109/obamas\_somali\_pirate\_hostage\_crisis.html</a> [associatedcontent.com]</p><p>Oh, you mean "piracy"[sic] not piracy. Sorry, my bad. Now I understand why Obama is so concerned; guns and gonads are not involved in helping save lives where "piracy"[sic] is concerned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama is finally paying attention to piracy ?
Just a few months ago he did n't care a whit about it .
See : http : //www.associatedcontent.com/article/1637109/obamas \ _somali \ _pirate \ _hostage \ _crisis.html [ associatedcontent.com ] Oh , you mean " piracy " [ sic ] not piracy .
Sorry , my bad .
Now I understand why Obama is so concerned ; guns and gonads are not involved in helping save lives where " piracy " [ sic ] is concerned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama is finally paying attention to piracy?
Just a few months ago he didn't care a whit about it.
See:http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1637109/obamas\_somali\_pirate\_hostage\_crisis.html [associatedcontent.com]Oh, you mean "piracy"[sic] not piracy.
Sorry, my bad.
Now I understand why Obama is so concerned; guns and gonads are not involved in helping save lives where "piracy"[sic] is concerned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456038</id>
	<title>Re:!Piracy</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1259672580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+10</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+10</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178</id>
	<title>Re:Information just wants to be free</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1260877200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.</p></div><p>Copyright was never 17 years.<br>It started out as 14 years + a 14 year renewal.<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_copyright\_law#History" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_copyright\_law#History</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Anyways, <b>the USA can't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work , remove patent protection for software , and let 's get back to creating and away from lining CEO 's pockets.Copyright was never 17 years.It started out as 14 years + a 14 year renewal.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United \ _States \ _copyright \ _law # History [ wikipedia.org ] Anyways , the USA ca n't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restore copyright to 17 years renewable only by the author of the work, remove patent protection for software, and let's get back to creating and away from lining CEO's pockets.Copyright was never 17 years.It started out as 14 years + a 14 year renewal.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_copyright\_law#History [wikipedia.org]Anyways, the USA can't make any meaningful changes to copyright law without going through the World Trade Organization.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782</id>
	<title>And as usual......</title>
	<author>netruner</author>
	<datestamp>1260875280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who is representing the consumer's interests?  Does any of these people have a grasp on topics such as "fair use" - you know, that thing that the DMCA wasn't supposed to hinder (DMCA sec 1201(C)(1)).  Well, I guess some do, but they're the ones trying to destroy that concept.<br> <br>
Reference: <a href="http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap12.html#1201" title="copyright.gov">http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap12.html#1201</a> [copyright.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is representing the consumer 's interests ?
Does any of these people have a grasp on topics such as " fair use " - you know , that thing that the DMCA was n't supposed to hinder ( DMCA sec 1201 ( C ) ( 1 ) ) .
Well , I guess some do , but they 're the ones trying to destroy that concept .
Reference : http : //www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap12.html # 1201 [ copyright.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is representing the consumer's interests?
Does any of these people have a grasp on topics such as "fair use" - you know, that thing that the DMCA wasn't supposed to hinder (DMCA sec 1201(C)(1)).
Well, I guess some do, but they're the ones trying to destroy that concept.
Reference: http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap12.html#1201 [copyright.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451308</id>
	<title>Should start with huge commercial organizations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260877860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CRIA is a huge violator. I suspect the RIAA is a similar violator. These organizations should be made to pay in full.</p><p>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87347/can-cria-recover-from-the-largest-copyright-infringment-case-in-canadian-history/</p><p>---<br>Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) was sued for $6 billion (not $60 billion as initially reported) for commercial copyright infringement. The case was only filed and already, it is seemingly beyond the point of damage control for CRIA. The question is, can CRIA recover from what may be the biggest blunder in its history?<br>--</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CRIA is a huge violator .
I suspect the RIAA is a similar violator .
These organizations should be made to pay in full.http : //www.zeropaid.com/news/87347/can-cria-recover-from-the-largest-copyright-infringment-case-in-canadian-history/---Canadian Recording Industry Association ( CRIA ) was sued for $ 6 billion ( not $ 60 billion as initially reported ) for commercial copyright infringement .
The case was only filed and already , it is seemingly beyond the point of damage control for CRIA .
The question is , can CRIA recover from what may be the biggest blunder in its history ? --</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CRIA is a huge violator.
I suspect the RIAA is a similar violator.
These organizations should be made to pay in full.http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87347/can-cria-recover-from-the-largest-copyright-infringment-case-in-canadian-history/---Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) was sued for $6 billion (not $60 billion as initially reported) for commercial copyright infringement.
The case was only filed and already, it is seemingly beyond the point of damage control for CRIA.
The question is, can CRIA recover from what may be the biggest blunder in its history?--</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398</id>
	<title>!change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amazing how the more things change the more they stay the same, isn't it?
</p><p>I can't wait to hear all of the partisans who rightfully complained about Dick Cheney's energy task force come out of the woodwork to tell us why this is "different".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing how the more things change the more they stay the same , is n't it ?
I ca n't wait to hear all of the partisans who rightfully complained about Dick Cheney 's energy task force come out of the woodwork to tell us why this is " different " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing how the more things change the more they stay the same, isn't it?
I can't wait to hear all of the partisans who rightfully complained about Dick Cheney's energy task force come out of the woodwork to tell us why this is "different".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30454868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30511172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30458248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30463568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_2113213_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30511172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451486
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30452124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30458248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30456468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30463568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30454868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30455706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_2113213.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30450882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30453112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_2113213.30451888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
