<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_15_1652236</id>
	<title>Project Honey Pot Traps Billionth Spam</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260898380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>EastDakota writes <i>"<a href="http://www.projecthoneypot.org/">Project Honey Pot</a> today announced that it had trapped its 1 billionth spammer. To celebrate, the team behind the largest community sourced project tracking online fraud and abuse released a <a href="http://www.projecthoneypot.org/1\_billionth\_spam\_message\_stats.php">full rundown of statistics on the last five years of spam</a>. Findings include: spam drops 21\% on Christmas Day and 32\% of New Year's Day; the most spam is sent on Mondays, the least on Saturdays; spammers found at least 956 different ways to spell VIAGRA (e.g., VIAGRA, V1AGRA, V1@GR@, V!AGRA, VIA6RA, etc.) in mail received by the Project; and much more."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>EastDakota writes " Project Honey Pot today announced that it had trapped its 1 billionth spammer .
To celebrate , the team behind the largest community sourced project tracking online fraud and abuse released a full rundown of statistics on the last five years of spam .
Findings include : spam drops 21 \ % on Christmas Day and 32 \ % of New Year 's Day ; the most spam is sent on Mondays , the least on Saturdays ; spammers found at least 956 different ways to spell VIAGRA ( e.g. , VIAGRA , V1AGRA , V1 @ GR @ , V ! AGRA , VIA6RA , etc .
) in mail received by the Project ; and much more .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EastDakota writes "Project Honey Pot today announced that it had trapped its 1 billionth spammer.
To celebrate, the team behind the largest community sourced project tracking online fraud and abuse released a full rundown of statistics on the last five years of spam.
Findings include: spam drops 21\% on Christmas Day and 32\% of New Year's Day; the most spam is sent on Mondays, the least on Saturdays; spammers found at least 956 different ways to spell VIAGRA (e.g., VIAGRA, V1AGRA, V1@GR@, V!AGRA, VIA6RA, etc.
) in mail received by the Project; and much more.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447090</id>
	<title>Time to celebrate with a song</title>
	<author>kbob88</author>
	<datestamp>1260903000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's celebrate with a song we all know: "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."</p><p>Now repeat 1 billion times...</p><p>(Sad to think that way more spam has been sent than the number of times that Monty Python sketch has been played; should be the other way around)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's celebrate with a song we all know : " Spam , spam , spam , spam , spam... " Now repeat 1 billion times... ( Sad to think that way more spam has been sent than the number of times that Monty Python sketch has been played ; should be the other way around )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's celebrate with a song we all know: "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."Now repeat 1 billion times...(Sad to think that way more spam has been sent than the number of times that Monty Python sketch has been played; should be the other way around)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448552</id>
	<title>Re:People fall for spam?</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1260908880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'd be surprised.  There are still people out there dipping their first toe in the Internet pool because they felt it was time that they learn this "email" thing for various reasons.  Those are precisely the people that spammers are targeting.
<br> <br>
That said, bulk email is very 1999, and the spammers know it.  The real goal these days is to try to get as many systems out there connected to botnets as possible and try to "force feed" as many people with spam as they possibly can.  The key is to fashion emails to look as concise as possible, and get your parents' and friends' computers to send that email to you instead of a complete stranger.  Suddenly, the basic spam defense tactics that we all know and live by go out the window.  Everyone's mom or dad has a mailing list for forwards, and that is a prime target.  If you got an email from your dad saying "I just made my own website!" and a link, you can bet there'd be at least a few kids who'd try to be good kids and click that link.  And they're always the ones who don't patch their systems up, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd be surprised .
There are still people out there dipping their first toe in the Internet pool because they felt it was time that they learn this " email " thing for various reasons .
Those are precisely the people that spammers are targeting .
That said , bulk email is very 1999 , and the spammers know it .
The real goal these days is to try to get as many systems out there connected to botnets as possible and try to " force feed " as many people with spam as they possibly can .
The key is to fashion emails to look as concise as possible , and get your parents ' and friends ' computers to send that email to you instead of a complete stranger .
Suddenly , the basic spam defense tactics that we all know and live by go out the window .
Everyone 's mom or dad has a mailing list for forwards , and that is a prime target .
If you got an email from your dad saying " I just made my own website !
" and a link , you can bet there 'd be at least a few kids who 'd try to be good kids and click that link .
And they 're always the ones who do n't patch their systems up , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd be surprised.
There are still people out there dipping their first toe in the Internet pool because they felt it was time that they learn this "email" thing for various reasons.
Those are precisely the people that spammers are targeting.
That said, bulk email is very 1999, and the spammers know it.
The real goal these days is to try to get as many systems out there connected to botnets as possible and try to "force feed" as many people with spam as they possibly can.
The key is to fashion emails to look as concise as possible, and get your parents' and friends' computers to send that email to you instead of a complete stranger.
Suddenly, the basic spam defense tactics that we all know and live by go out the window.
Everyone's mom or dad has a mailing list for forwards, and that is a prime target.
If you got an email from your dad saying "I just made my own website!
" and a link, you can bet there'd be at least a few kids who'd try to be good kids and click that link.
And they're always the ones who don't patch their systems up, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447318</id>
	<title>Re:People fall for spam?</title>
	<author>castironpigeon</author>
	<datestamp>1260903840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on "V1AGRA!11!!" links?</p></div><p>You're saying you don't know anybody who clicks on ads because they read "Click Here" ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on " V1AGRA ! 11 ! !
" links ? You 're saying you do n't know anybody who clicks on ads because they read " Click Here " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on "V1AGRA!11!!
" links?You're saying you don't know anybody who clicks on ads because they read "Click Here" ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447032</id>
	<title>Re:People fall for spam?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should reason the opposite way.</p><p>Knowing that spam gives benefit. Who are the people who fall on all those traps and how could we help them not to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should reason the opposite way.Knowing that spam gives benefit .
Who are the people who fall on all those traps and how could we help them not to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should reason the opposite way.Knowing that spam gives benefit.
Who are the people who fall on all those traps and how could we help them not to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448408</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for the info on misspelling Viagra</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1260908220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there even demand for the stuff?  I spend most of my time trying to get it down, not up.  Seems like an artificial way of getting it up would just create more problems than it solves...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there even demand for the stuff ?
I spend most of my time trying to get it down , not up .
Seems like an artificial way of getting it up would just create more problems than it solves.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there even demand for the stuff?
I spend most of my time trying to get it down, not up.
Seems like an artificial way of getting it up would just create more problems than it solves...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</id>
	<title>Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is spam even really spam anymore?</p><p>Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder, and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.</p><p>Nothing being sold, nothing being said... What's the point?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is spam even really spam anymore ? Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder , and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.Nothing being sold , nothing being said... What 's the point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is spam even really spam anymore?Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder, and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.Nothing being sold, nothing being said... What's the point?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446794</id>
	<title>Project Glory Hole Traps CmdrTaco</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Project Glory Hole has announced that it has trapped CmdrTaco.  To celebrate, the team behind this has posted pictures of CmdrTaco's micropenis across the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Project Glory Hole has announced that it has trapped CmdrTaco .
To celebrate , the team behind this has posted pictures of CmdrTaco 's micropenis across the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Project Glory Hole has announced that it has trapped CmdrTaco.
To celebrate, the team behind this has posted pictures of CmdrTaco's micropenis across the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449340</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260869700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is noise to confuse the Bayesian filters</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is noise to confuse the Bayesian filters</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is noise to confuse the Bayesian filters</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447478</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>randallman</author>
	<datestamp>1260904440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are training your spam filters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are training your spam filters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are training your spam filters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448604</id>
	<title>Re:The summary is wrong</title>
	<author>Logical Zebra</author>
	<datestamp>1260909120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for reading TFA and ruining all our fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for reading TFA and ruining all our fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for reading TFA and ruining all our fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446804</id>
	<title>And now, a Joke (FROSTY PISS!)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did the dead baby cross the road?  Cuz it was stapled to the chicken!
<br> <br>
Did you hear they're improving the transportation in Harlem?  Yeah, they're planting the trees closer together!
<br> <br>
What do you call a gay Jew?  A He-blew!
<br> <br>
How was copper wiring invented?  Two Jews fighting over a penny!
<br> <br>
How could you make a nigger commit suicide?  Toss a bucket of KFC into traffic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did the dead baby cross the road ?
Cuz it was stapled to the chicken !
Did you hear they 're improving the transportation in Harlem ?
Yeah , they 're planting the trees closer together !
What do you call a gay Jew ?
A He-blew !
How was copper wiring invented ?
Two Jews fighting over a penny !
How could you make a nigger commit suicide ?
Toss a bucket of KFC into traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did the dead baby cross the road?
Cuz it was stapled to the chicken!
Did you hear they're improving the transportation in Harlem?
Yeah, they're planting the trees closer together!
What do you call a gay Jew?
A He-blew!
How was copper wiring invented?
Two Jews fighting over a penny!
How could you make a nigger commit suicide?
Toss a bucket of KFC into traffic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447268</id>
	<title>Is anybody actually trapped by it?</title>
	<author>jfengel</author>
	<datestamp>1260903660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their web site claims, "We also work with law enforcement authorities to track down and prosecute spammers."  Have they actually prosecuted any spammers using this?</p><p>If it helps create better spam filters, yay.  But I'd really like to know if any spammers are being punished as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their web site claims , " We also work with law enforcement authorities to track down and prosecute spammers .
" Have they actually prosecuted any spammers using this ? If it helps create better spam filters , yay .
But I 'd really like to know if any spammers are being punished as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their web site claims, "We also work with law enforcement authorities to track down and prosecute spammers.
"  Have they actually prosecuted any spammers using this?If it helps create better spam filters, yay.
But I'd really like to know if any spammers are being punished as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990</id>
	<title>Maybe</title>
	<author>machinelou</author>
	<datestamp>1260902700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe now with a billion samples, we can start training people how to recognize it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe now with a billion samples , we can start training people how to recognize it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe now with a billion samples, we can start training people how to recognize it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451982</id>
	<title>Re:People fall for spam?</title>
	<author>armareum</author>
	<datestamp>1260881280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..your link doesn't work<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..your link does n't work : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..your link doesn't work :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448952</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>stevey</author>
	<datestamp>1260867660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Attempting to subvert bayasian filters such that future <i>real</i> spam can slip through more easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Attempting to subvert bayasian filters such that future real spam can slip through more easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Attempting to subvert bayasian filters such that future real spam can slip through more easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30462714</id>
	<title>Re:one billion spammers</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1259658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>99 billion burgers, not 99 billion people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>99 billion burgers , not 99 billion people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>99 billion burgers, not 99 billion people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448514</id>
	<title>Where's the list</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260908760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've only been able to come up with 796 versions of viagra. I'm sure there must be many more. Can I download the list? It would help in my work^h^h^hhobby...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've only been able to come up with 796 versions of viagra .
I 'm sure there must be many more .
Can I download the list ?
It would help in my work ^ h ^ h ^ hhobby.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've only been able to come up with 796 versions of viagra.
I'm sure there must be many more.
Can I download the list?
It would help in my work^h^h^hhobby...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30450728</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1260875100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe now with a billion samples, we can start training people how to recognize it.</p></div><p>Do you actually know anybody who's ever purchased something from SPAM?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe now with a billion samples , we can start training people how to recognize it.Do you actually know anybody who 's ever purchased something from SPAM ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe now with a billion samples, we can start training people how to recognize it.Do you actually know anybody who's ever purchased something from SPAM?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447534</id>
	<title>Legalize OTC Viagra ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260904680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Putting aside for a moment the potential medical issues, I wonder how much money would be saved in the US economy if we just legalized the selling of Viagra over the counter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Putting aside for a moment the potential medical issues , I wonder how much money would be saved in the US economy if we just legalized the selling of Viagra over the counter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Putting aside for a moment the potential medical issues, I wonder how much money would be saved in the US economy if we just legalized the selling of Viagra over the counter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449604</id>
	<title>Re:no ipV6</title>
	<author>Straterra</author>
	<datestamp>1260870840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really. Every end user is supposed to get a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/64. You could just block their<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/64 and accomplish pretty much the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
Every end user is supposed to get a /64 .
You could just block their /64 and accomplish pretty much the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
Every end user is supposed to get a /64.
You could just block their /64 and accomplish pretty much the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446802</id>
	<title>Spelling</title>
	<author>Foxxxy</author>
	<datestamp>1260902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have seen 945 of the spellings in my inbox just last week.... damn spammers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen 945 of the spellings in my inbox just last week.... damn spammers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen 945 of the spellings in my inbox just last week.... damn spammers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451846</id>
	<title>Re:Cost-benefit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260880500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam, it's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra.</p></div><p>Kill them with viagra? How can you be sure every spammer are male, need viagra and have a latent heart condition?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam , it 's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra.Kill them with viagra ?
How can you be sure every spammer are male , need viagra and have a latent heart condition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam, it's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra.Kill them with viagra?
How can you be sure every spammer are male, need viagra and have a latent heart condition?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453334</id>
	<title>Re:no ipV6</title>
	<author>JesseMcDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1260890940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would that be? You can block a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/64 just as easily as a single IP address. Sure, each end-user may have 2**64 separate addresses, but they'll all be within the same subnet. If a particular host is misbehaving you can just block their entire<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/64.</p><p>In fact, the lack of ubiquitous NAT should make it easier to block individual hosts without affecting non-offending customers of the same ISP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would that be ?
You can block a /64 just as easily as a single IP address .
Sure , each end-user may have 2 * * 64 separate addresses , but they 'll all be within the same subnet .
If a particular host is misbehaving you can just block their entire /64.In fact , the lack of ubiquitous NAT should make it easier to block individual hosts without affecting non-offending customers of the same ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would that be?
You can block a /64 just as easily as a single IP address.
Sure, each end-user may have 2**64 separate addresses, but they'll all be within the same subnet.
If a particular host is misbehaving you can just block their entire /64.In fact, the lack of ubiquitous NAT should make it easier to block individual hosts without affecting non-offending customers of the same ISP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447560</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1260904740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses, and it is just running out of control.</p></div><p>This.  It's not just about finding whether the email address is correct, though, it's also testing the junkmail filters -- seeing what words will get a domain on a blacklist and which will still get delivered or bounced at the directory level.  I learned this after researching why I got a promising email titled "TEENAGE GIRL HAS SEX WITH BAT!" only to open it up and find a disappointing message like "Gillette rosemary is talking sweet sound to hair bounces great.  Sounded of?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses , and it is just running out of control.This .
It 's not just about finding whether the email address is correct , though , it 's also testing the junkmail filters -- seeing what words will get a domain on a blacklist and which will still get delivered or bounced at the directory level .
I learned this after researching why I got a promising email titled " TEENAGE GIRL HAS SEX WITH BAT !
" only to open it up and find a disappointing message like " Gillette rosemary is talking sweet sound to hair bounces great .
Sounded of ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses, and it is just running out of control.This.
It's not just about finding whether the email address is correct, though, it's also testing the junkmail filters -- seeing what words will get a domain on a blacklist and which will still get delivered or bounced at the directory level.
I learned this after researching why I got a promising email titled "TEENAGE GIRL HAS SEX WITH BAT!
" only to open it up and find a disappointing message like "Gillette rosemary is talking sweet sound to hair bounces great.
Sounded of?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868</id>
	<title>no ipV6</title>
	<author>mabu</author>
	<datestamp>1260910440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most effective way of stopping spam thus far is using IP blacklisting.  It should be noted if the net moves to ipV6, that will be the end of blacklist effectiveness for some time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most effective way of stopping spam thus far is using IP blacklisting .
It should be noted if the net moves to ipV6 , that will be the end of blacklist effectiveness for some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most effective way of stopping spam thus far is using IP blacklisting.
It should be noted if the net moves to ipV6, that will be the end of blacklist effectiveness for some time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451592</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1260879300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is spam even really spam anymore?</p><p>Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder, and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.</p><p>Nothing being sold, nothing being said... What's the point?</p></div><p>Take heed to the lilly botanical before racing and suffer the pullback!<br> <br>
These puzzle me too. You know what I think it is? I think those are test messages sent by spammers--to test mail filters for which words trigger a junk mail alert.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is spam even really spam anymore ? Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder , and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.Nothing being sold , nothing being said... What 's the point ? Take heed to the lilly botanical before racing and suffer the pullback !
These puzzle me too .
You know what I think it is ?
I think those are test messages sent by spammers--to test mail filters for which words trigger a junk mail alert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is spam even really spam anymore?Every now and then I take a look at my gmail spam folder, and none of the messages contain links or even coherent sentences.Nothing being sold, nothing being said... What's the point?Take heed to the lilly botanical before racing and suffer the pullback!
These puzzle me too.
You know what I think it is?
I think those are test messages sent by spammers--to test mail filters for which words trigger a junk mail alert.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30450544</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1260874560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many of those Viagra spelling variations are valid Perl code...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many of those Viagra spelling variations are valid Perl code.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many of those Viagra spelling variations are valid Perl code...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448634</id>
	<title>Re:Cost-benefit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260909240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But how would you contact them?  via e-mail?  Then how would they know it was legit?  Damn spammers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But how would you contact them ?
via e-mail ?
Then how would they know it was legit ?
Damn spammers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how would you contact them?
via e-mail?
Then how would they know it was legit?
Damn spammers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447498</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260904560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to project honey pot.  They are a little over eager to classify people as spammers.  I run my on mail server, so my IP is on there list.  None of the emails that they found to be violating were even somewhat spam like.  They were things like personal email to friends, ironing out the details on contracting work and other such personal things.  I keep adding my IP to the whitelist but since I still run a mail server it keeps getting blacklisted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to project honey pot .
They are a little over eager to classify people as spammers .
I run my on mail server , so my IP is on there list .
None of the emails that they found to be violating were even somewhat spam like .
They were things like personal email to friends , ironing out the details on contracting work and other such personal things .
I keep adding my IP to the whitelist but since I still run a mail server it keeps getting blacklisted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to project honey pot.
They are a little over eager to classify people as spammers.
I run my on mail server, so my IP is on there list.
None of the emails that they found to be violating were even somewhat spam like.
They were things like personal email to friends, ironing out the details on contracting work and other such personal things.
I keep adding my IP to the whitelist but since I still run a mail server it keeps getting blacklisted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448786</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1260910080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get links. Perhaps Google is filtering yours out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get links .
Perhaps Google is filtering yours out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get links.
Perhaps Google is filtering yours out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448314</id>
	<title>Not Something to Celebrate</title>
	<author>BlindSpot</author>
	<datestamp>1260907800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To celebrate,</p></div><p>Personally I think 1 billion spam isn't something to celebrate.  "Mourn" is more like it...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To celebrate,Personally I think 1 billion spam is n't something to celebrate .
" Mourn " is more like it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To celebrate,Personally I think 1 billion spam isn't something to celebrate.
"Mourn" is more like it...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447886</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Dan Ost</author>
	<datestamp>1260906240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If my understanding is correct, project honey pot puts bogus emails in webpages and any mail sent to those email addresses are, pretty much by definition, spam.</p><p>If that's true, then that would indicate that your machine is sending email to honey pot addresses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If my understanding is correct , project honey pot puts bogus emails in webpages and any mail sent to those email addresses are , pretty much by definition , spam.If that 's true , then that would indicate that your machine is sending email to honey pot addresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If my understanding is correct, project honey pot puts bogus emails in webpages and any mail sent to those email addresses are, pretty much by definition, spam.If that's true, then that would indicate that your machine is sending email to honey pot addresses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447290</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1260903720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article calls out that primarily, bots are used to actually distribute the spam.</p><p>Bots are also used for any number of malicious purposes, spam being perhaps the most benign (because it CAN be recognized and discarded).</p><p>People have called in this thread for training victims to make spam not pay.  This might work for spam bots, but would do nothing for any other type of bot.  How about training people to ensure their machine is swept clean of malware on a regular basis, and to keep adequate defenses (AV software, browser guards, whatever)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article calls out that primarily , bots are used to actually distribute the spam.Bots are also used for any number of malicious purposes , spam being perhaps the most benign ( because it CAN be recognized and discarded ) .People have called in this thread for training victims to make spam not pay .
This might work for spam bots , but would do nothing for any other type of bot .
How about training people to ensure their machine is swept clean of malware on a regular basis , and to keep adequate defenses ( AV software , browser guards , whatever ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article calls out that primarily, bots are used to actually distribute the spam.Bots are also used for any number of malicious purposes, spam being perhaps the most benign (because it CAN be recognized and discarded).People have called in this thread for training victims to make spam not pay.
This might work for spam bots, but would do nothing for any other type of bot.
How about training people to ensure their machine is swept clean of malware on a regular basis, and to keep adequate defenses (AV software, browser guards, whatever)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852</id>
	<title>ok</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1260902280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>1 billionth spammer</i>
<br>
<br>
So approximately one out of every 7 people on earth is a spammer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 billionth spammer So approximately one out of every 7 people on earth is a spammer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 billionth spammer


So approximately one out of every 7 people on earth is a spammer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446866</id>
	<title>one billion spammers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that like McDonald's 99 billion served, or are one-sixth of us spamming?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that like McDonald 's 99 billion served , or are one-sixth of us spamming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that like McDonald's 99 billion served, or are one-sixth of us spamming?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446982</id>
	<title>Billionth spammer? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spammer is supposed to be the person who spams our mail boxes. If there were a billion of those then approximately 1 in 7 people in the world would be a spammer. That number is unthinkable, even for Florida's and Brazil's standard..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spammer is supposed to be the person who spams our mail boxes .
If there were a billion of those then approximately 1 in 7 people in the world would be a spammer .
That number is unthinkable , even for Florida 's and Brazil 's standard. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spammer is supposed to be the person who spams our mail boxes.
If there were a billion of those then approximately 1 in 7 people in the world would be a spammer.
That number is unthinkable, even for Florida's and Brazil's standard..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447554</id>
	<title>Should have donated my email address</title>
	<author>jittles</author>
	<datestamp>1260904740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must get a billion spam in one year.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>Damn spammers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must get a billion spam in one year .
: ( Damn spammers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must get a billion spam in one year.
:(Damn spammers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447472</id>
	<title>The summary is wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260904440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article says clearly:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>On Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 06:20 (GMT) Project Honey Pot received its billionth email spam message</p></div><p>In fact, the title of the article is:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>Our 1 Billionth Spam Message</b></p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says clearly : On Wednesday , December 9 , 2009 at 06 : 20 ( GMT ) Project Honey Pot received its billionth email spam messageIn fact , the title of the article is : Our 1 Billionth Spam Message</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says clearly:On Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 06:20 (GMT) Project Honey Pot received its billionth email spam messageIn fact, the title of the article is: Our 1 Billionth Spam Message 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448390</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260908100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, that is the current number of compromised systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , that is the current number of compromised systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, that is the current number of compromised systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568</id>
	<title>Cost-benefit</title>
	<author>delirium of disorder</author>
	<datestamp>1260904800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam, it's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam , it 's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you total up all the productivity lost to fighting spam and time wasted getting spam, it's probably cheaper to just put the spammers out of business by giving every male on earth free Viagra.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448934</id>
	<title>Re:And now, a Joke (FROSTY PISS!)</title>
	<author>Kleen13</author>
	<datestamp>1260867600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ID10T</htmltext>
<tokenext>ID10T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ID10T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447642</id>
	<title>956 ways?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1260905100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>viagra can be misspelled many ways<br>in an email message.<br>all of them not as direct as<br>going and using this way of<br>routing the word around filters,<br>and not even misspelling it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>viagra can be misspelled many waysin an email message.all of them not as direct asgoing and using this way ofrouting the word around filters,and not even misspelling it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>viagra can be misspelled many waysin an email message.all of them not as direct asgoing and using this way ofrouting the word around filters,and not even misspelling it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447412</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260904260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My favorite theory is that spammers are making money by selling spamming services to suckers, not by actually selling a product in the spam.</p><p>I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses, and it is just running out of control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite theory is that spammers are making money by selling spamming services to suckers , not by actually selling a product in the spam.I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses , and it is just running out of control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite theory is that spammers are making money by selling spamming services to suckers, not by actually selling a product in the spam.I guess there is also some chance that there is some botnet out there set to verify that mail reaches addresses, and it is just running out of control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451696</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1260879780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone is checking to see if the email address is valid.</p><p>If so, the spammer will appropriate your name for spam.</p><p>--</p><p>Another tale from the Village of the Spammed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone is checking to see if the email address is valid.If so , the spammer will appropriate your name for spam.--Another tale from the Village of the Spammed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone is checking to see if the email address is valid.If so, the spammer will appropriate your name for spam.--Another tale from the Village of the Spammed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447822</id>
	<title>It's not easy being a Viagra spammer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260906000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They face a lot of STIFF competition!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They face a lot of STIFF competition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They face a lot of STIFF competition!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904</id>
	<title>People fall for spam?</title>
	<author>rehtonAesoohC</author>
	<datestamp>1260902400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been a long lonnnng time since I've actually seen a spam message that I didn't immediately recognize as spam... Maybe some people are completely ignorant of the fact that someone on the internet is out to take your money (*gasp!*), but honestly, how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on "V1AGRA!11!!" links?<br> <br>I'm just sayin'...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been a long lonnnng time since I 've actually seen a spam message that I did n't immediately recognize as spam... Maybe some people are completely ignorant of the fact that someone on the internet is out to take your money ( * gasp !
* ) , but honestly , how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on " V1AGRA ! 11 ! !
" links ?
I 'm just sayin'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been a long lonnnng time since I've actually seen a spam message that I didn't immediately recognize as spam... Maybe some people are completely ignorant of the fact that someone on the internet is out to take your money (*gasp!
*), but honestly, how can the amount of effort expended in creating spam compare to the amount of money they receive from suckers who click on "V1AGRA!11!!
" links?
I'm just sayin'...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453928</id>
	<title>Re:Spam = spy chatter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once found a reply from an employer in there.</p><p>"Sorry to inform you that we hired somebody else", so no biggie. But what if that was "Please contact me for an interview".</p><p>Since then I check my spamfolder daily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once found a reply from an employer in there .
" Sorry to inform you that we hired somebody else " , so no biggie .
But what if that was " Please contact me for an interview " .Since then I check my spamfolder daily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once found a reply from an employer in there.
"Sorry to inform you that we hired somebody else", so no biggie.
But what if that was "Please contact me for an interview".Since then I check my spamfolder daily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451010</id>
	<title>1 billion naive pattern matches?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260876420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, lets celebrate the evolution of a stupid, fundementally unwinnable and pointless battle between spammers and spam fighters.</p><p>Do they keep statistics on how many legitimate messages (viagra jokes!!) were marked as spam and never brightened the day of their intended receipients?</p><p>From personal experience the number of legitimate technical emails that get marked as spam (Either disappear outright or customers later fishing out of their spam folders) is nothing short of rediculous.  SNR, total lack of reliability and trust significantly reduces the utility of the Internets messaging system.</p><p>The current mail system desperately needs some morsal of trust injected otherwise it will have no future.  The amount of life being sucked from the world as a whole reading/deleting/falling for SPAM is nothing short of a greek tragedy.</p><p>Unfortunately those cooking up naive solutions feed into the evolution of filter avoidance by spammers while at the same time reducing the reliability of the Internets SMTP messaging system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , lets celebrate the evolution of a stupid , fundementally unwinnable and pointless battle between spammers and spam fighters.Do they keep statistics on how many legitimate messages ( viagra jokes ! !
) were marked as spam and never brightened the day of their intended receipients ? From personal experience the number of legitimate technical emails that get marked as spam ( Either disappear outright or customers later fishing out of their spam folders ) is nothing short of rediculous .
SNR , total lack of reliability and trust significantly reduces the utility of the Internets messaging system.The current mail system desperately needs some morsal of trust injected otherwise it will have no future .
The amount of life being sucked from the world as a whole reading/deleting/falling for SPAM is nothing short of a greek tragedy.Unfortunately those cooking up naive solutions feed into the evolution of filter avoidance by spammers while at the same time reducing the reliability of the Internets SMTP messaging system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, lets celebrate the evolution of a stupid, fundementally unwinnable and pointless battle between spammers and spam fighters.Do they keep statistics on how many legitimate messages (viagra jokes!!
) were marked as spam and never brightened the day of their intended receipients?From personal experience the number of legitimate technical emails that get marked as spam (Either disappear outright or customers later fishing out of their spam folders) is nothing short of rediculous.
SNR, total lack of reliability and trust significantly reduces the utility of the Internets messaging system.The current mail system desperately needs some morsal of trust injected otherwise it will have no future.
The amount of life being sucked from the world as a whole reading/deleting/falling for SPAM is nothing short of a greek tragedy.Unfortunately those cooking up naive solutions feed into the evolution of filter avoidance by spammers while at the same time reducing the reliability of the Internets SMTP messaging system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446816</id>
	<title>Thanks for the info on misspelling Viagra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really thought \/!@gra looked promising.  Also, most spam is in your inbox when you get to work and most spammers don't send on the weekends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really thought \ / !
@ gra looked promising .
Also , most spam is in your inbox when you get to work and most spammers do n't send on the weekends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really thought \/!
@gra looked promising.
Also, most spam is in your inbox when you get to work and most spammers don't send on the weekends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30462714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30450728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1652236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30462714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30450728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30446848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30449340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30453928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30448786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30451696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1652236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1652236.30447534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
