<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_15_145249</id>
	<title>Aussie Gov't To Introduce Bill That Would Require ISP-Level Censorship</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260887640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bennyboy64 writes <i>"iTnews reports that the Australian Government has announced its intention to introduce legislation <a href="http://itnews.com.au/News/162941,breaking-conroy-reveals-plans-to-censor-internet.aspx">that will make ISP-level filtering mandatory</a> for all refused classification material hosted overseas. The Government intends to amend the Broadcasting Services Act in August 2010 to enforce the filter, and expects the filter to be operational within a further twelve months. 'The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed' Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy said."</i> This despite, as reader Sharky2009 writes, the <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/funding\_and\_programs/cybersafety\_plan/internet\_service\_provider\_isp\_filtering/isp\_filtering\_live\_pilot">trial run</a> showing that  "a technically competent user <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/funding\_and\_programs/cybersafety\_plan/internet\_service\_provider\_isp\_filtering/isp\_filtering\_live\_pilot/isp\_filtering\_-\_frequently\_asked\_questions#8.0">could circumvent filtering technology based on ACMA&rsquo;s blacklist</a>."</htmltext>
<tokenext>bennyboy64 writes " iTnews reports that the Australian Government has announced its intention to introduce legislation that will make ISP-level filtering mandatory for all refused classification material hosted overseas .
The Government intends to amend the Broadcasting Services Act in August 2010 to enforce the filter , and expects the filter to be operational within a further twelve months .
'The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed ' Senator Conroy , Minister for Broadband , Communications and the Digital Economy said .
" This despite , as reader Sharky2009 writes , the trial run showing that " a technically competent user could circumvent filtering technology based on ACMA    s blacklist .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bennyboy64 writes "iTnews reports that the Australian Government has announced its intention to introduce legislation that will make ISP-level filtering mandatory for all refused classification material hosted overseas.
The Government intends to amend the Broadcasting Services Act in August 2010 to enforce the filter, and expects the filter to be operational within a further twelve months.
'The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed' Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy said.
" This despite, as reader Sharky2009 writes, the trial run showing that  "a technically competent user could circumvent filtering technology based on ACMA’s blacklist.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445818</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1260899040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I can't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice.</i> <br> <br>
Actually, it's really not a bad idea to learn from other people's mistakes. Of course, that rarely happens, and stupid ideas are recycled time and again, but the principle is a fine thing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice .
Actually , it 's really not a bad idea to learn from other people 's mistakes .
Of course , that rarely happens , and stupid ideas are recycled time and again , but the principle is a fine thing .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice.
Actually, it's really not a bad idea to learn from other people's mistakes.
Of course, that rarely happens, and stupid ideas are recycled time and again, but the principle is a fine thing.
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140</id>
	<title>Of course...</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1260892740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone (or at least, most people) here at Slashdot knows that on a network as large as the internet, <i>no</i> blacklist method will achieve 100\% accuracy.</p><p>This, of course, means that Senator Conroy is either completely ignoring the technical results, or the technical results are being flubbed to match Senator Conroy's agenda.</p><p>Are others in your parliament actually going to vote for this bill, or is he more of a rogue senator who isn't actually supported?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone ( or at least , most people ) here at Slashdot knows that on a network as large as the internet , no blacklist method will achieve 100 \ % accuracy.This , of course , means that Senator Conroy is either completely ignoring the technical results , or the technical results are being flubbed to match Senator Conroy 's agenda.Are others in your parliament actually going to vote for this bill , or is he more of a rogue senator who is n't actually supported ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone (or at least, most people) here at Slashdot knows that on a network as large as the internet, no blacklist method will achieve 100\% accuracy.This, of course, means that Senator Conroy is either completely ignoring the technical results, or the technical results are being flubbed to match Senator Conroy's agenda.Are others in your parliament actually going to vote for this bill, or is he more of a rogue senator who isn't actually supported?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30463428</id>
	<title>Re:a short story</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1259660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can "speak up" all you want on these things as a non-citizen of these places, but it's not going to do much good.  Why would these other countries' governments care about what some random person says about their policies on an internet forum?  The only people who actually have any power over an elected government are the people who elect it.  Unfortunately, the main problem with democratic governments is that if the voters are stupid, ignorant, naive, or apathetic, you get a crappy government.  That's why democratic governments really don't work all that much better (or even worse) than the monarchies of previous centuries, except in very small countries with highly-educated citizens.  For instance, the USA had a much better (i.e. non-corrupt) government back when only landholders were allowed to vote.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can " speak up " all you want on these things as a non-citizen of these places , but it 's not going to do much good .
Why would these other countries ' governments care about what some random person says about their policies on an internet forum ?
The only people who actually have any power over an elected government are the people who elect it .
Unfortunately , the main problem with democratic governments is that if the voters are stupid , ignorant , naive , or apathetic , you get a crappy government .
That 's why democratic governments really do n't work all that much better ( or even worse ) than the monarchies of previous centuries , except in very small countries with highly-educated citizens .
For instance , the USA had a much better ( i.e .
non-corrupt ) government back when only landholders were allowed to vote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can "speak up" all you want on these things as a non-citizen of these places, but it's not going to do much good.
Why would these other countries' governments care about what some random person says about their policies on an internet forum?
The only people who actually have any power over an elected government are the people who elect it.
Unfortunately, the main problem with democratic governments is that if the voters are stupid, ignorant, naive, or apathetic, you get a crappy government.
That's why democratic governments really don't work all that much better (or even worse) than the monarchies of previous centuries, except in very small countries with highly-educated citizens.
For instance, the USA had a much better (i.e.
non-corrupt) government back when only landholders were allowed to vote.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445502</id>
	<title>Riiiiight...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260898080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed</p></div><p>Riiight...</p><p>Protip: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darknet\_(file\_sharing)" title="wikipedia.org">Darknet</a> [wikipedia.org], <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy\_server#Tunneling\_proxy\_server" title="wikipedia.org">tunneling proxy</a> [wikipedia.org], <a href="http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Epic\_Fail" title="encycloped...matica.com">EPIC FAIL</a> [encycloped...matica.com]. ^^</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speedRiiight...Protip : Darknet [ wikipedia.org ] , tunneling proxy [ wikipedia.org ] , EPIC FAIL [ encycloped...matica.com ] .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speedRiiight...Protip: Darknet [wikipedia.org], tunneling proxy [wikipedia.org], EPIC FAIL [encycloped...matica.com].
^^
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444130</id>
	<title>Re:Leave australia Alone</title>
	<author>LordAndrewSama</author>
	<datestamp>1260892680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think people would be right to mod you down.</p><p>Firstly, Australia &amp; America have been friends since WW2 when the shock of the british defeat by japan in the asian theatre(most importantly, the loss of singapore) lead to australia moving further from britain to america for defensive pacts, which would lead to trade, etc etc.</p><p>Secondly, that has \_WHAT\_ to do with internet censorship?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think people would be right to mod you down.Firstly , Australia &amp; America have been friends since WW2 when the shock of the british defeat by japan in the asian theatre ( most importantly , the loss of singapore ) lead to australia moving further from britain to america for defensive pacts , which would lead to trade , etc etc.Secondly , that has \ _WHAT \ _ to do with internet censorship ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think people would be right to mod you down.Firstly, Australia &amp; America have been friends since WW2 when the shock of the british defeat by japan in the asian theatre(most importantly, the loss of singapore) lead to australia moving further from britain to america for defensive pacts, which would lead to trade, etc etc.Secondly, that has \_WHAT\_ to do with internet censorship?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444744</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1260895320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody who claims 100\% accuracy in such a context is 100\% lying, or 100\% incompetent, or both.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody who claims 100 \ % accuracy in such a context is 100 \ % lying , or 100 \ % incompetent , or both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody who claims 100\% accuracy in such a context is 100\% lying, or 100\% incompetent, or both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448122</id>
	<title>Boycott</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1260907080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Direct action of millions of customers canceling internet service would quickly force the ISPs to push legislators in the right direction. I suggest you organize the boycott before you cancel, however.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct action of millions of customers canceling internet service would quickly force the ISPs to push legislators in the right direction .
I suggest you organize the boycott before you cancel , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct action of millions of customers canceling internet service would quickly force the ISPs to push legislators in the right direction.
I suggest you organize the boycott before you cancel, however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445362</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>wadeal</author>
	<datestamp>1260897540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except you forget who just became leader of the Libs? Mr Ultra Conservative. Were fucked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except you forget who just became leader of the Libs ?
Mr Ultra Conservative .
Were fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except you forget who just became leader of the Libs?
Mr Ultra Conservative.
Were fucked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445966</id>
	<title>Re:national character?</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1260899520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I have to admit, this is not what I expect to see from Australians.</i> <br> <br>
Not many Australians happen to like it, but the Minister has the bit between his teeth and does not have our concerns at heart. And this is with the collusion of a Prime Minister who seems determined to adopt a Tony Blair-like position as conservative cuckoo in the nest of the Labor Party.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to admit , this is not what I expect to see from Australians .
Not many Australians happen to like it , but the Minister has the bit between his teeth and does not have our concerns at heart .
And this is with the collusion of a Prime Minister who seems determined to adopt a Tony Blair-like position as conservative cuckoo in the nest of the Labor Party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to admit, this is not what I expect to see from Australians.
Not many Australians happen to like it, but the Minister has the bit between his teeth and does not have our concerns at heart.
And this is with the collusion of a Prime Minister who seems determined to adopt a Tony Blair-like position as conservative cuckoo in the nest of the Labor Party.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444248</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260893220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny.. for a second there I thought you were talking about the United States...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny.. for a second there I thought you were talking about the United States.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny.. for a second there I thought you were talking about the United States...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444484</id>
	<title>Re:What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260894420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that's what everyone outside Australia thought, but the truth is, we were never cool.... not even very close to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's what everyone outside Australia thought , but the truth is , we were never cool.... not even very close to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's what everyone outside Australia thought, but the truth is, we were never cool.... not even very close to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451540</id>
	<title>Getting out of here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260879060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bye Australia! I apparently have this long to leave the country and find somewhere else to live</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bye Australia !
I apparently have this long to leave the country and find somewhere else to live</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bye Australia!
I apparently have this long to leave the country and find somewhere else to live</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446912</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1260902460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or hadn't thought about his own position.</p></div></blockquote><p>Benjamin Franklin, one of the more influential thinkers in the American Revolution, was the one who said that.  He was eccentric, but I don't think he was crazy.  He certainly was aware of his situation.</p><p>At the time, people living in America had relative safety (individually).  The British crown generally tried to protect them, and wasn't out to kill them.  However, there were certain injustices that the Crown perpetrated on them -- things like taxing them without letting them have representatives in Parliament, and the British military effectively forcing civilians to quarter (Feed+board) them for indefinite amounts of time.  Franklin, and the other revolutionaries who drafted our Declaration of Independence, were <b>very aware</b> that they were making a choice to either revolt (and risk capital punishment should they fail or be caught) or continue sacrificing the Liberties which they felt were absolutely essential.</p><p>Many of these liberties and related concerns are addressed directly in the first 10 amendments to our Constitution: the rights of freedom of religion, speech, a free press, and the right not to have troops quartered in your house are four examples.  These are principles which Franklin and the others were absolutely prepared to die for.</p><p>Franklin and his friends knew a lot more about the matter than many of us do.  Right now, we live in relative prosperity and comfort, so the risk and "temporary safety" are amplified in our minds.  We're not likely to die to disease, cold, or raiding natives, for example.  Our populace has basically been seduced by the bread and circuses (so to speak), and has willingly traded away freedoms which some of us consider essential (freedom to copy a DVD you own, freedom to communicate securely, etc) in order to have a more blissful and convenient existence.  The security theater we see in American (and other) airports is another example of this: we've pretty much irrevocably squandered our right to not be treated like a herd of potential criminals, in exchange for "safety".  This is absolutely the same sort of things over which Franklin and others were willing to shed blood over: tyrrany, however petty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever said " those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety , deserve neither liberty nor safety " was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or had n't thought about his own position.Benjamin Franklin , one of the more influential thinkers in the American Revolution , was the one who said that .
He was eccentric , but I do n't think he was crazy .
He certainly was aware of his situation.At the time , people living in America had relative safety ( individually ) .
The British crown generally tried to protect them , and was n't out to kill them .
However , there were certain injustices that the Crown perpetrated on them -- things like taxing them without letting them have representatives in Parliament , and the British military effectively forcing civilians to quarter ( Feed + board ) them for indefinite amounts of time .
Franklin , and the other revolutionaries who drafted our Declaration of Independence , were very aware that they were making a choice to either revolt ( and risk capital punishment should they fail or be caught ) or continue sacrificing the Liberties which they felt were absolutely essential.Many of these liberties and related concerns are addressed directly in the first 10 amendments to our Constitution : the rights of freedom of religion , speech , a free press , and the right not to have troops quartered in your house are four examples .
These are principles which Franklin and the others were absolutely prepared to die for.Franklin and his friends knew a lot more about the matter than many of us do .
Right now , we live in relative prosperity and comfort , so the risk and " temporary safety " are amplified in our minds .
We 're not likely to die to disease , cold , or raiding natives , for example .
Our populace has basically been seduced by the bread and circuses ( so to speak ) , and has willingly traded away freedoms which some of us consider essential ( freedom to copy a DVD you own , freedom to communicate securely , etc ) in order to have a more blissful and convenient existence .
The security theater we see in American ( and other ) airports is another example of this : we 've pretty much irrevocably squandered our right to not be treated like a herd of potential criminals , in exchange for " safety " .
This is absolutely the same sort of things over which Franklin and others were willing to shed blood over : tyrrany , however petty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or hadn't thought about his own position.Benjamin Franklin, one of the more influential thinkers in the American Revolution, was the one who said that.
He was eccentric, but I don't think he was crazy.
He certainly was aware of his situation.At the time, people living in America had relative safety (individually).
The British crown generally tried to protect them, and wasn't out to kill them.
However, there were certain injustices that the Crown perpetrated on them -- things like taxing them without letting them have representatives in Parliament, and the British military effectively forcing civilians to quarter (Feed+board) them for indefinite amounts of time.
Franklin, and the other revolutionaries who drafted our Declaration of Independence, were very aware that they were making a choice to either revolt (and risk capital punishment should they fail or be caught) or continue sacrificing the Liberties which they felt were absolutely essential.Many of these liberties and related concerns are addressed directly in the first 10 amendments to our Constitution: the rights of freedom of religion, speech, a free press, and the right not to have troops quartered in your house are four examples.
These are principles which Franklin and the others were absolutely prepared to die for.Franklin and his friends knew a lot more about the matter than many of us do.
Right now, we live in relative prosperity and comfort, so the risk and "temporary safety" are amplified in our minds.
We're not likely to die to disease, cold, or raiding natives, for example.
Our populace has basically been seduced by the bread and circuses (so to speak), and has willingly traded away freedoms which some of us consider essential (freedom to copy a DVD you own, freedom to communicate securely, etc) in order to have a more blissful and convenient existence.
The security theater we see in American (and other) airports is another example of this: we've pretty much irrevocably squandered our right to not be treated like a herd of potential criminals, in exchange for "safety".
This is absolutely the same sort of things over which Franklin and others were willing to shed blood over: tyrrany, however petty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974</id>
	<title>100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry but done with 100\% accuracy? I think that is an internet filtering first. I'd love to know what filtering technology they are using because it is far better than anything I've used to date.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry but done with 100 \ % accuracy ?
I think that is an internet filtering first .
I 'd love to know what filtering technology they are using because it is far better than anything I 've used to date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry but done with 100\% accuracy?
I think that is an internet filtering first.
I'd love to know what filtering technology they are using because it is far better than anything I've used to date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444538</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>BakaHoushi</author>
	<datestamp>1260894600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be Benjamin Franklin who said that, I believe, and I don't see anywhere where he is suggesting the wholesale slaughter of those who oppose liberty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be Benjamin Franklin who said that , I believe , and I do n't see anywhere where he is suggesting the wholesale slaughter of those who oppose liberty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be Benjamin Franklin who said that, I believe, and I don't see anywhere where he is suggesting the wholesale slaughter of those who oppose liberty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453810</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>keeperofdakeys</author>
	<datestamp>1260896220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both of the leaders for our main political parties are active church goers (wiki Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott), and (at least) Tony Abbott is pro-life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both of the leaders for our main political parties are active church goers ( wiki Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott ) , and ( at least ) Tony Abbott is pro-life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both of the leaders for our main political parties are active church goers (wiki Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott), and (at least) Tony Abbott is pro-life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445128</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>BlortHorc</author>
	<datestamp>1260896640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guy is a fucking turkey. iinet only took part in the trial to prove how idiotic it was, anyone who has a ssh tunnel to somewhere in the rest of the world can immediately bypass this foolish plan, and that has been pointed out to him. Repeatedly. Should I mention the turkey thing again? Not even to mention stenography, gpg encrypted emails, etc, etc, etc. This guy is without a doubt the biggest dumbfuck in the current Labour government.</p><p>Why don't we vote the other guys back in, I hear you ask? Why, because in Labour this kind of turkey is somewhat rare, whereas the Liberals/Nationals has a good half dozen or so wack jobs even loonier than him. Why are so many extremists attracted to politics in Aus? Because capable people stand to make way more in the private sector, and those very few capable people with a strong sense of ethics tend to join a party with an ethical basis, such as the Greens, who have yet to make enough traction to make useful changes to the fucked up political culture in this country.</p><p>And for what it is worth, the legislation is still just a twinkle in Conroy's eye, it hasn't even been tabled in the house of reps yet, let alone pass a hostile senate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guy is a fucking turkey .
iinet only took part in the trial to prove how idiotic it was , anyone who has a ssh tunnel to somewhere in the rest of the world can immediately bypass this foolish plan , and that has been pointed out to him .
Repeatedly. Should I mention the turkey thing again ?
Not even to mention stenography , gpg encrypted emails , etc , etc , etc .
This guy is without a doubt the biggest dumbfuck in the current Labour government.Why do n't we vote the other guys back in , I hear you ask ?
Why , because in Labour this kind of turkey is somewhat rare , whereas the Liberals/Nationals has a good half dozen or so wack jobs even loonier than him .
Why are so many extremists attracted to politics in Aus ?
Because capable people stand to make way more in the private sector , and those very few capable people with a strong sense of ethics tend to join a party with an ethical basis , such as the Greens , who have yet to make enough traction to make useful changes to the fucked up political culture in this country.And for what it is worth , the legislation is still just a twinkle in Conroy 's eye , it has n't even been tabled in the house of reps yet , let alone pass a hostile senate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guy is a fucking turkey.
iinet only took part in the trial to prove how idiotic it was, anyone who has a ssh tunnel to somewhere in the rest of the world can immediately bypass this foolish plan, and that has been pointed out to him.
Repeatedly. Should I mention the turkey thing again?
Not even to mention stenography, gpg encrypted emails, etc, etc, etc.
This guy is without a doubt the biggest dumbfuck in the current Labour government.Why don't we vote the other guys back in, I hear you ask?
Why, because in Labour this kind of turkey is somewhat rare, whereas the Liberals/Nationals has a good half dozen or so wack jobs even loonier than him.
Why are so many extremists attracted to politics in Aus?
Because capable people stand to make way more in the private sector, and those very few capable people with a strong sense of ethics tend to join a party with an ethical basis, such as the Greens, who have yet to make enough traction to make useful changes to the fucked up political culture in this country.And for what it is worth, the legislation is still just a twinkle in Conroy's eye, it hasn't even been tabled in the house of reps yet, let alone pass a hostile senate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446480</id>
	<title>What the hell happened down under?</title>
	<author>moxley</author>
	<datestamp>1260901200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I grew up knowing of Australia as this country that is about the same size as America - with a very free and independent spirit.</p><p>Then, in the mid 90s they come down with drastic firearms legislation, and now all we hear about is how obsessed with censorship many in the government there are - censoring film, games, etc to that point that some games aren't available or have to be changed, and they are trying again and again depite heavy Aussie and worldwide opposition to censoring the entire internet.</p><p>Is it just the same shift to authoritarianism that has occurred in almost all western countries? Is there enough outcry and clout among the public to put a stop to this stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up knowing of Australia as this country that is about the same size as America - with a very free and independent spirit.Then , in the mid 90s they come down with drastic firearms legislation , and now all we hear about is how obsessed with censorship many in the government there are - censoring film , games , etc to that point that some games are n't available or have to be changed , and they are trying again and again depite heavy Aussie and worldwide opposition to censoring the entire internet.Is it just the same shift to authoritarianism that has occurred in almost all western countries ?
Is there enough outcry and clout among the public to put a stop to this stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up knowing of Australia as this country that is about the same size as America - with a very free and independent spirit.Then, in the mid 90s they come down with drastic firearms legislation, and now all we hear about is how obsessed with censorship many in the government there are - censoring film, games, etc to that point that some games aren't available or have to be changed, and they are trying again and again depite heavy Aussie and worldwide opposition to censoring the entire internet.Is it just the same shift to authoritarianism that has occurred in almost all western countries?
Is there enough outcry and clout among the public to put a stop to this stuff?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1260892560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Believe me, Australians are not asleep. Senator Conroy has chosen to barge ahead regardless of any public outcry. Fortunately the Labour Government do not hold enough power in the Senate to push this through with out the support of the opposition and the Independents/Minority Parties, which they just aren't going to get. Independent Senator Nick Minchin and Greens Senator Scott Ludlam have both been very vocal in opposition to Censorship in Australia. The Librals (the other major party) seem to be fighting the Labour party at every turn, so I suspect their support will be limited. I think if it doesn't pass, the worst outcome will be that Labour will use this as a slander campaign to paint the opposition as supporting "Child Abuse".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe me , Australians are not asleep .
Senator Conroy has chosen to barge ahead regardless of any public outcry .
Fortunately the Labour Government do not hold enough power in the Senate to push this through with out the support of the opposition and the Independents/Minority Parties , which they just are n't going to get .
Independent Senator Nick Minchin and Greens Senator Scott Ludlam have both been very vocal in opposition to Censorship in Australia .
The Librals ( the other major party ) seem to be fighting the Labour party at every turn , so I suspect their support will be limited .
I think if it does n't pass , the worst outcome will be that Labour will use this as a slander campaign to paint the opposition as supporting " Child Abuse " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe me, Australians are not asleep.
Senator Conroy has chosen to barge ahead regardless of any public outcry.
Fortunately the Labour Government do not hold enough power in the Senate to push this through with out the support of the opposition and the Independents/Minority Parties, which they just aren't going to get.
Independent Senator Nick Minchin and Greens Senator Scott Ludlam have both been very vocal in opposition to Censorship in Australia.
The Librals (the other major party) seem to be fighting the Labour party at every turn, so I suspect their support will be limited.
I think if it doesn't pass, the worst outcome will be that Labour will use this as a slander campaign to paint the opposition as supporting "Child Abuse".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176</id>
	<title>100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>rainmaestro</author>
	<datestamp>1260892860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would love to see this filter of his. I've never seen a filter for *anything* that could truly be said to be 100\% accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would love to see this filter of his .
I 've never seen a filter for * anything * that could truly be said to be 100 \ % accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would love to see this filter of his.
I've never seen a filter for *anything* that could truly be said to be 100\% accurate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446560</id>
	<title>Welcome to "net neutrality"</title>
	<author>bonch</author>
	<datestamp>1260901440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what governments do when they're allowed to regulate internet traffic.  This is exactly what I was arguing can happen in discussions on "net neutrality."  You don't want this kind of government control over your public medium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what governments do when they 're allowed to regulate internet traffic .
This is exactly what I was arguing can happen in discussions on " net neutrality .
" You do n't want this kind of government control over your public medium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what governments do when they're allowed to regulate internet traffic.
This is exactly what I was arguing can happen in discussions on "net neutrality.
"  You don't want this kind of government control over your public medium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444116</id>
	<title>Re:Would this block web stores?</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1260892620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing the Australian Postal Service (or whatever it's called) will also implement "deep packet inspection".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing the Australian Postal Service ( or whatever it 's called ) will also implement " deep packet inspection " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing the Australian Postal Service (or whatever it's called) will also implement "deep packet inspection".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968</id>
	<title>national character?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to admit, this is not what I expect to see from Australians.  Perhaps from Europeans who prefer their governments to make peoples' personal decisions for them, but not from Australians.</p><p>Not that we're better here in the 'states - we're sliding down some very similar slopes over here as well, maybe just a little bit behind.  Maybe it's just that very few any more really care about being free peoples, and would rather have the convenience of a nanny state to protect them and make them feel safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to admit , this is not what I expect to see from Australians .
Perhaps from Europeans who prefer their governments to make peoples ' personal decisions for them , but not from Australians.Not that we 're better here in the 'states - we 're sliding down some very similar slopes over here as well , maybe just a little bit behind .
Maybe it 's just that very few any more really care about being free peoples , and would rather have the convenience of a nanny state to protect them and make them feel safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to admit, this is not what I expect to see from Australians.
Perhaps from Europeans who prefer their governments to make peoples' personal decisions for them, but not from Australians.Not that we're better here in the 'states - we're sliding down some very similar slopes over here as well, maybe just a little bit behind.
Maybe it's just that very few any more really care about being free peoples, and would rather have the convenience of a nanny state to protect them and make them feel safe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444152</id>
	<title>Re:What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260892740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They became apathetic.</p><p>When I was last there, the majority of people I met were more interested in drinking, surfing and watching TV than they were with politics or voting.</p><p>The only people who do care about anything at all are the small minority of crazies. These are mainly religious freaks, who continually cry and moan about "obscene" material.</p><p>Mind you, these people are probably the most deviant people around. Like many male Republicans in the US, especially those in power, they'll go on about the important of "family values" and religion, only to be caught in an airport bathroom getting fucked by three random men while performing fellatio on faucet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They became apathetic.When I was last there , the majority of people I met were more interested in drinking , surfing and watching TV than they were with politics or voting.The only people who do care about anything at all are the small minority of crazies .
These are mainly religious freaks , who continually cry and moan about " obscene " material.Mind you , these people are probably the most deviant people around .
Like many male Republicans in the US , especially those in power , they 'll go on about the important of " family values " and religion , only to be caught in an airport bathroom getting fucked by three random men while performing fellatio on faucet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They became apathetic.When I was last there, the majority of people I met were more interested in drinking, surfing and watching TV than they were with politics or voting.The only people who do care about anything at all are the small minority of crazies.
These are mainly religious freaks, who continually cry and moan about "obscene" material.Mind you, these people are probably the most deviant people around.
Like many male Republicans in the US, especially those in power, they'll go on about the important of "family values" and religion, only to be caught in an airport bathroom getting fucked by three random men while performing fellatio on faucet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452746</id>
	<title>Re:Remember - it's the Government, not Australians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260886080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conroy is taking public submissions here: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/all\_funding\_programs\_and\_support/cybersafety\_plan/transparency\_measures/how\_to\_make\_a\_submission</p><p>As well as #nocleanfeed, twitter to @nocleanfeed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conroy is taking public submissions here : http : //www.dbcde.gov.au/all \ _funding \ _programs \ _and \ _support/cybersafety \ _plan/transparency \ _measures/how \ _to \ _make \ _a \ _submissionAs well as # nocleanfeed , twitter to @ nocleanfeed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conroy is taking public submissions here: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/all\_funding\_programs\_and\_support/cybersafety\_plan/transparency\_measures/how\_to\_make\_a\_submissionAs well as #nocleanfeed, twitter to @nocleanfeed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451596</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260879300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, at this rate the Liberals will have a new leader before the next election.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , at this rate the Liberals will have a new leader before the next election .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, at this rate the Liberals will have a new leader before the next election.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445718</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1260898740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>In the last case, we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there.</i> <br> <br>
They were that idiotic in the previous election. They handed Howard a Senate virtually trussed up with an apple in its mouth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the last case , we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there .
They were that idiotic in the previous election .
They handed Howard a Senate virtually trussed up with an apple in its mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the last case, we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there.
They were that idiotic in the previous election.
They handed Howard a Senate virtually trussed up with an apple in its mouth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443898</id>
	<title>Would this block web stores?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the lone holdout Attorney General gets his way, Australia will ignore <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/12/14/2224208/Australia-Could-Finally-Get-R18-Games?art\_pos=7" title="slashdot.org">comments from the public</a> [slashdot.org] and continue to refuse classification to video games that have been rated mature in other regions. Does this mean Australia will start blocking Amazon, eBay, and other foreign sellers of mature-rated video games?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the lone holdout Attorney General gets his way , Australia will ignore comments from the public [ slashdot.org ] and continue to refuse classification to video games that have been rated mature in other regions .
Does this mean Australia will start blocking Amazon , eBay , and other foreign sellers of mature-rated video games ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the lone holdout Attorney General gets his way, Australia will ignore comments from the public [slashdot.org] and continue to refuse classification to video games that have been rated mature in other regions.
Does this mean Australia will start blocking Amazon, eBay, and other foreign sellers of mature-rated video games?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451164</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260877140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but think frying pan/fire (or kodos/kang).  You see the opposition "alternative" right now is a mish-mash of uber-conservatives, fruit-loops and combinations of the aforementioned.  Of course ideally people would vote for independents and smaller parties to win back some sort of actual representation, but unfortunately many, many people comprehensively fail to understand how our preferential voting works and believe the bullshit spin that such a vote would be "wasted", so that's not likely to happen any time soon.</p><p>So your answer is: technically yes, practically no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but think frying pan/fire ( or kodos/kang ) .
You see the opposition " alternative " right now is a mish-mash of uber-conservatives , fruit-loops and combinations of the aforementioned .
Of course ideally people would vote for independents and smaller parties to win back some sort of actual representation , but unfortunately many , many people comprehensively fail to understand how our preferential voting works and believe the bullshit spin that such a vote would be " wasted " , so that 's not likely to happen any time soon.So your answer is : technically yes , practically no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but think frying pan/fire (or kodos/kang).
You see the opposition "alternative" right now is a mish-mash of uber-conservatives, fruit-loops and combinations of the aforementioned.
Of course ideally people would vote for independents and smaller parties to win back some sort of actual representation, but unfortunately many, many people comprehensively fail to understand how our preferential voting works and believe the bullshit spin that such a vote would be "wasted", so that's not likely to happen any time soon.So your answer is: technically yes, practically no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451974</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>Pseudonym</author>
	<datestamp>1260881220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Barring a double dissolution (the constitutional trigger for which has occurred, but the PM has said it will not happen), you probably won't have a chance to vote him out before late 2010/early 2011.</p><p>In addition to writing to your MP, if you are a member of the IIA, you might want to write to them urging them to lobby the government to ensure that ISP-level filtering will be offered on an optional basis and will not unduly burden small ISPs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barring a double dissolution ( the constitutional trigger for which has occurred , but the PM has said it will not happen ) , you probably wo n't have a chance to vote him out before late 2010/early 2011.In addition to writing to your MP , if you are a member of the IIA , you might want to write to them urging them to lobby the government to ensure that ISP-level filtering will be offered on an optional basis and will not unduly burden small ISPs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barring a double dissolution (the constitutional trigger for which has occurred, but the PM has said it will not happen), you probably won't have a chance to vote him out before late 2010/early 2011.In addition to writing to your MP, if you are a member of the IIA, you might want to write to them urging them to lobby the government to ensure that ISP-level filtering will be offered on an optional basis and will not unduly burden small ISPs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444400</id>
	<title>Re:What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260893940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thousands of years of corrupt government to reflect upon, yet the average individual is <i>still</i> naive enough to believe the age-old fairy tale that government and the people are "one and the same".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thousands of years of corrupt government to reflect upon , yet the average individual is still naive enough to believe the age-old fairy tale that government and the people are " one and the same " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thousands of years of corrupt government to reflect upon, yet the average individual is still naive enough to believe the age-old fairy tale that government and the people are "one and the same".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451276</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>AReilly</author>
	<datestamp>1260877680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read the report: it's not accurate in any useful or unexpected sense: it blocks the URLs that are on the block list.  Neat, huh?  They just get to make a claim with a pretty, round number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the report : it 's not accurate in any useful or unexpected sense : it blocks the URLs that are on the block list .
Neat , huh ?
They just get to make a claim with a pretty , round number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the report: it's not accurate in any useful or unexpected sense: it blocks the URLs that are on the block list.
Neat, huh?
They just get to make a claim with a pretty, round number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452434</id>
	<title>Conroy is taking public submissions (link)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260884040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conroy is taking public submissions on his planned censorship here: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/all\_funding\_programs\_and\_support/cybersafety\_plan/transparency\_measures<br>Write and tell him what you think!</p><p>Also, sign this petition: http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNet/442</p><p>And twitter your support with @nocleanfeed and #nocleanfeed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conroy is taking public submissions on his planned censorship here : http : //www.dbcde.gov.au/all \ _funding \ _programs \ _and \ _support/cybersafety \ _plan/transparency \ _measuresWrite and tell him what you think ! Also , sign this petition : http : //www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNet/442And twitter your support with @ nocleanfeed and # nocleanfeed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conroy is taking public submissions on his planned censorship here: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/all\_funding\_programs\_and\_support/cybersafety\_plan/transparency\_measuresWrite and tell him what you think!Also, sign this petition: http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNet/442And twitter your support with @nocleanfeed and #nocleanfeed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446830</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260902220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In any case, whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy</p></div><p>Fuck you, you little internet pissant.  You don't know shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In any case , whoever said " those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety , deserve neither liberty nor safety " was obviously crazyFuck you , you little internet pissant .
You do n't know shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In any case, whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazyFuck you, you little internet pissant.
You don't know shit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454096</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1260899760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conroy is a minister in cabinet, and the communications portfolio he has is one of the higher profile ones. If he's pushing for net censorship it has the full backing* of the government.
</p><p>
* Full backing = 51\% or more of the Labor caucus.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conroy is a minister in cabinet , and the communications portfolio he has is one of the higher profile ones .
If he 's pushing for net censorship it has the full backing * of the government .
* Full backing = 51 \ % or more of the Labor caucus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conroy is a minister in cabinet, and the communications portfolio he has is one of the higher profile ones.
If he's pushing for net censorship it has the full backing* of the government.
* Full backing = 51\% or more of the Labor caucus.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446038</id>
	<title>Re:But if it's to protect the people ...</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1260899760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>.. from hackers, thieves, terrorists and child pornographers, they'll roll over and accept it.</i><br>Of course, the "Christian Lobby" wants to extend the filter to cover <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/162962,christian-lobby-wants-filter-net-cast-wider.aspx" title="itnews.com.au">much more than that</a> [itnews.com.au].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. from hackers , thieves , terrorists and child pornographers , they 'll roll over and accept it.Of course , the " Christian Lobby " wants to extend the filter to cover much more than that [ itnews.com.au ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. from hackers, thieves, terrorists and child pornographers, they'll roll over and accept it.Of course, the "Christian Lobby" wants to extend the filter to cover much more than that [itnews.com.au].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452774</id>
	<title>Re:What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>deek</author>
	<datestamp>1260886260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Politicians are not cool.  It is universal.</p><p>Anyways, we'll just have to wait until the next election.  Then we can vote yet another douchebag in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Politicians are not cool .
It is universal.Anyways , we 'll just have to wait until the next election .
Then we can vote yet another douchebag in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Politicians are not cool.
It is universal.Anyways, we'll just have to wait until the next election.
Then we can vote yet another douchebag in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447114</id>
	<title>Cameras everywhere</title>
	<author>speedlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1260903000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not much of a surprise.  Australia has more speed and stoplight cameras than anywhere else but England.  You are not trusted.

Why should we trust you with the series of tubes known as the intarwebs ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not much of a surprise .
Australia has more speed and stoplight cameras than anywhere else but England .
You are not trusted .
Why should we trust you with the series of tubes known as the intarwebs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not much of a surprise.
Australia has more speed and stoplight cameras than anywhere else but England.
You are not trusted.
Why should we trust you with the series of tubes known as the intarwebs ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940</id>
	<title>Conroy is a Traitor.</title>
	<author>ozmanjusri</author>
	<datestamp>1260891720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The new leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott, is an outspoken catholic. His party has opposed the ISP-based filter in the past, so it's just possible this nasty piece of trash legislation is an attempt to politically embarrass him.
<p>
If he opposes the bill, the government can accuse him of hypocrisy. If he supports it, he faces rebellion in his own party.
</p><p>
But if it is brinkmanship, Conroy is playing with fire. There could be a very serious electoral backlash from this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new leader of the opposition , Tony Abbott , is an outspoken catholic .
His party has opposed the ISP-based filter in the past , so it 's just possible this nasty piece of trash legislation is an attempt to politically embarrass him .
If he opposes the bill , the government can accuse him of hypocrisy .
If he supports it , he faces rebellion in his own party .
But if it is brinkmanship , Conroy is playing with fire .
There could be a very serious electoral backlash from this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott, is an outspoken catholic.
His party has opposed the ISP-based filter in the past, so it's just possible this nasty piece of trash legislation is an attempt to politically embarrass him.
If he opposes the bill, the government can accuse him of hypocrisy.
If he supports it, he faces rebellion in his own party.
But if it is brinkmanship, Conroy is playing with fire.
There could be a very serious electoral backlash from this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444558</id>
	<title>clearly a humbug reason for filtering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260894660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Why did the Government cease providing free PC filters when ISP filtering will not be available until 2011?<br>The PC filter program experienced low take-up and very low ongoing use. It was therefore closed to new users six months earlier than originally planned.<br>Only around 12.5 per cent of the approximately two million households with dependent children and an internet connection are estimated to have tried one of these filters, and less than one per cent of these households continue to use their filters."</p><p>1\% of the population still uses this filtering<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>12\% has tried it out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>this means:<br>
&nbsp; 88 \% of all people didn't even want to try it out,<br>out of the remaining 12\%, 90\% of those who've tried it out dumped it afterwards<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>conclusion: 99\% of your population do not want filtering, the other 1\% can still filter their own PC by installing the software on their own PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Why did the Government cease providing free PC filters when ISP filtering will not be available until 2011 ? The PC filter program experienced low take-up and very low ongoing use .
It was therefore closed to new users six months earlier than originally planned.Only around 12.5 per cent of the approximately two million households with dependent children and an internet connection are estimated to have tried one of these filters , and less than one per cent of these households continue to use their filters .
" 1 \ % of the population still uses this filtering ...12 \ % has tried it out ...this means :   88 \ % of all people did n't even want to try it out,out of the remaining 12 \ % , 90 \ % of those who 've tried it out dumped it afterwards ...conclusion : 99 \ % of your population do not want filtering , the other 1 \ % can still filter their own PC by installing the software on their own PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Why did the Government cease providing free PC filters when ISP filtering will not be available until 2011?The PC filter program experienced low take-up and very low ongoing use.
It was therefore closed to new users six months earlier than originally planned.Only around 12.5 per cent of the approximately two million households with dependent children and an internet connection are estimated to have tried one of these filters, and less than one per cent of these households continue to use their filters.
"1\% of the population still uses this filtering ...12\% has tried it out ...this means:
  88 \% of all people didn't even want to try it out,out of the remaining 12\%, 90\% of those who've tried it out dumped it afterwards ...conclusion: 99\% of your population do not want filtering, the other 1\% can still filter their own PC by installing the software on their own PC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260892980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There hasn't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones (i.e. since they got into power). You realise we can't just get new elections every news cycle. (Although the Prime Minister can call elections for the House of Representatives almost as often as he likes, it's terribly inconvenient and if they do go early (or, as early as you're suggesting they should've gone), people are inclined to vote them out just for dragging them out to the polls one more time than is necessary.)</p><p>In any case, even if we could, the other lot aren't any better... Most people would rank this (known) temporary inconvenience as a lot less bad than the (unknown) evils a government ran by Tony Abbott, Leader of the Liberal Party, would bring.</p><p>In the last case, we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there. I expect the Liberal party will oppose it on the basis that they're the opposition, the Greens will oppose it on the basis that it's neither left nor liberal, and the independents will probably vote quite randomly on the basis of stellar alignment and what their advisors tell them people think.</p><p>So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... don't say stupid things like that. The least you could do before commenting on our political system is inform yourself of the absolute basics of how it works. And in this particular case, almost every political system in the (developed) world works comparably.</p><p>(If you really *were* telling us to use pitchforks, then either you're completely unrealistic, or completely crazy. In any case, whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or hadn't thought about his own position, and if you're an American you've probably been brainwashed into both believing that and not acting on it. Our society is so great, and so free, precisely because we complain and wait until its time to vote instead of getting out the guns and pitchforks and executing anyone in Parliament)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There has n't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones ( i.e .
since they got into power ) .
You realise we ca n't just get new elections every news cycle .
( Although the Prime Minister can call elections for the House of Representatives almost as often as he likes , it 's terribly inconvenient and if they do go early ( or , as early as you 're suggesting they should 've gone ) , people are inclined to vote them out just for dragging them out to the polls one more time than is necessary .
) In any case , even if we could , the other lot are n't any better... Most people would rank this ( known ) temporary inconvenience as a lot less bad than the ( unknown ) evils a government ran by Tony Abbott , Leader of the Liberal Party , would bring.In the last case , we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there .
I expect the Liberal party will oppose it on the basis that they 're the opposition , the Greens will oppose it on the basis that it 's neither left nor liberal , and the independents will probably vote quite randomly on the basis of stellar alignment and what their advisors tell them people think.So ... do n't say stupid things like that .
The least you could do before commenting on our political system is inform yourself of the absolute basics of how it works .
And in this particular case , almost every political system in the ( developed ) world works comparably .
( If you really * were * telling us to use pitchforks , then either you 're completely unrealistic , or completely crazy .
In any case , whoever said " those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety , deserve neither liberty nor safety " was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or had n't thought about his own position , and if you 're an American you 've probably been brainwashed into both believing that and not acting on it .
Our society is so great , and so free , precisely because we complain and wait until its time to vote instead of getting out the guns and pitchforks and executing anyone in Parliament )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There hasn't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones (i.e.
since they got into power).
You realise we can't just get new elections every news cycle.
(Although the Prime Minister can call elections for the House of Representatives almost as often as he likes, it's terribly inconvenient and if they do go early (or, as early as you're suggesting they should've gone), people are inclined to vote them out just for dragging them out to the polls one more time than is necessary.
)In any case, even if we could, the other lot aren't any better... Most people would rank this (known) temporary inconvenience as a lot less bad than the (unknown) evils a government ran by Tony Abbott, Leader of the Liberal Party, would bring.In the last case, we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there.
I expect the Liberal party will oppose it on the basis that they're the opposition, the Greens will oppose it on the basis that it's neither left nor liberal, and the independents will probably vote quite randomly on the basis of stellar alignment and what their advisors tell them people think.So ... don't say stupid things like that.
The least you could do before commenting on our political system is inform yourself of the absolute basics of how it works.
And in this particular case, almost every political system in the (developed) world works comparably.
(If you really *were* telling us to use pitchforks, then either you're completely unrealistic, or completely crazy.
In any case, whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or hadn't thought about his own position, and if you're an American you've probably been brainwashed into both believing that and not acting on it.
Our society is so great, and so free, precisely because we complain and wait until its time to vote instead of getting out the guns and pitchforks and executing anyone in Parliament)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962</id>
	<title>Leave australia Alone</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1260891840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod me down but while I think Australians should be able to access the internet and communicate freely I think they should be left alone to work out their own problems. Australia has been under attack for a very long time and you have to bear in mind the US relationship with the Pacific region hasn't exactly been hmmm how shall we say very fair. The US has been happy to triain death squads at the school of americas <a href="http://www.soaw.org/" title="soaw.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.soaw.org/</a> [soaw.org] [soaw.org] and fund the over throw of democractically ellected goverments (Chile, Nicuragua, Guatmala most recenly the atempt in Venuzuela and not to mention Syrian and Iran) so you could see the leader ship in Australia might be a little paranoid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod me down but while I think Australians should be able to access the internet and communicate freely I think they should be left alone to work out their own problems .
Australia has been under attack for a very long time and you have to bear in mind the US relationship with the Pacific region has n't exactly been hmmm how shall we say very fair .
The US has been happy to triain death squads at the school of americas http : //www.soaw.org/ [ soaw.org ] [ soaw.org ] and fund the over throw of democractically ellected goverments ( Chile , Nicuragua , Guatmala most recenly the atempt in Venuzuela and not to mention Syrian and Iran ) so you could see the leader ship in Australia might be a little paranoid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod me down but while I think Australians should be able to access the internet and communicate freely I think they should be left alone to work out their own problems.
Australia has been under attack for a very long time and you have to bear in mind the US relationship with the Pacific region hasn't exactly been hmmm how shall we say very fair.
The US has been happy to triain death squads at the school of americas http://www.soaw.org/ [soaw.org] [soaw.org] and fund the over throw of democractically ellected goverments (Chile, Nicuragua, Guatmala most recenly the atempt in Venuzuela and not to mention Syrian and Iran) so you could see the leader ship in Australia might be a little paranoid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449226</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260869160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Independent Senator Nick Minchin</i></p><p>You're thinking of Nick Xenophon; Minchin is a Liberal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Independent Senator Nick MinchinYou 're thinking of Nick Xenophon ; Minchin is a Liberal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Independent Senator Nick MinchinYou're thinking of Nick Xenophon; Minchin is a Liberal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</id>
	<title>Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe you're still swallowing this bullshit by the buckets.
It's time you did something. Get those people out of parliament, elect new officials!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe you 're still swallowing this bullshit by the buckets .
It 's time you did something .
Get those people out of parliament , elect new officials !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe you're still swallowing this bullshit by the buckets.
It's time you did something.
Get those people out of parliament, elect new officials!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453696</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>geekangel</author>
	<datestamp>1260895200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Join, and vote for, the Australian Pirate Party. It's just starting, it needs your support, and we Aussies sure as shit need it.

<a href="http://www.pirateparty.org.au/" title="pirateparty.org.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.pirateparty.org.au/</a> [pirateparty.org.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Join , and vote for , the Australian Pirate Party .
It 's just starting , it needs your support , and we Aussies sure as shit need it .
http : //www.pirateparty.org.au/ [ pirateparty.org.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Join, and vote for, the Australian Pirate Party.
It's just starting, it needs your support, and we Aussies sure as shit need it.
http://www.pirateparty.org.au/ [pirateparty.org.au]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</id>
	<title>what the fuck.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there a way to vote this guy out of office or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there a way to vote this guy out of office or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there a way to vote this guy out of office or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446808</id>
	<title>Does this mean</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1260902100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That Aussies will be able to sue their ISPs for spam?</p><p>If they are taking control of the content being sent over their networks I think it's only fair.</p><p>Hurray Australia!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That Aussies will be able to sue their ISPs for spam ? If they are taking control of the content being sent over their networks I think it 's only fair.Hurray Australia !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Aussies will be able to sue their ISPs for spam?If they are taking control of the content being sent over their networks I think it's only fair.Hurray Australia!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444030</id>
	<title>lame</title>
	<author>Tei</author>
	<datestamp>1260892140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is stupid, so i can make a cards game on the internet, and ignore aussia boards, and these isp are forced to block my game (maybe on sf.com?).</p><p>guys, change this aus govern NOW</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is stupid , so i can make a cards game on the internet , and ignore aussia boards , and these isp are forced to block my game ( maybe on sf.com ?
) .guys , change this aus govern NOW</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is stupid, so i can make a cards game on the internet, and ignore aussia boards, and these isp are forced to block my game (maybe on sf.com?
).guys, change this aus govern NOW</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454182</id>
	<title>Re:Leave australia Alone</title>
	<author>keeperofdakeys</author>
	<datestamp>1260900900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They won't invade Australia because they already speak english and they're in the sphere of influence of the british crown.</p></div><p>Please, the crown is more of a figure head then anything. The crown's representatives don't exercise there power much either.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They wo n't invade Australia because they already speak english and they 're in the sphere of influence of the british crown.Please , the crown is more of a figure head then anything .
The crown 's representatives do n't exercise there power much either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They won't invade Australia because they already speak english and they're in the sphere of influence of the british crown.Please, the crown is more of a figure head then anything.
The crown's representatives don't exercise there power much either.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454936</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately we are forced to vote and our choices are never great. As another person replied here we are screwed either way.</p><p>The Pirate Party and other groups (like the bikies) are now starting groups to get into parliament and its about time. Current parties have really lost the plot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately we are forced to vote and our choices are never great .
As another person replied here we are screwed either way.The Pirate Party and other groups ( like the bikies ) are now starting groups to get into parliament and its about time .
Current parties have really lost the plot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately we are forced to vote and our choices are never great.
As another person replied here we are screwed either way.The Pirate Party and other groups (like the bikies) are now starting groups to get into parliament and its about time.
Current parties have really lost the plot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454080</id>
	<title>Re:Where's Sir John Kerr when you really need him?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260899640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, we've only had one single national leader in the last 30 or so years.  His name is Wayne Kerr!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , we 've only had one single national leader in the last 30 or so years .
His name is Wayne Kerr ! !
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, we've only had one single national leader in the last 30 or so years.
His name is Wayne Kerr!!
:-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444804</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>preperat</author>
	<datestamp>1260895500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, his next bill to be entered into parliament is "Do you want to vote this guy out,  ppl who vote yes, will be declared unreasonable and the gov will make decisions for them"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , his next bill to be entered into parliament is " Do you want to vote this guy out , ppl who vote yes , will be declared unreasonable and the gov will make decisions for them " : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, his next bill to be entered into parliament is "Do you want to vote this guy out,  ppl who vote yes, will be declared unreasonable and the gov will make decisions for them" :/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446096</id>
	<title>Re:Would this block web stores?</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260899940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And soon after, the border guard will also jump on the "deep inspection" hype bandwagon, marking a sharp increase in the sales figures of Crisco brand vegetable shortening.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And soon after , the border guard will also jump on the " deep inspection " hype bandwagon , marking a sharp increase in the sales figures of Crisco brand vegetable shortening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And soon after, the border guard will also jump on the "deep inspection" hype bandwagon, marking a sharp increase in the sales figures of Crisco brand vegetable shortening.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444894</id>
	<title>i was wondering how a thread</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1260895860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>about something the australian government is doing wrong can be spun into an attack on the american government</p><p>why do you have such a giant hard on for the usa?</p><p>do any governments besides washington dc actually do anything wrong in the world worthy of your condemnation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>about something the australian government is doing wrong can be spun into an attack on the american governmentwhy do you have such a giant hard on for the usa ? do any governments besides washington dc actually do anything wrong in the world worthy of your condemnation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about something the australian government is doing wrong can be spun into an attack on the american governmentwhy do you have such a giant hard on for the usa?do any governments besides washington dc actually do anything wrong in the world worthy of your condemnation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444922</id>
	<title>Re:What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>BlortHorc</author>
	<datestamp>1260895980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Believe me, our politicians have not been cool since the early to mid seventies.</p><p>Not saying the rest of us don't have some chops, but really, I don't know anyone who doesn't think Conroy is an unmitigated fool. He was elected because he was Labour, not because of the crazy shit he believes, and he got his cabinet position because of factional balance, despite what shit Rudd spouts about being above factional politics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe me , our politicians have not been cool since the early to mid seventies.Not saying the rest of us do n't have some chops , but really , I do n't know anyone who does n't think Conroy is an unmitigated fool .
He was elected because he was Labour , not because of the crazy shit he believes , and he got his cabinet position because of factional balance , despite what shit Rudd spouts about being above factional politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe me, our politicians have not been cool since the early to mid seventies.Not saying the rest of us don't have some chops, but really, I don't know anyone who doesn't think Conroy is an unmitigated fool.
He was elected because he was Labour, not because of the crazy shit he believes, and he got his cabinet position because of factional balance, despite what shit Rudd spouts about being above factional politics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444322</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>killmenow</author>
	<datestamp>1260893580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know. I still can't believe the man had the audacity to say it. This is one of those times when a person says something so stupid it's not even stupid, so f*ed up it's not even funny, and so retarded even retarded people say, "OMGWTF?!"</p><p><b>OMGWTF?!</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know .
I still ca n't believe the man had the audacity to say it .
This is one of those times when a person says something so stupid it 's not even stupid , so f * ed up it 's not even funny , and so retarded even retarded people say , " OMGWTF ? ! " OMGWTF ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know.
I still can't believe the man had the audacity to say it.
This is one of those times when a person says something so stupid it's not even stupid, so f*ed up it's not even funny, and so retarded even retarded people say, "OMGWTF?!"OMGWTF?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451662</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260879540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party. I'll vote for the Liberals next election.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's some extremely flawed logic you've got there. If Labor and Liberals have moved so far to the right, then why not vote to the <b> <i>left</i> </b> of Labor. The Greens, for example, have much better policies on freedom of speech ( as raised here ), environmental issues ( ETS is a joke ), foreign policy ( opposed the Iraq war ), and plenty more besides. Voting for Liberals won't send any message other than convincing Labor that they haven't moved far <b> <i>enough</i> </b> to the right yet<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and of course rewarding the far-right loonies with Abbot at the helm.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party .
I 'll vote for the Liberals next election.That 's some extremely flawed logic you 've got there .
If Labor and Liberals have moved so far to the right , then why not vote to the left of Labor .
The Greens , for example , have much better policies on freedom of speech ( as raised here ) , environmental issues ( ETS is a joke ) , foreign policy ( opposed the Iraq war ) , and plenty more besides .
Voting for Liberals wo n't send any message other than convincing Labor that they have n't moved far enough to the right yet ... and of course rewarding the far-right loonies with Abbot at the helm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party.
I'll vote for the Liberals next election.That's some extremely flawed logic you've got there.
If Labor and Liberals have moved so far to the right, then why not vote to the  left  of Labor.
The Greens, for example, have much better policies on freedom of speech ( as raised here ), environmental issues ( ETS is a joke ), foreign policy ( opposed the Iraq war ), and plenty more besides.
Voting for Liberals won't send any message other than convincing Labor that they haven't moved far  enough  to the right yet ... and of course rewarding the far-right loonies with Abbot at the helm.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444556</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260894660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the exact same predicament America is in right now, too.  Coinki-dink?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There hasn't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones (i.e. since they got into power). You realise we can't just get new elections every news cycle.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the exact same predicament America is in right now , too .
Coinki-dink ? There has n't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones ( i.e .
since they got into power ) .
You realise we ca n't just get new elections every news cycle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the exact same predicament America is in right now, too.
Coinki-dink?There hasn't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones (i.e.
since they got into power).
You realise we can't just get new elections every news cycle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444926</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1260895980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha!  What good has it done in the US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha !
What good has it done in the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha!
What good has it done in the US?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448524</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260908760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Independent Senator Nick Minchin</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/senator\_minchin/" title="aph.gov.au" rel="nofollow">Nick Minchin</a> [aph.gov.au] is a Liberal, not an independent. Did you mean <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/senator\_xenophon/" title="aph.gov.au" rel="nofollow">Nick Xenaphon</a> [aph.gov.au]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Independent Senator Nick Minchin Nick Minchin [ aph.gov.au ] is a Liberal , not an independent .
Did you mean Nick Xenaphon [ aph.gov.au ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Independent Senator Nick Minchin Nick Minchin [aph.gov.au] is a Liberal, not an independent.
Did you mean Nick Xenaphon [aph.gov.au]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445994</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260899580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We did.</p><p>The Liberal party (strangely enough, they are actually the more conservative of our two major parties) under John Howard (prime minister from 1996 to 2007, yes I did need to wikipedia what year he took office) tried to pander to the christian right for a number of years by talking about implementing this very policy. After being told it was unworkable, a public affairs nightmare waiting to happen, a waste of taxpayer's money etc he eventually settled for throwing a couple of hundred million into the development of client-side internet filtering software to be made freely available to any Australian who wanted it. The major users of the software were schools, and, surprise surprise, many kids quickly worked out how to get around it.</p><p>At the end of 2007, we got right of the Liberals, replacing them with the more liberal (note the little l) party, called the Labor party. An unfortunate side effect of the election held that year was that the balance of power in the senate is now held by Senator Steve Fielding from the Family First party (more often known as the christian nutjob party) and Nick Xenophon, an independent who ran pretty much entirely on an anti-gambling platform. So while Howard pandered to the christian right out of personal preference, the Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd is forced to do pretty much the same thing out of necessity. Not that knowing that makes it feel any better when you see these kind of antics.</p><p>An interesting (or not so much) aside: the original proposal mentioned blocking internet gambling sites, although Xenophon's less than enthusiastic comments on the policy and eventual opposal to it appear to have resulted in this being dropped as a selling point.</p><p>Anyhow, back to the parent's point: there's noone else to elect. We've been through the two major parties, and they both suck on this issue. And no other party in our system at the moment has enough support to realistically hope to achieve anything more than holding the balance of power in the house or senate - although the greens will have my first preference come next election, that much is for sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We did.The Liberal party ( strangely enough , they are actually the more conservative of our two major parties ) under John Howard ( prime minister from 1996 to 2007 , yes I did need to wikipedia what year he took office ) tried to pander to the christian right for a number of years by talking about implementing this very policy .
After being told it was unworkable , a public affairs nightmare waiting to happen , a waste of taxpayer 's money etc he eventually settled for throwing a couple of hundred million into the development of client-side internet filtering software to be made freely available to any Australian who wanted it .
The major users of the software were schools , and , surprise surprise , many kids quickly worked out how to get around it.At the end of 2007 , we got right of the Liberals , replacing them with the more liberal ( note the little l ) party , called the Labor party .
An unfortunate side effect of the election held that year was that the balance of power in the senate is now held by Senator Steve Fielding from the Family First party ( more often known as the christian nutjob party ) and Nick Xenophon , an independent who ran pretty much entirely on an anti-gambling platform .
So while Howard pandered to the christian right out of personal preference , the Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd is forced to do pretty much the same thing out of necessity .
Not that knowing that makes it feel any better when you see these kind of antics.An interesting ( or not so much ) aside : the original proposal mentioned blocking internet gambling sites , although Xenophon 's less than enthusiastic comments on the policy and eventual opposal to it appear to have resulted in this being dropped as a selling point.Anyhow , back to the parent 's point : there 's noone else to elect .
We 've been through the two major parties , and they both suck on this issue .
And no other party in our system at the moment has enough support to realistically hope to achieve anything more than holding the balance of power in the house or senate - although the greens will have my first preference come next election , that much is for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We did.The Liberal party (strangely enough, they are actually the more conservative of our two major parties) under John Howard (prime minister from 1996 to 2007, yes I did need to wikipedia what year he took office) tried to pander to the christian right for a number of years by talking about implementing this very policy.
After being told it was unworkable, a public affairs nightmare waiting to happen, a waste of taxpayer's money etc he eventually settled for throwing a couple of hundred million into the development of client-side internet filtering software to be made freely available to any Australian who wanted it.
The major users of the software were schools, and, surprise surprise, many kids quickly worked out how to get around it.At the end of 2007, we got right of the Liberals, replacing them with the more liberal (note the little l) party, called the Labor party.
An unfortunate side effect of the election held that year was that the balance of power in the senate is now held by Senator Steve Fielding from the Family First party (more often known as the christian nutjob party) and Nick Xenophon, an independent who ran pretty much entirely on an anti-gambling platform.
So while Howard pandered to the christian right out of personal preference, the Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd is forced to do pretty much the same thing out of necessity.
Not that knowing that makes it feel any better when you see these kind of antics.An interesting (or not so much) aside: the original proposal mentioned blocking internet gambling sites, although Xenophon's less than enthusiastic comments on the policy and eventual opposal to it appear to have resulted in this being dropped as a selling point.Anyhow, back to the parent's point: there's noone else to elect.
We've been through the two major parties, and they both suck on this issue.
And no other party in our system at the moment has enough support to realistically hope to achieve anything more than holding the balance of power in the house or senate - although the greens will have my first preference come next election, that much is for sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Jeeeb</author>
	<datestamp>1260894300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who says we are?<br> <br>

The Labor party (Current government) was meant to be liberal and reformist. The alternative is the Liberal party who despite there name are mostly socially conservative Christians. They just finished voting out Malcom Turnbull their former leader who was clearly too liberal and replacing him with Tony Abbot a Christian conservative who suffice to say holds a number of opinions that don't exactly resonate with the more liberally minded.<br> <br>

Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party. I'll vote for the Liberals next election. Maybe for 3 years it wouldn't be the perfect government. But it's better than voting for the status-quo of simply being ass-raped by greedy bastards.<br> <br>

As for young people the best way to make a real difference on this is to talk to your parents and grandparents (If they're still alive). Your vote alone isn't worth as much as the votes of both your parents and yours combined.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who says we are ?
The Labor party ( Current government ) was meant to be liberal and reformist .
The alternative is the Liberal party who despite there name are mostly socially conservative Christians .
They just finished voting out Malcom Turnbull their former leader who was clearly too liberal and replacing him with Tony Abbot a Christian conservative who suffice to say holds a number of opinions that do n't exactly resonate with the more liberally minded .
Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party .
I 'll vote for the Liberals next election .
Maybe for 3 years it would n't be the perfect government .
But it 's better than voting for the status-quo of simply being ass-raped by greedy bastards .
As for young people the best way to make a real difference on this is to talk to your parents and grandparents ( If they 're still alive ) .
Your vote alone is n't worth as much as the votes of both your parents and yours combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who says we are?
The Labor party (Current government) was meant to be liberal and reformist.
The alternative is the Liberal party who despite there name are mostly socially conservative Christians.
They just finished voting out Malcom Turnbull their former leader who was clearly too liberal and replacing him with Tony Abbot a Christian conservative who suffice to say holds a number of opinions that don't exactly resonate with the more liberally minded.
Anyway despite that I say fuck the Labor party.
I'll vote for the Liberals next election.
Maybe for 3 years it wouldn't be the perfect government.
But it's better than voting for the status-quo of simply being ass-raped by greedy bastards.
As for young people the best way to make a real difference on this is to talk to your parents and grandparents (If they're still alive).
Your vote alone isn't worth as much as the votes of both your parents and yours combined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447292</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>stonewallred</author>
	<datestamp>1260903720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bye-bye internet for Aussies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bye-bye internet for Aussies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bye-bye internet for Aussies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444466</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>KDEnut</author>
	<datestamp>1260894360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've just rounded 50.1 to the nearest hundred.<br>
<br>
That way they can keep it to one significant digit and all...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've just rounded 50.1 to the nearest hundred .
That way they can keep it to one significant digit and all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've just rounded 50.1 to the nearest hundred.
That way they can keep it to one significant digit and all...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444856</id>
	<title>But if it's to protect the people ...</title>
	<author>ScientiaPotentiaEst</author>
	<datestamp>1260895740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... from hackers, thieves, terrorists and child pornographers, they'll roll over and accept it.  The general media will no doubt paint it as such (old media typically hates the series of pipes - it circumvents them).<p>

There'll be some whining among fringe groups such as us here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.   But we'll do nothing more than that.  We'll go back to wanting those very same censoring governments to "protect" us similarly (job security, health care, global warming, etc.).  We give the Devil his power - and we're surprised when he uses it against us.</p><p>

I generalize of course.  But the pattern is clear and repeating.  Sadly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... from hackers , thieves , terrorists and child pornographers , they 'll roll over and accept it .
The general media will no doubt paint it as such ( old media typically hates the series of pipes - it circumvents them ) .
There 'll be some whining among fringe groups such as us here on / .
But we 'll do nothing more than that .
We 'll go back to wanting those very same censoring governments to " protect " us similarly ( job security , health care , global warming , etc. ) .
We give the Devil his power - and we 're surprised when he uses it against us .
I generalize of course .
But the pattern is clear and repeating .
Sadly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... from hackers, thieves, terrorists and child pornographers, they'll roll over and accept it.
The general media will no doubt paint it as such (old media typically hates the series of pipes - it circumvents them).
There'll be some whining among fringe groups such as us here on /.
But we'll do nothing more than that.
We'll go back to wanting those very same censoring governments to "protect" us similarly (job security, health care, global warming, etc.).
We give the Devil his power - and we're surprised when he uses it against us.
I generalize of course.
But the pattern is clear and repeating.
Sadly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445704</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a troll.  Obama has been against censorship his whole life.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a troll .
Obama has been against censorship his whole life .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a troll.
Obama has been against censorship his whole life.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452864</id>
	<title>Re:Links/contact details for protest groups ?</title>
	<author>cailith1970</author>
	<datestamp>1260887040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alas, Conroy is merely the dog doing the bidding of his master.  Who is quite happy for him to be the "public face" of it, and knows he's passionate about it and will put up a good front for the REAL puppetmaster who wants it to happen...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alas , Conroy is merely the dog doing the bidding of his master .
Who is quite happy for him to be the " public face " of it , and knows he 's passionate about it and will put up a good front for the REAL puppetmaster who wants it to happen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alas, Conroy is merely the dog doing the bidding of his master.
Who is quite happy for him to be the "public face" of it, and knows he's passionate about it and will put up a good front for the REAL puppetmaster who wants it to happen...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444320</id>
	<title>"technically competent users" are a lot these days</title>
	<author>ihavenospine</author>
	<datestamp>1260893580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will work till the next pedo scandal. Then the average citizens will ask themselves where the hell their taxes are going.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will work till the next pedo scandal .
Then the average citizens will ask themselves where the hell their taxes are going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will work till the next pedo scandal.
Then the average citizens will ask themselves where the hell their taxes are going.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453036</id>
	<title>Re:Remember - it's the Government, not Australians</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260888480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If it becomes law, mass civil disobedience is required. I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering.</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's when ISP's like iinet, node et al start offering VPN accounts in Sweden as standard with all of their plans, and routers pre-configured to use them. Smart people/companies work around stupid laws when they need to.</p><blockquote><div><p>Conroy is Public Enemy #1. He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government. I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.</p></div></blockquote><p>

The really sad part about this is that practically no-one knows and most of those who do believe it will never happen or affect them. As for voting in the Liberals, with Abbot placing hard-liners in the cabinet that will never happen. I'm afraid out political system is becoming as screwed up as Britain, the Labour party will always have majority, the Liberals will become as ridiculous as the Conservatives and the Nationals are one racist policy shy of being the BNP.<br> <br>

Our best hope is that Conroy keeps getting flak about the NBN (because that's what people are paying attention too, not filtering) as that will cause Rudd to replace him at the next election, He's already promoted backbencher, Kate Lundy to what is essentially Conroy's understudy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it becomes law , mass civil disobedience is required .
I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering .
That 's when ISP 's like iinet , node et al start offering VPN accounts in Sweden as standard with all of their plans , and routers pre-configured to use them .
Smart people/companies work around stupid laws when they need to.Conroy is Public Enemy # 1 .
He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government .
I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be .
The really sad part about this is that practically no-one knows and most of those who do believe it will never happen or affect them .
As for voting in the Liberals , with Abbot placing hard-liners in the cabinet that will never happen .
I 'm afraid out political system is becoming as screwed up as Britain , the Labour party will always have majority , the Liberals will become as ridiculous as the Conservatives and the Nationals are one racist policy shy of being the BNP .
Our best hope is that Conroy keeps getting flak about the NBN ( because that 's what people are paying attention too , not filtering ) as that will cause Rudd to replace him at the next election , He 's already promoted backbencher , Kate Lundy to what is essentially Conroy 's understudy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it becomes law, mass civil disobedience is required.
I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering.
That's when ISP's like iinet, node et al start offering VPN accounts in Sweden as standard with all of their plans, and routers pre-configured to use them.
Smart people/companies work around stupid laws when they need to.Conroy is Public Enemy #1.
He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government.
I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.
The really sad part about this is that practically no-one knows and most of those who do believe it will never happen or affect them.
As for voting in the Liberals, with Abbot placing hard-liners in the cabinet that will never happen.
I'm afraid out political system is becoming as screwed up as Britain, the Labour party will always have majority, the Liberals will become as ridiculous as the Conservatives and the Nationals are one racist policy shy of being the BNP.
Our best hope is that Conroy keeps getting flak about the NBN (because that's what people are paying attention too, not filtering) as that will cause Rudd to replace him at the next election, He's already promoted backbencher, Kate Lundy to what is essentially Conroy's understudy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444334</id>
	<title>Re:national character?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260893640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-1 troll?  How the hell was my message a troll?</p><p>Anyway thanks for the reply zblack.  I hope you're right, and these things really *don't* have much popular support, because that means there's a chance they'll get overturned eventually.  But just from the culture shift I've seen in the USA in the past decades, I'm pessimistic about people's sense regarding such things.  The perceived safety often outweighs the more nebulous benefits of not having government censorship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 troll ?
How the hell was my message a troll ? Anyway thanks for the reply zblack .
I hope you 're right , and these things really * do n't * have much popular support , because that means there 's a chance they 'll get overturned eventually .
But just from the culture shift I 've seen in the USA in the past decades , I 'm pessimistic about people 's sense regarding such things .
The perceived safety often outweighs the more nebulous benefits of not having government censorship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1 troll?
How the hell was my message a troll?Anyway thanks for the reply zblack.
I hope you're right, and these things really *don't* have much popular support, because that means there's a chance they'll get overturned eventually.
But just from the culture shift I've seen in the USA in the past decades, I'm pessimistic about people's sense regarding such things.
The perceived safety often outweighs the more nebulous benefits of not having government censorship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453498</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260892980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an Australian. Senators of a party (and also Representatives in the House) usually vote together on bills in their house. The differences of opinion are usually discussed in party meetings outside of the chamber. His opinions are usually the official party line for his area, as he is Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy and Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate</p><p>So assuming he does introduce this bill, it will have Labor support in both the house and the senate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an Australian .
Senators of a party ( and also Representatives in the House ) usually vote together on bills in their house .
The differences of opinion are usually discussed in party meetings outside of the chamber .
His opinions are usually the official party line for his area , as he is Minister for Broadband , Communications and the Digital Economy and Deputy Leader of the Government in the SenateSo assuming he does introduce this bill , it will have Labor support in both the house and the senate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an Australian.
Senators of a party (and also Representatives in the House) usually vote together on bills in their house.
The differences of opinion are usually discussed in party meetings outside of the chamber.
His opinions are usually the official party line for his area, as he is Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy and Deputy Leader of the Government in the SenateSo assuming he does introduce this bill, it will have Labor support in both the house and the senate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900</id>
	<title>Links/contact details for protest groups ?</title>
	<author>SirKveldulv</author>
	<datestamp>1260895920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there any existing groups dedicated to opposing this ?

</p><p>I'd like to do something constructive to help make sure this sort of BS doesn't end up as national policy.

</p><p> Conroy, if nothing else, is persistent, so the problem isn't going to go away after 1-2 rounds of failure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any existing groups dedicated to opposing this ?
I 'd like to do something constructive to help make sure this sort of BS does n't end up as national policy .
Conroy , if nothing else , is persistent , so the problem is n't going to go away after 1-2 rounds of failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any existing groups dedicated to opposing this ?
I'd like to do something constructive to help make sure this sort of BS doesn't end up as national policy.
Conroy, if nothing else, is persistent, so the problem isn't going to go away after 1-2 rounds of failure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449148</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>Gudeldar</author>
	<datestamp>1260868800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the Australian Election Commission there are a lot more than 2 parties.<br>

<a href="http://aec.gov.au/Parties\_and\_Representatives/Party\_Registration/Registered\_parties/index.htm" title="aec.gov.au">http://aec.gov.au/Parties\_and\_Representatives/Party\_Registration/Registered\_parties/index.htm</a> [aec.gov.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the Australian Election Commission there are a lot more than 2 parties .
http : //aec.gov.au/Parties \ _and \ _Representatives/Party \ _Registration/Registered \ _parties/index.htm [ aec.gov.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the Australian Election Commission there are a lot more than 2 parties.
http://aec.gov.au/Parties\_and\_Representatives/Party\_Registration/Registered\_parties/index.htm [aec.gov.au]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30469612</id>
	<title>Re:Links/contact details for protest groups ?</title>
	<author>SirKveldulv</author>
	<datestamp>1259693220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nocleanfeed.com/" title="nocleanfeed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nocleanfeed.com/</a> [nocleanfeed.com]  is the organised protest group/movement over here.

<p>Personally I'll be voting for the pirate party giving preferences to the sex party in the next federal election.

</p><p>And no, I didn't vote for Rudd in the first place either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.nocleanfeed.com/ [ nocleanfeed.com ] is the organised protest group/movement over here .
Personally I 'll be voting for the pirate party giving preferences to the sex party in the next federal election .
And no , I did n't vote for Rudd in the first place either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.nocleanfeed.com/ [nocleanfeed.com]  is the organised protest group/movement over here.
Personally I'll be voting for the pirate party giving preferences to the sex party in the next federal election.
And no, I didn't vote for Rudd in the first place either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444878</id>
	<title>Re:Remember - it's the Government, not Australians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260895860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize the vast majority is much more passive than this.  Don't worry, the politicians of late in Australia and America are already finished.  They realize it, and that is why they are making these mad grabs for power: they have nothing left to lose (e.g., censorship in Australia, Government controlled healthcare in America, etc).  The only difference is that the Autralian bullshit is an easy one to fudge in comparison in that it effects fewer people (as opposed to the whole populace).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize the vast majority is much more passive than this .
Do n't worry , the politicians of late in Australia and America are already finished .
They realize it , and that is why they are making these mad grabs for power : they have nothing left to lose ( e.g. , censorship in Australia , Government controlled healthcare in America , etc ) .
The only difference is that the Autralian bullshit is an easy one to fudge in comparison in that it effects fewer people ( as opposed to the whole populace ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize the vast majority is much more passive than this.
Don't worry, the politicians of late in Australia and America are already finished.
They realize it, and that is why they are making these mad grabs for power: they have nothing left to lose (e.g., censorship in Australia, Government controlled healthcare in America, etc).
The only difference is that the Autralian bullshit is an easy one to fudge in comparison in that it effects fewer people (as opposed to the whole populace).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446960</id>
	<title>They have to do this</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1260902580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen a documentary about an Australian called Michael Dundee. He went to New York and just couldn't live in a civilized world.
<br> <br>
Basically the whole island is full of bad genes from all the old British criminals. Give them a bit of freedom and they live like animals.
<br> <br>
They have beer cans and knives much larger than any normal human would need. You just can't trust people like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen a documentary about an Australian called Michael Dundee .
He went to New York and just could n't live in a civilized world .
Basically the whole island is full of bad genes from all the old British criminals .
Give them a bit of freedom and they live like animals .
They have beer cans and knives much larger than any normal human would need .
You just ca n't trust people like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen a documentary about an Australian called Michael Dundee.
He went to New York and just couldn't live in a civilized world.
Basically the whole island is full of bad genes from all the old British criminals.
Give them a bit of freedom and they live like animals.
They have beer cans and knives much larger than any normal human would need.
You just can't trust people like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445672</id>
	<title>Re:Conroy is a Traitor.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260898560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If he opposes the bill, the government can accuse him of hypocrisy.</p></div><p>Why? He's a catholic, why wouldn't he want kiddie-porn?</p><p>Oh, too low? ^^</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he opposes the bill , the government can accuse him of hypocrisy.Why ?
He 's a catholic , why would n't he want kiddie-porn ? Oh , too low ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he opposes the bill, the government can accuse him of hypocrisy.Why?
He's a catholic, why wouldn't he want kiddie-porn?Oh, too low?
^^
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446826</id>
	<title>Dilbert</title>
	<author>Tokolosh</author>
	<datestamp>1260902220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://dribibu.xs4all.nl/dilbert19960123.html" title="xs4all.nl" rel="nofollow">http://dribibu.xs4all.nl/dilbert19960123.html</a> [xs4all.nl]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //dribibu.xs4all.nl/dilbert19960123.html [ xs4all.nl ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://dribibu.xs4all.nl/dilbert19960123.html [xs4all.nl]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444854</id>
	<title>a short story</title>
	<author>thehostiles</author>
	<datestamp>1260895740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The EU decided to censor things on the internet. I was concerned, but didn't speak up because I wasn't from Europe
The Britons decided to censor things on the internet. I was worried, but didn't speak up because I wasn't from Briton.
The Australians decided to do it too. I was scared, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't Australian.
When they did it here, there was nobody left to stand alongside me</htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU decided to censor things on the internet .
I was concerned , but did n't speak up because I was n't from Europe The Britons decided to censor things on the internet .
I was worried , but did n't speak up because I was n't from Briton .
The Australians decided to do it too .
I was scared , but I did n't speak up because I was n't Australian .
When they did it here , there was nobody left to stand alongside me</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU decided to censor things on the internet.
I was concerned, but didn't speak up because I wasn't from Europe
The Britons decided to censor things on the internet.
I was worried, but didn't speak up because I wasn't from Briton.
The Australians decided to do it too.
I was scared, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't Australian.
When they did it here, there was nobody left to stand alongside me</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445338</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>dk90406</author>
	<datestamp>1260897480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, I am sorry. They are working on a bill that will abolish elections in Australia. The bill will say that ant other parties are opposed to protecting the children. Anyone who opposes the bill is obviously a child abuser.<p>I wish you a good safe life down under.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I am sorry .
They are working on a bill that will abolish elections in Australia .
The bill will say that ant other parties are opposed to protecting the children .
Anyone who opposes the bill is obviously a child abuser.I wish you a good safe life down under .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I am sorry.
They are working on a bill that will abolish elections in Australia.
The bill will say that ant other parties are opposed to protecting the children.
Anyone who opposes the bill is obviously a child abuser.I wish you a good safe life down under.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447340</id>
	<title>My letter to the Australian senator</title>
	<author>LiteralBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1260903900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have written a satirical letter to the Aussie senator in question, and have now posted it on my blog. Feel free to take a look:

www.jamesdeagle.blogspot.com</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have written a satirical letter to the Aussie senator in question , and have now posted it on my blog .
Feel free to take a look : www.jamesdeagle.blogspot.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have written a satirical letter to the Aussie senator in question, and have now posted it on my blog.
Feel free to take a look:

www.jamesdeagle.blogspot.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445060</id>
	<title>Where's Sir John Kerr when you really need him?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260896460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443902</id>
	<title>What's Next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260891600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they'll tell us what we can watch on TV too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 'll tell us what we can watch on TV too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they'll tell us what we can watch on TV too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282</id>
	<title>Re:Wake up Australia</title>
	<author>yincrash</author>
	<datestamp>1260893340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe the Obama administration went to Australia for broadband advice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444486</id>
	<title>Re:Conroy is a Traitor.</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1260894420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This political nonsense makes the Jacob Zuma/Malema crowd in South Africa look like amateurs.</p><p>Thank God SA's not the only country with idiots in power...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This political nonsense makes the Jacob Zuma/Malema crowd in South Africa look like amateurs.Thank God SA 's not the only country with idiots in power.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This political nonsense makes the Jacob Zuma/Malema crowd in South Africa look like amateurs.Thank God SA's not the only country with idiots in power...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444912</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>BakaHoushi</author>
	<datestamp>1260895980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But all of people blocked from the site failed to reach the site, ergo 100\% of those blocked were blocked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But all of people blocked from the site failed to reach the site , ergo 100 \ % of those blocked were blocked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But all of people blocked from the site failed to reach the site, ergo 100\% of those blocked were blocked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016</id>
	<title>What happened Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260892080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You used to be cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You used to be cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You used to be cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444160</id>
	<title>Re:100\% Accuracy?</title>
	<author>LordAndrewSama</author>
	<datestamp>1260892800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe that little gem came from "Politicians book of bullshit statistics, vol. 3".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that little gem came from " Politicians book of bullshit statistics , vol .
3 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that little gem came from "Politicians book of bullshit statistics, vol.
3".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444060</id>
	<title>Re:Leave australia Alone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260892320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They won't invade Australia because they already speak english and they're in the sphere of influence of the british crown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They wo n't invade Australia because they already speak english and they 're in the sphere of influence of the british crown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They won't invade Australia because they already speak english and they're in the sphere of influence of the british crown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445424</id>
	<title>Re:what the fuck.</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1260897780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because he's a dictator acting on a whim, right?  The thing I want to know is who is supporting his ideas?  Do the Aussies have some conservative/religiously motivated party down there like we do in the USA?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because he 's a dictator acting on a whim , right ?
The thing I want to know is who is supporting his ideas ?
Do the Aussies have some conservative/religiously motivated party down there like we do in the USA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because he's a dictator acting on a whim, right?
The thing I want to know is who is supporting his ideas?
Do the Aussies have some conservative/religiously motivated party down there like we do in the USA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304</id>
	<title>Remember - it's the Government, not Australians</title>
	<author>ajv</author>
	<datestamp>1260893460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an EPIC FAIL.</p><p>Australia has led technology trends and adoption for so long, and the Government is prepared to kill it and our children's future for a single lousy vote of a Senator who has the support of exactly no one.</p><p>The Government is terribly misguided on this one. Conroy might be pushing this as a wedge policy, he might be doing it for Fielding's support, but this issue alone will lose the ALP the next election, as well as many for years to come.</p><p>All of Gen i, Y and X will remember this and vote accordingly for years to come. The ALP will be in the wilderness for many elections, and struggle to form a strong government in their own right without doing the independent / Greens coalition tango that is working soooo well for them right now.</p><p>Seriously, I could see the Greens take this to the election and coupled with effective climate change policies and no internet censoring, they could become the balance of power for years.</p><p>Conroy is Public Enemy #1. He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government. I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.</p><p>In short - how to fight this thing:</p><p>* Ring your politicians tomorrow. All of them. Make the phones run hot.<br>* Write them letters.<br>* Ask to see them. Talk to them about this issue, and only this issue.<br>* Write letters to the news sites<br>* Blog and Twitter and Facebook away.<br>* Attend rallies. Publish photos and write ups about same.<br>* Join the EFA.<br>* Sign up to Get Up if you feel inclined<br>* Use #nocleanfeed religiously.<br>* Do not do work for Conroy's department. Resign or transfer if you work there.<br>* Support ISPs that are against this idea. Leave ISPs that support it or who have no position.</p><p>If it becomes law, mass civil disobedience is required. I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an EPIC FAIL.Australia has led technology trends and adoption for so long , and the Government is prepared to kill it and our children 's future for a single lousy vote of a Senator who has the support of exactly no one.The Government is terribly misguided on this one .
Conroy might be pushing this as a wedge policy , he might be doing it for Fielding 's support , but this issue alone will lose the ALP the next election , as well as many for years to come.All of Gen i , Y and X will remember this and vote accordingly for years to come .
The ALP will be in the wilderness for many elections , and struggle to form a strong government in their own right without doing the independent / Greens coalition tango that is working soooo well for them right now.Seriously , I could see the Greens take this to the election and coupled with effective climate change policies and no internet censoring , they could become the balance of power for years.Conroy is Public Enemy # 1 .
He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government .
I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.In short - how to fight this thing : * Ring your politicians tomorrow .
All of them .
Make the phones run hot .
* Write them letters .
* Ask to see them .
Talk to them about this issue , and only this issue .
* Write letters to the news sites * Blog and Twitter and Facebook away .
* Attend rallies .
Publish photos and write ups about same .
* Join the EFA .
* Sign up to Get Up if you feel inclined * Use # nocleanfeed religiously .
* Do not do work for Conroy 's department .
Resign or transfer if you work there .
* Support ISPs that are against this idea .
Leave ISPs that support it or who have no position.If it becomes law , mass civil disobedience is required .
I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an EPIC FAIL.Australia has led technology trends and adoption for so long, and the Government is prepared to kill it and our children's future for a single lousy vote of a Senator who has the support of exactly no one.The Government is terribly misguided on this one.
Conroy might be pushing this as a wedge policy, he might be doing it for Fielding's support, but this issue alone will lose the ALP the next election, as well as many for years to come.All of Gen i, Y and X will remember this and vote accordingly for years to come.
The ALP will be in the wilderness for many elections, and struggle to form a strong government in their own right without doing the independent / Greens coalition tango that is working soooo well for them right now.Seriously, I could see the Greens take this to the election and coupled with effective climate change policies and no internet censoring, they could become the balance of power for years.Conroy is Public Enemy #1.
He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government.
I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.In short - how to fight this thing:* Ring your politicians tomorrow.
All of them.
Make the phones run hot.
* Write them letters.
* Ask to see them.
Talk to them about this issue, and only this issue.
* Write letters to the news sites* Blog and Twitter and Facebook away.
* Attend rallies.
Publish photos and write ups about same.
* Join the EFA.
* Sign up to Get Up if you feel inclined* Use #nocleanfeed religiously.
* Do not do work for Conroy's department.
Resign or transfer if you work there.
* Support ISPs that are against this idea.
Leave ISPs that support it or who have no position.If it becomes law, mass civil disobedience is required.
I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30469612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30463428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_15_145249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445060
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449226
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30448524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30449148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30463428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30469612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30452864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30454096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30447292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30451974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30453810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30446038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_15_145249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30443968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30444334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_15_145249.30445966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
