<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_11_1655204</id>
	<title>Arrington Responds To the JooJoo, Files Suit</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260557280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett writes <i>"Not normally 'one to enjoy a <a href="http://www.itworld.com/business/88913/crunchpads-arrington-responds-joojoo">casual read of a lawsuit</a>,' blogger Peter Smith admits to finding the suit Michael Arrington is <a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/19283242/SF-38-303-C2\_20091210160410\_00000001">filing against Fusion Garage</a> over the JooJoo (nee CrunchPad) fascinating. 'Skip to page 4, starting with item 11,' says Smith. 'At this point I don't know what to think, Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington's story at face value, he pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments.' For example, says Smith, in one bullet point in <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/11/crunchpad-federal-lawsuit-filed-some-additional-thoughts/">Arrington's latest salvo</a>, he calls out the press, saying 'it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site.' 'This attempt to directly sway the press away from Fusion Garage really spikes my suspicion meter' says Smith. 'After all, Arrington is the press. If I started writing screeds advising him on what he should or should not say about a product, what would he think?'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett writes " Not normally 'one to enjoy a casual read of a lawsuit, ' blogger Peter Smith admits to finding the suit Michael Arrington is filing against Fusion Garage over the JooJoo ( nee CrunchPad ) fascinating .
'Skip to page 4 , starting with item 11, ' says Smith .
'At this point I do n't know what to think , Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington 's story at face value , he pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments .
' For example , says Smith , in one bullet point in Arrington 's latest salvo , he calls out the press , saying 'it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site .
' 'This attempt to directly sway the press away from Fusion Garage really spikes my suspicion meter ' says Smith .
'After all , Arrington is the press .
If I started writing screeds advising him on what he should or should not say about a product , what would he think ?
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett writes "Not normally 'one to enjoy a casual read of a lawsuit,' blogger Peter Smith admits to finding the suit Michael Arrington is filing against Fusion Garage over the JooJoo (nee CrunchPad) fascinating.
'Skip to page 4, starting with item 11,' says Smith.
'At this point I don't know what to think, Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington's story at face value, he pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments.
' For example, says Smith, in one bullet point in Arrington's latest salvo, he calls out the press, saying 'it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site.
' 'This attempt to directly sway the press away from Fusion Garage really spikes my suspicion meter' says Smith.
'After all, Arrington is the press.
If I started writing screeds advising him on what he should or should not say about a product, what would he think?
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406098</id>
	<title>Giant Iphone</title>
	<author>Zero\_Independent</author>
	<datestamp>1260522180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like a giant Iphone to me. I thought the appeal of the Iphone is that it's small. This product seems like a bad idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like a giant Iphone to me .
I thought the appeal of the Iphone is that it 's small .
This product seems like a bad idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like a giant Iphone to me.
I thought the appeal of the Iphone is that it's small.
This product seems like a bad idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405966</id>
	<title>Re:If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>subsystem</author>
	<datestamp>1260564540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree.  I seem to remember Arrington posting rumors about last.fm handing user data over to the RIAA back in February, and then AGAIN in May.  As far as I know, both of these rumors turned out to be false.  He never said anything about his source, just that it was a very trustworthy one, and he never posted a retraction.  He did, however, make a post in May ridiculing last.fm because its servers overheated and were taken offline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I seem to remember Arrington posting rumors about last.fm handing user data over to the RIAA back in February , and then AGAIN in May .
As far as I know , both of these rumors turned out to be false .
He never said anything about his source , just that it was a very trustworthy one , and he never posted a retraction .
He did , however , make a post in May ridiculing last.fm because its servers overheated and were taken offline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I seem to remember Arrington posting rumors about last.fm handing user data over to the RIAA back in February, and then AGAIN in May.
As far as I know, both of these rumors turned out to be false.
He never said anything about his source, just that it was a very trustworthy one, and he never posted a retraction.
He did, however, make a post in May ridiculing last.fm because its servers overheated and were taken offline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316</id>
	<title>Does Not Look Good for Arrington</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1260561420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not a law-talkin' guy but he's suing them under <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham\_Act" title="wikipedia.org">the Lanham Act</a> [wikipedia.org] which seems to be for all things trademark including trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and false advertising.  So way back when this first hit Slashdot, I went poking around for trademarks and patents belonging to Arrington.  All I found was the trademark for Crunchpad assigned to Interserve, Inc (I assume that's Arrington).  No patents.  <br> <br>

So, I'm not saying what they've done is right or moral, but if Fusion Garage steers clear of using 'Crunchpad' and only calls it JooJoo, then what kind of case does Arrington have?  False advertising for the news articles calling JooJoo the 'reborn Crunchpad'?  I'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled.  Or was never doing anything at all but wanted to be a part of it.  I guess we'll never know the unadulterated truth.  Anyone close to this have more details/proof?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a law-talkin ' guy but he 's suing them under the Lanham Act [ wikipedia.org ] which seems to be for all things trademark including trademark infringement , trademark dilution , and false advertising .
So way back when this first hit Slashdot , I went poking around for trademarks and patents belonging to Arrington .
All I found was the trademark for Crunchpad assigned to Interserve , Inc ( I assume that 's Arrington ) .
No patents .
So , I 'm not saying what they 've done is right or moral , but if Fusion Garage steers clear of using 'Crunchpad ' and only calls it JooJoo , then what kind of case does Arrington have ?
False advertising for the news articles calling JooJoo the 'reborn Crunchpad ' ?
I 'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled .
Or was never doing anything at all but wanted to be a part of it .
I guess we 'll never know the unadulterated truth .
Anyone close to this have more details/proof ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a law-talkin' guy but he's suing them under the Lanham Act [wikipedia.org] which seems to be for all things trademark including trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and false advertising.
So way back when this first hit Slashdot, I went poking around for trademarks and patents belonging to Arrington.
All I found was the trademark for Crunchpad assigned to Interserve, Inc (I assume that's Arrington).
No patents.
So, I'm not saying what they've done is right or moral, but if Fusion Garage steers clear of using 'Crunchpad' and only calls it JooJoo, then what kind of case does Arrington have?
False advertising for the news articles calling JooJoo the 'reborn Crunchpad'?
I'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled.
Or was never doing anything at all but wanted to be a part of it.
I guess we'll never know the unadulterated truth.
Anyone close to this have more details/proof?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</id>
	<title>If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>faust2097</author>
	<datestamp>1260562320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't the entire point of the CrunchPad to show how Michael Arrington was smarter than the entire consumer electronics industry and to highlight how he's a brilliant, super connected Silicon Valley darling? The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.</p><p>Techcrunch is the Drudge Report of tech blogs and Arrington is a douche who seems to piss off every person he encounters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't the entire point of the CrunchPad to show how Michael Arrington was smarter than the entire consumer electronics industry and to highlight how he 's a brilliant , super connected Silicon Valley darling ?
The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.Techcrunch is the Drudge Report of tech blogs and Arrington is a douche who seems to piss off every person he encounters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't the entire point of the CrunchPad to show how Michael Arrington was smarter than the entire consumer electronics industry and to highlight how he's a brilliant, super connected Silicon Valley darling?
The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.Techcrunch is the Drudge Report of tech blogs and Arrington is a douche who seems to piss off every person he encounters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1260562380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no idea who any of the people involved are, or what their products (or websites maybe?) are supposed to do. For the sake of us who aren't familiar with every current lawsuit, could you please add a little context to the story summaries? This isn't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you're talking about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no idea who any of the people involved are , or what their products ( or websites maybe ?
) are supposed to do .
For the sake of us who are n't familiar with every current lawsuit , could you please add a little context to the story summaries ?
This is n't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you 're talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no idea who any of the people involved are, or what their products (or websites maybe?
) are supposed to do.
For the sake of us who aren't familiar with every current lawsuit, could you please add a little context to the story summaries?
This isn't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you're talking about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405636</id>
	<title>misquote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The quote in the summary about not wanting press to link to the pre-sale site is a bit out of context. The full quote makes slightly more sense:</p><p>Fusion Garage&rsquo;s financial situation is a mess, and it is inappropriate for press to recommend to people to pre-buy a CrunchPad. The company has not yet hired an attorney to respond to our lawsuit. We believe they do not have the cash flow to do so. When the device goes on pre sales today, linked to from scores of gadget and press sites, they will suddenly have cash flow to defend themselves. What they won&rsquo;t have is cash flow to build the devices. <b>We believe it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site without disclosing this to readers.</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The quote in the summary about not wanting press to link to the pre-sale site is a bit out of context .
The full quote makes slightly more sense : Fusion Garage    s financial situation is a mess , and it is inappropriate for press to recommend to people to pre-buy a CrunchPad .
The company has not yet hired an attorney to respond to our lawsuit .
We believe they do not have the cash flow to do so .
When the device goes on pre sales today , linked to from scores of gadget and press sites , they will suddenly have cash flow to defend themselves .
What they won    t have is cash flow to build the devices .
We believe it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site without disclosing this to readers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The quote in the summary about not wanting press to link to the pre-sale site is a bit out of context.
The full quote makes slightly more sense:Fusion Garage’s financial situation is a mess, and it is inappropriate for press to recommend to people to pre-buy a CrunchPad.
The company has not yet hired an attorney to respond to our lawsuit.
We believe they do not have the cash flow to do so.
When the device goes on pre sales today, linked to from scores of gadget and press sites, they will suddenly have cash flow to defend themselves.
What they won’t have is cash flow to build the devices.
We believe it is irresponsible for press to link to the pre-sale site without disclosing this to readers.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405558</id>
	<title>Re:Does Not Look Good for Arrington</title>
	<author>Killer Orca</author>
	<datestamp>1260562620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Based on a reading over at engadget it appears the lawsuit doesn't even mention IP theft, maybe he gave them none.  We'll see how this plays out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on a reading over at engadget it appears the lawsuit does n't even mention IP theft , maybe he gave them none .
We 'll see how this plays out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on a reading over at engadget it appears the lawsuit doesn't even mention IP theft, maybe he gave them none.
We'll see how this plays out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405720</id>
	<title>YUOK FAIL IT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260563340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wheN done playing</htmltext>
<tokenext>wheN done playing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wheN done playing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406250</id>
	<title>Fail Lawsuit</title>
	<author>Skellbasher</author>
	<datestamp>1260523080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Arrington isn't suing for breach of contract. He isn't suing for on any grounds related to the IP.

To me, this suit is simply intended to sic legal costs on Fusion Garage since they backed out of whatever verbal or implied deal that they had with Arrington, and he's mad about it.

The claims aren't frivolous, but they're pretty weak, and not what Arrington has said the actual problems were.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrington is n't suing for breach of contract .
He is n't suing for on any grounds related to the IP .
To me , this suit is simply intended to sic legal costs on Fusion Garage since they backed out of whatever verbal or implied deal that they had with Arrington , and he 's mad about it .
The claims are n't frivolous , but they 're pretty weak , and not what Arrington has said the actual problems were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrington isn't suing for breach of contract.
He isn't suing for on any grounds related to the IP.
To me, this suit is simply intended to sic legal costs on Fusion Garage since they backed out of whatever verbal or implied deal that they had with Arrington, and he's mad about it.
The claims aren't frivolous, but they're pretty weak, and not what Arrington has said the actual problems were.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405482</id>
	<title>TFA not credible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington's story at face value, he <i>pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments.</i>
<br>

<br>
TFA starts with a promise but quickly loses the plot. Smith fights Arrington's ambiguity with ambiguity. Alright - so Arrington hates this guy and calls press out. Big deal.  Where are the facts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington 's story at face value , he pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments .
TFA starts with a promise but quickly loses the plot .
Smith fights Arrington 's ambiguity with ambiguity .
Alright - so Arrington hates this guy and calls press out .
Big deal .
Where are the facts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I get close to pretty much accepting Arrington's story at face value, he pulls something that makes me stop and reexamine his arguments.
TFA starts with a promise but quickly loses the plot.
Smith fights Arrington's ambiguity with ambiguity.
Alright - so Arrington hates this guy and calls press out.
Big deal.
Where are the facts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406658</id>
	<title>Re:Shareholder and Chiropractor Bruce Lee?!</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1260524700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next thing you know we weill hear about an Asian engineer that then died...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next thing you know we weill hear about an Asian engineer that then died.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next thing you know we weill hear about an Asian engineer that then died...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405842</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>gclef</author>
	<datestamp>1260563940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arrington: tech blogger/commentator/etc.</p><p>TechCrunch: his site:</p><p>CrunchPad: Arrington's idea for a cheap, tablet device that used a browser OS to do basic web stuff.  He wanted it to cost ~ $200.</p><p>FusionGarage: The company Arrington's group partnered with to develop the OS &amp; do some of the hardware integration work.</p><p>JooJoo: the name that FusionGarage released the CrunchPad under when they tried to go solo, ditching Arrington.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrington : tech blogger/commentator/etc.TechCrunch : his site : CrunchPad : Arrington 's idea for a cheap , tablet device that used a browser OS to do basic web stuff .
He wanted it to cost ~ $ 200.FusionGarage : The company Arrington 's group partnered with to develop the OS &amp; do some of the hardware integration work.JooJoo : the name that FusionGarage released the CrunchPad under when they tried to go solo , ditching Arrington .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrington: tech blogger/commentator/etc.TechCrunch: his site:CrunchPad: Arrington's idea for a cheap, tablet device that used a browser OS to do basic web stuff.
He wanted it to cost ~ $200.FusionGarage: The company Arrington's group partnered with to develop the OS &amp; do some of the hardware integration work.JooJoo: the name that FusionGarage released the CrunchPad under when they tried to go solo, ditching Arrington.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408920</id>
	<title>What did Arrington provide besides *ideas*</title>
	<author>nobodyman</author>
	<datestamp>1260537120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've heard game developers are often approached by folks who say "hey, I've got a great *idea* for a video game, but I don't know how to program.  How about I share  my ideas with you, you program the video game, and we split the profits 50/50!".</p><p>I wonder if it was a similar sitation here. I'm leaning towards believing that  Fusion Garage and Chandra Rathakrishnan have the actual ability to design and create the hardware, and Arrington is just a douchebag blogger with an inflated sense of how important his ideas are.</p><p>"Okay guys, check out my VISION. How about... a thin and *cheap* tablet pc!"  Yeah Michael, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've heard game developers are often approached by folks who say " hey , I 've got a great * idea * for a video game , but I do n't know how to program .
How about I share my ideas with you , you program the video game , and we split the profits 50/50 !
" .I wonder if it was a similar sitation here .
I 'm leaning towards believing that Fusion Garage and Chandra Rathakrishnan have the actual ability to design and create the hardware , and Arrington is just a douchebag blogger with an inflated sense of how important his ideas are .
" Okay guys , check out my VISION .
How about... a thin and * cheap * tablet pc !
" Yeah Michael , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've heard game developers are often approached by folks who say "hey, I've got a great *idea* for a video game, but I don't know how to program.
How about I share  my ideas with you, you program the video game, and we split the profits 50/50!
".I wonder if it was a similar sitation here.
I'm leaning towards believing that  Fusion Garage and Chandra Rathakrishnan have the actual ability to design and create the hardware, and Arrington is just a douchebag blogger with an inflated sense of how important his ideas are.
"Okay guys, check out my VISION.
How about... a thin and *cheap* tablet pc!
"  Yeah Michael, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406784</id>
	<title>Re:If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1260525420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't like Techcrunch either, but the truth is they're really not that far off from most other tech blogs.  Chock full of fanboys without a clue about anything other than the toys they play with, and the only reason they get to post their blogs there is because they can write reasonably grammatically correct bits.  I couldn't care less, though, if it was just an ego project for Arrington...innovation happens when someone who is moderately clued in decides they want something better than the current products available on the market and has an idea.
<br> <br>Fusion Garage has done nothing to convince me they're not a disreputable rip-off shop.  When you get notoriety for taking someone's idea and repackaging it as your own, especially if there are plenty of other options out on the market already, you better hope your theft pays off or else get ready to put your assets up on eBay and give your property management company a months notice.  Companies like Fusion Garage go out of business for pulling stunts like this.  Even if Arrington ends up not making a penny in a lawsuit against them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't like Techcrunch either , but the truth is they 're really not that far off from most other tech blogs .
Chock full of fanboys without a clue about anything other than the toys they play with , and the only reason they get to post their blogs there is because they can write reasonably grammatically correct bits .
I could n't care less , though , if it was just an ego project for Arrington...innovation happens when someone who is moderately clued in decides they want something better than the current products available on the market and has an idea .
Fusion Garage has done nothing to convince me they 're not a disreputable rip-off shop .
When you get notoriety for taking someone 's idea and repackaging it as your own , especially if there are plenty of other options out on the market already , you better hope your theft pays off or else get ready to put your assets up on eBay and give your property management company a months notice .
Companies like Fusion Garage go out of business for pulling stunts like this .
Even if Arrington ends up not making a penny in a lawsuit against them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't like Techcrunch either, but the truth is they're really not that far off from most other tech blogs.
Chock full of fanboys without a clue about anything other than the toys they play with, and the only reason they get to post their blogs there is because they can write reasonably grammatically correct bits.
I couldn't care less, though, if it was just an ego project for Arrington...innovation happens when someone who is moderately clued in decides they want something better than the current products available on the market and has an idea.
Fusion Garage has done nothing to convince me they're not a disreputable rip-off shop.
When you get notoriety for taking someone's idea and repackaging it as your own, especially if there are plenty of other options out on the market already, you better hope your theft pays off or else get ready to put your assets up on eBay and give your property management company a months notice.
Companies like Fusion Garage go out of business for pulling stunts like this.
Even if Arrington ends up not making a penny in a lawsuit against them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405356</id>
	<title>The only people who will get rich...</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1260561600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are the lawyers.  The Crunchpad/JooJoo was doomed from the start: too expensive given the current technology...</p><p>So all that will happen out of this is entertaining lawsuits where the laywers make their money and everyone else just laughs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are the lawyers .
The Crunchpad/JooJoo was doomed from the start : too expensive given the current technology...So all that will happen out of this is entertaining lawsuits where the laywers make their money and everyone else just laughs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are the lawyers.
The Crunchpad/JooJoo was doomed from the start: too expensive given the current technology...So all that will happen out of this is entertaining lawsuits where the laywers make their money and everyone else just laughs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406236</id>
	<title>Breach of partner fiduciary duty &amp; copyright..</title>
	<author>waTR</author>
	<datestamp>1260523020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>After a quick read through part of the document linked to, it sounds like this was a partnership as per the law (if you act and give the impression that you are partners, under the law, you are to those parties who you created the impression to). So there would be breach of fiduciary duty on Fusion Garage's part...  This looks like a lawyer's wet dream in some respects... Though it will be interesting how the lawyers will play this...<br> <br>

Also...what is TC trying to get out of this?  All they will likely get is an injunction (maybe interlocutory--thereby preventing sale of the Joojoo in the US before it even launches). There DOES seem to be some copyright involved (design of the tablet), as the copyright on the software is apparantly owned by Fusion Garage.<br> <br>

Interesting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>After a quick read through part of the document linked to , it sounds like this was a partnership as per the law ( if you act and give the impression that you are partners , under the law , you are to those parties who you created the impression to ) .
So there would be breach of fiduciary duty on Fusion Garage 's part... This looks like a lawyer 's wet dream in some respects... Though it will be interesting how the lawyers will play this.. . Also...what is TC trying to get out of this ?
All they will likely get is an injunction ( maybe interlocutory--thereby preventing sale of the Joojoo in the US before it even launches ) .
There DOES seem to be some copyright involved ( design of the tablet ) , as the copyright on the software is apparantly owned by Fusion Garage .
Interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After a quick read through part of the document linked to, it sounds like this was a partnership as per the law (if you act and give the impression that you are partners, under the law, you are to those parties who you created the impression to).
So there would be breach of fiduciary duty on Fusion Garage's part...  This looks like a lawyer's wet dream in some respects... Though it will be interesting how the lawyers will play this... 

Also...what is TC trying to get out of this?
All they will likely get is an injunction (maybe interlocutory--thereby preventing sale of the Joojoo in the US before it even launches).
There DOES seem to be some copyright involved (design of the tablet), as the copyright on the software is apparantly owned by Fusion Garage.
Interesting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405378</id>
	<title>Re:Shareholder and Chiropractor Bruce Lee?!</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1260561660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course. Raised from the dead by an evil magician's bad <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juju" title="wikipedia.org">juju</a> [wikipedia.org], then clad in armor -- evidently to evade the normal zombie killing methods.  Arrington is apparently bravely jumping them and attempting to get through the armor's weak point with a metal rasp ("Arrington files suit").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course .
Raised from the dead by an evil magician 's bad juju [ wikipedia.org ] , then clad in armor -- evidently to evade the normal zombie killing methods .
Arrington is apparently bravely jumping them and attempting to get through the armor 's weak point with a metal rasp ( " Arrington files suit " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course.
Raised from the dead by an evil magician's bad juju [wikipedia.org], then clad in armor -- evidently to evade the normal zombie killing methods.
Arrington is apparently bravely jumping them and attempting to get through the armor's weak point with a metal rasp ("Arrington files suit").</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408424</id>
	<title>Re:The only people who will get rich...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260534240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to break it to you but Arrington is a lawyer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to break it to you but Arrington is a lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to break it to you but Arrington is a lawyer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405508</id>
	<title>Along with Apple suing Nokia, Intel vs. AMD...</title>
	<author>kaizendojo</author>
	<datestamp>1260562320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why we STILL don't have fucking jet packs and robotic sex dolls. <br> <br> All kidding aside, if these jokers spent as much time DEVELOPING as they did LITIGATING, just imagine the cool stuff we'd have.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why we STILL do n't have fucking jet packs and robotic sex dolls .
All kidding aside , if these jokers spent as much time DEVELOPING as they did LITIGATING , just imagine the cool stuff we 'd have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why we STILL don't have fucking jet packs and robotic sex dolls.
All kidding aside, if these jokers spent as much time DEVELOPING as they did LITIGATING, just imagine the cool stuff we'd have.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228</id>
	<title>Shareholder and Chiropractor Bruce Lee?!</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1260560940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fusion Garage is, and always has been, a company on the edge of going out of business. Their main shareholder, the guy who wrote the now infamous email telling us that we were no longer part of the project, is a chiropractor named Bruce Lee. The company was constantly raising debt from unsavory investors, borderline loansharks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>... and zombie martial artists infecting people under the guise of 'chiropracty.'  Arrington is requesting chainsaws, shotguns and three volunteers from the straggling group of survivors<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fusion Garage is , and always has been , a company on the edge of going out of business .
Their main shareholder , the guy who wrote the now infamous email telling us that we were no longer part of the project , is a chiropractor named Bruce Lee .
The company was constantly raising debt from unsavory investors , borderline loansharks ... ... and zombie martial artists infecting people under the guise of 'chiropracty .
' Arrington is requesting chainsaws , shotguns and three volunteers from the straggling group of survivors .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fusion Garage is, and always has been, a company on the edge of going out of business.
Their main shareholder, the guy who wrote the now infamous email telling us that we were no longer part of the project, is a chiropractor named Bruce Lee.
The company was constantly raising debt from unsavory investors, borderline loansharks ... ... and zombie martial artists infecting people under the guise of 'chiropracty.
'  Arrington is requesting chainsaws, shotguns and three volunteers from the straggling group of survivors ...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405438</id>
	<title>Support?</title>
	<author>Ractive</author>
	<datestamp>1260561960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Dell / HP tech support is crappy, and those are well established companies, imagine how this will be. <br>Even with TechCrunch behind it and at $200 the stuff seemed dubious, now without, with all this litigation and at $500...   I think I'm gonna pass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Dell / HP tech support is crappy , and those are well established companies , imagine how this will be .
Even with TechCrunch behind it and at $ 200 the stuff seemed dubious , now without , with all this litigation and at $ 500... I think I 'm gon na pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Dell / HP tech support is crappy, and those are well established companies, imagine how this will be.
Even with TechCrunch behind it and at $200 the stuff seemed dubious, now without, with all this litigation and at $500...   I think I'm gonna pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30421350</id>
	<title>Re:Shareholder and Chiropractor Bruce Lee?!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260698940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>looool! That&rsquo;s the best punchline I read here, for a looong time. XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>looool !
That    s the best punchline I read here , for a looong time .
XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>looool!
That’s the best punchline I read here, for a looong time.
XD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405852</id>
	<title>What is this about?</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1260563940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This seems to involve some feud over clones of renamed vaporware products.  I think.
</p><p>
Whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to involve some feud over clones of renamed vaporware products .
I think .
Whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This seems to involve some feud over clones of renamed vaporware products.
I think.
Whatever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406248</id>
	<title>Re:Does Not Look Good for Arrington</title>
	<author>fooslacker</author>
	<datestamp>1260523080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I'm not a law talking guy either but I did read the lawsuit and he's suing them under more than just the Lenham act.
<br> <br>
First, Under Lahnam he's suing theme for false advertising that damaged TechCrunch
<br> <br>
Second, Under California law he's suing them for "breach of fiduciary duty" claiming they violated an implicit partnership which is formed automatically under CA law (according to the lawsuit)
<br> <br>
Third (I assume also under the California partnership theory) he's suing for "misappropriate of business ideas" and claiming that Fusion Garage doesn't own the IP but rather that the partnership does.
<br> <br>
Forth, he's suing them for fraud under CA law claiming they were basically liars and thieves.
<br> <br>
Fifth, he's claiming "unlawful business practices and false advertising" under CA law. (which I assume is similar to the first cause for action but under the CA state laws that are relevant rather than the Lanham Act)
<br> <br>
It then goes on to say what should be done to make things right, demand a jury trial, and file some "exhibits".  I'm not pro or con one way or the other but it's not as simple as he's filing suit under a trademark law so he doesn't have a chance and again, IANAL.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 'm not a law talking guy either but I did read the lawsuit and he 's suing them under more than just the Lenham act .
First , Under Lahnam he 's suing theme for false advertising that damaged TechCrunch Second , Under California law he 's suing them for " breach of fiduciary duty " claiming they violated an implicit partnership which is formed automatically under CA law ( according to the lawsuit ) Third ( I assume also under the California partnership theory ) he 's suing for " misappropriate of business ideas " and claiming that Fusion Garage does n't own the IP but rather that the partnership does .
Forth , he 's suing them for fraud under CA law claiming they were basically liars and thieves .
Fifth , he 's claiming " unlawful business practices and false advertising " under CA law .
( which I assume is similar to the first cause for action but under the CA state laws that are relevant rather than the Lanham Act ) It then goes on to say what should be done to make things right , demand a jury trial , and file some " exhibits " .
I 'm not pro or con one way or the other but it 's not as simple as he 's filing suit under a trademark law so he does n't have a chance and again , IANAL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I'm not a law talking guy either but I did read the lawsuit and he's suing them under more than just the Lenham act.
First, Under Lahnam he's suing theme for false advertising that damaged TechCrunch
 
Second, Under California law he's suing them for "breach of fiduciary duty" claiming they violated an implicit partnership which is formed automatically under CA law (according to the lawsuit)
 
Third (I assume also under the California partnership theory) he's suing for "misappropriate of business ideas" and claiming that Fusion Garage doesn't own the IP but rather that the partnership does.
Forth, he's suing them for fraud under CA law claiming they were basically liars and thieves.
Fifth, he's claiming "unlawful business practices and false advertising" under CA law.
(which I assume is similar to the first cause for action but under the CA state laws that are relevant rather than the Lanham Act)
 
It then goes on to say what should be done to make things right, demand a jury trial, and file some "exhibits".
I'm not pro or con one way or the other but it's not as simple as he's filing suit under a trademark law so he doesn't have a chance and again, IANAL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406724</id>
	<title>Re:Talk about contradictions...</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1260525000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cost rarely stops an Apple fan in his tracks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cost rarely stops an Apple fan in his tracks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cost rarely stops an Apple fan in his tracks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492</id>
	<title>Talk about contradictions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<blockquote><div><p>In the meanwhile, I'll go back to waiting for an affordable tablet to use while laying on the couch. If nothing else, I have the iTablet to look forward to!</p></div></blockquote><p>

If he things Apple is going to release "an affordable tablet" he needs a reality check.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : In the meanwhile , I 'll go back to waiting for an affordable tablet to use while laying on the couch .
If nothing else , I have the iTablet to look forward to !
If he things Apple is going to release " an affordable tablet " he needs a reality check .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:In the meanwhile, I'll go back to waiting for an affordable tablet to use while laying on the couch.
If nothing else, I have the iTablet to look forward to!
If he things Apple is going to release "an affordable tablet" he needs a reality check.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405664</id>
	<title>Re:Does Not Look Good for Arrington</title>
	<author>Firehed</author>
	<datestamp>1260563100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Under trademark law? Probably nothing. But he'd have been grossly negligent to be this far along in the development cycle without some sort of contract in place between himself (or TC) and Fusion Garage (I've heard that there were mostly verbal agreements in place, which wouldn't hold up in court, but Arrington is/was a lawyer and should know better). Presumably, something happened that would have been in breach of that contract and would constitute a valid lawsuit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Under trademark law ?
Probably nothing .
But he 'd have been grossly negligent to be this far along in the development cycle without some sort of contract in place between himself ( or TC ) and Fusion Garage ( I 've heard that there were mostly verbal agreements in place , which would n't hold up in court , but Arrington is/was a lawyer and should know better ) .
Presumably , something happened that would have been in breach of that contract and would constitute a valid lawsuit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Under trademark law?
Probably nothing.
But he'd have been grossly negligent to be this far along in the development cycle without some sort of contract in place between himself (or TC) and Fusion Garage (I've heard that there were mostly verbal agreements in place, which wouldn't hold up in court, but Arrington is/was a lawyer and should know better).
Presumably, something happened that would have been in breach of that contract and would constitute a valid lawsuit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405802</id>
	<title>Maybe, Maybe not</title>
	<author>Exstatica</author>
	<datestamp>1260563700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Gizmodo said it right in this article <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424261/the-crunchpadjoojoo-lawsuit-has-been-filed-preorders-are-officially-a-gamble" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5424261/the-crunchpadjoojoo-lawsuit-has-been-filed-preorders-are-officially-a-gamble</a> [gizmodo.com]

"if Arrington's lawsuit has even a hint of truth to it regarding the lack of lack of Fusion Garage's sound capital resource&mdash;is no longer an option for the sane or even marginally patient. I mean, just wait til it ships and gets reviewed before giving these guys any money, ok?"

One, I wouldn't put 500 bucks down on a device that is a web browser, and looks like e-ink. I want something very fresh. I've never owned an apple product, but if the rumored tablet is real, and is off the charts, I'll buy it. Otherwise I'm going to wait a year to see what other products come to light.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Gizmodo said it right in this article http : //gizmodo.com/5424261/the-crunchpadjoojoo-lawsuit-has-been-filed-preorders-are-officially-a-gamble [ gizmodo.com ] " if Arrington 's lawsuit has even a hint of truth to it regarding the lack of lack of Fusion Garage 's sound capital resource    is no longer an option for the sane or even marginally patient .
I mean , just wait til it ships and gets reviewed before giving these guys any money , ok ?
" One , I would n't put 500 bucks down on a device that is a web browser , and looks like e-ink .
I want something very fresh .
I 've never owned an apple product , but if the rumored tablet is real , and is off the charts , I 'll buy it .
Otherwise I 'm going to wait a year to see what other products come to light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Gizmodo said it right in this article http://gizmodo.com/5424261/the-crunchpadjoojoo-lawsuit-has-been-filed-preorders-are-officially-a-gamble [gizmodo.com]

"if Arrington's lawsuit has even a hint of truth to it regarding the lack of lack of Fusion Garage's sound capital resource—is no longer an option for the sane or even marginally patient.
I mean, just wait til it ships and gets reviewed before giving these guys any money, ok?
"

One, I wouldn't put 500 bucks down on a device that is a web browser, and looks like e-ink.
I want something very fresh.
I've never owned an apple product, but if the rumored tablet is real, and is off the charts, I'll buy it.
Otherwise I'm going to wait a year to see what other products come to light.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406826</id>
	<title>Re:Talk about contradictions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260525600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Riiight, 'cause nobody at all buys Apples. They're <em>unafforable</em>! Thirty billion a year in consumer product sales is obviously a company that prices itself out of the market.</p><p>cheapest != affordable. It's a sub-set.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Riiight , 'cause nobody at all buys Apples .
They 're unafforable !
Thirty billion a year in consumer product sales is obviously a company that prices itself out of the market.cheapest ! = affordable .
It 's a sub-set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Riiight, 'cause nobody at all buys Apples.
They're unafforable!
Thirty billion a year in consumer product sales is obviously a company that prices itself out of the market.cheapest != affordable.
It's a sub-set.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405436</id>
	<title>JooJoo = Linux tablet with 12 inch touchscreen</title>
	<author>the ReviveR</author>
	<datestamp>1260561900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hadn't heard of JooJoo aka Crunchpad before so did some googling. <br> <br>

For those who are as clueless as me, it seems to be a tablet pc with a 12 inch touchscreen. Runs a custom version of Ubuntu on Intel Atom. <br>
Sounds a bit like a bigger version of N810. Sounds a bit interesting, but it's all up to implementation. <br> <br>

Does anyone know whether you could bluetooth tether this to use internet through something like N900?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had n't heard of JooJoo aka Crunchpad before so did some googling .
For those who are as clueless as me , it seems to be a tablet pc with a 12 inch touchscreen .
Runs a custom version of Ubuntu on Intel Atom .
Sounds a bit like a bigger version of N810 .
Sounds a bit interesting , but it 's all up to implementation .
Does anyone know whether you could bluetooth tether this to use internet through something like N900 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hadn't heard of JooJoo aka Crunchpad before so did some googling.
For those who are as clueless as me, it seems to be a tablet pc with a 12 inch touchscreen.
Runs a custom version of Ubuntu on Intel Atom.
Sounds a bit like a bigger version of N810.
Sounds a bit interesting, but it's all up to implementation.
Does anyone know whether you could bluetooth tether this to use internet through something like N900?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405762</id>
	<title>So what did Arrington actually do?</title>
	<author>Rix</author>
	<datestamp>1260563520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't seem that he contributed anything to this project other than marketing support. If that's the case, 35\% of the company seems astronomically generous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't seem that he contributed anything to this project other than marketing support .
If that 's the case , 35 \ % of the company seems astronomically generous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't seem that he contributed anything to this project other than marketing support.
If that's the case, 35\% of the company seems astronomically generous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30412138</id>
	<title>Re:misquote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260612300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the press should disclose that FG has no money, without any proof, just on Arringtons word? How should the press know the details of FG's financial situation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the press should disclose that FG has no money , without any proof , just on Arringtons word ?
How should the press know the details of FG 's financial situation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the press should disclose that FG has no money, without any proof, just on Arringtons word?
How should the press know the details of FG's financial situation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405398</id>
	<title>This will not end well for Arrington</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260561720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He already has a reputation as a pompous ass. Now he has a reputation as a lazy, dishonest, litigious pompus ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He already has a reputation as a pompous ass .
Now he has a reputation as a lazy , dishonest , litigious pompus ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He already has a reputation as a pompous ass.
Now he has a reputation as a lazy, dishonest, litigious pompus ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406400</id>
	<title>Why don't they just</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260523680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>rename it the "Phantom".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rename it the " Phantom " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rename it the "Phantom".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405538</id>
	<title>Love and chemicals</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1260562500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The more I learn about this, the more it looks like one of those failed relationships where the guy thought things were getting <i>serious</i> and the girl was never looking for a long-term attachment.</p><p>Neither one can be blamed or absolved completely; they both were under the illusion that the other shared their view. Of course, the couple should have talked a little more about what they both wanted out of the relationship, as should Arrington and Fusion Garage have.</p><p>Love, or that dizzying sense that you're going to change an industry. Both serotonin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The more I learn about this , the more it looks like one of those failed relationships where the guy thought things were getting serious and the girl was never looking for a long-term attachment.Neither one can be blamed or absolved completely ; they both were under the illusion that the other shared their view .
Of course , the couple should have talked a little more about what they both wanted out of the relationship , as should Arrington and Fusion Garage have.Love , or that dizzying sense that you 're going to change an industry .
Both serotonin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more I learn about this, the more it looks like one of those failed relationships where the guy thought things were getting serious and the girl was never looking for a long-term attachment.Neither one can be blamed or absolved completely; they both were under the illusion that the other shared their view.
Of course, the couple should have talked a little more about what they both wanted out of the relationship, as should Arrington and Fusion Garage have.Love, or that dizzying sense that you're going to change an industry.
Both serotonin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405848</id>
	<title>Hardware is Hard</title>
	<author>jamesl</author>
	<datestamp>1260563940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TechCrunch's value as a source for news and analysis (especially analysis) has fallen as a result of this escapade. How much trust can we place in its stories when the owner, operator and editor in chief fails to cover a business enterprise with a written contract or background check of his business partners?</p><p>The lesson for readers is that developing, manufacturing and successfully marketing any product is hard. Creating a browser in a tablet that is a cost effective alternative to existing products is very hard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TechCrunch 's value as a source for news and analysis ( especially analysis ) has fallen as a result of this escapade .
How much trust can we place in its stories when the owner , operator and editor in chief fails to cover a business enterprise with a written contract or background check of his business partners ? The lesson for readers is that developing , manufacturing and successfully marketing any product is hard .
Creating a browser in a tablet that is a cost effective alternative to existing products is very hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TechCrunch's value as a source for news and analysis (especially analysis) has fallen as a result of this escapade.
How much trust can we place in its stories when the owner, operator and editor in chief fails to cover a business enterprise with a written contract or background check of his business partners?The lesson for readers is that developing, manufacturing and successfully marketing any product is hard.
Creating a browser in a tablet that is a cost effective alternative to existing products is very hard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405602</id>
	<title>Re:Shareholder and Chiropractor Bruce Lee?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll alert Natalie Portman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll alert Natalie Portman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll alert Natalie Portman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405458</id>
	<title>Is it just me, or...</title>
	<author>Penguinisto</author>
	<datestamp>1260562080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is Arrington laying it on a bit thick, firing every bit of ammo he can muster?</p><p>I mean, sure the guy has an understandable grievance and all, but seriously - why not stick to the points that aren't nearly as easy to drag off to the philosophical</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is Arrington laying it on a bit thick , firing every bit of ammo he can muster ? I mean , sure the guy has an understandable grievance and all , but seriously - why not stick to the points that are n't nearly as easy to drag off to the philosophical</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is Arrington laying it on a bit thick, firing every bit of ammo he can muster?I mean, sure the guy has an understandable grievance and all, but seriously - why not stick to the points that aren't nearly as easy to drag off to the philosophical</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408142</id>
	<title>Re:If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>unix1</author>
	<datestamp>1260532740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.</p></div><p>I don't know - I read the e-mails attached to the lawsuit, and they pretty much say TechCrunch would acquire Fusion Garage, and FG's investors would have 35\% stake in the resulting company. At least, it looks like that was the intention of FG and TC, and FG CEO was grateful for it; that is, until FG delivered a new bombshell proposition of 90/10 split favoring them, supposedly coming from the Bruce Lee dude.</p><p>We still have to wait for FG's response, and what evidence they produce of your claimed promise of "VC and supplier contacts" but so far I didn't see anything to that point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.I do n't know - I read the e-mails attached to the lawsuit , and they pretty much say TechCrunch would acquire Fusion Garage , and FG 's investors would have 35 \ % stake in the resulting company .
At least , it looks like that was the intention of FG and TC , and FG CEO was grateful for it ; that is , until FG delivered a new bombshell proposition of 90/10 split favoring them , supposedly coming from the Bruce Lee dude.We still have to wait for FG 's response , and what evidence they produce of your claimed promise of " VC and supplier contacts " but so far I did n't see anything to that point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The FusionGarage guys seem to have a pretty good point in that Arringon apparently never delivered on his promised to hook them up with VC and supplier contacts.I don't know - I read the e-mails attached to the lawsuit, and they pretty much say TechCrunch would acquire Fusion Garage, and FG's investors would have 35\% stake in the resulting company.
At least, it looks like that was the intention of FG and TC, and FG CEO was grateful for it; that is, until FG delivered a new bombshell proposition of 90/10 split favoring them, supposedly coming from the Bruce Lee dude.We still have to wait for FG's response, and what evidence they produce of your claimed promise of "VC and supplier contacts" but so far I didn't see anything to that point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406106</id>
	<title>Re:If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1260522240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't TechCrunch one of those 'tarded blogs that every other post is "Google did this", "Google did that", "Twitter did this", "Twitter did that", "some social web site queefed [mightly]", "some Web 2.0 startup farted [soundly]", "some [dumbass] VC invested [pissed away] $15 million for another [dumbass] Web 2.0 idea"? Or am I thinking of Mashable or ReadWriteWeb?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't TechCrunch one of those 'tarded blogs that every other post is " Google did this " , " Google did that " , " Twitter did this " , " Twitter did that " , " some social web site queefed [ mightly ] " , " some Web 2.0 startup farted [ soundly ] " , " some [ dumbass ] VC invested [ pissed away ] $ 15 million for another [ dumbass ] Web 2.0 idea " ?
Or am I thinking of Mashable or ReadWriteWeb ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't TechCrunch one of those 'tarded blogs that every other post is "Google did this", "Google did that", "Twitter did this", "Twitter did that", "some social web site queefed [mightly]", "some Web 2.0 startup farted [soundly]", "some [dumbass] VC invested [pissed away] $15 million for another [dumbass] Web 2.0 idea"?
Or am I thinking of Mashable or ReadWriteWeb?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406940</id>
	<title>Shame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260525960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was already seeing the ads: "JooJoo, you buy one Joo, you get two!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was already seeing the ads : " JooJoo , you buy one Joo , you get two !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was already seeing the ads: "JooJoo, you buy one Joo, you get two!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406244</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1260523080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have no idea who any of the people involved are, or what their products (or websites maybe?) are supposed to do. For the sake of us who aren't familiar with every current lawsuit, could you please add a little context to the story summaries? This isn't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you're talking about.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=crunchpad+joo+joo" title="lmgtfy.com">http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=crunchpad+joo+joo</a> [lmgtfy.com] <br> <br>
Fascinating, isn't it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no idea who any of the people involved are , or what their products ( or websites maybe ?
) are supposed to do .
For the sake of us who are n't familiar with every current lawsuit , could you please add a little context to the story summaries ?
This is n't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you 're talking about .
http : //www.lmgtfy.com/ ? q = crunchpad + joo + joo [ lmgtfy.com ] Fascinating , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no idea who any of the people involved are, or what their products (or websites maybe?
) are supposed to do.
For the sake of us who aren't familiar with every current lawsuit, could you please add a little context to the story summaries?
This isn't exactly like mentioning a new salvo in IBM v. SCO where you can assume a majority of Slashdotters will have a clue WTF you're talking about.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=crunchpad+joo+joo [lmgtfy.com]  
Fascinating, isn't it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405386</id>
	<title>appropriate tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260561660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>shutthefuckup

no body cares. this is not interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>shutthefuckup no body cares .
this is not interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shutthefuckup

no body cares.
this is not interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406198</id>
	<title>Re:If we ignore him will he go away?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260522780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup. He's an asshole and it's wonderful schadenfreude to watch him squirm under the weight of his own highly-publicized failure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup .
He 's an asshole and it 's wonderful schadenfreude to watch him squirm under the weight of his own highly-publicized failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup.
He's an asshole and it's wonderful schadenfreude to watch him squirm under the weight of his own highly-publicized failure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405624</id>
	<title>Re:Does Not Look Good for Arrington</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled.</p></div></blockquote><p>He got what he deserved. Arrington is a dick.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled.He got what he deserved .
Arrington is a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a bit confused as to how this is going to work and I think Arrington just got hustled.He got what he deserved.
Arrington is a dick.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406418</id>
	<title>Famous last words</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1260523680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crunchpad#Open\_source\_design" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia article</a> [wikipedia.org] (quote from Arrington himself):<p><div class="quote"><p>So let&rsquo;s design it, build a few and then open source the specs so anyone can create them.<br>
If everything works well, we&rsquo;d then open source the design and software and let anyone build one that wants to.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Wikipedia article [ wikipedia.org ] ( quote from Arrington himself ) : So let    s design it , build a few and then open source the specs so anyone can create them .
If everything works well , we    d then open source the design and software and let anyone build one that wants to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org] (quote from Arrington himself):So let’s design it, build a few and then open source the specs so anyone can create them.
If everything works well, we’d then open source the design and software and let anyone build one that wants to.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405456</id>
	<title>Joojoo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess Rathakrishnan will be sued by the <a href="http://www.adl.org/" title="adl.org" rel="nofollow">ADL</a> [adl.org] next.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Rathakrishnan will be sued by the ADL [ adl.org ] next .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Rathakrishnan will be sued by the ADL [adl.org] next.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30421350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30412138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_1655204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30408424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30421350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30412138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30406244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_1655204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_1655204.30405762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
