<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_14_1545218</id>
	<title>NASA WISE Satellite Blasts Into Space</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260811380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>coondoggie writes <i>"After a three day delay, NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer this morning <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/121409-layer8-nasa-wise-satellite.html">blasted into space</a> courtesy of a Delta II rocket and will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light, picking up the glow of hundreds of millions of objects and producing millions of images. The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months. The idea behind the spacecraft is to uncover objects never seen before, including the coolest stars, the universe's most luminous galaxies and some of the darkest near-Earth asteroids and comets."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>coondoggie writes " After a three day delay , NASA 's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer this morning blasted into space courtesy of a Delta II rocket and will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light , picking up the glow of hundreds of millions of objects and producing millions of images .
The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles , scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months .
The idea behind the spacecraft is to uncover objects never seen before , including the coolest stars , the universe 's most luminous galaxies and some of the darkest near-Earth asteroids and comets .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coondoggie writes "After a three day delay, NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer this morning blasted into space courtesy of a Delta II rocket and will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light, picking up the glow of hundreds of millions of objects and producing millions of images.
The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months.
The idea behind the spacecraft is to uncover objects never seen before, including the coolest stars, the universe's most luminous galaxies and some of the darkest near-Earth asteroids and comets.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435216</id>
	<title>A wise spacecraft?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260783720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One that knows the difference between inches and cm?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One that knows the difference between inches and cm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One that knows the difference between inches and cm?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435812</id>
	<title>1.5 times every 9 months?</title>
	<author>freedomseven</author>
	<datestamp>1260787020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months."</p><p>Maybe I am missing something but isn't 1.5 times in nine months the same thing as once every six months?</p><p>Why would you express something like that? It's like saying that gas costs 3.75 per 1.5 gallons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles , scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months .
" Maybe I am missing something but is n't 1.5 times in nine months the same thing as once every six months ? Why would you express something like that ?
It 's like saying that gas costs 3.75 per 1.5 gallons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months.
"Maybe I am missing something but isn't 1.5 times in nine months the same thing as once every six months?Why would you express something like that?
It's like saying that gas costs 3.75 per 1.5 gallons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434092</id>
	<title>Re:Bathing?</title>
	<author>Talderas</author>
	<datestamp>1260820980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Primary mission?</p><p>What's its secondary mission?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Primary mission ? What 's its secondary mission ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Primary mission?What's its secondary mission?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433846</id>
	<title>Re:SETI Application?</title>
	<author>TimSSG</author>
	<datestamp>1260819480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say till we can find proof of TI we need not look for ETI.</p><p>Tim S.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say till we can find proof of TI we need not look for ETI.Tim S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say till we can find proof of TI we need not look for ETI.Tim S.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433260</id>
	<title>Re:Bathing?</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1260816540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Soviet Russia, satellites <b>create</b> galaxies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , satellites create galaxies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, satellites create galaxies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433072</id>
	<title>Spy sat?</title>
	<author>LBt1st</author>
	<datestamp>1260815640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how long till this thing is pointed downward?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how long till this thing is pointed downward ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how long till this thing is pointed downward?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433214</id>
	<title>Re:Scan Rate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months? It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.</p></div><p>It's because WISE has a limited life expentancy of 10 months. In that 10 months its expected to cover the whole sky 1.5 times.</p><p>The life expentancy is only 10 months because the instrument needs to be cooled, which is done with solid hydrogen. Once the hydrogen is gone, the primary mission is over. Not sure if they have a plan for afterwards and can get secondary uses out of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that scan complete one sky in 6 months ?
It 's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.It 's because WISE has a limited life expentancy of 10 months .
In that 10 months its expected to cover the whole sky 1.5 times.The life expentancy is only 10 months because the instrument needs to be cooled , which is done with solid hydrogen .
Once the hydrogen is gone , the primary mission is over .
Not sure if they have a plan for afterwards and can get secondary uses out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months?
It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.It's because WISE has a limited life expentancy of 10 months.
In that 10 months its expected to cover the whole sky 1.5 times.The life expentancy is only 10 months because the instrument needs to be cooled, which is done with solid hydrogen.
Once the hydrogen is gone, the primary mission is over.
Not sure if they have a plan for afterwards and can get secondary uses out of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433980</id>
	<title>final term of the drake equation</title>
	<author>fred fleenblat</author>
	<datestamp>1260820320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the most melancholy facts about astromony is that that while at this time and for the near future we have a civilization capable of supporting advanced orbital telescopes, the solar system is currently positioned pretty much in the center of glactic plane--safer from intergalactic bombardment by cosmic rays, but also our view is clouded by interference from so many local objects that we cannot see as much, or as far, or as far back, as would be if the solar system happened to be in the part of its phase where its orbit kind of bobs up or down out of the galactic plan for a few hundred thousand years.</p><p>The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now.  That's for the northern sky.  Add another 35 million years to that before we get a clear view to the south.  I hope we're still here by then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the most melancholy facts about astromony is that that while at this time and for the near future we have a civilization capable of supporting advanced orbital telescopes , the solar system is currently positioned pretty much in the center of glactic plane--safer from intergalactic bombardment by cosmic rays , but also our view is clouded by interference from so many local objects that we can not see as much , or as far , or as far back , as would be if the solar system happened to be in the part of its phase where its orbit kind of bobs up or down out of the galactic plan for a few hundred thousand years.The next time we 'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now .
That 's for the northern sky .
Add another 35 million years to that before we get a clear view to the south .
I hope we 're still here by then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the most melancholy facts about astromony is that that while at this time and for the near future we have a civilization capable of supporting advanced orbital telescopes, the solar system is currently positioned pretty much in the center of glactic plane--safer from intergalactic bombardment by cosmic rays, but also our view is clouded by interference from so many local objects that we cannot see as much, or as far, or as far back, as would be if the solar system happened to be in the part of its phase where its orbit kind of bobs up or down out of the galactic plan for a few hundred thousand years.The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now.
That's for the northern sky.
Add another 35 million years to that before we get a clear view to the south.
I hope we're still here by then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433228</id>
	<title>Re:Scan Rate</title>
	<author>glop</author>
	<datestamp>1260816420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The satellite only has enough cryogen to keep cool for 1.5 sky surveys. Hence the summary.<br>I wonder if the satellite can still work without cryogen... I suppose it's going to be much noisier, but how much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The satellite only has enough cryogen to keep cool for 1.5 sky surveys .
Hence the summary.I wonder if the satellite can still work without cryogen... I suppose it 's going to be much noisier , but how much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The satellite only has enough cryogen to keep cool for 1.5 sky surveys.
Hence the summary.I wonder if the satellite can still work without cryogen... I suppose it's going to be much noisier, but how much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433586</id>
	<title>Re:Not bathing the cosmos</title>
	<author>idji</author>
	<datestamp>1260818460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think we have found the cause here not just of global warming but of<b> cosmological warming (TM)</b> as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we have found the cause here not just of global warming but of cosmological warming ( TM ) as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we have found the cause here not just of global warming but of cosmological warming (TM) as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433062</id>
	<title>Target the Universe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More likely to turn around and scan the earth for "the glow of hundreds of millions of objects."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely to turn around and scan the earth for " the glow of hundreds of millions of objects .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely to turn around and scan the earth for "the glow of hundreds of millions of objects.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30432962</id>
	<title>Nasa is indeed WISE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haha, get it? I am so wise I got this FP without trolling about homosexual negroid human beings. FP FP FP FAP</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha , get it ?
I am so wise I got this FP without trolling about homosexual negroid human beings .
FP FP FP FAP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha, get it?
I am so wise I got this FP without trolling about homosexual negroid human beings.
FP FP FP FAP</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036</id>
	<title>Not bathing the cosmos</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1260815460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure we're talking passive sensors here, so it's not going to be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light" as much as it's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos. If scientists hadn't stopped writing in Latin, we wouldn't have these little word order screwups, now would we?</p><p>But it's good it will be finding the coolest stars. Aside from giving us new insights into the age of the universe and stellar evolution, it'll give NASA something to boast about on Facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure we 're talking passive sensors here , so it 's not going to be " bathing the cosmos with infrared light " as much as it 's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos .
If scientists had n't stopped writing in Latin , we would n't have these little word order screwups , now would we ? But it 's good it will be finding the coolest stars .
Aside from giving us new insights into the age of the universe and stellar evolution , it 'll give NASA something to boast about on Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure we're talking passive sensors here, so it's not going to be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light" as much as it's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos.
If scientists hadn't stopped writing in Latin, we wouldn't have these little word order screwups, now would we?But it's good it will be finding the coolest stars.
Aside from giving us new insights into the age of the universe and stellar evolution, it'll give NASA something to boast about on Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433236</id>
	<title>Re:Scan Rate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's only true if the scanning rate is constant. Don't assume stuff because it makes an ass of you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's only true if the scanning rate is constant .
Do n't assume stuff because it makes an ass of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's only true if the scanning rate is constant.
Don't assume stuff because it makes an ass of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433380</id>
	<title>Mods, please start using the 'redundant' modifier.</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1260817260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or we'll have a completely useless and repetitive discussion about how badly written the article is, and see nothing about the actual issue itself.  I've waded all the way down the page in search of an actual insightful post and have so far been disappointed.</p><p>I mean, so TFS/TFA/whatever screwed up. OK! Enough already! I Fucking get it! Now can we move on?</p><p>Jeez!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or we 'll have a completely useless and repetitive discussion about how badly written the article is , and see nothing about the actual issue itself .
I 've waded all the way down the page in search of an actual insightful post and have so far been disappointed.I mean , so TFS/TFA/whatever screwed up .
OK ! Enough already !
I Fucking get it !
Now can we move on ? Jeez !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or we'll have a completely useless and repetitive discussion about how badly written the article is, and see nothing about the actual issue itself.
I've waded all the way down the page in search of an actual insightful post and have so far been disappointed.I mean, so TFS/TFA/whatever screwed up.
OK! Enough already!
I Fucking get it!
Now can we move on?Jeez!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433148</id>
	<title>This satellite will cause massive disruption!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This satellite will constantly change the channels of millions of models of television sets.</p><p>Not to mention contribute to global warming.</p><p>And if it emits too much infrared radiation, it may even set the Van Allen belt on fire!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This satellite will constantly change the channels of millions of models of television sets.Not to mention contribute to global warming.And if it emits too much infrared radiation , it may even set the Van Allen belt on fire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This satellite will constantly change the channels of millions of models of television sets.Not to mention contribute to global warming.And if it emits too much infrared radiation, it may even set the Van Allen belt on fire!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434378</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>kooky45</author>
	<datestamp>1260822360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a shame the wording of the summary is wrong because on first reading it sounded like the satellite will be bathing its surrounding in infra-red light to detect nearby objects like space debris, which I thought sounded quite fascinating. Then to discover it's just an infra-red telescope made it far less interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame the wording of the summary is wrong because on first reading it sounded like the satellite will be bathing its surrounding in infra-red light to detect nearby objects like space debris , which I thought sounded quite fascinating .
Then to discover it 's just an infra-red telescope made it far less interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame the wording of the summary is wrong because on first reading it sounded like the satellite will be bathing its surrounding in infra-red light to detect nearby objects like space debris, which I thought sounded quite fascinating.
Then to discover it's just an infra-red telescope made it far less interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>diablovision</author>
	<datestamp>1260819360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that Pluto orbits at close to 1/1000th of a lightyear from the Sun (up to 7 billion km versus about 10 trillion km in a lightyear), I think if there were a companion star at 1/2 a lightyear, we'd probably have been able to infer its presence by its gravitational disturbance on the outermost planets' orbits. Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system.</p><p>I suppose it is possible the Sun has a companion out there, but seems very unlikely to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that Pluto orbits at close to 1/1000th of a lightyear from the Sun ( up to 7 billion km versus about 10 trillion km in a lightyear ) , I think if there were a companion star at 1/2 a lightyear , we 'd probably have been able to infer its presence by its gravitational disturbance on the outermost planets ' orbits .
Also , most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system.I suppose it is possible the Sun has a companion out there , but seems very unlikely to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that Pluto orbits at close to 1/1000th of a lightyear from the Sun (up to 7 billion km versus about 10 trillion km in a lightyear), I think if there were a companion star at 1/2 a lightyear, we'd probably have been able to infer its presence by its gravitational disturbance on the outermost planets' orbits.
Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system.I suppose it is possible the Sun has a companion out there, but seems very unlikely to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433006</id>
	<title>Beautiful stars better see...</title>
	<author>genghisjahn</author>
	<datestamp>1260815340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am only interested in the coolest, most popular, stars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am only interested in the coolest , most popular , stars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am only interested in the coolest, most popular, stars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433538</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>Ipeunipig</author>
	<datestamp>1260818280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be "Billions and billions" according to a certain TV series host.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be " Billions and billions " according to a certain TV series host .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be "Billions and billions" according to a certain TV series host.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433304</id>
	<title>Hey, look, another shitty NetworkWorld.com article</title>
	<author>Megaweapon</author>
	<datestamp>1260816780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Submitted by one of their lackeys, or even worse, the author.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Submitted by one of their lackeys , or even worse , the author .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Submitted by one of their lackeys, or even worse, the author.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433876</id>
	<title>sometimes "hobbyists" can make discoveries</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1260819660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of this depends on how timely a given probe team makes the data available on the net.  For example, earlier this year hobbyists measured out of ring plane bumps on Saturns rings during Saturn's vernal equinox.  Then the rings were edge-on to the Sun and tiny out-of-plane excursions cast measurable shadows on the reset of the ring.
<br> <br>
A counter-example the Kepler project.  They are NOT putting raw data on the web yet for the public to anyalyze.  They probably have a private website somewhere with the data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of this depends on how timely a given probe team makes the data available on the net .
For example , earlier this year hobbyists measured out of ring plane bumps on Saturns rings during Saturn 's vernal equinox .
Then the rings were edge-on to the Sun and tiny out-of-plane excursions cast measurable shadows on the reset of the ring .
A counter-example the Kepler project .
They are NOT putting raw data on the web yet for the public to anyalyze .
They probably have a private website somewhere with the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of this depends on how timely a given probe team makes the data available on the net.
For example, earlier this year hobbyists measured out of ring plane bumps on Saturns rings during Saturn's vernal equinox.
Then the rings were edge-on to the Sun and tiny out-of-plane excursions cast measurable shadows on the reset of the ring.
A counter-example the Kepler project.
They are NOT putting raw data on the web yet for the public to anyalyze.
They probably have a private website somewhere with the data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433118</id>
	<title>Re:Not bathing the cosmos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm pretty sure we're talking passive sensors here, so it's not going to be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light" as much as it's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos.</p></div><p>Technically, it will retain residual heat from Earth, and as it emits that extremely weak infrared radiation, the universe will be eventually bathed in it.  Now that reminds me of the time my family had a large pepperoni pizza with luscious ripe tomato sauce, delicious mozzarella cheese, and freshly made pepperoni that was so hot you could practically get a suntan just putting your face near it.  (Temporarily filling in for PizzaAnalogyGuy.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure we 're talking passive sensors here , so it 's not going to be " bathing the cosmos with infrared light " as much as it 's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos.Technically , it will retain residual heat from Earth , and as it emits that extremely weak infrared radiation , the universe will be eventually bathed in it .
Now that reminds me of the time my family had a large pepperoni pizza with luscious ripe tomato sauce , delicious mozzarella cheese , and freshly made pepperoni that was so hot you could practically get a suntan just putting your face near it .
( Temporarily filling in for PizzaAnalogyGuy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure we're talking passive sensors here, so it's not going to be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light" as much as it's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos.Technically, it will retain residual heat from Earth, and as it emits that extremely weak infrared radiation, the universe will be eventually bathed in it.
Now that reminds me of the time my family had a large pepperoni pizza with luscious ripe tomato sauce, delicious mozzarella cheese, and freshly made pepperoni that was so hot you could practically get a suntan just putting your face near it.
(Temporarily filling in for PizzaAnalogyGuy.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034</id>
	<title>Bathing?</title>
	<author>Garble Snarky</author>
	<datestamp>1260815460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it really "bathing" the cosmos? Don't most orbiting observatories just have sensors, not emitters?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really " bathing " the cosmos ?
Do n't most orbiting observatories just have sensors , not emitters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really "bathing" the cosmos?
Don't most orbiting observatories just have sensors, not emitters?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440674</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260814980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the wiki page about WISE, it seems it will be able to discover also gas giant planets in the Oort cloud.</p><p>It would be most interesting if such body turned out to be rogue planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the wiki page about WISE , it seems it will be able to discover also gas giant planets in the Oort cloud.It would be most interesting if such body turned out to be rogue planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the wiki page about WISE, it seems it will be able to discover also gas giant planets in the Oort cloud.It would be most interesting if such body turned out to be rogue planet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433056</id>
	<title>Bathing the cosmos in infrared light?</title>
	<author>kawabago</author>
	<datestamp>1260815520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bathing the cosmos in infrared light? Did NASA launch an intergalactic flash light?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bathing the cosmos in infrared light ?
Did NASA launch an intergalactic flash light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bathing the cosmos in infrared light?
Did NASA launch an intergalactic flash light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</id>
	<title>Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260818820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99\% of the comments here are about?
<br> <br>
Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it, no matter what it's about, any interest that might have been gleaned from TFA is lost. All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first posts and you fill up this board with this redundantly unfunny goofballing- "huh huh huh it's bathing the cosmos not the other way around huh huh huh"! My heart pains for any infrared astronomer out there drowning in this shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid " bathing " thing ' , and then guess what 99 \ % of the comments here are about ?
Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it , no matter what it 's about , any interest that might have been gleaned from TFA is lost .
All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5 , Funny first posts and you fill up this board with this redundantly unfunny goofballing- " huh huh huh it 's bathing the cosmos not the other way around huh huh huh " !
My heart pains for any infrared astronomer out there drowning in this shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99\% of the comments here are about?
Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it, no matter what it's about, any interest that might have been gleaned from TFA is lost.
All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first posts and you fill up this board with this redundantly unfunny goofballing- "huh huh huh it's bathing the cosmos not the other way around huh huh huh"!
My heart pains for any infrared astronomer out there drowning in this shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433082</id>
	<title>bathing the cosmos in IR?</title>
	<author>Luxifer</author>
	<datestamp>1260815640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um, I hope that isn't what it's supposed to do, because if it's an active IR system, it's gonna be waiting billions of years to get a return signal.<br>I think what you mean is it'll be detecting the IR that is already out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um , I hope that is n't what it 's supposed to do , because if it 's an active IR system , it 's gon na be waiting billions of years to get a return signal.I think what you mean is it 'll be detecting the IR that is already out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um, I hope that isn't what it's supposed to do, because if it's an active IR system, it's gonna be waiting billions of years to get a return signal.I think what you mean is it'll be detecting the IR that is already out there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433122</id>
	<title>Let's all pile on the doofus who wrote the title!</title>
	<author>sribe</author>
	<datestamp>1260815820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light...</p></div><p>Uhm, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's not true<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light...Uhm , yeah , I 'm pretty sure that 's not true ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light...Uhm, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's not true ;-)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434484</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>Garble Snarky</author>
	<datestamp>1260822960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Precision in language has its place, and that place is in science, and science journalism. If the article were a poem about an IR satellite, I wouldn't be complaining. The two different phrasings have different meanings. Sorry for the redundancy though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Precision in language has its place , and that place is in science , and science journalism .
If the article were a poem about an IR satellite , I would n't be complaining .
The two different phrasings have different meanings .
Sorry for the redundancy though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Precision in language has its place, and that place is in science, and science journalism.
If the article were a poem about an IR satellite, I wouldn't be complaining.
The two different phrasings have different meanings.
Sorry for the redundancy though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433204</id>
	<title>Re:Scan Rate</title>
	<author>CityZen</author>
	<datestamp>1260816240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It may start repeating sections that it has done before it finishes the whole thing.  (I didn't RTFA yet.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may start repeating sections that it has done before it finishes the whole thing .
( I did n't RTFA yet .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may start repeating sections that it has done before it finishes the whole thing.
(I didn't RTFA yet.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433266</id>
	<title>Re:Bathing the cosmos in infrared light?</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1260816600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>An orbital space heater, more like. As if the poles weren't getting warm enough as it is...</htmltext>
<tokenext>An orbital space heater , more like .
As if the poles were n't getting warm enough as it is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An orbital space heater, more like.
As if the poles weren't getting warm enough as it is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439764</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>Higgs\_Bozon</author>
	<datestamp>1260806940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh,  you are such a ninny! <br>
Ask the teacher if you can clean the blackboard after class.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , you are such a ninny !
Ask the teacher if you can clean the blackboard after class .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh,  you are such a ninny!
Ask the teacher if you can clean the blackboard after class.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433054</id>
	<title>Bathing the cosmos with infrared light?</title>
	<author>Grokmoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260815520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary says it will be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light".  What is this supposed to mean?  The spacecraft will be detecting light, but will not be emitting it in any substantial quantity.  In fact, WISE will be emitting very little infrared light at all (even for a spacecraft), as it is being kept cool for the next 10 months or so with an onboard supply of solid hydrogen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary says it will be " bathing the cosmos with infrared light " .
What is this supposed to mean ?
The spacecraft will be detecting light , but will not be emitting it in any substantial quantity .
In fact , WISE will be emitting very little infrared light at all ( even for a spacecraft ) , as it is being kept cool for the next 10 months or so with an onboard supply of solid hydrogen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary says it will be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light".
What is this supposed to mean?
The spacecraft will be detecting light, but will not be emitting it in any substantial quantity.
In fact, WISE will be emitting very little infrared light at all (even for a spacecraft), as it is being kept cool for the next 10 months or so with an onboard supply of solid hydrogen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30432954</id>
	<title>That's a long wait</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1260815100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the infrared flashbulb light to bounce back. Plus, won't this contribute to galactic warming? NASA under Barack Obama is clearly in league with the Italians who are out to destroy America's universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the infrared flashbulb light to bounce back .
Plus , wo n't this contribute to galactic warming ?
NASA under Barack Obama is clearly in league with the Italians who are out to destroy America 's universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the infrared flashbulb light to bounce back.
Plus, won't this contribute to galactic warming?
NASA under Barack Obama is clearly in league with the Italians who are out to destroy America's universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433068</id>
	<title>Bathing the cosmos??</title>
	<author>frooddude</author>
	<datestamp>1260815580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously coondoggie, that's not how it works.  This is an IR detector.  Speed of light limitations, not to mention power requirements for umping enough IR into the sky to see any reflections, I mean... wow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously coondoggie , that 's not how it works .
This is an IR detector .
Speed of light limitations , not to mention power requirements for umping enough IR into the sky to see any reflections , I mean... wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously coondoggie, that's not how it works.
This is an IR detector.
Speed of light limitations, not to mention power requirements for umping enough IR into the sky to see any reflections, I mean... wow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433840</id>
	<title>What's the contingency for these missions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260819480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know with the Mars rovers the cost of a second rover was small change compared to the development cost of the original. The launch vehicle is expensive, of course, but it was considered cheaper to launch two missions and hope one succeeded than launching one that could fail and mean all the money was wasted.
<p>
What sort of contingency do they have for sats like this? Do they just fabricate another one and try again in a year or two?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know with the Mars rovers the cost of a second rover was small change compared to the development cost of the original .
The launch vehicle is expensive , of course , but it was considered cheaper to launch two missions and hope one succeeded than launching one that could fail and mean all the money was wasted .
What sort of contingency do they have for sats like this ?
Do they just fabricate another one and try again in a year or two ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know with the Mars rovers the cost of a second rover was small change compared to the development cost of the original.
The launch vehicle is expensive, of course, but it was considered cheaper to launch two missions and hope one succeeded than launching one that could fail and mean all the money was wasted.
What sort of contingency do they have for sats like this?
Do they just fabricate another one and try again in a year or two?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30436750</id>
	<title>WiseGuys</title>
	<author>freeasinrealale</author>
	<datestamp>1260791460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...so this project is run by a bunch of wiseguys?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...sorry - had to do it</htmltext>
<tokenext>...so this project is run by a bunch of wiseguys ?
...sorry - had to do it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so this project is run by a bunch of wiseguys?
...sorry - had to do it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433558</id>
	<title>Why pick such a bad article?</title>
	<author>Eevee</author>
	<datestamp>1260818340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of going to some half-assed article from networkworld, why aren't we linking to the actual
<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission\_pages/WISE/main/index.html" title="nasa.gov">NASA WISE</a> [nasa.gov] site? Original sources, people. It's not that hard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of going to some half-assed article from networkworld , why are n't we linking to the actual NASA WISE [ nasa.gov ] site ?
Original sources , people .
It 's not that hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of going to some half-assed article from networkworld, why aren't we linking to the actual
NASA WISE [nasa.gov] site?
Original sources, people.
It's not that hard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134</id>
	<title>Scan Rate</title>
	<author>tprox</author>
	<datestamp>1260815940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months? It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that scan complete one sky in 6 months ?
It 's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months?
It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30436348</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1260789360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A star so close would be really, really bright. Jupiter is visible to the naked eye, about 1/10,000 of a light year away, and 1000 times smaller than the sun. A second sun about 1/2 of a light year away would be about 1/5 as bright as the sun. So a star so close by would probably be brighter than the full moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A star so close would be really , really bright .
Jupiter is visible to the naked eye , about 1/10,000 of a light year away , and 1000 times smaller than the sun .
A second sun about 1/2 of a light year away would be about 1/5 as bright as the sun .
So a star so close by would probably be brighter than the full moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A star so close would be really, really bright.
Jupiter is visible to the naked eye, about 1/10,000 of a light year away, and 1000 times smaller than the sun.
A second sun about 1/2 of a light year away would be about 1/5 as bright as the sun.
So a star so close by would probably be brighter than the full moon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433192</id>
	<title>Re:Bathing?</title>
	<author>cream wobbly</author>
	<datestamp>1260816180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Evidently, it's a <em>very</em> subtle "Soviet Russia" joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Evidently , it 's a very subtle " Soviet Russia " joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evidently, it's a very subtle "Soviet Russia" joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433300</id>
	<title>Re:Bathing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No. It is a passive device, as you suspect.</p><p>However, TFS can&rsquo;t be entirely blamed for this mistake. It was copied and pasted directly from TFS.</p><p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission\_pages/WISE/news/wise20091214.html" title="nasa.gov">Better article</a> [nasa.gov] &ndash; from the horse&rsquo;s mouth, as it were. Some interesting tibits:</p><blockquote><div><p>Because the instrument sees the infrared, or heat, signatures of objects, it must be kept at chilly temperatures. Its coldest detectors are less than minus 447 degrees Fahrenheit.</p><p>"WISE needs to be colder than the objects it's observing," said Ned Wright of UCLA, the mission's principal investigator. "Now we're ready to see the infrared glow from hundreds of thousands of asteroids, and hundreds of millions of stars and galaxies."</p><p>WISE will see the infrared colors of the whole sky with sensitivity and resolution far better than the last infrared sky survey, performed 26 years ago. The space telescope will spend nine months scanning the sky once, then one-half the sky a second time. The primary mission will end when WISE's frozen hydrogen runs out, about 10 months after launch.</p><p>Just about everything in the universe glows in infrared, which means the mission will catalog a variety of astronomical targets. Near-Earth asteroids, stars, planet-forming disks and distant galaxies all will be easy for the mission to see. Hundreds of millions of objects will populate the WISE atlas, providing astronomers and other space missions, such as NASA's planned James Webb Space Telescope, with a long-lasting infrared roadmap.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
It is a passive device , as you suspect.However , TFS can    t be entirely blamed for this mistake .
It was copied and pasted directly from TFS.Better article [ nasa.gov ]    from the horse    s mouth , as it were .
Some interesting tibits : Because the instrument sees the infrared , or heat , signatures of objects , it must be kept at chilly temperatures .
Its coldest detectors are less than minus 447 degrees Fahrenheit .
" WISE needs to be colder than the objects it 's observing , " said Ned Wright of UCLA , the mission 's principal investigator .
" Now we 're ready to see the infrared glow from hundreds of thousands of asteroids , and hundreds of millions of stars and galaxies .
" WISE will see the infrared colors of the whole sky with sensitivity and resolution far better than the last infrared sky survey , performed 26 years ago .
The space telescope will spend nine months scanning the sky once , then one-half the sky a second time .
The primary mission will end when WISE 's frozen hydrogen runs out , about 10 months after launch.Just about everything in the universe glows in infrared , which means the mission will catalog a variety of astronomical targets .
Near-Earth asteroids , stars , planet-forming disks and distant galaxies all will be easy for the mission to see .
Hundreds of millions of objects will populate the WISE atlas , providing astronomers and other space missions , such as NASA 's planned James Webb Space Telescope , with a long-lasting infrared roadmap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
It is a passive device, as you suspect.However, TFS can’t be entirely blamed for this mistake.
It was copied and pasted directly from TFS.Better article [nasa.gov] – from the horse’s mouth, as it were.
Some interesting tibits:Because the instrument sees the infrared, or heat, signatures of objects, it must be kept at chilly temperatures.
Its coldest detectors are less than minus 447 degrees Fahrenheit.
"WISE needs to be colder than the objects it's observing," said Ned Wright of UCLA, the mission's principal investigator.
"Now we're ready to see the infrared glow from hundreds of thousands of asteroids, and hundreds of millions of stars and galaxies.
"WISE will see the infrared colors of the whole sky with sensitivity and resolution far better than the last infrared sky survey, performed 26 years ago.
The space telescope will spend nine months scanning the sky once, then one-half the sky a second time.
The primary mission will end when WISE's frozen hydrogen runs out, about 10 months after launch.Just about everything in the universe glows in infrared, which means the mission will catalog a variety of astronomical targets.
Near-Earth asteroids, stars, planet-forming disks and distant galaxies all will be easy for the mission to see.
Hundreds of millions of objects will populate the WISE atlas, providing astronomers and other space missions, such as NASA's planned James Webb Space Telescope, with a long-lasting infrared roadmap.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435370</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>grgyle</author>
	<datestamp>1260784620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system..."</p><p>I just ran this through a three-body analysis program, and it shows a common valid solution path for this type of orbital system.  I am going to publish my results of the resultant curve and call it the "Unary Track Inflection".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...Also , most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system... " I just ran this through a three-body analysis program , and it shows a common valid solution path for this type of orbital system .
I am going to publish my results of the resultant curve and call it the " Unary Track Inflection " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system..."I just ran this through a three-body analysis program, and it shows a common valid solution path for this type of orbital system.
I am going to publish my results of the resultant curve and call it the "Unary Track Inflection".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433454</id>
	<title>Re:Beautiful stars better see...</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1260817680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Best subject line EVAR.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Best subject line EVAR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best subject line EVAR.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440638</id>
	<title>Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260814620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, brown dwarfs are really, really dim for a star. Your intuition cheats you here because majority of the stars you can see on the night sky are really bright; and Sun, Jupiter, are practically at our doorstep.</p><p>Our failure to discover such a star is feasible enough that it is quite seriously considered: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis\_(star)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis\_(star)</a> [wikipedia.org] (and hey, there won't be any problems with picking a name<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , brown dwarfs are really , really dim for a star .
Your intuition cheats you here because majority of the stars you can see on the night sky are really bright ; and Sun , Jupiter , are practically at our doorstep.Our failure to discover such a star is feasible enough that it is quite seriously considered : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis \ _ ( star ) [ wikipedia.org ] ( and hey , there wo n't be any problems with picking a name ; ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, brown dwarfs are really, really dim for a star.
Your intuition cheats you here because majority of the stars you can see on the night sky are really bright; and Sun, Jupiter, are practically at our doorstep.Our failure to discover such a star is feasible enough that it is quite seriously considered: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis\_(star) [wikipedia.org] (and hey, there won't be any problems with picking a name ;) )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30436348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439834</id>
	<title>Re:Not bathing the cosmos</title>
	<author>Higgs\_Bozon</author>
	<datestamp>1260807420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  <p><div class="quote"><p> "...so it's not going to be "bathing  \_\_ the cosmos with infrared light"</p></div><p>
And no,  that wasn't one small step for \_ man.  <br>
<br>
Apparently \_  pronoun was once again lost in the transmission....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...so it 's not going to be " bathing \ _ \ _ the cosmos with infrared light " And no , that was n't one small step for \ _ man .
Apparently \ _ pronoun was once again lost in the transmission... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>   "...so it's not going to be "bathing  \_\_ the cosmos with infrared light"
And no,  that wasn't one small step for \_ man.
Apparently \_  pronoun was once again lost in the transmission....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433810</id>
	<title>I am a journalist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260819360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a journalist, and I will not be denied the right
to use "bathing the cosmos".  It is, in my view, and elegant
turn of phrase.  Please do not bother me with all this
science nonsense about sensors.</p><p>Now excuse me, I have to get off to my 2nd job.  It's
not easy being a journalist these days.  The paper could go
belly-up any time.  I moonlight writing advertising copy
for real estate agents.  There are tiny cabins that need
to be described as "cozy", and houses needing tree work that
need to be described as "nestled in the woods".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a journalist , and I will not be denied the right to use " bathing the cosmos " .
It is , in my view , and elegant turn of phrase .
Please do not bother me with all this science nonsense about sensors.Now excuse me , I have to get off to my 2nd job .
It 's not easy being a journalist these days .
The paper could go belly-up any time .
I moonlight writing advertising copy for real estate agents .
There are tiny cabins that need to be described as " cozy " , and houses needing tree work that need to be described as " nestled in the woods " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a journalist, and I will not be denied the right
to use "bathing the cosmos".
It is, in my view, and elegant
turn of phrase.
Please do not bother me with all this
science nonsense about sensors.Now excuse me, I have to get off to my 2nd job.
It's
not easy being a journalist these days.
The paper could go
belly-up any time.
I moonlight writing advertising copy
for real estate agents.
There are tiny cabins that need
to be described as "cozy", and houses needing tree work that
need to be described as "nestled in the woods".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434364</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260822360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not error, misconception.  Engineers and scientists hate those.  Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing, but care to be accurate still taken.  So be glad we give a shit,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not error , misconception .
Engineers and scientists hate those .
Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing , but care to be accurate still taken .
So be glad we give a shit,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not error, misconception.
Engineers and scientists hate those.
Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing, but care to be accurate still taken.
So be glad we give a shit,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434372</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260822360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first posts</p></div></blockquote><p>You must be new here.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/oblig.</p><p>"Funny" moderation does not affect karma.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5 , Funny first postsYou must be new here .
/oblig. " Funny " moderation does not affect karma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first postsYou must be new here.
/oblig."Funny" moderation does not affect karma.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434176</id>
	<title>Meanwhie on the sister launch pad...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260821400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA UNWISE Satellite Blasts Into Earth.</p><p>Comment: &ldquo;I&rsquo;m more of a down-to-earth kind of satellite.&rdquo;</p><p>More opposite news here on the opposite network. Stay tuned!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA UNWISE Satellite Blasts Into Earth.Comment :    I    m more of a down-to-earth kind of satellite.    More opposite news here on the opposite network .
Stay tuned !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA UNWISE Satellite Blasts Into Earth.Comment: “I’m more of a down-to-earth kind of satellite.”More opposite news here on the opposite network.
Stay tuned!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296</id>
	<title>Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars...</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1260816780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this will find any stars closer to the earth that proxima centari?</p><p>It would be interesting if it found a brown or red dwarf companion to our star which orbits out beyond the ort cloud.   An Ion or VASIMIR powered probe to this star would be cool and feasible even if it were up to 1/2 a light year away.</p><p>What would everyone think if we found out that our solar system is just another binary star system amonst the trillions and quadrillions of other multiple star systems out there....</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this will find any stars closer to the earth that proxima centari ? It would be interesting if it found a brown or red dwarf companion to our star which orbits out beyond the ort cloud .
An Ion or VASIMIR powered probe to this star would be cool and feasible even if it were up to 1/2 a light year away.What would everyone think if we found out that our solar system is just another binary star system amonst the trillions and quadrillions of other multiple star systems out there... .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this will find any stars closer to the earth that proxima centari?It would be interesting if it found a brown or red dwarf companion to our star which orbits out beyond the ort cloud.
An Ion or VASIMIR powered probe to this star would be cool and feasible even if it were up to 1/2 a light year away.What would everyone think if we found out that our solar system is just another binary star system amonst the trillions and quadrillions of other multiple star systems out there....
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435244</id>
	<title>Re:final term of the drake equation</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1260783900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now."</p><p>(adds to Blackberry calendar)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The next time we 'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now .
" ( adds to Blackberry calendar )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now.
"(adds to Blackberry calendar)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433272</id>
	<title>SETI Application?</title>
	<author>coolmoose25</author>
	<datestamp>1260816660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it would be interesting to see if this thing picks up any sign of ETI... You could make the argument that initial communications for ETI might be in the infrared spectrum, as this is what is required to search for asteroids that might wipe out your home world.  Any sufficiently intelligent species should have such an early warning system, indeed - you might see that as a necessary capability for an "intelligent" species.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it would be interesting to see if this thing picks up any sign of ETI... You could make the argument that initial communications for ETI might be in the infrared spectrum , as this is what is required to search for asteroids that might wipe out your home world .
Any sufficiently intelligent species should have such an early warning system , indeed - you might see that as a necessary capability for an " intelligent " species .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it would be interesting to see if this thing picks up any sign of ETI... You could make the argument that initial communications for ETI might be in the infrared spectrum, as this is what is required to search for asteroids that might wipe out your home world.
Any sufficiently intelligent species should have such an early warning system, indeed - you might see that as a necessary capability for an "intelligent" species.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433080</id>
	<title>Bathing the cosmos?</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1260815640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod me up too pls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod me up too pls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod me up too pls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433384</id>
	<title>Re:Not bathing the cosmos</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1260817260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome images of our Great Old Overlords bathed in infra-red light!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome images of our Great Old Overlords bathed in infra-red light !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome images of our Great Old Overlords bathed in infra-red light!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434582</id>
	<title>Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1260823560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it..."</p><p>You do realize that you are addressing a large population of programmers, right?</p><p>Its is their JOB to notice such "tiniest little compiler error(s)". If they don't, rockets end up underwater instead of in space, people end up dead, Microsoft makes billions and programmers lose jobs.</p><p>You must be in marketing...or management.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it... " You do realize that you are addressing a large population of programmers , right ? Its is their JOB to notice such " tiniest little compiler error ( s ) " .
If they do n't , rockets end up underwater instead of in space , people end up dead , Microsoft makes billions and programmers lose jobs.You must be in marketing...or management .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it..."You do realize that you are addressing a large population of programmers, right?Its is their JOB to notice such "tiniest little compiler error(s)".
If they don't, rockets end up underwater instead of in space, people end up dead, Microsoft makes billions and programmers lose jobs.You must be in marketing...or management.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30436348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1545218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30432954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30432962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30436348
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30440674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30435244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1545218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30439764
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30433300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1545218.30434092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
