<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_13_0034219</id>
	<title>Google Releases Experimental Phone To Employees</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260732060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>alphadogg, as is his wont, sends in a Network World piece on the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/121209-google-releases-experimental-phone-to.html">resurgent rumors of a Google Phone.</a> <i>"Google has handed out a new mobile phone running its Android software to some employees, stirring another wave of speculation that the oft-rumored Google Phone is real. In a blog post on Saturday morning, Google said the phones are <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2009/12/android-dogfood-diet-for-holidays.html">being distributed so that workers can experiment with new mobile features</a>. It did not say the device will be a Google-branded phone. Since even before Google unveiled Android, onlookers have wondered whether the search giant will release its own phone. Instead, it released an open source operating system that other hardware vendors can use to make phones."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>alphadogg , as is his wont , sends in a Network World piece on the resurgent rumors of a Google Phone .
" Google has handed out a new mobile phone running its Android software to some employees , stirring another wave of speculation that the oft-rumored Google Phone is real .
In a blog post on Saturday morning , Google said the phones are being distributed so that workers can experiment with new mobile features .
It did not say the device will be a Google-branded phone .
Since even before Google unveiled Android , onlookers have wondered whether the search giant will release its own phone .
Instead , it released an open source operating system that other hardware vendors can use to make phones .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alphadogg, as is his wont, sends in a Network World piece on the resurgent rumors of a Google Phone.
"Google has handed out a new mobile phone running its Android software to some employees, stirring another wave of speculation that the oft-rumored Google Phone is real.
In a blog post on Saturday morning, Google said the phones are being distributed so that workers can experiment with new mobile features.
It did not say the device will be a Google-branded phone.
Since even before Google unveiled Android, onlookers have wondered whether the search giant will release its own phone.
Instead, it released an open source operating system that other hardware vendors can use to make phones.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421612</id>
	<title>Google Habits.</title>
	<author>ScottySniper</author>
	<datestamp>1260704040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait for a new Google Phone to be honest. I love my HTC Magic and Android phones in general, but knowing Google, this'll be a free beta!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for a new Google Phone to be honest .
I love my HTC Magic and Android phones in general , but knowing Google , this 'll be a free beta !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for a new Google Phone to be honest.
I love my HTC Magic and Android phones in general, but knowing Google, this'll be a free beta!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421164</id>
	<title>Re:google dialing</title>
	<author>j0hnyquest</author>
	<datestamp>1260695880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>maybe it will have something like safari's "private browsing" so you can still call your phone sex line without anyone knowing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe it will have something like safari 's " private browsing " so you can still call your phone sex line without anyone knowing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe it will have something like safari's "private browsing" so you can still call your phone sex line without anyone knowing...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120</id>
	<title>What's the benefit for Google to have a device?</title>
	<author>aplusjimages</author>
	<datestamp>1260714240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see any benefit for Google to get into the device market. They seem to be doing great staying in the software/advertisement market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see any benefit for Google to get into the device market .
They seem to be doing great staying in the software/advertisement market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see any benefit for Google to get into the device market.
They seem to be doing great staying in the software/advertisement market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428776</id>
	<title>Sounds Familiar</title>
	<author>jkonrad</author>
	<datestamp>1260824040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't want to make a phone, just an OS (for other companies to put on their phones).</p><p>Go back a few months...</p><p>They don't want to make an OS, just a browser (to run on other OSes).</p><p>See a pattern?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't want to make a phone , just an OS ( for other companies to put on their phones ) .Go back a few months...They do n't want to make an OS , just a browser ( to run on other OSes ) .See a pattern ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't want to make a phone, just an OS (for other companies to put on their phones).Go back a few months...They don't want to make an OS, just a browser (to run on other OSes).See a pattern?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</id>
	<title>How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Daetrin</author>
	<datestamp>1260736020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there anywhere enough details available to say if whatever this thing is will be better than the Droid? (At least the impression i've gotten without doing a great deal of research is that the Droid is the best Android phone out so far.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there anywhere enough details available to say if whatever this thing is will be better than the Droid ?
( At least the impression i 've gotten without doing a great deal of research is that the Droid is the best Android phone out so far .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there anywhere enough details available to say if whatever this thing is will be better than the Droid?
(At least the impression i've gotten without doing a great deal of research is that the Droid is the best Android phone out so far.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421560</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260703140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is a software feature. There's no need to build your own device for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a software feature .
There 's no need to build your own device for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a software feature.
There's no need to build your own device for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421056</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260737520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it appears to be the HTC passion. The twitter hype of this thing is extraordinary, it's like viral advertising only done right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it appears to be the HTC passion .
The twitter hype of this thing is extraordinary , it 's like viral advertising only done right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it appears to be the HTC passion.
The twitter hype of this thing is extraordinary, it's like viral advertising only done right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424480</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ says it's real</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260737460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually this is system inherent, the main issue simply is multitasking, the phone terminates on a LRU algorithm the programs once the ram runs out, so if you do a lot on the phone some task might drag you the processor cycles away or the phone stops for a second to kill another app and reclaim the ram. Also if you switch the keyboard direction it can happen that the phone has to load the keyboard app for the proper keyboard because the app was terminated.</p><p>I can see that pretty well on my phone, first it is blazingly fast but after a while it loses around 30\% of its performance due to the multitasking, killing all apps again restores the performance to a level similar to the iPhone (I have an HTC Hero btw. way slower than the Droid)</p><p>I used to kill the apps constantly a while ago, but now I dont even bother anymore, because the phone stays usable and it is way faster than the WinCE phone I had before! You get used to the occasional hickups!</p><p>But the OS definitely has a load of potential for performance improvement, starting with the Dog slow Dalvik VM which thankfully does not show that much thanks to native C code being accessed left and right on classlib level and ending with the way the user has to deal with background processes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually this is system inherent , the main issue simply is multitasking , the phone terminates on a LRU algorithm the programs once the ram runs out , so if you do a lot on the phone some task might drag you the processor cycles away or the phone stops for a second to kill another app and reclaim the ram .
Also if you switch the keyboard direction it can happen that the phone has to load the keyboard app for the proper keyboard because the app was terminated.I can see that pretty well on my phone , first it is blazingly fast but after a while it loses around 30 \ % of its performance due to the multitasking , killing all apps again restores the performance to a level similar to the iPhone ( I have an HTC Hero btw .
way slower than the Droid ) I used to kill the apps constantly a while ago , but now I dont even bother anymore , because the phone stays usable and it is way faster than the WinCE phone I had before !
You get used to the occasional hickups ! But the OS definitely has a load of potential for performance improvement , starting with the Dog slow Dalvik VM which thankfully does not show that much thanks to native C code being accessed left and right on classlib level and ending with the way the user has to deal with background processes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually this is system inherent, the main issue simply is multitasking, the phone terminates on a LRU algorithm the programs once the ram runs out, so if you do a lot on the phone some task might drag you the processor cycles away or the phone stops for a second to kill another app and reclaim the ram.
Also if you switch the keyboard direction it can happen that the phone has to load the keyboard app for the proper keyboard because the app was terminated.I can see that pretty well on my phone, first it is blazingly fast but after a while it loses around 30\% of its performance due to the multitasking, killing all apps again restores the performance to a level similar to the iPhone (I have an HTC Hero btw.
way slower than the Droid)I used to kill the apps constantly a while ago, but now I dont even bother anymore, because the phone stays usable and it is way faster than the WinCE phone I had before!
You get used to the occasional hickups!But the OS definitely has a load of potential for performance improvement, starting with the Dog slow Dalvik VM which thankfully does not show that much thanks to native C code being accessed left and right on classlib level and ending with the way the user has to deal with background processes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30425006</id>
	<title>It's real</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260698340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ran into an old friend that works for Google yesterday and he showed me his phone.  He says it has a 1 GHz processor, 5 MP camera, led flash, OLED screen, and is running Android 2.1.  It does not have a built in keyboard, but he showed me that he could write an email by just talking to the phone.  On the front it says "HTC", and on the back it says "Google".  He didn't say who the service provider was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran into an old friend that works for Google yesterday and he showed me his phone .
He says it has a 1 GHz processor , 5 MP camera , led flash , OLED screen , and is running Android 2.1 .
It does not have a built in keyboard , but he showed me that he could write an email by just talking to the phone .
On the front it says " HTC " , and on the back it says " Google " .
He did n't say who the service provider was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran into an old friend that works for Google yesterday and he showed me his phone.
He says it has a 1 GHz processor, 5 MP camera, led flash, OLED screen, and is running Android 2.1.
It does not have a built in keyboard, but he showed me that he could write an email by just talking to the phone.
On the front it says "HTC", and on the back it says "Google".
He didn't say who the service provider was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424512</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260737760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I have a Hero but it lacks the speed of the iPhone this is multitasking inherent, and that some parts of the OS and the drivers are not optimized, heck even the 3d graphics are not that well optimized yet, the phone could do more from its hardware, there are rumours that HTC simply was to stingy to pay for the optimized qualcom 3d drivers, whether it is true or not I do not know, the qualcom test reveals around 30 fps.</p><p>But it is way better than an iPhone for its openness.</p><p>I just hate the head in the arse attitude HTC has regarding non Windows connectivity, they simply do not support it period. A hacked rom can run Wifi Tethering, HTCs official stance is we do not support it neither do we support OSX.</p><p>USB Tethering can be enabled out of the box, but no drivers which would make it work on OSX. There are hacks to enable it on a stock ROM, but HTCs support does not even know about the hack via OpenVPN which allows to do it.</p><p>The phone itself is very sturdy and like most HTCs phones a real workhose, but the companies stance on non windows in their clients is simply annoying, they dont even read the mails properly once the encounter the word OSX and just do a copy paste answer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I have a Hero but it lacks the speed of the iPhone this is multitasking inherent , and that some parts of the OS and the drivers are not optimized , heck even the 3d graphics are not that well optimized yet , the phone could do more from its hardware , there are rumours that HTC simply was to stingy to pay for the optimized qualcom 3d drivers , whether it is true or not I do not know , the qualcom test reveals around 30 fps.But it is way better than an iPhone for its openness.I just hate the head in the arse attitude HTC has regarding non Windows connectivity , they simply do not support it period .
A hacked rom can run Wifi Tethering , HTCs official stance is we do not support it neither do we support OSX.USB Tethering can be enabled out of the box , but no drivers which would make it work on OSX .
There are hacks to enable it on a stock ROM , but HTCs support does not even know about the hack via OpenVPN which allows to do it.The phone itself is very sturdy and like most HTCs phones a real workhose , but the companies stance on non windows in their clients is simply annoying , they dont even read the mails properly once the encounter the word OSX and just do a copy paste answer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I have a Hero but it lacks the speed of the iPhone this is multitasking inherent, and that some parts of the OS and the drivers are not optimized, heck even the 3d graphics are not that well optimized yet, the phone could do more from its hardware, there are rumours that HTC simply was to stingy to pay for the optimized qualcom 3d drivers, whether it is true or not I do not know, the qualcom test reveals around 30 fps.But it is way better than an iPhone for its openness.I just hate the head in the arse attitude HTC has regarding non Windows connectivity, they simply do not support it period.
A hacked rom can run Wifi Tethering, HTCs official stance is we do not support it neither do we support OSX.USB Tethering can be enabled out of the box, but no drivers which would make it work on OSX.
There are hacks to enable it on a stock ROM, but HTCs support does not even know about the hack via OpenVPN which allows to do it.The phone itself is very sturdy and like most HTCs phones a real workhose, but the companies stance on non windows in their clients is simply annoying, they dont even read the mails properly once the encounter the word OSX and just do a copy paste answer!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421498</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Full bias disclosure: I own a Droid and love it.  Plan to marry it.  Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though.</p></div><p>Sorry for being AC, but would you still care to explain? I'm sincerely interested. What's so good about droid? I had a droid phone at work (had to code some apps for it) and absolutely hated the damn thing:</p><p>
&nbsp; - tiny screen (resolution)<br>
&nbsp; - web pages take ages (=long enough to be frustrating) to load<br>
&nbsp; - locked down OS</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Full bias disclosure : I own a Droid and love it .
Plan to marry it .
Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though.Sorry for being AC , but would you still care to explain ?
I 'm sincerely interested .
What 's so good about droid ?
I had a droid phone at work ( had to code some apps for it ) and absolutely hated the damn thing :   - tiny screen ( resolution )   - web pages take ages ( = long enough to be frustrating ) to load   - locked down OS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Full bias disclosure: I own a Droid and love it.
Plan to marry it.
Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though.Sorry for being AC, but would you still care to explain?
I'm sincerely interested.
What's so good about droid?
I had a droid phone at work (had to code some apps for it) and absolutely hated the damn thing:
  - tiny screen (resolution)
  - web pages take ages (=long enough to be frustrating) to load
  - locked down OS
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422530</id>
	<title>they have this thing</title>
	<author>zogger</author>
	<datestamp>1260719340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Subcontracted, but a hardware device with their branding on it</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google\_Appliance" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google\_Appliance</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Subcontracted , but a hardware device with their branding on ithttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google \ _Appliance [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Subcontracted, but a hardware device with their branding on ithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google\_Appliance [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988</id>
	<title>Dumb rumors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260736440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab, which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilities</p></div><p>I'm reading this as "some hardware manufacturer invented the big red button and we want our employees to be able to play around with what the software will do when the big red button is pressed." Or maybe they're just talking about faster processors, more memory, or some other somewhat minor upgrade. I see nothing to indicate they're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from "a partner".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab , which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilitiesI 'm reading this as " some hardware manufacturer invented the big red button and we want our employees to be able to play around with what the software will do when the big red button is pressed .
" Or maybe they 're just talking about faster processors , more memory , or some other somewhat minor upgrade .
I see nothing to indicate they 're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from " a partner " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab, which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilitiesI'm reading this as "some hardware manufacturer invented the big red button and we want our employees to be able to play around with what the software will do when the big red button is pressed.
" Or maybe they're just talking about faster processors, more memory, or some other somewhat minor upgrade.
I see nothing to indicate they're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from "a partner".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421088</id>
	<title>Way better than the droid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260737880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No keyboard, but it comes with a general purpose cutting blade, corkscrew, philips and standard screwdriver blades, as well as ultrasonic toothbrush, and still slimmer than the droid.</p><p>Also has new experimental plasma generated focused nadion particle emitter.  At the risk of battery life, it should be useful for self-defense, or even for heating up cans of soup or rocks on cold days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No keyboard , but it comes with a general purpose cutting blade , corkscrew , philips and standard screwdriver blades , as well as ultrasonic toothbrush , and still slimmer than the droid.Also has new experimental plasma generated focused nadion particle emitter .
At the risk of battery life , it should be useful for self-defense , or even for heating up cans of soup or rocks on cold days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No keyboard, but it comes with a general purpose cutting blade, corkscrew, philips and standard screwdriver blades, as well as ultrasonic toothbrush, and still slimmer than the droid.Also has new experimental plasma generated focused nadion particle emitter.
At the risk of battery life, it should be useful for self-defense, or even for heating up cans of soup or rocks on cold days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260704100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google will not release their own phone. Here's why:</p><p>Google likes to dominate the software spectrum. If they release their own phone, then companies will look a bit suspicious at their "you can use our OS too!, fro free!"</p><p>In the end that will result in less Android phones and thus less people that use Google products and less people to click on their adds, which is their main source of imcome anyway.</p><p>The best Android phone I've seen so far is the HTC Hero. It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect. Except for the fact that it doesn't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google will not release their own phone .
Here 's why : Google likes to dominate the software spectrum .
If they release their own phone , then companies will look a bit suspicious at their " you can use our OS too ! , fro free !
" In the end that will result in less Android phones and thus less people that use Google products and less people to click on their adds , which is their main source of imcome anyway.The best Android phone I 've seen so far is the HTC Hero .
It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect .
Except for the fact that it does n't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google will not release their own phone.
Here's why:Google likes to dominate the software spectrum.
If they release their own phone, then companies will look a bit suspicious at their "you can use our OS too!, fro free!
"In the end that will result in less Android phones and thus less people that use Google products and less people to click on their adds, which is their main source of imcome anyway.The best Android phone I've seen so far is the HTC Hero.
It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect.
Except for the fact that it doesn't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30425980</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1260706080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> - tiny screen (resolution)</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola\_Droid" title="wikipedia.org">Droid</a> [wikipedia.org]: 854 x 480 (3.7 in)<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone#Screen\_and\_input" title="wikipedia.org">iPhone</a> [wikipedia.org]: 320&#215;480 (3.5 in)<br>Care to explain?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- tiny screen ( resolution ) Droid [ wikipedia.org ] : 854 x 480 ( 3.7 in ) iPhone [ wikipedia.org ] : 320   480 ( 3.5 in ) Care to explain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> - tiny screen (resolution) Droid [wikipedia.org]: 854 x 480 (3.7 in)iPhone [wikipedia.org]: 320×480 (3.5 in)Care to explain?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421680</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1260705060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processor</i></p><p>Maybe not - the screen is an AMOLED, which should use less juice than the Droid's. Dunno if it's enough to make up for more juice for the CPU, so only time will tell.</p><p>This phone seems to be the HTC Passion, the CDMA version of which (the Bravo) is rumoured for Verizon in 1Q2010, so if you don't need the crappy keyboard of the Droid, and want a faster processor, better screen, and FM radio, that would be the one to wait for (assuming the rumours are true). Flash on the Bravo is rumoured to be dual LED, btw.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processorMaybe not - the screen is an AMOLED , which should use less juice than the Droid 's .
Dunno if it 's enough to make up for more juice for the CPU , so only time will tell.This phone seems to be the HTC Passion , the CDMA version of which ( the Bravo ) is rumoured for Verizon in 1Q2010 , so if you do n't need the crappy keyboard of the Droid , and want a faster processor , better screen , and FM radio , that would be the one to wait for ( assuming the rumours are true ) .
Flash on the Bravo is rumoured to be dual LED , btw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processorMaybe not - the screen is an AMOLED, which should use less juice than the Droid's.
Dunno if it's enough to make up for more juice for the CPU, so only time will tell.This phone seems to be the HTC Passion, the CDMA version of which (the Bravo) is rumoured for Verizon in 1Q2010, so if you don't need the crappy keyboard of the Droid, and want a faster processor, better screen, and FM radio, that would be the one to wait for (assuming the rumours are true).
Flash on the Bravo is rumoured to be dual LED, btw.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422894</id>
	<title>Re:What's the benefit for Google to have a device?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260722580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uhh, iPhone? Simply put, everyone talks about 'iPhone killer this", "iPhone killer that", but in reality NO ONE has done it like Apple and the iPhone. So they're going to do that. 2 + 2 = 4. Why is it so hard for people to figure this out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uhh , iPhone ?
Simply put , everyone talks about 'iPhone killer this " , " iPhone killer that " , but in reality NO ONE has done it like Apple and the iPhone .
So they 're going to do that .
2 + 2 = 4 .
Why is it so hard for people to figure this out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uhh, iPhone?
Simply put, everyone talks about 'iPhone killer this", "iPhone killer that", but in reality NO ONE has done it like Apple and the iPhone.
So they're going to do that.
2 + 2 = 4.
Why is it so hard for people to figure this out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428854</id>
	<title>Re:lets hope the OHA survives...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260781800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Wow, if Google starts eating its own dogfood, by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business</p></div></blockquote><p>

The HW is manufactured by HTC, the OS is owned by the OHA (in a manner of speaking, as much as one can own open source, they at least have the rights to the Android(TM) trademark) and most of the SW is Google. The only difference with the Google Nexus One is that Google are handling the Marketing and Distribution.<br> <br>

Google have been dogfooding Android for a while with the ADP (an unlocked developer version of the Dream/G1) and Google Ion (an unlocked developer version of the Magic/MyTouch3G). This is just the first one Google intends to market and sell to the general public rather then just developers, so it's only a first as they've given this phone to the secretary and accountant, not just the devs.<br> <br>

Android was never in danger of being discontinued by the OHA, they have some pretty big partners who all have a stake in this including Intel, Nvidia, Samsung, HTC, LG, Google, Vodafone and T-Mobile. The OHA is just not playing the hype and rush to market game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , if Google starts eating its own dogfood , by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business The HW is manufactured by HTC , the OS is owned by the OHA ( in a manner of speaking , as much as one can own open source , they at least have the rights to the Android ( TM ) trademark ) and most of the SW is Google .
The only difference with the Google Nexus One is that Google are handling the Marketing and Distribution .
Google have been dogfooding Android for a while with the ADP ( an unlocked developer version of the Dream/G1 ) and Google Ion ( an unlocked developer version of the Magic/MyTouch3G ) .
This is just the first one Google intends to market and sell to the general public rather then just developers , so it 's only a first as they 've given this phone to the secretary and accountant , not just the devs .
Android was never in danger of being discontinued by the OHA , they have some pretty big partners who all have a stake in this including Intel , Nvidia , Samsung , HTC , LG , Google , Vodafone and T-Mobile .
The OHA is just not playing the hype and rush to market game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, if Google starts eating its own dogfood, by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business

The HW is manufactured by HTC, the OS is owned by the OHA (in a manner of speaking, as much as one can own open source, they at least have the rights to the Android(TM) trademark) and most of the SW is Google.
The only difference with the Google Nexus One is that Google are handling the Marketing and Distribution.
Google have been dogfooding Android for a while with the ADP (an unlocked developer version of the Dream/G1) and Google Ion (an unlocked developer version of the Magic/MyTouch3G).
This is just the first one Google intends to market and sell to the general public rather then just developers, so it's only a first as they've given this phone to the secretary and accountant, not just the devs.
Android was never in danger of being discontinued by the OHA, they have some pretty big partners who all have a stake in this including Intel, Nvidia, Samsung, HTC, LG, Google, Vodafone and T-Mobile.
The OHA is just not playing the hype and rush to market game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421040</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260737160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least they are testing them on employees rather then the general public.</p><p>Probably cost them a lot less in legal fees when the batteries start exploding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least they are testing them on employees rather then the general public.Probably cost them a lot less in legal fees when the batteries start exploding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least they are testing them on employees rather then the general public.Probably cost them a lot less in legal fees when the batteries start exploding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421460</id>
	<title>Re:Dumb rumors</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1260700920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I see nothing to indicate they're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from "a partner".</p></div><p>I guess I missed the 'partner' keyword on my first read. That would seem a little bit more realistic than for Google to start manufacturing themselves. It would certainly make the OHA continue to resemble more of a playground than a battlefield.</p><p>One interesting note, is that the article does not explicitly say its a phone but rather a "device". Could this finally be the next step in the evolution of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxbbjobwaR0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Qualcomm's SmartBook</a> [youtube.com]? Personally, I see it as a highly compatible platform for the <a href="http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os" title="chromium.org" rel="nofollow">Chrome OS</a> [chromium.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see nothing to indicate they 're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from " a partner " .I guess I missed the 'partner ' keyword on my first read .
That would seem a little bit more realistic than for Google to start manufacturing themselves .
It would certainly make the OHA continue to resemble more of a playground than a battlefield.One interesting note , is that the article does not explicitly say its a phone but rather a " device " .
Could this finally be the next step in the evolution of Qualcomm 's SmartBook [ youtube.com ] ?
Personally , I see it as a highly compatible platform for the Chrome OS [ chromium.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see nothing to indicate they're going to enter the phone market themselves especially since it mentions the hardware is from "a partner".I guess I missed the 'partner' keyword on my first read.
That would seem a little bit more realistic than for Google to start manufacturing themselves.
It would certainly make the OHA continue to resemble more of a playground than a battlefield.One interesting note, is that the article does not explicitly say its a phone but rather a "device".
Could this finally be the next step in the evolution of Qualcomm's SmartBook [youtube.com]?
Personally, I see it as a highly compatible platform for the Chrome OS [chromium.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421414</id>
	<title>lets hope the OHA survives...</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1260700320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, if Google starts eating its own dogfood, by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business, then I'll most certainly be eating <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1459448&amp;cid=30253618" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">my own words</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p>I honestly thought that they would be more of a nonpartisan member of the OHA, focusing entirely on the software side of things. With a handset manufacturing division, they would be directly competing with the manufacturing members of the OHA. However, with Google's superiority in software, I doubt that the competition will be able to keep up, at least in the Android universe. Other manufacturers might then just be striving to make a Google phone that measures up to the actual Google phone. Surely there would be some proprietary software components that Google would not be releasing, no?</p><p>If that were the case, wouldn't that be a motivating factor for OHA members to discontinue Android development altogether? Maybe its just me... but I would certainly hope that Google keeps their Android improvements entirely open for the OHA to remain sustainable (aside from the Google API components, of course).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , if Google starts eating its own dogfood , by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business , then I 'll most certainly be eating my own words [ slashdot.org ] .I honestly thought that they would be more of a nonpartisan member of the OHA , focusing entirely on the software side of things .
With a handset manufacturing division , they would be directly competing with the manufacturing members of the OHA .
However , with Google 's superiority in software , I doubt that the competition will be able to keep up , at least in the Android universe .
Other manufacturers might then just be striving to make a Google phone that measures up to the actual Google phone .
Surely there would be some proprietary software components that Google would not be releasing , no ? If that were the case , would n't that be a motivating factor for OHA members to discontinue Android development altogether ?
Maybe its just me... but I would certainly hope that Google keeps their Android improvements entirely open for the OHA to remain sustainable ( aside from the Google API components , of course ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, if Google starts eating its own dogfood, by taking the leap into the handset manufacturing business, then I'll most certainly be eating my own words [slashdot.org].I honestly thought that they would be more of a nonpartisan member of the OHA, focusing entirely on the software side of things.
With a handset manufacturing division, they would be directly competing with the manufacturing members of the OHA.
However, with Google's superiority in software, I doubt that the competition will be able to keep up, at least in the Android universe.
Other manufacturers might then just be striving to make a Google phone that measures up to the actual Google phone.
Surely there would be some proprietary software components that Google would not be releasing, no?If that were the case, wouldn't that be a motivating factor for OHA members to discontinue Android development altogether?
Maybe its just me... but I would certainly hope that Google keeps their Android improvements entirely open for the OHA to remain sustainable (aside from the Google API components, of course).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422598</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260719940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it probably depends on what aspect of the Droid you are talking about.  I think the most interesting thing about the Droid is its lack of non-proprietary video out connectors. The upshot is that you can't use the droid to drive your TV by putting it in a docking cradle, as you can with the iPhone.  It's a significant, but interesting limitation,and if the Google phone is like that as well that tells us something.</p><p>My theory is that the big difference between Android and the iPhone is that ultimately for Android the device is secondary -- just a terminal into the cloud. You don't need a media connector in that vision, because your TV will be connected to the cloud as well.  If the Google phone has some provision for HDMI output, that'd tell us that Google is hedging its bets.</p><p>At the current state of development, iPhone is more polished and useful.  The user interface for the Safari and the iPhone email app are more convenient.  At present my TV does not have software that work with non-proprietary Internet standards, so it's really quite helpful to be able to dock my iPod touch to my TV.  But it'd be even *more* convenient not to have to connect my mobile device at all. If my TV were something like giant Archos box, or just a display peripheral to such a device, then I wouldn't miss the media connectors.</p><p>We all know about the limitations of the "cloud" concept, but let's not forget that the idea of every device being a storage device has its limitations too.  We take it for granted that to use our *home* data, we have to become network and server admins. We accept that without question because that's the status quo, but even people who *can* be competent home network admins don't always *want* to be.  I think Apple realizes this too, which is why they push the MobileMe service.</p><p>For my personal data, I'd much rather kiss dependency on any single device goodbye and let Google be the primary manager of my data, provided that (a) I had reliable network access, (b) my devices could work when the network fails by caching the data I'm most likely to want and (c) I had some kind of backup medium that I could recover *all* my data from if I had a dispute with Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it probably depends on what aspect of the Droid you are talking about .
I think the most interesting thing about the Droid is its lack of non-proprietary video out connectors .
The upshot is that you ca n't use the droid to drive your TV by putting it in a docking cradle , as you can with the iPhone .
It 's a significant , but interesting limitation,and if the Google phone is like that as well that tells us something.My theory is that the big difference between Android and the iPhone is that ultimately for Android the device is secondary -- just a terminal into the cloud .
You do n't need a media connector in that vision , because your TV will be connected to the cloud as well .
If the Google phone has some provision for HDMI output , that 'd tell us that Google is hedging its bets.At the current state of development , iPhone is more polished and useful .
The user interface for the Safari and the iPhone email app are more convenient .
At present my TV does not have software that work with non-proprietary Internet standards , so it 's really quite helpful to be able to dock my iPod touch to my TV .
But it 'd be even * more * convenient not to have to connect my mobile device at all .
If my TV were something like giant Archos box , or just a display peripheral to such a device , then I would n't miss the media connectors.We all know about the limitations of the " cloud " concept , but let 's not forget that the idea of every device being a storage device has its limitations too .
We take it for granted that to use our * home * data , we have to become network and server admins .
We accept that without question because that 's the status quo , but even people who * can * be competent home network admins do n't always * want * to be .
I think Apple realizes this too , which is why they push the MobileMe service.For my personal data , I 'd much rather kiss dependency on any single device goodbye and let Google be the primary manager of my data , provided that ( a ) I had reliable network access , ( b ) my devices could work when the network fails by caching the data I 'm most likely to want and ( c ) I had some kind of backup medium that I could recover * all * my data from if I had a dispute with Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it probably depends on what aspect of the Droid you are talking about.
I think the most interesting thing about the Droid is its lack of non-proprietary video out connectors.
The upshot is that you can't use the droid to drive your TV by putting it in a docking cradle, as you can with the iPhone.
It's a significant, but interesting limitation,and if the Google phone is like that as well that tells us something.My theory is that the big difference between Android and the iPhone is that ultimately for Android the device is secondary -- just a terminal into the cloud.
You don't need a media connector in that vision, because your TV will be connected to the cloud as well.
If the Google phone has some provision for HDMI output, that'd tell us that Google is hedging its bets.At the current state of development, iPhone is more polished and useful.
The user interface for the Safari and the iPhone email app are more convenient.
At present my TV does not have software that work with non-proprietary Internet standards, so it's really quite helpful to be able to dock my iPod touch to my TV.
But it'd be even *more* convenient not to have to connect my mobile device at all.
If my TV were something like giant Archos box, or just a display peripheral to such a device, then I wouldn't miss the media connectors.We all know about the limitations of the "cloud" concept, but let's not forget that the idea of every device being a storage device has its limitations too.
We take it for granted that to use our *home* data, we have to become network and server admins.
We accept that without question because that's the status quo, but even people who *can* be competent home network admins don't always *want* to be.
I think Apple realizes this too, which is why they push the MobileMe service.For my personal data, I'd much rather kiss dependency on any single device goodbye and let Google be the primary manager of my data, provided that (a) I had reliable network access, (b) my devices could work when the network fails by caching the data I'm most likely to want and (c) I had some kind of backup medium that I could recover *all* my data from if I had a dispute with Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>beakerMeep</author>
	<datestamp>1260736680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd say it would be about equal to the Droid.  Here's the rumors I've heard/read:

- Processor speed will probably beat the droid,
- HTC SenseUI will be nice,
- Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processor.
- Screen should be nice an beautiful like the droid's, maybe ever more stunning.
- Haven't heard anything about an LED flash like the droid's
- No hardware keyboard
- Sounds like T-Mobile's (weird flavor of?) GSM.
- HTC Trackball v Moto'd directional pad
- No discount, so looking at $300-800 ish?


Full bias disclosure: I own a Droid and love it.  Plan to marry it.  Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say it would be about equal to the Droid .
Here 's the rumors I 've heard/read : - Processor speed will probably beat the droid , - HTC SenseUI will be nice , - Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processor .
- Screen should be nice an beautiful like the droid 's , maybe ever more stunning .
- Have n't heard anything about an LED flash like the droid 's - No hardware keyboard - Sounds like T-Mobile 's ( weird flavor of ?
) GSM .
- HTC Trackball v Moto 'd directional pad - No discount , so looking at $ 300-800 ish ?
Full bias disclosure : I own a Droid and love it .
Plan to marry it .
Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say it would be about equal to the Droid.
Here's the rumors I've heard/read:

- Processor speed will probably beat the droid,
- HTC SenseUI will be nice,
- Battery will probably be worse due to the stronger processor.
- Screen should be nice an beautiful like the droid's, maybe ever more stunning.
- Haven't heard anything about an LED flash like the droid's
- No hardware keyboard
- Sounds like T-Mobile's (weird flavor of?
) GSM.
- HTC Trackball v Moto'd directional pad
- No discount, so looking at $300-800 ish?
Full bias disclosure: I own a Droid and love it.
Plan to marry it.
Verizon has me by the balls in the prenup though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423296</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260726600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically you made up some shit so vague and general anybody could have done.<br>Better screen. Oh yeah !<br>Better processor speed. Oh yeah !<br>No keybard. Oh yeah !<br>Even if TFA is shitty, not need to respond with some deeper crap dude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically you made up some shit so vague and general anybody could have done.Better screen .
Oh yeah ! Better processor speed .
Oh yeah ! No keybard .
Oh yeah ! Even if TFA is shitty , not need to respond with some deeper crap dude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically you made up some shit so vague and general anybody could have done.Better screen.
Oh yeah !Better processor speed.
Oh yeah !No keybard.
Oh yeah !Even if TFA is shitty, not need to respond with some deeper crap dude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</id>
	<title>Any good?</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1260736200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been quite unimpressed so far with the current Android phones, so I'm very interested in what features Google would add on top of the base Android OS. I'm particularly interested in how they intend to support Exchange users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been quite unimpressed so far with the current Android phones , so I 'm very interested in what features Google would add on top of the base Android OS .
I 'm particularly interested in how they intend to support Exchange users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been quite unimpressed so far with the current Android phones, so I'm very interested in what features Google would add on top of the base Android OS.
I'm particularly interested in how they intend to support Exchange users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422550</id>
	<title>What network?</title>
	<author>teeks99</author>
	<datestamp>1260719580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't see it say if it was a CDMA or GSM phone.   Does anyone know what network Google has had its internal phones on before?  I heard they gave out some G1s, which would have been GSM...did they give out Droid phones (CDMA) internally as well?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't see it say if it was a CDMA or GSM phone .
Does anyone know what network Google has had its internal phones on before ?
I heard they gave out some G1s , which would have been GSM...did they give out Droid phones ( CDMA ) internally as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't see it say if it was a CDMA or GSM phone.
Does anyone know what network Google has had its internal phones on before?
I heard they gave out some G1s, which would have been GSM...did they give out Droid phones (CDMA) internally as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30427878</id>
	<title>Best phone yet!!!</title>
	<author>akayani</author>
	<datestamp>1260724320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is an even better phone on the horizon. Here is a video preview.<br><br>http://www.flixxy.com/sumsing-turbo-3000-cellphone.htm<br><br>
&nbsp;</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is an even better phone on the horizon .
Here is a video preview.http : //www.flixxy.com/sumsing-turbo-3000-cellphone.htm  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is an even better phone on the horizon.
Here is a video preview.http://www.flixxy.com/sumsing-turbo-3000-cellphone.htm
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421656</id>
	<title>Gizmodo has an article too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260704700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5425146/the-real-google-phone-everything-is-different-now" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5425146/the-real-google-phone-everything-is-different-now</a> [gizmodo.com]</p><p>Looks and sounds real to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gizmodo.com/5425146/the-real-google-phone-everything-is-different-now [ gizmodo.com ] Looks and sounds real to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gizmodo.com/5425146/the-real-google-phone-everything-is-different-now [gizmodo.com]Looks and sounds real to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423006</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>sucati</author>
	<datestamp>1260723840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What exactly do you mean by "weird flavor"?  Would this work on AT&amp;T?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly do you mean by " weird flavor " ?
Would this work on AT&amp;T ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly do you mean by "weird flavor"?
Would this work on AT&amp;T?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421252</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Rennt</author>
	<datestamp>1260697080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Droid has the best specs, but the materials and build quality of the handset itself is disappointing. HTC units feel much nicer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Droid has the best specs , but the materials and build quality of the handset itself is disappointing .
HTC units feel much nicer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Droid has the best specs, but the materials and build quality of the handset itself is disappointing.
HTC units feel much nicer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356</id>
	<title>Nexus One</title>
	<author>tuxliner</author>
	<datestamp>1260699000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can see a picture of this device <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/13/google-phone-makes-first-twitter-appearance" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [engadget.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can see a picture of this device here [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can see a picture of this device here [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422046</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>the ReviveR</author>
	<datestamp>1260712500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most americans seem to have quite a hard time comparing prices simply because most of the time your carriers subsidize so much of the actual price.<br> <br>

Here are some prices from one of the cheaper web stores in Finland. Please note that these have taxes included and probably the "europeans are idiots" bonus (1 dollar = 1 euro)<ul>
<li>iPhone 3GS 32GB - 528 euro (+ 12 month contract with "normal" prices)</li><li>iPhone 3G 8GB - 396 euro (+12 month contract with "normal" prices)</li><li>HTC Hero - 489.90 euro (no contract)</li><li>Motorola Milestone - 549.90 euro (no contract + 50 euro for localized keyboard)</li><li>Nokia N900 - 569.00 euro (no contract)</li><li>Samsung Galaxy i7500 - 489.90 euro( no contract)</li><li>Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Android - 749.90 euro (no contract)</li></ul><p>
Based on these it would seem that most top of the line phones actually cost around 500 - 600 euro (that is probably 500$-600$ in US) and even correlates pretty nicely with release schedule. Don't get the price on the Sony Ericsson, though it isn't actually out yet I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most americans seem to have quite a hard time comparing prices simply because most of the time your carriers subsidize so much of the actual price .
Here are some prices from one of the cheaper web stores in Finland .
Please note that these have taxes included and probably the " europeans are idiots " bonus ( 1 dollar = 1 euro ) iPhone 3GS 32GB - 528 euro ( + 12 month contract with " normal " prices ) iPhone 3G 8GB - 396 euro ( + 12 month contract with " normal " prices ) HTC Hero - 489.90 euro ( no contract ) Motorola Milestone - 549.90 euro ( no contract + 50 euro for localized keyboard ) Nokia N900 - 569.00 euro ( no contract ) Samsung Galaxy i7500 - 489.90 euro ( no contract ) Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Android - 749.90 euro ( no contract ) Based on these it would seem that most top of the line phones actually cost around 500 - 600 euro ( that is probably 500 $ -600 $ in US ) and even correlates pretty nicely with release schedule .
Do n't get the price on the Sony Ericsson , though it is n't actually out yet I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most americans seem to have quite a hard time comparing prices simply because most of the time your carriers subsidize so much of the actual price.
Here are some prices from one of the cheaper web stores in Finland.
Please note that these have taxes included and probably the "europeans are idiots" bonus (1 dollar = 1 euro)
iPhone 3GS 32GB - 528 euro (+ 12 month contract with "normal" prices)iPhone 3G 8GB - 396 euro (+12 month contract with "normal" prices)HTC Hero - 489.90 euro (no contract)Motorola Milestone - 549.90 euro (no contract + 50 euro for localized keyboard)Nokia N900 - 569.00 euro (no contract)Samsung Galaxy i7500 - 489.90 euro( no contract)Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Android - 749.90 euro (no contract)
Based on these it would seem that most top of the line phones actually cost around 500 - 600 euro (that is probably 500$-600$ in US) and even correlates pretty nicely with release schedule.
Don't get the price on the Sony Ericsson, though it isn't actually out yet I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421392</id>
	<title>Fits with Google's \_true\_ mission</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260699720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do only evil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do only evil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do only evil</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422612</id>
	<title>Re:Nexus One</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260720120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the reflection of the photographer, is he some kind of Telly Tubby? He has a white hood and giant ears!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the reflection of the photographer , is he some kind of Telly Tubby ?
He has a white hood and giant ears !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the reflection of the photographer, is he some kind of Telly Tubby?
He has a white hood and giant ears!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424448</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260737160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Main issue is the missing keyboard, I have an HTC Hero and I miss the keyboard really, while you are better off than with T9 the autocompletion does get you only that far.<br>I will use my Hero for the next year, but I am pretty sure I will get a phone with a slideout keyboard after that!<br>And yes HTC Sense is nice, but I think the biggest + simply is the 7 homescreens instead of 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Main issue is the missing keyboard , I have an HTC Hero and I miss the keyboard really , while you are better off than with T9 the autocompletion does get you only that far.I will use my Hero for the next year , but I am pretty sure I will get a phone with a slideout keyboard after that ! And yes HTC Sense is nice , but I think the biggest + simply is the 7 homescreens instead of 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Main issue is the missing keyboard, I have an HTC Hero and I miss the keyboard really, while you are better off than with T9 the autocompletion does get you only that far.I will use my Hero for the next year, but I am pretty sure I will get a phone with a slideout keyboard after that!And yes HTC Sense is nice, but I think the biggest + simply is the 7 homescreens instead of 3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421248</id>
	<title>just google being google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260697080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sounds like SOP for google... set up an open source beta, have everyone test and improve on it, and then begin selling an updated final version. Think about how they used chrome to attract open source devs and now are releasing chrome OS as a separate platform. They also did the same with gmail... collecting a huge amount of users with the beta then released a for fee version for businesses</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like SOP for google... set up an open source beta , have everyone test and improve on it , and then begin selling an updated final version .
Think about how they used chrome to attract open source devs and now are releasing chrome OS as a separate platform .
They also did the same with gmail... collecting a huge amount of users with the beta then released a for fee version for businesses</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like SOP for google... set up an open source beta, have everyone test and improve on it, and then begin selling an updated final version.
Think about how they used chrome to attract open source devs and now are releasing chrome OS as a separate platform.
They also did the same with gmail... collecting a huge amount of users with the beta then released a for fee version for businesses</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422662</id>
	<title>Thank you for pointing out the obvious</title>
	<author>dkartuzinski</author>
	<datestamp>1260720720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you fo pointing out the obvious.  The Media is going crazy trying to create controversy where there isn't any.   It actually makes no sense for Google to alienate all the telephone makers by making their own phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you fo pointing out the obvious .
The Media is going crazy trying to create controversy where there is n't any .
It actually makes no sense for Google to alienate all the telephone makers by making their own phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you fo pointing out the obvious.
The Media is going crazy trying to create controversy where there isn't any.
It actually makes no sense for Google to alienate all the telephone makers by making their own phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421902</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>phonewebcam</author>
	<datestamp>1260709380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GSM is a pretty darn well-defined spec. The FCC compliance process takes months and is amongst the strictest in the business. You either conform completely or you don't get a licence. So WTF are these flavours you speak of?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GSM is a pretty darn well-defined spec .
The FCC compliance process takes months and is amongst the strictest in the business .
You either conform completely or you do n't get a licence .
So WTF are these flavours you speak of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GSM is a pretty darn well-defined spec.
The FCC compliance process takes months and is amongst the strictest in the business.
You either conform completely or you don't get a licence.
So WTF are these flavours you speak of?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422450</id>
	<title>Android 2.0 already supports Exchange</title>
	<author>Mr2001</author>
	<datestamp>1260718440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.0-highlights.html" title="android.com">Android 2.0 Highlights</a> [android.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>Multiple accounts can be added to a device for email and contact synchronization, including Exchange accounts. (Handset manufacturers can choose whether to include Exchange support in their devices.)</p></div></blockquote><p>The Droid was the first Android 2.0 device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android 2.0 Highlights [ android.com ] Multiple accounts can be added to a device for email and contact synchronization , including Exchange accounts .
( Handset manufacturers can choose whether to include Exchange support in their devices .
) The Droid was the first Android 2.0 device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android 2.0 Highlights [android.com] Multiple accounts can be added to a device for email and contact synchronization, including Exchange accounts.
(Handset manufacturers can choose whether to include Exchange support in their devices.
)The Droid was the first Android 2.0 device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423752</id>
	<title>Forget buying it</title>
	<author>quercus.aeternam</author>
	<datestamp>1260730980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google just gave a bunch of Android phones to a bunch of competent devs.</p><p>I'm not very familiar with the app situation, but if<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/I/ were a dev with ~20\% time for personal projects, and I just got handed a shiny new toy (and a shiny new toy that everyone around me had) I would definitely consider developing for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google just gave a bunch of Android phones to a bunch of competent devs.I 'm not very familiar with the app situation , but if /I/ were a dev with ~ 20 \ % time for personal projects , and I just got handed a shiny new toy ( and a shiny new toy that everyone around me had ) I would definitely consider developing for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google just gave a bunch of Android phones to a bunch of competent devs.I'm not very familiar with the app situation, but if /I/ were a dev with ~20\% time for personal projects, and I just got handed a shiny new toy (and a shiny new toy that everyone around me had) I would definitely consider developing for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421290</id>
	<title>Re:google dialing</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1260697560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone:
<br> <br>
555-1212
<br> <br>
Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212. (0.24 seconds)</p></div></blockquote><p> <i>Did you mean <b>9545</b>-1212 ?</i> </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone : 555-1212 Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212 .
( 0.24 seconds ) Did you mean 9545-1212 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone:
 
555-1212
 
Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212.
(0.24 seconds) Did you mean 9545-1212 ? 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421410</id>
	<title>Re:Dumb rumors</title>
	<author>jabithew</author>
	<datestamp>1260700200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't see Google releasing their own hardware; it seems like a Slashdot wet dream. If you look at their current strategy with Chrome (OS) and Android, it seems like their attitude is that if you look after the software, the hardware will look after itself.</p><p>It would also be quite outside their core competence. Google have never done any hardware releases for consumers, and there's no reason at all to expect them to be any good at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see Google releasing their own hardware ; it seems like a Slashdot wet dream .
If you look at their current strategy with Chrome ( OS ) and Android , it seems like their attitude is that if you look after the software , the hardware will look after itself.It would also be quite outside their core competence .
Google have never done any hardware releases for consumers , and there 's no reason at all to expect them to be any good at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see Google releasing their own hardware; it seems like a Slashdot wet dream.
If you look at their current strategy with Chrome (OS) and Android, it seems like their attitude is that if you look after the software, the hardware will look after itself.It would also be quite outside their core competence.
Google have never done any hardware releases for consumers, and there's no reason at all to expect them to be any good at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421956</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260710280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Android Eris by HTC (Verizon) has Exchange support right now. I entered in my Exchange information during the initial setup and it synched my Mail, Contacts and Calendar without any issues. I just got it a few days ago and absolutely LOVE it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Android Eris by HTC ( Verizon ) has Exchange support right now .
I entered in my Exchange information during the initial setup and it synched my Mail , Contacts and Calendar without any issues .
I just got it a few days ago and absolutely LOVE it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Android Eris by HTC (Verizon) has Exchange support right now.
I entered in my Exchange information during the initial setup and it synched my Mail, Contacts and Calendar without any issues.
I just got it a few days ago and absolutely LOVE it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046</id>
	<title>google dialing</title>
	<author>C18H27NO3 </author>
	<datestamp>1260737220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone:<br>
<br>
555-1212 <br>
<br>
Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212. (0.24 seconds)<br>
<br>
www.555-1212.com<br>
<br>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory\_assistance<br>
<br>
phones.whitepages.com/703-555-1212<br>
<br>
.
.
.
<br>
et al.<br>
<br>
Somewhere in there would be the option to dial the number you wanted.
If you happen to have SafeDial turned on you can forget about ever connecting to your sex^H^H^Hchat line.
In all serious I would think that perhaps they are trying to incorporate something Googly to reach a larger userbase but certainly their own phone with that ability would be much more lucrative.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone : 555-1212 Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212 .
( 0.24 seconds ) www.555-1212.com en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory \ _assistance phones.whitepages.com/703-555-1212 .
. .
et al .
Somewhere in there would be the option to dial the number you wanted .
If you happen to have SafeDial turned on you can forget about ever connecting to your sex ^ H ^ H ^ Hchat line .
In all serious I would think that perhaps they are trying to incorporate something Googly to reach a larger userbase but certainly their own phone with that ability would be much more lucrative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably how a phone call would proceed on a Google phone:

555-1212 

Results 1 - 30 of about 499,000 for 555-1212.
(0.24 seconds)

www.555-1212.com

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory\_assistance

phones.whitepages.com/703-555-1212

.
.
.
et al.
Somewhere in there would be the option to dial the number you wanted.
If you happen to have SafeDial turned on you can forget about ever connecting to your sex^H^H^Hchat line.
In all serious I would think that perhaps they are trying to incorporate something Googly to reach a larger userbase but certainly their own phone with that ability would be much more lucrative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423182</id>
	<title>And after five revisions... ?</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1260725580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After five revisions, will they superior in strength and agility, and at least equal in intelligence, to the hardware engineers who created them?</p><p>Or will they just have a screensaver with electric sheep?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After five revisions , will they superior in strength and agility , and at least equal in intelligence , to the hardware engineers who created them ? Or will they just have a screensaver with electric sheep ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After five revisions, will they superior in strength and agility, and at least equal in intelligence, to the hardware engineers who created them?Or will they just have a screensaver with electric sheep?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424234</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Captain Spam</author>
	<datestamp>1260735480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly, if it were just a US version of the Milestone (so, a GSM Droid with a 3G radio that can talk to US networks), I think I'd be plenty happy enough...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , if it were just a US version of the Milestone ( so , a GSM Droid with a 3G radio that can talk to US networks ) , I think I 'd be plenty happy enough.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, if it were just a US version of the Milestone (so, a GSM Droid with a 3G radio that can talk to US networks), I think I'd be plenty happy enough...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422436</id>
	<title>Re:What's the benefit for Google to have a device?</title>
	<author>daveb1</author>
	<datestamp>1260718380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Customisation, enhanced trac...erh search results, google name, brand image....
Oh and did they tell you, it can make "phone calls" apparently<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Customisation , enhanced trac...erh search results , google name , brand image... . Oh and did they tell you , it can make " phone calls " apparently : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Customisation, enhanced trac...erh search results, google name, brand image....
Oh and did they tell you, it can make "phone calls" apparently :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421466</id>
	<title>I friggin swear it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260701040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is real life umbrella corp. I give it ten years before google has a product in every single category. Including zombie nerve agents</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is real life umbrella corp. I give it ten years before google has a product in every single category .
Including zombie nerve agents</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is real life umbrella corp. I give it ten years before google has a product in every single category.
Including zombie nerve agents</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428794</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260824340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The best Android phone I've seen so far is the HTC Hero. It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

Most Android phones do.</p><blockquote><div><p>Except for the fact that it doesn't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base...</p></div></blockquote><p>

Try using <a href="http://www.nitrodesk.com/dk\_touchdownFeatures.aspx" title="nitrodesk.com">Touchdown</a> [nitrodesk.com], by far and above the best mobile Exchange client I've ever used even on WinMo. US$20 a license but it will only take one telco to start buying the licenses and adding them to the cost of the plan to win over business users.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The best Android phone I 've seen so far is the HTC Hero .
It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect .
Most Android phones do.Except for the fact that it does n't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base.. . Try using Touchdown [ nitrodesk.com ] , by far and above the best mobile Exchange client I 've ever used even on WinMo .
US $ 20 a license but it will only take one telco to start buying the licenses and adding them to the cost of the plan to win over business users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best Android phone I've seen so far is the HTC Hero.
It whipes the floor with the iPhone in every aspect.
Most Android phones do.Except for the fact that it doesn't help Microsoft with growing the Exchange user base...

Try using Touchdown [nitrodesk.com], by far and above the best mobile Exchange client I've ever used even on WinMo.
US$20 a license but it will only take one telco to start buying the licenses and adding them to the cost of the plan to win over business users.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421802</id>
	<title>Re:Any good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260707820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have the Moto Droid/Verizon, and it works fine...native Activesync with my employer's Exchange server.</p><p>Syncs mail, contacts, calendar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have the Moto Droid/Verizon , and it works fine...native Activesync with my employer 's Exchange server.Syncs mail , contacts , calendar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have the Moto Droid/Verizon, and it works fine...native Activesync with my employer's Exchange server.Syncs mail, contacts, calendar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423706</id>
	<title>Need More Sets with Hardware Keyboard and Buttons</title>
	<author>highvista63</author>
	<datestamp>1260730560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are some great Android phones coming down the pike, but I wish there were more with a physical keyboard and buttons.  I have a G1 and wish HTC would come out with a "next generation" version with essentially the same layout but larger screen, more memory, better processor, etc.  Getting rid of the call and end buttons arranged linearly at the bottom of the set seems a mistake.  One example of lost functionality is the three-finger reboot available by holding down the call, menu, and end buttons simultaneously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some great Android phones coming down the pike , but I wish there were more with a physical keyboard and buttons .
I have a G1 and wish HTC would come out with a " next generation " version with essentially the same layout but larger screen , more memory , better processor , etc .
Getting rid of the call and end buttons arranged linearly at the bottom of the set seems a mistake .
One example of lost functionality is the three-finger reboot available by holding down the call , menu , and end buttons simultaneously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some great Android phones coming down the pike, but I wish there were more with a physical keyboard and buttons.
I have a G1 and wish HTC would come out with a "next generation" version with essentially the same layout but larger screen, more memory, better processor, etc.
Getting rid of the call and end buttons arranged linearly at the bottom of the set seems a mistake.
One example of lost functionality is the three-finger reboot available by holding down the call, menu, and end buttons simultaneously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016</id>
	<title>WSJ says it's real</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1260736740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703757404574592530591075444.html" title="wsj.com">says it's real</a> [wsj.com].</p><p>I was doubtful myself, it seemed really weird that Google would compete against partners like this.  It seems like most technical people that would even want Android to start with would flock to this phone and drop the others.   Heck, I might even buy one to have something to tether my iPhone to when traveling internationally!!</p><p>I had a chance to try out a Droid, and it was still pretty pokey (especially when using the built in browser).  Perhaps the Google phone will finally hit a good performance stride.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wall Street Journal says it 's real [ wsj.com ] .I was doubtful myself , it seemed really weird that Google would compete against partners like this .
It seems like most technical people that would even want Android to start with would flock to this phone and drop the others .
Heck , I might even buy one to have something to tether my iPhone to when traveling internationally !
! I had a chance to try out a Droid , and it was still pretty pokey ( especially when using the built in browser ) .
Perhaps the Google phone will finally hit a good performance stride .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wall Street Journal says it's real [wsj.com].I was doubtful myself, it seemed really weird that Google would compete against partners like this.
It seems like most technical people that would even want Android to start with would flock to this phone and drop the others.
Heck, I might even buy one to have something to tether my iPhone to when traveling internationally!
!I had a chance to try out a Droid, and it was still pretty pokey (especially when using the built in browser).
Perhaps the Google phone will finally hit a good performance stride.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422122</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>aplusjimages</author>
	<datestamp>1260714300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard all the phones say "Beta" on the sides of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard all the phones say " Beta " on the sides of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard all the phones say "Beta" on the sides of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421684</id>
	<title>Nobody can beat the Nokia n900</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260705120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got my Nokia n900, and it's really GREAT, even better than expected. After few weeks it's out, there's already Pidgin, OpenVPN, and many more. Sure it crashes a bit, but that should be because it's still a quite young phone, and I hope that it's going to be fixed.<br>
<br>
I quite hate the Google concept where things are SUPPOSED to be opened, but in fact, you get something which is not really modifiable. I don't see how this will change sooner or later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got my Nokia n900 , and it 's really GREAT , even better than expected .
After few weeks it 's out , there 's already Pidgin , OpenVPN , and many more .
Sure it crashes a bit , but that should be because it 's still a quite young phone , and I hope that it 's going to be fixed .
I quite hate the Google concept where things are SUPPOSED to be opened , but in fact , you get something which is not really modifiable .
I do n't see how this will change sooner or later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got my Nokia n900, and it's really GREAT, even better than expected.
After few weeks it's out, there's already Pidgin, OpenVPN, and many more.
Sure it crashes a bit, but that should be because it's still a quite young phone, and I hope that it's going to be fixed.
I quite hate the Google concept where things are SUPPOSED to be opened, but in fact, you get something which is not really modifiable.
I don't see how this will change sooner or later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423180</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1260725520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will not have the sense UI. It has the normal android UI but modified slightly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... with lasers (no I'm not joking). The screen will definitely look better thanks to the OLED technology.  And this OLED technology also helps the battery life - it may have better battery life than the Droid. Also, early images of the device clearly show a flash light (http://www.cellphones.ca/news/upload/2009/10/htc-passion-back.jpg) (yes that's the Nexus one, not the passion/bravo.  There was a lot of early confused about the naming)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will not have the sense UI .
It has the normal android UI but modified slightly .... with lasers ( no I 'm not joking ) .
The screen will definitely look better thanks to the OLED technology .
And this OLED technology also helps the battery life - it may have better battery life than the Droid .
Also , early images of the device clearly show a flash light ( http : //www.cellphones.ca/news/upload/2009/10/htc-passion-back.jpg ) ( yes that 's the Nexus one , not the passion/bravo .
There was a lot of early confused about the naming )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will not have the sense UI.
It has the normal android UI but modified slightly .... with lasers (no I'm not joking).
The screen will definitely look better thanks to the OLED technology.
And this OLED technology also helps the battery life - it may have better battery life than the Droid.
Also, early images of the device clearly show a flash light (http://www.cellphones.ca/news/upload/2009/10/htc-passion-back.jpg) (yes that's the Nexus one, not the passion/bravo.
There was a lot of early confused about the naming)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421428</id>
	<title>Joy! Droid Feedback From A Mac Loony...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260700500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL! What a loser...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL !
What a loser.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!
What a loser...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421034</id>
	<title>It's the season</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260736980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google likes to give its employees little toys every year for Christmas. There aren't that many Google-related toys out there to give, so they could end up picking a phone even if it's nothing special.</p><p>Oooorrr... it could be teh awesomest Googlest phone evar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google likes to give its employees little toys every year for Christmas .
There are n't that many Google-related toys out there to give , so they could end up picking a phone even if it 's nothing special.Oooorrr... it could be teh awesomest Googlest phone evar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google likes to give its employees little toys every year for Christmas.
There aren't that many Google-related toys out there to give, so they could end up picking a phone even if it's nothing special.Oooorrr... it could be teh awesomest Googlest phone evar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421822</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to the Droid?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260708060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It almost seems like expectations of constant race towards <i>put some number here</i> times faster hardware shifted from PCs to smartphones... (since the former are good/fast enough for some time now)</p><p>Fast/high pixel count hardware doesn't make the phone "best". Where's long battery life? Sturdiness? Low price with rest of the features balanced? (yes, that includes two I mentioned previously)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It almost seems like expectations of constant race towards put some number here times faster hardware shifted from PCs to smartphones... ( since the former are good/fast enough for some time now ) Fast/high pixel count hardware does n't make the phone " best " .
Where 's long battery life ?
Sturdiness ? Low price with rest of the features balanced ?
( yes , that includes two I mentioned previously )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It almost seems like expectations of constant race towards put some number here times faster hardware shifted from PCs to smartphones... (since the former are good/fast enough for some time now)Fast/high pixel count hardware doesn't make the phone "best".
Where's long battery life?
Sturdiness? Low price with rest of the features balanced?
(yes, that includes two I mentioned previously)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30425980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_13_0034219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30428854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30420966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421498
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30425980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30424234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30422598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30421034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_13_0034219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_13_0034219.30423706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
