<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_11_2328245</id>
	<title>Is Earth's Atmosphere an Import?</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1260532500000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>garg0yle writes <i>"One of the questions about the formation of our planet is: where did the atmosphere come from?  One theory is that the oxygen, nitrogen, and other gases were part of the coalescing ball, and 'seeped out' during the final stages of the planet's formation.  However, a new article at <em>Wired</em> says isotopic analysis of krypton and xenon indicates that they (and the rest of our atmosphere) may be of extraterrestrial origin, either <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/earth-atmosphere-alien/">arriving via comets or being swept up from gas clouds</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>garg0yle writes " One of the questions about the formation of our planet is : where did the atmosphere come from ?
One theory is that the oxygen , nitrogen , and other gases were part of the coalescing ball , and 'seeped out ' during the final stages of the planet 's formation .
However , a new article at Wired says isotopic analysis of krypton and xenon indicates that they ( and the rest of our atmosphere ) may be of extraterrestrial origin , either arriving via comets or being swept up from gas clouds .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>garg0yle writes "One of the questions about the formation of our planet is: where did the atmosphere come from?
One theory is that the oxygen, nitrogen, and other gases were part of the coalescing ball, and 'seeped out' during the final stages of the planet's formation.
However, a new article at Wired says isotopic analysis of krypton and xenon indicates that they (and the rest of our atmosphere) may be of extraterrestrial origin, either arriving via comets or being swept up from gas clouds.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260536640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly who cares?</p><p>This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets.  The atmosphere is from some part of space.  Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly who cares ? This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets .
The atmosphere is from some part of space .
Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly who cares?This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets.
The atmosphere is from some part of space.
Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30442704</id>
	<title>Time Machine</title>
	<author>m1xram</author>
	<datestamp>1260883680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm getting in my time machine right now... I'm back. The cowboy aliens, I ran into, said large scale matter transporters were used. Who knew?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm getting in my time machine right now... I 'm back .
The cowboy aliens , I ran into , said large scale matter transporters were used .
Who knew ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm getting in my time machine right now... I'm back.
The cowboy aliens, I ran into, said large scale matter transporters were used.
Who knew?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409468</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>phantomcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1260541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres?</p></div><p>How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe?</p></div><p>I had to think about this one for a minute, but I realised that if we are having trouble figuring out what happened here how are we going to even begin to hazard a guess about what happened light years away?</p><p>Sure it might be useful, but this was a waste of funding and time.  There are far more useful ways to spend research money.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres ? How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets ? Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe ? I had to think about this one for a minute , but I realised that if we are having trouble figuring out what happened here how are we going to even begin to hazard a guess about what happened light years away ? Sure it might be useful , but this was a waste of funding and time .
There are far more useful ways to spend research money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres?How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets?Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe?I had to think about this one for a minute, but I realised that if we are having trouble figuring out what happened here how are we going to even begin to hazard a guess about what happened light years away?Sure it might be useful, but this was a waste of funding and time.
There are far more useful ways to spend research money.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408928</id>
	<title>Al Gore invented it in his own image...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260537120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...which is why he is so upset that we are destroying it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which is why he is so upset that we are destroying it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which is why he is so upset that we are destroying it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412060</id>
	<title>Isotope Separation</title>
	<author>Roger W Moore</author>
	<datestamp>1260610260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?</p></div><p>
My guess would be yes since there is a well established method to measure the historic ocean temperature using the ratio of Oxygen-18 to Oxygen-16. O-16 preferentially evaporates due to its smaller mass and so during ice ages the oceans are depleted of O-16 because it evaporates and forms glacial ice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?
My guess would be yes since there is a well established method to measure the historic ocean temperature using the ratio of Oxygen-18 to Oxygen-16 .
O-16 preferentially evaporates due to its smaller mass and so during ice ages the oceans are depleted of O-16 because it evaporates and forms glacial ice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?
My guess would be yes since there is a well established method to measure the historic ocean temperature using the ratio of Oxygen-18 to Oxygen-16.
O-16 preferentially evaporates due to its smaller mass and so during ice ages the oceans are depleted of O-16 because it evaporates and forms glacial ice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411450</id>
	<title>Hot grits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260557700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GOD created the Earth out of hot grits like a few thousand hot actresses ago!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GOD created the Earth out of hot grits like a few thousand hot actresses ago !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOD created the Earth out of hot grits like a few thousand hot actresses ago!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411718</id>
	<title>Re:Rubbish...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260561360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...samples of gas pulled from a natural reservoir of carbon dioxide that lies several hundred meters below northeastern New Mexico." Isn't this the stuff (CO2) that's causing all the political hell at present? "A natural resevoir?" Is mother nature producing this gas? Whose side is she on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...samples of gas pulled from a natural reservoir of carbon dioxide that lies several hundred meters below northeastern New Mexico .
" Is n't this the stuff ( CO2 ) that 's causing all the political hell at present ?
" A natural resevoir ?
" Is mother nature producing this gas ?
Whose side is she on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...samples of gas pulled from a natural reservoir of carbon dioxide that lies several hundred meters below northeastern New Mexico.
" Isn't this the stuff (CO2) that's causing all the political hell at present?
"A natural resevoir?
" Is mother nature producing this gas?
Whose side is she on?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410436</id>
	<title>donkey's made it i tell ya!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260548400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>donkey's made it i tell ya! that's all i know what the truth is and that's all the truth i will ever know how to handle gdamnit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>donkey 's made it i tell ya !
that 's all i know what the truth is and that 's all the truth i will ever know how to handle gdamnit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>donkey's made it i tell ya!
that's all i know what the truth is and that's all the truth i will ever know how to handle gdamnit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411634</id>
	<title>Re:Wha...?</title>
	<author>rastoboy29</author>
	<datestamp>1260559980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>So uh...how *do* you explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants?<br><br>You say that like it's a known, or that there is a whole lot other "known" information on this subject.&nbsp; There is not.&nbsp; And therefore your off the cuff skepticism is quite premature.&nbsp; At this point we're still in the stage of needing to consider all the possibilities, with all the creativity that entails.<br><br>There could be some real merit to this theory, even if not on the surface.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>So uh...how * do * you explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants ? You say that like it 's a known , or that there is a whole lot other " known " information on this subject.   There is not.   And therefore your off the cuff skepticism is quite premature.   At this point we 're still in the stage of needing to consider all the possibilities , with all the creativity that entails.There could be some real merit to this theory , even if not on the surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So uh...how *do* you explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants?You say that like it's a known, or that there is a whole lot other "known" information on this subject.  There is not.  And therefore your off the cuff skepticism is quite premature.  At this point we're still in the stage of needing to consider all the possibilities, with all the creativity that entails.There could be some real merit to this theory, even if not on the surface.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768</id>
	<title>Rubbish...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260536280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an atmosphere skeptic.</p><p>The existence of the atmosphere is a liberal hoax perpetrated on us by the scientific community.</p><p>Can you see it? No. What are they trying to hide?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an atmosphere skeptic.The existence of the atmosphere is a liberal hoax perpetrated on us by the scientific community.Can you see it ?
No. What are they trying to hide ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an atmosphere skeptic.The existence of the atmosphere is a liberal hoax perpetrated on us by the scientific community.Can you see it?
No. What are they trying to hide?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409022</id>
	<title>Redefining terrestrial</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everything's from somewhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything 's from somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything's from somewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30413956</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>brusk</author>
	<datestamp>1260633360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets?</p><p>If, for example, certain conditions are needed for a planet to develop a substantial atmosphere, we could look for star systems with those conditions.</p><p>Another potential use of this information: it might be helpful data for future terraforming projects, since it could provide a model for the introduction of new gases to a planet.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets ? If , for example , certain conditions are needed for a planet to develop a substantial atmosphere , we could look for star systems with those conditions.Another potential use of this information : it might be helpful data for future terraforming projects , since it could provide a model for the introduction of new gases to a planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is the specific order of events that lead to the creation of our planet going to tell us anything about the creation of other planets?If, for example, certain conditions are needed for a planet to develop a substantial atmosphere, we could look for star systems with those conditions.Another potential use of this information: it might be helpful data for future terraforming projects, since it could provide a model for the introduction of new gases to a planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30423540</id>
	<title>Re:Rubbish...</title>
	<author>a1cypher</author>
	<datestamp>1260729240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the earth is an oblate spheroid.   Not a perfect sphere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the earth is an oblate spheroid .
Not a perfect sphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the earth is an oblate spheroid.
Not a perfect sphere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408870</id>
	<title>Has anyone considered mega maid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260536820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw a documentary on this giant vacuum cleaner theory once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw a documentary on this giant vacuum cleaner theory once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw a documentary on this giant vacuum cleaner theory once.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409050</id>
	<title>aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260537960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810</id>
	<title>Weird conclusion</title>
	<author>BlueParrot</author>
	<datestamp>1260536460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In particular, heavier isotopes of each gas appear in larger proportions in the subterranean samples than they do in the atmosphere.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is exactly what I would expect from a diffusion process since heavier atoms would move slower than light ones. Granted the ratios may be too large to be explained in this way, but still.</p><p>Also I dunno how large an effect it would be but in a system the radius of the entire earth, but would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In particular , heavier isotopes of each gas appear in larger proportions in the subterranean samples than they do in the atmosphere.This is exactly what I would expect from a diffusion process since heavier atoms would move slower than light ones .
Granted the ratios may be too large to be explained in this way , but still.Also I dunno how large an effect it would be but in a system the radius of the entire earth , but would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In particular, heavier isotopes of each gas appear in larger proportions in the subterranean samples than they do in the atmosphere.This is exactly what I would expect from a diffusion process since heavier atoms would move slower than light ones.
Granted the ratios may be too large to be explained in this way, but still.Also I dunno how large an effect it would be but in a system the radius of the entire earth, but would the mass difference make a measurable difference due to gravity ?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409488</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1260541200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The entire Earth came from dust and gas. Sure some of it may have arrived a little late in big chunks or clouds but the reason our atmosphere has the composition it does now is that life changed it from something like Titan's atmosphere to what we see today. In otherwords life and the atmosphere co-evolved on this planet and they continue to do so, neither would exist in their current form without the other.
<br> <br>
The atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere are collectively know as the biosphere. If we find a spectra from another planet's atmosphere that has a similar composition to ours then our current state of knowledge would demand the conclusion that life created it. And yeah, it's worthwhile looking. IIRC scientists have already determined the atmospheric composition of several exoplanets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire Earth came from dust and gas .
Sure some of it may have arrived a little late in big chunks or clouds but the reason our atmosphere has the composition it does now is that life changed it from something like Titan 's atmosphere to what we see today .
In otherwords life and the atmosphere co-evolved on this planet and they continue to do so , neither would exist in their current form without the other .
The atmosphere , lithosphere , and hydrosphere are collectively know as the biosphere .
If we find a spectra from another planet 's atmosphere that has a similar composition to ours then our current state of knowledge would demand the conclusion that life created it .
And yeah , it 's worthwhile looking .
IIRC scientists have already determined the atmospheric composition of several exoplanets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entire Earth came from dust and gas.
Sure some of it may have arrived a little late in big chunks or clouds but the reason our atmosphere has the composition it does now is that life changed it from something like Titan's atmosphere to what we see today.
In otherwords life and the atmosphere co-evolved on this planet and they continue to do so, neither would exist in their current form without the other.
The atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere are collectively know as the biosphere.
If we find a spectra from another planet's atmosphere that has a similar composition to ours then our current state of knowledge would demand the conclusion that life created it.
And yeah, it's worthwhile looking.
IIRC scientists have already determined the atmospheric composition of several exoplanets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410028</id>
	<title>"Transpermia"?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1260544860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411558</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1260558960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>the full implications of knowledge cannot be predicted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the full implications of knowledge can not be predicted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the full implications of knowledge cannot be predicted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414200</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1260635340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets. The atmosphere is from some part of space. Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information.</p></div></blockquote><p>Have I misread, or have I've just heard someone say that knowledge of the origin of our planet is 'useless information'?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets .
The atmosphere is from some part of space .
Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information.Have I misread , or have I 've just heard someone say that knowledge of the origin of our planet is 'useless information ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has zero relevance to our basic understanding of the formation of the planets.
The atmosphere is from some part of space.
Whether it is from asteroids more recently than the late stages of the earths formation is kind of useless information.Have I misread, or have I've just heard someone say that knowledge of the origin of our planet is 'useless information'?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411800</id>
	<title>Wake up to chemtrails...  we're sprayed daily</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260648900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Atmosphere came from CHEMTRAILS</p><p>I filmed electromagnetic activity (HAARP?), mysterious black lines, invisible planes, spider-web chemtrails and more.</p><p>All in a few short weeks...  look up at your sky - you can see it too.</p><p>http://youtube.com/TrutherD1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Atmosphere came from CHEMTRAILSI filmed electromagnetic activity ( HAARP ?
) , mysterious black lines , invisible planes , spider-web chemtrails and more.All in a few short weeks... look up at your sky - you can see it too.http : //youtube.com/TrutherD1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Atmosphere came from CHEMTRAILSI filmed electromagnetic activity (HAARP?
), mysterious black lines, invisible planes, spider-web chemtrails and more.All in a few short weeks...  look up at your sky - you can see it too.http://youtube.com/TrutherD1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411632</id>
	<title>More devastating news</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1260559920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Earth itself is made out of materials from outer space. Some super novae transported the heavy metals to our solar system. And even that was not there all the time. Hell no. And even some people think that happened on Tuesday. I am absolutely sure the whole Earth creation stuff happened on Monday as God rested on Saturday. And on Monday he made a loud noise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Earth itself is made out of materials from outer space .
Some super novae transported the heavy metals to our solar system .
And even that was not there all the time .
Hell no .
And even some people think that happened on Tuesday .
I am absolutely sure the whole Earth creation stuff happened on Monday as God rested on Saturday .
And on Monday he made a loud noise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earth itself is made out of materials from outer space.
Some super novae transported the heavy metals to our solar system.
And even that was not there all the time.
Hell no.
And even some people think that happened on Tuesday.
I am absolutely sure the whole Earth creation stuff happened on Monday as God rested on Saturday.
And on Monday he made a loud noise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409104</id>
	<title>Look at the science</title>
	<author>JadeBuddha23</author>
	<datestamp>1260538380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vegetation on this planet has been here a huge amount of time. How much time? If all of human existence, in it's entirety, were a single pixel, the age of the earth would be nearly 6000 pixels long. Vegetation have been here for 1300 pixels. That's an awful long time for the plants (completely unencumbered by man) to create oxygen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vegetation on this planet has been here a huge amount of time .
How much time ?
If all of human existence , in it 's entirety , were a single pixel , the age of the earth would be nearly 6000 pixels long .
Vegetation have been here for 1300 pixels .
That 's an awful long time for the plants ( completely unencumbered by man ) to create oxygen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vegetation on this planet has been here a huge amount of time.
How much time?
If all of human existence, in it's entirety, were a single pixel, the age of the earth would be nearly 6000 pixels long.
Vegetation have been here for 1300 pixels.
That's an awful long time for the plants (completely unencumbered by man) to create oxygen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409118</id>
	<title>or maybe</title>
	<author>quickpick</author>
	<datestamp>1260538560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>God created the earth?</htmltext>
<tokenext>God created the earth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God created the earth?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972</id>
	<title>Wha...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260537360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's hard to understand how you can extrapolate a whole atmosphere's origins by looking at a couple of very rare gases like krypton and xenon.</p><p>Given that all the elements that make up the Earth were manufactured in the same solar furnace(s) why is it necessary that some originated separately from others? How do you then explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants? It would take an unlikely number of very large asteroids to do the job.</p><p>This hypothesis suffers from the same shortcomings as the Transpermia idea. It just moves the problem elsewhere, at best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's hard to understand how you can extrapolate a whole atmosphere 's origins by looking at a couple of very rare gases like krypton and xenon.Given that all the elements that make up the Earth were manufactured in the same solar furnace ( s ) why is it necessary that some originated separately from others ?
How do you then explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants ?
It would take an unlikely number of very large asteroids to do the job.This hypothesis suffers from the same shortcomings as the Transpermia idea .
It just moves the problem elsewhere , at best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's hard to understand how you can extrapolate a whole atmosphere's origins by looking at a couple of very rare gases like krypton and xenon.Given that all the elements that make up the Earth were manufactured in the same solar furnace(s) why is it necessary that some originated separately from others?
How do you then explain the huge atmospheres of the Gas Giants?
It would take an unlikely number of very large asteroids to do the job.This hypothesis suffers from the same shortcomings as the Transpermia idea.
It just moves the problem elsewhere, at best.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409300</id>
	<title>Re:The aliens that delivered it forgot to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260540000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...remove the flying saucers.</p></div><p>They're here only to see if we are able to pay the bill yet</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...remove the flying saucers.They 're here only to see if we are able to pay the bill yet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...remove the flying saucers.They're here only to see if we are able to pay the bill yet
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30428044</id>
	<title>I used to live in space but I left because</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260726300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it had no atmosphere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it had no atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it had no atmosphere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122</id>
	<title>Science?</title>
	<author>jwiegley</author>
	<datestamp>1260538620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the HELL did this article get filed under "science".</p><p> Venus has a significant atmosphere. Saturn has an atmosphere. Neptune... atmosphere. Jupiter... ALL atmosphere. Hey, look at that! All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.</p><p>Maybe it's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.</p><p>Please refile this article under "Intellectually Bankrupt" instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the HELL did this article get filed under " science " .
Venus has a significant atmosphere .
Saturn has an atmosphere .
Neptune... atmosphere .
Jupiter... ALL atmosphere .
Hey , look at that !
All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.Maybe it 's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.Please refile this article under " Intellectually Bankrupt " instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the HELL did this article get filed under "science".
Venus has a significant atmosphere.
Saturn has an atmosphere.
Neptune... atmosphere.
Jupiter... ALL atmosphere.
Hey, look at that!
All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.Maybe it's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.Please refile this article under "Intellectually Bankrupt" instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414358</id>
	<title>Re:aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</title>
	<author>Will.Woodhull</author>
	<datestamp>1260636480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>aliens terraformed earth a long time ago</p></div><p>According to this book I've partly read [disclaimer below], it was only 6,000 years ago, and it was only one alien. A pretty powerful guy, but still only one of him.

</p><p>[disclaimer] I never finished that book. I skipped over all the begats that establish the time line, for one thing. And frankly a lot of it is just tl;dr. Then I completely stopped reading it as I began to realize just how sick in the head that alien guy is, if one is to believe the book's descriptions of his motives and actions. He's got some serious hangups about sex and fun, for one thing. And he's prone to violence that he justifies with very selfish reasoning, in fact he really seems to fit the diagnosis of narcissistic sociopath (I think the DSM now has a different name for that).

</p><p>If there is such a guy out there, presumably he is not alone, and we can hope that the others are more sane and community minded than this jerk is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>aliens terraformed earth a long time agoAccording to this book I 've partly read [ disclaimer below ] , it was only 6,000 years ago , and it was only one alien .
A pretty powerful guy , but still only one of him .
[ disclaimer ] I never finished that book .
I skipped over all the begats that establish the time line , for one thing .
And frankly a lot of it is just tl ; dr. Then I completely stopped reading it as I began to realize just how sick in the head that alien guy is , if one is to believe the book 's descriptions of his motives and actions .
He 's got some serious hangups about sex and fun , for one thing .
And he 's prone to violence that he justifies with very selfish reasoning , in fact he really seems to fit the diagnosis of narcissistic sociopath ( I think the DSM now has a different name for that ) .
If there is such a guy out there , presumably he is not alone , and we can hope that the others are more sane and community minded than this jerk is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aliens terraformed earth a long time agoAccording to this book I've partly read [disclaimer below], it was only 6,000 years ago, and it was only one alien.
A pretty powerful guy, but still only one of him.
[disclaimer] I never finished that book.
I skipped over all the begats that establish the time line, for one thing.
And frankly a lot of it is just tl;dr. Then I completely stopped reading it as I began to realize just how sick in the head that alien guy is, if one is to believe the book's descriptions of his motives and actions.
He's got some serious hangups about sex and fun, for one thing.
And he's prone to violence that he justifies with very selfish reasoning, in fact he really seems to fit the diagnosis of narcissistic sociopath (I think the DSM now has a different name for that).
If there is such a guy out there, presumably he is not alone, and we can hope that the others are more sane and community minded than this jerk is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410300</id>
	<title>Re:Wha...?</title>
	<author>raovq</author>
	<datestamp>1260547380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These gases were used because they are rare. To be of any value, the gas has to be inert, so it doesn't undergo a natural fractionation (all biological systems favour lighter isotopes). We also need a very old reliably dated source.

These gases are used as an indicator for the atmosphere as a whole, and provide the best proxy. Isotope data can be difficult to interpret at the best of times, it's best to take these hypothesis with a grain of salt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These gases were used because they are rare .
To be of any value , the gas has to be inert , so it does n't undergo a natural fractionation ( all biological systems favour lighter isotopes ) .
We also need a very old reliably dated source .
These gases are used as an indicator for the atmosphere as a whole , and provide the best proxy .
Isotope data can be difficult to interpret at the best of times , it 's best to take these hypothesis with a grain of salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These gases were used because they are rare.
To be of any value, the gas has to be inert, so it doesn't undergo a natural fractionation (all biological systems favour lighter isotopes).
We also need a very old reliably dated source.
These gases are used as an indicator for the atmosphere as a whole, and provide the best proxy.
Isotope data can be difficult to interpret at the best of times, it's best to take these hypothesis with a grain of salt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409060</id>
	<title>It's not natural</title>
	<author>Lije Baley</author>
	<datestamp>1260538080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why can't we do something to return the planet to it's natural state - before it was violated and exploited by these cosmic phenomena?  Whose children did they destroy and what of their future?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't we do something to return the planet to it 's natural state - before it was violated and exploited by these cosmic phenomena ?
Whose children did they destroy and what of their future ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't we do something to return the planet to it's natural state - before it was violated and exploited by these cosmic phenomena?
Whose children did they destroy and what of their future?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>Kerrigann</author>
	<datestamp>1260537060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres?</p><p>Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe?</p><p>Who knows, it might be useful.  It should be at least as useful as studying the mating habits of the short-tailed horned lizard, or a million other things scientists study.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres ? Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe ? Who knows , it might be useful .
It should be at least as useful as studying the mating habits of the short-tailed horned lizard , or a million other things scientists study .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it would give us hints about what to look for in other solar systems when looking for rocky planets with similar atmospheres?Maybe it would tell us something about whether or not our type of atmosphere is rare in the universe?Who knows, it might be useful.
It should be at least as useful as studying the mating habits of the short-tailed horned lizard, or a million other things scientists study.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410738</id>
	<title>Enceladus?</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1260550800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aren't we observing the volcanoes of Enceladus spewing gases that are forming an atmosphere? Could that be how our atmospheric elements got to the surface as well?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't we observing the volcanoes of Enceladus spewing gases that are forming an atmosphere ?
Could that be how our atmospheric elements got to the surface as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't we observing the volcanoes of Enceladus spewing gases that are forming an atmosphere?
Could that be how our atmospheric elements got to the surface as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409190</id>
	<title>Re:Science?</title>
	<author>repepo</author>
	<datestamp>1260539220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How the HELL did this article get filed under "science".</p><p> Venus has a significant atmosphere. Saturn has an atmosphere. Neptune... atmosphere. Jupiter... ALL atmosphere. Hey, look at that! All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.</p><p>Maybe it's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.</p><p>Please refile this article under "Intellectually Bankrupt" instead.</p></div><p>I think the question is the origin of the gases, not the mechanism that keeps them trapped.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How the HELL did this article get filed under " science " .
Venus has a significant atmosphere .
Saturn has an atmosphere .
Neptune... atmosphere .
Jupiter... ALL atmosphere .
Hey , look at that !
All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.Maybe it 's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.Please refile this article under " Intellectually Bankrupt " instead.I think the question is the origin of the gases , not the mechanism that keeps them trapped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the HELL did this article get filed under "science".
Venus has a significant atmosphere.
Saturn has an atmosphere.
Neptune... atmosphere.
Jupiter... ALL atmosphere.
Hey, look at that!
All the planets larger than Mars have a significantly thick atmosphere.Maybe it's as simple as their gravity is sufficient to trap gasses.Please refile this article under "Intellectually Bankrupt" instead.I think the question is the origin of the gases, not the mechanism that keeps them trapped.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408862</id>
	<title>comets</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1260536760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The early Earth as it was forming was probably hit with quite a few objects like comets that had volatiles like Water, Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide so it is quite possible that a great deal of the water and other volatiles found on Earth have cometary or otherwise other-worldly origins.  Water and Carbon Dioxide are not rare substances in our solar system.  There are entire moons with more than half of their mass consisting of water or other volatiles and comets are huge sources of volatiles in general.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The early Earth as it was forming was probably hit with quite a few objects like comets that had volatiles like Water , Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide so it is quite possible that a great deal of the water and other volatiles found on Earth have cometary or otherwise other-worldly origins .
Water and Carbon Dioxide are not rare substances in our solar system .
There are entire moons with more than half of their mass consisting of water or other volatiles and comets are huge sources of volatiles in general .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The early Earth as it was forming was probably hit with quite a few objects like comets that had volatiles like Water, Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide so it is quite possible that a great deal of the water and other volatiles found on Earth have cometary or otherwise other-worldly origins.
Water and Carbon Dioxide are not rare substances in our solar system.
There are entire moons with more than half of their mass consisting of water or other volatiles and comets are huge sources of volatiles in general.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409134</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1260538680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Honestly who cares?</p></div><p>Atmospheric scientists?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly who cares ? Atmospheric scientists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly who cares?Atmospheric scientists?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409124</id>
	<title>Re:Rubbish...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260538620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, the Earth is a SPHERE. Now they talk about atmoSPHERE.  Coincidence?</p><p>Now, I'm not saying the same yahoos who say the Earth is round also say some magic dust from outer space fills my lungs with every breath, but don't you think it's interesting that I'm the only one at least asking questions about their true intentions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , the Earth is a SPHERE .
Now they talk about atmoSPHERE .
Coincidence ? Now , I 'm not saying the same yahoos who say the Earth is round also say some magic dust from outer space fills my lungs with every breath , but do n't you think it 's interesting that I 'm the only one at least asking questions about their true intentions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, the Earth is a SPHERE.
Now they talk about atmoSPHERE.
Coincidence?Now, I'm not saying the same yahoos who say the Earth is round also say some magic dust from outer space fills my lungs with every breath, but don't you think it's interesting that I'm the only one at least asking questions about their true intentions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411454</id>
	<title>Re:or maybe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260557700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's more likely Earth created God.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more likely Earth created God .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more likely Earth created God.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409784</id>
	<title>God put the atmosphere around the earth.</title>
	<author>bezenek</author>
	<datestamp>1260543180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But, I cannot remember on which day...<br> <br>

-Todd</htmltext>
<tokenext>But , I can not remember on which day.. . -Todd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, I cannot remember on which day... 

-Todd</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410222</id>
	<title>may be of extraterrestrial origin?</title>
	<author>hAckz0r</author>
	<datestamp>1260546780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to current theory, absolutely everything on Earth, heavier than lithium, came from extraterrestrial origin rather than from the initial Big Bang. Without supernova's there would simply be no Earth, so I fail to see any productive insight to be taken from this article. It must be a slow 'science news day' at Wired.com. Either that or they now only employ 'slow' writers that have forgotten to check their facts with any 'real' scientists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to current theory , absolutely everything on Earth , heavier than lithium , came from extraterrestrial origin rather than from the initial Big Bang .
Without supernova 's there would simply be no Earth , so I fail to see any productive insight to be taken from this article .
It must be a slow 'science news day ' at Wired.com .
Either that or they now only employ 'slow ' writers that have forgotten to check their facts with any 'real ' scientists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to current theory, absolutely everything on Earth, heavier than lithium, came from extraterrestrial origin rather than from the initial Big Bang.
Without supernova's there would simply be no Earth, so I fail to see any productive insight to be taken from this article.
It must be a slow 'science news day' at Wired.com.
Either that or they now only employ 'slow' writers that have forgotten to check their facts with any 'real' scientists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414658</id>
	<title>EVERYTHING is an import</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1260638640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you go back far enough. This is a non-story and just an excuse to get research grants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you go back far enough .
This is a non-story and just an excuse to get research grants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you go back far enough.
This is a non-story and just an excuse to get research grants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411210</id>
	<title>Re:Science?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1260555300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you read the article, or just decide to post some random complaint?  Even the summary isn't half bad.</p><p>The question is whether the gasses in the atmosphere outgas from the planet or whether they were delivered to Earth from space after the planet was more or less formed.</p><p>Your entire post is basically irrelevant - the story has nothing to do with whether planets can "trap gasses" or not.</p><p>Worst of all, you got modded as insightful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you read the article , or just decide to post some random complaint ?
Even the summary is n't half bad.The question is whether the gasses in the atmosphere outgas from the planet or whether they were delivered to Earth from space after the planet was more or less formed.Your entire post is basically irrelevant - the story has nothing to do with whether planets can " trap gasses " or not.Worst of all , you got modded as insightful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you read the article, or just decide to post some random complaint?
Even the summary isn't half bad.The question is whether the gasses in the atmosphere outgas from the planet or whether they were delivered to Earth from space after the planet was more or less formed.Your entire post is basically irrelevant - the story has nothing to do with whether planets can "trap gasses" or not.Worst of all, you got modded as insightful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408946</id>
	<title>Giant reactor to melt the frozen core?</title>
	<author>gblackwo</author>
	<datestamp>1260537240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ask Kuato</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask Kuato</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask Kuato</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408982</id>
	<title>Re:Rubbish...</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1260537480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I just about finished Mike's <i>Nature</i> trick.  Our charts of atmospheric content will be sure to hide the oxygen.  That'll handle the "burning problem", widely discussed in the literature, about how stuff catches on fire on earth even though there's no oxygen.</p><p>How should we explain away all the other evidence for oxygen in earth's atmosphere though?  Perhaps animal respiration works through nitrogen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I just about finished Mike 's Nature trick .
Our charts of atmospheric content will be sure to hide the oxygen .
That 'll handle the " burning problem " , widely discussed in the literature , about how stuff catches on fire on earth even though there 's no oxygen.How should we explain away all the other evidence for oxygen in earth 's atmosphere though ?
Perhaps animal respiration works through nitrogen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I just about finished Mike's Nature trick.
Our charts of atmospheric content will be sure to hide the oxygen.
That'll handle the "burning problem", widely discussed in the literature, about how stuff catches on fire on earth even though there's no oxygen.How should we explain away all the other evidence for oxygen in earth's atmosphere though?
Perhaps animal respiration works through nitrogen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412214</id>
	<title>the distribution of gas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260613920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in any vertical column region of the atmosphere there is a distribution of the molecules of a gas which should be exponential in density and a function of the partial pressure and molecular mass of the gas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in any vertical column region of the atmosphere there is a distribution of the molecules of a gas which should be exponential in density and a function of the partial pressure and molecular mass of the gas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in any vertical column region of the atmosphere there is a distribution of the molecules of a gas which should be exponential in density and a function of the partial pressure and molecular mass of the gas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408884</id>
	<title>Re:Rubbish...</title>
	<author>pitchpipe</author>
	<datestamp>1260536880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was totally brought here by liberals to start warming at just the right moment!  You see they HATE the US and if they get their way, we'll develop technologies to burn something other than fossil fuels.  Don't you see what an evil, ingenious plan that is to bring down the US?!  Genius, I tells ya, geni...  Oh wait!  Crap!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was totally brought here by liberals to start warming at just the right moment !
You see they HATE the US and if they get their way , we 'll develop technologies to burn something other than fossil fuels .
Do n't you see what an evil , ingenious plan that is to bring down the US ? !
Genius , I tells ya , geni... Oh wait !
Crap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was totally brought here by liberals to start warming at just the right moment!
You see they HATE the US and if they get their way, we'll develop technologies to burn something other than fossil fuels.
Don't you see what an evil, ingenious plan that is to bring down the US?!
Genius, I tells ya, geni...  Oh wait!
Crap!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408916</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>kraydel</author>
	<datestamp>1260537060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about that being irrelevant information.  The formation of our planet seems like something we may want to get as much information as possible about, because it may explain the development of other features, which, in turn, may lead to deeper knowledge about how other planets work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about that being irrelevant information .
The formation of our planet seems like something we may want to get as much information as possible about , because it may explain the development of other features , which , in turn , may lead to deeper knowledge about how other planets work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about that being irrelevant information.
The formation of our planet seems like something we may want to get as much information as possible about, because it may explain the development of other features, which, in turn, may lead to deeper knowledge about how other planets work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408760</id>
	<title>The aliens that delivered it forgot to</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260536220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...remove the flying saucers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...remove the flying saucers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...remove the flying saucers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411060</id>
	<title>uh no... atmosphere created from supernovae</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260553440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need for comets. This is all pretty well documented as possible with Star life cycles.</p><p>Billions and billions of years ago there were multiple stars ( YA RLY) in our neck of the woods... all super heated and close quartered like, ya dig?<br>Hydrogen fusion --&gt; Helium... bang pow... eject some helium, eject some hydrogen.... simmer....<br>Helium4 fusion --&gt; baryllium8-&gt;Carbon12 and Oxygen 16, whirrr spin...  more ejections into cooling surrounding  plasma.... CO2, O2, CO, Carbon carbon reaction yielding Magnesium Sodium , Neon, Silicon,  argon..., then all the spare hyrdogen from the previous stage crashing around fusing at times... secondary Helium4 combining with these gets you other isotopes like flourine and iron and nitrogen.<br>The Oxygen-Oxygen fusion gets you Phosphorus, Sulfur, etc....</p><p>billions more year-ish units pass, stars explode, space expands, reactions slow... remaining young stars stablize.<br>All the iron and more massive elements in the local group start to clump together<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... makes a ring around the sun(s). imperfect distribution of elements causes more mass to be concentrated at a couple of points.... thereby yielding local gravity...  that draws adjacent particles together, and scoops up disconnected lighter elements in the orbital pathways.</p><p>Planet's external temperature starts to cool, thereby allowing other chemical weak bonds to form... the end. One atmosphere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need for comets .
This is all pretty well documented as possible with Star life cycles.Billions and billions of years ago there were multiple stars ( YA RLY ) in our neck of the woods... all super heated and close quartered like , ya dig ? Hydrogen fusion -- &gt; Helium... bang pow... eject some helium , eject some hydrogen.... simmer....Helium4 fusion -- &gt; baryllium8- &gt; Carbon12 and Oxygen 16 , whirrr spin... more ejections into cooling surrounding plasma.... CO2 , O2 , CO , Carbon carbon reaction yielding Magnesium Sodium , Neon , Silicon , argon... , then all the spare hyrdogen from the previous stage crashing around fusing at times... secondary Helium4 combining with these gets you other isotopes like flourine and iron and nitrogen.The Oxygen-Oxygen fusion gets you Phosphorus , Sulfur , etc....billions more year-ish units pass , stars explode , space expands , reactions slow... remaining young stars stablize.All the iron and more massive elements in the local group start to clump together ... makes a ring around the sun ( s ) .
imperfect distribution of elements causes more mass to be concentrated at a couple of points.... thereby yielding local gravity... that draws adjacent particles together , and scoops up disconnected lighter elements in the orbital pathways.Planet 's external temperature starts to cool , thereby allowing other chemical weak bonds to form... the end .
One atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need for comets.
This is all pretty well documented as possible with Star life cycles.Billions and billions of years ago there were multiple stars ( YA RLY) in our neck of the woods... all super heated and close quartered like, ya dig?Hydrogen fusion --&gt; Helium... bang pow... eject some helium, eject some hydrogen.... simmer....Helium4 fusion --&gt; baryllium8-&gt;Carbon12 and Oxygen 16, whirrr spin...  more ejections into cooling surrounding  plasma.... CO2, O2, CO, Carbon carbon reaction yielding Magnesium Sodium , Neon, Silicon,  argon..., then all the spare hyrdogen from the previous stage crashing around fusing at times... secondary Helium4 combining with these gets you other isotopes like flourine and iron and nitrogen.The Oxygen-Oxygen fusion gets you Phosphorus, Sulfur, etc....billions more year-ish units pass, stars explode, space expands, reactions slow... remaining young stars stablize.All the iron and more massive elements in the local group start to clump together ... makes a ring around the sun(s).
imperfect distribution of elements causes more mass to be concentrated at a couple of points.... thereby yielding local gravity...  that draws adjacent particles together, and scoops up disconnected lighter elements in the orbital pathways.Planet's external temperature starts to cool, thereby allowing other chemical weak bonds to form... the end.
One atmosphere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409258</id>
	<title>Re:Science?</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1260539700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe that the point of the article was that the isotopic composition of Krypton and Xenon indicated that this was possibly not the case.  It may be intuitive to believe that outgassing is responsible for our atmosphere in its entirety but that doesn't mean that it is correct.  Science only progresses by challenging ideas even if they seem to be likely or even correct at first glance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that the point of the article was that the isotopic composition of Krypton and Xenon indicated that this was possibly not the case .
It may be intuitive to believe that outgassing is responsible for our atmosphere in its entirety but that does n't mean that it is correct .
Science only progresses by challenging ideas even if they seem to be likely or even correct at first glance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that the point of the article was that the isotopic composition of Krypton and Xenon indicated that this was possibly not the case.
It may be intuitive to believe that outgassing is responsible for our atmosphere in its entirety but that doesn't mean that it is correct.
Science only progresses by challenging ideas even if they seem to be likely or even correct at first glance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409202</id>
	<title>"analysis of krypton..."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260539340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... indicates that they (and the rest of our atmosphere) may be of extraterrestrial origin..</p><p>Duh.  Why do you suppose they call it "krypton," Kal-El?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... indicates that they ( and the rest of our atmosphere ) may be of extraterrestrial origin..Duh .
Why do you suppose they call it " krypton , " Kal-El ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... indicates that they (and the rest of our atmosphere) may be of extraterrestrial origin..Duh.
Why do you suppose they call it "krypton," Kal-El?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411280</id>
	<title>This is such an easy answer.</title>
	<author>jwdonal</author>
	<datestamp>1260555960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. ~Genesis 1:1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth .
~ Genesis 1 : 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
~Genesis 1:1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414820</id>
	<title>Re:Look at the science</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1260639540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That explains why real life is High Definition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That explains why real life is High Definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That explains why real life is High Definition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409104</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30423540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30413956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_2328245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409468
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30413956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30423540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30410028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30411210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30414820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30408810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30412214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_2328245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_2328245.30409022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
