<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_15_1529249</id>
	<title>Adobe Warns of Reader, Acrobat Attack</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260892980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett writes <i>"Monday afternoon, Adobe 'received reports of a <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2009/12/new\_adobe\_reader\_and\_acrobat\_v.html">vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions</a> being exploited in the wild,' the company said in a post to the company's Product Security Incident Response Team blog. According to malware tracking group Shadowserver, the vulnerability is due to <a href="http://www.itworld.com/software/89209/adobe-warns-reader-acrobat-attack-wild">a bug in the way Reader processes JavaScript code</a>. Several 'tests have confirmed this is a 0-day vulnerability affecting several versions of Adobe Acrobat [Reader] to include the most recent versions of 8.x and 9.x. <a href="http://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php/Calendar/20091214">We have not tested on 7.x, but it may also be vulnerable</a>,' Shadowserver said in a post on its Web site. The group recommends that concerned users disable JavaScript within Adobe's software as a work-around for this problem. (This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript' in the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window). 'This is legit and is very bad,' Shadowserver added."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett writes " Monday afternoon , Adobe 'received reports of a vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions being exploited in the wild, ' the company said in a post to the company 's Product Security Incident Response Team blog .
According to malware tracking group Shadowserver , the vulnerability is due to a bug in the way Reader processes JavaScript code .
Several 'tests have confirmed this is a 0-day vulnerability affecting several versions of Adobe Acrobat [ Reader ] to include the most recent versions of 8.x and 9.x .
We have not tested on 7.x , but it may also be vulnerable, ' Shadowserver said in a post on its Web site .
The group recommends that concerned users disable JavaScript within Adobe 's software as a work-around for this problem .
( This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript ' in the Edit - &gt; Preferences - &gt; JavaScript window ) .
'This is legit and is very bad, ' Shadowserver added .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett writes "Monday afternoon, Adobe 'received reports of a vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions being exploited in the wild,' the company said in a post to the company's Product Security Incident Response Team blog.
According to malware tracking group Shadowserver, the vulnerability is due to a bug in the way Reader processes JavaScript code.
Several 'tests have confirmed this is a 0-day vulnerability affecting several versions of Adobe Acrobat [Reader] to include the most recent versions of 8.x and 9.x.
We have not tested on 7.x, but it may also be vulnerable,' Shadowserver said in a post on its Web site.
The group recommends that concerned users disable JavaScript within Adobe's software as a work-around for this problem.
(This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript' in the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window).
'This is legit and is very bad,' Shadowserver added.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446710</id>
	<title>n00b question</title>
	<author>mapkinase</author>
	<datestamp>1260901860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does PDF reader need JavaScript support?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does PDF reader need JavaScript support ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does PDF reader need JavaScript support?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446618</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260901620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cost -- the full product is hundreds of dollars -- and brand recognition, which is important to PHB's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cost -- the full product is hundreds of dollars -- and brand recognition , which is important to PHB 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cost -- the full product is hundreds of dollars -- and brand recognition, which is important to PHB's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445868</id>
	<title>Maybe limitations are a good thing?</title>
	<author>SteveHeadroom</author>
	<datestamp>1260899220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do we really need to make everything dynamic and interactive? Why do documents need scripting support? Why do emails need scripting support? We're blurring the line between documents and applications and security is suffering as a result. Are the benefits really worth it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we really need to make everything dynamic and interactive ?
Why do documents need scripting support ?
Why do emails need scripting support ?
We 're blurring the line between documents and applications and security is suffering as a result .
Are the benefits really worth it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we really need to make everything dynamic and interactive?
Why do documents need scripting support?
Why do emails need scripting support?
We're blurring the line between documents and applications and security is suffering as a result.
Are the benefits really worth it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445560</id>
	<title>seen it, I think</title>
	<author>1u3hr</author>
	<datestamp>1260898200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was browsing a soft porn site and suddenlty Acrobat launched, then crashed. So it looks like someone really is trying to use this. Since I use Acrobat 4, I think I'm safe from this. (I need a full version of Acrobat for DTP, and version 4 does the job, and quite quickly. If I need to open a later version file I use FoxIt.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was browsing a soft porn site and suddenlty Acrobat launched , then crashed .
So it looks like someone really is trying to use this .
Since I use Acrobat 4 , I think I 'm safe from this .
( I need a full version of Acrobat for DTP , and version 4 does the job , and quite quickly .
If I need to open a later version file I use FoxIt .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was browsing a soft porn site and suddenlty Acrobat launched, then crashed.
So it looks like someone really is trying to use this.
Since I use Acrobat 4, I think I'm safe from this.
(I need a full version of Acrobat for DTP, and version 4 does the job, and quite quickly.
If I need to open a later version file I use FoxIt.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447174</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>nyctopterus</author>
	<datestamp>1260903240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientific papers are distributed as PDFs, which is a fairly substantial (and important) market. Of course, there's little reason to use Adobe Reader itself, as there are plenty of alternatives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientific papers are distributed as PDFs , which is a fairly substantial ( and important ) market .
Of course , there 's little reason to use Adobe Reader itself , as there are plenty of alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientific papers are distributed as PDFs, which is a fairly substantial (and important) market.
Of course, there's little reason to use Adobe Reader itself, as there are plenty of alternatives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446178</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1260900240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields.  Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.</p></div><p>That sounds like a nice sheet. Could you post a link to it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For roleplaying game character sheets , there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields .
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score , for example , and your dexterity mod , defenses , and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.That sounds like a nice sheet .
Could you post a link to it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields.
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.That sounds like a nice sheet.
Could you post a link to it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445522</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260898140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To send an email after filling out a form and clicking sumbit in a PDF.</p><p>Honestly - It's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability, its just javascript in general. I mean it's not great that the reader will execute the code just by opening the file - but now that you know it does that, is it really the readers fault? Isn't the user executing the code as if he were clicking a button now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To send an email after filling out a form and clicking sumbit in a PDF.Honestly - It 's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability , its just javascript in general .
I mean it 's not great that the reader will execute the code just by opening the file - but now that you know it does that , is it really the readers fault ?
Is n't the user executing the code as if he were clicking a button now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To send an email after filling out a form and clicking sumbit in a PDF.Honestly - It's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability, its just javascript in general.
I mean it's not great that the reader will execute the code just by opening the file - but now that you know it does that, is it really the readers fault?
Isn't the user executing the code as if he were clicking a button now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447006</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...</p></div><p>Why the hell does a <b>document reader</b> need JavaScript in the first place?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...Why the hell does a document reader need JavaScript in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...Why the hell does a document reader need JavaScript in the first place?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260899820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's more useful than you might think.  I've personally used it for two purposes:</p><ul><li>For a food diary, I put in my current weight and it calculated my daily caloric needs and calories burned for different intensities of exercise.</li><li>For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields.  Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more useful than you might think .
I 've personally used it for two purposes : For a food diary , I put in my current weight and it calculated my daily caloric needs and calories burned for different intensities of exercise.For roleplaying game character sheets , there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields .
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score , for example , and your dexterity mod , defenses , and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more useful than you might think.
I've personally used it for two purposes:For a food diary, I put in my current weight and it calculated my daily caloric needs and calories burned for different intensities of exercise.For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields.
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445386</id>
	<title>Why javascript in a pdf reader?</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1260897660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is high time people stop using any pdf reader that uses javascript or opens external links or does anything other than simply render the document on screen. Editable pdf, where one can fill in the fields etc must be a separate application, not plugged into the browser. I feel safe with NoScript controlling FireFox. Hope someone comes up with a good general purpose sandboxer that will sandbox every plug-in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is high time people stop using any pdf reader that uses javascript or opens external links or does anything other than simply render the document on screen .
Editable pdf , where one can fill in the fields etc must be a separate application , not plugged into the browser .
I feel safe with NoScript controlling FireFox .
Hope someone comes up with a good general purpose sandboxer that will sandbox every plug-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is high time people stop using any pdf reader that uses javascript or opens external links or does anything other than simply render the document on screen.
Editable pdf, where one can fill in the fields etc must be a separate application, not plugged into the browser.
I feel safe with NoScript controlling FireFox.
Hope someone comes up with a good general purpose sandboxer that will sandbox every plug-in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445228</id>
	<title>Look at the Acrobat Reader credits.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the names in the credits in the Acrobat Reader about dialog. Notice that many of them are clearly from an area well noted for the poor quality of the software developed by its off-shore software development industry.</p><p>If you've ever worked with such off-shore developers, you'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the names in the credits in the Acrobat Reader about dialog .
Notice that many of them are clearly from an area well noted for the poor quality of the software developed by its off-shore software development industry.If you 've ever worked with such off-shore developers , you 'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the names in the credits in the Acrobat Reader about dialog.
Notice that many of them are clearly from an area well noted for the poor quality of the software developed by its off-shore software development industry.If you've ever worked with such off-shore developers, you'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445264</id>
	<title>Does it run Linux?</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1260897240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Normally that would be my first response as a joke, but I begin to wonder if Adobe could affect anything that is not root-level (or admin level).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Normally that would be my first response as a joke , but I begin to wonder if Adobe could affect anything that is not root-level ( or admin level ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Normally that would be my first response as a joke, but I begin to wonder if Adobe could affect anything that is not root-level (or admin level).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446966</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe Acrobat</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260902580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "redaction" was because someone used a text object to overlay the source. They could have avoided failure by using the <b>built-in redaction feature</b>, modifying the pages at the source and generating the PDF from that, or scanning the original (with redacted sections blacked out) as graphics.<br> <br>You can't blame the tool for its clueless users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " redaction " was because someone used a text object to overlay the source .
They could have avoided failure by using the built-in redaction feature , modifying the pages at the source and generating the PDF from that , or scanning the original ( with redacted sections blacked out ) as graphics .
You ca n't blame the tool for its clueless users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "redaction" was because someone used a text object to overlay the source.
They could have avoided failure by using the built-in redaction feature, modifying the pages at the source and generating the PDF from that, or scanning the original (with redacted sections blacked out) as graphics.
You can't blame the tool for its clueless users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446060</id>
	<title>YOU KFAIL IT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260899820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>lead developers they're gone Came Before play1nG to there are only</htmltext>
<tokenext>lead developers they 're gone Came Before play1nG to there are only</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lead developers they're gone Came Before play1nG to there are only</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447084</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe Acrobat</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260902940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the whole non-redacted-data text redaction "feature"</p></div><p>Well, it&rsquo;s a highlighter pen, with variable colour, opacity, and thickness.</p><p>For some reason the idiots at the TSA thought that an opaque black highlighter would be adequate to obliterate the text. Morons.</p><p>(Before you say &ldquo;well, duh, anybody would&rdquo; &ndash; no. You wouldn&rsquo;t trust this on printed documents, either. You&rsquo;d photocopy them, ensuring that the photocopier&rsquo;s sensor couldn&rsquo;t distinguish between the text and the marker it was covered with. The original document could likely still be read... by tilting it, getting the light to hit it just right, etc. Same goes for white-out.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the whole non-redacted-data text redaction " feature " Well , it    s a highlighter pen , with variable colour , opacity , and thickness.For some reason the idiots at the TSA thought that an opaque black highlighter would be adequate to obliterate the text .
Morons. ( Before you say    well , duh , anybody would       no .
You wouldn    t trust this on printed documents , either .
You    d photocopy them , ensuring that the photocopier    s sensor couldn    t distinguish between the text and the marker it was covered with .
The original document could likely still be read... by tilting it , getting the light to hit it just right , etc .
Same goes for white-out .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the whole non-redacted-data text redaction "feature"Well, it’s a highlighter pen, with variable colour, opacity, and thickness.For some reason the idiots at the TSA thought that an opaque black highlighter would be adequate to obliterate the text.
Morons.(Before you say “well, duh, anybody would” – no.
You wouldn’t trust this on printed documents, either.
You’d photocopy them, ensuring that the photocopier’s sensor couldn’t distinguish between the text and the marker it was covered with.
The original document could likely still be read... by tilting it, getting the light to hit it just right, etc.
Same goes for white-out.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228</id>
	<title>Adobe Acrobat</title>
	<author>eples</author>
	<datestamp>1260900420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't it high time that Adobe got its act together with this thing? Javascript attacks, the whole non-redacted-data text redaction "feature" that recently bit the TSA - I mean REALLY. <br> <br>
Come on Adobe, you can do better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it high time that Adobe got its act together with this thing ?
Javascript attacks , the whole non-redacted-data text redaction " feature " that recently bit the TSA - I mean REALLY .
Come on Adobe , you can do better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it high time that Adobe got its act together with this thing?
Javascript attacks, the whole non-redacted-data text redaction "feature" that recently bit the TSA - I mean REALLY.
Come on Adobe, you can do better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446260</id>
	<title>What about brower plugins?</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1260900540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I loaded a pdf in firefox and didn't see any options within the plugin menus for disabling javascript.  Anyone know what to do with the plugins?  I haven't used the stand alone reader in a while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I loaded a pdf in firefox and did n't see any options within the plugin menus for disabling javascript .
Anyone know what to do with the plugins ?
I have n't used the stand alone reader in a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loaded a pdf in firefox and didn't see any options within the plugin menus for disabling javascript.
Anyone know what to do with the plugins?
I haven't used the stand alone reader in a while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445792</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>farlukar</author>
	<datestamp>1260898920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First it's gotta download that 7 Meg file, then Adobe's gotta kick start, and then it doesn't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting.</p></div><p> <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/636" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">how to not use reader inside a browser</a> [mozilla.org]</p><p>And re:slow &amp; bloated; just go to the plugin directory and delete anything you have no need for (ie. most of it). Voil&#224;, fast-booting, non-bloated adobe reader.</p><p>imnsho, anything xpdf-based is way slower than acrobat in page-rendering, and generally not clever enough to search ligatured words.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First it 's got ta download that 7 Meg file , then Adobe 's got ta kick start , and then it does n't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting .
how to not use reader inside a browser [ mozilla.org ] And re : slow &amp; bloated ; just go to the plugin directory and delete anything you have no need for ( ie .
most of it ) .
Voil   , fast-booting , non-bloated adobe reader.imnsho , anything xpdf-based is way slower than acrobat in page-rendering , and generally not clever enough to search ligatured words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First it's gotta download that 7 Meg file, then Adobe's gotta kick start, and then it doesn't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting.
how to not use reader inside a browser [mozilla.org]And re:slow &amp; bloated; just go to the plugin directory and delete anything you have no need for (ie.
most of it).
Voilà, fast-booting, non-bloated adobe reader.imnsho, anything xpdf-based is way slower than acrobat in page-rendering, and generally not clever enough to search ligatured words.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446396</id>
	<title>Why need to view PDFs inline in the browser anyway</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1260900960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After being bitten by a PDF vulnerability before (I run as a normal user account so it didn't completely own my box and was fairly easy to clean up) I disabled the PDF plugin in Firefox. Now if I try to view a PDF I get an open/download request for the file rather than just opening automatically.</p><p>This way a site can't open any PDF files without me knowing.</p><p>It seems Adobe PDF reader is fast becoming the new IE in terms of web security.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After being bitten by a PDF vulnerability before ( I run as a normal user account so it did n't completely own my box and was fairly easy to clean up ) I disabled the PDF plugin in Firefox .
Now if I try to view a PDF I get an open/download request for the file rather than just opening automatically.This way a site ca n't open any PDF files without me knowing.It seems Adobe PDF reader is fast becoming the new IE in terms of web security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After being bitten by a PDF vulnerability before (I run as a normal user account so it didn't completely own my box and was fairly easy to clean up) I disabled the PDF plugin in Firefox.
Now if I try to view a PDF I get an open/download request for the file rather than just opening automatically.This way a site can't open any PDF files without me knowing.It seems Adobe PDF reader is fast becoming the new IE in terms of web security.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447768</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260905700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny you should mention that -- you know all those new computers the stores sell every day? That's "everyone".</p><p>Dad just bought a new computer last month[1].  I had him on Ubuntu for the last two years, and I haven't used Windows since W98 -- so basically I forgot Acrobat till last night when he showed me a screenshot of his desktop while he was experimenting with the Snipping Tool[2]. Yeah, there was the Adobe icon, and I said "oh shit" and had to dig around Google to find out what the preferences look like these days so I could tell him how to turn js off.</p><p>[1]Yup, 'black screen of death' immediately, but that's another story.<br>[2]Yup, you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/still/ can't just press PrnScn and get a screenshot dialog. Sigh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny you should mention that -- you know all those new computers the stores sell every day ?
That 's " everyone " .Dad just bought a new computer last month [ 1 ] .
I had him on Ubuntu for the last two years , and I have n't used Windows since W98 -- so basically I forgot Acrobat till last night when he showed me a screenshot of his desktop while he was experimenting with the Snipping Tool [ 2 ] .
Yeah , there was the Adobe icon , and I said " oh shit " and had to dig around Google to find out what the preferences look like these days so I could tell him how to turn js off .
[ 1 ] Yup , 'black screen of death ' immediately , but that 's another story .
[ 2 ] Yup , you /still/ ca n't just press PrnScn and get a screenshot dialog .
Sigh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny you should mention that -- you know all those new computers the stores sell every day?
That's "everyone".Dad just bought a new computer last month[1].
I had him on Ubuntu for the last two years, and I haven't used Windows since W98 -- so basically I forgot Acrobat till last night when he showed me a screenshot of his desktop while he was experimenting with the Snipping Tool[2].
Yeah, there was the Adobe icon, and I said "oh shit" and had to dig around Google to find out what the preferences look like these days so I could tell him how to turn js off.
[1]Yup, 'black screen of death' immediately, but that's another story.
[2]Yup, you /still/ can't just press PrnScn and get a screenshot dialog.
Sigh...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</id>
	<title>Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445520</id>
	<title>Don't cross streams</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1260898140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Separate your programs from your data, and your documents from your interactive media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Separate your programs from your data , and your documents from your interactive media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Separate your programs from your data, and your documents from your interactive media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236</id>
	<title>Javascript Again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have to use Reader, ALWAYS disable Javascript. It always seems like that's was these exploits use. Or use one of the many PDF reader alternatives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have to use Reader , ALWAYS disable Javascript .
It always seems like that 's was these exploits use .
Or use one of the many PDF reader alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have to use Reader, ALWAYS disable Javascript.
It always seems like that's was these exploits use.
Or use one of the many PDF reader alternatives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447514</id>
	<title>CERT guidance for securing Adobe Reader</title>
	<author>WD</author>
	<datestamp>1260904620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CERT has some suggestions for securing Adobe Reader here:<br><a href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257117" title="cert.org">http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257117</a> [cert.org]</p><p>Note that the above vulnerability note is not this particular vulnerability, but the same mitigations apply time and time again.  The mitigations include:</p><p>- Enable DEP<br>- Disable JavaScript<br>- Disable automatic opening of PDF files by Internet Explorer<br>- Disable the displaying of PDF files in your web browser</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CERT has some suggestions for securing Adobe Reader here : http : //www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257117 [ cert.org ] Note that the above vulnerability note is not this particular vulnerability , but the same mitigations apply time and time again .
The mitigations include : - Enable DEP- Disable JavaScript- Disable automatic opening of PDF files by Internet Explorer- Disable the displaying of PDF files in your web browser</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CERT has some suggestions for securing Adobe Reader here:http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257117 [cert.org]Note that the above vulnerability note is not this particular vulnerability, but the same mitigations apply time and time again.
The mitigations include:- Enable DEP- Disable JavaScript- Disable automatic opening of PDF files by Internet Explorer- Disable the displaying of PDF files in your web browser</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30454800</id>
	<title>Re:Acrobat attack.</title>
	<author>clem</author>
	<datestamp>1259699820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or else you have Daryl Hannah trying to break your neck between her inhumanly powerful thighs.</p><p>Mmm...acrobat attacks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or else you have Daryl Hannah trying to break your neck between her inhumanly powerful thighs.Mmm...acrobat attacks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or else you have Daryl Hannah trying to break your neck between her inhumanly powerful thighs.Mmm...acrobat attacks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447654</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>dslbrian</author>
	<datestamp>1260905160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I would love a good alternative personally. All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents.</i></p><p>Free and you don't even need to install them.  Just unpack in a directory:</p><p> <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/office/foxit\_reader\_portable" title="portableapps.com">Foxit Reader Portable</a> [portableapps.com]</p><p> <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/office/sumatra\_pdf\_portable" title="portableapps.com">Sumatra PDF Portable</a> [portableapps.com]</p><p>For merge/split: <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/office/pdftk\_builder\_portable" title="portableapps.com">PDFTK Builder Portable</a> [portableapps.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would love a good alternative personally .
All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents.Free and you do n't even need to install them .
Just unpack in a directory : Foxit Reader Portable [ portableapps.com ] Sumatra PDF Portable [ portableapps.com ] For merge/split : PDFTK Builder Portable [ portableapps.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I would love a good alternative personally.
All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents.Free and you don't even need to install them.
Just unpack in a directory: Foxit Reader Portable [portableapps.com] Sumatra PDF Portable [portableapps.com]For merge/split: PDFTK Builder Portable [portableapps.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568</id>
	<title>And this is why...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a DOCUMENT READER shouldn't be interpreting javascript.</p><p>Seriously. Web pages are interactive. Documents are meant to be read and maybe filled out. The only reason we need PDF is for stuff that needs to look the same on every screen and print out the way it looks. We don't need Javascript in them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a DOCUMENT READER should n't be interpreting javascript.Seriously .
Web pages are interactive .
Documents are meant to be read and maybe filled out .
The only reason we need PDF is for stuff that needs to look the same on every screen and print out the way it looks .
We do n't need Javascript in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a DOCUMENT READER shouldn't be interpreting javascript.Seriously.
Web pages are interactive.
Documents are meant to be read and maybe filled out.
The only reason we need PDF is for stuff that needs to look the same on every screen and print out the way it looks.
We don't need Javascript in them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30456094</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1259673000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability, its just javascript in general</p></div><p>Absolute and total nonsense.  JavaScript always runs in some kind of sandbox (I only know one person who is writing a kernel in JS, and he hasn't got very far), either provided by the hosting application or by the OS.  It can not interact with anything other than objects that the program created unless explicitly allowed to by the sandbox.  Blaming this on JavaScript is like blaming a Windows (or Linux, or whatever) vulnerability that let unprivileged code destroy your master boot record on C.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability , its just javascript in generalAbsolute and total nonsense .
JavaScript always runs in some kind of sandbox ( I only know one person who is writing a kernel in JS , and he has n't got very far ) , either provided by the hosting application or by the OS .
It can not interact with anything other than objects that the program created unless explicitly allowed to by the sandbox .
Blaming this on JavaScript is like blaming a Windows ( or Linux , or whatever ) vulnerability that let unprivileged code destroy your master boot record on C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's not really like the Adobe reader has the vulnerability, its just javascript in generalAbsolute and total nonsense.
JavaScript always runs in some kind of sandbox (I only know one person who is writing a kernel in JS, and he hasn't got very far), either provided by the hosting application or by the OS.
It can not interact with anything other than objects that the program created unless explicitly allowed to by the sandbox.
Blaming this on JavaScript is like blaming a Windows (or Linux, or whatever) vulnerability that let unprivileged code destroy your master boot record on C.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445558</id>
	<title>I haven't used Acrobat Reader in Years</title>
	<author>quangdog</author>
	<datestamp>1260898200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use this instead: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7518" title="mozilla.org">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7518</a> [mozilla.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use this instead : https : //addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7518 [ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use this instead: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7518 [mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446002</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260899640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They infect ad networks, automatically launching reader, and their exploit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They infect ad networks , automatically launching reader , and their exploit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They infect ad networks, automatically launching reader, and their exploit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447720</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript Again</title>
	<author>JeffSpudrinski</author>
	<datestamp>1260905400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have javascript disabled at each user login on our network (through the logon script), just in case someone has re-enabled it when their system was last logged on.  I haven't found a way to totally lock it out yet.</p><p>The huge problem is that Adobe offers to enable javascript for users when they open a PDF with Javasript in it.  It displays a message along the lines of "you're not seeing everything here unless you enable javascript...click here to enable it" with a big friendly "YES" button.  Kind of defeats the purpose when it's made so easy for users to re-enable.</p><p>I warn users not to enable it, but most either don't care or don't pay attention...and at least 80\% of them will always click "YES" or "OK" just to get a message box to go away without reading it. (Invariably followed by a tech call stating "I clicked OK on something...what's wrong with it and why don't you know off the top of your head what I did wrong?")</p><p>Nice of Adobe to make it so helpful and user-friendly to re-enable the most dangerous part of their software.</p><p>-JJS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have javascript disabled at each user login on our network ( through the logon script ) , just in case someone has re-enabled it when their system was last logged on .
I have n't found a way to totally lock it out yet.The huge problem is that Adobe offers to enable javascript for users when they open a PDF with Javasript in it .
It displays a message along the lines of " you 're not seeing everything here unless you enable javascript...click here to enable it " with a big friendly " YES " button .
Kind of defeats the purpose when it 's made so easy for users to re-enable.I warn users not to enable it , but most either do n't care or do n't pay attention...and at least 80 \ % of them will always click " YES " or " OK " just to get a message box to go away without reading it .
( Invariably followed by a tech call stating " I clicked OK on something...what 's wrong with it and why do n't you know off the top of your head what I did wrong ?
" ) Nice of Adobe to make it so helpful and user-friendly to re-enable the most dangerous part of their software.-JJS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have javascript disabled at each user login on our network (through the logon script), just in case someone has re-enabled it when their system was last logged on.
I haven't found a way to totally lock it out yet.The huge problem is that Adobe offers to enable javascript for users when they open a PDF with Javasript in it.
It displays a message along the lines of "you're not seeing everything here unless you enable javascript...click here to enable it" with a big friendly "YES" button.
Kind of defeats the purpose when it's made so easy for users to re-enable.I warn users not to enable it, but most either don't care or don't pay attention...and at least 80\% of them will always click "YES" or "OK" just to get a message box to go away without reading it.
(Invariably followed by a tech call stating "I clicked OK on something...what's wrong with it and why don't you know off the top of your head what I did wrong?
")Nice of Adobe to make it so helpful and user-friendly to re-enable the most dangerous part of their software.-JJS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447224</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1260903420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+1 Ironically Funny</p><p>All the spiffy things you can do with scripting-enabled PDF really should qualify it as an "attractive nuisance". Every good trap has irresistible bait, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 Ironically FunnyAll the spiffy things you can do with scripting-enabled PDF really should qualify it as an " attractive nuisance " .
Every good trap has irresistible bait , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 Ironically FunnyAll the spiffy things you can do with scripting-enabled PDF really should qualify it as an "attractive nuisance".
Every good trap has irresistible bait, after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30451790</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>mightyteegar</author>
	<datestamp>1260880140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if you want to modify it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you want to modify it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you want to modify it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445688</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your problem is not PDF, but your PDF reader.<br><br>Change it, you will see how fast it can be with a proper application.<br><br>Oh, and it's not only the reader, everything from Adobe is as slow as humanly possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your problem is not PDF , but your PDF reader.Change it , you will see how fast it can be with a proper application.Oh , and it 's not only the reader , everything from Adobe is as slow as humanly possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your problem is not PDF, but your PDF reader.Change it, you will see how fast it can be with a proper application.Oh, and it's not only the reader, everything from Adobe is as slow as humanly possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445616</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding?  <i>After</i> vulnerabilities showed up?  I had it turned off or completely disabled (as in: most of the relevant plugins removed) back at version 6 or so, before any of the known vulnerabilities.  It was a flaw waiting to be exploited, it was useless for 99\% of PDFs out there, and it was one of many things making newer versions of Reader slower and slower to load.  Good riddance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding ?
After vulnerabilities showed up ?
I had it turned off or completely disabled ( as in : most of the relevant plugins removed ) back at version 6 or so , before any of the known vulnerabilities .
It was a flaw waiting to be exploited , it was useless for 99 \ % of PDFs out there , and it was one of many things making newer versions of Reader slower and slower to load .
Good riddance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding?
After vulnerabilities showed up?
I had it turned off or completely disabled (as in: most of the relevant plugins removed) back at version 6 or so, before any of the known vulnerabilities.
It was a flaw waiting to be exploited, it was useless for 99\% of PDFs out there, and it was one of many things making newer versions of Reader slower and slower to load.
Good riddance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446136</id>
	<title>Re:Javascript Again</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1260900060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What bothers me about this is that once its disabled it just prompts you to enable it once it senses a JS PDF.  The end user, if he or she has rights (and they do at home), just clicks another OK box instead of being forced to go into preferences and turn it back on.  Once thats clicked it runs the JS and the exploit. Its ridiculous its even on by default, let alone this UI stupidity.</p><p>The next version of Acrobat should just have it off by default. Force people to turn it on. Chances are 99.9\% of users have no legitimate reason for a JS PDF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What bothers me about this is that once its disabled it just prompts you to enable it once it senses a JS PDF .
The end user , if he or she has rights ( and they do at home ) , just clicks another OK box instead of being forced to go into preferences and turn it back on .
Once thats clicked it runs the JS and the exploit .
Its ridiculous its even on by default , let alone this UI stupidity.The next version of Acrobat should just have it off by default .
Force people to turn it on .
Chances are 99.9 \ % of users have no legitimate reason for a JS PDF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What bothers me about this is that once its disabled it just prompts you to enable it once it senses a JS PDF.
The end user, if he or she has rights (and they do at home), just clicks another OK box instead of being forced to go into preferences and turn it back on.
Once thats clicked it runs the JS and the exploit.
Its ridiculous its even on by default, let alone this UI stupidity.The next version of Acrobat should just have it off by default.
Force people to turn it on.
Chances are 99.9\% of users have no legitimate reason for a JS PDF.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445368</id>
	<title>Dear Adobe:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either fix your javascript holes or disable it till you do.<br>Sincerely, A.C.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either fix your javascript holes or disable it till you do.Sincerely , A.C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either fix your javascript holes or disable it till you do.Sincerely, A.C.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447904</id>
	<title>Re:Limit permissions and seek alternatives?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260906240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seems like deja vu</p></div><p>What? DjVu had none such vulnerabilities. But that was back in the time when we still thought it possible to read documents without 3D animation and a scripting interface.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like deja vuWhat ?
DjVu had none such vulnerabilities .
But that was back in the time when we still thought it possible to read documents without 3D animation and a scripting interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like deja vuWhat?
DjVu had none such vulnerabilities.
But that was back in the time when we still thought it possible to read documents without 3D animation and a scripting interface.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</id>
	<title>BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260897600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one uses Adobe Reader for anything other than business PDF's.</p><p>Seriously, The launch time for a PDF off the web is too large for me to bother. First it's gotta download that 7 Meg file, then Adobe's gotta kick start, and then it doesn't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting.</p><p>Seriously - I have only ever seen PDF's used at work and at school, and anywhere else they exist usually aren't worth the bother.</p><p>So who are the people taking advantage of these vulnerabilities?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one uses Adobe Reader for anything other than business PDF 's.Seriously , The launch time for a PDF off the web is too large for me to bother .
First it 's got ta download that 7 Meg file , then Adobe 's got ta kick start , and then it does n't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting.Seriously - I have only ever seen PDF 's used at work and at school , and anywhere else they exist usually are n't worth the bother.So who are the people taking advantage of these vulnerabilities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one uses Adobe Reader for anything other than business PDF's.Seriously, The launch time for a PDF off the web is too large for me to bother.
First it's gotta download that 7 Meg file, then Adobe's gotta kick start, and then it doesn't let me highlight anything to keep me from copying and pasting.Seriously - I have only ever seen PDF's used at work and at school, and anywhere else they exist usually aren't worth the bother.So who are the people taking advantage of these vulnerabilities?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282</id>
	<title>Preferences?</title>
	<author>vrmlguy</author>
	<datestamp>1260897360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript' in the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window.</p></div><p>I've used Reader forever, and I never even noticed that there was a preferences dialog.  There's 26 sub-dialogs, each with one or two dozen options, and (checking a few at random) I see several that look worthy of more investigation.  Anyone know of any recommendations of where I should start?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript ' in the Edit - &gt; Preferences - &gt; JavaScript window.I 've used Reader forever , and I never even noticed that there was a preferences dialog .
There 's 26 sub-dialogs , each with one or two dozen options , and ( checking a few at random ) I see several that look worthy of more investigation .
Anyone know of any recommendations of where I should start ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This can be done by un-checking the 'Enable Acrobat JavaScript' in the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window.I've used Reader forever, and I never even noticed that there was a preferences dialog.
There's 26 sub-dialogs, each with one or two dozen options, and (checking a few at random) I see several that look worthy of more investigation.
Anyone know of any recommendations of where I should start?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446362</id>
	<title>Re:Preferences?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260900840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could try the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window. Here, I&rsquo;ll make a little instruction sheet for you.</p><p><a href="http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/1/12/15/clone53421/f\_viwjj0m\_1729695.jpg" title="imagefra.me">http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/1/12/15/clone53421/f\_viwjj0m\_1729695.jpg</a> [imagefra.me]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could try the Edit - &gt; Preferences - &gt; JavaScript window .
Here , I    ll make a little instruction sheet for you.http : //img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/1/12/15/clone53421/f \ _viwjj0m \ _1729695.jpg [ imagefra.me ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could try the Edit -&gt; Preferences -&gt; JavaScript window.
Here, I’ll make a little instruction sheet for you.http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/1/12/15/clone53421/f\_viwjj0m\_1729695.jpg [imagefra.me]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445578</id>
	<title>Adobe 5.x...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...was the last good Reader version, with the installer weighing in at a whopping 6MB.  After that, feature creep turned it into insane bloatware.  I'm willing to bet that 99.9\% of PDFs out there are 5.x "compliant" and do not need these newer "features" we never really asked for in the first place.</p><p>Hey Adobe, are you listening?  How about you give us JUST a Reader?  I would say call it Reader Light, but you would probably get sued by many a beer company...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...was the last good Reader version , with the installer weighing in at a whopping 6MB .
After that , feature creep turned it into insane bloatware .
I 'm willing to bet that 99.9 \ % of PDFs out there are 5.x " compliant " and do not need these newer " features " we never really asked for in the first place.Hey Adobe , are you listening ?
How about you give us JUST a Reader ?
I would say call it Reader Light , but you would probably get sued by many a beer company.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...was the last good Reader version, with the installer weighing in at a whopping 6MB.
After that, feature creep turned it into insane bloatware.
I'm willing to bet that 99.9\% of PDFs out there are 5.x "compliant" and do not need these newer "features" we never really asked for in the first place.Hey Adobe, are you listening?
How about you give us JUST a Reader?
I would say call it Reader Light, but you would probably get sued by many a beer company...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278</id>
	<title>Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>Killer Orca</author>
	<datestamp>1260897300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is Reader being used in large-scale deployments?  It's freeware-ish and gets no more support from Adobe than many of the other free pdf reader alternatives out there would get.  I have Reader installed at my work without having Writer or Photoshop either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is Reader being used in large-scale deployments ?
It 's freeware-ish and gets no more support from Adobe than many of the other free pdf reader alternatives out there would get .
I have Reader installed at my work without having Writer or Photoshop either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is Reader being used in large-scale deployments?
It's freeware-ish and gets no more support from Adobe than many of the other free pdf reader alternatives out there would get.
I have Reader installed at my work without having Writer or Photoshop either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446662</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260901740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How else do you get portable documentation if you don't use PDF? There's no other format that can do what it can do, period.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How else do you get portable documentation if you do n't use PDF ?
There 's no other format that can do what it can do , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How else do you get portable documentation if you don't use PDF?
There's no other format that can do what it can do, period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446110</id>
	<title>darn</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1260900000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate when acrobats attack.  They're so freaking limber!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate when acrobats attack .
They 're so freaking limber !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate when acrobats attack.
They're so freaking limber!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445244</id>
	<title>How many bad code offsets has Adobe bought?</title>
	<author>GungaDan</author>
	<datestamp>1260897120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This shit happens every other week now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This shit happens every other week now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This shit happens every other week now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448104</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>mzs</author>
	<datestamp>1260907020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I xpdf on unix, Preview.app on OS X, and Sumatra on Windows. Weren't there some vulnerabilities in Foxit for Windows about two years ago?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I xpdf on unix , Preview.app on OS X , and Sumatra on Windows .
Were n't there some vulnerabilities in Foxit for Windows about two years ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I xpdf on unix, Preview.app on OS X, and Sumatra on Windows.
Weren't there some vulnerabilities in Foxit for Windows about two years ago?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446810</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why...</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As has been discussed countless times in this thread already, turn off JavaScript if you don't need it. The rest of us use it for business purposes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As has been discussed countless times in this thread already , turn off JavaScript if you do n't need it .
The rest of us use it for business purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As has been discussed countless times in this thread already, turn off JavaScript if you don't need it.
The rest of us use it for business purposes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446124</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260900060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am surprised anyone that comes to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. uses adobe reader anymore. Bloated to an almost impressive level and filled with security holes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised anyone that comes to / .
uses adobe reader anymore .
Bloated to an almost impressive level and filled with security holes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised anyone that comes to /.
uses adobe reader anymore.
Bloated to an almost impressive level and filled with security holes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446160</id>
	<title>Re:Look at the Acrobat Reader credits.</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1260900180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>If you've ever worked with such off-shore developers, you'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software.</i> <br> <br>
Nevertheless, the Adobe reader still (I'm sorry to say) does a noticeably better job of rendering PDFs than any of the FOSS alternatives I've tried on Linux. Especially if the PDF includes much in the way of text scanned at too low a DPI setting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 've ever worked with such off-shore developers , you 'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software .
Nevertheless , the Adobe reader still ( I 'm sorry to say ) does a noticeably better job of rendering PDFs than any of the FOSS alternatives I 've tried on Linux .
Especially if the PDF includes much in the way of text scanned at too low a DPI setting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you've ever worked with such off-shore developers, you'll immediately understand why Reader is such a shitty piece of software.
Nevertheless, the Adobe reader still (I'm sorry to say) does a noticeably better job of rendering PDFs than any of the FOSS alternatives I've tried on Linux.
Especially if the PDF includes much in the way of text scanned at too low a DPI setting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>COMON$</author>
	<datestamp>1260898500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would love a good alternative personally.  All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents.  I just havent found one that seems to be solid enough for the enterprise push.  Any recommendations from people who have made the switch?  I am getting tired of patching every 5 minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would love a good alternative personally .
All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents .
I just havent found one that seems to be solid enough for the enterprise push .
Any recommendations from people who have made the switch ?
I am getting tired of patching every 5 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would love a good alternative personally.
All my users do is read the PDFs and we use PDFCreator for merging documents.
I just havent found one that seems to be solid enough for the enterprise push.
Any recommendations from people who have made the switch?
I am getting tired of patching every 5 minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445646</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1260898500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to do useless fancy web2.0 crap.  it really is not needed. We disabled it automatically across the company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to do useless fancy web2.0 crap .
it really is not needed .
We disabled it automatically across the company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to do useless fancy web2.0 crap.
it really is not needed.
We disabled it automatically across the company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446868</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe 5.x...</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260902340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. I went from 5 to 9 and wow what a shock. Although I have to admit the last patch helped tremendously (it was suffering from really poor load times).<br> <br>And, Adobe, get rid of that stupid FNPLicensingService.exe spyware that tries to run constantly in the background. I detest the idea of not being trusted when I *PAID* for the damn software!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I went from 5 to 9 and wow what a shock .
Although I have to admit the last patch helped tremendously ( it was suffering from really poor load times ) .
And , Adobe , get rid of that stupid FNPLicensingService.exe spyware that tries to run constantly in the background .
I detest the idea of not being trusted when I * PAID * for the damn software !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I went from 5 to 9 and wow what a shock.
Although I have to admit the last patch helped tremendously (it was suffering from really poor load times).
And, Adobe, get rid of that stupid FNPLicensingService.exe spyware that tries to run constantly in the background.
I detest the idea of not being trusted when I *PAID* for the damn software!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445768</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone still has JavaScript enabled?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...</p></div><p>I thought after so many vulnerabilities, everyone* had been turned off of Reader.</p><p>( * for values of "everyone" composed entirely of Slashdotters.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...I thought after so many vulnerabilities , everyone * had been turned off of Reader .
( * for values of " everyone " composed entirely of Slashdotters .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought after so many vulnerabilities everyone had turned that off in Reader...I thought after so many vulnerabilities, everyone* had been turned off of Reader.
( * for values of "everyone" composed entirely of Slashdotters.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446518</id>
	<title>Re:Really...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260901320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields. Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.</p></div><p>I&rsquo;m just echoing what the other guy said, really, but I created a helluva Excel spreadsheet that did that for Runescape. Why on earth would you use a PDF?</p><p>Heck... I could <em>probably</em> even make it import the player data from the hiscores website, but I didn&rsquo;t ever bother trying.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For roleplaying game character sheets , there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields .
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score , for example , and your dexterity mod , defenses , and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.I    m just echoing what the other guy said , really , but I created a helluva Excel spreadsheet that did that for Runescape .
Why on earth would you use a PDF ? Heck... I could probably even make it import the player data from the hiscores website , but I didn    t ever bother trying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For roleplaying game character sheets, there are a ton of fields that are dependent on other fields.
Javascript lets you enter your dexterity score, for example, and your dexterity mod, defenses, and dex-based skills are all updated accordingly.I’m just echoing what the other guy said, really, but I created a helluva Excel spreadsheet that did that for Runescape.
Why on earth would you use a PDF?Heck... I could probably even make it import the player data from the hiscores website, but I didn’t ever bother trying.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447108</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260903000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a DOCUMENT READER shouldn't be interpreting javascript.</p></div><p>I totally agree.</p><p>A document format which allows embedding javascript seems like Adobes desperate attempt to enforce their products.</p><p>I hope javascript in PDFs won't spread like it did in webpages.<br>Nowadays, approximately 50\% of the webpages I have to visit every day actually need javascript to work properly (without <b>really</b> needing it, of course) - it's a disaster.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a DOCUMENT READER should n't be interpreting javascript.I totally agree.A document format which allows embedding javascript seems like Adobes desperate attempt to enforce their products.I hope javascript in PDFs wo n't spread like it did in webpages.Nowadays , approximately 50 \ % of the webpages I have to visit every day actually need javascript to work properly ( without really needing it , of course ) - it 's a disaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a DOCUMENT READER shouldn't be interpreting javascript.I totally agree.A document format which allows embedding javascript seems like Adobes desperate attempt to enforce their products.I hope javascript in PDFs won't spread like it did in webpages.Nowadays, approximately 50\% of the webpages I have to visit every day actually need javascript to work properly (without really needing it, of course) - it's a disaster.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218</id>
	<title>Really...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why on earth do you need JavaScript in a PDF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth do you need JavaScript in a PDF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth do you need JavaScript in a PDF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445576</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A large number of journal articles are pdfs, seriously!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A large number of journal articles are pdfs , seriously !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A large number of journal articles are pdfs, seriously!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445306</id>
	<title>Acrobat attack.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're horrible. You have guys flipping and attacking you with their feet while standing on their hands. You have two other guys with one sitting on the other's shoulders while they punch down on you. You try to fight back and they just do backflips away or jump and balance on some pole way above your head.<p>Yikes! I hate acrobat attacks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're horrible .
You have guys flipping and attacking you with their feet while standing on their hands .
You have two other guys with one sitting on the other 's shoulders while they punch down on you .
You try to fight back and they just do backflips away or jump and balance on some pole way above your head.Yikes !
I hate acrobat attacks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're horrible.
You have guys flipping and attacking you with their feet while standing on their hands.
You have two other guys with one sitting on the other's shoulders while they punch down on you.
You try to fight back and they just do backflips away or jump and balance on some pole way above your head.Yikes!
I hate acrobat attacks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446066</id>
	<title>Help, how do you disable version check on startup?</title>
	<author>British</author>
	<datestamp>1260899820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yesterday morning, my system started up saying a new version of Acrobat reader was available. HOWEVER, reader\_Sl.exe couldn't be found on my reader dir, plus I had it disabled in msconfig in the Startup tab.</p><p>How the hell did this thing startup? Adobe doesn't seem to make it easy to disable any pre-loader app on startup. Why does every software company insist on jamming this crap on everyone's system?</p><p>I would love to see Symnatec, etc list this as malware. After all, same symptoms(drains system resources), and was added w/o user consent, nor is it easy to remove.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday morning , my system started up saying a new version of Acrobat reader was available .
HOWEVER , reader \ _Sl.exe could n't be found on my reader dir , plus I had it disabled in msconfig in the Startup tab.How the hell did this thing startup ?
Adobe does n't seem to make it easy to disable any pre-loader app on startup .
Why does every software company insist on jamming this crap on everyone 's system ? I would love to see Symnatec , etc list this as malware .
After all , same symptoms ( drains system resources ) , and was added w/o user consent , nor is it easy to remove .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday morning, my system started up saying a new version of Acrobat reader was available.
HOWEVER, reader\_Sl.exe couldn't be found on my reader dir, plus I had it disabled in msconfig in the Startup tab.How the hell did this thing startup?
Adobe doesn't seem to make it easy to disable any pre-loader app on startup.
Why does every software company insist on jamming this crap on everyone's system?I would love to see Symnatec, etc list this as malware.
After all, same symptoms(drains system resources), and was added w/o user consent, nor is it easy to remove.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445388</id>
	<title>I'd say this has been around a while</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260897660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got a variation of worm on my machine, being dropped into a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bak file in the adobe directory. I was running 7.0 (somehow, I neglected to ever upgrade). I have since upgraded to 9.2, however, an alternative application seems like a good idea now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a variation of worm on my machine , being dropped into a .bak file in the adobe directory .
I was running 7.0 ( somehow , I neglected to ever upgrade ) .
I have since upgraded to 9.2 , however , an alternative application seems like a good idea now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a variation of worm on my machine, being dropped into a .bak file in the adobe directory.
I was running 7.0 (somehow, I neglected to ever upgrade).
I have since upgraded to 9.2, however, an alternative application seems like a good idea now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446772</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe still used why?</title>
	<author>haruchai</author>
	<datestamp>1260902040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On Windows? Foxit Reader or PDF Xchange viewer ( <a href="http://www.docu-track.com/" title="docu-track.com">http://www.docu-track.com/</a> [docu-track.com] ). Unlike Acrobat Reader, both have tabbed interfaces, can remember which docs were open and reopen them automatically.</p><p>I think PDF Xchange also will track where you were in each opened document and will take you right<br>back to the page you were reading when reopened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On Windows ?
Foxit Reader or PDF Xchange viewer ( http : //www.docu-track.com/ [ docu-track.com ] ) .
Unlike Acrobat Reader , both have tabbed interfaces , can remember which docs were open and reopen them automatically.I think PDF Xchange also will track where you were in each opened document and will take you rightback to the page you were reading when reopened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On Windows?
Foxit Reader or PDF Xchange viewer ( http://www.docu-track.com/ [docu-track.com] ).
Unlike Acrobat Reader, both have tabbed interfaces, can remember which docs were open and reopen them automatically.I think PDF Xchange also will track where you were in each opened document and will take you rightback to the page you were reading when reopened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445700</id>
	<title>Re:BUT WAIT!!!!</title>
	<author>jasonwc</author>
	<datestamp>1260898620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half of my readings in Law School are scanned documents/books in PDF format. Many of the documents are 25-40 MB in size and several hundred pages. I find that PDFs actually load very quickly - much faster than a similarly sized Word or Open Office document, and easier to read. Of course, you can use any PDF reader and not just Adobe Reader/Acrobat.</p><p>On my Core 2 Duo and Core i7 systems, I can open PDFs pretty much instantaneously (less than 0.5 seconds). The only delay is the download. Thankfully, this is one area where Comcast's 25 Mbit "Speedboost" actually comes in handy. At school, being able to download at 100 Mbit/sec makes the files load even faster. The only issue is that Adobe Reader sometimes stalls and I have to try again. However, I find the Adobe reader plugin to generally work better than the alternatives, and I like the full screen reader. I've used Foxit for the tab support but I prefer Reader for its menu layout simplicity when I don't need many documents open.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half of my readings in Law School are scanned documents/books in PDF format .
Many of the documents are 25-40 MB in size and several hundred pages .
I find that PDFs actually load very quickly - much faster than a similarly sized Word or Open Office document , and easier to read .
Of course , you can use any PDF reader and not just Adobe Reader/Acrobat.On my Core 2 Duo and Core i7 systems , I can open PDFs pretty much instantaneously ( less than 0.5 seconds ) .
The only delay is the download .
Thankfully , this is one area where Comcast 's 25 Mbit " Speedboost " actually comes in handy .
At school , being able to download at 100 Mbit/sec makes the files load even faster .
The only issue is that Adobe Reader sometimes stalls and I have to try again .
However , I find the Adobe reader plugin to generally work better than the alternatives , and I like the full screen reader .
I 've used Foxit for the tab support but I prefer Reader for its menu layout simplicity when I do n't need many documents open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half of my readings in Law School are scanned documents/books in PDF format.
Many of the documents are 25-40 MB in size and several hundred pages.
I find that PDFs actually load very quickly - much faster than a similarly sized Word or Open Office document, and easier to read.
Of course, you can use any PDF reader and not just Adobe Reader/Acrobat.On my Core 2 Duo and Core i7 systems, I can open PDFs pretty much instantaneously (less than 0.5 seconds).
The only delay is the download.
Thankfully, this is one area where Comcast's 25 Mbit "Speedboost" actually comes in handy.
At school, being able to download at 100 Mbit/sec makes the files load even faster.
The only issue is that Adobe Reader sometimes stalls and I have to try again.
However, I find the Adobe reader plugin to generally work better than the alternatives, and I like the full screen reader.
I've used Foxit for the tab support but I prefer Reader for its menu layout simplicity when I don't need many documents open.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445472</id>
	<title>Limit permissions and seek alternatives?</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1260898020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like deja vu, since this has issue <a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5926" title="sans.org">cropped up before</a> [sans.org], what with everything from Adobe wanting to install (at least on Mac and Windows) with system level privileges and enable javascript by default. [Tell me again, how is javascript a desirable feature for this file type?]</p><p>Which makes it a good idea to use alternatives like Preview, and <a href="http://skim-app.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">Skim</a> [sourceforge.net] (for OS X), as well as <a href="http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/reader3.php" title="foxitsoftware.com">Foxit Reader</a> [foxitsoftware.com] for Windows.</p><p>It's not like there's a paucity of options to get away from Adobe's bloatware, no matter what OS you're running.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like deja vu , since this has issue cropped up before [ sans.org ] , what with everything from Adobe wanting to install ( at least on Mac and Windows ) with system level privileges and enable javascript by default .
[ Tell me again , how is javascript a desirable feature for this file type ?
] Which makes it a good idea to use alternatives like Preview , and Skim [ sourceforge.net ] ( for OS X ) , as well as Foxit Reader [ foxitsoftware.com ] for Windows.It 's not like there 's a paucity of options to get away from Adobe 's bloatware , no matter what OS you 're running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like deja vu, since this has issue cropped up before [sans.org], what with everything from Adobe wanting to install (at least on Mac and Windows) with system level privileges and enable javascript by default.
[Tell me again, how is javascript a desirable feature for this file type?
]Which makes it a good idea to use alternatives like Preview, and Skim [sourceforge.net] (for OS X), as well as Foxit Reader [foxitsoftware.com] for Windows.It's not like there's a paucity of options to get away from Adobe's bloatware, no matter what OS you're running.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448192</id>
	<title>Re:seen it, I think</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260907320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Link or it didn't happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Link or it did n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Link or it didn't happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445560</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30451790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30456094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30454800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_1529249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30454800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446136
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446178
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30451790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30456094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30448104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30447654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30445368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_1529249.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_1529249.30446260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
