<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_14_2126230</id>
	<title>Super-Earths Discovered Orbiting Nearby, Sun-Like Star</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1260784320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>likuidkewl writes <i>"Two super-earths, 5 and 7.5 times the size of our home, were <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091214121523.htm">found to be orbiting 61 Virginis a mere 28 light years away</a>. 'These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars. The discovery of potentially habitable nearby worlds may be just a few years away,' said Steven Vogt, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC. Among hundreds of our nearest stellar neighbors, 61 Vir stands out as being the most nearly similar to the Sun in terms of age, mass, and other essential properties."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>likuidkewl writes " Two super-earths , 5 and 7.5 times the size of our home , were found to be orbiting 61 Virginis a mere 28 light years away .
'These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars .
The discovery of potentially habitable nearby worlds may be just a few years away, ' said Steven Vogt , a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC .
Among hundreds of our nearest stellar neighbors , 61 Vir stands out as being the most nearly similar to the Sun in terms of age , mass , and other essential properties .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>likuidkewl writes "Two super-earths, 5 and 7.5 times the size of our home, were found to be orbiting 61 Virginis a mere 28 light years away.
'These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars.
The discovery of potentially habitable nearby worlds may be just a few years away,' said Steven Vogt, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC.
Among hundreds of our nearest stellar neighbors, 61 Vir stands out as being the most nearly similar to the Sun in terms of age, mass, and other essential properties.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436908</id>
	<title>Super Earths?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260792120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can they tell that they are "Super" Earths? Are they wearing a big "S"?</p><p>I would assume that they are 3/4 covered with water, and have a large diversity of living creatures wandering about. Otherwise, how can you compare these planets to Earth? Thats like saying a toilet is just like a box of cookies, except that they're made from different materials, are different sizes, used for a different purposes, and look nothing alike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can they tell that they are " Super " Earths ?
Are they wearing a big " S " ? I would assume that they are 3/4 covered with water , and have a large diversity of living creatures wandering about .
Otherwise , how can you compare these planets to Earth ?
Thats like saying a toilet is just like a box of cookies , except that they 're made from different materials , are different sizes , used for a different purposes , and look nothing alike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can they tell that they are "Super" Earths?
Are they wearing a big "S"?I would assume that they are 3/4 covered with water, and have a large diversity of living creatures wandering about.
Otherwise, how can you compare these planets to Earth?
Thats like saying a toilet is just like a box of cookies, except that they're made from different materials, are different sizes, used for a different purposes, and look nothing alike.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30441850</id>
	<title>Names for extra solar planets?</title>
	<author>masehare</author>
	<datestamp>1260872760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, are the scientists who make the discoveries able to identify the same planets again at a later stage? Then they could possibly start naming planets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , are the scientists who make the discoveries able to identify the same planets again at a later stage ?
Then they could possibly start naming planets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, are the scientists who make the discoveries able to identify the same planets again at a later stage?
Then they could possibly start naming planets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438130</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260797580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Long live Walter! - This is Jeff Dunham reference if I'm not mistaken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Long live Walter !
- This is Jeff Dunham reference if I 'm not mistaken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long live Walter!
- This is Jeff Dunham reference if I'm not mistaken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436088</id>
	<title>But are they filled with Super Men?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260788100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if so, where do I get my kryptonite?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if so , where do I get my kryptonite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if so, where do I get my kryptonite?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439264</id>
	<title>On those super-earth...</title>
	<author>mathfeel</author>
	<datestamp>1260803640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>are there any superman?</htmltext>
<tokenext>are there any superman ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are there any superman?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443294</id>
	<title>Re:What about...</title>
	<author>NCG\_Mike</author>
	<datestamp>1260888600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had Rainbow Worlds on my old Commodore 64... guess it's already been discovered.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had Rainbow Worlds on my old Commodore 64... guess it 's already been discovered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had Rainbow Worlds on my old Commodore 64... guess it's already been discovered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439312</id>
	<title>Ahh there's something special about that star...</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1260804000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>61 virginis.  I'm pretty sure that's where you go after you jihad.  Let's steer clear of that one when we start flying around the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>61 virginis .
I 'm pretty sure that 's where you go after you jihad .
Let 's steer clear of that one when we start flying around the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>61 virginis.
I'm pretty sure that's where you go after you jihad.
Let's steer clear of that one when we start flying around the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30453442</id>
	<title>28 light years?</title>
	<author>Scarumanga</author>
	<datestamp>1260892320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well really 28 light years isn't really that far. With our current technology yeah we can forget ever getting there. This is why is important for research to be put back into Project Orion, that would give us the ability to at the very least send machines into deep space, we have the stockpiles of nuclear weapons to do this with. The technology has been tested with regular explosives back in the 50's and works. But treaties where signed to ban the detonation of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and space. So we will have to wait until antimatter propulsion methods have been developed.
Until then they should work on making massive telescopes that can take HD pictures of the planets surface 28 light years away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well really 28 light years is n't really that far .
With our current technology yeah we can forget ever getting there .
This is why is important for research to be put back into Project Orion , that would give us the ability to at the very least send machines into deep space , we have the stockpiles of nuclear weapons to do this with .
The technology has been tested with regular explosives back in the 50 's and works .
But treaties where signed to ban the detonation of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and space .
So we will have to wait until antimatter propulsion methods have been developed .
Until then they should work on making massive telescopes that can take HD pictures of the planets surface 28 light years away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well really 28 light years isn't really that far.
With our current technology yeah we can forget ever getting there.
This is why is important for research to be put back into Project Orion, that would give us the ability to at the very least send machines into deep space, we have the stockpiles of nuclear weapons to do this with.
The technology has been tested with regular explosives back in the 50's and works.
But treaties where signed to ban the detonation of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and space.
So we will have to wait until antimatter propulsion methods have been developed.
Until then they should work on making massive telescopes that can take HD pictures of the planets surface 28 light years away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443596</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>kick6</author>
	<datestamp>1260890220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>61 Virgins? Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they're doing?</p></div><p>I'll take a SINGLE slutty broad as long as she wants to sleep with ME.  Everyone forgets that part.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>61 Virgins ?
Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they 're doing ? I 'll take a SINGLE slutty broad as long as she wants to sleep with ME .
Everyone forgets that part.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>61 Virgins?
Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they're doing?I'll take a SINGLE slutty broad as long as she wants to sleep with ME.
Everyone forgets that part.....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438428</id>
	<title>61 Viginis</title>
	<author>belthize</author>
	<datestamp>1260799080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Relatively geeky crowd,  orbiting dead cat, Contact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>      Relatively geeky crowd , orbiting dead cat , Contact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
      Relatively geeky crowd,  orbiting dead cat, Contact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436106</id>
	<title>I don't know why I did, but...</title>
	<author>HideyoshiJP</author>
	<datestamp>1260788160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read that as "...were found to be orbiting 61 Virginians..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that as " ...were found to be orbiting 61 Virginians... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that as "...were found to be orbiting 61 Virginians..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437836</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1260796380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Who's coming with me?!?!?</i> Sorry, I'm waiting for them to develop an even faster spacecraft. But don't worry -- I'll be there to greet you when you arrive!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's coming with me ? ! ? ! ?
Sorry , I 'm waiting for them to develop an even faster spacecraft .
But do n't worry -- I 'll be there to greet you when you arrive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's coming with me?!?!?
Sorry, I'm waiting for them to develop an even faster spacecraft.
But don't worry -- I'll be there to greet you when you arrive!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438008</id>
	<title>When to go Visit</title>
	<author>DanielRavenNest</author>
	<datestamp>1260797160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>World energy use is increasing about 2\% a year. Speed of a vehicle goes as the square root of the kinetic energy.  Therefore if the speed of a vehicle depends on the energy you have to throw at the problem, you can expect your spaceships to get faster about 1\% a year.</p><p>Therefore any trip over 100 years, you would expect a faster ship launched later to overtake you.  So any spaceship heading for alpha Centauri (4.3 light years), you may as well wait till you have 4\% of lightspeed ships or better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>World energy use is increasing about 2 \ % a year .
Speed of a vehicle goes as the square root of the kinetic energy .
Therefore if the speed of a vehicle depends on the energy you have to throw at the problem , you can expect your spaceships to get faster about 1 \ % a year.Therefore any trip over 100 years , you would expect a faster ship launched later to overtake you .
So any spaceship heading for alpha Centauri ( 4.3 light years ) , you may as well wait till you have 4 \ % of lightspeed ships or better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>World energy use is increasing about 2\% a year.
Speed of a vehicle goes as the square root of the kinetic energy.
Therefore if the speed of a vehicle depends on the energy you have to throw at the problem, you can expect your spaceships to get faster about 1\% a year.Therefore any trip over 100 years, you would expect a faster ship launched later to overtake you.
So any spaceship heading for alpha Centauri (4.3 light years), you may as well wait till you have 4\% of lightspeed ships or better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437176</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260793500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Else you could teach the virgins what you like and help them develop their own tastes, that way you quite literally have a hand-picked assortment of women that live by your will.</p><p>Think outside the box next time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Else you could teach the virgins what you like and help them develop their own tastes , that way you quite literally have a hand-picked assortment of women that live by your will.Think outside the box next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Else you could teach the virgins what you like and help them develop their own tastes, that way you quite literally have a hand-picked assortment of women that live by your will.Think outside the box next time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30441164</id>
	<title>Several virgins orbiting......</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1260820440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Several virgins orbiting one overweight heavenly body.<br>

Sounds like they found the one cosplay chick at the convetion who'se still single.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Several virgins orbiting one overweight heavenly body .
Sounds like they found the one cosplay chick at the convetion who'se still single .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several virgins orbiting one overweight heavenly body.
Sounds like they found the one cosplay chick at the convetion who'se still single.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437218</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1260793740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you've got 61 virgins to trade, I'm sure someone on here could hook you up with 8 hookers in no time flat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 've got 61 virgins to trade , I 'm sure someone on here could hook you up with 8 hookers in no time flat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you've got 61 virgins to trade, I'm sure someone on here could hook you up with 8 hookers in no time flat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443472</id>
	<title>first contact</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1260889500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait for our first contact, it may be bad, or good, but we sure will prove that there is life out there besides our own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for our first contact , it may be bad , or good , but we sure will prove that there is life out there besides our own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for our first contact, it may be bad, or good, but we sure will prove that there is life out there besides our own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437008</id>
	<title>blast off to awaiting Virginis</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1260792660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they had be found to be orbiting 72 Virginis then a certain religious theory might have become more feasible. But no<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...still pending evidence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they had be found to be orbiting 72 Virginis then a certain religious theory might have become more feasible .
But no ...still pending evidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they had be found to be orbiting 72 Virginis then a certain religious theory might have become more feasible.
But no ...still pending evidence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437244</id>
	<title>"size" = mass</title>
	<author>kryptKnight</author>
	<datestamp>1260793920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article, these planets are between 5 and 25 times as massive as the Earth.  These planets are notable because they orbit a star that is about the same temperature and mass as the Sun, the planets themselves are of unknown composition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article , these planets are between 5 and 25 times as massive as the Earth .
These planets are notable because they orbit a star that is about the same temperature and mass as the Sun , the planets themselves are of unknown composition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article, these planets are between 5 and 25 times as massive as the Earth.
These planets are notable because they orbit a star that is about the same temperature and mass as the Sun, the planets themselves are of unknown composition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436664</id>
	<title>Drake's Equation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260790740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the estimation of Drake's equation getting better now with the discovery of more plants?  Does anyone have an up to date estimate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the estimation of Drake 's equation getting better now with the discovery of more plants ?
Does anyone have an up to date estimate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the estimation of Drake's equation getting better now with the discovery of more plants?
Does anyone have an up to date estimate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439202</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260803340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh... the fastest spaceship ever built is way too small to carry all of the oxygen and other life support you'll need for 150,000 years.</p><p>Oh... and then there's the problem of escaping the Earth's gravity well...</p><p>And then when you arrive on this planet 28 light years away the gravity there will make you feel like you weigh 600 pounds. And then you don't even know if there's any water there when you arrive. Or any air. Or habitable temperatures (unlike e.g. Venus).</p><p>After further review, Mars would be easier to colonize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh... the fastest spaceship ever built is way too small to carry all of the oxygen and other life support you 'll need for 150,000 years.Oh... and then there 's the problem of escaping the Earth 's gravity well...And then when you arrive on this planet 28 light years away the gravity there will make you feel like you weigh 600 pounds .
And then you do n't even know if there 's any water there when you arrive .
Or any air .
Or habitable temperatures ( unlike e.g .
Venus ) .After further review , Mars would be easier to colonize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh... the fastest spaceship ever built is way too small to carry all of the oxygen and other life support you'll need for 150,000 years.Oh... and then there's the problem of escaping the Earth's gravity well...And then when you arrive on this planet 28 light years away the gravity there will make you feel like you weigh 600 pounds.
And then you don't even know if there's any water there when you arrive.
Or any air.
Or habitable temperatures (unlike e.g.
Venus).After further review, Mars would be easier to colonize.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098</id>
	<title>mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260788160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>61 virgins...... drool.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>61 virgins...... drool.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>61 virgins...... drool.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437694</id>
	<title>Great - more planets to pollute</title>
	<author>nickull</author>
	<datestamp>1260795720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this would make some (clearly stupid) people feel that they can now safely disregard looking after the earth with the comfort of a bigger and newer planet so close by?

duane chaos
"chaos is not just a theory!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this would make some ( clearly stupid ) people feel that they can now safely disregard looking after the earth with the comfort of a bigger and newer planet so close by ?
duane chaos " chaos is not just a theory !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this would make some (clearly stupid) people feel that they can now safely disregard looking after the earth with the comfort of a bigger and newer planet so close by?
duane chaos
"chaos is not just a theory!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436842</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260791880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, a mere 28 light years away. So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.</p></div><p>I suggest we go faster than that. It'll only take me 18,000 years to properly pimp out my hardcore Diablo character. What am I going to do with the rest of the time?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , a mere 28 light years away .
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we 've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.I suggest we go faster than that .
It 'll only take me 18,000 years to properly pimp out my hardcore Diablo character .
What am I going to do with the rest of the time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, a mere 28 light years away.
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.I suggest we go faster than that.
It'll only take me 18,000 years to properly pimp out my hardcore Diablo character.
What am I going to do with the rest of the time?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436878</id>
	<title>What about...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260792000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How far away are we from discovering Rainbow Worlds? Those have much more minerals and would make the ~30 light year trip more worth it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How far away are we from discovering Rainbow Worlds ?
Those have much more minerals and would make the ~ 30 light year trip more worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How far away are we from discovering Rainbow Worlds?
Those have much more minerals and would make the ~30 light year trip more worth it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437800</id>
	<title>Infant space tech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260796260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I probably won't be around for it, but I'd get quite the laugh outta a human spacecraft showing up there and a superior alien race telling the travellers that they can take their freakshow on to the next planet, tyvm. They'll keep their planet for themselves and wonder what kinda irrational species heads off across interstellar space in a slower-than-light steel bucket to a 'habital planet" and not expect to find someone already inhabiting it?</p><p>Think how far science has come in the last 200 years (horses to space shuttle). Now try to imagine where we might be in about 5 times that period (1000 years). NASA, the US space agency, is only 51 years old. Again, only 1000 years is almost 20x that period. Only an idiot would try manned interstellar travel with today's tech.  Queue idiots.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I probably wo n't be around for it , but I 'd get quite the laugh outta a human spacecraft showing up there and a superior alien race telling the travellers that they can take their freakshow on to the next planet , tyvm .
They 'll keep their planet for themselves and wonder what kinda irrational species heads off across interstellar space in a slower-than-light steel bucket to a 'habital planet " and not expect to find someone already inhabiting it ? Think how far science has come in the last 200 years ( horses to space shuttle ) .
Now try to imagine where we might be in about 5 times that period ( 1000 years ) .
NASA , the US space agency , is only 51 years old .
Again , only 1000 years is almost 20x that period .
Only an idiot would try manned interstellar travel with today 's tech .
Queue idiots.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I probably won't be around for it, but I'd get quite the laugh outta a human spacecraft showing up there and a superior alien race telling the travellers that they can take their freakshow on to the next planet, tyvm.
They'll keep their planet for themselves and wonder what kinda irrational species heads off across interstellar space in a slower-than-light steel bucket to a 'habital planet" and not expect to find someone already inhabiting it?Think how far science has come in the last 200 years (horses to space shuttle).
Now try to imagine where we might be in about 5 times that period (1000 years).
NASA, the US space agency, is only 51 years old.
Again, only 1000 years is almost 20x that period.
Only an idiot would try manned interstellar travel with today's tech.
Queue idiots.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438836</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1260801240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>61 virgins? Last I checked there were around 1.6 million on this website alone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>61 virgins ?
Last I checked there were around 1.6 million on this website alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>61 virgins?
Last I checked there were around 1.6 million on this website alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437088</id>
	<title>Ummm.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260793080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me or does that strike anyone else as an astounding deduction?</p><p>Maybe Im just ignorant, but it seems to me that detecting 2 low-mass planets out of all the planets within ~30 light years, and then going on to say "These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars" is a little crazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or does that strike anyone else as an astounding deduction ? Maybe Im just ignorant , but it seems to me that detecting 2 low-mass planets out of all the planets within ~ 30 light years , and then going on to say " These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars " is a little crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or does that strike anyone else as an astounding deduction?Maybe Im just ignorant, but it seems to me that detecting 2 low-mass planets out of all the planets within ~30 light years, and then going on to say "These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars" is a little crazy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436444</id>
	<title>Cheetos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260789720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your bringing the Cheetos right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your bringing the Cheetos right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your bringing the Cheetos right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437534</id>
	<title>Re:Drake's Equation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260795120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's more like that the Drake equation has gone from an relation where all the variables are unknown to one where about half the variables are unknown.  Advances in astronomy have allowed us to refine estimates of the number of stars in the galaxy, the fraction of those stars with planets, and the age of the galaxy.  Studies like those the article refers to could potentially pin a value down on the "number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets."  The very meaning of that variable, however, depends on what characteristics you would consider necessary to support life.
<br> <br>
From the progress of exoplanet searches so far, it does seem likely that some planets will be found that could support life in an earth-like sense (terrestrial with liquid water, at minimum).  So, maybe four variables with potentially supportable estimates (and exoplanet searching is in its infancy, so that estimate will develop over time).
<br> <br>
But the other variables in the Drake equation?  What fraction of "habitable" planets actually develop life?  What fraction of those develop intelligent life?  Intelligent life that sends out detectable signals into space?  And what is the expected lifetime of such civilizations?  Values we might assign to those variables would be pure conjecture, with our only evidence being our own anecdote of existence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more like that the Drake equation has gone from an relation where all the variables are unknown to one where about half the variables are unknown .
Advances in astronomy have allowed us to refine estimates of the number of stars in the galaxy , the fraction of those stars with planets , and the age of the galaxy .
Studies like those the article refers to could potentially pin a value down on the " number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets .
" The very meaning of that variable , however , depends on what characteristics you would consider necessary to support life .
From the progress of exoplanet searches so far , it does seem likely that some planets will be found that could support life in an earth-like sense ( terrestrial with liquid water , at minimum ) .
So , maybe four variables with potentially supportable estimates ( and exoplanet searching is in its infancy , so that estimate will develop over time ) .
But the other variables in the Drake equation ?
What fraction of " habitable " planets actually develop life ?
What fraction of those develop intelligent life ?
Intelligent life that sends out detectable signals into space ?
And what is the expected lifetime of such civilizations ?
Values we might assign to those variables would be pure conjecture , with our only evidence being our own anecdote of existence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more like that the Drake equation has gone from an relation where all the variables are unknown to one where about half the variables are unknown.
Advances in astronomy have allowed us to refine estimates of the number of stars in the galaxy, the fraction of those stars with planets, and the age of the galaxy.
Studies like those the article refers to could potentially pin a value down on the "number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
"  The very meaning of that variable, however, depends on what characteristics you would consider necessary to support life.
From the progress of exoplanet searches so far, it does seem likely that some planets will be found that could support life in an earth-like sense (terrestrial with liquid water, at minimum).
So, maybe four variables with potentially supportable estimates (and exoplanet searching is in its infancy, so that estimate will develop over time).
But the other variables in the Drake equation?
What fraction of "habitable" planets actually develop life?
What fraction of those develop intelligent life?
Intelligent life that sends out detectable signals into space?
And what is the expected lifetime of such civilizations?
Values we might assign to those variables would be pure conjecture, with our only evidence being our own anecdote of existence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436728</id>
	<title>The 'verse</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1260791280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've found it.  Get started on Artificial Gravity and Terraforming tech so we can use it when we fill up Earth that was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've found it .
Get started on Artificial Gravity and Terraforming tech so we can use it when we fill up Earth that was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've found it.
Get started on Artificial Gravity and Terraforming tech so we can use it when we fill up Earth that was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438390</id>
	<title>So lets dial the startgate and go there.</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260798840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So lets dial the startgate and go there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So lets dial the startgate and go there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So lets dial the startgate and go there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30442842</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>waynedunham</author>
	<datestamp>1260885180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  Sorry, but Tiger has all the slutty broads right now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but Tiger has all the slutty broads right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Sorry, but Tiger has all the slutty broads right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437372</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>hedge49</author>
	<datestamp>1260794460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But virgin what?...sheep, vinyl, olive oil?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But virgin what ? ...sheep , vinyl , olive oil ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But virgin what?...sheep, vinyl, olive oil?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439442</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260804900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or we could build one that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\_Orion\_(nuclear\_propulsion)#Applications" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">doesn't suck</a> [wikipedia.org] and do it in 0.357\% as much time</p><p>I'll grant it's still a multi-generational trip, but please know that the "fastest spacecraft we've ever built" and the fastest spacecraft we could have built 40 years ago are very far apart in terms of performance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or we could build one that does n't suck [ wikipedia.org ] and do it in 0.357 \ % as much timeI 'll grant it 's still a multi-generational trip , but please know that the " fastest spacecraft we 've ever built " and the fastest spacecraft we could have built 40 years ago are very far apart in terms of performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or we could build one that doesn't suck [wikipedia.org] and do it in 0.357\% as much timeI'll grant it's still a multi-generational trip, but please know that the "fastest spacecraft we've ever built" and the fastest spacecraft we could have built 40 years ago are very far apart in terms of performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436564</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260790260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the story about 72 Virgins may not be too far fetched after all!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the story about 72 Virgins may not be too far fetched after all ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the story about 72 Virgins may not be too far fetched after all!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437270</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>WheelDweller</author>
	<datestamp>1260794040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compared to that, the Starbucks in Mississippi is "nearby" if you walk. I mean REALLY nearby.</p><p>I'm kinda tired of the "like Earth" suggestions with 15G gravity, or oxygen with sulfuric acid or something.</p><p>Guys...really...no place close. No place suitable. Space exploration is dead only on TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compared to that , the Starbucks in Mississippi is " nearby " if you walk .
I mean REALLY nearby.I 'm kinda tired of the " like Earth " suggestions with 15G gravity , or oxygen with sulfuric acid or something.Guys...really...no place close .
No place suitable .
Space exploration is dead only on TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compared to that, the Starbucks in Mississippi is "nearby" if you walk.
I mean REALLY nearby.I'm kinda tired of the "like Earth" suggestions with 15G gravity, or oxygen with sulfuric acid or something.Guys...really...no place close.
No place suitable.
Space exploration is dead only on TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30442574</id>
	<title>super earths?</title>
	<author>kuei12</author>
	<datestamp>1260882240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does "super earths" mean they have better weapons?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does " super earths " mean they have better weapons ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does "super earths" mean they have better weapons?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437830</id>
	<title>Mass, not size -- summary is wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260796380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since I haven't seen anyone else mention it yet...</p><p>"Size" and "mass" are two different things.</p><p>Size has to do with physical dimensions, whereas mass is an intrinsic property of matter.  TFA clearly states these super Earths are 5 to 7.5 times the <em>mass</em> of Earth, not the "size."  Summary is wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since I have n't seen anyone else mention it yet... " Size " and " mass " are two different things.Size has to do with physical dimensions , whereas mass is an intrinsic property of matter .
TFA clearly states these super Earths are 5 to 7.5 times the mass of Earth , not the " size .
" Summary is wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since I haven't seen anyone else mention it yet..."Size" and "mass" are two different things.Size has to do with physical dimensions, whereas mass is an intrinsic property of matter.
TFA clearly states these super Earths are 5 to 7.5 times the mass of Earth, not the "size.
"  Summary is wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438688</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>BlueStrat</author>
	<datestamp>1260800340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yes, a mere 28 light years away. So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.</i></p><p><i>Who's coming with me?!?!?</i></p><p>Elwood: "It's 28 light-years to 61 Virginis, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses."</p><p>Jake: "Hit it."</p><p>Strat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , a mere 28 light years away .
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we 've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.Who 's coming with me ? ! ? !
? Elwood : " It 's 28 light-years to 61 Virginis , we got a full tank of gas , half a pack of cigarettes , it 's dark , and we 're wearing sunglasses .
" Jake : " Hit it .
" Strat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, a mere 28 light years away.
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.Who's coming with me?!?!
?Elwood: "It's 28 light-years to 61 Virginis, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses.
"Jake: "Hit it.
"Strat</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</id>
	<title>Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1260788220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, a mere 28 light years away. So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.</p><p>Who's coming with me?!?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , a mere 28 light years away .
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we 've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.Who 's coming with me ? ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, a mere 28 light years away.
So all we need to do is get in the fastest spacecraft we've ever built and we can be there in just about 150,000 years.Who's coming with me?!?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437072</id>
	<title>Bowl of petunias, anyone?</title>
	<author>Sleeper Service</author>
	<datestamp>1260792960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to The Times, it was actually a number of new \_plants\_ discovered near this "neighbouring" star (neighbours 27 light-years away? I should be so lucky).  They were apparently accompanied by a slightly surprised looking whale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to The Times , it was actually a number of new \ _plants \ _ discovered near this " neighbouring " star ( neighbours 27 light-years away ?
I should be so lucky ) .
They were apparently accompanied by a slightly surprised looking whale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to The Times, it was actually a number of new \_plants\_ discovered near this "neighbouring" star (neighbours 27 light-years away?
I should be so lucky).
They were apparently accompanied by a slightly surprised looking whale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438420</id>
	<title>Water in Uranus and Neptune? WRONG</title>
	<author>mikedep333</author>
	<datestamp>1260799020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the article: <br>
<i>The researchers said they cannot tell yet if HD 1461b is a scaled-up version of Earth, composed largely of rock and iron, or whether, like Uranus and Neptune, it is composed mostly of water.</i> <br>
[sarcasm]Yeah, perhaps they have as much water as planetary nebulae have![/sarcasm]<br>
Actually, Uranus and Neptune are primarily composed of hydrogen, just like the other 2 gas planets. Uranus and Neptune appear blue because of their methane, not water!</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the article : The researchers said they can not tell yet if HD 1461b is a scaled-up version of Earth , composed largely of rock and iron , or whether , like Uranus and Neptune , it is composed mostly of water .
[ sarcasm ] Yeah , perhaps they have as much water as planetary nebulae have !
[ /sarcasm ] Actually , Uranus and Neptune are primarily composed of hydrogen , just like the other 2 gas planets .
Uranus and Neptune appear blue because of their methane , not water !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the article: 
The researchers said they cannot tell yet if HD 1461b is a scaled-up version of Earth, composed largely of rock and iron, or whether, like Uranus and Neptune, it is composed mostly of water.
[sarcasm]Yeah, perhaps they have as much water as planetary nebulae have!
[/sarcasm]
Actually, Uranus and Neptune are primarily composed of hydrogen, just like the other 2 gas planets.
Uranus and Neptune appear blue because of their methane, not water!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454</id>
	<title>Re:mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260789780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>61 Virgins?   Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they're doing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>61 Virgins ?
Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they 're doing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>61 Virgins?
Can I trade them for 8 slutty broads that know what they're doing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438874</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>flibuste</author>
	<datestamp>1260801420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had the same reaction when I read 28 light years. Please don't tempt me you insensitive clod.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the same reaction when I read 28 light years .
Please do n't tempt me you insensitive clod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the same reaction when I read 28 light years.
Please don't tempt me you insensitive clod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439976</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>bronney</author>
	<datestamp>1260808620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eww.  I am not coming with you.   Sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eww .
I am not coming with you .
Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eww.
I am not coming with you.
Sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436176</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, nearby</title>
	<author>FunkyRider</author>
	<datestamp>1260788520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or carry human dna sequence in computer disks and rams and go there. Then rebuild those DNA to born new human beings! At least 'The Scientists' say so!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or carry human dna sequence in computer disks and rams and go there .
Then rebuild those DNA to born new human beings !
At least 'The Scientists ' say so !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or carry human dna sequence in computer disks and rams and go there.
Then rebuild those DNA to born new human beings!
At least 'The Scientists' say so!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30442842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_2126230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30442842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30443294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30436664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30437534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30438420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_2126230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_2126230.30439264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
