<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_13_2028219</id>
	<title>Facebook Founder's Pictures Go Public</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260697080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:jamie@slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">jamie</a> passes along a Newsfactor piece that begins <i>"In a not-uncommon development for the social-networking leader, Facebook's <a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/12/10/1341220/Facebook-Masks-Worse-Privacy-With-New-Interface">recently released privacy controls</a> are leaving the company a bit red-faced. As a result of a new policy that by default makes users' profiles, photos, and friends lists available on the Web, almost <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20091212/tc\_nf/70579">300 personal photos of founder Mark Zuckerberg</a> became publicly available, a development that had gossip sites like Gawker yukking it up."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jamie passes along a Newsfactor piece that begins " In a not-uncommon development for the social-networking leader , Facebook 's recently released privacy controls are leaving the company a bit red-faced .
As a result of a new policy that by default makes users ' profiles , photos , and friends lists available on the Web , almost 300 personal photos of founder Mark Zuckerberg became publicly available , a development that had gossip sites like Gawker yukking it up .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jamie passes along a Newsfactor piece that begins "In a not-uncommon development for the social-networking leader, Facebook's recently released privacy controls are leaving the company a bit red-faced.
As a result of a new policy that by default makes users' profiles, photos, and friends lists available on the Web, almost 300 personal photos of founder Mark Zuckerberg became publicly available, a development that had gossip sites like Gawker yukking it up.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425430</id>
	<title>Ok so where are the pictures?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I clicked the link in the summary and I didn't find any pictures. So after a quick search I found this <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12#with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1" title="businessinsider.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12#with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1</a> [businessinsider.com]

Enjoy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I clicked the link in the summary and I did n't find any pictures .
So after a quick search I found this http : //www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12 # with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1 [ businessinsider.com ] Enjoy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I clicked the link in the summary and I didn't find any pictures.
So after a quick search I found this http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12#with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1 [businessinsider.com]

Enjoy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426052</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1260706620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If she has any level of <b>discrete</b>ness, then certainly she be divided into a single entity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If she has any level of discreteness , then certainly she be divided into a single entity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she has any level of discreteness, then certainly she be divided into a single entity!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425548</id>
	<title>i really dont get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260702360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i really don't.</p><p>The new privacy dialog game up when I logged in and i read it and then checked each option to keep things the same as before... it's not rocket science. One's inability to read and think is not Facebook's fault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i really do n't.The new privacy dialog game up when I logged in and i read it and then checked each option to keep things the same as before... it 's not rocket science .
One 's inability to read and think is not Facebook 's fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i really don't.The new privacy dialog game up when I logged in and i read it and then checked each option to keep things the same as before... it's not rocket science.
One's inability to read and think is not Facebook's fault.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425420</id>
	<title>Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, if he has nothing to hide then this shouldn't be a problem.  Only people with criminal activity need privacy, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if he has nothing to hide then this should n't be a problem .
Only people with criminal activity need privacy , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if he has nothing to hide then this shouldn't be a problem.
Only people with criminal activity need privacy, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425584</id>
	<title>Eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260702660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I vaguely remember automatically being "friends" with mark zuckerberg when I originally signed up for facebook eons ago... (This was before "fans" existed...).</p><p>In any case, I wouldn't think someone like mark would want most of his pictures private.. it is his site after all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I vaguely remember automatically being " friends " with mark zuckerberg when I originally signed up for facebook eons ago... ( This was before " fans " existed... ) .In any case , I would n't think someone like mark would want most of his pictures private.. it is his site after all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I vaguely remember automatically being "friends" with mark zuckerberg when I originally signed up for facebook eons ago... (This was before "fans" existed...).In any case, I wouldn't think someone like mark would want most of his pictures private.. it is his site after all!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>MWoody</author>
	<datestamp>1260709140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any system wherein you upload pictures for the world to see is fail for not assuming that's what you want to do?  We're not talking an OS or web server here; it's a social site.</p><p>I have to ask: if you have private pictures, why are they online?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any system wherein you upload pictures for the world to see is fail for not assuming that 's what you want to do ?
We 're not talking an OS or web server here ; it 's a social site.I have to ask : if you have private pictures , why are they online ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any system wherein you upload pictures for the world to see is fail for not assuming that's what you want to do?
We're not talking an OS or web server here; it's a social site.I have to ask: if you have private pictures, why are they online?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428236</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260728700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish people would stop making the assumption that things on the web are private. WORLD WIDE WEB is called that for a reason.</p><p>There are no "levels" of privacy on the web. There is only "more or less secure", and Facebook is anything but "secure".</p><p>And if you don't directly control it, you don't have control over it.</p><p>SO, you see, you're just wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish people would stop making the assumption that things on the web are private .
WORLD WIDE WEB is called that for a reason.There are no " levels " of privacy on the web .
There is only " more or less secure " , and Facebook is anything but " secure " .And if you do n't directly control it , you do n't have control over it.SO , you see , you 're just wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish people would stop making the assumption that things on the web are private.
WORLD WIDE WEB is called that for a reason.There are no "levels" of privacy on the web.
There is only "more or less secure", and Facebook is anything but "secure".And if you don't directly control it, you don't have control over it.SO, you see, you're just wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428796</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260824340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you entrust the information to a third party, you can't really expect it to stay private, especially if their privacy policy makes them not liable for anything.</p><p>If you want control over things you put online, host them yourself, and allow only specific people to access them, using strong passwords.  Sure, people aren't likely to go to your website, but if you care about privacy, that's about the only way you can do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you entrust the information to a third party , you ca n't really expect it to stay private , especially if their privacy policy makes them not liable for anything.If you want control over things you put online , host them yourself , and allow only specific people to access them , using strong passwords .
Sure , people are n't likely to go to your website , but if you care about privacy , that 's about the only way you can do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you entrust the information to a third party, you can't really expect it to stay private, especially if their privacy policy makes them not liable for anything.If you want control over things you put online, host them yourself, and allow only specific people to access them, using strong passwords.
Sure, people aren't likely to go to your website, but if you care about privacy, that's about the only way you can do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425496</id>
	<title>He should've left them public</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1260701880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>He definitely should have left them public. He should've made it look as though he meant to do that and left them on. Somebody will have downloaded them all anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He definitely should have left them public .
He should 've made it look as though he meant to do that and left them on .
Somebody will have downloaded them all anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He definitely should have left them public.
He should've made it look as though he meant to do that and left them on.
Somebody will have downloaded them all anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428194</id>
	<title>Re:What am I missing?</title>
	<author>chialea</author>
	<datestamp>1260727980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go to your profile and hit the little pencil icon next to it. You can hide your friends list from there. (Thanks to another<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. commenter, who pointed this out to me.)</p><p>BTW, make sure you lock down the settings on what your friends' apps can see, unless you trust them not to accidentally add malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to your profile and hit the little pencil icon next to it .
You can hide your friends list from there .
( Thanks to another / .
commenter , who pointed this out to me .
) BTW , make sure you lock down the settings on what your friends ' apps can see , unless you trust them not to accidentally add malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to your profile and hit the little pencil icon next to it.
You can hide your friends list from there.
(Thanks to another /.
commenter, who pointed this out to me.
)BTW, make sure you lock down the settings on what your friends' apps can see, unless you trust them not to accidentally add malware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428202</id>
	<title>Facebook has no privacy anymore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260727980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You used to be able to exclude yourself from the system. Now you can't even opt out of the Facebook API, there is information that is accessible to 3rd party developers as long as your friends install an app. Used to be you could opt out of it though. After this whole debacle I ended up requesting deletion of my facebook account, which should be processed in 10 days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You used to be able to exclude yourself from the system .
Now you ca n't even opt out of the Facebook API , there is information that is accessible to 3rd party developers as long as your friends install an app .
Used to be you could opt out of it though .
After this whole debacle I ended up requesting deletion of my facebook account , which should be processed in 10 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You used to be able to exclude yourself from the system.
Now you can't even opt out of the Facebook API, there is information that is accessible to 3rd party developers as long as your friends install an app.
Used to be you could opt out of it though.
After this whole debacle I ended up requesting deletion of my facebook account, which should be processed in 10 days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429972</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1260799380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My full name is not on there, my birthday is faked, and I have no other info of worth on there.  I don't upload pictures and updates are very few.  I occasionally comment on friends updates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My full name is not on there , my birthday is faked , and I have no other info of worth on there .
I do n't upload pictures and updates are very few .
I occasionally comment on friends updates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My full name is not on there, my birthday is faked, and I have no other info of worth on there.
I don't upload pictures and updates are very few.
I occasionally comment on friends updates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260702540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So...are you single?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So...are you single ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So...are you single?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30435838</id>
	<title>Hopefully Google will buy FB...</title>
	<author>maharvey</author>
	<datestamp>1260787140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully Google will buy FB so we don't have to worry about someone using the data for evil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully Google will buy FB so we do n't have to worry about someone using the data for evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully Google will buy FB so we don't have to worry about someone using the data for evil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427048</id>
	<title>Re:Karma.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260715680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's a b****.</p></div></blockquote><ul>
 <li>  banjo  </li><li>  beach  </li><li>  beard   </li><li>  beast  </li><li>  bible  </li><li>  bicep  </li><li>  bidet  </li><li>biker </li><li>bimbo </li><li>biped </li><li>bison </li><li>blank </li><li>bleep </li><li>blimp </li><li>blink </li><li>blitz </li><li>bloke </li><li>board </li><li>boast </li><li>bonus </li><li>  boost </li><li>  booty </li><li>  bosom </li><li>  brake </li><li>  brand </li><li>  break </li><li>  breed </li><li>  broth </li><li>  brute  </li><li>  bugle </li><li>  bulge </li><li>  bully </li><li>  buyer  </li><li>  bylaw  </li></ul><p> <b>HTH!</b> </p><p>.</p><p>.</p><p>.</p><p>  Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 4.6). </p><p>Important Stuff

    * Please try to keep posts on topic.
    * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    * Only editors are allowed to post dupes.
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. For example the "slashdot.org" domain name,  what could possibly be clearer than that?
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts and butt jokes, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    * If you don't want replies to your comments sent to you, do not log in or create an account.

If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please offer analingus. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a b * * * * .
banjo beach beard beast bible bicep bidet biker bimbo biped bison blank bleep blimp blink blitz bloke board boast bonus boost booty bosom brake brand break breed broth brute bugle bulge bully buyer bylaw HTH !
... Your comment has too few characters per line ( currently 4.6 ) .
Important Stuff * Please try to keep posts on topic .
* Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
* Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
* Only editors are allowed to post dupes .
* Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
* Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
For example the " slashdot.org " domain name , what could possibly be clearer than that ?
* Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
* Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts and butt jokes , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) * Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
* If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .
* Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
* If you do n't want replies to your comments sent to you , do not log in or create an account .
If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting , please offer analingus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a b****.
banjo    beach    beard     beast    bible    bicep    bidet  biker bimbo biped bison blank bleep blimp blink blitz bloke board boast bonus   boost   booty   bosom   brake   brand   break   breed   broth   brute    bugle   bulge   bully   buyer    bylaw   HTH!
...  Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 4.6).
Important Stuff

    * Please try to keep posts on topic.
* Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
* Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
* Only editors are allowed to post dupes.
* Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
* Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
For example the "slashdot.org" domain name,  what could possibly be clearer than that?
* Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
* Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts and butt jokes, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
    * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
* If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
* Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
* If you don't want replies to your comments sent to you, do not log in or create an account.
If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please offer analingus. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428488</id>
	<title>Google Wave</title>
	<author>JNSL</author>
	<datestamp>1260732660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We all know that Facebook is afraid of Wave. Now why don't they behave like it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know that Facebook is afraid of Wave .
Now why do n't they behave like it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know that Facebook is afraid of Wave.
Now why don't they behave like it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426984</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260715020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who says they don't have access...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who says they do n't have access.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who says they don't have access...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758</id>
	<title>Re:Ok so where are the pictures?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260704040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks,<br>I've resisted having a Facebook account but I think I might get one now. Whether deliberate or accidental, it makes me feel more secure knowing thiws guy put himself in the same boat as his fans and customers. Kind of a reverse-monarchy attitude.<br>I also like that his gf is of a different race to hime. No white supremacism with this fella.</p><p>Hello facebook world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks,I 've resisted having a Facebook account but I think I might get one now .
Whether deliberate or accidental , it makes me feel more secure knowing thiws guy put himself in the same boat as his fans and customers .
Kind of a reverse-monarchy attitude.I also like that his gf is of a different race to hime .
No white supremacism with this fella.Hello facebook world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks,I've resisted having a Facebook account but I think I might get one now.
Whether deliberate or accidental, it makes me feel more secure knowing thiws guy put himself in the same boat as his fans and customers.
Kind of a reverse-monarchy attitude.I also like that his gf is of a different race to hime.
No white supremacism with this fella.Hello facebook world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425390</id>
	<title>From Mark:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For those wondering, I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it. I set some of my content to be more private, but I didn't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends, family or my teddy bear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For those wondering , I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it .
I set some of my content to be more private , but I did n't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends , family or my teddy bear : ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For those wondering, I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it.
I set some of my content to be more private, but I didn't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends, family or my teddy bear :)"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1260703620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook is the government database the government never had but wishes they did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook is the government database the government never had but wishes they did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook is the government database the government never had but wishes they did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</id>
	<title>I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am really worried about the fact that Facebook has access to data such as people's real name (that's the point of it, right?), IP addresses, friends' lists, and other info. It worries me enough on a personnal level, so I'll never register, but what worries me more is on the macro level. Even if such company did not want to 'do evil' with this tremendous amount of info, I feel that the power they posess is ultimately too big to be own by a for-profit company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am really worried about the fact that Facebook has access to data such as people 's real name ( that 's the point of it , right ?
) , IP addresses , friends ' lists , and other info .
It worries me enough on a personnal level , so I 'll never register , but what worries me more is on the macro level .
Even if such company did not want to 'do evil ' with this tremendous amount of info , I feel that the power they posess is ultimately too big to be own by a for-profit company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am really worried about the fact that Facebook has access to data such as people's real name (that's the point of it, right?
), IP addresses, friends' lists, and other info.
It worries me enough on a personnal level, so I'll never register, but what worries me more is on the macro level.
Even if such company did not want to 'do evil' with this tremendous amount of info, I feel that the power they posess is ultimately too big to be own by a for-profit company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</id>
	<title>Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>swein515</author>
	<datestamp>1260702000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For those wondering, I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it. I set some of my content to be more private, but I didn't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends, family or my teddy bear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)"</p><p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg" title="facebook.com">http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg</a> [facebook.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For those wondering , I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it .
I set some of my content to be more private , but I did n't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends , family or my teddy bear : ) " http : //www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg [ facebook.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For those wondering, I set most of my content on my personal Facebook page to be open so people could see it.
I set some of my content to be more private, but I didn't see a need to limit visibility of pics with my friends, family or my teddy bear :)"http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg [facebook.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426162</id>
	<title>What am I missing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260707520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is an honest question.  I've seen numerous stories about how terrible Facebook's privacy setting are but I just don't understand what is wrong.  I've made a dummy account with the same settings as my personal Facebook account.  Tell me what you can find out about "Billy Slashdot Perkins".  The answer is nothing as far as I can tell.  Searching for him on Google or Facebook gives no results as far as I can tell.<p>
As far as I can tell there are two options for privacy on Facebook</p><p>
(1) Be 'searchable' which means some information about yourself should be included otherwise the search is useless</p><p>
(2) Not be 'searchable'.  Everything you have is private and between you and the friends you have</p><p>
I have option (1) and I haven't had any problems with it yet.</p><p>
Please tell me <em>specifically</em> what it is about Facebook that is violating your privacy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an honest question .
I 've seen numerous stories about how terrible Facebook 's privacy setting are but I just do n't understand what is wrong .
I 've made a dummy account with the same settings as my personal Facebook account .
Tell me what you can find out about " Billy Slashdot Perkins " .
The answer is nothing as far as I can tell .
Searching for him on Google or Facebook gives no results as far as I can tell .
As far as I can tell there are two options for privacy on Facebook ( 1 ) Be 'searchable ' which means some information about yourself should be included otherwise the search is useless ( 2 ) Not be 'searchable' .
Everything you have is private and between you and the friends you have I have option ( 1 ) and I have n't had any problems with it yet .
Please tell me specifically what it is about Facebook that is violating your privacy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an honest question.
I've seen numerous stories about how terrible Facebook's privacy setting are but I just don't understand what is wrong.
I've made a dummy account with the same settings as my personal Facebook account.
Tell me what you can find out about "Billy Slashdot Perkins".
The answer is nothing as far as I can tell.
Searching for him on Google or Facebook gives no results as far as I can tell.
As far as I can tell there are two options for privacy on Facebook
(1) Be 'searchable' which means some information about yourself should be included otherwise the search is useless
(2) Not be 'searchable'.
Everything you have is private and between you and the friends you have
I have option (1) and I haven't had any problems with it yet.
Please tell me specifically what it is about Facebook that is violating your privacy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428380</id>
	<title>Re:Ok so where are the pictures?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260730860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, you're a retard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you 're a retard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you're a retard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426852</id>
	<title>Facebook is best used anonymously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260714180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enuf info in public domain as it is - how much more candy do we retarded people need to "GIFT" to govt/business/stalkers....oh, and my ex now works at a hospital and has 4 kids</p><p>Thank you Facebook</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enuf info in public domain as it is - how much more candy do we retarded people need to " GIFT " to govt/business/stalkers....oh , and my ex now works at a hospital and has 4 kidsThank you Facebook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enuf info in public domain as it is - how much more candy do we retarded people need to "GIFT" to govt/business/stalkers....oh, and my ex now works at a hospital and has 4 kidsThank you Facebook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428828</id>
	<title>Re:Karma.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260781380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a bitch.</p></div><p>FTFY. Prude.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bitch.FTFY .
Prude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bitch.FTFY.
Prude.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426762</id>
	<title>Things I love...</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1260713520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love it when I read a story about another story that is all about photos, yet neither story contains or links to any.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love it when I read a story about another story that is all about photos , yet neither story contains or links to any .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love it when I read a story about another story that is all about photos, yet neither story contains or links to any.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425484</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Plus, Zuckerberg is an arrogant, greedy <b>Jew</b>. He also made a gay sex tape while high on ecstasy and amyl nitrate while in college. Word on the street is that he's secretly negotiating a deal to buy the incriminating evidence from his former gay lover, a black man named Jermaine.<br> <br>

Marc Zuckerberg: He'll zuck any dick, including <a href="http://i25.tinypic.com/2mg3xqg.jpg" title="tinypic.com" rel="nofollow">yours.</a> [tinypic.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus , Zuckerberg is an arrogant , greedy Jew .
He also made a gay sex tape while high on ecstasy and amyl nitrate while in college .
Word on the street is that he 's secretly negotiating a deal to buy the incriminating evidence from his former gay lover , a black man named Jermaine .
Marc Zuckerberg : He 'll zuck any dick , including yours .
[ tinypic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus, Zuckerberg is an arrogant, greedy Jew.
He also made a gay sex tape while high on ecstasy and amyl nitrate while in college.
Word on the street is that he's secretly negotiating a deal to buy the incriminating evidence from his former gay lover, a black man named Jermaine.
Marc Zuckerberg: He'll zuck any dick, including yours.
[tinypic.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434052</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1260820680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the web?</p><p>See robots.txt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the web ? See robots.txt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the web?See robots.txt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522</id>
	<title>he meant to do it, then had the pictures removed</title>
	<author>Mr.Zuka</author>
	<datestamp>1260702060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it says a lot about his personality that he posted to his newsfeed that he meant to post the pictures, then somehow the pictures mysteriously disappear. Kind of scary with an ego that he can't admit to a mistake that small. If there ever was a security breach would facebook ever admit to it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it says a lot about his personality that he posted to his newsfeed that he meant to post the pictures , then somehow the pictures mysteriously disappear .
Kind of scary with an ego that he ca n't admit to a mistake that small .
If there ever was a security breach would facebook ever admit to it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it says a lot about his personality that he posted to his newsfeed that he meant to post the pictures, then somehow the pictures mysteriously disappear.
Kind of scary with an ego that he can't admit to a mistake that small.
If there ever was a security breach would facebook ever admit to it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425878</id>
	<title>Who cares</title>
	<author>Murdoch5</author>
	<datestamp>1260705240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook might be the social network giant but it's a really pointless site.  It's more about showing off how many friends you have who most of you probably haven't met.
<br>
<br>
Joining groups who's point is to see how many people join the group and most of all showing off your pics and status in life.
<br>
<br>
I do have a facebook account but I haven't updated it in 3 years which is about when I made it.  If you want to keep your life private don't put it on the web.  How hard is it to just pass a USB key or pass a memory key and let your real friends see your pics / status or anything else you feel like sharing.
<br>
<br>
Facebook might be the social giant of the internet but it's also a giant waste of time and resources.  Don't complain that your pics get stolen, released or broadcast.  If you really want to keep your info private then don't put it on the net.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook might be the social network giant but it 's a really pointless site .
It 's more about showing off how many friends you have who most of you probably have n't met .
Joining groups who 's point is to see how many people join the group and most of all showing off your pics and status in life .
I do have a facebook account but I have n't updated it in 3 years which is about when I made it .
If you want to keep your life private do n't put it on the web .
How hard is it to just pass a USB key or pass a memory key and let your real friends see your pics / status or anything else you feel like sharing .
Facebook might be the social giant of the internet but it 's also a giant waste of time and resources .
Do n't complain that your pics get stolen , released or broadcast .
If you really want to keep your info private then do n't put it on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook might be the social network giant but it's a really pointless site.
It's more about showing off how many friends you have who most of you probably haven't met.
Joining groups who's point is to see how many people join the group and most of all showing off your pics and status in life.
I do have a facebook account but I haven't updated it in 3 years which is about when I made it.
If you want to keep your life private don't put it on the web.
How hard is it to just pass a USB key or pass a memory key and let your real friends see your pics / status or anything else you feel like sharing.
Facebook might be the social giant of the internet but it's also a giant waste of time and resources.
Don't complain that your pics get stolen, released or broadcast.
If you really want to keep your info private then don't put it on the net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425956</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260705900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which glitches?  His profile has always had the Add as Friend button disabled, and the friend list can be hidden from everyone now (which is still not as configurable as how it was before) - I use both of those options myself.  The conflicting points at this stage relate to his status update denying the fact he did revealed anything in error; except his photos are no longer accessible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which glitches ?
His profile has always had the Add as Friend button disabled , and the friend list can be hidden from everyone now ( which is still not as configurable as how it was before ) - I use both of those options myself .
The conflicting points at this stage relate to his status update denying the fact he did revealed anything in error ; except his photos are no longer accessible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which glitches?
His profile has always had the Add as Friend button disabled, and the friend list can be hidden from everyone now (which is still not as configurable as how it was before) - I use both of those options myself.
The conflicting points at this stage relate to his status update denying the fact he did revealed anything in error; except his photos are no longer accessible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Eskarel</author>
	<datestamp>1260718380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish people would stop making the assumption that because someone shares something on facebook they want to share it with the world.</p><p>There are levels of privacy and sharing between telling everyone everything and hiding in a secure lead lined bunker somewhere. I might want to share pictures of my kid with my friends and family who live in other states and other countries without wanting to share that photo with the entire rest of the world.</p><p>The reason for using a social site is to allow you to exchange information in a controlled way. If I wanted to just share information with the world I'd stick it up on a public facing web page and let google find it. The problem is that Mark Zuckerberg is an idiot and presumes exactly like you do, that because I want to show my mother her grandchild that I want to share that same information with him and everyone else. Guess what I don't.</p><p>I know that the social networking evangalists seem to think that everyone should be metaphorically naked for the world to see and we'd all get along better, and the tin foil hat brigade thinks we should never give our real names even to our spouses, but a lot of times, people want somewhere in the middle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish people would stop making the assumption that because someone shares something on facebook they want to share it with the world.There are levels of privacy and sharing between telling everyone everything and hiding in a secure lead lined bunker somewhere .
I might want to share pictures of my kid with my friends and family who live in other states and other countries without wanting to share that photo with the entire rest of the world.The reason for using a social site is to allow you to exchange information in a controlled way .
If I wanted to just share information with the world I 'd stick it up on a public facing web page and let google find it .
The problem is that Mark Zuckerberg is an idiot and presumes exactly like you do , that because I want to show my mother her grandchild that I want to share that same information with him and everyone else .
Guess what I do n't.I know that the social networking evangalists seem to think that everyone should be metaphorically naked for the world to see and we 'd all get along better , and the tin foil hat brigade thinks we should never give our real names even to our spouses , but a lot of times , people want somewhere in the middle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish people would stop making the assumption that because someone shares something on facebook they want to share it with the world.There are levels of privacy and sharing between telling everyone everything and hiding in a secure lead lined bunker somewhere.
I might want to share pictures of my kid with my friends and family who live in other states and other countries without wanting to share that photo with the entire rest of the world.The reason for using a social site is to allow you to exchange information in a controlled way.
If I wanted to just share information with the world I'd stick it up on a public facing web page and let google find it.
The problem is that Mark Zuckerberg is an idiot and presumes exactly like you do, that because I want to show my mother her grandchild that I want to share that same information with him and everyone else.
Guess what I don't.I know that the social networking evangalists seem to think that everyone should be metaphorically naked for the world to see and we'd all get along better, and the tin foil hat brigade thinks we should never give our real names even to our spouses, but a lot of times, people want somewhere in the middle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427696</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Puff\_Of\_Hot\_Air</author>
	<datestamp>1260722460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well this is the point of facebook isn't it? It's not "online for all the world to see". It's "online for all my friends and family to see". I mean, if it's just a "show the world" site, why bother with a friends list at all? Why wouldn't you just have a a home page builder ala geocities? The idea that appeals to people is to have a semi private place to share stuff with friends/family on the interweb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well this is the point of facebook is n't it ?
It 's not " online for all the world to see " .
It 's " online for all my friends and family to see " .
I mean , if it 's just a " show the world " site , why bother with a friends list at all ?
Why would n't you just have a a home page builder ala geocities ?
The idea that appeals to people is to have a semi private place to share stuff with friends/family on the interweb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well this is the point of facebook isn't it?
It's not "online for all the world to see".
It's "online for all my friends and family to see".
I mean, if it's just a "show the world" site, why bother with a friends list at all?
Why wouldn't you just have a a home page builder ala geocities?
The idea that appeals to people is to have a semi private place to share stuff with friends/family on the interweb.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425558</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260702420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they know your name, and some of your friends names. And about 100 people who you said hi to once, who decided to add you as a friend. They know your IP, if they log it.<br>Okay. What else? You don't have to give them any other information. At all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they know your name , and some of your friends names .
And about 100 people who you said hi to once , who decided to add you as a friend .
They know your IP , if they log it.Okay .
What else ?
You do n't have to give them any other information .
At all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they know your name, and some of your friends names.
And about 100 people who you said hi to once, who decided to add you as a friend.
They know your IP, if they log it.Okay.
What else?
You don't have to give them any other information.
At all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427106</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>shadowbearer</author>
	<datestamp>1260716100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; They do now.</p><p>SB</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  They do now.SB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  They do now.SB</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30464702</id>
	<title>Re:DID NOT WANT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should write it like this:</p><p>my $elf;<br>Note to $elf: think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd.</p><p>Just using $elf makes it a global accessible variable, which is probably not what you want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should write it like this : my $ elf ; Note to $ elf : think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd.Just using $ elf makes it a global accessible variable , which is probably not what you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should write it like this:my $elf;Note to $elf: think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd.Just using $elf makes it a global accessible variable, which is probably not what you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425624</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1260702960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The worst part about the new settings:  You can't keep your photos from being tied to you.  Sure you can make your profile picture a kitchen sink (since you must show your profile picture), but now that you must show your friends list, if any of your friends has an open profile and tags you in a photo, it's game over; cyber-stalker-chick/dude knows what you look like (and your hometown since that's mandatory open now too).  So now to be private, you have to police your friends.  I'm curious what witness protection plans doing in the coming decades; cabins in the woods?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The worst part about the new settings : You ca n't keep your photos from being tied to you .
Sure you can make your profile picture a kitchen sink ( since you must show your profile picture ) , but now that you must show your friends list , if any of your friends has an open profile and tags you in a photo , it 's game over ; cyber-stalker-chick/dude knows what you look like ( and your hometown since that 's mandatory open now too ) .
So now to be private , you have to police your friends .
I 'm curious what witness protection plans doing in the coming decades ; cabins in the woods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The worst part about the new settings:  You can't keep your photos from being tied to you.
Sure you can make your profile picture a kitchen sink (since you must show your profile picture), but now that you must show your friends list, if any of your friends has an open profile and tags you in a photo, it's game over; cyber-stalker-chick/dude knows what you look like (and your hometown since that's mandatory open now too).
So now to be private, you have to police your friends.
I'm curious what witness protection plans doing in the coming decades; cabins in the woods?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428396</id>
	<title>One word...</title>
	<author>TheBunnyGirl.com</author>
	<datestamp>1260731040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>p0wned !</htmltext>
<tokenext>p0wned !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>p0wned !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427992</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1260725760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I have to ask: if you have private pictures, why are they online?</p></div></blockquote><p>Easy, you're convinced it's "easier" and "More convenient" that way, so that "the cloud" can be forced on you. Then, when everyone is completely dependent on it, they'll start charging (and by "they", I am referring to the entire IT industry).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to ask : if you have private pictures , why are they online ? Easy , you 're convinced it 's " easier " and " More convenient " that way , so that " the cloud " can be forced on you .
Then , when everyone is completely dependent on it , they 'll start charging ( and by " they " , I am referring to the entire IT industry ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to ask: if you have private pictures, why are they online?Easy, you're convinced it's "easier" and "More convenient" that way, so that "the cloud" can be forced on you.
Then, when everyone is completely dependent on it, they'll start charging (and by "they", I am referring to the entire IT industry).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425728</id>
	<title>Re:he meant to do it, then had the pictures remove</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260703680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that's par for the course, isn't it? Naive "I have nothing to hide" never lasts long when the attention comes. Even people who are in the showbiz don't want everybody rummaging around in their private lives. Can you imagine how Zuckerberg's friends reacted to that kind of scrutiny?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that 's par for the course , is n't it ?
Naive " I have nothing to hide " never lasts long when the attention comes .
Even people who are in the showbiz do n't want everybody rummaging around in their private lives .
Can you imagine how Zuckerberg 's friends reacted to that kind of scrutiny ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that's par for the course, isn't it?
Naive "I have nothing to hide" never lasts long when the attention comes.
Even people who are in the showbiz don't want everybody rummaging around in their private lives.
Can you imagine how Zuckerberg's friends reacted to that kind of scrutiny?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425682</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>ndunnuck</author>
	<datestamp>1260703380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do people think it matters if a company is for-profit?  Everybody's "for-profit", including all the full-time employees at every "non-profit" organization and every single politician wrangling to get their hands on a piece of your tax dollars, so they can control where it goes.  It's not too big for a "for-profit" company.  It's too big for anyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do people think it matters if a company is for-profit ?
Everybody 's " for-profit " , including all the full-time employees at every " non-profit " organization and every single politician wrangling to get their hands on a piece of your tax dollars , so they can control where it goes .
It 's not too big for a " for-profit " company .
It 's too big for anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do people think it matters if a company is for-profit?
Everybody's "for-profit", including all the full-time employees at every "non-profit" organization and every single politician wrangling to get their hands on a piece of your tax dollars, so they can control where it goes.
It's not too big for a "for-profit" company.
It's too big for anyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428660</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>Solandri</author>
	<datestamp>1260822420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Technically, that's illegal too.  To publish an identifiable photo of a person, one typically needs a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model\_release" title="wikipedia.org">model release</a> [wikipedia.org] from that individual.  Yes everybody does it, and most people don't care.  But the fact that he owns Facebook and is making advertising money off the public exhibition of those photos could open him up to some juicy liability should anyone in those photos wish to pursue it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , that 's illegal too .
To publish an identifiable photo of a person , one typically needs a model release [ wikipedia.org ] from that individual .
Yes everybody does it , and most people do n't care .
But the fact that he owns Facebook and is making advertising money off the public exhibition of those photos could open him up to some juicy liability should anyone in those photos wish to pursue it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, that's illegal too.
To publish an identifiable photo of a person, one typically needs a model release [wikipedia.org] from that individual.
Yes everybody does it, and most people don't care.
But the fact that he owns Facebook and is making advertising money off the public exhibition of those photos could open him up to some juicy liability should anyone in those photos wish to pursue it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582</id>
	<title>Re:What am I missing?</title>
	<author>sheriff\_p</author>
	<datestamp>1260721080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey buddy,</p><p>I have my account on the highest level of lock-down. However, if you get the URL to my profile, or you're a friend of a friend, you can still see (and I can't block this):</p><p>- My friend list, in its entirety<br>- Pages of which I'm a fan<br>- Profile photo<br>- An option to send me a friend request<br>- Some other stuff</p><p>None of which I wanted. My circumstances are somewhat special, because not everyone needs or wants this level of security, but I do, and I used to have it, and now it's gone away.</p><p>-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey buddy,I have my account on the highest level of lock-down .
However , if you get the URL to my profile , or you 're a friend of a friend , you can still see ( and I ca n't block this ) : - My friend list , in its entirety- Pages of which I 'm a fan- Profile photo- An option to send me a friend request- Some other stuffNone of which I wanted .
My circumstances are somewhat special , because not everyone needs or wants this level of security , but I do , and I used to have it , and now it 's gone away.-P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey buddy,I have my account on the highest level of lock-down.
However, if you get the URL to my profile, or you're a friend of a friend, you can still see (and I can't block this):- My friend list, in its entirety- Pages of which I'm a fan- Profile photo- An option to send me a friend request- Some other stuffNone of which I wanted.
My circumstances are somewhat special, because not everyone needs or wants this level of security, but I do, and I used to have it, and now it's gone away.-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30456060</id>
	<title>Re:What am I missing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259672700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Life is hard when you're a celebrity, constantly hounded by the media and crazed fans, isn't it? Or perhaps you just need to get over yourself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Life is hard when you 're a celebrity , constantly hounded by the media and crazed fans , is n't it ?
Or perhaps you just need to get over yourself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life is hard when you're a celebrity, constantly hounded by the media and crazed fans, isn't it?
Or perhaps you just need to get over yourself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425656</id>
	<title>what an idiot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260703140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This self-serving policy change is certainly a strong warning for everyone to avoid facebook and others. Having such a stupid CEO should be the coup de grace for facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This self-serving policy change is certainly a strong warning for everyone to avoid facebook and others .
Having such a stupid CEO should be the coup de grace for facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This self-serving policy change is certainly a strong warning for everyone to avoid facebook and others.
Having such a stupid CEO should be the coup de grace for facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429046</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1260784860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just <b>my</b> private pictures I'm concerned about.</p><p>10 years ago the most anyone could do with an embarrassing photo of me was to show it to my friends.  Today they can show it to the entire world and because of Facebook's tagging system, the entire world can find it very easily indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just my private pictures I 'm concerned about.10 years ago the most anyone could do with an embarrassing photo of me was to show it to my friends .
Today they can show it to the entire world and because of Facebook 's tagging system , the entire world can find it very easily indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just my private pictures I'm concerned about.10 years ago the most anyone could do with an embarrassing photo of me was to show it to my friends.
Today they can show it to the entire world and because of Facebook's tagging system, the entire world can find it very easily indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429426</id>
	<title>Re:he meant to do it, then had the pictures remove</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1260791340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's been no major hack and subsequent large data leak AFAIK, but Facebook has had countless vulnerabilities, one of which has gone unfixed that allows you to grab someone's private photos, messages and other private information that I discovered and reported over 2 years ago.</p><p>I gather many other people who have discovered and reported vulnerabilities have seen a similar story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's been no major hack and subsequent large data leak AFAIK , but Facebook has had countless vulnerabilities , one of which has gone unfixed that allows you to grab someone 's private photos , messages and other private information that I discovered and reported over 2 years ago.I gather many other people who have discovered and reported vulnerabilities have seen a similar story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's been no major hack and subsequent large data leak AFAIK, but Facebook has had countless vulnerabilities, one of which has gone unfixed that allows you to grab someone's private photos, messages and other private information that I discovered and reported over 2 years ago.I gather many other people who have discovered and reported vulnerabilities have seen a similar story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30460282</id>
	<title>More and more</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More and more it seems like this guy fell ass backward into money and nothing more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More and more it seems like this guy fell ass backward into money and nothing more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More and more it seems like this guy fell ass backward into money and nothing more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427526</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1260720360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you tell us what settings you chose? I'm still messing with mine and don't have a complete idea what is exposed and what isn't. Having some idea of what people who have spent a lot of time thinking about this are doing might help. For some of the options it isn't even well explained what exactly the settings do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you tell us what settings you chose ?
I 'm still messing with mine and do n't have a complete idea what is exposed and what is n't .
Having some idea of what people who have spent a lot of time thinking about this are doing might help .
For some of the options it is n't even well explained what exactly the settings do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you tell us what settings you chose?
I'm still messing with mine and don't have a complete idea what is exposed and what isn't.
Having some idea of what people who have spent a lot of time thinking about this are doing might help.
For some of the options it isn't even well explained what exactly the settings do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646</id>
	<title>DID NOT WANT</title>
	<author>phantomcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1260703080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note to self: think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to self : think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to self: think before clicking links to private pictures of nerd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434066</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1260820800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because you want to share those photos with a friend, but not with random strangers?</p><p>Why don't you publish all your personal E-mails and chats to the web as well while you're at it?  Those are done online too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because you want to share those photos with a friend , but not with random strangers ? Why do n't you publish all your personal E-mails and chats to the web as well while you 're at it ?
Those are done online too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because you want to share those photos with a friend, but not with random strangers?Why don't you publish all your personal E-mails and chats to the web as well while you're at it?
Those are done online too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427894</id>
	<title>The old facebook was better...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260724500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He totally deserved it.  He should take it as a message to STOP FUCKING WITH FACEBOOK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He totally deserved it .
He should take it as a message to STOP FUCKING WITH FACEBOOK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He totally deserved it.
He should take it as a message to STOP FUCKING WITH FACEBOOK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429920</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>DarkOx</author>
	<datestamp>1260798720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you really wanted to share stuff in a "controlled" way you would set up a web or ftp server and only give your friends an family the password.  Facebook privacy setings are security like putting the house key under the doormat is security.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you really wanted to share stuff in a " controlled " way you would set up a web or ftp server and only give your friends an family the password .
Facebook privacy setings are security like putting the house key under the doormat is security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you really wanted to share stuff in a "controlled" way you would set up a web or ftp server and only give your friends an family the password.
Facebook privacy setings are security like putting the house key under the doormat is security.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30437580</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1260795240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>She has four words in her name.  What do <b>you</b> think?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>She has four words in her name .
What do you think ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She has four words in her name.
What do you think?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425762</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>cameigons</author>
	<datestamp>1260704100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's weird, I've read on the news that it was almost 300 pictures.. but I only see a couple dozens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's weird , I 've read on the news that it was almost 300 pictures.. but I only see a couple dozens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's weird, I've read on the news that it was almost 300 pictures.. but I only see a couple dozens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425434</id>
	<title>Eating your own dog food...</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1260701400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>takes on another outfit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>takes on another outfit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>takes on another outfit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425776</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1260704220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Ah... but you see..  I can see 200 friends in your profile, that might not all have their privacy settings turned up that high.
</p><p>
I just have to find one of them to have a little discrete innocent chat with  "Hey, do you know such and such.. bla bla.. bla bla..."
</p><p>
People are almost always a weaker link than technology.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah... but you see.. I can see 200 friends in your profile , that might not all have their privacy settings turned up that high .
I just have to find one of them to have a little discrete innocent chat with " Hey , do you know such and such.. bla bla.. bla bla... " People are almost always a weaker link than technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ah... but you see..  I can see 200 friends in your profile, that might not all have their privacy settings turned up that high.
I just have to find one of them to have a little discrete innocent chat with  "Hey, do you know such and such.. bla bla.. bla bla..."

People are almost always a weaker link than technology.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429192</id>
	<title>Re:DID NOT WANT</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1260787380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No problem, just click the "Unlike" link.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No problem , just click the " Unlike " link .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problem, just click the "Unlike" link.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429042</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260784800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't even have to have a facebook account for pictures of you to be uploaded. They can still tag the pictures with your name.<br><br>It may not be obvious to you, but some people have friends (and enemies?), and some people do leave their mom's basement from time to time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't even have to have a facebook account for pictures of you to be uploaded .
They can still tag the pictures with your name.It may not be obvious to you , but some people have friends ( and enemies ?
) , and some people do leave their mom 's basement from time to time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't even have to have a facebook account for pictures of you to be uploaded.
They can still tag the pictures with your name.It may not be obvious to you, but some people have friends (and enemies?
), and some people do leave their mom's basement from time to time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426190</id>
	<title>Gaming our privacy controls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260707700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tend to think that Facebook is just gaming our privacy controls.<br>Once in a while they make an attempt to "enact new security provisions"... forcing users to, once again, update their security settings.</p><p>Eventually there will be enough dumb/careless users out there who can't and won't get it right, opening more users to the likes of advertisers and whatever else Facebook want our information for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tend to think that Facebook is just gaming our privacy controls.Once in a while they make an attempt to " enact new security provisions " ... forcing users to , once again , update their security settings.Eventually there will be enough dumb/careless users out there who ca n't and wo n't get it right , opening more users to the likes of advertisers and whatever else Facebook want our information for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tend to think that Facebook is just gaming our privacy controls.Once in a while they make an attempt to "enact new security provisions"... forcing users to, once again, update their security settings.Eventually there will be enough dumb/careless users out there who can't and won't get it right, opening more users to the likes of advertisers and whatever else Facebook want our information for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888</id>
	<title>Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260705360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any system which defaults to "share everything" is a fail. You should never have to opt-out, only opt-in, to release data. Otherwise it's way too easy to screw up and show something private to everyone (as in this example).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any system which defaults to " share everything " is a fail .
You should never have to opt-out , only opt-in , to release data .
Otherwise it 's way too easy to screw up and show something private to everyone ( as in this example ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any system which defaults to "share everything" is a fail.
You should never have to opt-out, only opt-in, to release data.
Otherwise it's way too easy to screw up and show something private to everyone (as in this example).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425532</id>
	<title>If you're worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260702120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont put your shit in there, and, Fuck Facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont put your shit in there , and , Fuck Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont put your shit in there, and, Fuck Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427602</id>
	<title>Re:Ok so where are the pictures?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260721320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll sign up for facebook because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the founder likes asian pussy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll sign up for facebook because ... the founder likes asian pussy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll sign up for facebook because ... the founder likes asian pussy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425668</id>
	<title>Re:Karma.</title>
	<author>blackraven14250</author>
	<datestamp>1260703200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, they could turn this into awesome PR. "The founder of Facebook agrees with our new privacy controls, and really doesn't mind, so the new controls must be awesome!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , they could turn this into awesome PR .
" The founder of Facebook agrees with our new privacy controls , and really does n't mind , so the new controls must be awesome !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, they could turn this into awesome PR.
"The founder of Facebook agrees with our new privacy controls, and really doesn't mind, so the new controls must be awesome!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425830</id>
	<title>my facebook status this past thursday reads</title>
	<author>weirdcrashingnoises</author>
	<datestamp>1260704820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[name] dislikes facebook's new privacy alert that by default would have made my facebook LESS secure... *rolleyes*</p></div><p>Today's status update is a link to this article with my comment "Oh, the irony!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ name ] dislikes facebook 's new privacy alert that by default would have made my facebook LESS secure... * rolleyes * Today 's status update is a link to this article with my comment " Oh , the irony !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[name] dislikes facebook's new privacy alert that by default would have made my facebook LESS secure... *rolleyes*Today's status update is a link to this article with my comment "Oh, the irony!
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433628</id>
	<title>Re:What am I missing?</title>
	<author>madpansy</author>
	<datestamp>1260818640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It still doesn't let you hide your geek friends from your normal ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It still does n't let you hide your geek friends from your normal ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It still doesn't let you hide your geek friends from your normal ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429368</id>
	<title>Re:I'll never use Facebook</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1260790320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference is, contrary to a government database I can decide to instead give them a digital 4 instead of my data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is , contrary to a government database I can decide to instead give them a digital 4 instead of my data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is, contrary to a government database I can decide to instead give them a digital 4 instead of my data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425820</id>
	<title>Re:he meant to do it, then had the pictures remove</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1260704700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Banks won't admit to it, when they have a breach.  I doubt Facebook will.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Banks wo n't admit to it , when they have a breach .
I doubt Facebook will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Banks won't admit to it, when they have a breach.
I doubt Facebook will.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425948</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260705840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are full of shit and he is full of shit.<br>Here is the link of ALL the pictures "he meant to show" but all of a sudden are not there?</p><p>http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12#with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1</p><p>So now the question is this - how much you got paid to write that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are full of shit and he is full of shit.Here is the link of ALL the pictures " he meant to show " but all of a sudden are not there ? http : //www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12 # with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1So now the question is this - how much you got paid to write that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are full of shit and he is full of shit.Here is the link of ALL the pictures "he meant to show" but all of a sudden are not there?http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerbergs-private-photos-2009-12#with-girlfriend-priscilla-chan-from-her-album-moments-have-you-seen-a-sweeter-thing-today-probably-not-1So now the question is this - how much you got paid to write that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425760</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260704040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For these wondering his personal profile page is http://www.facebook.com/zuck</p><p>Also either Facebook is glitching (It's been doing that a lot lately), or there is no option to add him as a friend,<br>and his friends list is hidden, even though that is no longer allowed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For these wondering his personal profile page is http : //www.facebook.com/zuckAlso either Facebook is glitching ( It 's been doing that a lot lately ) , or there is no option to add him as a friend,and his friends list is hidden , even though that is no longer allowed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For these wondering his personal profile page is http://www.facebook.com/zuckAlso either Facebook is glitching (It's been doing that a lot lately), or there is no option to add him as a friend,and his friends list is hidden, even though that is no longer allowed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358</id>
	<title>Karma.</title>
	<author>SilverHatHacker</author>
	<datestamp>1260700920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a b****.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a b * * * * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a b****.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425738</id>
	<title>Douche?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260703800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What kind of self-absorbed douchebag has 300 photos of himself on his profile?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of self-absorbed douchebag has 300 photos of himself on his profile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of self-absorbed douchebag has 300 photos of himself on his profile?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425896</id>
	<title>Re:Um, he did it ON PURPOSE</title>
	<author>six11</author>
	<datestamp>1260705360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regardless of if he did it on purpose, those pictures tell me that he is basically a regular dude, or at least plays one on the Intertron. I don't find any of those pictures even remotely embarrassing or controversial. Not that I'm supporting the recent privacy policy changes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regardless of if he did it on purpose , those pictures tell me that he is basically a regular dude , or at least plays one on the Intertron .
I do n't find any of those pictures even remotely embarrassing or controversial .
Not that I 'm supporting the recent privacy policy changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regardless of if he did it on purpose, those pictures tell me that he is basically a regular dude, or at least plays one on the Intertron.
I don't find any of those pictures even remotely embarrassing or controversial.
Not that I'm supporting the recent privacy policy changes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425974</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260706020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>You are not all that public.....<br><br>I see this when I use the link you gave:<br><br>Sign up for Facebook to connect with Lisa K LaForest Schreiner.<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are not all that public.....I see this when I use the link you gave : Sign up for Facebook to connect with Lisa K LaForest Schreiner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are not all that public.....I see this when I use the link you gave:Sign up for Facebook to connect with Lisa K LaForest Schreiner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426384</id>
	<title>Re:too funny</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1260709920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am seeing that most of slashdot is now on facebook, which is totally sad. I can't reply to everyone, so I had to pick someone, and that was you, congratulations!. Here it goes:</p><p>You use Facebook? What a faggot.</p><p>There, I feel much better now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am seeing that most of slashdot is now on facebook , which is totally sad .
I ca n't reply to everyone , so I had to pick someone , and that was you , congratulations ! .
Here it goes : You use Facebook ?
What a faggot.There , I feel much better now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am seeing that most of slashdot is now on facebook, which is totally sad.
I can't reply to everyone, so I had to pick someone, and that was you, congratulations!.
Here it goes:You use Facebook?
What a faggot.There, I feel much better now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427600</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>prograde</author>
	<datestamp>1260721320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You opt-in when you sign up for an account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You opt-in when you sign up for an account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You opt-in when you sign up for an account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425806</id>
	<title>Re:Karma.</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1260704520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My guess is it's fake.</p><p>They either had the choice of (A) cleaning up his profile and "accidentily" making it public or (B) setting his profile private by default thereby admitting it's a bad idea to make profiles public by default.</p><p>Obviously there's choice (C) of making profiles private by default, but the marketing people probably didn't like people having privacy.</p><p>The lesson is simple; never trust any company to keep your stuff private.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess is it 's fake.They either had the choice of ( A ) cleaning up his profile and " accidentily " making it public or ( B ) setting his profile private by default thereby admitting it 's a bad idea to make profiles public by default.Obviously there 's choice ( C ) of making profiles private by default , but the marketing people probably did n't like people having privacy.The lesson is simple ; never trust any company to keep your stuff private .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess is it's fake.They either had the choice of (A) cleaning up his profile and "accidentily" making it public or (B) setting his profile private by default thereby admitting it's a bad idea to make profiles public by default.Obviously there's choice (C) of making profiles private by default, but the marketing people probably didn't like people having privacy.The lesson is simple; never trust any company to keep your stuff private.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427950</id>
	<title>Re:Poor choice of defaults</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1260725040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have pics of my family online because we have a large extended family and it's easier to share this way, but I certainly don't want every pervert in the world to be able to see them. I use a private site to accomplish this, but I could easily see how others -- who may not be technically inclined to get their own hosting plan and learn how to set this up themselves -- might use private FaceBook (or other pages) to do the same thing.<br> <br> There are different levels of privacy -- for instance I'm fine with sharing some documents and pics with my entire extended family (kids' wish lists, family pics). There are some documents that only my immediate family should be able to see (passwords, etc in case something happens to me). There are other documents that only my employer should be able to see (because of NDA's and all that, some documents should not be viewed by my family). And then you have things such as browsing history / bookmarks that I consider very private not because there's anything bad about them but because I consider myself fairly private in most regards and that's just nobody's business.<br> <br>All this could explain why I may have a "faked" FaceBook account with false info, but that's only because I wanted to look someone up and apparently you have to be a member to do that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have pics of my family online because we have a large extended family and it 's easier to share this way , but I certainly do n't want every pervert in the world to be able to see them .
I use a private site to accomplish this , but I could easily see how others -- who may not be technically inclined to get their own hosting plan and learn how to set this up themselves -- might use private FaceBook ( or other pages ) to do the same thing .
There are different levels of privacy -- for instance I 'm fine with sharing some documents and pics with my entire extended family ( kids ' wish lists , family pics ) .
There are some documents that only my immediate family should be able to see ( passwords , etc in case something happens to me ) .
There are other documents that only my employer should be able to see ( because of NDA 's and all that , some documents should not be viewed by my family ) .
And then you have things such as browsing history / bookmarks that I consider very private not because there 's anything bad about them but because I consider myself fairly private in most regards and that 's just nobody 's business .
All this could explain why I may have a " faked " FaceBook account with false info , but that 's only because I wanted to look someone up and apparently you have to be a member to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have pics of my family online because we have a large extended family and it's easier to share this way, but I certainly don't want every pervert in the world to be able to see them.
I use a private site to accomplish this, but I could easily see how others -- who may not be technically inclined to get their own hosting plan and learn how to set this up themselves -- might use private FaceBook (or other pages) to do the same thing.
There are different levels of privacy -- for instance I'm fine with sharing some documents and pics with my entire extended family (kids' wish lists, family pics).
There are some documents that only my immediate family should be able to see (passwords, etc in case something happens to me).
There are other documents that only my employer should be able to see (because of NDA's and all that, some documents should not be viewed by my family).
And then you have things such as browsing history / bookmarks that I consider very private not because there's anything bad about them but because I consider myself fairly private in most regards and that's just nobody's business.
All this could explain why I may have a "faked" FaceBook account with false info, but that's only because I wanted to look someone up and apparently you have to be a member to do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428280</id>
	<title>Click</title>
	<author>OverflowingBitBucket</author>
	<datestamp>1260729360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OverflowingBitBucket likes this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OverflowingBitBucket likes this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OverflowingBitBucket likes this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392</id>
	<title>too funny</title>
	<author>pertelote</author>
	<datestamp>1260701100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have spent the best part of the week trying to adjust my facebook profile to some level of discreteness that I am comfortable with. Have been very unhappy with the "all or nothing" choices, and have started just simply deleting content. I feel a little better, because now I am sure the settings will get some fine-tuning.</p><p>Just for fun:<br><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pertelote" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/pertelote</a> [facebook.com]</p><p>And this is after I have locked down as much as I can without insulting my family and classmates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have spent the best part of the week trying to adjust my facebook profile to some level of discreteness that I am comfortable with .
Have been very unhappy with the " all or nothing " choices , and have started just simply deleting content .
I feel a little better , because now I am sure the settings will get some fine-tuning.Just for fun : http : //www.facebook.com/pertelote [ facebook.com ] And this is after I have locked down as much as I can without insulting my family and classmates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have spent the best part of the week trying to adjust my facebook profile to some level of discreteness that I am comfortable with.
Have been very unhappy with the "all or nothing" choices, and have started just simply deleting content.
I feel a little better, because now I am sure the settings will get some fine-tuning.Just for fun:http://www.facebook.com/pertelote [facebook.com]And this is after I have locked down as much as I can without insulting my family and classmates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433542</id>
	<title>Re:he meant to do it, then had the pictures remove</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1260818280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Kind of scary with an ego that he can't admit to a mistake that small.</p></div><p>Considering how much press this generates, it's not exactly a small mistake.  This is akin to that guy who used to promote his identify theft prevention business by putting his social security number in his ads, and then eventually getting one or more loans taken out in his name.  When much of Mark's business is involved with privacy, he certainly wants to do everything possible to make it appear that the privacy policy that his company sets also works for him, but apparently it doesn't.  That's not something he wants to admit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of scary with an ego that he ca n't admit to a mistake that small.Considering how much press this generates , it 's not exactly a small mistake .
This is akin to that guy who used to promote his identify theft prevention business by putting his social security number in his ads , and then eventually getting one or more loans taken out in his name .
When much of Mark 's business is involved with privacy , he certainly wants to do everything possible to make it appear that the privacy policy that his company sets also works for him , but apparently it does n't .
That 's not something he wants to admit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of scary with an ego that he can't admit to a mistake that small.Considering how much press this generates, it's not exactly a small mistake.
This is akin to that guy who used to promote his identify theft prevention business by putting his social security number in his ads, and then eventually getting one or more loans taken out in his name.
When much of Mark's business is involved with privacy, he certainly wants to do everything possible to make it appear that the privacy policy that his company sets also works for him, but apparently it doesn't.
That's not something he wants to admit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30437580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30435838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30464702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30456060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_2028219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427362
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429920
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428236
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30434066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30435838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30437580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428194
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30456060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30464702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30433542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30429426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30425758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30428380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30427602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_2028219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_2028219.30426762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
