<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_14_1515215</id>
	<title>B&amp;N Nook Successfully Opened</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260809040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>garg0yle writes <i>"A team has managed to <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/nook-torn-open-hacked-and-rooted/">open the Barnes and Noble Nook e-reader</a>, gaining full access to the operating system.  From the article: 'The Nook is now a computer running a full Android operating system, with a built-in, free cellular connection to the internet. It also has a battery that lasts days, not hours.'  They are documenting their progress on the <a href="http://nookdevs.com/Main\_Page">Nook Devs</a> wiki."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>garg0yle writes " A team has managed to open the Barnes and Noble Nook e-reader , gaining full access to the operating system .
From the article : 'The Nook is now a computer running a full Android operating system , with a built-in , free cellular connection to the internet .
It also has a battery that lasts days , not hours .
' They are documenting their progress on the Nook Devs wiki .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>garg0yle writes "A team has managed to open the Barnes and Noble Nook e-reader, gaining full access to the operating system.
From the article: 'The Nook is now a computer running a full Android operating system, with a built-in, free cellular connection to the internet.
It also has a battery that lasts days, not hours.
'  They are documenting their progress on the Nook Devs wiki.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433760</id>
	<title>free wireless?</title>
	<author>Kludge</author>
	<datestamp>1260819120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt people will be getting free cellular internet very long if at all.  The SIM card identifies the user as a Nook, and if the service provider has any brains, they will restrict the routing of all traffic from such users to where they want.</p><p>Not that this is not a cool hack.  I would like to throw in my own SIM card and take this baby for a spin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt people will be getting free cellular internet very long if at all .
The SIM card identifies the user as a Nook , and if the service provider has any brains , they will restrict the routing of all traffic from such users to where they want.Not that this is not a cool hack .
I would like to throw in my own SIM card and take this baby for a spin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt people will be getting free cellular internet very long if at all.
The SIM card identifies the user as a Nook, and if the service provider has any brains, they will restrict the routing of all traffic from such users to where they want.Not that this is not a cool hack.
I would like to throw in my own SIM card and take this baby for a spin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434588</id>
	<title>Re:The battery...</title>
	<author>tuttleturtle42</author>
	<datestamp>1260823620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Kindle 2 has around a three or four day battery with heavy internet use. It's about two with some music and some internet use (by some I mean a noticeable amount but less than I would consider heavy use).

From this experience it would be days. I've not seen a Nook but I'd expect it to be similar to the Kindle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Kindle 2 has around a three or four day battery with heavy internet use .
It 's about two with some music and some internet use ( by some I mean a noticeable amount but less than I would consider heavy use ) .
From this experience it would be days .
I 've not seen a Nook but I 'd expect it to be similar to the Kindle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Kindle 2 has around a three or four day battery with heavy internet use.
It's about two with some music and some internet use (by some I mean a noticeable amount but less than I would consider heavy use).
From this experience it would be days.
I've not seen a Nook but I'd expect it to be similar to the Kindle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432842</id>
	<title>eInk MPD remote control client</title>
	<author>niko9</author>
	<datestamp>1260814560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really would love an eInk (read: no back light) MPD client for my custom MPD server. Although, stealing Internet access is not my forte. I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really would love an eInk ( read : no back light ) MPD client for my custom MPD server .
Although , stealing Internet access is not my forte .
I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really would love an eInk (read: no back light) MPD client for my custom MPD server.
Although, stealing Internet access is not my forte.
I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435282</id>
	<title>Re:Deja Vu all over again...</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1260784200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is ragingly retarded if it was not firewalled simply with a custom cingular.WAP.BN that those sim cards are only authorized on.   It's brain dead easy and if AT&amp;T did not do that from step one then they deserve the pain they are about to recieve.</p><p>All AT&amp;T data is currently through cingular.WAP and auths and bills based on your sim number.  They have had the capability of having a username and password forever on it but have never used it.   There's another way for them to do the same..</p><p>Honestly, are all these corporations ran by bungling idiots that dont think of these things?  seeing that device the first words out of my mouth in the boardroom would be, "what's to stop someone from taking out the sim and using it in a laptop with a 3G WWAN card?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is ragingly retarded if it was not firewalled simply with a custom cingular.WAP.BN that those sim cards are only authorized on .
It 's brain dead easy and if AT&amp;T did not do that from step one then they deserve the pain they are about to recieve.All AT&amp;T data is currently through cingular.WAP and auths and bills based on your sim number .
They have had the capability of having a username and password forever on it but have never used it .
There 's another way for them to do the same..Honestly , are all these corporations ran by bungling idiots that dont think of these things ?
seeing that device the first words out of my mouth in the boardroom would be , " what 's to stop someone from taking out the sim and using it in a laptop with a 3G WWAN card ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is ragingly retarded if it was not firewalled simply with a custom cingular.WAP.BN that those sim cards are only authorized on.
It's brain dead easy and if AT&amp;T did not do that from step one then they deserve the pain they are about to recieve.All AT&amp;T data is currently through cingular.WAP and auths and bills based on your sim number.
They have had the capability of having a username and password forever on it but have never used it.
There's another way for them to do the same..Honestly, are all these corporations ran by bungling idiots that dont think of these things?
seeing that device the first words out of my mouth in the boardroom would be, "what's to stop someone from taking out the sim and using it in a laptop with a 3G WWAN card?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432888</id>
	<title>You knew this was coming...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260814740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why we can't have nice things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why we ca n't have nice things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why we can't have nice things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433754</id>
	<title>Re:Free Cell Connection? "Yes, but don't do that."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260819120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Don't do that."</p><p>Ahh, the prosecutorial mindset.  Sad to see it at this level of inaneness.</p><p>Maybe someone wants the Nook to fail.  Failure comes in many forms, and incompetence is one of them.  If B&amp;N and their affiliates can't figure out the ebook market, that's their damn fault, not anyone else's.</p><p>I'm one of those people who want the Nook to flame.  I hate B&amp;N entering this market only because some other players are in it and they want to behave like them.  B&amp;N already tried the ebook market years prior, and withdrew from it, leaving all prior users mostly hanging when they pulled the plug.  It's not like they embraced the users they screwed over before, they just went ahead blindly with a quickly released device.  Their fault they got hosed due to THEIR lack of planning and consideration of understanding the technological market and culture.</p><p>"Pushing the connection to carry things it wasn't meant to is pretty much theft of service, and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers, and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who can't behave themselves."</p><p>The Man's really got you by the balls.  Maybe you should consider that B&amp;N rushed out a device deliberate, to reinforce the need for DRM and DMCA laws, in conjunction with AT&amp;T, which in turn has a massive copyright and network (cellular, fiber optic) which more regulation would suit them.</p><p>That's the fault of providers and policymakers then, whether it be their lack of foresight or their deliberate machinations to get ahead at the expense of "hackers" or the common, inventive civilian.  Putting any blame on hackers who release information and mess with a device without left themselves committing theft of service of any slaughtering level (I'm not talking about "Hmm, does Google load?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  Booya!") is ridiculous.</p><p>So don't you dare put this on the feet of people who messed with the device.  Blame the device maker, equipment hardware manufacturers, and decision makers who put this on a microSD card.</p><p>I would go so far as saying that if this came to the notice of lawmakers and policymakers, and AT&amp;T's and B&amp;N's incompetence doesn't came up strongly, then we know really why the device was released the way it was--stupidity disguised as maliciousness ("we'll release a device, and if they don't hack it, fine, but if they do, we can use it to our advantage").</p><p>"Do what you'd like with the devices and/or media that you've purchased, but recognize that there's a line of fairness and don't cross it."</p><p>Fairness according to whom?  Anyone who understand the world knows there really isn't a "fair" standard, only the perception of one.  Even if there was a standard, the very nature of it means there is advantage to working around it and not getting caught.</p><p>And again, what exactly was unfair about this?  What exactly is unfair about loading a web site or downloading?  When did that in and of itself become criminal?</p><p>The service provider provides the network, controls the network, directs traffic on their network, verifies access to their network with SIM cards, buy the equipment for and charge for the network, and YOU STILL MANAGE TO BLAME THE HACKERS OR SOME ASS DOWNLOADER?  Are you insane?  If a private network cannot restrict or direct traffic and route it's own traffic which it owns, controls, and profits off of...they don't deserve to be in business if they continue to allow it.</p><p>If AT&amp;T or whoever doesn't know the SIM access of all Nook devices, it's their fault if someone downloads off of it, because THEY released the hardware, verified it and the code/driver, and put it out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do n't do that .
" Ahh , the prosecutorial mindset .
Sad to see it at this level of inaneness.Maybe someone wants the Nook to fail .
Failure comes in many forms , and incompetence is one of them .
If B&amp;N and their affiliates ca n't figure out the ebook market , that 's their damn fault , not anyone else 's.I 'm one of those people who want the Nook to flame .
I hate B&amp;N entering this market only because some other players are in it and they want to behave like them .
B&amp;N already tried the ebook market years prior , and withdrew from it , leaving all prior users mostly hanging when they pulled the plug .
It 's not like they embraced the users they screwed over before , they just went ahead blindly with a quickly released device .
Their fault they got hosed due to THEIR lack of planning and consideration of understanding the technological market and culture .
" Pushing the connection to carry things it was n't meant to is pretty much theft of service , and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers , and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who ca n't behave themselves .
" The Man 's really got you by the balls .
Maybe you should consider that B&amp;N rushed out a device deliberate , to reinforce the need for DRM and DMCA laws , in conjunction with AT&amp;T , which in turn has a massive copyright and network ( cellular , fiber optic ) which more regulation would suit them.That 's the fault of providers and policymakers then , whether it be their lack of foresight or their deliberate machinations to get ahead at the expense of " hackers " or the common , inventive civilian .
Putting any blame on hackers who release information and mess with a device without left themselves committing theft of service of any slaughtering level ( I 'm not talking about " Hmm , does Google load ?
... Booya !
" ) is ridiculous.So do n't you dare put this on the feet of people who messed with the device .
Blame the device maker , equipment hardware manufacturers , and decision makers who put this on a microSD card.I would go so far as saying that if this came to the notice of lawmakers and policymakers , and AT&amp;T 's and B&amp;N 's incompetence does n't came up strongly , then we know really why the device was released the way it was--stupidity disguised as maliciousness ( " we 'll release a device , and if they do n't hack it , fine , but if they do , we can use it to our advantage " ) .
" Do what you 'd like with the devices and/or media that you 've purchased , but recognize that there 's a line of fairness and do n't cross it .
" Fairness according to whom ?
Anyone who understand the world knows there really is n't a " fair " standard , only the perception of one .
Even if there was a standard , the very nature of it means there is advantage to working around it and not getting caught.And again , what exactly was unfair about this ?
What exactly is unfair about loading a web site or downloading ?
When did that in and of itself become criminal ? The service provider provides the network , controls the network , directs traffic on their network , verifies access to their network with SIM cards , buy the equipment for and charge for the network , and YOU STILL MANAGE TO BLAME THE HACKERS OR SOME ASS DOWNLOADER ?
Are you insane ?
If a private network can not restrict or direct traffic and route it 's own traffic which it owns , controls , and profits off of...they do n't deserve to be in business if they continue to allow it.If AT&amp;T or whoever does n't know the SIM access of all Nook devices , it 's their fault if someone downloads off of it , because THEY released the hardware , verified it and the code/driver , and put it out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Don't do that.
"Ahh, the prosecutorial mindset.
Sad to see it at this level of inaneness.Maybe someone wants the Nook to fail.
Failure comes in many forms, and incompetence is one of them.
If B&amp;N and their affiliates can't figure out the ebook market, that's their damn fault, not anyone else's.I'm one of those people who want the Nook to flame.
I hate B&amp;N entering this market only because some other players are in it and they want to behave like them.
B&amp;N already tried the ebook market years prior, and withdrew from it, leaving all prior users mostly hanging when they pulled the plug.
It's not like they embraced the users they screwed over before, they just went ahead blindly with a quickly released device.
Their fault they got hosed due to THEIR lack of planning and consideration of understanding the technological market and culture.
"Pushing the connection to carry things it wasn't meant to is pretty much theft of service, and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers, and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who can't behave themselves.
"The Man's really got you by the balls.
Maybe you should consider that B&amp;N rushed out a device deliberate, to reinforce the need for DRM and DMCA laws, in conjunction with AT&amp;T, which in turn has a massive copyright and network (cellular, fiber optic) which more regulation would suit them.That's the fault of providers and policymakers then, whether it be their lack of foresight or their deliberate machinations to get ahead at the expense of "hackers" or the common, inventive civilian.
Putting any blame on hackers who release information and mess with a device without left themselves committing theft of service of any slaughtering level (I'm not talking about "Hmm, does Google load?
...  Booya!
") is ridiculous.So don't you dare put this on the feet of people who messed with the device.
Blame the device maker, equipment hardware manufacturers, and decision makers who put this on a microSD card.I would go so far as saying that if this came to the notice of lawmakers and policymakers, and AT&amp;T's and B&amp;N's incompetence doesn't came up strongly, then we know really why the device was released the way it was--stupidity disguised as maliciousness ("we'll release a device, and if they don't hack it, fine, but if they do, we can use it to our advantage").
"Do what you'd like with the devices and/or media that you've purchased, but recognize that there's a line of fairness and don't cross it.
"Fairness according to whom?
Anyone who understand the world knows there really isn't a "fair" standard, only the perception of one.
Even if there was a standard, the very nature of it means there is advantage to working around it and not getting caught.And again, what exactly was unfair about this?
What exactly is unfair about loading a web site or downloading?
When did that in and of itself become criminal?The service provider provides the network, controls the network, directs traffic on their network, verifies access to their network with SIM cards, buy the equipment for and charge for the network, and YOU STILL MANAGE TO BLAME THE HACKERS OR SOME ASS DOWNLOADER?
Are you insane?
If a private network cannot restrict or direct traffic and route it's own traffic which it owns, controls, and profits off of...they don't deserve to be in business if they continue to allow it.If AT&amp;T or whoever doesn't know the SIM access of all Nook devices, it's their fault if someone downloads off of it, because THEY released the hardware, verified it and the code/driver, and put it out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444</id>
	<title>And so it begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260812940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What crazy antics are AT&amp;T going to throw out to try and stop this one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What crazy antics are AT&amp;T going to throw out to try and stop this one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What crazy antics are AT&amp;T going to throw out to try and stop this one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433708</id>
	<title>Just don't power-cycle the thing...</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1260818940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're dealing with the Nook and you power cycle without properly shutting down, you can expect a visit from Mr. Resetti...  Those are never fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're dealing with the Nook and you power cycle without properly shutting down , you can expect a visit from Mr. Resetti... Those are never fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're dealing with the Nook and you power cycle without properly shutting down, you can expect a visit from Mr. Resetti...  Those are never fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433562</id>
	<title>Re:Holy crap.</title>
	<author>Carik</author>
	<datestamp>1260818340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect that, in large part, it's an issue with the display.  My understanding is that you can't change anything on an electronic ink display without redrawing the whole screen, which takes long enough to be visible.  (My understanding may, of course, now be outdated... I haven't looked carefully at how these things work in a year or so...) Ever worked on an old enough computer that the entire screen flashes when you press a key on the keyboard?  It loses its appeal pretty quickly.</p><p>And if you replace it with an LCD, well... there goes your days of battery life.  Certainly it would open up the option of, say, viewing documentation online with it, which would be nice, but it probably wouldn't work very well as an all-purpose computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that , in large part , it 's an issue with the display .
My understanding is that you ca n't change anything on an electronic ink display without redrawing the whole screen , which takes long enough to be visible .
( My understanding may , of course , now be outdated... I have n't looked carefully at how these things work in a year or so... ) Ever worked on an old enough computer that the entire screen flashes when you press a key on the keyboard ?
It loses its appeal pretty quickly.And if you replace it with an LCD , well... there goes your days of battery life .
Certainly it would open up the option of , say , viewing documentation online with it , which would be nice , but it probably would n't work very well as an all-purpose computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that, in large part, it's an issue with the display.
My understanding is that you can't change anything on an electronic ink display without redrawing the whole screen, which takes long enough to be visible.
(My understanding may, of course, now be outdated... I haven't looked carefully at how these things work in a year or so...) Ever worked on an old enough computer that the entire screen flashes when you press a key on the keyboard?
It loses its appeal pretty quickly.And if you replace it with an LCD, well... there goes your days of battery life.
Certainly it would open up the option of, say, viewing documentation online with it, which would be nice, but it probably wouldn't work very well as an all-purpose computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435664</id>
	<title>B&amp;N and AT&amp;T are idiots</title>
	<author>nebular</author>
	<datestamp>1260786240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow this could not have been a simpler hack.</p><p>A blob of epoxy on the sdcard would have prevented it, or perhaps a more complex reconfiguring then editing ONE LINE in a file. Furthermore why the hell does the cellular connection have full internet access. I mean it should be locked down to only what B&amp;N want you to access on AT&amp;T's side.</p><p>An unless the Terms and conditions of service state anything about accessing parts of the internet that B&amp;N don't approve, these guys aren't breaking any laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow this could not have been a simpler hack.A blob of epoxy on the sdcard would have prevented it , or perhaps a more complex reconfiguring then editing ONE LINE in a file .
Furthermore why the hell does the cellular connection have full internet access .
I mean it should be locked down to only what B&amp;N want you to access on AT&amp;T 's side.An unless the Terms and conditions of service state anything about accessing parts of the internet that B&amp;N do n't approve , these guys are n't breaking any laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow this could not have been a simpler hack.A blob of epoxy on the sdcard would have prevented it, or perhaps a more complex reconfiguring then editing ONE LINE in a file.
Furthermore why the hell does the cellular connection have full internet access.
I mean it should be locked down to only what B&amp;N want you to access on AT&amp;T's side.An unless the Terms and conditions of service state anything about accessing parts of the internet that B&amp;N don't approve, these guys aren't breaking any laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432424</id>
	<title>How soon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260812880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>until this whole operation gets blocked?  I might have to snag one now before BN gets wise to this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>until this whole operation gets blocked ?
I might have to snag one now before BN gets wise to this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>until this whole operation gets blocked?
I might have to snag one now before BN gets wise to this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432670</id>
	<title>Re:Free internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet this may just be the ``feature'' that sells millions of these devices [if they make pretend to stop this hack, but don't actually do much about it---I might just consider buying it].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet this may just be the ` ` feature' ' that sells millions of these devices [ if they make pretend to stop this hack , but do n't actually do much about it---I might just consider buying it ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet this may just be the ``feature'' that sells millions of these devices [if they make pretend to stop this hack, but don't actually do much about it---I might just consider buying it].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434400</id>
	<title>Rooted?</title>
	<author>certsoft</author>
	<datestamp>1260822540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Nook e-reader has been hacked and rooted</i>
<br>
<br>

I'm sure Slashdotters in New Zealand will get a kick out of that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nook e-reader has been hacked and rooted I 'm sure Slashdotters in New Zealand will get a kick out of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nook e-reader has been hacked and rooted



I'm sure Slashdotters in New Zealand will get a kick out of that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30438880</id>
	<title>Exhale</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1260801420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA: <i>This could turn into the Roomba of e-readers, only it won't suck.</i></p><p>Let me guess.. it will blow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : This could turn into the Roomba of e-readers , only it wo n't suck.Let me guess.. it will blow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: This could turn into the Roomba of e-readers, only it won't suck.Let me guess.. it will blow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432414</id>
	<title>DMCA notice coming</title>
	<author>Stavr0</author>
	<datestamp>1260812880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>in 3... 2... 1...
<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and hacking a device with an active cellular connection in it too. FCC's gonna want a piece of the action too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in 3... 2... 1.. . ... and hacking a device with an active cellular connection in it too .
FCC 's gon na want a piece of the action too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 3... 2... 1...
 ... and hacking a device with an active cellular connection in it too.
FCC's gonna want a piece of the action too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432700</id>
	<title>Re:Holy crap.</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1260813960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.</p></div><p>Future value of money, basically.  Anything that can be subsidized and supported by a subscription model will be of superior quality whenever the interest rate on lending is &gt;0\%.  Razors and blades.  This is the essence of human capital.  Why invest in production or technological improvement when you can invest in locking-in future consumers?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This begs the question of why we do n't already have netbooks this awesome , with free internet and days of battery life.Future value of money , basically .
Anything that can be subsidized and supported by a subscription model will be of superior quality whenever the interest rate on lending is &gt; 0 \ % .
Razors and blades .
This is the essence of human capital .
Why invest in production or technological improvement when you can invest in locking-in future consumers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.Future value of money, basically.
Anything that can be subsidized and supported by a subscription model will be of superior quality whenever the interest rate on lending is &gt;0\%.
Razors and blades.
This is the essence of human capital.
Why invest in production or technological improvement when you can invest in locking-in future consumers?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435422</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>SilverJets</author>
	<datestamp>1260784980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you want to?  It's an E-ink display.  Oooh...look at the pretty greyscale.</p><p>On top of that, according to two reviews I read that were both posted here on Slashdot last week, the thing is dog slow just displaying the next page of the book you are reading.    Think it will do any better with the web?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you want to ?
It 's an E-ink display .
Oooh...look at the pretty greyscale.On top of that , according to two reviews I read that were both posted here on Slashdot last week , the thing is dog slow just displaying the next page of the book you are reading .
Think it will do any better with the web ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you want to?
It's an E-ink display.
Oooh...look at the pretty greyscale.On top of that, according to two reviews I read that were both posted here on Slashdot last week, the thing is dog slow just displaying the next page of the book you are reading.
Think it will do any better with the web?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432840</id>
	<title>The battery...</title>
	<author>The Living Fractal</author>
	<datestamp>1260814560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to see how long the battery lasts during heavy internet use.</p><p>Days?  Sorry, but I just don't think so.  My Kindle DX battery lasts about two weeks, as long as I don't have wireless on and only read 1-2hrs a day.  If wireless is on, substantially less.  If I'm *using* the wireless a lot, even less than that.</p><p>So, let's leave the hyperbole out of the summary, shall we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see how long the battery lasts during heavy internet use.Days ?
Sorry , but I just do n't think so .
My Kindle DX battery lasts about two weeks , as long as I do n't have wireless on and only read 1-2hrs a day .
If wireless is on , substantially less .
If I 'm * using * the wireless a lot , even less than that.So , let 's leave the hyperbole out of the summary , shall we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see how long the battery lasts during heavy internet use.Days?
Sorry, but I just don't think so.
My Kindle DX battery lasts about two weeks, as long as I don't have wireless on and only read 1-2hrs a day.
If wireless is on, substantially less.
If I'm *using* the wireless a lot, even less than that.So, let's leave the hyperbole out of the summary, shall we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435824</id>
	<title>The real issues is .... cost of the connection...</title>
	<author>sl149q</author>
	<datestamp>1260787080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real elephant in the room is the high cost of a ubiquitous internet connection.... Locally, here in Canada it costs a minimum of $30/month for a 3G internet only connection... with low transfer numbers (500mb). That makes Kindles and Nooks use of 3G look like "free" beer. And even that charge is shown to be far too high as I get 6GB for $30 on my iPhone. And that is not really subsidized by the phone side (well not too much) as I only have the minimum voice plan they provide.</p><p>What we need is for the carriers to get the price down far enough that it makes sense for every netbook, laptop etc to have 3G builtin. Usable with a pre-paid SIM or very low cost monthly. We'll get there eventually. But not while the carriers continue to overcharge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real elephant in the room is the high cost of a ubiquitous internet connection.... Locally , here in Canada it costs a minimum of $ 30/month for a 3G internet only connection... with low transfer numbers ( 500mb ) .
That makes Kindles and Nooks use of 3G look like " free " beer .
And even that charge is shown to be far too high as I get 6GB for $ 30 on my iPhone .
And that is not really subsidized by the phone side ( well not too much ) as I only have the minimum voice plan they provide.What we need is for the carriers to get the price down far enough that it makes sense for every netbook , laptop etc to have 3G builtin .
Usable with a pre-paid SIM or very low cost monthly .
We 'll get there eventually .
But not while the carriers continue to overcharge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real elephant in the room is the high cost of a ubiquitous internet connection.... Locally, here in Canada it costs a minimum of $30/month for a 3G internet only connection... with low transfer numbers (500mb).
That makes Kindles and Nooks use of 3G look like "free" beer.
And even that charge is shown to be far too high as I get 6GB for $30 on my iPhone.
And that is not really subsidized by the phone side (well not too much) as I only have the minimum voice plan they provide.What we need is for the carriers to get the price down far enough that it makes sense for every netbook, laptop etc to have 3G builtin.
Usable with a pre-paid SIM or very low cost monthly.
We'll get there eventually.
But not while the carriers continue to overcharge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433626</id>
	<title>Re:Holy crap.</title>
	<author>IndigoDarkwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1260818640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's almost as if they<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/wanted/ it to be jailbroken, sooner than later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's almost as if they /wanted/ it to be jailbroken , sooner than later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's almost as if they /wanted/ it to be jailbroken, sooner than later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433524</id>
	<title>Sure - Locks not Good Enough So it's Not Stealing?</title>
	<author>gadlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1260818220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That sounds like an amoral way of looking at things. They didn't create a device for you to steal someone's bandwidth and yet you think that it's their fault for making something that someone can break into. That's illegal and these anarchists need to be put in jail and taught the meaning of being a responsible member of society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds like an amoral way of looking at things .
They did n't create a device for you to steal someone 's bandwidth and yet you think that it 's their fault for making something that someone can break into .
That 's illegal and these anarchists need to be put in jail and taught the meaning of being a responsible member of society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds like an amoral way of looking at things.
They didn't create a device for you to steal someone's bandwidth and yet you think that it's their fault for making something that someone can break into.
That's illegal and these anarchists need to be put in jail and taught the meaning of being a responsible member of society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432590</id>
	<title>And suddenly, I want a nook.</title>
	<author>Chyeld</author>
	<datestamp>1260813480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And suddenly, I want a nook.</p><p>I was going to wait for the next gen, but the likelihood that B&amp;N would keep it as accessible in the next hardware revision is about as much as Amazon buying these for all their employees.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And suddenly , I want a nook.I was going to wait for the next gen , but the likelihood that B&amp;N would keep it as accessible in the next hardware revision is about as much as Amazon buying these for all their employees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And suddenly, I want a nook.I was going to wait for the next gen, but the likelihood that B&amp;N would keep it as accessible in the next hardware revision is about as much as Amazon buying these for all their employees.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434692</id>
	<title>Re:And so it begins</title>
	<author>timbck2</author>
	<datestamp>1260824160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, but I'll bet there's a map for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but I 'll bet there 's a map for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but I'll bet there's a map for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432568</id>
	<title>filesystem on a chip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had no idea that the filesystem of a device manifests itself as a chip on the board. Where can I find the filesystem chip on my desktop motherboard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no idea that the filesystem of a device manifests itself as a chip on the board .
Where can I find the filesystem chip on my desktop motherboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no idea that the filesystem of a device manifests itself as a chip on the board.
Where can I find the filesystem chip on my desktop motherboard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433046</id>
	<title>Re:And so it begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some information about mobile networks: Mobile devices have several ID-codes. Some of them are "easily" changed by a software manipulation, for example the IMEI. However, those aren't the ones which matter. The contract is tied to a SIM (subscriber identity module), which is a system on a chip with built-in cryptographic functions and credentials. Think of it as a private key which can be used to authenticate the SIM but can only be read by destroying the SIM. The SIM is as close to unhackable as it gets. All AT&amp;T needs to do is put all devices with Nook-SIMs on a VPN that only connects to B&amp;N servers. This is the same principle that is used by pay as you go data cards which only allow access to a payment interface when the balance is zero. Free internet access through hacked Nooks will not last, guaranteed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some information about mobile networks : Mobile devices have several ID-codes .
Some of them are " easily " changed by a software manipulation , for example the IMEI .
However , those are n't the ones which matter .
The contract is tied to a SIM ( subscriber identity module ) , which is a system on a chip with built-in cryptographic functions and credentials .
Think of it as a private key which can be used to authenticate the SIM but can only be read by destroying the SIM .
The SIM is as close to unhackable as it gets .
All AT&amp;T needs to do is put all devices with Nook-SIMs on a VPN that only connects to B&amp;N servers .
This is the same principle that is used by pay as you go data cards which only allow access to a payment interface when the balance is zero .
Free internet access through hacked Nooks will not last , guaranteed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some information about mobile networks: Mobile devices have several ID-codes.
Some of them are "easily" changed by a software manipulation, for example the IMEI.
However, those aren't the ones which matter.
The contract is tied to a SIM (subscriber identity module), which is a system on a chip with built-in cryptographic functions and credentials.
Think of it as a private key which can be used to authenticate the SIM but can only be read by destroying the SIM.
The SIM is as close to unhackable as it gets.
All AT&amp;T needs to do is put all devices with Nook-SIMs on a VPN that only connects to B&amp;N servers.
This is the same principle that is used by pay as you go data cards which only allow access to a payment interface when the balance is zero.
Free internet access through hacked Nooks will not last, guaranteed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432558</id>
	<title>Jailbroken!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260813420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I attach this term to the Nook now too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I attach this term to the Nook now too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I attach this term to the Nook now too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433318</id>
	<title>Far more impressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One was successfully bought. I tried weeks before they were to hit the stores and the preorders were already into January and I was informed none would be in stores until after the first of the year. The scalpers seemed to have got their hands on them and for $750 to $800 you could buy one on Ebay. I said screw it and bought my niece a Kindle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One was successfully bought .
I tried weeks before they were to hit the stores and the preorders were already into January and I was informed none would be in stores until after the first of the year .
The scalpers seemed to have got their hands on them and for $ 750 to $ 800 you could buy one on Ebay .
I said screw it and bought my niece a Kindle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One was successfully bought.
I tried weeks before they were to hit the stores and the preorders were already into January and I was informed none would be in stores until after the first of the year.
The scalpers seemed to have got their hands on them and for $750 to $800 you could buy one on Ebay.
I said screw it and bought my niece a Kindle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432908</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1260814860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook." I succesfully opened it many times<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>Yeah, but did she notice?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a " nook .
" I succesfully opened it many times : ) Yeah , but did she notice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook.
" I succesfully opened it many times :)Yeah, but did she notice?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432998</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>the\_fat\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1260815280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dude, nobody here wants to hear about your mom...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dude , nobody here wants to hear about your mom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude, nobody here wants to hear about your mom...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433700</id>
	<title>Root for yourself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260818940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remove SIM and only access protected networks, ie your own.<br>The re-disable the dev port.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remove SIM and only access protected networks , ie your own.The re-disable the dev port .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remove SIM and only access protected networks, ie your own.The re-disable the dev port.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432806</id>
	<title>Re:Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>ircmaxell</author>
	<datestamp>1260814380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Netbooks can view YouTube. Readers with electronic paper displays can't.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Well, that's where this device is superior to the Kindle.  It has a color LCD display (albeit a small one) in addition to the E-ink.  If this "hack" stays open for long enough, I'd bet we'd start seeing some interesting applications that take full advantage of the dual screens (Possibly even a Youtube player).  The point being that this device has the hardware to truly be a fun gadget so long as it stays rootable...  I'm strongly considering the possibility of buying one now that I know they are so easy to root...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Netbooks can view YouTube .
Readers with electronic paper displays ca n't .
Well , that 's where this device is superior to the Kindle .
It has a color LCD display ( albeit a small one ) in addition to the E-ink .
If this " hack " stays open for long enough , I 'd bet we 'd start seeing some interesting applications that take full advantage of the dual screens ( Possibly even a Youtube player ) .
The point being that this device has the hardware to truly be a fun gadget so long as it stays rootable... I 'm strongly considering the possibility of buying one now that I know they are so easy to root.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netbooks can view YouTube.
Readers with electronic paper displays can't.
Well, that's where this device is superior to the Kindle.
It has a color LCD display (albeit a small one) in addition to the E-ink.
If this "hack" stays open for long enough, I'd bet we'd start seeing some interesting applications that take full advantage of the dual screens (Possibly even a Youtube player).
The point being that this device has the hardware to truly be a fun gadget so long as it stays rootable...  I'm strongly considering the possibility of buying one now that I know they are so easy to root...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433750</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>kbob88</author>
	<datestamp>1260819120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook."  I succesfully opened it many times<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>Sure, that's the very definition of truthfulness: An AC on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posting about dating and pussy.   Right... how's the wireless connection down in the basement btw?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a " nook .
" I succesfully opened it many times : ) Sure , that 's the very definition of truthfulness : An AC on / .
posting about dating and pussy .
Right... how 's the wireless connection down in the basement btw ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook.
"  I succesfully opened it many times :)Sure, that's the very definition of truthfulness: An AC on /.
posting about dating and pussy.
Right... how's the wireless connection down in the basement btw?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30436076</id>
	<title>Re:You knew this was coming...</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1260788100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dunno about you, but I consider a hackable device to a be a nice thing.</p><p>One of the reasons I've been holding back on an ebook reader is because there hasn't been much success in opening them up despite the fact that they run open source software under the hood. Now that this has happened with the Nook (before it has shipped, even?), I'm pretty much set on buying one now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno about you , but I consider a hackable device to a be a nice thing.One of the reasons I 've been holding back on an ebook reader is because there has n't been much success in opening them up despite the fact that they run open source software under the hood .
Now that this has happened with the Nook ( before it has shipped , even ?
) , I 'm pretty much set on buying one now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno about you, but I consider a hackable device to a be a nice thing.One of the reasons I've been holding back on an ebook reader is because there hasn't been much success in opening them up despite the fact that they run open source software under the hood.
Now that this has happened with the Nook (before it has shipped, even?
), I'm pretty much set on buying one now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432618</id>
	<title>Not really</title>
	<author>electricbern</author>
	<datestamp>1260813600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If those 3G connections are not VPNed exclusively to B&amp;Ns servers that is criminally stupid. If they are, then there is no big deal here, they just showed how you can get full access to a device you purchased. The way it should be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If those 3G connections are not VPNed exclusively to B&amp;Ns servers that is criminally stupid .
If they are , then there is no big deal here , they just showed how you can get full access to a device you purchased .
The way it should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If those 3G connections are not VPNed exclusively to B&amp;Ns servers that is criminally stupid.
If they are, then there is no big deal here, they just showed how you can get full access to a device you purchased.
The way it should be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432576</id>
	<title>Beware! Root access to the world.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you do this, your Nook will be openly accessible to anyone who port-scanned your Nook and found that port 5555 is open.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do this , your Nook will be openly accessible to anyone who port-scanned your Nook and found that port 5555 is open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you do this, your Nook will be openly accessible to anyone who port-scanned your Nook and found that port 5555 is open.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434444</id>
	<title>Ding, dong!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260822840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Nook is dead!</p><p>And so is Android as a commercial OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nook is dead ! And so is Android as a commercial OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nook is dead!And so is Android as a commercial OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433288</id>
	<title>Coral Cache link.</title>
	<author>psergiu</author>
	<datestamp>1260816720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://nookdevs.com.nyud.net/Main\_Page" title="nyud.net">http://nookdevs.com.nyud.net/Main\_Page</a> [nyud.net]</p><p>It's not hard. Just add<nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>.nyud.net</i> after the hostname.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //nookdevs.com.nyud.net/Main \ _Page [ nyud.net ] It 's not hard .
Just add .nyud.net after the hostname .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://nookdevs.com.nyud.net/Main\_Page [nyud.net]It's not hard.
Just add .nyud.net after the hostname.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654</id>
	<title>MicroSD card?</title>
	<author>adamdoyle</author>
	<datestamp>1260813720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They used an open source operating system and stuck in on a removable (albeit internal) MicroSD card?? It's almost as though they wanted it to be hacked. And then they just implemented it with a SIM card (which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone).  I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone (probably doesn't work or else it would've been in the article).  Still... I think we all know this won't last for long</htmltext>
<tokenext>They used an open source operating system and stuck in on a removable ( albeit internal ) MicroSD card ? ?
It 's almost as though they wanted it to be hacked .
And then they just implemented it with a SIM card ( which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone ) .
I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone ( probably does n't work or else it would 've been in the article ) .
Still... I think we all know this wo n't last for long</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They used an open source operating system and stuck in on a removable (albeit internal) MicroSD card??
It's almost as though they wanted it to be hacked.
And then they just implemented it with a SIM card (which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone).
I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone (probably doesn't work or else it would've been in the article).
Still... I think we all know this won't last for long</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434458</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260822840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me guess: In the end, you n00ked it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me guess : In the end , you n00ked it .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me guess: In the end, you n00ked it.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433166</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1260816120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This joke has been told to death. By the time any level of humor gets to the webcomic level, it's no longer funny:
<a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/12/14/" title="penny-arcade.com">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/12/14/</a> [penny-arcade.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This joke has been told to death .
By the time any level of humor gets to the webcomic level , it 's no longer funny : http : //www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/12/14/ [ penny-arcade.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This joke has been told to death.
By the time any level of humor gets to the webcomic level, it's no longer funny:
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/12/14/ [penny-arcade.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook."  I succesfully opened it many times<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a " nook .
" I succesfully opened it many times : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to date a girl who called her pussy a "nook.
"  I succesfully opened it many times :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30441762</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>dushkin</author>
	<datestamp>1260871500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm confused. You made her private parts run Android?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused .
You made her private parts run Android ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused.
You made her private parts run Android?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432906</id>
	<title>Re:Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260814800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While nice to see posts that smarmily correct me  being eligible for both -1 Redundant and the mythical -1 Uninformed, I appreciate you bringing to my attention my misuse of "begs the question." I never knew.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While nice to see posts that smarmily correct me being eligible for both -1 Redundant and the mythical -1 Uninformed , I appreciate you bringing to my attention my misuse of " begs the question .
" I never knew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While nice to see posts that smarmily correct me  being eligible for both -1 Redundant and the mythical -1 Uninformed, I appreciate you bringing to my attention my misuse of "begs the question.
" I never knew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433104</id>
	<title>Re:MicroSD card?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it most likely has a SIM pin on it to prevent it from working in any old cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it most likely has a SIM pin on it to prevent it from working in any old cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it most likely has a SIM pin on it to prevent it from working in any old cell phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</id>
	<title>Holy crap.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA: <i>If you tear open a Nook (which the team has done) you&rsquo;ll find that the Android operating system is contained on a microSD card (separate from the microSD expansion slot). From here, it&rsquo;s a simple matter of using a card reader to mount this card on your computer and changing a single word in the init.rc file (the file that is in charge of which services are begun at startup, similar to a Linux boot).</i></p><p>I'm incredibly surprised it isn't even using proprietary flash storage for this purpose, and am suddenly incredibly attracted to the prospect of this device due to its free cellular internet connection. Can I attach a foldable keyboard to this thing? This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : If you tear open a Nook ( which the team has done ) you    ll find that the Android operating system is contained on a microSD card ( separate from the microSD expansion slot ) .
From here , it    s a simple matter of using a card reader to mount this card on your computer and changing a single word in the init.rc file ( the file that is in charge of which services are begun at startup , similar to a Linux boot ) .I 'm incredibly surprised it is n't even using proprietary flash storage for this purpose , and am suddenly incredibly attracted to the prospect of this device due to its free cellular internet connection .
Can I attach a foldable keyboard to this thing ?
This begs the question of why we do n't already have netbooks this awesome , with free internet and days of battery life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: If you tear open a Nook (which the team has done) you’ll find that the Android operating system is contained on a microSD card (separate from the microSD expansion slot).
From here, it’s a simple matter of using a card reader to mount this card on your computer and changing a single word in the init.rc file (the file that is in charge of which services are begun at startup, similar to a Linux boot).I'm incredibly surprised it isn't even using proprietary flash storage for this purpose, and am suddenly incredibly attracted to the prospect of this device due to its free cellular internet connection.
Can I attach a foldable keyboard to this thing?
This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433184</id>
	<title>Will it take another SIM?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260816180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The unit has a SIM slot, hopefully it will take another SIM. Then you can buy service from someone who supports tethering (is there anyone doing that on GSM? heh) if you need that feature. Otherwise, configure your Linux side to perform all communications via WiFi somehow, and you won't have a problem with abusing their network. I don't know if this will increase uptake significantly, but I certainly wouldn't consider buying any such device that I wasn't able to load Linux on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The unit has a SIM slot , hopefully it will take another SIM .
Then you can buy service from someone who supports tethering ( is there anyone doing that on GSM ?
heh ) if you need that feature .
Otherwise , configure your Linux side to perform all communications via WiFi somehow , and you wo n't have a problem with abusing their network .
I do n't know if this will increase uptake significantly , but I certainly would n't consider buying any such device that I was n't able to load Linux on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The unit has a SIM slot, hopefully it will take another SIM.
Then you can buy service from someone who supports tethering (is there anyone doing that on GSM?
heh) if you need that feature.
Otherwise, configure your Linux side to perform all communications via WiFi somehow, and you won't have a problem with abusing their network.
I don't know if this will increase uptake significantly, but I certainly wouldn't consider buying any such device that I wasn't able to load Linux on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432616</id>
	<title>Re:Free internet?</title>
	<author>kamikazearun</author>
	<datestamp>1260813600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They keep locking it down. We keep opening it up. We wouldn't have this problem if all devices were "open" in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They keep locking it down .
We keep opening it up .
We would n't have this problem if all devices were " open " in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They keep locking it down.
We keep opening it up.
We wouldn't have this problem if all devices were "open" in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432916</id>
	<title>Re:And so it begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260814920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen the commercials, their coverage is so laughably small it won't even matter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen the commercials , their coverage is so laughably small it wo n't even matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen the commercials, their coverage is so laughably small it won't even matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434238</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260821760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It must have been open source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It must have been open source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It must have been open source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433346</id>
	<title>Re:Free Cell Connection? "Yes, but don't do that."</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1260817080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately it seems culture these days follows the "if it can be exploited for my own gain I must exploit it and should not be held responsible for exploiting it no matter what damages my actions cause" mentality.</p><p>I don't own either of those readers but if I did I'd really appreciate the planless cellular connection. I'd be very annoyed if some people lacking in self restraint caused the companies to disable the cellular connection or force a data plan on someone who wanted to continue using the cellular connection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately it seems culture these days follows the " if it can be exploited for my own gain I must exploit it and should not be held responsible for exploiting it no matter what damages my actions cause " mentality.I do n't own either of those readers but if I did I 'd really appreciate the planless cellular connection .
I 'd be very annoyed if some people lacking in self restraint caused the companies to disable the cellular connection or force a data plan on someone who wanted to continue using the cellular connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately it seems culture these days follows the "if it can be exploited for my own gain I must exploit it and should not be held responsible for exploiting it no matter what damages my actions cause" mentality.I don't own either of those readers but if I did I'd really appreciate the planless cellular connection.
I'd be very annoyed if some people lacking in self restraint caused the companies to disable the cellular connection or force a data plan on someone who wanted to continue using the cellular connection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433322</id>
	<title>Deja Vu all over again...</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1260816960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-Opener" title="wikipedia.org">I-Opener</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p><p>I predict a similar fate to the Nook:</p><p>- Wicked cool device hits the market.<br>- Hacked and liberated.<br>- Provider(s) lose money due to the liberation.<br>- Tug-of-war between provider(s) and hackers.<br>- Provider(s) give up and more on after losing too much money.</p><p>I expect the cell connection will be firewalled pretty soon unless they completely munged the process and can't.  Expect some OTA updates pronto to keep the rooters out.  Tug-of-war over rooting.  Eventually new TOS to make you a criminal for using the cell connection in ways other than expected.  Dead Nooks all over the place.</p><p>I'm kinda tempted to buy one just to root it.  I had a LOT OF FUN with my v5 I-Opener.  Short-lived, but it made my soldering iron useful again, and kept my GF's 9-year-old daughter entertained and safer than with a standard PC, until she discovered LimeWire.  Ugh.</p><p>I wonder if Cyanogen has any interest in Nook rooting. He's the best right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the I-Opener [ wikipedia.org ] ? I predict a similar fate to the Nook : - Wicked cool device hits the market.- Hacked and liberated.- Provider ( s ) lose money due to the liberation.- Tug-of-war between provider ( s ) and hackers.- Provider ( s ) give up and more on after losing too much money.I expect the cell connection will be firewalled pretty soon unless they completely munged the process and ca n't .
Expect some OTA updates pronto to keep the rooters out .
Tug-of-war over rooting .
Eventually new TOS to make you a criminal for using the cell connection in ways other than expected .
Dead Nooks all over the place.I 'm kinda tempted to buy one just to root it .
I had a LOT OF FUN with my v5 I-Opener .
Short-lived , but it made my soldering iron useful again , and kept my GF 's 9-year-old daughter entertained and safer than with a standard PC , until she discovered LimeWire .
Ugh.I wonder if Cyanogen has any interest in Nook rooting .
He 's the best right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the I-Opener [wikipedia.org]?I predict a similar fate to the Nook:- Wicked cool device hits the market.- Hacked and liberated.- Provider(s) lose money due to the liberation.- Tug-of-war between provider(s) and hackers.- Provider(s) give up and more on after losing too much money.I expect the cell connection will be firewalled pretty soon unless they completely munged the process and can't.
Expect some OTA updates pronto to keep the rooters out.
Tug-of-war over rooting.
Eventually new TOS to make you a criminal for using the cell connection in ways other than expected.
Dead Nooks all over the place.I'm kinda tempted to buy one just to root it.
I had a LOT OF FUN with my v5 I-Opener.
Short-lived, but it made my soldering iron useful again, and kept my GF's 9-year-old daughter entertained and safer than with a standard PC, until she discovered LimeWire.
Ugh.I wonder if Cyanogen has any interest in Nook rooting.
He's the best right now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434018</id>
	<title>have they disassmbled the jars?</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1260820500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If variable names have been left int he jars, you may be able to dissamble so that you can start add your own classes.
<br>
I havent coded for the Android yet.  But was under the impression it used a "custom" form of Java, mainly special multi-process JVM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If variable names have been left int he jars , you may be able to dissamble so that you can start add your own classes .
I havent coded for the Android yet .
But was under the impression it used a " custom " form of Java , mainly special multi-process JVM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If variable names have been left int he jars, you may be able to dissamble so that you can start add your own classes.
I havent coded for the Android yet.
But was under the impression it used a "custom" form of Java, mainly special multi-process JVM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434970</id>
	<title>Days of battery life?</title>
	<author>PuckSR</author>
	<datestamp>1260782280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that they "days" of battery life are due to the fact that it is designed to read books?<br>The battery life on ereaders really should be rated in "page turns".  This gets about 2000 page turns on a single charge.<br>Using that color screen all the time or actively using the internet will suck down that battery so fast your head will spin!!!</p><p>The battery on this device is going to suck if you are using it to IM your friends or regularly browse the web.  The battery on these devices is actually significantly SMALLER than a netbook battery.  These devices have a cheap and small cell phone battery.</p><p>The real advantage is the internet....but it isn't that big of a deal.  The kindle already has a web-browser.<br>Plus, as many have explained...they will just block non-B&amp;N usage if it is abused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that they " days " of battery life are due to the fact that it is designed to read books ? The battery life on ereaders really should be rated in " page turns " .
This gets about 2000 page turns on a single charge.Using that color screen all the time or actively using the internet will suck down that battery so fast your head will spin ! !
! The battery on this device is going to suck if you are using it to IM your friends or regularly browse the web .
The battery on these devices is actually significantly SMALLER than a netbook battery .
These devices have a cheap and small cell phone battery.The real advantage is the internet....but it is n't that big of a deal .
The kindle already has a web-browser.Plus , as many have explained...they will just block non-B&amp;N usage if it is abused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that they "days" of battery life are due to the fact that it is designed to read books?The battery life on ereaders really should be rated in "page turns".
This gets about 2000 page turns on a single charge.Using that color screen all the time or actively using the internet will suck down that battery so fast your head will spin!!
!The battery on this device is going to suck if you are using it to IM your friends or regularly browse the web.
The battery on these devices is actually significantly SMALLER than a netbook battery.
These devices have a cheap and small cell phone battery.The real advantage is the internet....but it isn't that big of a deal.
The kindle already has a web-browser.Plus, as many have explained...they will just block non-B&amp;N usage if it is abused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435492</id>
	<title>Re:Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Begs the question" in the sense of "raises the question" is perfectly acceptable English.</p><p>Just because a few philosophy majors have their noses bent out of shape over a phrase that sounds similar to the English translation of a latin phrase doesn't change that.</p><p>I've never even seen any real evidence that the two phrases are linked in any way - they are just as likely to have independently evolved. And, even if one came from the other, meanings change and English evolves (eg. the words 'hack', 'artificial', 'computer', 'gay' etc.)</p><p>So, please, get the fuck over yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Begs the question " in the sense of " raises the question " is perfectly acceptable English.Just because a few philosophy majors have their noses bent out of shape over a phrase that sounds similar to the English translation of a latin phrase does n't change that.I 've never even seen any real evidence that the two phrases are linked in any way - they are just as likely to have independently evolved .
And , even if one came from the other , meanings change and English evolves ( eg .
the words 'hack ' , 'artificial ' , 'computer ' , 'gay ' etc .
) So , please , get the fuck over yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Begs the question" in the sense of "raises the question" is perfectly acceptable English.Just because a few philosophy majors have their noses bent out of shape over a phrase that sounds similar to the English translation of a latin phrase doesn't change that.I've never even seen any real evidence that the two phrases are linked in any way - they are just as likely to have independently evolved.
And, even if one came from the other, meanings change and English evolves (eg.
the words 'hack', 'artificial', 'computer', 'gay' etc.
)So, please, get the fuck over yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432812</id>
	<title>I've had this for years - Nokia N800</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260814440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had this for years - Nokia N800.</p><p>I'm always amazed when folks think this hasn't been around for about $200 for years.  The N800 can tether to a cell phone or blackberry for data services or use WiFi.  Mine is tethered to a friends unlimited cell data plan for lunch and meeting access. I don't have a data plan on my pay-as-u-go cell.  At home, it uses WPA2 auth.</p><p>9 days of standby time, about 2 days of normal wifi use.  If the battery gets too low, I just swap with a spare - take that i-whatever lovers.</p><p>The N800/N810/N900 browser is routinely considered the best of any portable device. Mine is running a version of firefox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had this for years - Nokia N800.I 'm always amazed when folks think this has n't been around for about $ 200 for years .
The N800 can tether to a cell phone or blackberry for data services or use WiFi .
Mine is tethered to a friends unlimited cell data plan for lunch and meeting access .
I do n't have a data plan on my pay-as-u-go cell .
At home , it uses WPA2 auth.9 days of standby time , about 2 days of normal wifi use .
If the battery gets too low , I just swap with a spare - take that i-whatever lovers.The N800/N810/N900 browser is routinely considered the best of any portable device .
Mine is running a version of firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had this for years - Nokia N800.I'm always amazed when folks think this hasn't been around for about $200 for years.
The N800 can tether to a cell phone or blackberry for data services or use WiFi.
Mine is tethered to a friends unlimited cell data plan for lunch and meeting access.
I don't have a data plan on my pay-as-u-go cell.
At home, it uses WPA2 auth.9 days of standby time, about 2 days of normal wifi use.
If the battery gets too low, I just swap with a spare - take that i-whatever lovers.The N800/N810/N900 browser is routinely considered the best of any portable device.
Mine is running a version of firefox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432660</id>
	<title>Oblig. Penny-Arcade</title>
	<author>Kadagan AU</author>
	<datestamp>1260813780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone say <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/12/11/" title="penny-arcade.com">Nook Opened</a> [penny-arcade.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone say Nook Opened [ penny-arcade.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone say Nook Opened [penny-arcade.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433182</id>
	<title>Funny ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260816180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else laugh when the big banner ad at the top of the wiki was an ad to buy a Kindle?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else laugh when the big banner ad at the top of the wiki was an ad to buy a Kindle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else laugh when the big banner ad at the top of the wiki was an ad to buy a Kindle?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433650</id>
	<title>Nooks and Crannies</title>
	<author>Snyper1000</author>
	<datestamp>1260818700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just tell me they are going to call their hack cranny, please!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Perhaps that was too obvious...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tell me they are going to call their hack cranny , please !
: ) Perhaps that was too obvious.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tell me they are going to call their hack cranny, please!
:)  Perhaps that was too obvious...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433028</id>
	<title>Re:Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260815400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, not until someone writes ASCIITube!</p><p>(Or <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4202" title="newscientist.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [newscientist.com] becomes commonplace.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , not until someone writes ASCIITube !
( Or this [ newscientist.com ] becomes commonplace .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, not until someone writes ASCIITube!
(Or this [newscientist.com] becomes commonplace.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434918</id>
	<title>Well what did they expect?</title>
	<author>unitron</author>
	<datestamp>1260782100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you name something the nookie book, of course people are going to try to open it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you name something the nookie book , of course people are going to try to open it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you name something the nookie book, of course people are going to try to open it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434650</id>
	<title>Re:DMCA notice coming</title>
	<author>DarkAce911</author>
	<datestamp>1260823980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so, you are saying buy one now? I have been kind of interested in the Nook, I may be really interested in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so , you are saying buy one now ?
I have been kind of interested in the Nook , I may be really interested in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so, you are saying buy one now?
I have been kind of interested in the Nook, I may be really interested in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432772</id>
	<title>Re:Holy crap.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260814260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.</i></p><p>Because the internet access isn't free - B&amp;N pays for the bandwidth (as does Amazon, for that matter) and builds the cost of downloading x Mb into the price of the digital book. They don't recoup the cost of using your Nook as a netbook with always-on internet, so either (a) they'll pass it on to people using the Nook as intended in the form of higher e-book prices, (b) they'll raise the price of the Nook or (c) they'll quickly rush to market either a firmware "upgrade" or Nook 2.0 which closes the hole. I'm betting they do all four.</p><p>Hell, since you can pull the filesystem out and read it, has anyone looked to see if they built in a killswitch or enforceable upgrade policy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This begs the question of why we do n't already have netbooks this awesome , with free internet and days of battery life.Because the internet access is n't free - B&amp;N pays for the bandwidth ( as does Amazon , for that matter ) and builds the cost of downloading x Mb into the price of the digital book .
They do n't recoup the cost of using your Nook as a netbook with always-on internet , so either ( a ) they 'll pass it on to people using the Nook as intended in the form of higher e-book prices , ( b ) they 'll raise the price of the Nook or ( c ) they 'll quickly rush to market either a firmware " upgrade " or Nook 2.0 which closes the hole .
I 'm betting they do all four.Hell , since you can pull the filesystem out and read it , has anyone looked to see if they built in a killswitch or enforceable upgrade policy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This begs the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet and days of battery life.Because the internet access isn't free - B&amp;N pays for the bandwidth (as does Amazon, for that matter) and builds the cost of downloading x Mb into the price of the digital book.
They don't recoup the cost of using your Nook as a netbook with always-on internet, so either (a) they'll pass it on to people using the Nook as intended in the form of higher e-book prices, (b) they'll raise the price of the Nook or (c) they'll quickly rush to market either a firmware "upgrade" or Nook 2.0 which closes the hole.
I'm betting they do all four.Hell, since you can pull the filesystem out and read it, has anyone looked to see if they built in a killswitch or enforceable upgrade policy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434080</id>
	<title>Re:Free internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260820860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I wonder about the impact of free 3G will be</i></p><p>Well, an unlimited data plan for 7.2Mbit/s 3G is only $10/month here in Sweden, and Sweden is a sparsely populated country so the ratio of infrastructure vs population is relatively high and expensive.</p><p>You guys in the US are just being ripped off by the carriers. They make a fortune on your data traffic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder about the impact of free 3G will beWell , an unlimited data plan for 7.2Mbit/s 3G is only $ 10/month here in Sweden , and Sweden is a sparsely populated country so the ratio of infrastructure vs population is relatively high and expensive.You guys in the US are just being ripped off by the carriers .
They make a fortune on your data traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder about the impact of free 3G will beWell, an unlimited data plan for 7.2Mbit/s 3G is only $10/month here in Sweden, and Sweden is a sparsely populated country so the ratio of infrastructure vs population is relatively high and expensive.You guys in the US are just being ripped off by the carriers.
They make a fortune on your data traffic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433808</id>
	<title>Re:Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1260819360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>YouTube in monochrome... now that would bring back old memories! (Yes, we actually did have a 20" B&amp;W television when I was a kid... I'm OLD! Sigh...)</htmltext>
<tokenext>YouTube in monochrome... now that would bring back old memories !
( Yes , we actually did have a 20 " B&amp;W television when I was a kid... I 'm OLD !
Sigh... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YouTube in monochrome... now that would bring back old memories!
(Yes, we actually did have a 20" B&amp;W television when I was a kid... I'm OLD!
Sigh...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30439040</id>
	<title>The good and the service can come apart</title>
	<author>Pfhorrest</author>
	<datestamp>1260802320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know this is largely redundant with what others have said throughout this thread, but I think it needs saying together in one succinct form:<br><br>When you buy a Nook, you're buying two things bundled together: (1) a physical good which you own and can (or at least should be able to) do any damn thing you want to, and (2) the service of connectivity to Barnes &amp; Noble to buy books. If you're unintentionally being given perpetual connectivity to the general internet for all purposes, then it's up to the service provider to stop giving you that service and start limiting what they give you to what you bought. If they do so, you have no right to complain about the loss of service you never bought; but until they do so, they have no right to complain if you use the service they're giving you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is largely redundant with what others have said throughout this thread , but I think it needs saying together in one succinct form : When you buy a Nook , you 're buying two things bundled together : ( 1 ) a physical good which you own and can ( or at least should be able to ) do any damn thing you want to , and ( 2 ) the service of connectivity to Barnes &amp; Noble to buy books .
If you 're unintentionally being given perpetual connectivity to the general internet for all purposes , then it 's up to the service provider to stop giving you that service and start limiting what they give you to what you bought .
If they do so , you have no right to complain about the loss of service you never bought ; but until they do so , they have no right to complain if you use the service they 're giving you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is largely redundant with what others have said throughout this thread, but I think it needs saying together in one succinct form:When you buy a Nook, you're buying two things bundled together: (1) a physical good which you own and can (or at least should be able to) do any damn thing you want to, and (2) the service of connectivity to Barnes &amp; Noble to buy books.
If you're unintentionally being given perpetual connectivity to the general internet for all purposes, then it's up to the service provider to stop giving you that service and start limiting what they give you to what you bought.
If they do so, you have no right to complain about the loss of service you never bought; but until they do so, they have no right to complain if you use the service they're giving you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434070</id>
	<title>Re:MicroSD card?</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1260820800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And then they just implemented it with a SIM card (which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone).  I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone (probably doesn't work or else it would've been in the article).</p></div><p>Any half-sane HLR will allow the provider to provision only specific services to the SIM card.  I'd imagine the only thing provisioned to these cards is internet access.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And then they just implemented it with a SIM card ( which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone ) .
I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone ( probably does n't work or else it would 've been in the article ) .Any half-sane HLR will allow the provider to provision only specific services to the SIM card .
I 'd imagine the only thing provisioned to these cards is internet access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then they just implemented it with a SIM card (which makes me think the AT&amp;T network abstracts it as a standard cell phone).
I wonder what happens if you stick that SIM card in a cellphone (probably doesn't work or else it would've been in the article).Any half-sane HLR will allow the provider to provision only specific services to the SIM card.
I'd imagine the only thing provisioned to these cards is internet access.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682</id>
	<title>Limitations of e-paper</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1260813900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This begs</p></div><p>raises</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internet</p></div><p>Subsidized by book sales, as OldeTimeGeek pointed out.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and days of battery life.</p></div><p>Netbooks can view YouTube. Readers with electronic paper displays can't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This begsraisesthe question of why we do n't already have netbooks this awesome , with free internetSubsidized by book sales , as OldeTimeGeek pointed out.and days of battery life.Netbooks can view YouTube .
Readers with electronic paper displays ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This begsraisesthe question of why we don't already have netbooks this awesome, with free internetSubsidized by book sales, as OldeTimeGeek pointed out.and days of battery life.Netbooks can view YouTube.
Readers with electronic paper displays can't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432622</id>
	<title>Re:Free internet?</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1260813600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free?  Why do you think it (and the Kindle) cost $250?  You pay for the internet access when you buy the thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free ?
Why do you think it ( and the Kindle ) cost $ 250 ?
You pay for the internet access when you buy the thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free?
Why do you think it (and the Kindle) cost $250?
You pay for the internet access when you buy the thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432892</id>
	<title>Re:Holy crap.</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1260814800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "days of battery life" are for electronic paper use and the occasional book download. I imagine if you were surfing the web on it, you'd get a far shorter battery life, even if you hacked the ability to bump pages on to the epaper screen and switch off the touchscreen for reading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " days of battery life " are for electronic paper use and the occasional book download .
I imagine if you were surfing the web on it , you 'd get a far shorter battery life , even if you hacked the ability to bump pages on to the epaper screen and switch off the touchscreen for reading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "days of battery life" are for electronic paper use and the occasional book download.
I imagine if you were surfing the web on it, you'd get a far shorter battery life, even if you hacked the ability to bump pages on to the epaper screen and switch off the touchscreen for reading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434244</id>
	<title>Re:eInk MPD remote control client</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1260821820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card.</p></div><p>the nook comes with a WiFi modem already internal.  That is the interesting part for me, if they now have a browser for the nook I will likely order one (for Febuary delivery<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(  )  seams like a really handy reference material storage device, even if without 3G...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card.the nook comes with a WiFi modem already internal .
That is the interesting part for me , if they now have a browser for the nook I will likely order one ( for Febuary delivery : ( ) seams like a really handy reference material storage device , even if without 3G.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder of the modem can be swiped out for a WiFi card.the nook comes with a WiFi modem already internal.
That is the interesting part for me, if they now have a browser for the nook I will likely order one (for Febuary delivery :(  )  seams like a really handy reference material storage device, even if without 3G...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426</id>
	<title>Free internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260812880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its great to see the Nook being opened up to allow unsupported apps, but I wonder about the impact of free 3G will be if this hack is widely used. Will this lead to the Nook2 featuring even more DRM, or perhaps no 3G at all? I sure hope not, but considering that BN will likely take a lot of heat from the service provider I wouldn't be surprised to see abuse of the network leading to a more locked down future device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its great to see the Nook being opened up to allow unsupported apps , but I wonder about the impact of free 3G will be if this hack is widely used .
Will this lead to the Nook2 featuring even more DRM , or perhaps no 3G at all ?
I sure hope not , but considering that BN will likely take a lot of heat from the service provider I would n't be surprised to see abuse of the network leading to a more locked down future device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its great to see the Nook being opened up to allow unsupported apps, but I wonder about the impact of free 3G will be if this hack is widely used.
Will this lead to the Nook2 featuring even more DRM, or perhaps no 3G at all?
I sure hope not, but considering that BN will likely take a lot of heat from the service provider I wouldn't be surprised to see abuse of the network leading to a more locked down future device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612</id>
	<title>Free Cell Connection? "Yes, but don't do that."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've been down <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1357525&amp;cid=29304303" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this road before</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p>Don't do that. Pushing the connection to carry things it wasn't meant to is pretty much theft of service, and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers, and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who can't behave themselves.</p><p>Do what you'd like with the devices and/or media that you've purchased, but recognize that there's a line of fairness and don't cross it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've been down this road before [ slashdot.org ] .Do n't do that .
Pushing the connection to carry things it was n't meant to is pretty much theft of service , and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers , and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who ca n't behave themselves.Do what you 'd like with the devices and/or media that you 've purchased , but recognize that there 's a line of fairness and do n't cross it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've been down this road before [slashdot.org].Don't do that.
Pushing the connection to carry things it wasn't meant to is pretty much theft of service, and it will get pushback from rightfully upset providers, and maybe more from policymakers who see hackers who can't behave themselves.Do what you'd like with the devices and/or media that you've purchased, but recognize that there's a line of fairness and don't cross it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432570</id>
	<title>Re:And so it begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260813420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're probably going to lock in iPhone users to a two-year contract with $100+ data plans, and then not deliver on the promised speeds. That's how they'll make up the difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're probably going to lock in iPhone users to a two-year contract with $ 100 + data plans , and then not deliver on the promised speeds .
That 's how they 'll make up the difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're probably going to lock in iPhone users to a two-year contract with $100+ data plans, and then not deliver on the promised speeds.
That's how they'll make up the difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30436076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30441762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_14_1515215_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30436076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30441762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30435492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30434650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_14_1515215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30432576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_14_1515215.30433700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
