<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_12_1419215</id>
	<title>Google and Microsoft Sued By Mini Music Label</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1260631020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>carre4 writes <i>"Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/09/blue\_destiny\_suit\_against\_google\_and\_microsoft/">allegedly 'facilitating and enabling' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally</a>. The suit alleges that RapidShare runs 'a distribution center for unlawful copies of copyrighted works.' RapidShare is helped by Google and Microsoft, which benefit from the ad relationships, according to the suit. Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices, and Google has, apparently, not complied, while Microsoft's Bing site has removed the links. RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>carre4 writes " Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly 'facilitating and enabling ' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally .
The suit alleges that RapidShare runs 'a distribution center for unlawful copies of copyrighted works .
' RapidShare is helped by Google and Microsoft , which benefit from the ad relationships , according to the suit .
Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices , and Google has , apparently , not complied , while Microsoft 's Bing site has removed the links .
RapidShare , for its part , is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>carre4 writes "Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly 'facilitating and enabling' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally.
The suit alleges that RapidShare runs 'a distribution center for unlawful copies of copyrighted works.
' RapidShare is helped by Google and Microsoft, which benefit from the ad relationships, according to the suit.
Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices, and Google has, apparently, not complied, while Microsoft's Bing site has removed the links.
RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418186</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260619800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude they are stealing someones hard work the artist is just ah poor boy from New Orleans</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude they are stealing someones hard work the artist is just ah poor boy from New Orleans</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude they are stealing someones hard work the artist is just ah poor boy from New Orleans</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415524</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>HatRoot</author>
	<datestamp>1260644340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>""Maybe they just want some attention? Which raises the question: Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads?""



Um... for the lawyer or the company?

Seems to me it's the lawyers reach, not the DMCA that is in question here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" " Maybe they just want some attention ?
Which raises the question : Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads ?
" " Um... for the lawyer or the company ?
Seems to me it 's the lawyers reach , not the DMCA that is in question here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""Maybe they just want some attention?
Which raises the question: Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads?
""



Um... for the lawyer or the company?
Seems to me it's the lawyers reach, not the DMCA that is in question here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414916</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1260640320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery, then probably.</p></div><p>If the publisher (Google, Bing) has no knowledge of the crime, it's rather hard to make the claim that the publisher is an accessory.<br>And since these guys are dumb enough to file in a US Court, the DMCA exemptions and requirements makes all their claims go away.</p><p>Anyways, here's the case: BLUES DESTINY RECORDS, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC. et al<br><a href="http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flndce/3:2009cv00538/56427/1/" title="justia.com">http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flndce/3:2009cv00538/56427/1/</a> [justia.com]</p><p>And here are the search terms being complained about:<br>"Roy Powers Firing Line"<br>"Peter McGraw More McGraw"<br>"Ronny Sessum"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery , then probably.If the publisher ( Google , Bing ) has no knowledge of the crime , it 's rather hard to make the claim that the publisher is an accessory.And since these guys are dumb enough to file in a US Court , the DMCA exemptions and requirements makes all their claims go away.Anyways , here 's the case : BLUES DESTINY RECORDS , LLC v. GOOGLE , INC. et alhttp : //docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flndce/3 : 2009cv00538/56427/1/ [ justia.com ] And here are the search terms being complained about : " Roy Powers Firing Line " " Peter McGraw More McGraw " " Ronny Sessum "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery, then probably.If the publisher (Google, Bing) has no knowledge of the crime, it's rather hard to make the claim that the publisher is an accessory.And since these guys are dumb enough to file in a US Court, the DMCA exemptions and requirements makes all their claims go away.Anyways, here's the case: BLUES DESTINY RECORDS, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC. et alhttp://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flndce/3:2009cv00538/56427/1/ [justia.com]And here are the search terms being complained about:"Roy Powers Firing Line""Peter McGraw More McGraw""Ronny Sessum"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124</id>
	<title>Remove the Internet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260634860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Changing the order around a little here...</p><blockquote><div><p>Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices, and Google has, apparently, not complied, while Microsoft's Bing site has removed the links.</p><p>[...]</p><p>Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly 'facilitating and enabling' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, what lesson should we take away from this?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Changing the order around a little here...Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices , and Google has , apparently , not complied , while Microsoft 's Bing site has removed the links. [ .. .
] Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly 'facilitating and enabling ' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally.So , what lesson should we take away from this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Changing the order around a little here...Blue Destiny has attempted to link to pages with RapidShare links to their music via DMCA takedown notices, and Google has, apparently, not complied, while Microsoft's Bing site has removed the links.[...
]Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly 'facilitating and enabling' distribution of copyrighted songs illegally.So, what lesson should we take away from this?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30417560</id>
	<title>Contact Rapidshare?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260614940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://rapidshare.com/abuse.html" title="rapidshare.com">This page</a> [rapidshare.com] seems to spell things out pretty clearly. Email them with your contact info, the links in question, and what the problem is (in this case, copyrighted content), and they will work with you to resolve the matter. Took all of 2 seconds to find.
<br> <br>
But no, rather than have their content removed, they would rather make a huge stink about it to try and get attention and press coverage. As a previous poster pointed out, a nice civil email about the matter could have had this whole thing resolved in a day or two. Sure, the lawyers don't get to rack up billable hours, but the unethical prick who would recommend this course of action needs to walk off of a cliff anyway...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This page [ rapidshare.com ] seems to spell things out pretty clearly .
Email them with your contact info , the links in question , and what the problem is ( in this case , copyrighted content ) , and they will work with you to resolve the matter .
Took all of 2 seconds to find .
But no , rather than have their content removed , they would rather make a huge stink about it to try and get attention and press coverage .
As a previous poster pointed out , a nice civil email about the matter could have had this whole thing resolved in a day or two .
Sure , the lawyers do n't get to rack up billable hours , but the unethical prick who would recommend this course of action needs to walk off of a cliff anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This page [rapidshare.com] seems to spell things out pretty clearly.
Email them with your contact info, the links in question, and what the problem is (in this case, copyrighted content), and they will work with you to resolve the matter.
Took all of 2 seconds to find.
But no, rather than have their content removed, they would rather make a huge stink about it to try and get attention and press coverage.
As a previous poster pointed out, a nice civil email about the matter could have had this whole thing resolved in a day or two.
Sure, the lawyers don't get to rack up billable hours, but the unethical prick who would recommend this course of action needs to walk off of a cliff anyway...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414368</id>
	<title>Google never posted the links in the first place!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260636480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its not like google runs a message board where people post these rapidshare links and is being sent notices to run the message board better and remove infringing links.  If that were the case then google and microsoft both would be advised if not required to remove those links if they want to avoid a suit.  Google, on the other hand, simply runs a web site that searches other web sites and finds keywords without discrimination between keywords that are linked to rapidshare links and keywords that aren't.  I fail to see how it is google's responsibility to comply with a takedown notice although it would be nice to have the forums with rapidshare links no longer showing up in google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not like google runs a message board where people post these rapidshare links and is being sent notices to run the message board better and remove infringing links .
If that were the case then google and microsoft both would be advised if not required to remove those links if they want to avoid a suit .
Google , on the other hand , simply runs a web site that searches other web sites and finds keywords without discrimination between keywords that are linked to rapidshare links and keywords that are n't .
I fail to see how it is google 's responsibility to comply with a takedown notice although it would be nice to have the forums with rapidshare links no longer showing up in google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not like google runs a message board where people post these rapidshare links and is being sent notices to run the message board better and remove infringing links.
If that were the case then google and microsoft both would be advised if not required to remove those links if they want to avoid a suit.
Google, on the other hand, simply runs a web site that searches other web sites and finds keywords without discrimination between keywords that are linked to rapidshare links and keywords that aren't.
I fail to see how it is google's responsibility to comply with a takedown notice although it would be nice to have the forums with rapidshare links no longer showing up in google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414404</id>
	<title>Re:Remove the Internet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260636780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What lesson? Seriously... it's Saturday morning, and the slashdot summary is poorly worded and full of grammatical errors, leading to mass confusion, dogs and cats living together, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What lesson ?
Seriously... it 's Saturday morning , and the slashdot summary is poorly worded and full of grammatical errors , leading to mass confusion , dogs and cats living together , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What lesson?
Seriously... it's Saturday morning, and the slashdot summary is poorly worded and full of grammatical errors, leading to mass confusion, dogs and cats living together, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308</id>
	<title>US Jurisdiction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260636120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"....RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices."</p><p>This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still don't get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ....RapidShare , for its part , is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices .
" This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still do n't get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"....RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices.
"This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still don't get.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30420212</id>
	<title>Re:Sue Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260641400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Although it could (potentially, I suppose) be argued that their software (MS Windows) does have significant non-infringing uses, I think it's fairly obvious that 90\%+ of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies.

RIAA meet Bill.</p></div><p>And how many of those illegal file sharers actually got legal copies of Windows? It's the ISPs who should be sued, they enabled illegal downloads of both music and operating systems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although it could ( potentially , I suppose ) be argued that their software ( MS Windows ) does have significant non-infringing uses , I think it 's fairly obvious that 90 \ % + of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies .
RIAA meet Bill.And how many of those illegal file sharers actually got legal copies of Windows ?
It 's the ISPs who should be sued , they enabled illegal downloads of both music and operating systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although it could (potentially, I suppose) be argued that their software (MS Windows) does have significant non-infringing uses, I think it's fairly obvious that 90\%+ of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies.
RIAA meet Bill.And how many of those illegal file sharers actually got legal copies of Windows?
It's the ISPs who should be sued, they enabled illegal downloads of both music and operating systems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414948</id>
	<title>How does the DMCA apply?</title>
	<author>mark-t</author>
	<datestamp>1260640500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if something is copyright infringement, how does the DMCA apply for something like music, which (generally) does not require any sort of decryption to digitize.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if something is copyright infringement , how does the DMCA apply for something like music , which ( generally ) does not require any sort of decryption to digitize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if something is copyright infringement, how does the DMCA apply for something like music, which (generally) does not require any sort of decryption to digitize.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415330</id>
	<title>Patently false.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260643320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><blockquote><div><p>&ldquo;Google&rsquo;s consistent and prominent ranking of links to illegal &lsquo;free&rsquo; downloads of [Blue Destiny&rsquo;s] copyrighted recordings has devastated [Blue Destiny&rsquo;s] business,&rdquo; the suit reads, before pointing to specific RapidShare links that have appeared when users search Google for the Roy Powers song &ldquo;Firing Line.&rdquo;</p><p>It would appear, however, that Google is not linking directly to such downloads. It links to RapidShare landing pages where the download urls are listed. In other words, Google&rsquo;s top &ldquo;Roy Powers Firing Line&rdquo; result points to a RapidShare page that serves up several links where you can download the song.</p></div></blockquote><p>And even that is false! The Google results for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Roy\%20Powers\%20Firing\%20Line" title="google.com">&ldquo;Roy Powers Firing Line&rdquo;</a> [google.com] are:</p><p><a href="http://rapidog.com/roy-powers-firing-line-rapidshare.html" title="rapidog.com">Roy Powers Firing Line rapidshare file downloads</a> [rapidog.com]<br><a href="http://megauploadbot.com/roy-powers-firing-line-megaupload.html" title="megauploadbot.com">Roy Powers Firing Line megaupload file downloads</a> [megauploadbot.com]<br><a href="http://www.zona-musical.com/postt165279.html" title="zona-musical.com">Roy Powers - Firing Line (2009) rapidshare</a> [zona-musical.com]<br><a href="http://www.roypowersmusic.com/" title="roypowersmusic.com">Roy Powers Music Firing Line Out Now!</a> [roypowersmusic.com]<br><a href="http://www.myspace.com/roypowersmusic" title="myspace.com">Roy Powers on MySpace Music - Free Streaming MP3s, Pictures<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</a> [myspace.com]<br><a href="http://www.bluesdestinyrecords.com/ipnmonitor/index.php?page=3&amp;maincat\_id=1" title="bluesdestinyrecords.com">Blues Destiny Records</a> [bluesdestinyrecords.com]<br><a href="http://www.tech-forums.net/pc/f39/google-microsoft-sued-links-filesharing-sites-221722/" title="tech-forums.net">Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</a> [tech-forums.net]<br><a href="http://www.ronnysessum.com/" title="ronnysessum.com">Ronny Sessum Funk'n Blues Man Album Out</a> [ronnysessum.com]<br><a href="http://www.triplecrownofsurfing.com/vtcs/" title="triplecrownofsurfing.com">Vans Triple Crown of Surfing</a> [triplecrownofsurfing.com]</p><p><em>None of those URLs point to a RapidShare server!</em></p><p>Even the ones that look like they&rsquo;d have RapidShare links are merely search engines or forums where the RapidShare links are found.</p><p>This is so false that it&rsquo;s laughable. Also, can anyone say Streisand effect?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA :    Google    s consistent and prominent ranking of links to illegal    free    downloads of [ Blue Destiny    s ] copyrighted recordings has devastated [ Blue Destiny    s ] business ,    the suit reads , before pointing to specific RapidShare links that have appeared when users search Google for the Roy Powers song    Firing Line.    It would appear , however , that Google is not linking directly to such downloads .
It links to RapidShare landing pages where the download urls are listed .
In other words , Google    s top    Roy Powers Firing Line    result points to a RapidShare page that serves up several links where you can download the song.And even that is false !
The Google results for    Roy Powers Firing Line    [ google.com ] are : Roy Powers Firing Line rapidshare file downloads [ rapidog.com ] Roy Powers Firing Line megaupload file downloads [ megauploadbot.com ] Roy Powers - Firing Line ( 2009 ) rapidshare [ zona-musical.com ] Roy Powers Music Firing Line Out Now !
[ roypowersmusic.com ] Roy Powers on MySpace Music - Free Streaming MP3s , Pictures ... [ myspace.com ] Blues Destiny Records [ bluesdestinyrecords.com ] Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites ... [ tech-forums.net ] Ronny Sessum Funk'n Blues Man Album Out [ ronnysessum.com ] Vans Triple Crown of Surfing [ triplecrownofsurfing.com ] None of those URLs point to a RapidShare server ! Even the ones that look like they    d have RapidShare links are merely search engines or forums where the RapidShare links are found.This is so false that it    s laughable .
Also , can anyone say Streisand effect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:“Google’s consistent and prominent ranking of links to illegal ‘free’ downloads of [Blue Destiny’s] copyrighted recordings has devastated [Blue Destiny’s] business,” the suit reads, before pointing to specific RapidShare links that have appeared when users search Google for the Roy Powers song “Firing Line.”It would appear, however, that Google is not linking directly to such downloads.
It links to RapidShare landing pages where the download urls are listed.
In other words, Google’s top “Roy Powers Firing Line” result points to a RapidShare page that serves up several links where you can download the song.And even that is false!
The Google results for “Roy Powers Firing Line” [google.com] are:Roy Powers Firing Line rapidshare file downloads [rapidog.com]Roy Powers Firing Line megaupload file downloads [megauploadbot.com]Roy Powers - Firing Line (2009) rapidshare [zona-musical.com]Roy Powers Music Firing Line Out Now!
[roypowersmusic.com]Roy Powers on MySpace Music - Free Streaming MP3s, Pictures ... [myspace.com]Blues Destiny Records [bluesdestinyrecords.com]Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites ... [tech-forums.net]Ronny Sessum Funk'n Blues Man Album Out [ronnysessum.com]Vans Triple Crown of Surfing [triplecrownofsurfing.com]None of those URLs point to a RapidShare server!Even the ones that look like they’d have RapidShare links are merely search engines or forums where the RapidShare links are found.This is so false that it’s laughable.
Also, can anyone say Streisand effect?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414142</id>
	<title>Sue Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260634980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although it could (potentially, I suppose) be argued that their software (MS Windows) does have significant non-infringing uses, I think it's fairly obvious that 90\%+ of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies.

RIAA meet Bill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although it could ( potentially , I suppose ) be argued that their software ( MS Windows ) does have significant non-infringing uses , I think it 's fairly obvious that 90 \ % + of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies .
RIAA meet Bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although it could (potentially, I suppose) be argued that their software (MS Windows) does have significant non-infringing uses, I think it's fairly obvious that 90\%+ of all illegal file-sharing takes place on systems that utilize Microsoft software technologies.
RIAA meet Bill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414362</id>
	<title>Not surprising</title>
	<author>Mathinker</author>
	<datestamp>1260636480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still don't get.</p><p>It's not clear that "they don't get it". You are assuming that what a politician says is connected with what he wants done or thinks can be done rather than being connected <i>with what he wants others to think about him</i> (so he gets reelected, perhaps via getting more campaign contributions).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still do n't get.It 's not clear that " they do n't get it " .
You are assuming that what a politician says is connected with what he wants done or thinks can be done rather than being connected with what he wants others to think about him ( so he gets reelected , perhaps via getting more campaign contributions ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; This is an important concept regarding the internet that most politicians still don't get.It's not clear that "they don't get it".
You are assuming that what a politician says is connected with what he wants done or thinks can be done rather than being connected with what he wants others to think about him (so he gets reelected, perhaps via getting more campaign contributions).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419152</id>
	<title>Re:Patently false.</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1260632400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe something that should Google do is to clean all pages from their index that have that author name and song title, as they don't know a priory if it is linking to a rapidshare-like server or forum that enables to illegally download that song. In fact, they should do that with anyone that complains. Avoiding piracy is more important than having any opportunity to be known.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe something that should Google do is to clean all pages from their index that have that author name and song title , as they do n't know a priory if it is linking to a rapidshare-like server or forum that enables to illegally download that song .
In fact , they should do that with anyone that complains .
Avoiding piracy is more important than having any opportunity to be known .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe something that should Google do is to clean all pages from their index that have that author name and song title, as they don't know a priory if it is linking to a rapidshare-like server or forum that enables to illegally download that song.
In fact, they should do that with anyone that complains.
Avoiding piracy is more important than having any opportunity to be known.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414384</id>
	<title>Re:US Jurisdiction</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1260636600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, they DO get it.</p><p>Why do you think ACTA is getting pushed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , they DO get it.Why do you think ACTA is getting pushed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, they DO get it.Why do you think ACTA is getting pushed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414678</id>
	<title>Blue Destiny's reasoning is unsound</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1260638760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:  "The suits insists that Google and Microsoft benefit financially because they generate ad revenue from search results. And both companies have received DMCA takedown notices requesting removal of the links in question."</p><p>Google would generate several times the revenue by placing the allegedly illegal download links lower so that one would perform multiple searches rather than finding them with the first click.  If there is a financial incentive for Google to manipulate results, it would be to lower the rankings of those links.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " The suits insists that Google and Microsoft benefit financially because they generate ad revenue from search results .
And both companies have received DMCA takedown notices requesting removal of the links in question .
" Google would generate several times the revenue by placing the allegedly illegal download links lower so that one would perform multiple searches rather than finding them with the first click .
If there is a financial incentive for Google to manipulate results , it would be to lower the rankings of those links .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:  "The suits insists that Google and Microsoft benefit financially because they generate ad revenue from search results.
And both companies have received DMCA takedown notices requesting removal of the links in question.
"Google would generate several times the revenue by placing the allegedly illegal download links lower so that one would perform multiple searches rather than finding them with the first click.
If there is a financial incentive for Google to manipulate results, it would be to lower the rankings of those links.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415376</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260643620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google gets revenue from searches by displaying ads and by sponsored links.</p><p>The White Pages does the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google gets revenue from searches by displaying ads and by sponsored links.The White Pages does the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google gets revenue from searches by displaying ads and by sponsored links.The White Pages does the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418412</id>
	<title>Re:Good thing</title>
	<author>blitzkrieg3</author>
	<datestamp>1260622200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it almost looks like that's exactly what they're trying to do. Surely they know they can't win, and they probably won't get a huge amount of converts just by disallowing RS access.
<br>
I know they probably are sueing in earnest but it seems as though they're trying to take the wind out of record companies sails. (IE you can't sue the ISP for being the medium)</htmltext>
<tokenext>it almost looks like that 's exactly what they 're trying to do .
Surely they know they ca n't win , and they probably wo n't get a huge amount of converts just by disallowing RS access .
I know they probably are sueing in earnest but it seems as though they 're trying to take the wind out of record companies sails .
( IE you ca n't sue the ISP for being the medium )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it almost looks like that's exactly what they're trying to do.
Surely they know they can't win, and they probably won't get a huge amount of converts just by disallowing RS access.
I know they probably are sueing in earnest but it seems as though they're trying to take the wind out of record companies sails.
(IE you can't sue the ISP for being the medium)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414784</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260639420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what clueless drivel.<br>if there was an entry in the white pages saying "Houses that are empty this weekend, and location of keys" you bet your ass they would get sued.</p><p>Try and get a sense of fucking perspective before drooling out the pro-piracy content-creator hating bullshit that spews out of the slashdot hive 'mind'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what clueless drivel.if there was an entry in the white pages saying " Houses that are empty this weekend , and location of keys " you bet your ass they would get sued.Try and get a sense of fucking perspective before drooling out the pro-piracy content-creator hating bullshit that spews out of the slashdot hive 'mind'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what clueless drivel.if there was an entry in the white pages saying "Houses that are empty this weekend, and location of keys" you bet your ass they would get sued.Try and get a sense of fucking perspective before drooling out the pro-piracy content-creator hating bullshit that spews out of the slashdot hive 'mind'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30416864</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>gbarules2999</author>
	<datestamp>1260610140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What clueless drivel.<br>If Google and Microsoft were actively publishing information required to pirate music - not just picking up information, but actively publishing it - they would get sued to hard they'd have string coming out of their ass.<br> <br>Try and get a sense of santiy before drooling out the "OMG they dun it again" nonsense that spews out of the anti-slashdot brigade who hate this website so much they post every five minutes about how shitty it is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What clueless drivel.If Google and Microsoft were actively publishing information required to pirate music - not just picking up information , but actively publishing it - they would get sued to hard they 'd have string coming out of their ass .
Try and get a sense of santiy before drooling out the " OMG they dun it again " nonsense that spews out of the anti-slashdot brigade who hate this website so much they post every five minutes about how shitty it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What clueless drivel.If Google and Microsoft were actively publishing information required to pirate music - not just picking up information, but actively publishing it - they would get sued to hard they'd have string coming out of their ass.
Try and get a sense of santiy before drooling out the "OMG they dun it again" nonsense that spews out of the anti-slashdot brigade who hate this website so much they post every five minutes about how shitty it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415016</id>
	<title>I am reminded of a line from Battlestar Galactica</title>
	<author>mr\_da3m0n</author>
	<datestamp>1260641160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Point you finger back far enough and some germ gets blamed for splitting in two."

How fitting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Point you finger back far enough and some germ gets blamed for splitting in two .
" How fitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Point you finger back far enough and some germ gets blamed for splitting in two.
"

How fitting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414452</id>
	<title>Re:US Jurisdiction</title>
	<author>SirKveldulv</author>
	<datestamp>1260637200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rapidshare, if told about it,  will remove files that infringe on copyright though.

<a href="http://rapidshare.com/abuse.html" title="rapidshare.com" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/abuse.html</a> [rapidshare.com]

It's not DMCA, but the result is basically the same.

They will also fingerprint/hash files and remove such files proactively in future.

Rapidshare make their money selling premium subscriptions. For the free downloads, they show ads, which I'm sure will be something other than google in very short order.  I'm quite surprised they are using adsense at all really.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rapidshare , if told about it , will remove files that infringe on copyright though .
http : //rapidshare.com/abuse.html [ rapidshare.com ] It 's not DMCA , but the result is basically the same .
They will also fingerprint/hash files and remove such files proactively in future .
Rapidshare make their money selling premium subscriptions .
For the free downloads , they show ads , which I 'm sure will be something other than google in very short order .
I 'm quite surprised they are using adsense at all really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rapidshare, if told about it,  will remove files that infringe on copyright though.
http://rapidshare.com/abuse.html [rapidshare.com]

It's not DMCA, but the result is basically the same.
They will also fingerprint/hash files and remove such files proactively in future.
Rapidshare make their money selling premium subscriptions.
For the free downloads, they show ads, which I'm sure will be something other than google in very short order.
I'm quite surprised they are using adsense at all really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414666</id>
	<title>Re:Google never posted the links in the first plac</title>
	<author>s0litaire</author>
	<datestamp>1260638760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>The way I read the origional article, (not the Slashdot hackjob!) is that Blue Destiney Records (BDR) is suing Google and Microsoft NOT because if the links, but for the fact that Microsoft and Google profit from the filesharing activities through the ads placed on Rapidshares free pages.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way I read the origional article , ( not the Slashdot hackjob !
) is that Blue Destiney Records ( BDR ) is suing Google and Microsoft NOT because if the links , but for the fact that Microsoft and Google profit from the filesharing activities through the ads placed on Rapidshares free pages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way I read the origional article, (not the Slashdot hackjob!
) is that Blue Destiney Records (BDR) is suing Google and Microsoft NOT because if the links, but for the fact that Microsoft and Google profit from the filesharing activities through the ads placed on Rapidshares free pages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414724</id>
	<title>Business plan</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1260639060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices.</i>
</p><ul>
<li>Launch groundless legal action against company with $154 billion net worth.</li>
<li>????</li>
<li>Profit!!!</li>
</ul><p>What could go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...RapidShare , for its part , is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices .
Launch groundless legal action against company with $ 154 billion net worth .
? ? ? ? Profit ! ! !
What could go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...RapidShare, for its part, is based outside of the US and does not accept DMCA notices.
Launch groundless legal action against company with $154 billion net worth.
????
Profit!!!
What could go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414288</id>
	<title>Good thing</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260636000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope lots of companies without billions of dollars sue Google and others like this. It will build up a precendent of this is stupid. So whenever the major labels try it they will have to work extra hard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope lots of companies without billions of dollars sue Google and others like this .
It will build up a precendent of this is stupid .
So whenever the major labels try it they will have to work extra hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope lots of companies without billions of dollars sue Google and others like this.
It will build up a precendent of this is stupid.
So whenever the major labels try it they will have to work extra hard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30416070</id>
	<title>Search shared</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1260648180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look here, this will land you most albums<br><a href="http://www.searchshared.com/" title="searchshared.com">http://www.searchshared.com/</a> [searchshared.com]</p><p>and it's using google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look here , this will land you most albumshttp : //www.searchshared.com/ [ searchshared.com ] and it 's using google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look here, this will land you most albumshttp://www.searchshared.com/ [searchshared.com]and it's using google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>rtaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1260636720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery, then probably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery , then probably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the publisher who puts out the book received a percentage of the spoils from the robbery, then probably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414664</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260638700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No Wikipedia entry, and their website seems to be hidden, unless they call themselves "Blues Destiny Records" when not filing frivolous lawsuits</p></div></blockquote><p>
Apparently both Blues Destiny Records and Blue Destiny Recordings exist, but not Blue Destiny Records. Anyway, a lawsuit by a small label may be the big four's way of either limiting their risk if they lose or getting around some previous agreement with Google. And by limiting risk I mean avoiding big "Sony, Universal,  EMI and Warner sue Google!" headlines when there's a big risk they'll lose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Wikipedia entry , and their website seems to be hidden , unless they call themselves " Blues Destiny Records " when not filing frivolous lawsuits Apparently both Blues Destiny Records and Blue Destiny Recordings exist , but not Blue Destiny Records .
Anyway , a lawsuit by a small label may be the big four 's way of either limiting their risk if they lose or getting around some previous agreement with Google .
And by limiting risk I mean avoiding big " Sony , Universal , EMI and Warner sue Google !
" headlines when there 's a big risk they 'll lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Wikipedia entry, and their website seems to be hidden, unless they call themselves "Blues Destiny Records" when not filing frivolous lawsuits
Apparently both Blues Destiny Records and Blue Destiny Recordings exist, but not Blue Destiny Records.
Anyway, a lawsuit by a small label may be the big four's way of either limiting their risk if they lose or getting around some previous agreement with Google.
And by limiting risk I mean avoiding big "Sony, Universal,  EMI and Warner sue Google!
" headlines when there's a big risk they'll lose.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414810</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260639480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the same thing.</p><p>There are legitimate reasons for someone's address to be listed in the white pages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the same thing.There are legitimate reasons for someone 's address to be listed in the white pages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the same thing.There are legitimate reasons for someone's address to be listed in the white pages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419030</id>
	<title>I could be good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260630600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could be good: Google and MS will win this stupid lawsuit and set a precedent in the court.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could be good : Google and MS will win this stupid lawsuit and set a precedent in the court .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could be good: Google and MS will win this stupid lawsuit and set a precedent in the court.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>gman003</author>
	<datestamp>1260635760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They know, absolutely, that they're going to lose. So what reason could they have for suing?

Well, they're about as unknown on the Internet as possible. No Wikipedia entry, and their website seems to be hidden, unless they call themselves "Blues Destiny Records" when not filing frivolous lawsuits. Maybe they just want some attention?

Which raises the question:

Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They know , absolutely , that they 're going to lose .
So what reason could they have for suing ?
Well , they 're about as unknown on the Internet as possible .
No Wikipedia entry , and their website seems to be hidden , unless they call themselves " Blues Destiny Records " when not filing frivolous lawsuits .
Maybe they just want some attention ?
Which raises the question : Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They know, absolutely, that they're going to lose.
So what reason could they have for suing?
Well, they're about as unknown on the Internet as possible.
No Wikipedia entry, and their website seems to be hidden, unless they call themselves "Blues Destiny Records" when not filing frivolous lawsuits.
Maybe they just want some attention?
Which raises the question:

Is a lawsuit against the two biggest companies in technology cheaper than buying some ads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414892</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260640080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about suing the libraries of the world. I can check out books and movies and copy them to my hearts content! Is it time to ban books and videos from libraries?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about suing the libraries of the world .
I can check out books and movies and copy them to my hearts content !
Is it time to ban books and videos from libraries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about suing the libraries of the world.
I can check out books and movies and copy them to my hearts content!
Is it time to ban books and videos from libraries?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414348</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260636360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the perspective many corporate rightsholders take, yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the perspective many corporate rightsholders take , yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the perspective many corporate rightsholders take, yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415432</id>
	<title>Re:Remove the Internet.</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1260643860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blue Destiny Records: Hey Rapidshare. We saw that somebody uploaded a few songs without our permission. We have copyright on them. Could you maybe remove them for us please? If you could do that than we would be very grateful for that.<br>Rapidshare: Hey what a kind email. I suppose we could notify the uploader and take it down.</p><p>But this happened instead:</p><p>Blue Destiny Records: Hey you fothermuckers! You got our copyrighted material on your website! Take it the fsck down or we will sue you!<br>Rapidshare: Pardon? Fsck off! There is no DMCA in my country, assholes!<br>Blue Destiny Records: Fsckers! We will cut of their earnings! We will sue Goole and Microsoft instead because I need an extra house with a pool on a remote island! My neighbours have that too, so we got to have it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue Destiny Records : Hey Rapidshare .
We saw that somebody uploaded a few songs without our permission .
We have copyright on them .
Could you maybe remove them for us please ?
If you could do that than we would be very grateful for that.Rapidshare : Hey what a kind email .
I suppose we could notify the uploader and take it down.But this happened instead : Blue Destiny Records : Hey you fothermuckers !
You got our copyrighted material on your website !
Take it the fsck down or we will sue you ! Rapidshare : Pardon ?
Fsck off !
There is no DMCA in my country , assholes ! Blue Destiny Records : Fsckers !
We will cut of their earnings !
We will sue Goole and Microsoft instead because I need an extra house with a pool on a remote island !
My neighbours have that too , so we got to have it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue Destiny Records: Hey Rapidshare.
We saw that somebody uploaded a few songs without our permission.
We have copyright on them.
Could you maybe remove them for us please?
If you could do that than we would be very grateful for that.Rapidshare: Hey what a kind email.
I suppose we could notify the uploader and take it down.But this happened instead:Blue Destiny Records: Hey you fothermuckers!
You got our copyrighted material on your website!
Take it the fsck down or we will sue you!Rapidshare: Pardon?
Fsck off!
There is no DMCA in my country, assholes!Blue Destiny Records: Fsckers!
We will cut of their earnings!
We will sue Goole and Microsoft instead because I need an extra house with a pool on a remote island!
My neighbours have that too, so we got to have it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419616</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1260636360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A percentage? You're mistaken, Google doesn't get a percentage, it gets paid upfront a set fee for serving keywords. What if you got that information from calling 411 instead and just paid 50 cents upfront for you to get that information? Are you saying 411 should be held liable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A percentage ?
You 're mistaken , Google does n't get a percentage , it gets paid upfront a set fee for serving keywords .
What if you got that information from calling 411 instead and just paid 50 cents upfront for you to get that information ?
Are you saying 411 should be held liable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A percentage?
You're mistaken, Google doesn't get a percentage, it gets paid upfront a set fee for serving keywords.
What if you got that information from calling 411 instead and just paid 50 cents upfront for you to get that information?
Are you saying 411 should be held liable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415142</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260642120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it's Streisand's record company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it 's Streisand 's record company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it's Streisand's record company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30417212</id>
	<title>moD do3n</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260612120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">lead developers overly morbid and BsD fanatics? I've one common goal - and help us! To get involved in the deal with you national gay nigger number of FreeBSD Are you a NIGGER</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>lead developers overly morbid and BsD fanatics ?
I 've one common goal - and help us !
To get involved in the deal with you national gay nigger number of FreeBSD Are you a NIGGER [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lead developers overly morbid and BsD fanatics?
I've one common goal - and help us!
To get involved in the deal with you national gay nigger number of FreeBSD Are you a NIGGER [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30441070</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260819180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess about now I'm wondering why Microsoft stop linking to German/Swiss company? I guess they did that because they thought they could win the case?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess about now I 'm wondering why Microsoft stop linking to German/Swiss company ?
I guess they did that because they thought they could win the case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess about now I'm wondering why Microsoft stop linking to German/Swiss company?
I guess they did that because they thought they could win the case?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206</id>
	<title>Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260635340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if someone finds an address in the White Pages and robs their house the homeowner should sue the White Pages?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if someone finds an address in the White Pages and robs their house the homeowner should sue the White Pages ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if someone finds an address in the White Pages and robs their house the homeowner should sue the White Pages?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30416372</id>
	<title>Sue reality!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260650280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets sue this Universe for the possible existence of anything harmful!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets sue this Universe for the possible existence of anything harmful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets sue this Universe for the possible existence of anything harmful!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415206</id>
	<title>Re:Sue the White Pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260642480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if the thing robbed was a very long prime number written in the front door which the robber memorized? We are supposing this thief did that because he is an appassionato of very long prime numbers, not because he intended to sell the number.</p><p>(I'm just taking the analogy to it's logical extreme)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the thing robbed was a very long prime number written in the front door which the robber memorized ?
We are supposing this thief did that because he is an appassionato of very long prime numbers , not because he intended to sell the number .
( I 'm just taking the analogy to it 's logical extreme )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the thing robbed was a very long prime number written in the front door which the robber memorized?
We are supposing this thief did that because he is an appassionato of very long prime numbers, not because he intended to sell the number.
(I'm just taking the analogy to it's logical extreme)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30441070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30420212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30416864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_1419215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30417560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414394
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419616
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414916
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30416864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30441070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30419152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30418186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30415142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_1419215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30414142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_1419215.30420212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
