<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_12_0341227</id>
	<title>Mars Express Captures Phobos and Deimos</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1260644640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>westtxfun writes <i>"The Mars Express Orbiter captured a <a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars\_Express/SEMDOE7JT2G\_1.html">very cool movie of Phobos and Deimos</a> on Nov 5.  Besides the 'wow factor,' the images will be used to refine models of the moons' orbits.  The orbiter has also captured high resolution images of Phobos back in July. 'The images were acquired with the Super Resolution Channel (SRC) of the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC). The camera took 130 images of the moons on 5 November at 9:14 CET in a span of 1.5 minutes at intervals of 1s, speeding up to 0.5-s intervals toward the end. The image resolution is 110 m/pixel for Phobos and 240 m/pixel for Deimos &mdash; Deimos was more than twice as far from the camera. '"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>westtxfun writes " The Mars Express Orbiter captured a very cool movie of Phobos and Deimos on Nov 5 .
Besides the 'wow factor, ' the images will be used to refine models of the moons ' orbits .
The orbiter has also captured high resolution images of Phobos back in July .
'The images were acquired with the Super Resolution Channel ( SRC ) of the High Resolution Stereo Camera ( HRSC ) .
The camera took 130 images of the moons on 5 November at 9 : 14 CET in a span of 1.5 minutes at intervals of 1s , speeding up to 0.5-s intervals toward the end .
The image resolution is 110 m/pixel for Phobos and 240 m/pixel for Deimos    Deimos was more than twice as far from the camera .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>westtxfun writes "The Mars Express Orbiter captured a very cool movie of Phobos and Deimos on Nov 5.
Besides the 'wow factor,' the images will be used to refine models of the moons' orbits.
The orbiter has also captured high resolution images of Phobos back in July.
'The images were acquired with the Super Resolution Channel (SRC) of the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC).
The camera took 130 images of the moons on 5 November at 9:14 CET in a span of 1.5 minutes at intervals of 1s, speeding up to 0.5-s intervals toward the end.
The image resolution is 110 m/pixel for Phobos and 240 m/pixel for Deimos — Deimos was more than twice as far from the camera.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411878</id>
	<title>Mmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260650100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's kind of sad but that movie made my genitals move a little bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's kind of sad but that movie made my genitals move a little bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's kind of sad but that movie made my genitals move a little bit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412634</id>
	<title>Re:Ask slashdot</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260619320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Planetary models from centuries were basically an example of:<br>a) idealized scenario (frictionless vacuum kind of stuff)<br>b) based on Newtonian physics; which is not quite accurate...</p><p>With the number of bodies and their interactions, Solar System is pretty much chaotic:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body\_problem" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body\_problem</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability\_of\_the\_Solar\_System" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability\_of\_the\_Solar\_System</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Planetary models from centuries were basically an example of : a ) idealized scenario ( frictionless vacuum kind of stuff ) b ) based on Newtonian physics ; which is not quite accurate...With the number of bodies and their interactions , Solar System is pretty much chaotic : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body \ _problem [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability \ _of \ _the \ _Solar \ _System [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Planetary models from centuries were basically an example of:a) idealized scenario (frictionless vacuum kind of stuff)b) based on Newtonian physics; which is not quite accurate...With the number of bodies and their interactions, Solar System is pretty much chaotic:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body\_problem [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability\_of\_the\_Solar\_System [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30454030</id>
	<title>Re:Odd Phobos striations</title>
	<author>dvs01</author>
	<datestamp>1260899100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe they were caused by Barons of Hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they were caused by Barons of Hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they were caused by Barons of Hell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411910</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260650700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks kind of fake because it was taken through a telescopic lens, and thus you don't see the perspective of movement. When photographers and artists want to exaggerate perspective, they do the opposite: use a wide-angle lens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks kind of fake because it was taken through a telescopic lens , and thus you do n't see the perspective of movement .
When photographers and artists want to exaggerate perspective , they do the opposite : use a wide-angle lens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks kind of fake because it was taken through a telescopic lens, and thus you don't see the perspective of movement.
When photographers and artists want to exaggerate perspective, they do the opposite: use a wide-angle lens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411864</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>liquibyte</author>
	<datestamp>1260649800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and I once again look like an ass.  We should remember that those at nasa aren't good at technical shit.  That would be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.tiff and not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.tif for those less fortunate souls that really wanted the big pictures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and I once again look like an ass .
We should remember that those at nasa are n't good at technical shit .
That would be .tiff and not .tif for those less fortunate souls that really wanted the big pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and I once again look like an ass.
We should remember that those at nasa aren't good at technical shit.
That would be .tiff and not .tif for those less fortunate souls that really wanted the big pictures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411896</id>
	<title>Re:Europe has been had</title>
	<author>Richard Dick Head</author>
	<datestamp>1260650400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>suck a nigger cock you fat fuck</htmltext>
<tokenext>suck a nigger cock you fat fuck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>suck a nigger cock you fat fuck</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>FlyingSquidStudios</author>
	<datestamp>1260649020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413276</id>
	<title>That's no moon!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260627240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're doomed!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're doomed ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're doomed!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854</id>
	<title>Ask slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260649740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, forgive my ignorance (physics is not my field): What orbit model is going to be refined? I've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries ago, and that modern cosmology studies the 'very big' things, portions of universe so massive that introduce glitches in relativistic theories, instead of moons' orbits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , forgive my ignorance ( physics is not my field ) : What orbit model is going to be refined ?
I 've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries ago , and that modern cosmology studies the 'very big ' things , portions of universe so massive that introduce glitches in relativistic theories , instead of moons ' orbits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, forgive my ignorance (physics is not my field): What orbit model is going to be refined?
I've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries ago, and that modern cosmology studies the 'very big' things, portions of universe so massive that introduce glitches in relativistic theories, instead of moons' orbits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412308</id>
	<title>TIFF URLs missing extra "f"</title>
	<author>Wodin</author>
	<datestamp>1260615780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want the "HI-RES TIFF" versions of the images, you'll need to add another "f" onto the ends of the URLs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want the " HI-RES TIFF " versions of the images , you 'll need to add another " f " onto the ends of the URLs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want the "HI-RES TIFF" versions of the images, you'll need to add another "f" onto the ends of the URLs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413200</id>
	<title>Sure, if you believe in</title>
	<author>gilroy</author>
	<datestamp>1260626280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that whole "we've sent things to Mars" myth that the Conspiracy is trying to force on you.  I think the whole thing was shot on a soundstage in Southern California<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'm pretty sure I can see the support wires.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that whole " we 've sent things to Mars " myth that the Conspiracy is trying to force on you .
I think the whole thing was shot on a soundstage in Southern California ... I 'm pretty sure I can see the support wires .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that whole "we've sent things to Mars" myth that the Conspiracy is trying to force on you.
I think the whole thing was shot on a soundstage in Southern California ... I'm pretty sure I can see the support wires.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411948</id>
	<title>That's odd...</title>
	<author>jtownatpunk.net</author>
	<datestamp>1260651300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see any Leather Goddesses.  Maybe I need to set the naughtiness level to "lewd".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see any Leather Goddesses .
Maybe I need to set the naughtiness level to " lewd " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see any Leather Goddesses.
Maybe I need to set the naughtiness level to "lewd".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413494</id>
	<title>4X MORE magnification</title>
	<author>smchris</author>
	<datestamp>1260629580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody know the absolute magnification?  These objects are really close, but small.  Whatever, I suppose.  It would surely still be weird to see them track across the sky live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody know the absolute magnification ?
These objects are really close , but small .
Whatever , I suppose .
It would surely still be weird to see them track across the sky live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody know the absolute magnification?
These objects are really close, but small.
Whatever, I suppose.
It would surely still be weird to see them track across the sky live.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415290</id>
	<title>Odd Phobos striations</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1260643080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the deal with the curious striations running longitudinally across the whole surface?  Notice, in particular, that they even continue down into and through craters!  What could cause that?</p><p>My first thought was that Phobos must have a fast spin in addition to its fast orbit, and that it was acquiring those gouges as it spins through clouds of debris.  Then I read the notes and learned that the "N" marked the north pole of its axis, meaning that the striations are running perpendicular to its rotation!?</p><p>Back to the drawing board....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the deal with the curious striations running longitudinally across the whole surface ?
Notice , in particular , that they even continue down into and through craters !
What could cause that ? My first thought was that Phobos must have a fast spin in addition to its fast orbit , and that it was acquiring those gouges as it spins through clouds of debris .
Then I read the notes and learned that the " N " marked the north pole of its axis , meaning that the striations are running perpendicular to its rotation !
? Back to the drawing board... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the deal with the curious striations running longitudinally across the whole surface?
Notice, in particular, that they even continue down into and through craters!
What could cause that?My first thought was that Phobos must have a fast spin in addition to its fast orbit, and that it was acquiring those gouges as it spins through clouds of debris.
Then I read the notes and learned that the "N" marked the north pole of its axis, meaning that the striations are running perpendicular to its rotation!
?Back to the drawing board....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412234</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260614340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most "space images" are very heavily processed.  If they took a normal picture it wouldn't look nearly as good.  NASA learned a long time ago that its only reason for getting funded (besides being a jobs program) was making pretty pictures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most " space images " are very heavily processed .
If they took a normal picture it would n't look nearly as good .
NASA learned a long time ago that its only reason for getting funded ( besides being a jobs program ) was making pretty pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most "space images" are very heavily processed.
If they took a normal picture it wouldn't look nearly as good.
NASA learned a long time ago that its only reason for getting funded (besides being a jobs program) was making pretty pictures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412004</id>
	<title>Ho80</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260609120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your own towel in Right now. I tried, Were nuulified by sure that by the to stick something Under the GPL. a relatively posts. Therefore FreeBSD at about 80 Took precedence</htmltext>
<tokenext>your own towel in Right now .
I tried , Were nuulified by sure that by the to stick something Under the GPL .
a relatively posts .
Therefore FreeBSD at about 80 Took precedence</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your own towel in Right now.
I tried, Were nuulified by sure that by the to stick something Under the GPL.
a relatively posts.
Therefore FreeBSD at about 80 Took precedence</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412196</id>
	<title>Two Words</title>
	<author>DigitalJer</author>
	<datestamp>1260613500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>most awesome<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...'awesome' is so over-used, but it's truly appropriate here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>most awesome ...'awesome ' is so over-used , but it 's truly appropriate here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>most awesome ...'awesome' is so over-used, but it's truly appropriate here</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411946</id>
	<title>action films</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260651180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's sad that we are so used to action and sci-fi films with amazing simulations of astonishing things, that when it comes to the real one (a piece of rock which really exists up there, and IS cool) we think we are seeing the intro for a 1985 asteroid game, and think for ourselves 'where are the explosions?
I myself had to do an effort to rationally avoid that thinking and covince myself of the real coolness of the thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sad that we are so used to action and sci-fi films with amazing simulations of astonishing things , that when it comes to the real one ( a piece of rock which really exists up there , and IS cool ) we think we are seeing the intro for a 1985 asteroid game , and think for ourselves 'where are the explosions ?
I myself had to do an effort to rationally avoid that thinking and covince myself of the real coolness of the thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sad that we are so used to action and sci-fi films with amazing simulations of astonishing things, that when it comes to the real one (a piece of rock which really exists up there, and IS cool) we think we are seeing the intro for a 1985 asteroid game, and think for ourselves 'where are the explosions?
I myself had to do an effort to rationally avoid that thinking and covince myself of the real coolness of the thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413316</id>
	<title>Drunk Pirate with two peglegs.</title>
	<author>telomerewhythere</author>
	<datestamp>1260627660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or does Phobos seem like a drunk pirate with two peglegs has been wandering around on it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or does Phobos seem like a drunk pirate with two peglegs has been wandering around on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or does Phobos seem like a drunk pirate with two peglegs has been wandering around on it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411790</id>
	<title>Europe has been had</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260648780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's merely a negative of somebody taking a shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's merely a negative of somebody taking a shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's merely a negative of somebody taking a shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412098</id>
	<title>Nice mission overall</title>
	<author>dragisha</author>
	<datestamp>1260611400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Movie is only one of mission returns, and it surely looks like a video game to many who don't think further than WoW when thinking about exploring unknown<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p><p>Mission itself is what is important here - being technologically advanced far more than Voyagers and giving us previews of what will come in future.... Better cameras and other instruments, better communications, faster spacecraft.... We are only beggining to see around solar system (Voyager is only 32 yrs old) and Mars Express is BIG THING.</p><p>What is also expected is downplay of whole thing, not-invented-here syndrome... But it's ok and it's temporary - results will surely be used without discrimination in world's scientific communities.</p><p>What I can't understand is why they're still inventing whole lander thing when technology for safe landing (and going back up) of people is tried FORTY years ago?!! One would expect it wil be everyday thing after so much time. Just think about how other technologies developed in 40 years span. Just compare already mentioned cameras and communications.... Weird.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Movie is only one of mission returns , and it surely looks like a video game to many who do n't think further than WoW when thinking about exploring unknown : ) .Mission itself is what is important here - being technologically advanced far more than Voyagers and giving us previews of what will come in future.... Better cameras and other instruments , better communications , faster spacecraft.... We are only beggining to see around solar system ( Voyager is only 32 yrs old ) and Mars Express is BIG THING.What is also expected is downplay of whole thing , not-invented-here syndrome... But it 's ok and it 's temporary - results will surely be used without discrimination in world 's scientific communities.What I ca n't understand is why they 're still inventing whole lander thing when technology for safe landing ( and going back up ) of people is tried FORTY years ago ? ! !
One would expect it wil be everyday thing after so much time .
Just think about how other technologies developed in 40 years span .
Just compare already mentioned cameras and communications.... Weird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Movie is only one of mission returns, and it surely looks like a video game to many who don't think further than WoW when thinking about exploring unknown :).Mission itself is what is important here - being technologically advanced far more than Voyagers and giving us previews of what will come in future.... Better cameras and other instruments, better communications, faster spacecraft.... We are only beggining to see around solar system (Voyager is only 32 yrs old) and Mars Express is BIG THING.What is also expected is downplay of whole thing, not-invented-here syndrome... But it's ok and it's temporary - results will surely be used without discrimination in world's scientific communities.What I can't understand is why they're still inventing whole lander thing when technology for safe landing (and going back up) of people is tried FORTY years ago?!!
One would expect it wil be everyday thing after so much time.
Just think about how other technologies developed in 40 years span.
Just compare already mentioned cameras and communications.... Weird.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411758</id>
	<title>eat my shorts slashdot !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260648420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eat my shorts slashdot !!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413478</id>
	<title>Re:Ask slashdot</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1260629340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The theory behind orbits in general is a solved problem, for some limited specific condtions (i.e. gravity as a point source, two bodies, and stuff like that). But that doesn't mean you know the actual parameters of the orbit (inclination, semi-major axis (period), etc) of any particular body. Any orbit "fit" is alwasy being refined.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The other issue is that gravity actually isn't a point source with a simple inverse-square law nor are there only two bodies involved. The gravity of any real physical body is lumpy, other bodies pull on it, too, so the orbits are far from completely predictable and will never be perfectly well known.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The theory behind orbits in general is a solved problem , for some limited specific condtions ( i.e .
gravity as a point source , two bodies , and stuff like that ) .
But that does n't mean you know the actual parameters of the orbit ( inclination , semi-major axis ( period ) , etc ) of any particular body .
Any orbit " fit " is alwasy being refined .
        The other issue is that gravity actually is n't a point source with a simple inverse-square law nor are there only two bodies involved .
The gravity of any real physical body is lumpy , other bodies pull on it , too , so the orbits are far from completely predictable and will never be perfectly well known .
        Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The theory behind orbits in general is a solved problem, for some limited specific condtions (i.e.
gravity as a point source, two bodies, and stuff like that).
But that doesn't mean you know the actual parameters of the orbit (inclination, semi-major axis (period), etc) of any particular body.
Any orbit "fit" is alwasy being refined.
        The other issue is that gravity actually isn't a point source with a simple inverse-square law nor are there only two bodies involved.
The gravity of any real physical body is lumpy, other bodies pull on it, too, so the orbits are far from completely predictable and will never be perfectly well known.
        Brett</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415712</id>
	<title>Let's go</title>
	<author>Yergle143</author>
	<datestamp>1260645540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phobos and Deimos have a significant amount of water.<br>How about a manned deep space mission to sample them...probably cheaper<br>than a return to the moon, and demonstrably more interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phobos and Deimos have a significant amount of water.How about a manned deep space mission to sample them...probably cheaperthan a return to the moon , and demonstrably more interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phobos and Deimos have a significant amount of water.How about a manned deep space mission to sample them...probably cheaperthan a return to the moon, and demonstrably more interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413732</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone noticed ...</title>
	<author>HNS-I</author>
	<datestamp>1260631620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess it won't fit in Bill's harddrive then. Can't  they crop it just a little?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it wo n't fit in Bill 's harddrive then .
Ca n't they crop it just a little ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it won't fit in Bill's harddrive then.
Can't  they crop it just a little?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412222</id>
	<title>Wow....</title>
	<author>WGFCrafty</author>
	<datestamp>1260614100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Encapsulating planets takes a BIG satellite.<br> <br>
It must stretch itself out really thin for only weighing 1123 kg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Encapsulating planets takes a BIG satellite .
It must stretch itself out really thin for only weighing 1123 kg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Encapsulating planets takes a BIG satellite.
It must stretch itself out really thin for only weighing 1123 kg.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413560</id>
	<title>Re:Ask slashdot</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1260630300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The orbit of Phobos, particularly, has an oddity that has attracted a lot of interest, and more data is always welcomed.</p><p>The orbit of Phobos is decaying, presumably due to <a href="http://astrosun2.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro6570/Tidal\_evolution.pdf" title="cornell.edu">tidal friction</a> [cornell.edu] - the work required for Phobos to raise a small tidal bugle in the part of Mars below it. There is nothing surprising in that, per se (Moons inside a geostationary orbit will decay inwards due to tidal friction, Moons outside  a geostationary orbit will "decay" outwards), but what is surprising is the "Q" required to match the observations. (The Q is total energy in the bulge divided by the rate of energy lost per orbit.) The Q inferred from observations of Phobos's orbital decay, and the rigidity of the Martian surface found from observations of the Martian <a href="http://seismo.berkeley.edu/~manga/yoder2003.pdf" title="berkeley.edu">Solar tide</a> [berkeley.edu], is about 90. The corresponding Q for the Earth is about 12, but that is mostly due to ocean tides, and the Q inferred for the Earth's mantle is about 280.</p><p>So, the Mars-Phobos system <a href="http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2009/pdf/1712.pdf" title="usra.edu">has a higher solid-body dissipation</a> [usra.edu] than the Earth-Moon system, which is surprising. In nailing this down, all sorts of data have been acquired for Phobos (including eclipse data from the Mars Rovers), but there is always room for more. What the current data should do is provide a tie for the relative longitudes of Phobos and Deimos which (especially if this can be repeated) will help make sure that there are no drifts between the orbits of the two Moons.</p><p>By the way, with the current orbital decay, the <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.1995" title="arxiv.org">expected lifetime of the orbits is somewhere in the 20 to 40 million year range</a> [arxiv.org]  - it seems unlikely that we just happen to catch Phobos at its end-of-life, which has raised speculation about its decay being time variable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The orbit of Phobos , particularly , has an oddity that has attracted a lot of interest , and more data is always welcomed.The orbit of Phobos is decaying , presumably due to tidal friction [ cornell.edu ] - the work required for Phobos to raise a small tidal bugle in the part of Mars below it .
There is nothing surprising in that , per se ( Moons inside a geostationary orbit will decay inwards due to tidal friction , Moons outside a geostationary orbit will " decay " outwards ) , but what is surprising is the " Q " required to match the observations .
( The Q is total energy in the bulge divided by the rate of energy lost per orbit .
) The Q inferred from observations of Phobos 's orbital decay , and the rigidity of the Martian surface found from observations of the Martian Solar tide [ berkeley.edu ] , is about 90 .
The corresponding Q for the Earth is about 12 , but that is mostly due to ocean tides , and the Q inferred for the Earth 's mantle is about 280.So , the Mars-Phobos system has a higher solid-body dissipation [ usra.edu ] than the Earth-Moon system , which is surprising .
In nailing this down , all sorts of data have been acquired for Phobos ( including eclipse data from the Mars Rovers ) , but there is always room for more .
What the current data should do is provide a tie for the relative longitudes of Phobos and Deimos which ( especially if this can be repeated ) will help make sure that there are no drifts between the orbits of the two Moons.By the way , with the current orbital decay , the expected lifetime of the orbits is somewhere in the 20 to 40 million year range [ arxiv.org ] - it seems unlikely that we just happen to catch Phobos at its end-of-life , which has raised speculation about its decay being time variable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The orbit of Phobos, particularly, has an oddity that has attracted a lot of interest, and more data is always welcomed.The orbit of Phobos is decaying, presumably due to tidal friction [cornell.edu] - the work required for Phobos to raise a small tidal bugle in the part of Mars below it.
There is nothing surprising in that, per se (Moons inside a geostationary orbit will decay inwards due to tidal friction, Moons outside  a geostationary orbit will "decay" outwards), but what is surprising is the "Q" required to match the observations.
(The Q is total energy in the bulge divided by the rate of energy lost per orbit.
) The Q inferred from observations of Phobos's orbital decay, and the rigidity of the Martian surface found from observations of the Martian Solar tide [berkeley.edu], is about 90.
The corresponding Q for the Earth is about 12, but that is mostly due to ocean tides, and the Q inferred for the Earth's mantle is about 280.So, the Mars-Phobos system has a higher solid-body dissipation [usra.edu] than the Earth-Moon system, which is surprising.
In nailing this down, all sorts of data have been acquired for Phobos (including eclipse data from the Mars Rovers), but there is always room for more.
What the current data should do is provide a tie for the relative longitudes of Phobos and Deimos which (especially if this can be repeated) will help make sure that there are no drifts between the orbits of the two Moons.By the way, with the current orbital decay, the expected lifetime of the orbits is somewhere in the 20 to 40 million year range [arxiv.org]  - it seems unlikely that we just happen to catch Phobos at its end-of-life, which has raised speculation about its decay being time variable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415020</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>snaz555</author>
	<datestamp>1260641160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop.</p></div><p>
They can't afford tabletop models anymore, so in this project they used paper cutouts on a black canvas.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop .
They ca n't afford tabletop models anymore , so in this project they used paper cutouts on a black canvas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so weird when reality looks like bad Photoshop.
They can't afford tabletop models anymore, so in this project they used paper cutouts on a black canvas.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846</id>
	<title>Anyone noticed ...</title>
	<author>PIBM</author>
	<datestamp>1260649560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ?!!!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ? ! ! !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ?!!!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412546</id>
	<title>Due to just waking up...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260618480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And some strange effect of my eyes "booting up", I read that as "Mars Captures Phobos and Deimos"... i almost dropped a lung.</p><p>Also, those are some amazing graphics, did you see those 2 rocks moving across that screen!  <i>WOW</i><br>I think it is quite sad that we have gotten to the point where unrealistic CG looks <i>better</i> than the real thing.<br>I think the space agencies should hire whatever CG teams they can to make things <b>awesome</b>, i'm talking dust trails on a moon, explosions of fire or whatever, maybe throw in some messy pixels in animations that look semi-human to keep the alien hunters interested.<br>It won't exactly matter if they are found out, by the time the kids grow up and are interested, the current teams will probably be dead... it would almost be trolling in the future from your grave.<br>I could imagine the grave stones of all the team, something along the lines of "once you get in, you never get out", it would appear to just be in reference to how much they loved it, but they'll never truly get it till they are working and it is too late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And some strange effect of my eyes " booting up " , I read that as " Mars Captures Phobos and Deimos " ... i almost dropped a lung.Also , those are some amazing graphics , did you see those 2 rocks moving across that screen !
WOWI think it is quite sad that we have gotten to the point where unrealistic CG looks better than the real thing.I think the space agencies should hire whatever CG teams they can to make things awesome , i 'm talking dust trails on a moon , explosions of fire or whatever , maybe throw in some messy pixels in animations that look semi-human to keep the alien hunters interested.It wo n't exactly matter if they are found out , by the time the kids grow up and are interested , the current teams will probably be dead... it would almost be trolling in the future from your grave.I could imagine the grave stones of all the team , something along the lines of " once you get in , you never get out " , it would appear to just be in reference to how much they loved it , but they 'll never truly get it till they are working and it is too late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And some strange effect of my eyes "booting up", I read that as "Mars Captures Phobos and Deimos"... i almost dropped a lung.Also, those are some amazing graphics, did you see those 2 rocks moving across that screen!
WOWI think it is quite sad that we have gotten to the point where unrealistic CG looks better than the real thing.I think the space agencies should hire whatever CG teams they can to make things awesome, i'm talking dust trails on a moon, explosions of fire or whatever, maybe throw in some messy pixels in animations that look semi-human to keep the alien hunters interested.It won't exactly matter if they are found out, by the time the kids grow up and are interested, the current teams will probably be dead... it would almost be trolling in the future from your grave.I could imagine the grave stones of all the team, something along the lines of "once you get in, you never get out", it would appear to just be in reference to how much they loved it, but they'll never truly get it till they are working and it is too late.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30454058</id>
	<title>Someone spot E1M1</title>
	<author>dvs01</author>
	<datestamp>1260899400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm looking at those craters and am trying to figure out where the Phobos bases are.  Perhaps it's at the wrong angle.  Did the UAC cover it up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking at those craters and am trying to figure out where the Phobos bases are .
Perhaps it 's at the wrong angle .
Did the UAC cover it up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm looking at those craters and am trying to figure out where the Phobos bases are.
Perhaps it's at the wrong angle.
Did the UAC cover it up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414440</id>
	<title>Re:Pitch black.</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1260637080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody with experience using a camera will not expect such a thing at all, in fact the opposite. Well, with current technology anyway. Plus big dynamic range isn't really that useful in space...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody with experience using a camera will not expect such a thing at all , in fact the opposite .
Well , with current technology anyway .
Plus big dynamic range is n't really that useful in space.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody with experience using a camera will not expect such a thing at all, in fact the opposite.
Well, with current technology anyway.
Plus big dynamic range isn't really that useful in space...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412350</id>
	<title>Pitch black.</title>
	<author>yogibaer</author>
	<datestamp>1260616380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is really creepy about these movies and pictures is, that somehow you always expect stars in the background (like on a ship at night). Instead you get two rocks hanging in a black void. Just one vast emptiness. Scary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is really creepy about these movies and pictures is , that somehow you always expect stars in the background ( like on a ship at night ) .
Instead you get two rocks hanging in a black void .
Just one vast emptiness .
Scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is really creepy about these movies and pictures is, that somehow you always expect stars in the background (like on a ship at night).
Instead you get two rocks hanging in a black void.
Just one vast emptiness.
Scary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413798</id>
	<title>Well that's disappointing...</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1260632040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The RSS feed headline said "Mars Express Captures Phobos and Deimos" and I thought to myself, if we can do that then any future comet or asteroid impact should be easy to avoid, we just capture it and park it at Lagrange Point 4. Then we can maybe use the materials as resources for other missions....<br> <br>Then I read the story and see we have a stop frame animation that looks like a cut from Robot Chicken.<br> <br> It just doesn't pay to get excited about science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The RSS feed headline said " Mars Express Captures Phobos and Deimos " and I thought to myself , if we can do that then any future comet or asteroid impact should be easy to avoid , we just capture it and park it at Lagrange Point 4 .
Then we can maybe use the materials as resources for other missions.... Then I read the story and see we have a stop frame animation that looks like a cut from Robot Chicken .
It just does n't pay to get excited about science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RSS feed headline said "Mars Express Captures Phobos and Deimos" and I thought to myself, if we can do that then any future comet or asteroid impact should be easy to avoid, we just capture it and park it at Lagrange Point 4.
Then we can maybe use the materials as resources for other missions.... Then I read the story and see we have a stop frame animation that looks like a cut from Robot Chicken.
It just doesn't pay to get excited about science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412216</id>
	<title>Re:Ask slashdot</title>
	<author>Linzer</author>
	<datestamp>1260614040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Please, forgive my ignorance (physics is not my field): What orbit model is going to be refined? I've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries ago</p></div><p>Sure, the physics behind planetary movements is well-known, but the zillion parameters that are at play (including the mass distribution of the objects involved) are only measured to finite precision. They are talking about refining the model by refining its parameters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , forgive my ignorance ( physics is not my field ) : What orbit model is going to be refined ?
I 've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries agoSure , the physics behind planetary movements is well-known , but the zillion parameters that are at play ( including the mass distribution of the objects involved ) are only measured to finite precision .
They are talking about refining the model by refining its parameters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, forgive my ignorance (physics is not my field): What orbit model is going to be refined?
I've always thought that planetary movements were resolved centuries agoSure, the physics behind planetary movements is well-known, but the zillion parameters that are at play (including the mass distribution of the objects involved) are only measured to finite precision.
They are talking about refining the model by refining its parameters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415212</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1260642540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really.  They look more like poorly tweened objects in Flash.  Which is actually worse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
They look more like poorly tweened objects in Flash .
Which is actually worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
They look more like poorly tweened objects in Flash.
Which is actually worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413106</id>
	<title>fris7 stop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260625380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">brain. It is the By fundamental parts. The current to download the commun1ty. The I'm sick of it. over tjhe same</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>brain .
It is the By fundamental parts .
The current to download the commun1ty .
The I 'm sick of it .
over tjhe same [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brain.
It is the By fundamental parts.
The current to download the commun1ty.
The I'm sick of it.
over tjhe same [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414022</id>
	<title>Fake?</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1260634020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Notice that both moons move in a perfect horizontal line? So the camera was perfectly aligned at the time? Or ??? <br>Did anyone else expect tumbling or rotation, however slowly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Notice that both moons move in a perfect horizontal line ?
So the camera was perfectly aligned at the time ?
Or ? ? ?
Did anyone else expect tumbling or rotation , however slowly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notice that both moons move in a perfect horizontal line?
So the camera was perfectly aligned at the time?
Or ???
Did anyone else expect tumbling or rotation, however slowly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30421014</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone noticed ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260736740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ?!!!?</p></div><p>Maybe John Romero had the right idea all along...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ? ! ! !
? Maybe John Romero had the right idea all along.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the jpg weight in at 666kb ?!!!
?Maybe John Romero had the right idea all along...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412976</id>
	<title>Re:That's odd...</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1260623820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That will happen automatically, due to time dilation, once we accelerate to lewdicrous speed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That will happen automatically , due to time dilation , once we accelerate to lewdicrous speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That will happen automatically, due to time dilation, once we accelerate to lewdicrous speed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413634</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260630840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/331/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">Obligatory xkcd reference.</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory xkcd reference .
[ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory xkcd reference.
[xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414018</id>
	<title>Maelstrom</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1260634020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My fingers instinctively groped for the keyboard when I saw the asteroids entering the picture. I find it alarming that the large asteroid is faster than the small one.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maelstrom.png" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maelstrom.png</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My fingers instinctively groped for the keyboard when I saw the asteroids entering the picture .
I find it alarming that the large asteroid is faster than the small one.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File : Maelstrom.png [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My fingers instinctively groped for the keyboard when I saw the asteroids entering the picture.
I find it alarming that the large asteroid is faster than the small one.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maelstrom.png [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413472</id>
	<title>No! Get away!</title>
	<author>Windwraith</author>
	<datestamp>1260629280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you might end knee-deep in the dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you might end knee-deep in the dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you might end knee-deep in the dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30421014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_12_0341227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30454030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30421014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30454030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30414018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_12_0341227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30413634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30411864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30412234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_12_0341227.30415020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
